XML 28 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill, Customer Relationships and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Goodwill, Customer Relationships and Other Intangible Assets  
Goodwill, Customer Relationships and Other Intangible Assets

(3) Goodwill, Customer Relationships and Other Intangible Assets

        Goodwill, customer relationships and other intangible assets consisted of the following:

 
   
  Successor    
  Predecessor  
 
  Weighted Average
of Remaining Lives
  December 31, 2011    
  December 31, 2010  
 
   
  (Dollars in millions)
 

Goodwill

  N/A   $ 10,106          
                   

Customer relationships, less accumulated amortization of $770 and $2

  9.3 years   $ 6,855          
                   

Other intangible assets subject to amortization

                     

Capitalized software, less accumulated amortization of $354 and $1,741

  4.1 years     1,460         888  

Tradenames and patents, less accumulated amortization of $62 and $5

  3.3 years and 7.5 years, respectively     127         50  
                   

Total other intangible assets, net

      $ 1,587         938  
                   

        As of the successor date of December 31, 2011, the gross carrying amounts of goodwill, customer relationships and other intangible assets were $19.734 billion. These assets were recorded at fair value on April 1, 2011 as a result of CenturyLink's acquisition of us.

        Total amortization expense for intangible assets was as follows:

 
  Successor    
  Predecessor  
 
  Nine Months
Ended
December 31,
2011
   
  Three Months
Ended March 31,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 
 
  (Dollars in millions)
 

Amortization expense for intangible assets

  $ 1,185         58     221     211  

        We amortize customer relationships over an estimated life of 10 years, using either the sum-of-the-years-digits or straight-line methods, depending on the type of customer. We amortize capitalized software using the straight-line method over estimated lives ranging up to seven years and amortize our other intangible assets predominantly using the sum-of-the-years digits method over an estimated life of four years. The estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:

 
  (Dollars in millions)  

Year ending December 31,

       

2012

  $ 1,390  

2013

    1,277  

2014

    1,161  

2015

    1,025  

2016

    905  

2017 and thereafter

    2,685  

        We regularly review the estimated lives and methods used to amortize our software, customer relationships and other intangible assets. The actual amounts of amortization expense may differ materially from our estimated future amortization, depending on the results of our periodic reviews of estimated lives, amortization methods and our final determinations of acquisition date fair value related to our intangible assets.

        We early adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, during the third quarter of 2011, which permits us to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two step goodwill impairment test. If, after completing our qualitative assessment we determine that it is more likely than not that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, we compare the fair value to ourcarrying value (including goodwill). If the estimated fair valueis greater than the carrying value, we conclude that no impairment exists. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, a second calculation is required in which the implied fair value of goodwill is compared to its carrying value. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value, goodwill must be written down to its implied fair value. We elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2011-8 and perform a qualitative assessment given the six month proximity of the goodwill impairment date and the acquisition date resulting in the creation of the goodwill.

        As a result of the acquisition and related acquisition accounting, the carrying value of our assets and liabilities equaled our fair value as of April 1, 2011. A decrease in our fair value in excess of a reduction in the carrying value of our net assets will result in us having a carrying value in excess of our fair value, which may result in an impairment of our goodwill. There is significant judgment in estimating the fair value of the company. The factors that most significantly impact our estimate of fair value include forecasted cash flows and a risk adjusted discount rate. The applicable risk adjusted discount rate is impacted by the market risk free rate of return and a risk premium associated with a group of peer telecommunications companies, which have been deemed to be market participants for purposes of determining the fair value of the company.

        The qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of changes in certain factors from April 1, 2011 (the acquisition date on which all assets and liabilities were assigned a fair value) to September 30, 2011 (the goodwill impairment testing date), including (i) changes in forecasted operating results and comparing actual results to those utilized in the April 1, 2011 fair value assignment; (ii) changes in our weighted average cost of capital from April 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011; (iii) changes in the industry or our competitive environment since the acquisition date; (iv) changes in the overall economy, our market share and market interest rates since the acquisition date; (v) trends in the stock price of CenturyLink and related market capitalization and enterprise values; (vi) trends in peer companies total enterprise value metrics; (vii) control premiums paid for recent industry transactions; and (viii) additional factors such as management turnover, changes in regulation and changes in litigation matters.

        Based on our qualitative assessment, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the estimated fair value of our reporting unit exceeded its carrying value as of September 30, 2011 and thus, determined it was not necessary to perform the two step goodwill impairment test. We believe the more impactful assessments include our actual results compared to those forecasted as of April 1, 2011 and the decline in our weighted average cost of capital since April 1, 2011. To date, our actual operating results have been comparable to those forecasted as of April 1, 2011 and, as of September 30, 2011, we believe the forecasted results of future periods are not materially different than those estimated as of April 1, 2011.