FORM S-1

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered		Amount to be Registered		Price Per Share(1)		Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price (1)		Amount of Registration Fee

Common Stock, $.01 par value		500,000		$22.00		$11,000,000		$3,058

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.

	Per Share	Total if all 500,000 shares are sold
Public Offering Price	$	$
Discounts and Commissions	$	$
Proceeds to us	$	$

		Page
Prospectus Summary		1
Risk Factors		4
Use of Proceeds		15
Dividend Policy		15
Capitalization		16
Dilution		17
Selected Historical Financial Data		18
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		19
Business		27

		Page
Management		43
Certain Transactions		47
Security Ownership of Management and Significant Stockholders		48
Description of Capital Stock		49
Shares Eligible for Future Sale		50
Plan of Distribution		51
Experts		51
Where You Can Find More Information		52
Index to Financial Statements		F-1

We provide dial-up and broadband Internet access and other Internet services to approximately 30,000 customers in small- to medium-sized communities in the western United States. Dial-up Internet access provides data over a single telecommunication line. Broadband Internet access provides multiple streams of data over a communication medium and is a form of high-speed Internet access. Our objective is to become a dominant Internet communications provider in communities with populations under 500,000. Based on our experience in these markets and our knowledge of the industry, we believe that a committed local presence in a community will assist in establishing a strong customer base, providing us with an advantage over our larger competitors.

In response to perceived market interest in low-priced, high-speed Internet access, we offer a broadband Internet service under the brand name PeRKInet®. Unlike other competing high-speed Internet access technologies, which require substantial capital improvements, the PeRKInet® solution uses existing cable TV and telephone technologies to offer customers the ability to connect to the Internet more than four times faster than conventional 56K modems. However, we currently provide the PeRKInet ® service only to a limited number of subscribers in five of the nineteen communities in which we operate.

We incurred net losses of approximately $8.4 million from inception in September 1995 through June 30, 1999, and therefore have accumulated an earnings deficit, as well as negative working capital. We expect to continue incurring net losses as we continue expending substantial resources on sales, marketing and administration, and the development of PeRKInet®, our broadband Internet-over-cable access service. In addition, we currently intend to substantially increase our capital expenditures and operating expenses in order to expand our network to support additional expected subscribers in existing and future markets and to market and provide our services to a growing number of potential subscribers. In addition, we plan to continue growing through acquisitions. As a result, we expect to incur additional substantial operating and net losses for the foreseeable future, and accordingly expect our earnings deficit to increase.

We began offering our services in September 1995. We compete in the relatively new markets for Internet services. Thus, you should evaluate our chances of financial and operational success in light of the risks, uncertainties, expenses, delays and difficulties associated with operating a business in a relatively new and unproven market, many of which may be beyond our control. Some of the risks that we face are described in the following paragraphs. Our failure to address these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

A key element in our growth strategy is launching our PeRKInet ® service in our target markets. Our ability to launch our PeRKInet® technology depends on our ability to gain access to cable systems. This requires either establishing a voluntary carriage relationship with a cable operator in our target markets or gaining access to the cable operator’s system by virtue of the law, including the leased access provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. We have carriage agreements in five of the nineteen communities which we serve, but have encountered difficulty in our efforts to create revenue sharing partnerships with cable systems serving additional target markets. To gain cable access, we filed a petition with the FCC requesting that it rule that Internet service providers are entitled to commercial leased access over cable systems. We devote a substantial amount of our resources to the pursuit of leased access. We cannot be certain that we will obtain a favorable determination from the FCC that our PeRKInet® service falls within the scope of the leased access provisions. In addition, the FCC is not required to rule within a specified period of time on our petition. A ruling might not come for several years during which time new technology could become available to make the issue moot. Even if the FCC rules in our favor, it is likely that the cable industry will appeal the ruling. A final judicial decision could take several years, and again, new technology could become available to make the issue moot. It is also not clear what a favorable determination would mean for Internet service providers. In addition to the access we desire, it could open us up to additional regulation by both federal and state authorities. Also, our promotion of leased access may have alienated some cable operators, which might make it difficult for us to negotiate carriage agreements with cable operators to introduce PeRKInet®. If we have difficulty gaining access to cable systems, through either leased access or negotiated agreements with cable operators, it will have a material adverse effect on the growth of our company.

Prior to the initial filing of the registration statement to which this prospectus relates, we sold unregistered units of securities consisting of 12% convertible debentures due 2001 and shares of our common stock pursuant to Regulation D under the Securities Act. The aggregate purchase price for the units was $5,448,685. Although an offering and sale of securities under Regulation D constitutes a valid exemption from registration under the Securities Act, we cannot be certain that the offering of our 12% convertible debentures satisfied all of the requirements of Regulation D. If we failed to satisfy all of the requirements to qualify the offering as exempt from registration, each of the purchasers of our 12% convertible debentures may have the right to require that we repurchase the 12% convertible debentures and the shares of our common stock issued in connection with the Regulation D offering at a price equal to the consideration originally paid, or a cash equivalent, plus interest to the date of the purchase. In addition, we may be subject to federal rescission claims brought by the SEC. Any liability which we may have as a result of such rescission claim would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, and we may not be able to satisfy any rescission claims without raising further capital or reaching some other negotiated accommodation with the purchasers of our 12% convertible debentures. If any rescission claims are made, it could have the effect of delaying or postponing this offering. The proceeds of this offering could be used to satisfy any rescission claims. The Division of Securities of the Ohio Department of Commerce has requested further information about our convertible debenture offering. Additional details about this inquiry are described in the Legal Proceedings section of this prospectus under the caption “Ohio Securities Inquiry.”

Our independent auditors have included in their audit reports of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 1998 and 1999 that they are concerned with our ability to continue as a going concern. Through June 30, 1999, we have generated only limited revenues and have incurred losses. There can be no assurance that we will be able to implement successfully our business strategy or achieve significant revenues or profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance that our business strategy, if fully executed, will enable us to continue as a going concern.

Because our sales, marketing and other costs of acquiring new subscribers are substantial relative to the monthly fees derived from these subscribers, we believe that our long-term success depends largely on our ability to retain our existing subscribers, while continuing to attract new subscribers. We continue to invest significant resources in our technical support capabilities to provide high levels of customer service. We cannot be certain that these investments will maintain or improve subscriber retention. We believe that intense competition from our competitors, some of which offer many free hours of service or other enticements for new subscribers, has caused, and may continue to cause, some of our subscribers to switch to our competitors’ services. In addition, some new subscribers use the Internet only as a novelty and do not become consistent users of Internet services and, therefore, may be more likely to discontinue their service. These factors adversely affect our subscriber retention rates. Any decline in subscriber retention rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

The Internet services market in which we operate is extremely competitive and highly fragmented. There are no substantial barriers to entry, and we expect competition in this market to intensify in the future. Our current and prospective competitors include many large companies that have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than our company. We compete (or expect to compete in the future) directly or indirectly with the following categories of companies:

Many of our competitors offer (or may soon offer) technologies that compete with some or all of our products and services. These technologies may have the ability to provide higher speed, more reliable Internet access than our PeRKInet® service. As high-speed Internet access becomes more prevalent, we may have difficulty retaining or attracting new subscribers. This increase in competition for subscribers could cause reductions in our operating results and revenue growth.

In addition, the Telecommunications Act contains certain provisions that lift, or establish procedures for lifting, certain restrictions relating to the ability of the regional Bell operating companies to engage directly in the Internet access business. The Telecommunications Act also makes it easier for national long distance carriers such as AT&T to offer local telephone service and allows regional Bell operating companies to provide electronic publishing of information and databases. Competition from these companies could have a material adverse effect on our business.

An evolving trend among Internet service providers is to offer free Internet access to subscribers rather than charging a monthly service fee. National and regional Internet service providers, like NetZero, have offered access to the Internet at no initial or monthly cost to the subscriber. To date no such model or competitor has emerged offering free broadband access to the Internet. These companies expect to derive niche markets of customers based upon targeted web-advertising revenue streams. Such competitors may derive adequate revenue streams from these new customer lists to sustain an operating Internet service provider business and increase competition in our markets. If these companies are successful at increasing the number of their subscribers, our subscriber base may decrease causing us to lose monthly revenue. If free Internet access becomes a dominant trend in our industry, we may suffer competitively. If competition forces us to offer free Internet access, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to generate enough revenue from advertising to sustain our growth or become profitable.

Our competitors may be able to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote substantially more resources to developing Internet services. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors or that competitive pressures we face will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Further, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment, we may make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions or enter into acquisitions or new ventures that could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.

We rely on local telephone, cable television, wireless/microwave and other companies to provide data communications capacity via cable television lines, wireless microwave signals, local telecommunications lines and leased long distance lines. We are subject to potential disruptions in these cable, microwave and telecommunications services and may have no means of replacing these services, on a timely basis or at all, in the event of a disruption. Any of these disruptions could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

In addition, we are dependent on certain third-party suppliers including Cisco Systems, Inc., Lucent Technologies, Inc. and Hybrid Networks, Inc., for hardware components. Certain components used in providing our network services are currently acquired from limited sources. We also depend on third-party software vendors including Netscape Communications Corp. and Microsoft Corporation to provide us with much of our Internet software. Failure of our suppliers to provide components and products in the quantities, at the quality levels or at the time required by us, or an inability by us to develop alternative sources of supply if required, could materially adversely affect our ability to effectively support our customer base in a timely manner and increase costs of expansion.

Our suppliers and cable, wireless/microwave and telecommunications carriers also sell or lease services and products to our competitors, and some of these carriers are, and in the future others may become, our competitors. There can be no assurance that our suppliers and telecommunications carriers will not enter into exclusive arrangements with our competitors or otherwise stop selling or leasing their services or products to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to our stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants with respect to dividends, raising future capital and other financial and operational matters. We will need additional financing to expand, and if we cannot obtain additional financing as needed, we may be required to reduce the scope of our operations or our anticipated expansion, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We have expanded our operations since inception and intend to continue to expand our operations aggressively to pursue existing and potential market opportunities. This rapid growth has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant strain on our managerial, operational and financial resources. In particular, our expansion into additional markets will require implementation of marketing efforts in new locations, as well as the employment of qualified technical, marketing and customer support personnel in these locations.

Our future growth depends in part on our ability to acquire and successfully integrate Internet service providers in our target markets. Although we are actively pursuing acquisition targets, there can be no assurance that we will successfully identify and acquire these companies on favorable terms. We may face increased competition for acquisition opportunities, which may inhibit our ability to consummate suitable acquisitions and increase the costs of completing acquisitions. In addition, acquisitions involve substantial risks, which include:

If we were to proceed with one or more significant acquisitions in which the consideration consists of cash, a substantial portion of our available cash could be used to consummate the acquisitions and strategic relationships. If we were to consummate one or more significant acquisitions in which the consideration consists of stock, our shareholders could experience significant dilution of their ownership of our stock. Further, many business acquisitions must be accounted for as a purchase. Most of the businesses that may become attractive acquisition candidates are likely to have significant goodwill and intangible assets, and acquisition of these businesses, if accounted for as a purchase, would typically result in additional goodwill charges. If we consummate additional acquisitions in the future that must be accounted for as purchases, these acquisitions would likely increase our goodwill amortization expenses and increase net losses.

Our success largely depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer and communications hardware systems and the Internet. As we expand our operations and data traffic grows, the stress on our hardware and traffic management systems will increase. In addition, our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, break-ins and similar events. The occurrence of a natural disaster, the failure of one of our systems or the occurrence of other unanticipated problems could cause interruptions in our services. Extensive or multiple interruptions in providing customers with Internet access are a primary reason for customer decisions to cancel the use of access services. Accordingly, any system failure that causes interruptions in our operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We do not presently have a formal disaster recovery plan and do not carry business interruption insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur.

Our networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses and other disruptive problems. Internet service providers, including us, have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, interruptions in service as a result of the accidental or intentional actions of Internet users, current and former employees or others. Unauthorized access could also potentially jeopardize the security of confidential information stored in our computer systems, which may result in liability to our subscribers and also may deter potential subscribers. Current security measures have been circumvented in the past, and there can be no assurance that measures implemented by us will not be circumvented in the future. Moreover, we have no control over the security measures of local cable operators through whom we offer our PeRKInet® service. Eliminating computer viruses and alleviating other security problems may require interruptions, delays or cessations of service to our subscribers, which could result in subscriber cancellations which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We are highly dependent on the technical and managerial skills of our key employees, including technical, sales, marketing, information systems, financial and executive personnel, and on its ability to identify, hire and retain additional personnel. Competition for key personnel, particularly persons having technical expertise, is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain existing personnel or to identify or hire additional personnel. In particular, we are highly dependent on the continued services of Donald A. Janke, our President.

We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of our employees; and any of our employees may voluntarily terminate their employment at any time. We do not have employment agreements or non-competition agreements with any member of senior management. Our inability to attract, hire or retain the necessary technical, sales, marketing, information systems, financial and executive personnel, or the loss of the services of any member of our senior management team, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Market acceptance of our services is substantially dependent upon the adoption of the Internet for commerce, entertainment and communications. We cannot be certain that Internet usage will continue to grow as it has in the past. Critical issues concerning the commercial use of the Internet remain unresolved and may affect the growth of Internet use, especially in the business and consumer markets we target. Despite growing interest in the commercial possibilities for the Internet, many businesses and consumers have been deterred from purchasing Internet access services for a number of reasons, including:

The adoption of the Internet for commerce and communications, particularly by those individuals and enterprises that have historically relied upon alternative means of commerce and communication, generally requires an understanding and acceptance of a new way of conducting business and exchanging information. In particular, enterprises that have already invested substantial resources in other means of conducting commerce and exchanging information, or in relationships with other Internet service providers, may be slow to adopt a new strategy that may make their existing personnel, infrastructure and Internet service provider relationships obsolete. If the use of the Internet does not continue to grow, or evolves in a way that we cannot address, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

The market for Internet access is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in subscriber needs, and frequent new service and product introductions. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to use leading technologies effectively, to continue to develop our technical expertise, and to enhance existing services and develop new services to meet changing subscriber needs on a timely and cost-effective basis. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in using new technologies effectively, developing new services or enhancing existing services on a timely basis or that new technologies or enhancements will achieve market acceptance.

We believe that our ability to compete successfully also depends upon the continued compatibility and interoperability of our services with products and architectures offered by various vendors. Although we intend to support emerging standards in the market for Internet access, there can be no assurance that industry standards will be established or, if they become established, that we will be able to conform to these new standards in a timely fashion and maintain a competitive position in the market. In addition, there can be no assurance that services or technologies developed by others will not render our services or technology uncompetitive or obsolete.

One component of our strategy is to provide a more compelling interactive experience to Internet users than is currently available from some dial-up Internet service providers and online service providers. We believe that, in addition to providing broadband, high-performance Internet access, we must also promote the development of high-quality local multimedia content. Our success in providing this content depends on the ability of content providers to create and support high-quality multimedia content and our ability to aggregate content offerings in a manner that subscribers find useful and compelling. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in these endeavors. In addition, the market for high-quality multimedia Internet content has only recently begun to develop and is rapidly evolving, and there is significant competition among Internet service providers and online service providers for aggregating content. If the market fails to develop or develops more slowly than expected, or if competition increases, or if our content offerings do not achieve or sustain market acceptance, our business, operating results and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

Because materials will be downloaded and redistributed by subscribers and cached or replicated by us in connection with the offering of our services, there is a potential that claims may be made against us under both United States and foreign law for negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, or other theories based on the nature and content of materials. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against online service providers in the past. In particular, copyright and trademark laws are evolving both domestically and internationally, and there is uncertainty concerning how broadly the rights afforded under these laws will be applied to online environments. It is impossible for us to determine who all the potential rights holders may be with respect to all materials available through our services. The recently enacted federal Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which creates a safe harbor from copyright infringement liability for Internet service providers that meet certain statutory requirements, may provide us with protection from certain copyright infringement liability claims. However, a number of third parties have claimed that they hold patents covering various forms of online transactions or online technologies. Patent infringement claims relating to our services or technologies could be asserted against us.

The law relating to liability of Internet service providers and online service providers for information carried on or disseminated over their networks is currently unsettled. A number of lawsuits have sought to impose liability for defamatory speech and indecent materials. In one case, a court held that an Internet service provider could be found liable for defamatory matter provided through its service, on the ground that the service provider exercised active editorial control over postings to its service. Other courts have held that Internet service providers and online service providers may, under certain circumstances, be subject to damages for copying or distributing copyrighted materials. The Telecommunications Act prohibits and imposes criminal penalties and civil liability for using an interactive computer service for transmitting indecent or obscene communications, but appears to limit this liability to the user and protects Internet service providers as the provider of the access unless they play some larger part in the act. A number of states have adopted or are currently considering similar legislation and other legislation affecting Internet service provider liability for what its subscribers transmit or access has been or may be proposed by Congress. The anti-indecency provisions of the Telecommunications Act were declared unconstitutional by the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Southern District of New York, which have issued preliminary injunctions against their enforcement. Although the United States Supreme Court has upheld these decisions, its holding leaves open the possibility of the passage of federal or state laws which are narrower in scope but may still impose upon Internet service providers or online service providers potential liability for materials carried on, or disseminated through, their systems. This could require us to implement measures reducing exposure to this liability, which may require the expenditure of substantial resources or the discontinuation of certain product or service offerings.

We provide Internet services, in part, through data transmissions over public telephone lines. These transmissions are governed by regulatory policies establishing charges and terms for wire line communications. We are not currently subject to direct regulation by the FCC or any other governmental agency, other than regulations applicable to businesses generally. However, in the future we could become subject to regulation by the FCC or other regulatory agencies as a provider of basic telecommunications services. A number of local telephone companies have asked the FCC to levy access charges on “enhanced service providers,” which may be deemed to include Internet service providers. Moreover, the public service commissions of certain states are exploring the adoption of regulations that might subject Internet service providers to state regulation.

In addition, a number of proposals have been made at the federal, state and local levels that could impose taxes on online commerce. The three-year tax moratorium preventing state and local governments from taxing internet access, taxing electronic commerce in multiple states and discriminating against electronic commerce is scheduled to expire on October 21, 2001. If the moratorium ends, state and local governments could impose these types of taxes or discriminate against electronic growth of online commerce and materially adversely affect our business.

After this offering, we will have outstanding approximately 8,144,038 shares of common stock if all 500,000 shares are sold. The 500,000 shares we are selling in this offering may be resold in the public market immediately. In addition, 960,590 shares of common stock are freely tradeable, including shares sold by us pursuant to Regulation A under the Securities Act and other shares for which the restrictive legend was removed. The remaining 82%, or 6,683,448 shares, of our total outstanding shares will become available for resale in the public market between 90 and 365 days after the date of this prospectus due to requirements of federal securities laws.

The offering price per share of common stock in this offering was determined by us after considering factors such as our anticipated results of operations and current financial condition, estimates of our business potential and prospects, the experience of our management, the economics of the industry in general, the general condition of the equities market and other relevant factors. The offering price is not to be considered a representation that the common stock has a market value equal to the offering price or that they could be resold at that price. The offering price is substantially higher than the purchase price in recent sales of our common stock. In addition, the offering price may bear no relationship to our actual value.

We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest will lead to an active trading market in our stock or how liquid that market might become. The stock market has experienced price and volume fluctuations. In particular, the market prices of the securities of Internet-related companies have been especially volatile. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price have been the object of class action litigation. If we were the object of securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention.

The offering price per share of the common stock offered is substantially higher than the tangible book value per share of the outstanding common stock. Investors purchasing shares in the offering will therefore incur immediate and substantial dilution, and existing shareholders will receive a material increase in the tangible book value per share of their shares of common stock. As of June 30, 1999, the immediate dilution to new investors would have been $18.82 per share, or 94%. In addition, investors purchasing shares of common stock in the offering may bear most of the risk of economic loss if we are not successful. Also, investors purchasing shares of common stock in the offering will incur additional dilution to the extent outstanding options, warrants and convertible debentures are exercised or converted.

Upon completion of this offering, assuming all 500,000 shares offered are sold, and based upon the shares outstanding as of September 15, 1999, Donald A. Janke and our other executive officers and directors will together beneficially own 32.3% of our outstanding common stock. Accordingly, our officers and directors will have the ability to influence significantly the election of our directors and most other stockholder actions.

The shares will be offered and sold on a best efforts basis. There is no minimum offering amount which is required to be sold before we may use the proceeds of the offering. Funds tendered by prospective purchasers will not be placed in escrow, but will be available for our use immediately upon acceptance, for the purposes identified and in the amounts as estimated in the table under “ Use of Proceeds.” Lack of an escrow arrangement could cause some risk to the initial investors in the event that insufficient capital is raised in the offering. In addition, the offering could continue for a significant period of time yet the offering price will remain the same.

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that are based on the beliefs of, assumptions made by and information available to our management. Where possible we have used words such as “may, ” “will,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “ plan” and similar expressions to identify these forward-looking statements. Our actual results, performance or achievements in 1999 and beyond may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements due to a number of factors, including the risks described above and the occurrence of events described elsewhere in this prospectus.

The table above describes our best estimate of our use of our net proceeds from this offering, based on our current plans and estimates of anticipated expenditures. However, at this time, we cannot precisely determine the exact cost, timing and amount of funds required for our specific uses. Our actual expenditures may vary from these estimates. We may find it necessary or advisable to reallocate the net proceeds within the uses outlined above or to use portions of the net proceeds for other purposes. Pending these uses, we intend to invest the net proceeds of the offering in short-term, investment grade, interest-bearing obligations.

As of June 30, 1999, we had negative net tangible book value of $147,540, or negative $0.02 per share of outstanding common stock. Net tangible book value per share is equal to our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares of common stock. Dilution per share represents the difference between the price per share paid by the investors in this offering and the adjusted net tangible book value per share immediately after this offering.

After the sale of the 500,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed offering price of $20 per share, and after deducting the estimated commissions, finders’ fees and offering expenses payable by us, our as adjusted net tangible book value at June 30, 1999 would have been approximately $8,942,401, or $1.18 per share. This represents an immediate dilution of $18.82 per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:

In this section, we present our selected historical financial data. You should read carefully the financial statements included in this prospectus, including the notes to the financial statements. The selected data in this section are not intended to replace the financial statements. We derived the statement of operations data for the years ended March 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, and the balance sheet data as of March 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, from our audited consolidated financial statements in this prospectus. Those statements were audited by Stonefield Josephson, Inc., independent auditors. We derived the statement of operations data for the period from September 19, 1995, our inception, to March 31, 1996 and the balance sheet data as of March 31, 1996 from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. We derived the statement of operations data for the three months ended June 30, 1998 and 1999, and the balance sheet data as of June 30, 1998 and 1999, from our unaudited consolidated financial statements in this prospectus. We believe that the unaudited historical financial statements contain all adjustments needed to present fairly the information included in those statements, and that the adjustments made consist only of normal recurring adjustments. Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 1999 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future.

You should read the following discussion along with our financial statements and the related notes included in this prospectus. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those discussed under “Risk Factors.” Our actual results, performance and achievements in fiscal year ended March 31, 2000 and beyond may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.

We are an Internet service provider focused on serving individuals and businesses in small- to medium-sized communities in the western United States. Since we began providing Internet access in September 1995, we have acquired 23 local Internet service providers in California, Colorado, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Expanding the capacity of an acquired Internet service provider requires additional equipment infrastructure within the region, while expanding the customer base is a function of quality customer service, reliability and marketing. Increases in our number of subscribers will cause our revenues to increase but will also cause our costs of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures, and depreciation and amortization to increase. We do not capitalize and defer start-up expenses related to entering new markets.

We have experienced operating losses since our inception as a result of efforts to build our network infrastructure and internal staffing, develop our systems and expand into new markets. We expect to continue to focus on increasing our number of subscribers and geographic coverage. Since we have incurred net losses in each year of operation, we have had no tax liability. As of fiscal year ended March 31,1999, we had federal and state operating loss carry-forwards totaling approximately $7,469,000 that expire in various years through 2014.

Since June 30, 1999, the date of the most recent financial statements contained in this prospectus, there have been several significant events for our company. First, we completed two acquisitions of Internet service providers which expanded our presence in our existing markets. In July 1999, we acquired Extent, Inc. for aggregate consideration of $199,710, comprised of $66,670 in cash, a note in the principal amount of $16,670 and 15,510 shares of our common stock (valued at $116,370). In September 1999, we acquired Tomato Web Online for aggregate consideration of $299,500, comprised of $191,500 cash and the balance in notes. Second, in September 1999, we invested an aggregate of $660,000 in InnerCite Corp., consisting of $200,000 cash, a short term note in the principal amount of $150,000 and a 12% convertible debenture in the principal amount of $310,000. This investment gives us a 30% equity interest in this Internet service provider which operates in one of our existing markets. Third, we experienced a significant reduction in our number of PeRKInet® subscribers due to notice of the cancellation of our contract with Davis Communications, Inc. to supply our PeRKInet® broadband access to 900 dormitory rooms at Eastern Washington University in Spokane, Washington. See “Legal Proceedings—Davis Litigation.”

Internet access revenues are recurring revenues from dial-up and broadband access customers. Our customers typically prepay for their service. Internet access revenues are received under prepaid term plans pursuant to which subscribers prepay for longer terms at reduced monthly rates or under month-to-month plans. We historically have experienced better subscriber retention under prepaid term plans than under month-to-month plans. We recognize revenue related to prepaid fees over the period services are provided on a straight-line basis. Of our total Internet access customers at March 31, 1999, 94% were dial-up customers and 6% were PeRKInet® broadband customers. Our total average monthly recurring revenue is approximately $17.45 per month per customer. Our average monthly recurring revenue from broadband Internet customers is approximately $30 per month per customer. Internet access revenues represented approximately 96% of recurring revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999. Our dial-up and broadband Internet services also generate revenue through installation charges and equipment sales. Revenue from these services accounted for less than 10% of total revenues for the past two fiscal years.

Advertising revenues, which are also recurring revenues, are generated through promotional and content partnerships and online advertising. An example is our agreement with the LookSmart, Ltd. Internet directory, a search engine website, which was implemented at all of our subsidiaries by August 1999. We receive $2.50 for every thousand viewers that visit a page containing a third party advertisement placed by LookSmart. Additionally, we are in the process of gathering content into a local portal to provide a vehicle for local advertising in each of our markets. An example is HumGuide ^SM , which provides a directory of business, government and informational websites for Humboldt County, California, as well as additional offerings such as regional news and movie listings. Advertising revenues are recognized when earned. While we expect increased revenues from advertising sales in the future, we expect that they will nonetheless represent less than 1% of total revenues in fiscal year ended March 31, 2000.

Systems integration and network design services revenue is generated from consulting services related to designing internal networks, assisting with the purchase and installation of network equipment, and establishing secure connections to the Internet. Pricing for consulting services varies significantly depending upon the hours required to complete a project. We recognize consulting revenues ratably over the period services are provided. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999, systems integration and network design services revenues accounted for 3% of total revenues. We perceive these consulting services as ancillary revenue generated during the normal course of providing our core monthly access services.

Cost of revenues includes telecommunications costs, operating costs and sales and marketing costs. The two main components of telecommunications costs are local digital dial-up lines that connect customers to us and digital tail circuits that connect us to the Internet backbone providers. The Internet backbone refers to the traffic data connecting portion of a network. One local phone line is required for every ten customers at an average cost of $30 per month, or $3 per dial-up customer. A 1.544 Mbps backbone circuit to the Internet backbone provider can support 2,000 dial-up customers, as well as some content hosting and high-speed dedicated access, at an average cost of $2000 per month. Telecommunications costs accounted for approximately 32% of total cost of revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999.

Operating costs, another component of cost of revenues, include customer service and technical service, payroll and occupancy costs. Operating costs also include the carriage agreements we have with cable companies to provide our PeRKInet ® broadband Internet service. Under these agreements we pay cable TV operators a carriage fee ranging between $3-8 per month per customer to use their cable TV system for data delivery. Operating costs accounted for approximately 62% of total cost of revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 as compared to 70% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998. The improvement in fiscal 1999 was attributable to improved utilization of facilities and a reduction in our receivables collection costs.

Sales and marketing costs, also a component of our cost of revenues, consist of media and production and advertising costs. Significant levels of marketing activity may be necessary in order for us to increase our subscriber base in a given market to a size large enough to achieve profitability. The increases in marketing expense will have a negative impact on current earnings in that we do not defer or capitalize marketing costs. Sales and marketing costs accounted for approximately 6% of total cost of revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999.

Selling, general and administrative expenses relate primarily to corporate overhead, acquisition activities, legal and accounting. Selling, general and administrative expenses will increase over time as the scope of our operations increases, although we expect that these costs will be at least partially offset by anticipated increases in revenue attributable to subscriber growth. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 45% of revenues in fiscal 1999 from 64% of fiscal 1998 revenues, and we expect further reduction to this percentage cost as the costs of administration and corporate overhead increase at a rate below our anticipated revenue growth.

Depreciation expense is a result of capital investments in data networking and related computer equipment required to provide Internet access services and from fixed assets acquired in acquisitions. Plant and equipment are depreciated over the useful life of the assets, typically five years. Amortization expense is the result of our acquisitions. When we acquire an Internet service provider, the excess of the purchase price over the value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. We amortize goodwill over a three-year period as an expense to current operations.

Revenues. Total revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 rose 57% to $1,521,229 from $969,614 for the same period last year. The increase in revenues during the quarter ended June 30, 1999 reflects the growth in our number of subscribers attributable to four Internet service provider acquisitions, which accounted for 7,500 new subscribers, with the balance attributable to internal growth. Broadband subscriber revenues accounted for approximately 5% of total revenues, or $70,832, for the quarter ended June 30, 1999.

Cost of Revenues. In the quarter ended June 30, 1999, total cost of revenues increased to $1,326,665 from $931,770 for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, due to acquisitions of Internet service providers. Gross profit increased 414% to $194,564 for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 from $37,844 for the comparable period last year. This enabled the absorption of some corporate overhead, the increase of which was marginal compared to the appreciation in revenue, gross profit, and scope of operations.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 45% of total revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 versus 25% of total revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 1998. The increase is attributable to corporate activities including legal expenses related to our leased access filings with the FCC, accounting costs, and merger and acquisition costs expensed in the period.

Revenues. Total revenues in the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 increased 59% to $4,369,949 from $2,754,763 for the previous fiscal year. The increase is attributable to a 111% increase in dial-up customers and a 70% increase in PeRKInet ® customers. This increase is also attributable to a 36% increase in customer density in existing markets, resulting from increases in our number of subscribers in our existing markets due to Internet service provider acquisitions in those markets. Four strategic Internet service provider acquisitions expanded operations in each of our regions and added over 7,300 dial-up subscribers to our company. Internal growth of existing systems and these acquisitions contributed to the revenue growth. Recurring revenues, primarily subscriber Internet access fees, accounted for 97% of our total revenues in fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 and 88% in fiscal year ended March 31, 1998. This increase is attributable to the reasons described below for the decrease in system consulting revenues. Through acquisitions and internal growth total customers increased 108% in fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 over fiscal 1998. System consulting revenues declined to 3% of total revenues in the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 from 11% in the prior year, due to a decreased emphasis in consulting and a shift in a portion of system revenues, namely web hosting, to recurring revenues.

Cost of Revenues. In fiscal year ended March 31, 1999, total cost of revenues increased to $4,252,049 from $3,303,796 in fiscal year ended March 31, 1998, due to growth resulting from our Internet service provider acquisitions and the costs of providing services to our increased subscriber base. Gross profit for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 improved to $117,900 from negative $549,033 in the prior fiscal year, reflecting improved system density which enhances operating efficiencies, reducing delivery costs per subscriber.

Revenues. Total revenues for fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 increased 102% to $2,754,763 from $1,364,694 for fiscal year ended March 31, 1997. Revenues increased from the previous year due to the acquisition of four Internet service providers which expanded two of our four regions and added over 4,400 dial-up customers and a computer publication. Internal growth from existing regions accounted for another 3,800 new customers. Approximately 93% of our customers were dial-up and 7% were PeRKInet at fiscal year end March 31, 1998. Through acquisitions and internal growth total customers increased 168% in fiscal year 1998 over 1997.

Cost of Revenues. In fiscal year ended March 31, 1998, cost of revenues increased to $3,303,796 as compared to $1,764,971 for fiscal year ended March 31, 1997, due to our Internet service provider acquisitions and internal growth. The cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues was 179% in fiscal 1998, compared to 129% in fiscal 1997. The building of infrastructure to accommodate growth for current and future periods caused the relative increase. Total cost of revenues grew 87% while revenues grew 102% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 as compared to fiscal 1997.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. There was a significant increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 to $1,769,322 as compared to $636,084 in fiscal year ended March 31, 1997, due to an increase in Internet service provider acquisitions, as discussed above. The ratio of selling, general and administrative expenses to total revenues increased from 46% in fiscal 1997 to 64% in fiscal 1998. The fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 amount represents the costs of assembling our management group, the majority of which is stock compensation and cash consulting fees. In addition, approximately 20% of the selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 is from marketing costs to establish us and our services in the industry. There was also a significant cost to establish the PeRKInet® concept and service. We hired additional marketing and administrative personnel, and a substantial portion of their compensation was in the form of stock, which we expensed as compensation.

Since inception we have financed our operations through a combination of private placements and an Regulation A public offering of common stock, issuances of convertible debentures in a private placement, and seller and lease financings. As of March 31, 1999, we had cash and cash equivalents of $207,590 and no material bank debt. We had a negative working capital position of $1,819,604 due in large part to $762,761 of current notes payable to sellers from acquisitions, and also due to the trade accounts and accrued expenses associated with the cost of producing revenues.

Net cash used in investing activities was $1,150,521 in the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999. These funds were used for capital expenditures, including the purchase of property, equipment and improvements totaling $658,574 as part of our expansion. In addition, four acquisitions were completed in the fiscal year, financed with a combination of proceeds of our convertible debenture sales, issuances of common stock and seller financings.

We believe that the net proceeds from this offering, together with existing cash and cash equivalents, will be sufficient to meet the payment of notes payable from acquisitions, our operating expenses and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. Capital expenditures over the next twelve months are estimated to be $400,000. After that twelve month period, if cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our liquidity and capital expenditure requirements, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. In addition, our anticipated capital requirements during the next twelve months depend on numerous factors, including:

For example, a favorable ruling by the FCC granting us leased access may enable us to offer broadband Internet access on a much larger scale. However, if we do not have sufficient working capital to take advantage of that opportunity, it could dramatically impact our ability to increase market share for our PeRKInet® broadband access service. The timing and amount of capital requirements cannot be accurately predicted. If capital requirements vary materially from those currently planned, we may require additional financing sooner than anticipated.

While we have not had the financial strength to obtain significant credit lines to date, as the size and scope of our operations increase, we will attempt to establish working capital and acquisition facilities. However, there can be no assurance we will be successful in this effort. We operate with trade credit established locally by our operating subsidiaries. In establishing the PeRKInet® service, we negotiated a purchase contract with Hybrid Networks, Inc. to take delivery of $1 million in PeRKInet® equipment on extended payment terms. The equipment includes the cable headend hardware, as well as subscriber modems, which are to be sold or rented to the subscriber. Under the contract, we have a remaining balance of approximately $55,000, which is payable $27,000 per month until paid in full. The amount payable has been reclassified to accrued liabilities.

The vendors of the hardware and software used in our core systems, such as router and authentication servers, indicate that these products are Year 2000 compliant. In addition to receiving these vendor assurances, we are testing all types of core systems for operation with dates beyond January 1, 2000. Further, we are currently evaluating all internal phone and switching systems, and plan to resolve any issues prior to October 31, 1999. However, any significant Year 2000 disruption of the network services or equipment provided to us by third-party vendors could cause customers to consider seeking alternate providers or cause an unmanageable burden on customer service and technical support, which in turn could materially adversely effect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. We are not presently aware of any vendor-related Year 2000 issue that is likely to result in this type of disruption.

Our customers maintain their Internet operations on commercially available operating systems, which may be impacted by Year 2000 complications. However, we do not expect customer Year 2000 problems to result in a significant number of cancellations. We depend on the continued operation of, and widespread access to, the Internet. To the extent that the normal operation of the Internet is disrupted by Year 2000, our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Additionally, we currently use several different billing and customer management systems, most of which were developed by the independent Internet service providers prior to being acquired by us. Year 2000 compliance of these systems is unknown. However, we have selected a standard billing and customer management application, Billmax, which is represented by its developer as Year 2000 compliant. All our operations will be converted to Billmax prior to December 31, 1999.

Our most reasonably likely worst case scenario related to Year 2000 would be for one or more of our network service providers to fail, thereby making it difficult for subscribers to dial up and access the Internet. However, where financially feasible, we have connected our facilities to the Internet redundantly, both in terms of backbone providers and in terms of local loop facilities. Should any of our Internet service providers be unable to provide subscribers with Internet access as a result of Year 2000, we believe our redundant network arrangements will adequately accommodate our dial-up access needs.

The estimates and conclusions included in this discussion contain forward-looking statements and are based on management’s best estimates of future events. Our expectations about risks, future costs and the timely completion of any Year 2000 modifications may turn out to be incorrect and any variance from these expectations could cause actual results to differ materially from what has been discussed above. Factors that could influence risks, amount of future costs and the effective timing of remediation efforts include our success in identifying and correcting potential Year 2000 issues and the ability of third parties to appropriately address their Year 2000 issues.

Interest Rate Risk. Short-term investments at June 30, 1999 were $737,600. These investments consist of highly liquid securities which may be converted to cash with minimal risk. While the investments are subject to market interest rates, a hypothetical increase in interest rates by 10% would not cause a material decline in the value of the investments. To the extent we maintain cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits, we would have market risk relating to those amounts.

To mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates, we generally enter into fixed rate borrowing arrangements. We have no material market risk relating to our outstanding notes, convertible debentures and capital leases, which are all at fixed interest rates and thus are not sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates. At present, we have no plans to enter into any hedging arrangement with respect to potential future borrowings.

We provide dial-up and broadband Internet access and other Internet services to approximately 30,000 customers in small- to medium-sized communities in the western United States. Our objective is to become a dominant Internet communications provider in communities with populations under 500,000. Based on our experience in these markets and our knowledge of the industry, we believe that a committed local presence in a community will assist in establishing a strong customer base, providing us with an advantage over our larger competitors.

In response to perceived market interest in low-priced, high-speed Internet access, we offer a broadband Internet service under the brand name PeRKInet®. Unlike other competing high-speed Internet access technologies, which require substantial capital improvements, the PeRKInet® solution uses existing cable TV and telephone technologies to offer customers the ability to connect to the Internet at a minimum of 256Kbps, a speed that is more than four times faster than conventional 56Kbps modems.

The Internet. The Internet is a collection of computer networks connecting millions of public and private computers around the world. In its formative stages, the Internet was used by government agencies and academic institutions to exchange information, publish research and communicate through electronic mail, or e-mail. A number of factors, including the proliferation of personal computers, the availability of user-friendly software and the wide accessibility of an increasingly robust network infrastructure, combined to allow users easy access to the Internet and, in turn, produced rapid growth in the number of Internet users.

The emergence of the graphic, multimedia environment of the Internet, or the Web, has resulted in the development of the Internet as a new mass communications medium. The ease and speed of publishing and distributing text, graphics, audio and video over the Internet has led to a tremendous increase in Internet-based services, including chat rooms, online magazines, news feeds, interactive games, online communities and a wealth of educational and entertainment information. In addition, by eliminating many of the costs involved in routine commercial transactions, such as simple banking services and retail purchases, the Internet has become a new medium for conducting business.

Growth of the Internet Access Market. The consumer online and Internet services industry has evolved since the mid-1990s to embrace both consumers and businesses. Industry sources call the Internet the fastest-growing mass market media in history, reaching 30 million users only five years after it was introduced. According to Worth magazine, 80 million people in the U.S. and nearly 200 million people worldwide use the Internet. These numbers are projected to double by 2002.

Residential users are a large portion of Internet consumers. As of May 1999, the Internet penetration rate of U.S. households was approximately 25%, according to industry data and is growing rapidly. Approximately one-third of U.S. households are projected to be online by the end of 1999, and that number is expected to increase to nearly two-thirds of households by the end of 2003. This growth is spurred by the increasing affordability of personal computers and by the Internet’s ability to provide, more economically and efficiently, many of the functions historically provided by mail, telephone and television. The evolution of the Internet industry has had an enormous impact on the way individuals communicate, work, learn, and entertain themselves. According to general industry data, the Internet is now the number one use for home computers.

Limitations of Internet Architecture and Bandwidth. Currently, the potential of the Internet as a medium for communication, education, entertainment and commerce remains unfulfilled due to problems with its performance and reliability. The Internet’s performance limitations stem from its basic architecture, which is not optimized for distribution of data-intensive multimedia content. A key factor in whether the Internet fulfills its promise as a communications medium is the span of bandwidth available to transmit increasingly data-intensive material. Bandwidth refers to the capacity to carry data over a connection. However, limitations associated with any element in the system can result in performance bottlenecks that slow data transmission speed to that of the weakest link. For example, congestion occurs when the same data streams from popular web site servers to millions of individual users. In addition, dial-up users frequently encounter busy signals upon attempting to connect to their Internet service providers and cannot readily access quality multimedia content due to the slow speed of their modems. Because the Internet is an interconnection of independently operated networks, there is no single point of accountability or management to respond to performance problems or to ensure optimized Internet traffic routing, security or consistency of service. Therefore, no single Internet service provider can offer an end-to-end solution to Internet bottlenecks. These performance limitations frustrate and discourage users from fully using the Internet as a convenient and effective information tool, a compelling educational and entertainment resource, or a way to purchase goods and services.

We hope to be the dominant Internet service provider for both dial-up and broadband access in small- to medium-sized communities in the western United States. Our strategy focuses on the 65% of homes passed by cable that currently can only subscribe to a one-way cable data Internet service using a telephone line connection for the return path. We target small- to medium-sized communities in the western United States with populations under 500,000. Based on our knowledge of the industry and our experience in these markets, we believe there is less competition for Internet access in our target markets from national companies, which devote substantially more resources in marketing and providing service to larger metropolitan areas. Similarly, we believe that major cable operators are not focused on upgrading the systems to offer two-way data transmission in these markets.

Acquire Existing Internet Service Providers. To gain initial presence within our target markets, we intend to acquire existing Internet service providers in the community. We focus on pursuing Internet service providers that have strong technical teams and superior customer service. We offer our acquisition targets the capital and expertise needed to accelerate growth and a unique position to market our PeRKInet ® services through the local cable TV system. With a presence in the market established, we implement a business plan designed to maintain profitability while maximizing revenue growth. This business plan involves an aggressive marketing program, an emphasis on providing superior customer service and an efficient data network.

Launch PeRKInet®. The advantage of PeRKInet ® over other broadband access technologies is that it does not require significant capital improvements, because it uses existing cable and telephone technologies. PeRKInet® is not television-based web browsing. Rather, it is full Internet access for personal computers or local area networks, using a cable modem. PeRKInet® uses local telephone lines to send information “upstream” (from the computer to the Internet) and uses a broadband cable modem to receive “ downstream traffic” (from the Internet to the computer). Because the majority of the data used while you browse the Internet is “downstream,” this method maximizes PeRKInet ®’s speed and improves Internet connections where it is most noticeable. Simply stated, most Internet subscribers currently use local telephone lines and modems that range between 14.4Kbps and 56Kbps. PeRKInet® delivers access to the Internet over the same coaxial cable that brings you cable TV at speeds between 256Kbps and 10 Megabits per second—eight to ten times faster than most Internet services, and twice the speed of ISDN at half of ISDN’s cost.

Our focus is to establish relationships with cable TV operators within our target markets that do not plan to offer two-way high-speed data services in the near future. We believe that most of the cable TV operators in our target markets fall into this category, based upon our internal research. Our goal is to enter into agreements with cable TV operators in our target markets and pay them a carriage fee to use their cable TV system for our PeRKInet® broadband Internet service. To date we have carriage agreements with local cable systems in five of our target markets.

Although we have carriage agreements in five of our markets, we have encountered difficulty in our efforts with cable systems in other target markets. As a result, in June 1999, we filed an administrative request with the FCC that would, should it receive a favorable ruling, allow us to gain access to cable systems in our other target markets under the “leased access ” provisions of federal law. More detailed information about leased access and the relevant laws can be found below under the heading “Leased Access.” We feel that the attainment of leased access would significantly enhance our ability to compete in the broadband Internet arena and provide PeRKInet® service to customers in each of our target markets.

We have acquired 23 local Internet companies in California, Colorado, Idaho, Oregon and Washington since our formation as a California corporation on September 19, 1995. We currently operate in the following 12 counties: Ventura, Humboldt, Del Norte and San Joaquin Counties, California; LaPlata, Mesa, and Montezuma Counties, Colorado; Kootanai County, Idaho; Jackson, Josephine and Klamath Counties, Oregon; and Spokane County, Washington. The significant events in the history of our company are summarized below.

While we intend to maintain a local presence in the nineteen communities which we service, we are grouping our operations into four regional operating units. In addition to the employees of our subsidiaries, we also maintain a small corporate staff responsible for pursuing business development through acquisitions and strategic partnerships and for developing and managing company-wide administrative and marketing services. This corporate structure and the regional clustering of operations maximizes economies of scale, centralizes certain administrative functions and provides cost advantages over local competitors.

Internet Access and Content Hosting Service. The majority of our current revenues come from Internet access and content hosting services targeted at businesses, schools, local governments and individuals. Internet access services range from 28.8 Kbps dial-up service targeted to individuals to high-speed dedicated T1 Internet access (1.5 Megabits per second) targeted to businesses. As of March 31, 1999, we provided 94% of our Internet access customers with traditional dial-up access and 6% of our customers with broadband Internet access. Of our broadband Internet customers, we provide access to 95% through our phone-return cable modem PeRKInet® broadband Internet service, while we provide access to the remainder of our broadband customers through the use of other technologies. These other broadband technologies include Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line in Grants Pass, Oregon, wireless multi-point distribution service in Medford, Oregon and unlicensed wireless in Durango and Grand Junction, Colorado. We believe, however, that wired technology presents a better delivery solution than the wireless alternatives.

Advertising. In 1999, we entered into an agreement with the LookSmart Internet search service to provide their search tool on each of our subsidiary Internet service providers’ home page, as well as ads and search sections tailored to each local market. To further enhance and differentiate our services, we also gather together local sources of content. For example, in October 1998 we expanded our portfolio with the acquisition of HumGuide ^SM . HumGuide ^SM provides a directory of business, government and information web sites for Humboldt County, California. We anticipate that HumGuide ^SM will serve as a model for the creation of a Community Wide Web ^SM , our concept of gathering local content into a local portal to enhance value for local subscribers.

Streaming Media Storage. We also store streaming media content on our local servers. One example is “Eye on Durango, ” which presents live video broadcasts of prominent city landmarks in Durango, Colorado. We also reached an agreement with The Auto Channel™ in December 1998 that provides for carriage of selected video programming via our PeRKInet® broadband Internet service. Under the terms of the agreement, The Auto Channel™ is responsible for acquiring and selecting programming to be mirrored on PeRKInet®, and The Auto Channel™ ’s Video2Net subsidiary is responsible for digitizing the programming for 256Kbps distribution. We are responsible for distributing the product via PeRKInet ® and for promoting it to existing and potential PeRKInet® subscribers.

Our PeRKInet® service provides broadband Internet-over-cable access at a minimum of 256Kbps for individual PeRKInet® users. PeRKInet®’s monthly fee is $29.95, including cable modem rental, which we believe is one of the lowest in the nation for broadband cable Internet access. In addition, we offer a commercial version of PeRKInet® suitable for use with intra-company computer networks at up to Ethernet speed (10 Megabits per second) for $95 per month. Both services provide maximized downstream speed (from the Internet to the computer) while the upstream speed (from the computer to the Internet) remains at traditional dial-up speed.

In addition to broadband Internet access, the PeRKInet® service also includes local content and interactive PC programming. PeRKInet® content is a single-source portal of more than 75 Internet-delivered television broadcast stations and other programming. The site includes links to a unique combination of established broadcast programming sources in 28 countries, including Bahrain TV, Vatican TV, the Philippines’ Sarimanok News Network, WGBH, which is the Boston public broadcasting station, and KTVB, an NBC affiliate in Boise, Idaho. We hope to expand this portal with local programming in each market through strategic alliances with local television stations. All stations can be viewed in a format comparable in size to a pocket television screen.

The PeRKInet® Advantage. The advantage of PeRKInet® over other broadband access technology is that it does not require capital improvements, because it uses existing cable and telephone technologies. The local telephone network is highly reliable in a narrowband environment, whereas the local cable TV network is highly reliable in a broadband environment. Both networks have a connection to substantially all of the homes and businesses in the United States. By combining the strengths of these two networks with our expertise and local Internet communications presence, we believe we can deliver a reliable solution to broadband Internet access with our PeRKInet® service, using the telephone lines for the upstream data path (to the Internet) and the coaxial cable TV plant for the downstream data path (from the Internet to your personal computer). In addition, to the extent a cable operator has upgraded their system to carry two-way data transmission, our PeRKInet® service can use this technology and provide two-way cable Internet access.

The PeRKInet® Technology. PeRKInet® delivers Internet access at a minimum of 256Kbps, a speed that is more than four times faster than 56Kbps modems. Upstream data is moved via telephone modems at up to 33.6Kbps or via a frame relay connection at up to 128Kbps. Customers receive data on a personal computer equipped with a cable modem and Ethernet card. An Ethernet card is the hardware equipment known as an interface board that connects the computer to a local network of computers. The modem and Ethernet card can be leased, much like today’s cable boxes. The technology used for PeRKInet® was developed and patented by Hybrid Networks, Inc., and was tailored to an Internet service provider solution rather than a cable solution. However, we do not have exclusive rights to the equipment or technology used in connection with our PeRKInet® service. In June 1996, we also began purchasing Hybrid’s phone return cable modem product line. We are the first to commercialize this technology, which was launched in Ventura, California in March 1997. PeRKInet® technology works as follows:

The markets for consumer and business Internet services and online content are extremely competitive and highly fragmented. There are no significant barriers to entry and we expect that competition will intensify in the future. Many of our competitors are offering or may soon offer technologies that will attempt to compete with some or all of our products and services. These technologies include Digital Subscriber Line Services, satellite access and two-way cable Internet access. We compete on the basis of transmission speed, reliability of service, ease of access, price and performance, ease-of-use, content quality, quality of presentation, timeliness of content, customer support, brand recognition, operating experience and revenue sharing. Our competitors include the following:

The Communications Act sets forth the purpose of leased access, to promote competition in the delivery of video programming and to assure that a variety of information sources are made available to the public from cable systems. The Communications Act notes “a cable operator shall designate channel capacity for commercial use by persons unaffiliated with the operator.” The section then indicates the number of channels that must be provided by system operators, and the procedure for requests and fulfillment. The FCC has defined the formula by which cable systems are to be paid for leased access channels.

Many cable operators and others opposed our petition and filed written comments with the FCC. Since the leased access rules specifically speak to “video programming,” cable has taken the stance that Internet programming is not included within the definition of video programming. Our Petition for Declaratory Ruling asks the FCC to rule that Internet programming is video programming entitled to leased access. We feel that the attainment of leased access is important because it will provide consumers the access to the bandwidth necessary for the next generation of Internet content and navigation. In the event a favorable ruling is not promptly received, we will continue to seek other means to provide our customers with broadband Internet access. The FCC does not have a deadline by which to rule, nor are we able to determine when the FCC will issue a decision. We have no assurance that the FCC will rule in favor of our interpretation of the law.

We provide Internet services, in part, by means of data transmissions over public telephone lines. These transmissions are governed by regulatory policies establishing charges, terms and conditions for wire line communications. We, as an Internet access provider, are not currently subject to direct regulation by the FCC or any other governmental agency, other than the type and scope of regulation applicable to businesses generally. In April 1998, the FCC reaffirmed that Internet access providers should be classified as unregulated “information service providers” rather than regulated “ telecommunications providers” under the terms of the Federal Telecommunications Act. As a result, we are not currently subject to federal regulations applicable to telephone companies and similar carriers merely because we provide our services using telecommunications services provided by third-party carriers. To date, no state has attempted to exercise economic regulations over Internet access providers.

However, in the future we could become subject to regulation by the FCC or other federal agencies or by state regulatory agencies or bodies. For example, a number of long distance telephone carriers recently filed a petition with the FCC seeking a ruling that Internet telephone service is a “telecommunication service” subject to common carrier regulation. This ruling, if made, would create substantial barriers to entry for companies seeking to provide telephone-dependent Internet services. The FCC has requested comments on this petition, but has not set a deadline for issuing a final decision. The FCC is also considering whether providers of Internet-based telephone services should be required to contribute to the universal service fund, which subsidizes telephone service for rural and low income consumers, or should pay carrier access charges on the same basis as regulated telecommunications providers. Also, a number of local telephone companies have asked the FCC to levy access charges on “ enhanced service providers,” which may be deemed to include Internet service providers. Although the Chairman of the FCC has indicated his opposition to levying service charges against Internet service providers, local interconnection charges could be levied in the future. Moreover, the public service commissions of certain states are exploring the adoption of regulations that might subject Internet service providers to state regulation. To the extent that we engage in the provision of Internet or Internet-based telephone services, we may become subject to FCC or state regulations with respect to these activities. We cannot assure you that regulations will not adversely affect our ability to offer certain enhanced business services in the future.

The Telecommunications Act contains provisions that lift, or establish procedures for lifting, certain restrictions relating to the regional Bell operating company’s ability to engage directly in the Internet access business. The Telecommunications Act also makes it easier for national long distance carriers such as AT &T to offer local telephone service. In addition, the Telecommunications Act allows the regional Bell operating companies to provide electronic publishing of information and databases. Competition from these companies could have an adverse effect on our business.

Furthermore, in August 1998, the FCC proposed that if an incumbent regional Bell operating company establishes a separate affiliate to offer advanced telecommunications services, such as those offered by us, and if that affiliate uses the network on the same terms and conditions as offered to the incumbent competitors, then the affiliate would not be subject to certain obligations in the Telecommunications Act that apply to incumbent regional Bell operating companies. Rather, the affiliate would be treated as a competitive carrier. If the FCC ultimately adopts this or any similar proposal, we would likely face increased competition from incumbent regional Bell operating company affiliates and our access to providers of broadband data technology could be curtailed.

Due to the increasing use of the Internet, it is possible that additional laws and regulations may be promulgated with respect to the Internet, covering issues such as content, user privacy, pricing, libel, encryption standards, intellectual property protection and infringement and technology export and other controls. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that any future regulatory changes or developments may have on the demand for our Internet services or our ability to provide them.

We do not hold any patents. The equipment we use to provide Internet access to our customers consists, in part, of a cable modem which is patented by Hybrid Networks, Inc., the manufacturer of the equipment. We do not have an exclusive technology license to use any of this equipment. It is our policy to have our employees and consultants enter into non-disclosure agreements with us when they begin working with us. These agreements provide that confidential information developed or made known during the course of their relationships with us is owned by us or the applicable subsidiary and is to be kept confidential except in specific circumstances. There can be no assurance that the steps we have taken will be adequate to prevent unauthorized use of our technology or that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology.

WIC.net Proceedings. On April 7, 1998, the former owners of our WIC.net subsidiary filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association, alleging that we breached the contract for our acquisition of WIC.net. On October 26, 1998, we filed a counterclaim in the arbitration, alleging breaches of the selling shareholders’ employment agreements, conversion, embezzlement, misappropriation of corporate opportunities, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation. We sought damages in the amount of $100,000.

On February 10, 1999, the former owners filed an Amended Demand for Arbitration. They alleged breach of contract, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, wrongful termination and violations of federal and state securities laws. They requested rescission of the acquisition and employment agreements, damages for breach of contract in the amount of $50,500; damages for emotional distress in the amount of $300,000; repurchase of our stock issued to them for an aggregate repurchase price of $122,500 plus interest; and compensatory damages for lost profits and business opportunities in the amount of $1,000,000.

In related litigation, we filed two lawsuits against the former owners of the WIC.net subsidiary in Colorado state court. The first lawsuit, filed April 27, 1998, alleged that the former owners wrongfully enjoined us from entering the office of both the WIC.net subsidiary and our Information Technologies International, Inc. subsidiary; wrongfully denied us access to computer equipment; abused judicial process; and breached their fiduciary duty through a usurpation of a corporate opportunity by personally entering into a lease for the subsidiary’s office. The second suit filed August 17, 1998 sought a preliminary injunction against the same former owners and alleged breach of the non-compete clause in their employment agreements.

On July 26, 1999, the parties reached a settlement agreement through American Arbitration Association mediation of both the arbitration and the state court litigation. Under the terms of the settlement, the former owners agreed to sell their 76,828 shares of our common stock at a price of $2.75 per share. Of that amount, third parties purchased directly from the former owners 72,000 shares, including 27,837 shares in the aggregate bought by Alfred Leopold, a director of our company, and members of his immediate and extended family, and we purchased the remaining 4,828 shares. The former owners also agreed not to compete with us until
March 26, 2000. On September 22, 1999 the parties closed the settlement, exchanging cash payments, shares of common stock and executed copies of the settlement agreements.

Internet On-Ramp Litigation. On November 10, 1998, the former owners of our Internet On-Ramp subsidiary filed suit in federal district court for the Eastern District of Washington against our president, Donald Janke, and one of our former directors, Matthew Matern. The suit alleges violations of federal and Washington state securities laws and misrepresentation. This suit involves the defendants’ actions in their capacities as officers and directors of our company.

On March 31, 1999, the judge stayed the case, ruling that the matter should be resolved by arbitration in Los Angeles. On May 21, 1999, the judge denied the plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration and he also denied their motion for leave to file an interlocutory appeal. Based upon recent comments by the plaintiffs, it is anticipated that the plaintiffs will file a demand for arbitration and that we will become a party to the arbitration.

Davis Litigation. On September 20, 1999, our Internet On-Ramp subsidiary filed suit in Washington state court against Eastern Washington University and Davis Communications, Inc. alleging breach of contract, defamation and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. The suit arises out of a contract under which Internet On-Ramp was to supply our PeRKInet® broadband access service over Davis’ cable system in Spokane, Washington, to 900 dormitory rooms at Eastern Washington until September 2001, which represents approximately half of our PeRKInet® subscribers. Davis and Eastern Washington contracted with the ISP Channel on March 31, 1999 to make the ISP Channel the exclusive provider of Internet access to Davis’ customers (including the 900 dormitory rooms at Eastern Washington). On July 16, 1999, Internet On-Ramp received notice from Eastern Washington of termination of the contract under which Internet On-Ramp was to supply PeRKInet® service. Eastern Washington and Davis claim that our service was unsatisfactory, but have not produced any supporting information either in meetings with our attorneys or in response to Freedom of Information Act requests. On September 15, 1999, the ISP Channel announced its contract with Davis and Eastern Washington.

Ohio Securities Inquiry. We received a letter dated October 6, 1999 from the Division of Securities of the Ohio Department of Commerce which asserted that certain statements on our web site may have constituted general solicitation, which is prohibited under Regulation D of the Securities Act. This letter relates to our offering of units of securities consisting of 12% convertible debentures and shares of our common stock pursuant to Regulation D prior to the filing of the registration statement to which this prospectus relates. We have until November 6, 1999 to respond to the Ohio Division of Securities and we intend to work with the Ohio Division of Securities to bring a mutually acceptable conclusion to this inquiry. This inquiry could result in a rescission offer by us to the six people in Ohio who purchased in our convertible debenture offering for an aggregate purchase price of $55,500. This inquiry could delay or postpone our initial registered public offering.

Donald A. Janke is a co-founder of our company and has served as President and a director of our company since its inception in September 1995. From January 1994 to April 1995, Mr. Janke served as Manager of Cable Marketing for Prodigy Services Company where he led the technical and market trials of high-speed online service via cable with Cox Communications in San Diego and Omaha, and with Viacom in Castro Valley. From 1987 to 1993, Mr. Janke was a marketing representative for Prodigy for southern California, marketing the service to retail distribution channels, major Hollywood studios, travel companies, and other industries. Prior to joining Prodigy Services Company, Mr. Janke served as president of CVN Infonet, Inc., “America’s Local Electronic Newspaper, ” a company he co-founded in 1984. Prior to 1984, he held positions as Director of Marketing for Palmer Communications, Regional Sales Manager for Century Communications, and Sales Representative for US Cable.

Marshall F. Sparks is a co-founder of our company and has served as Chief Financial Officer and a director of our company since its inception in September 1995. Mr. Sparks is also a director of W30TC Inc., a development web site company that maintains a web portal for investment research, and has held that position since January 1994. In addition, Mr. Sparks has been a principal of Hampton Financial Corporation, an investment banking firm specializing in small capital emerging growth companies, since 1994.

Alfred M. Leopold became a director of our company in September 1999. Mr. Leopold has been president of Leopold Enterprises, a business and financial consulting firm, since May 1999. He also serves as executive director of the Cornerstone Foundation, a non-profit organization devoted to raising money for religious vocations. At the Franciscan University of Steubenville in Steubenville, Ohio, Mr. Leopold was Associate Director for Austrian Programs from June 1995 to May 1999 after serving as Austrian Program Coordinator and International Admissions Counselor since January 1991. Prior to 1991, he held the position of Marketing and Promotions Manager for Veritas Communications, publishers of a Catholic youth magazine and other youth-oriented resources, and for Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.

Reed W. Olson became Chief Operating Officer of our company in October 1998, prior to which he served as our Director of Network Planning, a position he began in May 1996. From 1990 to 1996 he was the President of Optimal Systems Integrators, Inc., which we subsequently purchased and whose operations include reselling of local dedicated circuits to small businesses, system integration and network planning for medium-sized businesses, and government contracts for outsourcing and broadband Internet access.

Randy Strickley joined our company in September 1999 as Vice President, Finance. From 1997 to 1999, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Todd-AO Corporation, a Los Angeles based publicly-held video and sound post production company serving the television and film industries. From 1972 to 1997, he was with Bank of America, where he was most recently a Managing Director in the U.S. Corporate Group providing corporate finance, capital markets products and merger and acquisitions services to businesses in the entertainment/media and healthcare services industries.

On October 1, 1999 our board of directors established a compensation committee consisting solely of non-employee directors. The compensation committee provides a general review of our compensation plans to ensure that they meet corporate objectives and administers our stock plans. Also on October 1, 1999 our board of directors established an audit committee comprised solely of independent directors. The responsibilities of the audit committee include recommending to our board of directors the independent public accountants to be selected to conduct the annual audit of our books and records, reviewing the proposed scope of the audit and approving the audit fees to be paid, reviewing accounting and financial controls with the independent public accountants and our financial and accounting staff, and reviewing and approving transactions between us and our directors, officers and affiliates.

Our directors do not receive any cash compensation for their services as a director of our company. There is no policy regarding option grants to directors, but historically we have made a one-time grant of options to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock when a director joins the board. Subsequently, from time to time in our discretion, we have also given our non-employee directors an additional grant of options to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price of all of these option grants is set at the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. In addition, we reimburse our employee and non-employee directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending board meetings.

On October 24, 1995, we adopted the following stock option plans to reward and provide incentives to our officers, directors, employees, consultants and other eligible participants: (i) the Executive Stock Incentive Plan, (ii) the 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan, and (iii) the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. We have reserved 400,000 shares for issuance under each of the plans. The number of shares reserved for issuance under each plan will be increased each year by an amount equal to one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock at the beginning of each fiscal year, and by the number of shares of common stock that equals 3-1/3% of the number of shares of voting stock issued in connection with any acquisition.

Stock Options. The option plans permit the granting of (i) options to purchase shares of common stock intended to qualify as incentive options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and (ii) options that do not so qualify. The maximum amount that may be earned as an incentive stock option in any fiscal year by any one participant is $100,000. The option exercise price of each option will be determined by the board of directors, but any option meant to qualify as an incentive option will have an exercise price of at least 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.

The term of each option will be fixed by the board and may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The board will determine at what time or times each option may be exercised and, subject to any provisions of the option plans, the period of time, if any, after retirement, death, disability or termination of employment during which options may be exercised. Options may be made exercisable in installments, and the exercisability of options may be accelerated by the board.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The board may approve the grant of a right to receive a number of shares or, in the discretion of the board, an amount in cash or shares or a combination of cash and shares, based on the increase in the fair market value of the shares subject to the right during the period specified by the board. These rights are called stock appreciation rights, or SARS. The board may approve the grant of SARs related to stock options.

Amendments and Termination. The board may at any time terminate or amend the option plans, provided that without approval of stockholders there shall be: (i) no increase in the total number of shares covered by the option plans and (ii) no change in the class of persons eligible to receive options. In any event, no amendment may adversely affect any then outstanding options without the consent of the participant unless such amendment is required to enable the option to qualify as an incentive stock option.

Amendments to Option Plans. On October 1, 1999, we adopted amendments to our option plans. These amendments (i) provide for the plans to be administered by non-employee directors once we become a reporting company, (ii) restrict the exercise of options, SARs or warrants while shares are offered pursuant to an effective registration statement, (iii) provides for indemnification of the board by our company and limits liability of stockholders, officers and directors in connection with any claims arising from the plans and (iv) contains additional provisions ensuring compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.

We have not entered into individual indemnity agreements with our officers and directors. However, our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws provide a blanket indemnity and state that we will indemnify, to the fullest extent under California law, our directors and officers against certain liabilities incurred with respect to their service in their capacities as officers and directors. In addition, our Articles of Incorporation provide that the personal liability of directors and officers for monetary damages will be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California law.

Donald Janke and Marshall Sparks, both executive officers and directors of our company, Timothy McGrath, an executive officer, and Mark Millet, a former director and executive officer, were involved in our founding and organization. On September 20, 1995, the board of directors authorized the issuance of an aggregate of 1,272,800 shares of common stock, as founder’s stock, at a price of $.01 per share, to Messrs. Janke, Millet, Sparks and Matthew Matern (who, until December 1996, was an officer and director of our company). In addition, the board authorized the sale of an additional 179,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate to Messrs. Janke, Millet and Matthew Matern at $.10 per share on the same date.

Unless otherwise indicated below, the persons in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. The number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person include shares of our common stock subject to options and warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of September 15, 1999.

Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters subject to shareholder vote, including the election of directors. Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding preferred stock, holders of outstanding shares of common stock are entitled to dividends and other distributions as may be declared by our board of directors from legally available funds. Holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding preferred stock, upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up and after payment of all prior claims, the holders of shares of common stock outstanding at that time will be entitled to receive pro rata all of our assets. All shares of common stock currently outstanding are, and all shares of common stock offered by us in this offering, when duly issued and paid for will be, fully paid and nonassessable. Additional shares of authorized common stock may be issued without shareholder approval.

We have designated 500,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A preferred stock. The Series A preferred stock has a preference in the payment of dividends and upon our liquidation. The liquidation value of the shares of preferred stock is $1.25 per share. The shares of Series A preferred stock do not otherwise participate in a liquidation, except to the extent of dividends declared but not paid. Dividends are non-cumulative. The Series A preferred stock may be redeemed by us at our option at any time for $1.25 per share. The Series A preferred stock is convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of common stock at a one-to-one ratio. Holders of Series A preferred stock are entitled to one vote per share, and these votes may be cast with respect to any matter as to which the holders of common stock have the right to vote.

On March 12, 1998, we noticed the redemption of the Series A preferred stock. Four shareholders holding a total of 20,000 shares redeemed their stock for $1.25 per share or converted their preferred stock into common stock. The remaining four shareholders, holding 141,600 shares, filed suit against our president and a former officer and director. One of the four, however, settled her claims in exchange for a complete release and the redemption price of her preferred shares, although the remaining three continue to refuse to surrender their preferred stock certificates in return for the redemption price. This suit is discussed in more detail in the section entitled “Legal Proceedings— Internet On-Ramp Litigation.”

Our board of directors, without further stockholder approval, may issue the remaining 9,500,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series from time to time and fix or alter the designations, relative rights, priorities, preferences, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the shares of each series. The rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions of different series of preferred stock may differ with respect to dividend rates, amounts payable on liquidation, voting rights, conversion rights, redemption provisions, sinking fund provisions and other matters. Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock which ranks senior to our common stock for the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets on liquidation. In addition, our board of directors can fix limitations and restrictions, if any, upon the payment of dividends on our common stock to be effective while any shares of preferred stock are outstanding. Our board of directors, without stockholder approval, can also issue preferred stock with voting and conversion rights which could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock. Our issuance of preferred stock may delay, defer or prevent a change in our control.

When we complete the offering, we will have a total of approximately 8,144,038 shares of common stock outstanding if all 500,000 shares are sold. The 500,000 shares sold in this offering will be freely tradeable under federal securities law unless they are purchased by our affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. In addition, we sold 909,090 shares of common stock pursuant to Regulation A under the Securities Act and lifted the restrictive legend for an additional 51,500 shares of common stock. These 960,590 shares are also freely tradeable under federal securities law. The remaining 6,683,448 shares are restricted, which means they were originally sold in offerings that were not subject to a registration statement filed with the SEC. These restricted shares may be resold only through registration under the Securities Act or under an available exemption from registration, including the exemption provided by Rule 144.

In general, under Rule 144, a person who has beneficially owned restricted shares for at least one year, including a person who may be deemed our affiliate, would be entitled to sell, within any three-month period, a number of shares that does not exceed one percent of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. Rule 144 is available for sales beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us. We are unable to estimate accurately the number of restricted shares that will be sold under Rule 144 because this will depend in part on the market price of our common stock, the personal circumstances of the seller and other factors.

Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been our affiliate at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned for at least two years the shares proposed to be sold, would be entitled to sell these shares under Rule 144(k) without complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144. Therefore, 144(k) shares may be sold after we complete this offering.

Beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the options granted by us prior to the effective date of the registration statement will be eligible for sale in the public market through Rule 701 under the Securities Act. Rule 701 covers shares issued before an initial registered public offering under compensatory benefit plans and contracts. In general, Rule 701 permits resales of these shares beginning 90 days after the issuer becomes subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act in reliance upon Rule 144, but without compliance with holding period requirements and other restrictions contained in Rule 144.

After we complete this offering, we intend to file under the Securities Act one or more registration statements on Form S-8 to register all of the shares of common stock reserved for future grants under our stock option plans. These registration statements are expected to become effective upon filing and shares covered by these registration statements will be freely tradeable under federal securities laws, subject to vesting provisions and, in the case of affiliates only, to the restrictions of Rule 144.

We may, in our sole discretion, accept or reject any potential purchaser ’s subscription in whole or in part. We are under no obligation to accept a potential purchaser’s subscription. We may accept subscriptions for any amount of shares up to and including the maximum amount of the offering; we are not required to obtain any minimum level of subscriptions in order to sell shares in the offering. Our executive officers, directors, controlling persons, and affiliates may purchase shares in the offering in any amount.

This offering will terminate on the date of our receipt of funds and executed subscription agreements acceptable to us for the entire amount of the offering, or an earlier date as determined by us in our discretion. Closings will be held at our main office from time to time as soon as practicable after the receipt by us of funds and acceptable subscription agreements. At each closing, we will deliver to purchasers whose subscription agreements and funds we accept certificates for the number of shares which we have agreed to sell to the purchasers.

During our two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period, there were no disagreements with Arthur Andersen LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure. Arthur Andersen LLP did not issue any reports on the financial statements for these periods and therefore no reports contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were any reports qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

This prospectus is part of the registration statement and does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement and all of its exhibits, certificates and schedules. Whenever a reference is made in this prospectus to any contract or other document of ours, the reference may not be complete and you should refer to the exhibits that are a part of the registration statement for a copy of the contract or document.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Internet Ventures, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 1999, current liabilities exceeded current assets by $1,819,604 and there was an accumulated deficit of $7,469,220. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management is monitoring the status of its indebtedness and is currently evaluating methods to reduce costs, improve results of operations, and increase investment capital. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its efforts. If the Company is unsuccessful in its efforts, it may be necessary to undertake such other actions as may be appropriate to preserve asset value. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The Company was formed in September 1995 to acquire selected traditional local and regional Internet access Service Providers (ISP ’s) in order to achieve economies of operation and accelerated growth through centralized management. Since inception, the Company has acquired nine operating ISP ’s, a systems integration company, an internet publications company and seven asset acquisitions of subscribers and equipment of marginal ISP’s in its market areas. All acquisitions have been accounted for as purchases. The systems integration company stopped providing services to third parties and the publications company was closed, both effective December 31, 1998.

The Company has experienced losses since its inception as it continues to build a critical base of subscribers in each of its operating subsidiaries that are capable of generating monthly recurring revenue. Monthly recurring revenue is a trade term reflecting subscriber revenue billed on a monthly recurring basis until canceled by the subscriber. Revenues of the consulting and publications subsidiaries are project term limited. Other ISP revenue and the consulting and publication revenue are combined and classified as Systems/Consulting revenue. This caption can be described as “Non-recurring revenue ’ in contrast to subscriber recurring revenue. The Company intends to continue to acquire additional ISP ’s in selected markets, which will result in additional losses until such time as the aggregate subsidiary revenues net of subsidiary expenses are of a scale to cover the corporate management costs.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Deferred income taxes are reported using the liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

The inventory in 1998 was comprised of cable modems purchased under a contract with a PeRKInet® equipment supplier. These modems were to be sold or rented to subscribers as their PeRKInet® sites are installed. The inventory was recorded at the specific identification method of inventory costing, which is not more than fair market value. A majority of the modems were subsequently returned to the vendor (see Note 3). In 1999, all remaining modems are classified as fixed assets as they will be loaned or rented to subscribers and are depreciated when placed in service.

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Property acquired through acquisition purchase transactions are recorded at the fair market value at the time of acquisition. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets, commencing when assets are placed in service. Property and equipment includes certain PeRKInet ® equipment purchased in advance of operational needs which is expected to be placed in service in the near term. The estimated useful life of all classes of equipment is five years.

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, Earnings per Share (“SFAS No. 128”), which is effective for annual and interim financial statements issued for periods ending after December 15, 1997. SFAS No. 128 was issued to simplify the standards for calculating earnings per share (“EPS”) previously required by APB No. 15, Earnings Per Share. SFAS No. 128 replaces the presentation of primary EPS with a presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Common stock equivalents have been excluded from the net loss per share calculations because their effect would reduce loss per share.

The Company’s policy is to grow by acquisition using its stock at fair market value or cash to purchase a business, its subscribers, assets or a combination of subscribers and assets of a competitor in its market area. Often, the realized value to the Company is greater than the value of the equipment or other assets acquired. This economic value and the value of the subscribers is recorded as an asset and identified as goodwill.

Goodwill is recorded as an intangible asset, and represents the difference between the price paid (fair market value of securities or cash) in excess of the fair market value of the equipment or other net assets acquired. Goodwill is amortized over a period of three years on a straight-line basis for each acquisition, beginning in the fiscal quarter following the date of the respective acquisition, and is expensed against current operations.

The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, no compensation expense is recorded by the Company since the exercise price of employee stock options granted by it equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123).

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements for the interim periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Regulation SX. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 1999 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2000.

At the inauguration of the PeRKInet® service, a commitment was made to the manufacturer of the PeRKInet® equipment to purchase a substantial number of head end systems and subscriber modems, sufficient for an estimated nine months worth of installations based on the Company’ s projections. A deferred payment arrangement was negotiated, which, after substantial payments, was reduced to a note payable due over twelve months beginning in June 1997. The note was rescinded in December 1997, with subsequent authorization to return the modems giving rise to a portion of the note. In 1998, 970 modems were returned and the note was reduced by $573,270, leaving a balance due to the supplier of approximately $200,000. This amount is payable in monthly installments over a one year period which began in October 1998.

The Company is authorized to issue 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, the rights and preferences of which may be determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion. The Company has designated 500,000 shares of Preferred Stock as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred ”). 161,600 shares of Series A Preferred were issued during the year ended March 31, 1996 in conjunction with the acquisition of two operating subsidiaries. The Series A Preferred has a liquidation value of $1.25 per share and otherwise does not have a preference in liquidation. The Series A Preferred may be redeemed by the Company at its option at any time for $1.25 per share. The Series A Preferred is convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of Common Stock at a one-to-one ratio. In March 1998, the Company noticed the redemption of the Series A Preferred; 7,080 shares were converted and the redemption price was tendered for the remaining 154,520 shares.

Effective October 1, 1998, the Company authorized the sale of up to $5,000,000 of equity in a Regulation D, 506 offering comprising 12% convertible debentures and shares of common stock. The Company is required to issue the shares of common stock involved in the units purchased or as a result of the conversion of the debentures. The debentures are convertible into common stock at the rate of $7.50 per share. The activity in the offering has resulted in the requirement to issue 422,800 shares of common stock as of March 31, 1999. The unconverted debenture balance at March 31, 1999 was $354,125. The offering is still in process as of June 30, 1999.

shares issued in connection with any acquisition transaction. The accretion of all plans at each fiscal year end aggregates 3% of the outstanding voting shares and 10% of any shares issued in an acquisition. As of March 31, 1999, stock options have been granted under the plans, net of forfeitures, for an aggregate of 993,400 shares at exercise prices from $.25 to $5.50. Options representing 664,000 shares have become vested and are exercisable. No options have been exercised as of March 31, 1999.

The adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 ( “SFAS 123”) requires the Company to measure the effect of stock-based compensation of shares issued for services and stock options granted based on fair value of the shares when granted. The Company issues shares for services and grants stock options only at exercise prices that represent fair value based on the last sale of stock for cash to a third party investor. All compensation of stock for services is recorded as a current expense at the time of grant, which generally represents the period of services for which the grant is made.

Proforma information regarding net loss and losses per share is required by SFAS 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with an assumption of a risk-free interest rate ranging between 4.75% and 6.67% and an expected life ranging between 2.0 years to 5.3 years.

From inception through March 31, 1999, the Company has acquired nine operating internet access service providers (“ISP ’s”), a systems integration company and an internet publications company, all of which were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill has been appropriately recorded for each acquisition (see Note 2). Optimal Systems Integrated and Computor Link were absorbed into Internet On Ramp in December 1998 and the associated unamortized Goodwill was written off to expense.

The following unaudited proforma results of activities assume that the acquisition of Frontier Internet and Budget Internet occurred as of the beginning of 1998, after giving effect to proforma adjustments. The proforma adjustments represent interest expense on long-term debt incurred to fund the acquisition and amortization of goodwill and deferred financing costs. The proforma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and may not necessarily be indicative of the operating results that would have occurred had these acquisitions been consummated as of the beginning of each period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 1998, current liabilities exceeded current assets by $2,146,224 and there was a deficiency in net assets of $142,408. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company was formed in September 1995 to acquire selected traditional local and regional Internet access Service Providers (ISP ’s) in order to achieve economies of operation and accelerated growth through centralized management. Since inception, the Company has acquired seven operating ISP ’s, a systems integration company, an internet publications company and five asset acquisitions of subscribers and equipment of marginal ISP’s in its market areas. All acquisitions have been accounted for as purchases.

The Company has experienced losses since its inception as it continues to build a critical base of subscribers in each of its operating subsidiaries that are capable of generating monthly recurring revenue. Monthly recurring revenue is a trade term reflecting subscriber revenue billed on a monthly recurring basis until canceled by the subscriber. Other revenues of ISP’s consist of web design and hosting and consulting services. Revenues of the consulting and publications subsidiaries are project term limited. The other ISP revenue and the consulting and publication revenue are combined and classified as Systems/Consulting revenue. This caption can be described as “Non-recurring revenue” in contrast to subscriber recurring revenue. The Company intends to continue to acquire additional ISP’s in selected markets, which will result in additional losses until such time as the aggregate subsidiary revenues net of subsidiary expenses are of a scale to cover the corporate management costs.

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, Earnings per Share (“SFAS No. 128”), which is effective for annual and interim financial statements issued for periods ending after December 15, 1997. SFAS No. 128 was issued to simplify the standards for calculating earnings per share (“EPS”) previously required by APB No. 15, Earnings Per Share. SFAS No. 128 replaces the presentation of primary EPS with a presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Common stock equivalents have been excluded from the net loss per share and weighted average calculations because they are anti-dilutive.

arrangement was negotiated, which, after substantial payments, was reduced to a note payable due over twelve months beginning in June 1997. The note was rescinded in December 1997, with subsequent authorization to return the modems giving rise to a portion of the note. In September 1998, 970 modems were returned and the note was reduced by $573,270, leaving a balance due to the supplier of approximately $200,000. This amount is payable in monthly installments over a one year period beginning in October 1998.

In 1995, the Company adopted the following three stock option plans to reward and provide incentives to its officers, directors, employees, consultants and other eligible participants: (a) the Executive Stock Incentive Plan, (b) the 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan, (c) the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. The Company has reserved 200,000 shares for issuance under each of the plans for an aggregate of 600,000 shares. The number of shares reserved for issuance under each plan will be increased by an amount equal to one percent of the outstanding shares at the end of each fiscal year and by the number of shares that equals 3¹ /3% of the number of common shares issued in connection with any acquisition transaction. The accretion of all plans at each fiscal year end aggregates 3% of the outstanding voting shares and 10% of any shares issued in an acquisition. As of March 31, 1998, stock options have been granted under the plans, net of forfeitures, for an aggregate of 325,700 shares at exercise prices from $.50 to $5.00. Options representing 285,700 shares have become vested and are exercisable. No options have been exercised as of March 31, 1998.

Subsequent to March 31, 1998, the Company sold approximately 360,000 shares of common stock through a direct public offering under Regulation A of the Securities Act of 1933. The Company also has granted approximately 260,000 stock options pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plans (Note 6). All stock options granted subsequent to March 31, 1998 have an exercise price of $11.00 per share. Additionally, the Company has granted 20,000 warrants to certain officers of the Company which have an exercise price of $11.00 per warrant.

Effective October 1, 1998, the Company authorized the sale of equity in a Regulation D, 506 offering comprising 12% convertible debentures and shares of common stock. The Company is required to issue the shares of common stock involved in the units purchased or as a result of the conversion of the debentures. The activity in the offering since the effective date has resulted in the requirement to issue 405,152 shares of common stock.

The California Corporations Code and our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide for indemnification of the directors and officers of the Registrant for liabilities and expenses that they may incur in these capacities. The California General Corporation Law permits a corporation through its Articles of Incorporation to eliminate the personal liability of its directors to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty and care as a director, with certain exceptions. The exceptions include a breach of the director’s duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law, improper declarations of dividends, and transactions from which the directors derived an improper personal benefit. Our Articles of Incorporation exonerates our directors from monetary liability to the fullest extent permitted by this statutory provision.

1. From the Registrant’s inception in September 1995 through September 15, 1999, the Registrant granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 1,365,471 shares of common stock to employees, officers, directors, associates, advisors or consultants under its stock option plans at exercise prices ranging from $.25 to $5.50. Of these, options to purchase 258,000 shares of common stock have been forfeited and options to purchase 899,413 shares are exercisable as of September 15, 1999. As of September 15, 1999, no options have been exercised. These issuances are exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as offered and sold pursuant to a written employee benefit plan.

2. From November 16, 1995 through September 30, 1998, the Registrant issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 212,632 shares of common stock to 15 investors. The exercise prices of the warrants range from $0.75 to $7.00, and have terms ranging from one to five years. Of these, warrants to purchase an aggregate of 13,302 shares of common stock have been canceled. These issuances are exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

3. From July 31, 1996 through September 23, 1997, the Registrant issued an aggregate of 803,868 shares of common stock to 213 investors for cash purchase prices ranging from $1.25 to $2.25 per share. The aggregate cash proceeds received by the Registrant for the sale of all 803,868 shares was $1,477,753. These issuances are exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 1001 under the Securities Act (“ Rule 1001”) as issuances of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000.

4. From July 31, 1996 through January 27, 1998, the Registrant issued an aggregate of 323,676 shares of common stock to employees, directors, officers, consultants or advisors in exchange for services provided to the Registrant. These shares were valued at $1.00 to $2.25 per share, resulting in an aggregate value of the services provided to the Registrant in exchange for the shares of $547,483. These issuances are exempt from registration under Rule 701 under the Securities Act as offered and sold pursuant to a written compensation contract or a written employee benefit plan.

5. On July 31, 1996, in connection with its acquisition of Information Technologies International, Inc. (“ITI”), the Registrant issued an aggregate of 72,000 shares of common stock (valued at $1.25 per share) to six persons in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of ITI (valued at $50,000) and the retirement of outstanding loans to ITI in an aggregate principal amount of $40,000. These issuances are exempt from registration under Rule 1001 under the Securities Act as issuance of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

6. On July 31, 1996, the Registrant issued 25,696 shares of common stock to Touch Tone Network, Inc. (“Touch Tone”) in exchange for the assets of Touch Tone valued at $32,120. This issuance is exempt from registration under Rule 1001 under the Securities Act as an issuance of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

7. From November 13, 1996 through July 2, 1997, the Registrant issued an aggregate of 28,600 shares of common stock (valued at $1.25 per share) to seven stockholders of Community Wide Web of Stockton (“CWWS”) in exchange for their shares of CWWS common stock. These issuances are exempt from registration under Rule 1001 under the Securities Act as issuances of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

8. On January 23, 1997, the Registrant issued 28,956 shares of common stock to one person in exchange for assets of Windows on the World valued at $50,673. This issuance is exempt from registration under Rule 1001 under the Securities Act of 1933 as an issuance of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as a transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

9. On February 10, 1997, the Registrant issued 72,000 shares of common stock to three stockholders of Western Internet Connections, Inc. (“WIC”) in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of WIC valued at $126,000. These issuances are exempt from registration under Rule 1001 as issuances of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

10. On April 1, 1997, the Registrant issued 65,714 shares of common stock to Boudames Investment Corp. (“Boudames” ) in exchange for substantially all of the assets of Boudames valued at $114,999.50. This issuance is exempt from registration under Rule 1001 as an issuance of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.

11. On May 9, 1997, the Registrant issued 46,934 shares of common stock to the three stockholders of ComputerLink Publications, Inc. (“ComputerLink”) in exchange for all of the capital stock of ComputerLink valued at $105,601.50. These issuances are exempt from registration under Rule 1001 under the Securities Act as issuances of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

12. On May 23, 1997, the Registrant issued 28,286 shares of common stock to three stockholders of VorTech Net World Access (“ VorTech”) in exchange for the assets of VorTech valued at $63,643.50. These issuances are exempt from registration under Rule 1001 under the Securities Act of 1933 as issuances of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

13. On July 30, 1997, the Registrant issued 20,658 shares of common stock to one person in exchange for the assets of Tide Pool Internet valued at $46,480.50. This issuance is exempt from registration under Rule 1001 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as an issuance of securities for consideration not exceeding $5,000,000 and/or pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.

15. In connection with its acquisition of Oregon Wilderness Delivery Service, Inc., (“Oregon Wilderness”), on September 24, 1998, the Registrant issued a convertible note in the principal amount of $375,000 to the former stockholder of Oregon Wilderness. The note is convertible into shares of the Registrant’s common stock through the exercise of warrants with an exercise price of $5.50 per share which expire on September 1, 2000. This issuance is exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.

16. From October 1, 1998 through August 17, 1999, the Registrant sold units of securities consisting of 12% Convertible Debentures due 2001 (“Debentures”) and shares of common stock. The purchase price for each unit was $7.50 and consisted of $7.50 in principal amount of Debentures and one share of common stock. The Registrant issued $5,448,685 in aggregate principal amount of Debentures, together with the 686,980 corresponding shares of common stock to approximately 432 investors, all except 34 of which were accredited. As of September 15, 1999, 602,740 shares were issued upon conversion of $4,520,550 in principal amount of the Debentures. In addition, as of September 15, 1999, 58,592 shares in the aggregate were issued for interest due on the Debentures. These issuances are exempt from registration pursuant to Regulation D and/or Section 4(2) under the Securities Act, as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering, in that the transactions involved the issuance and sale by the Registrant of its securities to financially sophisticated institutions or individuals who represented that they were aware of the Registrant’ s activities as well as its business and financial condition, and who took the securities for investment purposes and understood the ramifications of the same. Each security holder represented that they acquired the securities for investment for their own account and not for distribution. All certificates representing the securities issued in these transactions bear restrictive legends.

(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(c) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, (a) the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective and (b) each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Donald A. Janke, Marshall
F. Sparks and Christopher Matern, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution, to sign on his behalf, individually and in each capacity stated below, all amendments and post-effective amendments to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 (including any registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, and all amendments thereto) and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and any other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as each might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming each act that said attorneys-in-fact and agents may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

	Fiscal Year Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	1997		1998		1999		1998		1999
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues	$ 1,365		$ 2,755		$ 4,370		$ 970		$ 1,521
Cost of revenues	1,765		3,304		4,252		932		1,327
Expenses	869		2,353		3,319		486		1,079

Net loss	(1,270	)	(2,902	)	(3,201	)	(448	)	(884	)

Net loss per share basic and diluted	(.27	)	(.54	)	(.51	)	(.08	)	(.12	)
Weighted average shares outstanding used in basic and diluted calculation	3,968,277		5,311,624		6,268,217		5,780,921		7,081,254

Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets	$ 2,021		$ 2,913		$ 3,898		$ 2,763		$ 4,229
Total liabilities	1,457		3,055		2,994		1,583		2,752
Total stockholders ’ equity (deficit)	564		(142	)	904		1,180		1,477
Working capital (deficit)	(751	)	(2,146	)	(1,820	)	(675	)	(880	)

Other Data:
Number of dial-up subscribers at period end	4,893		12,193		25,733		13,150		28,604
Number of PERKInet ® subscribers at period end	5		965		1,540		1,100		1,642	(1)
Total number of subscribers at period end	4,898		13,158		27,273		14,250		30,246
Total number of communities served	8		12		19		12		19

GROSS PROCEEDS:	$2,000,000		$4,000,000		$6,000,000		$8,000,000		$10,000,000
Less offering expenses (1)	$ (320,000	)	$ (530,000	)	$ (680,000	)	$ (840,000	)	$(1,040,000	)
Net Proceeds	$1,680,000		$3,470,000		$5,320,000		$7,160,000		$8,960,000

USE OF PROCEEDS:
Ÿ Repayment of trade accounts payable and notes payable	$ 210,000		$ 600,000		$ 620,000		$ 620,000		$ 620,000
Ÿ Purchase new PeRKInet® equipment (2)	$ 100,000		$ 300,000		$ 500,000		$ 700,000		$ 900,000
Ÿ Network operations and customer support regional center for PeRKInet ® expansion (3)	$ 0		$ 150,000		$ 300,000		$ 450,000		$ 600,000
Ÿ Sales and marketing to potential new subscribers	$ 168,000		$ 172,000		$ 350,000		$ 350,000		$ 250,000
Ÿ Finance Internet service provider acquisitions within our target markets and establish new Internet service provider sites (4)	$ 656,000		$1,550,000		$2,510,000		$3,870,000		$5,300,000
Ÿ New employee salaries	$ 168,000		$ 170,000		$ 175,000		$ 200,000		$ 250,000
Ÿ New manager salaries	$ 100,000		$ 100,000		$ 100,000		$ 100,000		$ 100,000
Ÿ Office rent and office overhead	$ 70,000		$ 70,000		$ 70,000		$ 70,000		$ 80,000
Ÿ Acquired subscriber prepaid float (5)	$ 70,000		$ 100,000		$ 150,000		$ 170,000		$ 180,000

	Capitalization as of June 30, 1999
	Actual		As Adjusted
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized and none issued and outstanding, actual; none issued and outstanding, as adjusted	0		0
Common stock, $.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized and 7,081,254 shares issued and outstanding, actual; 7,581,254 shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted	70,812		75,812
Additional paid-in capital	9,759,898		18,219,898
Accumulated deficit	(8,353,521	)	(8,353,521	)

Total stockholders’ equity and capitalization	$1,477,189		$11,401,377

Per share offering price			$20.00

Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 1999	$(0.02	)
Increase per share attributable to new investors	$ 1.20

As adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering				$ 1.18

Dilution per share to new investors in this offering				$18.82

	Shares Purchased			Total Consideration			Average Price Paid Per Share
	Number	Percent		Amount	Percent		Average Price Paid Per Share
Existing shareholders	7,081,254	93	%	$ 9,830,710	50	%	$ 1.39
New public investors	500,000	7	%	10,000,000	50	%	$20.00

Total	7,581,254	100.0	%	$19,830,710	100.0	%

	Three Months Ended June 30, 1998		Change		Three Months Ended June 30, 1999
Total revenues	$ 969,614		57	%	$1,521,229
Cost of revenues	931,770		42	%	1,326,665
Gross profit	37,844		414	%	194,564
Selling, general and administrative expenses	248,684		175	%	684,674
Depreciation and amortization	205,413		71	%	350,775
Interest expense	32,111		35	%	43,416

Net loss	$(448,364	)	97	%	$ (884,301	)

	Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 1997		Change		Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 1998		Change		Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 1999
	(Dollars in thousands)
Total revenues	$ 1,365		102	%	$ 2,755		59%		$ 4,370
Cost of revenues	1,765		87	%	3,304		29%		4,252
Gross profit (loss)	(400	)	37	%	(549	)	(121%	)	118
Selling, general and administrative expenses	636		178	%	1,769		12%		1,979
Depreciation and amortization	233		136	%	551		107%		1,139
Interest expense	N/A		N/A		33		509%		201

Net loss	$(1,270	)	128	%	$(2,902	)	10%		$(3,201	)

Date	Event	Significance
September 1995	Internet Ventures, Inc. Founded	Ÿ Our company was incorporated in California

November 1995	Community Wide Web of Stockton, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Established a presence in Stockton, California, through the purchase of a leading Internet service provider in that market

November 1995	Internet On-Ramp, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Established a presence in Spokane, Washington, through the purchase of a leading Internet service provider in that market

May 1996	Northcoast Internet, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Entered the Eureka, California, market

May 1996	Optimal Systems Integrators, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Purchase of this network planning and systems integration services company enhanced our primary services as an Internet service provider

July 1996	Information Technology International, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Entered the Grand Junction, Colorado, market

July 1996	Touchtone Network, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Consolidated customers of local Internet service providers in Stockton, California

September 1996	Launch of Internet-On-Ramp Internet service in Idaho	Ÿ From our Spokane-based Internet service provider, Internet-On-Ramp, offered service in Coeur D’Alene, Idaho

January 1997	Digital City Communications, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Consolidated customers of local Internet service providers in Stockton, California

January 1997	Windows on the World Acquired	Ÿ Entered the Crescent City, California, market

February 1997	Western Internet Connections, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Increased our presence in the Grand Junction, Colorado, market by 200%

March 1997	PeRKInet® Introduced	Ÿ Our PeRKInet® service was first offered on Avenue TV Cable in Ventura, California

May 1997	Boudames Investment Corporation, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Consolidated customers of local Internet service providers in Stockton, California

May 1997	VorTech Net World Access Acquired	Ÿ Entered the Tracy, California, market

June 1997	Tide Pool, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Increased presence in Arcata, California, market by 50%

Date	Event	Significance
August 1997	Medford Internet Acquired	Ÿ Entered the Medford, Oregon, market

December 1997	Badas Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Infostructure Merger into Internet Ventures Oregon	Ÿ Entered the Ashland, Oregon, market

February 1998	Launch of PeRKInet® in Eureka, California	Ÿ Entered carriage agreement with Cox Cable Humboldt to offer PeRKInet® service to 49,000 homes passed in Eureka, California

August 1998	$29.95 PeRKInet® Subscription Price Introduced	Ÿ New, lower price introduced to attract more subscribers by providing more economical service

September 1998	DurangoNet, Inc. Acquired	Ÿ Entered the Southwest Colorado market

September 1998	Oregon Wilderness Delivery Systems, Inc. d/b/a BudgetNet Acquired	Ÿ Entered the Grants Pass, Oregon, market

September 1998	Redwood Country Online, a division of Evergreen Technologies, Acquired	Ÿ Aggregated local content and web hosting

September 1998	HumGuide Internet Publishing Acquired	Ÿ Expanded our portfolio to provide advertising services

January 1999	Next Dimension Internet Acquired	Ÿ Increased our presence in the Spokane, Washington, market by 25%

February 1999	National Computer Solutions, Inc. K-Falls Acquired	Ÿ Entered the Klamath Falls, Oregon, market

February 1999	Internet On-Ramp, Inc. Business Services Established	Ÿ Integrated operations of Optimal Systems Integrators

February 1999	Launch of Wireless Cable PeRKInet®	Ÿ Multi-point distribution service microwave spectrum was used for PeRKInet® for the first time in Medford, Oregon

July 1999	Extent, Inc. d/b/a FutureLink Acquired	Ÿ Increased our presence in the Spokane, Washington, market by 10%

July 1999	Launch of PeRKInet® on Ashland Fiber Network	Ÿ Our first two-way cable launch of PeRKInet®

September 1999	Investment in InnerCite	Ÿ 30% equity investment in an Internet service provider with operations in El Dorado and Sacramento counties in California

September 1999	Tomato Web Online Acquired	Ÿ Expanded our presence in the Central Valley of California by 95%

Community	Homes Marketed	Subscribers			Other Customers(3)	Total	Penetration Rate				Number of Months in Operation
Community	Homes Marketed	PeRKInet®		Dial-Up(2)	Other Customers(3)	Total		PeRKInet®		Dial-Up	Number of Months in Operation
Stockton, CA (including Manteca, CA and Tracy, CA)	145,000			1,430	38	1,468	0.00	%	0.99	%	42
Spokane, WA	140,000	900	(1)	5,517	663	7,080	0.64	%	3.94	%	42
Eureka, CA	40,000	419		2,986	7	3,412	1.05	%	7.46	%	37
Grand Junction, CO	44,000			1,058		1,058	0.00	%	2.40	%	36
Coeur D ’Alene, ID	38,000			1,559	22	1,581	0.00	%	4.10	%	34
Crescent City, CA	9,400			479		479	0.00	%	5.10	%	30
Arcata, CA	10,000			1,276	37	1,314	0.00	%	12.76	%	24
Ventura, CA	90,000	139		689		828	0.15	%	0.77	%	21
Medford, OR	50,000	179		652	99	930	0.36	%	1.30	%	22
Ashland, OR	17,700			4,155	898	5,053	0.00	%	23.48	%	19
Montrose, CO	7,000			242		242	0.00	%	3.45	%	10
Cortez, CO	8,000			314	314		0.00	%	3.93	%	10
Durango, CO	15,000	5		4,275	1034	5,314	0.03	%	28.50	%	10
Pagosa Springs, CO	2,800			357		357	0.00	%	12.75	%	10
Grants Pass, OR	29,000			2,830		2,830	0.00	%	9.76	%	10
Telluride, CO	2,200			28		28	0.00	%	1.28	%	10
Klamath Falls, OR	24,000			757	70	827	0.00	%	3.15	%	5

Totals	633,100	1,642		28,604	2,869	33,115	0.26	%	4.52	%

Location		Cable Partner
Eureka, California		Cox Cable Humboldt

Ventura, California		Avenue TV Cable

Durango, Colorado		Hermosa Cable

Medford, Oregon		ATI, Medford (wireless)

Ashland, Oregon		Ashland Fiber Network

Name	Age	Position
Donald A. Janke	48	President and Director
Marshall F. Sparks	58	Chief Financial Officer and Director
Daniel R. DiMicco	49	Director
Alfred M. Leopold	39	Director
Timothy P. McGrath	52	Vice President, Investor Relations
Reed W. Olson	44	Chief Operating Officer
Randy Strickley	49	Vice President, Finance

Name and Principal Positions		Fiscal year ended March 31,		Annual Compensation				Long Term Compensation		All Other Compensation($)
Name and Principal Positions		Fiscal year ended March 31,		Salary($)		Bonus($)		Securities Underlying Options(#)		All Other Compensation($)
Donald A. Janke Chairman and President (1)		1999 1998 1997		84,000 72,200 0		0 0 0		10,000 0 0		0 0 1,875

Name	Individual Grants
	Number of Shares Underlying Options Granted(#)(1)	Percentage of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal 1999(2)	Exercise Price ($/Sh)	Expiration Date	Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term (3)
	Number of Shares Underlying Options Granted(#)(1)		Exercise Price ($/Sh)	Expiration Date	5% ($)	10% ($)
Donald A. Janke	10,000	1.9%	5.50	6/19/2003	15,195	33,578

Name		Number of Shares Underlying Unexercised Options as of March 31, 1999(#)		Value of Unexercised in-the-Money Options as of March 31, 1999($)(1)
Name		Exercisable/Unexercisable		Exercisable/Unexercisable
Donald A. Janke		94,000/0		$424,000/$0

		Page
Consolidated Financial Statements of Internet Ventures, Inc. Years Ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, and unaudited Three Months Ended June 30, 1999:

Independent Auditors’ Report		F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-4

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders ’ Equity (Deficit)		F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-8

Consolidated Financial Statements of Internet Ventures, Inc. Years Ended March 31, 1998 and 1997:

Independent Auditors’ Report		F-17

Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-18

Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-19

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders ’ Equity (Deficit)		F-20

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-21

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-22

ASSETS	June 30, 1999		March 31, 1999		March 31, 1998
	(unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash	$ 737,632		$ 207,590		$ 161,564
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for bad debts Of $120,171, $122,243 and $90,327, respectively	179,707		140,087		79,902
Modem inventory	—		—		596,215
Note receivable, officer-stockholder	25,000		25,000		—
Deferred interest	182,136		142,106		—
Other current assets	58,721		35,497		40,107

Total current assets	1,183,196		550,280		877,788
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $739,492, $633,892 and $296,107, respectively	1,421,405		1,478,099		898,175
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $1,318,553, $1,073,378 and $502,558, respectively	1,624,729		1,869,904		1,136,978

	$4,229,330		$3,898,283		$2,912,941


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$ 676,958		$ 668,182		$ 823,568
Accrued expenses	476,714		570,457		507,189
Equipment financing by vendor	—		147,195		770,296
Current maturities of notes payable	703,884		762,761		745,959
Current maturities of capital lease obligations	44,289		44,289		—
Preferred stock redemption obligation	161,476		177,000		177,000

Total current liabilities	2,063,321		2,369,884		3,024,012

Notes payable, less current maturities	176,705		250,455		31,337

Capital lease obligations, less current maturities	16,582		19,581		—

Debentures payable	495,533		354,125		—

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Preferred stock—$.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding	—		—		—
Common stock—$.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 7,081,254, 6,662,112 and 5,630,954 issued and outstanding	70,812		66,621		56,310
Additional paid-in capital	9,759,898		8,306,837		4,069,020
Accumulated deficit	(8,353,521	)	(7,469,220	)	(4,267,738	)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)	1,477,189		904,238		(142,408	)

	$4,229,330		$3,898,283		$2,912,941

	Three months ended June 30, 1999		Three months ended June 30, 1998		Year ended March 31, 1999		Year ended March 31, 1998
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenues:
Recurring revenues	$1,489,433		$ 877,661		$4,245,461		$2,437,982
System/consulting revenues	31,796		91,953		124,488		316,781

Total revenues	1,521,229		969,614		4,369,949		2,754,763


Cost of revenues	1,326,665		931,770		4,252,049		3,303,796


Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	684,674		248,684		1,978,872		1,769,322
Depreciation	105,600		68,840		337,785		225,727
Amortization of goodwill	245,175		136,573		801,576		324,922
Interest, net	43,416		32,111		201,149		33,476

Total expenses	1,078,865		486,208		3,319,382		2,353,447


Net loss	$ (884,301	)	$(448,364	)	$(3,201,482	)	$(2,902,480	)


Net loss per share basic and diluted	$ (.12	)	$ (.08	)	$ (.51	)	$ (.54	)


Weighted average shares outstanding	7,081,254		5,780,912		6,268,217		5,311,624

	Preferred Stock				Common Stock		Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated deficit		Total
	Shares		Amount		Shares	Amount	Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated deficit		Total
Balance at March 31, 1997, restated due to 100% stock dividend on July 15, 1998	161,600		$ 1,616		4,641,182	$46,410	$1,881,022		$(1,365,258	)	$ 563,790

Purchase of assets and acquisitions					202,502	2,026	553,715				555,741
Stock issued for services					182,078	1,820	519,246				521,066
Stock issued for cash, net of $327,164 costs					591,032	5,912	1,306,713				1,312,625
Redemption of preferred	(161,600	)	(1,616	)	14,160	142	(191,676	)			(193,150	)
Net loss for the year ended March 31, 1998									(2,902,480	)	(2,902,480	)

Balance at March 31, 1998	—		—		5,630,954	56,310	4,069,020		(4,267,738	)	(142,408	)

Purchase of assets and acquisitions					31,400	314	127,036				127,350
Stock issued for services					40,168	401	220,523				220,924
Stock issued for cash, net of $472,782 costs					536,790	5,368	2,695,118				2,700,486
Stock issued in kind as interest on debentures					25,416	254	190,366				190,620
Stock issued with and upon conversion of debentures, net of $283,708 costs					397,384	3,974	1,004,774				1,008,748
Net loss for the year ended March 31, 1999									(3,201,482	)	(3,201,482	)

Balance at March 31, 1999	—		—		6,662,112	66,621	8,306,837		(7,469,220	)	904,238

Stock issued in kind as interest on debentures					15,515	155	116,842				116,997
Stock issued with and upon conversion of debentures, net of $142,096 costs					403,627	4,036	1,336,219				1,340,255
Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 1999 (unaudited)									(884,301	)	(884,301	)

Balance at June 30, 1999 (unaudited)	—		$ —		7,081,254	$70,812	$9,759,898		$(8,353,521	)	$1,477,189

	1999	1998
Acquisition note payable to the former owners of Frontier Internet. Interest at 10%, interest only payments due June 30, 1999, convertible into common stock at $5.50 per share, the note is being renegotiated	$ 355,640	$ —

Acquisition note payable to the former owner of Budget Net. Interest at 11%, interest only monthly payments in the first year, principal and interest payments in the second year, unpaid principal and interest due in full on September 11, 2000, convertible into common stock at $5.50 per share	375,000	—

Acquisition note for Next Dimension Internet, no interest, due in 90 days. This note was paid on May 4, 1999	90,000	—

Acquisition note payable to the former owners of Infostructure. Interest at 8.5%, interest only payments due monthly, secured by the company acquired. This note was paid in full on February 12, 1999	—	290,000

Note convertible into stock at $11 per share, interest at 8.5%. This note was paid in full on December 16, 1998	—	250,000

Working capital loans of subsidiary operations, interest from 0% to 18%, partially secured by various assets of the Company, due in various installments	192,576	119,007

Unsecured note, interest at 8.5%. This note was paid in full on June 15, 1998 .	—	50,000

Unsecured note payable to a shareholder of the Company. Interest at 14%, principal and interest were paid in full on June 15, 1998	—	30,000

8% note payable to a shareholder of the Company, secured by certain equipment, due September 1997	—	25,000

Acquisition note payable to the former owner of Northcoast Internet. Interest at 11%, monthly payments of $1,200, secured by certain equipment of the Company. This note was paid in full March 1, 1999	—	13,289

	1,013,216	777,296
Less current maturities	762,761	745,959

	$ 250,455	$ 31,337

Year ending March 31,
2000		$ 762,761
2001		216,561
2002		25,727
2003		8,167

		$1,013,216

Year ending March 31,
2000		$32,357
2001		32,357
2002		21,604

		86,318
Less amounts representing interest		22,448

Present value of net minimum lease payments under capital leases		63,870
Less current maturities		44,289

		$19,581

	Shares available for options		Number of outstanding Shares		Option price range per share	Weighted average exercise price	Weighted average remaining life
Plan adoption—October 1995	1,200,000
Granted	(369,600	)	369,000		$ .25– .75	$0.43
Forfeitures	32,000		(32,000	)	$ .25– .75	$0.39

Balance —March 31, 1996	862,400		337,600		$ .25– .75	$0.43	4.9

Accretion	159,310
Granted	(254,800	)	254,800		$ .75–1.25	$1.10
Forfeitures	20,000		(20,000	)	$ .75– .75	$0.66

Balance —March 31, 1997	786,910		572,400		$ .25–1.75	$0.72	5.3

Accretion	201,860
Granted	(106,000	)	106,000		$2.25 –2.50	$2.39
Forfeitures	27,000		(27,000	)	$ .75–2.25	$1.92

Balance —March 31, 1998	909,770		651,400		$ .25–2.50	$0.94	2.0

Accretion	172,058
Granted	(521,000	)	521,000		$ 5.50	$5.50
Forfeitures	179,000		(179,000	)	$ .25–5.50	$1.95

Balance —March 31, 1999	739,828		993,400		$ .25–5.50	$3.15	3.5

	1999		1998
Net loss, as reported	$(3,201,482	)	$(2,902,480	)
Net loss, proforma	(3,696,119	)	(2,942,257	)
Losses per share, as reported	(.51	)	(.54	)
Losses per share, proforma	(.59	)	(.54	)

Company	Business	Acquisition date*	Shares Issued	Share Value	Goodwill Recorded
Internet On Ramp, Inc.	ISP	Nov 1995	**141,600	$177,000	$142,644
CWWS Stockton, Inc.	ISP	Nov 1995	**20,000	25,000	141,133
Northcoast Internet	ISP	May 1996	343,706	257,780	271,496
Optimal Systems, Inc.	Consulting	May 1996	201,334	151,001	140,733
ITI2 Inc	ISP	Aug 1996	72,000	90,000	59,569
Western Internet, Inc.	ISP	Feb 1997	72,000	126,000	133,346
Computer Link, Inc.	Publication	May 1997	46,934	105,602	104,665
Tidepool Internet	ISP	July 1997	20,658	46,480	69,315
Infostructure, Inc.	ISP	Jan 1998	39,090	214,995	576,635
Frontier Internet	ISP	Sept 1998	28,900	159,000	791,113
Budget Internet	ISP	Sept 1998	—	—	496,699

Year ending March 31,
2000		$298,616
2001		171,281
2003		32,053
2004		950

		$580,444

	Year ended March 31, 1998		Year ended March 31, 1997
Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:
Net loss	$(2,902,480	)	$(1,269,620	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Depreciation	225,727		68,099
Amortization of goodwill	324,922		165,161
Securities issued for services	521,066		321,977
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(63,980	)	12,372
Inventory	36,155		—
Other current assets	(6,942	)	(17,814	)
Accounts payable	477,023		265,213
Accrued expenses	365,870		120,222
Equipment financing	(57,279	)	—

Total adjustments	1,822,562		935,230

Net cash used for operating activities	(1,079,918	)	(334,390	)

Cash flows provided by (used for) investing activities:
Purchases of equipment	(305,725	)	(351,881	)
Acquisition of goodwill	(410,000	)	(10,000	)
Other assets	—		70,780

Net cash used for investing activities	(715,725	)	(291,101	)

Cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities:
Issuance of common stock	1,312,625		574,942
Proceeds from notes payable	635,612		55,081
Redemption of preferred stock	(16,150	)	—

Net cash provided by financing activities	1,932,087		630,023

Net increase in cash	136,444		4,532
Cash, beginning of year	25,120		20,588

Cash, end of year	$ 161,564		$ 25,120

Supplemental disclosures of noncash transactions:
Stock issued for net asset acquisitions	$ 107,450		$ 115,112

Stock issued for Goodwill	$ 448,291		$ 601,461

Seller financed equipment contract	$ —		$ 827,575

Preferred stock redemption liability	$ 177,000		$ —

	1998	1997
Acquisition note payable to the former owners of Infostructure.
Interest at 8.5%, interest only payments due monthly, secured by the company acquired. This note was paid in full on February 12, 1999	$290,000	$ —

Note convertible into stock at $11 per share, interest at 8.5%.

This note was paid in full on December 16, 1998	250,000	—

Working capital loans (5) of subsidiary operations, interest from 0% to 18%, partially secured by various assets of the Company, due in various installments through May 2002	119,007	46,196

Unsecured note, interest at 8.5%. This note was paid in full on June 15, 1998	50,000	—

Unsecured note payable to a shareholder of the Company. Interest at 14%, principal and interest were paid in full on June 15, 1998	30,000	30,000

8% note payable to a shareholder of the Company, secured by certain equipment, due September 1997	25,000	40,000

Acquisition note payable to the former owner of Northcoast Internet. Interest at 11%, monthly payments of $1,200, secured by certain equipment of the Company. This note was paid in full March 1, 1999	13,289	25,488

	777,296	141,684
Less current maturities	745,959	—

	$ 31,337	$141,684

	Shares available For options	Number of outstanding shares	Option price range per share	Weighted average exercise price	Weighted average remaining life
Plan adoption—October 1995	600,000
Granted	-184,800	184,800	$ .50–1.50	$0.87
Forfeitures	16,000	-16,000	$ .50–1.25	$0.78

Balance —March 31, 1996	431,200	168,800	$ .50–1.50	$0.87	5.99

Accretion	79,655
Granted	-127,400	127,400	$1.50 –3.50	$2.01
Forfeitures	10,000	-10,000	$1.50 –1.50	$1.50

Balance —March 31, 1997	393,455	286,200	$ .50–3.50	$1.41	5.40

Accretion	100,930
Granted	-53,000	53,000	$4.50 –5.00	$4.78
Forfeitures	13,500	-13,500	$1.50 –4.50	$3.50

Balance —March 31, 1998	454,885	325,700	$ .50–5.00	$1.93	3.17

Year ending March 31,
1999		$ 62,508
2000		42,568
2001		17,468
2002		9,229
2003		6,600
Beyond five years		40,200

		$178,573

		Amount to be Paid
SEC registration fee		$ 3,058
California registration fee		2,500
NASD filing fee		1,600
Legal fees and expenses		250,000
Accounting fees and expenses		15,000
Printing		30,000
Transfer agent fees		20,000
Miscellaneous		10,000

Total		$332,158

Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Internet Ventures*

3.2		Bylaws of Internet Ventures*

4.1		Specimen common stock certificate*

4.2		Form of 12% Convertible Debenture of Internet Ventures*

5		Opinion of Katten Muchin & Zavis as to the legality of the securities being registered (including consent)(1)

10.1		Internet Ventures Inc. Executive Stock Incentive Plan, as amended*

10.2		Internet Ventures Inc. 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended*

10.3		Internet Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended*

10.4		Wireless Cable Internet Revenue Sharing Agreement between Internet Ventures and American Telecasting of Medford, Inc. dated October 8, 1997*

10.5		Basic Provisions Agreement and Plan of Merger among Badas Technologies, Inc. dba Infostructure, Internet Ventures Oregon, Inc. and Internet Ventures dated December 22, 1997*

10.6		Stock Pledge Agreement among Internet Ventures Oregon, Inc. and Internet Ventures and Jorge Yant and Robert Down as trustees for the former shareholders of Badas Technologies, Inc. dated December 22, 1997*

10.7		Stock Purchase Agreement between Internet Ventures and certain stockholders of DurangoNet, Inc. dated September 3, 1998*

10.8		Stock Purchase Agreement between Internet Ventures and the former stockholder of Oregon Wilderness Delivery Service, Inc. dated September 11, 1998*

10.9		Co-Branding and Marketing Agreement between LookSmart, Ltd. and Internet Ventures dated January 4, 1999*

10.10		Cable Internet Revenue Sharing Agreement between DurangoNet, Inc. dba Frontier Internet, a wholly owned subsidiary of Internet Ventures, and Hermosa Cablevision, Inc. dated May 26, 1999*

Exhibit Number		Description
10.11		Membership Agreement between iBeam Broadcasting Corporation and Internet Ventures, Inc. dated August 23, 1999*

10.12		Asset Purchase Agreement between Internet Ventures, Inc. and Ronald E. Miller, dba Tomato Web Online, dated September 15, 1999, as amended September 15, 1999*

10.13		Stock Purchase Agreement between Innercite, Inc. and Internet Ventures, Inc., dated September 17, 1999*

10.14		Cable Internet Agreement between Internet Ventures, Inc. and CoxCom, Inc., d/b/a Cox Communications, dated January 14, 1998*

10.15		Letter of Agreement between Eastern Washington University, Davis Communications, Inc., and Optimal Systems Integrators, Inc., dated July 11, 1997*

10.16		Cooperative Agreement between the City of Ashland, by and through its Department of Electric Utilities, Ashland Fiber Network Division and Internet Ventures Oregon, Inc., dated July 9, 1999*

16		Letter from Arthur Andersen LLP dated October 8, 1999*

21		Subsidiaries of the Registrant*

23.1		Consent of Stonefield Josephson, Inc.*

23.2		Consent Katten Muchin & Zavis (contained in its opinion filed as Exhibit 5)

24		Power of Attorney (included on signature page)

27		Financial Data Schedule*

Signature	Title	Date

/ S / DONALD A. JANKE ^{Donald A. Janke}	Chairman of the Board and President (principal executive officer)	October 22, 1999


/ S / MARSHALL F. SPARKS ^{Marshall F. Sparks}	Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) and Director	October 22, 1999


/ S / DANIEL R. DI MICCO ^{Daniel R. DiMicco}	Director	October 22, 1999


/ S / ALFRED M. LEOPOLD ^{Alfred M. Leopold}	Director	October 22, 1999