Nevada
|
85-0206668
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
2490 East Sunset Road, Suite 100
|
89120
|
Las Vegas, Nevada
|
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company þ
|
Page
|
||
PART I
|
||
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and September 30, 2010
|
3
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
4
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
5
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
18
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
26
|
PART II
|
||
OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
27
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
28
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
29
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
30
|
Signatures
|
31
|
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 598,379 | $ | 3,227,374 | ||||
Certificates of deposit
|
- | 101,293 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
918,363 | 948,439 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
144,485 | 219,121 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
1,661,227 | 4,496,227 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, long term portion, net
|
237,366 | 330,234 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
212,434 | 397,382 | ||||||
Deposits and other assets
|
38,802 | 49,294 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net
|
1,246,100 | 1,938,952 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 3,395,929 | $ | 7,212,089 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 664,875 | $ | 354,440 | ||||
Accrued liabilities
|
635,282 | 880,188 | ||||||
Notes payable
|
1,000,000 | - | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligation
|
52,607 | 60,327 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
2,352,764 | 1,294,955 | ||||||
Long term portion of capital lease obligation
|
- | 38,283 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
2,352,764 | 1,333,238 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders' equity:
|
||||||||
Series E convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 127,840 issued and outstanding, liquidation preference $38,202
|
10,866 | 10,866 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 691,349 and 641,190 shares issued, 687,097 and 636,938 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and September 30, 2010, respectively
|
691 | 641 | ||||||
Treasury stock (4,252 shares carried at cost)
|
(70,923 | ) | (70,923 | ) | ||||
Paid in capital
|
20,795,863 | 20,441,690 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(19,693,332 | ) | (14,503,423 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity
|
1,043,165 | 5,878,851 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 3,395,929 | $ | 7,212,089 |
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
$ | 1,124,976 | $ | 992,260 | $ | 3,237,763 | $ | 3,201,600 | ||||||||
Cost of services
|
1,048,229 | 174,698 | 3,455,589 | 455,644 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
76,747 | 817,562 | (217,826 | ) | 2,745,956 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses
|
1,172,536 | 2,357,797 | 4,756,487 | 9,457,739 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing expenses
|
19,543 | 1,826 | 56,318 | 262,937 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
1,192,079 | 2,359,623 | 4,812,805 | 9,720,676 | ||||||||||||
Operating loss
|
(1,115,332 | ) | (1,542,061 | ) | (5,030,631 | ) | (6,974,720 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest income (expense), net
|
(24,151 | ) | 3,273 | (22,899 | ) | 13,791 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense)
|
(11,455 | ) | 1,667 | (11,455 | ) | 28,974 | ||||||||||
Total other income (expense)
|
(35,606 | ) | 4,940 | (34,354 | ) | 42,765 | ||||||||||
Loss before income taxes
|
(1,150,938 | ) | (1,537,121 | ) | (5,064,985 | ) | (6,931,955 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
- | - | - | (230,382 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations
|
(1,150,938 | ) | (1,537,121 | ) | (5,064,985 | ) | (6,701,573 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued component, including disposal costs
|
7,561 | 197,187 | (123,486 | ) | 1,062,466 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
7,561 | 197,187 | (123,486 | ) | 1,062,466 | |||||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (1,143,377 | ) | $ | (1,339,934 | ) | $ | (5,188,471 | ) | $ | (5,639,107 | ) | ||||
Earnings per share - basic and diluted1:
|
||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations
|
$ | (1.69 | ) | $ | (2.44 | ) | $ | (7.68 | ) | $ | (10.62 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations
|
0.01 | 0.31 | (0.19 | ) | 1.68 | |||||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (1.68 | ) | $ | (2.13 | ) | $ | (7.87 | ) | $ | (8.93 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
682,374 | 631,213 | 659,296 | 631,151 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
682,374 | 631,213 | 659,296 | 631,151 |
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (5,188,471 | ) | $ | (5,639,107 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
474,958 | 658,957 | ||||||
Non-cash stock compensation expense
|
36,338 | 22,739 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred stock compensation
|
17,885 | 139,082 | ||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts
|
376,395 | 698,138 | ||||||
Non-cash impairment of goodwill and intangibles
|
367,588 | - | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment and intangible assets
|
39,134 | 27,647 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(253,451 | ) | 231,386 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
74,636 | (21,922 | ) | |||||
Deposits and other assets
|
10,492 | 9,835 | ||||||
Accounts payable
|
310,435 | (176,738 | ) | |||||
Accrued liabilities
|
(246,344 | ) | (283,033 | ) | ||||
Income taxes receivable and payable
|
- | 1,490,835 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(3,980,405 | ) | (2,842,181 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
- | 4,999 | ||||||
Expenditures for intangible assets
|
- | (231,405 | ) | |||||
Redemption of (investment in) certificate of deposits
|
101,293 | (200,000 | ) | |||||
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(3,880 | ) | (54,921 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
97,413 | (481,327 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Series E preferred stock dividends
|
- | (1,437 | ) | |||||
Principal repayments on capital lease obligations
|
(46,003 | ) | (73,005 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock for cash
|
300,000 | - | ||||||
Proceeds from notes payable
|
1,000,000 | - | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
- | (25,882 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
1,253,997 | (100,324 | ) | |||||
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(2,628,995 | ) | (3,423,832 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
3,227,374 | 7,568,030 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
$ | 598,379 | $ | 4,144,198 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
|
||||||||
Noncash financing and investing activities:
|
||||||||
Accrued and unpaid dividends
|
$ | 1,438 | $ | 1,437 | ||||
Interest paid
|
$ | 25,845 | $ | 4,877 | ||||
Income tax paid (received)
|
$ | - | $ | (1,721,217 | ) |
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Receivables, current, net:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable, current
|
$ | 2,449,294 | $ | 2,750,393 | ||||
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(1,530,931 | ) | (1,801,954 | ) | ||||
$ | 918,363 | $ | 948,439 | |||||
Receivables, long term, net:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable, long term
|
$ | 506,986 | $ | 680,108 | ||||
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(269,620 | ) | (349,874 | ) | ||||
$ | 237,366 | $ | 330,234 | |||||
Total receivables, net:
|
||||||||
Gross receivables
|
$ | 2,956,280 | $ | 3,430,501 | ||||
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(1,800,551 | ) | (2,151,828 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,155,729 | $ | 1,278,673 |
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Allowance for dilution and fees on amounts due from billing aggregators
|
$ | 1,662,409 | $ | 2,104,826 | ||||
Allowance for customer refunds
|
138,142 | 47,002 | ||||||
$ | 1,800,551 | $ | 2,151,828 |
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Property and equipment, net:
|
||||||||
Leasehold improvements
|
$ | 201,476 | $ | 239,271 | ||||
Furnishings and fixtures
|
233,577 | 319,004 | ||||||
Office, computer equipment and other
|
441,130 | 704,388 | ||||||
876,183 | 1,262,663 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
(663,749 | ) | (865,281 | ) | ||||
$ | 212,434 | $ | 397,382 |
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Intangible assets, net:
|
||||||||
Domain name and marketing related intangibles
|
$ | 1,509,600 | $ | 1,509,600 | ||||
Website and technology related intangibles
|
363,367 | 1,914,991 | ||||||
1,872,967 | 3,424,591 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(626,867 | ) | (1,485,639 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,246,100 | $ | 1,938,952 |
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Accrued liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deferred revenue
|
$ | 26,120 | $ | 87,574 | ||||
Accrued payroll and bonuses
|
62,820 | 124,544 | ||||||
Accruals under revenue sharing agreements
|
149,392 | 133,119 | ||||||
Accrued expenses - other
|
396,950 | 534,951 | ||||||
$ | 635,282 | $ | 880,188 |
|
·
|
The Borrowers may not prepay the unpaid principal amount of the Loan, in full or in part, without Lender’s consent, during the first six months of the term.
|
|
·
|
Lender’s designated representative will have the right to observe meetings of any Borrower’s board of directors solely in a non-voting, non-contributing capacity (provided that such representative may be excluded from sensitive or confidential portions of such meetings).
|
|
·
|
The Borrowers are prohibited from creating, incurring or assuming additional indebtedness except for (among other things) (i) obligations to Lender, (ii) trade debt incurred in the ordinary course of business or (iii) purchase money financing and/or equipment leases for new equipment that do not exceed $25,000 in the aggregate during any single fiscal year.
|
|
·
|
The Borrowers are prohibited from (i) entering into any merger, consolidation, reorganization or recapitalization with another person or entity, or (ii) acquiring all of the assets, or a material portion of the assets or stock, of any other person or entity.
|
|
·
|
The Borrowers are prohibited from making or declaring any dividend or distribution in respect of their capital stock or other equity interests.
|
|
·
|
Employee contract termination charges of $7,083 reflecting the reduction in force of 7 employees;
|
|
·
|
Non cash impairment charges of $367,588 consisting of the write-off of net intangible assets;
|
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||
Number of
|
Exercise
|
Remaining
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
Contractual Life
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
5,263 | |||||||||||||||
Granted at market price
|
24,013 | |||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(5,263 | ) | $ | 13.78 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
|
24,013 | $ | 3.64 | 9.8 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Exercisable
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - |
Outstanding (unvested) at September 30, 2010
|
4,903 | |||
Granted
|
- | |||
Forfeited
|
(8 | ) | ||
Vested
|
(3,553 | ) | ||
Outstanding (unvested) at June 30, 2011
|
1,342 |
|
·
|
$50,000 was wired to the Company on December 3, 2010 in exchange for the Company’s issuance of 8,000 shares of Common Stock (determined by using the $6.25 per share purchase price applicable to the first Tranche).
|
|
·
|
$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on December 22, 2010 in exchange for the issuance of 7,014 shares (determined by using the $7.13 per share purchase price applicable to the second Tranche).
|
|
·
|
$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on January 22, 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 6,704 shares (determined by using the $7.46 per share purchase price applicable to the third Tranche).
|
|
·
|
$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on February 25, 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 7,239 shares (determined by using the $6.91 per share purchase price applicable to the fourth Tranche).
|
|
·
|
$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on March 28, 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 8,578 shares (determined by using the $5.83 per share purchase price applicable).
|
|
·
|
$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on April 26, 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 10,124 shares (determined by using the $4.94 per share purchase price applicable).
|
|
·
|
An additional $50,000 was due to be wired to the Company’s designated account on or before May 25, 2011, but such amount was never paid by the applicable March Purchasers. On or about July 7, 2011, the Company provided written notice to the applicable March Purchasers that it considered them to be in material breach of their agreements with the Company. Under the applicable March Agreements, the Company is entitled to, among other potential remedies, repurchase any and all shares previously issued to the March Purchasers and their affiliates for an amount equal to the applicable purchase price paid for such shares less US$0.50 per share. The March Purchasers have not responded to the Company’s notice of breach. The Company has taken action to preserve its rights under the March Agreements while it considers the potential remedies that could be pursued.
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations
|
$ | (1,150,938 | ) | $ | (1,537,121 | ) | $ | (5,064,985 | ) | $ | (6,701,573 | ) | ||||
Less: preferred stock dividends
|
(480 | ) | (479 | ) | (1,438 | ) | (1,437 | ) | ||||||||
Loss from continuing operations applicable to common stock
|
(1,151,418 | ) | (1,537,600 | ) | (5,066,423 | ) | (6,703,010 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
7,561 | 197,187 | (123,486 | ) | 1,062,466 | |||||||||||
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
$ | (1,143,857 | ) | $ | (1,340,413 | ) | $ | (5,189,909 | ) | $ | (5,640,544 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted
|
682,374 | 631,213 | 659,296 | 631,151 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share - basic and diluted1:
|
||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations
|
$ | (1.69 | ) | $ | (2.44 | ) | $ | (7.68 | ) | $ | (10.62 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations
|
0.01 | 0.31 | (0.19 | ) | 1.68 | |||||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (1.68 | ) | $ | (2.13 | ) | $ | (7.87 | ) | $ | (8.94 | ) |
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Options to purchase shares of common stock
|
24,013 | 5,263 | 26,645 | 31,675 | ||||||||||||
Series E convertible preferred stock
|
127,840 | 127,840 | 127,840 | 127,840 | ||||||||||||
Shares of non-vested restricted stock
|
1,342 | 5,203 | 1,342 | 7,422 | ||||||||||||
153,195 | 138,306 | 155,827 | 166,937 |
Payments Due by Fiscal Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Thereafter
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease commitments
|
$ | 522,104 | $ | 83,333 | $ | 348,871 | $ | 89,900 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||
Non-canceleable service contracts
|
291,583 | 153,583 | 138,000 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 813,687 | $ | 236,916 | $ | 486,871 | $ | 89,900 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
2011
|
$ | 16,035 | ||
2012
|
37,417 | |||
2013
|
- | |||
2014
|
- | |||
2015
|
- | |||
Thereafter
|
- | |||
Total minimum lease payments
|
53,452 | |||
Less imputed interest
|
(845 | ) | ||
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
52,607 | |||
Less: current maturities of capital lease obligations
|
52,607 | |||
Noncurrent maturities of capital lease obligations
|
$ | - |
|
·
|
Employee contract termination charges of $7,083 reflecting the reduction in force of 7 employees;
|
|
·
|
Non cash impairment charges $367,588 consisting of the write-off of net intangible assets;
|
Net Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 1,124,976 | $ | 992,260 | $ | 132,716 | 13 | % | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 3,237,763 | $ | 3,201,600 | $ | 36,163 | 1 | % |
Cost of Services
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 1,048,229 | $ | 174,698 | $ | 873,531 | 500 | % | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 3,455,589 | $ | 455,644 | $ | 2,999,945 | 658 | % |
Gross Profit
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 76,747 | $ | 817,562 | $ | (740,815 | ) | (91 | )% | |||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | (217,826 | ) | $ | 2,745,956 | $ | (2,963,782 | ) | (108 | )% |
General and Administrative Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 1,172,536 | $ | 2,357,797 | $ | (1,185,261 | ) | (50 | )% | |||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 4,756,487 | $ | 9,457,739 | $ | (4,701,252 | ) | (50 | )% |
|
·
|
Decreased compensation costs of approximately $544,000 reflecting the impacts of our restructuring actions and reduction in force during 2009, 2010 and 2011 from 111 employees at September 30, 2009 to 13 employees as of June 30, 2011;
|
|
·
|
Other expense decreases of $206,000, including, but not limited to, rent and utilities, services and fees, office and supplies expenses, office closure expenses, travel and entertainment and other corporate expenses associated with our office closures, reductions in force and other cost containment initiatives;
|
|
·
|
Decreased professional fees of approximately $299,000 related to reduced IT consulting of $131,000, legal fees of $13,000, investment banker fees of $10,000, accounting fees of $7,000, marketing consultants of $25,000, outside sales service costs of $51,000 and other miscellaneous consultants costs of $62,000;
|
|
·
|
Decreased depreciation and amortization expense of $136,000;
|
|
·
|
Decreased compensation costs of approximately $2,665,000 reflecting the impacts of our restructuring actions and reduction in force during 2009, 2010 and 2011 from 111 employees at September 30, 2009 to 13 employees as of June 30, 2011;
|
|
·
|
Other expense decreases of $734,000, including, but not limited to, rent and utilities, services and fees, office and supplies expenses, office closure expenses, travel and entertainment and other corporate expenses associated with our office closures, reductions in force and other cost containment initiatives;
|
|
·
|
A reduction of $300,000 in damages paid in a legal settlement incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2010;
|
|
·
|
Decreased professional fees of approximately $818,000 related to legal costs of $305,000 due to the resolution and wind-down of certain litigation activities, IT consultants of $217,000, investment banker fees of $156,000, accounting fees of $84,000, marketing consultants of $62,000 and other miscellaneous consultants costs of $52,000 partially offset by outside sales service costs of $58,000;
|
|
·
|
Decreased depreciation and amortization expense of $184,000;
|
Q3 2011 | Q2 2011 | Q1 2011 | Q4 2010 | Q3 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Compensation for employees, officers and directors
|
$ | 422,901 | $ | 536,269 | $ | 936,426 | $ | 1,048,094 | $ | 967,323 | ||||||||||
Professional fees
|
378,960 | 539,950 | 453,062 | 551,394 | 677,507 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
79,227 | 190,254 | 205,477 | 214,617 | 215,102 | |||||||||||||||
Other general and administrative costs
|
291,448 | 344,909 | 377,604 | 462,278 | 497,863 |
Sales and Marketing Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 19,543 | $ | 1,826 | $ | 17,717 | 970 | % | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 56,318 | $ | 262,937 | $ | (206,619 | ) | (79 | )% |
Operating Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | (1,115,332 | ) | $ | (1,542,061 | ) | $ | 426,729 | (28 | )% | ||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | (5,030,631 | ) | $ | (6,974,720 | ) | $ | 1,944,089 | (28 | )% |
Total Other Income (Expense)
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | (35,606 | ) | $ | 4,940 | $ | (40,546 | ) | (821 | )% | ||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | (34,354 | ) | $ | 42,765 | $ | (77,119 | ) | (180 | )% |
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | n/a | |||||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | - | $ | (230,382 | ) | $ | 230,382 | (100 | )% |
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | 7,561 | $ | 197,187 | $ | (189,626 | ) | (96 | )% | |||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | (123,486 | ) | $ | 1,062,466 | $ | (1,185,952 | ) | (112 | )% |
Net Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | (1,143,377 | ) | $ | (1,339,934 | ) | $ | 196,557 | (15 | )% | ||||||
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
$ | (5,188,471 | ) | $ | (5,639,107 | ) | $ | 450,636 | (8 | )% |
Payments Due by Fiscal Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Thereafter
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease commitments
|
$ | 522,104 | $ | 83,333 | $ | 348,871 | $ | 89,900 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||
Capital lease commitments
|
53,452 | 16,035 | 37,417 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Noncanceleable service contracts
|
291,583 | 153,583 | 138,000 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 867,139 | $ | 252,951 | $ | 524,288 | $ | 89,900 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
|
·
|
the pace of expansion of our operations;
|
|
·
|
our need to respond to competitive pressures; and
|
|
·
|
future acquisitions of complementary products, technologies or businesses.
|
|
·
|
maintain a closing bid price of $1.00 per share for our common stock;
|
|
·
|
have at least 500,000 “publicly held” shares of our common stock (i.e., shares that are not held by the Company’s directors, officers or 10% or greater stockholders);
|
|
·
|
maintain stockholders’ equity (as reported on our consolidated balance sheet) of at least $2,500,000; and
|
|
·
|
maintain a market value of our “publicly held” shares of at least $1,000,000.
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
10.1
|
Loan Agreement, dated May 13, 2011, between LiveDeal, Inc., Local Marketing Experts, Inc., Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc., 247 Marketing, LLC, Telco Billing, Inc., Telco of Canada, Inc., LiveDeal, Inc. (California), and Everest Group LLC
|
|
10.2
|
General Security Agreement, dated May 13, 2011, between LiveDeal, Inc., Local Marketing Experts, Inc., Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc., 247 Marketing, LLC, Telco Billing, Inc., Telco of Canada, Inc., LiveDeal, Inc. (California), and Everest Group LLC
|
|
10.3
|
Employment agreement, dated May 20, 2011, betweenLiveDeal, Inc. and Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
|
31
|
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
LiveDeal, Inc.
|
||
Dated: August 15, 2011
|
/s/ Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
|
Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
||
Chief Financial Officer
|
EVEREST GROUP LLC
|
LIVEDEAL, INC., a Nevada corporation formerly
|
|||
known as YP Corp.
|
||||
By:
|
/s/ Vinod Gupta
|
|||
Name: Vinod Gupta
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
||
Title: Manager
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
|||
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||||
LOCAL MARKETING EXPERTS, INC.
|
VELOCITY MARKETING CONCEPTS, INC.
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
|||
Title: President
|
Title: President
|
|||
247 MARKETING, LLC
|
TELCO BILLING, INC
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
|||
Title: President
|
Title: President
|
|||
TELCO OF CANADA, INC.
|
LIVEDEAL, INC., a California corporation
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
|||
Title: President
|
Title: President
|
EVEREST GROUP LLC
|
LIVEDEAL, INC., a Nevada corporation formerly
|
|||
known as YP Corp.
|
||||
By:
|
/s/ Vinod Gupta
|
|||
Name: Vinold Gupta
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
||
Title: Manager
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
|||
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||||
LOCAL MARKETING EXPERTS, INC.
|
VELOCITY MARKETING CONCEPTS, INC.
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
|||
Title: President
|
Title: President
|
|||
247 MARKETING, LLC
|
TELCO BILLING, INC
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
|||
Title: President
|
Title: President
|
|||
TELCO OF CANADA, INC.
|
LIVEDEAL, INC., a California corporation
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
Name: Kevin A. Hall
|
|||
Title: President
|
|
Title: President
|
LIVEDEAL, INC., a Nevada corporation
|
EXECUTIVE
|
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
/s/ Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
|
By: Kevin A. Hall
|
Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
|
Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Dated: May 20, 2011
|
|
Dated: May 20, 2011
|
Date: August 15, 2011
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
|
Kevin A. Hall
|
||
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
Date: August 15, 2011
|
/s/ Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
|
Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
||
Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
Date: August 15, 2011
|
/s/ Kevin A. Hall
|
Kevin A. Hall
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
Date: August 15, 2011
|
/s/ Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
Lawrence W. Tomsic
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)
|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Sep. 30, 2010
|
---|---|---|
Series E convertible preferred stock, par value | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Series E convertible preferred stock, shares authorized | 200,000 | 200,000 |
Series E convertible preferred stock, issued | 127,840 | 127,840 |
Series E convertible preferred stock, outstanding | 127,840 | 127,840 |
Series E convertible preferred stock, liquidation preference | $ 38,202 | $ 38,202 |
Common stock, par value | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Common stock, shares authorized | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 |
Common stock, shares issued | 691,349 | 641,190 |
Common stock, shares outstanding | 687,097 | 636,938 |
Treasury stock, shares | 4,252 | 4,252 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Net revenues | $ 1,124,976 | $ 992,260 | $ 3,237,763 | $ 3,201,600 | ||||||
Cost of services | 1,048,229 | 174,698 | 3,455,589 | 455,644 | ||||||
Gross profit | 76,747 | 817,562 | (217,826) | 2,745,956 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | Â | Â | Â | Â | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 1,172,536 | 2,357,797 | 4,756,487 | 9,457,739 | ||||||
Sales and marketing expenses | 19,543 | 1,826 | 56,318 | 262,937 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,192,079 | 2,359,623 | 4,812,805 | 9,720,676 | ||||||
Operating loss | (1,115,332) | (1,542,061) | (5,030,631) | (6,974,720) | ||||||
Other income (expense): | Â | Â | Â | Â | ||||||
Interest income (expense), net | (24,151) | 3,273 | (22,899) | 13,791 | ||||||
Other income (expense) | (11,455) | 1,667 | (11,455) | 28,974 | ||||||
Total other income (expense) | (35,606) | 4,940 | (34,354) | 42,765 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes | (1,150,938) | (1,537,121) | (5,064,985) | (6,931,955) | ||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | Â | Â | Â | (230,382) | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations | (1,150,938) | (1,537,121) | (5,064,985) | (6,701,573) | ||||||
Discontinued operations | Â | Â | Â | Â | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued component, including disposal costs | 7,561 | 197,187 | (123,486) | 1,062,466 | ||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | 7,561 | 197,187 | (123,486) | 1,062,466 | ||||||
Net loss | $ (1,143,377) | $ (1,339,934) | $ (5,188,471) | $ (5,639,107) | ||||||
Earnings per share - basic and diluted: | Â | Â | Â | Â | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations | $ (1.69) | [1] | $ (2.44) | [1] | $ (7.68) | [1] | $ (10.62) | [1] | ||
Discontinued operations | $ 0.01 | [1] | $ 0.31 | [1] | $ (0.19) | [1] | $ 1.68 | [1] | ||
Net loss | $ (1.68) | [1] | $ (2.13) | [1] | $ (7.87) | [1] | $ (8.93) | [1] | ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | Â | Â | Â | Â | ||||||
Basic | 682,374 | 631,213 | 659,296 | 631,151 | ||||||
Diluted | 682,374 | 631,213 | 659,296 | 631,151 | ||||||
|
Document and Entity Information
|
9 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Aug. 01, 2011
|
|
Document Information [Line Items] | Â | Â |
Document Type | 10-Q | Â |
Amendment Flag | false | Â |
Document Period End Date | Jun. 30, 2011 | |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2011 | Â |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 | Â |
Trading Symbol | LIVE | Â |
Entity Registrant Name | LIVEDEAL INC | Â |
Entity Central Index Key | 0001045742 | Â |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --09-30 | Â |
Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | Â |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | Â | 691,349 |
"+ text.join( "
\n" ) +"
" + text[p] + "
\n"; } } }else{ formatted = '' + raw + '
'; } html = ''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+' formatted: '+ ( this.Default == 'raw' ? 'as Filed' : 'with Text Wrapped' ) +''+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
Equity
|
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity |
Note 7: Equity
November 2010 Equity Issuance Agreement
On
November 29, 2010, the Company and Joint Corporation FeelTech
Investment Unit 1 (the “Purchaser”) entered into a
Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the
purchase of $200,000 worth of the Company’s common
stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”),
over a three month period.
Under
the terms of the Agreement, the Company agreed to sell, and the
Purchaser is obligated to purchase, unregistered shares of Common
Stock in multiple investment tranches (each, a
“Tranche”) for an aggregate purchase price of
$200,000. The per share price in each Tranche is to be
determined by adding (i) $0.50 and (ii) the average closing price
for the Common Stock as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market for
the 90-day period immediately preceding (but not including) the
closing date of the applicable Tranche. The Agreement
provides that the Tranches will be satisfied by the Purchaser as
follows:
As
of June 30, 2011, the Company received the payments totaling
$200,000 and issued an aggregate of 28,957 shares to the
Purchaser.
The
Company issued and sold the shares of Common Stock to the Purchaser
in reliance on the exemption provided under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Regulation D promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)
thereunder.
March 2011 Equity Issuance Agreement
On
March 22, 2011, the Company and six new investors (the “March
Purchasers”) entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the
“March Agreement”), pursuant to which the March
Purchasers committed to purchase an aggregate of $150,000 worth of
the Company’s Common Stock, over a three month
period.
Under
the terms of the March Agreement, the Company agreed to sell, and
each March Purchaser is obligated to purchase by a specified date,
Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$25,000. The per share price is to be determined by
adding (i) US$0.50 and (ii) the average closing price for the
Common Stock as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market for the
90-day period immediately preceding (but not including) the closing
date of the applicable purchase.
|
Segment Reporting
|
9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Segment Reporting |
Note 12: Segment Reporting
The
Company has historically had two reportable operating
segments: Directory Services and Direct Sales - Customer
Acquisition Services. During the nine months ended June
30, 2011, the Company discontinued its direct sales operations as
described in Note 5. Accordingly, the Company’s
continuing operations consists of only one business
segment.
All
of the Company’s revenues are derived from sales to external
customers, from operations in the United States, and no single
customer accounts for more than 10% of the Company’s
revenues.
|
Notes Payable
|
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes Payable |
Note 3: Notes Payable
On
May 13, 2011, the Company, certain of the Company’s wholly
owned subsidiaries (collectively with the Company, the
“Borrowers”), and Everest Group LLC
(“Lender”) entered into a Loan Agreement (the
“Loan Agreement”), pursuant to which Lender agreed to
loan the Borrowers an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,000,000
(the “Loan”). The Loan was funded to the
Borrowers on May 16, 2011. The Borrowers will use the
proceeds of the Loan for working capital and other general
corporate purposes.
The
Loan Agreement provides for a one-year term, unless terminated
earlier pursuant to its terms or extended upon the mutual agreement
of all parties. Subject to applicable law, the Borrowers
will pay an annual interest rate equal to 18% on the unpaid
principal balance of the Loan. Interest will be payable
monthly in arrears on the first day of each calendar month (unless
such day is not a business day, in which case interest will be
payable on the next succeeding business day) commencing June 1,
2011. Commencing on November 1, 2011, and on the first
day of each subsequent calendar month, the Borrowers will be
required to make $50,000 monthly installment payments of principal
on the Loan, with the unpaid principal balance to be due and
payable on the termination date of the Loan.
Pursuant
to a General Security Agreement (the “Security
Agreement”) also entered into on May 13, 2011, and as a
condition to closing the Loan and the other transactions
contemplated by the Loan Agreement, the Borrowers granted to Lender
a security interest in certain of their assets, including (without
limitation) their accounts receivable, books, tort claims, deposit
accounts, equipment, general intangibles, inventory, investment
property, negotiable collateral, property and the proceeds
thereof. Certain Borrowers, including the Company, also
entered into agreements with Lender and their banking institutions
to grant Lender certain rights and remedies with respect to their
deposit accounts.
The
Loan Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants
of the parties that are customary for transactions similar to the
Loan. These include:
The
Loan Agreement defines certain events of default, including (among
other things) (i) the Borrowers’ failure to make any payment
required under the Loan Agreement when due (subject to a
five-business-day cure period), (ii) the Borrowers’ failure
to comply with their covenants and agreements under the Loan
Agreement and other Loan documents and (iii) the occurrence of a
change of control with respect to the Company. Upon an
event of default, Lender would be entitled to immediately
accelerate all amounts due and payable in respect of the Loan and a
cash default fee of $20,000.
In
connection with closing the Loan, the Borrowers paid Lender a
$20,000 cash origination fee and also reimbursed Lender for $20,000
in closing costs, including attorneys’ fees and other
out-of-pocket expenses related to the negotiation of the Loan
Agreement. Both the cash origination fee and the closing
costs were expensed in the third fiscal quarter.
|
Income Taxes
|
9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Income Taxes |
Note 9: Income Taxes
At
June 30, 2011, the Company maintains a valuation allowance against
its deferred tax assets. The Company determined that
such a valuation allowance was necessary given the current and
expected near term losses and the uncertainty with respect to the
Company’s ability to generate sufficient profits from its new
business model.
During
the nine months ended June 30, 2011, the Company did not incur any
income tax benefit associated with its net loss due to the
establishment of a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets
generated during the period.
|
Subsequent Events
|
9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Subsequent Events |
Note 14: Subsequent Events
Term Sheet for $1,500,000 Equity Investment
On
July 5, 2011, the Company received an executed term sheet
from a prospective investor based in Japan
(“Investor”), setting forth certain terms and
conditions of a proposed $1,500,000 investment in the Company. The
term sheet, which is legally non-binding, provides
that Investor and certain co-investors would purchase an
aggregate of 600,000 newly issued shares of the Company’s
common stock at a purchase price of $2.50 per share. Investor
and its co-investors would also be entitled to appoint up to five
members of the Company’s board of directors, who could be
current directors or new appointees, subject to applicable rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and The
Nasdaq Stock Market.
The
proposed investment transaction is subject to certain conditions,
including the completion of Investor's due diligence review of
the Company, the parties’ execution and delivery of a
definitive stock purchase agreement, and the approval of the
Company’s stockholders. Unless and until a definitive stock
purchase agreement is executed and stockholder approval is
obtained, Investor will not be obligated to consummate the
proposed investment.
20:19 Forward Stock Split
On July 19, 2011, the board of directors of LiveDeal, Inc. (the
“Company”) authorized and approved a 20:19 forward
stock split with respect to the Company’s issued
and outstanding common stock. The forward stock split will be
implemented in the form of a stock dividend, with one (1) share of
the Company’s common
stock to be issued in respect of every 19 shares of common stock
issued and outstanding as of July 29, 2011, the record date for the
forward stock split.
Any fractional shares otherwise issuable as a result of the forward
stock split will be rounded up to the nearest whole share. The
Company completed the
forward stock split which took effect on the NASDAQ Capital Market
on August 10, 2011.
Updates on Pending Litigation and Nasdaq Compliance
Issues
Reference
is made to the disclosures set forth under “Litigation”
and “Nasdaq Compliance Issues” in Note 10 (Commitments
and Contingencies) above.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
Note 10: Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases and Service Contracts
As
of June 30, 2011, future minimum annual payments under operating
lease agreements and non-cancelable service contracts for fiscal
years ending September 30 are as follows:
This
table excludes minimum payment obligations under capital leases,
which are set forth below.
Capital leases
As
of June 30, 2011, future obligations under non-cancelable capital
leases are as follows for the fiscal years ended September
30:
Litigation
Except
as described below, as of June 30, 2011, the Company was not a
party to any pending material legal proceedings other than claims
that arise in the normal conduct of its business. While
management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these
proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations,
litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If an
unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a
material adverse impact on the Company’s net income (loss) in
the period in which a ruling occurs. The Company’s
estimate of the potential impact of the following legal proceedings
on its financial position and its results of operations could
change in the future.
The
Company has not recorded any accruals pertaining to its legal
proceedings, as they do not meet the criteria for accrual under
FASB ASC 450.
Joe Cunningham v. LiveDeal, Inc. et al.
On
July 16, 2008, Joseph Cunningham, who was at the time a member of
LiveDeal’s Board of Directors, filed a complaint with the
U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (“OSHA”) alleging that the Company and
certain members of its Board of Directors had engaged in
discriminatory employment practices in violation of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002’s statutory protections for
corporate whistleblowers when the Board of Directors removed him as
Chairman on May 22, 2008. In his complaint, Mr.
Cunningham asked OSHA to order his appointment as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company or, in the alternative, to order his
reinstatement as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Cunningham
also sought back pay, special damages and litigation
costs.
On
July 16, 2010, Mr. Cunningham attempted to amend his OSHA complaint
to include an additional adverse action allegation. On
September 20, 2010, OSHA issued a letter informing Mr.
Cunningham that, as a former board member and alleged prospective
interim CEO, he is not considered an “employee”
under the relevant statute, which is a required element for his
claims. Accordingly, OSHA dismissed Mr. Cunningham’s
complaint.
On
October 20, 2010, Mr. Cunningham filed objections to OSHA’s
findings. On April 1, 2011, an administrative law judge for
the U.S. Department of Labor issued an Order of Dismissal
confirming OSHA’s findings. Mr. Cunningham has
elected not to appeal the Order of Dismissal, concluding the
substantive proceedings. On April 15, 2011, the Company
filed a petition for review for the limited purpose of seeking an
award of attorneys’ fees.
On
June 13, 2011, Mr. Cunningham entered into a Settlement Agreement
and Mutual Release with the Company and the members of the
Company’s board of directors who had been named as defendants
in the lawsuit. The parties to the Settlement Agreement
and Mutual Release agreed to, among other things, bear their own
attorneys’ fees and costs and release, discharge
and covenant not to sue one another, and/or any of their current,
past or future subsidiaries, parents, affiliates, owners, officers,
directors, employees, agents or representatives on any and all
claims, actions . . . contracts, [and] agreements . . . whether
known or unknown . . . as of [June 13, 2011], arising out of or
relating to the Litigation and/or Cunningham's position as a member
of the LiveDeal Board of Directors." As a result of the
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, this matter has been
resolved and the Company has filed a notice to dismiss its limited
petition for review.
Global Education Services, Inc. v. LiveDeal, Inc.
On June 6, 2008, Plaintiff Global Education Services, Inc.
(“GES“) filed a consumer fraud class action lawsuit
against the Company in King County (Washington) Superior Court. GES
has alleged in its complaint that the Company’s use of
activator checks violated the Washington Consumer Protection Act.
GES sought injunctive relief against the Company’s use of the
checks, as well as judgment in an amount equal to three times the
alleged damages sustained by GES and the members of the class.
LiveDeal has denied the allegations. Early in 2010, the Court
denied both parties’ dispositive motions after oral argument.
Active litigation is temporarily suspended, but Plaintiff sought to
restart the litigation through arbitration.
On August 1, 2011, the parties participated in an arbitration
hearing regarding the status of a settlement agreement previously
considered in their attempts to resolve the matter. GES argued that
the settlement agreement should be reformed to provide for a higher
settlement amount (or, in the alternative, rescinded), and the
Company argued that the agreement should be enforced as written
(or, in the alternative, rescinded). The arbitrator rescinded
the settlement agreement and awarded fees and costs to the
plaintiffs. It is estimated that the request for fees
and costs will be about $40,000.
Nasdaq Compliance Issues
On
February 2, 2011, the Company received a letter from Nasdaq’s
Listing Qualifications Department informing the Company of its
failure to comply with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(4), which
requires that the Company have at least 500,000 publicly held
shares for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital
Market. In accordance with Listing Rule 5810(c)(2)(C),
the Company was given a 45-day period (until March 19, 2011) to
provide the Nasdaq staff with a specific plan to achieve and
sustain compliance with all of the Nasdaq Capital Market listing
requirements, including a time frame for the completion of the
plan. In accordance with the requirements set forth in
Nasdaq’s letter, the Company submitted its compliance plan on
March 18, 2011. The plan included several alternative
strategies for regaining compliance with Listing Rule 5550(a)(4),
including the issuance of additional shares of common stock in one
or more private placement transactions, assuming a suitable
investor could be identified.
On
April 14, 2011, Nasdaq notified the Company that its compliance
plan had been accepted, and that the Company had been granted an
extension to regain compliance with Listing Rule
5550(a)(4). Pursuant to the terms of the extension, on
or before August 1, 2011, the Company was required to file with the
SEC and Nasdaq a public document containing its current total
shares outstanding and a beneficial ownership table prepared in
accordance with SEC rules.
On
May 18, 2011, the Company received a letter from Nasdaq’s
Listing Qualifications Department informing the Company of its
failure to comply with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), which
requires the Company to maintain a minimum of $2,500,000 in
stockholders’ equity for continued listing on the Nasdaq
Capital Market. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had
stockholders’ equity of $2,124,183, as reported in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 16,
2011.
In
accordance with Listing Rule 5810(c)(2)(C), the Company was
given a 45-day period (until July 5, 2011) to provide the Nasdaq
staff with a specific plan to achieve and sustain compliance with
all of the Nasdaq Capital Market listing requirements, including a
time frame for the completion of the plan. On July 5, 2011,
the Company submitted its compliance plan and supporting
documentation.
On
July 19, 2011, the Company’s board of directors authorized
and approved a 20:19 forward stock split with respect to the
Company’s issued and outstanding common stock to enable the
Company to regain compliance with Listing Rule
5550(a)(4). The forward stock split was implemented in
the form of a stock dividend, with one (1) share of the
Company’s common stock issued in respect of every 19 shares
of common stock issued and outstanding as of July 29, 2011, the
record date for the forward stock split. Any fractional
shares otherwise issuable as a result of the forward stock split
were rounded up to the nearest whole share. The forward
stock split was completed on August 10, 2011.
On
August 2, 2011, the Company received a letter from Nasdaq’s
Listing Qualifications Department informing the Company of its
failure to comply with the terms of an extension previously granted
by the Nasdaq staff for the Company to regain compliance with
Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(4), which requires that the Company
have at least 500,000 publicly held shares for continued listing on
the Nasdaq Capital Market.
As
noted above, the Company was first notified of its failure to
comply with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(4) on February 2, 2011 and
was subsequently granted an extension (until August 1, 2011) to
regain compliance. Due to procedural requirements, the Company was
unable to complete the forward stock split by Nasdaq’s August
1, 2011 deadline, which resulted in the August 2, 2011 letter
described above.
According
to the letter, as a result of the Company’s failure to meet
the terms of its extension, the Company’s common stock was to
be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market on August 11, 2011
unless the Company appealed the staff’s delisting
determination to a Nasdaq hearings panel by August 9, 2011. In the
letter, the Nasdaq staff also noted the Company’s failure to
comply with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b), which requires that the
Company maintain stockholders’ equity of at least $2,500,000,
as an additional basis for delisting the Company’s common
stock.
The
Company appealed the Nasdaq staff’s delisting determination
on August 9, 2011 and requested an oral hearing, at which the
Company will present its comprehensive plan to regain and sustain
compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rules 5550(a)(4) and 5550(b). While
the appeal is pending, the Company’s common stock will
continue to be traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
|
Net Loss Per Share
|
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Loss Per Share |
Note 8: Net Loss Per Share
Net
loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the
period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
do not include shares of restricted stock that have not yet vested,
although such shares are included as outstanding shares in the
Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance
sheet. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding and if
dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the
period. Potential common shares consist of the
incremental common shares issuable from restricted shares, stock
options and convertible preferred stock. Preferred stock
dividends are subtracted from net loss to determine the amount
available to common stockholders.
The
following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net
loss per share:
1 Certain amounts may not total due to rounding of
individual components.
The
following potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the
calculation of diluted net loss per share because the effects were
antidilutive based on the application of the treasury stock method
and because the Company incurred net losses during the
period:
|
Organization and Basis of Presentation
|
9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Organization and Basis of Presentation |
Note 1: Organization and Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of LiveDeal, Inc. (formerly YP Corp.), a
Nevada corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries
(collectively, the “Company”). The Company
delivers internet directory services for small and medium-sized
businesses to deliver an affordable way for businesses to extend
their marketing reach to local, relevant customers via the
Internet.
The
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September
30, 2010, which has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements, and the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2011, and for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30,
2010, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial
information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for audited financial statements. In the
opinion of the Company’s management, the interim information
includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for
the interim periods. The results of operations for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending
September 30, 2011. The footnote disclosures related to the interim
financial information included herein are also unaudited. Such
financial information should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto as of
September 30, 2010 and for the year then ended included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2010.
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Significant estimates and assumptions have been
made by management throughout the preparation of the condensed
consolidated financial statements, including in conjunction with
establishing allowances for customer refunds, non-paying customers,
dilution and fees, analyzing the recoverability of the carrying
amount of intangible assets, estimating forfeitures of stock-based
compensation and evaluating the recoverability of deferred tax
assets. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
While
the Company believes that its existing cash on hand, together with
the additional cash obtained from the loan facility the Company
entered into on May 13,
2011, as described in more detail in Note 3 together with other
sources of capital, such other sources of cash possibly including:
stock issuances; additional loans;
advances from our existing LEC clearing houses through their
current advance programs; or other forms of financing secured by or
leveraged off our accounts
receivable based on existing programs in place that are being
offered to companies similar to ours; is sufficient to finance our
operations for the next twelve
months, there can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient
revenue to repay the loan facility referenced above when it comes
due or that we will achieve
profitability, positive operating cash flows, or sufficient cash
flows for operations. To the extent that we cannot repay the loan
when it comes due or achieve
profitability or sufficient operating cash flows, our business will
be materially and adversely affected. Further, our business is
likely to experience significant
volatility in its revenues, operating losses, personnel involved,
products or services for sale, and other business parameters, as
management implements
its strategies and responds to operating results. Although the
Company has suspended new sales of the Velocity products, the
Company continues to
maintain the Legacy business and we are simultaneously exploring
other strategic alternatives. We cannot provide any assurance that
additional financing arrangements
will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at
all.
Effects of Stock Split: Effective August 10, 2011, the
Company implemented a 20-for-19 stock split with respect to issued
and outstanding shares of its common
stock. The stock split was in the form of a stock dividend, with
one (1) share of the Company’s common stock issued in respect
of every 19 shares of common
stock issued and outstanding as of July 29, 2011, the record date
for the stock split. Any fractional shares otherwise issuable as a
result of the stock split
were rounded up to the nearest whole share. All share and per share
amounts have been retroactively restated for the effects of this
stock split.
|
Restructuring Activities
|
9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Restructuring Activities |
Note 4: Restructuring Activities
On
November 30, 2010, the Board of Directors of LiveDeal, Inc. (the
“Company”) approved a reduction in force that resulted
in the termination of 36 employees of the Company, or approximately
60% of the Company’s workforce, effective December 1,
2010. The reduction in force was related to the
Company’s ongoing restructuring and cost reduction efforts
and strategy of focusing its resources on the development and
expansion of its core InstantProfile product, the successor to the
Company’s LEC-billed directory product. All
terminated employees were involved in the marketing and sale of the
Company’s InstantPromote product by its subsidiary, Local
Marketing Experts, Inc.
During
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred
expenses of $0 and $99,319 respectively, in connection with the
reduction in force, of which $37,500 were incurred for one-time
employee termination benefits payable in cash. The
remaining expenses relate to salaries and wages payable in cash to
the affected employees. All amounts were paid as of December
31, 2010 and no additional expenses pertaining to this reduction in
force are expected to be incurred subsequent to June 30,
2011.
|
Discontinued Operations
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||
Discontinued Operations |
Note 5: Discontinued Operations
As
part of the Company’s strategy to evaluate each of its
business segments as separate entities, management noted that the
Direct Sales business segment has incurred operating losses and
declining revenues and did not fit with the Company’s change
in strategic direction. Accordingly, in March 2011, the
Company made the strategic decision to discontinue its Direct Sales
business and product offerings. Prior year financial statements
have been restated to present the Direct Sales business segment as
a discontinued operation.
The
Company initiated shutdown activities in March 2011 and closed the
Direct Sales business segment in May 2011. In
conjunction with the discontinued operations, the Company recorded
the following charges in the nine months ended June 30,
2011:
The
Direct Sales business segment accounted for $105,293 and $1,341,430
of net revenues for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, and $658,847 and $3,092,607 of net revenues for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, which are
now included as part of income (loss) from discontinued component
including disposal costs, in the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
As
part of the Company’s plan to discontinue its Direct Sales
segment, the Company entered into an agreement dated April 25, 2011
to migrate those customers to a third party in exchange for ten and
five percent of gross revenues derived from such customers during
the first and second year, respectively. The Company has
no continuing involvement or influence in the third parties’
operations, nor does the third party have any recourse to the
Company in the event of lost customers, nonpayment by the
customers, etc. The Company recorded $4,000 in revenues
for this agreement during the three and nine months ended June 30,
2011.
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
Note 13: Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 2010-06”). A
majority of this update was effective for the Company for all
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2009. However, the guidance also required that the
disclosures on any Level 3 assets present separately information
about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. This
portion of the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2010, and is effective for us on
October 1, 2011. We do not believe that the full
adoption of ASU 2010-06, with respect to the Level 3
measurements, will have a material impact on our fair value
measurement disclosures.
In
December 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No.
2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Disclosure of
Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. If a
public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity
should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as
though the business combination that occurred during the current
year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior
annual reporting period only. ASU 2010-29 also expands the
supplementary pro forma disclosures. ASU 2010-29 is effective
prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. ASU 2010-29 will
only affect the Company if there are future business
combinations.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition
(Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a
consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (“ASU
2009-13”), which provides guidance on whether multiple
deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and
the consideration allocated. ASU 2009-13 requires an entity to
allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices
of deliverables if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective
evidence or third-party evidence of selling price. ASU 2009-13 is
effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after June 15, 2010 and may be applied retrospectively for all
periods presented or prospectively to arrangements entered into or
materially modified after the adoption date. Early adoption is
permitted provided that the revised guidance is retroactively
applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. ASU 2009-13 was
effective for the Company on October 1, 2010. The adoption of
ASU 2009-13 did not have a material impact on our financial
condition, results of operations, and disclosures.
|
,SPWZ9ESJ+(
M$]L]*$1-$R6IEY7>3:I[#?\>EEV4>KJR@XQ[]?)+>7J&+O>,PSOYY8RDK)=S
M\A.2^,7T;_R[D+HJ;"Y?L,^6Z#7Q?IMA_]LZM\BMGX6N(.2K_TVX,F)GVX1J
M7M/Y`F[!I1MYYE7ZK4+/4/64;<_'L#$,`'9B,YQXCHW]@+)5N-BGP=^%9;<6
MN0R">75ZN(@"X0BV(:U:4XB"GHQ?<@9/H]OKFHN"(HM:PG'>M :;A^'M8IO_%W1?S#'JQ^CQ>K?_&:7U6]ZQ\LK9X"I
ME+Q'A>0J9P6/EU(VT5JH:$-.UA*9XYD6/EK%+3287QM1TZ/ME^OAVJS=#2
M#`WI'NO:F-0B4XM,49&AT6(M,;7$U!)30F*D6F)JB:DEIH3$R+7$U!)32TP)
MB5%JB:DEII:8$A*CUA)32TPM,8639?0,N#D&:+7<%,^ LV:J]@&.3Y_#U7Q_A(-":<*S<7)L?9;7R=Q^(
M-/;PB$9\S.[.V$?G3EP*[AKLVK/.&)P%=U\`A+<`S1M@EG^/06#5VRAU:UV#
M_=T/Q624@[`!#-0G`:Q$&2JQ*)JH/AY8%:I%\@"*O/F]SP,;6=FE`[06^0$0
MS@!D)E` #MRBB'/5MU,SFH&>:C+D\S_
M`ZQAM\#/%<,['P:"_H+S`.;\!]C\@%%?A(S,)*IS7G.ESSFE- )
M!5[>E?]`$VB>K0E.JS0_)@];E@%7I\"LP(_.L5"2!]TB1-KT9;2;IX@9E@
M4H84H5G2!]@@PS1LGE3JRFI;!VV8G-<=HV3YWBHRIYX1D;'9\4C-3[,J9VTC
M&6@`XG5EMF8AMI`43`X2!6&QT*3.VY1MGRG8,OMEI="X@S[%`*!2HK[(=FLD
M9M*1@=E0XCFFR60H3'9@'A@YZ)(`4(G;Y`["=A)G[#.V;I"1OO+\I+R$4#(!
M)DUZU>"R'H8^VHD\OT@[\SSHA/"5XX%9:C>0@ZPD'\61[=]C##"]#JB`1K+T
MP:6VUBN0";T[G6W#DV^J31&LN1#W@K,-YVY<`&P7*J@W\#%V18X:5?VGU-C%
M.0;2%_[NJ3$F^R`M237X>M>1@3""O0>H&C!+N&XXX6@XIY\G:%:KS\EU;[5:
M=L&S1?&'G'D6!>E]:I$_R?^0WM'VU_7EU[_!_-W9MAJ[REY]X!:YHOY7?J?<
MPO4N/L^],FGQ[],!'SON]-WM=`SJ!U[V$3B#/'3>=TJ@LS*HBF!Y&N9SI $(+D&ED1I,'7=9ZQ79L=3?;&EV
ME$W%`F2&L`[%.@?`WUFS]A/NN@W_I!OC5A1S-\\&Z2A!*T2[!<%!T5S@JXI_
MPS:`7^,I`.`X;; BTPPF?F"+X-=7];-:$3[P
M^**S6;KDQN$MV3RP)3<.#S$:AX<8C<-##//P$,,\/,0P#P\QFH>'&,W#0XSF
M'B#&K.*!=BG\(+^&/_X_4$L#!!0````(`)4U#S_AM&.\A`P```B=```5`!P`
M;&EV92TR,#$Q,#8S,%]C86PN>&UL550)``.9^$A.F?A(3G5X"P`!!"4.```$
M.0$``.U=7V_C-A)_+]#OH'-?[H`ZCI-LNPDV+1(GNS"030(G+=I[*61I;!-+
MBRHI.4D__0TEV9(NQ0+JHJ25/!%\MQGP*-D3"P0JN!F
M'.5K]^=UB8(H&QPF&W!`?TE.5Z+>KN_"R5SF<]^9C!_8MPTG$7AS^;
MP$E,4]25X=>M#$>4E?+T,!-U\L2\6%[_\OQ@73I8%PG=&FPK`:.M%>!T)8UC
MRR\$MZE9IRP04FWS."'0D@);`\,*O23,5`#7[,4;D3LU**X<U1*V^91K-5
&<+/X7G&9N=AP+FV(
M-I"T<9`C2)N"K`]+MA!2#;?2ZP:I[-V+`M\MB_4EX24-&?$VKW#L+W3MW)
MD9ZK,MC9%SJ)6P_I1V
M'<9]L*`='@#J?`1[&);R1SH!"JD`/9V(X)J)K,!$+@EOI7,B&@5".H#!?(1S
M@YE&:.ZB08JF=L)D9LI;'$^Z;PE%44<@&G\M[?#7O9YAUGM)@(1,5H/)/'5/
M2`JA"`KAPSQ!&CB6=-2\-CM8DY(@F?(9H\'J>^(4J[1A!0H5"QRH+SPQ0-R9
M*+4?I^?A:$'$BM8QY@[9T.F6)%-`2@(,YD%2!G'/49N<&9C<-63[$WO*D\A9
M@8P8'\OD"-H3*(B)#SSA9M6*6<]Y-3P?[&UI)(,EG:YM(G/_RQALUX#
M&W-)071^-3/P#8;<4Y"_\#WJ59B
@CY`_Z*TCZ(B;SH
M6E;\'K;AC&5;:.!+`P':`&QM`5M3D])[/%D-<\*D2Y1<"`?6!PP";8E3/`5<
M(CSCWP$;PF4$XC^Q@QY\T'%
MP"8"1%KU6A=U>700&"3YR#YRG0&]TCZK5RM3P4%VEDZ)[AHG_`X26F12NW'6
M;21C'B'6E4^EPC'J016C>?3\FP3:UQ"74Y!^CQ*6!3%3$)8?5A*6L""CU6B#
M9'B4L)1B#_A@3EAV.D\C+!G:V,E643)6*^N+1I9)1M/H-+J9)P+'(GTUQ_J7
MR;XZ.1)+A1];+/OJ\[)/Z4(SPH\MDWWDZ9J5=&P-05>ME$LZ]I"@(W?,*I+N
MX#G0<\N]1MUH-CNKR;V$:-+CGJ#;R??>Y*RX:F6Y3&0E(K%:V4PFLKQ(!#X!
M%#LC$SL/R,3667-]F5@_;IFX*XS,&&0@)H!4@H)$#`Y]K$R#HI<$_2AXB,H3
M4ZTL\0\M:Z*T_:-XSB;RK6(3^4+NR8($DE9C'Y)/]SDQ=L6N164)8#NIB3GD
M1D;[CAN+0WM/B3#'U`;S+X$Q)V$O4]D.`7-WBAT:G34Z:W36DGN/$>8Q52I:
M%]48?>`8K87W@0OO\SL1\.&ZW3SW$G$/3G9K;-;8K+%98_-";$Z"AAJ?M?:L
MJ?"9J/!3C&F=&?3\@29'C=A'@-A7*I%$H[-&YR-`YR])":7&9XW/1X#/UUX4
M.%[H6!J?EVG_&[102RR#/7$!Z\MI7RZA+YF'GJ+"\Y*:R4>SA3UL_+9-1-1T
MI>GJ(;KZC$FQFJPT66FRVB9976!1@BQ4SD[CHS/0I*9)39/:5DGMGUBOHLGJ
M"2_:1M/QF"[:OHFCI&:-.GG--^-:$Z/V.5ML`^_(SMP$F_#/_;B#I&4TVN8N
M8/VRT]MTZJ/T;&C