def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
2011
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and Proxy Statement
To be Held on May 11, 2011
Dear Shareholder:
We invite you to attend our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Wednesday, May 11, 2011, in
Cincinnati, Ohio. In connection with the meeting, we will report on our operations and you will
have an opportunity to meet your Companys directors and senior executives.
This booklet includes the formal notice of the meeting and the proxy statement. The proxy
statement tells you more about the agenda and procedures for the meeting. It also describes how
your Board of Directors operates and provides information about the director candidates.
We are pleased once again to take advantage of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules
that allow companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are
mailing to most of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the
Notice) instead of a paper copy of this proxy statement and our 2010 Annual Report. The Notice
contains instructions on how to access and review those documents over the Internet. The Notice
also instructs you on how to submit your proxy over the Internet. We believe that this process
will allow us to provide our shareholders with the information they need in a more timely manner,
while reducing the environmental impact and lowering the costs of printing and distributing our
proxy materials. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our
proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the
Notice.
We want your shares to be represented at the meeting and urge you to vote using our Internet
or telephone voting systems or by promptly returning a properly completed proxy card.
Sincerely,
Karl J. Grafe
Vice President & Secretary
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 25, 2011
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
OF AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
Wednesday, May 11, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
11:30 a.m., Cincinnati, Ohio Time |
|
|
|
|
|
Place: |
|
The Cincinnatian Hotel
Second Floor Filson Room
601 Vine Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose:
|
|
1.
|
|
Elect ten directors |
|
|
2.
|
|
Ratify Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
3.
|
|
Approve the Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan |
|
|
4.
|
|
Approve the Annual Senior Executive Bonus Plan |
|
|
5.
|
|
Conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation (Say-on-Pay) |
|
|
6.
|
|
Conduct an advisory vote on the frequency of holding future advisory votes on executive compensation (Say When on Pay) |
|
|
7.
|
|
Consider two shareholder proposals, if properly presented |
|
|
8.
|
|
Conduct other business if properly raised |
|
|
|
|
|
Record Date: |
|
March 15, 2011 - Shareholders registered in the records of the
Company or its agents on that date are entitled to receive notice
of and to vote at the meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mailing Date: |
|
The approximate mailing date of the notice of availability of this
proxy statement and accompanying proxy card is April 1, 2011. |
Your vote is important.
If you are a shareholder of record, you can vote your shares via the Internet or by using a
toll-free telephone number by following the instructions on your proxy card. If voting by mail,
please complete, date and sign your proxy card and return it as soon as possible in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope.
Because rules governing how brokers may vote your shares have recently changed, brokers may no
longer use discretionary authority to vote your shares on the election of directors if they have
not received instructions from you. Please vote your proxy so that your vote may be counted.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company makes available, on its website, all of its filings that are made
electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including Forms
10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. To access these filings, go to the Companys website
(www.AFGinc.com) and click on the Investor Relations in the top of the home page
and select SEC Filings from the menu. Copies of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, including financial statements and
schedules, filed with the SEC, are also available without charge to shareholders
upon written request addressed to:
Investor Relations
American Financial Group, Inc.
301 East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
GENERAL INFORMATION
Record Date; Shares Outstanding
As of March 15, 2011, the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of and
to vote at the meeting, the Company had 103,886,069 shares of common stock outstanding and eligible
to vote. This number does not include 14,940,627 shares held by subsidiaries of AFG which, under
Ohio law, are not entitled to vote and are not considered to be outstanding for purposes of the
meeting. Each share of outstanding common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter to be
presented at the meeting. Abstentions (including instructions to withhold authority to vote for one
or more nominees) and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining a quorum but will
not be considered votes cast on a proposal. Broker non-votes occur when a broker returns a proxy
card but does not have authority to vote on a particular proposal. Broker non-votes will not
affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the meeting.
Proxies and Voting Procedures
Shareholders of record can vote by mail, via the Internet or by telephone. Internet and
telephone voting information is provided on the proxy card. If you vote via the Internet or by
telephone, please do not return a signed proxy card. Shareholders who hold their shares through a
bank or broker can vote by mail, or via the Internet or by telephone if these options are offered
by the bank or broker. You may vote by telephone or Internet 24 hours a day, 7 days a week until
11:59 p.m., Cincinnati, Ohio time, the day before the meeting. Your telephone or Internet vote
authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you had executed a proxy
card.
If voting by mail, please complete, sign, date and return your proxy card enclosed with the
proxy statement in the accompanying postage-paid envelope.
If your shares are held in the name of your broker or bank and you wish to vote in person at
the meeting, you should request your broker or bank to issue you a proxy covering your shares.
Solicitation of proxies through the mail, in person and otherwise, is being made by management
at the direction of AFGs Board of Directors, without additional compensation. AFG will pay all
costs of soliciting proxies. In addition, AFG will request brokers and other custodians, nominees
and fiduciaries to forward proxy-soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares held of
record by such persons, and AFG will reimburse them for their expenses.
If a choice is specified on a properly executed proxy card, the shares will be voted
accordingly. If a proxy card is signed without a preference indicated, those shares will be voted
in accordance with the recommendations of our Board of Directors, namely FOR the election of the
ten nominees proposed for the Board of Directors, FOR the ratification of the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm, FOR the approval of the Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan,
FOR the approval of the Annual Senior Executive Bonus Plan, FOR the approval, on an advisory
basis, of executive compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, FOR a frequency of every
year for future advisory votes on executive compensation, and AGAINST each of the shareholder
proposals, if properly presented. If any other matters properly come before the meeting or any
postponement or adjournment of the meeting, each properly executed proxy card will be voted in the
discretion of the named proxies. Management has not received proper notice of any matters to be
presented at the meeting other than those proposed in this proxy statement.
Banks or brokers holding shares for beneficial owners must vote those shares as instructed.
If the bank or broker has not received instructions from you, the beneficial owner, the bank or
broker generally has discretionary voting power only with respect to the ratification of
appointment of the independent registered public accountants. It is therefore important that you
provide instructions to your bank or broker if your shares are held by such a bank or broker so
that your vote with respect to all other matters is counted.
Votes Required
With respect to Proposal No. 1, the ten nominees who receive the greatest number of votes will
be elected. Abstentions will not count as a vote for or against a nominee.
The advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes (every year, every two years or every
three years) (Proposal No. 6) is a plurality vote, and we will consider shareholders to have
expressed a non-binding preference for the frequency option that receives the most favorable votes.
Abstentions will have the same effect as not expressing a preference.
Approval of all other matters at the meeting, including approval on an advisory basis of our
executive compensation (Proposal No. 5), or of postponement or adjournment, require the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions will not be counted either for or against these
proposals.
Retirement and Savings Plan Participants
If you are a participant in the Companys retirement and savings plan with a balance in the
AFG Common Stock Fund, the accompanying proxy card shows the number of shares of common stock
attributed to your account balance, calculated as of the record date. In order for your plan
shares to be voted in your discretion, you must vote at least two business days prior to the day of
the meeting (by the end of the day on May 8, 2011) either by Internet, telephone, or returned
properly signed proxy card. If you choose not to vote or if you return an invalid or unvoted proxy
card, the Administrative Plan Committee, consisting of four senior executive officers of the
Company, will vote your plan shares in the Committees sole discretion. Individual plan
participants votes will be processed by the plan trustee, and will not be disclosed to the
Company.
Revoking a Proxy
Whether you vote by mail, via the Internet or by telephone, you may revoke your proxy at any
time before it is voted by submitting a new proxy with a later date, voting via the Internet or by
telephone at a later time, delivering a written notice of revocation to the Companys Secretary, at
the address set forth under Communication with Directors on page 46, or by voting in person at
the meeting.
Cumulative Voting
Shareholders have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors and one vote per share
on all other matters. Cumulative voting allows a shareholder to multiply the number of shares
owned on the record date by the number of directors to be elected and to cast the total for one
nominee or distribute the votes among the nominees as the shareholder desires. The ten nominees
who receive the greatest number of votes will be elected. In order to invoke cumulative voting,
notice of cumulative voting must be given in writing to the Companys corporate secretary not less
than 48 hours before the time fixed for the holding of the meeting. The authority solicited by
this proxy statement includes discretionary authority to cumulate votes in the election of
directors.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED
|
|
|
Proposal No. 1 ► |
|
Elect Ten Directors |
The Board of Directors oversees the management of the Company on your behalf. The Board
reviews AFGs long-term strategic plans and exercises direct decision-making authority in key areas
such as choosing the Co-Chief Executive Officers, setting the scope of their authority to manage
the Companys business day-to-day, and evaluating senior management performance.
Upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, the Board of Directors has
nominated ten individuals to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until
their successors are elected and qualified. If any of the nominees should become unable to serve
as a director, the proxies will be voted for any substitute nominee designated by the Board of
Directors but, in any event, no proxy may be voted for more than ten nominees. Each nominee is a
current director and
brings a strong and unique background and set of qualifications to the Board, giving the Board
as a whole competence and experience in a wide variety of areas central to the Companys
businesses, including corporate governance and board service, executive management and
entrepreneurial experience and insurance, finance and accounting expertise.
- 2 -
The nominees for election to the Board of Directors are:
|
|
|
Carl H. Lindner
Director since 1959
|
|
Mr. Lindner is our Chairman of the Board, and until
January 2005, also served as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company. Mr. Lindner began working in 1940 in
his familys Norwood, Ohio cash-and-carry dairy
market. That store was the origin of the Lindner
familys United Dairy Farmers, Inc. convenience store
chain and launched Mr. Lindners career as self-made
businessman and entrepreneur. Mr. Lindner founded
American Financial Corporation (AFC), the
predecessor to the Company. Mr. Lindner served as
AFCs Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer from its founding in 1959, leading its entry
into the insurance industry. Mr. Lindner previously
served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Great
American Financial Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of
the Company that markets tax-deferred annuities
principally to employees of educational institutions
and offers supplemental insurance products, until it
became a private company in 2007. He was inducted
into the Greater Cincinnati Business Hall of Fame in
2008. Mr. Lindners career, first as a self-made
businessman and entrepreneur, next as an established
principal executive officer during the growth of
privately-held and publicly traded companies, and,
most importantly, as the founder and driving vision
behind the Company, uniquely qualifies him to serve
as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Company. |
|
|
|
Carl H. Lindner III
Director since 1991
|
|
Mr. Lindner has been Co-Chief Executive Officer and
Co-President since January 2005, and since 1996, he
has served as Co-President of the Company. Until
2010, for over ten years, Mr. Lindner served as
President, and since 2010, Mr. Lindner has served as
Chairman of Great American Insurance Company, a
subsidiary of the Company, and has been principally
responsible for the Companys property and casualty
insurance operations. The Board believes that Mr.
Lindners familiarity with the Company as a whole, as
well as his experience and expertise in its core
property and casualty insurance businesses, makes his
service on the Board of Directors extremely
beneficial to the Company. |
|
|
|
S. Craig Lindner
Director since 1985
|
|
Mr. Lindner has been Co-Chief Executive Officer and
Co-President since January 2005, and since 1996, he
has served as Co-President of the Company. For more
than ten years, Mr. Lindner has been President of our
Great American Financial Resources, Inc. subsidiary,
and has been principally responsible for the
Companys annuity and supplemental health insurance
operations. Until 2011, for over ten years, Mr.
Lindner served as President, and since 2011, Mr.
Lindner has served as Chairman, of American Money
Management Corporation, a subsidiary that provides
investment services for the Company and certain of
its affiliated companies. Until April 2007, Mr.
Lindner was a director of National City Corp. (now a
part of PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.). The
Board believes that Mr. Lindners familiarity with
the Company as a whole, as well as his experience and
expertise in its core annuity and supplemental health
insurance operations and the Companys investment
portfolio, makes his service on the Board of
Directors extremely beneficial to the Company. |
|
|
|
Kenneth C. Ambrecht
Director since 2005
|
|
(Member of the Compensation Committee; Member of the
Corporate Governance Committee) Mr. Ambrecht has
extensive corporate finance experience having worked
in the U.S. capital markets for over 30 years. In
December 2005, Mr. Ambrecht organized KCA Associates
LLC, through which he serves as a consultant to
several companies, advising them with respect to
financial transactions. From July 2004 to December
2005, he served as a Managing Director with the
investment banking firm First Albany Capital. For
more than five years prior, Mr. Ambrecht was a
Managing Director with Royal Bank Canada Capital
Markets. Prior to that post, Mr. Ambrecht worked
with the investment bank Lehman Brothers as Managing
Director of its capital markets division. In
September 2009, he joined the Board of Directors of
Spectrum Brands, Inc., a global consumer products
company. For more than five years, Mr. Ambrecht has
been a member of the Board of Directors of Fortescue
Metals Group Limited, an Australian mining company.
Until February 2010, he served on the Board of
Directors of Dominion Petroleum Ltd., a Bermuda
domiciled company dedicated to exploration of oil and
gas reserves in east and central Africa and until
2007 he was a member of the Board of Directors of
Great American Financial Resources, Inc. The Board
believes that Mr. Ambrechts knowledge and experience
in the areas of corporate finance, capital markets,
capital structures and investment portfolio
management benefit the Company in light of its
businesses. |
- 3 -
|
|
|
Theodore H. Emmerich
Director since 1988
|
|
(Chairman of the Audit Committee) Prior to his
retirement in 1986, Mr. Emmerich was managing partner
of the Cincinnati office of the independent
accounting firm of Ernst & Whinney, a predecessor to
Ernst & Young. He currently serves on the Board of
Trustees of the Christ Hospital, Christ Hospital
Foundation, the University of Cincinnati Foundation,
and as President and Treasurer of the Elizabeth
Gamble Deaconess Home Association, each in
Cincinnati, Ohio. He formerly served as a director
of Summit Mutual Funds, Inc., Victory Mutual Funds,
Inc., American Steel & Wire Corp., and Citicasters,
Inc. In his capacity as a certified public
accountant and managing partner of Ernst and Whinney,
Mr. Emmerich developed significant experience in
preparing, auditing, analyzing and evaluating
financial statements that present a breadth and level
of complexity of accounting issues that compare to
those of the Company and qualify him as an audit
committee financial expert under SEC guidelines.
Mr. Emmerichs experience with one of the Big Four
accounting firms, both as a certified public
accountant and in a managerial role, qualify him for
membership on the Companys Board and Audit
Committee. The Board believes that the Company
benefits from Mr. Emmerichs understanding of
accounting and financial reporting, disclosures and
controls, and managerial experience, all of which
began in his years with Ernst and Whinney. |
|
|
|
James E. Evans
Director since 1985
|
|
For more than ten years, Mr. Evans has served as
Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the
Company. Prior to that he also served as Vice
President and General Counsel of AFC beginning in
1976. Mr. Evans also previously served on the Boards
of Directors of The Penn Central Corporation,
Citicasters, Inc. and other affiliated companies. He
began his career in the private practice of law with
Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL in 1971. The Board
believes that Mr. Evans many years of experience
with legal and business issues involving the Company
specifically, as well as his legal and business
expertise generally, render his Board service
invaluable to the Company. |
|
|
|
Terry S. Jacobs
Director since 2003
|
|
(Chairman of the Compensation Committee; Member of
the Audit Committee) Mr. Jacobs has served as
Chairman and CEO of The JFP Group, LLC, a real estate
development company, since September 2005. From
September 2008 through December 2010, he served as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and since
December 2010 he has served as Chairman Emeritus and
Founder of Jamos Capital, LLC, a private equity firm
specializing in alternative investment strategies.
From its founding in 1996 until September 2005, Mr.
Jacobs was Chairman of the Board and CEO of Regent
Communications, Inc., a holding company in the radio
broadcasting business (Regent). Since September
2010, he has served as non-executive Chairman of the
Board of Adelante Media Group, LLC, a private company
which owns and operates radio and television stations
and specializes in Spanish language programming. Mr.
Jacobs is a Fellow of the Casualty Actuarial Society,
a professional organization focused on applying
actuarial science to property, casualty and similar
risk exposures and a Member of the American Academy
of Actuaries. For more than five years he has served
as a director of Global Entertainment Corp. and he
has served on the Board of the National Football
Foundation and College Hall of Fame, Inc. Mr. Jacobs
was a director of Capital Title Group, Inc. until its
merger with Landamerica Financial Group, Inc. in
2006. Mr. Jacobs service with Regent, as well as
principal executive officer experience at two
privately-held companies, qualify him for membership
on the Companys Board and as an audit committee
financial expert under SEC guidelines.
Specifically, Mr. Jacobs position at Regent provided
him with significant knowledge of and experience in
capital management and allocation, public company
financial statement preparation and strategic
investment, the latter of which is also bolstered by
Mr. Jacobs private equity experience. Through his
memberships as a Fellow of the Casualty Actuarial
Society, a professional organization focused on
applying actuarial science to property, casualty and
similar risk exposures, and with the American Academy
of Actuaries, Mr. Jacobs has developed significant
experience in understanding and critically assessing
risks in the property and casualty insurance
industry, which the Board believes is valuable to the
Company. |
- 4 -
|
|
|
Gregory G. Joseph
Director Since 2008
|
|
(Member of the Audit Committee; Member of the
Corporate Governance Committee) For more than five
years, Mr. Joseph has been Executive Vice President,
an attorney, and a principal of Joseph Automotive
Group, a Cincinnati, Ohio-based company that manages a
number of automobile dealerships and certain real
estate holdings. From February 2003 until May 2008,
he served on the board of directors of Infinity
Property & Casualty Corporation (IPCC), an insurance
company primarily offering personal automobile
insurance, the last two years as the lead director.
Since 2005, Mr. Joseph has served on the Board of
Trustees of Xavier University, a private university
located in Cincinnati, Ohio. Mr. Josephs service as
the lead director of another publicly traded provider
of insurance products qualifies him for membership on
the Companys Board. Specifically, Mr. Josephs
service at IPCC provided him with significant
knowledge of and experience in the business operations
of a publicly-traded insurance holding company, which
is beneficial to the Company in light of the many
issues applicable to the insurance industry. |
|
|
|
William W. Verity
Director since 2002
|
|
(Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee;
Member of the Compensation Committee) Mr. Verity has
been President of Verity & Verity, LLC (formerly known
as Veritas Asset Management, LLC), an investment
management company, since January 1, 2002, and prior
to that, he was a partner of Pathway Guidance L.L.C.,
an executive consulting firm, from October 2000.
Previously, Mr. Verity was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of ENCOR Holdings, Inc., a developer
and manufacturer of plastic molded components and
worked as an associate in corporate finance at Alex.
Brown & Sons, an investment bank, from 1985 to 1987.
From 1994 to 2002, he served on the Board of Directors
of Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (Chiquita), a
leading international food products marketer and
distributor. Mr. Veritys position as the principal
executive officer of a privately held company, his
nine years of experience with complex asset management
issues as a result of his position with Verity &
Verity, LLC, and his service on the Board of Chiquita,
an NYSE listed, Fortune 500 company, qualify him for
membership on the Companys Board and Corporate
Governance and Compensation Committees. In addition,
Mr. Veritys executive consulting experience provides
him insight into high-level corporate governance,
executive compensation matters and business management
matters, all of which the Company and the Board deal
with on a regular basis. |
|
|
|
John I. Von Lehman
Director since 2008
|
|
(Member of the Audit Committee, Member of the
Corporate Governance Committee) Mr. Von Lehman began
his career as a certified public accountant for
Haskins & Sells, a predecessor of Deloitte, LLP. For
more than five years until his retirement in 2007, Mr.
Von Lehman served as Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and a director of The
Midland Company, an Ohio-based provider of specialty
insurance products (Midland). He serves on the
Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of Ohio
National Mutual Funds and a number of Cincinnati-based
charitable organizations. Mr. Von Lehmans 18 years
of service as CFO and director of another publicly
traded provider of insurance products qualifies him
for membership on the Companys Board. Specifically,
Mr. Von Lehmans position at Midland provided him with
significant knowledge of and experience in property
and casualty insurance operations, investment
portfolio oversight, capital management and allocation
and public company financial statement preparation.
In his capacity as a certified public accountant and
Chief Financial Officer of Midland, Mr. Von Lehman
developed significant experience in preparing,
auditing, analyzing and evaluating financial
statements that present a breadth and level of
complexity of accounting issues that compare to those
of the Company and which qualify him as an audit
committee financial expert under SEC guidelines. The
depth in his understanding of internal control over
financial reporting and risk assessment skills that
evolved in his experience with Midland constitute
attributes that the Board believes benefit the Company
in light of its businesses. |
Carl H. Lindner is the father of Carl H. Lindner III and S. Craig Lindner. All of the
nominees were elected directors at the last annual meeting of shareholders of the Company held on
May 12, 2010. See Securities Ownership, Corporate Governance and Executive
CompensationDirector Compensation below for additional information concerning the background,
securities holdings, remuneration and other matters relating to the nominees.
Certain entities affiliated with the JFP Group, LLC are involved in related civil actions
brought by lenders to commercial real estate development projects owned or managed by JFP Group,
LLC or its affiliates. Mr. Jacobs is a member, manager or guarantor of each of these entities.
This litigation has resulted in several foreclosure actions, and in at least two cases, the
appointment of a receiver to oversee
properties. A number of the affected properties have been sold, and all related claims have
been settled. Settlement negotiations are ongoing with respect to continuing litigation and
underlying loans, and in certain cases, JFP Group, LLC has asserted various counterclaims. The
Board has reviewed these actions and determined that they are not an impediment to Mr. Jacobs
ability to faithfully and productively serve as a director of the Company.
- 5 -
In March 2002, Chiquita completed a comprehensive financial restructuring that included a
prepackaged plan of reorganization filed in November of the prior year under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code. Carl H. Lindner was an executive officer of Chiquita at the time of the filing.
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of these ten nominees as
directors.
|
|
|
Proposal No. 2 ► |
|
Ratification of the Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
The Companys Audit Committee Charter provides that the Audit Committee shall appoint annually
an independent registered public accounting firm to serve as auditors. In February 2011, the Audit
Committee appointed Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Companys registered public accounting firm
for 2011.
Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint auditors, shareholders are
being asked to ratify this appointment. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment, the
Audit Committee will take that fact into consideration but may, nevertheless, continue to retain
Ernst & Young. However, the Audit Committee in its discretion may engage a different registered
public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a
change would be in the best interests of the Company whether or not the shareholders ratify the
appointment.
Audit Fees and Non-Audit Fees
The following table presents fees for professional services performed by Ernst & Young for the
years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Audit fees (1) |
|
$ |
5,623,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,740,000 |
|
Audit related fees (2) |
|
|
302,000 |
|
|
|
169,000 |
|
Tax fees (3) |
|
|
87,000 |
|
|
|
53,000 |
|
All other fees |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,024,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,974,000 |
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
These aggregate fees were for audits of the financial statements
(including services incurred to render an opinion under Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), subsidiary insurance company audits, reviews of SEC
filings, and quarterly reviews. |
|
2. |
|
These fees related to SAS 70 internal audit reports and due diligence
services. |
|
3. |
|
These fees relate primarily to review of federal and state tax
returns. |
Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be at the meeting and will be given the
opportunity to make a statement if they so desire. They will also be available to respond to
appropriate questions from shareholders.
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the ratification of the Audit
Committees appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm for
2011.
- 6 -
|
|
|
Proposal No. 3 ► |
|
Proposal to Approve the Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan |
Shareholders are being asked to approve the Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan (the Equity Bonus
Plan). The following description of the material terms of the Equity Bonus Plan is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the complete text set forth in Annex A.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (as used in this Proposal No. 3 and the
immediately following Proposal No. 4, the Committee) established the Equity Bonus Plan to benefit
the shareholders of the Company by promoting extraordinary levels of corporate performance and by
incentivizing the Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company through the potential for
performance-based equity compensation as a component of their compensation.
The Equity Bonus Plan replaces the Annual Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan (the 2009 Plan) approved
by shareholders at our 2009 annual meeting. The 2009 Plan was designed to award equity
compensation to our Co-Chief Executive Officers based on the satisfaction of annual performance
conditions. The Equity Bonus Plan differs from the 2009 Plan primarily by permitting the Committee
to grant equity awards over performance periods of at least one and as many as five years.
The Committee intends to adopt rolling three-year performance periods, but in order to retain
an equity compensation component for the Co-Chief Executive Officers in the two years preceding the
end of the initial three-year performance period, the Committee will approve performance goals
based on one year (2011), two year (2011 and 2012) and three year (2011 through 2013) performance.
Beginning with the establishment of performance criteria next year, the Committee will annually
determine, typically within 90 days of the end of the previous year, three-year performance goals.
In its consideration of the Equity Bonus Plan and an appropriate performance period, the
Committee noted the Companys three-year total shareholder returns (including the reinvestment of
dividends) against various peer groups (including the Compensation Peer Group as defined under
Compensation Discussion and Analysis) as follows:
The Equity Bonus Plan is structured to satisfy the requirements for performance-based
compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, so that we may
preserve our ability to deduct for tax purposes such compensation awarded in excess of $1 million
to certain top paid executives. We expect that awards of common stock under the Equity Bonus Plan
will be fully deductible for tax purposes, but we make no assurances in this regard. Section 162(m)
requires that certain material terms of the plan, including the eligibility, performance measures
for establishing performance targets for applicable awards, and maximum amounts payable, be
approved by our shareholders. In addition, the Plan is subject to shareholder approval under the
NYSEs and NASDAQs listing requirements.
- 7 -
Under the Equity Bonus Plan, the Company may grant bonus awards in the form of shares of
common stock of the Company to the Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, the only
participants in the Equity Bonus Plan, based on the satisfaction of pre-established performance
criteria determined by the Committee.
Administration. The Equity Bonus Plan is administered by the Committee, which is composed
solely of three outside directors as defined under Section 162(m). The Committee has exclusive
power to determine the conditions (including the specific annual performance goals consistent with
the Equity Bonus Plan) to which the payment of the bonuses under the Equity Bonus Plan may be
subject and to certify that performance goals are attained.
Performance Criteria and Goals. The Committee has flexibility under the Equity Bonus Plan to
base awards on performance criteria involving one or more of the following performance-based
business criteria, either on a Company, subsidiary, division, business unit or line of business
basis or in comparison with peer group performance or to an index, as the Committee deems
appropriate: net income or operating income; net income per share or operating income per share;
aggregate or per-share
book value or adjusted book value; written premiums (net or gross); return measures
(including, but not limited to, return on assets, investment portfolio, capital, invested capital,
equity, sales, or premiums); cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free
cash flow, and cash flow return on capital); combined ratios; share price (including, but not
limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return); and increase in or maintenance of the
Companys market share. In the discretion of the Committee at the time of the grant of an award,
any performance objective may be calculated after accounting for specified adjustments.
The Committee initially plans to utilize one performance criterionbook value per share
growth versus the book value per share growth of the peer group set forth below. The book value
per share comparisons will negate the effects of dividends and accounting changes. The Committee
will base initial goals on this performance metric, but with respect to future awards, the
Committee has discretion to utilize one or more of the performance criteria set forth above. The
peer group, which was designed to approximate the Companys business mix of property and casualty
insurance and annuities and supplemental health insurance, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ace Limited
|
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
Alleghany Corp.
|
|
Horace Mann Educators Corp. |
|
|
American Equity Investment Life Holding Co.
|
|
Lincoln National Corp. |
|
|
American National Insurance Co.
|
|
Markel Corporation |
|
|
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
|
|
Metlife Inc. |
|
|
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
National Western Life Insurance Co. |
|
|
Baldwin & Lyons Inc.
|
|
Presidential Life Corp. |
|
|
The Chubb Corporation
|
|
Protective Life Corp. |
|
|
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
|
|
RLI Corp. |
|
|
CNA Financial Corporation
|
|
Travelers Companies, Inc. |
|
|
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
W.R. Berkley Corporation |
|
|
Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
|
|
XL Group plc |
|
|
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
|
|
The Committee determines the performance period and evaluates the performance criteria, then
establishes a performance goal and allocates a bonus amount to be awarded upon attainment of each
performance goal. The Committee may also structure goals with multiple potential levels of
achievement.
In order to receive the bonus amount allocated to a particular performance goal or level, that
goal or level must have been fully met, or exceeded, for the plan year. If not met or satisfied,
the award tied to a goal or level will not be payable. Further, under the Equity Bonus Plan,
neither the Board nor the Committee retains any discretion to pay an excess amount above the
established bonus amounts or to award any portion of the bonus amount allocated to a performance
goal which has not been met by a participant.
- 8 -
As soon as practicable after the end of a calendar year, but no later than March 31, the
Committee will certify in writing whether or not the performance goals of the participants have
been attained and shall report to the Board the bonus amount, if any, to be paid in shares to each
participant. The value of a share for purposes of determining the number of shares to be awarded
is to be valued based on the closing price of the shares on the date of determination of the bonus
amount by the Committee. The maximum amount which may be awarded to any participant in any year is
$6,000,000.
Up to 1,500,000 shares have been authorized for issuance under the Equity Bonus Plan, which
number may be adjusted by the Committee in the event of certain corporate changes affecting AFG
common stock. Two million shares were previously authorized for issuance under the 2009 Plan, of
which 329,566 shares were issued prior to its termination upon adoption of the Equity Bonus Plan.
If our shareholders do not approve the Equity Bonus Plan, the Committee may still approve cash
or equity incentive compensation for our Co-Chief Executive Officers achievement of the objectives
set forth in the Equity Bonus Plan in order to maintain the market competitiveness of the Companys
executive compensation program. However, some of the amounts awarded under a plan not approved by
shareholders may not be deductible as set forth in Section 162(m), which would result in an
increase to our corporate tax liability.
Amendment and Termination. The Equity Bonus Plan has been adopted and approved by the
Committee and will remain effective, unless earlier terminated by the Board, until all shares
authorized under the Equity Bonus Plan have been issued. The Board may at any time amend, suspend
or terminate the Equity Bonus Plan. Any amendment or revision to the Equity Bonus Plan and/or
performance goals that requires shareholder approval pursuant to Section 162(m) may be submitted to
our shareholders for approval.
Recoupment of Awards. In the event of a restatement of materially inaccurate financial
results, the Committee has the discretion to recover bonus awards that were paid under the Equity
Bonus Plan to a participant with respect to the period covered by the restatement. If the payment
of a bonus award would have been lower had the achievement of applicable financial performance
targets been calculated based on such restated financial results, the Committee may, if it
determines appropriate in its sole discretion, to the extent permitted by law, recover from the
participant the portion of the bonus award paid in excess of the payment that would have been made
based on the restated financial results.
Federal Income Tax Consequences. Equity Bonus Plan participants must generally recognize
ordinary income equal to the bonus received. As discussed above, subject to Section 162(m), the
Company will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount.
Acceleration of income, additional taxes, and interest apply to nonqualified deferred
compensation that is not compliant with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. To be compliant
with Section 409A rules with respect to the timing of elections to defer compensation, distribution
events and funding must be satisfied. The terms of the 2011 Plan are intended to ensure that awards
under it will not be subject to adverse tax consequences applicable to deferred compensation under
Section 409A. Subject to Section 162(m), the Company will be entitled to a deduction for the same
amount.
New Plan Benefits. Grants of awards under the Equity Bonus Plan are subject to the
certification and discretion of the Committee and are, therefore, not determinable at this time.
Each Co-CEO received $3,200,000 (94,151 shares) for 2010 under the 2009 Plan, and bonus amounts for
future years may be higher, lower or the same as bonus amounts for 2010.
- 9 -
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following reflects certain information about shares of our common stock authorized for
issuance (at December 31, 2010) under compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
future issuance under |
|
|
|
Number of securities to |
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
equity compensation |
|
|
|
be issued upon exercise |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
plans (excluding |
|
|
|
of outstanding options, |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
securities reflected in |
|
Plan category |
|
warrants, and rights |
|
|
warrants, and rights |
|
|
column (a) |
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
8,484,233 |
|
|
$ |
24.98 |
|
|
|
8,358,271 |
(1) |
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,112 |
(2) |
Total |
|
|
8,484,233 |
|
|
$ |
24.98 |
|
|
|
8,679,383 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 1.67 million shares available for issuance under the 2009 Plan (terminated in
2011), 3.7 million shares available for issuance under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, 2.8
million shares issuable under AFGs Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 49,821 shares issuable
under AFGs Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan at December 31, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents shares issuable under AFGs Deferred Compensation Plan. Under this plan,
certain employees of AFG and its subsidiaries may defer up to 80% of their annual salary
and/or bonus. Participants may elect to have the value of deferrals (i) earn a return
equal to the overall performance of mutual fund alternatives,
(ii) earn a fixed rate of interest, set annually by the Board of Directors, or (iii)
fluctuate based on the market value of AFG common stock, as adjusted to reflect stock
splits, distributions and dividends. |
The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the
Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan.
- 10 -
|
|
|
Proposal No. 4 ► |
|
Proposal to Approve the Annual Senior Executive Bonus Plan |
Shareholders are being asked to approve the Annual Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the Executive
Bonus Plan). The following description of the material terms of the Executive Bonus Plan is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text set forth in Annex B.
The Committee established the Executive Bonus Plan to benefit of the shareholders of the
Company by promoting high levels of corporate performance by including performance-based
compensation as a component of a participants annual compensation.
This Executive Bonus Plan is being presented for shareholder approval so that the compensation
expense for awards under the Executive Bonus Plan will be, to the extent permissible, tax
deductible for the Company and not subject to the $1 million deductibility threshold under Section
162(m).
Under the Executive Bonus Plan, the Company may grant cash bonus awards to the Companys
Co-Chief Executive Officers and Senior Vice Presidents, if any, the only participants in the
Executive Bonus Plan, based on the satisfaction of pre-established performance goals.
Administration. The Executive Bonus Plan is administered by the Committee, which is composed
solely of three outside directors as defined under Section 162(m). The Committee has exclusive
power to determine the conditions (including the specific annual performance goals consistent with
the Executive Bonus Plan) to which the payment of the bonuses under the Executive Bonus Plan may be
subject and to certify that performance goals are attained.
Performance Criteria and Goals. The Committee has flexibility under the Executive Bonus Plan
to base awards on performance criteria involving one or more of the following performance-based
business criteria, either on a Company, subsidiary, division, business unit or line of business
basis or in comparison with peer group performance or to an index, as the Committee deems
appropriate: net income or operating income; net income per share or operating income per share;
aggregate or per-share book value or adjusted book value; written premiums (net or gross); return
measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, investment portfolio, capital, invested
capital, equity, sales, or premiums); cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash
flow, free cash flow, and cash flow return on capital); combined ratios; share price (including,
but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return); and increase in or maintenance
of the Companys market share. In the discretion of the Committee at the time of the grant of an
award, any performance objective may be calculated after accounting for specified adjustments.
The Committee determines identical performance criteria for all participants annually and then
establishes a performance goal and allocates a target bonus amount to be awarded upon attainment of
each performance goal. The Committee may also structure goals with multiple potential levels of
achievement. Consistent with predecessor plans in effect for prior years, the Committee intends to
link 50% of a participants goals to a core earnings per share component, For the Co-CEOs, the
remaining 50% of their target bonus is linked to several company performance metrics. Other
participants have the remaining 50% of their target bonus linked to individual performance goals.
The Co-Chief Executive Officers and Senior Vice Presidents can earn up to 175% and 125%,
respectively, of their target bonus based on the achievement of the performance goals. The maximum
amount which may be awarded to any participant in any year is $5,000,000.
In order to receive the bonus amount allocated to a particular performance goal or level, that
goal or level must have been fully met, or exceeded, for the plan year. If not met or satisfied,
the award tied to a goal or level will not be payable. Further, under the Executive Bonus Plan,
neither the Board nor the Committee retains any discretion to pay an excess amount above the
established bonus amounts or to
award any portion of the bonus amount allocated to a performance goal which has not been met
by a participant.
As soon as practicable after the end of a calendar year, but no later than March 31, the
Committee will certify in writing whether or not the performance goals of the participants have
been attained and shall report to the Board the bonus amount, if any, to be paid to each
participant.
- 11 -
If our shareholders do not approve the Executive Bonus Plan, the Committee may still approve
bonus compensation for our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Senior Vice Presidents, if any, based on
achievement of the objectives set forth in the Executive Bonus Plan in order to maintain the market
competitiveness of the Companys executive compensation program. However, some of the amounts
awarded under a plan not approved by shareholders may not be deductible as set forth in Section
162(m) which would result in an increase to our corporate tax liability.
Amendment and Termination. The Executive Bonus Plan has been adopted and approved by the
Committee and will remain effective until terminated by the Board. The Board may at any time
amend, suspend or terminate the Executive Bonus Plan. Any amendment or revision to the Executive
Bonus Plan and/or performance goals that requires shareholder approval pursuant to Section 162(m)
may be submitted to our shareholders for approval. Neither the Board nor Committee has the
discretion to increase compensation under the Executive Bonus Plan after performance goals are
established and the period of service has commenced.
Recoupment of Awards. In the event of a restatement of materially inaccurate financial
results, the Committee has the discretion to recover bonus awards that were paid under the
Executive Bonus Plan to a participant with respect to the period covered by the restatement. If the
payment of a bonus award would have been lower had the achievement of applicable financial
performance targets been calculated based on such restated financial results, the Committee may, if
it determines appropriate in its sole discretion, to the extent permitted by law, recover from the
participant the portion of the bonus award paid in excess of the payment that would have been made
based on the restated financial results.
Federal Income Tax Consequences. Executive Bonus Plan participants must generally recognize
ordinary income equal to the bonus received. As discussed above, subject to Section 162(m), the
Company will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount.
Acceleration of income, additional taxes, and interest apply to nonqualified deferred
compensation that is not compliant with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. To be compliant
with Section 409A rules with respect to the timing of elections to defer compensation, distribution
events and funding must be satisfied. The terms of the 2011 Plan are intended to ensure that awards
under it will not be subject to adverse tax consequences applicable to deferred compensation under
Section 409A. Equity Bonus Plan participants must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the
cash value of awards received. Subject to Section 162(m), the Company will be entitled to a
deduction for the same amount.
New Plan Benefits. Grants of awards under the Annual Senior Executive Bonus Plan are subject
to the certification and discretion of the Committee and are, therefore, not determinable at this
time. Amounts paid to senior executive officers for 2010 under a predecessor program are set forth
under Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCompensation Components beginning on page 31 of this
proxy statement.
The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the
Annual Senior Executive Bonus Plan.
- 12 -
|
|
|
Proposal No. 5 ► |
|
Advisory Vote on Compensation of our Named Executive Officers |
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd Act), enacted in
July 2010, requires that we provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a
non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executives officers as disclosed in this
proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
As described in detail below under the heading Compensation Discussion and Analysis
beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement, we seek to closely align the interests of our named
executive officers with the interests of our shareholders. We structure our programs to
discourage excessive risk-taking through a balanced use of compensation vehicles and metrics with
an overall goal of delivering sustained long-term shareholder value while aligning our executives
interests with those of our shareholders. Further, our programs require that a substantial portion
of each named executive officers compensation be contingent on delivering performance results that
benefit our shareholders. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our named executive
officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and the
achievement of increased total shareholder return. Shareholders should note that, because the
advisory vote on executive compensation occurs well after the beginning of the compensation year
and because the different elements of our executive compensation programs are designed to operate
in an integrated manner and to complement one another, in many cases it may not be appropriate or
feasible to change our executive compensation programs in consideration of any one years advisory
vote on executive compensation by the time of the following years annual meeting of shareholders.
The vote on this matter is not intended to address any specific element of compensation;
rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this
proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, our
Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. The Board and the Compensation Committee will
review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding our executive
compensation program.
Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the
named executive officers, as disclosed in the this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation
disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the approval of the compensation of
our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.
- 13 -
|
|
|
Proposal No. 6 ► |
|
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Compensation of our Named Executive Officers |
The Dodd Act also provides that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote, on a
non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek future
advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with
the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as
an advisory vote on executive compensation. By voting with respect to this Proposal No. 6,
shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on
executive compensation once every year, every two years and every three years.
Our Board of Directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that
occurs each year is the most appropriate alternative for the Company at this time, and therefore,
our Board recommends that you vote for annual advisory votes on executive compensation. The Board
of Directors has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our
shareholders to provide timely, direct input on the Companys executive compensation philosophy,
policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year. The Board believes that an
annual vote is therefore consistent with the Companys efforts to engage in an ongoing dialogue
with our shareholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters. However, as
discussed above in Proposal No. 5, shareholders should note that because the timing of the advisory
vote on executive compensation, in many cases it may not be appropriate or feasible to change our
executive compensation programs in consideration of any one years advisory vote on executive
compensation by the time of the following years annual meeting of shareholders.
This vote is advisory and not binding on the Company or our Board of Directors in any way. The
Board and the Compensation Committee will carefully review the voting results. Notwithstanding the
Boards recommendation and the outcome of the shareholder vote, the Board may in the future decide
to conduct advisory votes on a more or less frequent basis and may vary its practice based on
factors such as discussions with shareholders and the adoption of material changes to compensation
programs.
Shareholders may cast a vote on the preferred voting frequency by selecting the option of
every year, every two years or every three years (or abstain) when voting in response to this
Proposal No. 6 and, therefore, shareholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the
recommendation of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the option of every year as the
preferred frequency for future advisory votes on executive compensation.
- 14 -
|
|
|
Proposal No. 7 ► |
|
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Certain Employment Matters |
We have been notified by New York State Common Retirement Fund, State of New York, Office of
State Comptroller, Pension Investments & Cash Management, 633 Third Avenue, 31st Floor,
New York, New York 10017, that it owns, and will own through the annual meeting, at least $2,000 of
our common stock and that it intends to propose the resolution set forth below at the annual
meeting. In accordance with applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have
set forth the Funds proposal and the Companys response below:
Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Policy-2011
Whereas: American Financial Group does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based
on sexual orientation and gender identity in its written employment policy;
Over 89% of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination
policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual
orientation, as have more than 95% of Fortune 100 companies, according to the Human
Rights Campaign. Nearly 70% of the Fortune 100 and 43% of the Fortune 500 now
prohibit discrimination based on general identity or expression;
We believe that corporations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual
orientation and gender identity have a competitive advantage in recruiting and
retaining employees from the widest talent pool;
According to an October, 2009 survey by Harris Interactive and Witeck-Combs, 44% of
gay and lesbian workers in the United States reported an experience with some form
of job discrimination related to sexual orientation; an earlier survey found that
almost one out of every 10 gay or lesbian adults also stated that they had been
fired or dismissed unfairly from a previous job, or pressured to quit a job because
of their sexual orientation;
Twenty-one states, the District of Columbia and more than 160 cities and counties,
have laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation; 12
states and the District of Columbia have laws prohibiting employment discrimination
based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Minneapolis, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles have adopted legislation
restricting business with companies that do not guarantee equal treatment for gay
and lesbian employees;
Our company has operations in, and makes sales to institutions in states and cities
that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
National public opinion polls consistently find more than three quarters of the
American people support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and
bisexuals; for example, in a Gallup poll conducted in May 2009, 89% of respondents
favored equal opportunity in employment for gays and lesbians;
Resolved: The Shareholders request that American Financial Group amend its written
equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on
sexual orientation and gender identity and to substantially implement the policy.
Supporting Statement: Employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation
and gender identity diminishes employee morale and productivity. Because state and
local laws are inconsistent with respect to employment discrimination, our company
would benefit from a consistent, corporate wide policy to enhance efforts to prevent
discrimination, resolve complaints internally, and ensure a respectful and
supportive atmosphere for all employees. American Financial Group will enhance its
competitive
edge by joining the growing ranks of companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for
all employees.
- 15 -
Board of Directors Position
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST this proposal.
The Company received a substantially identical proposal in 2008 which was presented to
shareholders, even though neither the proponent nor its qualified representative, as required by
SEC rule, attended the meeting to present the proposal.
The Board of Directors continues to believe that this proposal is unnecessary. The Company is
an equal opportunity employer. We are fully committed to complying with all applicable equal
employment opportunity laws. Furthermore, we believe that our current policies adequately reflect
our strong commitment to non-discrimination, that we have already substantially implemented the
principles reflected in the above proposal and that our current policies and practices fully
achieve the objectives of this proposal.
The Companys written employment policies prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color,
religion, sex, age, national origin, disability or any other legally protected status, and mirror
the non-discrimination categories of federal law. Our nondiscrimination policy applies to all
areas of employment, including, but not limited to, hiring and recruitment, training, promotion,
transfer, demotion, counseling and discipline, employee benefits and compensation and termination
of employment.
We recognize the value of a truly diverse workforce. We are dedicated to ensuring that
diversity helps our employees, customers, vendors and communities achieve their full potential. We
continually strive to maintain a diverse workforce that meets the needs of our customers and the
communities in which we work and live.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
- 16 -
|
|
|
Proposal No. 8 ► |
|
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Board Composition |
We have been notified by each of the Board of Pensions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in
America, and Calvert Asset Management Company, Inc., 4550 Montgomery Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland
20814, that it intends to propose the resolution set forth below at the annual meeting. We have
been informed that the Board of Pensions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America has
beneficially owned 9,201 shares of Common Stock for at least one year, and Calvert Asset Management
Company, Inc. has notified us that it owns 2,562 shares of Common Stock. In accordance with
applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have set forth the proponents
identical proposals and the Companys response below:
Be it Resolved:
That the Board of Directors consistent with their fiduciary duties:
|
1. |
|
Take every reasonable step to ensure that women and minority candidates are in
the pool from which Board nominees are chosen; |
|
|
2. |
|
Publicly commit itself to a policy of Board inclusiveness to ensure that: |
|
|
|
Women and minority candidates are routinely sought as part of every Board
search the company undertakes; |
|
|
|
|
The Board strives to obtain diverse candidates by expanding director
searches to include nominees from both corporate positions beyond the executive
suite and non-traditional environments such government, academia, and
non-profit organizations; and |
|
|
|
|
Board composition is reviewed periodically to ensure that the Board
reflects the knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity required
for the Board to fulfill its duties. |
|
3. |
|
To report to shareholders, at reasonable expense and omitting proprietary
information, its efforts to encourage diversified representation on the Board. |
Supporting Statement:
We believe that diversity is an essential measure of sound governance and a critical
attribute to a well-functioning board. We believe that in an increasingly complex
global marketplace, the ability to draw on a wide range of viewpoints, backgrounds,
skills, and experience is critical to a companys success, as it increases the
likelihood of making the right strategic and operational decisions and catalyzes
efforts to recruit, retain, and promote the best people, including women and
minorities. We believe director and nominee diversity helps to ensure that
different perspectives are brought to bear on issues, while enhancing the likelihood
that proposed solutions will be nuanced and comprehensive.
A growing body of academic research shows that there is a significant positive
relationship between firm value and the percentage of women and minorities on
boards. This view is strongly supported by many large institutional fund managers,
who have successfully petitioned the SEC to require board diversity disclosures
aimed at informing the proxy voting process. We believe our companys current board
diversity policies and disclosures limit the companys definition and understanding
of diversity and do not sufficiently address the growing investor demand and
interest in this critical corporate governance matter.
- 17 -
In September 2010, SEC Commissioner Luis Aguilar stated I personally believe that
companies that expand their search for new directors to include more women and
minorities will find a breadth and depth of talent that will serve to improve their
performance and increase the wealth of their investors. To that end, I encourage
companies to prioritize and implement practices to increase board diversity. To do
this, it is imperative to have processes in place to be able to identify diverse
candidates. In todays environment, diversity in the boardroom is a business
necessity that companies need to take seriously.
In our view, companies combining competitive financial performance with high
standards of corporate governance, including board diversity, are better positioned
to generate long-term value for their shareholders. As such, we urge the Board to
broaden its pool of, candidates and publicly commit to taking steps to
establish an inclusive Board.
Board of Directors Position
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST this proposal.
The Board of Directors and the Corporate Governance Committee believe that the Companys
existing director nominating process is designed to identify the best possible nominees for the
Board, regardless of the nominees gender, racial background, religion, ethnicity or other
classification. Although the Board agrees with the merits of achieving diversity throughout the
Company, the Board believes that the proposal could impede the Boards ability to select the most
suitable and qualified candidates for membership on the Board and would impose unnecessary
administrative burdens and costs.
The Companys employment policies and practices, including recruitment, promotion and
compensation, are guided by the fundamental principle that decisions are made on the basis of
whether the individuals personal capabilities and qualifications fit the Companys needs and meet
the requirements of the position. As stated above, the Companys written employment policies
prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin,
disability or any other legally protected status, and mirror the non-discrimination categories of
federal law.
Similarly, the Companys employment policies apply equally to the Corporate Governance
Committees search for and evaluation of candidates for Board membership. In evaluating prospective
Board nominees, the Corporate Governance Committee considers many factors, including those listed
below under Corporate GovernanceCorporate Governance CommitteeDirector Nomination
Qualifications to determine whether a candidates capabilities will enhance the collective
effectiveness of the Board in performing its responsibilities in overseeing a large, complex
company and serving the long-term interests of our shareholders.
The Board and the Corporate Governance Committee aim to assemble a diverse group of candidates
and believe that no single criterion such as gender or minority status is determinative in
obtaining diversity on the Board. This approach is consistent with amendments that the SEC adopted
in late 2009 to its rules governing proxy statement disclosure. The amendments require companies to
disclose whether, and if so how, the nominating committee considers diversity in identifying
nominees for director. In its adopting release, the SEC explicitly acknowledges that companies may
define diversity in different ways. The SEC states:
We recognize that companies may define diversity in various ways, reflecting
different perspectives. For instance, some companies may conceptualize diversity
expansively to include differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education,
skill and other individual qualities and attributes that contribute to board
heterogeneity, while others may focus on diversity concepts such as race, gender and
national origin. We believe that for purposes of this disclosure requirement,
companies should be allowed to define diversity in ways that they consider
appropriate. As a result we have not defined diversity in the amendments.
- 18 -
The Board and the Corporate Governance Committee are supportive of qualified candidates who
would provide the Board with greater diversity but believe that the shareholder proposal provides
an inappropriate method for increasing Board diversity. The Board believes it is important to
maintain
flexibility in the nominating process in order to ensure that the most qualified available
candidates are selected as directors in light of the Companys evolving needs and circumstances.
The Board believes that the Companys existing nominating process, including the factors considered
by the Corporate Governance Committee in evaluating director candidates, is appropriate for the
discharge of the Boards fiduciary obligations to the Companys shareholders. The imposition on the
nominating process of gender and minority requirements and affirmative search obligations would
unduly restrict the Corporate Governance Committee in the performance of its duties and add
administrative burdens and costs, without necessarily resulting in the selection of the best
director candidates for the Company.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
- 19 -
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following shareholders are the only persons known by the Company to own beneficially 5% or
more of its outstanding common stock as of February 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
|
|
|
Name and Address |
|
|
|
|
|
Obtainable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
upon Exercise of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Owner |
|
Held (1) |
|
|
Options (2) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Percent of Class |
|
Carl H. Lindner
One East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 |
|
|
2,749,854 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,749,854 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl H. Lindner III
One East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 |
|
|
7,162,297 |
(4) |
|
|
377,500 |
|
|
|
7,539,797 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Craig Lindner
One East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 |
|
|
5,567,839 |
(5) |
|
|
377,500 |
|
|
|
5,945,339 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black Rock, Inc.
40 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10022 |
|
|
6,917,372 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,917,372 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSV Asset Management
155 N. Wacker Drive
Suite 4600
Chicago, Illinois 60606 |
|
|
5,887,008 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,887,008 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
(1) |
|
Unless otherwise noted, the holder has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the
shares listed. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents shares of common stock that may be acquired within 60 days of February 28, 2011
through the exercise of options granted under the Companys stock incentive plans. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 1,468,419 shares held by his spouse as trustee with voting and dispositive power and
306,939 shares held in a charitable foundation over which Mr. Lindner has sole voting and
dispositive power but no pecuniary interest. Does not include 9,700,000 shares held in two
grantor retained annuity trusts, the grantor of which is his spouse and the beneficiaries of
which are Mrs. Lindner and their sons, but for which third parties act as trustee with voting
and dispositive power. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 35,859 shares held by his spouse in a trust over which she has voting and
dispositive power, 1,468,500 shares held by a limited liability company over which he holds
dispositive but not voting power, 289,257 shares held in two trusts over which his spouse has
dispositive power, 2,515,000 shares owned by a limited liability company for which he shares
voting and dispositive power, 2,714,850 shares owned by a trust over which he has voting and
dispositive power, 128,886 shares held in a charitable trust for which he shares voting and
dispositive power and 9,945 shares held in a foundation over which shares he has voting and
dispositive power. Does not include 1,884,457 shares held in a grantor retained annuity
trust, the beneficiaries of which are members of his family, for which third parties act as
trustee with voting and dispositive power. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 24,404 shares held by child, 111,120 shares held in trust for the benefit of his
spouse over which shares she has voting and dispositive power, 250,546 shares held in trust
over which his spouse has dispositive power, 2,515,000 shares owned by a limited liability
company for which he shares voting and dispositive power, 128,886 shares held in a charitable
trust for which he shares voting and dispositive power 2,497,214 shares owned by trusts over
which he has voting and dispositive power, 26,819 shares held in a Company retirement plan
account for his benefit, and 13,850 held in a foundation over which he has voting and
dispositive power. Mr. Lindner has pledged 443,661 shares as collateral under loan
agreements. |
|
(6) |
|
Information based on Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. on February 3, 2011. |
|
(7) |
|
Information based on Schedule 13G filed by LSV Asset Management on February 9, 2011. |
- 20 -
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Management
The directors, nominees for director and executive officers of the Company are as follows.
Ages are provided as of March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director or |
|
|
Age |
|
Position |
|
Executive Since |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl H. Lindner |
|
91 |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
1959 |
Carl H. Lindner III |
|
57 |
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and a Director |
|
1979 |
S. Craig Lindner |
|
56 |
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and a Director |
|
1980 |
Kenneth C. Ambrecht |
|
65 |
|
Director |
|
2005 |
Theodore H. Emmerich |
|
84 |
|
Director |
|
1988 |
James E. Evans |
|
65 |
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Director |
|
1976 |
Terry S. Jacobs |
|
68 |
|
Director |
|
2003 |
Gregory G. Joseph |
|
48 |
|
Director |
|
2008 |
William W. Verity |
|
52 |
|
Director |
|
2002 |
John I. Von Lehman |
|
58 |
|
Director |
|
2008 |
Keith A. Jensen |
|
60 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
1999 |
Thomas E. Mischell |
|
63 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
1985 |
Keith A. Jensen has served as Senior Vice President of the Company for over five years. Since
January 2005, he has also served as the Companys chief financial officer. Mr. Jensen was a
partner with Deloitte & Touche LLP for over eleven years prior to joining the Company.
Thomas E. Mischell has served as Senior Vice President of the Company for over five years.
Information regarding all directors of the Company is set forth beginning on page 2 under
Matters to be Considered Proposal No. 1 Elect Ten Directors.
Leadership Structure
The Companys leadership structure has evolved significantly since our predecessor, American
Financial Corporation, was founded more than five decades ago. Carl H. Lindner is the current
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Lindner served as the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company until January 2005 and prior to that had been the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of AFC.
The Company has two principal executive officers: Carl H. Lindner III and S. Craig Lindner,
each of whom serves as a Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and a director of the Company.
Carl H. Lindner III also serves as Chairman of Great American Insurance Company and is primarily
responsible for AFGs property and casualty insurance operations and investor relations. S. Craig
Lindner also serves as President of Great American Financial Resources, Inc. and Chairman of
American Money Management Corporation and is primarily responsible for AFGs annuity and
supplemental health insurance operations and investments. While each Co-CEO functions within a
clearly defined role with respect to the day-to-day operations of the Company, both Co-CEOs work
closely with one another and are significantly involved in all aspects of Company management so
that either could succeed the other in the event such a need arose.
The Board of Directors believes that the Companys leadership structure, including the
separation of the principal executive officer position from that of Chairman of the Board, aids in
succession planning and provides the Company with significant executive depth and leadership
experience. The Board has determined that the Companys leadership structure is currently the most
appropriate for the Company. To the extent it deems necessary, the Board intends to review the
leadership structure of the Company from time to time and in the event of any potential change in
the persons serving as executive officers, although no potential change is contemplated at this
time.
- 21 -
Risk Oversight
The Company believes a role of management, including the named executive officers, is to
identify and manage risks confronting the Company. The Board of Directors plays an integral part
in the Companys risk oversight, particularly in reviewing the processes used by management to
identify and report risk, and also in monitoring corporate actions so as to minimize inappropriate
levels of risk. The Board of Directors and its committees discuss risks which the Company faces at
each regularly-scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors and in many committee meetings.
The Companys leadership structure and overall corporate governance framework is designed to
aid the Board in its oversight of management responsibility for risk. The Audit Committee serves a
key risk oversight function in carrying out its review of the Companys financial reporting and
internal reporting processes, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Inherently, part of
this review involves an
evaluation of whether our financial reporting and internal reporting systems are adequately
reporting the Companys exposure to certain risks. In connection with this evaluation, the Audit
Committee has, from time to time, considered whether any changes to these processes are necessary
or desirable. While it has concluded that no such changes are warranted at this time, the Audit
Committee will continue to monitor the Companys financial reporting and internal reporting
processes. In addition, pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for discussing
with management the guidelines and policies related to enterprise risk assessment and risk
management.
As more fully described under Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this proxy statement,
the Compensation Committee takes an active role in overseeing risks relating to AFGs executive
compensation programs, plans and practices. Specifically, the Compensation Committee reviews the
risk profile of the components of the executive compensation program, including the performance
objectives and target levels used in connection with incentive awards, and considers the risks an
executive officer might be incentivized to take with respect to such components with special
attention given to establishing a mix among these components that does not encourage excessive risk
taking.
The Corporate Governance Committee contributes to the Companys risk oversight process by
frequently reviewing the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines and Board committee charters to
ensure that they continue to comply with any applicable laws, regulations, and stock exchange or
other listing standards, as each are subject to change from time to time. The Corporate Governance
Committee also oversees the director nomination process, the overall Board reporting structure and
the operations of the individual committees.
Meetings of the Board of Directors
The Companys Board of Directors held eight meetings in 2010. The Board has a Compensation
Committee, an Audit Committee and a Corporate Governance Committee. The charters for each of these
Committees as well as the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines are available at www.AFGinc.com
and upon written request to the Companys Secretary, at the address set forth under Communications
with Directors on page 46 of this proxy statement.
Compensation Committee
Responsibilities and Meetings
The Compensation Committee acts on behalf of the Board of Directors and, by extension, the
shareholders to monitor adherence to the Companys compensation philosophy. The Committee ensures
that the total compensation paid to the named executive officers is fair, reasonable and
competitive.
The Compensation Committee also acts as the oversight committee with respect to the Companys
deferred compensation plans, stock incentive plans, and bonus plans covering senior executive
officers. In overseeing those plans, the Committee may delegate authority for day-to-day
administration and interpretation of the plan, including selection of participants, determination
of award levels within plan parameters, and approval of award documents, to officers of the
Company. However, the Committee may not delegate any authority under those plans for matters
affecting the compensation and benefits of the Companys Co-CEOs.
- 22 -
The Compensation Committee consulted among themselves and with management throughout the year
and met eight times in 2010. The primary processes for establishing and overseeing executive
compensation can be found under Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 28 of this
proxy statement.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of AFGs Compensation Committee was at any time during 2010 or at any
other time an officer or employee of the Company, and none had any relationship with the Company
requiring disclosure as a related-person transaction in the section Related Person Transactions
on page 45 of this proxy statement. During 2010, none of our executive officers served on the
compensation
committee (or its equivalent) or board of directors of another entity an executive officer of
which served on our Compensation Committee.
Audit Committee
Meetings and Committee Composition
The Audit Committee met 10 times in 2010. The Audit Committee is comprised of four directors,
each of whom is experienced with financial statements and has past accounting or related financial
management experience. The Companys Board has determined that of the Audit Committees members,
Theodore H. Emmerich, Terry S. Jacobs, and John I. Von Lehman are each considered to be an audit
committee financial expert as defined under SEC Regulation S-K Item 407(d).
Audit Committee Report
The members of the Committee are Theodore H. Emmerich (Chairman), Terry S. Jacobs, Gregory G.
Joseph and John I. Von Lehman. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as defined
by the NYSE and NASDAQ listing standards. The Board has determined that three of the four members
of the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Securities and
Exchange Commission regulations.
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities by reviewing the financial information which will be provided to shareholders and
others, the systems of internal control which management has established and the audit process.
Management is responsible for the Companys internal controls and the financial reporting
process. The independent registered public accountants are responsible for performing an
independent audit of the Companys consolidated financial statements and internal control over
financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (US) (PCAOB) and issuing reports thereon. The Committees responsibility is to monitor and
oversee these processes. Additionally, the Audit Committee engages the Companys independent
registered public accountants who report directly to the Committee.
The Committee has met and held discussions with management and the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm. Management represented to the Committee that the Companys
audited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and the Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated
financial statements and the audit of internal control over financial reporting with management and
the independent registered public accountants. The Committee discussed with the independent
registered public accountants the matters required to be discussed by the PCAOB and relevant
listing standards.
The Companys independent registered public accountants also provided to the Committee the
written disclosures and the letter pursuant to applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the
independent registered public accountants communications with the Committee concerning
independence and the Committee discussed with the independent registered public accountants that
firms independence. As part of its discussions, the Committee determined that Ernst & Young LLP
was independent of AFG.
- 23 -
Based on the Committees discussions with management and the independent registered public
accountants and the Committees review of the representation of management and the report of the
independent registered public accountants to the Committee, the Committee recommended that the
audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
Members of the Audit Committee
|
|
Theodore H. Emmerich, Chairman |
|
|
Terry S. Jacobs |
|
|
Gregory G. Joseph |
|
|
John I. Von Lehman |
Pre-Approval Policies
The Audit Committee has adopted policies that require its approval for any audit and non-audit
services to be provided to AFG by Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee delegated authority to the
Committee Chairman to approve certain non-audit services. Pursuant to these procedures and
delegation of authority, the Audit Committee was informed of and approved all of the audit and
other services described above. No services were provided with respect to the de minimus waiver
process provided by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Corporate Governance Committee
Responsibilities and Meetings
The Corporate Governance Committee met four times in 2010. The Corporate Governance Committee
is responsible for, among other things, establishing criteria for selecting new directors,
identifying individuals qualified to be Board members as needed, and recommending to the Board
director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders. The Corporate Governance Committee
also facilitates participation by directors in continuing education programs, including accredited
director education programs and structured internal programs presented by management. The
Committee is comprised solely of members who are independent as defined under NYSE and NASDAQ
listing standards.
Director Nominee Qualifications; Nominations by Shareholders
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines identify some of the criteria used to evaluate prospective
nominees for director. All candidates must have the highest personal and professional integrity
and must have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment. A candidate must have the
availability and willingness to take the time necessary to properly discharge the duties of a
director. Additionally, we consider it desirable for director candidates to have management
experience, especially with public companies, and experience in the insurance and financial
services industries. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Companys website at
www.AFGinc.com.
Nominees for director will be recommended by the Corporate Governance Committee in accordance
with the principles in its charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines on AFGs website. When
considering an individual candidates suitability for membership on the Board, the Corporate
Governance Committee will evaluate each individual on a case-by-case basis. Although the Committee
does not prescribe minimum qualifications or standards for directors, candidates for Board
membership should have the highest personal and professional integrity, demonstrated exceptional
ability and judgment, and availability and willingness to take the time necessary to properly
discharge the duties of a director. The Corporate Governance Committee has not established a
formal policy on diversity in identifying director candidates. However, the Company aims to have a
Board representing diverse experience in business, finance, insurance and other disciplines,
relevant to the Companys operations.
- 24 -
The Corporate Governance Committee does not have a policy with regard to the consideration of
director candidates recommended by shareholders because Ohio law and the Companys Amended and
Restated Code of Regulations (the Regulations) afford shareholders certain rights related to such
matters. The Regulations provide that the only candidates eligible for election at a meeting of
shareholders are candidates nominated by or at the direction of the Board of Directors and
candidates nominated at the meeting by a shareholder who has complied with the procedures set forth
in the Regulations. The Regulations require that a shareholder wishing to nominate a director
candidate must have first given the Secretary of the Company at least 90 and not more than 120 days
prior written notice setting forth or accompanied by (1) certain disclosures about the proposed
nominee, including biographical, stock ownership and investment intent information and all other
information about the proposed nominee that is required in the solicitation of proxies in an
election contest or otherwise required pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, (2) certain disclosures regarding the shareholder giving the notice and specified persons
associated with such shareholder, including biographical and stock ownership information for and
any hedging activity or other similar arrangements entered into by such persons, (3) verification
of the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in the nomination at the Companys
request, (4) a statement that a nomination that
is inaccurate or incomplete in any manner shall be disregarded, (5) a representation that the
shareholder was a holder of record of the Companys voting stock and intended to appear, in person
or by proxy, at the meeting to nominate the persons specified in the notice, and (6) the consent of
each such nominee to serve as director if so elected. Directors nominated through this process
will be considered by the Corporate Governance Committee.
The Committee will make its determinations on whether to nominate an individual in the context
of the Board as a whole based on the Boards then-current needs, the merits of each such candidate
and the qualifications of other available candidates. The Committee will have no obligation to
respond to shareholders who propose candidates that it has determined not to nominate for election
to the Board, but the Committee may do so in its sole discretion. All director candidates are
evaluated similarly, whether nominated by the Board or by a shareholder.
The Corporate Governance Committee did not seek, nor did it receive the recommendation of, any
of the director candidates named in this proxy statement from any shareholder, independent
director, executive officer or third-party search firm in connection with its own approval of such
candidates. The Company has not paid any fee to a third party to assist it in identifying or
evaluating nominees.
Executive Sessions
NYSE and NASDAQ rules require independent directors to meet regularly in executive sessions.
Four of these sessions were held during 2010. The independent director presiding over each session
rotates. Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with any of the independent
directors, individually or as a group, by following the procedures set forth on page 46 of this
proxy statement.
Director Attendance Policy at Meetings
AFG expects its directors to attend meetings of shareholders. All of AFGs directors attended
last years shareholders meeting. Each director attended at least 75% of the total meetings of
the Board and committees of the Board of which the director was a member and in many cases attended
meetings of committees on which they did not serve.
Independence Determinations
In accordance with NYSE and NASDAQ rules, the Board affirmatively determines the independence
of each director and nominee for election as a director in accordance with guidelines it has
adopted, which guidelines comply with the listing standards set forth by the NYSE and NASDAQ.
Where the NYSE and NASDAQ rules on director independence conflict, the Companys standards reflect
the applicable rule which is more stringent to the director and the Company. Based on these
standards, the Board determined that each of the following non-employee directors, namely Messrs.
Ambrecht, Emmerich, Jacobs, Joseph, Verity and Von Lehman is independent and has no relationship
with the Company, except as a director and shareholder of the Company, and the Board intends to
make such a determination as to each of these directors at the Board of Directors meeting following
the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
- 25 -
Mr. Ambrecht was a Managing Director with First Albany Capital from July 2004 until December
2005. For more than five years prior to that, Mr. Ambrecht was a Managing Director with Royal Bank
Canada Capital Markets. From time to time, the Company has purchased or sold securities through
these companies in the ordinary course of business, for which it paid customary commissions. The
Company has acquired vehicles from, and had vehicles serviced by, automobile dealerships affiliated
with a company of which Mr. Joseph is an executive and part owner. The amounts involved in these
transactions were deemed by AFGs Board of Directors not to be material.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires AFGs executive officers, directors and persons who
own more than ten percent of AFGs common stock to file reports of ownership with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and to furnish AFG with copies of these reports. Like many companies, AFG
assists its directors and officers by monitoring transactions and completing and filing
Section 16 reports on their behalf. Based on the Companys involvement in the preparation and
review of these reports, the Company believes that all filing requirements were met in 2010 except
for one late filing in connection with a stock option exercise by Mr. Mischell.
Code of Ethics
The Companys Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to the Companys
directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethics is available at www.AFGinc.com and upon
written request to the Companys Secretary, at the address set forth under Communications with
Directors on page 46.
- 26 -
SECURITIES OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth information, as of February 28, 2011, concerning the beneficial
ownership of equity securities of the Company and its subsidiaries by each director, the named
executive officers and by all of these individuals as a group. Except as set forth in the
footnotes below or under Principal Shareholders on page 20 of this proxy statement, no director
or executive officer beneficially owned 1% or more of any class of equity security of the Company.
Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named have sole voting and dispositive power over the
shares reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
Name of |
|
Shares of Common |
|
|
Shares Acquirable Within |
|
Beneficial Owner |
|
Stock Held (1) |
|
|
60 Days (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl H. Lindner (3) |
|
|
2,749,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carl H. Lindner III (3) |
|
|
7,162,297 |
|
|
|
377,500 |
|
S. Craig Lindner (3) |
|
|
5,567,839 |
|
|
|
377,500 |
|
Kenneth C. Ambrecht |
|
|
18,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore H. Emmerich (4) |
|
|
46,980 |
|
|
|
11,250 |
|
James E. Evans (5)(6) |
|
|
221,578 |
|
|
|
329,838 |
|
Terry S. Jacobs (7) |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory G. Joseph (8) |
|
|
83,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
William W. Verity |
|
|
15,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
John I. Von Lehman |
|
|
10,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
Keith A. Jensen (9) |
|
|
47,302 |
|
|
|
240,005 |
|
Thomas E. Mischell (6) |
|
|
237,328 |
|
|
|
231,876 |
|
All directors,
nominees, and executive
officers as a group (12
persons)(3) |
|
|
16,156,812 |
|
|
|
1,567,969 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the following numbers of shares owned through a Company retirement plan as of
December 31, 2010: S. C. Lindner 26,819; K. A. Jensen 728; T. E. Mischell 47,516;
and all directors and executive officers as a group 75,063. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents shares of common stock that may be acquired within 60 days of February 28, 2011
through the exercise of options granted under the Companys stock incentive plans. |
|
(3) |
|
The shares beneficially owned by Carl H. Lindner, Carl H. Lindner III, and S. Craig Lindner,
and all directors and executive officers as a group, constituted 2.6%, 7.2%, 5.6% and 14.2%
respectively, of the common stock outstanding at February 28, 2011. See footnotes 3 through 5
to the Principal Shareholders table on page 20 for more information regarding share ownership
by Carl H. Lindner, Carl H. Lindner III, and S. Craig Lindner. |
|
(4) |
|
All shares held in a trust for which Mr. Emmerich serves as trustee with voting and
dispositive power. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Evans has pledged 89,733 shares as collateral under a loan agreement. |
|
(6) |
|
Excludes shares held in the RASP, for which he serves on the Administrative Plan Committee,
other than those shares allocated to his personal RASP account. See General
InformationRetirement and Savings Plan Participants on page 2. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Jacobs has pledged 7,500 shares as collateral under a loan agreement. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 63,423 shares held by companies in which he is a shareholder and for which he serves
as an executive officer or director. Also includes 3,000 shares held by a family partnership
in which he holds a 25% interest. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 8,343 shares owned by Mr. Jensens spouse. Does not include beneficial ownership of
500 shares of the Companys subsidiary, National Interstate Corporation. |
- 27 -
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview of Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has responsibility for reviewing and
approving the compensation paid to the Companys Co-CEOs, reviewing the compensation of the other
Company senior executive officers and overseeing the executive compensation policies of the
Company. The Compensation Committee ensures that the total compensation paid to the named
executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
AFGs philosophy regarding executive compensation programs focuses on the balance of
motivating, rewarding and retaining executives with a compensation package competitive among its
peers, and maximizing shareholder value by designing and implementing programs that tie
compensation earned to the performance of the Company. Guided by principles that reinforce the
Companys pay-for-performance philosophy for the past several years, named executive officer
compensation has included base salary and eligibility for annual cash bonuses and long-term
incentives such as stock options, restricted stock and stock awards and other compensation,
including certain perquisites. A significant portion of each senior executive officers
compensation is dependent upon the Company achieving business and financial goals and the executive
achieving individual performance objectives.
Establishing Compensation Levels
As in prior years, compensation levels for the Co-CEOs were based primarily upon the
Compensation Committees assessment of their leadership performance and potential to enhance
long-term shareholder value. The Compensation Committee relies upon a combination of judgment and
guidelines in determining the amount and mix of compensation elements for the Co-CEOs. The
compensation levels for the other named executive officers are similarly determined by the Co-CEOs,
and reviewed by the Compensation Committee, again based primarily upon the assessment of each
Co-CEOs leadership performance and potential to enhance long-term shareholder value.
Key factors affecting the Compensation Committees judgment with respect to the Co-CEOs
include the nature and scope of their responsibilities and their effectiveness in leading
initiatives to effectively manage capital and increase shareholder value, productivity,
profitability and growth. The Compensation Committee also considers the compensation levels and
performances of a comparison group of publicly-held insurance companies (collectively, the
Compensation Peer Group) in reviewing the appropriateness and competitiveness of the Companys
compensation programs. The Compensation Committee believes, however, that the peer review should
be simply a point of reference for measurement, not a determinative factor for executive
compensation. The purpose of this research is not to supplant the analyses of the individual
performance of the executive officers that the Compensation Committee considers when making
compensation decisions, but rather to serve as additional data utilized by the Compensation
Committee in its analysis. The Compensation Peer Group, which is periodically reviewed and updated
by the Compensation Committee, consisted in 2010 of companies against which the Compensation
Committee believes AFG competes for talent and for shareholder investment, and in the marketplace
for business. The Compensation Peer Group is identical to the group utilized in recent years
except for the deletion of one company which was acquired during 2010. In analyzing market pay
levels among the Compensation Peer Group, the Compensation Committee factors into its analysis the
large variance in size (both in terms of revenues and market capitalization) among the companies.
The companies comprising the Compensation Peer Group during 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
ACE Limited
|
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. |
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
|
|
Markel Corporation |
The Chubb Corporation
|
|
RLI Corp. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
|
|
W. R. Berkley Corporation |
CNA Financial Corp.
|
|
XL Group plc |
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
|
|
The Compensation Committee and the Co-CEOs analyze peer group and industry pay rates at least
annually using relevant published survey sources available. In addition, the Compensation
Committee and the Co-CEOs analyze information reported in the SEC filings of companies in the
Compensation Peer Group and compiled by a service provider.
- 28 -
The Compensation Committee determined that the types of compensation paid to the Companys
senior executives (i.e. annual salary, performance bonus, equity incentives, retirement plan
contributions and perquisites) are similar to those paid to senior management at companies in the
Compensation Peer Group. Although the Company seeks to offer a level of total compensation to our
executive officers that is competitive with the compensation paid by companies in the Compensation
Peer Group, we do not target or benchmark a particular percentile with respect to our executives
total pay packages or any individual components thereof. Rather, the Compensation Committees
consideration of the compensation levels and performances of the companies in the Compensation Peer
Group constitutes just one of many of the factors described in this Compensation Discussion and
Analysis, and such peer group data is considered generally and not as a substitute for the
Compensation Committees discharge of its fiduciary duties in making executive officer compensation
decisions.
The Compensation Committee has also noted that, except for the acceleration of vesting of
equity awards under the Companys shareholder approved equity incentive plans upon a change in
control, which acceleration applies to all holders of awards under such plans, no amounts become
payable to the named executive officers under severance or change in control arrangements, unlike
many of the executive officers of the companies in the Compensation Peer Group.
Based upon all these factors, the Compensation Committee believes it is in AFG shareholders
best long-term interest for the Compensation Committee to ensure that the overall level of
compensation, especially the aggregate total of salary, bonus and equity-based awards, is
competitive with companies in the Compensation Peer Group. The Compensation Committee continues to
believe that the quality, skills and dedication of executive leaders are critical factors affecting
the long-term value of the Company. Therefore, the Compensation Committee and the Co-CEOs continue
to try to maintain an executive compensation program that will attract, motivate and retain the
highest level of executive leadership possible and align the interests of AFGs executives with
those of AFGs shareholders.
The Compensation Committees decisions concerning the specific 2010 compensation elements for
the Co-CEOs were made within this framework. The Compensation Committee also considered each
Co-CEOs performance and prior-year salary, bonus and other compensation. In all cases, specific
decisions involving 2010 compensation were ultimately based upon the Compensation Committees
judgment about the Co-CEOs performance, potential future contributions and about whether each
particular payment or award would provide an appropriate incentive and reward for performance that
sustains and enhances long-term shareholder value without subjecting the Company to inappropriate
or unreasonable risk.
Tally Sheets
The Compensation Committee reviews a comprehensive tally sheet compiled internally to review
all elements of the named executive officers compensation. The tally sheets reviewed include all
of the information that is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table as well as amounts and
descriptions of perquisites not required to be specifically identified by SEC regulations,
generally due to the fact that the amount of such items is not deemed material under applicable SEC
regulations. The review by the Compensation Committee analyzes how changes in any element of
compensation would impact other elements. Such analysis has become an important component in the
Compensation Committees review of named executive officer compensation as various components,
including perquisites, are deemed by the Compensation Committee to be important elements of an
executives overall compensation. This also allows the Compensation Committee to make compensation
decisions and evaluate management recommendations based upon a complete analysis of an executives
total compensation.
To get a clearer picture of the total amount of compensation paid to the Companys executive
officers, the Compensation Committee annually reviews all components of the named executive
officers total compensation package. This review includes salary, bonus, equity and long-term
incentive compensation, accumulated realized and unrealized stock option gains, the dollar value to
the executive and cost to the Company of all perquisites and other personal benefits, and the
contributions to and investment performance under the Companys retirement plans. A tally sheet
totaling all the above
components was prepared and reviewed by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee noted the annual limitations agreed upon by the Compensation Committee and the Co-CEOs
with respect to personal use of corporate aircraft (120 occupied flight hours each) and the
executive insurance program ($300,000) and the fact that, if such limitations are exceeded,
reimbursement is made based on the cost to the Company of providing those benefits.
- 29 -
Based on this review, the Compensation Committee found the named executive officers total
compensation in the aggregate to be reasonable and consistent with the objectives of the Companys
compensation programs.
Wealth Accumulation
As part of its analysis and approval of the long-term equity incentive compensation, the
Compensation Committee reviewed information relative to equity wealth accumulation of the named
executive officers based on previous awards. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether
prior and proposed awards are likely to be effective for retention and as performance incentives to
the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee was mindful of the substantial percentage
ownership of the Companys common stock by the Co-CEOs, and the effect of such ownership in
aligning their interests with those of our public shareholders.
Internal Pay Equity
The Compensation Committee does not apply fixed ratios when conducting an analysis of the
relative difference between the Co-CEOs compensation and the compensation of the Companys other
senior executives. However, the Compensation Committee believes that the Companys internal pay
equity structure is appropriate based upon the contributions to the success of the Company and as a
means of motivation to other executives and employees.
Outside Consultants
The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and from time to time has
considered the use of outside consultants to assist in evaluating the Companys executive
compensation programs and practices. While the Compensation Committee did not formally engage such
a compensation consultant during 2010, it has obtained and considered studies and reports
containing comparative market and industry-wide data, which were generated by professional
compensation research firms. The Company has also surveyed publicly available compensation data.
As a result, the Compensation Committee believes that it has the necessary resources available to
survey the compensation practices of the Companys Compensation Peer Group and receive current
information regarding the compensation developments in the marketplace.
Tax Deductibility of Pay
Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that AFG
may deduct in any one year with respect to each of its five most highly paid executive officers.
There is an exception to the $1,000,000 limitation for performance-based compensation meeting
certain requirements. The Compensation Committee attempts, to the extent practicable, to structure
a significant portion of named executive officer compensation as incentive-based. As a result,
the incentive compensation paid to the named executive officers should also satisfy the
requirements for the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m), although no
assurances can be made in this regard.
Section 409A
Section 409A of the Code requires that nonqualified deferred compensation be deferred and
paid under plans or arrangements that satisfy the requirements of the law with respect to the
timing of deferral elections, timing of payments and certain other matters. In general, it is
AFGs intention to design and administer its compensation and benefits plans and arrangements for
all of its employees so that they are either exempt from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section
409A. AFG believes it is currently
operating such plans in compliance with Section 409A. However, no assurances can be made in
this regard.
- 30 -
Compensation Components
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the principal components of compensation for
named executive officers were:
|
|
|
annual performance-based bonuses (including cash and stock awards); |
|
|
|
long-term equity incentive compensation; |
|
|
|
retirement and other related benefits; and |
|
|
|
perquisites and other personal benefits. |
Each of these components has a different risk profile:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
|
Description |
|
Examples |
|
Risk Profile |
Base Salary
|
|
Fixed based on
level of
responsibility,
experience, tenure
and qualifications
|
|
Cash
|
|
Low to moderate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Performance-Based
Bonuses
|
|
Variable based on
achievement of
certain objectives
|
|
Cash
Performance-Based Stock Awards
|
|
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Equity
Incentive
Compensation
|
|
Variable based on
responsibility and
the achievement of
longer term
financial goals and
shareholder value
creation
|
|
Stock Options
Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
Moderate to
high |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement and
Other Related
Benefits
|
|
Satisfy employee
retirement and tax
planning needs
|
|
Retirement & Savings plans
Deferred Compensation
Plan
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and
Other Personal
Benefits
|
|
Satisfy employee
health and welfare
needs
|
|
Health care
Life, Auto, Home Insurance
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Usage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
|
|
The Compensation Committee has reviewed the risk profile of the components of AFGs executive
compensation programs, including the performance objectives and target levels used in connection
with incentive awards. We structure our programs to discourage excessive risk-taking through a
balanced use of compensation vehicles and metrics with an overall goal of delivering sustained
long-term shareholder value while aligning our executives interests with those of our
shareholders. Further, our programs make a substantial portion of each named executive officers
compensation contingent on delivering performance results that benefit our shareholders. The
Compensation Committee believes that AFGs executive compensation programs incentivize the
appropriate level of risk-taking behavior by its named executive officers needed to grow the
business, while encouraging prudent decision-making that focuses on both short-term and long-term
results.
The Compensation Committee continues to monitor and evaluate on an ongoing basis the mix of
compensation, especially equity compensation, awarded to the named executive officers, and the
extent to which such compensation aligns the interests of the named executive officers with those
of AFGs shareholders. In connection with this practice, the Compensation Committee has, from time
to time, reconsidered the structure of the Companys executive compensation program and the
relative weighting of various compensation elements. For example, the Compensation Committee
recently reviewed the long-term compensation components for our Co-Chief Executive Officers which
resulted in the adoption of the Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan as discussed in Proposal No. 3.
- 31 -
Our Co-CEOs determine the compensation for the named executive officers other than themselves.
The Compensation Committee reviews the levels of compensation determined by the Co-CEOs, and
annually reviews the performance of the other named executive officers with the Co-CEOs. The
Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board with respect to general non-CEO
compensation, incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans.
Our Co-CEOs discuss with the Compensation Committee their thoughts on the Companys
performance, their performance, their current and future compensation levels, and the reported
compensation of senior executives at the Compensation Peer Group prior to the time that the
Compensation Committee takes any action with respect to setting the compensation of the Co-CEOs.
The Co-CEOs also make recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the EPS and
Company Performance Components of the incentive compensation arrangements applicable to them.
Specifically, the Co-CEOs recommended that these components from AFGs business plan be considered
in connection with 2010 compensation objectives and targets. The Compensation Committee considers
this input in connection with its review and approval of corporate goals and objectives relevant to
Co-CEO compensation, deliberation of Co-CEO performance in light of those goals and objectives, and
determination of Co-CEO compensation levels based on this evaluation.
Base Salary
The Company pays salaries that are designed to attract and retain superior leaders. The
Compensation Committee determines annual base salaries for the Co-CEOs that are appropriate, in its
subjective judgment, based on each officers responsibilities and performance and input from the
Co-CEOs themselves. The Co-CEOs set salaries for the other named executive officers, which are
reviewed by the Compensation Committee. The Co-CEOs believe that such salaries are appropriate in
light of the levels of responsibility of such officers and their individual contributions to the
Companys success.
After awarding salary increases of between 2% and 5% for 2009 for the named executive
officers, the Compensation Committee and Co-CEOs determined for 2010 to maintain salaries at their
2009 levels for all named executive officers.
Annual Performance-Based Bonuses
Annual performance-based cash bonuses are designed to reward the current year performance of
AFG as compared to AFGs performance in prior years and its current year performance versus other
companies in its market segment. The Company believes that the overall performance of AFG is
substantially related to the performance of its executives. If earned, cash bonuses, and with
respect to the Co-CEOs, equity bonuses, are generally paid in the first quarter for the prior
years performance.
As has been the case in recent years, the Compensation Committee, working with management,
developed an annual bonus plan for 2010(2010 Bonus Plan) for the Co-CEOs and other named
executive officers that made a substantial portion of their 2010 compensation dependent on AFGs
performance. Specifically, annual bonus determinations are based on a two-part analysis of AFG and
executive performance. The Compensation Committee has approved the Annual Senior Executive Bonus
Plan, being considered by shareholders as Proposal No. 4, which will replace the Companys current
annual bonus plan. Consistent with prior years, the Compensation Committee will approve, annually
under the Annual Senior Executive Bonus Plan, both objective company performance metrics for the
Co-CEOs and objective company performance metrics and individual performance components for the
other named executive officers.
As discussed below, the Compensation Committee considered AFGs business plan and budgeted
targets in connection with its establishment of objectives in the EPS and Company Performance
Components under the 2010 Bonus Plan. Specifically, with respect to personal objectives for each
of the Co-CEOs, the Compensation Committee did not establish quantifiable measurements other than
those identified in these EPS and Company Performance Components because the Compensation Committee
believes that the Co-CEOs are ultimately jointly responsible for the achievement of such
objectives. The Compensation Committee views the roles of the Co-CEOs as collaborative, as opposed
to competitive, and thus does not seek to distinguish the performance of one from the other.
Rather, the Compensation Committee scrutinized the Co-CEOs collective role in AFGs
achievement of EPS targets, developing management personnel, focus on investment portfolio
performance and development and implementation of strategic transactions and initiatives to enhance
shareholder value. The Compensation Committee believes these areas merit considerable attention by
the Co-CEOs and constitute areas of responsibility in which the Co-CEOs responded in a manner
commensurate with the level of compensation received under the parameters of the 2010 Bonus Plan.
- 32 -
Individual areas of responsibility for named executive officers other than the Co-CEOs are
assigned by the Co-CEOs as the year progresses. As discussed elsewhere in this Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, the individual performance component of the 2010 Bonus Plan for the other
named executive officers addresses the factors considered by the Co-CEOs in their evaluation of the
individual performance and related incentive compensation for the other named executive officers.
2010 Bonus Plan Components and Bonus Amounts for Co-CEOs
Under the 2010 Bonus Plan, the cash bonus for 2010 for each Co-CEO equaled the sum of such
Co-CEOs bonuses for the EPS Component and Company Performance Component.
The EPS Component was based on Operating EPS which was determined consistent with prior
years. Operating EPS differs from AFGs reported net earnings (determined in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles) by not including realized gains and losses in the
investment portfolio and unusual or non-recurring items considered to be non-core to insurance
operations. Further, any special charge taken as a result of an internal review of asbestos and
environmental reserves is to be considered a non-core item. The Company Performance Component
consisted of eight separate performance goals.
Each Co-Chief Executive Officer had a target bonus tied to the EPS Component of $650,000 and
could earn up to an additional $1,137,500 based on the proportionate achievement of the eight
performance goals under the Company Performance Component.
EPS Component
Under the 2010 Bonus Plan, each Co-CEOs EPS Component ranged from $0 up to $1,137,500 (175%
of the dollar amount of the target bonus allocated to the EPS Component), based on the following
levels of Operating EPS achieved by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries for 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Bonus Target |
|
Operating EPS |
|
to be paid for EPS Component |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $3.20 |
|
|
0 |
|
$3.50 |
|
|
100 |
% |
$3.75 or more |
|
|
175 |
% |
The Operating EPS target for 2010 was established by the Compensation Committee after
reviewing the Companys 2010 business plan prepared by management and approved by the Co-CEOs. The
2010 target of $3.50 per share equaled the 2010 Operating EPS target in the Companys business
plan. While 9.1% below the Operating EPS target of $3.85 for 2009 and 17.3% below actual 2009
Operating EPS of $4.23, the Compensation Committee considered the higher level of favorable reserve
development recorded in 2009, the above average profitability in our 2009 crop operations, a
continued soft insurance market and lower investment returns expected in 2010 as principal factors
in determining the target. The Compensation Committee determined that achieving the 2010 Operating
EPS target would require substantial efforts on behalf of the entire organization, including
Company senior management, and gave consideration to factors which might impact ongoing earnings,
including, but not limited to, competition, market influences, governmental regulation and the
Board of Directors desire to devote resources to other internal corporate objectives, such as
acquisitions or start-ups.
Under the 2010 Bonus Plan, 100% of the EPS Component ($650,000) was payable if Operating EPS
were $3.50 per share. If Operating EPS were above $3.20 but less than $3.50 or above $3.50 but
less than $3.75, the EPS Component of the bonus was to be determined by straight-line
interpolation. If Operating EPS was $3.75 or more, 175% of the EPS Component of the bonus was to
be paid.
- 33 -
For 2010, AFG reported Operating EPS of $3.92. As a result, the Compensation Committee
authorized the payment of a bonus of $1,137,500 (175% of the $650,000 bonus target allocated to the
EPS Component) to each Co-CEO under the EPS Component of the 2010 Bonus Plan.
Company Performance Component
Payment of a maximum of $1,137,500 in bonus was payable to each Co-CEO based on AFGs overall
performance after considering eight Company performance goals determined by the Compensation
Committee at the time of adoption of the 2010 Bonus Plan. The 2010 Bonus Plan provides that each
Co-CEO would receive one-eighth of the maximum bonus amount for each of the following Company
Performance Component goals satisfied during 2010:
|
|
|
Grow book value per share (excluding unrealized gains/losses and non-core asbestos
and environmental charges) at least 7%. |
|
|
|
Grow book value per share (as defined in the 2010 Bonus Plan) at least 7%. |
|
|
|
Achieve core return on equity of at least 10%. |
|
|
|
Achieve specialty property and casualty combined ratio of 89 or below. |
|
|
|
Achieve annuity and supplemental insurance pre-tax, pre-interest expense operating
earnings of at least $183 million. |
|
|
|
Achieve returns on fixed income portfolio that exceed those of a benchmark. |
|
|
|
Have AFG common stock outperform the S&P 500 Insurance Stock Index. |
|
|
|
Maintain debt-to-total capital ratio of less than 22% (calculated consistent with
past practice). |
The Companys performance in 2010 exceeded each of these objectives. As a result, the Co-CEOs
received $1,137,500 under the Company Performance Component, for a total of $2,750,000 when added
with the EPS Component.
2010 Bonus Plan Components and Bonus Amounts for Other Named Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the bonus target amounts and performance criteria under the
2010 Bonus Plan for named executive officers other than the Co-CEOs that were reviewed by the
Compensation Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual |
|
|
|
Total Bonus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance |
|
Name |
|
Target |
|
|
EPS Component |
|
|
Component |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. Evans |
|
$ |
875,000 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Keith A. Jensen |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Thomas E. Mischell |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
- 34 -
EPS Component
For the other named executive officers participating in the 2010 Bonus Plan, the EPS Component
was set at a maximum of 125% of the eligible bonus, based on the following levels of reported
Operating EPS, calculated the same as for the Co-CEOs, achieved by the Company and its consolidated
subsidiaries for 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Bonus Target to be paid for |
|
Operating EPS |
|
EPS Component |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $3.20 |
|
|
0 |
|
$3.50 |
|
|
100 |
% |
$3.75 or more |
|
|
125 |
% |
For 2010, AFG reported Operating EPS of $3.92. As a result, under the EPS Component of the
2010 Bonus Plan, bonuses were paid to named executive officers as follows: $546,875 to Mr. Evans;
$375,000 to Mr. Jensen; and $250,000 to Mr. Mischell.
Individual Performance Component
Under the 2010 Bonus Plan, each named executive officers bonus allocated to the Individual
Performance Component ranged from 0% up to 125% of the target amount allocated to the Individual
Performance Component and was determined by the Co-CEOs based on the Co-CEOs subjective rating of
the named executive officers relative to overall performance for 2010. The determination for each
of the named executive officers includes a consideration of all factors deemed relevant, including,
but not limited to: operational, qualitative measurements relating to the development and
implementation of strategic initiatives and annual objectives; responses to unexpected
developments; the development of management personnel; and the impact of any extraordinary
transactions involving or affecting the Company and its subsidiaries. The Co-CEOs considered these
factors, together with the respective roles of the named executive officers with respect to the
consistent improvement in the Companys operating performance over the past several years, and
determined that the named executive officers receive the following: $503,125 to Mr. Evans (115% of
target); $360,000 to Mr. Jensen (120% of target); and $230,000 to Mr. Mischell (115% of target).
As a result, the total bonuses paid to the named executive officers under the 2010 Bonus Plan
(aggregating the amounts determined under both the EPS Component and the Individual Performance
Component) were: $1,050,000 to Mr. Evans; $735,000 to Mr. Jensen; and $480,000 to Mr. Mischell.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation
The Compensation Committee believes long-term equity incentive compensation encourages
management to focus on long-term Company performance and provides an opportunity for executive
officers and certain designated key employees to increase their stake in the Company through stock
option grants and restricted stock awards that vest over time. The Compensation Committee believes
that stock options and stock awards represent an important part of AFGs performance-based
compensation system. The Compensation Committee believes that AFG shareholders interests are well
served by aligning AFGs senior executives interests with those of its shareholders through the
grant of stock options and stock awards. In determining the size of overall annual grants, the
Compensation Committee takes into consideration the possible dilutive effect to shareholders of the
additional shares which may be issued pursuant to stock-based awards as well as the expense to AFG
as stock-based awards vest. The Compensation Committee believes that several features present in
stock-based awards give recipients substantial incentive to maximize AFGs long-term success.
Specifically, the Compensation Committee believes that, because the stock options vest at the rate
of 20% per year, and the restricted stock awarded in 2010 vests in four years, these awards promote
executive retention due to the potential for forfeiture of options and restricted shares that have
not fully vested upon departure from AFG.
Consistent with past practice, in February 2011, the Compensation Committee determined to
award a portion of the long-term equity incentive compensation of several key executives, including
each named executive officer, in restricted stock awards. The restricted stock awards vest over
four years, or
sooner upon the death or permanent disability of the recipient. The recipients are entitled
to receive dividends on and vote the shares during the restriction period.
- 35 -
Equity award levels are determined based on award amounts for participants from previous
years, market data, fair value of option grants, expense to AFG, the relative benefits to
participants of such expense, and the overall compensation level of such participants. Equity
grants vary among participants based on their positions within the Company, and AFG believes that
the consideration of these factors results in reasonable grant levels to its named executive
officers and other employees. Options and restricted shares granted to the named executive
officers are set forth in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 41 of this proxy statement.
Equity awards are generally granted at a regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting in
February after AFG issues a press release announcing results of the recently ended fiscal year.
Annual Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan
In 2009, the Company established the 2009 Plan as discussed above in Proposal No. 3. The 2009
Plan was established to formalize the Compensation Committees practice of rewarding the Co-CEOs
with equity awards for the achievement of Company performance objectives to enhance the
profitability of the Company and is designed to reflect the current market for executive
compensation and to promote corporate performance that the Compensation Committee believes will
enhance long-term shareholder value.
Under the 2009 Plan, the Company may grant bonus awards to the Co-CEOs (the only participants
in the 2009 Plan) only in the form of shares of common stock of the Company, which further aligns
the interests of the Co-CEOs with those of all shareholders, and only based upon the achievement of
the performance goals set forth in the 2009 Plan.
Performance criteria and performance goals for 2010 were established by the Compensation
Committee in February 2010. Under the 2009 Plan in effect for 2010, $400,000 in shares of AFG
common stock was allocated to each of eight financial measurements for each Co-CEO: growth of core
operating earnings per share of at least $3.60; growth in book value (as adjusted for gains/losses
on fixed maturity securities and certain non-core charges) of at least 8%; growth in book value of
at least 8%; the achievement of a combined ratio of 88% or less; the achievement of pre-tax,
pre-interest expense earnings of GAFRI of at least $190 million; the outperformance of the
Companys fixed income portfolio over three-year period ending December 31, 2010 over an industry
benchmark; achieving a return on equity of at least 11%; and achieving at least a 10% growth in
share price from the end of 2009 to the end of 2010 coupled with the return for the Companys
common stock exceeding the S&P 500 Insurance Stock Index during 2010. Each of the eight financial
measurements were attained for 2010, and as a result, $3,200,000 in shares of common stock (94,151
shares) were awarded to each of the Co-CEOs.
The Equity Bonus Plan discussed in Proposal No. 3 has, beginning in 2011, replaced the 2009
Plan.
Recovery of Prior Awards
Other than in the 2009 Plan, the Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan (Proposal No. 3) and the Annual
Executive Bonus Plan (Proposal No. 4), AFG does not have a policy with respect to adjustment or
recovery of awards or payments if relevant company performance measures upon which previous awards
were based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of such award
or payment. Under those circumstances, we expect that the Compensation Committee and the Board
would evaluate whether compensation adjustments were appropriate based upon the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicable restatement or adjustment. Nevertheless, the Company is
subject to the provisions of Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, with its recoupment
requirements. In addition, each of the Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan and the Annual Senior Executive
Bonus Plan contain specific provisions regarding recovery of awards in the event of restatement of
materially inaccurate financial results.
- 36 -
Stock Ownership Guidelines
AFGs Board adopted executive stock ownership guidelines in 2006 because it believes that it
is in the best interests of AFG and its shareholders to align the financial interests of its
executives and certain other officers of the Company and its principal subsidiaries with those of
AFGs shareholders. AFGs Board also adopted such guidelines because it believes that the
investment community values stock ownership by such officers and that share ownership demonstrates
a commitment to and belief in the long-term profitability of AFG. Under the guidelines, AFGs
Co-CEOs are required to own an amount of AFG common stock which is equal to or exceeds five times
their annual base salary; other named executive officers and certain other senior officers of the
Company and its major subsidiaries (in excess of 40 executives) are required to own an amount of
AFG common stock which is equal to or exceeds their annual base salary. Generally, persons subject
to the guidelines were required to achieve the applicable ownership guideline by January 1, 2011,
and all executives to whom the guidelines apply had met their ownership target as of such date.
The Co-CEOs own AFG common stock having a value well in excess of the guidelines indicated by their
annual base salary.
Retirement and Other Related Benefits
The Company provides retirement benefits to named executive officers through a combination of
qualified (under the Internal Revenue Code) and nonqualified plans. AFG provides retirement
benefits to qualified employees through the 401(k) Retirement and Savings Plan (401(k) RASP), a
defined contribution plan. AFG makes all contributions to the retirement fund portion of the plan
and matches a percentage of employee contributions to the savings fund. The amount of such
contributions and matching payments are based on a percentage of the employees salary up to
certain thresholds. AFG also makes available to certain employees benefits in its Nonqualified
Auxiliary RASP (Auxiliary RASP). The purpose of the Auxiliary RASP is to enable employees whose
contributions in the retirement contribution portion of the 401(k) RASP are limited by IRS
regulations to have an additional benefit to the 401(k) RASP.
The Company also maintains a Deferred Compensation Plan pursuant to which certain employees of
AFG and its subsidiaries (currently those paid $110,000 or more annually) may defer up to 80% of
their annual salary and/or bonus. For 2010, participants could elect to have the value of
deferrals (i) earn a fixed rate of interest, set annually by the Board of Directors (4 1/2% in 2010),
(ii) fluctuate based on the market value of AFG common stock, as adjusted to reflect stock splits,
distributions, dividends, or (iii) earn interest as determined by one or more publicly traded
mutual funds. A deferral term of either a fixed number of years or upon termination of employment
must be elected at the time of deferral. Under the plan, no federal or state income taxes are paid
on deferred compensation. Rather, such taxes will be due upon receipt at the end of the deferral
period. The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 43 of this proxy statement discloses
2010 compensation earned by the named executive officers in connection with the Deferred
Compensation Plan.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Perquisites, such as insurance coverage, security services, certain entertainment expenses,
administrative staff attending to occasional personal matters, and the personal use of corporate
aircraft, are made available to AFGs executive officers. These benefits are described below, and
the estimated costs to the Company of such benefits are included in the All Other Compensation
table below on page 40. The Compensation Committee and the Co-CEOs have limited the benefit
attributable to the Co-CEOs personal use of corporate aircraft and insurance coverage. See Tally
Sheet discussion above. The Company does not provide tax gross-up payments to named executive
officers for any perquisites.
During 2010, as in prior years, the Company operated corporate aircraft used for the business
travel of senior management of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Board has encouraged the use
of corporate aircraft for the travel needs of the Companys Chairman of the Board and Co-CEOs,
including personal travel, in order to minimize and more efficiently utilize their travel time,
protect the confidentiality of their travel and the Companys business, and enhance their personal
security. Notwithstanding, the Compensation Committee and the Chairman of the Board and Co-CEOs
jointly acknowledge that such aircraft use is a personal benefit, and as such, the Compensation
Committee considers the cost to the Company of such use to be an element of the total compensation
paid to these individuals.
- 37 -
The Compensation Committee believes these perquisites to be reasonable, particularly as a part
of total executive compensation, comparable with peer companies and consistent with the Companys
overall executive compensation programs.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on these reviews and discussions,
the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis be included in the Companys proxy statement on Schedule 14A.
|
|
|
Members of the Compensation Committee:
|
|
Terry S. Jacobs (Chairman) |
|
|
William W. Verity |
|
|
Kenneth C. Ambrecht |
- 38 -
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the aggregate compensation paid to or earned by the named
executive officers for each of the last three years. Such compensation includes amounts paid by
AFG and its subsidiaries and certain affiliates for the years indicated. Amounts shown relate to
the year indicated, regardless of when paid. AFG has no employment agreements with the named
executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
($) (1) |
|
|
($) (2) |
|
|
($) (3) |
|
|
($) (4) |
|
|
($) (5) |
|
|
($) (6) |
|
|
($) |
|
Carl H. Lindner III |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,150,000 |
|
|
|
3,667,670 |
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
2,275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,129 |
|
|
|
8,250,799 |
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,144,250 |
|
|
|
1,968,668 |
|
|
|
219,375 |
|
|
|
1,990,625 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
|
|
589,370 |
|
|
|
5,917,156 |
|
and Co-President (Co- |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594,000 |
|
|
|
1,943,500 |
|
|
|
14,180 |
|
|
|
730,017 |
|
|
|
4,381,697 |
|
Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Craig Lindner |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,150,000 |
|
|
|
3,667,670 |
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
2,275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781,535 |
|
|
|
8,319,205 |
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,144,250 |
|
|
|
1,968,668 |
|
|
|
219,375 |
|
|
|
1,990,625 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
|
|
630,490 |
|
|
|
5,958,276 |
|
and Co-President (Co- |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594,000 |
|
|
|
1,943,500 |
|
|
|
14,180 |
|
|
|
743,089 |
|
|
|
4,394,769 |
|
Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith A. Jensen |
|
2010 |
|
|
637,500 |
|
|
|
217,263 |
|
|
|
222,500 |
|
|
|
938,500 |
|
|
|
5,389 |
|
|
|
113,813 |
|
|
|
2,134,964 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
2009 |
|
|
634,150 |
|
|
|
143,250 |
|
|
|
146,250 |
|
|
|
1,141,875 |
|
|
|
16,454 |
|
|
|
102,054 |
|
|
|
2,184,033 |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
2008 |
|
|
640,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,000 |
|
|
|
704,700 |
|
|
|
7,162 |
|
|
|
95,437 |
|
|
|
1,843,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. Evans |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,070,000 |
|
|
|
271,640 |
|
|
|
278,125 |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,903 |
|
|
|
2,793,668 |
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,066,150 |
|
|
|
179,063 |
|
|
|
182,813 |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,096 |
|
|
|
2,587,122 |
|
General Counsel |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495,000 |
|
|
|
1,041,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,607 |
|
|
|
2,681,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Mischell |
|
2010 |
|
|
590,000 |
|
|
|
190,098 |
|
|
|
194,688 |
|
|
|
480,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,190 |
|
|
|
1,551,976 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
2009 |
|
|
590,000 |
|
|
|
125,353 |
|
|
|
127,969 |
|
|
|
480,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,128 |
|
|
|
1,418,450 |
|
Taxes |
|
2008 |
|
|
597,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,500 |
|
|
|
464,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,975 |
|
|
|
1,492,575 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts shown are not reduced to reflect the named executive officers elections, if any, to
defer receipt of salary into the Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount represents the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for
compensation expense incurred by the Company in connection with discretionary restricted stock
awards made by the Compensation Committee under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and, with
respect to the Co-CEOs, bonuses under the Annual Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan in the form of AFG
common stock (as further described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section
beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement) in each fiscal year in accordance with FASB ASC
718 (Compensation Stock Compensation), rather than an amount paid to or realized by the
Co-CEO. |
|
(3) |
|
Amount represents the grant date fair value which will be expensed for financial statement
reporting purposes over the vesting period of the options in accordance with ASC 718, rather
than an amount paid to or realized by the named executive officer. There can be no assurance
that the amounts recognized in accordance with ASC 718 will ever be realized. |
|
(4) |
|
Amount represents payment for performance in the year indicated, whenever paid, under the
Senior Executive Annual Bonus Plan as further described in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement. As these bonus payments were
made pursuant to a performance-based annual bonus plan, no separate bonus column appears in
the table. Includes, for Mr. Jensen, amounts paid under a subsidiary incentive compensation
plan. |
|
(5) |
|
Amounts represent above market earnings on deferrals under the Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
(6) |
|
See All Other Compensation chart below for amounts, which include perquisites, Company or
subsidiary contributions or allocations under the (i) defined contribution retirement plans
and (ii) employee savings plan
in which the named executive officers participate (and related accruals for their benefit
under the Companys benefit equalization plan which generally makes up certain reductions
caused by Internal Revenue Code limitations in the Companys contributions to certain of the
Companys retirement plans) and Company paid group life insurance. |
- 39 -
All Other Compensation2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item |
|
C. H. Lindner III |
|
|
S. C. Lindner |
|
|
K. A. Jensen |
|
|
J. E. Evans |
|
|
T. E. Mischell |
|
Group life insurance |
|
$ |
4,902 |
|
|
$ |
4,902 |
|
|
$ |
4,902 |
|
|
$ |
7,524 |
|
|
$ |
7,524 |
|
Insurance (Auto/Home Executive Insurance Program) |
|
|
276,689 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
14,139 |
|
|
|
30,092 |
|
|
|
7,845 |
|
Aircraft Usage (1) |
|
|
229,654 |
|
|
|
251,203 |
|
|
|
12,647 |
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Car and Related Expenses |
|
|
4,902 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
Security Services |
|
|
50,889 |
|
|
|
25,445 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Meals and Entertainment |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
3,056 |
|
Administrative/Secretarial Services |
|
|
77,468 |
|
|
|
125,519 |
|
|
|
19,700 |
|
|
|
20,095 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Annual RASP Contribution (2) |
|
|
18,375 |
|
|
|
18,375 |
|
|
|
18,375 |
|
|
|
18,375 |
|
|
|
18,375 |
|
Annual Auxiliary RASP Contribution |
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
713,129 |
|
|
$ |
781,535 |
|
|
$ |
113,813 |
|
|
$ |
123,903 |
|
|
$ |
97,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Board of Directors has encouraged the Companys Chairman and Co-CEOs to use corporate
aircraft for all travel whenever practicable for productivity, security and confidentiality
reasons. On certain occasions, an executives spouse, other family members or guests may fly
on the corporate aircraft. The value of the use of corporate aircraft is calculated based on
the aggregate incremental cost to the Company, including fuel costs, trip-related maintenance,
universal weather-monitoring costs, on-board catering, landing/ramp fees and other
miscellaneous variable costs. Fixed costs which do not change based on usage, such as pilot
salaries, the amortized costs of the company aircraft, and the cost of maintenance not related
to trips, are excluded. Amounts for personal use of company aircraft are included in the
table. The amounts reported utilize a different valuation methodology than used for income tax
purposes, where the cost of the personal use of corporate aircraft has been calculated using
the Standard Industrial Fare Level (SIFL) tables found in the tax regulations. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a Company 41/2% match on employee 401(k) contributions. |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the named executive officers
do not have employment, severance or change in control agreements with the Company. In addition,
any agreements, plans or arrangements that provide for payments to a named executive officer at,
following, or in connection with any termination (including retirement) of such named executive
officer, do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the named executive officer,
and are available generally to all salaried employees. All options and restricted shares granted
under the Companys shareholder approved equity compensation plans provide for the acceleration of
vesting upon a change in control.
- 40 -
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
Exercise or |
|
|
Closing |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Base Price |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
of Option |
|
|
Price on |
|
|
Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
Awards (1) |
|
|
of Stock |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
the Date |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
Grant |
|
Thresh- |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
or Units |
|
|
Options |
|
|
($/Sh) |
|
|
of Grant |
|
|
Awards |
|
Name |
|
Date |
|
old ($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(2)(3) |
|
|
($/Sh) |
|
|
($) (4) |
|
Carl H. Lindner III |
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
434,525 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
2,275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,233,145 |
|
S. Craig Lindner |
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
434,525 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
2,275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,233,145 |
|
Keith A. Jensen |
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
217,263 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
222,500 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. Evans |
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
271,640 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,250 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
278,125 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
875,000 |
|
|
|
1,093,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Mischell |
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
190,098 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,875 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
194,688 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These columns show the range of payouts targeted for 2010 performance under the 2010 Annual
Senior Executive Bonus Plan with respect to the Co-CEOs and the remaining named executive
officers. These amounts, paid in 2011, are shown in the Summary Compensation Table in the
column titled Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation because these awards were recognized in
2010 for financial statement reporting purposes. |
|
(2) |
|
These employee stock options were granted pursuant to the Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
and become exercisable as to 20% of the shares initially granted on the first anniversary of
the date of grant, with an additional 20% becoming exercisable on each subsequent anniversary.
The options become fully exercisable in the event of death or disability or upon a change in
control of the Company. More discussion regarding the Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan can
be found in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 28 of this
proxy statement. |
|
(3) |
|
Under the terms of the Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, stock options are granted at an
exercise price equal to the average of the high and low trading prices on the date of grant. |
|
(4) |
|
This column represents, with respect to stock options, the aggregate full grant date fair
value in accordance with ASC 718 of options granted during the year. There can be no
assurance that the options will ever be exercised (in which case no value will be realized by
the executive) or that the amount received by the executive upon exercise will equal the ASC
718 value. |
- 41 -
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities |
|
|
of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Market Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or Units |
|
|
Shares or Units |
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock That |
|
|
of Stock That |
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Option Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have Not |
|
|
Have Not |
|
|
|
Award Grant |
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Vested |
|
Name |
|
Date |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Expiration Date |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
Carl H. Lindner III |
|
02/27/2004 |
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
03/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/24/2005 |
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.28 |
|
|
|
02/27/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2006 |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
26.89 |
|
|
|
02/22/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2007 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
36.57 |
|
|
|
02/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/21/2008 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
27.20 |
|
|
|
02/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2009 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
19.10 |
|
|
|
02/12/2019 |
|
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
363,263 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
02/11/2020 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
565,075 |
|
S. Craig Lindner |
|
02/27/2004 |
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
03/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/24/2005 |
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.28 |
|
|
|
02/27/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2006 |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
26.89 |
|
|
|
02/22/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2007 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
36.57 |
|
|
|
02/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/21/2008 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
27.20 |
|
|
|
02/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2009 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
19.10 |
|
|
|
02/12/2019 |
|
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
363,263 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
02/11/2020 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
565,075 |
|
Keith A. Jensen |
|
02/27/2004 |
|
|
50,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
02/27/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/24/2005 |
|
|
60,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.28 |
|
|
|
02/24/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2006 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
26.89 |
|
|
|
02/22/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2007 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
36.57 |
|
|
|
02/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/21/2008 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
27.20 |
|
|
|
02/21/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2009 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
19.10 |
|
|
|
02/12/2019 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
242,175 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
02/11/2020 |
|
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
|
282,538 |
|
James E. Evans |
|
02/20/2003 |
|
|
31,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.30 |
|
|
|
02/23/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/27/2004 |
|
|
65,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
02/27/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/24/2005 |
|
|
75,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.28 |
|
|
|
02/24/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2006 |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
26.89 |
|
|
|
02/22/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2007 |
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
36.57 |
|
|
|
02/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/21/2008 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
27.20 |
|
|
|
02/21/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2009 |
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
19.10 |
|
|
|
02/12/2019 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
302,719 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,250 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
02/11/2020 |
|
|
|
10,940 |
|
|
|
353,253 |
|
Thomas E. Mischell |
|
02/27/2004 |
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
02/27/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/24/2005 |
|
|
52,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.28 |
|
|
|
02/24/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2006 |
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
26.89 |
|
|
|
02/22/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/22/2007 |
|
|
26,250 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
36.57 |
|
|
|
02/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/21/2008 |
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
26,250 |
|
|
|
27.20 |
|
|
|
02/21/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2009 |
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
19.10 |
|
|
|
02/12/2019 |
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
|
|
211,919 |
|
|
|
02/11/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,875 |
|
|
|
24.83 |
|
|
|
02/11/2020 |
|
|
|
7,656 |
|
|
|
247,212 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents employee stock options that become exercisable as to 20% of the shares initially
granted on the first anniversary of the date of grant, with an additional 20% becoming
exercisable on each subsequent anniversary. They are generally exercisable for ten years.
The options become fully exercisable in the event of death or disability or upon a change in
control of the Company. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents restricted shares which vest in full four years following the award grant date.
Shares vest in full in the event of death or disability or upon a change in control of the
Company. |
- 42 -
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The table below shows the number of shares of AFG common stock acquired during 2010 upon the
exercise of options. No shares were acquired in 2010 by the named executive officers pursuant to
the vesting of stock awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Name |
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
|
|
Value Realized on Exercise($) (1) |
|
Carl H. Lindner III |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
2,301,857 |
|
S. Craig Lindner |
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
1,450,350 |
|
Keith A. Jensen |
|
|
45,525 |
|
|
|
695,892 |
|
James E. Evans |
|
|
71,200 |
|
|
|
1,188,838 |
|
Thomas E. Mischell |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
1,381,905 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts reflect the difference between the exercise price of the option and the closing price
on the date of exercise. |
Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
The Company provides retirement benefits to named executive officers through a combination of
qualified (under the Internal Revenue Code) and nonqualified plans. AFG makes available to certain
employees, including its named executive officers, benefits in its Nonqualified Auxiliary RASP
(Auxiliary RASP). The purpose of the Auxiliary RASP is to enable employees whose contributions
are limited by IRS regulations in the retirement contribution portion of the AFG Retirement and
Savings Plan to have an additional benefit to the RASP.
The Company also maintains a Deferred Compensation Plan pursuant to which certain key
employees of AFG and its subsidiaries may defer up to 80% of their annual salary and/or bonus. The
deferral term of either a fixed number of years or upon termination of employment must be elected
at the time of deferral. Under the plan, no federal or state income taxes are paid on deferred
compensation. Rather, such taxes will be due upon receipt at the end of the deferral period.
The table below discloses information on the nonqualified deferred compensation of the named
executives in 2010, including the Auxiliary RASP and the Deferred Compensation Plan. Any amounts
deferred are included in compensation figures disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table on page
39 of this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
contributions in |
|
|
contributions in |
|
|
earnings in last |
|
|
withdrawals / |
|
|
balances at last |
|
Name |
|
last FY($) |
|
|
last FY($) (1) |
|
|
FY($) (2) |
|
|
distributions($) |
|
|
FYE($) |
|
Carl H. Lindner III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
202,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,987,050 |
|
S. Craig Lindner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
225,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,321,761 |
|
Keith A. Jensen |
|
|
110,336 |
|
|
|
43,139 |
|
|
|
330,592 |
|
|
|
(746,050 |
) |
|
|
1,274,052 |
|
James E. Evans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
114,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168,452 |
|
Thomas E. Mischell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
256,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,532,946 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents Company contributions credited to participants Auxiliary RASP accounts which are
included in All Other Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table on page 39, and $5,389,
of preferential earnings or above market earnings on deferred compensation which is reported
under Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings in that table. |
|
(2) |
|
Earnings are calculated by reference to actual earnings or losses of mutual funds and
securities, including Company common stock, held by the plans. |
- 43 -
Director Compensation
Directors receive compensation under the Companys Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan
(the Director Plan). During 2010, all directors who were not officers or employees of the
Company were paid the following fees: an annual board retainer of $40,000 and $1,750 per each board
meeting attended. The Audit Committee Chairman received an additional $30,000 retainer. Other
committee Chairmen received an additional $12,000 annual retainer. Committee members (non-chairman)
received an additional $6,000 annual retainer for each committee served. All committee members
received $1,250 for each meeting attended. Non-employee directors who become directors during the
year receive a pro rata portion of these annual retainers. In addition, non-employee directors
receive an annual award of restricted stock. In 2010, this award was $85,000.
Compensation earned for director service in 2010 is set forth in the following table. Other
than the restricted stock awards, all amounts were paid in cash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
Name |
|
Cash ($) |
|
|
($) (2) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
($) (3) |
|
|
($) |
|
Carl H. Lindner |
|
|
130,000 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,244 |
|
|
|
739,244 |
|
Kenneth C. Ambrecht |
|
|
98,500 |
|
|
|
83,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,407 |
|
Theodore H. Emmerich |
|
|
109,000 |
|
|
|
83,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,907 |
|
Terry S. Jacobs |
|
|
104,500 |
|
|
|
83,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,407 |
|
Gregory G. Joseph |
|
|
94,750 |
|
|
|
83,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,657 |
|
William W. Verity |
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
83,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,907 |
|
John I. Von Lehman |
|
|
92,250 |
|
|
|
83,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,157 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In January 2005, Carl H. Lindner stepped down as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, but
remained the non-executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Lindner has requested that his annual
salary be no more than the compensation paid to the Companys independent directors. In 2005,
the Compensation Committee set his annualized salary at $130,000, which has not changed
through 2010. The Audit Committee annually reviews this salary and all other compensation and
perquisites received by him. The Audit Committee has determined that the total compensation
and benefits paid to Mr. Lindner are appropriate in recognition of Mr. Lindners many
contributions to the Companys success. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as the compensation cost for financial statement reporting purposes with respect
to the annual stock grant under the Director Plan. See Securities Ownership on page 27 for
detail on beneficial ownership of AFG common stock by directors. |
|
(3) |
|
Amount includes the following: aircraft usage, $192,000; automobile related expenses,
$31,000; security, $76,000; insurance (auto/home), $213,000; administrative/secretarial
services, $83,744; and annual 401(k) RASP contribution, group life insurance and meals and
entertainment, $6,300. The value of the use of corporate aircraft is calculated based on the
aggregate incremental cost to the Company, including fuel costs, trip-related maintenance,
universal weather-monitoring costs, on-board catering, landing/ramp fees and other
miscellaneous variable costs. Fixed costs which do not change based on usage, such as pilot
salaries, the amortized costs of the company aircraft, and the cost of maintenance not related
to trips, are excluded. |
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Director Plan also sets forth stock ownership guidelines for the non-employee directors.
Specifically, within three years after a non-employee director receives the first restricted stock
award under the Director Plan, the non-employee director, as a consideration in the determination
of his or her future service to AFGs Board of Directors, must beneficially own shares of AFG
common stock with a value of at least six times the then-current annual board retainer.
- 44 -
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Stock exchange rules require the Company to conduct an appropriate review of all related party
transactions (including those required to be disclosed by the Company pursuant to SEC Regulation
S-K Item 404) for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis and that all such
transactions must be approved by the Audit Committee or another committee comprised of independent
directors. As a result, our Audit Committee Charter provides that the Audit Committee review and
approve all related party transactions. In considering the transaction, the Committee may consider
all relevant factors, including as applicable: (i) the Companys business rationale for entering
into the transaction; (ii) the alternatives to entering into a related person transaction; (iii)
whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those available to third parties, or in the case
of employment relationships, to employees generally; (iv) the potential for the transaction to lead
to an actual or apparent conflict of interest and any safeguards imposed to prevent such actual or
apparent conflicts; and (v) the overall fairness of the transaction to the Company.
While the Company adheres to this policy for potential related person transactions, the policy
is not in written form (other than as a part of listing agreements with stock exchanges). However,
approval of such related person transactions is evidenced by Audit Committee resolutions in
accordance with our practice of approving transactions in this manner.
Other than as follows, there were no such transactions in 2010 requiring disclosure under
applicable rules. Subsidiaries of the Company employed a son of one of the Co-CEOs and a
son-in-law of the other Co-CEO during 2010, and the individuals received compensation of $132,500
and $123,500, respectively, for 2010.
PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS FOR 2012 ANNUAL MEETING
Under the rules and regulations of the SEC, any proposal which a shareholder of the Company
intends to present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2012 and which such
shareholder desires to have included in the Companys proxy materials for such meeting must be
received by the Secretary of the Company not less than 120 calendar days before the anniversary
date of this years proxy statement, or December 2, 2011. Our Regulations, as they may be amended
from time to time, may contain additional requirements for matters to be properly presented at
annual meetings of shareholders.
The proxy card used by AFG for the annual meeting typically grants authority to management to
vote in its discretion on any matters that come before the meeting as to which adequate notice has
not been received. In order for a notice to be deemed adequate for the 2012 annual meeting, it must
be received by February 17, 2012.
COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has adopted procedures for shareholders to send written communications
to the Board as a group. Communications must be clearly addressed either to the Board of Directors,
a committee of the Board or any or all of the independent directors, and sent to either of the
following, who will forward any communications except for spam, junk mail, mass mailings, job
inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, or patently offensive or otherwise
inappropriate material:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karl J. Grafe
|
|
Theodore H. Emmerich |
|
|
Vice President, Assistant General
|
|
Chairman of the Audit Committee |
|
|
Counsel & Secretary
|
|
American Financial Group, Inc. |
|
|
American Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
One East Fourth Street |
|
|
One East Fourth Street
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 |
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 |
|
|
- 45 -
One East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Annex A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CO-CEO EQUITY BONUS PLAN
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON MARCH 15, 2011
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Annual Co-CEO Equity Bonus Plan (the Plan) is to further the
profitability of American Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) to the benefit of the shareholders
of the Company by promoting extraordinary levels of corporate performance and by incentivizing the
Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company through the potential for performance-based equity
compensation as a component of a Plan Participants compensation.
When used in the Plan, the following terms have the following meanings.
1.1. Award means an award made pursuant to the Plan.
1.2. Award Agreement means the agreement entered into between the Company and a Participant,
setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to an Award granted to the Participant.
1.3. Board means the Board of Directors of the Company.
1.4. Bonus Amount means the amount that may become payable under an Award as a result of the
satisfaction of Performance Objectives for a Performance Period.
1.5. Change of Control means a change in ownership or effective control of the Company as
defined in Section 1.409A-3 of the Treasury Regulations to Section 409A of the Code that also meets
one of the following:
(a) an event or series of events by which Carl H. Lindner, his wife and all lineal descendants
and their wives, as well as trusts established for the benefit of such person (collectively,
Lindner Family Members) collectively cease to be the beneficial owner, as defined in Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act of (i) at least 25% of the Common Stock and (ii) a sufficient number of
Shares so that Lindner Family Members in the aggregate own more Shares than any other person or
group, as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, by a margin of at
least 10% of the total number of Shares then outstanding; or
(b) during any period of one year after January 1, 2011, individuals who at the beginning of
such period constitute the Board and any new director whose election by the Board or nomination for
election by the Companys shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the
directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose
election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute
a majority thereof.
1.6. Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
1.7. Committee means the committee appointed by the Board as described under Section 3.
A-1
1.8. Performance Objectives means the objective targets selected by the Committee to measure
performance, the outcome of which is substantially uncertain at the time selected, for a
Performance Period which shall be based upon one or more of the following performance-based
business
criteria, either on a Company, subsidiary, division, business unit or line of business basis
or in comparison with peer group performance or to an index, as the Committee deems appropriate:
net income or operating income; net income per share or operating income per share; aggregate or
per-share book value or adjusted book value; written premiums (net or gross); return measures
(including, but not limited to, return on assets, investment portfolio, capital, invested capital,
equity, sales, or premiums); cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free
cash flow, and cash flow return on capital); combined ratios; share price (including, but not
limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return); and increase in or maintenance of the
Companys market share. In the discretion of the Committee at the time of the grant of an Award
and as set forth in an Award Agreement, any Performance Objective may be calculated after
accounting for specified adjustments.
1.9. Performance Period means a period of at least one and at most five fiscal years of the
Company as determined by the Committee at the time of the grant of an Award. Upon the grant of an
Award, the Performance Period shall be fixed and may not subsequently be changed. Performance
Periods may overlap.
1.10. Shares means shares of common stock of the Company.
1.11. Subsidiary means a subsidiary of the Company within the meaning of Code Section
424(f).
Awards under the Plan are intended to be performance-based compensation for purposes of
Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Plan, the Plan
shall be administered by the Compensation Committee or a successor committee or subcommittee (the
Committee) of the Board comprised solely of two or more outside directors as defined pursuant
to Section 162(m) of the Code. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall
determine the Performance Period and Performance Objectives applicable to Awards and all other
terms and conditions of Awards. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have
the authority to interpret the Plan and establish, adopt or revise such rules and regulations and
to make all determinations relating to the Plan as it may deem necessary or advisable for the
administration of the Plan. The Committees interpretation of the Plan and all of its actions and
decisions with respect to the Plan shall be final, binding and conclusive on all parties.
The participants in the Plan are the Companys Co-Chief Executive Officers (the
Participants).
|
4. |
|
SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN; MAXIMUM AWARDS |
The number of Shares which may be issued under this Plan shall not exceed One Million Five
Hundred Thousand (1,500,000) Shares. Shares issued under the Plan shall be authorized but unissued
Shares. If there shall occur any change with respect to the outstanding Shares by reason of any
recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, extraordinary dividend, stock split, reverse
stock split or other distribution with respect to the Shares, or any merger, reorganization,
consolidation, combination, spin-off or other similar corporate change, or any other change
affecting the common stock of the Company, the Committee may, in the manner and to the extent that
it deems appropriate and equitable to the Participants and consistent with the terms of the Plan,
cause an adjustment to be made in the maximum number and kind of Shares provided in this Section 5.
The maximum amount which may be awarded to any Participant for any Performance Period shall be
$6,000,000.
A-2
|
5. |
|
ESTABLISHMENT OF PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND BONUS AMOUNTS |
The Committee shall establish objectively determinable Performance Objectives and Bonus
Amounts that shall become payable upon the achievement of such Performance Objectives and the
applicable Performance Period annually. The Performance Objectives, Bonus Amount and Performance
Period shall be set forth in an Award Agreement approved by the Committee. In no event shall the
establishment of any Participants Bonus Amount give a Participant any right to be paid all or any
part of such amount unless and until a bonus is actually awarded pursuant to Section 7.
|
6. |
|
DETERMINATION OF BONUSES AND TIME OF PAYMENT |
6.1. As soon as practicable after the end of each Performance Period, the Committee shall
determine whether or not the Performance Objectives of each Participant have been attained and
shall certify to such attainment in writing. The Committee shall determine the Bonus Amount, if
any, to be awarded to each Participant for such Performance Period according to the terms of this
Plan. Such Bonus Amount determinations shall be based on achievement of the Performance Objectives
for such Performance Period.
6.2. Except as otherwise provided in Section 8.2, once the Bonus Amount is determined for each
Participant pursuant to Section 7, it shall be paid in Shares. The payment, if any, shall take
place between March 1 and March 31 following any Performance Period. The Participant must continue
to be employed through the last day of the Performance Period to be eligible for the Bonus Amount.
For the purpose of determining the number of Shares to be awarded under this Plan, the value of a
Share shall be calculated by taking the average high and low sale prices of a Share on the date of
determination of the Bonus Amount as provided in Section 7.
|
7. |
|
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT; CHANGE OF CONTROL |
7.1. Notwithstanding the requirement to be employed on the last day of the Performance Period
in order to be eligible for payment of the Bonus Amount described in Section 7.2, if a
Participants employment with the Company is terminated during a Performance Period for which
Performance Objectives have been attained for any reason other than discharge for cause, the
Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the Participant is entitled to a portion of
the Bonus Amount that is determined at the end of the Performance Period and payable at the time
specified in Section 7.2. This provision only provides discretion in determining whether to waive
the employment requirement. In the event the employment requirement is waived, the Bonus Amount
shall be a pro rata amount based on the number of months of the Participants employment during the
Performance Period with the month of termination counting as a full month of employment. For
purposes of the Plan, cause shall mean: (i) a Participants failure or refusal to materially
perform his duties; (ii) a Participants failure or refusal to follow material directions of the
Board or any other act of material insubordination on the part of Participant; (iii) the commission
by a Participant of an act of fraud or embezzlement against the Company; or (iv) any conviction of,
or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony by a Participant.
7.2. Notwithstanding any provision in this Plan to the contrary, upon the occurrence of a
Change of Control during the course of a Performance Period, then a Participant shall be deemed to
have satisfied the Performance Objectives in order to receive the target bonus as specified in the
Participants Award Agreement. Distribution of amounts payable in connection with an Award shall be
made in cash immediately following (but in no event later than 30 days) following the occurrence of
the Change of Control.
A-3
In the event of a restatement of materially inaccurate financial results, the Committee has
the discretion to recover bonus awards that were paid under the Plan to a Participant with respect
to the period covered by the restatement. If the payment of a bonus award would have been lower had
the achievement of applicable financial performance targets been calculated based on such restated
financial results, the Committee may, if it determines appropriate in its sole discretion, to the
extent permitted by law, recover from the Participant the portion of the bonus award paid in excess
of the payment that would have been made based on the restated financial results. The Company will
not seek to recover bonus awards paid more than three years after the date the Company files the
report with the Securities and Exchange Commission that contained the incorrect financial results.
This Section 10 is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any requirements under any applicable law or
regulation, including but not limited to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and shall apply notwithstanding anything to the contrary
in the Plan.
|
9. |
|
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 409A OF THE CODE |
It is intended that this Plan shall either be exempt from the application of, or comply with,
the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. This Plan shall be construed, administered, and
governed in a manner that reflects such intent, and the Committee shall not take any action that
would be inconsistent with such intent. Without limiting the foregoing, the bonus amount shall not
be deferred, accelerated, extended, paid out, settled, adjusted, substituted, exchanged or modified
in a manner that would cause the award to fail to satisfy the conditions of an applicable exception
from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or otherwise would subject the Participant to the
additional tax imposed under Section 409A of the Code. The amounts payable pursuant to this
Agreement are intended to be separate payments that qualify for the short-term deferral exception
to Section 409A of the Code to the maximum extent possible.
10.1. Government and Other Regulations. The obligation of the Company to pay bonuses
shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations and to such approvals by
governmental agencies as may be required.
10.2. Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the right to deduct from all bonuses
paid any federal, state or local taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such
payments.
10.3. Claim to Bonuses and Employment Rights. Neither this Plan nor any action taken
hereunder shall be construed as giving any Participant any right to be retained in the employ of
the Company or a Subsidiary.
10.4. Beneficiaries. Any bonuses awarded and otherwise payable under this Plan to a
Participant who dies prior to payment shall be paid at the time specified in Section 7.2 to the
beneficiary designated by the Participant on a form filed with the Company. If no such beneficiary
has been designated or survives the Participant, payment shall be made to the Participants legal
representative. A beneficiary designation may be changed or revoked by a Participant at any time
provided the change or revocation is filed with the Company. If the Participant dies during the
Performance Period and while employed, the payment shall be made at the end of the Performance
Period at the time specified in Section 7.2 and shall be a pro rata amount based on the
Participants months of employment during the Performance Period prior to death with the month of
death counting as a full month of employment.
10.5. Nontransferability. A persons rights and interests under the Plan may not be
assigned, pledged or transferred except, in the event of a Participants death, to his designated
beneficiary as provided in the Plan or, in the absence of such designation, by will or the laws of
descent and distribution.
A-4
10.6. Indemnification. Each person who is or shall have been a member of the
Committee or of the Board shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company (to the extent
permitted by the Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations of the Company and applicable
law) against and from any loss, cost, liability or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably
incurred by him in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which he may
be a party or in which they may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under
the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him in settlement thereof, with the
Companys approval, or paid by him, in satisfaction of judgment in any such action, suit or
proceeding against him. He shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle
and defend the same before he undertakes to handle and defend it on his own behalf. The foregoing
right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which
such person may be entitled under the Companys Articles of Incorporation or Code of Regulations,
as a matter of law or otherwise or of any power that the Company may have to indemnify him or hold
him harmless.
10.7. Reliance on Reports. Each member of the Committee and each member of the Board
shall be fully justified in relying or acting in good faith upon any report made by the independent
certified public accountants of the Company or of its Subsidiaries or upon any other information
furnished in connection with the Plan by any officer, director or employee of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries. In no event shall any person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee
or of the Board be liable for any determination made or other action taken or any omission to act
in reliance upon any such report or information or for any action taken, including the furnishing
of information, or failure to act, if in good faith.
10.8. Expenses. The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company
and its Subsidiaries in such proportions as shall be agreed upon by them from time to time.
10.9. Titles and Headings. The titles and headings of the sections in the Plan are
for convenience of reference only, and, in the event of any conflict between any such title or
heading and the text of the Plan, such text shall control.
10.10. Shareholder Approval. This Plan shall become effective following its adoption
by the Board of Directors and its approval by the Companys shareholders on the date of the 2011
Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
11. |
|
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION |
The Board may at any time terminate the Plan. Other than modifying the number of Shares to be
issued under the Plan, the Board may at any time, or from time to time, amend or suspend and, if
suspended, reinstate the Plan in whole or in part. This Plan shall terminate upon the payment of
Bonus Amounts, if any, associated with all Performance Periods, provided that the Plan shall
continue in effect to the extent necessary to settle all matters relating to the payment of bonuses
awarded prior to any such termination or suspension.
A-5
Annex B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL SENIOR EXECUTIVE
BONUS PLAN
|
|
|
Adopted on March 15, 2011
The purpose of the Annual Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the Plan) is to further the
profitability of American Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) to the benefit of the shareholders
of the Company through promoting high levels of corporate performance by including
performance-based compensation as a component of a Plan participants annual compensation.
When used in the Plan, the following terms have the following meanings.
2.1. Board means the Board of Directors of the Company.
2.2. Bonus Year means a calendar year.
2.3. Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
2.4. Committee means the committee appointed by the Board as described under Section 3.
2.5. Performance Criteria means the objective targets selected by the Committee to measure
performance, the outcome of which is substantially uncertain at the time selected, for a Bonus Year
which shall be based upon one or more of the following performance-based business criteria, either
on a Company, Subsidiary, division, business unit or line of business basis or in comparison with
peer group performance or to an index, as the Committee deems appropriate: net income or operating
income; net income per share or operating income per share; aggregate or per-share book value or
adjusted book value; written premiums (net or gross); return measures (including, but not limited
to, return on assets, investment portfolio, capital, invested capital, equity, sales, or premiums);
cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free cash flow, and cash flow return
on capital); combined ratios; share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total
shareholder return); and increase in or maintenance of the Companys market share. In the
discretion of the Committee at the time of the annual selection of Performance Criteria for the
Bonus Year, any Performance Criteria may be calculated after accounting for specified adjustments.
2.6. Subsidiary means a subsidiary of the Company within the meaning of Code Section 424(f).
Bonuses under the Plan are intended to be performance-based compensation for purposes of
Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Plan, the Plan
shall be administered by the Compensation Committee or a successor committee or subcommittee of the
Board comprised solely of two or more outside directors as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of
the Code. Subject to the provisions of the Plan (and to the approval of the Board where specified
in the Plan), the Committee shall have exclusive power to determine the Performance Criteria
applicable to bonuses and all other terms and conditions (including performance requirements) to
which the payment of the bonuses may be subject and to certify that Performance Criteria are
attained. Subject to the provisions of the
Plan, the Committee shall have the authority to interpret the Plan and establish, adopt or revise
such rules and regulations and to make all determinations relating to the Plan as it may deem
necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. The Committees interpretation of the
Plan and all of its actions and decisions with respect to the Plan shall be final, binding and
conclusive on all parties.
B-1
The Plan shall remain in effect from the date of approval by the Board until terminated or
suspended by the Board as provided in Section 12.
Subject to the approval of the Committee, each of the Companys Co-Chief Executive Officers
and Senior Vice Presidents, if any, shall participate in the Plan (the Participants).
6. |
|
ESTABLISHMENT OF INDIVIDUAL BONUS TARGETS AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
The Committee shall approve annually the individual target amount of bonus (the Bonus
Target) that may be awarded to each Participant. In no event shall the establishment of any
Participants Bonus Target give a Participant any right to be paid all or any part of such amount
unless and until a bonus is actually awarded pursuant to Section 7.
The Committee shall establish annually the specific Performance Criteria to be used to
determine the amount of bonus, if any, to be paid to each Participant under the Plan.
7. |
|
DETERMINATION OF BONUSES AND TIME OF PAYMENT |
As soon as practicable after the end of each Bonus Year, the Committee shall determine whether
or not the Performance Criteria of each Participant have been attained and shall determine the
amount of the bonus, if any, to be awarded to each Participant for such year according to the terms
of this Plan. Such bonus determinations shall be based on achievement of the Performance Criteria
for such Bonus Year. The Committee shall certify in writing that the Performance Criteria have
been achieved prior to payment of any bonus under the Plan. The payment, if any, of a bonus amount
shall take place between February 1 and March 31 following any Bonus Year. The Participant must
continue to be employed through the last day of the Bonus Year to be eligible for the bonus.
Once the bonus is so determined for each Participant, it shall be paid in cash. The maximum
amount which may be awarded to any Participant for any Bonus Year shall be $5,000,000.
8. |
|
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT |
Notwithstanding the requirement to be employed on the last day of the Bonus Year in order to
be eligible for payment of the Bonus Amount described in Section 7, if a Participants employment
with the Company is terminated during a Performance Period for which Performance Criteria have been
attained for any reason other than discharge for cause, the Committee, in its sole discretion,
may determine that the Participant is entitled to a portion of the Bonus Amount that is determined
at the end of the Bonus Year and payable at the time specified in Section 7. This provision only
provides discretion in determining whether to waive the employment requirement. In the event the
employment requirement is waived, the bonus amount payable shall be a pro rata amount based on the
number of months of the Participants employment during the Performance Period with the month of
termination counting as a full month of employment. For purposes of the Plan, cause shall mean:
(i) a Participants failure or refusal to materially perform his duties; (ii) a Participants
failure or refusal to follow material directions of the Board or any other act of material
insubordination on the part of Participant; (iii) the commission by a Participant of an act of
fraud or embezzlement against the Company; or (iv) any conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo
contendere to, a felony by a Participant.
B-2
In the event of a Participants discharge for cause from the employment of the Company or a
Subsidiary, as the case may be, he shall not be entitled to any amount of bonus.
9. |
|
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 409A OF THE CODE |
It is intended that this Plan shall either be exempt from the application of, or comply with,
the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. This Plan shall be construed, administered, and
governed in a manner that reflects such intent, and the Committee shall not take any action that
would be inconsistent with such intent. Without limiting the foregoing, bonus amounts shall not be
deferred, accelerated, extended, paid out, settled, adjusted, substituted, exchanged or modified in
a manner that would cause the award to fail to satisfy the conditions of an applicable exception
from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or otherwise would subject the Participant to the
additional tax imposed under Section 409A of the Code. The amounts payable pursuant to this
Agreement are intended to be separate payments that qualify for the short-term deferral exception
to Section 409A of the Code to the maximum extent possible.
In the event of a restatement of materially inaccurate financial results, the Committee has
the discretion to recover bonus awards that were paid under the Plan to a Participant with respect
to the period covered by the restatement. If the payment of a bonus award would have been lower had
the achievement of applicable financial performance targets been calculated based on such restated
financial results, the Committee may, if it determines appropriate in its sole discretion, to the
extent permitted by law, recover from the Participant the portion of the bonus award paid in excess
of the payment that would have been made based on the restated financial results. The Company will
not seek to recover bonus awards paid more than three years after the date the Company files the
report with the Securities and Exchange Commission that contained the incorrect financial results.
This Section 10 is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any requirements under any applicable law or
regulation, including but not limited to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and shall apply notwithstanding anything to the contrary
in the Plan.
11.1. Government and Other Regulations. The obligation of the Company to make payment
of bonuses shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations and to such approvals by
governmental agencies as may be required.
11.2. Tax Withholding. The Company or a Subsidiary, as appropriate, shall have the
right to deduct from all bonuses paid in cash any federal, state or local taxes required by law to
be withheld with respect to such cash payments.
11.3. Claim to Bonuses and Employment Rights. Neither this Plan nor any action taken
hereunder shall be construed as giving any Participant any right to be retained in the employ of
the Company or a Subsidiary.
11.4. Beneficiaries. Any bonuses awarded under this Plan to a Participant who dies
prior to payment shall be paid as specified in Section 7 to the beneficiary designated by the
Participant on a form filed with the Company. If no such beneficiary has been designated or
survives the Participant, payment shall be made to the Participants legal representative. A
beneficiary designation may be changed or revoked by a Participant at any time provided the change
or revocation is filed with the Company. If the Participant dies during a Bonus Year and while
employed, the payment shall be made at the end of the Performance Period at the time specified in
Section 7 and shall be a pro rata amount based on the Participants months of employment during the
Performance Period prior to death with the month of death counting as a full month of employment.
B-3
11.5. Nontransferability. A persons rights and interests under the Plan may not be
assigned, pledged or transferred except, in the event of a Participants death, to his designated
beneficiary as provided in the Plan or, in the absence of such designation, by will or the laws of
descent and distribution.
11.6. Indemnification. Each person who is or shall have been a member of the
Committee or of the Board shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company (to the extent
permitted by the Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations of the Company and applicable
law) against and from any loss, cost, liability or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably
incurred by him in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which
he may be a party or in which they may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act
under the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him in settlement thereof, with the
Companys approval, or paid by him, in satisfaction of judgment in any such action, suit or
proceeding against him. He shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle
and defend the same before he undertakes to handle and defend it on his own behalf. The foregoing
right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which
such person may be entitled under the Companys Articles of Incorporation or Code of Regulations,
as a matter of law or otherwise or of any power that the Company may have to indemnify him or hold
him harmless.
11.7. Reliance on Reports. Each member of the Committee and each member of the Board
shall be fully justified in relying or acting in good faith upon any report made by the independent
certified public accountants of the Company or of its Subsidiaries or upon any other information
furnished in connection with the Plan by any officer or director of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries. In no event shall any person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee or
of the Board be liable for any determination made or other action taken or any omission to act in
reliance upon any such report or information or for any action taken, including the furnishing of
information, or failure to act, if in good faith.
11.8. Expenses. The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company
and its subsidiaries in such proportions as shall be agreed upon by them from time to time.
11.9. Pronouns. Masculine pronouns and other words of masculine gender shall refer to
both men and women.
11.10. Titles and Headings. The titles and headings of the sections in the Plan are
for convenience of reference only, and, in the event of any conflict between any such title or
heading and the text of the Plan, such text shall control.
12. |
|
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION |
The Board may at any time terminate the Plan. The Board may at any time, or from time to
time, amend or suspend and, if suspended, reinstate the Plan in whole or in part. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the Plan shall continue in effect to the extent necessary to settle all matters
relating to the payment of bonuses awarded prior to any such termination or suspension.
B-4
|
|
|
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
1 EAST FOURTH STREET
CINCINNATI, OH 45202
ATTN: KARL GRAFE
|
|
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of
information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or
meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and
follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting
instruction form. |
|
|
|
Electronic Delivery of Future PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy
materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards
and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for
electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet
and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials
electronically in future years. |
|
|
|
|
|
VOTE BY PHONE - 800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59
P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your
proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. |
|
|
|
|
|
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we
have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c)o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way,
Edgewood, NY 11717. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKSBELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
|
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
All
|
|
Withhold
All
|
|
For All
Except
|
|
To withhold authority to vote for any
individual nominee(s), mark For All
Except and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line
below. |
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the following: |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Election of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 Carl H. Lindner
|
|
02 Carl H. Lindner III
|
|
03 S. Craig Lindner
|
|
04 Kenneth C. Ambrecht
|
|
05 Theodore H. Emmerich |
06 James E. Evans
|
|
07 Terry S. Jacobs
|
|
08 Gregory G. Joseph
|
|
09 William W. Verity
|
|
10 John I. Von Lehman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5. |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal:
|
|
1 year |
|
2 years |
|
3 years |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Proposal to ratify the Audit Committees appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2011.
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
6 |
|
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory
Votes on Compensation of Named Executive
Officers.
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Proposal to Approve the Co-CEO Equity Bonus |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGAINST proposals 7 and 8. |
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Proposal to Approve the Annual Senior Executive
Bonus Plan.
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
7 |
|
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Employment Matters.
|
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Advisory Vote on Compensation of Named Executive Officers.
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
8 |
|
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Board Composition
|
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary,
please give
full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership,
please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN
BOX] |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners) |
Date |
|
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual
Report, Notice & Proxy Statement, Form 10-K is/are available at www.proxyvote.com.
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP. INC.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 11, 2011, 11:30 a.m. EDT
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints Karl J. Grafe and Mark A. Weiss, and either of them,
attorneys and proxies, with the power of substitution to each, to vote all shares of
common stock of the Company that the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held May 11, 2011 at 11:30
A.M., on the matters set forth on the reverse side (and at their discretion to
cumulate votes in the election of directors if cumulative voting is invoked by a
shareholder through proper notice to the Company), and on such other matters as may
properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
Continued and to be signed on reverse side