10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-23667

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	61-1322555
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4155 Lafayette Road, Hopkinsville, Kentucky	42240
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (270) 885-1171

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated file or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act: (Check one)

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x.

As of November 11, 2008, the Registrant had issued and outstanding 3,583,574 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.

CONTENTS

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

	PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its wholly owned subsidiaries are as follows:
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007	2
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the Three-Month and Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007	4
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three-Month and Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007	6
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2008	7
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007	8
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements	9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	29
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	30
Item 1A. Risk Factors	30
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities	31
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	32
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	32
Item 5. Other Information	32
Item 6. Exhibits	32
SIGNATURES	33

1

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition

(Dollars in Thousands)

	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	11,101		17,343
Interest-earning deposits in Federal Home Loan Bank		1,235		931
Federal funds sold		9,280		3,755
Cash and cash equivalents		21,616		22,029
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		4,050		3,836
Securities available for sale		144,171		142,310
Securities held to maturity, market value of $505 at September 30, 2008 and $14,109 at December 31, 2007		499		14,095
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $5,749 at September 30, 2008 and $4,842 at December 31, 2007		621,485		576,252
Accrued interest receivable		4,931		5,235
Real estate and other assets owned		351		347
Bank owned life insurance		7,926		7,723
Premises and equipment, net		26,779		27,260
Deferred tax assets		1,691		823
Intangible asset		2,022		2,665
Goodwill		4,989		4,989
Other assets		2,925		788
Total assets	$	843,435		808,352
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing accounts	$	59,341	$	52,226
Interest-bearing accounts:
NOW accounts		91,820		101,706
Savings and money market accounts		60,113		63,560
Other time deposits		435,431		381,261
Total deposits		646,705		598,753
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		91,412		101,882
Repurchase agreements		32,558		37,199
Subordinated debentures		10,310		10,310
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		449		316
Dividends payable		440		438
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,108		3,651
Total liabilities		786,982		752,549

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

2

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition, Continued

(Dollars in Thousands)

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
	(Unaudited)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized - 500,000 shares; none issued or outstanding at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007	$	—		—
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized 7,500,000 shares; 4,089,129 issued and 3,581,770 outstanding at September 30, 2008 and 4,079,092 issued and 3,592,033 outstanding at December 31, 2007		41		41
Additional paid-in-capital		26,201		26,077
Retained earnings-substantially restricted		38,670		36,065
Treasury stock (at cost, 507,359 shares at September 30, 2008 and 487,059 shares at December 31, 2007)		(6,395	)	(6,112	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes		(2,064	)	(268	)
Total stockholders’ equity		56,453		55,803
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	843,435		808,352

The balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial statements of that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

3

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

(Dollars in Thousand)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,		For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008	2007	2008	2007
Interest and dividend income:
Loans receivable	10,345	10,397	31,323	30,130
Investment in securities, taxable	1,750	1,772	5,068	5,603
Nontaxable securities available for sale	153	129	477	374
Interest-earning deposits	23	93	118	347
Total interest and dividend income	12,271	12,391	36,986	36,454
Interest expense:
Deposits	4,967	5,635	15,331	16,484
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	985	1,145	3,018	3,259
Repurchase agreements	256	403	856	979
Subordinated debentures	121	192	405	587
Total interest expense	6,329	7,375	19,610	21,309
Net interest income	5,942	5,016	17,376	15,145
Provision for loan losses	805	224	1,682	702
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	5,137	4,792	15,694	14,443
Non-interest income:
Service charges	1,250	1,076	3,420	2,968
Merchant card income	148	125	432	361
Gain on sale of loans	7	30	112	82
Gain on sale of securities	16	—	718	—
Income from bank owned life insurance	68	77	203	247
Financial services commission	321	294	840	879
Other operating income	240	275	826	847
Total non-interest income	2,050	1,877	6,551	5,384

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

4

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income, Continued

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Non-interest expenses:
Salaries and benefits		2,875		2,729		8,667		7,927
Occupancy expense		726		683		2,112		1,945
Data processing expense		582		477		1,685		1,359
State deposit tax		128		145		384		411
Intangible amortization expense		204		224		643		705
Professional services expense		265		337		815		1,113
Advertising expense		313		236		910		741
Postage and communications expense		162		151		476		398
Supplies expense		86		87		253		270
Other operating expenses		272		165		749		506
Total non-interest expense		5,613		5,234		16,694		15,375
Income before income tax expense		1,574		1,435		5,551		4,452
Income tax expense		425		410		1,649		1,297
Net income	$	1,149	$	1,025	$	3,902	$	3,155
Net income per share, basic	$	0.32	$	0.29	$	1.09	$	0.87
Net income per share, diluted	$	0.32	$	0.28	$	1.08	$	0.87
Dividend per share	$	0.12	$	0.12	$	0.36	$	0.36
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic		3,578,924		3,584,053		3,592,525		3,607,870
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted		3,583,018		3,607,093		3,604,581		3,628,455

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

5

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net income	$	1,149		$	1,025		$	3,902		$	3,155
Other comprehensive income, net of tax -
Unrealized holding gains (loss) arising during the period net of tax effect of $365 and ($711) for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively; and $665 and ($417) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.		(708	)		1,380			(1,290	)		810
Reclassification adjustment for loss on derivative, net of tax of $8 and $24 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.		(16	)		(16	)		(48	)		(48	)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income net of taxes of $6 and $235 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively.		(11	)		—			(458	)		—
Comprehensive income	$	414		$	2,389		$	2,106		$	3,917

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

6

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital	Retained Earnings		Treasury Stock		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss		Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance January 1, 2008	$	41	26,077	36,065		(6,112	)	(268	)	55,803
Net income		—	—	3,902		—		—		3,902
Net change in unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of taxes of $900		—	—	—		—		(1,748	)	(1,748	)
Loss on derivatives, net of taxes of $24		—	—	—		—		(48	)	(48	)
Purchase of treasury stock		—	—	—		(283	)	—		(283	)
Dividends ($0.36 per share)		—	—	(1,297	)	—		—		(1,297	)
Compensation expense, options		—	9	—		—		—		9
Compensation expense, restricted stock awards		—	115	—		—		—		115
Balance September 30, 2008	$	41	26,201	38,670		(6,395	)	(2,064	)	56,453

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

7

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	5,555		$	5,863
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from calls and maturities of securities held to maturity		13,632			117
Proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of securities available for sale		76,997			67,946
Purchase of securities available for sale		(80,945	)		(22,995	)
Net increase in loans		(47,063	)		(64,414	)
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(57	)		(197	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed asset		685			383
Purchase of premises and equipment		(611	)		(2,810	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(37,362	)		(21,970	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net decrease in demand deposits		(6,218	)		(8,735	)
Net increase in time deposits		54,170			21,564
Net increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		133			210
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		134,810			75,000
Repayment of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(145,280	)		(86,341	)
Net increase (decrease) in repurchase agreements		(4,641	)		20,485
Purchase of treasury stock		(283	)		(556	)
Dividends paid		(1,297	)		(1,298	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		31,394			20,329
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(413	)		4,222
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		22,029			21,883
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	21,616		$	26,105
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	9,716		$	9,800
Income taxes paid		2,410			1,467
Loans charged off		981			595
Foreclosures and in substance foreclosures of loans during year		689			394
Capitalized interest		—			27
Unrealized gain (loss) on AFS investments		(2,648	)		1,277
Increase in deferred tax asset related to unrealized losses on investments		900			(417	)
Dividends declared and payable		446			440
Issue of unearned restricted stock		142			123

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

8

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION

HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed at the direction of Heritage Bank, formerly Hopkinsville Federal Savings Bank (the “Bank”), to become the holding company of the Bank upon the conversion of the Bank from a federally chartered mutual savings bank to a federally chartered stock savings bank. The conversion was consummated on February 6, 1998. The Company’s primary assets are the outstanding capital stock of the converted Bank, and its sole business is that of the converted Bank. The Bank owns 100% of the stock of Fall and Fall Insurance Agency (Fall & Fall) of Fulton, Kentucky. Fall & Fall sells life and casualty insurance to both individual to both individual and businesses. The majority of Fall & Fall’s customer base is within the geographic footprint of the Bank.

The Bank operates a mortgage division, Heritage Mortgage Services, in Clarksville, Tennessee with agents located in several of its markets. The Bank has a financial services division, Heritage Solutions, with offices in Murray and Hopkinsville in Kentucky as well as Dickson and Pleasant View in Tennessee. The agents for Heritage Solutions travel throughout western Kentucky and middle Tennessee offering fixed and variable annuities, mutual funds and brokerage services.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary for fair representation have been included. The results of operations and other data for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s December 31, 2007 Consolidated Financial Statements.

9

(2) INCOME PER SHARE

The following schedule reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income per share (“IPS”) computations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Diluted common shares arise from the potentially dilutive effect of the Company’s stock options outstanding.

	For the Three Month Periods Ended September 30,
	2008		2007
Basic IPS:
Net income	$	1,149,000	$	1,025,000
Average common shares outstanding		3,578,924		3,584,053
Net income per share	$	0.32	$	0.29
Diluted IPS:
Net income		1,149,000		1,025,000
Average common shares outstanding		3,578,924		3,584,053
Diluted effect of stock options		4,094		23,040
Average diluted shares outstanding		3,583,018		3,607,093
Diluted income per share	$	0.32	$	0.28
	For the Nine Month Periods Ended September 30,
	2008		2007
Basic IPS:
Net income	$	3,902,000	$	3,155,000
Average common shares outstanding		3,592,525		3,607,870
Net income per share	$	1.09	$	0.87
Diluted IPS:
Net income		3,902,000		3,155,000
Average common shares outstanding		3,592,525		3,607,870
Diluted effect of stock options		12,056		20,585
Average diluted shares outstanding		3,604,581		3,628,455
Diluted income per share	$	1.08	$	0.87

10

(3) STOCK COMPENSATION

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123R, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation using the modified prospective method which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. The financial statement dated March 31, 2006 is the first to reflect the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, the Company incurred additional compensation expense related to SFAS 123R of $9,083. For the three month period ended September 30, 2008, the Company did not incur compensation expense related to SFAS 123R. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, the Company incurred of additional compensation expense related to SFAS 123R of $5,450 and $16,350, respectively. At September 30, 2008, all outstanding stock options are fully vested.

No stock options were issued, forfeited, or exercised in the three-month or nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007. The value of vested options outstanding at September 30, 2008 was $1,670,430 for options issued under the 1999 Plan and $144,800 for options issued under the 2000 Plan. The fair value of options vested in 2008 is $21,800. Shares issued for option exercises are expected to come from authorized but unissued shares.

For the three-month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, the Company incurred compensation cost related to the HopFed Bancorp Inc. 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan of approximately $38,000 and $115,000 respectively. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, the Company incurred compensation cost related to the HopFed Bancorp Inc. 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan of approximately $38,500 and $99,400 respectively. The Company issued 10,487 shares of restricted stock during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008. The Company had 450 shares of restricted stock previously awarded that were forfeited due to the voluntary resignation of a Director prior to vesting.

The Company will incur total additional compensation cost of approximately $38,000 for the year ending December 31, 2008 related to restricted stock grants previously awarded. The Company will incur cost of approximately $134,000, $93,000, $54,000 and $16,000 in total compensation cost for the years ending December 31, 2009, December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 related to restricted stock grants previously awarded. The compensation committee may make additional awards of restricted stock, thereby increasing the future expense related to this plan. In addition, award vesting may be accelerated due to certain events as outlined in the restricted stock award agreement. Any acceleration of vesting will change the timing of, but not the aggregate amount of, compensation expense incurred.

11

(4) SECURITIES

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluations. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

At September 30, 2008, the Company has 115 securities with unrealized losses. Management believes these unrealized losses relate to changes in interest rates and not credit quality with the exception of $2 million (par value) in commercial paper consisting of two Ford Motor Credit bonds maturing in $1.0 million increments on October 1, 2008 and October 28, 2009. The Company’s quarterly financial analysis of Ford and Ford Motor Credit indicates the Ford’s financial condition has weakened significantly and its negative rate of cash flow has increased substantially in the last three months. The Company will monitor both financial and political events as it relates to Ford and all automakers in the next three months. If Ford’s financial prospects decline further, the Company will carefully consider impairment at December 31, 2008.

The carrying amount of securities available for sale and their estimated fair values at September 30, 2008 is as follows:

	September 30, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains	Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Restricted:
FHLB stock	$	4,050	—	—		4,050
Unrestricted:
U.S. government and agency securities:
Agency debt securities	$	47,844	142	(503	)	47,483
Corporate bonds		2,019	—	(215	)	1,804
Trust preferred securities		2,000	—	(377	)	1,623
Municipal bonds		17,081	12	(1,032	)	16,061
Mortgage-backed securities:
GNMA		19,886	3	(93	)	19,796
FNMA		29,752	60	(415	)	29,397
FHLMC		12,695	10	(145	)	12,560
CMOs		16,021	94	(668	)	15,447
	$	147,298	321	(3,448	)	144,171

12

The carrying amount of securities held to maturity and their estimated fair values at September 30, 2008 are as follows:

	September 30, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains	Gross Unrealized Losses	Estimated Fair Value
Held to maturity securities
Mortgage-backed securities:
GNMA		439	6	—	445
FNMA		60	—	—	60
	$	499	6	—	505

At September 30, 2008, securities with a cost of approximately $65.9 million and a market value of approximately $65.0 million were pledged to various municipalities and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati for deposits in excess of FDIC limits as well as for overnight borrowings as required by law.

At September 30, 2008, securities with a book value of approximately $16.8 million and a market value of approximately $16.6 million were sold under agreements to repurchase from various customers. Furthermore, the Company has two wholesale repurchase agreements with third parties secured by investments with a combined book value of $17.1 million and a market value of $17.0 million. The first repurchase agreement in the amount of $6.0 million repurchase agreement and has a maturity of September 18, 2016 and is currently callable on a quarterly basis and has a fixed rate of interest of 4.36%. The second repurchase agreement, in the amount of $10 million, has a maturity of September 5, 2014, is callable quarterly and has a fixed rate of interest of 4.28%.

On September 29, 2008, the Company entered into a seven year interest rate swap in the amount of $10 million. The purpose of this interest rate swap was to fix the cost of the Company’s Trust Preferred Securities issued on September 25, 2003. The Company will receive a variable rate of interest equal to the three-month London Interbank Overnight Rate (Libor). During the seven year term, the Company will pay a fixed rate of interest at 4.17%. Terms and conditions of the swap were structured to closely mirror the terms of the HopFed Capital Trust 1.

13

(5) INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATED COMPANIES

Investments in affiliated companies accounted for under the equity method consist of 100% of the common stock of Hopfed Capital Trust 1 (“Trust”), a wholly-owned statutory business trust. The Trust was formed on September 25, 2003. Summary financial information for the Trust follows (dollars in thousands):

	Summary Balance Sheet
	At September 30, 2008		At December 31, 2007
Asset - Investment in subordinated debentures issued by HopFed Bancorp, Inc.	$	10,310	$	10,310
Stockholders’ equity - Trust preferred securities	$	10,000	$	10,000
Common stock (100% owned by HopFed Bancorp, Inc.	$	310	$	310
Total stockholders’ equity	$	10,310	$	10,310

	Summary Income Statement
	Three months ended September 30,			Nine months ended September 30,
	2008		2007	2008	2007
Income - interest income from subordinated debentures issued by HopFed Bancorp, Inc.	$	151	223	494	681
Net income	$	151	223	494	681

	Summary Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
	Trust Preferred Securities		Total Common Stock	Retained Earnings		Total Stockholders’ Equity
Beginning balances, December 31, 2007	$	10,000	310	—		10,310
Retained earnings:
Net income		—	—	494		494
Dividends
Trust preferred securities				(479	)	(479	)
Common paid to HopFed Bancorp, Inc		—	—	(15	)	(15	)
Total retained earnings		—	—	—		—
Ending balances, September 30, 2008	$	10,000	310	—		10,310

14

(6) FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value. The statement was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The statement establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable input and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.

• Level 1 is for assets and liabilities that management has obtained quoted prices (unadjusted for transaction cost) or identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

• Level 2 is for assets and liabilities in which significant unobservable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

• Level 3 is for assets and liabilities in which significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by a matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique that is widely used in the industry to value debt securities without exclusively on quoted prices for the individual securities in the Company’s portfolio but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Impaired loans are valued at the net present value of expected payments and considering the fair value of any assigned collateral.

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

The assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

	Fair Value of Measurements at September 30, 2008 Using
Description	Total carrying value in the consolidated balance sheet at 9/30/2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets ( Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Available for sale securities	$	142,548	—	$	142,548		—
Impaired loans	$	14,903	—		—	$	14,903
Trust preferred securities	$	1,623	—		—	$	1,623
Bank owned life insurance	$	7,926	—	$	7,926		—

15

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

The consolidated condensed financial statements as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 included herein have been prepared by the Company, without an audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in interim financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereon included in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K.

Certain of the Company’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances, which could affect these material judgments, include, but without limitation, changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses and determining the fair value of securities and other financial instruments and assessing other than temporary impairments of securities.

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007

Total assets increased by $35.0 million, from $808.4 million at December 31, 2007 to $843.4 million at September 30, 2008. Securities available for sale increased from $142.3 million at December 31, 2007 to $144.2 million at September 30, 2008. Federal funds sold increased from $3.8 million at December 31, 2007 to $9.3 million at September 30, 2008. The Company’s holdings of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost, increased from $3.8 million at December 31, 2007 to $4.1 million at September 30, 2008. Total FHLB borrowings decreased $10.5 million, from $101.9 million at December 31, 2007 to $91.4 million at September 30, 2008. Total repurchase balances decreased from $37.2 million at December 31, 2007 to $32.6 million at September 30, 2008.

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, investments classified as “held to maturity” were carried at an amortized cost and had an estimated fair value of $499,000 and $14.1 million, respectively. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, securities classified as “available for sale” had an amortized book value of $147.3 million and $142.8 million, respectively.

The loan portfolio increased $45.2 million during the nine month period ended September 30, 2008. Net loans totaled $621.5 million and $576.3 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, the average tax equivalent yield on loans was 7.09%, 7.76% and 7.70% respectively. Set forth below is selected data relating to the composition of the loan portfolio by type of loan at September 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007.

16

At September 30, 2008, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007, there were no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans other than as disclosed below:

	9/30/2008		9/30/2008		12/31/2007		12/31/2007		9/30/2007		9/30/2007
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family (closed end) first mortgages	$	180,960	28.86	%	$	183,901	31.66	%	$	184,050	32.72	%
Second mortgages (closed end)		8,769	1.40	%		6,771	1.17	%		6,715	1.19	%
Home equity lines of credit		34,268	5.47	%		32,216	5.55	%		31,387	5.58	%
Multi-family		34,780	5.55	%		24,538	4.22	%		23,710	4.22	%
Commercial real estate		218,745	34.88	%		183,168	31.53	%		176,845	31.44	%
Construction		60,475	9.65	%		50,230	8.65	%		45,394	8.07	%
Total mortgage loans		537,997	85.81	%		480,824	82.78	%		468,101	83.22	%
Loans secured by deposits		3,192	0.51	%		4,419	0.76	%		3,730	0.66	%
Other consumer loans		20,431	3.26	%		21,331	3.67	%		21,507	3.82	%
Commercial loans		65,315	10.42	%		74,276	12.79	%		69,148	12.30	%
Total other loans		88,938	14.19	%		100,026	17.22	%		94,385	16.78	%
Total loans, gross		626,935	100.00	%		580,850	100.00	%		562,486	100.00	%
Deferred loan origination cost, net of income		299				244				431
Less allowance for loan losses		5,749				4,842				4,840
Total net loans	$	621,485			$	576,252			$	558,077

The allowance for loan losses totaled $5.7 million at September 30, 2008, $4.8 million at December 31, 2007 and $4.8 million at September 30, 2007. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans was 0.92% at September 30, 2008, 0.83% at December 31, 2007 and 0.86% at September 30, 2007. Also at September 30, 2008, non-performing loans, defined as loans past due ninety days or more, were $8.4 million, or 1.34% of total loans, compared to $593,000, or 0.10% of total loans, at December 31, 2007 and $755,000, or 0.13% at September 30, 2007. Non-performing assets, which include other real estate owned and other assets owned, were $8.8 million or 1.04% of total assets at September 30, 2008, compared to $1.1 million, or 0.14% of assets, at September 30, 2007 and $940,000, or 0.12% of assets at December 31, 2007.

The increase in non-performing loans is the result of a bankruptcy filing of one large residential developer. The relationship has an aggregate balance of approximately $7.3 million and is secured with numerous properties including both developed and undeveloped land, fully completed single family and duplex residences, office buildings and other various pieces of collateral. Management anticipates the liquidation of these properties will take six to twelve months and that the Company’s losses will be minimal.

The Company does not originate loans it considers sub-prime and is not aware of any exposure to the additional credit concerns associated with sub-prime lending in either the Company’s loan or investment portfolios. The Company’s loan portfolio includes construction and land development loan balances of approximately $60.5 million, or 9.7% of total loans. Management reports to the Company’s Board of Directors on the status of the Company’s specific construction and development loans as well as the market trends in those markets in which the Company actively participates.

The Company’s annualized net charge off ratios for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2007 were 0.17%, 0.09% and 0.11%, respectively. The ratios of allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at September 30, 2008, September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007 were 68.4%, 641.1% and 816.5%, respectively.

17

The increase in the charge off ratio at September 30, 2008 was largely the result of two loans charged off during the first quarter of the year. The following table sets forth an analysis of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:

	Nine Month Period ended 9/30/2008			Nine Month Period Ended 9/30/2007			Year Ended 12/31/2007
				(Dollars in Thousands)
Beginning balance
Allowance for loan loss	$	4,842		$	4,470		$	4,470
Loans charged off:
Commercial loans		(241	)		(44	)		(110	)
Consumer loans and overdrafts		(486	)		(477	)		(625	)
Residential loans		(254	)		(74	)		(186	)
Total charge offs		(981	)		(595	)		(921	)
Recoveries		206			263			317
Net charge offs		(775	)		(332	)		(604	)
Provision for loan loss expense		1,682			702			976
End of period balance	$	5,749		$	4,840		$	4,842
Ratio of net charge offs to average outstanding loans during the period		0.17	%		0.09	%		0.11	%

The determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s analysis, performed on a quarterly basis. Various factors are considered, including the market value of the underlying collateral, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, the relationship of the allowance for loan losses to outstanding loans, historical loss experience, delinquency trends and prevailing economic conditions. Although management believes its allowance for loan losses is adequate, there can be no assurance that additional allowances will not be required or that losses on loans will not be incurred.

A loan is considered to be impaired when management determines that it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The value of individually impaired loans is measured based on the present value of expected payments using the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company’s impaired loans totaled $14.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company’s reserve for impaired loans totaled approximately $775,000 and $488,000, respectively.

The increase in impaired loans is the result of a bankruptcy filing of one residential developer with an aggregate lending relationship of approximately $7.3 million. At September 30, 2008, the Company’s specific reserve for this relationship was approximately $175,000. The Company is in the process of reviewing all appraisals and loan documentation associated with this relationship. The Company’s preliminary analysis indicates that the value of the collateral is adequate to pay all interest and principal balances due. At this time, the Company anticipates that the current reserve level for this lending relationship is adequate.

18

The Company had $346,000 in real estate owned and $5,000 of other assets owned at September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2008, the Company had loans totaling $64.9 million classified as watch or special mention and loans totaling $14.9 million classified as impaired. Watch and special mention loans are not considered impaired but are reserved for based on potential weaknesses or higher levels of perceived risk due to the various factors, including unpredictable cash flows, a business operating in a challenging industry, or a new and significant relationship.

At September 30, 2008, deposits increased to $646.7 million from $598.8 million at December 31, 2007. The Company’s balances of brokered deposits increased from $19.8 million at December 31, 2007 to $72.7 million at September 30, 2008. The increase in brokered deposits was the result of pricing abnormalities in the credit markets, making brokered deposits up to 0.50% lower as compared to for one year deposits. Recent developments in the credit markets have forced large regional banks to price time deposits in an increasingly aggressive manner. The new pricing practice of regional banks will result in an increase in the Company’s cost of funds as the Company must increase its deposit rates in order to maintain adequate liquidity levels.

The average cost of deposits during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2007 was 3.30%, 3.77%, and 3.80%, respectively. Management continually evaluates the investment alternatives available to customers and adjusts the pricing on its deposit products to more actively manage its funding costs while remaining competitive in its market area.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

Net Income. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $3,902,000, compared to net income of $3,155,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in the Company’s net income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008 was largely the result of changes in market interest rates. Lower short-term rates provided the Company the opportunity to reduce its cost of funds and sell selected securities with a net gain of approximately $700,000.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $17.4 million, compared to $15.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to September 30, 2007 was largely due to a $71.8 million increase in the average balance of loans outstanding. To a lesser extent, the improvement in net interest margin has benefited from the reduction in the Company’s cost of funding interest earning assets, which has declined at a faster rate than the reduction of its net yield on interest earning assets.

Average Balances, Yields and Interest Expenses. The table below summarizes the overall effect of changes to both interest rates and changes in the average balances of interest earning assets and liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and September 30, 2007. Yields on assets and cost of liabilities are derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balances of interest earning assets and liabilities for the appropriate nine-month periods. Average balances for loans include loans classified as non-accrual, net of the allowance for loan losses.

The table adjusts tax-free investment income by $207 for September 30, 2008, and $156 for September 30, 2007, for a tax equivalent rate using a cost of funds rate of 3.70% for September 30, 2008 and 4.30% for September 30, 2007. The table adjusts tax-free loan income by $209 for September 30, 2008 and $201 for September 30, 2007 for a tax equivalent rate using the same cost of funds rate.

19

	(Table Amounts in Thousands, Except Percentages)
	Average Balance 9/30/2008		Income and Expense 9/30/2008			Average Rates 9/30/2008		Average Balance 9/30/2007		Income and Expense 9/30/2007			Average Rates 9/30/2007
Loans	$	593,088	$	31,532		7.09	%	$	521,333	$	30,331		7.76	%
Investments AFS taxable		133,479		4,919		4.91	%		142,356		5,010		4.69	%
Investment AFS tax free		17,311		684		5.27	%		14,931		530		4.73	%
Investment held to maturity		4,428		150		4.52	%		18,020		593		4.39	%
Federal funds		6,522		118		2.41	%		9,076		347		5.10	%
Total interest earning assets		754,828		37,403		6.61	%		705,716		36,811		6.95	%
Other assets		64,567							65,414
Total assets	$	819,395						$	771,130
Interest bearing deposits	$	563,255		15,331		3.63	%	$	533,924		16,484		4.12	%
FHLB borrowings		93,775		3,018		4.29	%		93,478		3,259		4.65	%
Repurchase agreements		34,661		856		3.29	%		26,715		979		4.89	%
Subordinated debentures		10,310		405		5.24	%		10,310		587		7.59	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		702,001		19,610		3.72	%		664,427		21,309		4.28	%
Non-interest bearing deposits		55,369							49,769
Other liabilities		5,110							5,022
Shareholders equity		56,915							51,912
Total liabilities and shareholder equity	$	819,395						$	771,130
Net change in interest bearing assets and liabilities			$	17,793		2.89	%			$	15,502		2.67	%
Net yield on interest earning assets				3.14	%						2.93	%

Interest Income. Interest income increased by approximately $500,000 from $36.5 million to $37.0 million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The modest increase in total interest income is the result of strong loan growth, offsetting a 375 basis point decline in the prime rate. The average balance of loans receivable increased $71.8 million to $593.1 million at September 30, 2008 from $521.3 million at September 30, 2007. The ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities increased from 106.21% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to 107.53% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased approximately $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower short term interest rate which was offset by a higher average balance of interest bearing deposits, and an increase in repurchase agreements as compared to September 30, 2007. The average cost of average interest-bearing deposits declined from 4.12% at September 30, 2007 to 3.63% at September 30, 2008.

20

Over the same period, the average balance of interest bearing deposits increased $29.4 million, from $533.9 million at September 30, 2007 to $563.3 million at September 30, 2008 and the average balance of funds borrowed from the FHLB increased approximately $300,000, from $93.5 million at September 30, 2007 to $93.8 million at September 30, 2008. The average cost of average borrowed funds from the FHLB decreased from 4.65% at September 30, 2007 to 4.29% at September 30, 2008.

The average cost of all deposits declined from 3.77% at September 30, 2007 to 3.30% at September 30, 2008. The average balance of repurchase agreements increased from $26.7 million at September 30, 2007 to $34.7 million at September 30, 2008. The average cost of repurchase agreements declined from 4.89% at September 30, 2007 to 3.29% at September 30, 2008.

Provision for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in its loan portfolio and the general economy. Such evaluation considers numerous factors including, general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, prior loss experience, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an adequate loan loss allowance. The Company determined that an additional $1.7 million of provision for loan loss was required for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to a $702,000 provision for loan loss expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in the Company’s provision expense was largely the result in an increase in total loans outstanding.

Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased approximately $1.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, gains on the sale of loans were $112,000 as compared to $82,000 in the same period in 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income from financial services was $840,000, compared to $879,000 for the same period in 2007. The Company realized gains on the sale of investments totaling $718,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. These gains were the result of the sale of agency bonds. In addition, two agency bonds classified as held to maturity with unearned discounts were called at par, contributing approximately $27,000 to the above mentioned gains. The proceeds from both sales and calls of agency bonds were reinvested in both loans and mortgage-back securities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income from bank owned life insurance declined by $44,000 as one insurance company reduced the rate of interest paid on its policies.

Non-Interest Expenses. There was a $1.3 million increase in total non-interest expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared the same period in 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compensation expense increased to $8.7 million compared to $7.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 largely due to the opening of two new retail offices during the period. The increase in advertising expenses and postage expenses are related to the Company’s direct marketing campaign focus on demand deposit growth. The increase in data processing and occupancy expenses are related the addition of two retail offices.

Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 29.7%, compared to 29.1% for the same period in 2007. The increase in the effective tax rate is due to large amount of gains on the sale of securities and increased income from taxable sources, all of which are taxed at 34%. The Company does not pay Kentucky income taxes but does pay a 6% tax on all Tennessee income.

21

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

Net Income. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $1,149,000, compared to net income of $1,025,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in the Company’s net income for the three month period ended September 30, 2008 was largely the result of an increase in interest earning assets and changes in market interest rates. Partially offsetting the Company’s improved net income levels was a $581,000 increase in the Company’s provision for loan loss expense resulting from an increase in total loans outstanding. Non-interest expenses increased by $379,000 as the Company opened two new retail banking locations in the last twelve months and entered into marketing agreements to greatly expand its ATM network.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $6.0 million, compared to $5.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to September 30, 2007 was largely due to a $66.9 million increase in the average balance of loans outstanding and, to a lesser extent, lower short-term interest rates. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the tax equivalent yield on total interest earning assets declined to 6.47% from 7.02%. For the three month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company’s cost of interest bearing liabilities was 3.56% and 4.38%, respectively.

Average Balances, Yields and Interest Expenses. The table below summarizes the overall effect of changes to both interest rates and changes in the average balances of interest earning assets and liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2008, and September 30, 2007. Yields on assets and cost of liabilities are derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balances of interest earning assets and liabilities for the appropriate three-month periods. Average balances for loans include loans classified as non-accrual, net of the allowance for loan losses. The table adjusts tax-free investment income by $67 for September 30, 2008, and $54 for September 30, 2007, for a tax equivalent rate using a cost of funds rate of 3.50% for September 30, 2008 and 4.30% for September 30, 2007. The table adjusts tax-free loan income by $80 for September 30, 2008 and $80 for September 30, 2007 for a tax equivalent rate using the same cost of funds rate. The cost of funds rates used for the periods above correspond to the Company’s actual cost of funds rates for those periods.

22

(Table Amounts in Thousands, Except Percentages)

	Average Balance 9/30/2008		Income & Expense 9/30/2008			Average Rates 9/30/2008		Average Balance 9/30/2007		Income & Expense 9/30/2007			Average Rates 9/30/2007
Loans	$	608,925	$	10,425		6.85	%	$	542,025	$	10,477		7.73	%
Investments AFS taxable		134,440		1,726		5.14	%		131,406		1,575		4.79	%
Investment AFS tax free		16,872		220		5.22	%		15,147		183		4.83	%
Investment Held to maturity		1,926		24		4.98	%		17,891		197		4.40	%
Federal funds		5,110		23		1.80	%		7,167		93		5.19	%
Total interest earning assets		767,273		12,418		6.47	%		713,636		12,525		7.02	%
Other assets		63,929							66,996
Total assets	$	831,202						$	780,632
Interest bearing deposits	$	575,376		4,967		3.45	%	$	531,065		5,635		4.24	%
FHLB borrowings		93,145		985		4.23	%		98,539		1,145		4.65	%
Repurchase agreements		32,290		256		3.17	%		33,122		403		4.87	%
Subordinated debentures		10,310		121		4.69	%		10,310		192		7.45	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		711,121		6,329		3.56	%		673,036		7,375		4.38	%
Non-interest bearing deposits		57,758							50,690
Other liabilities		5,190							4,994
Stockholders’ equity		57,133							51,912
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	831,202						$	780,632
Net change in interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities			$	6,089		2.91	%			$	5,150		2.64	%
Net yield on interest earning assets				3.17	%						2.89	%

Interest Income. Interest income decreased by approximately $100,000, from $12.4 million to $12.3 million, during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decline was primarily resulted from a 375 basis point decline in the prime rate as well as a result of a sharp increase in non-accrual loans mentioned earlier in this report. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the average tax equivalent yield on average loans declined from 7.73% to 6.85%. The average balance of loans receivable increased $66.9 million to $608.9 million at September 30, 2008 from $542.0 million at September 30, 2007. As compared to the three month period ended September 30, 2008, the tax equivalent yields on investments improved by approximately 26 basis points despite lower market interest rates as the Company reduced its holdings of unsecured U.S. government agency debt and increased its holdings of mortgage backed securities and municipal bonds.

23

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased approximately $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease was attributable to sharply lower short term interest rates offsetting higher average balance of interest bearing deposits and repurchase accounts as compared to September 30, 2007. The average cost of average interest-bearing deposits declined from 4.24% at September 30, 2007 to 3.45% at September 30, 2008. Over the same period, the average balance of interest bearing deposits increased $44.3 million, from $531.1 million at September 30, 2007 to $575.4 million at September 30, 2008 and the average balance of funds borrowed from the FHLB decreased $5.4 million, from $98.5 million at September 30, 2007 to $93.1 million at September 30, 2008. The average cost of average borrowed funds from the FHLB decreased from 4.65% at September 30, 2007 to 4.23% at September 30, 2008. The average cost of all deposits declined from 3.87% at September 30, 2007 to 3.14% at September 30, 2008. The average balance of repurchase agreements decreased from $33.1 million at September 30, 2007 to $32.3 million at September 30, 2008. The average cost of repurchase agreements declined from 4.85% at September 30, 2007 to 3.17% at September 30, 2008.

Provision for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in its loan portfolio and the general economy. Such evaluation considers numerous factors including, general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, prior loss experience, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an adequate loan loss allowance. The Company determined that an additional $805,000 provision for loan loss was required for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to a $224,000 provision for loan loss expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in provision expense is attributable to loan growth and local economic conditions.

Non-Interest Income. There was an approximate $173,000 increase in non-interest income in the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. For the three-month period ended September 30, 2008, service charge income was $1.25 million, an increase of $174,000 over the same period in 2007. The increase in service charge income is largely the result of the increased number of checking accounts. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, gains on the sale of loans were $7,000 as compared to $30,000 in the same period in 2007. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, income from financial services was $321,000, compared to $294,000 for the same period in 2007.

Non-Interest Expenses. There was approximately a $400,000 increase in total non-interest expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared the same period in 2007. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, compensation expense increased to $2.9 million compared to $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 largely due to the opening of two new offices during the period. For the three month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the only other operating expenses that increased by more than $50,000 were data processing expense, advertising expenses related to the Company’s checking account promotion and other operating expenses.

Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 27.0%, compared to 28.6% for the same period in 2007. The decrease in the effective tax rate is due to a higher amount of provision for loan loss expense and increase in income from tax free sources.

Liquidity and Capital Resources. The Company has no business other than that of the Bank. Management believes that dividends that may be paid by the Bank to the Company will provide sufficient funds for its current needs. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will not have a need for additional funds in the future. The Bank is subject to certain regulatory limitations with respect to the payment of dividends to the Company.

24

The Bank’s principal sources of funds for operations are deposits from its primary market areas, principal and interest payments on loans and proceeds from maturing investment securities. The Company estimates that its CMO and mortgage backed security portfolio will provide more than $1.0 million dollars in cash flow per month over the remaining three months of 2008. Additional cash flows from agency securities are highly dependent on market interest rates. This cash flow will be used to fund additional loan growth, reduce FHLB borrowings, and to replace more expensive deposits. The principal uses of funds by the Bank include the origination of mortgage and consumer loans and the purchase of investment securities.

The Bank must satisfy three capital standards: a ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets of 4.0%, a tangible capital standard expressed as 1.5% of total adjusted assets, and a combination of core and “supplementary” capital equal to 8.0% of risk-weighted assets. At September 30, 2008, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. The table below presents certain information relating to the Company’s and Bank’s capital compliance at September 30, 2008:

	At September 30, 2008
	Company				Bank
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Tangible Capital	$	61,816	7.37	%	$	60,692	7.25	%
Core Capital	$	61,816	7.37	%	$	60,692	7.25	%
Risk-Based Capital	$	67,565	10.97	%	$	66,441	10.80	%

At September 30, 2008, the Bank had outstanding commitments to originate loans of approximately $3.3 million and undisbursed commitments on loans outstanding of $60.8 million. Management believes that the Bank’s sources of funds are sufficient to fund all of its outstanding commitments. Certificates of deposits, which are scheduled to mature in one year or less from September 30, 2008, totaled $280.3 million. Management believes that a significant percentage of such deposits will remain with the Bank.

At September 30, 2008, the Bank has outstanding borrowings of $91.4 million from the FHLB with maturities ranging from overnight borrowing to nine years. In addition, the FHLB has issued letters of credit total $53.5 million using the Bank’s borrowing based as collateral.

The Company’s FHLB borrowings are secured by a blanket security agreements pledging the Bank’s 1-4 family first mortgage loans, multi-family real estate loans and non-residential real estate loans. At September 30, 2008, the Bank has approximately $181.0 million in closed end 1-4 family first mortgages, $218.7 million in non-residential real estate loans and $34.8 million in multi-family real estate loans that are pledged under these agreements.

25

At September 30, 2008, the Bank had additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB of approximately $28.1 million. A schedule of FHLB borrowings at September 30, 2008 is provided below:

Outstanding Balance	Rate		Maturity	Note
	(Dollars in thousands)
$7,000	4.83	%	10/31/08
8,000	2.75	%	08/21/09
10,000	3.83	%	10/27/09
9,000	4.26	%	01/28/10
8,000	2.80	%	08/21/10
10,000	5.26	%	02/14/11
6,093	3.30	%	06/01/13	Monthly Principal Payments
2,319	3.19	%	04/14/14	Monthly Principal Payments
4,000	5.34	%	03/17/16
7,000	4.25	%	05/01/17	Quarterly callable
10,000	4.56	%	06/28/17	Quarterly callable
10,000	4.26	%	08/17/17	Quarterly callable
$91,412	4.09	%	4.2 years

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. At September 30, 2008, the Company had the following off-balance sheet commitments:

	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	60,799
Standby letters of credit	$	3,555
Unused commercial lines of credit	$	10,288
Unused home equity lines of credit	$	33,311
Non-cancelable lease obligations	$	80

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Additional written or oral forward-looking statements may be made by the Company from time to time in filings with the

Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise. The words “believe,” “expect,” “seek,” and “intend” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement is made. Such forward-looking statements are within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of income or loss, expenditures, acquisitions, plans for future operations, financing needs or plans relating to services of the Company, as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing.

26

Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims, any obligation to publicly release the results of revisions, which may be made to forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Effect of New Accounting Standards

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB State Position No. 157-2. The staff position delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The delay is intended to allow additional time to consider the effect of various implementation issues with regard to the application of SFAS No. 157. The new staff position defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to January 1, 2009 for items within the scope of the staff position.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, Fair Value Option Statement for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS No. 159 allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on an individual basis. Future changes in the fair value of these financial instruments would be recognized on the current period’s statement of income while establishing additional disclosure requirements for these financial statements. The stated objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in the reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex accounting provisions. FASB No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption was permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity made the choice in the first 120 days of that physical year and also elects to apply the provisions of FASB No. 157. The Company chose not to utilize the option of early adoption of FASB No. 159. The Company’s adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, (SAB 109). SAB 109 modifies how to apply generally accepted accounting principles to loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Prior to SAB 109, when companies measured the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan was excluded. Under SAB 109, the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loans sold will be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value of earnings. SAB 109 is effective for the Company January 1, 2008. The Company’s adoption of SAB 109 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51 SFAS No. 160 requires non-controlling interest to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of equity. Disclosure requirements included net income and comprehensive income to be displayed for both the controlling and non-controlling interest and a separate schedule that shows the effects of any transactions with the non-controlling interest on the equity attributable to the controlling interest. The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement should be applied prospectively except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

27

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations. SFAS 141R clarified the definitions of both a business combination and a business. All business combinations will be accounted for under the purchase method. This standard defines the acquisition date as the only relevant date for recognition and measurement of the fair value of consideration paid. SFAS 141R requires the acquirer to expense all acquisition related cost. SFAS 141R defines the measurement period as the time after the acquisition date during which the acquirer may make adjustments to the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date. This period cannot exceed one year, and any subsequent adjustments to the provisional amounts are done so retrospectively and require a restatement of prior period data. The provisions of this statement are effective for business combinations during fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008. The Company has not determined the impact of SFAS 141R on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related items are accounted for under Statement 133 and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of FASB No. 161 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The standard identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of non-governmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The new standard becomes effective sixty days following the Security and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411. SFAS No. 162 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An amendment of FASB Statement No. 161. This staff position amends FASB Statement 133 to require sellers of credit derivatives to disclosure information about their credit derivatives and hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives. This staff position also amends FASB Interpretation No. 45 to require additional disclosure about the current status of the payment and performance risk of the guarantee. It also clarifies the intent of FASB about the effective date of SFAS 161. These provisions of this FASB staff position are effective for the Company for reporting periods ending after November 15, 2008. FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for that Asset Is Not Active. This FASB staff position clarifies the application of SFAS in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. This FASB staff position became effective for the Company on October 10, 2008. The Company utilized this position to determine the market value of a $2 million investment of a private placement trust preferred investment.

28

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company monitors whether material changes in market risk have occurred since year-end. The Company’s income and the value of its assets are strongly influenced by changes in interest rates. The Company does not believe that material changes in the Company’s interest rate risk profile have occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The Company’s model assumes an immediate change of interest rates, considered a severe test of interest rate sensitivity.

In general, a 1% and 2% increase in interest rates will result in a $400,000 and $900,000 increase to the Company’s net interest margin, respectively. A 1% or 2% reduction in interest rates will result in a $200,000 and $1.1 million decline in net interest income. These anticipated results represent a significant change as compared to December 31, 2007 due to the re-pricing of the investment portfolio and time deposits.

The effects of rising interest rates are discussed throughout Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Actual results for the year ended December 31, 2008 will differ from simulations due to timing, magnitude, and the frequency or interest rate changes, market conditions, management strategies, and the timing of the Company’s cash receipts and disbursements.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), an evaluation was carried out with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) and 15 d-14(c) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2008.

Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.

Any control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that its objectives are achieved. The design of a control system inherently has limitations, including the controls cost relative to their benefits. Additionally, controls can be circumvented. No cost-effective control system can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected.

29

The Company is currently subject to certain provisions outlined in Section 404b of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404b requires management to assess and report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Additionally, it requires the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to report on management’s assessment as well as report on its own assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Management has established policies and procedures to assess and report on internal controls, and has retained an outside firm to assist it in determining the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Company anticipates

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The Company’s risk factors are discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 in reference to Item 1A. Due to the current conditions in the financial markets, the Company will amend its risk factors to include the following items:

The current economic environment poses significant challenges for us and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Although we remain well capitalized and have not suffered from liquidity issues, we are operating in a challenging and uncertain economic environment. Financial institutions continue to be affected by declines in the real estate market and constrained financial markets. We retain direct exposure to the residential and commercial real estate markets and we could be affected by those events. Continued declines in real estate values, home sales volumes and financial stress on borrowers as a result of the uncertain economic environment, including job losses, could have an adverse affect on our borrowers and their customers, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a possible local or national economic recession could drive losses beyond those which are provided for in our allowance for loan losses account. The Company is currently experiencing a significant increase in deposit cost as regional institutions aggressively price deposits in an effort to ease their own liquidity concerns.

30

Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented and could adversely impact our results of operations and access to capital.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than one year. In recent weeks, volatility in, and disruption of, these markets have reached unprecedented levels. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity without regard to an issuer’s underlying financial strength. If the current climate of market disruption and volatility continues or becomes worse, there can be no assurance that we will not experience adverse effects, which may be material, on our ability to access capital and on our results of operations and financial condition, including our liquidity position.

We cannot predict the effect of recent legislative and regulatory initiative.

Congress recently enacted the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which is intended to stabilize the financial markets, including providing funding of up to $700 billion to purchase troubled assets and loans from financial institutions while providing the Treasury Department with the ability to make direct equity investments into selected financial institutions. The legislation also increases the amount of FDIC deposit account insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 for interest bearing accounts. The Act also provides for unlimited FDIC insurance coverage for non-interest bearing deposits in financial institutions that decide to accept this level of insurance at an additional cost. The increased level of FDIC insurance is in effect until December 31, 2009. The full effect of this wide-ranging legislation and recent regulatory initiatives on the national economy, financial institutions, and our participation in and access to these programs cannot now be predicted and has not been determined.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) None

(b) None

Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share	Total number of shares purchased as part of announced plans or programs	Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
July 1, 2008 - July 31, 2008	—	—	95,950	29,050
August 1, 2008 - August 31, 2008	2,500	12.25	98,450	26,550
September 1, 2008 - September 30, 2008	—	—	98,450	0
			98,450	0

On August 25, 2006, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the repurchase of an additional 125,000 of the Company’s common stock, or approximately 3.5% of the total shares outstanding. The purchases are being made from time

31

to time on the NASDAQ Stock Market at prices prevailing on that market or in privately negotiated transactions at management’s discretion, depending on market conditions, price of the Company’s common stock, corporate cash requirements and other factors. As of September 30, 2008, a total of 98,450 shares of common stock had been repurchased under the current program. The Company has repurchased a total of 507,359 shares of common stock under all current and prior repurchase programs. The Company’s current repurchase plan expired September 30, 2008.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 for John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer.
32.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 for Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer.

32

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HOPFED BANCORP, INC.
Date: November 14, 2008	/s/ John E. Peck
	John E. Peck
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2008	/s/ Billy C. Duvall
	Billy C. Duvall
	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

33

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John E. Peck, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HopFed Bancorp, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards.

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

34

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant roles in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2008	/s/ John. E. Peck
	John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer

35

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Billy C. Duvall, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HopFed Bancorp, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(c) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards.

(d) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

(e) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

36

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2008	/s/ Billy C. Duvall
	Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer

37

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2008

/s/ John E. Peck

John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

38

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2008

/s/ Billy C. Duvall

Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

39