Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Notes to Financial Statements
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]	Note 6 : Commitments and Contingencies In January 2019, a putative class action complaint was filed by a different individual in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that the Company’s website, www.1800petmeds.com , does not comply with the ADA, NYSHRL, and NYCHRL, and discriminates against visually impaired individuals. The Plaintiff initially named a New York corporation named Pet Meds Inc., which is not related or affiliated with the Company, as the defendant. However, the Plaintiff sought to remedy that error by requesting leave to file an amended complaint naming the Company, which request the Court granted on April 9, 2019. On April 18, 2019, the Court granted the Plaintiff’s request to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, where it is currently pending. The matter is styled Brian Fischler, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. PetMed Express, Inc. ; Case No. 19 -cv- 02391. The Company denies any wrongdoing. As of July 24, 2019, the Company and the Plaintiff have reached a confidential settlement in which the Plaintiff and the Company will enter into a consent decree requiring among other things, the Company to modify its website to comply with certain accessibility standards within the next 24 months, and the matter will be dismissed with prejudice. As part of the confidential settlement agreement, the Company will pay the Plaintiff a sum of $10,000. The parties are awaiting the district court’s execution of the joint proposed consent decree. The Company has settled complaints that had been filed with various states’ regulatory boards in the past. There can be no assurances made that other states will not attempt to take similar actions against the Company in the future. The Company initiates litigation to protect its trade or service marks. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in protecting its trade or service marks. Legal costs related to the above matters are expensed as incurred.

Note

: Commitments and Contingencies

January 2019,

a putative class action complaint was filed by a different individual in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that the Company’s website,

www.1800petmeds.com

, does

not

comply with the ADA, NYSHRL, and NYCHRL, and discriminates against visually impaired individuals. The Plaintiff initially named a New York corporation named Pet Meds Inc., which is

not

related or affiliated with the Company, as the defendant. However, the Plaintiff sought to remedy that error by requesting leave to file an amended complaint naming the Company, which request the Court granted on

April 9, 2019.

April 18, 2019,

the Court granted the Plaintiff’s request to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, where it is currently pending. The matter is styled

Brian Fischler, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. PetMed Express, Inc.

; Case

No.

-cv-

02391.

The Company denies any wrongdoing. As of

July 24, 2019,

the Company and the Plaintiff have reached a confidential settlement in which the Plaintiff and the Company will enter into a consent decree requiring among other things, the Company to modify its website to comply with certain accessibility standards within the next

months, and the matter will be dismissed with prejudice. As part of the confidential settlement agreement, the Company will pay the Plaintiff a sum of

$10,000.

The parties are awaiting the district court’s execution of the joint proposed consent decree.

The Company has settled complaints that had been filed with various states’ regulatory boards in the past. There can be

assurances made that other states will

not

attempt to take similar actions against the Company in the future. The Company initiates litigation to protect its trade or service marks. There can be

assurance that the Company will be successful in protecting its trade or service marks. Legal costs related to the above matters are expensed as incurred.