XML 96 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

14. Commitments and Contingencies

Capital Leases

In the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, the following amounts of assets under capitalized lease agreements are included in property and equipment and other long-term assets and the related obligations are included in debt (amounts in thousands):

 

 

                 
    2011     2010  

Property and equipment

  $ 3,761     $ 1,814  

Other long-term assets

    130       130  

Accumulated depreciation

    (1,411     (1,214
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net assets under capital leases

  $ 2,480     $ 730  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current lease obligations

  $ 755     $ 178  

Long-term lease obligations

    1,644       306  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital lease obligations

  $ 2,399     $ 484  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During 2011, the Company entered into one capital lease.

Operating Leases

Rental expense related to continuing operations for operating leases was $15.7 million, $15.3 million, and $14.5 million for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Non-cash lease expense related to continuing operations for 2011, 2010, and 2009 was $5.8 million, $5.9 million, and $6.0 million, respectively, as discussed below.

 

Future minimum cash lease commitments under all non-cancelable leases in effect for continuing operations at December 31, 2011 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

 

                 
    Capital     Operating  
    Leases     Leases  

2012

  $ 837     $ 7,036  

2013

    735       6,332  

2014

    623       4,314  

2015

    364       4,298  

2016

    —         4,274  

Years thereafter

    —         617,949  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

    2,559     $ 644,203  
           

 

 

 

Less amount representing interest

    (160        
   

 

 

         

Total present value of minimum payments

    2,399          

Less current portion of obligations

    (755        
   

 

 

         

Long-term obligations

  $ 1,644          
   

 

 

         

The Company entered into a 75-year operating lease agreement during 1999 for 65.3 acres of land located in Osceola County, Florida for the development of Gaylord Palms. The lease requires the Company to make annual base lease payments, which were approximately $3.5 million in 2011. The lease agreement provides for an annual 3% escalation of base rent beginning in 2007. The terms of this lease require that the Company recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis, which resulted in an annual base lease expense of approximately $9.4 million for 2011, 2010, and 2009. This rent included approximately $5.8 million, $5.9 million, and $6.0 million of non-cash expenses during 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. At the end of the 75-year lease term, the Company may extend the operating lease to January 31, 2101, at which point the buildings and fixtures will be transferred to the lessor. The Company also records contingent rentals based upon net revenues associated with the Gaylord Palms operations. The Company recorded $1.4 million, $1.5 million, and $1.5 million of contingent rentals related to the Gaylord Palms in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

On June 21, 2011, the Company announced its plans to develop a resort and convention hotel in Aurora, Colorado, located approximately 25 minutes from downtown Denver. The Aurora development, which is expected to feature 1,500 guest rooms and 400,000 square feet of exhibition and meeting space, will be located on 85 acres in LNR Property CPI Fund’s High Point Master Plan Development. The project is expected to cost approximately $800 million and could be funded by the Company, potential joint venture partners and the tax incentives that are being provided as a result of an agreement between the Company and the city of Aurora, and is contingent on receiving required governmental approvals, incentives, and final approval by the Company’s board of directors. The Company expects to break ground on construction in 2013 and expects the resort to be open for business in early 2016. At this time, the Company has not made any material financial commitments in connection with this development.

On September 3, 2008, the Company announced it had entered into a land purchase agreement with DMB Mesa Proving Grounds LLC, an affiliate of DMB Associates, Inc. (“DMB”), to create a resort and convention hotel at the Mesa Proving Grounds in Mesa, Arizona, which is located approximately 30 miles from downtown Phoenix. The DMB development is planned to host an urban environment that features a Gaylord resort property, a retail development, a golf course, office space, residential offerings and significant other mixed-use components. The Company’s purchase agreement includes the purchase of 100 acres of real estate within the 3,200-acre Mesa Proving Grounds. The project is contingent on the finalization of entitlements and incentives, and final approval by the Company’s board of directors. The Company made an initial deposit of a portion of the land purchase price upon execution of the agreement with DMB, and additional deposit amounts are due upon the occurrence of various development milestones, including required governmental approvals of the entitlements and incentives. These deposits are refundable to the Company upon a termination of the agreement with DMB during a specified due diligence period, except in the event of a breach of the agreement by the Company. The timing of this development is uncertain, and the Company has not made any financing plans or, except as described above, made any commitments in connection with the proposed development.

 

The Company is considering other potential hotel sites throughout the country. The timing and extent of any of these development projects is uncertain, and the Company has not made any commitments, received any government approvals or made any financing plans in connection with these development projects.

Through joint venture arrangements with two private real estate funds, the Company previously invested in minority ownership interests in two joint ventures which were formed to own and operate hotels in Hawaii. As part of the joint venture arrangements, the Company entered into contribution agreements with the majority owners, which owners had guaranteed certain recourse liabilities under third-party loans to the joint ventures. The guarantees of the joint venture loans guaranteed each of the subsidiaries’ obligations under its third party loans for as long as those loans remain outstanding (i) in the event of certain types of fraud, breaches of environmental representations or warranties, or breaches of certain “special purpose entity” covenants by the subsidiaries, or (ii) in the event of bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings of the subsidiaries. The Company agreed that, in the event a majority owner is required to make any payments pursuant to the terms of these guarantees of joint venture loans, it will contribute to the majority owner an amount based on its proportional commitment in the applicable joint venture. The Company estimates that the maximum potential amount for which the Company could be liable under the contribution agreements is $23.8 million, which represents its pro rata share of the $121.2 million of total debt that is subject to the guarantees. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had not recorded any liability in the consolidated balance sheet associated with the contribution agreements.

The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage in order to limit its exposure to any significant levels of claims relating to workers’ compensation, employee medical benefits and general liability for which it is self-insured.

The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain officers, which provides for severance payments upon certain events, including a change of control.

As of December 31, 2011, approximately 14% of the Company’s employees were represented by labor unions and are working pursuant to the terms of the collective bargaining agreements which have been negotiated with the four unions representing these employees.

The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is involved in certain legal actions and claims on a variety of other matters. It is the opinion of management that such legal actions will not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial condition or liquidity of the Company.