Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Principles of Consolidation

: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mercantile Bank Corporation (“Mercantile”) and its subsidiary, Mercantile Bank of Michigan (“Bank”), and of Mercantile Bank Real Estate Co., L.L.C. (“Mercantile Real Estate”) and Mercantile Insurance Center, Inc. (“Mercantile Insurance”), subsidiaries of our Bank, after elimination of significant intercompany transactions and accounts.

Mercantile has

five

separate business trusts: Mercantile Bank Capital Trust I, Firstbank Capital Trust I, Firstbank Capital Trust II, Firstbank Capital Trust III and Firstbank Capital Trust IV (“our trusts”). Our trusts were formed to issue trust preferred securities. We issued subordinated debentures to our trusts in return for the proceeds raised from the issuance of the trust preferred securities. Our trusts are

not

consolidated, but instead we report the subordinated debentures issued to the trusts as liabilities.

Nature of Operation [Policy Text Block]

Nature of Operations

: Mercantile was incorporated on

July

15,

1997

to establish and own the Bank based in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The Bank began operations on

December

15,

1997.

We completed the merger of Firstbank Corporation (“Firstbank”), a Michigan corporation with approximately

$1.5

billion in total assets and

branch locations, into Mercantile as of

June 1, 2014.

The Bank is a community-based financial institution. The Bank

’s primary deposit products are checking, savings, and term certificate accounts, and its primary lending products are commercial loans, residential mortgage loans, and instalment loans. Substantially all loans are secured by specific items of collateral including business assets, real estate or consumer assets. Commercial loans are expected to be repaid from cash flow from operations of businesses. Real estate loans are secured by commercial or residential real estate. The Bank’s loan accounts and retail deposits are primarily with customers located in the communities in which we have bank office locations. As an alternative source of funds, the Bank has also issued certificates of deposit to depositors outside of its primary market areas. Substantially all revenues are derived from banking products and services and investment securities. While we monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services offered, we manage our business on the basis of

one

operating segment, banking.

Mercantile Real Estate was organized on

July 21, 2003,

principally to develop, construct, and own a facility in downtown Grand Rapids th

at serves as our Bank’s main office and Mercantile’s headquarters. This facility was placed into service during the

second

quarter of

2005.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

: To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ. The allowance for loan losses and the fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash Flow Reporting

: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits with other financial institutions, short-term investments (including securities with daily put provisions) and federal funds sold. Cash flows are reported net for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest-earning time deposits with other financial institutions and short-term borrowings with maturities of

days or less.

Marketable Securities, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Securities

: Debt securities classified as held to maturity are carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Debt securities are classified as available for sale when they might be sold prior to maturity. Equity securities with readily determinable fair values are classified as available for sale. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax. Federal Home Loan Bank stock is carried at cost.

Interest income includes

amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of discounts. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized or accreted on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method.

Declines in the fair value of debt securities below their amortized cost that are other than temporary (“

OTTI”) are reflected in earnings or other comprehensive income, as appropriate. For those debt securities whose fair value is less than their amortized cost, we consider our intent to sell the security, whether it is more likely than

not

that we will be required to sell the security before recovery and whether we expect to recover the entire amortized cost of the security based on our assessment of the issuer’s financial condition. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, we consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, and whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do

not

meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into

two

components as follows:

) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement, and

) OTTI related to other factors, such as liquidity conditions in the market or changes in market interest rates, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost.

Finance, Loan and Lease Receivables, Held-for-investment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Loans

: Loans that we have the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments. Net unamortized deferred loan fees amounted to

$1.0

million and

$1.4

million, respectively, at

December 31, 2017

and

2016

Interest income on commercial loans and mortgage loans is discontinued at the time the loan is

days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and in

process of collection. Consumer and credit card loans are typically charged off

later than when they are

120

days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal and interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but

not

received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or c

ost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Finance, Loan and Lease Receivables, Held-for-sale, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Loans Held for Sale

: Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value, as determined by outstanding commitments from investors. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recorded as a valuation allowance and charged to earnings. Mortgage loans held for sale are generally sold with servicing rights retained. Gains and losses on sales of mortgage loans are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related mortgage loan sold, which is reduced by the cost allocated to the servicing right. We generally lock in the sale price to the purchaser of the mortgage loan at the same time we make an interest rate commitment to the borrower.

Year-end mortgage loans held for sale, included in total loans in the balance sheet, were as follows:

	201 7		201 6
Mortgage loans held for sale	$	2,553,000	$	1,035,000
Less: Allowance to adjust to lower of cost or market		0		0
Mortgage loans held for sale, net	$	2,553,000	$	1,035,000

Mortgage Loan Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Mortgage Loan Derivatives

: We enter into forward contracts and interest rate lock commitments in the ordinary course of business, which are accounted for as derivatives. The derivatives are

not

designated as hedges and are carried at fair value. The net gain or loss on derivatives is included in mortgage banking activities in the income statement. The balance of derivatives was immaterial at

December 31, 2017

and

2016

Loans and Leases Receivable, Mortgage Banking Activities, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Mortgage Banking Activities

: Mortgage loan servicing rights are recognized as assets based on the allocated value of retained servicing rights on mortgage loans sold. Mortgage loan servicing rights are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value and are expensed in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues. Impairment is evaluated based on the fair value of the rights using groupings of the underlying mortgage loans as to interest rates. Any impairment of a grouping is reported as a valuation allowance.

Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing mortgage loans. The fees

are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. Amortization of mortgage loan servicing rights is netted against mortgage loan servicing income and recorded in mortgage banking activities in the statements of income.

Loans and Leases Receivable, Troubled Debt Restructuring Policy [Policy Text Block]

Troubled Debt Restructurings

: A loan is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring if we, for economic or legal reasons, grant a concession to a borrower considered to be experiencing financial difficulties that we would

not

otherwise consider. A troubled debt restructuring

may

involve the receipt of assets from the debtor in partial or full satisfaction of the loan, or a modification of terms such as a reduction of the stated interest rate or balance of the loan, a reduction of accrued interest, an extension of the maturity date or renewal of the loan at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for a new loan with similar risk, or some combination of these concessions. Troubled debt restructurings can be in either accrual or nonaccrual status. Nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings are included in nonperforming loans. Accruing troubled debt restructurings are generally excluded from nonperforming loans as it is considered probable that all contractual principal and interest due under the restructured terms will be collected.

Loans modified as troubled debt restructurings are, by definition, considered to be impaired loans. Impairment for these loans is measured on a loan-by-loan basis s

imilar to other impaired loans as described below under “Allowance for Loan Losses.” Certain loans modified as troubled debt restructurings

may

have been previously measured for impairment under a general allowance methodology (i.e., pooling), thus at the time the loan is modified as a troubled debt restructuring the allowance will be impacted by the difference between the results of these

two

measurement methodologies. Loans modified as troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default are factored into the determination of the allowance for loan losses in the same manner as other defaulted loans.

Loans and Leases Receivable, Allowance for Loan Losses Policy [Policy Text Block]

Allowance for Loan Losses

: The allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when we believe the uncollectability of a loan is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. We estimate the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions and other factors. We estimate credit losses based on individual loans determined to be impaired and on all other loans grouped on similar risk characteristics. Our historical loss component is the most significant of the allowance components and is based on historical loss experience by credit risk grade for commercial loans and payment status for mortgage and consumer loans. Loans are pooled based on similar risk characteristics supported by observable data. The historical loss experience component of the allowance represents the results of migration analysis of historical net charge-offs for portfolios of loans, including groups of commercial loans within each credit risk grade. For measuring loss exposure in a pool of loans, the historical net charge-off or migration experience is utilized to estimate expected future losses to be realized from the pool of loans. Allocations of the allowance

may

be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in our judgment, should be charged-off.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms o

f the loan agreement. Factors considered in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are

not

classified as impaired. We determine the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of delay, the reasons for delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.

Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Transfers of Financial Assets

: Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when: (

) the assets have been isolated from the Bank and put presumptively beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (

) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (

) the Bank does

not

maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets. Our transfers of financial assets are generally limited to commercial loan participations sold and residential mortgage loans sold in the secondary market.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Premises and Equipment

: Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from

years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from

years. Maintenance, repairs and minor alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures occur and major improvements are capitalized.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Long-lived Assets

: Premises and equipment and other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount

may

not

be recoverable based on future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value.

Finance, Loan and Lease Receivables, Held for Investments, Foreclosed Assets Policy [Policy Text Block]

Foreclosed Assets:

Assets acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure are initially recorded at their estimated fair value net of estimated selling costs, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value subsequently declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through noninterest expense, as are collection and operating costs after acquisition. Foreclosed assets, included in other assets in the balance sheet, totaled

$2.3

million and

$0.5

million as of

December 31, 2017

and

2016,

respectively.

Bank Owned Life Insurance, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Bank Owned Life Insurance:

The Bank has purchased life insurance policies on certain key officers. Bank owned life insurance is recorded at its cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible

: Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment is recognized in the period identified. A more frequent assessment is performed should events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the goodwill

may

not

be recoverable. We

may

elect to perform a qualitative assessment for the annual impairment test. If the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than

not

that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, or if we elect

not

to perform a qualitative assessment, then we would be required to perform a quantitative test for goodwill impairment. The quantitative test is a

two

-step process consisting of comparing the carrying value of the reporting unit to an estimate of its fair value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, goodwill is impaired and is written down to its estimated fair value. In

2016

and

2017,

we elected to perform a qualitative assessment for our annual impairment test and concluded it is more likely than

not

our fair value was greater than its carrying amount; therefore,

further testing was required.

The core deposit intangible that arose from the merger with Firstbank was initially measured at fair value and is being amortized into noninterest expense over a

ten

-year period using

the sum-of-the-years-digits methodology.

Repurchase and Resale Agreements Policy [Policy Text Block]

Repurchase Agreements

: The Bank sells certain securities under agreements to repurchase. The agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions, with the obligations to repurchase the securities sold reflected as liabilities and the securities underlying the agreements remaining in assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposure, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Financial Instruments and Loan Commitments

: Financial instruments include off-balance-sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. Instruments, such as standby letters of credit, that are considered financial guarantees are recorded at fair value.

Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]

Stock-Based Compensation:

Compensation cost for equity-based awards is measured on the grant date based on the fair value of the award at that date, and is recognized over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Fair value of stock option awards is estimated using a closed option valuation (Black-Scholes) model. Fair value of restricted stock awards is based upon the quoted market price of the common stock on the date of grant.

Advertising Cost, Policy, Expensed Advertising Cost [Policy Text Block]

Advertising Costs

: Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Income Taxes

: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable, the change in deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and any adjustments related to unrecognized tax benefits. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates applicable to future years. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

: Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. The fair value estimates of existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments do

not

include the value of anticipated future business or the values of assets and liabilities

not

considered financial instruments.

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Earnings Per Share

: Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and participating securities outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under our stock-based compensation plans using the treasury stock method. Our unvested stock awards, which contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends whether paid or unpaid (i.e., participating securities), are included in the number of shares outstanding for both basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. In the event of a net loss, our unvested stock awards are excluded from the calculations of both basic and diluted earnings per share.

Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Comprehensive Income

: Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and interest rate swaps which are also recognized as a separate component of equity.

Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Derivatives

: Derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the use of the derivatives and whether the derivatives qualify for hedge accounting. Used as part of our asset and liability management to help manage interest rate risk, our derivatives have historically generally consisted of interest rate swap agreements that qualified for hedge accounting. We do

not

use derivatives for trading purposes.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated, for accounting purposes, as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received on various assets and liabilities and are effective are reported in other comprehensive income. They

are later reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings and are included in the line item in which the hedged cash flows are recorded. If hedge accounting does

not

apply, changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized immediately in current earnings as interest income or expense.

If designated as a hedge, we formally document the relationship between the derivative instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk-management objective and t

he strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. This documentation includes linking cash flow hedges to specific assets on the balance sheet. If designated as a hedge, we also formally assess, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instrument that is used is highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. Ineffective hedge gains and losses are recognized immediately in current earnings as noninterest income or expense. We discontinue hedge accounting when we determine the derivative is

longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative is settled or terminates, or treatment of the derivatives as a hedge is

longer appropriate or intended.

Commitments and Contingencies, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Contingencies:

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do

not

believe there are any such matters outstanding that would have a material effect on the financial statements.

Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Reclassifications

: Certain items in the prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Accounting Standards Updates

: In

May 2014,

the FASB issued ASU

2014

09,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

. This ASU establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries under U.S. GAAP, including those that previously followed industry-specific guidance such as the real estate, construction and software industries. The revenue standard’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. To accomplish this objective, the standard requires

five

basic steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. This ASU was originally effective for annual and interim periods beginning after

December 15, 2016,

with

three

transition methods available – full retrospective, retrospective and cumulative effect approach. In

August 2015,

the FASB issued ASU

2015

14,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of Effective Date

, which delays the implementation of this guidance by

one

year. Since the guidance does

not

apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under GAAP, the new guidance will

not

have an impact on interest income. We have completed an overall assessment of revenue streams and reviewed the related contracts potentially affected by the ASU. We will adopt this ASU on

January 1, 2018

utilizing the modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings. We have determined that this ASU will

not

have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. Expanded disclosure requirements will be included in the

March 31, 2018

Form

-Q.

January 2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

. This ASU requires an entity to (i) measure equity investments at fair value through net income, with certain exceptions; (ii) present in OCI the changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured using the fair value option; (iii) present financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset; (iv) calculate the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes based on an exit price; and (v) assess a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses on available for sale debt securities in combination with other deferred tax assets. This ASU provides an election to subsequently measure certain nonmarketable equity investments at cost less any impairment and adjusted for certain observable price changes. This ASU also requires a qualitative impairment assessment of such equity investments and amends certain fair value disclosure requirements. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after

December 15, 2017,

and are

not

expected to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

February 2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

02,

Leases

. This ASU establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than

months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after

December 15, 2018.

A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Adoption of this ASU is

not

expected to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

March 2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

09,

Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

. This ASU requires that, prospectively, all tax effects related to share-based payments be made through the income statement at the time of settlement as opposed to excess tax benefits being recognized in additional paid-in capital under the current guidance. The ASU also removes the requirement to delay recognition of a tax benefit until it reduces current taxes payable. This change is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis, with a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings. Additionally, all tax related cash flows resulting from share-based payments are to be reported as operating activities on the statement of cash flows, a change from the current requirement to present tax benefits as an inflow from financing activities and an outflow from operating activities. Finally, entities will be allowed to withhold an amount up to the employees’ maximum individual tax rate (as opposed to the minimum statutory tax rate) in the relevant jurisdiction without resulting in liability classification of the award. The change in withholding requirements will be applied on a modified retrospective approach. This standard will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after

December 15, 2016.

Adoption of this ASU did

not

have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

June 2016,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2016

13,

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

. This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are

not

measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace the current “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model. The new model, referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model, will apply to: (i) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (ii) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is

not

limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments and financial guarantees. The ASU also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans, and expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after

December 15, 2019,

and early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after

December 15, 2018.

Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the

first

reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach). We are currently evaluating the provisions of this ASU to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements. We are also in the process of selecting a software vendor for applying this new ASU, which we plan to implement later in

2018.

August 2016,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2016

15,

Statement of Cash Flows (Topic

230

): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

. This ASU will make

eight

targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows and is effective for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2017.

The new standard will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impractical to apply, in which case it would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. We are currently evaluating the provisions of this ASU to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

January 2017,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2017

04,

Goodwill and Other (Topic

350

): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill impairment

. This ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step

from the goodwill impairment test. Under this ASU, an entity should perform the Step

annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value,

not

to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. This ASU is effective

January 1, 2020

and early adoption is permitted. The ASU should be applied prospectively. We adopted this guidance on

January 1, 2017.

The adoption of this guidance had

material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

March 2017,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2017

08,

Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities

. This ASU requires the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do

not

require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. Previously, entities were allowed to amortize to contractual maturity or to call date. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after

December 15, 2018,

and early adoption is permitted. The provisions of this ASU will

not

have an impact on our financial position or results of operations as we have always amortized premiums to the earliest call date.

August 2017,

the

FASB issued ASU

2017

12,

Derivatives and Hedging (Topic

815

): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities

. The ASU changes the recognition and presentation requirements of hedge accounting, including eliminating the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and presenting all items that affect earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item. The ASU also eases certain documentation and assessment requirements and modifies the accounting components excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2018,

and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the provisions of this ASU to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

February 2018,

the FASB issued ASU

2018

02,

Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

. This ASU requires reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The amount of the reclassification is the difference between the historical

35%

corporate income tax rate and the newly enacted

21%

corporate income tax rate. Because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws of rates be included in income from continuing operations is

not

affected. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2018.

Early adoption is permitted. We early adopted this ASU, which resulted in the reclassification of

$0.9

million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings at

December 31, 2017.