XML 51 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Acquisitions
9 Months Ended
Sep. 29, 2012
Acquisitions  
Acquisitions

8. Acquisitions

 

Ember

 

On July 3, 2012, the Company acquired Ember Corporation, a privately held company. Ember’s products integrate high-performance, low-power 2.4 GHz wireless ICs with reliable and scalable software into a flexible and robust networking platform.

 

The Company acquired Ember for approximately $79.0 million, including contingent consideration with an estimated fair value of $4.0 million at the date of acquisition. The contingent consideration is payable on a dollar for dollar basis to the extent that revenue of the acquired products exceeds $27.0 million over a one-year period from the beginning of the third fiscal quarter of 2012 through the end of the second fiscal quarter of 2013.

 

The Company recorded the purchase of Ember using the acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, recognized the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The results of Ember’s operations will be included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations beginning on the date of the acquisition. Pro forma information related to this acquisition has not been presented because it would not be materially different from amounts reported.

 

The Company believes that this strategic acquisition provides it with the technology and software expertise required to enable the low-power mesh sensor networks being deployed today in a wide range of residential, commercial and industrial applications. These factors contributed to a purchase price that was in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired and, as a result, the Company recorded goodwill. The goodwill was allocated to the Company’s operating segment and is not deductible for tax purposes. The purchase price was allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Amount

 

Weighted-Average
Amortization Period
(Years)

 

Intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

In-process research and development

 

$

14,810

 

Not amortized

 

Developed technology

 

17,800

 

11

 

Customer relationships

 

5,620

 

9

 

Trademarks

 

910

 

12

 

 

 

39,140

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

3,115

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

1,928

 

 

 

Inventories

 

4,749

 

 

 

Other current assets

 

324

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

14,580

 

 

 

Non-current deferred tax assets, net

 

16,530

 

 

 

Other non-current assets

 

1,776

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

(3,171

)

 

 

Total purchase price

 

$

78,971

 

 

 

 

The allocation of the purchase price is preliminary and subject to change, primarily for income tax matters. Accordingly, adjustments may be made to the values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as additional information is obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed at the valuation date.

 

In-process research and development (IPR&D) represents acquired technology that had not achieved technological feasibility as of the acquisition date and had no alternative future use. The IPR&D recorded in connection with the acquisition of Ember consisted of a low-power RF transceiver. The fair value of this technology was determined using the income approach. The discount rate applicable to the cash flows was 12.5%. The remaining research and development efforts include additional design, integration and testing. The estimated cost to complete the IPR&D as of the acquisition date was approximately $11.2 million. Such costs have been consistent with the Company’s assumptions at the time of the acquisition. The Company does not expect the products derived from this technology to begin to contribute to revenues prior to fiscal 2013.

 

Corporate Headquarters Buildings

 

The Company leased facilities at 400 W. Cesar Chavez (“400 WCC”) and 200 W. Cesar Chavez (“200 WCC”) in Austin, Texas for its corporate headquarters. During the terms of the leases, the Company had options to purchase the buildings for approximately $44.3 million for 400 WCC and $50.1 million for 200 WCC. On September 28, 2012, the Company exercised such options and purchased the facilities.

 

The buildings are located on land which is leased through 2099 from a third party. The rents for these ground leases were prepaid for the term of the leases by the previous lessee. The first floor of each building was leased to the same third party for the term of the ground leases. The base rents for the first floor leases were prepaid to the previous owner of the buildings. Portions of the remaining floors were also leased to other tenants.

 

The Company determined that the purchase of the facilities represented a business combination. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The purchase price was allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Amount

 

Buildings

 

$

90,900

 

Leasehold interest in ground leases

 

23,840

 

Acquired unfavorable leases

 

(11,925

)

Lease-related charges

 

(8

)

Net gain on purchase

 

(8,457

)

Total purchase price

 

$

94,350

 

 

The buildings and leasehold interest in ground leases will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 40 years and 86 years, respectively. Acquired unfavorable leases represent the difference between contractual minimum rental payments due under previously-existing leases in each building and the market rates of those same leases. This amount was recorded in other non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be amortized to rental income over the estimated terms of the leases.

 

The purchase of the facilities resulted in a net gain of approximately $8.5 million, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. The gain resulted primarily because the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values as of the date of the acquisition, which was substantially higher than the purchase prices of the facilities. The purchase prices were fixed at the beginning of the two leases in March 2006 and March 2008. While market prices for such facilities increased over the terms of the leases, the purchase prices remained the same.