XML 24 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Disclosures; Derivative Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivatives and Fair Value [Text Block]
4. Fair Value Disclosures; Derivative Instruments
 
GAAP USA clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. GAAP USA also requires that a fair value measurement reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based upon the best information available.
 
GAAP USA establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and liabilities at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
 
·
Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
 
·
Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs are observable for the asset or liability, or unobservable but corroborated by market data, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
 
·
Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
 
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of the input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The following table presents information about the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value:
 
 
 
Amount as of
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
12/31/2015
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Warrant Liability
 
$
714,000
 
 
-
 
$
714,000
 
 
-
 
 
 
$
714,000
 
 
 
 
$
714,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount as of
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
12/31/2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Warrant Liability
 
$
525,000
 
 
-
 
$
525,000
 
 
-
 
 
 
$
525,000
 
 
 
 
$
525,000
 
 
 
 
 
The fair value of the warrants issued to BMO Equity (see Note 8) was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model uses the assumptions listed in the table below as of July 17, 2012 (initial valuation date of the warrants). In the valuation of the warrants, it was determined that the warrants were required to be carried as a derivative liability at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the warrants have been recognized in the consolidated statement of operations.
 
GAAP USA requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and to measure those instruments at fair value. Under certain conditions, a derivative may be specifically designated as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge.