UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

OR ( )TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                  to                 

Commission File Number 000-24111

WESTPORT FUTURES FUND L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York	13-3939393
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

c/o Ceres Managed Futures LLC

522 Fifth Ave

New York, New York 10036

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(855) 672-4468

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X     No    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes X     No    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer      Accelerated filer      Non-accelerated filer X   Smaller reporting company    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes         No X

As of July 31, 2016, 16,621.9717 Limited Partnership Redeemable Units were outstanding.

WESTPORT FUTURES FUND L.P.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

		Page Number
PART I — Financial Information:
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (unaudited)		3
	Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)		4
	Notes to Financial Statements including the Financial Statements of Rabar Master Fund LP (unaudited)		5 – 21
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		22 – 24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		25 – 26
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		27
PART II — Other Information:
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		28 – 35
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		36
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		36
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		36
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		36
Item 5.	Other Information		36
Item 6.	Exhibits		37 - 38

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)

	June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Assets:
Investment in the Master(1) , at fair value	$	16,873,378	$	19,181,327
Cash at MS&Co.		87,456		110,752
Cash at bank		607		-
Total assets	$	16,961,441	$	19,292,079
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses:
Ongoing selling agent fees	$	28,269	$	32,153
Management fees		28,049		31,895
General Partner fees		14,025		15,948
Professional fees		103,569		122,669
Redemptions payable to Limited Partners		87,282		935,814
Total liabilities		261,194		1,138,479
Partners’ Capital:
General Partner, 248.2379 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015		242,905		238,732
Limited Partners, 16,818.6817 and 18,628.2377 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		16,457,342		17,914,868
Total partners’ capital (net asset value)		16,700,247		18,153,600
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	16,961,441	$	19,292,079
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit	$	978.52	$	961.71

(1) Defined in Note 1.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

3

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Investment Income:
Interest income allocated from the Master	$	6,376	$	376	$	13,381	$	843
Expenses:
Expenses allocated from the Master		42,888		56,091		78,482		118,769
Ongoing selling agent fees		85,417		122,637		177,281		256,365
Management fees		84,738		121,929		175,965		254,967
General Partner fees		42,369		60,964		87,982		127,483
Professional fees		51,187		53,664		102,843		134,908
Total expenses		306,599		415,285		622,553		892,492
Net investment loss		(300,223)		(414,909)		(609,172)		(891,649)
Trading Results:
Net gains (losses) on investment in the Master:
Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts allocated from the Master		(79,127)		(1,617,525)		221,956		(602,577)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts allocated from the Master		593,369		114,223		694,832		(391,609)
Total trading results		514,242		(1,503,302)		916,788		(994,186)
Net income (loss)		214,019		(1,918,211)		307,616		(1,885,835)
Subscriptions - Limited Partners		-		88,000		-		644,330
Redemptions - Limited Partners		(783,031)		(1,251,377)		(1,760,969)		(1,909,668)
Net increase (decrease) in Partners’ Capital		(569,012)		(3,081,588)		(1,453,353)		(3,151,173)
Partners’ Capital, beginning of period		17,269,259		25,995,055		18,153,600		26,064,640
Partners’ Capital, end of period	$	16,700,247	$	22,913,467	$	16,700,247	$	22,913,467
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit (17,066.9196 and 21,126.3356 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively)	$	978.52	$	1,084.59	$	978.52	$	1,084.59
Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit*	$	12.96	$	(87.86)	$	16.81	$	(86.44)
Weighted average Redeemable Units outstanding		17,538.5083		21,869.8083		18,038.8748		22,063.8526

* Represents the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit during the period.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization:

Westport Futures Fund L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York on March 21, 1997, to engage, directly and indirectly, in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests, including futures, option on futures, forward, option on forward, spot and swap contracts, cash commodities and any other rights or interests pertaining thereto including interests in commodity pools. The sectors traded include currencies, energy, grains, indices, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, metals and softs. The Partnership commenced trading on August 1, 1997. The commodity interests that are indirectly traded by the Partnership, through its investment in Rabar Master Fund L.P. (the “Master”), are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The General Partner (defined below) may also determine to invest up to all of the Partnership’s assets in United States (“U.S.”) Treasury bills and/or money market mutual funds, including money market mutual funds managed by Morgan Stanley or its affiliates. The Partnership privately and continuously offers redeemable units of limited partnership interest (“Redeemable Units”) to qualified investors. There is no maximum number of Redeemable Units that may be sold by the Partnership.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. The General Partner is wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSB Holdings”). MSSB Holdings is ultimately owned by Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley is a publicly held company whose shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Morgan Stanley is engaged in various financial services and other businesses. Prior to June 28, 2013, Morgan Stanley indirectly owned a majority equity interest in MSSB Holdings and Citigroup Inc. indirectly owned a minority equity interest in MSSB Holdings. Prior to July 31, 2009, the date as of which MSSB Holdings became its owner, the General Partner was wholly owned by Citigroup Financial Products Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., the sole owner of which is Citigroup Inc. All trading decisions for the Partnership are made by Rabar Market Research Inc. (“Rabar” or the “Advisor”).

On December 1, 2012, the Partnership allocated substantially all of its capital to the Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership purchased an interest in the Master with cash equal to $31,143,887. The Master permits accounts managed now and in the future by Rabar using the Diversified Program, a proprietary and systematic trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of the Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by the Advisor, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of the Master. The General Partner and the Advisor believe that trading through this master-feeder structure promotes efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to investors as a result of the investment in the Master are approximately the same as if the Partnership traded directly and redemption rights are not affected.

The General Partner is not aware of any material changes to the trading program discussed above during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016.

Generally, a limited partner in the Master withdraws all or part of its capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Master as of the end of any month (the “Redemption Date”) after a request has been made to the General Partner at least three days in advance of the Redemption Date. Such withdrawals are classified as a liability when the limited partner in the Master elects to redeem and informs the Master. However, a limited partner in the Master may request a withdrawal as of the end of any day if such request is received by the General Partner at least three days in advance of the proposed withdrawal day.

During the reporting periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership’s and the Master’s commodity broker was Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”), a registered futures commission merchant. The Partnership and the Master also deposit a portion of their cash in a non-trading account at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

5

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership owned 100% of the Master. The Partnership intends to continue to invest substantially all of its assets in the Master. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Master. The Master’s trading of futures, forward, swaps and option contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on U.S. and foreign commodity exchanges. The Master engages in such trading through commodity brokerage accounts maintained by MS&Co. The Master’s Statements of Financial Condition, including Condensed Schedules of Investments and Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital, are included herein.

The General Partner and each limited partner of the Partnership share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of Partnership interest owned by each, except that no limited partner is liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of its capital contributions and profits, if any, net of distributions or redemptions and losses, if any.

The Master has entered into a futures brokerage account agreement and a foreign exchange brokerage account agreement with MS&Co. The Partnership has also entered into a futures brokerage account agreement with MS&Co. The Partnership, through its investment in the Master, pays MS&Co. (or will reimburse MS&Co., if previously paid) its allocable share of all trading fees for the clearing and, where applicable, execution of transactions as well as exchange, clearing, user, give-up, floor brokerage and National Futures Association fees (collectively, the “clearing fees”).

The Partnership has entered into a selling agreement with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (doing business as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management) (“Morgan Stanley Wealth Management”) (as amended, the “Selling Agreement”). Pursuant to the Selling Agreement, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management receives a monthly ongoing selling agent fee equal to 2.0% per year of the Partnership’s adjusted month-end net assets. The ongoing selling agent fee received by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is shared with the properly registered/exempted financial advisors of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management who sell Redeemable Units in the Partnership.

In July 2015, the General Partner delegated certain administrative functions to SS&C Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, currently doing business as SS&C GlobeOp (the “Administrator”). Pursuant to a master services agreement, the Administrator furnishes certain administrative, accounting, regulatory, reporting, tax and other services as agreed from time to time. In addition, the Administrator maintains certain books and records of the Partnership. The cost of retaining the Administrator is allocated among the pools operated by the General Partner, including the Partnership.

2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

The accompanying financial statements and accompanying notes are unaudited but, in the opinion of the General Partner, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership’s financial condition at June 30, 2016, and the results of its operations and changes in partners’ capital for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, and 2015. These financial statements present the results for interim periods and do not include all disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. These financial statements should be read together with the financial statements and notes included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the year ended December 31, 2015. The December 31, 2015 information has been derived from the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Due to the nature of commodity trading, the results of operations for the interim periods presented should not be considered indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

6

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Statement of Cash Flows: The Partnership is not required to provide a Statement of Cash Flows.

Partnership’s Investment: The Partnership carries its investment in the Master based on the Partnership’s (1) net contribution to the Master and (2) its allocated share of the undistributed profits and losses, including realized gains or losses and net change in unrealized gains or losses, of the Master. The valuation of the Master’s investments including the classification within the fair value hierarchy of the investments held by the Master are described in Note 5. “Fair Value Measurements.”

Master’s Investments: All commodity interests of the Master, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, are held for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on the trade date and open contracts are recorded at fair value (as described in Note 5, ”Fair Value Measurements”) at the measurement date. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the measurement date. Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated and are determined using the first-in, first-out method. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are included as a component of equity in trading account in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains or losses and net change in unrealized gains or losses are included in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Master’s Cash: The Master’s cash includes cash denominated in foreign currencies of $41,151 (cost of $41,405) and $(50,189) (proceeds of $51,168) as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The carrying value of the assets and liabilities presented in the Statements of Financial Condition that qualify as financial instruments under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825, “Financial Instruments”, approximates the fair value due to the short term nature of such balances.

Investment Company Status: Effective January 1, 2014, the Partnership adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-08, “Financial Services—Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure Requirements” and based on the General Partner’s assessment, the Partnership has been deemed to be an investment company since inception. Accordingly, the Partnership follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of Topic 946 and reflects its investments at fair value with unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value reflected in the Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Income Taxes: Income taxes have not been listed as each partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on its share of the Partnership’s income and expenses. The General Partner concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Partnership’s financial statements. The Partnership files U.S. federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The 2012 through 2015 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities. The General Partner does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

Net Income (Loss) per Redeemable Unit: Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit is calculated in accordance with ASU 946, “Financial Services – Investment Companies”. See Note 3, “Financial Highlights.”

7

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Recent Accounting Pronouncement: In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The amendments in this update address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments or all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. One of the amendments in this update eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet or a description of changes in the methods and significant assumptions. Additionally, the update eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities. Investment companies are specifically exempted from ASU 2016-01’s equity investment accounting provisions and will continue to follow the industry specific guidance for investment accounting under Topic 946. For public business entities, this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein. For other entities, it is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The General Partner is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the Partnership’s financial statements and related disclosures.

There have been no material changes with respect to the Partnership’s critical accounting policies as reported in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

8

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The Master’s Statements of Financial Condition and Condensed Schedules of Investments as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, are presented below:

Rabar Master Fund L. P.

Statements of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)

	June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Assets:
Equity in trading account:
Investment in U.S. Treasury bills, at fair value (amortized cost $0, and $10,249,398 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)	$	-	$	10,248,341
Cash at MS&Co.		14,702,921		7,722,577
Cash margin		1,502,998		1,233,230
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts		583,394		20,178
Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		111,360		-
Total equity in trading account		16,900,673		19,224,326
Cash at bank		607		-
Total assets	$	16,901,280	$	19,224,326
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	-	$	21,489
Accrued expenses:
Professional fees		30,065		22,293
Total liabilities		30,065		43,782
Partners’ Capital:
General Partner		-		-
Limited Partner		16,871,215		19,180,544
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	16,901,280	$	19,224,326

9

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Rabar Master Fund L. P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

June 30, 2016

(Unaudited)

	Notional ($)/Number				% of Partners’
	of Contracts		Fair Value		Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		26	$	16,294		0.10	%
Energy		28		10,230		0.06
Grains		40		41,470		0.25
Indices		24		9,420		0.06
Interest Rates U.S.		88		153,945		0.91
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		405		230,421		1.37
Metals		53		112,900		0.67
Softs		58		60,271		0.36
Total futures contracts purchased				634,951		3.78
Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies		20		(2,421)		(0.01)
Energy		21		(26,543)		(0.16)
Indices		20		(11,572)		(0.07)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		20		(935)		(0.01)
Livestock		20		628		0.00	*
Metals		18		(10,714)		(0.06)
Total futures contracts sold				(51,557)		(0.31)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			$	583,394		3.47	%
Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies		$3,096,931	$	141,550		0.84	%
Metals		21		19,602		0.12
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts				161,152		0.96
Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies		$728,096		(3,946)		(0.02)
Metals		21		(45,846)		(0.27)
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts				(49,792)		(0.29)
Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			$	111,360		0.67	%

*  Due to rounding

10

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Rabar Master Fund L. P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2015

	Notional ($)/Number				% of Partners’
	of Contracts		Fair Value		Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		43	$	18,890		0.10	%
Energy		3		1,730		0.01
Grains		20		(6,256)		(0.03)
Indices		40		(13,822)		(0.07)
Interest Rates U.S.		3		(4,969)		(0.03)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		190		16,623		0.09
Livestock		10		1,880		0.01
Metals		1		(2,960)		(0.02)
Softs		87		(17,087)		(0.09)
Total futures contracts purchased				(5,971)		(0.03)
Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies		35		48,572		0.25
Indices		9		3,592		0.02
Interest Rates U.S.		27		(2,625)		(0.02)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		110		(530)		(0.00)	*
Livestock		7		(12,145)		(0.06)
Metals		72		(10,366)		(0.05)
Softs		21		(349)		(0.00)	*
Total futures contracts sold				26,149		0.14
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			$	20,178		0.11	%
Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	4,358,723	$	69,575		0.36	%
Metals		3		3,906		0.02
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts				73,481		0.38
Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	2,196,032		(45,651)		(0.24)
Metals		43		(49,319)		(0.26)
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts				(94,970)		(0.50)
Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			$	(21,489)		(0.12)	%

U.S. Government Securities

					% of Partners’
Face Amount	Maturity Date	Description	Fair Value		Capital
$10,250,000	3/3/2016	U.S. Treasury bills, 0.015% (Amortized cost of $10,249,398)	$	10,248,341		53.43	%

* Due to rounding

11

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Rabar Master Fund L. P.

Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Investment Income:
Interest income	$	6,376	$	376	$	13,381	$	843
Expenses:
Clearing fees		22,368		32,781		37,438		62,876
Professional fees		20,520		23,310		41,044		55,893
Total expenses		42,888		56,091		78,482		118,769
Net investment income (loss)		(36,512)		(55,715)		(65,101)		(117,926)
Trading Results:
Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests:
Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts		(79,127)		(1,617,525)		221,956		(602,577)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts		593,369		114,223		694,832		(391,609)
Total trading results		514,242		(1,503,302)		916,788		(994,186)
Net income (loss)		477,730		(1,559,017)		851,687		(1,112,112)
Subscriptions		-		88,000		-		644,330
Redemptions		(1,162,999)		(1,488,781)		(3,151,051)		(2,702,903)
Distributions of interest income to feeder fund		(5,818)		(376)		(9,965)		(843)
Net increase (decrease) in Partners’ Capital		(691,087)		(2,960,174)		(2,309,329)		(3,171,528)
Partners’ Capital, beginning of period		17,562,302		26,262,984		19,180,544		26,474,338
Partners’ Capital, end of period	$	16,871,215	$	23,302,810	$	16,871,215	$	23,302,810

12

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

3. Financial Highlights:

Financial highlights for the limited partner class as a whole for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Per Redeemable Unit Performance (for a unit oustanding throughout the period): *
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	$	30.08		$	(68.88)		$	50.58		$	(46.04)
Net investment loss		(17.12)			(18.98)			(33.77)			(40.40)
Increase (decrease) for the period		12.96			(87.86)			16.81			(86.44)
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, beginning of period		965.56			1,172.45			961.71			1,171.03
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, end of period	$	978.52		$	1,084.59		$	978.52		$	1,084.59
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital: **
Net investment loss ***		(7.2)	%		(6.8)	%		(7.0)	%		(7.1)	%
Operating expenses		7.3	%		6.8	%		7.2	%		7.1	%
Incentive fees		-	%		-	%		-	%		-	%
Total expenses		7.3	%		6.8	%		7.2	%		7.1	%
Total return:
Total return before incentive fees		1.3	%		(7.5)	%		1.7	%		(7.4)	%
Incentive fees		-	%		-	%		-	%		-	%
Total return after incentive fees		1.3	%		(7.5)	%		1.7	%		(7.4)	%

* Net investment loss per Redeemable Unit is calculated by dividing the expenses net of interest income by the average number of Redeemable Units outstanding during the period. The net realized and unrealized gains (losses) per Redeemable Unit is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit with the other per unit information.

** Annualized (other than incentive fees).

*** Interest income allocated from the Master less total expenses.

The above ratios and total return may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner class using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average partners’ capital of the Partnership and includes the income and expenses allocated from the Master.

13

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Financial Highlights of the Master:

Financial highlights for the limited partner class as a whole for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital: *
Net investment loss **		(0.9)	%		(0.9)	%		(0.7)	%		(0.9)	%
Operating expenses		1.0	%		0.9	%		0.9	%		0.9	%
Total return		2.9	%		(6.0)	%		4.9	%		(4.5)	%

* Annualized.

** Interest income less total expenses.

The above ratios and total return may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner class using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average partners’ capital.

4.    Trading Activities:

The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. The Partnership invests substantially all of its assets through a “master/feeder” structure. The Partnership’s pro rata share of the results of the Master’s trading activities is shown on the Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

The futures brokerage account agreements with MS&Co. give the Partnership and the Master the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses on open futures and forward contracts. The Partnership and the Master net, for financial reporting purposes, the unrealized gains and losses on open futures and open forward contracts in the Statements of Financial Condition as the criteria under ASC 210-20, “Balance Sheet” have been met.

Trading and transaction fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisor for the Master. All clearing fees paid to MS&Co. are borne by the Master and allocated to the Partnership.

All of the commodity interests owned by the Master are held for trading purposes. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were 883 and 1,261, respectively. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, were 858 and 1,361, respectively. The monthly average number of metal forward contracts traded during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were 72 and 182, respectively. The monthly average number of metal forward contracts traded during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were 64 and 143, respectively. The monthly average notional value of currency forward contracts held during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $7,646,993 and $17,019,623, respectively. The monthly average notional value of currency forward contracts held during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $8,243,960 and $16,799,196, respectively.

14

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following tables summarize the gross and net amounts recognized relating to assets and liabilities of the Master’s derivatives and their offsetting subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

			Gross Amounts		Amounts		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
			Offset in the		Presented in the		Statements of Financial Condition
			Statements of		Statements of				Cash Collateral
	Gross Amounts		Financial		Financial		Financial		Received/
June 30, 2016	Recognized		Condition		Condition		Instruments		Pledged*		Net Amount
Assets
Futures	$	726,745	$	(143,351)	$	583,394	$	-	$	-	$	583,394
Forwards		161,152		(49,792)		111,360		-		-		111,360
Total assets	$	887,897	$	(193,143)	$	694,754	$	-	$	-	$	694,754
Liabilities
Futures	$	(143,351)	$	143,351	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Forwards		(49,792)		49,792		-		-		-		-
Total liabilities	$	(193,143)	$	193,143	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Net fair value											$	694,754	*
			Gross Amounts		Amounts		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
			Offset in the		Presented in the		Statements of Financial Condition
			Statements of		Statements of				Cash Collateral
	Gross Amounts		Financial		Financial		Financial		Received/
December 31, 2015	Recognized		Condition		Condition		Instruments		Pledged*		Net Amount
Assets
Futures	$	157,979	$	(137,801)	$	20,178	$	-	$	-	$	20,178
Forwards		73,481		(73,481)		-		-		-		-
Total assets	$	231,460	$	(211,282)	$	20,178	$	-	$	-	$	20,178
Liabilities
Futures	$	(137,801)	$	137,801	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Forwards		(94,970)		73,481		(21,489)		-		-		(21,489)
Total liabilities	$	(232,771)	$	211,282	$	(21,489)	$	-	$	-	$	(21,489)
Net fair value											$	(1,311)	*

* In the event of default by the Master, MS&Co., the Master’s commodity futures broker and the sole counterparty to the Master’s off-exchange-traded contracts, as applicable, has the right to offset the Master’s obligation with the Master’s cash and/or U.S. Treasury bills held by MS&Co., thereby minimizing MS&Co.’s risk of loss. There is no collateral posted by MS&Co. and as such, in the event of default by MS&Co., the Master is exposed to the amount shown in the Statements of Financial Condition. In the case of exchange-traded contracts, the Master’s exposure to counterparty risk may be reduced since the exchange’s clearinghouse interposes its credit between buyer and seller and the clearinghouse’s guarantee fund may be available in the event of a default.

15

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following tables indicate the Master’s gross fair values of derivative instruments of futures and forward contracts as separate assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015.

	June 30, 2016
Assets
Futures Contracts
Currencies	$	28,885
Energy		11,943
Grains		55,845
Indices		21,123
Interest Rates U.S.		155,633
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		233,298
Livestock		10,340
Metals		141,847
Softs		67,831
Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts		726,745
Liabilities
Futures Contracts
Currencies		(15,012)
Energy		(28,256)
Grains		(14,375)
Indices		(23,275)
Interest Rates U.S.		(1,688)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		(3,812)
Livestock		(9,712)
Metals		(39,661)
Softs		(7,560)
Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts		(143,351)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	583,394	*
Assets
Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	141,550
Metals		19,602
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		161,152
Liabilities
Forward Contracts
Currencies		(3,946)
Metals		(45,846)
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(49,792)
Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	111,360	**

* This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

** This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

16

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2015
Assets
Futures Contracts
Currencies	$	70,795
Energy		2,050
Indices		17,362
Interest Rates U.S.		906
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		42,819
Livestock		3,890
Metals		8,210
Softs		11,947
Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts		157,979
Liabilities
Futures Contracts
Currencies		(3,333)
Energy		(320)
Grains		(6,256)
Indices		(27,592)
Interest Rates U.S.		(8,500)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		(26,726)
Livestock		(14,155)
Metals		(21,536)
Softs		(29,383)
Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts		(137,801)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	20,178	*
Assets
Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	69,575
Metals		3,906
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		73,481
Liabilities
Forward Contracts
Currencies		(45,651)
Metals		(49,319)
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		(94,970)
Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	(21,489)	**

* This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

** This amount is in “Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

17

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following table indicates the Master’s trading gains and losses, by market sector, on derivative instruments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Sector	2016			2015			2016			2015
Currencies	$	(21,871)		$	(125,714)		$	74,563		$	(320,394)
Energy		(86,849)			(161,444)			(99,345)			(208,072)
Grains		378,614			302,962			383,678			(71,032)
Indices		(253,024)			(338,836)			(411,685)			163,602
Interest Rates U.S.		186,617			(152,478)			399,703			99,248
Interest Rates non-U.S.		425,511			(635,730)			997,184			(53,209)
Livestock		18,413			(59,542)			8,155			9,747
Metals		(138,491)			(373,167)			(370,361)			(409,897)
Softs		5,322			40,647			(65,104)			(204,179)
Total	$	514,242	*	$	(1,503,302)	*	$	916,788	*	$	(994,186)	*

* This amount is in “Total trading results” in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partner’s Capital.

5.  Fair Value Measurements:

Master’s Fair Value Measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The fair value of exchange-traded futures, option and forward contracts is determined by the various exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of business on the last business day of the reporting period. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period from various exchanges. The fair value of non-exchange-traded foreign currency option contracts is calculated by applying an industry standard model application for options valuation of foreign currency options, using as input the spot prices, interest rates, and option implied volatilities quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period. U.S. Treasury bills are valued at the last available bid price received from independent pricing services as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period.

The Master considers prices for exchange-traded commodity futures, forwards, swaps and option contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1). The values of U.S. Treasury bills, non-exchange-traded forward, swap and certain option contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker-quotes or pricing services that derive fair values for those assets and liabilities from observable inputs (Level 2). As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Master did not hold any derivative instruments that were priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of the General Partner’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3). Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. During the reporting periods, there were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2.

18

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

June 30, 2016	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Futures	$	726,745	$	726,745	$	-	$	-
Forwards		161,152		19,602		141,550		-
Total assets	$	887,897	$	746,347	$	141,550	$	-
Liabilities
Futures	$	143,351	$	143,351	$	-	$	-
Forwards		49,792		45,846		3,946		-
Total liabilities	$	193,143	$	189,197	$	3,946	$	-
December 31, 2015	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Futures	$	157,979	$	157,979	$	-	$	-
Forwards		73,481		3,906		69,575		-
U.S. Treasury bills		10,248,341		-		10,248,341		-
Total assets	$	10,479,801	$	161,885	$	10,317,916	$	-
Liabilities
Futures	$	137,801	$	137,801	$	-	$	-
Forwards		94,970		49,319		45,651		-
Total liabilities	$	232,771	$	187,120	$	45,651	$	-

6. Financial Instrument Risks:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership, through its investment in the Master, is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments include forwards, futures, options and swaps, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms on specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange, a swap-execution facility or over-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded instruments include futures and certain standardized forward, swap and option contracts. Certain swap contracts may also be traded on a swap execution facility or OTC. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and also include certain forward and option contracts. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments, including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract. The General Partner estimates at any given time approximately 0.3% to 16.4% of the Partnership’s/Master’s contracts are traded OTC.

19

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Futures Contracts. The Master trades futures contracts. A futures contract is a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of investments, currency or a standardized amount of a deliverable grade commodity, at a specified price on a specified future date, unless the contract is closed before the delivery date or the delivery quantity is something where physical delivery cannot occur (such as the S&P 500 Index), whereby such contract is settled in cash. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Master each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Master. When the contract is closed, the Master records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in futures contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts are included in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. Forward foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Master agrees to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed-upon future date. Forward foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Master’s net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur, respectively, and are included in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

London Metals Exchange Forward Contracts. Metal contracts traded on the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) represent a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin or zinc. LME contracts traded by the Master are cash settled based on prompt dates published by the LME. Variation margin may be made or received by the Master each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Master. A contract is considered offset when all long positions have been matched with a like number of short positions settling on the same prompt date. When the contract is closed at the prompt date, the Master records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in LME contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the broker, directly with the LME. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on metal contracts are included in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

The Master does not isolate the portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments due to fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in total trading results in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units is limited to the amount of their share of the Partnership’s net assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a result of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under New York law.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Master due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The Master is exposed to market risk equal to the value of the futures and forward contracts purchased and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short.

20

Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s/Master’s risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and is not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership’s/Master’s risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Partnership/Master to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership/Master has credit risk and concentration risk as MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate is the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Partnership’s/Master’s assets. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that, through MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate, the Partnership’s/Master’s counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Partnership’s/Master’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/Master may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forward and option contracts by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these financial instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Partnership’s/Master’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

7. Subsequent Events:

The General Partner evaluates events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The General Partner has assessed the subsequent events through the date of issuance and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.

21

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services. Its assets are (i) investment in the Master, and (ii) equity in its trading account, consisting of cash. The Master does not engage in sales of goods or services. The Master’s only assets are its equity in trading account, consisting of cash, cash margin, net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts, U.S. Treasury bills at fair value and cash at bank. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership through its investment in the Master. While substantial losses could lead to a material decrease in liquidity, no such illiquidity occurred in the second quarter of 2016.

The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of its partners, as increased or decreased by realized and/or unrealized gains or losses on trading and by expenses, interest income, subscriptions and redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits if any.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, Partnership’s capital decreased 8.0% from $18,153,600 to $16,700,247. This decrease was attributable to redemptions of 1,809.5560 Redeemable Units totaling $1,760,969, which was partially offset by the net income of $307,616. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contract positions in subsequent periods.

The Master’s capital consists of the capital contributions of its partners increased or decreased by realized and/or unrealized gains or losses on trading and by expenses, interest income, subscriptions and redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits if any.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Master’s capital decreased 12.0% from $19,180,544 to $16,871,215. This decrease was attributable to redemptions of $3,151,051 and distribution of interest income to the Partnership totaling $9,965, which was partially offset by the net income of $851,687. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investment in the Master in subsequent periods.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with GAAP requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Partnership’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 2, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the financial statements.

The Partnership records all investments at fair value in their financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) in the Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Results of Operations

During the Partnership’s second quarter of 2016, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit increased 1.3% from $965.56 to $978.52 as compared to a decrease of 7.5% in the second quarter of 2015. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses in the second quarter of 2016 of $514,242. Gains were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of commodity futures in grains, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, and softs and were partially offset by losses in currencies, energy, indices, and metals. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses in the second quarter of 2015 of $1,503,302. Losses were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, indices, livestock, metals and U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and were partially offset by gains in grains and softs.

22

The most significant gains were recorded in the global interest rate sector during June from long positions in European and U.S. fixed income futures as prices advanced as uncertainty surrounding the economic and political fallout following the U.K.’s vote in late June to leave the European Union increased demand for the relative “safety” of government debt. Within the agricultural sector, gains were experienced during April and June from long positions in soybean futures as prices rose as flooding and adverse weather in South America threatened to curtail grain exports. Additional gains were experienced from long positions in sugar futures, primarily during June, as prices climbed higher amid speculation India’s newly imposed duty on sugar exports could further tighten the world sugar market. The Partnership’s trading gains for the quarter were partially offset by trading losses within the global stock index sector during April and June from short positions in European and U.S. equity index futures as prices rallied early in the month amid signs of optimism about the global economy and as data showed euro-zone economic growth quickened more than analysts predicted during the first quarter. Within the metals sector, losses were recorded during May from long positions in gold futures as prices declined as a strengthening U.S. dollar diminished investor demand for precious metals. Additional losses in the metals sector were incurred throughout the second quarter from positions in copper, aluminum, and nickel futures. Within the energy sector, losses were recorded during June from short positions in natural gas futures as prices advanced as warm weather forecasts stoked expectations for strong demand this summer. Additional losses in the energy sector were incurred from positions in gasoline and heating oil futures during June.

During the Partnership’s six months ended June 30, 2016, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit increased 1.7% from $961.71 to $978.52 as compared to a decrease of 7.4% during the six months ended June 30, 2015. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2016 of $916,788. Gains were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of commodity futures in currencies, grains, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, and livestock and were partially offset by losses in energy, indices, metals, and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 of $994,186. Losses were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, grains, metals, softs, and non-U.S. interest rates and were partially offset by gains in indices, livestock and U.S. interest rates.

The most significant gains were recorded in the global interest rate sector during June from long positions in European and U.S. fixed income futures as prices advanced as uncertainty surrounding the economic and political fallout following the U.K.’s vote in late June to leave the European Union increased demand for the relative “safety” of government debt. Additional gains in the global interest rate sector were experienced during January and February from long positions in European, Pacific Rim, and U.S. fixed income futures as prices advanced after weakness in Chinese economic data revived concern about the stability of the global economy. Within the agricultural sector, gains were experienced during April and June from long positions in soybean futures as prices rose as flooding and adverse weather in South America threatened to curtail grain exports. Additional gains were experienced from long positions in sugar futures, primarily during June, as prices climbed higher amid speculation India’s newly imposed duty on sugar exports could further tighten the world sugar market. Within the currency sector, gains were experienced during June from long positions in the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar as the relative value of the yen, which has long been considered a “safe haven” investment in times of market apprehension, rallied after the U.K. decided to leave the European Union. Additional currency gains were recorded during January from short positions in the British pound. The Partnership’s trading gains for the first six months of the year were partially offset by trading losses within the global stock index sector during March, April, and June from short positions in European and U.S. equity index futures as prices rallied amid signs of optimism about the global economy, a rebound in commodity prices, and as data showed economic growth quickened more than analysts predicted during the first quarter. Within the metals sector, losses were recorded during May from long positions in gold futures as prices declined as a strengthening U.S. dollar diminished investor demand for precious metals. Additional losses in the metals sector were incurred throughout the second quarter from positions in copper and aluminum futures. Within the energy sector, losses were recorded during June from short positions in natural gas futures as prices advanced as warm weather forecasts stoked expectations for strong demand this summer. Additional losses in the energy sector were incurred from positions in gasoline and heating oil futures during June.

23

Commodity markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and rapid inflation increase the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increase the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership and the Master depend on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisor to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events, and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisor is able to identify them, the Partnership and the Master expect to increase capital through operations.

Interest income on 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of the Master’s) brokerage account during each month is earned at a rate equal to the monthly average of the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate. Any interest earned on the Partnership’s and/or the Master’s account in excess of the amounts described above, if any, will be retained by MS&Co. and/or shared with the General Partner. All interest earned on U.S. Treasury bills and money market mutual fund securities will be retained by the Partnership and/or the Master, as applicable. Interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 increased by $6,000 and $12,538, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The increase in interest income is primarily due to higher 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rates along with additional interest income earned on U.S. Treasury bills during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. Interest earned by the Partnership will increase the net asset value of the Partnership. The amount of interest income earned by the Partnership depends on (1) the average daily equity in the Partnership’s and the Master’s accounts, (2) the amount of U.S. Treasury bills and/or money market mutual funds purchased by the Partnership and/or the Master and (3) interest rates over which the Partnership, the Master and MS&Co. have no control.

Ongoing selling agent fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Ongoing selling agent fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $37,220 and $79,084, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The decrease in ongoing selling agent fees is primarily due to lower average net assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Management fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $37,191 and $79,002, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The decrease in management fees is due to lower average net assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015.

General Partner fees are paid to the General Partner for administering the business and affairs of the Partnership including, among other things, (i) selecting, appointing and terminating the Partnership’s commodity trading advisor and (ii) monitoring the activities of the commodity trading advisor. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. General Partner fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $18,595 and $39,501, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The decrease in General Partner fees is due to lower average net assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015.

Incentive fees are based on the new trading profits generated by the Advisor at the end of the quarter, as defined in the management agreement. There were no incentive fees earned for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The Advisor will not be paid an incentive fee until the Advisor recovers the net loss incurred and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership.

In allocating substantially all of the assets of the Partnership to the Master, the General Partner considers, among other things, the Advisor’s past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements. The General Partner may modify or terminate the allocation of assets to the Advisor and may allocate assets to additional advisors at any time.

24

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

All or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss through its investment in the Master. The Partnership and the Master are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership and the Master are acquired for speculative trading purposes. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership’s and the Master’s main line of business.

The limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of their investment.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s and the Master’s open contracts and, consequently, in their earnings and cash balances. The Partnership’s and the Master’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership’s and the Master’s open contracts and the liquidity of the markets in which they trade.

The Master rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership’s and the Master’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of their future results.

“Value at Risk” is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership and/or the Master could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership’s and/or the Master’s speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership and/or the Master of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership’s and/or the Master’s experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s and/or the Master’s losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership’s and/or the Master’s attempts to manage their market risk.

Exchange margin requirements have been used by the Partnership and the Master as the measure of their Value at Risk. Margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. The margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

Value at Risk tables represent a probabilistic assessment of the risk of loss in market sensitive instruments. The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Master’s open positions by market category as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. All open position trading risk exposures of the Master have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. There has been no material change in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

25

As of June 30, 2016, the Master’s total capitalization was $16,871,215. The Partnership owned approximately 100% of Master. The Master’s Value at Risk as of June 30, 2016 was as follows:

June 30, 2016

Market Sector	Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk		Low Value at Risk		Average Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	130,347		0.77	%	$	428,594	$	101,491	$	253,053
Energy		140,250		0.83			145,915		6,765		80,025
Grains		63,845		0.38			214,358		63,845		124,279
Indices		148,472		0.88			315,567		126,726		226,152
Interest Rates U.S.		171,507		1.02			220,215		32,698		149,560
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		324,496		1.92			425,144		158,756		286,816
Livestock		45,243		0.27			64,103		42,867		49,022
Metals		364,501		2.16			388,607		85,667		247,855
Softs		104,111		0.62			139,821		51,099		92,996
Total	$	1,492,772		8.85	%

* Average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2015, the Master’s total capitalization was $19,180,544. The Partnership owned approximately 100% of Master. The Master’s Value at Risk as of December 31, 2015 was as follows:

December 31, 2015

Market Sector	Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk		Low Value at Risk		Average Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	317,041		1.65	%	$	929,435	$	178,351	$	491,411
Energy		7,425		0.04			330,550		5,280		58,453
Grains		28,160		0.15			313,905		8,745		109,545
Indices		253,585		1.32			920,945		48,103		462,347
Interest Rates U.S.		38,578		0.20			195,965		10,789		100,768
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		199,927		1.04			643,373		80,303		359,436
Livestock		28,793		0.15			99,495		9,240		38,912
Metals		231,376		1.21			585,045		63,800		278,696
Softs		100,588		0.52			333,400		46,842		111,852
Total	$	1,205,473		6.28	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

26

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership on the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods expected in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports it files is accumulated and communicated to the General Partner, including the President and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”) of the General Partner, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.

The General Partner is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Partnership’s external disclosures.

The General Partner’s President and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2016, and, based on that evaluation, the General Partner’s President and CFO have concluded that, at that date, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process under the supervision of the General Partner’s President and CFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These controls include policies and procedures that:

• pertain to the maintenance of records, that in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

• provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and (ii) the Partnership’s receipts are handled and expenditures are made only pursuant to authorizations of the General Partner; and

• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting process during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

27

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

This section describes the major pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which MS&Co. or its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Partnership or the General Partner.

On June 1, 2011, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated converted from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware limited liability company. As a result of that conversion, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated is now named Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”).

MS&Co. is a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, a Delaware holding company. Morgan Stanley files periodic reports with the SEC as required by the Exchange Act, which include current descriptions of material litigation and material proceedings and investigations, if any, by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations concerning Morgan Stanley and its subsidiaries, including MS&Co. As a consolidated subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, MS&Co. does not file its own periodic reports with the SEC that contain descriptions of material litigation, proceedings and investigations. As a result, please refer to the “Legal Proceedings” section of Morgan Stanley’s SEC 10-K filings for 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011. In addition, MS&Co. annually prepares an Audited, Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition (“Audited Financial Statement”) that is publicly available on Morgan Stanley’s website at www.morganstanley.com. We refer you to the Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies – Legal section of MS&Co.’s 2015 Audited Financial Statement.

In addition to the matters described in those filings, in the normal course of business, each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities as a global diversified financial services institution. Certain of the legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. is also involved, from time to time, in investigations and proceedings by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, fines or penalties. The number of these investigations and proceedings has increased in recent years with regard to many financial services institutions, including Morgan Stanley and MS&Co.

MS&Co. is a Delaware limited liability company with its main business office located at 1585 Broadway, New York, New York 10036. Among other registrations and memberships, MS&Co. is registered as a futures commission merchant and is a member of the National Futures Association.

Regulatory and Governmental Matters. 

MS&Co. has received subpoenas and requests for information from certain federal and state regulatory and governmental entities, including among others various members of the RMBS Working Group of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, such as the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and several state Attorney General’s Offices, concerning the origination, financing, purchase, securitization and servicing of subprime and non-subprime residential mortgages and related matters such as residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”), collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), structured investment vehicles (“SIVs”) and credit default swaps backed by or referencing mortgage pass-through certificates. These matters, some of which are in advanced stages, include, but are not limited to, investigations related to MS&Co.’s due diligence on the loans that it purchased for securitization, MS&Co.’s communications with ratings agencies, MS&Co.’s disclosures to investors, and MS&Co.’s handling of servicing and foreclosure related issues.

On February 25, 2015, MS&Co. reached an agreement in principle with the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, Civil Division (collectively, the “Civil Division”) to pay $2.6 billion to resolve certain claims that the Civil Division indicated it intended to bring against MS&Co. That settlement was finalized on February 10, 2016.

28

On April 1, 2016, the California Attorney General’s Office filed an action against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in California state court styled California v. Morgan Stanley, et al., on behalf of California investors, including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California Teachers’ Retirement System. The complaint alleges that MS&Co. made misrepresentations and omissions regarding residential mortgage-backed securities and notes issued by the Cheyne SIV (defined below), and asserts violations of the California False Claims Act and other state laws and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, disgorgement, and injunctive relief. On July 20, 2016, MS&Co. filed a demurrer.

In October 2014, the Illinois Attorney General’s Office (“ILAG”) sent a letter to MS&Co. alleging that MS&Co. knowingly made misrepresentations related to RMBS purchased by certain pension funds affiliated with the State of Illinois and demanding that MS&Co. pay ILAG approximately $88 million. MS&Co. and ILAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On January 13, 2015, the New York Attorney General’s Office (“NYAG”), which is also a member of the RMBS Working Group, indicated that it intends to file a lawsuit related to approximately 30 subprime securitizations sponsored by MS&Co. NYAG indicated that the lawsuit would allege that MS&Co. misrepresented or omitted material information related to the due diligence, underwriting and valuation of the loans in the securitizations and the properties securing them and indicated that its lawsuit would be brought under the Martin Act. MS&Co. and NYAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On June 5, 2012, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to resolve allegations related to the failure of a salesperson to comply with exchange rules that prohibit off-exchange futures transactions unless there is an Exchange for Related Position (“EFRP”). Specifically, the CFTC found that from April 2008 through October 2009, MS&Co. violated Section 4c(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulation 1.38 by executing, processing and reporting numerous off-exchange futures trades to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) and Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) as EFRPs in violation of CME and CBOT rules because those trades lacked the corresponding and related cash, OTC swap, OTC option, or other OTC derivative position. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to supervise the handling of the trades at issue and failing to have adequate policies and procedures designed to detect and deter the violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulations. Without admitting or denying the underlying allegations and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to entry of findings and the imposition of a cease and desist order, a fine of $5,000,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation and payment of the fine. MS&Co. entered into corresponding and related settlements with the CME and CBOT in which the CME found that MS&Co. violated CME Rules 432.Q and 538 and fined MS&Co. $750,000 and CBOT found that MS&Co. violated CBOT Rules 432.Q and 538 and fined MS&Co. $1,000,000.

On July 23, 2014, the SEC approved a settlement by MS&Co. and certain affiliates to resolve an investigation related to certain subprime RMBS transactions sponsored and underwritten by those entities in 2007. Pursuant to the settlement, MS&Co. and certain affiliates were charged with violating Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, agreed to pay disgorgement and penalties in an amount of $275 million and neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings.

On April 21, 2015, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE”) and the CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC (“CFE”) filed statements of charges against MS&Co. in connection with trading by one of MS&Co.’s former traders of EEM options contracts that allegedly disrupted the final settlement price of the November 2012 VXEM futures. CBOE alleged that MS&Co. violated CBOE Rules 4.1, 4.2 and 4.7, Sections 9(a) and 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. CFE alleged that MS&Co. violated CFE Rules 608, 609 and 620. The matters were resolved on June 28, 2016 without any findings of fraud.

29

On June 18, 2015, MS&Co. entered into a settlement with the SEC and paid a fine of $500,000 as part of the Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative to resolve allegations that MS&Co. failed to form a reasonable basis through adequate due diligence for believing the truthfulness of the assertions by issuers and/or obligors regarding their compliance with previous continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 in connection with offerings in which MS&Co. acted as senior or sole underwriter.

On August 6, 2015, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an order by the CFTC to resolve allegations that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 22.9(a) by failing to hold sufficient U.S. Dollars in cleared swap segregated accounts in the U.S. to meet all U.S. Dollar obligations to cleared swaps customers. Specifically, the CFTC found that while MS&Co. at all times held sufficient funds in segregation to cover its obligations to its customers, on certain days during 2013 and 2014, it held currencies, such as euros, instead of U.S. dollars, to meet its U.S. dollar obligations. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to have in place adequate procedures to ensure that it complied with Regulation 22.9(a). Without admitting or denying the findings or conclusions and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to the entry of findings, the imposition of a cease and desist order, a civil monetary penalty of $300,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation, and payment of the monetary penalty.

Civil Litigation

On December 23, 2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle filed a complaint against MS&Co. and another defendant in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, styled Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. The amended complaint, filed on September 28, 2010, alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $233 million. The complaint raises claims under the Washington State Securities Act and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. By orders dated June 23, 2011 and July 18, 2011, the court denied defendants’ omnibus motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint and on August 15, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s individual motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On March 7, 2013, the court granted defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial. The defendants’ joint motions for partial summary judgment were denied on November 9, 2015. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $44 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $44 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styled Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. et al. An amended complaint, filed on June 10, 2010, alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $276 million. The complaint raises claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On August 11, 2011, plaintiff’s federal securities law claims were dismissed with prejudice. On February 9, 2012, defendants’ demurrers with respect to all other claims were overruled. On December 20, 2013, plaintiff’s negligent misrepresentation claims were dismissed with prejudice. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in these cases was approximately $55 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of approximately $2 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss for this action up to the difference between the $55 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

30

On July 15, 2010, China Development Industrial Bank (“CDIB”) filed a complaint against MS&Co., styled China Development Industrial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated et al., which is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (“Supreme Court of NY”). The complaint relates to a $275 million credit default swap referencing the super senior portion of the STACK 2006-1 CDO. The complaint asserts claims for common law fraud, fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment and alleges that MS&Co. misrepresented the risks of the STACK 2006-1 CDO to CDIB, and that MS&Co. knew that the assets backing the CDO were of poor quality when it entered into the credit default swap with CDIB. The complaint seeks compensatory damages related to the approximately $228 million that CDIB alleges it has already lost under the credit default swap, rescission of CDIB’s obligation to pay an additional $12 million, punitive damages, equitable relief, fees and costs. On February 28, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss of up to approximately $240 million plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs.

On October 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Circuit Court of the State of Illinois, styled Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago v. Bank of America Funding Corporation et al. A corrected amended complaint was filed on April 8, 2011. The corrected amended complaint alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans and asserts claims under Illinois law. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. at issue in the action was approximately $203 million. The complaint seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the corrected amended complaint on May 27, 2011, which was denied on September 19, 2012. On December 13, 2013, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to one of the securitizations at issue. After that dismissal, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $78 million. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $49 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $49 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

On April 20, 2011, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts styled Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston v. Ally Financial, Inc. F/K/A GMAC LLC et al. An amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012 and alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $385 million. The amended complaint raises claims under the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act, the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and common law and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On May 26, 2011, defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint were granted in part and denied in part on September 30, 2013. On November 25, 2013, July 16, 2014, and May 19, 2015, respectively, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its claims against MS&Co. with respect to three of the securitizations at issue. After these voluntary dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $332 million. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $53 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $53 million unpaid balance of these

31

certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

On May 3, 2013, plaintiffs in Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co., certain affiliates, and other defendants in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff currently at issue in this action was approximately $644 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and rescission and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On June 10, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. MS&Co. perfected its appeal from that decision on June 12, 2015. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $258 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of approximately $84 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $258 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses.

On May 17, 2013, plaintiff in IKB International S.A. in Liquidation, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $132 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On October 29, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss. All claims regarding four certificates were dismissed. After these dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $116 million. On August 26, 2015, MS&Co. perfected its appeal from the court’s October 29, 2014 decision. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $26 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of $58 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $26 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

Settled Civil Litigation

On August 25, 2008, MS&Co. and two ratings agencies were named as defendants in a purported class action related to securities issued by a SIV called Cheyne Finance PLC and Cheyne Finance LLC (together, the “Cheyne SIV”). The case was styled Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, et al. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the ratings assigned to the securities issued by the Cheyne SIV were false and misleading, including because the ratings did not accurately reflect the risks associated with the subprime RMBS held by the Cheyne SIV. The plaintiffs asserted allegations of aiding and abetting fraud and negligent misrepresentation relating to approximately $852 million of securities issued by the Cheyne SIV. On April 24, 2013, the parties reached an agreement to settle the case, and on April 26, 2013, the court dismissed the action with prejudice.

32

On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styled Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. An amended complaint filed on June 10, 2010 alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $704 million. The complaint raised claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 26, 2015, as a result of a settlement with certain other defendants, the plaintiff requested and the court subsequently entered a dismissal with prejudice of certain of the plaintiff’s claims, including all remaining claims against MS&Co.

On July 9, 2010 and February 11, 2011, Cambridge Place Investment Management Inc. filed two separate complaints against MS&Co. and/or its affiliates and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, both styled Cambridge Place Investment Management Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., et al. The complaints asserted claims on behalf of certain clients of plaintiff’s affiliates and allege that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. and/or its affiliates or sold to plaintiff’s affiliates’ clients by MS&Co. and/or its affiliates in the two matters was approximately $263 million. On February 11, 2014, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation. On February 20, 2014, the court dismissed the action.

On October 25, 2010, MS&Co., certain affiliates and Pinnacle Performance Limited, a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”), were named as defendants in a purported class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), styled Ge Dandong, et al. v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd., et al. On January 31, 2014, the plaintiffs in the action, which related to securities issued by the SPV in Singapore, filed a second amended complaint, which asserted common law claims of fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraudulent inducement, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On July 17, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, which received final court approval on July 2, 2015.

On July 5, 2011, Allstate Insurance Company and certain of its affiliated entities filed a complaint against MS&Co. in the Supreme Court of NY, styled Allstate Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on September 9, 2011, and alleges that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued and/or sold to the plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $104 million. The complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation and seeks, among other things, compensatory and/or recessionary damages associated with the plaintiffs’ purchases of such certificates. On March 15, 2013, the court denied in substantial part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which order MS&Co. appealed on April 11, 2013. On May 3, 2013, MS&Co. filed its answer to the amended complaint. On January 16, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On July 18, 2011, the Western and Southern Life Insurance Company and certain affiliated companies filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Court of Common Pleas in Ohio, styled Western and Southern Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., et al. An amended complaint was filed on April 2, 2012 and alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of the certificates allegedly sold to plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $153 million. On June 8, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

33

On September 2, 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, filed 17 complaints against numerous financial services companies, including MS&Co. and certain affiliates. A complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates and other defendants was filed in the Supreme Court of NY, styled Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator v. Morgan Stanley et al. The complaint alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of residential mortgage pass-through certificates with an original unpaid balance of approximately $11 billion. The complaint raised claims under federal and state securities laws and common law and seeks, among other things, rescission and compensatory and punitive damages. On February 7, 2014, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation. On February 20, 2014, the court dismissed the action.

On April 25, 2012, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY, styled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012, and alleges that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten, and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $758 million. The amended complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, and aiding and abetting fraud and seeks, among other things, rescission, compensatory, and/or rescissionary damages, as well as punitive damages, associated with the plaintiffs’ purchases of such certificates. On April 11, 2014, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.

On April 25, 2012, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, styled The Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. On October 16, 2012, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $1.073 billion. The amended complaint raises claims under the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, as well as common law claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraud, fraudulent inducement, equitable fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and violations of the New Jersey RICO statute, and includes a claim for treble damages. On January 8, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

In re Morgan Stanley Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Litigation, which had been pending in the SDNY, was a putative class action involving allegations that, among other things, the registration statements and offering documents related to the offerings of certain mortgage pass-through certificates in 2006 and 2007 contained false and misleading information concerning the pools of residential loans that backed these securitizations. On December 18, 2014, the parties’ agreement to settle the litigation received final court approval, and on December 19, 2014, the court entered an order dismissing the action.

On November 4, 2011, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Franklin Bank S.S.B, filed two complaints against MS&Co. in the District Court of the State of Texas. Each was styled Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Franklin Bank, S.S.B v. Morgan Stanley & Company LLC F/K/A Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and alleged that MS&Co. made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly underwritten and sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. in these cases was approximately $67 million and $35 million, respectively. On July 2, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

34

On February 14, 2013, Bank Hapoalim B.M. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY, styled Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. Morgan Stanley et al. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $141 million. On July 28, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, and on August 12, 2015, the plaintiff filed a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice.

On September 23, 2013, the plaintiff in National Credit Union Administration Board v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the SDNY. The complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts in the sale to the plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates issued by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiffs in the matter was approximately $417 million. The complaint alleged violations of federal and various state securities laws and sought, among other things, rescissionary and compensatory damages. On November 23, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the matter.

On September 16, 2014, the Virginia Attorney General’s Office filed a civil lawsuit, styled Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Barclays Capital Inc., et al., against MS&Co. and several other defendants in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond related to RMBS. The lawsuit alleged that MS&Co. and the other defendants knowingly made misrepresentations and omissions related to the loans backing RMBS purchased by the Virginia Retirement System. The complaint asserts claims under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, as well as common law claims of actual and constructive fraud, and seeks, among other things, treble damages and civil penalties. On January 6, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation. An order dismissing the action with prejudice was entered on January 28, 2016.

Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future. In the course of its business, MS&Co., as a major futures commission merchant, is party to various civil actions, claims and routine regulatory investigations and proceedings that the General Partner believes do not have a material effect on the business of MS&Co. MS&Co. may establish reserves from time to time in connections with such actions.

35

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and under Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, there were no subscriptions of Redeemable Units. The Redeemable Units were issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The Redeemable Units were purchased by accredited investors as described in Regulation D. In determining the applicability of the exemption, the General Partner relied on the fact that the Redeemable Units were purchased by accredited investors in a private offering.

Proceeds from the sale of Redeemable Units are used in the trading of commodity interests including futures and forward contracts, and any other rights or interests pertaining thereto including interests in commodity pools.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

Period	(a) Total Number of Redeemable Units Purchased*		(b) Average Price Paid per Redeemable Unit**		(c) Total Number of Redeemable Units   Purchased as Part of   Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Redeemable Units that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1, 2016 - April 30, 2016		311.2080	$	973.91	N/A	N/A
May 1, 2016 - May 31, 2016		417.9820	$	939.42	N/A	N/A
June 1, 2016 - June 30, 2016		89.1980	$	978.52	N/A	N/A
		818.3880	$	956.80

* Generally, limited partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on three business days’ notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption, although to date, the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership’s business in connection with effecting redemptions for limited partners.

** Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the end of each month at the net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of that day. No fee will be charged for redemptions.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities — None.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures — Not Applicable.

Item 5.  Other Information — None.

36

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1 Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, dated December 1, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

(a) Amendment No. 1 to the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, dated August 8, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.1(b) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

(b) Amendment No. 2 to the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, dated January 1, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2 Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated March 21, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 10, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).

(a) Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated October 1, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 3.2(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

(b) Certificate of Change of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, effective January 31, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 3.2(b) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

(c) Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated May 21, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 3.2(c) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

(d) Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 21, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 3.2(d) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

(e) Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 19, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 3.2(e) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

(f) Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 28, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

(g) Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated June 29, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 3.2(g) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

(h) Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 2, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 3.2(h) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

(i) Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated November 30, 2012, (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

(j) Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of the State of New York, dated August 7, 2013, (filed as Exhibit 3.2(i) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

37

10.1 Amended and Restated Commodity Futures Customer Agreement between the Partnership and MS&Co., effective August 2, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

(a) U.S. Treasury Securities Purchase Authorization Agreement between the Partnership and MS&Co., effective June 1, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2 Form of Subscription Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3 Escrow Agreement among the General Partner, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management LLC and The Bank of New York (filed as Exhibit 10.7(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 27, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

(a) Amendment No. 5 to the Escrow Agreement among the General Partner, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management LLC and The Bank of New York (filed as Exhibit 10.7(b) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 27, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4 Management Agreement among the General Partner, the Partnership and Rabar Market Research Inc. dated as of December 1, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

(a) Letter from the General Partner extending Management Agreement with Rabar Market Research Inc. through June 30, 2016, dated June 1, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.5(b) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 28, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5 Amended and Restated Alternative Investment Selling Agent Agreement between the Partnership, the General Partner, and Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, effective March 3, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.6 Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, by and among Ceres Managed Futures LLC, SS&C Technologies, Inc. and the funds listed on Schedule C thereto, effective March 31, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit 31.1  – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).

Exhibit 31.2  – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).

Exhibit 32.1  – Section 1350 Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).

Exhibit 32.2  – Section 1350 Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).

101.INS          XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH        XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL        XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB        XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE        XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF        XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WESTPORT FUTURES FUND L.P.
By:	Ceres Managed Futures LLC
	(General Partner)
By:	/s/ Patrick T. Egan
	Patrick T. Egan
	President and Director
Date: August 11, 2016
By:	/s/ Steven Ross
	Steven Ross
	Chief Financial Officer and Director
	(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: August 11, 2016

39