UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019

or

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ____________

Commission file number: 0-23153

Track Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	87-0543981
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

200 E. 5th Avenue Suite 100, Naperville, IL 60563

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(877) 260-2010

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]   No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes [X]   No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer   [   ]	Accelerated filer                     [   ]
Non-accelerated filer     [X]	Smaller reporting company    [X]
	Emerging growth company    [   ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes [   ] No [X]

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share	TRCK	OTCQX Marketplace

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of August 9, 2019 was 11,401,650 

Track Group, Inc.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2019

INDEX

		Page
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity/(Deficit) (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	5
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	25
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	26
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	27
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28
Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	28
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	28
Item 5	Other Information	28
Item 6	Exhibits	28
Signatures		29

-i-

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Assets	June 30, 2019 (unaudited)	September 30, 2018
Current assets:
Cash	$6,878,916	$5,446,557
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,542,103 and $3,152,966, respectively	5,533,258	5,978,896
Note receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $234,733 at September 30,2018	-	-
Prepaid expense and other	1,374,236	1,270,043
Inventory, net of reserves of $26,934, respectively	253,238	277,119
Total current assets	14,039,648	12,972,615
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,235,720 and $1,999,222, respectively	741,641	745,475
Monitoring equipment, net of accumulated amortization of $6,215,061 and $5,325,654, respectively	2,619,670	3,162,542
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $13,608,444 and $12,016,512, respectively	22,283,352	23,253,054
Goodwill	8,123,550	8,076,759
Other assets	124,522	145,839
Total assets	$47,932,383	$48,356,284
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$2,424,626	$2,518,030
Accrued liabilities	12,209,866	10,333,103
Current portion of long-term debt	30,437,825	30,437,810
Total current liabilities	45,072,317	43,288,943
Long-term debt, net of current portion	3,399,644	3,428,975
Total liabilities	48,471,961	46,717,918
Commitments and contingencies (Note 21)	-	-
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 30,000,000 shares authorized;11,401,650 shares outstanding, respectively	1,140	1,140
Series A Convertible Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 1,200,000 shares authorized; 0 shares outstanding	-	-
Paid in capital	302,230,868	302,102,866
Accumulated deficit	(301,657,263)	(299,495,370)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,114,323)	(970,270)
Total equity (deficit)	(539,578)	1,638,366
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$47,932,383	$48,356,284

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

-1-

TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	June 30,	June 30,	June 30,	June 30,
	2019	2018	2019	2018
Revenue:
Monitoring and other related services	$7,904,015	$7,549,779	$23,841,746	$22,062,789
Product sales and other	1,051,449	129,196	1,416,495	423,056
Total revenue	8,955,464	7,678,975	25,258,241	22,485,845
Cost of revenue:
Monitoring, products and other related services	3,661,470	3,039,755	9,827,373	8,409,604
Depreciation and amortization	500,704	432,952	1,512,583	1,377,760
Total cost of revenue	4,162,174	3,472,707	11,339,956	9,787,364
Gross profit	4,793,290	4,206,268	13,918,285	12,698,481
Operating expense:
General & administrative	2,725,991	3,703,869	9,464,332	10,856,950
Selling & marketing	556,122	466,048	1,637,026	1,394,778
Research & development	350,532	254,060	954,276	600,814
Depreciation & amortization	521,013	520,639	1,556,378	1,624,916
Total operating expense	4,153,658	4,944,616	13,612,012	14,477,458
Income (loss) from operations	639,632	(738,348)	306,273	(1,778,977)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net	(597,623)	(594,452)	(1,783,210)	(2,074,245)
Currency exchange rate gain (loss)	201,972	(166,586)	(134,795)	(442,706)
Other income, net	-	3,733	143	21,199
Total other income (expense)	(395,651)	(757,305)	(1,917,862)	(2,495,752)
Loss before income taxes	243,981	(1,495,653)	(1,611,589)	(4,274,729)
Income tax expense	313,328	360,807	457,335	360,807
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	(69,347)	(1,856,460)	(2,068,924)	(4,635,536)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	15,255	(861,637)	(144,053)	(431,186)
Comprehensive loss	$(54,092)	$(2,718,097)	$(2,212,977)	$(5,066,722)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$(0.01)	$(0.17)	$(0.18)	$(0.44)
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	11,251,650	10,885,444	11,200,551	10,608,127

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

-2-

TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY/(DEFICIT)

(Unaudited)

	Common stock		Paid-in	Accumulated	Comprehensive
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Deficit	Loss	Total
Balance September 30, 2018	11,401,650	$1,140	$302,102,866	$(299,495,370)	$(970,270)	$1,638,366
ASC 606 modified retrospective adjustment	-	-	-	(92,969)	-	(92,969)
Amortization of equity-based compensation granted to employees	-	-	83,218	-	-	83,218
Foreign currency translation adjustments	-	-	-	-	96,673	96,673
Net loss	-	-	-	(1,734,918)	-	(1,734,918)
Balance December 31, 2018	11,401,650	1,140	302,186,084	(301,323,257)	(873,597)	(9,630)
Amortization of equity-based compensation granted to employees	-	-	25,097	-	-	25,097
Foreign currency translation adjustments	-	-	-	-	(255,981)	(255,981)
Net loss	-	-	-	(264,659)	-	(264,659)
Balance March 31, 2019	11,401,650	1,140	302,211,181	(301,587,916)	(1,129,578)	(505,173)
Amortization of equity-based compensation granted to employees	-	-	19,687	-	-	19,687
Foreign currency translation adjustments	-	-		-	15,255	15,255
Net loss	-	-		(69,347)	-	(69,347)
Balance June 30, 2019	11,401,650	$1,140	$302,230,868	$(301,657,263)	$(1,114,323)	$(539,578)

	Common stock		Paid-in	Accumulated	Comprehensive
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Deficit	Loss	Total
Balance September 30, 2017	10,480,984	$1,048	$300,717,861	$(294,067,329)	$(675,822)	$5,975,758
Cancellation of Common Stock issued to Board Member	(18,551)	(2)	-	-	-	(2)
Modification of warrants			149,888			149,888
Amortization of equity-based compensation granted to employees	-	-	110,859	-	-	110,859
Foreign currency translation adjustments	-	-	-	-	188,725	188,725
Net loss	-	-	-	(1,042,591)	-	(1,042,591)
Balance December 31, 2017	10,462,433	1,046	300,978,608	(295,109,920)	(487,097)	5,382,637
Modification of warrants			12,530			12,530
Amortization of equity-based compensation granted to employees	-	-	47,694	-	-	47,694
Foreign currency translation adjustments	-	-	-	-	241,726	241,726
Net loss	-	-	-	(1,736,485)	-	(1,736,485)
Balance March 31, 2018	10,462,433	1,046	301,038,832	(296,846,405)	(245,371)	3,948,102
Amortization of equity-based compensation granted to employees	-	-	22,071	-	-	22,071
Issuance of Warrants for Board of Director fees	-	-	75,000	-	-	75,000
Issuance of Common Stock for Board of Director fees	266,358	27	364,696	-	-	364,723
Issuance of Common Stock to employees for services	672,859	67	519,049	-	-	519,116
Foreign currency translation adjustments	-	-	-	-	(861,637)	(861,637)
Net loss	-	-	-	(1,856,460)	-	(1,856,460)
Balance June 30, 2018	11,401,650	$1,140	$302,019,648	$(298,702,865)	$(1,107,008)	$2,210,915

  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

-3-

TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited) 

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2019	2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$(2,068,924)	$(4,635,536)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	3,068,961	3,002,676
Bad debt expense	445,212	345,215
Amortization of debt discount	-	167,230
Stock based compensation	128,002	1,467,521
Loss on monitoring equipment included in cost of revenue	372,059	290,238
Foreign currency exchange loss	134,795	442,706
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net	(49,254)	(19,352)
Prepaid expense and other assets	(135,714)	2,388,345
Inventory	401,438	-
Accounts payable	(83,201)	(564,889)
Accrued liabilities	1,849,972	2,427,277
Net cash provided by operating activities	4,063,346	5,311,431
Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	(299,839)	(143,116)
Capitalized software	(868,652)	(802,560)
Purchase of monitoring equipment and parts	(1,296,621)	(1,128,484)
Net cash used in investing activities	(2,465,112)	(2,074,160)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Principal payments on long-term debt	(65,237)	(47,579)
Net cash used in financing activities	(65,237)	(47,579)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(100,638)	(6,868)
Net increase in cash	1,432,359	3,182,824
Cash, beginning of period	5,446,557	2,027,321
Cash, end of period	$6,878,916	$5,210,145

Cash paid for interest	$23,685	$204,927
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Non-cash transfer of inventory to monitoring equipment	$424,642	$309,710

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

-4-

TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(1)  BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information of Track Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “Track Group”) has been prepared in accordance with the Instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim consolidated financial information contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2019, and results of its operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 19, 2018. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019 may not be indicative of the results for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019.

As of June 30, 2019, and 2018, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $301,657,263 and $298,702,865, respectively. The Company incurred a net loss of $2,068,924 and $4,635,536 for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company may continue to incur losses and require additional financial resources. The Company also has debt maturing in April 2020. The Company’s transition to profitable operations is dependent upon generating a level of revenue adequate to support its cost structure, which it has almost achieved and resolving the balance sheet. Management has evaluated the significance of these conditions and has determined that the Company can meet its operating obligations for a reasonable period of time. The Company expects to fund operations using cash on hand, through operational cash flows and the potential extension of its existing debt agreement, if necessary. Management of the Company believes that the availability of financing from these sources is adequate to fund operations through the upcoming twelve months.

(2)  PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Track Group, Inc. and its active subsidiaries, Track Group Analytics Limited, Track Group Americas, Inc., Track Group International LTD., and Track Group - Chile SpA. All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

(3)  RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies, which are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, there were no new accounting pronouncements that had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 and related amendments “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASC 606”), which superseded all prior revenue recognition methods and industry-specific guidance. The principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control for promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. On October 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method, whereby the adoption does not impact any prior periods. See Note 8.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting,” which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. An entity will account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value of the modified award is the same as the original award, the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the original award and the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or liability instrument is the same as the original award. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The update is to be adopted prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. Early adoption is permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have an impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

-5-

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)” requiring the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments to conform the presentation in the statement of cash flows for certain transactions, including cash distributions from equity method investments, among others. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The new guidance simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by removing the second step of the two-step impairment test. The amendment requires an entity to perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The new guidance will be effective for annual periods or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendment should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Management does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” For lessees, the amendments in this update require that for all leases not considered to be short term, a company recognize both a lease liability and right-of-use asset on its balance sheet, representing the obligation to make payments and the right to use or control the use of a specified asset for the lease term. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those annual periods. Management does not anticipate that this adoption will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 (4)  IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of an asset may not be recoverable and in the case of goodwill, at least annually. The Company evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred which indicate possible impairment as of each balance sheet date. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. Impairment of long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there is an identifiable fair value that is independent of other groups of assets.

(5)  BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The Company accounts for its business acquisitions under the acquisition method of accounting as indicated in ASC 805, Business Combinations, which requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the fair value of all assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, and establishes the acquisition date as the fair value measurement point. Accordingly, the Company recognizes assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, including contingent assets and liabilities and non-controlling interest in the acquiree, based on fair value estimates as of the date of acquisition. In accordance with ASC 805, the Company recognizes and measures goodwill as of the acquisition date, as the excess of the fair value of the consideration paid over the fair value of the identified net assets acquired.

Acquired Assets and Assumed Liabilities

Pursuant to ASC No. 805-10-25, if the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs, but during the allowed measurement period not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the Company retrospectively adjusts the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date, by means of adjusting the amount recognized for goodwill.

-6-

Contingent Consideration

In certain acquisitions, the Company has agreed to pay additional amounts to sellers contingent upon achievement by the acquired businesses of certain future goals, which may include revenue milestones, new customer accounts, and earnings targets. The Company records contingent consideration based on its estimated fair value as of the date of the acquisition. The Company evaluates and adjusts the value of contingent consideration, if necessary, at each reporting period based on the progress toward and likely achievement of certain targets on which issuance of the contingent consideration is based. Any differences between the acquisition-date fair value and the changes in fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date are recognized in current period earnings until the arrangement is settled. If there is uncertainty surrounding the value of contingent consideration, then the Company’s policy is to wait until the end of the measurement period before making an adjustment.

(6)  ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) as currently reported under GAAP and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) considers the effects of additional economic events, such as foreign currency translation adjustments, that are not required to be recorded in determining net income (loss), but rather are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Chilean Peso, New Israeli Shekel and the Canadian Dollar are used as functional currencies of the following operating subsidiaries: (i) Track Group Chile SpA; (ii) Track Group International Ltd.; and (iii) Track Group Analytics Limited, respectively. The balance sheets of all subsidiaries have been converted into United States Dollars (USD) at the prevailing exchange rate at June 30, 2019.

(7)  NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Basic net income (loss) per common share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

Diluted net income (loss) per common share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted-average dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. The computation of Diluted EPS does not assume exercise or conversion of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect.

Common share equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of common stock options and warrants. As of June 30, 2019 and 2018, there were 685,259 and 628,592 outstanding common share equivalents, respectively, that were not included in the computation of Diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. The common stock equivalents outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 consisted of the following:

	June 30,	June 30,
	2019	2018
Exercisable common stock options and warrants	685,259	628,592
Total common stock equivalents	685,259	628,592

At June 30, 2019 and 2018, all stock option and warrant exercise prices were above the market price of $0.53 and $1.00, respectively, and thus have not been included in the basic earnings per share calculation.

(8) REVENUE RECOGNITION

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 and related amendments, which superseded all prior revenue recognition methods and industry-specific guidance. The principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control for promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying the revenue principles, an entity is required to identify the contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied (i.e., either over time or at a point in time). ASC 606 further requires that companies disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method, whereby the adoption does not impact any prior periods.

-7-

Monitoring and Other Related Services. Monitoring services include two components: (i) lease contracts pursuant to which the Company provides monitoring services and lease devices to distributors or end users and the Company retains ownership of the leased device; and (ii) monitoring services purchased by distributors or end users who have previously purchased monitoring devices and opt to use the Company’s monitoring services. Sales of devices and leased GPS devices provided by the Company are required to use the Company’s monitoring service and both the GPS leased devices and monitoring services are accounted for as a single performance obligation. The rates for leased devices and monitoring services are considered to be stated at their individual stand-alone selling prices. The Company recognizes revenue on leased devices and monitoring services at the end of each month the services have been provided and payment terms are 30 days from invoice date. In those circumstances in which the Company receives payment in advance, the Company records these payments as deferred revenue.

Product Sales and Other. The Company sells replacement parts to customers under certain contracts, as well as law enforcement software licenses and maintenance, and analytical software. The Company recognizes device and other product sales in the period when: (a) the Company has transferred physical possession of the products, (b) the Company has a present right to payment, (c) the customer has legal title to the products, and (d) the customer bears significant risks and rewards of ownership of the products. The Company recognizes revenue from other services as the customer receives services and the Company has the right to payment.

Multiple Element Arrangements. The majority of our revenue transactions do not have multiple elements. However, on occasion, the Company may enter into revenue transactions that have multiple elements. These may include different combinations of products or services that are included in a single billable rate. These products or services are delivered over time as the customer utilizes our services. In cases where obligations in a contract are distinct and thus require separation into multiple performance obligations, revenue recognition guidance requires that contract consideration be allocated to each distinct performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The value allocated to each performance obligation is then recognized as revenue when the revenue recognition criteria for each distinct promise or bundle of promises has been met.

The standalone selling price for each performance obligation is an amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the good or service. When there is only one performance obligation associated with a contract, the entire sale value is attributed to that obligation. When a contract contains multiple performance obligations the transaction value is first allocated using the observable price, which is generally a list price net of applicable discount or the price used to sell in similar circumstances. In circumstances when a selling price is not directly observable, the Company will estimate the standalone selling price using information available to us.

Effect of Adopting ASC 606.  The Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method. Under the modified retrospective method, the Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying this accounting standard as an adjustment to the opening balance in retained earnings of $92,969, relating to one contract for the sale of products and associated use of software.

The cumulative effect of the changes made to the Company’s Consolidated October 1, 2018 Balance Sheet for the adoption of ASC 606 is as follows:

Balance Sheet	As Reported at September 30, 2018	Adjustments	Balance as of October 1, 2018
LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities	$10,333,103	$92,969	$10,426,072
Total current liabilities	$43,288,943	$92,969	$43,381,912
Total liabilities	$46,717,918	$92,969	$46,810,887
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accumulated deficit	$(299,495,370)	$(92,969)	$(299,588,339)
Total equity	$1,638,366	$(92,969)	$1,545,397
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$48,356,284	$(92,969)	$48,263,315

-8-

The following tables present the Company’s revenue disaggregated by geography, based on management’s assessment of available data:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Total Revenue	% of Total Revenue	Total Revenue	% of Total Revenue
United States	$5,112,538	57%	$4,862,970	63%
Latin America	3,740,858	42%	2,798,326	37%
Other	102,068	1%	17,679	-%
Total	$8,955,464	100%	$7,678,975	100%

	Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019		Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Total Revenue	% of Total Revenue	Total Revenue	% of Total Revenue
United States	$14,997,609	59%	$14,405,972	64%
Latin America	10,111,825	40%	7,947,837	35%
Other	148,807	1%	132,036	1%
Total	$25,258,241	100%	$22,485,845	100%

The above table includes total revenue for the Company, of which monitoring and other related services is the majority (approximately 94%) of the Company’s revenue. Latin America includes Bahamas, Chile, Mexico, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Other includes Canada, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom and Vietnam.

(9)  PREPAID EXPENSE AND OTHER

As of June 30, 2019, and September 30, 2018, the outstanding balance of prepaid and other expense was $1,374,236 and $1,270,043, respectively. These balances are comprised largely of a performance bond deposit, tax deposits, vendor deposits and other prepaid supplier expense.

(10)  INVENTORY

 Inventory is valued at the lower of the cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the standard costing method. Net realizable value is determined based on the item selling price. Inventory is periodically reviewed in order to identify obsolete or damaged items or impaired values. The Company did not record impairment of inventory during the quarters ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Inventory consists of finished goods that are to be shipped to customers and parts used for minor repairs of ReliAlert™, Shadow, and other tracking devices. Completed and shipped ReliAlert™ and other tracking devices are reflected in Monitoring Equipment. As of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, inventory consisted of the following: 

	June 30, 2019	September 30, 2018
Finished goods inventory	$280,172	$304,053
Reserve for damaged or obsolete inventory	(26,934)	(26,934)
Total inventory, net of reserves	$253,238	$277,119

-9-

The Company uses a third-party fulfillment service provider. As a result of this service, the Company’s employees do not actively assemble new product or repair damaged inventory or monitoring equipment shipped directly from suppliers. Purchases of monitoring equipment are recognized directly. Management believes this process reduces maintenance and fulfillment costs associated with inventory and monitoring equipment.

(11)  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively:

	June 30, 2019	September 30, 2018
Equipment, software and tooling	$1,199,074	$1,074,471
Automobiles	5,950	6,153
Leasehold improvements	1,460,199	1,358,984
Furniture and fixtures	312,138	305,089
Total property and equipment before accumulated depreciation	2,977,361	2,744,697
Accumulated depreciation	(2,235,720)	(1,999,222)
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	$741,641	$745,475

Property and equipment depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $88,975 and $73,245, respectively. Property and equipment depreciation expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $256,276 and $275,127, respectively.

(12)  MONITORING EQUIPMENT

The Company leases monitoring equipment to agencies for offender tracking under contractual service agreements. The monitoring equipment is amortized using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of between one and three years. Monitoring equipment as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018 was as follows:

	June 30, 2019	September 30, 2018
Monitoring equipment	$8,834,731	$8,488,196
Less: accumulated amortization	(6,215,061)	(5,325,654)
Monitoring equipment, net of accumulated amortization	$2,619,670	$3,162,542

Amortization of monitoring equipment for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $374,081 and $309,021, respectively. Amortization of monitoring equipment for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $1,135,584 and $1,005,541, respectively. Amortization expense for monitoring devices is recognized in cost of revenue. During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, the Company recorded charges of $137,968 and $67,124, respectively, for devices that were lost, stolen or damaged. During the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, the Company recorded charges of $372,059 and $290,238, respectively, for devices that were lost, stolen or damaged. Lost, stolen and damaged items are included in Monitoring, products & other related services in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

(13)  INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table summarizes intangible assets at June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively:

Other intangible assets:	June 30, 2019	September 30, 2018
Patent & royalty agreements	$21,170,565	$21,170,565
Developed technology	12,463,959	11,835,293
Customer relationships	1,860,000	1,860,000
Trade name	319,071	325,507
Website	78,201	78,201
Total intangible assets	35,891,796	35,269,566
Accumulated amortization	(13,608,444)	(12,016,512)
Intangible assets, net	$22,283,352	$23,253,054

-10-

The intangible assets summarized above were purchased or developed on various dates from January 2010 through June 30, 2019. The assets have useful lives ranging from three to twenty years. Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $558,661 and $571,325, respectively. Amortization expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $1,677,101 and $1,722,008, respectively.

(14)  GOODWILL

The following table summarizes the activity of goodwill at June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively:

	June 30,	September 30,
	2019	2018
Balance - beginning of period	$8,076,759	$8,226,714
Effect of foreign currency translation on goodwill	46,791	(149,955)
Balance - end of period	$8,123,550	$8,076,759

Goodwill is recognized in connection with acquisition transactions in accordance with ASC 805. The Company performs an impairment test for goodwill annually or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist. No impairment of goodwill was recognized through June 30, 2019.

(15)  ACCRUED LIABILITES

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively:

	June 30, 2019	September 30, 2018
Accrued payroll, taxes and employee benefits	$1,728,761	$1,937,021
Deferred revenue	130,908	150,604
Deposits payable	-	54,504
Accrued taxes - foreign and domestic	275,789	351,469
Accrued other expense	175,345	298,268
Accrued legal costs	905,521	473,777
Accrued costs of revenue	384,279	230,514
Accrued bond guarantee	152,004	157,199
Accrued interest	8,457,259	6,679,747
Total accrued liabilities	$12,209,866	$10,333,103

(16)  DEBT OBLIGATIONS

On February 24, 2019, the Company and Conrent Invest S.A. (“Conrent”) entered into a second amendment to their Facility Agreement (the “SecondAmended Facility Agreement”), which Second Amended Facility Agreement (i) extends the maturity date of the Facility to the earlier of either April 1, 2020 or the date upon which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company, and (ii) provides that in the event of a change of control of the Company, Conrent shall immediately cancel the Second Amended Credit Facility and declare the outstanding principal amount, together with unpaid interest, immediately due and payable.

-11-

Debt obligations as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively, are comprised of the following: 

	June 30, 2019	September 30, 2018
Unsecured facility agreement with Conrent whereby, as of June 30, 2015, the Company had borrowed $30.4 million, bearing interest at a rate of 8% per annum, payable in arrears semi-annually, with all principal and accrued and unpaid interest due on April 1, 2020. The Company did not pay interest on this loan during the nine months ended June 30, 2019.	$30,400,000	$30,400,000
Loan Agreement whereby the Company can borrow up to $5.0 million at 8% interest per annum on borrowed funds maturing on September 30, 2020.	3,399,644	3,399,644
Non-interest bearing notes payable to a Canadian governmental agency assumed in conjunction with the acquisition.	37,825	67,141
Total debt obligations	33,837,469	33,866,785
Less current portion	(30,437,825)	(30,437,810)
Long-term debt, net of current portion	$3,399,644	$3,428,975

The following table summarizes future maturities of debt obligations as of June 30, 2019:

Twelve-month period ended June 30,	Total
2020	$30,437,825
2021	3,399,644
Thereafter	-
Total	$33,837,469

(17)  RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related-Party Loan Agreement

On September 25, 2015, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Sapinda Loan Agreement”) with Sapinda Asia Limited (“Sapinda”), a related party at that time, to provide the Company with a $5.0 million line of credit that accrued interest at a rate of 3% per annum for undrawn funds, and 8% per annum for borrowed funds. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Sapinda Loan Agreement, available funds could be drawn down at the Company’s request at any time prior to the maturity date of September 30, 2017 (the “Maturity Date”), when all borrowed funds, plus all accrued but unpaid interest would have become due and payable. The Company, however, was entitled to elect to satisfy any outstanding obligations under the Sapinda Loan Agreement prior to the Maturity Date without penalties or fees.

On March 13, 2017, the Company and Sapinda entered into Amendment Number One to theSapinda Loan Agreement. Amendment Number One extended the maturity date of all loans made pursuant to theSapinda Loan Agreement to September 30, 2020. In addition, Amendment Number One eliminated the requirement that the Company pay Sapinda the3%interest, and forgave the 3% interest due to Sapinda for all undrawn funds under theSapinda Loan Agreement through the Execution Date. Further, Amendment Number One provided that all Lender Penalties accrued under theSapinda Loan Agreement through the Execution Date were forgiven. Per Amendment Number One, Lender Penalties began to accrue again because Sapinda failed to fund the amount of $1.5 million on or before June 30, 2017. The Company formally notified Sapinda of the breach by letter dated April 4, 2017. The Company is again accruing Lender Penalties, amounting to $730,000 at June 30, 2019, under Section 6.3 of theSapinda Loan Agreement, as amended, and the Company intends to offset Lender Penalties against future payments due. We did not draw on this line of credit, nor did we pay any interest during the three months ended June 30, 2019. The undrawn balance of this line of credit at June 30, 2019 was $1,600,356. Further advances under theSapinda Loan Agreement are not currently expected to be forthcoming, and therefore no assurances can be given that the Company will obtain additional funds to which it is entitled under theSapinda Loan Agreement, or that the penalties accruing will ever be paid. 

-12-

 Additional Related-Party Transactions and Summary of All Related-Party Obligations

	June 30, 2019	September 30, 2018
Related party loan with an interest rate of 8% per annum for borrowed funds. Principal and interest due September 30, 2020.	$3,399,644	$3,399,644
Total related-party debt obligations	$3,399,644	$3,399,644

Each of the foregoing related-party transactions was reviewed and approved by disinterested and independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors. 

(18)  PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share.

The Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share. The Company’s Board of Directors has the authority to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, without further shareholder approval, to designate and determine, in whole or in part, the preferences, limitations and relative rights of the preferred stock before any issuance of the preferred stock, and to create one or more series of preferred stock. As of June 30, 2019, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

No dividends were paid during the three- and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2019 or 2018, respectively.

Series A Preferred Stock

On October 12, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation of the Relative Rights and Preferences (“Certificate of Designation”) with the Delaware Division of Corporations, designating 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s preferred stock as Series A Preferred. Shares of Series A Preferred rank senior to the Company’s common stock, and all other classes and series of equity securities of the Company that by their terms do not rank senior to the Series A Preferred.

Except with respect to transactions upon which holders of the Series A Preferred are entitled to vote separately as a class under the terms of the Certificate of Designation, the Series A Preferred has no voting rights. The shares of common stock into which the Series A Preferred is convertible shall, upon issuance, have all of the same voting rights as other issued and outstanding shares of our common stock.

The Series A Preferred has no separate dividend rights; however, whenever the Board declares a dividend on the Company’s common stock, if ever, each holder of record of a share of Series A Preferred shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to such dividend declared on one share of common stock multiplied by the number of shares of common stock into which such share of Series A Preferred could be converted on the Record Date.

Each share of Series A Preferred has a Liquidation Preference of $35.00 per share, and is convertible, at the holder’s option, into ten shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustments as set forth in the Certificate of Designation, at any time beginning five hundred and forty days after the date of issuance.

As of June 30, 2019, no shares of Series A Preferred were issued and outstanding.

-13-

 (19)  STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Stock Incentive Plan

At the annual meeting of shareholders on March 21, 2011, our shareholders approved the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”). The 2012 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards and performance-based awards to employees and certain non-employees who provide services to the Company in lieu of cash. A total of 90,000 shares were initially authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2012 Plan. At the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders held on May 19, 2015, our stockholders approved a 713,262 share increase to the total number of shares authorized under the 2012 Plan. Warrants for Board members vest immediately and warrants issued to employees vest annually over either a two or three-year period after the grant date. 

As of December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors suspended further awards under the 2012 Plan until further notice. The Company recorded expense of $106,772 and $1,084,335 for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to the vesting of common stock awarded prior to the suspension of the 2012 Plan. There were 27,218 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2012 Plan as of June 30, 2019.

All Options and Warrants

On November 30, 2017, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the adjustment of the exercise price of 605,678 unexercised warrants/options issued under the 2012 Plan, with original exercise prices ranging from $1.81 to $19.46, to $1.24, resulting in incremental stock-based compensation of $149,088, which was expensed in the three-month period ending December 31, 2017.

The fair value of each stock option and warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. During the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company granted no options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock under the 2012 Plan. The warrants for Board members vest immediately and expire five years from grant date and warrants or options issued to employees vest annually over either a two to three-year period and expire five years after the final vesting date of the grant. The Company recorded expense of $21,231 and $151,136 for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to the issuance and vesting of outstanding stock options and warrants.

The option and warrant grants for three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were valued using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

-14-

	Nine Months Ended June 30
	2019	2018
Expected stock price volatility	N/A	102%
Risk-free interest rate	N/A	2.09%
Expected life of options/warrants		5 years

The expected life of stock options (warrants) represents the period of time that the stock options or warrants are expected to be outstanding based on the simplified method allowed under GAAP. The expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk-free interest rate represents the U.S. Treasury bill rate for the expected life of the related stock options (warrants). The dividend yield represents the Company’s anticipated cash dividends over the expected life of the stock options (warrants).

A summary of stock option (warrant) activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 is presented below:

	Shares Under Option	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of September 30, 2018	685,259	$1.56	3.90 years	$-
Granted	-	$-
Expired/Cancelled	-	$-
Exercised	-	$-
Outstanding as of June 30, 2019	685,259	$1.56	3.15 years	$-
Exercisable as of June 30, 2019	685,259	$1.56	3.15 years	$-

The intrinsic value of options and warrants outstanding and exercisable is based on the Company’s share price of $0.53 at June 30, 2019.

(20)  INCOME TAXES

The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets or liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or income tax returns. Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply when the differences are expected to be settled or realized. Deferred income tax assets are reviewed periodically for recoverability and valuation allowances are provided as necessary. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities, when incurred, are classified in interest expense and income tax provision, respectively.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred a net loss for income tax purposes of $2,068,924 and $4,635,536, respectively. The amount and ultimate realization of the benefits from the net operating losses is dependent, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, our future earnings, and other future events, the effects of which cannot be determined. The Company has established a valuation allowance for all deferred income tax assets not offset by deferred income tax liabilities due to the uncertainty of their realization. Accordingly, there is no benefit for income taxes in the accompanying statements of operations.

In computing income tax, we recognize an income tax provision in tax jurisdictions in which we have pre-tax income for the period and are expecting to generate pre-tax book income during the fiscal year.

-15-

(21)  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Matters

The Company is, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business.

Lazar Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc.On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich, Dovie Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach of contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption Agreements. The plaintiffs alleged $1,587,604 in combined damages. On May 2, 2016, the Court resolved this case in favor of the Company by granting the Company’s motion for Summary Judgment. The plaintiffs filed an Appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging the Court’s ruling on the motion for Summary Judgment. The Appellate court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that factual issues remain, reversing the Summary Judgment and remanding the case back to the trial court. On February 21, 2019, the trial concluded and a jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor; awarding the plaintiffs $336,000 before interest. The Company filed a motion to reverse the verdict in its entirety, which was denied on July 30, 2019. The Court entered a judgment on August 1, 2019 in the amount of $553,115.84, inclusive of pre-judgment interest. The Company is currently considering its options on appealing both the original judgement and the interest methodology used by the court.

John Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois.On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, in District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, among other causes of action, related to Mr. Merrill’s termination of employment effective September 27, 2016. Mr. Merrill is seeking not less than $590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and costs. At a hearing on April 25, 2018, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims related to existence of an oral look-back agreement and a separation agreement. In an order entered July 25, 2019, the court granted defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s damages’ expert report and barred plaintiff’s expert from testifying at trial, if any. Plaintiff has moved the court to reconsider its July 25, 2019 order. The Company intends to seek summary judgment on the remaining contested issues. We believe the allegations and claims are without merit.

SecureAlert, Inc. v. Federal Government of Mexico (Department of the Interior).On March 24, 2017, SecureAlert Inc. filed a complaint before the Federal Administrative Tribunal, asserting the failure by defendant to pay claimant amounts agreed to, and due under, the Pluri Annual Contract for the Rendering of Monitoring Services of Internees, through Electric Bracelets, in the Islas Marias Penitentiary Complex dated July 15, 2011, entered into by and between the Organo Administrativo Desconcentrado Prevencion y Readaptacion Social of the then Public Security Department, and presently, an agency of the National Security Commission of the Department of the Interior, and SecureAlert, Inc., presently Track Group, Inc. The Company’s claim amount is upwards of $6.0 million. The Supreme Court took action to resolve previous, conflicting decisions regarding the jurisdiction of such claims and determined that such claims will be resolved by the Federal Administrative Tribunal. Subsequently, plaintiff filed an Amparo action before the Collegiate Court, seeking an appeal of the Federal Administrative Court’s earlier decision against plaintiff. A decision on the Amparo action is anticipated in late 2019. Based upon the fee arrangement the Company has with its counsel, we anticipate the future liabilities attributable to legal expense will be minimal.

Eli Sabag v. Track Group, Inc., Sapinda Asia Limited and Lars Windhorst.On May 4, 2018, Eli Sabag filed a complaint before the Marion Superior Court in Marion County Indiana for damages and declaratory Judgment against the Company. The complaint seeks to enforce an “earn-out” clause in a Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between the Company and Sabag. In addition, Sabag sued the Company for breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference, alleging that the Company avoided selling sufficient GPS devices so as to not trigger the issuance of contingent stock under the “earn-out” clause in the SPA. Finally, Sabag alleges that the Company was unjustly enriched because it failed to pay full value for his shares under the SPA. The Company believes the allegations are unfounded and without merit, and it will defend the case vigorously. Furthermore, according to the SPA, any disputes are to be resolved through binding arbitration held in New York. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and Compel Arbitration on September 5, 2018. On March 29, 2019, the Marion Superior Court ruled in favor of the Company and dismissed all claims against the Company without prejudice. The plaintiff has not taken any further action since March 29, 2019.

-16-

Erick Cerda v. Track Group, Inc. On July 25, 2018, former employee Erick Cerda, the plaintiff, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 18-CV-05075, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecific amount.  To avoid the costs and uncertainties of prolonged litigation, the parties reached a settlement, which was finalized on June 4, 2019 and paid in June 2019. On July 22, 2019, the case was dismissed with prejudice as a result of the settlement.

Blaike Anderson v. Track Group, Inc., et. al.On June 24, 2019, Blaike Anderson filed a complaint seeking unspecified damages in the State Court of Marion County, Indiana, alleging liability on the part of the defendants for providing a defective ankle monitoring device and failure to warn plaintiff regarding the condition thereof. The defendants dispute the allegations of the complaint and intend to vigorously defend the case.

Operating Lease Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual lease obligations as of June 30, 2019:

Fiscal Year	Total
2019 (three months)	$79,190
2020	248,806
2021	176,291
2022	161,075
2023	3,612
Thereafter	-
Total	$668,974

The total operating lease obligations of $668,974 is largely related to facilities operating leases. During the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company paid $359,288 and $354,948, in lease payment obligations, respectively.

 (22)  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In accordance with the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC 855, we have evaluated subsequent events, through the filing date and noted that, other than as disclosed above, no additional subsequent events have occurred that are reasonably likely to impact the financial statements.

-17-

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains information that constitutes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Generally, the statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical can be considered to be “forward-looking statements.” These statements represent our expectations, hopes, beliefs, anticipations, commitments, intentions, and strategies regarding the future. They may be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “should,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential,” and “will,” among others. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations regarding our financial performance, revenue, and expense levels in the future and the sufficiency of our existing assets to fund future operations and capital spending needs. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, and those described from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are contained in this Report, as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, and Current Reports on Form 8-K that have been filed with the SEC through the date of this Report. Except as otherwise indicated, as used in this Report, the terms “the Company,” “Track Group,” “we,” “our,” “us,” refer to Track Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

General

Our core business is based on the leasing of patented tracking and monitoring solutions to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, both in the U.S and abroad, for the electronic monitoring of offenders and offering unique data analytics services on a platform-as-a-service (“PaaS”) business model. Currently, we deploy offender based management services that combine patented GPS tracking technologies, fulltime 24/7/365 global monitoring capabilities, case management, and proprietary data analytics. We offer customizable tracking solutions that leverage real-time tracking data, best practices monitoring, and analytics capabilities to create complete, end-to-end tracking solutions.

Our devices consist principally of the ReliAlertTM product line, which is supplemented by the Shadow product line. These devices are generally leased on a daily rate basis and may be combined with our monitoring center services, proprietary software and data analytics subscription to provide an end-to-end PaaS.

ReliAlertTMand Shadow.  Our tracking devices utilize patented technology and are securely attached around an offender’s ankle with a tamper resistant strap that cannot be adjusted or removed without detection, unless by a supervising officer, and which are activated through services provided by our monitoring centers. The ReliAlertTM and Shadow units are intelligent devices with integrated computer circuitry, utilizing both GPS and RF, and constructed from case-hardened plastics designed to promptly notify the intervention centers of any attempt made to breach applicable protocols, or to remove or otherwise tamper with the device or optical strap housing. The ReliAlertTM platform also incorporates voice communication technology that provides officers with 24/7/365 voice communication with the offenders. Both devices are FCC, CE and PTCRB certified and protected by numerous patents and trademarks.

Monitoring Center Services.  Our monitoring center facilities provide live 24/7/365 monitoring of all alarms generated from our devices, as well as customer and technical support. Our monitoring center operators play a vital role, and as such, we staff our centers with highly-trained, bi-lingual individuals. These operators act as an extension of agency resources receiving alarms, communicating and intervening with offenders regarding violations, and interacting with supervision staff, all pursuant to agency-established protocols. The facilities have redundant power source, battery back-up and triple redundancy in voice, data, and IP. The Company has established monitoring centers in the U.S. and Chile. In addition, the Company has assisted in the establishment of monitoring centers for customers and local partners in other global locations

-18-

Data Analytics Services.  Our TrackerPALTM software, TrackerPALTM Mobile, combined with our Data Analytic analysis tools, provide an integrated platform allowing case managers and law enforcement officers quick access views of an offender’s travel behavior, mapping, and inference on patterns. Our advanced data analytics service offers a highly complex predictive reporting mechanism that combines modern statistical methods, developed using computer science and used by intelligence agencies that separate noteworthy events from normal events, rank offender cases according to their need for supervision, and relate decision-relevant metrics to benchmarks in real-time.

Other Services. The Company offers smartphone applications specifically designed for the criminal justice market, including a domestic violence app that creates a mobile geo-zone around a survivor and an alcohol monitoring app linked to a police-grade breathalyzer.

Business Strategy

We are committed to helping our customers improve offender rehabilitation and re-socialization outcomes through our innovative hardware, software, and services. We treat our business as a service business. Although we still manufacture patented tracking technology, we see the physical goods as only a small part of the integrated offender monitoring solutions we provide. Accordingly, rather than receiving a payment just for a piece of manufactured equipment, the Company receives a recurring stream of revenue for ongoing device agnostic subscription contracts. As part of our strategy, we continue to expand our device-agnostic platform to not only collect, but also store, analyze, assess and correlate location data for both accountability and auditing reasons, as well as to use for predictive analytics and assessment of effective and emerging techniques in criminal behavior and rehabilitation. We believe a high-quality customer experience with knowledgeable salespersons who can convey the value of our products and services greatly enhances our ability to attract and retain customers. Therefore, our strategy also includes building and expanding our own direct sales force and our third-party distribution network to effectively reach more customers and provide them with a world-class sales and post-sales support experience. In addition, we are developing related-service offerings to address adjacent market opportunities in both the public and private sectors. We believe continual investment in research and development (“R&D”), including smartphone applications and other monitoring services is critical to the development and sale of innovative technologies and integrated solutions today and in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies

From time to time, management reviews and evaluates certain accounting policies that are considered to be significant in determining our results of operations and financial position.

A description of the Company’s critical accounting policies that affect the preparation of the Company’s financial statements is set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 19, 2018. During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, there have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies other than the adoption of ASU 2014-09, as described in Note 8.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We assess the reasonableness of our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, estimated useful lives, intangible assets, warranty obligations, product liability, revenue, legal matters and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience as well as available current information on a regular basis. Management uses this information to form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Government Regulation

Our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and international laws and regulations.

-19-

In October 2018, through an internal review of our export compliance, it came to our attention that some of our products may not have been properly classified in the past, and that our export of certain products, software and technology may be subject to export licensing requirements of which we were not previously aware. As a result of these findings, we hired independent counsel to assist in, among other things, an investigation with respect to our past export practices and analyzing our classification of products, software and technology and implementation of corrective measures. In addition, on October 16, 2018, we voluntarily self-disclosed the information above to the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”), followed by additional details that we sent on April 1, 2019, and we have obtained licenses for the export of our products, software and technology to all of the Company’s international customers.

Also, on February 7, 2019, the Company received authorization from BIS for all of its international customers, contractors and subsidiaries requiring approval and for its Swedish and Mexican foreign national employees to continue using electronic monitoring devices and the associated software and technology. On April 22, 2019, the Company received a letter from BIS indicating that it decided to close this matter with the issuance of the Warning Letter in lieu of prosecution or fines given the facts and circumstances.

Other than the above disclosure related to our exports, we are not involved in any pending or, to our knowledge, threatened governmental proceedings, which would require curtailment of our operations because of such laws and regulations.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2018

Revenue

For the three months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized revenue from operations of $8,955,464 compared to $7,678,975 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $1,276,489 or approximately 17%. The increase in revenue was principally the result of an increase in product sales of $914,780 and growth driven by clients in Illinois, Bahamas, Puerto Rico and Michigan.

Other revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019 increased to $1,051,449 from $129,196 in the same period in 2018, an increase of $922,253. This increase is largely due to device sales of $914,780 to a distributor and a small increase in consumable item sales.

Cost of Revenue

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, cost of revenue totaled $4,162,174 compared to cost of revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2018 of $3,472,707, an increase of $689,467 or approximately 20%. The increase in cost of revenue was largely the result of higher product sales cost of $401,438, higher communication costs of $25,181, higher device amortization of $65,059 due to accelerated depreciation of certain devices and an increased number of devices, higher monitoring costs of $76,699 incurred to distribute additional devices to meet demand from growing clients, higher lost, stolen and damaged expense of $70,844, higher freight costs of $37,923, partially offset by lower device repair costs of $26,370.

Depreciation and amortization included in cost of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 totaled $500,704 and $432,952, respectively. These costs represent the depreciation of ReliAlert™ and other monitoring devices, as well as the amortization of monitoring software and certain royalty agreements. The increase of $67,752 represents accelerated depreciation of certain ReliAlertTM monitoring devices as well as an increase in the number of devices. We believe the equipment lives on which the depreciation is based are appropriate due to rapid changes in electronic monitoring technology and the corresponding potential for obsolescence. Management periodically assesses the useful life of the devices for appropriateness. Amortization of a patent related to GPS and satellite tracking is also included in cost of sales.

-20-

Gross Profit and Margin

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, gross profit totaled $4,793,290, representing an increase of $587,022 or approximately 14% compared to the same period last year, and resulting in a gross margin of approximately 53.5% compared to $4,206,268 or a gross margin of approximately 54.8% during the three months ended June 30, 2018.

General and Administrative Expense

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, general and administrative expense totaled $2,725,991 compared to $3,703,869 for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease of $977,878 or approximately 26% in general and administrative costs resulted largely from lower legal and professional fees of $412,369, decrease in stock based compensation of $161,325, lower wages and taxes of $116,040, lower business taxes of $148,229, lower fees and licenses of $113,697, lower Board of Director fees of $100,000 and lower outside service costs of $53,352, partially offset by higher bad debt expense of $171,105.

Selling and Marketing Expense

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, selling and marketing expense increased to $556,122 compared to $466,048 for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The increase in expense of $110,074, or approximately 25% is principally the result of higher wages and taxes of $68,008, higher travel and entertainment expense of $29,978 and higher outside services of $15,432.

Research and Development Expense

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, research and development expense totaled $350,532 compared to $254,060 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $96,472 or approximately 38%. The increaseresulted largely from reallocation of $46,713 of wages and $15,191 of rent expense, higher dues and subscriptions of $11,217 and higher travel and entertainment of $8,563. In addition, we are significantly enhancing our technology platform to improve the efficiency of our software, firmware, user interface and automation. As a result of these improvements, $297,448 was capitalized as developed technology during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $299,709 was capitalized in the three months ended June 30, 2018. A portion of this expense would have been recognized as research and development expense, absent the significant enhancements to the technology.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, depreciation and amortization expense totaled $521,013 compared to $520,639 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $374 or less than 1%.

Total Operating Expense

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, total operating expense decreased to $4,153,658 compared to $4,944,616 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, a decrease of $790,958 or approximately 16%.

Income / Loss from Operations

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, income from operations was $639,632 compared to a loss of $738,348 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $1,377,980. This improvement was due to an improvement in gross profit of $587,022, and a decrease in operating expense of $790,958.

Other Income and Expense

For the three months ended June 30, 2019, other income (expense) totaled $395,651 compared to $757,305 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, a decrease in net expense of $361,654 or approximately 48%. The improvement in other income (expense) is largely due to positive currency exchange rate movements of $368,558 compared to the third fiscal quarter of 2018.

-21-

Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders

The Company had net loss attributable to common shareholders of $69,347 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $1,856,460 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, a decrease in net loss of $1,787,113 or approximately 96%. This decrease in net loss is largely due to higher gross profit, lower operating expense and positive currency exchange rate movements.

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018

Revenue

For the nine months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized revenue from operations of $25,258,241, compared to $22,485,845 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $2,772,396 or approximately 12%. Of this revenue, $23,841,746 and $22,062,789, respectively, were from monitoring and other related services, an increase of $1,778,957 or approximately 8%. The increase in revenue was principally the result of an increase in monitoring operations driven by clients in Nevada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Michigan, Bahamas and Illinois, partially offset by lower international monitoring revenue.

Other revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019 increased to $1,416,495 from $423,056 in the same period in 2018, an increase of $993,439 largely due to device of $1,007,749 to two distributors, partially offset by a small decrease in consumable items.

Cost of Revenue

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, cost of revenue totaled $11,339,956 compared to cost of revenue during the nine months ended June 30, 2018 of $9,787,364, an increase of $1,552,592 or approximately 16%. The increase in cost of revenue was largely the result of higher product cost of goods sold of $401,438, higher communication costs of $318,838, higher device repair costs of $246,852 incurred to distribute additional devices to meet demand from growing clients, higher monitoring costs of $166,552, higher lost, stolen and damaged unit costs of $81,821, higher server costs of $75,486, higher freight costs of $69,501 and higher device depreciation of $134,823.

Depreciation and amortization included in cost of revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 totaled $1,512,583 and $1,377,760, respectively. This $134,823 or approximately 10% increase in costs represents accelerated depreciation of certain ReliAlertTM monitoring devices as well as an increase in the number of devices.Devices are depreciated over a one to three-year useful life. Royalty agreements are being amortized over a ten-year useful life. The Company believes these lives are appropriate due to changes in electronic monitoring technology and the corresponding potential for obsolescence. Management periodically assesses the useful life of the devices for appropriateness. Amortization of a patent related to GPS and satellite tracking is also included in cost of sales.

Gross Profit and Margin

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, gross profit totaled $13,918,285, resulting in a gross margin of approximately 55.1%, compared to $12,698,481, or a gross margin of approximately 56.5% during the nine months ended June 30, 2018. The increase in absolute gross profit of $1,219,804 or approximately 10% is due to an increase in revenue offset by increases in certain cost of revenue, including product sales costs, device repair, monitoring activity, communication costs and depreciation of devices.

General and Administrative Expense

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, general and administrative expense totaled $9,464,332 compared to $10,856,950 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease of $1,392,618 or approximately 13% in general and administrative costs resulted largely from a decrease in stock based compensation of $1,083,386, lower Board of Director fees of $264,722, lower wages and taxes of $286,156, lower outside services of $152,860, lower business taxes of $143,868 and lower travel and entertainment of $68,105, partially offset by higher legal and professional expense of $519,448, bad debt expense of $99,997 and higher insurance costs of $88,246.

-22-

Selling and Marketing Expense

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, selling and marketing expense totaled $1,637,026 compared to $1,394,778 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018. The $242,248, or approximately 17% increase resulted largely from higher wages and taxes of $125,012 and higher travel and entertainment of $96,275 visiting existing and new customers.

Research and Development Expense

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, research and development expense totaled $954,276 compared to research and development expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2018 totaling $600,814, an increase of $353,462 or approximately 59%. The increaseresulted largely from the reallocation of $277,279 of wages and higher travel and entertainment of $35,963. In addition, we are significantly enhancing our technology platform to improve the efficiency of our software, firmware, user interface, and automation. As a result of these improvements, $868,652 was capitalized as developed technology during the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and $802,560 was capitalized during the nine months ended June 30, 2018. A portion of this expense would have been recognized as research and development expense, absent the significant enhancements to the technology.

 Depreciation and Amortization Expense

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, depreciation and amortization expense totaled $1,556,378 compared to $1,624,916 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018. The $68,538, or approximately 4% decrease was largely the result of certain property and equipment assets becoming fully depreciated.

Total Operating Expense

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, total operating expense decreased to $13,612,012 compared to $14,477,458 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018, a decrease of $865,446 or approximately 6%. The decrease was largely due to lower general and administrative expense of $1,392,618 and lower depreciation and amortization of $68,538. These costs were partially offset by higher selling and marketing expense of $242,248 and higher research and development expense of $353,462.

Income / Loss from Operations

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, income from operations was $306,273 compared to a loss of $1,778,977 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018, an improvement of $2,085,250. This improvement was due to higher gross profit of $1,219,804 and a reduction in operating expense of $865,446.

Other Income and Expense

For the nine months ended June 30, 2019, other income (expense) totaled expense of $1,917,862 compared to expense of $2,495,752 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease in net other expense of $577,890 resulted primarily from lower interest expense of $291,035, associated with supplier financing and deferred financing fees, both in the prior fiscal year and positive currency exchange rate movements of $307,911.

Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders

The Company had a net loss from continuing operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 totaling $2,068,924 compared to a net loss of $4,635,536 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018, representing a decrease of $2,566,612 or approximately 55%. This decrease in net loss is largely due to higher gross profit, lower general and administrative costs, and lower depreciation and amortization, partially offset by higher research and development costs and higher selling and marketing expense.

-23-

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During and prior to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, we supplemented cash flows by financing the business from borrowings under a credit facility, a revolving line of credit from one of our shareholders, receipt of certain disgorgement funds, and from the sale and issuance of debt securities. As of June 30, 2019, excluding interest, approximately $3.4 million was owed to Sapinda Asia Limited under a loan agreement (the “Sapinda Loan Agreement”) that matures on September 30, 2020 and $30.4 million was owed to Conrent Invest S.A. (“Conrent”) under a loan (the “Conrent Loan Agreement”). No borrowings or sales of equity securities occurred during the nine months ended June 30, 2019 or during the year ended September 30, 2018.

On July 19, 2018, the Company and Conrent entered into an amendment to their Facility Agreement (the “Amended Facility Agreement”), which Amended Facility Agreement (i) extended the maturity date of the Facility to the earlier of either April 1, 2019 or the date upon which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company, and (ii) provided that in the event of a change of control of the Company, Conrent shall immediately cancel the Amended Credit Facility and declare the outstanding principal amount, together with unpaid interest, immediately due and payable. On February 24, 2019, the Company and Conrent entered into a second amendment to their Facility Agreement (the “SecondAmended Facility Agreement”), which Second Amended Facility Agreement (i) extends the maturity date of the Facility to the earlier of either April 1, 2020 or the date upon which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company, and (ii) provides that in the event of a change of control of the Company, Conrent shall immediately cancel the Second Amended Credit Facility and declare the outstanding principal amount, together with unpaid interest, immediately due and payable.

Management will continue to seek additional extensions of debt maturities, other sources of capital, refinancing options, and potentially other transactions to meet all of its future obligations. While management believes it will be successful in completing one of these alternatives prior to the maturity of the Second Amended Facility Agreement, no assurances can be given.

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, we had cash flows from operating activities of $4,063,346, compared to cash flows from operating activities of $5,311,431 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018, representing a decrease of approximately 23%. The cash from operations was the result of the net loss of $2,068,924, offset by aggregated non-cash expense of $4,149,029 in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. In addition, there was an increase in accrued liabilities of $1,849,972 and a decrease in inventory of $401,438, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $83,201, an increase in prepaid expense and other assets of $135,714 and an increase in accounts receivable. In the nine month period ended June 30, 2018 the Company had a net loss of $4,635,536, offset by aggregated non-cash expense of $5,715,586 in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income and received a refund of an international performance bond of approximately $2.9 million in prepaid expense and other assets.

Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities.

The Company used $2,465,112 of cash for investing activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2019, compared to $2,074,160 of cash used during the nine months ended June 30, 2018. Cash used for investing activities was used for significant enhancements of our software platform and purchases of monitoring and other equipment to meet customer demand during the nine months ended June 30, 2019. Purchases of property and equipment increased $156,723, compared to the prior period, largely due to increases in leasehold improvements and computer equipment.

Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities.

The Company used $65,237 of cash for financing activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2019, compared to $47,579 of cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2018.

-24-

Liquidity, Working Capital and Management’s Plan

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had unrestricted cash of $6,878,916 compared to unrestricted cash of $5,446,557 as of September 30, 2018. As of June 30, 2019, we had a working capital deficit of $31,032,669, compared to a working capital deficit of $30,316,328 as of September 30, 2018. This increase in working capital deficit of $716,341 is principally due to an increase in accrued interest and legal costs, cash used for additional capitalized software of $868,652, purchases of monitoring equipment of $1,296,621 and purchases of property and equipment of $299,839. These items were partially offset by cash provided by operations and cash received from the sale of inventory items.

The Company believes that our cash on hand in addition to cash derived from our operating activities will be sufficient to sustain operations through the next twelve months, although no assurance can be given. In the event that they are not sufficient, the Company will need to obtain additional funding from outside sources. No assurances can be given that we will be able to obtain additional funding on terms favorable to us, if at all.

On March 13, 2017, the Company successfully extended the Sapinda Loan Agreement from September 30, 2017 to September 30, 2020. On February 24, 2019, the Company successfully extended the Conrent Loan Agreement to the earlier of either April 1, 2020 or the date upon which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our historical operations or profitability.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Arrangements

The Company has not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby the Company has financial guarantees, derivative instruments, or other contingent arrangements that expose the Company to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligation that provides financing, liquidity, market risk, or credit risk support to the Company, except as described below.

	Payments due in fiscal year 2019	Payments due in fiscal years 2020-2021	Payments due in fiscal years 2022-2023	Total
Operating leases	$79,190	$425,097	$164,687	$668,974

As of June 30, 2019, the Company’s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $668,974. The Company’s facility leases typically have original terms not exceeding five years and generally contain multi-year renewal options.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company footprint extends to a number of countries outside the United States, and we intend to continue to examine international opportunities. As a result, our revenue and results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates, transfer pricing changes, taxes and other uncertainties inherent in doing business in more than one currency. In addition, our operations are exposed to risks that are associated with changes in social, political, and economic conditions in the foreign countries in which we operate, including changes in the laws and policies that govern foreign investment, as well as, to a lesser extent, changes in United States laws and regulations relating to foreign trade and investment.

-25-

Foreign Currency Risks

We had $10,220,079 and $8,080,688 in revenue from sources outside of the United States for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We made and received payments in a foreign currency during the periods indicated, which resulted in a foreign exchange expense of $134,795 and of $442,706 in the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Fluctuations in the exchange loss or gain in any given period are due to the strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Chilean Peso and Canadian dollar. Changes in currency exchange rates affect the relative prices at which we sell our products and purchase goods and services. Given the uncertainty of exchange rate fluctuations, we cannot estimate the effect of these fluctuations on our future business, product pricing, results of operations, or financial condition. We do not use foreign currency exchange contracts or derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes. To the extent foreign sales become a more significant part of our business in the future, we may seek to implement strategies which make use of these or other instruments in order to minimize the effects of foreign currency exchange on our business.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. 

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2019 was completed pursuant to Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms as of June 30, 2019.

Changes in Internal Controls

We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that our books and records accurately reflect our transactions and that our established policies and procedures are followed. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our quarter ended June 30, 2019 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

-26-

PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

The Company is, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business.

Lazar Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc.On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich, Dovie Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach of contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption Agreements. The plaintiffs alleged $1,587,604 in combined damages. On May 2, 2016, the Court resolved this case in favor of the Company by granting the Company’s motion for Summary Judgment. The plaintiffs filed an Appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging the Court’s ruling on the motion for Summary Judgment. The Appellate court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that factual issues remain, reversing the Summary Judgment and remanding the case back to the trial court. On February 21, 2019, the trial concluded and a jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor; awarding the plaintiffs $336,000 before interest. The Company filed a motion to reverse the verdict in its entirety, which was denied on July 30, 2019. The Court entered a judgment on August 1, 2019 in the amount of $553,115.84, inclusive of pre-judgment interest. The Company is currently considering its options on appealing both the original judgement and the interest methodology used by the court.

John Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois.On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, in District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, among other causes of action, related to Mr. Merrill’s termination of employment effective September 27, 2016. Mr. Merrill is seeking not less than $590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and costs. At a hearing on April 25, 2018, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims related to existence of an oral look-back agreement and a separation agreement. In an order entered July 25, 2019, the court granted the defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s damages’ expert report and barred plaintiff’s expert from testifying at trial, if any. Plaintiff has moved the court to reconsider its July 25, 2019 order. The Company intends to seek summary judgment on the remaining contested issues. We believe the allegations and claims are without merit.

SecureAlert, Inc. v. Federal Government of Mexico (Department of the Interior).On March 24, 2017, SecureAlert Inc. filed a complaint before the Federal Administrative Tribunal, asserting the failure by defendants to pay claimant amounts agreed to, and due under, the Pluri Annual Contract for the Rendering of Monitoring Services of Internees, through Electric Bracelets, in the Islas Marias Penitentiary Complex dated July 15, 2011, entered into by and between the Organo Administrativo Desconcentrado Prevencion y Readaptacion Social of the then Public Security Department, and presently, an agency of the National Security Commission of the Department of the Interior, and SecureAlert, Inc., presently Track Group, Inc. The Company’s claim amount is upwards of $6.0 million. The Supreme Court took action to resolve previous, conflicting decisions regarding the jurisdiction of such claims and determined that such claims will be resolved by the Federal Administrative Tribunal. Subsequently, plaintiff filed an Amparo action before the Collegiate Court, seeking an appeal of the Federal Administrative Court’s earlier decision against plaintiff. A decision on the Amparo action is anticipated in late 2019. Based upon the fee arrangement the Company has with its counsel, we anticipate the future liabilities attributable to legal expense will be minimal.

Eli Sabag v. Track Group, Inc., Sapinda Asia Limited and Lars Windhorst.On May 4, 2018, Eli Sabag filed a complaint before the Marion Superior Court in Marion County Indiana for damages and declaratory Judgment against the Company. The complaint seeks to enforce an “earn-out” clause in a Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between the Company and Sabag. In addition, Sabag sued the Company for breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference, alleging that the Company avoided selling sufficient GPS devices so as to not trigger the issuance of contingent stock under the “earn-out” clause in the SPA. Finally, Sabag alleges that the Company was unjustly enriched because it failed to pay full value for his shares under the SPA. The Company believes the allegations are unfounded and without merit, and it will defend the case vigorously. Furthermore, according to the SPA, any disputes are to be resolved through binding arbitration held in New York. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and Compel Arbitration on September 5, 2018. On March 29, 2019, the Marion Superior Court ruled in favor of the Company and dismissed all claims against the Company without prejudice. The plaintiff has not taken any further actions since March 29, 2019

-27-

Erick Cerda v. Track Group, Inc. On July 25, 2018, former employee Erick Cerda, the plaintiff, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 18-CV-05075, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecific amount.  To avoid the costs and uncertainties of prolonged litigation, the parties reached a settlement, which was finalized on June 4, 2019 and paid in June 2019. On July 22, 2019, the case was dismissed with prejudice as a result of the settlement.

Blaike Anderson v. Track Group, Inc., et. al.On June 24, 2019, Blaike Anderson filed a complaint seeking unspecified damages in the State Court of Marion County, Indiana, alleging liability on the part of defendants for providing a defective ankle monitoring device and failure to warn plaintiff regarding the condition thereof. Defendants dispute the allegations of the Complaint and intend to vigorously defend the case.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Our results of operations and financial condition are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, filed on December 19, 2018. You should carefully consider these risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained in this Quarterly Report. Should any of these risks materialize, our business, financial condition and future prospects could be negatively impacted. As of August 9, 2019, there have been no material changes to the disclosures made in the above-referenced Form 10-K.

Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.   Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.   Other Information

None.

Item 6.   Exhibits

(a) Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

Exhibit Number	Title of Document
31(i)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31(ii)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32	Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (filed herewith).
101.INS	XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
101.SCH	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
101.CAL	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
101.DEF	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
101.LAB	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
101.PRE	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

-28-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Track Group, Inc.
Date: August 9, 2019	By:	/s/ Derek Cassell
		Derek Cassell, Chief Executive Officer Principal Executive Officer
Date: August 9, 2019	By:	/s/ Peter K. Poli
		Peter K. Poli, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

-29-