10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2015.

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                 TO                 .

Commission File Number: 333-31929

DISH DBS Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Colorado	84-1328967
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
9601 South Meridian Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado	80112
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

(303) 723-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No x

As of August 12, 2015, the registrant’s outstanding common stock consisted of 1,015 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value.

The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements	i
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	3
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4
Item 2.	Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations	39
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	*
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	54
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	55
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	55
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	*
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	*
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	None
Item 5.	Other Information	None
Item 6.	Exhibits	55
	Signatures	56

*This item has been omitted pursuant to the reduced disclosure format as set forth in General Instruction (H)(2) of Form 10-Q.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, in particular, statements about our plans, objectives and strategies, growth opportunities in our industries and businesses, our expectations regarding future results, financial condition, liquidity and capital requirements, our estimates regarding the impact of regulatory developments and legal proceedings, and other trends and projections.  Forward-looking statements are not historical facts and may be identified by words such as “future,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “seek,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “predict,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can,” “may,” and similar terms.  These forward-looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and represent management’s current views and assumptions.  Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, events or results and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control.  Accordingly, actual performance, events or results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

Competition and Economic Risks Affecting our Business

·We face intense and increasing competition from satellite television providers, cable companies and telecommunications companies, especially as the pay-TV industry has matured, which may require us to further increase subscriber acquisition and retention spending or accept lower subscriber activations and higher subscriber churn.

·Competition from digital media companies that provide or facilitate the delivery of video content via the Internet may reduce our gross new subscriber activations and may cause our subscribers to purchase fewer services from us or to cancel our services altogether, resulting in less revenue to us.

·Economic weakness and uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to grow or maintain our business.

·Our competitors may be able to leverage their relationships with programmers to reduce their programming costs and offer exclusive content that will place them at a competitive advantage to us.

·As a new service offering, our over-the-top or OTT Internet-based services face certain risks, including, among others, significant competition.

·We face increasing competition from other distributors of unique programming services such as foreign language and sports programming that may limit our ability to maintain subscribers that desire these unique programming services.

Operational and Service Delivery Risks Affecting our Business

·If we do not continue improving our operational performance and customer satisfaction, our gross new subscriber activations may decrease and our subscriber churn may increase.

·If our gross new subscriber activations decrease, or if our subscriber churn, subscriber acquisition costs or retention costs increase, our financial performance will be adversely affected.

·Programming expenses are increasing and could adversely affect our future financial condition and results of operations.

·We depend on others to provide the programming that we offer to our subscribers and, if we lose access to this programming, our gross new subscriber activations may decline and our subscriber churn may increase.

·We may not be able to obtain necessary retransmission consent agreements at acceptable rates, or at all, from local network stations.

·We may be required to make substantial additional investments to maintain competitive programming offerings.

i

·Any failure or inadequacy of our information technology infrastructure and communications systems could disrupt or harm our business.

·We currently depend on EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries, or EchoStar, to design, develop and manufacture substantially all of our new set-top boxes and certain related components, to provide the vast majority of our transponder capacity, to provide digital broadcast operations and other services to us, and to provide the IPTV streaming technology for our OTT services.  Our business would be adversely affected if EchoStar ceases to provide these products and services to us and we are unable to obtain suitable replacement products and services from third parties.

·We operate in an extremely competitive environment and our success may depend in part on our timely introduction and implementation of, and effective investment in, new competitive products and services, the failure of which could negatively impact our business.

·Technology in our industry changes rapidly and our inability to offer new subscribers and upgrade existing subscribers with more advanced equipment could cause our products and services to become obsolete.

·We rely on a single vendor or a limited number of vendors to provide certain key products or services to us such as information technology support, billing systems, and security access devices, and the inability of these key vendors to meet our needs could have a material adverse effect on our business.

·Our primary supplier of new set-top boxes, EchoStar, relies on a few suppliers and in some cases a single supplier, for many components of our new set-top boxes, and any reduction or interruption in supplies or significant increase in the price of supplies could have a negative impact on our business.

·Our programming signals are subject to theft, and we are vulnerable to other forms of fraud that could require us to make significant expenditures to remedy.

·We depend on third parties to solicit orders for our services that represent a significant percentage of our total gross new subscriber activations.

·We have limited satellite capacity and failures or reduced capacity could adversely affect our business.

·Our owned and leased satellites are subject to construction, launch, operational and environmental risks that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.

·We generally do not carry commercial insurance for any of the in-orbit satellites that we use, other than certain satellites leased from third parties, and could face significant impairment charges if any of our owned satellites fail.

·We may have potential conflicts of interest with EchoStar due to our and DISH Network’s common ownership and management.

·We rely on key personnel and the loss of their services may negatively affect our businesses.

Acquisition and Capital Structure Risks Affecting our Business

·Our parent, DISH Network, has made substantial investments to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and other related assets.  In addition, DISH Network has made substantial non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities related to the AWS-3 Auction.

·To the extent that our parent, DISH Network, commercializes its wireless spectrum licenses, it will face certain risks entering and competing in the wireless services industry and operating a wireless services business.

·Our parent, DISH Network, faces certain risks related to its non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities.

·We may pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions to complement or expand our business that may not be successful and we may lose up to the entire value of our investment in these acquisitions and transactions.

ii

·We may need additional capital, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all, to continue investing in our business and to finance acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

·We have substantial debt outstanding and may incur additional debt.

·Our parent, DISH Network, is controlled by one principal stockholder who is also our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Legal and Regulatory Risks Affecting our Business

·Our business depends on certain intellectual property rights and on not infringing the intellectual property rights of others.

·We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided, could have a significant adverse impact on our business, particularly lawsuits regarding intellectual property.

·Our ability to distribute video content via the Internet, including our OTT services, involves regulatory risk.

·Changes in the Cable Act of 1992 (“Cable Act”), and/or the rules of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) that implement the Cable Act, may limit our ability to access programming from cable-affiliated programmers at nondiscriminatory rates.

·The injunction against our retransmission of distant networks, which is currently waived, may be reinstated.

·We are subject to significant regulatory oversight, and changes in applicable regulatory requirements, including any adoption or modification of laws or regulations relating to the Internet, could adversely affect our business.

·Our business depends on FCC licenses that can expire or be revoked or modified and applications for FCC licenses that may not be granted.

·We are subject to digital high-definition (“HD”) “carry-one, carry-all” requirements that cause capacity constraints.

·Our business and investor confidence in our financial results, and DISH Network’s stock price may be adversely affected if our internal controls are not effective.

·We may face other risks described from time to time in periodic and current reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

Other factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “10-K”) filed with the SEC, those discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” herein and in the 10-K and those discussed in other documents we file with the SEC.  All cautionary statements made or referred to herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear.  Investors should consider the risks and uncertainties described or referred to herein and should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.  The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and we expressly disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

Unless otherwise required by the context, in this report, the words “DISH DBS,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to DISH DBS Corporation and its subsidiaries, “DISH Network” refers to DISH Network Corporation, our parent company, and its subsidiaries, including us, and “EchoStar” refers to EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries.

iii

Item 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DISH DBS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	As of
	June 30,			December 31,
	2015			2014
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	59,792		$	6,762,140
Marketable investment securities	48,860			1,401,145
Trade accounts receivable - other, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15,339 and $23,520, respectively	919,035			870,795
Trade accounts receivable - EchoStar, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of zero	50,080			31,391
Inventory	466,081			493,546
Deferred tax assets	37,018			37,018
Other current assets	126,706			130,038
Total current assets	1,707,572			9,726,073
Noncurrent Assets:
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities	86,984			86,984
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,702,057 and $2,628,945, respectively	2,275,595			2,437,004
FCC authorizations	635,794			635,794
Other noncurrent assets, net	533,163			535,308
Total noncurrent assets	3,531,536			3,695,090
Total assets	$	5,239,108		$	13,421,163
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities:
Trade accounts payable - other	$	192,496		$	152,076
Trade accounts payable - EchoStar	224,072			236,122
Advances from affiliates	188,720			—
Deferred revenue and other	903,884			865,210
Accrued programming	1,514,161			1,374,710
Accrued interest	224,981			227,158
Other accrued expenses	407,051			441,693
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	1,530,483			679,149
Total current liabilities	5,185,848			3,976,118
Long-Term Obligations, Net of Current Portion:
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion	12,218,842			13,728,749
Deferred tax liabilities	1,160,980			1,225,417
Long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities	206,686			188,067
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion	13,586,508			15,142,233
Total liabilities	18,772,356			19,118,351
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)
Redeemable noncontrolling interest	12,792			19,913
Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit):
Common stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 1,015 shares issued and outstanding	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	1,303,458			1,276,201
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	22,051			28,383
Accumulated earnings (deficit)	(14,872,842		)	(7,022,887		)
Total DISH DBS stockholder’s equity (deficit)	(13,547,333		)	(5,718,303		)
Noncontrolling interest	1,293			1,202
Total stockholder’s equity (deficit)	(13,546,040		)	(5,717,101		)
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity (deficit)	$	5,239,108		$	13,421,163

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

DISH DBS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months						For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Revenue:
Subscriber-related revenue	$	3,693,872		$	3,555,953		$	7,284,576		$	7,029,161
Equipment sales and other revenue	17,111			26,057			34,628			47,507
Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar	13,451			16,555			26,292			32,107
Total revenue	3,724,434			3,598,565			7,345,496			7,108,775
Costs and Expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below - Note 6):
Subscriber-related expenses	2,167,880			2,042,504			4,272,976			4,058,177
Satellite and transmission expenses	192,556			178,660			377,236			326,787
Cost of sales - equipment, services and other	23,804			30,985			54,299			56,211
Subscriber acquisition costs:
Cost of sales - subscriber promotion subsidies	49,829			62,051			97,347			117,394
Other subscriber acquisition costs	205,914			234,242			400,896			462,390
Subscriber acquisition advertising	126,377			126,164			262,810			251,037
Total subscriber acquisition costs	382,120			422,457			761,053			830,821
General and administrative expenses	167,802			178,381			359,476			357,965
Depreciation and amortization (Note 6)	237,248			248,382			461,143			473,348
Total costs and expenses	3,171,410			3,101,369			6,286,183			6,103,309
Operating income (loss)	553,024			497,196			1,059,313			1,005,466
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income	728			10,102			4,945			18,864
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized	(219,328		)	(212,177		)	(441,338		)	(424,256		)
Other, net	392			405			483			745
Total other income (expense)	(218,208		)	(201,670		)	(435,910		)	(404,647		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	334,816			295,526			623,403			600,819
Income tax (provision) benefit, net	(125,871		)	(109,532		)	(230,471		)	(225,414		)
Net income (loss)	208,945			185,994			392,932			375,405
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax	(3,168		)	(4,492		)	(7,113		)	(5,233		)
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS	$	212,113		$	190,486		$	400,045		$	380,638
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net income (loss)	$	208,945		$	185,994		$	392,932		$	375,405
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities	9,959			(5,756		)	(7,573		)	14,195
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit, net	(3,705		)	2,163			1,241			(5,364		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	6,254			(3,593		)	(6,332		)	8,831
Comprehensive income (loss)	215,199			182,401			386,600			384,236
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax	(3,168		)	(4,492		)	(7,113		)	(5,233		)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS	$	218,367		$	186,893		$	393,713		$	389,469

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

DISH DBS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)	$	392,932		$	375,405
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	461,143			473,348
Non-cash, stock-based compensation	14,823			20,517
Deferred tax expense (benefit)	(63,677		)	(46,597		)
Other, net	29,094			(9,788		)
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net	154,289			24,404
Net cash flows from operating activities	988,604			837,289
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
(Purchases) Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities, net	1,345,330			50,495
Purchases of property and equipment	(324,183		)	(415,952		)
Other, net	(724		)	(6,303		)
Net cash flows from investing activities	1,020,423			(371,760		)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Dividend to DISH Orbital Corporation	(8,250,000		)	(650,000		)
Redemption and repurchases of long-term debt	(650,001		)	(101,208		)
Advances from affiliates	188,720			—
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	(13,772		)	(14,846		)
Other, net	13,678			13,273
Net cash flows from financing activities	(8,711,375		)	(752,781		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(6,702,348		)	(287,252		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	6,762,140			4,294,475
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	59,792		$	4,007,223

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.Organization and Business Activities

Principal Business

DISH DBS Corporation (which together with its subsidiaries is referred to as “DISH DBS,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our” unless otherwise required by the context) is a holding company and an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network Corporation (“DISH Network”).  DISH DBS was formed under Colorado law in January 1996 and its common stock is held by DISH Orbital Corporation (“DOC”), a direct subsidiary of DISH Network.  We offer pay-TV services under the DISH® brand (“DISH”) and the Sling® brand (“Sling”) (collectively “Pay-TV” services).  The DISH branded pay-TV service consists of, among other things, Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses authorizing us to use direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”) and Fixed Satellite Service (“FSS”) spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, receiver systems, third-party broadcast operations, customer service facilities, a leased fiber optic network, in-home service and call center operations, and certain other assets utilized in our operations.  The Sling branded pay-TV services consist of, among other things, live, linear streaming over-the-top (“OTT”) Internet-based domestic, international and Latino video programming services (“Sling TV”).  The Sling International video programming service (formerly known as DishWorld) was launched prior to 2015.  Sling International subscribers have historically been included in our Pay-TV subscriber count and represented a small percentage of our Pay-TV subscribers.  During 2015, we launched our Sling domestic and Sling Latino services. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we have included all Sling TV subscribers in our Pay-TV subscriber count.  As of June 30, 2015, we had 13.932 million Pay-TV subscribers in the United States.

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information.  Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements prepared under GAAP.  In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Our results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.  For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.  Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Principles of Consolidation

We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling influence and variable interest entities where we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary.  Minority interests are recorded as noncontrolling interests or redeemable noncontrolling interests.  See below for further discussion.  Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee.  When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

4

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense for each reporting period.  Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for doubtful accounts, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, fair value of multi-element arrangements, capital leases, asset impairments, estimates of future cash flows used to evaluate impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer incentives, programming expenses and subscriber lives.  Economic conditions may increase the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and assumptions indicated above.  Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.

Fair Value Measurements

We determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We apply the following hierarchy in determining fair value:

·Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;

·Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; and quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and

·Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other participants therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts) and current liabilities (excluding the “Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations”) is equal to or approximates fair value due to their short-term nature or proximity to current market rates.  See Note 4 for the fair value of our marketable investment securities.

Fair values for our publicly traded debt securities are based on quoted market prices, when available.  The fair values of private debt are estimated based on an analysis in which we evaluate market conditions, related securities, various public and private offerings, and other publicly available information.  In performing this analysis, we make various assumptions regarding, among other things, credit spreads, and the impact of these factors on the value of the debt securities.  See Note 7 for the fair value of our long-term debt.

5

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

New Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  This converged standard on revenue recognition was issued jointly with the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  ASU 2014-09 provides a framework for revenue recognition that replaces most existing GAAP revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective.  ASU 2014-09 allows for either a full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption.  We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.  We have not yet selected an adoption method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.  On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved a one year deferral on the effective date for implementation of this standard, which changed the effective date for us to January 1, 2018.

3.Supplemental Data — Statements of Cash Flows

The following table presents our supplemental cash flow and other non-cash data.

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Cash paid for interest	$	437,969	$	422,338
Cash received for interest	4,945		17,588
Cash paid for income taxes	1,487		4,321
Cash paid for income taxes to DISH Network	278,970		252,913
Unsettled trades related to repurchases of long-term debt	—		12,673
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar:
Transfer of property and equipment, net	—		432,080
Investment in EchoStar and HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method	—		316,204
Transfer of liabilities and other	—		44,540
Capital distribution to EchoStar, net of deferred taxes of $31,274	—		51,466

6

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

4.Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities

Our marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities consisted of the following:

	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Marketable investment securities:
Current marketable investment securities	$	48,860	$	1,401,145
Restricted marketable investment securities (1)	81,795		76,970
Total marketable investment securities	130,655		1,478,115
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (1)	5,189		10,014
Other investment securities:
Investment in EchoStar preferred tracking stock - cost method	228,795		228,795
Investment in HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method	87,409		87,409
Other investment securities - cost method	11,046		11,046
Total other investment securities (2)	327,250		327,250
Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities	$	463,094	$	1,815,379

(1)Restricted marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents are included in “Restricted cash and marketable investment securities” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(2)Other investment securities are included in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Marketable Investment Securities

Our marketable investment securities portfolio consists of various debt and equity instruments, all of which are classified as available-for-sale.

Current Marketable Investment Securities

Our current marketable investment securities portfolio includes investments in equity securities and various debt instruments including, among others, commercial paper, corporate securities and U.S. treasury and agency securities.

Commercial paper consists mainly of unsecured short-term, promissory notes issued primarily by corporations with maturities ranging up to 365 days.  Corporate securities consist of debt instruments issued by corporations with various maturities normally less than 18 months.  U. S. Treasury and agency securities consist of debt instruments issued by the federal government and other government agencies.

Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our restricted marketable investment securities, together with our restricted cash, included amounts required as collateral for our letters of credit.

7

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Other Investment Securities

We have strategic investments in certain debt and equity securities that are included in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and accounted for using the cost, equity and/or available-for-sale methods of accounting.

Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in securities that are not publicly traded depends on the success of the issuers’ businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient capital, on acceptable terms or at all, and to execute their business plans.  Because private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.

Investment in Tracking Stock

On February 20, 2014, we entered into agreements with EchoStar Corporation (“EchoStar”) to implement a transaction pursuant to which, among other things:  (i) on March 1, 2014, we transferred to EchoStar and Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation (“HSSC”), a subsidiary of EchoStar, five satellites (EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and EchoStar XIV (collectively the “Transferred Satellites”), including related in-orbit incentive obligations and cash interest payments of approximately $59 million), and approximately $11 million in cash in exchange for an aggregate of 6,290,499 shares of a series of preferred tracking stock issued by EchoStar and an aggregate of 81.128 shares of a series of preferred tracking stock issued by HSSC (collectively, the “Tracking Stock”); and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, we lease back certain satellite capacity on the Transferred Satellites (collectively, the “Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction”).  The Tracking Stock generally tracks the residential retail satellite broadband business of Hughes Network Systems, LLC (“HNS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSSC, including without limitation the operations, assets and liabilities attributed to the Hughes residential retail satellite broadband business (collectively, the “Hughes Retail Group”).  The shares of the Tracking Stock issued to us represent an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group.

Since the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction is among entities under common control, we recorded the Tracking Stock at EchoStar’s and HSSC’s historical cost basis for these instruments of $229 million and $87 million, respectively.  The difference between the historical cost basis of the Tracking Stock received and the net carrying value of the Transferred Satellites of $356 million (including debt obligations, net of deferred taxes), plus the $11 million in cash, resulted in a $51 million capital transaction recorded in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Although our investment in the Tracking Stock represents an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group, we have no operational control or significant influence over the Hughes Retail Group business, and currently there is no public market for the Tracking Stock.  As such, the Tracking Stock is accounted for under the cost method of accounting.

On February 20, 2014, DISH Operating L.L.C. (“DOLLC”) and DISH Network L.L.C. (“DNLLC”), each indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of us, entered into an Investor Rights Agreement with EchoStar and HSSC with respect to the Tracking Stock (the “Investor Rights Agreement”).  The Investor Rights Agreement provides, among other things, certain information and consultation rights for us; certain transfer restrictions on the Tracking Stock and certain rights and obligations to offer and sell under certain circumstances (including a prohibition on transfers of the Tracking Stock for one year, with continuing transfer restrictions (including a right of first offer in favor of EchoStar) thereafter, an obligation to sell the Tracking Stock to EchoStar in connection with a change of control of DISH Network and a right to require EchoStar to repurchase the Tracking Stock in connection with a change of control of EchoStar, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions); certain registration rights; certain obligations to provide conversion and exchange rights of the Tracking Stock under certain circumstances; and certain protective covenants afforded to holders of the Tracking Stock.  The Investor Rights Agreement generally will terminate with respect to our interest should we no longer hold any shares of the HSSC-issued Tracking Stock and any registrable securities under the Investor Rights Agreement.

8

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had accumulated net unrealized gains of $36 million and $43 million, respectively.  These amounts, net of related tax effect, were $22 million and $28 million, respectively.  All of these amounts are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” within “Total stockholder’s equity (deficit).”  The components of our available-for-sale investments are summarized in the table below.

	As of June 30, 2015								As of December 31, 2014
	Marketable								Marketable
	Investment		Unrealized						Investment		Unrealized
	Securities		Gains		Losses		Net		Securities		Gains		Losses			Net
	(In thousands)
Debt securities (including restricted):
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	56,754	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	58,254	$	7	$	(11	)	$	(4	)
Commercial paper	11,792		—		—		—		65,696		—		—			—
Corporate securities	—		—		—		—		1,247,403		5,608		(145		)	5,463
Other	13,249		—		—		—		55,788		—		—			—
Equity securities	48,860		35,623		—		35,623		50,974		37,737		—			37,737
Total	$	130,655	$	35,623	$	—	$	35,623	$	1,478,115	$	43,352	$	(156	)	$	43,196

As of June 30, 2015, restricted marketable investment securities included debt securities of $42 million with contractual maturities within one year and $40 million with contractual maturities extending longer than one year through and including five years.  Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as a result of our ability to sell these securities prior to maturity.

Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position

The following table reflects the length of time that the individual securities, accounted for as available-for-sale, have been in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category.

	As of
	June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Loss		Value		Loss
	(In thousands)
Debt Securities:
Less than 12 months	$	—	$	—	$	268,492	$	(100	)
12 months or more	—		—		129,092		(56		)
Total	$	—	$	—	$	397,584	$	(156	)

9

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Fair Value Measurements

Our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

	As of
	June 30, 2015								December 31, 2014
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Cash Equivalents (including restricted)	$	5,189	$	5,189	$	—	$	—	$	6,605,274	$	258,281	$	6,346,993	$	—
Debt securities (including restricted):
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	56,754	$	51,870	$	4,884	$	—	$	58,254	$	42,710	$	15,544	$	—
Commercial paper	11,792		—		11,792		—		65,696		—		65,696		—
Corporate securities	—		—		—		—		1,247,403		—		1,247,403		—
Other	13,249		—		13,249		—		55,788		—		55,788		—
Equity securities	48,860		48,860		—		—		50,974		50,974		—		—
Total	$	130,655	$	100,730	$	29,925	$	—	$	1,478,115	$	93,684	$	1,384,431	$	—

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had no transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements.

5.Inventory

Inventory consisted of the following:

	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Finished goods	$	233,584	$	252,101
Raw materials	126,155		159,095
Work-in-process	106,342		82,350
Total inventory	$	466,081	$	493,546

6.Property and Equipment

Depreciation and amortization expense consisted of the following:

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Equipment leased to customers	$	206,314	$	213,653	$	398,067	$	399,376
Satellites	15,261		15,261		30,522		38,462
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other	15,673		19,468		32,554		35,510
Total depreciation and amortization	$	237,248	$	248,382	$	461,143	$	473,348

Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) do not include depreciation expense related to satellites or equipment leased to customers.

10

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Pay-TV Satellites.  We currently utilize 14 satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator, one of which we own and depreciate over its useful life.  We currently utilize certain capacity on 11 satellites that we lease from EchoStar, which are accounted for as operating leases.  We also lease two satellites from third parties, which are accounted for as capital leases and are depreciated over the shorter of the economic life or the term of the satellite agreement.

As of June 30, 2015, our pay-TV satellite fleet consisted of the following:

			Estimated
			Useful Life
			(Years) /
		Degree	Lease
	Launch	Orbital	Termination
Satellites	Date	Location	Date
Owned:
EchoStar XV (1)	July 2010	45	15
Under Construction:
EchoStar XVIII (2)	2016	110	15
Leased from EchoStar (1):
EchoStar I (3)(4)(5)	December 1995	77	November 2015
EchoStar VII (3)(4)	February 2002	119	June 2016
EchoStar VIII	August 2002	77	Month to month
EchoStar IX	August 2003	121	Month to month
EchoStar X (3)(4)	February 2006	110	February 2021
EchoStar XI (3)(4)	July 2008	110	September 2021
EchoStar XII (3)	July 2003	61.5	September 2017
EchoStar XIV (3)(4)	March 2010	119	February 2023
EchoStar XVI (6)	November 2012	61.5	January 2017
Nimiq 5	September 2009	72.7	September 2019
QuetzSat-1	September 2011	77	November 2021
Leased from Other Third Party:
Anik F3	April 2007	118.7	April 2022
Ciel II	December 2008	129	January 2019

(1)See Note 10 for further discussion of our Related Party Transactions with EchoStar.

(2)EchoStar XVIII is expected to launch during 2016.

(3)We generally have the option to renew each lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite’s useful life.

(4)On February 20, 2014, we entered into the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar pursuant to which, among other things, we transferred these satellites to EchoStar and lease back all available capacity on these satellites.  See Note 4 and Note 10 for further discussion.

(5)We did not exercise our option to renew the satellite capacity agreement for EchoStar I.

(6)We have the option to renew this lease for an additional six-year period.  If we exercise our six-year renewal option, we have the option to renew this lease for an additional five years.

11

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

7.Long-Term Debt

Fair Value of our Long-Term Debt

The following table summarizes the carrying and fair values of our debt facilities as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	As of
	June 30, 2015					December 31, 2014
	Carrying					Carrying
	Value			Fair Value		Value			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (1)	$	—		$	—	$	650,001		$	664,321
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 (2)	1,500,000			1,540,680		1,500,000			1,580,625
4 5/8% Senior Notes due 2017	900,000			926,298		900,000			933,750
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018	1,200,000			1,221,000		1,200,000			1,245,600
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019	1,400,000			1,554,140		1,400,000			1,589,700
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020	1,100,000			1,136,498		1,100,000			1,100,000
6 3/4% Senior Notes due 2021	2,000,000			2,090,000		2,000,000			2,157,500
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2022	2,000,000			2,000,000		2,000,000			2,055,000
5% Senior Notes due 2023	1,500,000			1,407,045		1,500,000			1,470,000
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2024	2,000,000			1,920,000		2,000,000			2,019,800
Other notes payable	14,701			14,701		14,701			14,701
Subtotal	13,614,701			$	13,810,362	14,264,702			$	14,830,997
Unamortized deferred financing costs and debt discounts, net	(46,286		)			(51,473		)
Capital lease obligations (3)	180,910			NA		194,669			NA
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations (including current portion)	$	13,749,325				$	14,407,898

(1)On June 1, 2015, we redeemed the principal balance of our 7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015.

(2)Our 7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 mature on February 1, 2016 and have been reclassified to “Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015.

(3)Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required.

We estimated the fair value of our publicly traded long-term debt using market prices in less active markets (Level 2).

12

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

8.Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

DISH Network Spectrum

DISH Network has invested over $5.0 billion since 2008 to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and related assets.

700 MHz Licenses.  In 2008, DISH Network paid $712 million to acquire certain 700 MHz E Block (“700 MHz”) wireless spectrum licenses, which were granted to DISH Network by the FCC in February 2009.  At the time they were granted, these licenses were subject to certain interim and final build-out requirements.  On October 29, 2013, the FCC issued an order approving a voluntary industry solution to resolve certain interoperability issues affecting the lower 700 MHz spectrum band (the “Interoperability Solution Order”), which requires DISH Network to reduce power emissions on its 700 MHz licenses.  As part of the Interoperability Solution Order, the FCC, among other things, approved DISH Network’s request to modify the original interim and final build-out requirements associated with its 700 MHz licenses so that by March 2017, DISH Network must provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 40% of its total E Block population (the “Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement”).  The FCC also approved DISH Network’s request to modify the 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement so that by March 2021, DISH Network must provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 70% of the population in each of its E Block license areas (the “Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement”).  While the modifications to DISH Network’s 700 MHz licenses provide DISH Network additional time to complete the build-out requirements, the reduction in power emissions could have an adverse impact on DISH Network’s ability to fully utilize its 700 MHz licenses.  If DISH Network fails to meet the Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement, the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by one year, from March 2021 to March 2020, and DISH Network could face the reduction of license area(s).  If DISH Network fails to meet the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement, DISH Network’s authorization may terminate for the geographic portion of each license in which DISH Network is not providing service.

AWS-4 Licenses.  On March 2, 2012, the FCC approved the transfer of 40 MHz of wireless spectrum licenses held by DBSD North America, Inc. (“DBSD North America”) and TerreStar Networks, Inc. (“TerreStar”) to DISH Network.  On March 9, 2012, DISH Network completed the acquisition of 100% of the equity of reorganized DBSD North America (the “DBSD Transaction”) and substantially all of the assets of TerreStar (the “TerreStar Transaction”), pursuant to which DISH Network acquired, among other things, certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by DBSD North America and TerreStar.  The total consideration to acquire the DBSD North America and TerreStar assets was approximately $2.860 billion.

On February 15, 2013, the FCC issued an order, which became effective on March 7, 2013, modifying DISH Network’s licenses to expand its terrestrial operating authority with AWS-4 authority (“AWS-4”).  That order imposed certain limitations on the use of a portion of this spectrum, including interference protections for other spectrum users and power and emission limits that DISH Network presently believes could render 5 MHz of its uplink spectrum (2000-2005 MHz) effectively unusable for terrestrial services and limit its ability to fully utilize the remaining 15 MHz of its uplink spectrum (2005-2020 MHz) for terrestrial services.  These limitations could, among other things, impact the ongoing development of technical standards associated with DISH Network’s wireless business, and may have a material adverse effect on DISH Network’s ability to commercialize its AWS-4 licenses.  That order also mandated certain interim and final build-out requirements for the licenses.  By March 2017, DISH Network must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service to at least 40% of the aggregate population represented by all of the areas covered by the licenses (the “AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement”).  By March 2020, DISH Network was required to provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service to at least 70% of the population in each area covered by an individual license (the “AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement”).

13

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

On December 20, 2013, the FCC issued a further order that, among other things, extended the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement by one year to March 2021 (the “Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement”).  If DISH Network fails to meet the AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement, the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by one year, from March 2021 to March 2020.  If DISH Network fails to meet the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement, DISH Network’s terrestrial authorization for each license area in which it fails to meet the requirement may terminate.  The FCC’s December 20, 2013 order also conditionally waived certain FCC rules for DISH Network’s AWS-4 licenses to allow DISH Network to repurpose all 20 MHz of its uplink spectrum (2000-2020 MHz) for downlink (the “AWS-4 Downlink Waiver”).  If DISH Network fails to notify the FCC that it intends to use its uplink spectrum for downlink by June 20, 2016, the AWS-4 Downlink Waiver will terminate, and the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement will revert back to the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement.

H Block Licenses.  On April 29, 2014, the FCC issued an order granting DISH Network’s application to acquire all 176 wireless spectrum licenses in the H Block auction.  DISH Network paid approximately $1.672 billion to acquire these H Block licenses, including clearance costs associated with the lower H Block spectrum.  The H Block licenses are subject to certain interim and final build-out requirements.  By April 2018, DISH Network must provide reliable signal coverage and offer service to at least 40% of the population in each area covered by an individual H Block license (the “H Block Interim Build-Out Requirement”).  By April 2024, DISH Network must provide reliable signal coverage and offer service to at least 75% of the population in each area covered by an individual H Block license (the “H Block Final Build-Out Requirement”).  If DISH Network fails to meet the H Block Interim Build-Out Requirement, the H Block license term and the H Block Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by two years (from April 2024 to April 2022) for each H Block license area in which it fails to meet the requirement.  If DISH Network fails to meet the H Block Final Build-Out Requirement, its authorization for each H Block license area in which it fails to meet the requirement may terminate.  The FCC has adopted rules for the H Block spectrum band that is adjacent to DISH Network’s AWS-4 licenses.  Depending on the outcome of the standard-setting process for the H Block and DISH Network’s ultimate decision regarding the AWS-4 Downlink Waiver, the rules that the FCC adopted for the H Block could further impact 15 MHz of DISH Network’s AWS-4 uplink spectrum (2005-2020 MHz), which may have a material adverse effect on DISH Network’s ability to commercialize the AWS-4 licenses.

Commercialization of DISH Network’s Wireless Spectrum Licenses and Related Assets.  DISH Network has made substantial investments to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and related assets.  DISH Network may also determine that additional wireless spectrum licenses may be required to commercialize its wireless business and to compete with other wireless service providers.  DISH Network will need to make significant additional investments or partner with others to, among other things, commercialize, build-out, and integrate these licenses and related assets, and any additional acquired licenses and related assets; and comply with regulations applicable to such licenses.  Depending on the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such investments or partnerships could vary significantly.  In connection with the development of DISH Network’s wireless business, including without limitation the efforts described above, we have made cash distributions to partially finance these efforts to date and may make additional cash distributions to finance in whole or in part DISH Network’s future efforts.  See Note 10 for further information regarding our dividends to DOC.  There can be no assurance that DISH Network will be able to develop and implement a business model that will realize a return on these wireless spectrum licenses or that DISH Network will be able to profitably deploy the assets represented by these wireless spectrum licenses.

AWS-3 Auction

The FCC auction of AWS-3 wireless spectrum licenses (the “AWS-3 Licenses”), designated by the FCC as Auction 97 (the “AWS-3 Auction”), commenced on November 13, 2014 and concluded on January 29, 2015.  The FCC’s prohibition on certain communications related to the AWS-3 Auction expired on February 13, 2015.  Also, on February 13, 2015, Northstar Wireless, LLC (“Northstar Wireless”) and SNR Wireless LicenseCo, LLC (“SNR

14

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Wireless”) each filed applications with the FCC to acquire certain AWS-3 Licenses that were made available in the AWS-3 Auction for which it was named as winning bidder and had made the required down payments.  Each of Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless had applied to receive a bidding credit of 25% as designated entities under applicable FCC rules.

Northstar Wireless was the winning bidder for certain AWS-3 Licenses (the “Northstar Licenses”) with gross winning bids totaling approximately $7.845 billion, which after taking into account a 25% bidding credit, equals net winning bids totaling approximately $5.884 billion.  Northstar Wireless is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northstar Spectrum, LLC (“Northstar Spectrum,” and collectively with Northstar Wireless, the “Northstar Entities”).  DISH Network, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, American AWS-3 Wireless II L.L.C. (“American II”), owns an 85% non-controlling interest in Northstar Spectrum.  Northstar Manager, LLC (“Northstar Manager”) owns a 15% controlling interest in, and is the sole manager of, Northstar Spectrum.  Northstar Spectrum is governed by a limited liability company agreement by and between American II and Northstar Manager (the “Northstar Spectrum LLC Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Northstar Spectrum LLC Agreement, American II and Northstar Manager made pro-rata equity contributions in Northstar Spectrum equal to approximately 15% of the net purchase price of the Northstar Licenses.  As of March 2, 2015, the total equity contributions from Northstar Manager to Northstar Spectrum were $133 million.  American II also entered into a Credit Agreement by and among American II, as Lender, Northstar Wireless, as Borrower, and Northstar Spectrum, as Guarantor (the “Northstar Credit Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Northstar Credit Agreement, American II made loans to Northstar Wireless for approximately 85% of the net purchase price of the Northstar Licenses.  After Northstar Wireless made the final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the Northstar Licenses, the total equity contributions from American II to Northstar Spectrum were approximately $750 million and the total loans from American II to Northstar Wireless were approximately $5.001 billion.

SNR Wireless was the winning bidder for certain AWS-3 Licenses (the “SNR Licenses”) with gross winning bids totaling approximately $5.482 billion, which after taking into account a 25% bidding credit, equals net winning bids totaling approximately $4.112 billion.  In addition to the net winning bids, SNR Wireless made a bid withdrawal payment of approximately $8 million to the FCC.  SNR Wireless is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SNR Wireless Holdco, LLC (“SNR Holdco,” and collectively with SNR Wireless, the “SNR Entities”).  DISH Network, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, American AWS-3 Wireless III L.L.C. (“American III”), owns an 85% non-controlling interest in SNR Holdco.  SNR Wireless Management, LLC (“SNR Management”) owns a 15% controlling interest in, and is the sole manager of, SNR Holdco.  SNR Holdco is governed by a limited liability company agreement by and between American III and SNR Management (the “SNR Holdco LLC Agreement”).  Pursuant to the SNR Holdco LLC Agreement, American III and SNR Management made pro-rata equity contributions in SNR Holdco equal to approximately 15% of the net purchase price of the SNR Licenses.  As of March 2, 2015, the total equity contributions from SNR Management to SNR Holdco were $93 million.  American III also entered into a Credit Agreement by and among American III, as Lender, SNR Wireless, as Borrower, and SNR Holdco, as Guarantor (the “SNR Credit Agreement”).  Pursuant to the SNR Credit Agreement, American III made loans to SNR Wireless for the amount of the bid withdrawal payment and approximately 85% of the net purchase price of the SNR Licenses.  After SNR Wireless made the final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the SNR Licenses, the total equity contributions from American III to SNR Holdco were approximately $524 million and the total loans from American III to SNR Wireless were approximately $3.503 billion.

After Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless made their respective final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses (which payments were net of a bidding credit of 25%), DISH Network’s total non-controlling equity and debt investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities were approximately $9.778 billion.  On April 29, 2015, the FCC issued a public notice that, among other things, found the applications filed by Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing.  The FCC’s public notice also set the following filing deadlines related to the applications: (i) petitions to deny the applications must have been filed no later than May 11, 2015; (ii) oppositions to a petition to deny the applications must have been filed no later than May 18, 2015; and (iii) replies to oppositions must have been filed no later than May 26, 2015.  In addition, on April 29, 2015, DISH Network received a letter from the United States Senate

15

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (the “Senate Committee”), requesting certain information related to its relationship with Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless and its participation in the AWS-3 Auction.  DISH Network cannot predict the timing or the outcome of the Senate Committee’s inquiry.

On July 22, 2015, DISH Network, Northstar Wireless, SNR Wireless and certain other parties attended a meeting with staff of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau of the FCC to discuss a draft order that has been circulated by the Chairman’s office for approval by the other Commissioners relating to Northstar Wireless’ and SNR Wireless’ respective pending applications for the AWS-3 Licenses.  At the meeting and as subsequently confirmed by a summary of the meeting released by the FCC, DISH Network was informed that the draft order, if approved, would find that:  (i) DISH Network has a controlling interest in Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, therefore DISH Network’s revenues should be attributed to them, which in turn makes Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless ineligible to receive the 25% bidding credits (approximately $1.961 billion for Northstar Wireless and $1.370 billion for SNR Wireless) for which each had applied to receive as designated entities under applicable FCC rules; (ii) Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless are qualified to hold the AWS-3 Licenses; (iii) the FCC will not designate the matter for a hearing, or refer the matter to the FCC enforcement bureau or the Department of Justice; and (iv) all other relief sought by the parties that filed Petitions to Deny will be denied.  The draft order remains subject to change, and must be approved by a majority of the Commissioners to become effective.

In the event that the FCC grants the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, DISH Network may need to make significant additional loans to the Northstar Entities and to the SNR Entities, or they may need to partner with others, so that the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities may commercialize, build-out and integrate the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, and comply with regulations applicable to the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses.  Depending upon the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such loans or partnerships could vary significantly.  There can be no assurance that DISH Network will be able to obtain a profitable return on its non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities.

In connection with certain funding obligations related to the investments by American II and American III discussed above, in February 2015 we paid a dividend of $8.250 billion to DOC for, among other things, general corporate purposes, which include such funding obligations, and to fund other DISH Network cash needs.  We used a substantial portion of our existing cash and marketable investment securities to pay this dividend.  We may make additional cash distributions to finance in whole or in part loans that DISH Network may make to the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities in the future related to DISH Network’s non-controlling investments in these entities.

As a result of, among other things, DISH Network’s non-controlling debt and equity investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities, we may need to raise significant additional capital in the future, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all, to among other things, make additional cash distributions to DISH Network, continue investing in our business and to pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions.  In addition, economic weakness or weak results of operations may limit our ability to generate sufficient internal cash to fund such additional cash distributions to DISH Network, investments in our businesses, acquisitions and other strategic transactions, as well as to fund ongoing operations and service our debt.  As a result, these conditions make it difficult for us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities because we may not have access to funding sources necessary for us to pursue organic and strategic business development opportunities.

Guarantees

During the third quarter 2009, EchoStar entered into a satellite transponder service agreement for Nimiq 5 through 2024.  We sublease this capacity from EchoStar and also guarantee a certain portion of EchoStar’s obligation under its satellite transponder service agreement through 2019.  As of June 30, 2015, the remaining obligation of our guarantee was $280 million.  As of June 30, 2015, we have not recorded a liability on the balance sheet for this guarantee.

16

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Contingencies

Separation Agreement

On January 1, 2008, DISH Network completed the distribution of its technology and set-top box business and certain infrastructure assets (the “Spin-off”) into a separate publicly-traded company, EchoStar.  In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar that provides, among other things, for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation.  Under the terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed certain liabilities that relate to its business, including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions that occurred prior to the Spin-off.  Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property related claims under which, generally, EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions following the Spin-off and DISH Network will indemnify EchoStar for any liabilities or damages resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off, as well as our acts or omissions following the Spin-off.

Litigation

We are involved in a number of legal proceedings (including those described below) concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our business activities.  Many of these proceedings are at preliminary stages, and many of these proceedings seek an indeterminate amount of damages.  We regularly evaluate the status of the legal proceedings in which we are involved to assess whether a loss is probable or there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred and to determine if accruals are appropriate.  If accruals are not appropriate, we further evaluate each legal proceeding to assess whether an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss can be made.

For certain cases described on the following pages, management is unable to provide a meaningful estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss because, among other reasons, (i) the proceedings are in various stages; (ii) damages have not been sought; (iii) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; (iv) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (v) there are significant factual issues to be resolved; and/or (vi) there are novel legal issues or unsettled legal theories to be presented or a large number of parties (as with many patent-related cases).  For these cases, however, management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcomes of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.

California Institute of Technology

On October 1, 2013, the California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) filed complaints against DISH Network and its wholly-owned subsidiaries DISH Network L.L.C. and dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C., as well as Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC, which are subsidiaries of EchoStar, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,116,710; 7,421,032; 7,916,781 and 8,284,833, each of which is entitled “Serial Concatenation of Interleaved Convolutional Codes forming Turbo-Like Codes.”  Caltech alleges that encoding data as specified by the DVB-S2 standard infringes each of the asserted patents.  In the operative Amended Complaint, served on March 6, 2014, Caltech claims that our Hopper® set-top box, as well as the Hughes defendants’ satellite broadband products and services, infringe the asserted patents by implementing the DVB-S2 standard.  On May 5, 2015, the Court granted summary judgment in our favor as to the DISH products and services alleged in the complaint.  On February 17, 2015, Caltech filed a new complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, asserting the same patents against the same defendants.  Caltech alleges that certain broadband equipment, including without limitation the HT1000 and HT1100 modems, gateway hardware, software and/or firmware that the Hughes defendants provide to, among others, us for our use in connection with the dishNET branded broadband service, infringes these patents.

17

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

ClearPlay, Inc.

On March 13, 2014, ClearPlay, Inc. (“ClearPlay”) filed a complaint against DISH Network, our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., EchoStar, and its wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the District of Utah.  The complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,898,799, entitled “Multimedia Content Navigation and Playback”; 7,526,784, entitled “Delivery of Navigation Data for Playback of Audio and Video Content”; 7,543,318, entitled “Delivery of Navigation Data for Playback of Audio and Video Content”; 7,577,970, entitled “Multimedia Content Navigation and Playback”; and 8,117,282, entitled “Media Player Configured to Receive Playback Filters From Alternative Storage Mediums.”  ClearPlay alleges that the AutoHop™ feature of our Hopper set-top box infringes the asserted patents.  On February 11, 2015, the case was stayed pending various third-party challenges before the United States Patent and Trademark Office regarding the validity of certain of the patents asserted in the action.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

CRFD Research, Inc. (a subsidiary of Marathon Patent Group, Inc.)

On January 17, 2014, CRFD Research, Inc. (“CRFD”) filed a complaint against us, our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., DISH Network, EchoStar, and its wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,191,233 (the “233 patent”).  The 233 patent is entitled “System for Automated, Mid-Session, User-Directed, Device-to-Device Session Transfer System,” and relates to transferring an ongoing software session from one device to another.  CRFD alleges that our Hopper and Joey® set-top boxes infringe the 233 patent.  On the same day, CRFD filed similar complaints against AT&T Inc.; Comcast Corp.; DirecTV; Time Warner Cable Inc.; Cox Communications, Inc.; Akamai Technologies, Inc.; Cablevision Systems Corp. and Limelight Networks, Inc.  CRFD is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  On January 26, 2015, we and EchoStar filed a petition before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 233 patent.  The United States Patent and Trademark Office has agreed to institute a proceeding on our petition, as well as on two third-party petitions challenging the validity of the 233 patent.  On June 4, 2015, the litigation in the District Court was ordered stayed pending resolution of the proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Custom Media Technologies LLC

On August 15, 2013, Custom Media Technologies LLC (“Custom Media”) filed complaints against DISH Network; AT&T Inc.; Charter Communications, Inc.; Comcast Corp.; Cox Communications, Inc.; DirecTV; Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,269,275 (the “275 patent”).  The 275 patent, which is entitled

18

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

“Method and System for Customizing and Distributing Presentations for User Sites,” relates to the provision of customized presentations to viewers over a network, such as “a cable television network, an Internet or other computer network, a broadcast television network, and/or a satellite system.”  Custom Media alleges that our DVR devices and DVR functionality infringe the 275 patent.  Custom Media is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, on November 6, 2013, the Court entered an order substituting DISH Network L.L.C., our wholly-owned subsidiary, as the defendant in DISH Network’s place.  Trial is scheduled to commence on September 19, 2016.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Do Not Call Litigation

On March 25, 2009, our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. was sued in a civil action by the United States Attorney General and several states in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Telephone Sales Rules, as well as analogous state statutes and state consumer protection laws.  The plaintiffs allege that we, directly and through certain independent third-party retailers and their affiliates, committed certain telemarketing violations.  On December 23, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment, which indicated for the first time that the state plaintiffs were seeking civil penalties and damages of approximately $270 million and that the federal plaintiff was seeking an unspecified amount of civil penalties (which could substantially exceed the civil penalties and damages being sought by the state plaintiffs).  The plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive relief that if granted would, among other things, enjoin DISH Network L.L.C., whether acting directly or indirectly through authorized telemarketers or independent third-party retailers, from placing any outbound telemarketing calls to market or promote its goods or services for five years, and enjoin DISH Network L.L.C. from accepting activations or sales from certain existing independent third-party retailers and from certain new independent third-party retailers, except under certain circumstances.  We also filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of all claims.  On December 12, 2014, the Court issued its opinion with respect to the parties’ summary judgment motions.  The Court found that DISH Network L.L.C. is entitled to partial summary judgment with respect to one claim in the action.  In addition, the Court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to partial summary judgment with respect to ten claims in the action, which includes, among other things, findings by the Court establishing DISH Network L.L.C.’s liability for a substantial amount of the alleged outbound telemarketing calls by DISH Network L.L.C. and certain of its independent third-party retailers that were the subject of the plaintiffs’ motion.  The Court did not issue any injunctive relief and did not make any determination on civil penalties or damages, ruling instead that the scope of any injunctive relief and the amount of any civil penalties or damages are questions for trial.  Trial is scheduled to commence on January 5, 2016.  In recent pre-trial disclosures, the federal plaintiff has informed us that it intends to seek up to $900 million in alleged civil penalties at trial, and the state plaintiffs have informed us that they now intend to seek $23.5 billion in alleged civil penalties and damages.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC

On December 20, 2013, Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC (“Dragon IP”) filed complaints against our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., as well as Apple Inc.; AT&T, Inc.; Charter Communications, Inc.; Comcast Corp.; Cox Communications, Inc.; DirecTV; Sirius XM Radio Inc.; Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,930,444 (the “444 patent”), which is entitled “Simultaneous Recording and Playback Apparatus.”  Dragon IP alleges that various of our DVR receivers infringe the 444 patent.  Dragon IP is an entity

19

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  On December 23, 2014, DISH Network L.L.C. filed a petition before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 444 patent.  On April 10, 2015, the Court granted DISH Network L.L.C.’s motion to stay the action in light of DISH Network L.L.C.’s petition and certain other defendants’ petitions pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 444 patent.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Grecia

On March 27, 2015, William Grecia (“Grecia”) filed a complaint against our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,533,860 (the “860 patent”), which is entitled “Personalized Digital Media Access System—PDMAS Part II.”  Grecia alleges that we violate the 860 patent in connection with our digital rights management.  Grecia is the named inventor on the 860 patent.  On June 22, 2015, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

The Hopper Litigation

On May 24, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.; CBS Corporation; Fox Entertainment Group, Inc.; Fox Television Holdings, Inc.; Fox Cable Network Services, L.L.C. and NBCUniversal, LLC.  In the lawsuit, we sought a declaratory judgment that we are not infringing any defendant’s copyright, or breaching any defendant’s retransmission consent agreement, by virtue of the PrimeTime Anytime™ and AutoHop features of our Hopper set-top box.  A consumer can use the PrimeTime Anytime feature, at his or her option, to record certain primetime programs airing on ABC, CBS, Fox, and/or NBC up to every night, and to store those recordings for up to eight days.  A consumer can use the AutoHop feature, at his or her option, to watch certain recordings that the subscriber made with our PrimeTime Anytime feature, commercial-free, if played back at a certain point after the show’s original airing.

Later on May 24, 2012, (i) Fox Broadcasting Company; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature, the AutoHop feature, as well as Slingbox placeshifting functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their retransmission consent agreements, (ii) NBC Studios LLC; Universal Network Television, LLC; Open 4 Business Productions LLC and NBCUniversal, LLC filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights, and (iii) CBS Broadcasting Inc.; CBS Studios Inc. and Survivor Productions LLC filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights.

As a result of certain parties’ competing venue-related motions brought in both the New York and California actions, and certain networks’ filing various counterclaims and amended complaints, the claims have proceeded in the

20

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

following venues:  (1) the copyright and contract claims regarding the ABC and CBS parties in New York; and (2) the copyright and contract claims regarding the Fox and NBC parties in California.

California Actions.  The NBC plaintiffs and Fox plaintiffs filed amended complaints in their respective California actions, adding copyright claims against EchoStar and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., a wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar.  In addition, the Fox plaintiffs’ amended complaint added claims challenging the Hopper Transfers™ feature of our second-generation Hopper set-top box.

On November 7, 2012, the California court denied the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box’s PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features, and the Fox plaintiffs appealed.  On March 27, 2013, at the request of the parties, the Central District of California granted a stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending resolution of the appeal by the Fox plaintiffs.  On July 24, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as to the PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features.  On August 7, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, which was denied on January 24, 2014.  The United States Supreme Court granted the Fox plaintiffs an extension until May 23, 2014 to file a petition for writ of certiorari, but they did not file one.  As a result, the stay of the NBC plaintiffs’ action expired.  On August 6, 2014, at the request of the parties, the Central District of California granted a further stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending a final judgment on all claims in the Fox plaintiffs’ action.  No trial date is currently set on the NBC claims.

In addition, on February 21, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a second motion for preliminary injunction against:  (i) us seeking to enjoin the Hopper Transfers feature in our second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging breach of their retransmission consent agreement; and (ii) us and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. seeking to enjoin the Slingbox placeshifting functionality in our second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging copyright infringement and breach of their retransmission consent agreement.  On September 23, 2013, the California court denied the Fox plaintiffs’ motion.  The Fox plaintiffs appealed, and on July 14, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as to the Hopper Transfers feature and the Slingbox placeshifting functionality in our second-generation Hopper set-top box.

On January 12, 2015, the Court ruled on the Fox plaintiffs’ and our respective motions for summary judgment, holding that:  (a) the Slingbox placeshifting functionality and the PrimeTime Anytime, AutoHop and Hopper Transfers features do not violate the copyright laws; (b) certain quality assurance copies (which were discontinued in November 2012) do violate the copyright laws; and (c) the Slingbox placeshifting functionality, the Hopper Transfers feature and such quality assurance copies breach our Fox retransmission consent agreement.  The only issue remaining for trial is the amount of damages (if any) on the claims upon which the Fox plaintiffs prevailed on summary judgment, but the Court ruled that the Fox plaintiffs could not pursue disgorgement as a remedy.  At the parties’ joint request, the Court has stayed the case until October 1, 2015, and no trial date has been set.

New York Actions.  Both the ABC and CBS parties filed counterclaims in the New York action adding copyright claims against EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and the CBS parties filed a counterclaim alleging that we fraudulently concealed the AutoHop feature when negotiating the renewal of our CBS retransmission consent agreement.  On November 23, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box’s PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features.  On September 18, 2013, the New York court denied that motion.  The ABC plaintiffs appealed, and oral argument on the appeal was heard on February 20, 2014 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  Pursuant to a settlement between us and the ABC parties, during March 2014, the ABC parties withdrew their appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; we and the ABC parties dismissed without prejudice all of our respective claims pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; and the ABC parties granted a covenant not to sue.  Pursuant to a settlement between us and the CBS parties, on December 10, 2014, we and the CBS parties dismissed with prejudice all of our respective claims pending in the New York Court.

21

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend our position in these cases.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted copyrights, or are in breach of any of the retransmission consent agreements, we may be subject to substantial damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  In addition, as a result of this litigation, we may not be able to renew certain of our retransmission consent agreements and other programming agreements on favorable terms or at all.  If we are unable to renew these agreements, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain substitute programming, or that such substitute programming would be comparable in quality or cost to our existing programming.  Loss of access to existing programming could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including, among other things, our gross new subscriber activations and subscriber churn rate.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

LightSquared/Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (LightSquared Bankruptcy)

As previously disclosed in our public filings, L-Band Acquisition, LLC (“LBAC”), DISH Network’s wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a Plan Support Agreement (the “PSA”) with certain senior secured lenders to LightSquared LP (the “LightSquared LP Lenders”) on July 23, 2013, which contemplated the purchase by LBAC of substantially all of the assets of LightSquared LP and certain of its subsidiaries (the “LBAC Bid”) that are debtors and debtors in possession in the LightSquared bankruptcy cases pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), which cases are jointly administered under the caption In re LightSquared Inc., et. al., Case No. 12 12080 (SCC).

Pursuant to the PSA, LBAC was entitled to terminate the PSA in certain circumstances, certain of which required three business days’ written notice, including, without limitation, in the event that certain milestones specified in the PSA were not met.  On January 7, 2014, LBAC delivered written notice of termination of the PSA to the LightSquared LP Lenders.  As a result, the PSA terminated effective on January 10, 2014, and the LBAC Bid was withdrawn.

On August 6, 2013, Harbinger Capital Partners LLC and other affiliates of Harbinger (collectively, “Harbinger”), a shareholder of LightSquared Inc., filed an adversary proceeding against DISH Network, LBAC, EchoStar, Charles W. Ergen (our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer), SP Special Opportunities, LLC (“SPSO”) (an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen), and certain other parties, in the Bankruptcy Court.  Harbinger alleged, among other things, claims based on fraud, unfair competition, civil conspiracy and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage related to certain purchases of LightSquared secured debt by SPSO.  Subsequently, LightSquared intervened to join in certain claims alleged against certain defendants other than DISH Network, LBAC and EchoStar.

On October 29, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the claims in Harbinger’s complaint in their entirety, but granted leave for LightSquared to file its own complaint in intervention.  On November 15, 2013, LightSquared filed its complaint, which included various claims against DISH Network, EchoStar, Mr. Ergen and SPSO.  On December 2, 2013, Harbinger filed an amended complaint, asserting various claims against SPSO.  On December 12, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed several of the claims asserted by LightSquared and Harbinger.  The surviving claims included, among others, LightSquared’s claims against SPSO for declaratory relief, breach of contract and statutory disallowance; LightSquared’s tortious interference claim against DISH Network, EchoStar and Mr. Ergen; and Harbinger’s claim against SPSO for statutory disallowance.  These claims proceeded to a non-jury trial on January 9, 2014.  In its Post-Trial Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered on June 10, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court rejected all claims against DISH Network and EchoStar, and it rejected some but not all claims against the other defendants.  On July 7, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Harbinger’s motion for an appeal of certain Bankruptcy Court orders in the adversary proceeding.

DISH Network intends to vigorously defend any claims against it in this proceeding and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

22

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

LightSquared/Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (Harbinger Colorado and New York Actions)

On July 8, 2014, Harbinger filed suit against DISH Network, LBAC, Mr. Ergen, SPSO, and certain other parties, in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.  The complaint asserts claims for tortious interference with contract and abuse of process, as well as claims alleging violations of the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act and the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act.  Harbinger seeks to rely on many of the same facts and circumstances that were at issue in the LightSquared adversary proceeding pending in the Bankruptcy Court.  Harbinger argues that the defendants’ alleged conduct, among other things, is responsible for Harbinger’s losing control of LightSquared and causing Harbinger to lose certain of its equity interests or rights in LightSquared.  The complaint seeks damages in excess of $500 million, which under federal and state law may be trebled.  On April 28, 2015, the District Court granted DISH Network’s motion to dismiss the complaint.  On May 28, 2015, Harbinger filed a notice of appeal and on July 27, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted Harbinger’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.  This matter is now concluded.

On July 21, 2015, Harbinger filed a substantially similar complaint against DISH Network, LBAC, Mr. Ergen, SPSO, and certain other parties, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.  The complaint again asserts claims for tortious interference with contract and abuse of process, and also repeats the same claims alleging violations of the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act and the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act.  Harbinger again seeks to rely on many of the same facts and circumstances that were at issue in the LightSquared adversary proceeding pending in the Bankruptcy Court.  Harbinger argues that the defendants’ alleged conduct, among other things, is responsible for Harbinger’s losing control of LightSquared and causing Harbinger to lose certain of its equity interests or rights in LightSquared.  This complaint seeks damages in excess of $1.5 billion, which under federal and state law may be trebled.

DISH Network intends to vigorously defend any claims against it in this case and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

LightSquared Transaction Shareholder Derivative Actions

On August 9, 2013, a purported shareholder of DISH Network, Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund (“Jacksonville PFPF”), filed a putative shareholder derivative action in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty claims against the members of DISH Network’s Board of Directors as of that date:  Charles W. Ergen; Joseph P. Clayton; James DeFranco; Cantey M. Ergen; Steven R. Goodbarn; David K. Moskowitz; Tom A. Ortolf; and Carl E. Vogel (collectively, the “Director Defendants”).  In its first amended complaint, Jacksonville PFPF asserted claims that Mr. Ergen breached his fiduciary duty to DISH Network in connection with certain purchases of LightSquared debt by SPSO, an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen, and that the other Director Defendants aided and abetted that alleged breach of duty.  The Jacksonville PFPF claims alleged that (1) the debt purchases created an impermissible conflict of interest and (2) put at risk the LBAC Bid, which as noted above has been withdrawn.  Jacksonville PFPF further claimed that most members of DISH Network’s Board of Directors are beholden to Mr. Ergen to an extent that prevents them from discharging their duties in connection with DISH Network’s participation in the LightSquared bankruptcy auction process.  Jacksonville PFPF is seeking an unspecified amount of damages.  Jacksonville PFPF dismissed its claims against Mr. Goodbarn on October 8, 2013.

Jacksonville PFPF sought a preliminary injunction that would enjoin Mr. Ergen and all of the Director Defendants other than Mr. Goodbarn from influencing DISH Network’s efforts to acquire certain assets of LightSquared in the bankruptcy proceeding.  On November 27, 2013, the Court denied that request but granted narrower relief enjoining Mr. Ergen and anyone acting on his behalf from participating in negotiations related to one aspect of the LBAC Bid, which, as noted above, has been withdrawn.

Five alleged shareholders have filed substantially similar putative derivative complaints in state and federal courts alleging the same or substantially similar claims.  On September 18, 2013, DCM Multi-Manager Fund, LLC filed a duplicative putative derivative complaint in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada, which was consolidated with

23

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

the Jacksonville PFPF action on October 9, 2013.  Between September 25, 2013 and October 2, 2013, City of Daytona Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement System, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System and Iron Worker Mid-South Pension Fund filed duplicative putative derivative complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.  Also on October 2, 2013, Iron Workers District Council (Philadelphia and Vicinity) Retirement and Pension Plan filed its complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

On October 11, 2013, Iron Worker Mid-South Pension Fund dismissed its claims without prejudice.  On October 30, 2013, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System dismissed its claims without prejudice and, on January 2, 2014, filed a new complaint in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada, which, on May 2, 2014, was consolidated with the Jacksonville PFPF action.  On December 13, 2013, City of Daytona Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement System voluntarily dismissed its claims without prejudice.  On March 28, 2014, Iron Workers District Council (Philadelphia and Vicinity) Retirement and Pension Plan voluntarily dismissed its claims without prejudice.

On July 25, 2014, Jacksonville PFPF filed a second amended complaint, which added claims against George R. Brokaw and Charles M. Lillis, as Director Defendants, and Thomas A. Cullen, R. Stanton Dodge and K. Jason Kiser, as officers of DISH Network. Jacksonville PFPF asserted five claims in its second amended complaint, each of which alleged breaches of the duty of loyalty.  Three of the claims were asserted solely against Mr. Ergen; one claim was made against all of the remaining Director Defendants, other than Mr. Ergen and Mr. Clayton; and the final claim was made against Messrs. Cullen, Dodge and Kiser.

DISH Network’s Board of Directors has established a Special Litigation Committee to review the factual allegations and legal claims in these actions.  On October 24, 2014, the Special Litigation Committee filed a report in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada regarding its investigation of the claims and allegations asserted in Jacksonville PFPF’s second amended complaint.  The Special Litigation Committee filed a motion to dismiss the action based, among other things, on its business judgment that it is in the best interests of DISH Network not to pursue the claims asserted by Jacksonville PFPF.  The Director Defendants and Messrs. Cullen, Dodge and Kiser have also filed various motions to dismiss the action.  At a hearing on July 16, 2015, the Court issued an oral decision granting the Special Litigation Committee’s motion to defer to the Special Litigation Committee’s October 24, 2014 report, including its finding that dismissal of the action is in the best interest of DISH Network.  The Court also held that, in light of the granting of the motion to defer, the pending motions to dismiss filed by the individual defendants were moot.  The Court’s oral decision granting the motion to defer will be reflected in a written order, which has not yet been entered.  DISH Network cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Personalized Media Communications, Inc.

During 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. (“PMC”) filed suit against DISH Network; EchoStar and Motorola Inc., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,109,414; 4,965,825; 5,233,654; 5,335,277 and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.  PMC is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  Subsequently, Motorola Inc. settled with PMC, leaving DISH Network and EchoStar as defendants.  On July 18, 2012, pursuant to a Court order, PMC filed a Second Amended Complaint that added Rovi Guides, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.) and TVG-PMC, Inc. (collectively, “Gemstar”) as a party, and added a new claim against all defendants seeking a declaratory judgment as to the scope of Gemstar’s license to the patents in suit, under which DISH Network and EchoStar are sublicensees.  On August 12, 2014, in response to the parties’ respective summary judgment motions related to the Gemstar license issues, the Court ruled in favor of PMC and dismissed all claims by or against Gemstar and entered partial final judgment in PMC’s favor as to those claims.  On September 16, 2014, DISH Network and EchoStar filed a notice of appeal of that partial final judgment.  PMC’s damages expert had contended that DISH Network and EchoStar are liable for damages ranging from approximately $500 million to $650 million as of March 31, 2012, and subsequently modified such damages as ranging from approximately $150 million to $450 million, as of September 30, 2014, which did not include pre-

24

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

judgment interest and could be trebled under Federal law.  On May 7, 2015, DISH Network, EchoStar and PMC entered into a settlement and release agreement that provides, among other things, for a license by PMC to DISH Network and EchoStar for certain patents and patent applications and the dismissal of all of PMC’s claims in the action against DISH Network and EchoStar with prejudice.  On June 4, 2015, the Court dismissed all of PMC’s claims in the action against DISH Network and EchoStar with prejudice.

Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C./LPL Licensing, L.L.C.

On October 17, 2014, Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. and LPL Licensing, L.L.C. (together referred to as “Phoenix”) filed a complaint against DISH Network and our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,987,434 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Transacting Marketing and Sales of Financial Products”; 7,890,366 entitled “Personalized Communication Documents, System and Method for Preparing Same”; 8,352,317 entitled “System for Facilitating Production of Variable Offer Communications”; 8,234,184 entitled “Automated Reply Generation Direct Marketing System”; and 6,999,938 entitled “Automated Reply Generation Direct Marketing System.”  Phoenix alleges that we infringe the asserted patents by making and using products and services that generate customized marketing materials.  Phoenix is an entity that seeks to license a patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  Trial is set scheduled to commence on March 14, 2016.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Qurio Holdings, Inc.

On September 26, 2014, Qurio Holdings, Inc. (“Qurio”) filed a complaint against DISH Network and our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,102,863 entitled “Highspeed WAN To Wireless LAN Gateway” and United States Patent No. 7,787,904 entitled “Personal Area Network Having Media Player And Mobile Device Controlling The Same.”  On the same day, Qurio filed similar complaints against Comcast and DirecTV.  On November 13, 2014, Qurio filed a first amended complaint, which added a claim alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,879,567 entitled “High-Speed WAN To Wireless LAN Gateway.”  Qurio is an entity that seeks to license a patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  On February 9, 2015, the Court granted DISH Network L.L.C.’s motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C.

On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C. (“TDL”) filed suit against DISH Network and EchoStar, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. Re. 35,952, which relates to certain favorite channel features.  TDL is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  The case was stayed in July 2009 pending two reexamination petitions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The case resumed on August 10, 2015.

25

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

TQ Beta LLC

On June 30, 2014, TQ Beta LLC (“TQ Beta”) filed a complaint against us; our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C.; DISH Network; EchoStar; and EchoStar’s subsidiaries EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation, and Sling Media Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The Complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 7,203,456 (the “456 patent”), which is entitled “Method and Apparatus for Time and Space Domain Shifting of Broadcast Signals.”  TQ Beta alleges that our Hopper set-top boxes, ViP 722 and ViP 722k DVR devices, as well as our DISH Anywhere™ service and DISH Anywhere mobile application, infringe the 456 patent.  TQ Beta is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  Trial is scheduled to commence on January 12, 2016.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

TQ Delta, LLC

On July 17, 2015, TQ Delta, LLC (“TQ Delta”) filed a complaint against us, DISH Network and our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.  The Complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,961,369 (the “369 patent”), which is entitled “System and Method for Scrambling the Phase of the Carriers in a Multicarrier Communications System”; United States Patent No. 8,718,158 (the “158 patent”), which is entitled “System and Method for Scrambling the Phase of the Carriers in a Multicarrier Communications System”; United States Patent No. 9,014,243 (the “243 patent”), which is entitled “System and Method for Scrambling Using a Bit Scrambler and a Phase Scrambler”; United States Patent No.7,835,430 (the “430 patent”), which is entitled “Multicarrier Modulation Messaging for Frequency Domain Received Idle Channel Noise Information”; United States Patent No. 8,238,412 (the “412 patent”), which is entitled “Multicarrier Modulation Messaging for Power Level per Subchannel Information”; United States Patent No. 8,432,956 (the “956 patent”), which is entitled “Multicarrier Modulation Messaging for Power Level per Subchannel Information”; and United States Patent No. 8,611,404 (the “404 patent”), which is entitled “Multicarrier Transmission System with Low Power Sleep Mode and Rapid-On Capability.”  TQ Delta alleges that our satellite TV service, Internet service, set-top boxes, gateways, routers, modems, adapters and networks that operate in accordance with one or more Multimedia over Coax Alliance Standards infringe the asserted patents.  On the same day, in the same court, TQ Delta filed actions alleging infringement of the same patents against Comcast Corp., Cox Communications, Inc., DirecTV, Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc.  TQ Delta is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Waste Disposal Inquiry

The California Attorney General and the Alameda County (California) District Attorney are investigating whether certain of our waste disposal policies, procedures and practices are in violation of the California Business and

26

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Professions Code and the California Health and Safety Code.  We expect that these entities will seek injunctive and monetary relief.  The investigation appears to be part of a broader effort to investigate waste handling and disposal processes of a number of industries.  While we are unable to predict the outcome of this investigation, we do not believe that the outcome will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Other

In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, including, among other things, disputes with programmers regarding fees.  In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.

9.Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors

Our senior notes are fully, unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by all of our subsidiaries other than minor subsidiaries and the stand-alone entity DISH DBS has no independent assets or operations.  Therefore, supplemental financial information on a condensed consolidating basis of the guarantor subsidiaries is not required.  There are no restrictions on our ability to obtain cash dividends or other distributions of funds from the guarantor subsidiaries, except those imposed by applicable law.

10.Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions with DISH Network

On February 12, 2015, we paid a dividend of $8.250 billion to DOC for, among other things, general corporate purposes, which include certain funding obligations related to DISH Network’s non-controlling equity and debt investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities, and to fund other DISH Network cash needs.

On October 14, 2014, we paid a dividend of $1.5 billion to DOC in connection with, among other things, DISH Network’s general corporate purposes.

On May 2, 2014, DISH Network contributed its equity interest in Sling TV Holding L.L.C. (“Sling TV Holding,” formerly known as DISH Digital Holding L.L.C.) to us.  We recorded all of the assets and liabilities at historical cost and the difference was recorded as a deemed distribution in “Stockholder’s equity (deficit)” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  As a result, all operating activities of Sling TV Holding are included in our financial results beginning May 2, 2014.

On March 28, 2014, we paid a dividend of $650 million to DOC in connection with, among other things, the funding of certain payments by DISH Network related to its winning bid for all 176 wireless spectrum licenses in the H Block auction.  See Note 8 for further information.

Advertising Sales.  We provide advertising services to DISH Network’s broadband business.  During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we received revenue associated with these services of $2 million and $5 million, respectively, in “Subscriber-related revenue” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we received revenue associated with these services of $6 million and $9 million, respectively.

27

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Broadband, Wireless and Other Operations.  We provide certain administrative support such as legal, information systems, marketing, human resources, accounting and finance services to DISH Network’s Broadband, Wireless and other operations.  During each of the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the costs associated with these services were $3 million.  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the costs associated with these services were $7 million and $6 million, respectively.  In addition, we provide call center, installation and other services to DISH Network for its Broadband business. 

Related Party Transactions with EchoStar

Following the Spin-off, DISH Network and EchoStar have operated as separate publicly-traded companies, and, except for the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction and Sling TV Holding described below, neither entity has any ownership interest in the other.  However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family.

EchoStar is our primary supplier of set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations and a supplier of the vast majority of our transponder capacity.  Generally, the amounts we pay EchoStar for products and services are based on pricing equal to EchoStar’s cost plus a fixed margin (unless noted differently below), which will vary depending on the nature of the products and services provided.

In connection with and following the Spin-off, we and EchoStar have entered into certain agreements pursuant to which we obtain certain products, services and rights from EchoStar, EchoStar obtains certain products, services and rights from us, and we and EchoStar have indemnified each other against certain liabilities arising from our respective businesses.  We also may enter into additional agreements with EchoStar in the future.  The following is a summary of the terms of our principal agreements with EchoStar that may have an impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

“Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar”

Remanufactured Receiver Agreement.  We entered into a remanufactured receiver agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which EchoStar has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase remanufactured receivers and accessories from us at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the equipment purchased.  In November 2014, we and EchoStar extended this agreement until December 31, 2015.  EchoStar may terminate the remanufactured receiver agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to us.  We may also terminate this agreement if certain entities acquire us.

Satellite Capacity Leased to EchoStar.  Since the Spin-off, we have entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which EchoStar leases certain capacity on certain satellites owned by us.  The fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the applicable satellite, the number of transponders that are leased on the applicable satellite and the length of the lease.  The term of each lease is set forth below:

·EchoStar XV.  During May 2013, we began leasing satellite capacity to EchoStar on EchoStar XV and relocated the satellite for testing at EchoStar’s Brazilian authorization at the 45 degree orbital location.  Effective March 1, 2014, this lease converted to a month-to-month lease.  Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice.  Upon termination, EchoStar is responsible, among other things, for relocating this satellite from the 45 degree orbital location back to the 61.5 degree orbital location.

28

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Real Estate Lease Agreements.  Since the Spin-off, DISH Network has entered into lease agreements pursuant to which DISH Network leases certain real estate to EchoStar.  The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic areas, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises.  The term of each lease is set forth below:

·El Paso Lease Agreement.  During 2012, DISH Network leased certain space at 1285 Joe Battle Blvd., El Paso, Texas to EchoStar for an initial period ending on August 1, 2015, which also provides EchoStar with renewal options for four consecutive three-year terms.  During the second quarter 2015, EchoStar exercised its first renewal option for a period ending on August 1, 2018.

·American Fork Occupancy License Agreement.  During 2013, DISH Network subleased certain space at 796 East Utah Valley Drive, American Fork, Utah to EchoStar for a period ending on July 31, 2017.  In connection with the Exchange Agreement relating to Sling TV Holding discussed below, this sublease terminated during the fourth quarter 2014.

“Subscriber-related expenses”

During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $3 million and $2 million, respectively, for subscriber-related expenses from EchoStar.  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $6 million and $3 million, respectively, for subscriber-related expenses from EchoStar.  These amounts are recorded in “Subscriber-related expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The agreements pertaining to these expenses are discussed below.

SlingService Services Agreement.  Effective February 23, 2010, we entered into an agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive certain services related to placeshifting, which is used for, among other things, the DISH Anywhere mobile application.  The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services.  This agreement had an initial term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms.  This agreement automatically renewed on February 23, 2015 for an additional one-year period until February 23, 2016.  This agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar.

DISH Remote Access Services Agreement.  Effective February 23, 2010, we entered into an agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive, among other things, certain remote DVR management services.  The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services.  This agreement had an initial term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms.  This agreement automatically renewed on February 23, 2015 for an additional one-year period until February 23, 2016.  This agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar.

“Satellite and transmission expenses”

During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $183 million and $169 million, respectively, for satellite and transmission expenses from EchoStar.  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $358 million and $307 million, respectively, for satellite and transmission expenses from EchoStar.  These amounts are recorded in “Satellite and transmission expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The agreements pertaining to these expenses are discussed below.

Broadcast Agreement.  Effective January 1, 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a broadcast agreement (the “2012 Broadcast Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides broadcast services to us, including teleport services such as transmission and downlinking, channel origination services, and channel management services, for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016.  The fees for services provided under the 2012 Broadcast

29

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Agreement are calculated at either:  (a) EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed dollar fee, which is subject to certain adjustments; or (b) EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the services provided.  We have the ability to terminate channel origination services and channel management services for any reason and without any liability upon at least 60 days notice to EchoStar.  If we terminate the teleport services provided under the 2012 Broadcast Agreement for a reason other than EchoStar’s breach, we are generally obligated to reimburse EchoStar for any direct costs EchoStar incurs related to any such termination that it cannot reasonably mitigate.

Broadcast Agreement for Certain Sports Related Programming.  During May 2010, we and EchoStar entered into a broadcast agreement pursuant to which EchoStar provides certain broadcast services to us in connection with our carriage of certain sports related programming.  The term of this agreement is for ten years.  If we terminate this agreement for a reason other than EchoStar’s breach, we are generally obligated to reimburse EchoStar for any direct costs EchoStar incurs related to any such termination that it cannot reasonably mitigate.  The fees for the broadcast services provided under this agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and provide such services.

Satellite Capacity Leased from EchoStar.  Since the Spin-off, we have entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which we lease certain capacity on certain satellites owned or leased by EchoStar.  The fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the applicable satellite, the number of transponders that are leased on the applicable satellite and the length of the lease.  See “Pay-TV Satellites” in Note 6 for further information.  The term of each lease is set forth below:

·EchoStar I, VII, X, XI and XIV.  On March 1, 2014, we began leasing all available capacity from EchoStar on the EchoStar I, VII, X, XI and XIV satellites.  The term of each satellite capacity agreement generally terminates upon the earlier of:  (i) the end-of-life of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; or (iii) a certain date, which depends upon, among other things, the estimated useful life of the satellite.  We generally have the option to renew each satellite capacity agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite’s life.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew such agreements will be exercised.  We did not exercise our option to renew the satellite capacity agreement for EchoStar I.

·EchoStar VIII.  During May 2013, we began leasing capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar VIII as an in-orbit spare.  Effective March 1, 2014, this lease converted to a month-to-month lease.  Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice.

·EchoStar IX.  We lease certain satellite capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar IX.  Subject to availability, we generally have the right to continue to lease satellite capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar IX on a month-to-month basis.

·EchoStar XII.  The lease for EchoStar XII generally terminates upon the earlier of:  (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite (unless we determine to renew on a year-to-year basis); (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponders on which service is being provided fails; or (iv) a certain date, which depends upon, among other things, the estimated useful life of the satellite, whether the replacement satellite fails at launch or in orbit prior to being placed into service and the exercise of certain renewal options.  We generally have the option to renew the lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the satellite’s life.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew this agreement will be exercised.

·EchoStar XVI.  During December 2009, we entered into a transponder service agreement with EchoStar to lease all of the capacity on EchoStar XVI, a DBS satellite, after its service commencement date.  EchoStar XVI was launched during November 2012 to replace EchoStar XV at the 61.5 degree orbital location and is currently in service.  Under the original transponder service agreement, the initial term generally expired upon the earlier of:  (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite failed; (iii) 

30

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

the date the transponder(s) on which service was being provided under the agreement failed; or (iv) ten years following the actual service commencement date.  Prior to expiration of the initial term, we also had the option to renew on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the satellite.  Effective December 21, 2012, we and EchoStar amended the transponder service agreement to, among other things, change the initial term to generally expire upon the earlier of:  (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponder(s) on which service is being provided under the agreement fails; or (iv) four years following the actual service commencement date.  Prior to expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew for an additional six-year period.  Prior to expiration of the initial term, EchoStar also has the right, upon certain conditions, to renew for an additional six-year period.  If either we or EchoStar exercise our respective six-year renewal options, then we have the option to renew for an additional five-year period prior to expiration of the then-current term.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew this agreement will be exercised.

Nimiq 5 Agreement.  During 2009, EchoStar entered into a fifteen-year satellite service agreement with Telesat Canada (“Telesat”) to receive service on all 32 DBS transponders on the Nimiq 5 satellite at the 72.7 degree orbital location (the “Telesat Transponder Agreement”).  During 2009, EchoStar also entered into a satellite service agreement (the “DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement”) with us, pursuant to which we currently receive service from EchoStar on all 32 of the DBS transponders covered by the Telesat Transponder Agreement.  DISH Network has also guaranteed certain obligations of EchoStar under the Telesat Transponder Agreement.  See discussion under “Guarantees” in Note 8.

Under the terms of the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement, we make certain monthly payments to EchoStar that commenced in September 2009 when the Nimiq 5 satellite was placed into service and continue through the service term.  Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement, the service term will expire ten years following the date the Nimiq 5 satellite was placed into service.  Upon expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite.  Upon in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement will be exercised or that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.

QuetzSat-1 Lease Agreement.  During 2008, EchoStar entered into a ten-year satellite service agreement with SES Latin America S.A. (“SES”), which provides, among other things, for the provision by SES to EchoStar of service on 32 DBS transponders on the QuetzSat-1 satellite.  During 2008, EchoStar also entered into a transponder service agreement (“QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement”) with us pursuant to which we receive service from EchoStar on 24 DBS transponders.  QuetzSat-1 was launched on September 29, 2011 and was placed into service during the fourth quarter 2011 at the 67.1 degree orbital location while we and EchoStar explored alternative uses for the QuetzSat-1 satellite.  In the interim, EchoStar provided us with alternate capacity at the 77 degree orbital location.  During the third quarter 2012, we and EchoStar entered into an agreement pursuant to which we sublease five DBS transponders back to EchoStar.  During January 2013, QuetzSat-1 was moved to the 77 degree orbital location and we commenced commercial operations at that location in February 2013.

Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement, the initial service term will expire in November 2021.  Upon expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite.  Upon an in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement will be exercised or that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.

31

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

103 Degree Orbital Location/SES-3.  During May 2012, EchoStar entered into a spectrum development agreement (the “103 Spectrum Development Agreement”) with Ciel Satellite Holdings Inc. (“Ciel”) to develop certain spectrum rights at the 103 degree orbital location (the “103 Spectrum Rights”).  During June 2013, we and EchoStar entered into a spectrum development agreement (the “DISH 103 Spectrum Development Agreement”) pursuant to which we may use and develop the 103 Spectrum Rights.  During the third quarter 2013, we made a $23 million payment to EchoStar in exchange for its rights under the 103 Spectrum Development Agreement.  In accordance with accounting principles that apply to transfers of assets between companies under common control, we recorded EchoStar’s net book value of this asset of $20 million in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and recorded the amount in excess of EchoStar’s net book value of $3 million as a capital distribution.  Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH 103 Spectrum Development Agreement, the term generally will continue for the duration of the 103 Spectrum Rights.

In connection with the 103 Spectrum Development Agreement, during May 2012, EchoStar also entered into a ten-year service agreement with Ciel pursuant to which EchoStar leases certain satellite capacity from Ciel on the SES-3 satellite at the 103 degree orbital location (the “103 Service Agreement”).  During June 2013, we and EchoStar entered into an agreement pursuant to which we lease certain satellite capacity from EchoStar on the SES-3 satellite (the “DISH 103 Service Agreement”).  Under the terms of the DISH 103 Service Agreement, we make certain monthly payments to EchoStar through the service term.  Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH 103 Service Agreement, the initial service term will expire on the earlier of: (i) the date the SES-3 satellite fails; (ii) the date the transponder(s) on which service was being provided under the agreement fails; or (iii) ten years following the actual service commencement date.  Upon in-orbit failure or end of life of the SES-3 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite.  There can be no assurance that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.

TT&C Agreement.  Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a telemetry, tracking and control (“TT&C”) agreement pursuant to which we receive TT&C services from EchoStar for certain satellites for a period ending on December 31, 2016 (the “2012 TT&C Agreement”).  The fees for services provided under the 2012 TT&C Agreement are calculated at either: (i) a fixed fee; or (ii) cost plus a fixed margin, which will vary depending on the nature of the services provided.  We are able to terminate the 2012 TT&C Agreement for any reason upon 60 days notice.

DISHOnline.com Services Agreement.  Effective January 1, 2010, we entered into a two-year agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive certain services associated with an online video portal.  The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services.  We have the option to renew this agreement for successive one year terms and the agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar.  In October 2014, we exercised our right to renew this agreement for a one-year period ending on December 31, 2015.

Sling TV Holding.  On May 2, 2014, DISH Network contributed its equity interest in Sling TV Holding to us.  See “Related Party Transactions with DISH Network” within the related party section previously discussed.  Effective July 1, 2012, DISH Network and EchoStar formed Sling TV Holding, which was owned two-thirds by DISH Network and one-third by EchoStar and was consolidated into DISH Network’s financial statements beginning July 1, 2012.  Sling TV Holding was formed to develop and commercialize certain advanced technologies.  At that time, DISH Network, EchoStar and Sling TV Holding entered into the following agreements with respect to Sling TV Holding:  (i) a contribution agreement pursuant to which DISH Network and EchoStar contributed certain assets in exchange for its respective ownership interests in Sling TV Holding; (ii) a limited liability company operating agreement (the “Operating Agreement”), which provides for the governance of Sling TV Holding; and (iii) a commercial agreement (the “Commercial Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other things, Sling TV Holding has:  (a) certain rights and corresponding obligations with respect to its business; and (b) the right, but not the obligation, to receive certain services from DISH Network and EchoStar, respectively.  Since this was a formation

32

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

of an entity under common control and a step-up in basis was not allowed, each party’s contributions were recorded at historical book value for accounting purposes.

Effective August 1, 2014, EchoStar and Sling TV Holding entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other things, Sling TV Holding distributed certain assets to EchoStar and EchoStar reduced its interest in Sling TV Holding to a ten percent non-voting interest.  We now have a ninety percent equity interest and a 100% voting interest in Sling TV Holding.  In addition, we, EchoStar and Sling TV Holding amended and restated the Operating Agreement, primarily to reflect the changes implemented by the Exchange Agreement.  Finally, we, EchoStar and Sling TV Holding amended and restated the Commercial Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, Sling TV Holding:  (1) continues to have certain rights and corresponding obligations with respect to its business; (2) continues to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive certain services from us and EchoStar; and (3) has a license from EchoStar to use certain of the assets distributed to EchoStar as part of the Exchange Agreement.  Sling TV Holding operates, through its subsidiary Sling TV L.L.C., the Sling TV services.

Since the Exchange Agreement is among entities under common control, we recorded the difference between the historical cost basis of the assets transferred to EchoStar and our historical cost basis in EchoStar’s one-third noncontrolling interest in Sling TV Holding as a $6 million, net of deferred taxes, capital distribution in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  In addition, we recorded the initial fair value of EchoStar’s ten percent non-voting interest as a $14 million, net of deferred taxes, deemed distribution in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

EchoStar’s ten percent non-voting interest is redeemable, subject to certain conditions, at fair value within sixty days following the fifth anniversary of the Exchange Agreement.  This interest is considered temporary equity under the applicable accounting guidance and is thus recorded as part of “Redeemable noncontrolling interest” in the mezzanine section of our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  EchoStar’s redeemable noncontrolling interest in Sling TV Holding was initially accounted for at fair value, which established a minimum threshold value for this interest.  Redemption of the interest is contingent on a certain performance goal being achieved by Sling TV Holding, which is not yet probable of being achieved.

“General and administrative expenses”

During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $23 million and $28 million, respectively, for general and administrative expenses from EchoStar.  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $43 million and $49 million, respectively, for general and administrative expenses from EchoStar.  These amounts are recorded in “General and administrative expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The agreements pertaining to these expenses are discussed below.

Product Support Agreement.  In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a product support agreement pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to receive product support from EchoStar (including certain engineering and technical support services) for all set-top boxes and related accessories that EchoStar has previously sold and in the future may sell to us.  The fees for the services provided under the product support agreement are calculated at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided.  The term of the product support agreement is the economic life of such receivers and related accessories, unless terminated earlier.  We may terminate the product support agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice.  In the event of an early termination of this agreement, we are entitled to a refund of any unearned fees paid to EchoStar for the services.

33

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Real Estate Lease Agreements.  We have entered into lease agreements pursuant to which we lease certain real estate from EchoStar.  The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises.  The term of each lease is set forth below:

·Inverness Lease Agreement.  The lease for certain space at 90 Inverness Circle East in Englewood, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016.  This agreement can be terminated by either party upon six months prior notice.

·Meridian Lease Agreement.  The lease for all of 9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016.

·Santa Fe Lease Agreement.  The lease for all of 5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016, with a renewal option for one additional year.

·EchoStar Data Networks Sublease Agreement.  The sublease for certain space at 211 Perimeter Center in Atlanta, Georgia is for a period ending on October 31, 2016.

·Gilbert Lease Agreement.  Effective August 1, 2014, we began leasing certain space from EchoStar at 801 N. DISH Dr. in Gilbert, Arizona for a period ending on July 31, 2016.  We also have renewal options for three additional one-year terms.

·Cheyenne Lease Agreement. The lease for certain space at 530 EchoStar Drive in Cheyenne, Wyoming is for a period ending on December 31, 2031.

Application Development Agreement.  During the fourth quarter 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a set-top box application development agreement (the “Application Development Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides us with certain services relating to the development of web-based applications for set-top boxes for a period ending on February 1, 2016.  The Application Development Agreement renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier by us or EchoStar at any time upon at least 90 days notice.  The fees for services provided under the Application Development Agreement are calculated at EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the services provided.

XiP Encryption Agreement.  During the third quarter 2012, we entered into an encryption agreement with EchoStar for our whole-home HD DVR line of set-top boxes (the “XiP Encryption Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides certain security measures on our whole-home HD DVR line of set-top boxes to encrypt the content delivered to the set-top box via a smart card and secure the content between set-top boxes.  The initial term of the XiP Encryption Agreement was for a period until December 31, 2014.  Under the XiP Encryption Agreement, we had the option, but not the obligation, to extend the XiP Encryption Agreement for one additional year upon 180 days notice prior to the end of the term.  On May 5, 2014, we provided EchoStar notice to extend the XiP Encryption Agreement for one additional year until December 31, 2015.  We and EchoStar each have the right to terminate the XiP Encryption Agreement for any reason upon at least 30 days notice and 180 days notice, respectively.  The fees for the services provided under the XiP Encryption Agreement are calculated on a monthly basis based on the number of receivers utilizing such security measures each month.

Sling Trademark License Agreement.  On December 31, 2014, Sling TV L.L.C. entered into an agreement with Sling Media, Inc., a subsidiary of EchoStar, pursuant to which we have the right for a fixed fee to use certain trademarks, domain names and other intellectual property related to the “Sling” trademark for a period ending on December 31, 2016.

34

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Professional Services Agreement.  Prior to 2010, in connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into various agreements with EchoStar including the Transition Services Agreement, Satellite Procurement Agreement and Services Agreement, which all expired on January 1, 2010 and were replaced by a Professional Services Agreement.  During 2009, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed that EchoStar shall continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive the following services from DISH Network, among others, certain of which were previously provided under the Transition Services Agreement: information technology, travel and event coordination, internal audit, legal, accounting and tax, benefits administration, program acquisition services and other support services.  Additionally, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed that DISH Network shall continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to engage EchoStar to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network (previously provided under the Satellite Procurement Agreement) and receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services from EchoStar (previously provided under the Services Agreement) and other support services.  The Professional Services Agreement automatically renewed on January 1, 2015 for an additional one-year period until January 1, 2016 and renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier by either party upon at least 60 days notice.  However, either party may terminate the Professional Services Agreement in part with respect to any particular service it receives for any reason upon at least 30 days notice.  Revenue for services provided by us to EchoStar under the Professional Services Agreement is recorded in “Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Other Agreements — EchoStar

Receiver Agreement.  EchoStar is currently our primary supplier of set-top box receivers.  Effective January 1, 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a receiver agreement (the “2012 Receiver Agreement”) pursuant to which we had the right, but not the obligation, to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment from EchoStar for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014.  We had an option, but not the obligation, to extend the 2012 Receiver Agreement for one additional year upon 180 days notice prior to the end of the term.  On May 5, 2014, we provided EchoStar notice to extend the 2012 Receiver Agreement for one additional year until December 31, 2015.  The 2012 Receiver Agreement allows us to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories and other equipment from EchoStar either:  (i) at a cost (decreasing as EchoStar reduces costs and increasing as costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on EchoStar’s mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased.  Under the 2012 Receiver Agreement, EchoStar’s margins will be increased if they are able to reduce the costs of their digital set-top boxes and their margins will be reduced if these costs increase.  EchoStar provides us with standard manufacturer warranties for the goods sold under the 2012 Receiver Agreement.  Additionally, the 2012 Receiver Agreement includes an indemnification provision, whereby the parties indemnify each other for certain intellectual property matters.  We are able to terminate the 2012 Receiver Agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to EchoStar.  EchoStar is able to terminate the 2012 Receiver Agreement if certain entities acquire us.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we purchased set-top boxes and other equipment from EchoStar of $193 million and $296 million, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we purchased set-top boxes and other equipment from EchoStar of $416 million and $590 million, respectively.  Included in these amounts are purchases of certain broadband equipment from EchoStar under the 2012 Receiver Agreement.  These amounts are initially included in “Inventory” and are subsequently capitalized as “Property and equipment, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or expensed as “Subscriber acquisition costs” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) when the equipment is deployed.

35

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

Tax Sharing Agreement.  In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into a tax sharing agreement with EchoStar which governs our respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Spin-off with respect to taxes for the periods ending on or before the Spin-off.  Generally, all pre-Spin-off taxes, including any taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to implement the Spin-off, are borne by DISH Network, and DISH Network will indemnify EchoStar for such taxes.  However, DISH Network is not liable for and will not indemnify EchoStar for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the Spin-off or certain related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free distributions pursuant to any provision of Section 355 or Section 361 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) because of: (i) a direct or indirect acquisition of any of EchoStar’s stock, stock options or assets; (ii) any action that EchoStar takes or fails to take; or (iii) any action that EchoStar takes that is inconsistent with the information and representations furnished to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to counsel in connection with any opinion being delivered by counsel with respect to the Spin-off or certain related transactions.  In such case, EchoStar is solely liable for, and will indemnify DISH Network for, any resulting taxes, as well as any losses, claims and expenses.  The tax sharing agreement will only terminate after the later of the full period of all applicable statutes of limitations, including extensions, or once all rights and obligations are fully effectuated or performed.

TiVo.  On April 29, 2011, DISH Network and EchoStar entered into a settlement agreement with TiVo Inc. (“TiVo”).  The settlement resolved all pending litigation between DISH Network and EchoStar, on the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, including litigation relating to alleged patent infringement involving certain DISH digital video recorders, or DVRs.  Under the settlement agreement, all pending litigation was dismissed with prejudice and all injunctions that permanently restrain, enjoin or compel any action by DISH Network or EchoStar were dissolved.  DISH Network and EchoStar are jointly responsible for making payments to TiVo in the aggregate amount of $500 million, including an initial payment of $300 million and the remaining $200 million in six equal annual installments between 2012 and 2017.  Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off of EchoStar from DISH Network, DISH Network made the initial payment to TiVo in May 2011, except for the contribution from EchoStar totaling approximately $10 million, representing an allocation of liability relating to EchoStar’s sales of DVR-enabled receivers to an international customer.  Future payments will be allocated between DISH Network and EchoStar based on historical sales of certain licensed products, with DISH Network being responsible for 95% of each annual payment.

Patent Cross-License Agreements.  During December 2011, DISH Network and EchoStar entered into separate patent cross-license agreements with the same third party whereby: (i) EchoStar and such third party licensed their respective patents to each other subject to certain conditions; and (ii) DISH Network and such third party licensed their respective patents to each other subject to certain conditions (each, a “Cross-License Agreement”).  Each Cross License Agreement covers patents acquired by the respective party prior to January 1, 2017 and aggregate payments under both Cross-License Agreements total less than $10 million.  Each Cross License Agreement also contains an option to extend each Cross-License Agreement to include patents acquired by the respective party prior to January 1, 2022.  If both options are exercised, the aggregate additional payments to such third party would total less than $3 million.  However, DISH Network and EchoStar may elect to extend their respective Cross-License Agreement independently of each other.  Since the aggregate payments under both Cross-License Agreements were based on the combined annual revenues of DISH Network and EchoStar, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed to allocate their respective payments to such third party based on their respective percentage of combined total revenue.

Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar.  On February 20, 2014, we entered into the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar pursuant to which, among other things: (i) on March 1, 2014, we transferred to EchoStar and HSSC the Transferred Satellites, including related in-orbit incentive obligations and cash interest payments of approximately $59 million and approximately $11 million in cash in exchange for the Tracking Stock; and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, we lease back all available satellite capacity on the Transferred Satellites.  The Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction is further described below:

36

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

·Transaction Agreement.  On February 20, 2014, DOLLC, DNLLC and EchoStar XI Holding L.L.C., all indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of us, entered into the Transaction Agreement with EchoStar, HSSC and Alpha Company LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar, pursuant to which, on March 1, 2014, we, among other things, transferred to EchoStar and HSSC the Transferred Satellites in exchange for the Tracking Stock.  The Tracking Stock generally tracks the Hughes Retail Group.  The shares of the Tracking Stock issued to us represent an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group.  Since the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction is among entities under common control, we recorded the Tracking Stock at EchoStar’s and HSSC’s historical cost basis for these instruments of $229 million and $87 million, respectively.  The difference between the historical cost basis of the Tracking Stock received and the net carrying value of the Transferred Satellites of $356 million (including debt obligations, net of deferred taxes), plus the $11 million in cash, resulted in a $51 million capital transaction recorded in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Although our investment in the Tracking Stock represents an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group, we have no operational control or significant influence over the Hughes Retail Group business, and currently there is no public market for the Tracking Stock.  As such, the Tracking Stock is accounted for under the cost method of accounting.  The Transaction Agreement includes, among other things, customary mutual provisions for representations, warranties and indemnification.

·Satellite Capacity Leased from EchoStar.  On February 20, 2014, we entered into satellite capacity agreements with certain subsidiaries of EchoStar pursuant to which, beginning March 1, 2014, we, among other things, lease all available satellite capacity on the Transferred Satellites.  See further discussion under “Satellite and transmission expenses — Satellite Capacity Leased from EchoStar.”

·Investor Rights Agreement.  On February 20, 2014, EchoStar, HSSC, DOLLC and DNLLC (DOLLC and DNLLC, collectively referred to as the “DISH Investors”) also entered into the Investor Rights Agreement with respect to the Tracking Stock.  The Investor Rights Agreement provides, among other things, certain information and consultation rights for the DISH Investors; certain transfer restrictions on the Tracking Stock and certain rights and obligations to offer and sell under certain circumstances (including a prohibition on transfers of the Tracking Stock for one year, with continuing transfer restrictions (including a right of first offer in favor of EchoStar) thereafter, an obligation to sell the Tracking Stock to EchoStar in connection with a change of control of DISH Network and a right to require EchoStar to repurchase the Tracking Stock in connection with a change of control of EchoStar, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions); certain registration rights; certain obligations to provide conversion and exchange rights of the Tracking Stock under certain circumstances; and certain protective covenants afforded to holders of the Tracking Stock.  The Investor Rights Agreement generally will terminate as to the DISH Investors at such time as the DISH Investors no longer hold any shares of the HSSC-issued Tracking Stock and any registrable securities under the Investor Rights Agreement.

37

DISH DBS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

(Unaudited)

PMC.  During 2008, PMC filed suit against DISH Network; EchoStar and Motorola Inc., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,109,414; 4,965,825; 5,233,654; 5,335,277 and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.  On May 7, 2015, DISH Network, EchoStar and PMC entered into a settlement and release agreement that provided, among other things, for a license by PMC to DISH Network and EchoStar for certain patents and patent applications and the dismissal of all of PMC’s claims in the action against DISH Network and EchoStar with prejudice.  On June 4, 2015, the Court dismissed all of PMC’s claims in the action against DISH Network and EchoStar with prejudice.  See Note 8 for further discussion.  In June 2015, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed that EchoStar would contribute a one-time payment of $5 million towards the settlement under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off and the 2012 Receiver Agreement.

gTLD Bidding Agreement.  In April 2015, we and EchoStar entered into a gTLD Bidding Agreement whereby, among other things: (i) we obtained rights from EchoStar to participate in a generic top level domain (“gTLD”) auction, assuming all rights and obligations from EchoStar related to EchoStar’s application with ICANN for a particular gTLD; (ii) we agreed to reimburse EchoStar for its ICANN application fee and certain out-of-pocket expenses related to the application and the auction; and (iii) we and EchoStar agreed to split equally the net proceeds obtained by us as the losing bidder in the auction, less such fee reimbursement and out-of-pocket expenses.

Other

In November 2009, Mr. Roger Lynch became employed by both DISH Network and EchoStar as an Executive Vice President.  Mr. Lynch is responsible for the development and implementation of advanced technologies that are of potential utility and importance to both DISH Network and EchoStar.  Mr. Lynch’s compensation consisted of cash and equity compensation and was borne by both EchoStar and DISH Network.  As of January 1, 2015, Mr. Lynch is solely a DISH Network employee.

Related Party Transactions with NagraStar L.L.C.

NagraStar is a joint venture between EchoStar and Nagra USA, Inc. that is our provider of encryption and related security systems intended to assure that only authorized customers have access to our programming.  These expenses are recorded in “Subscriber-related expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  We record all payables in “Trade accounts payable — other” or “Other accrued expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The table below summarizes our transactions with NagraStar.

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Purchases (including fees):
Purchases from NagraStar	$	24,524	$	38,867	$	47,022	$	59,070
	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Amounts Payable and Commitments:
Amounts payable to NagraStar	$	15,083	$	14,819
Commitments to NagraStar	$	5,070	$	12,368

38

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following narrative analysis of our results of operations together with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  This management’s narrative analysis is intended to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of our operations and contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our industry, business and future financial results.  Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”  Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Overview

Our business strategy is to be the best provider of video services in the United States by providing products with the best technology, outstanding customer service, and great value.  We promote DISH® branded programming packages as providing our subscribers with a better “price-to-value” relationship than those available from other subscription television service providers.  We believe that there continues to be unsatisfied demand for high-quality, reasonably priced subscription television services.

We generate revenue primarily by providing pay-TV programming services to our subscribers.  We also generate revenue from pay-TV equipment rental fees and other hardware related fees, including fees for DVRs, equipment upgrade fees and additional outlet fees from subscribers with receivers with multiple tuners; advertising services; and fees earned from our in-home service operations.  Our most significant expenses are subscriber-related expenses, which are primarily related to programming, subscriber acquisition costs and depreciation and amortization.

Financial Highlights

2015 Second Quarter Consolidated Results of Operations and Key Operating Metrics

·Revenue of $3.724 billion

·Pay-TV ARPU of $87.91

·Net income attributable to DISH DBS of $212 million

·Gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations of approximately 638,000

·Loss of approximately 81,000 net Pay-TV subscribers

·Pay-TV subscriber churn rate of 1.71%

Consolidated Financial Condition as of June 30, 2015

·Cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities of $109 million

·Total assets of $5.239 billion

·Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $13.749 billion

We offer pay-TV services under the DISH® brand (“DISH”) and the Sling® brand (“Sling”) (collectively “Pay-TV” services).  We had 13.932 million Pay-TV subscribers in the United States as of June 30, 2015 and are the nation’s third largest pay-TV provider.  Our current revenue and profit is primarily derived from providing Pay-TV services.  Competition has intensified in recent years as the pay-TV industry has matured.  To differentiate our DISH branded pay-TV service from our competitors, we introduced the Hopper® whole-home DVR during 2012 and have continued to add functionality and simplicity for a more intuitive user experience.  Our current generation Hopper and Joey® whole-home DVR promotes a suite of integrated features and functionality designed to maximize the convenience and ease of watching TV anytime and anywhere.  It also has several innovative features that a consumer can use, at his or her option, to watch and record television programming, including recording up to eight shows at a time, through Internet-connected tablets, smartphones and computers.  During January 2015, we announced certain upcoming technological advancements including 4K Ultra HD capable receivers, a new remote control and user interface with

39

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

advanced voice command capability, and more mobile applications.  There can be no assurance that these integrated features and functionality will positively affect our results of operations or our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations.

Over-the-top pay-TV services.  The Sling branded pay-TV services consist of, among other things, live, linear streaming over-the-top (“OTT”) Internet-based domestic, international and Latino video programming services (“Sling TV”).  We market our Sling TV services primarily to consumers who do not subscribe to traditional satellite and cable pay-TV services.  Our Sling TV services require an Internet connection and are available through certain streaming-capable devices.  The Sling International video programming service (formerly known as DishWorld) was launched prior to 2015.  Sling International subscribers have historically been included in our Pay-TV subscriber count and represented a small percentage of our Pay-TV subscribers.  Sling International offers over 200 channels in 18 languages.  On February 9, 2015, we launched a live, linear streaming OTT domestic pay-TV service.  The Sling domestic core package consists of over 20 channels offered for a $20 monthly subscription.  In addition to the core programming package, Sling domestic offers additional tiers of programming, including news, children’s and premium programming, each for an additional monthly fee, as well as a video on-demand programming library.  On June 4, 2015, we also launched a live, linear streaming OTT Spanish-language pay-TV service under the Sling Latino brand.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we have included all Sling TV subscribers in our Pay-TV subscriber count.

Trends in our DISH Segment

Competition

Competition has intensified in recent years as the pay-TV industry has matured.  We and our competitors increasingly must seek to attract a greater proportion of new subscribers from each other’s existing subscriber bases rather than from first-time purchasers of Pay-TV services.  Some of our competitors have been especially aggressive by offering discounted programming and services for both new and existing subscribers.  We incur significant costs to retain our existing customers, mostly as a result of upgrading their equipment to HD and DVR receivers and by providing retention credits.  Our subscriber retention costs may vary significantly from period to period.

We also face increased competition from content providers and other companies who distribute video directly to consumers over the Internet.  Programming offered over the Internet has become more prevalent and consumers are spending an increasing amount of time accessing video content via the Internet on their mobile devices.  Significant changes in consumer behavior with regard to the means by which they obtain video entertainment and information in response to digital media competition could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition or otherwise disrupt our business.  In particular, consumers have shown increased interest in viewing certain video programming in any place, at any time and/or on any broadband-connected device they choose.  Online platforms may cause our subscribers to disconnect our services (“cord cutting”), downgrade to smaller, less expensive programming packages (“cord shaving”) or elect to purchase through these online platforms a certain portion of the services that they would have historically purchased from us, such as pay per view movies, resulting in less revenue to us.

During July 2015, we launched a new marketing promotion offering certain DISH branded pay-TV programming packages without a price increase for a two year period.  While we plan to implement other new marketing efforts, there can be no assurance that we will ultimately be successful increasing our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations.  Additionally, in response to our new efforts, we may face increased competitive pressures, including aggressive marketing, discounted promotional offers and more aggressive retention efforts.

Our Pay-TV subscriber base has recently been declining due to, among other things, the factors described above.  There can be no assurance that our Pay-TV subscriber base will not continue to decline.  In the event that our Pay-TV subscriber base continues to decline, it could have a material adverse long-term effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

40

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Programming

Our ability to compete successfully will depend, among other things, on our ability to continue to obtain desirable programming and deliver it to our subscribers at competitive prices.  Programming costs represent a large percentage of our “Subscriber-related expenses” and the largest component of our total expense.  We expect these costs to continue to increase, especially for local broadcast channels and sports programming.  Going forward, our margins may face pressure if we are unable to renew our long-term programming contracts on favorable pricing and other economic terms.

Increases in programming costs generally cause us to increase the rates that we charge to our subscribers, which could in turn cause our existing Pay-TV subscribers to disconnect our service or cause potential new Pay-TV subscribers to choose not to subscribe to our service.  Additionally, even if our subscribers do not disconnect our services, they may purchase through new and existing online platforms a certain portion of the services that they would have historically purchased from us, such as pay-per-view movies, resulting in less revenue to us.

Furthermore, our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations and Pay-TV churn rate may be negatively impacted if we are unable to renew our long-term programming contracts before they expire.  Our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, net Pay-TV subscriber additions and Pay-TV churn rate have been negatively impacted as a result of multiple programming interruptions and threatened programming interruptions in connection with the scheduled expiration of programming carriage contracts with several content providers, including, among others, Turner Networks, 21st Century Fox and certain local network affiliates.  In particular, we suffered from lower gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, lower net Pay-TV subscriber additions and higher Pay-TV churn rate beginning in the fourth quarter 2014 and continuing in the first quarter 2015, when, among others, certain programming from 21st Century Fox, including Fox entertainment and news channels, was not available on our service.  Although we believe that the impact of the programming interruptions that occurred beginning in the fourth quarter 2014 and continued in the first quarter 2015 has now subsided, we cannot predict with any certainty the impact to our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, net Pay-TV subscriber additions and Pay-TV churn rate resulting from similar programming interruptions that may occur in the future.  As a result, we may at times suffer from periods of lower gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, lower net Pay-TV subscriber additions and higher Pay-TV churn rates as we did beginning in the fourth quarter 2014 and continuing in the first quarter 2015.

Operations and Customer Service

While competitive factors have impacted the entire pay-TV industry, our relative performance has also been driven by issues specific to us.  In the past, our Pay-TV subscriber growth has been adversely affected by signal theft and other forms of fraud and by our operational inefficiencies.  To combat signal theft and improve the security of our broadcast system, we use microchips embedded in credit card sized access cards, called “smart cards,” or security chips in our DBS receiver systems to control access to authorized programming content (“Security Access Devices”).  We expect that future replacements of these devices will be necessary to keep our system secure.  To combat other forms of fraud, we monitor our third party distributors’ and retailers’ adherence to our business rules.

While we have made improvements in responding to and dealing with customer service issues, we continue to focus on the prevention of these issues, which is critical to our business, financial condition and results of operations.  To improve our operational performance, we continue to make investments in staffing, training, information systems, and other initiatives, primarily in our call center and in-home service operations.  These investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies introduced by the increasing complexity of our business, improve customer satisfaction, reduce churn, increase productivity, and allow us to scale better over the long run.  We cannot be certain, however, that our spending will ultimately be successful in improving our operational performance.

41

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Changes in our Technology

We have been deploying DBS receivers that utilize 8PSK modulation technology with MPEG-4 compression technology for several years.  These technologies, when fully deployed, will allow improved broadcast efficiency, and therefore allow increased programming capacity.  Many of our customers today, however, do not have DBS receivers that use MPEG-4 compression technology and a small number of our customers have DBS receivers that use QPSK modulation technology.  In addition, given that all of our HD content is broadcast in MPEG-4, any growth in HD penetration will naturally accelerate our transition to these newer technologies and may increase our subscriber acquisition and retention costs.  All new DBS receivers that we purchase from EchoStar Corporation (“EchoStar”) have MPEG-4 compression with 8PSK modulation technology.  Although we continue to refurbish and redeploy certain MPEG-2 DBS receivers with 8PSK modulation technology, as a result of our HD initiatives, current promotions and the scheduled launch of our EchoStar XVIII satellite during 2016, we currently activate most new customers with higher priced MPEG-4 technology, which limits our ability to redeploy MPEG-2 DBS receivers.

In addition, from time to time, we change equipment for certain subscribers to make more efficient use of transponder capacity in support of HD and other initiatives.  We believe that the benefit from the increase in available transponder capacity outweighs the short-term cost of these equipment changes.

Operational Liquidity

Like many companies, we make general investments in property such as satellites, set-top boxes, information technology and facilities that support our overall business.  However, since we are a subscriber-based company, we also make subscriber-specific investments to acquire new subscribers and retain existing subscribers.  While the general investments may be deferred without impacting the business in the short-term, the subscriber-specific investments are less discretionary.  Our overall objective is to generate sufficient cash flow over the life of each subscriber to provide an adequate return against the upfront investment.  Once the upfront investment has been made for each subscriber, the subsequent cash flow is generally positive.

There are a number of factors that impact our future cash flow compared to the cash flow we generate at a given point in time.  The first factor is our Pay-TV churn rate and how successful we are at retaining our current Pay-TV subscribers.  As we lose Pay-TV subscribers from our existing base, the positive cash flow from that base is correspondingly reduced.  The second factor is how successful we are at maintaining our subscriber-related margins.  To the extent our “Subscriber-related expenses” grow faster than our “Subscriber-related revenue,” the amount of cash flow that is generated per existing subscriber is reduced.  The third factor is the rate at which we acquire new subscribers.  The faster we acquire new subscribers, the more our positive ongoing cash flow from existing subscribers is offset by the negative upfront cash flow associated with acquiring new subscribers.  Finally, our future cash flow is impacted by the rate at which we make general investments and any cash flow from financing activities.

Our subscriber-specific investments to acquire new subscribers have a significant impact on our cash flow.  While fewer subscribers might translate into lower ongoing cash flow in the long-term, cash flow is actually aided, in the short-term, by the reduction in subscriber-specific investment spending.  As a result, a slow-down in our business due to external or internal factors does not introduce the same level of short-term liquidity risk as it might in other industries.

Availability of Credit and Effect on Liquidity

The ability to raise capital has generally existed for us despite economic weakness and uncertainty.  Modest fluctuations in the cost of capital will not likely impact our current operational plans.

42

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Future Liquidity

Debt Maturity.  Our 7 3/4% Senior Notes with a remaining principal balance of $650 million were redeemed on June 1, 2015.  Our 7 1/8% Senior Notes with an aggregate principal balance of $1.5 billion mature on February 1, 2016.  We expect to fund this obligation from cash generated from operations, existing cash and marketable investment securities balances and/or cash proceeds from any debt financings.

DISH Network Spectrum.  DISH Network has invested over $5.0 billion since 2008 to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and related assets.  DISH Network may also determine that additional wireless spectrum licenses may be required to commercialize its wireless business and to compete with other wireless service providers.  DISH Network will need to make significant additional investments or partner with others to, among other things, commercialize, build-out, and integrate these licenses and related assets, and any additional acquired licenses and related assets; and comply with regulations applicable to such licenses.  Depending on the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such investments or partnerships could vary significantly.  In connection with the development of DISH Network’s wireless business, including without limitation the efforts described above, we have made cash distributions to partially finance these efforts to date and may make additional cash distributions to finance in whole or in part DISH Network’s future efforts.  See Note 10 in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our dividends to DOC.  There can be no assurance that DISH Network will be able to develop and implement a business model that will realize a return on these wireless spectrum licenses or that DISH Network will be able to profitably deploy the assets represented by these wireless spectrum licenses.  See Note 8 “Commitments and Contingencies — DISH Network Spectrum” in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

AWS-3 Auction.  On February 13, 2015, Northstar Wireless, LLC (“Northstar Wireless”) and SNR Wireless LicenseCo, LLC (“SNR Wireless”) each filed applications with the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to acquire certain AWS-3 wireless spectrum licenses (the “AWS-3 Licenses”) that were made available in the auction designated by the FCC as Auction 97 (the “AWS-3 Auction”) for which it was named as winning bidder and had made the required down payments.  Each of Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless had applied to receive a bidding credit of 25% as designated entities under applicable FCC rules.  DISH Network owns an 85% non-controlling interest in each of Northstar Spectrum, LLC (“Northstar Spectrum,” and collectively with Northstar Wireless, the “Northstar Entities”) and SNR Wireless Holdco, LLC (“SNR Holdco,” and collectively with SNR Wireless, the “SNR Entities”), the parent companies of Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, respectively.  After Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless made their respective final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the AWS-3 Licenses (which payments were net of a bidding credit of 25%), DISH Network’s total non-controlling equity and debt investments in these entities and their parent companies, respectively, were approximately $9.778 billion.

On April 29, 2015, the FCC issued a public notice that, among other things, found the applications filed by Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing.  The FCC’s public notice also set the following filing deadlines related to the applications:  (i) petitions to deny the applications must have been filed no later than May 11, 2015; (ii) oppositions to a petition to deny the applications must have been filed no later than May 18, 2015; and (iii) replies to oppositions must have been filed no later than May 26, 2015.  In addition, on April 29, 2015, DISH Network received a letter from the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (the “Senate Committee”), requesting certain information related to its relationship with Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless and its participation in the AWS-3 Auction.  DISH Network cannot predict the timing or the outcome of the Senate Committee’s inquiry.

On July 22, 2015, DISH Network, Northstar Wireless, SNR Wireless and certain other parties attended a meeting with staff of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau of the FCC to discuss a draft order that has been circulated by the Chairman’s office for approval by the other Commissioners relating to Northstar Wireless’ and SNR Wireless’ respective pending applications for the AWS-3 Licenses.  At the meeting and as subsequently confirmed by a summary of the meeting released by the FCC, DISH Network was informed that the draft order, if approved, would find that:  (i) DISH Network has a controlling interest in Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, therefore

43

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

DISH Network’s revenues should be attributed to them, which in turn makes Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless ineligible to receive the 25% bidding credits (approximately $1.961 billion for Northstar Wireless and $1.370 billion for SNR Wireless) for which each had applied to receive as designated entities under applicable FCC rules; (ii) Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless are qualified to hold the AWS-3 Licenses; (iii) the FCC will not designate the matter for a hearing, or refer the matter to the FCC enforcement bureau or the Department of Justice; and (iv) all other relief sought by the parties that filed Petitions to Deny will be denied.  The draft order remains subject to change, and must be approved by a majority of the Commissioners to become effective.

In the event that the FCC grants the AWS-3 Licenses to Northstar Wireless (the “Northstar Licenses”) and to SNR Wireless (the “SNR Licenses”), DISH Network may need to make significant additional loans to the Northstar Entities and to the SNR Entities, or they may need to partner with others, so that the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities may commercialize, build-out and integrate the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, and comply with regulations applicable to the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses.  Depending upon the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such loans or partnerships could vary significantly.  There can be no assurance that DISH Network will be able to obtain a profitable return on its non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities.

In connection with certain funding obligations related to the investments by DISH Network discussed above, in February 2015 we paid a dividend of $8.250 billion to DISH Orbital Corporation (“DOC”) for, among other things, general corporate purposes, which include such funding obligations, and to fund other DISH Network cash needs.  We used a substantial portion of our existing cash and marketable investment securities to pay this dividend.  We may make additional cash distributions to finance in whole or in part loans that DISH Network may make to the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities in the future related to DISH Network’s non-controlling investments in these entities.

As a result of, among other things, DISH Network’s non-controlling debt and equity investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities, we may need to raise significant additional capital in the future, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all, to among other things, make additional cash distribution to DISH Network, continue investing in our business and to pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions.  In addition, economic weakness or weak results of operations may limit our ability to generate sufficient internal cash to fund such additional cash distributions to DISH Network, investments in our businesses, acquisitions and other strategic transactions, as well as to fund ongoing operations and service our debt.  As a result, these conditions make it difficult for us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities because we may not have access to funding sources necessary for us to pursue organic and strategic business development opportunities.

See Note 8 “Commitments and Contingencies — AWS-3 Auction” in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Covenants and Restrictions Related to our Senior Notes

The indentures related to our outstanding senior notes contain restrictive covenants that, among other things, impose limitations on our ability to:  (i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (iii) pay dividends or make distributions on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock; (iv) make certain investments; (v) create liens; (vi) enter into certain transactions with affiliates; (vii) merge or consolidate with another company; and (viii) transfer or sell assets.  Should we fail to comply with these covenants, all or a portion of the debt under the senior notes could become immediately payable.  The senior notes also provide that the debt may be required to be prepaid if certain change-in-control events occur.  As of the date of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we were in compliance with the covenants.

44

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

New Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  This converged standard on revenue recognition was issued jointly with the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  ASU 2014-09 provides a framework for revenue recognition that replaces most existing GAAP revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective.  ASU 2014-09 allows for either a full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption.  We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.  We have not yet selected an adoption method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.  On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved a one year deferral on the effective date for implementation of this standard, which changed the effective date for us to January 1, 2018.

EXPLANATION OF KEY METRICS AND OTHER ITEMS

Subscriber-related revenue.  “Subscriber-related revenue” consists principally of revenue from basic, premium movie, local, HD programming, pay-per-view, Latino and international subscription pay-TV services; equipment rental fees and other hardware related fees, including fees for DVRs, equipment upgrade fees and additional outlet fees from subscribers with receivers with multiple tuners; advertising services; fees earned from our in-home service operations and other subscriber revenue.  Certain of the amounts included in “Subscriber-related revenue” are not recurring on a monthly basis.

Equipment sales and other revenue.  “Equipment sales and other revenue” principally includes the non-subsidized sales of DBS accessories to retailers and other third-party distributors of our equipment.

Equipment sales, services and other revenue — EchoStar.  “Equipment sales, services and other revenue — EchoStar” includes revenue related to equipment sales, services, and other agreements with EchoStar.

Subscriber-related expenses.  “Subscriber-related expenses” principally include pay-TV programming expenses, which represent a substantial majority of these expenses.  “Subscriber-related expenses” also include costs for pay-TV services incurred in connection with our in-home service and call center operations, billing costs, refurbishment and repair costs related to DBS receiver systems, subscriber retention and other variable subscriber expenses.

Satellite and transmission expenses.  “Satellite and transmission expenses” includes the cost of leasing satellite and transponder capacity from EchoStar and the cost of digital broadcast operations provided to us by EchoStar, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access management, telemetry, tracking and control, and other professional services.  “Satellite and transmission expenses” also includes executory costs associated with capital leases and costs associated with transponder leases and other related services.  In addition, “Satellite and transmission expenses” includes costs associated with our Sling TV services including, among other things, streaming delivery technology and infrastructure.

Cost of sales - equipment, services and other.  “Cost of sales - equipment, services and other” primarily includes the cost of non-subsidized sales of DBS accessories to retailers and other third-party distributors of our equipment.  In addition, “Cost of sales - equipment, services and other” includes costs related to equipment sales, services, and other agreements with EchoStar.

Subscriber acquisition costs.  While we primarily lease DBS receiver systems, we also subsidize certain costs to attract new subscribers.  Our “Subscriber acquisition costs” include the cost of subsidized sales of DBS receiver systems to retailers and other third-party distributors of our equipment, the cost of subsidized sales of DBS receiver systems directly by us to subscribers, including net costs related to our promotional incentives, costs related to our direct sales efforts and costs related to installation and acquisition advertising.  Our “Subscriber acquisition costs” also

45

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

includes costs associated with acquiring Sling TV subscribers including, among other things, costs related to acquisition advertising, our direct sales efforts and commissions.

Pay-TV SAC.  Subscriber acquisition cost measures are commonly used by those evaluating companies in the pay-TV industry.  We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating the “average subscriber acquisition costs per new Pay-TV subscriber activation,” or Pay-TV SAC, and we believe presentations of Pay-TV SAC may not be calculated consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses.  Our Pay-TV SAC is calculated as “Subscriber acquisition costs,” plus the value of equipment capitalized under our lease program for new Pay-TV subscribers, divided by gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations.  We include all the costs of acquiring Pay-TV subscribers (e.g., subsidized and capitalized equipment) as we believe it is a more comprehensive measure of how much we are spending to acquire subscribers.  We also include all new Pay-TV subscribers in our calculation, including Pay-TV subscribers added with little or no subscriber acquisition costs.

General and administrative expenses.  “General and administrative expenses” consists primarily of employee-related costs associated with administrative services such as legal, information systems, accounting and finance, including non-cash, stock-based compensation expense.  It also includes outside professional fees (e.g., legal, information systems and accounting services) and other items associated with facilities and administration.

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized.  “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” primarily includes interest expense (net of capitalized interest), prepayment premiums and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with our senior debt and interest expense associated with our capital lease obligations.

Other, net.  The main components of “Other, net” are gains and losses realized on the sale of investments, impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities, unrealized gains and losses from changes in fair value of marketable and non-marketable investments accounted for under the Fair Value Option, and equity in earnings and losses of our affiliates.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”).  EBITDA is defined as “Net income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS” plus “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” net of “Interest income,” “Income tax (provision) benefit, net” and “Depreciation and amortization.”  This “non-GAAP measure” is reconciled to “Net income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS” in our discussion of “Results of Operations” below.

Pay-TV subscribers.  We include customers obtained through direct sales, third-party retailers and other third-party distribution relationships in our Pay-TV subscriber count.  We also provide DISH branded pay-TV service to hotels, motels and other commercial accounts.  For certain of these commercial accounts, we divide our total revenue for these commercial accounts by an amount approximately equal to the retail price of our DISH America programming package, and include the resulting number, which is substantially smaller than the actual number of commercial units served, in our Pay-TV subscriber count.  The Sling International video programming service was launched prior to 2015.  Sling International subscribers have historically been included in our Pay-TV subscriber count and represented a small percentage of our Pay-TV subscribers.  During 2015, we launched our Sling domestic and Sling Latino services.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we have included all Sling TV subscribers in our Pay-TV subscriber count.  Sling TV subscribers receiving service for no charge, under certain new subscriber promotions, are excluded from our Pay-TV subscriber count.  Sling TV subscribers are recorded net of disconnects in our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations.  Our Pay-TV metrics for the three months ended March 31, 2015 have been recast to include 169,000 Sling domestic subscribers.  For customers who subscribe to both our DISH branded pay-TV service and our Sling branded pay-TV service, each subscription is counted as a separate Pay-TV subscriber.

Pay-TV average monthly revenue per subscriber (“Pay-TV ARPU”).  We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating ARPU and believe presentations of ARPU may not be calculated consistently by other companies in the same or similar businesses.  We calculate Pay-TV average monthly revenue per Pay-TV subscriber, or Pay-TV ARPU, by dividing average monthly “Subscriber-related revenue” for the period by our average number of Pay-TV subscribers for the period.  The average number of Pay-TV subscribers is calculated for the period by adding the

46

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

average number of Pay-TV subscribers for each month and dividing by the number of months in the period.  The average number of Pay-TV subscribers for each month is calculated by adding the beginning and ending Pay-TV subscribers for the month and dividing by two.

Pay-TV average monthly subscriber churn rate (“Pay-TV churn rate”).  We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating subscriber churn rate and believe presentations of subscriber churn rates may not be calculated consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses.  We calculate Pay-TV churn rate for any period by dividing the number of Pay-TV subscribers who terminated service during the period by the average number of Pay-TV subscribers for the same period, and further dividing by the number of months in the period.  When calculating the Pay-TV churn rate, the same methodology for calculating average number of Pay-TV subscribers is used as when calculating Pay-TV ARPU.  Sling TV subscribers are recorded net of disconnects in our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, as discussed above, and to the extent that our Sling TV subscriber base grows, our Pay-TV churn rate will be positively impacted.

Sling TV.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, our operating results related to our Sling TV services are recorded in “Subscriber-related revenue,” “Subscriber-related expenses” and “Subscriber acquisition costs” and are included in our Pay-TV metrics, including Pay-TV subscribers, Pay-TV churn rate, Pay-TV SAC and Pay-TV ARPU.  Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

47

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014.

	For the Three Months
	Ended June 30,						Variance
Statements of Operations Data	2015			2014			Amount			%
	(In thousands)
Revenue:
Subscriber-related revenue	$	3,693,872		$	3,555,953		$	137,919		3.9
Equipment sales and other revenue	17,111			26,057			(8,946		)	(34.3	)
Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar	13,451			16,555			(3,104		)	(18.7	)
Total revenue	3,724,434			3,598,565			125,869			3.5
Costs and Expenses:
Subscriber-related expenses	2,167,880			2,042,504			125,376			6.1
% of Subscriber-related revenue	58.7		%	57.4		%
Satellite and transmission expenses	192,556			178,660			13,896			7.8
% of Subscriber-related revenue	5.2		%	5.0		%
Cost of sales - equipment, services and other	23,804			30,985			(7,181		)	(23.2	)
Subscriber acquisition costs	382,120			422,457			(40,337		)	(9.5	)
General and administrative expenses	167,802			178,381			(10,579		)	(5.9	)
% of Total revenue	4.5		%	5.0		%
Depreciation and amortization	237,248			248,382			(11,134		)	(4.5	)
Total costs and expenses	3,171,410			3,101,369			70,041			2.3
Operating income (loss)	553,024			497,196			55,828			11.2
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income	728			10,102			(9,374		)	(92.8	)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized	(219,328		)	(212,177		)	(7,151		)	(3.4	)
Other, net	392			405			(13		)	(3.2	)
Total other income (expense)	(218,208		)	(201,670		)	(16,538		)	(8.2	)
Income (loss) before income taxes	334,816			295,526			39,290			13.3
Income tax (provision) benefit, net	(125,871		)	(109,532		)	(16,339		)	(14.9	)
Effective tax rate	37.6		%	37.1		%
Net income (loss)	208,945			185,994			22,951			12.3
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax	(3,168		)	(4,492		)	1,324			29.5
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS	$	212,113		$	190,486		$	21,627		11.4
Other Data:
Pay-TV subscribers, as of period end (in millions)	13.932			14.053			(0.121		)	(0.9	)
Pay-TV subscriber additions, gross (in millions)	0.638			0.656			(0.018		)	(2.7	)
Pay-TV subscriber additions, net (in millions)	(0.081		)	(0.044		)	(0.037		)	(84.1	)
Pay-TV average monthly subscriber churn rate (“Pay-TV churn rate”)	1.71		%	1.66		%	0.05		%	3.0
Pay-TV average subscriber acquisition cost per subscriber (“Pay-TV SAC”)	$	767		$	846		$	(79	)	(9.3	)
Pay-TV average monthly revenue per subscriber (“Pay-TV ARPU”)	$	87.91		$	84.15		$	3.76		4.5
EBITDA	$	793,832		$	750,475		43,357			5.8

* Percentage is not meaningful.

48

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Pay-TV subscribers.  We lost approximately 81,000 net Pay-TV subscribers during the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the loss of approximately 44,000 net Pay-TV subscribers during the same period in 2014.  The decrease in net Pay-TV subscriber additions versus the same period in 2014 resulted from a higher Pay-TV churn rate and lower gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations.

Our Pay-TV churn rate for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was 1.71% compared to 1.66% for the same period in 2014.  Our Pay-TV churn rate continues to be adversely affected by increased competitive pressures, including aggressive marketing and discounted promotional offers.  Our Pay-TV churn rate is also impacted by, among other things, the credit quality of previously acquired subscribers, our ability to consistently provide outstanding customer service, price increases, programming interruptions in connection with the scheduled expiration of certain programming carriage contracts, our ability to control piracy and other forms of fraud, and the level of our retention efforts.

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we activated approximately 638,000 gross new Pay-TV subscribers compared to approximately 656,000 gross new Pay-TV subscribers during the same period in 2014, a decrease of 2.7%.  The decline in gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations was primarily related to stricter customer acquisition policies and increased competitive pressures, including aggressive marketing, discounted promotional offers, and more aggressive retention efforts.

We have not always met our own standards for performing high-quality installations, effectively resolving subscriber issues when they arise, answering subscriber calls in an acceptable timeframe, effectively communicating with our subscriber base, reducing calls driven by the complexity of our business, improving the reliability of certain systems and subscriber equipment, and aligning the interests of certain third-party retailers and installers to provide high-quality service.  Most of these factors have affected both gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations as well as Pay-TV churn rate.  Our future gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations and our Pay-TV churn rate may be negatively impacted by these factors, which could in turn adversely affect our revenue growth.

Subscriber-related revenue.  “Subscriber-related revenue” totaled $3.694 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $138 million or 3.9% compared to the same period in 2014.  The change in “Subscriber-related revenue” from the same period in 2014 was primarily related to the increase in Pay-TV ARPU discussed below.

Pay-TV ARPU.  Pay-TV ARPU was $87.91 during the three months ended June 30, 2015 versus $84.15 during the same period in 2014.  The $3.76 or 4.5% increase in Pay-TV ARPU was primarily attributable to the programming package price increases in February 2015 and 2014, higher hardware related revenue and revenue related to a pay-per-view event.  These increases were partially offset by a shift in programming package mix, and an increase in Sling TV subscribers and retention credits.  Sling TV subscribers generally have lower priced programming packages than DISH branded pay-TV subscribers.  Accordingly, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, the increase in Sling TV subscribers had a negative impact on Pay-TV ARPU.

Subscriber-related expenses.  “Subscriber-related expenses” totaled $2.168 billion during the three months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $125 million or 6.1% compared to the same period in 2014.  The increase in “Subscriber-related expenses” was primarily attributable to higher pay-TV programming costs.  The increase in programming costs was driven by rate increases in certain of our programming contracts, including the renewal of certain contracts at higher rates.  “Subscriber-related expenses” represented 58.7% and 57.4% of “Subscriber-related revenue” during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The change in this expense to revenue ratio primarily resulted from higher pay-TV programming costs, discussed above.

In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts to purchase programming content in which our payment obligations are generally contingent on the number of Pay-TV subscribers to whom we provide the respective content.  Our “Subscriber-related expenses” have and may continue to face further upward pressure from price increases and the renewal of long-term pay-TV programming contracts on less favorable pricing terms.  In addition, our programming expenses will increase to the extent we are successful in growing our Pay-TV subscriber base.

49

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Subscriber acquisition costs.  “Subscriber acquisition costs” totaled $382 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, a decrease of $40 million or 9.5% compared to the same period in 2014.  This change was primarily attributable to a decrease in gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations and a decrease in Pay-TV SAC, discussed below.

Pay-TV SAC.  Pay-TV SAC was $767 during the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $846 during the same period in 2014, a decrease of $79 or 9.3%.  This change was primarily attributable to an increase in Sling TV subscriber activations with lower Pay-TV SAC and a decrease in hardware costs per activation, partially offset by an increase in advertising costs per activation.  The decrease in hardware costs per activation was primarily driven by a higher percentage of remanufactured receivers being activated on new subscriber accounts.

During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the amount of equipment capitalized under our lease program for new Pay-TV subscribers totaled $107 million and $132 million, respectively.  This decrease in capital expenditures under our lease program for new Pay-TV subscribers resulted primarily from fewer gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations and a decrease in hardware costs per activation, discussed above.

To remain competitive we upgrade or replace subscriber equipment periodically as technology changes, and the costs associated with these upgrades may be substantial.  To the extent technological changes render a portion of our existing equipment obsolete, we would be unable to redeploy all returned equipment and consequently would realize less benefit from the Pay-TV SAC reduction associated with redeployment of that returned lease equipment.

Our “Subscriber acquisition costs” and “Pay-TV SAC” may materially increase in the future to the extent that we, among other things, transition to newer technologies, introduce more aggressive promotions, or provide greater equipment subsidies.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.  EBITDA was $794 million during the three months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $43 million or 5.8% compared to the same period in 2014.  The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements.

	For the Three Months
	Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
EBITDA	$	793,832		$	750,475
Interest, net	(218,600		)	(202,075		)
Income tax (provision) benefit, net	(125,871		)	(109,532		)
Depreciation and amortization	(237,248		)	(248,382		)
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS	$	212,113		$	190,486

EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP.  EBITDA is used as a measurement of operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure for those evaluating companies in the pay-TV industry.  Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures.  EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

50

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014.

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Variance
Statements of Operations Data	2015			2014			Amount			%
	(In thousands)
Revenue:
Subscriber-related revenue	$	7,284,576		$	7,029,161		$	255,415		3.6
Equipment sales and other revenue	34,628			47,507			(12,879		)	(27.1	)
Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar	26,292			32,107			(5,815		)	(18.1	)
Total revenue	7,345,496			7,108,775			236,721			3.3
Costs and Expenses:
Subscriber-related expenses	4,272,976			4,058,177			214,799			5.3
% of Subscriber-related revenue	58.7		%	57.7		%
Satellite and transmission expenses	377,236			326,787			50,449			15.4
% of Subscriber-related revenue	5.2		%	4.6		%
Cost of sales - equipment, services and other	54,299			56,211			(1,912		)	(3.4	)
Subscriber acquisition costs	761,053			830,821			(69,768		)	(8.4	)
General and administrative expenses	359,476			357,965			1,511			0.4
% of Total revenue	4.9		%	5.0		%
Depreciation and amortization	461,143			473,348			(12,205		)	(2.6	)
Total costs and expenses	6,286,183			6,103,309			182,874			3.0
Operating income (loss)	1,059,313			1,005,466			53,847			5.4
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income	4,945			18,864			(13,919		)	(73.8	)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized	(441,338		)	(424,256		)	(17,082		)	(4.0	)
Other, net	483			745			(262		)	(35.2	)
Total other income (expense)	(435,910		)	(404,647		)	(31,263		)	(7.7	)
Income (loss) before income taxes	623,403			600,819			22,584			3.8
Income tax (provision) benefit, net	(230,471		)	(225,414		)	(5,057		)	(2.2	)
Effective tax rate	37.0		%	37.5		%
Net income (loss)	392,932			375,405			17,527			4.7
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax	(7,113		)	(5,233		)	(1,880		)	35.9
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS	$	400,045		$	380,638		$	19,407		5.1
Other Data:
Pay-TV subscribers, as of period end (in millions)	13.932			14.053			(0.121		)	(0.9	)
Pay-TV subscriber additions, gross (in millions)	1.361			1.295			0.066			5.1
Pay-TV subscriber additions, net (in millions)	(0.046		)	(0.004		)	(0.042		)	*
Pay-TV average monthly subscriber churn rate (“Pay-TV churn rate”)	1.68		%	1.54		%	0.14		%	9.1
Pay-TV average subscriber acquisition cost per subscriber (“Pay-TV SAC”)	$	714		$	854		$	(140	)	(16.4	)
Pay-TV average monthly revenue per subscriber (“Pay-TV ARPU”)	$	86.83		$	83.25		$	3.58		4.3
EBITDA	$	1,528,052		$	1,484,792		43,260			2.9

* Percentage is not meaningful.

51

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Pay-TV subscribers.  We lost approximately 46,000 net Pay-TV subscribers during the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the loss of approximately 4,000 net Pay-TV subscribers during the same period in 2014.  The decrease in net Pay-TV subscriber additions versus the same period in 2014 resulted from a higher Pay-TV churn rate, partially offset by higher gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations primarily related to the launch of our Sling domestic service on February 9, 2015.

Our Pay-TV churn rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was 1.68% compared to 1.54% for the same period in 2014.  Our Pay-TV churn rate continues to be adversely affected by increased competitive pressures, including aggressive marketing and discounted promotional offers.  Our Pay-TV churn rate is also impacted by, among other things, the credit quality of previously acquired subscribers, our ability to consistently provide outstanding customer service, price increases, programming interruptions in connection with the scheduled expiration of certain programming carriage contracts, our ability to control piracy and other forms of fraud, and the level of our retention efforts.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we activated approximately 1.361 million gross new Pay-TV subscribers compared to approximately 1.295 million gross new Pay-TV subscribers during the same period in 2014, an increase of 5.1%.  The increase in our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations primarily related to the launch of our Sling domestic service on February 9, 2015.  Although our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations increased, our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations were negatively impacted by stricter customer acquisition policies and increased competitive pressures, including aggressive marketing, discounted promotional offers, and more aggressive retention efforts.  Furthermore, our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations were negatively impacted by programming interruptions in connection with the scheduled expiration of certain programming carriage contracts during the first half of the first quarter 2015.

Our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, net Pay-TV subscriber additions and Pay-TV churn rate have been negatively impacted as a result of multiple programming interruptions and threatened programming interruptions in connection with the scheduled expiration of programming carriage contracts with several content providers, including, among others, Turner Networks, 21st Century Fox and certain local network affiliates.  In particular, we suffered from lower gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, lower net Pay-TV subscriber additions and higher Pay-TV churn rate beginning in the fourth quarter 2014 and continuing in the first quarter 2015, when, among others, certain programming from 21st Century Fox, including Fox entertainment and news channels, was not available on our service. Although we believe that the impact of the programming interruptions that occurred beginning in the fourth quarter 2014 and continued in the first quarter 2015 has now subsided, we cannot predict with any certainty the impact to our gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, net Pay-TV subscriber additions and Pay-TV churn rate resulting from similar programming interruptions that may occur in the future.  As a result, we may at times suffer from periods of lower gross new Pay-TV subscriber activations, lower net Pay-TV subscriber additions and higher Pay-TV churn rates as we did beginning in the fourth quarter 2014 and continuing in the first quarter 2015.

Subscriber-related revenue.  “Subscriber-related revenue” totaled $7.285 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $255 million or 3.6% compared to the same period in 2014.  The change in “Subscriber-related revenue” from the same period in 2014 was primarily related to the increase in Pay-TV ARPU discussed below.

Pay-TV ARPU.  Pay-TV ARPU was $86.83 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 versus $83.25 during the same period in 2014.  The $3.58 or 4.3% increase in Pay-TV ARPU was primarily attributable to the programming package price increases in February 2015 and 2014, higher hardware related revenue and revenue related to a pay-per-view event during the second quarter 2015.  These increases were partially offset by a shift in programming package mix, and an increase in Sling TV subscribers and retention credits.  Sling TV subscribers generally have lower priced programming packages than DISH branded pay-TV subscribers.  Accordingly, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, the increase in Sling TV subscribers had a negative impact on Pay-TV ARPU.

52

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Subscriber-related expenses.  “Subscriber-related expenses” totaled $4.273 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $215 million or 5.3% compared to the same period in 2014.  The increase in “Subscriber-related expenses” was primarily attributable to higher pay-TV programming costs.  The increase in programming costs was driven by rate increases in certain of our programming contracts, including the renewal of certain contracts at higher rates.  “Subscriber-related expenses” represented 58.7% and 57.7% of “Subscriber-related revenue” during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The change in this expense to revenue ratio primarily resulted from higher pay-TV programming costs, discussed above.

Satellite and transmission expenses.  “Satellite and transmission expenses” totaled $377 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $50 million or 15.4% compared to the same period in 2014.  The increase in “Satellite and transmission expenses” was primarily related to an increase in transmission costs associated with our Sling TV services and an increase in transponder capacity leased from EchoStar as a result of the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction during the first quarter 2014.  See Note 10 in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Subscriber acquisition costs.  “Subscriber acquisition costs” totaled $761 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, a decrease of $70 million or 8.4% compared to the same period in 2014.  This change was primarily attributable to a decrease in Pay-TV SAC, discussed below.

Pay-TV SAC.  Pay-TV SAC was $714 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $854 during the same period in 2014, a decrease of $140 or 16.4%.  This change was primarily attributable to an increase in Sling TV subscriber activations with lower Pay-TV SAC and a decrease in hardware costs per activation, partially offset by an increase in advertising costs per activation.  The decrease in hardware costs per activation was driven by a reduction in manufacturing costs for next generation Hopper receiver systems and a higher percentage of remanufactured receivers being activated on new subscriber accounts.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the amount of equipment capitalized under our lease program for new Pay-TV subscribers totaled $210 million and $273 million, respectively.  This decrease in capital expenditures under our lease program for new Pay-TV subscribers resulted primarily from a decrease in hardware costs per activation, discussed above.

53

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.  EBITDA was $1.528 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $43 million or 2.9% compared to the same period in 2014.  The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements.

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
EBITDA	$	1,528,052		$	1,484,792
Interest, net	(436,393		)	(405,392		)
Income tax (provision) benefit, net	(230,471		)	(225,414		)
Depreciation and amortization	(461,143		)	(473,348		)
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS	$	400,045		$	380,638

EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP.  EBITDA is used as a measurement of operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure for those evaluating companies in the pay-TV industry.  Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures.  EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Item 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion regarding disclosure controls and procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

54

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Note 8 “Commitments and Contingencies - Litigation” in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding certain legal proceedings in which we are involved.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors.

Item 6.   EXHIBITS

(a)Exhibits.

31.1*	Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2*	Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1*	Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32.2*	Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
101*	The following materials from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH DBS for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, filed on August 14, 2015, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) related notes to these financial statements.

*              Filed herewith.

55

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

DISH DBS CORPORATION
By:	/s/ Charles W. Ergen
	Charles W. Ergen
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Duly Authorized Officer)
By:	/s/ Steven E. Swain
	Steven E. Swain
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

Date:  August 14, 2015

56

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Section 302 Certification

I, Charles W. Ergen, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH DBS Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2015

/s/ Charles W. Ergen

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Section 302 Certification

I, Steven E. Swain, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH DBS Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2015

/s/ Steven E. Swain

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Section 906 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of DISH DBS Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:	August 14, 2015
Name:	/s/ Charles W. Ergen
Title:	Chairman, President and
	Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Section 906 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of DISH DBS Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:	August 14, 2015
Name:	/s/ Steven E. Swain
Title:	Senior Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details 4) $ in Thousands			3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jan. 01, 2015	Jan. 02, 2010	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($) item	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)
Related Party Transactions
General and administrative expenses			$ 167,802	$ 178,381	$ 359,476	$ 357,965
Sling TV Holding LLC
Related Party Transactions
Ownership percentage					90.00%
Voting interest (as a percent)					100.00%
Additional paid in capital recorded due to difference between the historical cost basis of the assets transferred					$ 6,000
Deemed Distribution Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest Fair Value Net Of Deferred Tax					14,000
EchoStar
Related Party Transactions
General and administrative expenses			$ 23,000	$ 28,000	$ 43,000	$ 49,000
Non-voting interest redeemable period from fifth anniversary of the exchange agreement					60 days
EchoStar | Product Support Agreement | Minimum
Related Party Transactions
Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity					60 days
EchoStar | Inverness Lease Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Required notice period for termination of agreement					6 months
EchoStar | Gilbert Lease Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement Renewal Option Term					1 year
Number of consecutive renewal options | item					3
EchoStar | DISH Online.com Services Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Term of renewal option exercised					1 year
Agreement term		2 years
Agreement Renewal Option Term					1 year
EchoStar | DISH Online.com Services Agreement | Minimum
Related Party Transactions
Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity					120 days
EchoStar | Application Development Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Minimum notice period for termination of agreement					90 days
Automatic renewal period					1 year
EchoStar | XiP Encryption Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Required notice period for termination of agreement					180 days
Minimum notice period for termination of agreement					30 days
Term of renewal option exercised					1 year
Notice period required to extend the agreement term					180 days
Agreement Renewal Option Term					1 year
EchoStar | Santa Fe Lease Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement Renewal Option Term					1 year
EchoStar | Sling TV Holding LLC
Related Party Transactions
Ownership percentage					10.00%
Dish Network | EchoStar | Professional Services Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Minimum notice period for termination of agreement					60 days
Minimum notice period for termination of a specific service					30 days
Agreement term	1 year
Automatic renewal period					1 year

XML

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents and Other Investment Securities:
Current marketable investment securities	$ 48,860	$ 1,401,145
Restricted marketable investment securities(1)	81,795	76,970
Total marketable investment securities	130,655	1,478,115
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (1)	5,189	10,014
Other investment securities - cost method	327,250	327,250
Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities	$ 463,094	1,815,379
Maximum maturities of commercial paper	365 days
Maximum maturities of corporate securities	18 months
EchoStar
Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents and Other Investment Securities:
Other investment securities - cost method	$ 228,795	228,795
HSSC
Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents and Other Investment Securities:
Other investment securities - cost method	87,409	87,409
Current marketable investment securities - other
Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents and Other Investment Securities:
Other investment securities - cost method	$ 11,046	$ 11,046

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details 2) $ in Thousands		1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Feb. 23, 2010	May. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2012 item
Related Party Transactions
Subscriber-related expenses			$ 2,167,880	$ 2,042,504	$ 4,272,976	$ 4,058,177
Satellite and transmission expenses			192,556	178,660	377,236	326,787
EchoStar
Related Party Transactions
Subscriber-related expenses			3,000	2,000	6,000	3,000
Satellite and transmission expenses			$ 183,000	$ 169,000	$ 358,000	$ 307,000
EchoStar | Remanufactured Receiver Agreement | Minimum
Related Party Transactions
Minimum required notice period for termination of agreement by related party					60 days
EchoStar | El Paso Lease Agreement | Dish Network
Related Party Transactions
Number of consecutive three year renewal options | item							4
Agreement Renewal Option Term							3 years
EchoStar | EchoStar XV
Related Party Transactions
Notice period for termination of agreement		30 days
EchoStar | DISH Remote Access Services Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement term	5 years
Automatic renewal period					1 year
Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity					120 days
EchoStar | Sling Service Services Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement term	5 years
Automatic renewal period					1 year
Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity					120 days

XML

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities

4.Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities

Our marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities consisted of the following:

	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Marketable investment securities:
Current marketable investment securities	$	48,860	$	1,401,145
Restricted marketable investment securities (1)	81,795		76,970
Total marketable investment securities	130,655		1,478,115
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (1)	5,189		10,014
Other investment securities:
Investment in EchoStar preferred tracking stock - cost method	228,795		228,795
Investment in HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method	87,409		87,409
Other investment securities - cost method	11,046		11,046
Total other investment securities (2)	327,250		327,250
Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities	$	463,094	$	1,815,379

(1) Restricted marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents are included in “Restricted cash and marketable investment securities” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(2) Other investment securities are included in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Marketable Investment Securities

Our marketable investment securities portfolio consists of various debt and equity instruments, all of which are classified as available-for-sale.

Current Marketable Investment Securities

Our current marketable investment securities portfolio includes investments in equity securities and various debt instruments including, among others, commercial paper, corporate securities and U.S. treasury and agency securities.

Commercial paper consists mainly of unsecured short-term, promissory notes issued primarily by corporations with maturities ranging up to 365 days.  Corporate securities consist of debt instruments issued by corporations with various maturities normally less than 18 months.  U. S. Treasury and agency securities consist of debt instruments issued by the federal government and other government agencies.

Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our restricted marketable investment securities, together with our restricted cash, included amounts required as collateral for our letters of credit.

Other Investment Securities

We have strategic investments in certain debt and equity securities that are included in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and accounted for using the cost, equity and/or available-for-sale methods of accounting.

Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in securities that are not publicly traded depends on the success of the issuers’ businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient capital, on acceptable terms or at all, and to execute their business plans.  Because private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.

Investment in Tracking Stock

On February 20, 2014, we entered into agreements with EchoStar Corporation (“EchoStar”) to implement a transaction pursuant to which, among other things:  (i) on March 1, 2014, we transferred to EchoStar and Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation (“HSSC”), a subsidiary of EchoStar, five satellites (EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and EchoStar XIV (collectively the “Transferred Satellites”), including related in-orbit incentive obligations and cash interest payments of approximately $59 million), and approximately $11 million in cash in exchange for an aggregate of 6,290,499 shares of a series of preferred tracking stock issued by EchoStar and an aggregate of 81.128 shares of a series of preferred tracking stock issued by HSSC (collectively, the “Tracking Stock”); and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, we lease back certain satellite capacity on the Transferred Satellites (collectively, the “Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction”).  The Tracking Stock generally tracks the residential retail satellite broadband business of Hughes Network Systems, LLC (“HNS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSSC, including without limitation the operations, assets and liabilities attributed to the Hughes residential retail satellite broadband business (collectively, the “Hughes Retail Group”).  The shares of the Tracking Stock issued to us represent an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group.

Since the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction is among entities under common control, we recorded the Tracking Stock at EchoStar’s and HSSC’s historical cost basis for these instruments of $229 million and $87 million, respectively.  The difference between the historical cost basis of the Tracking Stock received and the net carrying value of the Transferred Satellites of $356 million (including debt obligations, net of deferred taxes), plus the $11 million in cash, resulted in a $51 million capital transaction recorded in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Although our investment in the Tracking Stock represents an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group, we have no operational control or significant influence over the Hughes Retail Group business, and currently there is no public market for the Tracking Stock.  As such, the Tracking Stock is accounted for under the cost method of accounting.

On February 20, 2014, DISH Operating L.L.C. (“DOLLC”) and DISH Network L.L.C. (“DNLLC”), each indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of us, entered into an Investor Rights Agreement with EchoStar and HSSC with respect to the Tracking Stock (the “Investor Rights Agreement”).  The Investor Rights Agreement provides, among other things, certain information and consultation rights for us; certain transfer restrictions on the Tracking Stock and certain rights and obligations to offer and sell under certain circumstances (including a prohibition on transfers of the Tracking Stock for one year, with continuing transfer restrictions (including a right of first offer in favor of EchoStar) thereafter, an obligation to sell the Tracking Stock to EchoStar in connection with a change of control of DISH Network and a right to require EchoStar to repurchase the Tracking Stock in connection with a change of control of EchoStar, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions); certain registration rights; certain obligations to provide conversion and exchange rights of the Tracking Stock under certain circumstances; and certain protective covenants afforded to holders of the Tracking Stock.  The Investor Rights Agreement generally will terminate with respect to our interest should we no longer hold any shares of the HSSC-issued Tracking Stock and any registrable securities under the Investor Rights Agreement.

Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had accumulated net unrealized gains of $36 million and $43 million, respectively.  These amounts, net of related tax effect, were $22 million and $28 million, respectively.  All of these amounts are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” within “Total stockholder’s equity (deficit).”  The components of our available-for-sale investments are summarized in the table below.

	As of June 30, 2015								As of December 31, 2014
	Marketable								Marketable
	Investment		Unrealized						Investment		Unrealized
	Securities		Gains		Losses		Net		Securities		Gains		Losses			Net
	(In thousands)
Debt securities (including restricted):
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	56,754	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	58,254	$	7	$	(11	)	$	(4	)
Commercial paper	11,792		—		—		—		65,696		—		—			—
Corporate securities	—		—		—		—		1,247,403		5,608		(145		)	5,463
Other	13,249		—		—		—		55,788		—		—			—
Equity securities	48,860		35,623		—		35,623		50,974		37,737		—			37,737
Total	$	130,655	$	35,623	$	—	$	35,623	$	1,478,115	$	43,352	$	(156	)	$	43,196

As of June 30, 2015, restricted marketable investment securities included debt securities of $42 million with contractual maturities within one year and $40 million with contractual maturities extending longer than one year through and including five years.  Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as a result of our ability to sell these securities prior to maturity.

Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position

The following table reflects the length of time that the individual securities, accounted for as available-for-sale, have been in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category.

	As of
	June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Loss		Value		Loss
	(In thousands)
Debt Securities:
Less than 12 months	$	—	$	—	$	268,492	$	(100	)
12 months or more	—		—		129,092		(56		)
Total	$	—	$	—	$	397,584	$	(156	)

Fair Value Measurements

Our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

	As of
	June 30, 2015								December 31, 2014
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Cash Equivalents (including restricted)	$	5,189	$	5,189	$	—	$	—	$	6,605,274	$	258,281	$	6,346,993	$	—
Debt securities (including restricted):
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	56,754	$	51,870	$	4,884	$	—	$	58,254	$	42,710	$	15,544	$	—
Commercial paper	11,792		—		11,792		—		65,696		—		65,696		—
Corporate securities	—		—		—		—		1,247,403		—		1,247,403		—
Other	13,249		—		13,249		—		55,788		—		55,788		—
Equity securities	48,860		48,860		—		—		50,974		50,974		—		—
Total	$	130,655	$	100,730	$	29,925	$	—	$	1,478,115	$	93,684	$	1,384,431	$	—

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had no transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements.

XML

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities (Details 5) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	$ 48,860	$ 1,401,145
Total marketable investment securities	130,655	1,478,115
Transfer of investments from Level 1 to Level 2	0
Transfer of investments from Level 2 to Level 1	0
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	56,754	58,254
Commercial paper
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	11,792	65,696
Corporate securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security		1,247,403
Other
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	13,249	55,788
Equity Securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Equity securities	48,860	50,974
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total
Fair value of marketable securities
Cash equivalents (including restricted)	5,189	6,605,274
Total marketable investment securities	130,655	1,478,115
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total | U.S. Treasury and agency securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	56,754	58,254
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total | Commercial paper
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	11,792	65,696
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total | Corporate securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security		1,247,403
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total | Other
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	13,249	55,788
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total | Equity Securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Equity securities	48,860	50,974
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 1
Fair value of marketable securities
Cash equivalents (including restricted)	5,189	258,281
Total marketable investment securities	100,730	93,684
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 1 | U.S. Treasury and agency securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	51,870	42,710
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 1 | Equity Securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Equity securities	48,860	50,974
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 2
Fair value of marketable securities
Cash equivalents (including restricted)		6,346,993
Total marketable investment securities	29,925	1,384,431
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 2 | U.S. Treasury and agency securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	4,884	15,544
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 2 | Commercial paper
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	11,792	65,696
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 2 | Corporate securities
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security		1,247,403
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 2 | Other
Fair value of marketable securities
Debt security	$ 13,249	$ 55,788

XML

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities (Details 4) $ in Thousands	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)
Fair value of marketable investment securities in a loss position
Total	$ 397,584
Unrealized loss on marketable investment securities in a loss position
Total	(156)
Debt Securities
Fair value of marketable investment securities in a loss position
Less than 12 Months	268,492
12 Months or More	129,092
Unrealized loss on marketable investment securities in a loss position
Less than 12 months	(100)
12 months or more	$ (56)

XML

Inventory (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Inventory
Finished goods	$ 233,584	$ 252,101
Raw materials	126,155	159,095
Work-in-process	106,342	82,350
Total inventory	$ 466,081	$ 493,546

XML

Property and Equipment (Details) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($) item	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($) item	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)
Depreciation and amortization expense
Depreciation and amortization expense	$ 237,248	$ 248,382	$ 461,143	$ 473,348
Equipment leased to customers
Depreciation and amortization expense
Depreciation and amortization expense	206,314	213,653	398,067	399,376
Satellites
Depreciation and amortization expense
Depreciation and amortization expense	15,261	15,261	30,522	38,462
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
Depreciation and amortization expense
Depreciation and amortization expense	$ 15,673	$ 19,468	$ 32,554	$ 35,510
Pay-TV Satellites
Depreciation and amortization expense
Number of satellites utilized in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator | item			14
Owned Satellites | item	1		1
Number of satellites utilized under operating lease | item			11
Number of satellites utilized under capital lease | item			2

XML

Supplemental Data - Statements of Cash Flows

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Supplemental Data - Statements of Cash Flows

Supplemental Data - Statements of Cash Flows

3.Supplemental Data — Statements of Cash Flows

The following table presents our supplemental cash flow and other non-cash data.

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Cash paid for interest	$	437,969	$	422,338
Cash received for interest	4,945		17,588
Cash paid for income taxes	1,487		4,321
Cash paid for income taxes to DISH Network	278,970		252,913
Unsettled trades related to repurchases of long-term debt	—		12,673
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar:
Transfer of property and equipment, net	—		432,080
Investment in EchoStar and HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method	—		316,204
Transfer of liabilities and other	—		44,540
Capital distribution to EchoStar, net of deferred taxes of $31,274	—		51,466

XML

Property and Equipment (Details 2)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2015
EchoStar XV
Property and Equipment
Estimate Useful life of assets	15 years
EchoStar XVIII
Property and Equipment
Estimate Useful life of assets	15 years
EchoStar XVI
Property and Equipment
Option to renew the lease for an additional period	6 years
Another option to renew the lease if renewal option exercised	5 years

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details 5) $ in Thousands		1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2011 USD ($) installment	Jan. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)
Related Party Transactions
Cost of sales - equipment, services and other				$ 23,804	$ 30,985	$ 54,299	$ 56,211
Dish Network | TiVo v. Dish Network and EchoStar Corporation
Related Party Transactions
Settlement amount	$ 500,000
Initial settlement amount paid	300,000
Aggregate of six annual installment amounts between 2012 and 2017	$ 200,000
Estimated percentage of annual future payments payable by the company	95.00%
Litigation settlement number of annual installments | installment	6
Contribution from related party	$ 10,000
Receiver Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement Renewal Option Term		1 year
Notice period required to extend the agreement term		180 days
EchoStar | Receiver Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Notice period required to extend the agreement term						60 days
Purchased set-top boxes and other equipment from EchoStar				193,000	$ 296,000	$ 416,000	$ 590,000
EchoStar | Patent Cross-License Agreements | Dish Network | Maximum
Related Party Transactions
Payments to third party by related party			$ 10,000
Payments to third party by related party under extension option				$ 3,000		$ 3,000

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 59,792	$ 6,762,140
Marketable investment securities	48,860	1,401,145
Trade accounts receivable - other, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15,339 and $23,520, respectively	919,035	870,795
Trade accounts receivable - EchoStar, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of zero	50,080	31,391
Inventory	466,081	493,546
Deferred tax assets	37,018	37,018
Other current assets	126,706	130,038
Total current assets	1,707,572	9,726,073
Noncurrent Assets:
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities	86,984	86,984
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,702,057 and $2,628,945, respectively	2,275,595	2,437,004
FCC authorizations	635,794	635,794
Other noncurrent assets, net	533,163	535,308
Total noncurrent assets	3,531,536	3,695,090
Total assets	5,239,108	13,421,163
Current Liabilities:
Trade accounts payable - other	192,496	152,076
Trade accounts payable - EchoStar	224,072	236,122
Advances from affiliates	188,720
Deferred revenue and other	903,884	865,210
Accrued programming	1,514,161	1,374,710
Accrued interest	224,981	227,158
Other accrued expenses	407,051	441,693
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	1,530,483	679,149
Total current liabilities	5,185,848	3,976,118
Long-Term Obligations, Net of Current Portion:
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion	12,218,842	13,728,749
Deferred tax liabilities	1,160,980	1,225,417
Long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities	206,686	188,067
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion	13,586,508	15,142,233
Total liabilities	$ 18,772,356	$ 19,118,351
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)
Redeemable noncontrolling interest	$ 12,792	$ 19,913
Stockholder's Equity (Deficit):
Common stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 1,015 shares issued and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital	$ 1,303,458	$ 1,276,201
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	22,051	28,383
Accumulated earnings (deficit)	(14,872,842)	(7,022,887)
Total DISH DBS stockholder's equity (deficit)	(13,547,333)	(5,718,303)
Noncontrolling interest	1,293	1,202
Total stockholder's equity (deficit)	(13,546,040)	(5,717,101)
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity (deficit)	$ 5,239,108	$ 13,421,163

XML

Organization and Business Activities

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Organization and Business Activities

Organization and Business Activities

1.Organization and Business Activities

Principal Business

DISH DBS Corporation (which together with its subsidiaries is referred to as “DISH DBS,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our” unless otherwise required by the context) is a holding company and an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network Corporation (“DISH Network”).  DISH DBS was formed under Colorado law in January 1996 and its common stock is held by DISH Orbital Corporation (“DOC”), a direct subsidiary of DISH Network.  We offer pay-TV services under the DISH® brand (“DISH”) and the Sling® brand (“Sling”) (collectively “Pay-TV” services).  The DISH branded pay-TV service consists of, among other things, Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses authorizing us to use direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”) and Fixed Satellite Service (“FSS”) spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, receiver systems, third-party broadcast operations, customer service facilities, a leased fiber optic network, in-home service and call center operations, and certain other assets utilized in our operations.  The Sling branded pay-TV services consist of, among other things, live, linear streaming over-the-top (“OTT”) Internet-based domestic, international and Latino video programming services (“Sling TV”).  The Sling International video programming service (formerly known as DishWorld) was launched prior to 2015.  Sling International subscribers have historically been included in our Pay-TV subscriber count and represented a small percentage of our Pay-TV subscribers.  During 2015, we launched our Sling domestic and Sling Latino services. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we have included all Sling TV subscribers in our Pay-TV subscriber count.  As of June 30, 2015, we had 13.932 million Pay-TV subscribers in the United States.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details 2) $ in Millions						3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jul. 21, 2015 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 item	Jul. 25, 2014 item	Jul. 08, 2014 USD ($)	Dec. 23, 2013 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2012 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($)
Lightsquared Harbinger Capital Partners LLC | Minimum
Loss contingencies
Claim amount	$ 1,500			$ 500
Personalized Media Communications Inc | Minimum
Loss contingencies
Claim amount						$ 150	$ 500
Personalized Media Communications Inc | Maximum
Loss contingencies
Claim amount						$ 450	$ 650
DISH Network L.L.C. | Do Not Call Litigation
Loss contingencies
Claim amount					$ 270
Claim amount from state plaintiff								$ 23,500
DISH Network L.L.C. | Do Not Call Litigation | Maximum
Loss contingencies
Claim amount from federal plaintiff								$ 900
LightSquared transaction shareholder derivative actions
Loss contingencies
Number of shareholders who filed lawsuits | item		5
Number of claims asserted by Jacksonville PFPF | item			5
LightSquared transaction shareholder derivative actions | Mr. Ergen
Loss contingencies
Number of claims asserted by Jacksonville PFPF | item			3
LightSquared transaction shareholder derivative actions | Director Defendants
Loss contingencies
Number of claims asserted by Jacksonville PFPF | item			1

XML

Related Party Transactions (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Related Party Transactions

Schedule of transactions with NagraStar

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Purchases (including fees):
Purchases from NagraStar	$	24,524	$	38,867	$	47,022	$	59,070
	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Amounts Payable and Commitments:
Amounts payable to NagraStar	$	15,083	$	14,819
Commitments to NagraStar	$	5,070	$	12,368

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details) $ in Thousands					3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Feb. 12, 2015 USD ($)	Feb. 12, 2015 USD ($)	Oct. 14, 2014 USD ($)	Mar. 28, 2014 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($) item	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($) item	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)
Related Party Transactions
Dividend paid to DOC		$ 8,250,000					$ 8,250,000	$ 650,000
Number of wireless spectrum licenses | item					176		176
Subscriber-related revenue					$ 3,693,872	$ 3,555,953	$ 7,284,576	7,029,161
Broadband, Wireless and Other Operations
Related Party Transactions
Expenses associated with services					3,000	3,000	7,000	6,000
Dish Network
Related Party Transactions
Dividend paid to DOC	$ 8,250,000		$ 1,500,000	$ 650,000
Subscriber-related revenue					$ 2,000	$ 5,000	$ 6,000	$ 9,000

XML

Supplemental Data - Statements of Cash Flows (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014
Cash paid for interest	$ 437,969	$ 422,338
Cash received for interest	4,945	17,588
Cash paid for income taxes	1,487	4,321
Cash paid for income taxes to DISH Network	278,970	252,913
Unsettled trades relating to repurchases of long-term debt		12,673
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar:
Investment in EchoStar and HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method	327,250		$ 327,250
EchoStar
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar:
Investment in EchoStar and HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method	$ 228,795		$ 228,795
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction | EchoStar
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar:
Transfer of property and equipment, net		432,080
Investment in EchoStar and HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method		316,204
Transfer of liabilities and other		44,540
Capital distribution to EchoStar, net of deferred taxes of $31,274		51,466
Deferred taxes for capital distribution to EchoStar		$ 31,274

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information.  Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements prepared under GAAP.  In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Our results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.  For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.  Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Principles of Consolidation

We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling influence and variable interest entities where we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary.  Minority interests are recorded as noncontrolling interests or redeemable noncontrolling interests.  See below for further discussion.  Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee.  When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense for each reporting period.  Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for doubtful accounts, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, fair value of multi-element arrangements, capital leases, asset impairments, estimates of future cash flows used to evaluate impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer incentives, programming expenses and subscriber lives.  Economic conditions may increase the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and assumptions indicated above.  Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.

Fair Value Measurements

We determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We apply the following hierarchy in determining fair value:

· Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;

· Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; and quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and

· Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other participants therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts) and current liabilities (excluding the “Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations”) is equal to or approximates fair value due to their short-term nature or proximity to current market rates.  See Note 4 for the fair value of our marketable investment securities.

Fair values for our publicly traded debt securities are based on quoted market prices, when available.  The fair values of private debt are estimated based on an analysis in which we evaluate market conditions, related securities, various public and private offerings, and other publicly available information.  In performing this analysis, we make various assumptions regarding, among other things, credit spreads, and the impact of these factors on the value of the debt securities.  See Note 7 for the fair value of our long-term debt.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  This converged standard on revenue recognition was issued jointly with the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  ASU 2014-09 provides a framework for revenue recognition that replaces most existing GAAP revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective.  ASU 2014-09 allows for either a full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption.  We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.  We have not yet selected an adoption method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.  On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved a one year deferral on the effective date for implementation of this standard, which changed the effective date for us to January 1, 2018.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Current Assets:
Allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts receivable - other	$ 15,339	$ 23,520
Allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts receivable - EchoStar	0
Noncurrent Assets:
Accumulated depreciation on property and equipment, net	$ 2,702,057	$ 2,628,945
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	1,000,000	1,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	1,015	1,015
Common stock, shares outstanding	1,015	1,015

XML

Supplemental Data - Statements of Cash Flows (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Supplemental Data - Statements of Cash Flows

Schedule of supplemental cash flow and other non-cash data

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Cash paid for interest	$	437,969	$	422,338
Cash received for interest	4,945		17,588
Cash paid for income taxes	1,487		4,321
Cash paid for income taxes to DISH Network	278,970		252,913
Unsettled trades related to repurchases of long-term debt	—		12,673
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar:
Transfer of property and equipment, net	—		432,080
Investment in EchoStar and HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method	—		316,204
Transfer of liabilities and other	—		44,540
Capital distribution to EchoStar, net of deferred taxes of $31,274	—		51,466

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2015	Aug. 12, 2015
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	DISH DBS CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0001042642
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2015
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		1,015
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2015
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2

XML

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities

Schedule of marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities

	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Marketable investment securities:
Current marketable investment securities	$	48,860	$	1,401,145
Restricted marketable investment securities (1)	81,795		76,970
Total marketable investment securities	130,655		1,478,115
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (1)	5,189		10,014
Other investment securities:
Investment in EchoStar preferred tracking stock - cost method	228,795		228,795
Investment in HSSC preferred tracking stock - cost method	87,409		87,409
Other investment securities - cost method	11,046		11,046
Total other investment securities (2)	327,250		327,250
Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investment securities	$	463,094	$	1,815,379

(1) Restricted marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents are included in “Restricted cash and marketable investment securities” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(2) Other investment securities are included in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Schedule of components of available-for-sale investments

	As of June 30, 2015								As of December 31, 2014
	Marketable								Marketable
	Investment		Unrealized						Investment		Unrealized
	Securities		Gains		Losses		Net		Securities		Gains		Losses			Net
	(In thousands)
Debt securities (including restricted):
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	56,754	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	58,254	$	7	$	(11	)	$	(4	)
Commercial paper	11,792		—		—		—		65,696		—		—			—
Corporate securities	—		—		—		—		1,247,403		5,608		(145		)	5,463
Other	13,249		—		—		—		55,788		—		—			—
Equity securities	48,860		35,623		—		35,623		50,974		37,737		—			37,737
Total	$	130,655	$	35,623	$	—	$	35,623	$	1,478,115	$	43,352	$	(156	)	$	43,196

Schedule of available-for-sale securities in continuous unrealized loss position by length of time and their fair value

	As of
	June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Loss		Value		Loss
	(In thousands)
Debt Securities:
Less than 12 months	$	—	$	—	$	268,492	$	(100	)
12 months or more	—		—		129,092		(56		)
Total	$	—	$	—	$	397,584	$	(156	)

Schedule of investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis

	As of
	June 30, 2015								December 31, 2014
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Cash Equivalents (including restricted)	$	5,189	$	5,189	$	—	$	—	$	6,605,274	$	258,281	$	6,346,993	$	—
Debt securities (including restricted):
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	56,754	$	51,870	$	4,884	$	—	$	58,254	$	42,710	$	15,544	$	—
Commercial paper	11,792		—		11,792		—		65,696		—		65,696		—
Corporate securities	—		—		—		—		1,247,403		—		1,247,403		—
Other	13,249		—		13,249		—		55,788		—		55,788		—
Equity securities	48,860		48,860		—		—		50,974		50,974		—		—
Total	$	130,655	$	100,730	$	29,925	$	—	$	1,478,115	$	93,684	$	1,384,431	$	—

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014
Revenue:
Subscriber-related revenue	$ 3,693,872	$ 3,555,953	$ 7,284,576	$ 7,029,161
Equipment sales and other revenue	17,111	26,057	34,628	47,507
Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar	13,451	16,555	26,292	32,107
Total revenue	3,724,434	3,598,565	7,345,496	7,108,775
Costs and Expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below - Note 6):
Subscriber-related expenses	2,167,880	2,042,504	4,272,976	4,058,177
Satellite and transmission expenses	192,556	178,660	377,236	326,787
Cost of sales - equipment, services and other	23,804	30,985	54,299	56,211
Subscriber acquisition costs:
Cost of sales - subscriber promotion subsidies	49,829	62,051	97,347	117,394
Other subscriber acquisition costs	205,914	234,242	400,896	462,390
Subscriber acquisition advertising	126,377	126,164	262,810	251,037
Total subscriber acquisition costs	382,120	422,457	761,053	830,821
General and administrative expenses	167,802	178,381	359,476	357,965
Depreciation and amortization (Note 6)	237,248	248,382	461,143	473,348
Total costs and expenses	3,171,410	3,101,369	6,286,183	6,103,309
Operating income (loss)	553,024	497,196	1,059,313	1,005,466
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income	728	10,102	4,945	18,864
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized	(219,328)	(212,177)	(441,338)	(424,256)
Other, net	392	405	483	745
Total other income (expense)	(218,208)	(201,670)	(435,910)	(404,647)
Income (loss) before income taxes	334,816	295,526	623,403	600,819
Income tax (provision) benefit, net	(125,871)	(109,532)	(230,471)	(225,414)
Net income (loss)	208,945	185,994	392,932	375,405
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax	3,168	4,492	7,113	5,233
Net income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS	212,113	190,486	400,045	380,638
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net income (loss)	208,945	185,994	392,932	375,405
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities	9,959	(5,756)	(7,573)	14,195
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit, net	(3,705)	2,163	1,241	(5,364)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	6,254	(3,593)	(6,332)	8,831
Comprehensive income (loss)	215,199	182,401	386,600	384,236
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax	(3,168)	(4,492)	(7,113)	(5,233)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to DISH DBS	$ 218,367	$ 186,893	$ 393,713	$ 389,469

XML

Long-Term Debt

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Long-Term Debt

Long-Term Debt

7.Long-Term Debt

Fair Value of our Long-Term Debt

The following table summarizes the carrying and fair values of our debt facilities as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	As of
	June 30, 2015					December 31, 2014
	Carrying					Carrying
	Value			Fair Value		Value			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (1)	$	—		$	—	$	650,001		$	664,321
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 (2)	1,500,000			1,540,680		1,500,000			1,580,625
4 5/8% Senior Notes due 2017	900,000			926,298		900,000			933,750
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018	1,200,000			1,221,000		1,200,000			1,245,600
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019	1,400,000			1,554,140		1,400,000			1,589,700
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020	1,100,000			1,136,498		1,100,000			1,100,000
6 3/4% Senior Notes due 2021	2,000,000			2,090,000		2,000,000			2,157,500
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2022	2,000,000			2,000,000		2,000,000			2,055,000
5% Senior Notes due 2023	1,500,000			1,407,045		1,500,000			1,470,000
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2024	2,000,000			1,920,000		2,000,000			2,019,800
Other notes payable	14,701			14,701		14,701			14,701
Subtotal	13,614,701			$	13,810,362	14,264,702			$	14,830,997
Unamortized deferred financing costs and debt discounts, net	(46,286		)			(51,473		)
Capital lease obligations (3)	180,910			NA		194,669			NA
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations (including current portion)	$	13,749,325				$	14,407,898

(1) On June 1, 2015, we redeemed the principal balance of our 7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015.

(2) Our 7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 mature on February 1, 2016 and have been reclassified to “Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015.

(3) Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required.

We estimated the fair value of our publicly traded long-term debt using market prices in less active markets (Level 2).

XML

Property and Equipment

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Property and Equipment

Property and Equipment

6.Property and Equipment

Depreciation and amortization expense consisted of the following:

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Equipment leased to customers	$	206,314	$	213,653	$	398,067	$	399,376
Satellites	15,261		15,261		30,522		38,462
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other	15,673		19,468		32,554		35,510
Total depreciation and amortization	$	237,248	$	248,382	$	461,143	$	473,348

Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) do not include depreciation expense related to satellites or equipment leased to customers.

Pay-TV Satellites.  We currently utilize 14 satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator, one of which we own and depreciate over its useful life.  We currently utilize certain capacity on 11 satellites that we lease from EchoStar, which are accounted for as operating leases.  We also lease two satellites from third parties, which are accounted for as capital leases and are depreciated over the shorter of the economic life or the term of the satellite agreement.

As of June 30, 2015, our pay-TV satellite fleet consisted of the following:

			Estimated
			Useful Life
			(Years) /
		Degree	Lease
	Launch	Orbital	Termination
Satellites	Date	Location	Date
Owned:
EchoStar XV (1)	July 2010	45	15
Under Construction:
EchoStar XVIII (2)	2016	110	15
Leased from EchoStar (1):
EchoStar I (3)(4)(5)	December 1995	77	November 2015
EchoStar VII (3)(4)	February 2002	119	June 2016
EchoStar VIII	August 2002	77	Month to month
EchoStar IX	August 2003	121	Month to month
EchoStar X (3)(4)	February 2006	110	February 2021
EchoStar XI (3)(4)	July 2008	110	September 2021
EchoStar XII (3)	July 2003	61.5	September 2017
EchoStar XIV (3)(4)	March 2010	119	February 2023
EchoStar XVI (6)	November 2012	61.5	January 2017
Nimiq 5	September 2009	72.7	September 2019
QuetzSat-1	September 2011	77	November 2021
Leased from Other Third Party:
Anik F3	April 2007	118.7	April 2022
Ciel II	December 2008	129	January 2019

(1) See Note 10 for further discussion of our Related Party Transactions with EchoStar.

(2) EchoStar XVIII is expected to launch during 2016.

(3) We generally have the option to renew each lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite’s useful life.

(4) On February 20, 2014, we entered into the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar pursuant to which, among other things, we transferred these satellites to EchoStar and lease back all available capacity on these satellites.  See Note 4 and Note 10 for further discussion.

(5) We did not exercise our option to renew the satellite capacity agreement for EchoStar I.

(6) We have the option to renew this lease for an additional six-year period.  If we exercise our six-year renewal option, we have the option to renew this lease for an additional five years.

XML

Organization and Business Activities (Details) item in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2015 item
Organization and Business Activities
Number of subscribers	13,932

XML

Inventory (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Inventory

Schedule of inventory

	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Finished goods	$	233,584	$	252,101
Raw materials	126,155		159,095
Work-in-process	106,342		82,350
Total inventory	$	466,081	$	493,546

XML

Related Party Transactions

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions

10.Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions with DISH Network

On February 12, 2015, we paid a dividend of $8.250 billion to DOC for, among other things, general corporate purposes, which include certain funding obligations related to DISH Network’s non-controlling equity and debt investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities, and to fund other DISH Network cash needs.

On October 14, 2014, we paid a dividend of $1.5 billion to DOC in connection with, among other things, DISH Network’s general corporate purposes.

On May 2, 2014, DISH Network contributed its equity interest in Sling TV Holding L.L.C. (“Sling TV Holding,” formerly known as DISH Digital Holding L.L.C.) to us.  We recorded all of the assets and liabilities at historical cost and the difference was recorded as a deemed distribution in “Stockholder’s equity (deficit)” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  As a result, all operating activities of Sling TV Holding are included in our financial results beginning May 2, 2014.

On March 28, 2014, we paid a dividend of $650 million to DOC in connection with, among other things, the funding of certain payments by DISH Network related to its winning bid for all 176 wireless spectrum licenses in the H Block auction.  See Note 8 for further information.

Advertising Sales.  We provide advertising services to DISH Network’s broadband business.  During the three months ended June 30,  2015 and 2014, we received revenue associated with these services of $2 million and $5 million, respectively, in “Subscriber-related revenue” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  During the six months ended June 30,  2015 and 2014, we received revenue associated with these services of $6 million and $9 million, respectively.

Broadband, Wireless and Other Operations.  We provide certain administrative support such as legal, information systems, marketing, human resources, accounting and finance services to DISH Network’s Broadband, Wireless and other operations.  During each of the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the costs associated with these services were $3 million.  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the costs associated with these services were $7 million and $6 million, respectively.  In addition, we provide call center, installation and other services to DISH Network for its Broadband business. 

Related Party Transactions with EchoStar

Following the Spin-off, DISH Network and EchoStar have operated as separate publicly-traded companies, and, except for the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction and Sling TV Holding described below, neither entity has any ownership interest in the other.  However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family.

EchoStar is our primary supplier of set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations and a supplier of the vast majority of our transponder capacity.  Generally, the amounts we pay EchoStar for products and services are based on pricing equal to EchoStar’s cost plus a fixed margin (unless noted differently below), which will vary depending on the nature of the products and services provided.

In connection with and following the Spin-off, we and EchoStar have entered into certain agreements pursuant to which we obtain certain products, services and rights from EchoStar, EchoStar obtains certain products, services and rights from us, and we and EchoStar have indemnified each other against certain liabilities arising from our respective businesses.  We also may enter into additional agreements with EchoStar in the future.  The following is a summary of the terms of our principal agreements with EchoStar that may have an impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

“Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar”

Remanufactured Receiver Agreement.  We entered into a remanufactured receiver agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which EchoStar has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase remanufactured receivers and accessories from us at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the equipment purchased.  In November 2014, we and EchoStar extended this agreement until December 31, 2015.  EchoStar may terminate the remanufactured receiver agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to us.  We may also terminate this agreement if certain entities acquire us.

Satellite Capacity Leased to EchoStar.  Since the Spin-off, we have entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which EchoStar leases certain capacity on certain satellites owned by us.  The fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the applicable satellite, the number of transponders that are leased on the applicable satellite and the length of the lease.  The term of each lease is set forth below:

· EchoStar XV.  During May 2013, we began leasing satellite capacity to EchoStar on EchoStar XV and relocated the satellite for testing at EchoStar’s Brazilian authorization at the 45 degree orbital location.  Effective March 1, 2014, this lease converted to a month-to-month lease.  Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice.  Upon termination, EchoStar is responsible, among other things, for relocating this satellite from the 45 degree orbital location back to the 61.5 degree orbital location.

Real Estate Lease Agreements.  Since the Spin-off, DISH Network has entered into lease agreements pursuant to which DISH Network leases certain real estate to EchoStar.  The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic areas, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises.  The term of each lease is set forth below:

· El Paso Lease Agreement.  During 2012, DISH Network leased certain space at 1285 Joe Battle Blvd., El Paso, Texas to EchoStar for an initial period ending on August 1, 2015, which also provides EchoStar with renewal options for four consecutive three-year terms.  During the second quarter 2015, EchoStar exercised its first renewal option for a period ending on August 1, 2018.

· American Fork Occupancy License Agreement.  During 2013, DISH Network subleased certain space at 796 East Utah Valley Drive, American Fork, Utah to EchoStar for a period ending on July 31, 2017.  In connection with the Exchange Agreement relating to Sling TV Holding discussed below, this sublease terminated during the fourth quarter 2014.

“Subscriber-related expenses”

During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $3 million and $2 million, respectively, for subscriber-related expenses from EchoStar.  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $6 million and $3 million, respectively, for subscriber-related expenses from EchoStar.  These amounts are recorded in “Subscriber-related expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The agreements pertaining to these expenses are discussed below.

SlingService Services Agreement.  Effective February 23, 2010, we entered into an agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive certain services related to placeshifting, which is used for, among other things, the DISH Anywhere mobile application.  The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services.  This agreement had an initial term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms.  This agreement automatically renewed on February 23, 2015 for an additional one-year period until February 23, 2016.  This agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar.

DISH Remote Access Services Agreement.  Effective February 23, 2010, we entered into an agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive, among other things, certain remote DVR management services.  The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services.  This agreement had an initial term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms.  This agreement automatically renewed on February 23, 2015 for an additional one-year period until February 23, 2016.  This agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar.

“Satellite and transmission expenses”

During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $183 million and $169 million, respectively, for satellite and transmission expenses from EchoStar.  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $358 million and $307 million, respectively, for satellite and transmission expenses from EchoStar.  These amounts are recorded in “Satellite and transmission expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The agreements pertaining to these expenses are discussed below.

Broadcast Agreement.  Effective January 1, 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a broadcast agreement (the “2012 Broadcast Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides broadcast services to us, including teleport services such as transmission and downlinking, channel origination services, and channel management services, for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016.  The fees for services provided under the 2012 Broadcast Agreement are calculated at either:  (a) EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed dollar fee, which is subject to certain adjustments; or (b) EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the services provided.  We have the ability to terminate channel origination services and channel management services for any reason and without any liability upon at least 60 days notice to EchoStar.  If we terminate the teleport services provided under the 2012 Broadcast Agreement for a reason other than EchoStar’s breach, we are generally obligated to reimburse EchoStar for any direct costs EchoStar incurs related to any such termination that it cannot reasonably mitigate.

Broadcast Agreement for Certain Sports Related Programming.  During May 2010, we and EchoStar entered into a broadcast agreement pursuant to which EchoStar provides certain broadcast services to us in connection with our carriage of certain sports related programming.  The term of this agreement is for ten years.  If we terminate this agreement for a reason other than EchoStar’s breach, we are generally obligated to reimburse EchoStar for any direct costs EchoStar incurs related to any such termination that it cannot reasonably mitigate.  The fees for the broadcast services provided under this agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and provide such services.

Satellite Capacity Leased from EchoStar. Since the Spin-off, we have entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which we lease certain capacity on certain satellites owned or leased by EchoStar.  The fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the applicable satellite, the number of transponders that are leased on the applicable satellite and the length of the lease.  See “Pay-TV Satellites” in Note 6 for further information.  The term of each lease is set forth below:

· EchoStar I, VII, X, XI and XIV.  On March 1, 2014, we began leasing all available capacity from EchoStar on the EchoStar I, VII, X, XI and XIV satellites.  The term of each satellite capacity agreement generally terminates upon the earlier of:  (i) the end-of-life of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; or (iii) a certain date, which depends upon, among other things, the estimated useful life of the satellite.  We generally have the option to renew each satellite capacity agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite’s life.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew such agreements will be exercised.  We did not exercise our option to renew the satellite capacity agreement for EchoStar I.

· EchoStar VIII.  During May 2013, we began leasing capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar VIII as an in-orbit spare.  Effective March 1, 2014, this lease converted to a month-to-month lease.  Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice.

· EchoStar IX.  We lease certain satellite capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar IX.  Subject to availability, we generally have the right to continue to lease satellite capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar IX on a month-to-month basis.

· EchoStar XII.  The lease for EchoStar XII generally terminates upon the earlier of:  (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite (unless we determine to renew on a year-to-year basis); (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponders on which service is being provided fails; or (iv) a certain date, which depends upon, among other things, the estimated useful life of the satellite, whether the replacement satellite fails at launch or in orbit prior to being placed into service and the exercise of certain renewal options.  We generally have the option to renew the lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the satellite’s life.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew this agreement will be exercised.

· EchoStar XVI.  During December 2009, we entered into a transponder service agreement with EchoStar to lease all of the capacity on EchoStar XVI, a DBS satellite, after its service commencement date.  EchoStar XVI was launched during November 2012 to replace EchoStar XV at the 61.5 degree orbital location and is currently in service.  Under the original transponder service agreement, the initial term generally expired upon the earlier of:  (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite failed; (iii) the date the transponder(s) on which service was being provided under the agreement failed; or (iv) ten years following the actual service commencement date.  Prior to expiration of the initial term, we also had the option to renew on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the satellite.  Effective December 21, 2012, we and EchoStar amended the transponder service agreement to, among other things, change the initial term to generally expire upon the earlier of:  (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponder(s) on which service is being provided under the agreement fails; or (iv) four years following the actual service commencement date.  Prior to expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew for an additional six-year period.  Prior to expiration of the initial term, EchoStar also has the right, upon certain conditions, to renew for an additional six-year period.  If either we or EchoStar exercise our respective six-year renewal options, then we have the option to renew for an additional five-year period prior to expiration of the then-current term.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew this agreement will be exercised.

Nimiq 5 Agreement.  During 2009, EchoStar entered into a fifteen-year satellite service agreement with Telesat Canada (“Telesat”) to receive service on all 32 DBS transponders on the Nimiq 5 satellite at the 72.7 degree orbital location (the “Telesat Transponder Agreement”).  During 2009, EchoStar also entered into a satellite service agreement (the “DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement”) with us, pursuant to which we currently receive service from EchoStar on all 32 of the DBS transponders covered by the Telesat Transponder Agreement.  DISH Network has also guaranteed certain obligations of EchoStar under the Telesat Transponder Agreement.  See discussion under “Guarantees” in Note 8.

Under the terms of the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement, we make certain monthly payments to EchoStar that commenced in September 2009 when the Nimiq 5 satellite was placed into service and continue through the service term.  Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement, the service term will expire ten years following the date the Nimiq 5 satellite was placed into service.  Upon expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite.  Upon in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement will be exercised or that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.

QuetzSat-1 Lease Agreement.  During 2008, EchoStar entered into a ten-year satellite service agreement with SES Latin America S.A. (“SES”), which provides, among other things, for the provision by SES to EchoStar of service on 32 DBS transponders on the QuetzSat-1 satellite.  During 2008, EchoStar also entered into a transponder service agreement (“QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement”) with us pursuant to which we receive service from EchoStar on 24 DBS transponders.  QuetzSat-1 was launched on September 29, 2011 and was placed into service during the fourth quarter 2011 at the 67.1 degree orbital location while we and EchoStar explored alternative uses for the QuetzSat-1 satellite.  In the interim, EchoStar provided us with alternate capacity at the 77 degree orbital location.  During the third quarter 2012, we and EchoStar entered into an agreement pursuant to which we sublease five DBS transponders back to EchoStar.  During January 2013, QuetzSat-1 was moved to the 77 degree orbital location and we commenced commercial operations at that location in February 2013.

Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement, the initial service term will expire in November 2021.  Upon expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite.  Upon an in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite.  There can be no assurance that any options to renew the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement will be exercised or that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.103 Degree Orbital Location/SES-3.  During May 2012, EchoStar entered into a spectrum development agreement (the “103 Spectrum Development Agreement”) with Ciel Satellite Holdings Inc. (“Ciel”) to develop certain spectrum rights at the 103 degree orbital location (the “103 Spectrum Rights”).  During June 2013, we and EchoStar entered into a spectrum development agreement (the “DISH 103 Spectrum Development Agreement”) pursuant to which we may use and develop the 103 Spectrum Rights.  During the third quarter 2013, we made a $23 million payment to EchoStar in exchange for its rights under the 103 Spectrum Development Agreement.  In accordance with accounting principles that apply to transfers of assets between companies under common control, we recorded EchoStar’s net book value of this asset of $20 million in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and recorded the amount in excess of EchoStar’s net book value of $3 million as a capital distribution.  Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH 103 Spectrum Development Agreement, the term generally will continue for the duration of the 103 Spectrum Rights.

In connection with the 103 Spectrum Development Agreement, during May 2012, EchoStar also entered into a ten-year service agreement with Ciel pursuant to which EchoStar leases certain satellite capacity from Ciel on the SES-3 satellite at the 103 degree orbital location (the “103 Service Agreement”).  During June 2013, we and EchoStar entered into an agreement pursuant to which we lease certain satellite capacity from EchoStar on the SES-3 satellite (the “DISH 103 Service Agreement”).  Under the terms of the DISH 103 Service Agreement, we make certain monthly payments to EchoStar through the service term.  Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH 103 Service Agreement, the initial service term will expire on the earlier of: (i) the date the SES-3 satellite fails; (ii) the date the transponder(s) on which service was being provided under the agreement fails; or (iii) ten years following the actual service commencement date.  Upon in-orbit failure or end of life of the SES-3 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite.  There can be no assurance that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.

TT&C Agreement.  Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a telemetry, tracking and control (“TT&C”) agreement pursuant to which we receive TT&C services from EchoStar for certain satellites for a period ending on December 31, 2016 (the “2012 TT&C Agreement”).  The fees for services provided under the 2012 TT&C Agreement are calculated at either: (i) a fixed fee; or (ii) cost plus a fixed margin, which will vary depending on the nature of the services provided.  We are able to terminate the 2012 TT&C Agreement for any reason upon 60 days notice.

DISHOnline.com Services Agreement.  Effective January 1, 2010, we entered into a two-year agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive certain services associated with an online video portal.  The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services.  We have the option to renew this agreement for successive one year terms and the agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar.  In October 2014, we exercised our right to renew this agreement for a one-year period ending on December 31, 2015.

Sling TV Holding.  On May 2, 2014, DISH Network contributed its equity interest in Sling TV Holding to us.  See “Related Party Transactions with DISH Network” within the related party section previously discussed.  Effective July 1, 2012, DISH Network and EchoStar formed Sling TV Holding, which was owned two-thirds by DISH Network and one-third by EchoStar and was consolidated into DISH Network’s financial statements beginning July 1, 2012.  Sling TV Holding was formed to develop and commercialize certain advanced technologies.  At that time, DISH Network, EchoStar and Sling TV Holding entered into the following agreements with respect to Sling TV Holding:  (i) a contribution agreement pursuant to which DISH Network and EchoStar contributed certain assets in exchange for its respective ownership interests in Sling TV Holding; (ii) a limited liability company operating agreement (the “Operating Agreement”), which provides for the governance of Sling TV Holding; and (iii) a commercial agreement (the “Commercial Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other things, Sling TV Holding has:  (a) certain rights and corresponding obligations with respect to its business; and (b) the right, but not the obligation, to receive certain services from DISH Network and EchoStar, respectively.  Since this was a formation of an entity under common control and a step-up in basis was not allowed, each party’s contributions were recorded at historical book value for accounting purposes.

Effective August 1, 2014, EchoStar and Sling TV Holding entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other things, Sling TV Holding distributed certain assets to EchoStar and EchoStar reduced its interest in Sling TV Holding to a ten percent non-voting interest.  We now have a ninety percent equity interest and a 100% voting interest in Sling TV Holding.  In addition, we, EchoStar and Sling TV Holding amended and restated the Operating Agreement, primarily to reflect the changes implemented by the Exchange Agreement.  Finally, we, EchoStar and Sling TV Holding amended and restated the Commercial Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, Sling TV Holding:  (1) continues to have certain rights and corresponding obligations with respect to its business; (2) continues to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive certain services from us and EchoStar; and (3) has a license from EchoStar to use certain of the assets distributed to EchoStar as part of the Exchange Agreement.  Sling TV Holding operates, through its subsidiary Sling TV L.L.C., the Sling TV services.

Since the Exchange Agreement is among entities under common control, we recorded the difference between the historical cost basis of the assets transferred to EchoStar and our historical cost basis in EchoStar’s one-third noncontrolling interest in Sling TV Holding as a $6 million, net of deferred taxes, capital distribution in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  In addition, we recorded the initial fair value of EchoStar’s ten percent non-voting interest as a $14 million, net of deferred taxes, deemed distribution in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

EchoStar’s ten percent non-voting interest is redeemable, subject to certain conditions, at fair value within sixty days following the fifth anniversary of the Exchange Agreement.  This interest is considered temporary equity under the applicable accounting guidance and is thus recorded as part of “Redeemable noncontrolling interest” in the mezzanine section of our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  EchoStar’s redeemable noncontrolling interest in Sling TV Holding was initially accounted for at fair value, which established a minimum threshold value for this interest.  Redemption of the interest is contingent on a certain performance goal being achieved by Sling TV Holding, which is not yet probable of being achieved.

“General and administrative expenses”

During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $23 million and $28 million, respectively, for general and administrative expenses from EchoStar.  During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $43 million and $49 million, respectively, for general and administrative expenses from EchoStar.  These amounts are recorded in “General and administrative expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The agreements pertaining to these expenses are discussed below.

Product Support Agreement.  In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a product support agreement pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to receive product support from EchoStar (including certain engineering and technical support services) for all set-top boxes and related accessories that EchoStar has previously sold and in the future may sell to us.  The fees for the services provided under the product support agreement are calculated at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided.  The term of the product support agreement is the economic life of such receivers and related accessories, unless terminated earlier.  We may terminate the product support agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice.  In the event of an early termination of this agreement, we are entitled to a refund of any unearned fees paid to EchoStar for the services.

Real Estate Lease Agreements.  We have entered into lease agreements pursuant to which we lease certain real estate from EchoStar.  The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises.  The term of each lease is set forth below:

· Inverness Lease Agreement.  The lease for certain space at 90 Inverness Circle East in Englewood, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016.  This agreement can be terminated by either party upon six months prior notice.

· Meridian Lease Agreement.  The lease for all of 9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016.

· Santa Fe Lease Agreement.  The lease for all of 5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016, with a renewal option for one additional year.

· EchoStar Data Networks Sublease Agreement.  The sublease for certain space at 211 Perimeter Center in Atlanta, Georgia is for a period ending on October 31, 2016.

· Gilbert Lease Agreement.  Effective August 1, 2014, we began leasing certain space from EchoStar at 801 N. DISH Dr. in Gilbert, Arizona for a period ending on July 31, 2016.  We also have renewal options for three additional one-year terms.

· Cheyenne Lease Agreement. The lease for certain space at 530 EchoStar Drive in Cheyenne, Wyoming is for a period ending on December 31, 2031.

Application Development Agreement.  During the fourth quarter 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a set-top box application development agreement (the “Application Development Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides us with certain services relating to the development of web-based applications for set-top boxes for a period ending on February 1, 2016.  The Application Development Agreement renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier by us or EchoStar at any time upon at least 90 days notice.  The fees for services provided under the Application Development Agreement are calculated at EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the services provided.

XiP Encryption Agreement.  During the third quarter 2012, we entered into an encryption agreement with EchoStar for our whole-home HD DVR line of set-top boxes (the “XiP Encryption Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides certain security measures on our whole-home HD DVR line of set-top boxes to encrypt the content delivered to the set-top box via a smart card and secure the content between set-top boxes.  The initial term of the XiP Encryption Agreement was for a period until December 31, 2014.  Under the XiP Encryption Agreement, we had the option, but not the obligation, to extend the XiP Encryption Agreement for one additional year upon 180 days notice prior to the end of the term.  On May 5, 2014, we provided EchoStar notice to extend the XiP Encryption Agreement for one additional year until December 31, 2015.  We and EchoStar each have the right to terminate the XiP Encryption Agreement for any reason upon at least 30 days notice and 180 days notice, respectively.  The fees for the services provided under the XiP Encryption Agreement are calculated on a monthly basis based on the number of receivers utilizing such security measures each month.

Sling Trademark License Agreement.  On December 31, 2014, Sling TV L.L.C. entered into an agreement with Sling Media, Inc., a subsidiary of EchoStar, pursuant to which we have the right for a fixed fee to use certain trademarks, domain names and other intellectual property related to the “Sling” trademark for a period ending on December 31, 2016.

Professional Services Agreement.  Prior to 2010, in connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into various agreements with EchoStar including the Transition Services Agreement, Satellite Procurement Agreement and Services Agreement, which all expired on January 1, 2010 and were replaced by a Professional Services Agreement.  During 2009, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed that EchoStar shall continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive the following services from DISH Network, among others, certain of which were previously provided under the Transition Services Agreement: information technology, travel and event coordination, internal audit, legal, accounting and tax, benefits administration, program acquisition services and other support services.  Additionally, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed that DISH Network shall continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to engage EchoStar to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network (previously provided under the Satellite Procurement Agreement) and receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services from EchoStar (previously provided under the Services Agreement) and other support services.  The Professional Services Agreement automatically renewed on January 1, 2015 for an additional one-year period until January 1, 2016 and renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier by either party upon at least 60 days notice.  However, either party may terminate the Professional Services Agreement in part with respect to any particular service it receives for any reason upon at least 30 days notice.  Revenue for services provided by us to EchoStar under the Professional Services Agreement is recorded in “Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Other Agreements — EchoStar

Receiver Agreement.  EchoStar is currently our primary supplier of set-top box receivers.  Effective January 1, 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a receiver agreement (the “2012 Receiver Agreement”) pursuant to which we had the right, but not the obligation, to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment from EchoStar for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014.  We had an option, but not the obligation, to extend the 2012 Receiver Agreement for one additional year upon 180 days notice prior to the end of the term.  On May 5, 2014, we provided EchoStar notice to extend the 2012 Receiver Agreement for one additional year until December 31, 2015.  The 2012 Receiver Agreement allows us to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories and other equipment from EchoStar either:  (i) at a cost (decreasing as EchoStar reduces costs and increasing as costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on EchoStar’s mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased.  Under the 2012 Receiver Agreement, EchoStar’s margins will be increased if they are able to reduce the costs of their digital set-top boxes and their margins will be reduced if these costs increase.  EchoStar provides us with standard manufacturer warranties for the goods sold under the 2012 Receiver Agreement.  Additionally, the 2012 Receiver Agreement includes an indemnification provision, whereby the parties indemnify each other for certain intellectual property matters.  We are able to terminate the 2012 Receiver Agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to EchoStar.  EchoStar is able to terminate the 2012 Receiver Agreement if certain entities acquire us.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we purchased set-top boxes and other equipment from EchoStar of $193 million and $296 million, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we purchased set-top boxes and other equipment from EchoStar of $416 million and $590 million, respectively.  Included in these amounts are purchases of certain broadband equipment from EchoStar under the 2012 Receiver Agreement.  These amounts are initially included in “Inventory” and are subsequently capitalized as “Property and equipment, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or expensed as “Subscriber acquisition costs” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) when the equipment is deployed.

Tax Sharing Agreement.  In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into a tax sharing agreement with EchoStar which governs our respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Spin-off with respect to taxes for the periods ending on or before the Spin-off.  Generally, all pre-Spin-off taxes, including any taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to implement the Spin-off, are borne by DISH Network, and DISH Network will indemnify EchoStar for such taxes.  However, DISH Network is not liable for and will not indemnify EchoStar for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the Spin-off or certain related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free distributions pursuant to any provision of Section 355 or Section 361 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) because of: (i) a direct or indirect acquisition of any of EchoStar’s stock, stock options or assets; (ii) any action that EchoStar takes or fails to take; or (iii) any action that EchoStar takes that is inconsistent with the information and representations furnished to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to counsel in connection with any opinion being delivered by counsel with respect to the Spin-off or certain related transactions.  In such case, EchoStar is solely liable for, and will indemnify DISH Network for, any resulting taxes, as well as any losses, claims and expenses.  The tax sharing agreement will only terminate after the later of the full period of all applicable statutes of limitations, including extensions, or once all rights and obligations are fully effectuated or performed.

TiVo.  On April 29, 2011, DISH Network and EchoStar entered into a settlement agreement with TiVo Inc. (“TiVo”).  The settlement resolved all pending litigation between DISH Network and EchoStar, on the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, including litigation relating to alleged patent infringement involving certain DISH digital video recorders, or DVRs.  Under the settlement agreement, all pending litigation was dismissed with prejudice and all injunctions that permanently restrain, enjoin or compel any action by DISH Network or EchoStar were dissolved.  DISH Network and EchoStar are jointly responsible for making payments to TiVo in the aggregate amount of $500 million, including an initial payment of $300 million and the remaining $200 million in six equal annual installments between 2012 and 2017.  Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off of EchoStar from DISH Network, DISH Network made the initial payment to TiVo in May 2011, except for the contribution from EchoStar totaling approximately $10 million, representing an allocation of liability relating to EchoStar’s sales of DVR-enabled receivers to an international customer.  Future payments will be allocated between DISH Network and EchoStar based on historical sales of certain licensed products, with DISH Network being responsible for 95% of each annual payment.

Patent Cross-License Agreements.  During December 2011, DISH Network and EchoStar entered into separate patent cross-license agreements with the same third party whereby: (i) EchoStar and such third party licensed their respective patents to each other subject to certain conditions; and (ii) DISH Network and such third party licensed their respective patents to each other subject to certain conditions (each, a “Cross-License Agreement”).  Each Cross License Agreement covers patents acquired by the respective party prior to January 1, 2017 and aggregate payments under both Cross-License Agreements total less than $10 million.  Each Cross License Agreement also contains an option to extend each Cross-License Agreement to include patents acquired by the respective party prior to January 1, 2022.  If both options are exercised, the aggregate additional payments to such third party would total less than $3 million.  However, DISH Network and EchoStar may elect to extend their respective Cross-License Agreement independently of each other.  Since the aggregate payments under both Cross-License Agreements were based on the combined annual revenues of DISH Network and EchoStar, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed to allocate their respective payments to such third party based on their respective percentage of combined total revenue.

Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar. On February 20, 2014, we entered into the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar pursuant to which, among other things: (i) on March 1, 2014, we transferred to EchoStar and HSSC the Transferred Satellites, including related in-orbit incentive obligations and cash interest payments of approximately $59 million and approximately $11 million in cash in exchange for the Tracking Stock; and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, we lease back all available satellite capacity on the Transferred Satellites.  The Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction is further described below:

· Transaction Agreement.  On February 20, 2014, DOLLC, DNLLC and EchoStar XI Holding L.L.C., all indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of us, entered into the Transaction Agreement with EchoStar, HSSC and Alpha Company LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar, pursuant to which, on March 1, 2014, we, among other things, transferred to EchoStar and HSSC the Transferred Satellites in exchange for the Tracking Stock.  The Tracking Stock generally tracks the Hughes Retail Group.  The shares of the Tracking Stock issued to us represent an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group.  Since the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction is among entities under common control, we recorded the Tracking Stock at EchoStar’s and HSSC’s historical cost basis for these instruments of $229 million and $87 million, respectively.  The difference between the historical cost basis of the Tracking Stock received and the net carrying value of the Transferred Satellites of $356 million (including debt obligations, net of deferred taxes), plus the $11 million in cash, resulted in a $51 million capital transaction recorded in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Although our investment in the Tracking Stock represents an aggregate 80% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group, we have no operational control or significant influence over the Hughes Retail Group business, and currently there is no public market for the Tracking Stock.  As such, the Tracking Stock is accounted for under the cost method of accounting.  The Transaction Agreement includes, among other things, customary mutual provisions for representations, warranties and indemnification.

· Satellite Capacity Leased from EchoStar. On February 20, 2014, we entered into satellite capacity agreements with certain subsidiaries of EchoStar pursuant to which, beginning March 1, 2014, we, among other things, lease all available satellite capacity on the Transferred Satellites.  See further discussion under “Satellite and transmission expenses — Satellite Capacity Leased from EchoStar.”

· Investor Rights Agreement.  On February 20, 2014, EchoStar, HSSC, DOLLC and DNLLC (DOLLC and DNLLC, collectively referred to as the “DISH Investors”) also entered into the Investor Rights Agreement with respect to the Tracking Stock.  The Investor Rights Agreement provides, among other things, certain information and consultation rights for the DISH Investors; certain transfer restrictions on the Tracking Stock and certain rights and obligations to offer and sell under certain circumstances (including a prohibition on transfers of the Tracking Stock for one year, with continuing transfer restrictions (including a right of first offer in favor of EchoStar) thereafter, an obligation to sell the Tracking Stock to EchoStar in connection with a change of control of DISH Network and a right to require EchoStar to repurchase the Tracking Stock in connection with a change of control of EchoStar, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions); certain registration rights; certain obligations to provide conversion and exchange rights of the Tracking Stock under certain circumstances; and certain protective covenants afforded to holders of the Tracking Stock.  The Investor Rights Agreement generally will terminate as to the DISH Investors at such time as the DISH Investors no longer hold any shares of the HSSC-issued Tracking Stock and any registrable securities under the Investor Rights Agreement.

PMC.  During 2008, PMC filed suit against DISH Network; EchoStar and Motorola Inc., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,109,414; 4,965,825; 5,233,654; 5,335,277 and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.  On May 7, 2015, DISH Network, EchoStar and PMC entered into a settlement and release agreement that provided, among other things, for a license by PMC to DISH Network and EchoStar for certain patents and patent applications and the dismissal of all of PMC’s claims in the action against DISH Network and EchoStar with prejudice.  On June 4, 2015, the Court dismissed all of PMC’s claims in the action against DISH Network and EchoStar with prejudice.  See Note 8 for further discussion.  In June 2015, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed that EchoStar would contribute a one-time payment of $5 million towards the settlement under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off and the 2012 Receiver Agreement.

gTLD Bidding Agreement.  In April 2015, we and EchoStar entered into a gTLD Bidding Agreement whereby, among other things: (i) we obtained rights from EchoStar to participate in a generic top level domain (“gTLD”) auction, assuming all rights and obligations from EchoStar related to EchoStar’s application with ICANN for a particular gTLD; (ii) we agreed to reimburse EchoStar for its ICANN application fee and certain out-of-pocket expenses related to the application and the auction; and (iii) we and EchoStar agreed to split equally the net proceeds obtained by us as the losing bidder in the auction, less such fee reimbursement and out-of-pocket expenses.

Other

In November 2009, Mr. Roger Lynch became employed by both DISH Network and EchoStar as an Executive Vice President.  Mr. Lynch is responsible for the development and implementation of advanced technologies that are of potential utility and importance to both DISH Network and EchoStar.  Mr. Lynch’s compensation consisted of cash and equity compensation and was borne by both EchoStar and DISH Network.  As of January 1, 2015, Mr. Lynch is solely a DISH Network employee.

Related Party Transactions with NagraStar L.L.C.

NagraStar is a joint venture between EchoStar and Nagra USA, Inc. that is our provider of encryption and related security systems intended to assure that only authorized customers have access to our programming.  These expenses are recorded in “Subscriber-related expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  We record all payables in “Trade accounts payable — other” or “Other accrued expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The table below summarizes our transactions with NagraStar.

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Purchases (including fees):
Purchases from NagraStar	$	24,524	$	38,867	$	47,022	$	59,070
	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Amounts Payable and Commitments:
Amounts payable to NagraStar	$	15,083	$	14,819
Commitments to NagraStar	$	5,070	$	12,368

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

8.Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

DISH Network Spectrum

DISH Network has invested over $5.0 billion since 2008 to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and related assets.

700 MHz Licenses.  In 2008, DISH Network paid $712 million to acquire certain 700 MHz E Block (“700 MHz”) wireless spectrum licenses, which were granted to DISH Network by the FCC in February 2009.  At the time they were granted, these licenses were subject to certain interim and final build-out requirements.  On October 29, 2013, the FCC issued an order approving a voluntary industry solution to resolve certain interoperability issues affecting the lower 700 MHz spectrum band (the “Interoperability Solution Order”), which requires DISH Network to reduce power emissions on its 700 MHz licenses.  As part of the Interoperability Solution Order, the FCC, among other things, approved DISH Network’s request to modify the original interim and final build-out requirements associated with its 700 MHz licenses so that by March 2017, DISH Network must provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 40% of its total E Block population (the “Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement”).  The FCC also approved DISH Network’s request to modify the 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement so that by March 2021, DISH Network must provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 70% of the population in each of its E Block license areas (the “Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement”).  While the modifications to DISH Network’s 700 MHz licenses provide DISH Network additional time to complete the build-out requirements, the reduction in power emissions could have an adverse impact on DISH Network’s ability to fully utilize its 700 MHz licenses.  If DISH Network fails to meet the Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement, the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by one year, from March 2021 to March 2020, and DISH Network could face the reduction of license area(s).  If DISH Network fails to meet the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement, DISH Network’s authorization may terminate for the geographic portion of each license in which DISH Network is not providing service.

AWS-4 Licenses.  On March 2, 2012, the FCC approved the transfer of 40 MHz of wireless spectrum licenses held by DBSD North America, Inc. (“DBSD North America”) and TerreStar Networks, Inc. (“TerreStar”) to DISH Network.  On March 9, 2012, DISH Network completed the acquisition of 100% of the equity of reorganized DBSD North America (the “DBSD Transaction”) and substantially all of the assets of TerreStar (the “TerreStar Transaction”), pursuant to which DISH Network acquired, among other things, certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by DBSD North America and TerreStar.  The total consideration to acquire the DBSD North America and TerreStar assets was approximately $2.860 billion.

On February 15, 2013, the FCC issued an order, which became effective on March 7, 2013, modifying DISH Network’s licenses to expand its terrestrial operating authority with AWS-4 authority (“AWS-4”).  That order imposed certain limitations on the use of a portion of this spectrum, including interference protections for other spectrum users and power and emission limits that DISH Network presently believes could render 5 MHz of its uplink spectrum (2000-2005 MHz) effectively unusable for terrestrial services and limit its ability to fully utilize the remaining 15 MHz of its uplink spectrum (2005-2020 MHz) for terrestrial services.  These limitations could, among other things, impact the ongoing development of technical standards associated with DISH Network’s wireless business, and may have a material adverse effect on DISH Network’s ability to commercialize its AWS-4 licenses.  That order also mandated certain interim and final build-out requirements for the licenses.  By March 2017, DISH Network must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service to at least 40% of the aggregate population represented by all of the areas covered by the licenses (the “AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement”).  By March 2020, DISH Network was required to provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service to at least 70% of the population in each area covered by an individual license (the “AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement”).

On December 20, 2013, the FCC issued a further order that, among other things, extended the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement by one year to March 2021 (the “Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement”).  If DISH Network fails to meet the AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement, the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by one year, from March 2021 to March 2020.  If DISH Network fails to meet the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement, DISH Network’s terrestrial authorization for each license area in which it fails to meet the requirement may terminate.  The FCC’s December 20, 2013 order also conditionally waived certain FCC rules for DISH Network’s AWS-4 licenses to allow DISH Network to repurpose all 20 MHz of its uplink spectrum (2000-2020 MHz) for downlink (the “AWS-4 Downlink Waiver”).  If DISH Network fails to notify the FCC that it intends to use its uplink spectrum for downlink by June 20, 2016, the AWS-4 Downlink Waiver will terminate, and the Modified AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement will revert back to the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement.

H Block Licenses.  On April 29, 2014, the FCC issued an order granting DISH Network’s application to acquire all 176 wireless spectrum licenses in the H Block auction.  DISH Network paid approximately $1.672 billion to acquire these H Block licenses, including clearance costs associated with the lower H Block spectrum.  The H Block licenses are subject to certain interim and final build-out requirements.  By April 2018, DISH Network must provide reliable signal coverage and offer service to at least 40% of the population in each area covered by an individual H Block license (the “H Block Interim Build-Out Requirement”).  By April 2024, DISH Network must provide reliable signal coverage and offer service to at least 75% of the population in each area covered by an individual H Block license (the “H Block Final Build-Out Requirement”).  If DISH Network fails to meet the H Block Interim Build-Out Requirement, the H Block license term and the H Block Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by two years (from April 2024 to April 2022) for each H Block license area in which it fails to meet the requirement.  If DISH Network fails to meet the H Block Final Build-Out Requirement, its authorization for each H Block license area in which it fails to meet the requirement may terminate.  The FCC has adopted rules for the H Block spectrum band that is adjacent to DISH Network’s AWS-4 licenses.  Depending on the outcome of the standard-setting process for the H Block and DISH Network’s ultimate decision regarding the AWS-4 Downlink Waiver, the rules that the FCC adopted for the H Block could further impact 15 MHz of DISH Network’s AWS-4 uplink spectrum (2005-2020 MHz), which may have a material adverse effect on DISH Network’s ability to commercialize the AWS-4 licenses.

Commercialization of DISH Network’s Wireless Spectrum Licenses and Related Assets.  DISH Network has made substantial investments to acquire certain wireless spectrum licenses and related assets.  DISH Network may also determine that additional wireless spectrum licenses may be required to commercialize its wireless business and to compete with other wireless service providers.  DISH Network will need to make significant additional investments or partner with others to, among other things, commercialize, build-out, and integrate these licenses and related assets, and any additional acquired licenses and related assets; and comply with regulations applicable to such licenses.  Depending on the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such investments or partnerships could vary significantly.  In connection with the development of DISH Network’s wireless business, including without limitation the efforts described above, we have made cash distributions to partially finance these efforts to date and may make additional cash distributions to finance in whole or in part DISH Network’s future efforts.  See Note 10 for further information regarding our dividends to DOC.  There can be no assurance that DISH Network will be able to develop and implement a business model that will realize a return on these wireless spectrum licenses or that DISH Network will be able to profitably deploy the assets represented by these wireless spectrum licenses.

AWS-3 Auction

The FCC auction of AWS-3 wireless spectrum licenses (the “AWS-3 Licenses”), designated by the FCC as Auction 97 (the “AWS-3 Auction”), commenced on November 13, 2014 and concluded on January 29, 2015.  The FCC’s prohibition on certain communications related to the AWS-3 Auction expired on February 13, 2015.  Also, on February 13, 2015, Northstar Wireless, LLC (“Northstar Wireless”) and SNR Wireless LicenseCo, LLC (“SNR Wireless”) each filed applications with the FCC to acquire certain AWS-3 Licenses that were made available in the AWS-3 Auction for which it was named as winning bidder and had made the required down payments.  Each of Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless had applied to receive a bidding credit of 25% as designated entities under applicable FCC rules.

Northstar Wireless was the winning bidder for certain AWS-3 Licenses (the “Northstar Licenses”) with gross winning bids totaling approximately $7.845 billion, which after taking into account a 25% bidding credit, equals net winning bids totaling approximately $5.884 billion.  Northstar Wireless is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northstar Spectrum, LLC (“Northstar Spectrum,” and collectively with Northstar Wireless, the “Northstar Entities”).  DISH Network, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, American AWS-3 Wireless II L.L.C. (“American II”), owns an 85% non-controlling interest in Northstar Spectrum.  Northstar Manager, LLC (“Northstar Manager”) owns a 15% controlling interest in, and is the sole manager of, Northstar Spectrum.  Northstar Spectrum is governed by a limited liability company agreement by and between American II and Northstar Manager (the “Northstar Spectrum LLC Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Northstar Spectrum LLC Agreement, American II and Northstar Manager made pro-rata equity contributions in Northstar Spectrum equal to approximately 15% of the net purchase price of the Northstar Licenses.  As of March 2, 2015, the total equity contributions from Northstar Manager to Northstar Spectrum were $133 million.  American II also entered into a Credit Agreement by and among American II, as Lender, Northstar Wireless, as Borrower, and Northstar Spectrum, as Guarantor (the “Northstar Credit Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Northstar Credit Agreement, American II made loans to Northstar Wireless for approximately 85% of the net purchase price of the Northstar Licenses.  After Northstar Wireless made the final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the Northstar Licenses, the total equity contributions from American II to Northstar Spectrum were approximately $750 million and the total loans from American II to Northstar Wireless were approximately $5.001 billion.

SNR Wireless was the winning bidder for certain AWS-3 Licenses (the “SNR Licenses”) with gross winning bids totaling approximately $5.482 billion, which after taking into account a 25% bidding credit, equals net winning bids totaling approximately $4.112 billion.  In addition to the net winning bids, SNR Wireless made a bid withdrawal payment of approximately $8 million to the FCC.  SNR Wireless is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SNR Wireless Holdco, LLC (“SNR Holdco,” and collectively with SNR Wireless, the “SNR Entities”).  DISH Network, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, American AWS-3 Wireless III L.L.C. (“American III”), owns an 85% non-controlling interest in SNR Holdco.  SNR Wireless Management, LLC (“SNR Management”) owns a 15% controlling interest in, and is the sole manager of, SNR Holdco.  SNR Holdco is governed by a limited liability company agreement by and between American III and SNR Management (the “SNR Holdco LLC Agreement”).  Pursuant to the SNR Holdco LLC Agreement, American III and SNR Management made pro-rata equity contributions in SNR Holdco equal to approximately 15% of the net purchase price of the SNR Licenses.  As of March 2, 2015, the total equity contributions from SNR Management to SNR Holdco were $93 million.  American III also entered into a Credit Agreement by and among American III, as Lender, SNR Wireless, as Borrower, and SNR Holdco, as Guarantor (the “SNR Credit Agreement”).  Pursuant to the SNR Credit Agreement, American III made loans to SNR Wireless for the amount of the bid withdrawal payment and approximately 85% of the net purchase price of the SNR Licenses.  After SNR Wireless made the final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the SNR Licenses, the total equity contributions from American III to SNR Holdco were approximately $524 million and the total loans from American III to SNR Wireless were approximately $3.503 billion.

After Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless made their respective final payments to the FCC on March 2, 2015 for the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses (which payments were net of a bidding credit of 25%), DISH Network’s total non-controlling equity and debt investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities were approximately $9.778 billion.  On April 29, 2015, the FCC issued a public notice that, among other things, found the applications filed by Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing.  The FCC’s public notice also set the following filing deadlines related to the applications: (i) petitions to deny the applications must have been filed no later than May 11, 2015; (ii) oppositions to a petition to deny the applications must have been filed no later than May 18, 2015; and (iii) replies to oppositions must have been filed no later than May 26, 2015.  In addition, on April 29, 2015, DISH Network received a letter from the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (the “Senate Committee”), requesting certain information related to its relationship with Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless and its participation in the AWS-3 Auction.  DISH Network cannot predict the timing or the outcome of the Senate Committee’s inquiry.

On July 22, 2015, DISH Network, Northstar Wireless, SNR Wireless and certain other parties attended a meeting with staff of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau of the FCC to discuss a draft order that has been circulated by the Chairman’s office for approval by the other Commissioners relating to Northstar Wireless’ and SNR Wireless’ respective pending applications for the AWS-3 Licenses.  At the meeting and as subsequently confirmed by a summary of the meeting released by the FCC, DISH Network was informed that the draft order, if approved, would find that:  (i) DISH Network has a controlling interest in Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless, therefore DISH Network’s revenues should be attributed to them, which in turn makes Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless ineligible to receive the 25% bidding credits (approximately $1.961 billion for Northstar Wireless and $1.370 billion for SNR Wireless) for which each had applied to receive as designated entities under applicable FCC rules; (ii) Northstar Wireless and SNR Wireless are qualified to hold the AWS-3 Licenses; (iii) the FCC will not designate the matter for a hearing, or refer the matter to the FCC enforcement bureau or the Department of Justice; and (iv) all other relief sought by the parties that filed Petitions to Deny will be denied.  The draft order remains subject to change, and must be approved by a majority of the Commissioners to become effective.

In the event that the FCC grants the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, DISH Network may need to make significant additional loans to the Northstar Entities and to the SNR Entities, or they may need to partner with others, so that the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities may commercialize, build-out and integrate the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses, and comply with regulations applicable to the Northstar Licenses and the SNR Licenses.  Depending upon the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, integration efforts, and regulatory compliance, any such loans or partnerships could vary significantly.  There can be no assurance that DISH Network will be able to obtain a profitable return on its non-controlling investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities.

In connection with certain funding obligations related to the investments by American II and American III discussed above, in February 2015 we paid a dividend of $8.250 billion to DOC for, among other things, general corporate purposes, which include such funding obligations, and to fund other DISH Network cash needs.  We used a substantial portion of our existing cash and marketable investment securities to pay this dividend.  We may make additional cash distributions to finance in whole or in part loans that DISH Network may make to the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities in the future related to DISH Network’s non-controlling investments in these entities.

As a result of, among other things, DISH Network’s non-controlling debt and equity investments in the Northstar Entities and the SNR Entities, we may need to raise significant additional capital in the future, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all, to among other things, make additional cash distributions to DISH Network, continue investing in our business and to pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions.  In addition, economic weakness or weak results of operations may limit our ability to generate sufficient internal cash to fund such additional cash distributions to DISH Network, investments in our businesses, acquisitions and other strategic transactions, as well as to fund ongoing operations and service our debt.  As a result, these conditions make it difficult for us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities because we may not have access to funding sources necessary for us to pursue organic and strategic business development opportunities.

Guarantees

During the third quarter 2009, EchoStar entered into a satellite transponder service agreement for Nimiq 5 through 2024.  We sublease this capacity from EchoStar and also guarantee a certain portion of EchoStar’s obligation under its satellite transponder service agreement through 2019.  As of June 30, 2015, the remaining obligation of our guarantee was $280 million.  As of June 30, 2015, we have not recorded a liability on the balance sheet for this guarantee.

Contingencies

Separation Agreement

On January 1, 2008, DISH Network completed the distribution of its technology and set-top box business and certain infrastructure assets (the “Spin-off”) into a separate publicly-traded company, EchoStar.  In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar that provides, among other things, for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation.  Under the terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed certain liabilities that relate to its business, including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions that occurred prior to the Spin-off.  Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property related claims under which, generally, EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions following the Spin-off and DISH Network will indemnify EchoStar for any liabilities or damages resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off, as well as our acts or omissions following the Spin-off.

Litigation

We are involved in a number of legal proceedings (including those described below) concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our business activities.  Many of these proceedings are at preliminary stages, and many of these proceedings seek an indeterminate amount of damages.  We regularly evaluate the status of the legal proceedings in which we are involved to assess whether a loss is probable or there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred and to determine if accruals are appropriate.  If accruals are not appropriate, we further evaluate each legal proceeding to assess whether an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss can be made.

For certain cases described on the following pages, management is unable to provide a meaningful estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss because, among other reasons, (i) the proceedings are in various stages; (ii) damages have not been sought; (iii) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; (iv) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (v) there are significant factual issues to be resolved; and/or (vi) there are novel legal issues or unsettled legal theories to be presented or a large number of parties (as with many patent-related cases).  For these cases, however, management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcomes of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.

California Institute of Technology

On October 1, 2013, the California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) filed complaints against DISH Network and its wholly-owned subsidiaries DISH Network L.L.C. and dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C., as well as Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC, which are subsidiaries of EchoStar, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,116,710; 7,421,032; 7,916,781 and 8,284,833, each of which is entitled “Serial Concatenation of Interleaved Convolutional Codes forming Turbo-Like Codes.”  Caltech alleges that encoding data as specified by the DVB-S2 standard infringes each of the asserted patents.  In the operative Amended Complaint, served on March 6, 2014, Caltech claims that our Hopper® set-top box, as well as the Hughes defendants’ satellite broadband products and services, infringe the asserted patents by implementing the DVB-S2 standard.  On May 5, 2015, the Court granted summary judgment in our favor as to the DISH products and services alleged in the complaint.  On February 17, 2015, Caltech filed a new complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, asserting the same patents against the same defendants.  Caltech alleges that certain broadband equipment, including without limitation the HT1000 and HT1100 modems, gateway hardware, software and/or firmware that the Hughes defendants provide to, among others, us for our use in connection with the dishNET branded broadband service, infringes these patents.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

ClearPlay, Inc.

On March 13, 2014, ClearPlay, Inc. (“ClearPlay”) filed a complaint against DISH Network, our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., EchoStar, and its wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the District of Utah.  The complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,898,799, entitled “Multimedia Content Navigation and Playback”; 7,526,784, entitled “Delivery of Navigation Data for Playback of Audio and Video Content”; 7,543,318, entitled “Delivery of Navigation Data for Playback of Audio and Video Content”; 7,577,970, entitled “Multimedia Content Navigation and Playback”; and 8,117,282, entitled “Media Player Configured to Receive Playback Filters From Alternative Storage Mediums.”  ClearPlay alleges that the AutoHop™ feature of our Hopper set-top box infringes the asserted patents.  On February 11, 2015, the case was stayed pending various third-party challenges before the United States Patent and Trademark Office regarding the validity of certain of the patents asserted in the action.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

CRFD Research, Inc. (a subsidiary of Marathon Patent Group, Inc.)

On January 17, 2014, CRFD Research, Inc. (“CRFD”) filed a complaint against us, our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., DISH Network, EchoStar, and its wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,191,233 (the “233 patent”).  The 233 patent is entitled “System for Automated, Mid-Session, User-Directed, Device-to-Device Session Transfer System,” and relates to transferring an ongoing software session from one device to another.  CRFD alleges that our Hopper and Joey® set-top boxes infringe the 233 patent.  On the same day, CRFD filed similar complaints against AT&T Inc.; Comcast Corp.; DirecTV; Time Warner Cable Inc.; Cox Communications, Inc.; Akamai Technologies, Inc.; Cablevision Systems Corp. and Limelight Networks, Inc.  CRFD is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  On January 26, 2015, we and EchoStar filed a petition before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 233 patent.  The United States Patent and Trademark Office has agreed to institute a proceeding on our petition, as well as on two third-party petitions challenging the validity of the 233 patent.  On June 4, 2015, the litigation in the District Court was ordered stayed pending resolution of the proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Custom Media Technologies LLC

On August 15, 2013, Custom Media Technologies LLC (“Custom Media”) filed complaints against DISH Network; AT&T Inc.; Charter Communications, Inc.; Comcast Corp.; Cox Communications, Inc.; DirecTV; Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,269,275 (the “275 patent”).  The 275 patent, which is entitled “Method and System for Customizing and Distributing Presentations for User Sites,” relates to the provision of customized presentations to viewers over a network, such as “a cable television network, an Internet or other computer network, a broadcast television network, and/or a satellite system.”  Custom Media alleges that our DVR devices and DVR functionality infringe the 275 patent.  Custom Media is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, on November 6, 2013, the Court entered an order substituting DISH Network L.L.C., our wholly-owned subsidiary, as the defendant in DISH Network’s place.  Trial is scheduled to commence on September 19, 2016.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Do Not Call Litigation

On March 25, 2009, our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. was sued in a civil action by the United States Attorney General and several states in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Telephone Sales Rules, as well as analogous state statutes and state consumer protection laws.  The plaintiffs allege that we, directly and through certain independent third-party retailers and their affiliates, committed certain telemarketing violations.  On December 23, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment, which indicated for the first time that the state plaintiffs were seeking civil penalties and damages of approximately $270 million and that the federal plaintiff was seeking an unspecified amount of civil penalties (which could substantially exceed the civil penalties and damages being sought by the state plaintiffs).  The plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive relief that if granted would, among other things, enjoin DISH Network L.L.C., whether acting directly or indirectly through authorized telemarketers or independent third-party retailers, from placing any outbound telemarketing calls to market or promote its goods or services for five years, and enjoin DISH Network L.L.C. from accepting activations or sales from certain existing independent third-party retailers and from certain new independent third-party retailers, except under certain circumstances.  We also filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of all claims.  On December 12, 2014, the Court issued its opinion with respect to the parties’ summary judgment motions.  The Court found that DISH Network L.L.C. is entitled to partial summary judgment with respect to one claim in the action.  In addition, the Court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to partial summary judgment with respect to ten claims in the action, which includes, among other things, findings by the Court establishing DISH Network L.L.C.’s liability for a substantial amount of the alleged outbound telemarketing calls by DISH Network L.L.C. and certain of its independent third-party retailers that were the subject of the plaintiffs’ motion.  The Court did not issue any injunctive relief and did not make any determination on civil penalties or damages, ruling instead that the scope of any injunctive relief and the amount of any civil penalties or damages are questions for trial.  Trial is scheduled to commence on January 5, 2016. In recent pre-trial disclosures, the federal plaintiff has informed us that it intends to seek up to $900 million in alleged civil penalties at trial, and the state plaintiffs have informed us that they now intend to seek $23.5 billion in alleged civil penalties and damages.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC

On December 20, 2013, Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC (“Dragon IP”) filed complaints against our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., as well as Apple Inc.; AT&T, Inc.; Charter Communications, Inc.; Comcast Corp.; Cox Communications, Inc.; DirecTV; Sirius XM Radio Inc.; Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,930,444 (the “444 patent”), which is entitled “Simultaneous Recording and Playback Apparatus.”  Dragon IP alleges that various of our DVR receivers infringe the 444 patent.  Dragon IP is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  On December 23, 2014, DISH Network L.L.C. filed a petition before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 444 patent.  On April 10, 2015, the Court granted DISH Network L.L.C.’s motion to stay the action in light of DISH Network L.L.C.’s petition and certain other defendants’ petitions pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office challenging the validity of the 444 patent.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Grecia

On March 27, 2015, William Grecia (“Grecia”) filed a complaint against our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,533,860 (the “860 patent”), which is entitled “Personalized Digital Media Access System—PDMAS Part II.”  Grecia alleges that we violate the 860 patent in connection with our digital rights management.  Grecia is the named inventor on the 860 patent.  On June 22, 2015, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

The Hopper Litigation

On May 24, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.; CBS Corporation; Fox Entertainment Group, Inc.; Fox Television Holdings, Inc.; Fox Cable Network Services, L.L.C. and NBCUniversal, LLC.  In the lawsuit, we sought a declaratory judgment that we are not infringing any defendant’s copyright, or breaching any defendant’s retransmission consent agreement, by virtue of the PrimeTime Anytime™ and AutoHop features of our Hopper set-top box.  A consumer can use the PrimeTime Anytime feature, at his or her option, to record certain primetime programs airing on ABC, CBS, Fox, and/or NBC up to every night, and to store those recordings for up to eight days.  A consumer can use the AutoHop feature, at his or her option, to watch certain recordings that the subscriber made with our PrimeTime Anytime feature, commercial-free, if played back at a certain point after the show’s original airing.

Later on May 24, 2012, (i) Fox Broadcasting Company; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature, the AutoHop feature, as well as Slingbox placeshifting functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their retransmission consent agreements, (ii) NBC Studios LLC; Universal Network Television, LLC; Open 4 Business Productions LLC and NBCUniversal, LLC filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights, and (iii) CBS Broadcasting Inc.; CBS Studios Inc. and Survivor Productions LLC filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights.

As a result of certain parties’ competing venue-related motions brought in both the New York and California actions, and certain networks’ filing various counterclaims and amended complaints, the claims have proceeded in the following venues:  (1) the copyright and contract claims regarding the ABC and CBS parties in New York; and (2) the copyright and contract claims regarding the Fox and NBC parties in California.

California Actions.  The NBC plaintiffs and Fox plaintiffs filed amended complaints in their respective California actions, adding copyright claims against EchoStar and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., a wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar.  In addition, the Fox plaintiffs’ amended complaint added claims challenging the Hopper Transfers™ feature of our second-generation Hopper set-top box.

On November 7, 2012, the California court denied the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box’s PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features, and the Fox plaintiffs appealed.  On March 27, 2013, at the request of the parties, the Central District of California granted a stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending resolution of the appeal by the Fox plaintiffs.  On July 24, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as to the PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features.  On August 7, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, which was denied on January 24, 2014.  The United States Supreme Court granted the Fox plaintiffs an extension until May 23, 2014 to file a petition for writ of certiorari, but they did not file one.  As a result, the stay of the NBC plaintiffs’ action expired.  On August 6, 2014, at the request of the parties, the Central District of California granted a further stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending a final judgment on all claims in the Fox plaintiffs’ action.  No trial date is currently set on the NBC claims.

In addition, on February 21, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a second motion for preliminary injunction against:  (i) us seeking to enjoin the Hopper Transfers feature in our second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging breach of their retransmission consent agreement; and (ii) us and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. seeking to enjoin the Slingbox placeshifting functionality in our second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging copyright infringement and breach of their retransmission consent agreement.  On September 23, 2013, the California court denied the Fox plaintiffs’ motion.  The Fox plaintiffs appealed, and on July 14, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as to the Hopper Transfers feature and the Slingbox placeshifting functionality in our second-generation Hopper set-top box.

On January 12, 2015, the Court ruled on the Fox plaintiffs’ and our respective motions for summary judgment, holding that:  (a) the Slingbox placeshifting functionality and the PrimeTime Anytime, AutoHop and Hopper Transfers features do not violate the copyright laws; (b) certain quality assurance copies (which were discontinued in November 2012) do violate the copyright laws; and (c) the Slingbox placeshifting functionality, the Hopper Transfers feature and such quality assurance copies breach our Fox retransmission consent agreement.  The only issue remaining for trial is the amount of damages (if any) on the claims upon which the Fox plaintiffs prevailed on summary judgment, but the Court ruled that the Fox plaintiffs could not pursue disgorgement as a remedy.  At the parties’ joint request, the Court has stayed the case until October 1, 2015, and no trial date has been set.

New York Actions.  Both the ABC and CBS parties filed counterclaims in the New York action adding copyright claims against EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and the CBS parties filed a counterclaim alleging that we fraudulently concealed the AutoHop feature when negotiating the renewal of our CBS retransmission consent agreement.  On November 23, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box’s PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features.  On September 18, 2013, the New York court denied that motion.  The ABC plaintiffs appealed, and oral argument on the appeal was heard on February 20, 2014 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  Pursuant to a settlement between us and the ABC parties, during March 2014, the ABC parties withdrew their appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; we and the ABC parties dismissed without prejudice all of our respective claims pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; and the ABC parties granted a covenant not to sue.  Pursuant to a settlement between us and the CBS parties, on December 10, 2014, we and the CBS parties dismissed with prejudice all of our respective claims pending in the New York Court.

We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend our position in these cases.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted copyrights, or are in breach of any of the retransmission consent agreements, we may be subject to substantial damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  In addition, as a result of this litigation, we may not be able to renew certain of our retransmission consent agreements and other programming agreements on favorable terms or at all.  If we are unable to renew these agreements, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain substitute programming, or that such substitute programming would be comparable in quality or cost to our existing programming.  Loss of access to existing programming could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including, among other things, our gross new subscriber activations and subscriber churn rate.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

LightSquared/Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (LightSquared Bankruptcy)

As previously disclosed in our public filings, L-Band Acquisition, LLC (“LBAC”), DISH Network’s wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a Plan Support Agreement (the “PSA”) with certain senior secured lenders to LightSquared LP (the “LightSquared LP Lenders”) on July 23, 2013, which contemplated the purchase by LBAC of substantially all of the assets of LightSquared LP and certain of its subsidiaries (the “LBAC Bid”) that are debtors and debtors in possession in the LightSquared bankruptcy cases pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), which cases are jointly administered under the caption In re LightSquared Inc., et. al., Case No. 12 12080 (SCC).

Pursuant to the PSA, LBAC was entitled to terminate the PSA in certain circumstances, certain of which required three business days’ written notice, including, without limitation, in the event that certain milestones specified in the PSA were not met.  On January 7, 2014, LBAC delivered written notice of termination of the PSA to the LightSquared LP Lenders.  As a result, the PSA terminated effective on January 10, 2014, and the LBAC Bid was withdrawn.

On August 6, 2013, Harbinger Capital Partners LLC and other affiliates of Harbinger (collectively, “Harbinger”), a shareholder of LightSquared Inc., filed an adversary proceeding against DISH Network, LBAC, EchoStar, Charles W. Ergen (our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer), SP Special Opportunities, LLC (“SPSO”) (an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen), and certain other parties, in the Bankruptcy Court.  Harbinger alleged, among other things, claims based on fraud, unfair competition, civil conspiracy and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage related to certain purchases of LightSquared secured debt by SPSO.  Subsequently, LightSquared intervened to join in certain claims alleged against certain defendants other than DISH Network, LBAC and EchoStar.

On October 29, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the claims in Harbinger’s complaint in their entirety, but granted leave for LightSquared to file its own complaint in intervention.  On November 15, 2013, LightSquared filed its complaint, which included various claims against DISH Network, EchoStar, Mr. Ergen and SPSO.  On December 2, 2013, Harbinger filed an amended complaint, asserting various claims against SPSO.  On December 12, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed several of the claims asserted by LightSquared and Harbinger.  The surviving claims included, among others, LightSquared’s claims against SPSO for declaratory relief, breach of contract and statutory disallowance; LightSquared’s tortious interference claim against DISH Network, EchoStar and Mr. Ergen; and Harbinger’s claim against SPSO for statutory disallowance.  These claims proceeded to a non-jury trial on January 9, 2014.  In its Post-Trial Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered on June 10, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court rejected all claims against DISH Network and EchoStar, and it rejected some but not all claims against the other defendants.  On July 7, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Harbinger’s motion for an appeal of certain Bankruptcy Court orders in the adversary proceeding.

DISH Network intends to vigorously defend any claims against it in this proceeding and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

LightSquared/Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (Harbinger Colorado and New York Actions)

On July 8, 2014, Harbinger filed suit against DISH Network, LBAC, Mr. Ergen, SPSO, and certain other parties, in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.  The complaint asserts claims for tortious interference with contract and abuse of process, as well as claims alleging violations of the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act and the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act.  Harbinger seeks to rely on many of the same facts and circumstances that were at issue in the LightSquared adversary proceeding pending in the Bankruptcy Court.  Harbinger argues that the defendants’ alleged conduct, among other things, is responsible for Harbinger’s losing control of LightSquared and causing Harbinger to lose certain of its equity interests or rights in LightSquared.  The complaint seeks damages in excess of $500 million, which under federal and state law may be trebled.  On April 28, 2015, the District Court granted DISH Network’s motion to dismiss the complaint.  On May 28, 2015, Harbinger filed a notice of appeal and on July 27, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted Harbinger’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.  This matter is now concluded.

On July 21, 2015, Harbinger filed a substantially similar complaint against DISH Network, LBAC, Mr. Ergen, SPSO, and certain other parties, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.  The complaint again asserts claims for tortious interference with contract and abuse of process, and also repeats the same claims alleging violations of the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act and the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act.  Harbinger again seeks to rely on many of the same facts and circumstances that were at issue in the LightSquared adversary proceeding pending in the Bankruptcy Court.  Harbinger argues that the defendants’ alleged conduct, among other things, is responsible for Harbinger’s losing control of LightSquared and causing Harbinger to lose certain of its equity interests or rights in LightSquared.  This complaint seeks damages in excess of $1.5 billion, which under federal and state law may be trebled.

DISH Network intends to vigorously defend any claims against it in this case and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

LightSquared Transaction Shareholder Derivative Actions

On August 9, 2013, a purported shareholder of DISH Network, Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund (“Jacksonville PFPF”), filed a putative shareholder derivative action in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty claims against the members of DISH Network’s Board of Directors as of that date:  Charles W. Ergen; Joseph P. Clayton; James DeFranco; Cantey M. Ergen; Steven R. Goodbarn; David K. Moskowitz; Tom A. Ortolf; and Carl E. Vogel (collectively, the “Director Defendants”).  In its first amended complaint, Jacksonville PFPF asserted claims that Mr. Ergen breached his fiduciary duty to DISH Network in connection with certain purchases of LightSquared debt by SPSO, an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen, and that the other Director Defendants aided and abetted that alleged breach of duty.  The Jacksonville PFPF claims alleged that (1) the debt purchases created an impermissible conflict of interest and (2) put at risk the LBAC Bid, which as noted above has been withdrawn.  Jacksonville PFPF further claimed that most members of DISH Network’s Board of Directors are beholden to Mr. Ergen to an extent that prevents them from discharging their duties in connection with DISH Network’s participation in the LightSquared bankruptcy auction process.  Jacksonville PFPF is seeking an unspecified amount of damages.  Jacksonville PFPF dismissed its claims against Mr. Goodbarn on October 8, 2013.

Jacksonville PFPF sought a preliminary injunction that would enjoin Mr. Ergen and all of the Director Defendants other than Mr. Goodbarn from influencing DISH Network’s efforts to acquire certain assets of LightSquared in the bankruptcy proceeding.  On November 27, 2013, the Court denied that request but granted narrower relief enjoining Mr. Ergen and anyone acting on his behalf from participating in negotiations related to one aspect of the LBAC Bid, which, as noted above, has been withdrawn.

Five alleged shareholders have filed substantially similar putative derivative complaints in state and federal courts alleging the same or substantially similar claims.  On September 18, 2013, DCM Multi-Manager Fund, LLC filed a duplicative putative derivative complaint in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada, which was consolidated with the Jacksonville PFPF action on October 9, 2013.  Between September 25, 2013 and October 2, 2013, City of Daytona Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement System, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System and Iron Worker Mid-South Pension Fund filed duplicative putative derivative complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.  Also on October 2, 2013, Iron Workers District Council (Philadelphia and Vicinity) Retirement and Pension Plan filed its complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

On October 11, 2013, Iron Worker Mid-South Pension Fund dismissed its claims without prejudice.  On October 30, 2013, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System dismissed its claims without prejudice and, on January 2, 2014, filed a new complaint in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada, which, on May 2, 2014, was consolidated with the Jacksonville PFPF action.  On December 13, 2013, City of Daytona Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement System voluntarily dismissed its claims without prejudice.  On March 28, 2014, Iron Workers District Council (Philadelphia and Vicinity) Retirement and Pension Plan voluntarily dismissed its claims without prejudice.

On July 25, 2014, Jacksonville PFPF filed a second amended complaint, which added claims against George R. Brokaw and Charles M. Lillis, as Director Defendants, and Thomas A. Cullen, R. Stanton Dodge and K. Jason Kiser, as officers of DISH Network. Jacksonville PFPF asserted five claims in its second amended complaint, each of which alleged breaches of the duty of loyalty.  Three of the claims were asserted solely against Mr. Ergen; one claim was made against all of the remaining Director Defendants, other than Mr. Ergen and Mr. Clayton; and the final claim was made against Messrs. Cullen, Dodge and Kiser.

DISH Network’s Board of Directors has established a Special Litigation Committee to review the factual allegations and legal claims in these actions.  On October 24, 2014, the Special Litigation Committee filed a report in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada regarding its investigation of the claims and allegations asserted in Jacksonville PFPF’s second amended complaint.  The Special Litigation Committee filed a motion to dismiss the action based, among other things, on its business judgment that it is in the best interests of DISH Network not to pursue the claims asserted by Jacksonville PFPF.  The Director Defendants and Messrs. Cullen, Dodge and Kiser have also filed various motions to dismiss the action.  At a hearing on July 16, 2015, the Court issued an oral decision granting the Special Litigation Committee’s motion to defer to the Special Litigation Committee’s October 24, 2014 report, including its finding that dismissal of the action is in the best interest of DISH Network.  The Court also held that, in light of the granting of the motion to defer, the pending motions to dismiss filed by the individual defendants were moot.  The Court’s oral decision granting the motion to defer will be reflected in a written order, which has not yet been entered.  DISH Network cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Personalized Media Communications, Inc.

During 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. (“PMC”) filed suit against DISH Network; EchoStar and Motorola Inc., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,109,414; 4,965,825; 5,233,654; 5,335,277 and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.  PMC is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  Subsequently, Motorola Inc. settled with PMC, leaving DISH Network and EchoStar as defendants.  On July 18, 2012, pursuant to a Court order, PMC filed a Second Amended Complaint that added Rovi Guides, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.) and TVG-PMC, Inc. (collectively, “Gemstar”) as a party, and added a new claim against all defendants seeking a declaratory judgment as to the scope of Gemstar’s license to the patents in suit, under which DISH Network and EchoStar are sublicensees.  On August 12, 2014, in response to the parties’ respective summary judgment motions related to the Gemstar license issues, the Court ruled in favor of PMC and dismissed all claims by or against Gemstar and entered partial final judgment in PMC’s favor as to those claims.  On September 16, 2014, DISH Network and EchoStar filed a notice of appeal of that partial final judgment.  PMC’s damages expert had contended that DISH Network and EchoStar are liable for damages ranging from approximately $500 million to $650 million as of March 31, 2012, and subsequently modified such damages as ranging from approximately $150 million to $450 million, as of September 30, 2014, which did not include pre-judgment interest and could be trebled under Federal law.  On May 7, 2015, DISH Network, EchoStar and PMC entered into a settlement and release agreement that provides, among other things, for a license by PMC to DISH Network and EchoStar for certain patents and patent applications and the dismissal of all of PMC’s claims in the action against DISH Network and EchoStar with prejudice.  On June 4, 2015, the Court dismissed all of PMC’s claims in the action against DISH Network and EchoStar with prejudice.

Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C./LPL Licensing, L.L.C.

On October 17, 2014, Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. and LPL Licensing, L.L.C. (together referred to as “Phoenix”) filed a complaint against DISH Network and our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,987,434 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Transacting Marketing and Sales of Financial Products”; 7,890,366 entitled “Personalized Communication Documents, System and Method for Preparing Same”; 8,352,317 entitled “System for Facilitating Production of Variable Offer Communications”; 8,234,184 entitled “Automated Reply Generation Direct Marketing System”; and 6,999,938 entitled “Automated Reply Generation Direct Marketing System.”  Phoenix alleges that we infringe the asserted patents by making and using products and services that generate customized marketing materials.  Phoenix is an entity that seeks to license a patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  Trial is set scheduled to commence on March 14, 2016.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Qurio Holdings, Inc.

On September 26, 2014, Qurio Holdings, Inc. (“Qurio”) filed a complaint against DISH Network and our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,102,863 entitled “Highspeed WAN To Wireless LAN Gateway” and United States Patent No. 7,787,904 entitled “Personal Area Network Having Media Player And Mobile Device Controlling The Same.”  On the same day, Qurio filed similar complaints against Comcast and DirecTV.  On November 13, 2014, Qurio filed a first amended complaint, which added a claim alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,879,567 entitled “High-Speed WAN To Wireless LAN Gateway.”  Qurio is an entity that seeks to license a patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  On February 9, 2015, the Court granted DISH Network L.L.C.’s motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C.

On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C. (“TDL”) filed suit against DISH Network and EchoStar, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. Re. 35,952, which relates to certain favorite channel features.  TDL is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  The case was stayed in July 2009 pending two reexamination petitions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The case resumed on August 10, 2015.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

TQ Beta LLC

On June 30, 2014, TQ Beta LLC (“TQ Beta”) filed a complaint against us; our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C.; DISH Network; EchoStar; and EchoStar’s subsidiaries EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation, and Sling Media Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The Complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 7,203,456 (the “456 patent”), which is entitled “Method and Apparatus for Time and Space Domain Shifting of Broadcast Signals.”  TQ Beta alleges that our Hopper set-top boxes, ViP 722 and ViP 722k DVR devices, as well as our DISH Anywhere™ service and DISH Anywhere mobile application, infringe the 456 patent.  TQ Beta is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.  Trial is scheduled to commence on January 12, 2016.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

TQ Delta, LLC

On July 17, 2015, TQ Delta, LLC (“TQ Delta”) filed a complaint against us, DISH Network and our wholly-owned subsidiary DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.  The Complaint alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,961,369 (the “369 patent”), which is entitled “System and Method for Scrambling the Phase of the Carriers in a Multicarrier Communications System”; United States Patent No. 8,718,158 (the “158 patent”), which is entitled “System and Method for Scrambling the Phase of the Carriers in a Multicarrier Communications System”; United States Patent No. 9,014,243 (the “243 patent”), which is entitled “System and Method for Scrambling Using a Bit Scrambler and a Phase Scrambler”; United States Patent No.7,835,430 (the “430 patent”), which is entitled “Multicarrier Modulation Messaging for Frequency Domain Received Idle Channel Noise Information”; United States Patent No. 8,238,412 (the “412 patent”), which is entitled “Multicarrier Modulation Messaging for Power Level per Subchannel Information”; United States Patent No. 8,432,956 (the “956 patent”), which is entitled “Multicarrier Modulation Messaging for Power Level per Subchannel Information”; and United States Patent No. 8,611,404 (the “404 patent”), which is entitled “Multicarrier Transmission System with Low Power Sleep Mode and Rapid-On Capability.”  TQ Delta alleges that our satellite TV service, Internet service, set-top boxes, gateways, routers, modems, adapters and networks that operate in accordance with one or more Multimedia over Coax Alliance Standards infringe the asserted patents.  On the same day, in the same court, TQ Delta filed actions alleging infringement of the same patents against Comcast Corp., Cox Communications, Inc., DirecTV, Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc.  TQ Delta is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.

We intend to vigorously defend this case.  In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.  We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Waste Disposal Inquiry

The California Attorney General and the Alameda County (California) District Attorney are investigating whether certain of our waste disposal policies, procedures and practices are in violation of the California Business and Professions Code and the California Health and Safety Code.  We expect that these entities will seek injunctive and monetary relief.  The investigation appears to be part of a broader effort to investigate waste handling and disposal processes of a number of industries.  While we are unable to predict the outcome of this investigation, we do not believe that the outcome will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Other

In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, including, among other things, disputes with programmers regarding fees.  In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.

XML

Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors

Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors

9.Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors

Our senior notes are fully, unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by all of our subsidiaries other than minor subsidiaries and the stand-alone entity DISH DBS has no independent assets or operations.  Therefore, supplemental financial information on a condensed consolidating basis of the guarantor subsidiaries is not required.  There are no restrictions on our ability to obtain cash dividends or other distributions of funds from the guarantor subsidiaries, except those imposed by applicable law.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information.  Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements prepared under GAAP.  In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Our results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.  For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.  Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling influence and variable interest entities where we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary.  Minority interests are recorded as noncontrolling interests or redeemable noncontrolling interests.  See below for further discussion.  Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee.  When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense for each reporting period.  Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for doubtful accounts, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, fair value of multi-element arrangements, capital leases, asset impairments, estimates of future cash flows used to evaluate impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer incentives, programming expenses and subscriber lives.  Economic conditions may increase the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and assumptions indicated above.  Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

We determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We apply the following hierarchy in determining fair value:

· Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;

· Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; and quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and

· Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other participants therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts) and current liabilities (excluding the “Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations”) is equal to or approximates fair value due to their short-term nature or proximity to current market rates.  See Note 4 for the fair value of our marketable investment securities.

Fair values for our publicly traded debt securities are based on quoted market prices, when available.  The fair values of private debt are estimated based on an analysis in which we evaluate market conditions, related securities, various public and private offerings, and other publicly available information.  In performing this analysis, we make various assumptions regarding, among other things, credit spreads, and the impact of these factors on the value of the debt securities.  See Note 7 for the fair value of our long-term debt.

New Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  This converged standard on revenue recognition was issued jointly with the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  ASU 2014-09 provides a framework for revenue recognition that replaces most existing GAAP revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective.  ASU 2014-09 allows for either a full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption.  We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.  We have not yet selected an adoption method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.  On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved a one year deferral on the effective date for implementation of this standard, which changed the effective date for us to January 1, 2018.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) $ in Thousands								1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended	90 Months Ended
	Aug. 10, 2015 item	Jul. 22, 2015 USD ($)	Mar. 02, 2015 USD ($)	Feb. 12, 2015 USD ($)	Apr. 29, 2014 USD ($) item	Dec. 23, 2013 USD ($)	Mar. 09, 2012 USD ($)	May. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($) item	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2008 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($) item
Spectrum Investments
Number of wireless spectrum licenses | item									176			176
Dividend paid to DOC				$ 8,250,000					$ 8,250,000	$ 650,000
Dish Network
Spectrum Investments
Payment to acquire certain wireless licenses												$ 5,000,000
Dish Network | Wireless
Spectrum Investments
Payment to acquire certain wireless licenses					$ 1,672,000						$ 712,000
Number of wireless spectrum licenses | item					176
H Block Interim Build-Out Requirement (as a percent)									40.00%
H Block Final Build-Out Requirement (as a percent)									75.00%
Accelerated period to meet Build-Out Requirement on failure									2 years
Dish Network | DBSD North America and TerreStar Transactions | Wireless
Spectrum Investments
Purchase price							$ 2,860,000
AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement (as a percent)									40.00%
AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement (as a percent)									70.00%
Accelerated period to meet Final Build-Out Requirement on failure to meet Interim Build-Out Requirement									1 year
Dish Network | 700 MHz Licenses | Wireless
Spectrum Investments
Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement (as a percent)									40.00%
Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement (as a percent)									70.00%
Accelerated period to meet Modified 700 MHz Build-Out Requirement on failure to meet Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement									1 year
Dish Network | DBSD North America
Spectrum Investments
Percentage of equity acquired							100.00%
Northstar Spectrum And SNR Holdco | Dish Network | AWS 3 Auction
Spectrum Investments
Total investments									$ 9,778,000			9,778,000
Northstar Wireless or Northstar Spectrum | Northstar Manager LLC
Spectrum Investments
Controlling interest owned by other companies									15.00%
Northstar Wireless or Northstar Spectrum | AWS 3 Auction
Spectrum Investments
Bidding credit									25.00%
Gross winning bids									$ 7,845,000
Net winning bid									$ 5,884,000
Percentage of bidding credit not eligible to receive if the draft order got approval		25.00%
Equity contribution			$ 133,000
Northstar Wireless or Northstar Spectrum | AWS 3 Auction | Northstar Manager LLC
Spectrum Investments
Equity contributions as percentage of purchase price									15.00%
Northstar Wireless or Northstar Spectrum | Dish Network | AWS 3 Auction
Spectrum Investments
Bidding credit value		$ 1,961,000
Northstar Wireless or Northstar Spectrum | American II
Spectrum Investments
Ownership percentage									85.00%
Northstar Wireless or Northstar Spectrum | American II | AWS 3 Auction
Spectrum Investments
Commitment to make loan as percentage of purchase price									85.00%
Equity contributions as percentage of purchase price									15.00%
Equity contribution			750,000
Loan receivable			5,001,000
SNR Wireless or SNR Wireless Holdco | SNR Wireless Management LLC
Spectrum Investments
Controlling interest owned by other companies									15.00%
SNR Wireless or SNR Wireless Holdco | AWS 3 Auction
Spectrum Investments
Bidding credit									25.00%
Gross winning bids									$ 5,482,000
Net winning bid									4,112,000
Bid withdrawal payment									$ 8,000
Percentage of bidding credit not eligible to receive if the draft order got approval		25.00%
Equity contribution			93,000
SNR Wireless or SNR Wireless Holdco | AWS 3 Auction | SNR Wireless Management LLC
Spectrum Investments
Equity contributions as percentage of purchase price									15.00%
SNR Wireless or SNR Wireless Holdco | Dish Network | AWS 3 Auction
Spectrum Investments
Bidding credit value		$ 1,370,000
SNR Wireless or SNR Wireless Holdco | American III
Spectrum Investments
Ownership percentage									85.00%
SNR Wireless or SNR Wireless Holdco | American III | AWS 3 Auction
Spectrum Investments
Commitment to make loan as percentage of purchase price									85.00%
Equity contributions as percentage of purchase price									15.00%
Equity contribution			524,000
Loan receivable			$ 3,503,000
Satellite transponder guarantees
Spectrum Investments
Guarantor Obligations, Maximum Exposure, Undiscounted									$ 280,000			$ 280,000
Hopper litigation | Maximum
Spectrum Investments
Number of days to store HD primetime programs recordings								8 days
Technology Development Licensing
Spectrum Investments
Number of reexamination petitions pending before patent and trademark office | item	2
Do Not Call Litigation
Spectrum Investments
Period of injunctive relief sought from placing any outbound telemarketing calls to market or promote its goods or services									5 years
Do Not Call Litigation | DISH Network L.L.C.
Spectrum Investments
Claim amount						$ 270,000
Lightsquared Harbinger Capital Partners LLC
Spectrum Investments
Business days allowed to terminate existing agreements									3 days

XML

Long-Term Debt (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Long-Term Debt

Schedule of carrying and fair values of the entity's debt facilities

	As of
	June 30, 2015					December 31, 2014
	Carrying					Carrying
	Value			Fair Value		Value			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (1)	$	—		$	—	$	650,001		$	664,321
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 (2)	1,500,000			1,540,680		1,500,000			1,580,625
4 5/8% Senior Notes due 2017	900,000			926,298		900,000			933,750
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018	1,200,000			1,221,000		1,200,000			1,245,600
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019	1,400,000			1,554,140		1,400,000			1,589,700
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020	1,100,000			1,136,498		1,100,000			1,100,000
6 3/4% Senior Notes due 2021	2,000,000			2,090,000		2,000,000			2,157,500
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2022	2,000,000			2,000,000		2,000,000			2,055,000
5% Senior Notes due 2023	1,500,000			1,407,045		1,500,000			1,470,000
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2024	2,000,000			1,920,000		2,000,000			2,019,800
Other notes payable	14,701			14,701		14,701			14,701
Subtotal	13,614,701			$	13,810,362	14,264,702			$	14,830,997
Unamortized deferred financing costs and debt discounts, net	(46,286		)			(51,473		)
Capital lease obligations (3)	180,910			NA		194,669			NA
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations (including current portion)	$	13,749,325				$	14,407,898

(1) On June 1, 2015, we redeemed the principal balance of our 7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015.

(2) Our 7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 mature on February 1, 2016 and have been reclassified to “Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015.

(3) Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required.

XML

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities (Details 2) - Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction $ in Thousands			6 Months Ended
	Feb. 20, 2014 USD ($) item	Feb. 20, 2014 USD ($) shares	Jun. 30, 2014 USD ($)
Other investment securities:
Percentage of economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group		80.00%
EchoStar and HSSC
Other investment securities:
Number of owned satellites transferred and leased back | item	5
Liabilities Transferred	$ 59,000	$ 59,000
Cash in exchange for shares of series of preferred tracking stock issued	$ 11,000	11,000
Capital transaction		356,000
Capital transaction recorded in additional paid-in capital		$ 51,000
Tracking stock prohibited transfer period	1 year
EchoStar
Other investment securities:
Liabilities Transferred			$ 44,540
Preferred tracking stock issued by related party | shares		6,290,499
Historical cost of tracking stock		$ 229,000
HSSC
Other investment securities:
Preferred tracking stock issued by related party | shares		81.128
Historical cost of tracking stock		$ 87,000

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details 6) - USD ($) $ in Thousands			3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Feb. 20, 2014	Feb. 20, 2014	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014
Related Party Transactions
Amounts payable to NagraStar			$ 224,072		$ 224,072		$ 236,122
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction
Related Party Transactions
Percentage of economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group	80.00%
EchoStar | Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction
Related Party Transactions
Liabilities Transferred						$ 44,540
Related Party Transactions Historical Cost of Tracking Stock	$ 229,000
NagraStar
Related Party Transactions
Purchases from NagraStar			24,524	$ 38,867	47,022	$ 59,070
Amounts payable to NagraStar			15,083		15,083		14,819
Commitments to NagraStar			$ 5,070		5,070		$ 12,368
EchoStar and HSSC | Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction
Related Party Transactions
Liabilities Transferred	59,000	$ 59,000
Cash in exchange for shares of series of preferred tracking stock issued	11,000	11,000
Capital transaction	356,000
Cash in Exchange of Shares Issued	11,000	$ 11,000
Capital Distribution to Related Party in Connection Purchase of Strategic Investments	51,000
Tracking stock prohibited transfer period		1 year
HSSC | Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction
Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions Historical Cost of Tracking Stock	$ 87,000
PMC
Related Party Transactions
Contribution from related party					$ 5,000
DISH Investors | EchoStar and HSSC
Related Party Transactions
Tracking stock prohibited transfer period	1 year

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)	$ 392,932	$ 375,405
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	461,143	473,348
Non-cash, stock-based compensation	14,823	20,517
Deferred tax expense (benefit)	(63,677)	(46,597)
Other, net	29,094	(9,788)
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net	154,289	24,404
Net cash flows from operating activities	988,604	837,289
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
(Purchases) Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities, net	1,345,330	50,495
Purchases of property and equipment	(324,183)	(415,952)
Other, net	(724)	(6,303)
Net cash flows from investing activities	1,020,423	(371,760)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Dividends to DISH Orbital Corporation	(8,250,000)	(650,000)
Redemption and repurchases of long-term debt	(650,001)	(101,208)
Advances from affiliates	188,720
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	(13,772)	(14,846)
Other, net	13,678	13,273
Net cash flows from financing activities	(8,711,375)	(752,781)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(6,702,348)	(287,252)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	6,762,140	4,294,475
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$ 59,792	$ 4,007,223

XML

Inventory

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Inventory

Inventory

5.Inventory

Inventory consisted of the following:

	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Finished goods	$	233,584	$	252,101
Raw materials	126,155		159,095
Work-in-process	106,342		82,350
Total inventory	$	466,081	$	493,546

XML

Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Other Investment Securities (Details 3) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Components of available-for-sale investments
Debt security	$ 48,860	$ 1,401,145
Total marketable investment securities	130,655	1,478,115
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities
Unrealized Gains	35,623	43,352
Unrealized Losses		(156)
Unrealized Gains Losses, Net	35,623	43,196
Contractual maturities of restricted and non-restricted marketable investment securities
Debt securities with contractual maturities within one year	42,000
Debt securities with contractual maturities extending longer than one year through and including five years	40,000
Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses)
Accumulated net unrealized gains, before tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	35,623	43,196
Accumulated net unrealized gains, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	22,000	28,000
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
Components of available-for-sale investments
Debt security	56,754	58,254
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities
Unrealized Gains		7
Unrealized Losses		(11)
Unrealized Gains Losses, Net		(4)
Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses)
Accumulated net unrealized gains, before tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(4)
Commercial paper
Components of available-for-sale investments
Debt security	11,792	65,696
Corporate securities
Components of available-for-sale investments
Debt security		1,247,403
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities
Unrealized Gains		5,608
Unrealized Losses		(145)
Unrealized Gains Losses, Net		5,463
Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses)
Accumulated net unrealized gains, before tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		5,463
Other
Components of available-for-sale investments
Debt security	13,249	55,788
Equity Securities
Components of available-for-sale investments
Equity securities	48,860	50,974
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities
Unrealized Gains	35,623	37,737
Unrealized Gains Losses, Net	35,623	37,737
Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses)
Accumulated net unrealized gains, before tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$ 35,623	$ 37,737

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details 3) $ in Millions			1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 21, 2012	Jan. 02, 2012	May. 31, 2013	May. 31, 2012	May. 31, 2010	Sep. 30, 2013 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2012 item	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2009 item	Dec. 31, 2008 item
EchoStar XVI
Related Party Transactions
Agreement Renewal Option Term								6 years
103 degree orbital location member
Related Party Transactions
Payments to the related party | $						$ 23
Net book value of asset | $						20
Capital distribution | $						$ 3
EchoStar | Certain Sports Related Programming Broadcast Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement term					10 years
EchoStar | EchoStar VIII
Related Party Transactions
Notice period for termination of agreement			30 days
EchoStar | EchoStar XVI
Related Party Transactions
Agreement term from commencement of service date	4 years								10 years
Agreement Renewal Option Term								6 years
Additional term of renewal option								5 years
EchoStar | Telesat Transponder Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement term with third party									15 years
Number of DBS transponders available to receive services									32
EchoStar | DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement term									10 years
Number of DBS transponders currently used									32
EchoStar | QuetzSat-1 Lease Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Agreement term with third party										10 years
Number of DBS transponders available to receive services										32
Number of DBS transponders currently used										24
Number of transponders subleased							5
EchoStar | 103 degree orbital location member
Related Party Transactions
Agreement term				10 years
Agreement term from commencement of service date								10 years
EchoStar | TT&C Agreement
Related Party Transactions
Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity								60 days
EchoStar | Prior Broadcast Agreement | Minimum
Related Party Transactions
Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity		60 days

XML

Property and Equipment (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

Property and Equipment

Schedule of depreciation and amortization expense

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Equipment leased to customers	$	206,314	$	213,653	$	398,067	$	399,376
Satellites	15,261		15,261		30,522		38,462
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other	15,673		19,468		32,554		35,510
Total depreciation and amortization	$	237,248	$	248,382	$	461,143	$	473,348

Schedule of pay-TV satellite fleet

As of June 30, 2015, our pay-TV satellite fleet consisted of the following:

			Estimated
			Useful Life
			(Years) /
		Degree	Lease
	Launch	Orbital	Termination
Satellites	Date	Location	Date
Owned:
EchoStar XV (1)	July 2010	45	15
Under Construction:
EchoStar XVIII (2)	2016	110	15
Leased from EchoStar (1):
EchoStar I (3)(4)(5)	December 1995	77	November 2015
EchoStar VII (3)(4)	February 2002	119	June 2016
EchoStar VIII	August 2002	77	Month to month
EchoStar IX	August 2003	121	Month to month
EchoStar X (3)(4)	February 2006	110	February 2021
EchoStar XI (3)(4)	July 2008	110	September 2021
EchoStar XII (3)	July 2003	61.5	September 2017
EchoStar XIV (3)(4)	March 2010	119	February 2023
EchoStar XVI (6)	November 2012	61.5	January 2017
Nimiq 5	September 2009	72.7	September 2019
QuetzSat-1	September 2011	77	November 2021
Leased from Other Third Party:
Anik F3	April 2007	118.7	April 2022
Ciel II	December 2008	129	January 2019

(1) See Note 10 for further discussion of our Related Party Transactions with EchoStar.

(2) EchoStar XVIII is expected to launch during 2016.

(3) We generally have the option to renew each lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite’s useful life.

(4) On February 20, 2014, we entered into the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction with EchoStar pursuant to which, among other things, we transferred these satellites to EchoStar and lease back all available capacity on these satellites.  See Note 4 and Note 10 for further discussion.

(5) We did not exercise our option to renew the satellite capacity agreement for EchoStar I.

(6) We have the option to renew this lease for an additional six-year period.  If we exercise our six-year renewal option, we have the option to renew this lease for an additional five years.