XML 58 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1: Significant Accounting Policies

Intermec is a global business that designs, develops, integrates, sells, and resells wired and wireless automated identification and data collection ("AIDC") products and related services. Our products and services are used by businesses of all sizes, throughout the world, and are particularly well suited for challenging or harsh environments where mobility, reliability and durability are important. Our products include mobile computers, barcode scanners, printers, label media, radio frequency identification ("RFID") products and related software. Due to our acquisition of Vocollect, our products now include wearable voice data collection devices and related software. We also offer a variety of services related to our product offerings. Most of our revenue is currently generated through sales of mobile computers, barcode scanners, printers and repair services.

We provide rugged mobile business solutions that help our customers improve their visibility and control of their businesses and, in the process, lower their costs, increase their revenues and improve customer satisfaction and loyalty. These business solutions are a collaborative effort between us and our channel partners.

We divested our Industrial Automation Systems ("IAS") businesses, which comprised the Cincinnati Lamb and Landis Grinding Systems divisions. The IAS businesses are classified as discontinued operations for accounting purposes in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. In 2009, we adjusted our long-term lease liability for the retained property that is held as available for sublease and classified it as loss from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Intermec, Inc., and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. We have no unconsolidated subsidiaries.

Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventoried costs include material, labor and manufacturing overhead. General and administrative costs are expensed as incurred. The valuation of inventory requires us to estimate obsolete or excess inventory as well as inventory that is not of saleable quality. The determination of obsolete or excess inventory requires us to estimate the future demand for our products and market conditions.

 

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. This method also requires the recognition of future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carry forwards and other tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We evaluate the likelihood of realizing our deferred tax assets by estimating sources of future taxable income and the impact of tax planning strategies. Our deferred tax assets include future tax benefits of discontinued operations that remain with us. We record benefits from uncertain tax positions based on the largest amount of benefit with greater than 50% cumulative probability of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority.

Concentrations of Credit Risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. We generally place our cash and cash equivalents and investments with high-credit-quality counterparties, and by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one counterparty based on our analysis of that counterparty's relative credit standing. Our short-term investments are comprised primarily of time deposits. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up our customer base, thus spreading the credit risk. We evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers and maintain an allowance for anticipated losses. For 2011, 2010 and 2009, one customer, ScanSource accounted for more than 10% of our revenues. Total sales to this customer were 22%, 23%, and 19% of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Additionally, ScanSource accounted for 19% and 14% of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We believe that the receivable balance from ScanSource does not represent a significant credit risk based on past collection experience.

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over the estimated useful life. We use an amortization method that best reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed or otherwise used up. A majority of our finite-lived intangible assets pertain to assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of Vocollect including developed technology, customer relationships, trademarks, lease agreements, and in-process research and development, as well as a patent portfolio and have estimated useful lives ranging from 3 years to 18 years.

Goodwill. The accounting for goodwill requires that we test the goodwill of our reporting units for impairment on an annual basis, or earlier when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is more likely than not that an impairment may exist. Our annual testing date is in the fourth quarter. In assessing the existence of impairment, our considerations include the impact of significant adverse changes in market and economic conditions; the results of our operational performance and strategic plans; unanticipated changes in competition; market share; and the potential for the sale or disposal of all or a significant portion of our business or a reporting unit. Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value.

We assign goodwill to our reporting units based on the expected benefit from the synergies arising from each business combination. We have three reportable segments: Intermec-branded products, Intermec-branded services and Voice solutions. Intermec-branded services and Voice solutions each comprise two reporting units. Intermec-branded services are divided into: Core Service and Integrated Global Services ("IGS"). Voice solutions contains the Vocollect Supply Chain and Vocollect Healthcare reporting units.

In the third quarter of 2011, we determined that certain economic circumstances had changed sufficiently to require an interim impairment testing of goodwill. Specifically, stock market indices declined suddenly and significantly in August and had only recovered minimally by the end of the third quarter. Intermec and other public companies in the same or similar industries experienced declines that were greater than those of the overall market.

We completed our interim tests for impairment of goodwill as of October 2, 2011, and determined goodwill was not impaired. In testing goodwill for impairment, the analysis utilized a combination of discounted cash flow approach and market approach to determine the fair value of the reporting units. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The fair value measurement was calculated using unobservable inputs to the discounted cash flow approach. The key inputs we used in the discounted cash flow approach include risk adjusted discount rates and future cash flows, which include estimates of future revenues and operating costs. The estimate of future cash flow takes into consideration factors such as growth rates and economic and market information. These key inputs are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

We assessed the reasonableness of our valuation by considering other information available such as the market capitalization of Intermec and other public companies in our industry and associated implied enterprise fair values, projected industry trends and investment analyst reports on us and other public companies in our industry, and information regarding recent acquisitions in our industry.

 

We completed our annual impairment test at November 30, 2011 and determined that our goodwill was not impaired.

 

 

 

Capitalized Legal Patent Costs. We capitalize external legal costs incurred in the defense of our patents where we believe that there is an evident increase in the value of the patent and that the successful outcome of the legal action is probable. In the event of a successful outcome, the capitalized costs for that case would be amortized over the remaining life of the patents in the case. During the course of any legal action, the court where the case is pending makes decisions and issues rulings of various kinds, which may be favorable or unfavorable. We monitor developments in the legal action, the legal costs incurred and the anticipated outcome of the legal action, and assess the likelihood of a successful outcome based on the entire action. If changes in the anticipated outcome were to occur that reduce the likelihood of a successful outcome of the entire action to less than probable, the capitalized costs would be charged to expense in the period in which the change is determined. As of December 31, 2011, and 2010, $7.4 and $12.4 million of legal patent defense costs have been capitalized, respectively. The capitalized legal patent costs are recorded in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. For the fourth quarter of 2011, we wrote off $5.6 million of legal costs that were capitalized between 2007 and 2011 attributable to a patent lawsuit, See Note 13, Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reclassification. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods to conform to the current year presentation. Specifically, for the year ended December 31, 2010 we have reclassified certain operating expenses previously reported in selling, general and administrative expense that totaled $6.0 million, which are now reported in cost of service revenues and research and development of $2.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively. Additionally, we have reclassified an impairment charge previously reported in selling, general and administrative expense and now report the charge in impairment of facility. This reclassification had no impact on previously reported earnings from continuing operations or net income. We have reclassified deferred tax liabilities previously reported in current deferred tax assets, net and deferred tax assets, net, and now report these liabilities in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we have reclassified accrued expenses previously reported in accounts payable and accrued expenses into accrued expenses in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Deferred Development Costs Certain pre-production costs under a guaranteed long-term supply contract are capitalized. We have capitalized approximately $2.2 million of such costs as of the year ended December 31, 2011 and recorded them as other assets.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income," ("ASU 2011-05"). ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in shareholders' equity and requires that all nonowner changes in shareholders' equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This new guidance is required to be adopted in January 2012 and is to be applied retrospectively. We anticipate that the adoption of this standard will require either changes to our current financial statements or the addition of an incremental statement. In December 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on the presentation of other comprehensive income which deferred the effective date for the provisions pertaining to reclassification adjustments. As the new accounting guidance will only amend the presentation requirements of other comprehensive income, we do not expect the adoption to have any impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, "Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) ("ASU 2011-08"). The amendments in this update will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under these amendments, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments include a number of events and circumstances for an entity to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. This new guidance is required to be adopted in January 2012. We anticipate that the adoption of this accounting standard update will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, as it is intended to potentially simplify the assessment for goodwill impairment.