ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

(a) Organization

 Radio One, Inc. (a Delaware corporation referred to as “Radio One”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is an urban-oriented, multi-media company that primarily targets African-American and urban consumers. Our core business is our radio broadcasting franchise that is the largest radio broadcasting operation that primarily targets African-American and urban listeners. We currently own and/or operate 55 broadcast stations located in 16 urban markets in the United States.  While our primary source of revenue is the sale of local and national advertising for broadcast on our radio stations, our operating strategy is to operate the premier multi-media entertainment and information content provider targeting African-American and urban consumers. Thus, we have diversified our revenue streams by making acquisitions and investments in other complementary media properties. Our other media interests include our approximately 51.0% (see Note 3 — Acquisitions) controlling ownership interest in TV One, LLC (“TV One”), an African-American targeted cable television network that we invested in with an affiliate of Comcast Corporation and other investors; our 53.5% ownership interest in Reach Media, Inc. (“Reach Media”), which operates the Tom Joyner Morning Show; our ownership of Interactive One, LLC (“Interactive One”), an online platform serving the African-American community through social content, news, information, and entertainment, which operates a number of branded sites, including News One, UrbanDaily and HelloBeautiful; and our ownership of Community Connect, LLC (formerly Community Connect Inc.) (“CCI”), an online social networking company, which operates a number of branded websites, including BlackPlanet, MiGente and Asian Avenue.  CCI is included within the operations of Interactive One. Through our national multi-media presence, we provide advertisers with a unique and powerful delivery mechanism to the African-American and urban audience.

As of June 2011, our remaining Boston radio station was made the subject of a local marketing agreement (“LMA”) whereby we have made available, for a fee, air time on this station to another party. The remaining assets and liabilities of stations sold or stations that we do not operate that are the subject of an LMA, have been classified as discontinued operations as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Thus, the Boston station’s results from operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

As part of our consolidated financial statements, consistent with our financial reporting structure and how the Company currently manages its businesses, we have provided selected financial information for the Company’s four reportable segments: (i) Radio Broadcasting; (ii) Reach Media; (iii) Internet; and (iv) Cable Television (See Note 12 – Segment Information.)

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

(b)  Interim Financial Statements

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In management’s opinion, the interim financial data presented herein include all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.

Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]

(c)  Financial Instruments

Financial instruments as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of cash and cash equivalents, investments, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, note payable, long-term debt and redeemable noncontrolling interest. The carrying amounts approximated fair value for each of these financial instruments as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, except for the Company’s outstanding senior subordinated notes. The 6³/₈% Senior Subordinated Notes due February 2013 had a carrying value of $747,000 and a fair value of approximately $642,000 as of September 30, 2012, and a carrying value of $747,000 and a fair value of approximately $710,000 as of December 31, 2011. The 12¹/₂%/15% Senior Subordinated Notes due May 2016 had a carrying value of approximately $327.0 million and a fair value of approximately $281.3 million as of September 30, 2012, and a carrying value of approximately $312.8 million and a fair value of approximately $262.2 million as of December 31, 2011. The fair values, classified as Level 2, were determined based on the trading values of these instruments in an inactive market as of the reporting date.

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

(d)  Revenue Recognition

Within our radio broadcasting and Reach Media segments, the Company recognizes revenue for broadcast advertising when a commercial is broadcast and is reported, net of agency and outside sales representative commissions, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, “Revenue Recognition.”  Agency and outside sales representative commissions are calculated based on a stated percentage applied to gross billing. Generally, clients remit the gross billing amount to the agency or outside sales representative, and the agency or outside sales representative remits the gross billing, less their commission, to the Company. For our radio broadcasting and Reach Media segments, agency and outside sales representative commissions were approximately $9.3 million and $8.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Agency and outside sales representative commissions were approximately $25.7 million and $23.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Interactive One generates the majority of the Company’s internet revenue, and derives such revenue principally from advertising services, including advertising aimed at diversity recruiting. Advertising services include the sale of banner and sponsorship advertisements.  Advertising revenue is recognized either as impressions (the number of times advertisements appear in viewed pages) are delivered, when “click through” purchases or leads are reported, or ratably over the contract period, where applicable.

TV One, the driver of revenues in our Cable Television segment, derives advertising revenue from the sale of television air time to advertisers and recognizes revenue when the advertisements are run. TV One also receives affiliate fees and records revenue during the term of various affiliation agreements at levels appropriate for the most recent subscriber counts reported by the applicable affiliate.

Advertising Barter Transactions, Policy [Policy Text Block]

(e)  Barter Transactions

The Company provides advertising time in exchange for programming content and certain services and accounts for these exchanges in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition.” The terms of these exchanges generally permit the Company to preempt such time in favor of advertisers who purchase time in exchange for cash. The Company includes the value of such exchanges in both net revenue and station operating expenses. The valuation of barter time is based upon the fair value of the network advertising time provided for the programming content and services received. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, barter transaction revenues were $825,000 and $856,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, barter transaction revenues were approximately $2.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Additionally, barter transaction costs were reflected in programming and technical expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses of $684,000 and $810,000 and $141,000 and $46,000, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, barter transaction costs were reflected in programming and technical expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $2.0 million and $2.3 million and $224,000 and $188,000, respectively.

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

(f) Earnings Per Share

        Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method.  The Company’s potentially dilutive securities include stock options and restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a net loss, as the inclusion of the potentially dilutive common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect.

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended  September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
	(In Thousands)
Numerator:
Consolidated net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(13,064	)	$	(9,878	)	$	(49,638	)	$	24,427
Denominator:
Denominator for basic net (loss) income per share — weighted average outstanding shares		50,019,048			50,270,550			50,010,406			51,072,480
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and restricted stock		—			—			—			1,871,056
Denominator for diluted net (loss) income per share — weighted-average outstanding shares		50,019,048			50,270,550			50,010,406			52,943,536
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders per share — basic	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.99	)	$	0.48
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders per share — diluted	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.99	)	$	0.46

All stock options and restricted stock awards were excluded from the diluted calculation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as well as the three months ended September 30, 2011, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.  The following table summarizes the potential common shares excluded from the diluted calculation.

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2012
	(Unaudited)
	(In Thousands)
Stock options		4,831		5,129		4,831
Restricted stock		105		1,137		114

Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block]

(g) Fair Value Measurements

We report our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis under the provisions of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

      The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that can be accessed at measurement date.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. The fair value of Level 2 assets are based on quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

      As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities are categorized as follows:

	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(Unaudited)
	(In thousands)
As of September 30, 2012
Assets subject to fair value measurement:
Fixed maturity securities – available for sale:
Corporate debt securities	$	2,432	$	2,432	$	—	$	—
Government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities		100		—		100		—
Total fixed maturity securities (a)		2,532		2,432		100		—
Total	$	2,532	$	2,432	$	100	$	—
Liabilities subject to fair value measurement:
Incentive award plan (b)	$	5,096	$	—	$	—	$	5,096
Employment agreement award (c)		11,086		—		—		11,086
Total	$	16,182	$	—	$	—	$	16,182
Mezzanine equity subject to fair value measurement:
Redeemable noncontrolling interest (d)	$	21,580	$	—	$	—	$	21,580
As of December 31, 2011
Assets subject to fair value measurement:
Fixed maturity securities – available for sale:
Corporate debt securities	$	7,178	$	7,178	$	—	$	—
Government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities		1,011		—		1,011		—
Total fixed maturity securities (a)		8,189		7,178		1,011		—
Total	$	8,189	$	7,178	$	1,011	$	—
Liabilities subject to fair value measurement:
Incentive award plan (b)	$	5,096	$	—	$	—	$	5,096
Employment agreement award (c)		10,346		—		—		10,346
Total	$	15,442	$	—	$	—	$	15,442
Mezzanine equity subject to fair value measurement:
Redeemable noncontrolling interest (d)	$	20,343	$	—	$	—	$	20,343

(a) Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows.

(b) These balances are measured based on the estimated enterprise fair value of TV One. For the period ended September 30, 2012, the Company determined that there was no change in TV One’s fair market value since the December 31, 2011 valuation.

(c)  Pursuant to an employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) executed in April 2008, the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) is eligible to receive an award amount equal to 8% of any proceeds from distributions or other liquidity events in excess of the return of the Company’s aggregate investment in TV One. The Company reviews the factors underlying this award at the end of each quarter including the valuation of TV One and an assessment of the probability that the employment agreement will be renewed and contain this provision. The Company’s obligation to pay the award will be triggered only after the Company’s recovery of the aggregate amount of its capital contribution in TV One and only upon actual receipt of distributions of cash or marketable securities or proceeds from a liquidity event with respect to the Company’s membership interest in TV One. The CEO was fully vested in the award upon execution of the Employment Agreement, and the award lapses if the CEO voluntarily leaves the Company or is terminated for cause. In calculating the fair value of the award, the Company determined that there was no change in TV One’s fair market value since the December 31, 2011 valuation (See Note 8 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.) The Company is currently in negotiations with the Company’s CEO for a new employment agreement. Until such time as his new employment agreement is executed, the terms of his April 2008 employment agreement remain in effect including eligibility for the TV One award.

(d)  Redeemable noncontrolling interest in Reach Media is measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology.  A third-party valuation firm assisted the Company in calculating the fair value. Inputs to the discounted cash flow analysis include forecasted operating results, discount rate and a terminal value.

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Incentive Award Plan		Employment Agreement Award			Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
	(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	5,096	$	10,346		$	20,343
Losses included in earnings (unrealized)		—		740			—
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—		—			(362	)
Change in fair value		—		—			1,599
Balance at September 30, 2012	$	5,096	$	11,086		$	21,580
The amount of total losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date	$	—	$	(740	)	$	—

	Incentive Award Plan		Employment Agreement Award			Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
	(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	—	$	6,824		$	30,635
Losses included in earnings (unrealized)		—		3,538			—
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—		—			1,533
Recognition of TV One management incentive award plan in connection with the consolidation of TV One		6,428		—			—
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		—		—			(933	)
Change in fair value		—		—			(1,524	)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	6,428	$	10,362		$	29,711
The amount of total losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date	$	—	$	(3,538	)	$	—

Gains (losses) included in earnings were recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as corporate selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

Level 3 liabilities	Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Significant Unobservable Input Value
Incentive Award Plan	Discounted Cash Flow and Market Multiple Approach	Discount Rate	11.5%
Incentive Award Plan	Discounted Cash Flow and Market Multiple Approach	Long-term Growth Rate	3.0%
Incentive Award Plan	Discounted Cash Flow and Market Multiple Approach	Market Multiple	10x
Incentive Award Plan	Discounted Cash Flow and Market Multiple Approach	Value Per Subscriber	$7.00
Employment Agreement Award	Discounted Cash Flow and Market Multiple Approach	Discount Rate	11.5%
Employment Agreement Award	Discounted Cash Flow and Market Multiple Approach	Long-term Growth Rate	3.0%
Employment Agreement Award	Discounted Cash Flow and Market Multiple Approach	Market Multiple	10x
Employment Agreement Award	Discounted Cash Flow and Market Multiple Approach	Value Per Subscriber	$7.00
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount Rate	12.0%
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest	Discounted Cash Flow	Long-term Growth Rate	2.0%

       Any significant increases or decreases in significant inputs could result in significantly higher or lower fair value measurements.

       Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using Level 3 inputs as defined in ASC 820.  These assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances.  Included in this category are goodwill, radio broadcasting licenses and other intangible assets, net, that are written down to fair value when they are determined to be impaired, as well as content assets that are periodically written down to net realizable value. The Company concluded these assets were not impaired during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and therefore, these assets were reported at carrying value as opposed to fair value. The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $313,000 related to our Charlotte radio broadcasting licenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

 (h) Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, which provides a consistent definition of fair value and ensures that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2012, and it did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, which provides companies with an option to perform a qualitative assessment that may allow them to skip the two-step impairment test. ASU 2011-08 amends existing guidance by giving an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If this is the case, companies will need to perform a more detailed two-step goodwill impairment test which is used to identify potential goodwill impairments and to measure the amount of goodwill impairment losses to be recognized, if any. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2012 and it did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which was subsequently modified in December 2011 by ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05.” This ASU amends existing presentation and disclosure requirements concerning comprehensive income, most significantly by requiring that comprehensive income be presented with net income in a continuous financial statement, or in a separate but consecutive financial statement. The provisions of this ASU (as modified) are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements, other than presentation and disclosure.

Liquidity Disclosure [Policy Text Block]

(i) Liquidity and Uncertainties Related to Going Concern

On March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a new senior credit facility (the “2011 Credit Agreement”).  Under the 2011 Credit Agreement, beginning June 30, 2011, the Company became required to maintain compliance with certain financial ratios (as detailed in Note 9 — Long-Term Debt below).  Based on our current projections, we expect to be in compliance with these financial ratios and other covenants over the next twelve months.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest Policy [Policy Text Block]

(j) Redeemable noncontrolling interest

Redeemable noncontrolling interest is an interest in a subsidiary that is redeemable outside of the Company’s control either for cash or other assets. This interest is classified as mezzanine equity and measured at the greater of estimated redemption value at the end of each reporting period or the historical cost basis of the noncontrolling interests adjusted for cumulative earnings allocations.  The resulting increases or decreases in the estimated redemption amount are affected by corresponding charges against retained earnings, or in the absence of retained earnings, additional paid-in-capital.

Investment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

(k) Investments

Investment Securities

Investments consist primarily of corporate fixed maturity securities and government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities.

Investments with original maturities in excess of three months and less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Long-term investments have original maturities in excess of one year.

Debt securities are classified as “available-for-sale” and reported at fair value. Investments in available-for-sale fixed maturity securities are classified as either current or noncurrent assets based on their contractual maturities. Fixed maturity securities are carried at estimated fair value based on quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments. Investment income is recognized when earned and reported net of investment expenses. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized, unless the losses are deemed to be other than temporary. Realized gains or losses, including any provision for other-than-temporary declines in value, are included in the statements of operations. For purposes of computing realized gains and losses, the specific-identification method of determining cost was used.

Evaluating Investments for Other than Temporary Impairments

The Company periodically performs evaluations, on a lot-by-lot and security-by-security basis, of its investment holdings in accordance with its impairment policy to evaluate whether any declines in the fair value of investments are other than temporary. This evaluation consists of a review of several factors, including but not limited to: length of time and extent that a security has been in an unrealized loss position, the existence of an event that would impair the issuer’s future earnings potential, and the near-term prospects for recovery of the market value of a security. The FASB has issued guidance for recognition and presentation of other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”), or FASB OTTI guidance. Accordingly, any credit-related impairment of fixed maturity securities that the Company does not intend to sell, and is not likely to be required to sell, is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations, with the noncredit-related impairment recognized in other comprehensive loss.

For fixed maturity securities where fair value is less than amortized cost, and where the securities are not deemed to be credit-impaired, the Company has asserted that it has no intent to sell and that it believes it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If such an assertion had not been made, the security’s decline in fair value would be deemed to be other than temporary and the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost would be recognized in the statements of income.

For fixed maturity securities, a critical component of the evaluation for OTTI is the identification of credit-impaired securities, where the Company does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. The difference between the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis is recognized as credit-related OTTI in the statements of income. If fair value is less than the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected, the portion of OTTI related to other than credit factors is reduced in accumulated other comprehensive income.

In order to determine the amount of credit loss for a fixed maturity security, the Company calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the present value of future cash flows expected to be received. The discount rate is generally the effective interest rate of the fixed maturity security prior to impairment.

When determining the collectability and the period over which the fixed maturity security is expected to recover, the Company considers the same factors utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process described above.

The Company believes that it has adequately reviewed its investment securities for OTTI and that its investment securities are carried at fair value. However, over time, the economic and market environment (including any ratings change for any such securities, including US treasury securities and corporate bonds) may provide additional insight regarding the fair value of certain securities, which could change management’s judgment regarding OTTI. This could result in realized losses relating to other than temporary declines being charged against future income. Given the judgments involved, there is a continuing risk that further declines in fair value may occur and material OTTI may be recorded in future periods.

Launch Support [Policy Text Block]

(l) Launch Support

TV One has entered into certain affiliate agreements requiring various payments by TV One for launch support. Launch assets are assets used to initiate carriage under new affiliation agreements and are amortized over the term of the respective contracts. Amortization is recorded as a reduction to revenue to the extent that revenue is recognized from the vendor, and any excess amortization is recorded as launch support amortization expense. The weighted-average amortization period for launch support is approximately 3.6 years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, launch asset amortization of approximately $2.5 million and $7.5 million, respectively, was recorded as a reduction in revenue. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, launch asset amortization of approximately $2.5 million and $4.6 million, respectively, was recorded as a reduction in revenue.

Content Assets [Policy Text Block]

(m) Content Assets

TV One has entered into contracts to acquire entertainment programming rights and programs from distributors and producers. The license periods granted in these contracts generally run from one year to perpetuity. Contract payments are made in installments over terms that are generally shorter than the contract period. Each contract is recorded as an asset and a liability at an amount equal to its gross contractual commitment when the license period begins and the program is available for its first airing.

Program rights are recorded at the lower of amortized cost or estimated net realizable value. Program rights are amortized based on the greater of the usage of the program or term of license. Estimated net realizable values are based on the estimated revenues directly associated with the program materials and related expenses. The Company has not recorded any additional amortization expense as a result of evaluating its contracts for recoverability for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and recorded $906,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company recorded an additional $965,000 and approximately $1.3 million of amortization expense as a result of evaluating its contracts for recoverability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. All produced and licensed content is classified as a long-term asset, except for the portion of the unamortized content balance that will be amortized within one year as it is classified as a current asset.