XML 63 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block]

8.  DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES:

 

  ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” establishes disclosure requirements related to derivative instruments and hedging activities with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and its related interpretations; and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. ASC 815 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.

 

The fair values and the presentation of the Company’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:

 

    Liability Derivatives
    As of September 30, 2012   As of December 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)    
    (In thousands)
     
    Balance Sheet Location     Fair Value     Balance Sheet Location     Fair Value  
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:                        
Employment agreement award   Other Long-Term Liabilities   $ 11,086     Other Long-Term Liabilities   $ 10,346  
Total derivatives       $ 11,086         $ 10,346  

 

The effect and the presentation of the Company’s derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations are as follows:

  

Derivatives in
Cash Flow
Hedging
Relationships
  Amount of Gain in Other
Comprehensive Loss on
Derivative (Effective Portion)
  Loss Reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss into Income (Effective Portion)
 

Gain (Loss) in Income (Ineffective

Portion and Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)

    Amount   Location   Amount   Location   Amount
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
                                             
    2012   2011       2012   2011       2012   2011
Interest rate swaps   $   $   Interest expense   $   $   Interest expense   $   $

 

Derivatives in
Cash Flow
Hedging
Relationships
  Amount of Gain in Other
Comprehensive Loss on
Derivative (Effective Portion)
  Loss Reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss into Income (Effective Portion)
   

Gain (Loss) in Income (Ineffective

Portion and Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)

    Amount   Location   Amount     Location   Amount
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
                                               
    2012   2011       2012   2011         2012   2011
Interest rate swaps   $   $   Interest expense   $   $ (258 )   Interest expense   $   $

 

Derivatives Not Designated
as Hedging Instruments
  Location of Gain (Loss)
in Income of Derivative
 

 

Amount of Gain (Loss) in Income of Derivative

 
        Three Months Ended September 30,  
        2012     2011  
        (Unaudited)  
        (In thousands)  
                     
Employment agreement award   Corporate selling, general and administrative expense   $ (46 )   $ (3,068 )

 

Derivatives Not Designated
as Hedging Instruments
  Location of Gain (Loss)
in Income on Derivative
  Amount of Gain (Loss) in Income of Derivative  
        Nine Months Ended September 30,  
        2012     2011  
        (Unaudited)  
        (In thousands)  
Employment agreement award   Corporate selling, general and administrative expense   $ (740 )   $ (3,538 )

 

Hedging Activities

 

In June 2005, pursuant to our Previous Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 9 — Long-Term Debt), the Company entered into four fixed rate swap agreements to reduce interest rate fluctuations on certain floating rate debt commitments. One of the four $25.0 million swap agreements expired in each of June 2007 and 2008, and 2010, respectively. The remaining $25.0 million swap agreement was terminated on March 31, 2011 in conjunction with the March 31, 2011 retirement of our Previous Credit Agreement.  We have no swap agreements in connection with our current credit facilities.

 

Each swap agreement had been accounted for as a qualifying cash flow hedge of the Company’s senior bank debt, in accordance with ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” whereby changes in the fair market value are reflected as adjustments to the fair value of the derivative instruments as reflected on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

 

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate swaps were to manage interest rate risk associated with the Company’s floating rate debt commitments and to add stability to future cash flows. To accomplish this objective, the Company used interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy.  Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

 

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges was recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing floating rate debt commitments.  The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives, if any, was recognized directly in earnings.

 

Amounts reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss related to derivatives were reclassified to interest expense as interest payments were made on the Company’s floating rate debt.

 

Under the swap agreements, the Company paid a fixed rate. The counterparties to the agreements paid the Company a floating interest rate based on the three month LIBOR, for which measurement and settlement is performed quarterly. The counterparties to these agreements were international financial institutions.

 

Other Derivative Instruments

 

The Company recognizes all derivatives at fair value, whether designated in hedging relationships or not, on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. If the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item are recognized in the statement of operations. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income and are recognized in the statement of operations when the hedged item affects net income. If a derivative does not qualify as a hedge, it is marked to fair value through the statement of operations. 

 

As of September 30, 2012, the Company was party to an Employment Agreement executed in April 2008 with the CEO. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, the CEO is eligible to receive an award amount equal to 8% of any proceeds from distributions or other liquidity events in excess of the return of the Company’s aggregate investment in TV One. The Company reassessed the estimated fair value of the award at September 30, 2012 to be approximately $11.1 million, and accordingly, adjusted its liability to this amount. The Company’s obligation to pay the award will be triggered only after the Company’s recovery of the aggregate amount of its capital contribution in TV One and only upon actual receipt of distributions of cash or marketable securities or proceeds from a liquidity event with respect to the Company’s membership interest in TV One. The CEO was fully vested in the award upon execution of the Employment Agreement, and the award lapses if the CEO voluntarily leaves the Company, or is terminated for cause. The Company is currently in negotiations with the Company’s CEO for a new employment agreement. Until such time as his new employment agreement is executed, the terms of his April 2008 employment agreement remain in effect including eligibility for the TV One award.