XML 145 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Provision for Income Taxes
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded a tax provision for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 of $1.5 million on foreign earnings and no tax benefit for the United States, Singapore and Japan. We currently record valuation allowances due to losses in those jurisdictions that offset any tax benefit.
Under GAAP, a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets is appropriate if based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not (defined as a likelihood of more than 50%) that the value of such assets will not be realized in the future. The valuation of deferred tax assets requires judgment in assessing a number of factors, including the likely future tax consequences of events we expect to recognize in our financial statements and tax returns, as well as our historical performance. The tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2013 included a net $0.1 million non-cash charge made to record a valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets. There was a similar non-cash charge made in the first quarter of 2013 in the amount of $0.1 million.
A sustained period of profitability in our U.S. operations is required before we would change our judgment regarding the need for a full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets. In the event that we determine in the future that we expect to benefit from our deferred income tax assets in excess of the net balance at that time, we will make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. This will reduce the provision for income taxes in that period. Until such time, we will offset U.S. profits against our deferred tax assets and will reduce the overall level of deferred tax assets subject to valuation allowance as a result.
For the jurisdictions where we did not record a valuation allowance, our tax provision includes an estimated annual effective tax rate from continuing operations of approximately 31.8%. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations in those jurisdictions is lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due primarily to lower tax rates and tax incentives in those jurisdictions.