XML 23 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Allowance for Loan Losses
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Receivables [Abstract]  
Allowance for Loan Losses Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans
Effective January 1, 2020, the Bank adopted ASU 2016-13. The adoption replaced the allowance for loan losses with the ACL on loans and replaced the related provision for loan losses with the provision for credit losses on loans.
The baseline loss rates used to calculate the ACL on loans at January 1, 2020 utilized the bank's average quarterly historical loss information from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2019. The baseline loss rate period for the ACL at June 30, 2020 used historical losses beginning December 31, 2012 through the balance sheet date. The Bank updated the historical loss period as it believes the economic cycle has ended, as evidenced by certain economic forecasts signaling that a recession has started given the prolonged, profound, and pervasive contraction in economic activities, otherwise known as the Global Coronavirus Recession. The Bank believes the historic loss rates are viable inputs to the current expected credit loss methodology as the Bank's lending practice and business has remained relatively stable throughout the periods. While the Bank's assets have grown, the credit culture has stayed consistent.
Prepayments included in the methodology at January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2020 were based on the 48-month rolling historical averages for each segment, which management believes is an accurate representation of future prepayment activity. Management's allowance estimates at January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2020 used a four quarter reasonable and supportable period, as forecasts beyond this time period tend to diverge in economic assumptions and may be less comparable to actual future events. As the length of the reasonable and supportable period increases, the degree of judgment involved in estimating the allowance will likely increase. The Bank used a two quarter reversion period in calculating its allowance as of January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2020 as it believes the
historical loss information is relevant to the expected credit losses and recognizes the declining precision and increasing uncertainty of estimating credit losses in those periods beyond which it can make reasonable and supportable forecasts. Risk characteristics by segment considered in the CECL methodology are the same as those disclosed in the 2019 Annual Form 10-K.
The following tables detail the activity in the ACL on loans disaggregated by segment and class for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Beginning Balance
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision for Credit Losses
Ending Balance
(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial
$13,900  $(1,824) $69  $17,628  $29,773  
SBA PPP—  —  —  —  —  
Owner-occupied CRE
6,216  —   3,785  10,003  
Non-owner occupied CRE
7,750  —  —  2,916  10,666  
Total commercial business
27,866  (1,824) 71  24,329  50,442  
One-to-four family residential3,026  —  —  (803) 2,223  
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential864  —   (304) 567  
Five or more family residential and commercial properties
11,444  —  —  (2,887) 8,557  
Total real estate construction and land development
12,308  —   (3,191) 9,124  
Consumer4,340  (431) 197  5,606  9,712  
Total$47,540  $(2,255) $275  $25,941  $71,501  

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Balance at Beginning Impact of CECL AdoptionBeginning Balance, as Adjusted
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision for Credit Losses
Ending Balance
(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial$11,739  $(1,348) $10,391  $(2,911) $1,126  $21,167  $29,773  
SBA PPP—  —  —  —  —  —  —  
Owner-occupied CRE
4,512  452  4,964  (135) 14  5,160  10,003  
Non-owner occupied CRE
7,682  (2,039) 5,643  —  —  5,023  10,666  
Total commercial business
23,933  (2,935) 20,998  (3,046) 1,140  31,350  50,442  
One-to-four family residential1,458  1,471  2,929  —   (709) 2,223  
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential1,455  (571) 884  —  21  (338) 567  
Five or more family residential and commercial properties
1,605  7,240  8,845  —  —  (288) 8,557  
Total real estate construction and land development
3,060  6,669  9,729  —  21  (626) 9,124  
Consumer6,821  (2,484) 4,337  (806) 291  5,890  9,712  
Unallocated899  (899) —  —  —  
Total$36,171  $1,822  $37,993  $(3,852) $1,455  $35,905  $71,501  
The Bank recognized net charge-offs of $2.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to a commercial and industrial charge-off of $1.7 million related to a lending relationship that has been experiencing difficulties. Due to issues surrounding the control of the underlying loan collateral, the Bank determined it appropriate to charge-off the entire balance and pursue an aggressive collection strategy. Net charge-offs also included small dollar charge-off on a large volume of consumer loans of $806,000 and a full recovery of a commercial and industrial agricultural lending relationship of $963,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2020, which was charged-off during the three months ended December 31, 2019.
The provision for credit losses on loans of $35.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was necessary to build the allowance to account for the current and forecasted economic conditions amidst COVID-19. The macroeconomic forecast used in the June 30, 2020 CECL model was as of June 9, 2020, and included the actual results of the sharp recession, followed by forecasted widened "U-shaped" recovery with unemployment rate spiking to 13% in second quarter 2020 and decreasing to 5% by 2023, and GDP slumping 6.1% in 2020, but rebounding 6.3% in 2021, with modest increases in GDP in future years. This forecast is in stark contrast to that used in CECL model as of January 1, 2020, which predicted steady GDP growth and unemployment rates, among other factors.
The following tables detail activity in the allowance for loan losses disaggregated by segment and class for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 under the incurred loss methodology, including the ASC 310-30 methodology for PCI loans:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
Beginning BalanceCharge-offsRecoveriesProvision for Loan LossesEnding Balance
(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial$11,755  $(774) $62  $950  $11,993  
Owner-occupied CRE
5,256  —  —  (190) 5,066  
Non-owner occupied CRE
7,825  —  —  239  8,064  
Total commercial business
24,836  (774) 62  999  25,123  
One-to-four family residential1,247  (15) —  113  1,345  
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential1,422  —   42  1,471  
Five or more family residential and commercial properties
995  —  —  65  1,060  
Total real estate construction and land development
2,417  —   107  2,531  
Consumer6,480  (566) 130  496  6,540  
Unallocated1,172  —  —  (348) 824  
Total$36,152  $(1,355) $199  $1,367  $36,363  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
 Beginning BalanceCharge-offsRecoveriesProvision for Loan LossesEnding Balance
(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial$11,343  $(877) $69  $1,458  $11,993  
Owner-occupied CRE
4,898  —   165  5,066  
Non-owner occupied CRE
7,470  —  149  445  8,064  
Total commercial business
23,711  (877) 221  2,068  25,123  
One-to-four family residential1,203  (30) —  172  1,345  
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential1,240  —  625  (394) 1,471  
Five or more family residential and commercial properties
954  —  —  106  1,060  
Total real estate construction and land development
2,194  —  625  (288) 2,531  
Consumer6,581  (1,152) 247  864  6,540  
Unallocated1,353  —  —  (529) 824  
Total$35,042  $(2,059) $1,093  $2,287  $36,363  

The following table details the allowance for loan losses disaggregated on the basis of the Company's impairment method as of December 31, 2019 under the incurred loss methodology, including the ASC 310-30 methodology for PCI loans:
Loans Individually Evaluated for ImpairmentLoans Collectively Evaluated for ImpairmentPCI LoansTotal Allowance for Loan Losses
(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial$1,372  $9,772  $595  $11,739  
Owner-occupied CRE
426  3,558  528  4,512  
Non-owner occupied CRE
146  7,064  472  7,682  
Total commercial business1,944  20,394  1,595  23,933  
One-to-four family residential56  1,316  86  1,458  
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential
—  1,296  159  1,455  
Five or more family residential and commercial properties
—  1,527  78  1,605  
Total real estate construction and land development
—  2,823  237  3,060  
Consumer143  6,327  351  6,821  
Unallocated—  899  —  899  
Total$2,143  $31,759  $2,269  $36,171  
The following table details the amortized cost of the loan receivables disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment method as of December 31, 2019 under the incurred loss methodology, including the ASC 310-30 methodology for PCI loans:
Loans Individually Evaluated for ImpairmentLoans Collectively Evaluated for ImpairmentPCI LoansLoans Receivable
(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial
$43,808  $806,044  $2,368  $852,220  
Owner-occupied CRE
6,336  793,984  4,914  805,234  
Non-owner occupied CRE
6,324  1,276,964  5,491  1,288,779  
Total commercial business56,468  2,876,992  12,773  2,946,233  
One-to-four family residential215  127,870  3,575  131,660  
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential
237  104,059  —  104,296  
Five or more family residential and commercial properties
—  170,350  —  170,350  
Total real estate construction and land development
237  274,409  —  274,646  
Consumer561  413,017  1,762  415,340  
Total$57,481  $3,692,288  $18,110  $3,767,879