XML 51 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND IMPAIRMENT
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND IMPAIRMENT

 

Goodwill

 

The carrying value of goodwill was $12,308,661 for both the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

 

Identifiable intangible assets

 

The changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

 

    2012     2011  
Balance at beginning of year   $ 5,551,149     $ 6,494,134  
Amortization expense     (919,572 )     (942,985 )
Balance at end of year   $ 4,631,577     $ 5,551,149  

 

The Company has recorded the fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets, which are subject to amortization, using the income approach. The following table sets forth the components of these intangible assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

          As of December 31, 2012  
    Estimated     Adjusted           Net  
    Useful     Carrying     Accumulated     as of  
    Life     Amount     Amortization     12/31/2012  
                         
Trade name     20 years     $ 704,458     $ (229,975 )   $ 474,483  
Patents and copyrights     17 years       1,117,842       (396,575 )     721,267  
Non-compete agreements     5 years       310,000       (206,667 )     103,333  
Developed technology     7 years       3,941,310       (2,760,370 )     1,180,940  
Backlog     3 years       303,400       (303,400 )     -  
Non-contractual customer relationships     15 years       3,268,568       (1,117,014 )     2,151,554  
            $ 9,645,578     $ (5,014,001 )   $ 4,631,577  

 

    As of December 31, 2011  
    Adjusted           Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     as of  
    Amount     Amortization     12/31/2011  
                   
Trade name   $ 704,458     $ (186,390 )   $ 518,068  
Patents and copyrights     1,117,842       (339,298 )     778,544  
Non-compete agreements     310,000       (144,667 )     165,333  
Developed technology     3,941,310       (2,225,605 )     1,715,705  
Backlog     303,400       (303,400 )     -  
Non-contractual customer relationships     3,268,568       (895,069 )     2,373,499  
    $ 9,645,578     $ (4,094,429 )   $ 5,551,149  

  

The following summarizes amortization of acquisition related intangible assets included in the statement of operations:

 

    Years Ended December 31,  
    2012     2011  
             
Cost of sales   $ 771,416     $ 784,749  
General and administrative     148,156       158,236  
    $ 919,572     $ 942,985  

 

The Company expects that amortization expense for the next five succeeding years will be as follows:

 

2013   $ 907,223  
2014   $ 416,656  
2015   $ 310,458  
2016   $ 310,458  
2017   $ 310,458  

 

These amounts are subject to change based upon the review of recoverability and useful lives that are performed at least annually.

 

Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment

 

The excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the assets of acquired businesses is considered goodwill. Under authoritative guidance, purchased goodwill is not amortized, but rather it is periodically reviewed for impairment. The Company had goodwill of $12,308,661 at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. This goodwill resulted from the acquisitions of Mobilisa, Inc. and Positive Access Corporation.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill and concluded that no impairment charge was required for either year. Under authoritative guidance, the Company can use industry and Company specific qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that impairment exists, before using a two-step quantitative analysis. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company determined that no impairment was necessary based on the below qualitative factors:

 

· Macroeconomic conditions
· Industry and market considerations
· Cost factors
· Overall financial performance
· Other entity-specific events
· Sustained decrease in share price

 

For the year ended December 31, 2012, after a review of these qualitative factors, the Company determined that it was prudent to perform a two-step quantitative analysis. The first step is to compare the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit, as calculated by its market capitalization, to its carrying value. If the fair value is lower, the second step is to calculate the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit based on a combined income approach using the discounted cash flow methodology, and the market approach based upon the market capitalization of the Company. In the first step, the Company determined that the fair value of its reporting unit was higher than its carrying value, at 102%. Furthermore, the Company believes that the stock price at December 31, 2012, was artificially deflated because of certain factors. Because of this analysis, no second step was deemed necessary. Management’s evaluation of the first step determined that no goodwill impairment charge was required as of December 31, 2012.

 

Market capitalization is a relevant and objective, but not conclusive, indicator of the Company’s fair value considered in our evaluation of goodwill impairment. During the two-month period around December 31, 2012, the Company’s closing stock prices fluctuated from a low of $.57 to a high of $.94. As directed by authoritative guidance, we evaluated the trading activity in the Company’s common stock, including the trading volume. The Company’s stock is thinly traded with relatively small float. As a result, small trading volumes can have a significant effect on the price of our common stock. Based on this evaluation, the results of this approach indicated a fair value in excess of carrying value.

 

The Company also considered whether long-lived assets including intangibles were also impaired. These assets are stated at cost, less accumulated amortization, which is provided for by charges to income on a basis consistent with the utilization of the assets over their useful lives. The carrying value of intangible and long-lived assets is reviewed periodically by the Company for the existence of facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment. If such circumstances exist, the Company would estimate the future, undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset, and compare that to the carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated cash flows, the asset would be written down to its estimated fair value. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company determined that there was no impairment of intangible assets.