XML 53 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Gaylord Entertainment Company (the “Company”) is a diversified hospitality and entertainment company principally operating, through its subsidiaries, in three business segments: Hospitality; Opry and Attractions; and Corporate and Other. The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31 for all periods presented.

Business Segments

Hospitality

The Hospitality segment includes the operations of Gaylord Hotels branded hotels and the Radisson Hotel at Opryland, as well as the Company’s previous investments in two joint ventures. At December 31, 2011, the Company owns and operates the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center (“Gaylord Opryland”), the Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention Center (“Gaylord Palms”), the Gaylord Texan Resort and Convention Center (“Gaylord Texan”), the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center (“Gaylord National”), and the Radisson Hotel at Opryland. Gaylord Opryland and the Radisson Hotel at Opryland are both located in Nashville, Tennessee. The Gaylord Palms in Kissimmee, Florida opened in January 2002. The Gaylord Texan in Grapevine, Texas opened in April 2004. The Gaylord National, located in Prince George’s County, Maryland, opened in April 2008.

Opry and Attractions

The Opry and Attractions segment includes all of the Company’s Nashville-based tourist attractions. At December 31, 2011, these include the Grand Ole Opry, the General Jackson Showboat, the Wildhorse Saloon, the Ryman Auditorium and the Gaylord Springs Golf Links, among others. The Opry and Attractions segment also includes WSM-AM.

On June 1, 2010, the Company completed the sale of its Corporate Magic business through the transfer of all of its equity interests in Corporate Magic, Inc. Prior to the sale of this business, which is further described in Note 3, Corporate Magic, Inc. was included in the Company’s Opry and Attractions segment. This business specialized in the production of creative events in the corporate entertainment marketplace. Due to the sale of this business, the results of its operations have been classified as discontinued operations in these consolidated financial statements.

Corporate and Other

Corporate and Other includes operating and selling, general and administrative expenses related to the overall management of the Company which are not allocated to the other reportable segments, including costs for the Company’s retirement plans, equity-based compensation plans, information technology, human resources, accounting, and other administrative expenses.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its majority-owned subsidiaries. The Company’s investments in non-controlled entities in which it has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for by the equity method. The Company’s investments in other entities are accounted for using the cost method. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company analyzes its variable interests, including loans, guarantees, and equity investments, to determine if an entity in which it has a variable interest is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). This analysis primarily includes a qualitative review, which is based on a review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure, including decision-making ability, and relevant financial agreements. This analysis is also used to determine if the Company must consolidate the VIE as the primary beneficiary.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — Unrestricted

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents — Restricted

Restricted cash and cash equivalents represent cash held in certificates of deposit with an original maturity of greater than three months. The Company is required to maintain these certificates of deposit in order to secure its Tennessee workers’ compensation self-insurance obligations.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Cash paid for interest for the years ended December 31 was comprised of (amounts in thousands):

 

 

                         
    2011     2010     2009  

Debt interest paid

  $ 61,667     $ 65,231     $ 71,561  

Capitalized interest

    (620     (1,188     (793
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest

  $ 61,047     $ 64,043     $ 70,768  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash refunds of income tax payments in 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $1.5 million, $65.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively (net of cash payments of income taxes of $1.3 million, $1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively). Net cash refunds received in 2010 resulted from the carryback of the 2009 tax loss to the Company’s 2007 income tax return. As the properties affected by the flood in Nashville are located in a Federal Disaster Area, the Company elected to deduct the casualty loss in the taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year in which the disaster occurred. Therefore, the Company was permitted to take the deduction on its 2009 federal tax return, which was carried back to the 2007 tax year for a refund.

Accounts Receivable

The Company’s accounts receivable are primarily generated by meetings and convention attendees’ room nights. Receivables arising from these sales are not collateralized. Credit risk associated with the accounts receivable is minimized due to the large and diverse nature of the customer base. No customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s trade receivables at December 31, 2011.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company provides allowances for doubtful accounts based upon a percentage of revenue and periodic evaluations of the aging of accounts receivable.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs consist of prepaid interest, loan fees and other costs of financing that are amortized over the term of the related financing agreements, using the effective interest method. During 2011, 2010 and 2009, deferred financing costs of $5.1 million, $5.3 million, and $4.8 million, respectively, were amortized and recorded as interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

As more fully discussed in Note 7, as a result of the refinancing of the Company’s credit facility, the Company wrote off $1.7 million of deferred financing costs, which is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for 2011. In addition, as more fully discussed in Note 7, as a result of the Company’s repurchase of portions of its senior notes outstanding, the Company wrote off $0.3 million and $4.2 million of deferred financing costs during 2010 and 2009, respectively, which is included as a reduction in the net gain on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for 2010 and 2009.

 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Improvements and significant renovations that extend the lives of existing assets are capitalized. Interest on funds borrowed to finance the construction of major capital additions is included in the cost of the applicable capital addition. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

 

 

     

Buildings

  40 years

Land improvements

  20 years

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

  3-8 years

Leasehold improvements

  The shorter of the lease term or

useful life

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accounting for the Company’s long-lived assets other than goodwill, the Company assesses its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets or asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets that will continue to be used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset or asset group to the related total future undiscounted net cash flows. If an asset or asset group’s carrying value is not recoverable through those cash flows, the asset group is considered to be impaired. The impairment is measured by the difference between the assets’ carrying amount and their fair value, which is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses that utilize comprehensive cash flow projections, as well as observable market data to the extent available.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment at least annually and whenever triggering events or circumstances occur indicating that these intangibles may be impaired. The Company allocates goodwill to reporting units by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit identified to the total fair value of the acquired company on the acquisition date. The Company performs its review of goodwill for impairment by comparing the carrying value of the applicable reporting unit to the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company estimates fair value using discounted cash flow analyses that utilize comprehensive cash flow projections, as well as observable market data to the extent available. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the Company measures potential impairment by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to the tangible assets and liabilities of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a business combination purchase price allocation. The remaining fair value of the reporting unit after assigning fair values to all of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities represents the implied fair value of goodwill of the reporting unit. The impairment is measured by the difference between the carrying value of goodwill and the implied fair value of goodwill. The Company’s goodwill and intangibles are discussed further in Note 3 and Note 6.

Leases

The Company is leasing a 65.3 acre site in Osceola County, Florida on which the Gaylord Palms is located, a 10.0 acre site in Grapevine, Texas on which a portion of the Gaylord Texan is located, and is a lessee under various other leasing arrangements, including leases for office space, office equipment, and other equipment. The Company’s leases are discussed further in Note 14.

Long-Term Investments

The Company owns minority interest investments in certain businesses. Generally, non-marketable investments (excluding limited partnerships and limited liability company interests) in which the Company owns less than 20 percent are accounted for using the cost method of accounting and investments in which the Company owns between 20 percent and 50 percent and limited partnerships are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

 

Other Assets

Other current and long-term assets of continuing operations at December 31 consist of (amounts in thousands):

 

 

                 
    2011     2010  

Other current assets:

               

Other current receivables

  $ 15,326     $ 15,435  

Income tax receivable

    —         2,395  

Prepaid expenses

    22,424       20,241  

Inventories

    10,762       10,877  

Other current assets

    26       44  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other current assets

  $ 48,538     $ 48,992  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other long-term assets:

               

Deferred software costs, net

  $ 17,685     $ 22,086  

Supplemental deferred compensation plan assets

    13,892       13,422  

Other

    19,136       15,557  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other long-term assets

  $ 50,713     $ 51,065  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Current Assets

Other current receivables result primarily from principal payments and interest income accrued on the notes received in connection with the development of Gaylord National and other non-operating income that are due within one year. Prepaid expenses consist of prepayments for property taxes at one of the Company’s hotel properties, insurance and other contracts that will be expensed during the subsequent year. Inventories consist primarily of merchandise and food and beverage inventory for resale and are carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed on an average cost basis.

Other Long-Term Assets

The Company capitalizes the costs of computer software developed for internal use. Accordingly, the Company has capitalized the external costs and certain internal payroll costs to develop computer software. Deferred software costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 5 years. Amortization expense of deferred software costs during 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $8.7 million, $8.2 million, and $7.1 million, respectively.

Other assets include, among various other items, deferred costs associated with the Company’s potential developments in Aurora, Colorado and Mesa, Arizona.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities of continuing operations at December 31 consist of (amounts in thousands):

 

 

                 
    2011     2010  

Trade accounts payable

  $ 13,871     $ 17,759  

Accrued construction in progress

    7,506       8,914  

Property and other taxes payable

    28,939       24,539  

Deferred revenues

    44,611       39,454  

Accrued salaries and benefits

    29,566       30,296  

Accrued self-insurance reserves

    8,898       8,603  

Accrued interest payable

    5,589       11,422  

Other accrued liabilities

    29,995       34,356  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  $ 168,975     $ 175,343  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred revenues consist primarily of deposits on advance bookings of hotel rooms and advance ticket sales at the Company’s tourism properties, as well as uncollected attrition and cancellation fees. The Company is self-insured up to a stop loss for certain losses relating to workers’ compensation claims, employee medical benefits and general liability claims. The Company recognizes self-insured losses based upon estimates of the aggregate liability for uninsured claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry or the Company’s historical experience. Other accrued liabilities include accruals for, among others, purchasing, meeting planner commissions and utilities.

 

Income Taxes

The Company establishes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax carrying amounts of assets and liabilities using existing tax laws and tax rates. The Company reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. See Note 13 for more detail on the Company’s income taxes.

Other Long-Term Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities of continuing operations at December 31 consist of (amounts in thousands):

 

 

                 
    2011     2010  

Pension and postretirement benefits liability

  $ 68,386     $ 45,028  

Straight-line lease liability

    62,570       56,757  

Deferred compensation liability

    13,892       13,422  

Unrealized tax benefits

    14,141       18,952  

Other

    7,220       8,041  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other long-term liabilities

  $ 166,209     $ 142,200  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from occupied hotel rooms are recognized as earned on the close of business each day and from concessions and food and beverage sales at the time of the sale. Revenues from other services at the Company’s hotels, such as spa, parking, and transportation services, are recognized at the time services are provided. Attrition fees, which are charged to groups when they do not fulfill the minimum number of room nights or minimum food and beverage spending requirements originally contracted for, as well as cancellation fees, are recognized as revenue in the period they are collected. The Company recognizes revenues from the Opry and Attractions segment when services are provided or goods are shipped, as applicable. The Company is required to collect certain taxes from customers on behalf of government agencies and remit these to the applicable governmental entity on a periodic basis. These taxes are collected from customers at the time of purchase, but are not included in revenue. The Company records a liability upon collection from the customer and relieves the liability when payments are remitted to the applicable governmental agency.

Preopening Costs

The Company expenses the costs associated with start-up activities and organization costs associated with its development or reopening of hotels and significant attractions as incurred. The Company’s preopening costs during 2011 primarily relate to a new restaurant concept at the Radisson Hotel at Opryland that opened in the third quarter of 2011. The Company’s preopening costs during 2010 included costs associated with the reopening of Gaylord Opryland and the Grand Ole Opry House as more fully described in Note 2 below.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs included in continuing operations were $22.2 million, $25.6 million, and $18.7 million for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 9. The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plan under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation.”

 

Discontinued Operations

The Company has presented the operating results, financial position and cash flows of Corporate Magic as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. The results of operations of this business, including impairment and other charges, restructuring charges and any gain or loss on disposal, have been reflected as discontinued operations, net of taxes, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and the assets and liabilities of this business are reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as further described in Note 3.

Income (Loss) Per Share

Earnings per share is measured at two levels: basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding after considering the effect of conversion of dilutive instruments, calculated using the treasury stock method. Net income (loss) per share amounts are calculated as follows for the years ended December 31 (income and share amounts in thousands):

 

 

                         
    2011  
    Income     Shares     Per Share  

Net income

  $ 10,177       48,351     $ 0.21  

Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents

    —         787       —    

Effect of convertible notes

    —         645       —    
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income — assuming dilution

  $ 10,177       49,783     $ 0.20  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   
    2010  
    Loss     Shares     Per Share  

Net loss

  $ (89,128     47,256     $ (1.89

Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents

    —         —         —    
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss — assuming dilution

  $ (89,128     47,256     $ (1.89
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   
    2009  
    Loss     Shares     Per Share  

Net loss

  $ (23     42,490     $ (0.00

Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents

    —         244       —    
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss — assuming dilution

  $ (23     42,734     $ (0.00
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For 2010, the effect of dilutive common stock equivalents was the equivalent of approximately 709,000 shares of common stock outstanding. Because the Company had a loss from continuing operations during 2010, these incremental shares were excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per share for that year as the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Additionally, the Company had approximately 1,401,000, 1,628,000 and 3,546,000 stock-based compensation awards outstanding as of December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively, that could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future but were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

As discussed in Note 7, during September 2009, the Company issued 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Convertible Notes”) due 2014. It is the Company’s intention to settle the face value of the Convertible Notes in cash upon conversion/maturity. Any conversion spread associated with the conversion/maturity of the Convertible Notes may be settled in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock. The effect of potentially issuable shares under this conversion spread for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was the equivalent of approximately 413,000 and 0 shares, respectively, of common stock outstanding. Because the Company had a loss from continuing operations for 2010, these incremental shares were excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per share for that period as the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

 

In connection with the issuance of these notes, the Company entered into warrant transactions with the note underwriters to sell common stock warrants. The initial strike price of these warrants is $32.70 per share of the Company’s common stock and the warrants cover an aggregate of approximately 13.2 million shares of the Company’s common stock. If the average closing stock price of the Company’s stock during the reporting period exceeds this strike price, these warrants will be dilutive. The warrants may only be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) is presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity.

A rollforward of the amounts included in comprehensive income (loss) related to the fair value of financial derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting, net of deferred taxes, for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

                         
    Interest Rate
Derivatives
    Natural Gas
Derivatives
    Total
Derivatives
 

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $ (16,481   $ —       $ (16,481

2010 changes in fair value, net of deferred taxes of $(2,408) and $(184)

    (4,312     (337     (4,649

Reclassification to earnings, net of deferred taxes of $7,222 and $103

    12,933       192       13,125  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

    (7,860     (145     (8,005

2011 changes in fair value, net of deferred taxes of $(159) and $(189)

    (288     (344     (632

Reclassification to earnings, net of deferred taxes of $4,526 and $270

    8,148       489       8,637  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $ —       $ —       $ —    
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

As more fully discussed in Note 8, the Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce interest rate risks related to its variable rate debt and to manage risk exposure to changes in the value of portions of its fixed rate debt, as well as changes in the prices at which the Company purchases natural gas. The Company records derivatives in the statement of financial position and measures derivatives at fair value. Changes in the fair value of those instruments are reported in earnings or other comprehensive income depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting.

Financial exposures are managed as an integral part of the Company’s risk management program, which seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effect that the volatility of the interest rate and natural gas commodity markets may have on operating results. The Company does not engage in speculative transactions, nor does it hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. The Company formally documents hedging instruments and hedging items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking hedged items. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair value and cash flow hedges to specific assets, liabilities or firm commitments on the consolidated balance sheet or to forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective, the derivative expires or is sold or terminated, or the derivative is discontinued because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively for that specific hedge instrument.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Newly Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” to require more detailed disclosures regarding transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, including the amounts and reasons for the transfers. Level 3 fair value measurements should present separate information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. In addition, this ASU requires that a reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities, defined as a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position, as well as disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value in either Level 2 or Level 3. The Company adopted the remaining disclosure requirements of this ASU in the first quarter of 2011, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements,” to clarify existing guidance and to require more detailed disclosures relating to Level 3 fair value measurements. In addition, this ASU requires that a reporting entity should provide the hierarchy classification for items whose fair value is not recorded on the balance sheet but is disclosed in the footnotes. The Company will adopt this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 and does not expect this adoption to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” to allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either instance, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. Portions of this ASU were deferred, and the Company will adopt the required portions of the ASU in the first quarter of 2012 and does not expect this adoption to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.