XML 42 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 29, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants. The standards establish a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to observable inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy level for each of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.
 
 
June 29, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Description
 
Level 1 (1)
 
Level 2 (2)
 
Level 3 (3)
 
Level 1 (1)
 
Level 2 (2)
 
Level 3 (3) 
 
 
(in millions)
Assets
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash equivalents
 
$
955

 
$

 
$

 
$
310

 
$

 
$

Derivatives (foreign currency forward contracts)
 

 
3

 

 

 
11

 

Total assets
 
$
955


$
3


$


$
310


$
11


$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Derivatives (foreign currency forward contracts)
 
$

 
$
8

 
$

 
$

 
$
1

 
$

Contingent consideration
 

 

 
27

 

 

 
31

Total liabilities
 
$


$
8


$
27


$


$
1


$
31

__________________
(1) 
Level 1 is based on quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Cash equivalents are primarily held in registered money market funds, which are valued using quoted market prices.
(2) 
Level 2 is based on pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable. The fair value is determined using a valuation model based on observable market inputs, including quoted foreign currency forward exchange rates and consideration of non-performance risk.
(3) 
Level 3 is based on pricing inputs that are not observable and not corroborated by market data.
The contingent consideration liabilities represent the future potential earn-out payments relating to the acquisitions of MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Limited, renamed L3 MacDonald Humfrey (MacH), on November 22, 2016, Open Water Power, Inc., renamed L3 Open Water Power, Inc. (Open Water Power), on May 19, 2017 and Latitude Engineering, LLC, renamed L3 Latitude Engineering, Inc. (Latitude Engineering) on June 28, 2018 and achieving certain milestones related to the Peak Nano investment. The fair value of the MacH contingent consideration liability, and a portion of the Latitude Engineering contingent consideration liability is based on a Monte Carlo Simulation of the aggregate revenue of MacH for the three-year period ending December 31, 2019, and the aggregate revenue of Latitude Engineering as of each year within the four-year period ended December 31, 2021. The significant unobservable inputs used in calculating the fair value of the MacH contingent consideration and a portion of the Latitude Engineering contingent consideration include: (i) projected revenues of the acquired businesses, (ii) company specific risk premium, which is a component of the discount rate applied to the revenue projections and (iii) volatility. The fair value of the Open Water Power contingent consideration liability and a portion of the Latitude Engineering contingent consideration liability is based on the Scenario-Based Method of the income approach using post-acquisition milestone achievements of Open Water Power and Latitude Engineering through December 31, 2020. The significant unobservable inputs used in calculating the fair value of the Open Water Power contingent consideration and a portion of the Latitude Engineering contingent consideration include: (i) timing of achieving the milestones associated with the contingent consideration arrangement, (ii) probabilities of achieving each milestone and (iii) discount rate. The fair value of the contingent consideration for potential earn-out payments is reassessed quarterly, including an analysis of the significant inputs used in the evaluation, as well as the accretion of the present value discount. Changes are reflected within operating costs and expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The Peak Nano contingent consideration liability was recorded at fair value on the acquisition date based on a probability assessment of the likelihood of achieving certain development milestones on or before August 5, 2018. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability is reassessed quarterly and changes are reflected within interest and other income, net, in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The table below presents the changes to contingent consideration obligations during the first half period ended June 29, 2018.
 
June 29, 2018
 
(in millions)
Balance at beginning of period
$
31

Acquisitions and investments
10

Cash payments
(2
)
Changes in fair value of contingent consideration, net
(12
)
Balance at end of period
$
27