XML 64 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

9. Fair Value Measurements

 

The hierarchy of fair value measurements prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The levels of the hierarchy, as defined below, give the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

 

·     Level 1 is defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 1 assets include available-for-sale equity securities and coal futures that are submitted for clearing on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

 

·     Level 2 is defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company’s level 2 assets and liabilities include commodity contracts (coal and heating oil) with fair values derived from quoted prices in over-the-counter markets or from prices received from direct broker quotes.

 

·     Level 3 is defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. These include the Company’s commodity option contracts (primarily coal and heating oil) valued using modeling techniques, such as Black-Scholes, that require the use of inputs, particularly volatility, that are rarely observable. Changes in the unobservable inputs would not have a significant impact on the reported Level 3 fair values at March 31, 2012.

 

The table below sets forth, by level, the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value at March 31, 2012

 

 

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in equity securities

 

$

7,936

 

$

7,936

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

Derivatives

 

 

37,750

 

 

20,177

 

 

2,068

 

 

15,505

 

Total assets

 

$

45,686

 

$

28,113

 

$

2,068

 

$

15,505

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives

 

$

9,100

 

$

 -

 

$

6,836

 

$

2,264

 

 

 

 

 

The Company’s contracts with certain of its counterparties allow for the settlement of contracts in an asset position with contracts in a liability position in the event of default or termination. For classification purposes, the Company records the net fair value of all the positions with these counterparties as a net asset or liability. Each level in the table above displays the underlying contracts according to their classification in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, based on this counterparty netting.

 

The following table summarizes the change in the fair values of financial instruments categorized as level 3.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

$

 6,211

 

 

 

Realized and unrealized losses recognized in earnings, net

 

 2,496

 

 

 

Realized and unrealized losses recognized in other comprehensive income, net

 

 -

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 5,261

 

 

 

Issuances

 

 -

 

 

 

Settlements

 

 (727)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance

$

 13,241

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains during the three month period ended March 31, 2012 related to level 3 financial instruments held on March 31, 2012 were $2.8 million.

 

 Fair Value of Long-Term Debt

 

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of the Company’s senior notes and other long-term debt, including amounts classified as current, was $3.9 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively. Fair values are based upon observed prices in an active market when available or from valuation models using market information.