EX-99.1 2 d652679dex991.htm EX-99.1 EX-99.1
Investor Presentation
January 2014
Exhibit 99.1


2
Forward-Looking Statements
Except for historical information contained herein, the statements, charts and graphs in this
presentation are forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward-looking statements and the
business prospects of Pioneer are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause
Pioneer's actual results in future periods to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. 
These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, volatility of commodity prices, product
supply and demand, competition, the ability to obtain environmental and other permits and the
timing thereof, other government regulation or action, the ability to obtain approvals from third
parties and negotiate agreements with third parties on mutually acceptable terms, satisfaction of
the conditions to the closing of the Company’s agreement to sell its Alaska subsidiary, litigation, the
costs and results of drilling and operations, availability of equipment, services, resources and
personnel required to complete the Company's operating activities, access to and availability of
transportation, processing, fractionation and refining facilities, Pioneer's ability to replace
reserves, implement its business plans or complete its development activities as scheduled, access
to
and
cost
of
capital,
the
financial
strength
of
counterparties
to
Pioneer's
credit
facility
and
derivative contracts and the purchasers of Pioneer's oil, NGL and gas production, uncertainties
about estimates of reserves and resource potential and the ability to add proved reserves in the
future,
the
assumptions
underlying
production
forecasts,
quality
of
technical
data,
environmental
and weather risks, including the possible impacts of climate change, the risks associated with the
ownership and operation of the Company’s industrial sand mining and oilfield services businesses
and acts of war or terrorism.  These and other risks are described in Pioneer's 10-K and 10-Q
Reports and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, Pioneer may be
subject
to
currently
unforeseen
risks
that
may
have
a
materially
adverse
impact
on
it.
Pioneer
undertakes
no
duty
to
publicly
update
these
statements
except
as
required
by
law.
Please
see
the
Appendix
slides
included
in
this
presentation
for
other
important
information.


Resource-focused strategy, with activity
concentrated in 3 of the most active U.S. fields
Best performing energy stock in S&P 500 since 2009
Second largest oil producer in Texas
Operating in core Spraberry/Wolfcamp asset since
early 1980s
Attractive derivative positions and vertical
integration protect margins
Strong investment grade financial position
Pioneer At A Glance
1) Year-end 2012 IHS data, gross reported oil and wet gas
Spraberry/Wolfcamp Gross
Production By Operator
(MBOEPD)
¹
Top U.S. Fields By Rig Count
(Pioneer
Operated
Count
in
Green
40
rigs)
Total Enterprise Value ($B)    
$28
2013 Drilling Capex ($B)
$2.8
Q3 2013 Production (MBOEPD)
173
2012 Reserves (BBOE)
1.1
2012 Reserves + Resource (BBOE)
>9.0
3
1) Baker Hughes Rig Count (11/15/13) and PXD Internal
PXD holds ~900,000 acres in Spraberry/Wolfcamp
Largest producer in Spraberry/Wolfcamp with 28
rigs operating (13 horizontal and 15 vertical) and
7,000+ producing wells
Preeminent, low-cost operator benefitting from
vertical integration strategy
89
41
36
32
29
18
17
13
13
11
28
10
2
272
223
177
168
87
76
61
50
50
39
36
36
1


NYMEX Oil Price ($/Bbl)
Sensitivity to Commodity Prices ($ MM)
4
2013E Capital Spending and Cash Flow
1
1)
Capital spending includes land capital and excludes asset retirement obligations, capitalized interest and G&G G&A
Drilling Capital: $2.75 B
$1,225 MM northern Wolfcamp/Spraberry area
o
$400 MM for horizontal program
o
$625 MM for vertical program
o
$200 MM for infrastructure & automation
$425 MM southern Wolfcamp joint venture area
$575 MM Eagle Ford Shale
$185 MM Barnett Shale Combo
$190 MM Alaska
$150 MM Other (includes land capital for 
existing assets)
$240 MM Other Capital (vertical
integration, buildings and offices)
Capital program funded from:
Operating cash flow of ~$2.3 B
Cash on hand ($744 MM at the end of Q3)
2013E Average Price
$98/Bbl oil and $3.70/MCF gas
Capital program remains at $3.0 B


Pioneer Focusing Capex in Highest Margin Assets
Peer
Average
=
$34.50/BOE
3
2013E
% Liquids
Production
>50%
<50%
PXD
2013E Cash Margins ($/BOE ex-hedges)
1,2
Assumes
$98.00/BBL
WTI
Crude
and
$3.70/MCF
Gas
1)
Source: 2013E analyst estimates from Citi, JP Morgan, Simmons & Co, ISI and Credit Suisse; PXD internal 2013E margins for Permian horizontal assets
2)
Cash margin is revenue excluding hedges minus production costs, taxes and G&A on a BOE basis
3)
Excludes PXD and PXD assets
5


Production Outlook
¹
151
~70%
Liquids
167
59%
Liquids
116
58%
Liquids
62%
Liquids
172
62%
Liquids
179 -
184
168
64%
Liquids
6
172 –
173 MBOEPD
FY Guidance
(Reflects Alaska as Discontinued Operations)
2011
2012
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4E
2014E
2015E
Q3 impacted by production
conveyed to Sinochem and Eagle
Ford pad drilling
Q4 severe weather event in
Spraberry/Wolfcamp expected to
result in production falling below
Q4 and FY 2013 guidance ranges
2013E
1)
All periods reflect Alaska as discontinued operations, comprising 4,432 BOEPD for 2011, 4,269 BOEPD for 2012, 3,707 BOEPD for Q1 '13, 4,209 BOEPD for Q2 '13
and 4,723 BOEPD for Q3 '13; Q4 severe weather event in Spraberry/Wolfcamp expected to result in production falling below FY 2013 growth guidance of ~14%
2)
High end of 2013-2015 growth range assumes $100 oil / $4.25 gas; low end assumes $85 oil / $3.25 gas
3)
Excludes production attributable to the 40% joint venture transaction with Sinochem in the southern Wolfcamp area after the May 31, 2013 closing date
4)
Spraberry/Wolfcamp production negatively impacted by reduced ethane recoveries of ~2,700 BOEPD in Q1, ethane rejection of ~1,400 BOEPD in Q2 and ~1,000
BOEPD in Q3; no ethane rejection assumed in Q4


Liquidity Position (09/30/13)
Net debt (net of cash balance of $744 MM):
$2.1 B
Unsecured credit facility availability:
$1.5 B
Net debt-to-book capitalization:
21%
1)
Excludes $201 MM of borrowings under PSE’s $300 MM credit facility that matures in March 2017
2)
Excludes net discounts and deferred hedge losses of ~$40 MM
Maturities
and
Balances
1,2
Unsecured credit facility matures in 2017
Investment grade rated
2016
$600 MM
3.95%
2017
$455 MM
5.875%
2022
$450 MM
6.875%
Undrawn $1.5 B unsecured credit facility
2018
$485 MM
6.65%
$450 MM
7.50%
2020
$250 MM
7.20%
2028
7


12/31/12 Proved Reserves: 1.1 BBOE
2
Additional
Net
Recoverable
Resource
Potential:
>8
BBOE
1)
All drilling locations shown on a gross basis
2)
SEC pricing of $94.84/Bbl for oil and $2.76/MMBtu for gas (NYMEX)
3)
Primarily reflects Alaska, Raton and South Texas
4)
Includes vertical well potential from Wolfcamp and deeper intervals
5)
Assumes average EUR of 500 MBOE per well, >600,000 gross acres, 140-acre spacing, Wolfcamp
A, B & D and Jo Mill intervals (excludes Spraberry Shale interval potential) and 20% royalty
6)
Assumes average EUR of 575 MBOE per well, 5,600  locations, 207,000  net acres , 140-acre
spacing, laterals in all intervals  (A, B, C & D), 25% royalty and Pioneer’s 60% share (reduced by
~1 BBOE associated with joint interest transaction)
Permian >7 BBOE
Spraberry
627 MMBOE
3,350 PUD locations
Rockies
119 MMBOE
55 PUD
locations
Other
123 MMBOE
140 PUD locations
Mid-Continent
101 MMBOE
Vertical Spraberry
40-ac Drilling
4
900 MMBOE
6,800 locations
Vertical Spraberry
20-ac Drilling
4
1.5 BBOE
14,650 high-graded locations
Spraberry Waterflood
300 MMBOE
40% acreage
Eagle Ford Shale
340 MMBOE
1,100 locations
Eagle
Ford Shale
116 MMBOE
190 PUD locations
Southern Horizontal Wolfcamp
6
Joint Interest Area
1.6 BBOE
5,600 locations
Proved Reserves + Estimated Net Recoverable Resource Potential of >9 BBOE and >40,000 Drilling Locations
Pioneer’s
Significant
Proved
Reserves
and
Recoverable
Resource
Potential
1
Northern Horizontal
Wolfcamp/Jo Mill
5
3.0 BBOE
8,000 locations
8


Expect to continue operating 8 horizontal
rigs in 2014
2014 drilling plan calls for ~115 horizontal
wells compared to ~100 horizontal wells
in 2013
Average lateral length will be increased by 13% from
8,300 feet in 2013 to 9,400 feet in 2014
Expect to utilize 3-well pads for most of
the program
Expect to drill ~2/3 Wolfcamp B interval
wells; remainder is a mix of Wolfcamp A,
C and D interval wells
2014 drilling program more focused on
higher-return areas in northern Upton and
Reagan counties (includes Giddings and
University Block 2)
Expect to continue to improve drilling and
completion times
9
Best Wolfcamp B interval
IP in Midland Basin
PXD –
University 2-20 #12
(Wolfcamp Upper B)
24-hr IP: 3,176 BOEPD (83% oil)
9,542’
lateral length
Joint Venture Area
(Wolfcamp and deeper intervals)


Gun Barrel View:
480’
Downspacing Test Underway in Southern JV Area
10
~200’
Wolfcamp
Upper B
Lower B
720’
310’
Began
testing
downspacing
from
720’
(116-acre
spacing)
to
480’
(77-acre spacing) in the Giddings area
Tested 12 wells on 3-well pads using zipper fracs
Wells staggered between Upper Wolfcamp B and Lower
Wolfcamp B intervals
All 12 wells currently on production
Average peak 24-hour IP rate of 1,016 BOEPD
Compares favorably to initial two Giddings B interval
wells which averaged 830 BOEPD at similar lateral
lengths
Expect early results on initial downspacing test and further
downspacing
to
310’
(50-acre
spacing)
by
mid-2014
77-Acre Spacing per
Interval
116-Acre Spacing per
Interval
50-Acre Spacing per
Interval
Based on
7,000’
lateral
Joint Venture Area
(Wolfcamp and deeper intervals)
Giddings
October 2013
Mid-2014


U. Spraberry
M. Spraberry
Shale
Jo Mill Silt
L. Spraberry
Shale
Dean
Wolfcamp A
Wolfcamp Lower B
Wolfcamp C1
Wolfcamp C2
Wolfcamp D
Strawn
Wolfcamp Upper B
Northern Spraberry/Wolfcamp Targeted Horizontal Drilling Intervals
Miss/Atoka
Wolfcamp
A
Wolfcamp
D
Jo Mill
M. Spraberry
Shale
L. Spraberry
Shale
Delineating multiple prospective
horizontal targets with
substantial oil in place across
>600,000 gross acres
Targeting $7.5 MM -
$8.5 MM
average well cost for 7,000’
laterals depending on depth
Jo Mill Shale
11
Wolfcamp
B
Excludes science and facilities capital


Pioneer’s Northern Horizontal Wolfcamp D Shale Wells
800 MBOE
500 MBOE
12
100
500
1,000
2,000
3,000
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Days
University 7-43 10H –
Wolfcamp D (Andrews County); 7,382’
lateral
24-hour peak IP rate of 3,605 BOEPD (74% oil)
E.T. O’Daniel #2H –
Wolfcamp D (Midland County); 9,112’
lateral
24-hour peak IP rate of 3,156 BOEPD (69% oil)
Scharbauer Ranch #201H –
Wolfcamp D (Martin County); 7,862’
lateral
24-hour peak IP rate of 1,509 BOEPD
Peak 30-day avg. rate of 662 BOEPD (60% oil)
DL Hutt C #4H –
Wolfcamp D (Midland County); 6,962’
lateral
24-hour peak IP rate of 2,128 BOEPD
Peak 30-day avg. rate of 856 BOEPD (69% oil)
Best IP of any interval
in the Midland Basin
Early production data suggests EURs for these wells will equal or exceed
average industry Wolfcamp D results to date


Pioneer’s Wolfcamp D Wells Extend Play 60 Miles West
13
LPI
-
Sugg-A—142
1H
24-hr IP: 944 BOEPD
30-day IP: 764 BOEPD
6,695’
lateral length
LPI
Glass-Glass
10-153H
24-hr IP: 1,886 BOEPD
30-day IP:
1,052
BOEPD
6,933’
lateral length
LPI
Bearkat
150
5H
24-hr IP: 1,380 BOEPD
30-day IP: 1,007 BOEPD
7,282’
lateral length
LPI
Cox
Bundy
16
#3H
24-hr IP: 1,227 BOEPD
30-day IP: 922 BOEPD
4,382’
lateral length
PXD –
DL Hutt C #4H
24-hr IP: 2,128  BOEPD
30-day IP: 856 BOEPD
6,962’
lateral length
PXD –
Scharbauer Ranch #201H
24-hr IP: 1,509 BOEPD
30-day IP: 662 BOEPD
7,862’
lateral length
APA
Barracuda
45-4H
24-hr IP: 695 BOEPD
30-day IP: 511 BOEPD
4,560’
lateral length
PXD –
E.T. O’Daniel #2H
24-hr IP: 3,156 BOEPD
9,112’
lateral length
PXD –
University 7-43 10H
24-hr IP: 3,605 BOEPD
7,382’
lateral length
APA
Barracuda
45-2H
24-hr IP: 810 BOEPD
30-day IP: 623 BOEPD
3,780’
lateral length
U. Spraberry
M. Spraberry
Shale
Jo Mill Silt
L. Spraberry
Shale
Dean
Wolfcamp A
Wolfcamp C1
Wolfcamp C2
Wolfcamp D
Strawn
Wolfcamp B
Miss/Atoka
Jo Mill Shale


Pioneer’s Northern Horizontal Wolfcamp B and Wolfcamp A Shale Wells¹
14
DL
Hutt
C
#1H
Wolfcamp
B
(Midland
County);
7,380’
lateral
Cumulative production: 170 MBOE in 9 months (73% oil)
1 MMBOE
800 MBOE
500 MBOE
DL
Hutt
C
#3H
Wolfcamp
B
(Midland
County);
7,142’
lateral
24-hour peak IP rate of 2,227 BOEPD; Peak 30-day avg. rate of 1,087 BOEPD (75% oil)
Mabee
K
#1H
Wolfcamp
B
(Martin
County);
6,671’
lateral
Cumulative production: 100 MBOE in 6 months (73% oil)
1)
Daily production normalized for operational shut-ins
DL Hutt
C
#2H
Wolfcamp
A
(Midland
County);
7,380’
lateral
Cumulative production: 115 MBOE in 5 months (74% oil)
Production data suggests that EURs for these Wolfcamp B and A wells are expected to exceed 800 MBOE
Scharbauer
Ranch
#202H
Wolfcamp
B
(Martin
County);
8,342’
lateral
24-hour peak IP rate of 979 BOEPD; Peak 30-day rate of 783 BOEPD (73% oil)
E.T.
O'Daniel
1H
Wolfcamp
B
(Midland
County);
9,229’
lateral
24-hour peak IP rate of 2,801 BOEPD (75% oil)
Best Wolfcamp B interval IP in
Pioneer’s northern acreage


Notable Industry Wolfcamp A, B & C and Spraberry Shale Horizontal Results
15
RSP (L. Spraberry Shale)
24-hr IP: 630 BOEPD
~4,800’
lateral length
U. Spraberry
M. Spraberry
Shale
Jo Mill Silt
L. Spraberry
Shale
Dean
Wolfcamp A
Wolfcamp C1
Wolfcamp C2
Wolfcamp D
Strawn
Wolfcamp B
Miss/Atoka
Jo Mill Shale
PXD -
2 Jo Mill Wells
Avg. 24-hr IP: 483 BOEPD
2,500’
avg. lateral length
PXD -
DL Hutt C #1H (WC B)
24-hr IP: 1,693 BOEPD
7,380’
lateral length
FANG -
UL III 4 1-H (WC B)
24-hr IP: 613 BOEPD
4,050’
lateral length
FANG (4 WC B wells)
Avg. 24-hr IP: 872 BOEPD
~4,340’
avg. lateral length
PXD -
DL Hutt C #2H (WC A)
24-hr IP: 1,712 BOEPD
7,380’
lateral length
LPI -
Sugg-A-143-4HU (WC A)
24-hr IP: 1,904 BOEPD
7,033’
lateral length
EGN -
Lavaca 38 #101H (WC B)
24-hr IP: 861 BOEPD
4,250’
lateral length
LPI -
Sugg-C-27-1HM (WC B)
24-hr IP: 1,409 BOEPD
7,745’
lateral length
RSP (M. Spraberry Shale)
24-hr IP: 733 BOEPD
~5,040’
lateral length
SM –
Dorcus 3035H (WC B)
24-hr IP: 1,571 BOEPD
4,960’
lateral length
PXD -
DL Hutt C #3H (WC B)
24-hr IP: 2,227 BOEPD
7,142’
lateral length
PXD –
Scharbauer #202H (WC B)
24-hr IP: 979 BOEPD
8,342’
lateral length
PXD -
Mabee K #1H (WC B)
24-hr IP: 1,572 BOEPD
6,671’
lateral length
PXD -
E.T. O'Daniel 1H (WC B)
24-hr IP: 2,801 BOEPD
9,229’
lateral length
PXD -
University 2-20 #12 (WC B)
Avg. 24-hr IP: 3,176 BOEPD
9,542’
avg. lateral length
PXD -
2 Giddings Wells (WC B)
Avg. 24-hr IP: 845 BOEPD
5,300’
avg. lateral length
LPI –
Lane Trust C/E 42-2HL (WC C)
24-hr IP: 2,147 BOEPD
7,571’
lateral length


Northern Horizontal Wolfcamp Before Tax Well Economics
1,2
16
1)
Pricing: $95 oil / $4 gas
2)
Assumes horizontal well with a 7,000’
lateral length
3)
Reflects single well drilling and completion cost of $8 MM
Payout
Years
3
1.7
0.9
0.8
60%
125%
150%
650 MBOE
800 MBOE
1,000 MBOE
BTAX IRR


Pioneer’s Northern
Spraberry/Wolfcamp
Activity
1
17
20 horizontal wells on production with 8
of these currently flowing back
6 wells awaiting completion
8 horizontal rigs drilling
Pioneer’s Northern
Spraberry/Wolfcamp Acreage
Joint Venture Area
(Wolfcamp and Deeper Intervals)
1)
As of end-December 2013
Producing
Completing
Drilling
~65 mi
Includes 14 Wolfcamp Shale wells and 6 Spraberry
Shale wells in Midland, Martin, Upton and Andrews
counties
Includes 2 Wolfcamp Shale wells and 4 Spraberry
Shale wells in Midland and Glasscock counties


Northern Spraberry/Wolfcamp: Focused on Growing Production in 2014
Ramping up from 5 horizontal rigs to 10+ horizontal rigs in early 2014
Vertical rig count being reduced from 15 rigs to 12 rigs or less
Expect to utilize 3-well pads for most of the program
Results in “lumpy”
production growth
Expect to drill 90%+ Wolfcamp A, B and D interval wells
Minimal “science”
activity planned
Drilling times being reduced
Targeting a reduction in spud-to-POP times from 120-150 days in 2013 (2-well
pads including “science”
time) to ~145 days in 2014 (3-well pads with no
“science”)
Equivalent reduction from 65 days per well to 50 days per well
Includes benefits from zipper fracs
18


2013 Spraberry/Wolfcamp Shale Production Growth Range
Spraberry/Wolfcamp Net Production
1
(MBOEPD)
1) Includes production from Spraberry vertical wells and horizontal Wolfcamp Shale and Spraberry Shale wells
2) Production reduced after May 31st to reflect the divested volumes associated with the closing of the southern Wolfcamp joint venture transaction
3) Production negatively impacted by reduced ethane recoveries of ~2,700 BOEPD in Q1, ethane rejection into the gas stream of ~1,400 BOEPD in Q2 and ~1,000
BOEPD in Q3 due to low ethane prices; assumes no ethane rejection in Q4
45
66
2,3
75
80
2013
80 –
81 MBOEPD
FY Guidance
19
79
85 -
88
Horizontal
Q4 severe weather event
expected to result in
production falling below
Q4 and FY 2013 guidance
ranges
2011
2012
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4E
Vertical


Severe Weather Disrupts Q4 Spraberry/Wolfcamp Production
20
Storm is over and repairs are nearing completion


Eagle Ford Shale Downspacing Results (500’
Well Spacing Tests)
Dry Gas Window
Condensate Window
Oil Window
21
Downspacing from 1,000’
(120-acre spacing) to 500’
(60-acre
spacing) between wells across liquids-rich acreage position
(~90 miles)
Added ~300 locations in liquids-rich areas
Tested 50+ wells on 3-well to 4-well pads using zipper fracs
Average EUR for zipper frac’d pad wells increased 20% vs.
offset single wells (1.2 MMBOE vs. 1.0 MMBOE)
Stimulation of pad wells provides improved fracture network
500’
Downspacing
Areas
LaSalle
Dewitt
Atascosa


Further Downspacing Tests Underway (Down to 300')
22
Upper
Eagle
Ford
Lower
Eagle
Ford
Height
45' -
100'
300' –
600'
175' -
300'
Further Downspacing & Staggered
Laterals Testing
Early results from initial 300' well spacing test encouraging
300’
testing
underway
in
liquids-rich
areas
where
500’
well
spacing
was
successful
Potential
to
add
300
-
400
incremental
locations
Staggered Lateral Example
Further
Downspacing
Areas


Reducing 2013 Eagle Ford Shale Production Growth Range
23
Eagle Ford Shale Net Production
1
(MBOEPD)
12
37 –
38 MBOEPD
FY Guidance
1)
Reflects Pioneer’s ~35% share of gross production
2)
Assumes no ethane rejection in Q4 2013
2-well to 6-well pads (Spud to POP averaging 100 –
125 days
for 3-well pads)
Saves $600 M to $700 M per well
Delays in placing wells on production related to increased
pad drilling (~2,000 BOEPD)
High level of shut-in wells for offset frac activity related to
downspacing tests (~1,000 BOEPD)
Comparable to Lower Eagle Ford Shale wells
~25% of acreage prospective for this interval
2011
2012
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4E
28
37
38
35
39 -
41
2013
~80% pad drilling in 2013, up from 45% in 2012
Q3 production declined 3 MBOEPD due to:
Wells POP’d towards the end of Q3 and an
aggressive Q4 POP schedule expected to
significantly ramp up Q4 production
Successfully completed first Upper Eagle Ford Shale
well
with
24-hour peak IP rate of 1,620 BOEPD
2


24
U.S. asset base
High oil exposure from proved reserves + estimated net resource
potential of >9 BBOE
Drilling program focused in liquids and resource rich core assets in
Texas
Horizontal Spraberry/Wolfcamp Shale
Spraberry vertical
Eagle Ford Shale
Strong production growth profile
Vertical integration substantially improving execution and returns
Attractive derivative positions protect margins
Strong investment grade financial position
PXD Investment Highlights


Appendix


Pioneer –
Large Independent U.S. E&P Company
26
North Slope
Eagle Ford Shale
West Panhandle
Raton
Hugoton
Northern Spraberry/Wolfcamp
Barnett Shale Combo
Operating Areas
Southern Wolfcamp JV Area
Dallas Headquarters
Total Enterprise Value ($B)
$28
2012 Operating Cash Flow ($B)
$1.8
2012 Drilling Expenditures ($B)
$2.8
2012 Drillbit F&D ($/BOE)
$17.72
Q3 2013
Production
64%
Liquids
(MBOEPD)
173
2012 Reserve Replacement (%)
264%
YE 2012 Proved Reserves (BBOE)
1.1


27
Production (MBOEPD)
Q3 ’12
Q4 ’12
Q1 ’13
Q2 ’13
Q3 ’13
Spraberry
69
69
75
80
79
1
Eagle Ford Shale
29
35
37
38
35
Raton
25
24
23
23
22
Mid-Continent
18
17
17
16
17
Barnett
7
9
9
9
8
South Texas
6
6
5
5
6
Alaska
5
4
4
4
5
Other
1
1
1
1
1
Total
160
165
171
176
173
1)
Q3 production was negatively impacted by the conveyance of ~3,000 BOEPD to Sinochem as part of JV agreement


28
PXD Production By Commodity By Area
Q3 '12
Q4 '12
Q1 '13
Q2 '13
Q3 '13
Spraberry/Wolfcamp
Oil (BOPD)
45,239
46,540
52,694
52,595
51,904
NGL (BOEPD)
14,138
11,262
12,864
13,919
16,199
Gas (MCFD)
57,095
64,607
58,653
83,021
62,892
Total (BOEPD)
68,893
68,570
75,333
80,351
78,585
Eagle Ford
Oil (BOPD)
10,087
11,671
12,741
13,868
12,399
NGL (BOEPD)
8,549
9,462
10,133
10,212
10,080
Gas (MCFD)
65,048
81,823
86,305
82,765
74,468
Total (BOEPD)
29,477
34,770
37,257
37,874
34,889
Raton
Oil (BOPD)
-
-
-
-
-
NGL (BOEPD)
-
-
-
-
-
Gas (MCFD)
148,188
144,245
138,358
136,093
133,933
Total (BOEPD)
24,698
24,041
23,060
22,682
22,323
Mid-Continent
Oil (BOPD)
3,243
3,063
3,202
2,902
3,081
NGL (BOEPD)
7,223
7,466
6,511
6,740
7,359
Gas (MCFD)
46,914
41,398
41,250
39,874
40,535
Total (BOEPD)
18,285
17,429
16,589
16,288
17,195
Barnett
Oil (BOPD)
1,217
1,574
1,445
1,364
1,547
NGL (BOEPD)
2,472
3,289
3,038
3,184
3,354
Gas (MCFD)
19,132
25,168
24,159
24,061
21,396
Total (BOEPD)
6,878
9,058
8,510
8,558
8,467
South Texas
Oil (BOPD)
90
66
79
71
233
NGL (BOEPD)
1
1
2
1
1
Gas (MCFD)
36,495
34,037
31,609
31,208
31,509
Total (BOEPD)
6,173
5,740
5,349
5,273
5,486
Alaska
Oil (BOPD)
4,404
4,102
3,707
4,209
4,723
NGL (BOEPD)
-
-
-
-
-
Gas (MCFD)
-
-
-
-
-
Total (BOEPD)
4,404
4,102
3,707
4,209
4,723
Other
Oil (BOPD)
62
53
71
64
57
NGL (BOEPD)
441
458
441
360
370
Gas (MCFD)
3,493
3,539
3,502
3,306
3,090
Total (BOEPD)
1,085
1,101
1,095
975
943
Total
Oil (BOPD)
64,342
67,069
73,939
75,073
73,943
NGL (BOEPD)
32,824
31,938
32,989
34,416
37,362
Gas (MCFD)
376,365
394,817
383,836
400,328
367,823
Total (BOEPD)
159,893
164,810
170,900
176,210
172,611


29
Production Costs (per BOE)
Production &                     
Ad Valorem Taxes
Workovers
LOE
Third Party
Transportation
Natural Gas    
Processing
Q3 ’13
Q3 ’12
$0.09
$14.56
Q4 ’12
$0.59
Q1 ’13
$0.42
Q2 ’13
$0.17
$15.61
$14.62
Q3 2013 production costs
increased slightly compared to
Q2 2013
LOE increase attributable to
higher saltwater disposal and
labor expenses
3
rd
party transportation increase
primarily due to one-time charges
associated with transportation of
Eagle Ford Shale production
$14.52
$(0.15)
$14.81
$9.61
$8.68
$8.34
$8.20
$8.59
$1.28
$1.40
$1.67
$1.57
$1.98
$3.38
$3.14
$3.53
$3.36
$3.40
$0.75
$0.98
$0.81
$1.34
$0.99


Continue to use derivatives to mitigate commodity price
exposure in order to ensure funding for development
programs and to maintain strong financial position
Target >50% on rolling 3 year basis
Continue to use a variety of derivative instruments, but
focus will be on providing floor protection while retaining
upside; primary derivative instruments will be:
Collars
Collars with short puts (three-way collars)
Puts
Enter derivative agreements only with counterparties that
are “A”
rated or better
Actively monitor credit exposure to each counterparty and
counterparty credit trends
No margin requirements with counterparties
Derivative Philosophy
30


31
Oil
Q4 2013
2014
2015
2016
Swaps –
WTI (BPD)
9,750
10,000
-
-
NYMEX WTI Price ($/BBL)
$ 95.57
$ 93.87
-
-
Three Way Collars –
(BPD)
¹
69,000
69,000
85,000
25,000
NYMEX Call Price ($/BBL)
$ 120.55
$ 114.05
$ 98.98
$ 93.30
NYMEX Put Price ($/BBL)
$ 91.39
$ 93.70
$ 88.06
$ 85.00
NYMEX Short Put Price ($/BBL)
$ 74.22
$ 77.61
$ 73.06
$ 70.00
% Total Oil Production
~95%
~85%
~65%
~15%
Open Commodity Derivative Positions as of 10/31/2013 (includes PSE)
Oil Basis Protection
Q4 2013
2014
2015
2016
Cushing to LLS Swaps (BPD)
3,000
-
-
-
Price Differential ($/BBL)
$ 8.53
-
-
-
Spraberry Fixed Differential
²
30,000
33,000
35,000
-
Price Differential ($/BBL)
$ (1.75)
$ (1.75)
$ (1.75)
-
Oil coverage: ~95% in 2013, ~85% in 2014 and ~65% in 2015
1)
When NYMEX price is above call price, PXD receives call price.  When NYMEX price is between put price and call price, PXD receives NYMEX price. When NYMEX
price is between the put price and the short put price, PXD receives put price.  When NYMEX price is below the short put price, PXD receives NYMEX price plus the
difference between the short put price and put price
2)
Market transaction representing Cushing to Midland differential; not a derivative


32
Natural Gasoline
Q4 2013
2014
2015
2016
Three Way Collars –
(BPD)
¹
,
²
1,064
1,000
-
-
Mont Belvieu Call Price ($/BBL)
$ 105.28
$ 109.50
-
-
Mont Belvieu Put Price ($/BBL)
$ 89.30
$ 95.00
-
-
Mont Belvieu Short Put Price ($/BBL)
$ 75.20
$ 80.00
-
-
% Total NGL Production
<5%
<5%
-
-
Open Commodity Derivative Positions as of 10/31/2013 (includes PSE)
Ethane
Q4 2013
2014
2015
2016
Collars –
(BPD)
³
2,500
3,000
-
-
Mont Belvieu Call Price ($/BBL)
$ 12.68
$ 13.72
-
-
Mont Belvieu Put Price ($/BBL)
$ 10.50
$ 10.78
-
-
% Total NGL Production
<5%
<5%
-
-
% Total Liquids
~65%
~60%
~45%
~10%
1)
When NYMEX price is above call price, PXD receives call price.  When NYMEX price is between put price and call price, PXD receives NYMEX price. 
When NYMEX price is between the put price and the short put price, PXD receives put price.  When NYMEX price is below the short put price, PXD
receives NYMEX price plus the difference between the short put price and put price
2)
Represent collar contracts with short puts that reduce price volatility of natural gasoline forecasted for sale by the Company at Mont Belvieu,
Texas-posted prices
3)
Represent collar contracts that reduce the price volatility of ethane forecasted for sale by the Company at Mont Belvieu, Texas-posted prices


33
Gas
Q4 2013
2014
2015
2016
Swaps -
(MMBTUPD)
165,870
175,000
20,000
-
NYMEX
Price
($/MMBTU)
$ 5.10
$ 4.02
$ 4.31
-
Collars -
(MMBTUPD)
152,500
-
-
-
NYMEX
Call
Price
($/MMBTU)
$ 6.22
-
-
-
NYMEX
Put
Price
($/MMBTU)
$ 4.98
-
-
-
Three
Way
Collars
(MMBTUPD)
1,
-
115,000
285,000
20,000
NYMEX Call Price ($/MMBTU)
-
$ 4.70
$ 5.07
$ 5.36
NYMEX Put Price ($/MMBTU)
-
$ 4.00
$ 4.00
$ 4.00
NYMEX Short Put Price ($/MMBTU)
-
$ 3.00
$ 3.00
$ 3.00
% Total Gas Production
~85%
~70%
~70%
<5%
Open Commodity Derivative Positions as of 10/31/2013 (includes PSE)
Gas Basis Swaps
Q4 2013
2014
2015
2016
Spraberry
(MMBTUPD)
52,500
10,000
10,000
-
Price Differential ($/MMBTU)
$ (0.23)
$ (0.15)
$ (0.13)
-
Mid-Continent
(MMBTUPD)
50,000
75,082
20,000
-
Price Differential ($/MMBTU)
$ (0.30)
$ (0.20)
$ (0.21)
-
Gulf Coast
(MMBTUPD)
60,000
-
-
-
Price Differential ($/MMBTU)
$ (0.14)
-
-
-
Gas coverage: ~85% in 2013, ~70% in 2014 and ~70% in 2015
1
1
1
2
1)
Represents the NYMEX Henry Hub index price or approximate NYMEX price based on historical differentials to the index price at the time the derivative was
entered into
2)
When NYMEX price is above call price, PXD receives call price.  When NYMEX price is between put price and call price, PXD receives NYMEX price.  When
NYMEX price is between the put price and the short put price, PXD receives put price.  When NYMEX price is below the short put price, PXD receives NYMEX
price plus the difference between short put price and put price


Oil
Q4 2013
2014
2015
Swaps
(BPD)
4,750
-
-
NYMEX Price ($/BBL)
$ 87.83
-
-
Three-Way
Collars
(BPD)
-
5,000
-
NYMEX Call Price ($/BBL)
-
$ 105.74
-
NYMEX Put Price ($/BBL)
-
$ 100.00
-
NYMEX Short Put Price ($/BBL)
-
$ 80.00
-
% Oil Production
~85%
~85%
-
Gas
Q4 2013
2014
2015
Swaps
(MMBTUPD)
2,500
5,000
-
NYMEX Price ($/MMBTU)
$ 6.89
$ 4.00
-
Three-Way
Collars
(MMBTUPD)
-
-
5,000
NYMEX Call Price ($/MMBTU)
-
-
$ 5.00
NYMEX Put Price ($/MMBTU)
-
-
$ 4.00
NYMEX Short Put Price ($/MMBTU)
-
-
$ 3.00
Collars
(MMBTUPD)
2,500
-
-
NYMEX Call Price ($/MMBTU)
$ 4.50
-
-
NYMEX Put Price ($/MMBTU)
$ 4.00
-
-
% Gas Production
~70%
~70%
~65%
% Total Production
~70%
~70%
~10%
Gas Basis Swaps
Q4 2013
2014
2015
Spraberry
(MMBTUPD)
2,500
-
-
Price Differential ($/MMBTU)
$ (0.31)
-
-
PSE Derivative Position as of 10/31/2013
34
1
1
1)
When NYMEX price is above call price, PSE receives call price.  When NYMEX price is between put price and call price, PSE receives NYMEX price.  When
NYMEX price is between the put price and the short put price, PSE receives put price.  When NYMEX price is below the short put price, PSE receives NYMEX
price plus the difference between the short put price and put price


Three-Way Collars ($75 by $90 by $135 example)
Three way collars protect downside while providing better
upside exposure than traditional collars or swaps
35
Potential
Opportunity Loss
Realize NYMEX price
plus $15/BBL
(difference between long put
and short put)
Realize $90/BBL
Realize NYMEX price
Realize $135/BBL
Short put at $75/BBL
Long put at $90/BBL
Short call at $135/BBL
Realized Price
NYMEX Price
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$80.00
$90.00
$100.00
$110.00
$120.00
$130.00
$140.00
$150.00
$160.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$80.00
$90.00
$100.00
$110.00
$120.00
$130.00
$140.00
$150.00
$160.00
NYMEX Oil ($/BBL)
Unhedged realization
Hedged realization


Experienced Senior Management Team
Scott Sheffield
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
38
33
Tim Dove
President and Chief Operating Officer
31
18
Rich Dealy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
23
20
Mark Berg
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
29
8
Chris Cheatwood
25
15
Danny Kellum
33
31
Bill Hannes
31
15
Joey Hall
24
22
Ken Sheffield
31
31
Years of Experience
Years at Pioneer /
Predecessor Companies
36
Senior management team has an average of 30 years of experience
and
has
worked
together
at
Pioneer
and
predecessor
companies
for
20 years
Executive Vice President – Business Development & Geoscience
Executive Vice President – Permian Operations
Executive Vice President – Southern Wolfcamp Operations
Senior Vice President – South Texas Operations
Senior Vice President – Operations and Engineering


Strong Stock Price Performance Demonstrates Successful Strategy Shift
Pioneer
S&P 500 Oil & Gas Index
S&P 500 Oil & Gas E&P Index (XOP): 75 E&P’s including all of Pioneer’s peers; Index composition is 70% upstream, 20% refining & marketing and 10% integrated
37
-
100
200
300
400
500
Jul-06
Jul-07
Jul-08
Jul-09
Jul-10
Jul-11
Jul-12
Jul-13
Pioneer raised $8 billion of capital during the Company’s transformation
period to accelerate development in unconventional plays:
Pioneer has been the top performing energy stock in the S&P 500 since 2009
Ranked #6 in the overall S&P 500 over this period
Economic Downturn
Onshore U.S. Liquids Focus
Restructuring
Portfolio
Onshore U.S.
Focus
$3 billion from the sale of conventional assets
$5 billion from 2 JVs and equity issuance


Added 161 MMBOE from the drillbit, or 264% of full-year
production, at a drillbit F&D cost of $17.72 per BOE
All-in reserve replacement of 87 MMBOE, or 144% of full-
year production at an all-in F&D cost of $34.46 per BOE,
including:
Reserve mix
Proved Reserves / Production: ~18 years
PD Reserves / Production: ~10 years
38
Strong 2012 Reserve Additions¹
Year-end ’12
Proved Reserves
(MMBOE)
Spraberry
627
Raton
119
Eagle Ford
116
Mid-Continent
101
Barnett Shale
55
Alaska
44
South Texas
23
Other
1
Total
1,086
1)
Reflects 2012 SEC pricing (12-month average) of $94.84/Bbl for oil and $2.76/MMBtu for gas (NYMEX) as compared to 2011 SEC pricing of $96.13/Bbl for oil and
$4.12/MMBtu for gas (NYMEX)
Reflects significant drilling campaigns in horizontal
Wolfcamp Shale, Spraberry vertical, Eagle Ford Shale
and Barnett Shale Combo plays
100% U.S.
Negative technical revisions of 27 MMBOE; performance
improvements of 53 MMBOE offset by 80 MMBOE of vertical
Spraberry PUDs moved to the probable category as the
Company shifts to more horizontal drilling in the
Spraberry field based on successful horizontal Wolfcamp
Shale drilling results
Negative pricing revisions of 82 MMBOE due to significant
decline in gas prices
45%
oil
/
21%
NGLs
/
34%
gas
58% PD / 42% PUD


Permian Basin is composed of multiple uplifts and basins that formed during the Pennsylvanian and early
Permian ages
Spraberry, Wolfcamp Shale and deeper intervals are located in the Midland Basin of the Permian Basin
Spraberry/Wolfcamp field was discovered in 1943 with production commencing in 1949
Spraberry/
Wolfcamp Shale
Midland
39
Geologic Provinces of the Permian Basin
TX
NM
OK
KS
20 Miles


40
Platform Carbonate
Shelf Edge Carbonate
Slope Sediments & Reef Talus
Carbonate Debris Flows
Carbonate Gravity Flows
Land
Clastic Detrital
Clastic Slope Sediments
Clastic Gravity Flows
Delta
Pelagic Sediments
Silt Cloud in Suspension
Anaerobic Zone
(Organic-rich Sediments)
Basinal Sediments
Wolfcamp Map
San Simon
Channel
North Basin
Platform
Glasscock
Nose
Marathon
Thrust Belt
Fluvial -
Deltaic
Platform
Carbonate
Clastic
Slope
Land
Carbonate Slope
Debris
Flow
Carb
Gravity Flow
Clastic
Gravity Flow
Pelagic Sed.
Platform
Carbonate
Land
Land
CBP
Midland
Basin
Marathon
Thrust Belt
North
Older
Wolfcamp
Clastics
Source: Adapted from Handford, 1981
Wolfcamp
Depositional
Model
Midland
Basin
Midland


41
Deposition of the Midland Basin
Platform
Carbonate
Land
Land
CBP
Midland
Basin
Marathon
Thrust Belt
West
East
Central Basin Platform
Eastern Shelf
Midland Basin
(WTGS Cross Section –
1984)


42
Progression
of
Spraberry/Wolfcamp
Field
Development
1
1)
Source: IHS Energy
2)
October 8, 1951. OIL: The Spraberry Trend, retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,859404,00.html
1940s –
Discovery
1960s –
Field extension
1970s –
Dramatic expansion
Independents including
Parker & Parsley (Pioneer’s
predecessor Company)
become large players; less
emphasis by Majors
Independents become the
dominant player
Independents continue to
dominate the landscape
driven by Pioneer
2010s –
Deeper and horizontals
Major oil company
development; principally
Texaco, Phillips and Mobil
1951 –
Time
(2)
magazine
cites
as most active oil field in
U.S.
1953 –
Considered “largest
uneconomic oil field in the
world”
1949 –
Seaboard #2-D
Lee drilled by Seaboard
Oil Company IP’d at 319
BOPD
1943 –
Trace oil found
from well drilled on the
Abner Spraberry farm in
Dawson County
Independents lead the
charge going deeper;
Horizontal oil shale
activity expanding
Continued development by
Majors and Independents
Continued development by
Majors with a few minor
Independents
1950s –
Early Development
1990s –
Infill and efficiency
1980s –
Expansion & Infill
2000s –
Infill and efficiency


History of Spraberry/Wolfcamp Completions
2010
2000 -
09
1980 -
90s
1950 -
70s
Limestone Pay
Sandstone Pay
Non-Organic Shale Non-Pay
Organic Rich Shale Pay
2011-12
5,000’
10,000’
Horizontal Wolfcamp A, B and D
2013+
5,000’
7,000’
Horizontal Spraberry Shales
5,000’
7,000’
Horizontal  Jo Mill
43
5,000’
10,000’
Horizontal Wolfcamp A, B, C and D
Horizontal drilling in Spraberry/Wolfcamp
further improves recoveries and capital
efficiency
Fracture
stimulation
stages
Drilling deeper and adding fracture
stimulation stages have added production
and improved recoveries
Dean
Jo Mill


Source: Rig count data provided by Baker Hughes, 11/15/13
44
Vertical Rigs
Horizontal Rigs
96% Vertical Rigs
68% Vertical Rigs
4% Horizontal Rigs
32% Horizontal Rigs
Counties: Andrews, Borden, Crockett, Dawson, Ector, Gaines, Glasscock, Howard, Irion, Martin,
Midland, Mitchell, Reagan, Schleicher, Scurry, Sterling, Tom Green and Upton
Spraberry/Wolfcamp Rig Count


Major U.S. Shale Play Comparisons
Red intervals indicate hydrocarbons
Petrophysical analysis indicates significantly more
oil in place in the Wolfcamp and Spraberry Shale
intervals in the Midland Basin compared to other
major U.S. shale oil plays
Barnett
Miss Lime
Woodford
Wolfcamp D
“Cline”
Wolfcamp A
Wolfcamp B
L. Spraberry
M. Spraberry
Clear Fork
JoMill
Source: PXD
Dean
Wolfcamp C
U. Spraberry
Atoka
Strawn
45
Midland Basin
Eagle Ford
Condensate
Barnett
Combo
Niobrara
Bakken
Marcellus
How big is the resource?


Wolfcamp Comparison to Other Major U.S. Oil Shale Plays
Major U.S. Oil Shale Play Characteristics
Attribute
Units
Wolfcamp
Shale
1
Eagle
Ford
2
(Oil Window)
Bakken
3
Age
Permian
Cretaceous
Devonian/Mississippian
Basin
Midland
South Texas
Williston
TVD Depth
ft
5,500 -
11,000
7,500 -
11,000
9,000 -
11,000
Thickness
ft
1,500 –
2,600
50 -
350
25 -
125
OOIP/Section
MMBO
80 –
220
30 -
90
10 -
20
Porosity
%
2 –
10
4 -
11
5 -
8
Quartz
%
20 –
50
10 -
25
30 -
60
Carbonate
%
10 –
60
60 -
75
30 -
80
Clay
%
10 -
45
10 -
40
25
TOC
%
2 –
6
1 –
7
2 -
18
Permeability
nd
10 -
3,000
40 -
1,300
50,000 -
500,000
Pressure Gradient
psi/ft
0.55 -
0.70
0.65 -
0.70
0.43 -
0.75
Recovery Factor
%
3 -
15
3 -
10
8 -
15
46
1)
Pioneer internal research (modified according to recent core and petrophysical data); multiple intervals
2)
EOG Analyst Conference April 2010
3)
Tudor, Pickering, Holt, “The Bakken Momentum Continues” November 2011, Hart Energy Bakken Playbooks 2008 and 2010, Jarvie – AAPG Section Meeting 2008
Wolfcamp geology compares favorably to other major oil shale plays


Wolfcamp B Interval Prospectivity Map
Tier 1
Tier 2
Pioneer Acreage
Pioneer Wolfcamp B wells
Competitor Wolfcamp B wells
Wolfcamp B depth contour
Tier 1 is highest prospectivity 
acreage, as determined by several
geologic properties, including:
Original oil in place (OOIP)
Kerogen content
Thermal maturity
Porosity
Brittle mineral fraction (fracability, 
low clay content)
Geologic maps based on:
>70,000 logs
>2,600 square miles of 3-D seismic
>14,500 feet of core
Industry Wolfcamp B Prospectivity
4.8 MM risked acres (Upper B and
Lower B)
>34,000 potential well locations on
140-acre spacing
450 MBOE to 1 MMBOE EUR per well
47
22 BBOE Resource Potential
Scharbauer
Ranch
#202H
24-hr IP: 979 BOEPD
Peak 30-day avg. rate: 783 BOEPD
~73% oil
8,342’
lateral length
Mabee K #1H
24-hr IP: 1,572 BOEPD
Peak 30-day avg. rate: 1,040 BOEPD
~76% oil
6,671’
lateral length
E.T. O’Daniel #1H
24-hr IP: 2,801 BOEPD
~75% oil
9,229’
lateral length
DL Hutt C #3H
24-hr IP: 2,227 BOEPD
Peak 30-day avg. rate: 1,087 BOEPD
~75% oil
7,142’
lateral length
DL Hutt C #1H
24-hr IP: 1,693 BOEPD
Peak 30-day avg. rate: 1,402 BOEPD
~75% oil
7,380’
lateral length
2
Giddings
Wells
Avg. 24-hr IP: 845 BOEPD
Peak 30-day avg. rate: 669 BOEPD
>75% oil 
5,300’
avg. lateral length
University
2-20
#12H
Avg. 24-hr IP: 3,176 BOEPD
9,542’
avg. lateral length


50 BBOE
recoverable
resource
potential
by
industry
in
four
shale
intervals
where
successful horizontal wells have been drilled
Additional
horizontal
potential
in
two
more
Spraberry
intervals,
Strawn,
Atoka
and
Barnett/Woodford intervals
Assumes 140-acre spacing; down-spacing potential exists
50 BBOE Recoverable Resource Potential by Industry
Midland Basin Wolfcamp and Jo Mill Shales
48
Source: Pioneer estimates
Jo Mill
7 BBOE
Wolfcamp A
13 BBOE
Wolfcamp B
22 BBOE
Wolfcamp D
8 BBOE
50 BBOE Recoverable Resource Potential in Midland Basin Wolfcamp and Jo Mill Shales


Largest Oil Fields Worldwide
1) Total recoverable reserves includes oil and gas for all fields
Source: Wood Mackenzie for international fields; Spraberry/Wolfcamp from Pioneer
Spraberry/Wolfcamp
is
the
2
nd
largest
oil
field
in
the
world
49
0
10
20
30
40
50
160
Ghawar, Saudi Arabia
Spraberry/Wolfcamp, USA
Burgan, Kuwait
Safaniyah, Saudi Arabia
Samotlorskoye, Russia
Shaybah, Saudi Arabia
Romashkinskoye, Russia
ADCO, UAE
Zuluf, Saudi Arabia
Cantarell, Mexico
Total
Recoverable
Resource
1
(BBOE)


Largest U.S. Oil Fields
1)
Cumulative production + estimated recoverable resource
Source: DOE, EIA, ITG and other sources
50
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Spraberry/Wolfcamp
Eagle Ford Shale
Prudhoe Bay, AK
Bakken Shale
Delaware Basin
East Texas Basin
Midway-Sunset, CA
Wilmington, CA
Kuparuk River, AK
Kern River, CA
Thunder Horse, GOM
Yates, West TX
Belridge South, CA
Wasson, West TX
Elk Hills, CA
Panhandle, TX
Estimated
Recoverable
Resource
1
(BBOE)
Spraberry/Wolfcamp is the largest oil field in the U.S.


Spraberry/Wolfcamp Production History
From 2009 to 2012, production growth primarily attributable to increased vertical activity
Post
2012,
production
growth
expected
to
be
driven
by
horizontal
activity
Production
Producing Wells
Source: IHS Energy through May 2013 for the Spraberry, Credo East, Garden City South and Lin Fields
Includes Vertical and Horizontal Wells
51
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
550,000
-
-


Production Growth Profiles For 3 Largest U.S. Oil Shale Plays
Eagle Ford
197 Horizontal Rigs
Bakken
156 Horizontal Rigs
Spraberry/Wolfcamp
86 Horizontal Rigs
Spraberry/Wolfcamp horizontal growth trajectory similar to Bakken and Eagle Ford
Includes Horizontal Wells Only
52
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
10,000,000
0
12
24
36
48
60
72
84
96
108
120
Months
Note: Production data is from IHS and represents incremental production for the play beginning when horizontal drilling activity began in earnest; Rig count data
from Baker Hughes as of 11/15/13 for selected counties identified on slide 44 for Spraberry/Wolfcamp; Initial month is November 2010 for Spraberry/Wolfcamp,
April 2008 for Eagle Ford and January 2003 for Bakken


Spraberry/Wolfcamp Horizontal Drilling Production Growth Profile
1)
Potential impediments to achieving this forecast include oil price, capital, infrastructure (Midland and oil field) and people
2)
Assumes industry rig count ramps up from ~65 horizontal rigs currently to ~120 rigs per year in 2018 and thereafter (excludes Pioneer’s portion)
3)
Includes royalties and joint interest partner’s share of production in southern Wolfcamp
Other Operators
2
(~200 Independent Operators)
Pioneer
3
53
1
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
2013
2018
2023
2028
2033
Assumes Pioneer’s rig count increases from 12 rigs
currently to 50 rigs in 2018 and thereafter


TPH’s Industry Permian Basin Production Growth Forecast
Source: IR Presentations, Drillinginfo, RigData, TPH Research; 2-stream
54
TPH’s Permian (Delaware + Midland) Production Forecast: 4.8 MMBOEPD by 2025


40% of PXD interest in 207,000 acres; sold Wolfcamp and deeper horizons
(retained Spraberry/Dean and shallower horizons)
$1.7 B total consideration; ~$21,000/acre
$631 MM of upfront cash (includes Sinochem’s share of capex of $109 MM
prior to closing)
Additional $1.2 B will be paid by Sinochem to carry 75% of Pioneer’s drilling
and facilities capital
JV Agreement with Sinochem
60%
15%
40%
40%
75% Carry
Capex Spend
After Carry Period
During Carry Period
45%
PXD
Sinochem
55


Southern Wolfcamp JV Drilling Performance Improving
56


Southern Wolfcamp JV Completion Costs Being Reduced
57
$660
$560
$530
Q1 2013
Q2 2013
Q3 2013
Average Completion Cost ($ per lateral foot)


Frac Design Changes Over Time
$4,360
($380)
($115)
($110)
($280)
($110)
$2,290
$2,475
($105)
($170)
$2,200
($285)
($545)
($255)
$ thousands
58
Hybrid Costs per 7,000’ of Lateral
Slickwater Costs per 7,000’ of Lateral


GC
Market
Wink
Permian
Basin
Cushing
Crude Pipeline Capacity to Gulf Coast
59
Operator
Origin
Destination
Name
Capacity
Time Frame
Plains
Permian
Cushing
Basin
450,000
Oxy
Permian
Cushing
Centurion
75,000
Sunoco
Permian
GC
West Texas Gulf
400,000
Kinder Morgan
Permian
El Paso
Wink
120,000
Magellan
Permian
GC
Longhorn
225,000
Total
1,270,000
Magellan
Permian
GC
Longhorn-add
50,000
mid 2014
Magellan
Permian
GC
BridgeTex
278,000
3Q 2014
Plains
Permian
Corpus
Cactus
200,000
2Q 2015
Possible
Sunoco
Permian
GC
Permian Express II
200,000
4Q 2015
Operator
Origin
Destination
Name
Capacity
Time Frame
Current
Enbridge/Enterprise
Cushing
GC
Seaway
400,000
Enbridge/Enterprise
Cushing
GC
Seaway-add
450,000
1Q 2014
Transcanada
Cushing
GC
Gulf Coast
700,000
1Q 2014
Planned
Permian Basin Crude Takeaway Capacity
Planned
Current
Cushing to Gulf Coast Pipeline Takeaway


Growing Midstream Infrastructure to Support Production Growth
60
Benedum
Sale Ranch
Gas Processing
Midkiff / Benedum / Driver
Current capacity: 460 MMCFD
1
PXD production makes up ~40%
of throughput
Includes 200 MMCFD
1
Driver
Plant which came online April
2013
Sale Ranch
Current capacity: 120 MMCFD
1
Jameson Plant interconnect
adds 40 MMCFD
PXD production makes up ~15%
of Sale Ranch throughput
Capacity Addition of 200
MMCFD announced for the
Benedum Area for late
2014 / 2015
Pipeline NGL Takeaway
to Mont Belvieu
Chaparral & West Texas
Pipelines
PXD production throughput of
~9 MBPD
Lone Star Pipeline
4 MBPD to PXD increasing to
16 MBPD by 2020
Connect to all PXD gas
processing plants
Expect >425 MBPD, or
~50%, increase in
fractionation capacity at
Mont Belvieu in 2013
Expanding processing capacity and contracted takeaway to support
Pioneer’s aggressive production growth
PXD Acreage
Spraberry Field
Midkiff
1) Wet gas stream with ~160 BBL/MMSCF NGL yield
Driver
Plant
Existing NGL Pipeline


Pioneer in the Spraberry/Wolfcamp Shale
Largest acreage position in the Midland Basin
High oil exposure from proved reserves + net recoverable resource potential of  >7.5 BBOE
Technology leader
Sophisticated geologic maps from >70,000 logs, >2,600 square miles of 3-D seismic and
>14,500 feet of core
Improving capital efficiency by successfully transitioning from vertical drilling to
horizontal drilling
Successful joint venture in southern Wolfcamp area
Reflects value of Pioneer acreage
Drilling program is cash flow positive
Accelerating northern drilling plan
Increasing northern rig count from 5 rigs currently to 10+ rigs in early 2014 in response to
successful results to date
Building out infrastructure required to support future growth from horizontal
drilling program
61
Focused on delivering continued strong production growth in 2014


62
Rigs –
Vertical vs. Horizontal
Vertical Rig
Horizontal Rig


63
Vertical Drilling –
Sand Supply for Fracs


64
Horizontal Drilling –
Sand Supply for Fracs
Portable Sand Silos For Horizontal Wells


65
Vertical Drilling –
Water Supply for Fracs from Frac Tanks
Frac Tanks


Horizontal Drilling –
Water Supply for Fracs from Frac Ponds
66
One frac pond can support
multiple well sites


67
Vertical Drilling –
Tank Battery, Separators and Pumping Unit


68
Horizontal Drilling –
Tank Battery, Separators and Compression
DL Hutt Separators and Compressor Station for gas lift
DL Hutt Horizontal Tank Battery and Separators


69
Water Disposal –
Vertical vs. Horizontal Wells
Trucks haul produced water from vertical wells to disposal site
Produced water piped from horizontal wells 
to central disposal facility


70
Pioneer’s Midland Basin Man Camp


Giddings Area –
Drilling Rigs
Patterson 244
Giddings Estate 2132H,
2133H & 2134H
Ensign 156
Giddings Estate 2135H,
2136H & 2137H
71


Giddings Area –
Frac Fleet
72
Fleet #2
Giddings Estate 3064H,
3065H & 3066H


Giddings Area –
Facilities (Tank Batteries)
Fleet #2
Giddings Estate 3064H,
3065H & 3066H
Facilities/Tank Batteries
73


Giddings Area –
D&C Simultaneous Operations
H&P 497
Giddings Estate 2096H,
2097H & 2098H
Fleet #2
Giddings Estate 3064H,
3065H & 3066H
Fleet #1
Giddings Estate 3067H,
3068H & 3069H
Patterson 244
Giddings Estate 2132H,
2133H & 2134H
Ensign 156
Giddings Estate 2135H,
2136H & 2137H
74


Pioneer’s Eagle Ford Shale Acreage
75
Oil Window
PXD Acreage Area


76
Eagle Ford Shale Resource Breakdown
30%
NGL*
50%
Gas
20%
Condensate
20%
NGL*
30%
Gas
100%
Gas
50%
Condensate
*NGLs are 50% ethane, 25% propane, 15% butanes and 10% heavier liquids
~
~
~
Rich Condensate
35% of Acreage
(200 BBL/MMSCF)
Lean Condensate
45% of Acreage
(60 BBL/MMSCF)
Dry
Gas
20% of Acreage


Pioneer’s
Edwards
Trend
and
Eagle
Ford
Shale
Production
Growth
1
1) Data represents Pioneer’s Eagle Ford and Edwards Trend gross production on a wellhead basis
Edwards Trend
Eagle Ford Shale
77
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
01/2004
01/2005
01/2006
01/2007
01/2008
01/2009
01/2010
01/2011
01/2012
01/2013
Pioneer grew gross Eagle Ford Shale production
from 0 MBOEPD to 100 MBOEPD in 3 years


Spraberry
3 vertical frac fleets (~20,000 HP each)
3 horizontal frac fleets (~35,000 HP each)
15 vertical drilling rigs
Well service equipment
Eagle Ford Shale
2 frac fleets    
(50,000 HP each)
2 coiled tubing units
78
PXD’s Vertical Integration Reduces Costs and Enhances Execution
Current frac capacity: ~300,000 HP
13   largest pressure pumping company in North America
1)
Includes pulling units, frac tanks, hot oilers, water trucks, blowout preventers, construction equipment and fishing tools
Barnett Shale Combo
1 frac fleet
(30,000 HP)
1 coiled tubing unit
Brady sand mine
1
th


79
Reserves Audit, F&D Costs and Reserve Replacement
An audit of proved reserves follows the general principles set forth in the standards pertaining to the estimating and
auditing of oil and gas reserve information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers ("SPE"). A reserve
audit as defined by the SPE is not the same as a financial audit. Please see the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-
K for a general description of the concepts included in the SPE's definition of a reserve audit.
"Finding and development cost per BOE," or “all-in F&D cost per BOE,”
means total costs incurred divided by the
summation of annual proved reserves, on a BOE basis, attributable to revisions of previous estimates, purchases of
minerals-in-place, discoveries and extensions and improved recovery. Consistent with industry practice, future
capital costs to develop proved undeveloped reserves are not included in costs incurred.
"Drillbit finding and development cost per BOE," or “drillbit F&D cost per BOE,”
means the summation of exploration
and development costs incurred divided by the summation of annual proved reserves, on a BOE basis, attributable to
technical revisions of previous estimates, discoveries and extensions and improved recovery. Consistent with industry
practice, future capital costs to develop proved undeveloped reserves are not included in costs incurred.
“Reserve replacement”
is the summation of annual proved reserves, on a BOE basis, attributable to revisions of
previous estimates, purchases of minerals-in-place, discoveries and extensions and improved recovery divided by
annual production of oil, NGLs and gas, on a BOE basis.
“Drillbit reserve replacement”
is the summation of annual proved reserves, on a BOE basis, attributable to technical
revisions of previous estimates, discoveries and extensions and improved recovery divided by annual production of
oil, NGLs and gas, on a BOE basis.


80
Certain Reserve Information
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors --The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC") prohibits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, from disclosing
estimates of oil or gas resources other than “reserves,”
as that term is defined by the
SEC. In this presentation, Pioneer includes estimates of quantities of oil and gas using
certain terms, such as “resource,”
“resource potential,”
“recoverable resource
potential,”
“EUR,”
“oil in place,”
or other descriptions of volumes of reserves, which
terms include quantities of oil and gas that may not meet the SEC’s definitions of proved,
probable and possible reserves, and which the SEC's guidelines strictly prohibit Pioneer
from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates are by their nature more
speculative than estimates of proved reserves and accordingly are subject to
substantially greater risk of being recovered by Pioneer. U.S. investors are urged to
consider closely the disclosures in the Company’s periodic filings with the SEC. Such
filings are available from the Company at 5205 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 200, Irving, Texas
75039, Attention Investor Relations, and the Company’s website at www.pxd.com. These
filings also can be obtained from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.