XML 85 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Derivative Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Derivative Financial Instruments

8. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk and commodity price risk. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with portions of the Company’s fixed and variable rate borrowings. Natural gas price swaps are entered into to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of natural gas and electricity used by the Company’s hotels. The Company designates its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of variable rate borrowings and natural gas price swaps as cash flow hedges of forecasted purchases of natural gas and electricity. The Company had designated certain interest rate swaps of its fixed rate borrowings as fair value hedges prior to the termination of these interest rate swaps in the second quarter of 2009. All of the Company’s derivatives are held for hedging purposes. Prior to July 2009, a portion of the Company’s natural gas price swap contracts were considered economic hedges and did not qualify for hedge accounting. The Company does not engage in speculative transactions, nor does it hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. All of the counterparties to the Company’s derivative agreements are financial institutions with at least investment grade credit ratings.

Cash Flow Hedging Strategy

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (e.g., in “interest expense” when the hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with variable rate debt). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, or ineffectiveness, if any, is recognized in the statement of operations during the current period. The Company assesses the correlation of the terms of these derivatives with the terms of the underlying hedged items on a quarterly basis.

 

The Company previously utilized an interest rate swap agreement that effectively modified its exposure to interest rate risk by converting $500.0 million, or 71%, of the Company’s variable rate debt outstanding under the term loan portion of the Company’s $1.0 Billion Credit Facility to a weighted average fixed rate of 3.94% plus the applicable margin on these borrowings, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on interest expense. This agreement involved the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed rate interest payments through July 25, 2011, without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. The critical terms of the swap agreements matched the critical terms of the borrowings under the term loan portion of the $1.0 Billion Credit Facility. Therefore, the Company designated these interest rate swap agreements as cash flow hedges. As the terms of these derivatives matched the terms of the underlying hedged items, there was no gain (loss) from ineffectiveness recognized in income on derivatives.

The Company enters into natural gas price swap contracts to manage the price risk associated with a portion of the Company’s forecasted purchases of natural gas and electricity used by the Company’s hotels. The objective of these hedges is to reduce the variability of cash flows associated with the forecasted purchases of these commodities. At December 31, 2011, the Company had no natural gas price swap contracts outstanding. At December 31, 2010, the Company had 36 variable to fixed natural gas price swap contracts that matured from January 2011 to December 2011 with an aggregate notional amount of approximately 1,031,000 dekatherms. The Company designated these natural gas price swap contracts as cash flow hedges.

The Company previously entered into six natural gas price swap contracts that were scheduled to mature from July 2010 to December 2010 to manage the price risk associated with a portion of the forecasted purchases of natural gas to be used at Gaylord Opryland. As a result of the Nashville Flood discussed above, the majority of these purchases were not going to be made. During June 2010, the Company terminated these contracts and received $0.1 million in cash, which is recorded in other gains and losses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for 2010.

Fair Value Hedging Strategy

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, is recognized in the same line item associated with the hedged item in current earnings (e.g., in “interest expense” when the hedged item is fixed-rate debt).

The Company previously entered into two interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk exposure on its fixed rate debt. The interest rate swap agreement utilized by the Company effectively modified the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk by converting $125.0 million of the Company’s fixed rate debt outstanding under its 8% Senior Notes to a variable rate equal to six-month LIBOR plus 2.95%, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on the fair value of the underlying fixed rate debt. This agreement involved the receipt of fixed rate amounts in exchange for variable rate interest payments through November 15, 2013, without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. The critical terms of the swap agreement mirrored the terms of the 8% Senior Notes. Therefore, the Company designated these interest rate swap agreements as fair value hedges. The counterparties, as permitted by the agreements, each opted to terminate its portion of the $125.0 million swap agreement effective May 15, 2009. As stated in the agreement, the two counterparties each paid a $2.5 million termination fee, plus accrued interest, to the Company on May 15, 2009. Prior to the redemption of the 8% Senior Notes discussed in Note 7, the Company amortized the resulting $5.0 million gain on the swap agreement over the remaining term of the 8% Senior Notes using the effective interest method. As a result of the redemption of the 8% Senior Notes, the Company recognized the remaining unamortized gain on the swap agreement during the fourth quarter of 2009, which is included in net gain on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for 2009. During 2009, the Company recognized a loss on derivative of $1.2 million and a gain on the related hedged fixed rate debt of $1.2 million, both of which are recorded in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for 2009. The Company had no open fair value hedges at December 31, 2011 or 2010.

The fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments based upon quotes, with appropriate adjustments for non-performance risk of the parties to the derivative contracts, at December 31 is as follows:

 

 

                                 
    Asset Derivatives     Liability Derivatives  
(in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010  

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

                               

Interest rate swaps—cash flow hedges

  $ —       $ —       $ —       $ 12,227  

Natural gas swaps

    —         22       —         248  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

  $ —       $ 22     $ —       $ 12,475  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

                                     
   

Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on

Derivative

        Amount Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI
 
Derivatives in Cash Flow   (Effective Portion)     Location of Amount Reclassified from   into Income  

Hedging Relationships

  2011     2010    

Accumulated OCI into Income

  2011     2010  

Interest rate swaps

  $ (447   $ (6,720  

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized

  $ 12,674     $ 20,154  

Natural gas swaps

    (533     (521  

Operating costs

    759       295  
   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ (980   $ (7,241   Total   $ 13,433     $ 20,449  
   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

                     
Derivatives Not Designated as   Location of Gain Recognized in Income on   Amount of Gain Recognized in
Income on Derivative
 

Hedging Instruments

 

Derivatives

  2011     2010  

Natural gas swaps

  Other gains and (losses), net   $ —       $ 202