XML 54 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments
Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments
Piedmont considers its cash, tenant receivables, restricted cash and escrows, accounts payable and accrued expenses, interest rate swap agreements, and debt to meet the definition of financial instruments. The following table sets forth the carrying and estimated fair value for each of Piedmont’s financial instruments, as well as its level within the GAAP fair value hierarchy, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively (in thousands):

 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Financial Instrument
Carrying Value
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Level Within Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Carrying Value
 
Estimated Fair Value
Level Within Fair Value Hierarchy
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
$
9,271

 
$
9,271

 
Level 1
 
$
6,973

 
$
6,973

Level 1
Tenant receivables, net(1)
$
22,196

 
$
22,196

 
Level 1
 
$
31,145

 
$
31,145

Level 1
Restricted cash and escrows(1)
$
751

 
$
751

 
Level 1
 
$
394

 
$
394

Level 1
Interest rate swap asset
$
464

 
$
464

 
Level 2
 
$
24,176

 
$
24,176

Level 2
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(1)
$
16,983

 
$
16,983

 
Level 1
 
$
16,680

 
$
16,680

Level 1
Interest rate swap liability
$
4,366

 
$
4,366

 
Level 2
 
$
4,526

 
$
4,526

Level 2
Debt
$
2,029,822

 
$
2,036,959

 
Level 2
 
$
2,002,205

 
$
2,004,870

Level 2

(1) 
For the periods presented, the carrying value of these financial instruments approximates estimated fair value due to their short-term maturity.

Piedmont's debt was carried at book value as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013; however, Piedmont's estimate of its fair value is disclosed in the table above. Piedmont uses widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis based on the contractual terms of the debt facilities, including the period to maturity of each instrument, and uses observable market-based inputs for similar debt facilities which have transacted recently in the market. Therefore, the fair values determined are considered to be based on significant other observable inputs (Level 2). Scaling adjustments are made to these inputs to make them applicable to the remaining life of Piedmont's outstanding debt. Piedmont has not changed its valuation technique for estimating the fair value of its debt.

Piedmont’s interest rate swap and forward starting interest rate swap agreements presented above, and further discussed in Note 4, are classified as “Interest rate swap” assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and were carried at fair value as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The valuation of these derivative instruments was determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis based on the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity of each instrument, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. Therefore, the fair values determined are considered to be based on significant other observable inputs (Level 2). In addition, Piedmont considered both its own and the respective counterparties’ risk of nonperformance in determining the fair value of its derivative financial instruments by estimating the current and potential future exposure under the derivative financial instruments that both Piedmont and the counterparties were at risk for as of the valuation date. The credit risk of Piedmont and its counterparties was factored into the calculation of the estimated fair value of the interest rate swaps; however, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, this credit valuation adjustment did not comprise a material portion of the estimated fair value. Therefore, Piedmont believes that any unobservable inputs used to determine the fair values of its derivative financial instruments are not significant to the fair value measurements in their entirety, and does not consider any of its derivative financial instruments to be Level 3 assets or liabilities.