XML 26 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (USD $)
In Millions, except Per Share data
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 11, 2011
Jun. 12, 2010
Jun. 11, 2011
Jun. 12, 2010
Revenues        
Company sales $ 2,431 $ 2,220 $ 4,482 $ 4,216
Franchise and license fees and income 385 354 759 703
Total revenues 2,816 2,574 5,241 4,919
Company restaurants        
Food and paper 792 699 1,454 1,324
Payroll and employee benefits 548 503 1,009 964
Occupancy and other operating expenses 705 652 1,273 1,222
Company restaurant expenses 2,045 1,854 3,736 3,510
General and administrative expenses 308 283 563 528
Franchise and license expenses 33 24 63 47
Closures and impairment (income) expenses 19 12 88 16
Refranchising (gain) loss 5 [1],[2] (10) [1] 3 [1],[2] 53 [1],[2],[3]
Other (income) expense (13) (10) (32) (20)
Total costs and expenses, net 2,397 2,153 4,421 4,134
Operating Profit 419 421 820 785
Interest expense, net 35 42 78 83
Income Before Income Taxes 384 379 742 702
Income tax provision 62 90 153 168
Net Income – including noncontrolling interests 322 289 589 534
Net Income - noncontrolling interests 6 3 9 7
Net Income - YUM! Brands, Inc. $ 316 $ 286 $ 580 $ 527
Basic Earnings Per Common Share $ 0.67 $ 0.61 $ 1.23 $ 1.11
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share $ 0.65 $ 0.59 $ 1.20 $ 1.09
Dividends Declared Per Common Share $ 0.50 $ 0.21 $ 0.50 $ 0.42
[1] Refranchising (gain) loss is not allocated to segments for performance reporting purposes.
[2] U.S. refranchising loss for the year to date ended June 12, 2010 included $73 million in non-cash impairment charges related to our offer to refranchise a substantial portion of our Company operated KFCs in the U.S.  We recorded an additional $12 million and $2 million in non-cash impairment charges related to these restaurants in the quarters ended December 25, 2010 and June 11, 2011, respectively.  The majority of these restaurants offered for sale in 2010 continue to be Company operated at June 11, 2011.  We believed in 2010 and continue to believe at June 11, 2011 that the restaurant groups for which we have not yet entered into agreements to sell do not meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale.  Consistent with our historical policy, we are reviewing these restaurant groups for impairment on a held for use basis each quarter as a result of our intent to refranchise.  To the extent the carrying value of these restaurant groups are not recoverable based upon our estimate of expected refranchising proceeds and holding period cash flows while we continue to operate the restaurants, they are written down to current estimates of their fair value.  These fair value estimates, which are based on the sales price we would expect to receive for each restaurant group, consider current market conditions, real-estate values, trends in the KFC-U.S. business, prices for similar transactions in the restaurant industry and preliminary offers for any restaurant groups to date.  We continue to depreciate the carrying values of the restaurant assets, net of the aforementioned impairment charges, and will continue to do so through the date we believe the held for sale criteria for any restaurant groups are met.  The $85 million and $2 million in impairment charges recorded in 2010 and 2011, respectively, do not include any allocation of the KFC reporting unit goodwill in the restaurant groups’ carrying values.  This additional non-cash write down is being recorded, consistent with our historical policy, when a restaurant group ultimately meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale.  We will also be required to record a charge for the fair value of our guarantee of future lease payments for leases we assign to the franchisee upon any sale.
[3] During the quarter ended March 20, 2010 we refranchised all of our remaining company restaurants in Taiwan, which consisted of 124 KFCs.  We included in our March 20, 2010 financial statements a non-cash write-off of $7 million of goodwill in determining the loss on refranchising of Taiwan.  This loss did not result in a related income tax benefit, and was not allocated to any segment for performance reporting purposes.  The amount of goodwill write-off was based on the relative fair values of the Taiwan business disposed of and the portion of the business that was retained.  The fair value of the business disposed of was determined by reference to the discounted value of the future cash flows expected to be generated by the restaurants and retained by the franchisee, which included a deduction for the anticipated royalties the franchisee will pay the Company associated with the franchise agreement entered into in connection with this refranchising transaction. The fair value of the Taiwan business retained consisted of expected net cash flows to be derived from royalties from franchisees, including the royalties associated with the franchise agreement entered into in connection with this refranchising transaction.  We believed the terms of the franchise agreement entered into in connection with the Taiwan refranchising were substantially consistent with market.  The remaining carrying value of goodwill related to our Taiwan business of $30 million, after the aforementioned write-off, was determined not to be impaired subsequent to the refranchising as the fair value of the Taiwan reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount.