Prospectus supplement dated May 1, 2013

to the following prospectus(es):

BOA Last Survivorship II, BOA ChoiceLife Survivorship, BOA ChoiceLife Survivorship II,
Next Generation Survivorship Life, BOA Protection Survivorship Life,
and BOA ChoiceLife Protection prospectus dated May 1, 2009

BOA MSPVL II, BOA Protection FPVUL, and BOA ChoiceLife Protection FPVUL
prospectus dated May 1, 2008

This supplement updates certain information contained in your prospectus. Please read it and keep it with your prospectus for future reference.

(1) Your prospectus offers the following underlying investment options under your contract. Effective May 1, 2013, the names of the investment options will be updated as indicated below:

 

CURRENT NAME	UPDATED NAME
Invesco - Invesco Van Kampen V.I. American Franchise Fund: Series I Shares	Invesco - Invesco V.I. American Franchise Fund: Series I Shares
Invesco - Invesco Van Kampen V.I. Mid Cap Growth Fund: Series I Shares	Invesco - Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Growth Fund: Series I Shares
Nationwide Variable Insurance Trust - Van Kampen NVIT Comstock Value Fund: Class I	Nationwide Variable Insurance Trust - Invesco NVIT Comstock Value Fund: Class I
Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds - Oppenheimer Global Securities Fund/VA: Class 3	Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds – Oppenheimer Global Fund/VA: Class 3
Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds - Oppenheimer Global Securities Fund/VA: Non-Service Shares	Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds – Oppenheimer Global Fund/VA: Non-Service Shares
Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds - Oppenheimer Main Street Small- & Mid-Cap Fund(R)/VA: Non-Service Shares	Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds - Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund(R)/VA: Non-Service Shares
Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds - Oppenheimer Small- & Mid-Cap Growth Fund/VA: Non-Service Shares	Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds – Oppenheimer Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund/VA: Non-Service Shares

(2) The "Legal Proceedings" section of your prospectus is replaced with the following:

Legal Proceedings

Nationwide Life Insurance Company

Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. (NFS, or collectively with its subsidiaries, "the Company") was formed in November 1996. NFS is the holding company for Nationwide Life Insurance Company (NLIC), Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company (NLAIC) and other companies that comprise the life insurance and retirement savings operations of the Nationwide group of companies (Nationwide). This group includes Nationwide Financial Network (NFN), an affiliated distribution network that markets directly to its customer base. NFS is incorporated in Delaware and maintains its principal executive offices in Columbus, Ohio.

The Company is subject to legal and regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of its business. The Company's legal and regulatory matters include proceedings specific to the Company and other proceedings generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which the Company operates. The Company's litigation and regulatory matters are subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity and scope, their outcomes cannot be predicted. Regulatory proceedings also could affect the outcome of one or more of the Company's litigation matters. Furthermore, it is often not possible to determine the ultimate outcomes of the pending regulatory investigations and legal proceedings or to provide reasonable ranges of potential losses with any degree of certainty. Some matters, including certain of those referred to below, are in very preliminary stages, and the Company does not have sufficient information to make an assessment of the plaintiffs' claims for liability or damages. In some of the cases seeking to be certified as class actions, the court has not yet decided whether a class will be certified or (in the event of certification) the size of the class and class period. In many of the cases, the plaintiffs are seeking undefined amounts of damages or other relief, including punitive damages and equitable remedies, which are difficult to quantify and cannot be defined based on the information currently available.

GWP-0428

1

The Company believes, however, that based on currently known information, the ultimate outcome of all pending legal and regulatory matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position. Nonetheless, given the large or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, it is possible that such outcomes could materially affect the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations in a particular quarter or annual period.

The financial services industry has been the subject of increasing scrutiny on a broad range of issues by regulators and legislators. The Company and/or its affiliates have been contacted by, self reported or received subpoenas from state and federal regulatory agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other governmental bodies, state securities law regulators and state attorneys general for information relating to, among other things, sales compensation, the allocation of compensation, unsuitable sales or replacement practices, and claims handling and escheatment practices. The Company is cooperating with and responding to regulators in connection with these inquiries and will cooperate with Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (NMIC) in responding to these inquiries to the extent that any inquiries encompass NMIC's operations.

In October 2012, NLIC and NLAIC entered into a Regulatory Settlement Agreement with the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation and 21 other state Departments of Insurance to resolve a multi-state market conduct exam regarding claim settlement practices. The Regulatory Settlement Agreement applies prospectively and requires NLIC and NLAIC to adopt and implement additional procedures relating to the use of to the Social Security Death Master File and identifying and locating beneficiaries once deaths are identified. In October 2012, NLIC and NLAIC also entered into a Global Resolution Agreement to resolve the related unclaimed property audit.

On November 20, 2007, Nationwide Retirement Solutions, Inc. (NRS) and NLIC were named in a lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama entitled Ruth A. Gwin and Sandra H. Turner, and a class of similarly situated individuals v. Nationwide Life Insurance Company, Nationwide Retirement Solutions, Inc., Alabama State Employees Association, PEBCO, Inc. and Fictitious Defendants A to Z. On March 12, 2010, NRS and NLIC were named in a Second Amended Class Action Complaint filed in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama entitled Steven E. Coker, Sandra H. Turner, David N. Lichtenstein and a class of similarly situated individuals v. Nationwide Life Insurance Company, Nationwide Retirement Solutions, Inc., Alabama State Employees Association, Inc., PEBCO, Inc. and Fictitious Defendants A to Z claiming to represent a class of all participants in the Alabama State Employees Association, Inc. (ASEA) Plan, excluding members of the Deferred Compensation Committee, ASEA's directors, officers and board members, and PEBCO's directors, officers and board members. On October 22, 2010, the parties to this action executed a stipulation of settlement that agreed to certify a class for settlement purposes only, that provided for payments to the settlement class, and that provided for releases, certain bar orders, and dismissal of the case. The settlement fund has been paid out. On December 6, 2011 the Court entered an Order that NRS owes indemnification to ASEA and PEBCO for the Coker (Gwin) class action, and dismissed NLIC. The Company has resolved the indemnification claims of ASEA. On February 13, 2013, the Court issued its Order determining the amount of fees due to PEBCO on its indemnification claim. On March 28, 2013, the Company filed a notice of appeal to the Alabama Supreme Court. NRS continues to defend this case vigorously.

On August 15, 2001, NFS and NLIC were named in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut entitled Lou Haddock, as trustee of the Flyte Tool & Die, Incorporated Deferred Compensation Plan, et al v. Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. and Nationwide Life Insurance Company. On November 18, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a sixth amended complaint amending the list of named plaintiffs and claiming to represent a class of qualified retirement plan trustees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) that purchased variable annuities from NLIC. The plaintiffs allege that they invested ERISA plan assets in their variable annuity contracts and that NLIC and NFS breached ERISA fiduciary duties by allegedly accepting service payments from certain mutual funds. The complaint seeks disgorgement of some or all of the payments allegedly received by NFS and NLIC, other unspecified relief for restitution, declaratory and injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees. On November 6, 2009, the Court granted the plaintiff's motion for class certification and certified a class of "All trustees of all employee pension benefit plans covered by ERISA which had variable annuity contracts with NFS and NLIC or whose participants had individual variable annuity contracts with NFS and NLIC at any time from January 1, 1996, or the first date NFS and NLIC began receiving payments from mutual funds based on a percentage of assets invested in the funds by NFS and NLIC, whichever came first, to the date of November 6, 2009." On October 21, 2010, the District Court dismissed NFS from the lawsuit. On February 6, 2012, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the November 6, 2009, order granting class certification and remanded the class back to the District Court for further consideration. The plaintiffs have renewed their motion for class certification. On December 18, 2012, the District Court heard oral argument on the motion for class certification. NLIC continues to defend this lawsuit vigorously.

GWP-0428

2

On June 8, 2011, NMIC and NLIC were named in a lawsuit filed in Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio entitled Stanley Andrews and Donald Clark, on their behalf and on behalf of the class defined herein v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Life Insurance Company. The lower court granted Nationwide's motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal on October 24, 2012. Plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing en banc on November 5, 2012. The Court of Appeals denied the petition on December 14, 2012. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court on January 24, 2013. Nationwide has 30 days to file an opposition memorandum. Nationwide filed its memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' petition for jurisdiction to the Ohio Supreme Court on February 27, 2013.

Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (Debtors) and Giddens, James v NLIC and NMIC, et al.In 2012 the Plaintiff, Debtor in Possession Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc., filed a class action in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York seeking the recovery of nearly $3 billion in assets from all the named defendants including NLIC and NMIC. This litigation arises from two collateralized debt obligation transactions, 801 Grand and Alta, which resulted in payments to NLIC and NMIC. In 2008, the Plaintiff and its parent company, Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. filed for bankruptcy which triggered an early termination of the above transactions. The Plaintiff seeks to have sums returned to the bankruptcy estate in addition to prejudgment interest and costs. The case is currently stayed and on February 13, 2013, the Court extended the stay. Responsive pleadings are now due September 5, 2013. Lehman recently sent correspondence out to all defendants inviting settlement discussions which is under review.

Nationwide Investment Services Corporation

The general distributor, NISC, is not engaged in any litigation of any material nature.

GWP-0428

3