-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, HQUx64oozvYjHaMjpPY4i6ySxvO1w4RLqWutFskJIUIU7AOJ9JP4dx5z6UWYfpID f1r63etPIjOLnfltLhNUeA== 0000929624-99-001865.txt : 19991029 0000929624-99-001865.hdr.sgml : 19991029 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000929624-99-001865 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19990630 FILED AS OF DATE: 19991028 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001036436 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE [7372] IRS NUMBER: 943120525 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 0630 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K/A SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-22605 FILM NUMBER: 99736438 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1155 MARKET ST 11TH FLOOR CITY: SAN FRANCISCO STATE: CA ZIP: 94103 BUSINESS PHONE: 4154371100 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1155 MARKET STREET,11TH FLOOR CITY: SAN FRANCISCO STATE: CA ZIP: 94103 10-K/A 1 FORM 10-K/A FOR PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 1999 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K/A ----------- Amendment No. 1 [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 Commission file number: 0-22605 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS -------------------------- LABORATORIES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) California 94-3120525 ---------- ---------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 1155 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94103 (Address of principal executive office, including Zip Code) (415) 437-1100 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock (no par value) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No --- --- Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. --- The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, as of September 24, 1999 was approximately $773 million (based on the closing price for shares of the Registrant's Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market System for that date). Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer, director, and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. On September 24, 1999 approximately 25,374,145 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock were outstanding. 1 PART I Certain statements contained in this report on Form 10-K including, without limitation, statements containing the words "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "expects" and words of similar import, constitute "forward- looking statements". Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1 under the heading "Risk Factors." Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Item 1. Business Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc ("Genesys" or the "Company") is a leading provider of enterprise-wide interaction management solutions for both traditional brick and mortar organizations and e-Businesses. The Company's products are designed to allow an organization to optimally manage its customer interactions and employee communications to increase productivity, lower costs and achieve greater customer satisfaction and loyalty. The company believes that successful, long term customer relationships are the result of managing and optimizing the individual interactions that transpire between an organization and its customers. To accomplish this, Genesys' software solutions, rooted in computer telephony integration technology, extend the capabilities of an organization's internet, computer, telecommunications and database systems, bringing together what were once disparate technologies. The Company anticipates that as customer interactions are increasingly viewed as strategic to an organization's mission, contact center capabilities will be extended beyond traditional agent, site and switch boundaries, transforming the entire enterprise into a customer interaction center. The Genesys Suite is made up of two integrated elements: an open, scalable, standards-based framework, and a broad integrated suite of applications, which enable Internet and telephony-based interactions, enterprise routing, network routing, outbound dialing and workforce management capabilities. With the ability to integrate multiple communications media, the Genesys Suite supports customer interactions via e-mail, the Internet and traditional voice thereby enabling consistent customer contact regardless of the communications channel. The open, standards-based nature of the Company's framework product allows an organization to leverage its investments in its existing telecommunications and computing infrastructure, software applications and employee training. The Company's products support the integration of internally developed or commercially available business applications, such as help desk or sales force automation. In order to assist customers in realizing the maximum benefit from its solutions, the Company augments its software products with a range of professional service offerings, including implementation, training and support services. To date, the Company has licensed its products to approximately 650 end-users worldwide. Background In the increasingly complex global business environment, an organization's ability to manage the increased information demands of customers and employees in a cost-effective manner is an important competitive advantage. In response to these competitive pressures, the delivery of high-quality, cost-effective services has become critical in differentiating an organization's product or service offerings and expanding its market share. To provide higher quality customer interactions and optimize communications with employees, organizations need to integrate critical business information and computing resources with telephony and other communications media. Organizations today communicate, both internally and externally, through a variety of media, including voice, e-mail and the Internet. Traditionally, each of these media and their associated databases and information retrieval systems has been developed as a point solution and treated as an independent environment. This has limited productivity, increased costs and restricted the ability of organizations to improve customer satisfaction and loyalty. Recognizing the limitations of these "silos" and the inherent value of their information assets to enhance customer interactions, organizations are seeking a flexible means to integrate communications media and computing platforms in order to optimize flows of information to the call/contact center, and across the enterprise. It has now become a requirement that organizations blend media to more optimally manage their global customer management strategies. To be most effective, organizations need to make information available at any time it is needed, anywhere it may be located and in any way that it may be requested. 2 A number of general business trends are also contributing to the increasing importance of integrating communications media and computing platforms. They include: . The increasingly global nature of business operations, which has significantly complicated the task of managing information and providing expertise in a real-time, cost-effective manner. . The proliferation of distributed computing environments, which has resulted in the broader dissemination of information--particularly through enterprise software applications that address key business functions such as customer service, finance, human resources, sales and marketing and supply chain management--and increased the complexity of accessing this information. . The deregulation of major industries, specifically telecommunications, banking, health care and utilities, which has resulted in increased competition, new business opportunities, and a drive to deliver new and enhanced services as a means of competitive differentiation. . The increase in merger/acquisition and partnering activity, which has forced organizations to integrate complex, disparate telecommunications and computing systems, while maintaining high-quality customer service without disrupting or delaying access to critical business information. . The convergence of traditional (brick and mortar) and new (e-Business) business models, whereby established brick and mortar companies are recognizing the need to interact with customers via the Internet and e- Businesses are recognizing the need to add voice capabilities. Organizations have confronted a variety of complex business and technological issues associated with intelligently accessing customer information in a real- time, automated and cost-effective manner. The initial response to these issues was the establishment of formal voice-based call centers, where hundreds of customer service representatives occupy a dedicated facility with systems designed specifically to address high levels of customer inquiry. Typically, these call centers have been automated at the hardware level (i.e., the telephone switch) through automated call distribution ("ACD") and interactive voice response ("IVR") systems. In the face of competitive pressures, the stand-alone nature of these systems is becoming increasingly burdensome to organizations. The appropriate person to handle certain customer interactions or employee inquiries may no longer be a call center representative with limited, generic training, but might instead be a more experienced or specialized employee either in the call center or located elsewhere within the enterprise. Providing intelligent access to these employees and furnishing them with pertinent information at the time of the customer inquiry requires a level of sophistication and flexibility beyond the reach of traditional ACD, IVR and call center solutions. Shortcomings in the traditional method that organizations have managed customer interactions and employee communications, in combination with the general business trends noted above, have created what the Company believes to be a significant market opportunity for computer telephony and sophisticated interaction management solutions with the following characteristics: . a high-performance, scaleable and flexible platform that can readily integrate with existing computer architectures and business applications, thereby preserving an organization's investment in its infrastructure and applications; . a suite of comprehensive integrated business applications that address a wide variety of customer needs; . intelligent, real-time integration of and access to information matched to customer and employee needs across different media channels and throughout the organization; and . a consistent level of functionality based on the underlying infrastructure. The Company believes that solutions with these characteristics will allow most organizations to increase productivity, lower costs and achieve greater customer satisfaction and loyalty, as well as enable organizations to develop and offer new or enhanced revenue-generating services. 3 The Genesys Solution Genesys believes that its solutions offer an innovative approach to computer telephony and interaction management that addresses many of the limitations inherent in traditional call centers. The Company's solutions provide the following features and benefits: Open, Scaleable and Media-Independent Platform The Company's open platform intelligently manages the convergence of disparate telecommunications media and heterogeneous computing environments. The Company's platform is designed to scale with increases in the volume of customer inquiries and growth in the number of customer service representatives and geographic locations. The Company's platform readily integrates with a broad range of proprietary telephone switching platforms, IVRs and major computing platforms, operating systems and databases. With the ability to integrate multiple communications media, the Company's platform supports customer interactions via e-mail and the Internet, as well as traditional voice calls. In addition, the Genesys platform is designed to integrate with products developed by third parties and customers' internal development teams. The Genesys platform also supports many software development and network communications standards. This open systems approach is designed to enable an organization to leverage its investments in its existing infrastructure, software applications and employee training. Broad Portfolio of Interaction Management Solutions Genesys offers a broad array of integrated business applications that provide a wide range of interaction management capabilities for both traditional (brick and mortar) organizations and new e-Businesses. These applications include network and enterprise call routing, Internet-based interaction management, workforce management, outbound/blended dialing, and real-time and historical reporting. These applications are designed to integrate with an organization's existing telecommunications and computing infrastructure. Genesys also offers a sophisticated computer telephony integration ("CTI") development environment to enable an organization to develop its own applications and integrate applications from other vendors into the Genesys framework. Enhanced Customer Interactions The Company's solutions enable an organization to improve its interactions with its customers, resulting in increased customer satisfaction and loyalty. For example, the Genesys enterprise routing solution may be utilized for the real-time analysis of critical information, including a customer's account profile, financial position and the nature of past interactions, in order to direct incoming interactions to the representative with the skills, attributes and experience necessary to best address the customer's needs. In addition, the Company's products extend the boundaries of the call center to enable a customer inquiry to be routed to more specialized personnel located throughout the organization, regardless of their location. This becomes more 99, Genesys introduced to the market place its integrated Internet Suite and workforce management solutions extending the product line to meet new and existing challenges within the enterprise. These new products are described below. Framework Genesys T-Server Framework. The Genesys framework is based upon T-Server Framework, the Company's platform product, which provides an open, scalable base for interaction management solutions. T-Server Framework integrates diverse telephony systems, enterprise databases, agent desktop applications, call center applications and multiple communications media (e.g. e-mail, Web-based interactions, fax, etc.) into a unified customer interaction foundation. It is compatible with most major PBXs, IVRs and ACDs and most major computing platforms, operating systems and databases. T-Server Framework is designed to scale with increases in the volume of customer inquiries, growth in the number of customer service representatives and expansion to multiple sites in multiple geographies. Additional features include the ability to transfer voice and data across sites regardless of the switch type and the immediate presentation of customer data on the agent's screen (known as a "screen pop"). Other features include a dynamic call center configuration management feature which provides a single point of configuration for the entire call center in real time, and the inclusion of a Desktop Toolkit feature, which enables integration of desktop applications on top of the Genesys platform. 4 Solutions Offerings - ------------------- Genesys' Internet Contact Center Solution. The Genesys Internet contact center solution provides a means to handle both Internet-based and voice interactions to create a consistent customer interface irregardless of the media channel chosen by the customers. The solution routes incoming interactions through a "universal queue," which treats all media interactions moving through the contact center as manageable "events," so that the various media gateways - ACDs, IVRs, and media servers for e-mail, chat and VOIP -- interface and speak a common language. The Genesys Internet contact center solution supports the following Internet-based customer communication channels: Genesys E-Mail allows contact center agents to respond to customer e-mail -------------- inquiries with the same personalized care as traditional voice interactions. Genesys E-mail can automatically respond and/or suggest responses to incoming e-mail based on business rules defined by contact center managers. Genesys Chat enables real-time text communication through a Web browser. Web ------------ users can enter questions or comments into their browsers and view responses from an agent in real time. Genesys Web Call Back makes it possible for customers visiting a company's Web --------------------- site to request a telephone call back from a contact center agent either immediately or at a more convenient time. Genesys Web Call Through (voice over IP) allows Web users to speak to customer ------------------------ representatives via their computer, using standard Internet phone software. Genesys Web Collaboration allows contact center agents and customers to ------------------------- automatically synchronize Internet browsers and simultaneously surf the Internet. Agents can assist customers in learning how to find solutions or use features on the Internet site. Genesys' Network Routing Solutions. The Genesys network routing solution enables customer or employee inquiries to be routed from the carrier's network to a company's multiple call center sites. The Genesys solution allows contact center managers to manage agents located at geographically dispersed sites as if they were in one virtual contact center. When an interaction arrives at the carrier's network, Genesys' network routing solution applies basic customer- defined criteria to identify, segment, and route the interaction. Routing criteria are unique for each business and can be based upon real-time statistics, customer-stored data, or customer-defined business rules and situations. Calls are routed dynamically to balance the load of calls across multiple sites. The network routing solution achieves this load balancing by continuously tracking real-time statistics, such as length of queues, call volumes, availability of agent skill sets, etc., throughout the virtual call center in order to match an incoming call with the best resource for that specific moment in time. Balancing interaction volume across multiple sites smoothes out the peaks and valleys at individual contact center sites, reducing customer "on hold" times, along with the associated telecommunications costs. Genesys' Enterprise Routing Solution. The Genesys enterprise routing solution is an intelligent, data driven routing application. Using an enterprise's business rules and objectives, the solution can route and transfer inbound voice calls, e-mails, Web-based interactions and other forms of communications based on a wide variety of criteria and conditions, (i) including: call information such as caller ID, automatic number identification (ANI), dialed number identification service (DNIS), caller-entered digits (CED) or IVR data; (ii) customer information from enterprise databases, enterprise resource planning applications, and customer interaction software; agent or group skill sets and skill levels; (iii) telephony statistics for agents, groups, routing points, or queues; (iv) particular conditions, dates or times; and (v) pre-defined service level objectives for different categories of callers; and pre-defined disaster recovery scenarios. The Genesys solution includes a graphical Strategy Builder that allows call centers to design customized routing strategies. The Strategy Builder features a drag-and-drop interface, compiler and debugger that tests and simulates strategies before loading, flexible scheduling for strategy loading, and the ability to redesign and load new strategies during real-time call center operations. Genesys' Workforce Management Solution: Genesys' workforce management solution allows contact center managers to analyze historical customer interaction statistics, accurately forecast customer service demands, and create appropriate staffing schedules to optimize the desired quality of service in the contact center. Traditional solutions are stand alone and only focused on voice interactions. The Genesys workforce management solution is integrated to the Genesys framework and leverages the configuration of staffing and skills being used to manage the Interaction environment, but more importantly, a multi- switch, -call center, -media environment of today's complex enterprise. This new solution offers advanced capabilities to improve customer service and minimize payroll and telecommunications expenses. The Genesys workforce management solution also tracks adherence to staffing schedules and forecasted customer contact volumes in real time, giving contact center managers flexibility to make immediate, intra-day scheduling adjustments should customer contact volumes suddenly fluctuate. 5 Genesys' Outbound Dialing Solution. Genesys' outbound dialing solution is an advanced, predictive dialing application that manages outbound campaigns and blends inbound and outbound calling. The solution allows contact center managers to design flexible, cost-effective outbound campaigns that increase sales, improve customer interactions and reduce costs. For blended campaigns, the Genesys solution is able to regulate the volume of outbound calls based on traffic to inbound services in order to optimize agent productivity and streamline staffing. Other features include: call-result detection, which enables customers to undertake large-scale, high-volume outbound call campaigns while minimizing agent downtime between calls; automated call-back management, which initiates outbound calls in response to customer requests generated by the Internet, IVR, ANI/DNIS, or even abandoned calls; an Outbound Scripting option that guides agents through pre-determined sales dialog; and displays of agent and campaign performance statistics in real time to help supervisors evaluate campaign success. Genesys' Historical Reporting Solution. Genesys historical reporting solution tracks and stores data related to call center activity. It creates a historical record for each call, tracing its path from the moment the contact enters the call center, through transfers and conferencing, to the call's final termination. In addition to voice calls, the Genesys solution tracks e-mail and Web-based interactions, providing a comprehensive analysis of customer interactions. The solution integrates with major databases such as Oracle, Sybase, Informix, DB2, and Microsoft SQL Server. Managers can produce standard reports or create customized reports using a Genesys tool or any third-party reporting tool. Additional features include: the ability to analyze the entire call center operation across multiple platforms and sites, and accessibility from virtually any desktop with Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer. Genesys' Real-Time Reporting Solution. Designed to give call center managers a measure of contact center effectiveness and efficiency, Genesys' real-time reporting solution monitors real-time activities across the contact center and provides a graphical display of these activities by agent, group or queue. The solution provides a unified, real-time view of a company's call centers across multiple sites, PBXs, platforms, and databases. The real-time reporting solution offers customizable views of interaction objects (agents, agent groups, queues, virtual queues, routing points and virtual routing points). A contact center supervisor can monitor the current state or status of the objects throughout the contact center to help make decisions about staffing, schedules and call/interaction routing strategies. Administrators can create business filters to separate statistics by customer segmentation and non-call properties and can apply filters to statistics as needed. A new feature of the real-time reporting suite improves reporting on business data by allowing contact center administrators to create statistics with formulas to calculate values specific to the contact center needs, i.e. revenue generated by a group of agents over a specific time period. Sample statistics include: number of inbound and outbound calls; number of calls handled; average time spent on the phone, compared to the total time required to handle the call; number of agents in each agent state; estimated number of calls that agents or groups can handle in an hour; number of agents logged on and available; average speed of answer; average time to abandon; and percentage of answered calls and percentage of abandoned calls. The real-time reporting solution also features flexible viewing options with customizable time profiles for calculating statistics, and object-based views of agents, groups, and call centers, which allow supervisors to monitor one or more agents or predetermined groups. Genesys' real-time reporting solution also provides each contact center agent with a real-time measure of his or her own performance. Agents can access current status information and cumulative statistics of key performance measures, by hour and by day. This tool allows each agent to review performance data elements throughout a shift, and make adjustments to more effectively allocate the agent's time and maximize his or her contribution to the call center. The Genesys solution also allows each agent to compare his or her performance to a group, and allows managers to set thresholds and statistical alarms to enforce specific parameters for agents. Customers As of June 30 1999, Genesys had, directly or indirectly through VARs, systems integrators and resellers, licensed its products to approximately 650 end-users worldwide. In fiscal 1999, no customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenues. In fiscal 1998 and 1997, MCI Telecommunications accounted for 14.1% and 11.1%, respectively, of total revenues. See "Risk Factors--Customer Concentration". Sales and Marketing The Company's sales strategy is to target large organizations through its worldwide direct sales force as well as through a broad range of indirect channels, including telecommunications equipment vendors, systems integrators, VARs, ISVs and NSPs. The Company's worldwide sales headquarters is located in San Francisco, California. Domestic sales offices are located in California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Virginia and Washington. Internationally, the Company has sales offices or other representation in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Israel, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. 6 Direct Sales The Company employs a direct sales force to market is products and services worldwide. As of June 30, 1999, the Company's sales and marketing staff consisted of 246 employees. Sales representatives are assigned quotas and compensated for all revenues generated within their assigned territories and/or accounts. The Company intends to expand its sales capabilities in the future. Many initial sales include a pilot implementation of the Company's products, successful completion of which is typically a prerequisite to full scale deployment. While the sales cycle varies from customer to customer, it typically ranges from three to nine months. See "Risk Factors--Lengthy Sales Cycle". Indirect Sales In order to enhance its revenue generation and implementation capabilities and extend its market reach, the Company complements its direct sales organization with a network of distribution partners, including systems integrators, VARs, telecommunications equipment and computer hardware vendors, NSPs and ISVs. While the majority of the Company's U.S. sales were direct, the percentage of reseller sales is increasing in the U.S. market. Internationally, large proportions of sales are executed via the indirect channel. See "Risk Factors--Dependence on Third-Party Resellers". . VARs and systems integrators such as Ameritech, BT, Bell Atlantic Call Center Solutions, Cambridge Technology Partners, CapGemini, Deloitte & Touche LLP, PWC, SAIC, SEMA and TSC market, distribute and implement the Company's products. The VARs and systems integrators represent a critical product delivery and implementation channel for the Company. . Telecommunications equipment and computer hardware vendors such as Alcatel, Compaq, NCR, Rockwell, Siemens and Unisys market and distribute Genesys products as part of a packaged solution with their own products. . ISV partners such as Clarify, SAP, Siebel Systems and Vantive integrate Genesys solutions with their own software products. The Company's ISV relationships are also an important source of sales leads. . NSPs such as BT, MCI, NBTel and Telsstra have entered into a broad range of relationships with the Company, including the resale of the Company's products and the provision of services utilizing the Company's products. International Sales Revenues outside of the United States accounted for 49.9%, 44.7% and 33.4% for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1999, 1998, and 1997 respectively. The Company has international sales offices or other representation in 18 countries and intends to continue broadening its international presence. A significant portion of international sales is currently conducted through indirect sales channels. The Company believes that international revenues will continue to represent a significant portion of its total revenues. The ability of the Company to expand internationally, however, is limited to those countries where there is regulatory approval of the third party telephony hardware supported by the T- Server Framework. See "Risk Factors--Risks Associated with International Sales and Operations". Support Services Support services, including maintenance, implementation, consulting, installation and training, are an important element of the overall Genesys solution. The Company intends to devote additional resources to supporting its customers and providing training to indirect channels as the Genesys platform becomes more widely adopted. There can be no assurance the Company will be successful in its efforts to provide sufficient resources to expand its customer support capabilities. See "Risk Factors--Lengthy Sales Cycle" and "--Dependence on Third-Party Resellers". Professional Services Consulting and systems integration services are provided directly by the Company's Professional Services group, as well as through alliances with major systems integrators, VARs and mid-tier consulting firms. The Genesys Professional Services group offers a range of services designed to support the customer's deployment of the Genesys Suite of products, working either directly with the customer or in conjunction with Genesys certified partners to provide the following types of services: scope and design, installation, development, testing and rollout. Genesys certified partners offer a broader range of services 7 including business planning, business process reengineering, call center operations, as well as integration, implementation, and support of Genesys products. Technical Support Genesys Technical Support provides expert-level support to augment customers' technical resources. Currently, Genesys technical support personnel deliver services world-wide from locations in Wokingham, United Kingdom; St. John, New Brunswick, Canada; and San Francisco, CA. Support is provided on a 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. or 7 by 24 basis, utilizing a combination of live support and pager notification. Genesys utilizes a tracking and reporting process that is integrated to all Genesys support locations to provide a proactive monitoring of customer environments and events. Educational Services Genesys University offers curriculum that addresses the entire Genesys product suite and a rigorous certification program to ensure the transfer of knowledge to the attendee and skills development to be able to implement the Genesys product suite. The certification program is offered to Genesys customers and end-users, as well as a requirement of Genesys employees and partners implementing Genesys products. Today, Genesys currently offers three certification programs: a Certified Genesys Engineer (CGE) program intended for those who will install, configure, maintain and troubleshoot enterprise-wide or single site contact center solutions; a Certified Genesys Developer (CGD) program intended for software developers who will develop applications supported by the Genesys framework; and a Certified Genesys Routing Professional (CGRP) program intended for professionals who design and implement complex business- rules-based routing strategies for the enterprise. In addition, Genesys offers a selection of sales and marketing courses intended for its partners and designed to provide tools and techniques for use in the selling and marketing of Genesys products in conjunction with partners' products or services. Research and Development Rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, and changes in customer requirements and emerging industry standards characterize the market for the Company's products. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render the Company's existing products obsolete and unmarketable. The life cycles of the Company's products are difficult to estimate. The Company's future success will depend upon its ability to develop and introduce new products and product enhancements on a timely basis that keep pace with technological developments and emerging industry standards and address increasingly sophisticated requirements of its customers. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in developing and marketing new products or product enhancements that respond to technological changes or evolving industry standards, that the Company will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of these new products or product enhancements, or that its new products or product enhancements will adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance. If the Company is unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop and market new products or product enhancements in a timely and cost- effective manner, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. Genesys believes that strong product development capabilities are essential to its strategy of building an industry standard platform, maintaining the competitiveness of its current product suite and adding new features and functionality to the Genesys platform and applications. The Company's product development team consists of professionals with expertise in software, telecommunications and computer hardware. From its founding, the Company has believed that this combination of diverse technical and communications expertise contributes to the highly integrated functionality of its software products and thereby provides the Company with a significant competitive advantage. Research and development expenses were $24.4 million, $15.3 million, and $9.4 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1999, 1998, and 1997. In addition, the Company capitalized software development costs totaling $4.8 million and $1.9 million in fiscal 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Company's total research and development staff consisted of 217 employees as of June 30, 1999. The Company expects that it will continue to increase research and development expenditures in the future. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". The Company's current product development efforts are focused on enhancements to the Genesys platform, new releases of many of the Company's applications, and new products designed to enhance the overall strength of the Genesys Suite. There can be no assurance that these development efforts will be completed within the Company's anticipated schedules or that, if 8 completed, they will have the features necessary to make them successful in the marketplace. Moreover, products as complex as the Company's may contain undetected errors or failures when first introduced or as new versions are released. Errors in new products may be found after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or delay in market acceptance. Future delays in the development or marketing of product enhancements or new products could result in a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Business--Solutions" and "Risk Factors--Dependence on New Products; Rapid Technological Change". Competition The market for the Company's software products is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change, and is significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. To date, the Company experienced significant competition and expects competition to increase significantly in the future. The Company's principal competition currently comes from different market segments including computer telephony platform developers, computer telephony applications software developers and telecommunications equipment vendors. These competitors include Aspect Telecommunications, Cisco Systems, Inc., Davox Corporation, Dialogic Corporation, Hewlett-Packard, IBM Corporation, IEX Corporation, Kana Communications, Lucent Technologies, Melita International, Northern Telecom, Quintus Corporation and Siebel Systems. The Company also competes to a lesser extent with new or recent entrants to the marketplace. The Company's competitors vary in size and in the scope and breadth of the products and services offered. Many of the Company's current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, customer service and other resources, greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than the Company. As a result, such competitors may be able to respond to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements more expediently than the Company, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of products than can the Company. Current and potential competitors have established and may in the future establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to address the needs of the Company's current or prospective customers. In addition, as the market for the Company's products develops, a number of companies with significantly greater resources than the Company could attempt to increase their presence in the market by acquiring or forming strategic alliances with competitors of the Company. Accordingly, it is likely that new competitors or alliances among competitors will emerge and may rapidly acquire significant market share, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because there are relatively low barriers to entry in the software market, the Company expects additional competition. Increased competition is likely to result in price reductions, reduced margins and loss of market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In order to be successful in the future, the Company must respond promptly and effectively to the challenges of technological change, changing customer requirements and competitors' innovations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that competitive pressures faced by the Company will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Risk Factors--Competition". Intellectual Property The Company's success is heavily dependent upon its proprietary technology. The Company relies primarily on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions to protect its proprietary rights. The Company presently has 16 U.S. patents issued, and 13 for which the issue fee is paid and the patents will soon issue. In addition, Genesys has 111 U.S. patent applications, 41 PCT International applications, and 14 National applications in countries foreign to the U.S. (five in Japan, six in Europe, two in Canada, and one in Australia). See "Risk Factors--Protection of Intellectual Property." Employees At June 30, 1999, the Company had 730 employees worldwide, of which 217 were primarily engaged in research and development, 172 in customer service, 246 in sales and marketing and 95 in finance and administration. The Company's future performance will depend significantly upon the continued contributions of its executive officers, technical, marketing, sales and customer service personnel and its continuing ability to attract, train and retain highly qualified personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and the failure to attract, train and retain such personnel in the future on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. None of the Company's 9 employees is represented by a collective bargaining agreement and the Company has never experienced any work stoppages. See "Risk Factors--Governmental Regulation of Immigration" and "--Management of Growth". RISK FACTORS In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report, the following additional risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company and its business. Certain statements contained in this Annual Report, including, without limitation, statements containing the words "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "expects" and words of similar import, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Operating Results The Company's quarterly operating results have varied significantly in the past. The company's quarterly revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside the Company's control. These factors include: . market acceptance of Genesys' products; . competition; . the size, timing and recognition of revenue from significant orders; . the ability to develop and market new products and product enhancements; . new product releases by the Company and its competitors and the timing of such releases; . the length of sales and implementation cycles; . the ability to integrate acquired businesses; . the Company's success in establishing indirect sales channels and expanding its direct sales force; . the Company's success in retaining and training third-party support personnel; . the delay or deferral of significant revenues until acceptance of software required by any specific license transaction; . the deferral of customer orders in anticipation of new products and product enhancements; . changes in pricing policies by the Company and its competitors; . the mix of revenues derived from the Company's direct sales force and various indirect distribution and marketing channels; . the mix of revenues derived from domestic and international customers; . seasonal fluctuations in our sales cycles; . changes in relationships with strategic partners; . personnel changes; . foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; . the ability to control its costs; and . general economic factors. The Company has a limited backlog of orders and total revenues for any future quarter are difficult to predict. The Company's revenues and operating results depend upon the amount and timing of customer orders that it receives in a given quarter. In the past, Genesys has recognized a substantial portion of its revenues in the last month of a quarter. If this trend continues, any failure or delay to fulfill orders by the end of a particular quarter will harm its business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result of these and other factors, the Company believes that period-to-period comparisons of its historical results or operations are not a good predictor of its future performance. If the Company's future operating results are below the expectations of stock market analysts, its stock price may decline. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". 10 Lengthy Sales Cycle The long sales and implementation cycles for the Company's products may cause revenues and operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter. A customer's decision to purchase the Company's products involves a significant commitment of its resources and a lengthy evaluation process. Throughout the sales cycle, Genesys often spends considerable time educating and providing information to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of the Company's products. The cost of the Company's products is typically only a small portion of the related hardware, software, development, training and integration costs associated with implementing an overall solution. As a result, the Company's sales cycle may be lengthy. Although it varies substantially from customer to customer, Genesys' sales cycle generally lasts from three to nine months or more. Even after making the decision to purchase the Company's products, its customers tend to deploy them slowly. Deployment of the Company's products extends from a few weeks to several months depending on the complexity of a customer's telecommunications and computing infrastructure. Deployment also may involve a pilot implementation phase, the successful completion of which is typically a prerequisite for full-scale deployment. This deployment may present significant technical challenges, particularly as large numbers of employees of a customer attempt to use the Company's products concurrently. Because of their complexity, larger implementations, especially multi-site or enterprise-wide implementations, can take several quarters. Genesys generally relies upon internal resources or third-party consultants to assist in the implementation of the Company's products. The Company has experienced difficulty implementing customer orders on a timely basis in the past due to the limited personnel resources available to the Company. The Company cannot guarantee that it will not experience delays in the implementation of orders in the future, or that third-party consultants will be available as needed by the Company. As a result of this lengthy sales and deployment cycle, the Company may experience a delay in the recognition of applicable license revenue. In addition, the delays inherent in such a lengthy sales and deployment cycle raise the risks that the Company's customers may decide to cancel or change their orders, which could result in the loss of anticipated revenue. The Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would suffer if the customers reduce or delay their orders or choose not to release products using our technology. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business--Sales and Marketing". Customer Concentration A significant portion of the Company's revenues has been recognized from a limited number of customers. For example, in fiscal 1999, no customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenues. In fiscal 1998 and 1997, MCI Telecommunications accounted for 14.1% and 11.1%, respectively, of total revenues. The Company expects that a majority of its revenues will continue to depend on sales of products to a small number of customers. The Company also expects that customers will vary from period-to-period. In general, the Company's customers have acquired fully paid licenses to the installed product and are not contractually obligated to license or purchase additional products or services from us. If the Company fails to successfully sell its products to one or more targeted customers in any particular period, or one or more customers defer or cancel their orders, the Company's revenues and results of operations could be harmed. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business--Sales and Marketing". Competition If the Company were unable to maintain its market share in the intensely competitive software market, its financial condition and results of operations would be harmed. Genesys' competitors include companies such as: . computer telephony platform developers; . computer telephony applications software developers; and . telecommunications equipment vendors. These competitors include Aspect Communications, Cisco Systems, Davox Corporation, Dialogic Corporation, Hewlett-Packard, IBM Corporation, IEX Corporation, Kana Communications, Lucent Technologies, Melita International Corporation, Nortel Networks, Quintus Corporation and Siebel Systems. Several of these competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater resources, greater name recognition and a larger customer base than the Company. Genesys expects to continue to encounter significant competition from these and other sources. In addition, as the market for the Company's products develops, companies with greater resources may attempt to increase their presence in the market by acquiring or forming strategic alliances with the Company's competitors. If new competitors or alliances among current competitors emerge and acquire significant market share, the Company's business and results of operations could be seriously harmed. 11 Dependence on New Products; Rapid Technological Change Rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards characterize the market for the Company's products. The introduction by competitors of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render the Company's existing products obsolete. Genesys' future success also will depend upon its ability to develop and manage key customer relationships in order to introduce a variety of new products and product enhancements that address the increasingly sophisticated needs of its customers. The Company's failure to establish and maintain these customer relationships may adversely affect the ability to develop new product and product enhancements. In addition, the Company may experience delays in releasing new products and product enhancements in the future. Material delays in introducing new products and enhancements or the Company's inability to introduce competitive new products may cause customers to forego purchases of the Company's products and purchase those of competitors. Due to the complexity of Genesys' software and the difficulty in gauging the engineering effort required to produce new products and product enhancements, these planned products and product enhancements can require long development and testing periods. As a result, significant delays in the general availability of such new releases or significant problems in the installation or implementation of such new releases could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. The Company has experienced delays in the past releasing new products and new product enhancements. The Company cannot guarantee that it will be successful in the future in: . developing and marketing, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products or new product enhancements that respond to technological change, evolving industry standards or customer requirements; . avoiding difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction or marketing of these products; or . achieving market acceptance for the Company's new products and product enhancements. Software products, like those offered by the Company, might contain errors or defects, which are sometimes called "bugs". These bugs are particularly common when new products are first introduced or as new versions or enhancements to old products are released. In the past, the Company has discovered software errors in certain of its new products after their introduction. Despite testing, current versions, new versions or enhancements may still have defects and errors after they are shipped to customers. The presence of such bugs could lead to lost revenues or delays in market acceptance, which could harm the Company's business and operating results. Integration of Acquired Businesses into the Company; Risks Associated with Acquisitions The Company continually evaluates strategic acquisitions of businesses and technologies that would complement its products or enhance its market coverage or technological capabilities. In December 1998, Genesys acquired Plato Software Corporation and in June 1999, it acquired Next Age Technology, Inc. The Company may continue to make such acquisitions and investments in the future and there are a number of risks that future transactions could entail. These risks include the following: . inability to successfully integrate or commercialize acquired technologies or otherwise realize anticipated synergies or economies of scale on a timely basis; . the diversion of management's attention; . the disruption of the Company's ongoing business; . inability to retain technical and managerial personnel for both companies; . inability to establish and maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and processes; . negative response by the government or our competitors to the proposed transactions; and . the impairment of our relationships with employees, vendors, and/or customers. In addition, the Company could affect future acquisitions without shareholder approval. Acquisitions could dilute shareholder equity, or cause the Company to incur debt and contingent liabilities and amortize acquisition expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets. The occurrence of any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. 12 Management of Growth The Company has experienced a period of rapid growth and expansion that has placed and will continue to place a significant strain on its resources. During this period, the Company has experienced revenue growth, an increase in the number of employees, an expansion in the scope of its operating and financial systems and an expansion in the geographic area of its operations. As of June 30, 1999, the Company had approximately 730 employees, as compared to approximately 538 on June 30, 1998 and 370 on June 30, 1997. The Company anticipates that it will expand further to address potential growth in its customer base and market opportunities. The Company expects to add additional key personnel in the near future. To manage this anticipated growth, the Company will be required to successfully do the following things: . improve and enhance its operational, financial and management information controls, reporting systems and procedures; . hire, train and manage additional qualified personnel; . expand and upgrade its core technologies; and . effectively manage multiple relationships with customers, suppliers and other third parties. The Company's systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support its operations. If the Company fails to improve its operational, financial and management information systems, or to hire, train, motivate or manage its employees, the business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business--Sales, Marketing and Support". Dependence on Third-Party Resellers The Company's success depends on its ability to continue to develop channels with third-party resellers such as original equipment manufacturers, systems integrators and telecommunications switch vendors. The Company has entered into reseller agreements with some of the telecommunications switch vendors, including those that compete with Genesys. Genesys is also seeking to establish strategic relationships with independent software vendors. Genesys does not have a substantial direct sales force and derives a significant portion of its revenue from its third-party resellers. Many of these third-party resellers do not have minimum purchase or resale requirements and can cease marketing the Company's products at any time. These sales channels could be affected by a number of additional factors including: . pressures placed on third-party resellers to sell competing products; . competing product lines offered by certain third-party resellers; . failure to adequately support the third-party resellers; . failure of current third-party resellers to provide the level of services and technical support required by Genesys' customers; . loss of a significant number of third-party resellers; and . failure to attract and retain third-party resellers who have the expertise necessary to successfully sell the Company's products. 13 Even if Genesys is able to increase its sales through third-party reseller's, those sales may be at more discounted rates. This would result in lower revenues to the Company than what it would generate by licensing the same products to customers directly. The Company is also seeking to incorporate its products into the products offered by telecommunications switch vendors and local and long distance network carriers. In the near term, the Company is focused on enabling network service providers to offer computer telephony integration services to their business customers. The Company cannot guarantee that it will be able to establish relationships with network service providers or telecommunication switch vendors or that they will successfully incorporate Genesys' products into theirs. The Company also cannot guarantee that its corporate partners or its business customers will be interested in purchasing products that incorporate Genesys software and are offered by network service providers or telecommunications switch vendors. If the Company fails to develop this sales channel, its business and results of operations could be harmed. Dependence on Emerging Market The market for customer interaction software, particularly across multiple media channels, is an emerging market that is extremely competitive and highly fragmented. This market is currently evolving and subject to rapid technological change. The Company's success will depend in large part on continued growth in the number of organizations adopting customer interaction solutions across multiple media channels. The market for Genesys' products is relatively new and undeveloped, and recent customers and prospective customers have little experience with deploying, maintaining or managing customer interaction solutions. If this market demand fails to develop, or develops more slowly than the Company currently anticipates, could have a material adverse effect on the demand for the Company's products and on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Risks Associated With International Sales and Operations For the fiscal years ended June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company derived 49.9%, 44.7% and 33.4% of its total revenues, respectively, from sales outside the United States. The Company anticipates that a significant portion of its revenues will continue to be concentrated in international markets for the foreseeable future. The Company intends to expand operations in its existing international markets and to enter new international markets, which will require management attention and resources. The Company may not be successful in expanding its international operations. In addition, a successful international expansion of Genesys' software solutions will be limited to those countries where there is regulatory approval of the third-party telephony hardware supported by Genesys' products. The Company expects to commit additional development resources to customizing its products for selected international markets and to developing international sales and support channels. Furthermore, to increase revenues in international markets, Genesys will need to continue to establish foreign operations, to hire additional personnel to run such operations and to maintain good relations with the Company's foreign systems integrators and distributors. To the extent that Genesys is unable to successfully do so, its growth in international sales will be limited. The failure to expand international sales could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. A majority of the Company's international sales to date have been denominated in U.S. dollars. The company does not currently engage in any foreign currency hedging transactions. A decrease in the value of foreign currencies relative to the United States dollar would make the Company's products more expensive in international markets. In addition to currency fluctuation risks, international operations involve a number of risks not typically present in domestic operations. Such risks include: . changes in regulatory requirements; 14 . costs and risks of deploying systems in foreign countries; . timing and availability of export licenses; . tariffs and other trade barriers; . political and economic instability; . difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations; . potentially adverse tax consequences; . difficulties in obtaining governmental approvals for products . the burden of complying with a wide variety of complex foreign laws and treaties; . the possibility of difficult accounts receivable collections; and . difficulties in managing distributors. Foreign laws that may differ significantly from laws of the United States may govern distributors' customers purchase agreements. The Company is also subject to the risks associated with the imposition of legislation and regulations relating to the import or export of high technology products. The Company cannot predict whether quotas, duties, taxes or other charges or restrictions upon the importation or exportation of its products will be implemented by the United States or other countries, leading to a reduction in sales and profitability in that country. Future international activity may result in sales dominated by foreign currencies. Gains and losses on the conversion to United States dollars of accounts receivables, accounts payable and other monetary assets and liabilities arising from international operations may contribute to fluctuations in the Company's operating results. Any of these factors could materially affect the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. Product Concentration Substantially all of the Company's revenues to date have been attributable to the license of the Company's platform and related applications software and services and, in particular, revenues from the license of the Company's platform products accounted for 45% of total revenues in fiscal 1999. Genesys' platform and related applications software and services are currently expected to account for substantially all of the Company's revenues for the foreseeable future. Consequently, a decline in pricing or demand for, or failure to achieve broad market acceptance of, Genesys' platform and related applications software products, as a result of competition, technological change or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company's application products, other than the Adante e-mail and Next Age Work Force Management products, can only be used in conjunction with the Company's platform products. As a result, a decline in demand for the Company's platform products would materially adversely affect sales of the Company's application products. Furthermore, if customers experience problems with the Company's platform products, it would adversely affect their ability to utilize the Company's application products. The Company's future financial performance will depend in part on the successful development, introduction and customer acceptance of new and enhanced versions of its platform and related applications software products. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to be successful in marketing its platform products, related applications software or any new or enhanced products. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business--Solutions". Government Regulation of Immigration As of June 30, 1999, over 26% of the Company's employees, including approximately 57% of the Company's technical staff, are foreign citizens. Accordingly, the Company must comply with the immigration laws of the United States. Most of the Company's foreign employees are working in the United States under H-1 temporary work visas ("H-1 Visas"). An H-1 Visa allows the holder to work in the United States for three years and, thereafter, to apply for a three- year extension. If the H-1 Visa holder has not become a Lawful Permanent United States Resident obtained some other legal status permitting continued 15 employment before expiration of this six-year period, the holder must spend at least one year abroad before reapplying for an H-1 Visa. Furthermore, Congress and administrative agencies with jurisdiction over immigration matters have periodically expressed concerns over the level of immigration into the United States. The inability of the Company to utilize the continued services of such employees would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Dependence on Ability to Integrate with Third-Party Technology The Company's products currently integrate with most major telephony systems and interoperate across most major computing platforms, operating systems and databases. If the Company's platform did not readily integrate with major telephone systems and computing platforms, operating systems or databases, (for instance, as a result of technology enhancements or upgrades of such systems) the Company could be required to redesign its platform product to ensure compatibility with such systems. The Company cannot guarantee that it would be able to redesign its products or that any redesign would achieve market acceptance. If the Company's platform products did not integrate with third- party technology, there would be a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Business-- Architecture" and "--Solutions". Year 2000 Many computer systems experience problems handling dates beyond the year 1999. The Company has designed and tested current versions of its products for use in the year 2000 and beyond, and believes that they are year 2000 compliant. However, some of Genesys' customers might be running older versions of the Company's products that might not be year 2000 compliant. It is possible that Genesys may experience increased expenses in addressing mitigation issues for these customers. In addition, the Company's products frequently are integrated into larger networks involving sophisticated hardware and software products supplied by other vendors. Each of the Company's customers' networks involves different combinations of third party products. The Company cannot evaluate whether all of their products are year 2000 compliant. Genesys may face claims based on year 2000 problems in other companies' products or based on issues arising from the integration of multiple products within the overall network. Although no such claims have been made, the Company may in the future be required to defend its products in legal proceedings, which could be expensive regardless of the merits of such claims. If the Company's suppliers, vendors, major distributors, partners, customers and service providers fail to correct their year 2000 problems, these facilities could result in an interruption in, or a failure of, the Company's normal business activities of operations. If a year 2000 problem occurs, it may be difficult to determine which party's products have caused the problem. These failures could interrupt the Company's operations and damage its relationships with its customers. Due to the general uncertain inherent in the year 2000 problem resulting from the readiness of third party suppliers and vendors, the Company is unable to determine at this time whether year 2000 failure could harm its business and financial results. Genesys' customers' purchasing plans could be affected by year 2000 issues if they need to expend significant resources to fix their existing systems to become year 2000 compliant. This situation may reduce funds available to purchase products until after the year 2000, which may reduce the Company's revenue. Protection of Intellectual Property The Company's success depends heavily on its ability to protect its software and other proprietary technology. The Company relies primarily on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions to protect its proprietary rights. Genesys currently holds four issued patents and has a number of United States and foreign patent applications pending. There can be no assurance that any of the Company's patent applications will be approved, that the Company will develop additional proprietary products or technologies that are patentable, that any issued patent will provide the Company with any competitive advantages or will not be challenged by third parties or that the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on the Company's ability to do business. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar or superior products, duplicate the Company's products or, if patents are issued to the Company, design around the patents issued to the Company. If third parties were successful in using their patents to challenge or compete with Genesys, its business could be seriously harmed. As part of its confidentiality procedures, Genesys generally enters into nondisclosure agreements with its employees, consultants and other third parties who provide technical services to the Company or who have access to confidential information of the Company. In addition, the Company limits access to and distribution of its software, documentation and 16 other proprietary information. The Company also relies in part on "shrink-wrap" and "click-wrap" licenses, although these licenses are not signed by the end user and, therefore, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. The measures described above however, afford Genesys only limited protection. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of the Company's products or to obtain and use information that the Company regards as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of the Company's products is difficult. Although the Company is unable to determine the extent to which piracy of its software products exists; software piracy may become a problem. In addition, effective protection of intellectual property rights may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries in which the Company currently sells products and countries Genesys may target to expand its sales efforts. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company's means of protecting its proprietary rights will be adequate or that the Company's competitors will not independently develop similar or superior technology. There has also been a substantial amount of litigation in the software industry regarding intellectual property rights. The Company has from time to time received claims that it is infringing third parties' intellectual property rights, and there can be no assurance that third parties will not in the future claim infringement by the Company with respect to current or future products, trademarks or other proprietary rights. The Company expects that software product developers will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in the Company's industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. Although the Company is not aware that any of its products or proprietary rights infringes upon the proprietary rights of third parties, the Company may be subject to infringement claims in the future. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that former employers of Genesys' present and future employees will not assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosed confidential or proprietary information to the Company. Any such claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming to defend, result in costly litigation, divert management's attention and resources, cause product shipment delays, cause the Company to lose or defer sales or require the Company to pay money damages or enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to Genesys or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on Genesys' business, financial condition and results of operations. 17 Item 2. Properties The Company's headquarters are located in approximately 82,000 square feet of office space in San Francisco, California under a lease, which expires on September 30, 2002. The Company also leases space for its sales and support offices in California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Washington and Virginia, as well as for offices in 18 foreign countries. The Company believes that its existing facilities are adequate for its current needs and that additional space will be available as needed. Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company is a party to routine litigation incident to its business. Management believes that none of these legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements taken as a whole or results of operations of the Company. GeoTel Litigation. On December 17, 1996, GeoTel Communications Corporation ("GeoTel") filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts naming the Company as defendant, and alleging infringement of a patent issued to GeoTel entitled "Communications System Using a Central Controller to Control at Least One Network and Agent System", U.S. Patent No. 5,546,452 (the "GeoTel Patent"). On November 20, 1998, the Company and GeoTel entered into a settlement agreement concerning the patent dispute on terms that neither company believes are material to its financial results. Pursuant to the settlement, GeoTel will receive a pre-determined license fee, paid over a fixed period of time, for certain products in exchange for a nonexclusive, irrevocable license to use the technology covered by GeoTel's 452 Patent or any related patent in all present and future Genesys products which incorporate such technology. The license fee is expensed in the period in which it is paid, which approximates the useful life of the licensed technology. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 21, 1999 (the "May Stockholders Meeting"), the stockholders of the Company voted on and approved the following proposals: Proposal 1. To elect five directors to the Board of Directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting; Proposal 2. To ratify the selection of Arthur Andersen LLP as the Company's independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1999; and Proposal 3. To approve an amendment to the Company's 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1997 Plan") to increase the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 1997 Plan by 2,500,000 shares. Information on the Board of Directors. The following directors were elected at the May Stockholders Meeting to serve until the next Annual Meeting, which is currently scheduled for November 19, 1999: . Gregory Shenkman, Chairman . Alec Miloslavsky, Vice Chairman . Ori Sasson . Bruce Dunlevie . Paul Levy 18 May Stockholders Meeting Results. Proposal 1. Election of Directors
Director In favor Withheld Broker non-votes - --------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Gregory Shenkman 17,301,348 109,250 n/a Alec Miloslavsky 17,303,287 107,311 n/a Ori Sasson 17,303,867 106,731 n/a Bruce Dunlevie 17,252,159 158,439 n/a Paul Levy 17,252,159 158,439 n/a
Proposal 2. Ratification of Independent Public Accountants
For Against Abstain Broker non-votes - --------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 17,382,080 25,971 2,547 0
Proposal 3. Amendment to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan
For Against Abstain Broker non-votes - --------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 8,239,666 4,136,658 9,296 5,024,978
19 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The executive officers of the Company and their respective position and age as of August 31, 1999 are as follows:
Name Age Position - ------------------------------------ ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Ori Sasson 37 President and Chief Executive Officer Alec Miloslavsky 36 Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Technical Officer Christopher D. Brennan 42 Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration Richard C. DeGolia 49 Senior Vice President, Business Development and Strategic Planning, Acting General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Donald W. Hunt 43 Senior Vice President, Field Operations, Americas and Asia Pacific Noelle Leca 42 Senior Vice President, Worldwide Marketing Ad P. Nederlof 52 Senior Vice President, Field Operations, EMEA Yuri Shtivelman 43 Senior Vice President, Product Development
Mr. Sasson joined the Company in December 1998 as its President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sasson was Chief Executive Officer and President of Scopus Technology, Inc. from March 1991 until July 1998, when Siebel Systems, Inc acquired Scopus. Mr. Miloslavsky co-founded the Company and has served as its Chief Technical Officer since the Company's formation in October 1990, as a director since January 1993 and as Vice Chairman of the Board since March 1997. Prior to co- founding the Company, Mr. Miloslavsky worked as an independent software consultant. Mr. Brennan joined the Company in April 1999 as its Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Brennan was Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of Diamond Lane Communications from September 1997 to April 1999. Prior to that, he was with UB Networks, a wholly owned subsidiary of Newbridge Networks, having been acquired from Tandem Computers, most recently as President and Chief Operating Officer, from April 1994 to July 1997. Mr. DeGolia joined the Company in September 1996 as Vice President, Business Development. In February 1999, Mr. DeGolia was promoted to Vice President, Business Development and Strategic Planning and Corporate Secretary. In July 1999, Mr. DeGolia was promoted to Senior Vice President, Business Development and Strategic Planning; Corporate Secretary and Acting General Counsel. From August 1985 to September 1996, Mr. DeGolia was an attorney with Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, a law firm located in Silicon Valley. Mr. DeGolia holds a B.A. in American Studies from the University of California at Berkeley and a J.D. from Harvard University. Mr. Hunt joined the Company in January 1999 as its Senior Vice President, Field Operations, Americas and Asia Pacific. Before joining the Company, Mr. Hunt was Vice President, North America Sales of Informix Software, Inc. from February 1997 to January 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Hunt was with Open Market as Vice President Sales for the Americas (North America and Latin America) from April 1996 to February 1997. Mr. Hunt was North American ISV Sales Director of Sun Microsystems, Inc. from October 1989 to April 1996. Ms. Leca joined the Company in July 1999 as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Marketing. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Leca was Vice President of Engineering at Commerce One from August 1997 to December 1999. From March 20 1996 to August 1997, she was Vice President and General Manager with International Network Services. Prior to March 1996, she was employed at Sybase Inc. from October 1989 to January 1996 in a variety of management roles, most recently as Vice President, Office of the COO. Mr. Nederlof joined the Company in April 1999 as its Senior Vice President, Field Operations, EMEA. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Nederlof was President and COO of Richter Systems from December 1996 to February 1999. Before that he was Vice President, Northern Europe for Oracle Corporation from August 1991 to December 1996. Mr. Shtivelman joined the Company in July 1996 as Vice President, Product Development. In July 1999, Mr. Shtivelman was promoted to Senior Vice President, Product Development. From 1986 to 1996, Mr. Shtivelman was employed in various capacities by Northern Telecom, most recently as Assistant Vice President, Meridian 1 Advanced Technology. Mr. Shtivelman holds an M.S. in mathematics from Moscow University. 21 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters The Company's Common Stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq National Market on June 16, 1997 and is traded under the symbol "GCTI". As of August 31, 1999, there were approximately 290 holders of record of the Common Stock. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low closing sale prices for the Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- High Low ------------------------------ Fiscal 1998 First Quarter $39.625 $24.250 Second Quarter $36.875 $24.375 Third Quarter $38.125 $24.000 Fourth Quarter $39.750 $26.375 Fiscal 1999 First Quarter $35.000 $16.250 Second Quarter $30.125 $ 9.125 Third Quarter $28.000 $10.688 Fourth Quarter $25.000 $11.500 - ----------------------------------------------------------------
The Company has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock. The Company currently anticipates that it will retain all available funds for use in its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends. 22 Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the three years in the period ended June 30, 1999 and the consolidated balance sheet data at June 30, 1999 and 1998 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that have been audited by and reported on by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, and should be read in conjunction with those consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The consolidated balance sheet data at June 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995, and the consolidated statement of operations data for fiscal 1996 and 1995 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included herein.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Year ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 --------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands, except per share data) Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: Revenues: License $113,620 $68,973 $31,919 $ 8,567 $3,077 Service 25,488 15,695 5,619 3,462 1,403 --------------------------------------------------------- Total revenues 139,108 84,668 37,538 12,029 4,480 --------------------------------------------------------- Cost of revenues: License 4,980 3,342 1,615 548 123 Service 18,761 10,554 3,881 2,568 1,190 --------------------------------------------------------- Total cost of revenues 23,741 13,896 5,496 3,116 1,313 --------------------------------------------------------- Gross margin 115,367 70,772 32,042 8,913 3,167 --------------------------------------------------------- Operating expenses: Research and development 24,378 15,308 9,382 4,511 959 Sales and marketing 51,177 35,705 16,042 3,998 705 General and administrative 11,587 8,462 5,432 4,397 1,343 Non-recurring charges 15,488 905 -- -- -- Purchased in process R&D 6,600 -- -- -- -- --------------------------------------------------------- Total operating expenses 109,230 60,380 30,856 12,906 3,007 --------------------------------------------------------- Income (loss) from operations 6,137 10,392 1,186 (3,993) 160 Interest and other income (expense), net 1,182 1,552 237 (115) (6) --------------------------------------------------------- Income before provision for income taxes 7,319 11,944 1,423 (4,108) 154 Provision for income taxes 9,942 4,010 649 -- -- --------------------------------------------------------- Net income (loss) $ (2,623) $ 7,934 $ 774 $(4,108) $ 154 ========================================================= Basic net income (loss) per share(1) $(0.11) $0.37 $0.05 $(0.39) $0.03 ========================================================= Diluted net income (loss) per share(1) $(0.11) $0.30 $0.04 $(0.39) $0.03 ========================================================= Basic weighted average common shares(1) 23,328 21,590 14,148 10,484 4,668 ========================================================= Diluted weighted average common shares(1) 23,328 26,747 20,299 10,484 4,668 ========================================================= - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Year ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 ---------------------------------------------------------- Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (In thousands): Cash and cash equivalents $ 44,271 $ 30,256 $47,160 $ 5,900 $ 213 Short-term investments 17,426 16,985 -- -- -- Working capital (deficiency) 77,255 52,585 47,028 2,251 (1,990) Total assets 147,507 104,700 79,945 12,632 2,931 Long-term obligations 66 102 875 367 955 Shareholders' equity (deficit) 109,968 73,621 56,761 2,624 (2,504) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of the method of calculation. Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Overview The Company was incorporated in California on October 11, 1990 and is involved in the design, development, marketing and support of a suite of Computer Telephony Integration ("CTI") products, including platform and applications software that enable organizations to integrate critical business information and computing resources with telephony and other telecommunications media. Prior to shipping its first product, the Company generated revenues primarily from one-time consulting projects. In 1991, the Company began shipping its platform software product. From 1991 to 1994, the Company transitioned from a consulting services company to a product company. Since 1994 the Company has significantly expanded through the establishment of wholly owned subsidiaries and the acquisition of other businesses, products and services. Most of the Company's revenues to date have been derived from license fees from customers who have received a perpetual license to the Company's products. License fees are generally based on the specific products licensed and on a per user basis. The Company's license revenues represented 81.7%, 81.5% and 85.0% of total revenues in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The Company currently expects that license revenues will continue to account for a substantial majority of the Company's revenues for the foreseeable future. The remainder of revenues is expected to be primarily attributable to maintenance and other service revenues, including consulting and training revenues. As a result, factors adversely affecting the pricing of or demand for the Company's licensed software products would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Substantially all of the Company's revenues to date have been attributable to the license of the Company's platform and related applications software and services. Revenues from the license of the Company's platform products accounted for 45% of total license revenues in fiscal 1999. The Company's platform and related applications and services are currently expected to account for substantially all of the Company's revenues for the foreseeable future. Consequently, a decline in demand for, or failure to achieve broad market acceptance of, the Company's platform and related applications software products, as a result of competition, technological change or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company's application products can only be used in conjunction with the Company's platform products. As a result, a decline in demand for the Company's platform products would adversely affect sales of the Company's application products. Furthermore, if customers experience problems with the Company's platform products, it may limit the customers' ability to utilize the Company's application products. The Company's future financial performance will depend in part on the successful development, introduction and customer acceptance of new and enhanced versions of its platform and related applications software products. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to be successful in marketing its platform products, related applications software or any new or enhanced products. License revenues are recognized upon shipment if there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, the fee is fixed or determinable, collection is probable and vendor specific objective evidence exists to allocate the total arrangement fee between all elements. If a software license agreement provides for acceptance criteria that extend beyond the published specifications of the applicable product, then revenues are recognized upon the earlier of customer acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period. If a software license agreement provides for the delivery of software products and significant customization and modification services, product and service revenue is recognized on a percentage of completion basis in relation to costs 24 incurred in the arrangement. Fees for consulting and training services are generally charged separately from the Company's software products and are recognized as the services are performed. Maintenance revenues primarily consist of fees for ongoing support and product updates, are generally determined as a percentage of license fees, and are recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contracts, which to date have typically ranged from 12 to 24 months. In its first fiscal quarter of 1999, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Position 97-2 "Software Revenue Recognition" ("97-2"), accordingly, in fiscal 1999 the Company recognized revenue in accordance with 97-2. Prior to fiscal year 1999 and the adoption of 97-2, the Company recognized revenues in accordance with Statement of Position 91-1, "Software Revenue Recognition". The adoption of SOP 97-2, as amended, did not have a material impact on the Company's business practices or revenue recognition. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. A relatively small number of customers have in the past and can in the future account for a significant percentage of the Company's revenues in a given fiscal year. In fiscal 1999, no customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenues. In fiscal 1998 and 1997, one customer accounted for 14.1% and 11.1%, respectively, of total revenues. Licensing of the Company's products to a limited number of customers may continue to account for a large percentage of revenues for the foreseeable future. The decision to license the Company's software products is typically an enterprise-wide decision by prospective customers and generally requires the Company to provide a significant level of education to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of the Company's products. In addition, the implementation of the Company's products involves a significant commitment of resources by prospective customers and typically involves substantial integration efforts, which may be performed by the Company, the customer or third party vendors. The cost of the Company's product is typically only a small portion of the related hardware, software, development, training and integration costs of implementing a CTI solution. For these and other reasons, the sales and implementation cycles associated with the license of the Company's products is often lengthy and is subject to a number of significant delays over which the Company has little or no control. Given these factors and the expected customer concentration, the loss of a major customer or any reduction or delay in sales to or implementations by such customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company markets its products in North America and internationally through VARs and through its direct sales force. International revenues accounted for 49.9%, 44.7% and 33.4% of total revenues in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The Company is increasing its international sales force, primarily in Europe and the Asia Pacific region, and is seeking to establish distribution relationships with appropriate strategic partners. As a result, failure to increase international sales could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. The Company expects that international revenues will continue to account for a significant portion of total revenues in the future. The Company's revenues have increased in each of the last twelve quarters, although given its recent rapid growth, historical growth rates cannot be relied upon as indicative of future growth, if any. Prior growth rates in the Company's revenues should not be considered indicative of future revenue growth rates or operating results. Future operating results will depend upon many factors, including the demand for and market acceptance of the Company's products, the level of product and price competition, the ability of the Company to develop, market and deploy new, high-quality products and control costs, the ability of the Company to expand its direct sales force and indirect distribution channels, the Company's success in attracting and retaining key personnel, the uncertainty, recent emergence and acceptance of the market for the Company's products, and technological changes in the market for the Company's products. There can be no assurance that any of the Company's business or strategies will be successful or that the Company will be able to achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. In June 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Next Age Technologies, Inc., a California corporation ("Next Age"). Next Age software products are designed to optimize the management, staffing, scheduling and productivity of contact center employees. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 556,557 shares of its Common Stock in exchange for all outstanding shares of Next Age Common Stock, and issued options to purchase 25,068 shares of the Company's Common Stock in exchange for all outstanding Next Age Stock options. A total of 97,918 shares have been placed into an escrow subject to the satisfaction of all representations and warranties under the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement. The merger was accounted for as a purchase; accordingly, the Company allocated the purchase price based upon the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities assumed. The valuation was based on accepted appraisal methodologies used at the time of the allocation. The results of operations of Next Age are included in the Company's financial statements from the date of acquisition forward. The total purchase price was $14.6 million. Management estimates that $6.6 million of the purchase price represents acquired in-process technology that has not yet reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future use. 25 Accordingly, this amount was immediately charged to expense upon consummation of the acquisition (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Additionally, the Company allocated $2.2 million, $0.9 million, and $4.9 million of the purchase price to acquired software, workforce and trade names, and goodwill, respectively. These intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over three to seven years. In December 1998, the Company hired Ori Sasson as its Chief Executive Officer and elected him as a member of the Board of Directors of Genesys. In connection with the hiring of Mr. Sasson, the Company also completed the acquisition of Plato Software Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Plato"), a company in which Mr. Sasson was a principal shareholder. The merger was completed pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization ("Merger Agreement") dated as of December 9, 1998. As Plato did not have significant operations or revenue prior to the acquisition, the Company has treated the purchase as the acquisition of an asset. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 202,500 shares of its Common Stock in exchange for all outstanding shares of Plato Common Stock, and issued options to purchase 47,500 shares of Genesys Common Stock in exchange for all outstanding Plato Stock options. A total of 50,000 shares have been placed into an escrow subject to the satisfaction of all representations and warranties under the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement. The Company recorded the fair value of net assets purchased from Plato, which consisted of certain technology to be incorporated into the Genesys products, totaling $382,000 as of December 31, 1998. As the acquisition of Plato was consummated in connection with the election of Ori Sasson as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, in December 1998 the Company recorded as expense the portion of the shares and options issued that represented compensation to Mr. Sasson and other Plato employees. Deferred compensation totaling $800,000 related to unvested options will be amortized over the remaining vesting period of the options of approximately four years. In addition, the Company recorded as expense its reimbursement to Mr. Sasson of the tax liabilities associated with this compensation. The total amount of compensation expense and related tax reimbursements associated with this transaction was approximately $12.4 million, and was reflected as part of a non-recurring charge in the Company's financial statements. In December 1997, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Forte Advanced Management Software, Inc. ("Forte") in exchange for approximately 667,099 shares of the Company's common stock. The Company also assumed Forte's outstanding options, which were converted to options to purchase 90,349 shares of the Company's common stock. The merger was accounted for as a pooling of interests and, accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect the acquisition on a pooling of interests basis. 26 Results of Operations The following table sets forth statement of operations data of the Company expressed as a percentage of total revenues for the years indicated.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 ------------------------------------ Revenues: License 81.7% 81.5% 85.0% Service 18.3 18.5 15.0 ------------------------------------ Total revenues 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------------------------------------ Cost of revenues: License 3.6 3.9 4.3 Service 13.5 12.5 10.3 ------------------------------------ Total cost of revenues 17.1 16.4 14.6 ------------------------------------ Gross margin 82.9 83.6 85.4 ------------------------------------ Operating expenses: Research and development 17.5 18.1 25.0 Sales and marketing 36.8 42.2 42.7 General and administrative 8.3 10.0 14.5 Merger costs -- 1.0 -- Non-recurring charges 11.1 -- -- Purchased in process R&D 4.7 -- -- ------------------------------------ Total operating expenses 78.4 71.3 82.2 ------------------------------------ Income from operations 4.5 12.3 3.2 Interest and other income (expense), net 0.8 1.8 0.6 ------------------------------------ Income before provision for income taxes 5.2 14.1 3.8 Provision for income taxes 7.1 4.7 1.7 ------------------------------------ Net income (loss) (1.9)% 9.4% 2.1% ==================================== - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues License. License revenues were $113.6 million, $69.0 million and $31.9 million in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, representing increases of 65% from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, and 116% from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998. These increases were due to the market's growing acceptance of the Company's products and underlying technology, an expansion of the Company's product offerings, and a significant increase in the Company's sales, marketing and customer service organizations. The Company does not believe that the historical growth rates of license revenues will be sustainable or are indicative of future results. Service. Service revenues primarily comprise fees from consulting, post- contract support and training services. Service revenues were $25.5 million, $15.7 million and $5.6 million, in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, representing increases of 62% from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999 and 179% from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998. The Company's software license agreements often provide for maintenance and for consulting and training. Accordingly, increases in licensing activity have resulted in increases in revenues from services related to maintenance, consulting and training. Service revenues are largely dependent upon the extent to which product implementation services are performed by the Company's internal professional services personnel versus third party organizations such as systems integrators. To the extent that the Company utilizes more internal resources to perform product implementations, service revenues could increase as a percentage of total revenues. Conversely, if the Company utilizes to a greater extent third- party organizations such as systems integrators to implement the Company's products, service revenues may decrease as a percentage of total revenues. Maintenance revenues as a percentage of total revenues are expected to increase due to continued expansion of the Company's installed base. The Company does not believe that the historical growth rates of service revenues will be sustainable or are indicative of future results. 27 Cost of Revenues License. Cost of license revenues includes the costs of product media, product duplication and manuals, as well as allocated labor and overhead costs associated with the preparation and shipment of products. Cost of license revenues were $5.0 million, $3.3 million and $1.6 million in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. These increases in absolute dollar amounts relate primarily to increases in the volume of products shipped by the Company, and the resulting increases in documentation material costs and personnel necessary to assemble and ship the products. Service. Cost of service revenues primarily consist of employee-related costs incurred in providing consulting, post-contract support and training services. Cost of service revenues were $18.8 million, $10.6 million and $3.9 million in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. These increases in absolute dollars were due primarily to increases in consulting, support and training personnel, and increases in overhead costs associated with travel, computer equipment and facilities. The cost of service revenues as a percentage of service revenues may vary between periods due to the mix of services provided by the Company and the resources used to provide these services. Operating Expenses The Company's operating expenses were $109.2 million, $60.4 million and $30.9 million, or 78.5%, 71.3% and 82.2% of total revenues in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Excluding the impact of $15.5 million of non-recurring charges and $6.6 million of purchased in process R&D expensed in fiscal 1999, operating expenses would have been $87.1 million, or 63.0% of total revenues in fiscal 1999. The Company expects that it will continue to invest in its Research and Development and Sales and Marketing organizations, as well as strengthen its infra-structure, accordingly, the Company expects operating expenditures will increase in absolute dollars. Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $24.4 million, $15.3 million and $9.4 million, or 17.5%, 18.1% and 25.0% of total revenues in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. These expenses increased in absolute dollars primarily as a result of an increase in personnel to support the Company's product development activities. The Company expects that it will continue to devote substantial resources to research and development, accordingly, the Company expects that research and development expenditures will continue to increase in absolute dollars but remain at similar percentages of total revenues as in fiscal 1999 and 1998. Research and development expenses are generally charged to operations as incurred. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, the Company capitalized approximately $4.8 million of software development costs incurred during fiscal 1999. The fiscal 1999 costs related primarily to the purchase of $2.2 million of existing technology in connection with the Next Age acquisition, as well as the release of products included in the Company's product suite. The Company capitalized approximately $1.9 million of software development costs incurred during fiscal 1998, primarily related to the release of new products included in its 5.0 and 5.1 product suites, and approximately $450,000 of software development costs incurred during fiscal 1997 related to the initial release of its 5.0 product suite. Prior to fiscal 1997, costs that were eligible for capitalization were insignificant, and accordingly the Company charged all software development costs to research and development expense in the period in which it was incurred. Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $51.2 million, $35.7 million and $16.0 million, representing 36.8%, 42.2% and 42.7% of total revenues in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. These expenses increased in absolute dollars primarily due to the Company's investment in building a direct sales force in North America and in Europe. From July 1, 1997 to June 30, 1999, the Company increased the number of its sales and marketing personnel from approximately 130 to 246 worldwide, and incurred higher commission expenses related to higher sales levels. In addition, the Company incurred increased marketing expenses associated with the Company's expanding product line, including trade shows and promotional expenses. The Company expects to continue to expand its direct sales and marketing efforts and to continue to invest in its channel sales organization, and therefore, anticipates sales and marketing expenditures will continue to increase significantly in absolute dollars. General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $11.6 million, $8.5 million and $5.4 million, or 8.3%, 10.0% and 14.5% of total revenues in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. These expenses increased in absolute dollars during these periods principally due to the addition of staff and information system investments to support the growth of the Company's business during these periods. The Company expects to continue to increase its general and administrative 28 staff and to incur other costs necessary to manage a growing organization. Accordingly, the Company expects general and administrative expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars. Purchased In-Process Research and Development ("IPR&D"). Purchased IPR&D expenses were $6.6 million, representing 4.7% of total revenues, in fiscal 1999. In connection with the Next Age acquisition, the Company immediately charged to expense $6.6 million representing purchased IPR&D that had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements." The allocation of the IPR&D was evaluated based on the SEC's current views regarding valuation methodologies. The value was determined by estimating the costs to develop the purchased IPR&D into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting net cash flows from each project, excluding the cash flows related to the portion of each project that was incomplete at the acquisition date, and discounting the net cash flows back to their present value. Each of the project forecasts were based upon future discounted cash flows, taking into account the stage of development of each in- process project, the cost to develop that project, the expected income stream, the life cycle of the product ultimately developed, and the associated risks. In each case, the selection of the applicable discount rate was based on consideration of the Company's weighted average costs of capital, as well as other factors including the useful life of each technology, profitability levels of each technology, the uncertainty of technology advances that were known at the time, and the stage of completion of each technology. If the projects are not successfully developed, the sales and profitability of the Company may be adversely affected in future periods. Additionally, the value of other intangible assets may be impaired. Non-Recurring Charges. Non-recurring charges were $15.5 million, representing 11.1% of total revenues, in fiscal 1999. In connection with the hiring of its Chief Executive Officer, Ori Sasson, and the acquisition of Plato in December 1998, the Company recorded non-recurring charges totaling $11.8 million related to compensation, consisting of common stock valued at $5.6 million and $6.2 million of tax reimbursements paid or accrued to Mr. Sasson and an additional $0.6 million of compensation paid or accrued to other Plato employees. In addition, the Company recorded $3.1 million of the non-recurring charges related to an employment and severance agreement dated December 11, 1998 with the Company's former President and Chief Financial Officer. Non-recurring charges, related to the acquisition of Forte in December 1997, were $1.0 million, representing 1% of total revenues, in fiscal 1998. Provision for Income Taxes The Company's effective tax rate for the year ended June 30, 1999 was 136% which reflects the utilization of research tax credits as well as the non- deductibility for income tax purposes of both non-recurring compensation charges and the purchased in-process research and development costs. Excluding the impact of the non-deductible, non-recurring charges and purchased in-process research and development costs, the Company's effective tax rate for fiscal 1999 was 35%. In the quarter ended December 31, 1998, the Company incurred certain non-recurring compensation charges related to the hiring of its Chief Executive Officer and the acquisition of Plato Software Corporation. In the quarter ended June 30, 1999, the Company expensed certain non-deductible in-process research and development costs related to the purchase of Next Age. The provision for income taxes for the year ended June 30, 1998 is based on an effective tax rate of approximately 34%. In the quarter ended December 31, 1997, the Company recorded a one-time credit relating to the benefit of deferred tax assets assumed in the acquisition of Forte, which was an S-Corporation prior to the merger. The provision for income taxes for the year ended June 30, 1997 is based on an effective tax rate of approximately 28% that reflects the estimated realization of deferred tax assets, primarily net operating loss carry forwards and research and development tax credit carry forwards. The Company has net deferred tax assets of approximately $1.6 million and $2.0 million as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" which requires companies to record derivative financial instruments on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives would be accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The key criterion for hedge accounting is that the hedging relationship must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows. In June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133 - an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133." SFAS No. 137 defers the effective date of SFAS No. 133, such that SFAS No. 133 shall be 29 effective for all fiscal quarters of all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. This Statement will not have a material impact on the financial condition or results of the operations of the Company. In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of Position (SOP) 98-4, "Deferral of the Effective Date of a Provision of SOP 97-2, `Software Revenue Recognition,'" which defers for one year the application of certain provisions of SOP 97-2, which limits what is considered vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the various elements in a multiple element arrangement. All other provisions of SOP 97-2 remain in effect. This SOP was effective as of March 31, 1998. In December 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-9, "Modification of SOP 97-2, `Software Revenue Recognition' With Respect to Certain Transactions," which amends of SOP 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition," to require recognition of revenue using the "residual value method" under certain conditions. Effective December 15, 1998, SOP 98-9 amends SOP 98-4, "Deferral of the Effective Date of a Provision of SOP 97-2, `Software Revenue Recognition,'" to extend the deferral of the application of certain passages of SOP 97-2 provided by SOP 98-4 through fiscal years beginning on or before March 15, 1999. All other provisions of this SOP are effective for transactions entered into in fiscal years beginning after March 15, 1999. The Company has adopted SOP 97-2, as amended. The adoption of SOP 97-2 did not have a material impact on the Company's business practices or revenue recognition. In March 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." SOP 98-1 provides guidance on accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use. SOP 98-1 applies to all non-governmental entities and is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. SOP 98-1 will not have a material impact on the financial condition or results of the operations of the Company. In April 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities." For purposes of this SOP, start-up activities are defined broadly as those one-time activities related to opening a new facility, introducing a new product or service, conducting business in a new territory, conducting business with a new class of customer or beneficiary, initiating a new process in an existing facility, or commencing some new operation. Start-up activities include activities related to organizing a new entity (commonly referred to as organization costs). This SOP provides guidance on accounting for the costs of start-up activities. SOP 98-5 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. SOP 98-5 will not have a material impact on the financial condition or results of the operations of the Company. Year 2000 Many computer systems experience problems handling dates beyond the year 1999. The Company has designed and tested current versions of its products for use in the year 2000 and beyond, and believes that they are year 2000 compliant. However, some of Genesys' customers might be running older versions of the Company's products that might not be year 2000 compliant. It is possible that Genesys may experience increased expenses in addressing mitigation issues for these customers. In addition, the Company's products frequently are integrated into larger networks involving sophisticated hardware and software products supplied by other vendors. Each of the Company's customers' networks involves different combinations of third party products. The Company cannot evaluate whether all of their products are year 2000 compliant. Genesys may face claims based on year 2000 problems in other companies' products or based on issues arising from the integration of multiple products within the overall network. Although no such claims have been made, the Company may in the future be required to defend its products in legal proceedings, which could be expensive regardless of the merits of such claims. If the Company's suppliers, vendors, major distributors, partners, customers and service providers fail to correct their year 2000 problems, these facilities could result in an interruption in, or a failure of, the Company's normal business activities of operations. If a year 2000 problem occurs, it may be difficult to determine which party's products have caused the problem. These failures could interrupt the Company's operations and damage its relationships with its customers. Due to the general uncertain inherent in the year 2000 problem resulting from the readiness of third party suppliers and vendors, the Company is unable to determine at this time whether year 2000 failure could harm its business and financial results. Genesys' customers' purchasing plans could be affected by year 2000 issues if they need to expend significant resources to fix their existing systems to become year 2000 compliant. This situation may reduce funds available to purchase products until after the year 2000, which may reduce the Company's revenue. 30 Liquidity and Capital Resources In June 1997, the Company completed its initial public offering in which it raised approximately $41.2 million from the sale of 2,375,000 shares of common stock and the exercise of certain Warrants. Prior to its initial public offering, the Company financed its operations and met its capital expenditure requirements primarily from proceeds from related party advances, a $1.5 million term note (of which $900,000 was converted into Series A Preferred Stock) and the private sale of Preferred Stock. Prior to its initial public offering, the Company had raised $17.2 million from the sale of Preferred Stock. At June 30, 1999, the Company's primary sources of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents of $44.3 million and short-term investments of $17.4 million. The Company generated cash from operating activities of $18.6 million in fiscal 1999 and $14.0 million in fiscal 1998 related primarily to income from operations and increases in deferred revenues and accrued liabilities. The Company used cash from operating activities of $175,000 in fiscal 1997. The increased use of cash for operating activities in fiscal 1997 was attributable primarily to an increase in accounts receivable of approximately $13.4 million, offset in part by an increase in deferred revenues of approximately $7.7 million. The Company used cash for the purchase of property and equipment totaling $9.3 million, $12.6 million and $7.2 million in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The Company generated cash of $9.0 million and $3.4 million from financing activities in fiscal 1999 and 1998, respectively, related to proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the sale of stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Company generated cash of $49.9 million from financing activities in fiscal 1997 primarily related to its initial public offering and the sale of Series C Preferred Stock. The Company has established subsidiaries in foreign countries, including Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom, which function primarily as sales offices in those locations. The Company expects to establish offices in other foreign countries as it continues to expand its international operations. The capital expenditures necessary to establish a foreign office are not significant, and, accordingly, the Company does not expect that the establishment of these subsidiaries will have a material adverse effect on its liquidity and capital resources. The Company believes that its existing sources of liquidity will satisfy the Company's projected working capital and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Disclosures about Market Risk Interest Rate Risk. The Company's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company's investment portfolio. The Company's investments consist primarily of tax-exempt debt securities, are classified as available for sale and are stated at fair value. The Company is averse to principal loss and seeks to preserve its invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. Table of Investment Securities:
(in thousands) Principal Average Amount Interest Rate --------------------------------------- Cash and cash equivalents $44,271 3.0% Short-term investments 17,426 3.12% --------------------------------------- Total cash and investment securities $61,697
31 Currency Rate Risk. The Company's subsidiaries primarily operate in foreign markets and predominantly have their local currencies as their functional currencies. These subsidiaries do not have third party borrowings in currencies other than their local currencies, and therefore there are no appropriate quantitative disclosures. The Company's primary currency rate risk exposures relates to: . The Company's decentralized operations, whereby approximately 50% of the Company's revenues are derived from operations outside the United States, denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. . The Company's investments in foreign subsidiaries being primarily directly from the U.S. parent, resulting in U.S. dollar investments in foreign currency functional companies, and . The location of the Company's operating subsidiaries in a number of countries that have seen significant exchange rate changes against the U.S. dollar. Currency rate risks are managed primarily through the Company's financial management of operations on a decentralized basis; individual markets are not necessarily impacted by changes in currency exchange rates. Subsidiaries operating in high or hyper-inflationary environments protect margins by adjusting prices based on U.S. pricing conversion methods. The Company does not use forward contracts. All foreign currency transactions are marked to market at the end of the period with unrealized gains and losses included in other income (expense). The unrealized cumulative translation loss was $384,000 and $312,000 for fiscal years 1999 and 1998, respectively. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Index to Consolidated Financial Statements:
Page Description - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 Report of Independent Public Accountants 35 Consolidated Balance Sheets--June 30, 1999 and 1998 36 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 37 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 39 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 41 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
32 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. (a California Corporation) and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1999. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed under Item 14(a)2 is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Arthur Andersen LLP San Jose, California July 20, 1999 33 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except share amounts)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- June 30, 1999 1998 -------------------------- ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents $ 44,271 $ 30,256 Short-term investments 17,426 16,985 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $875 and $789, Respectively 44,802 28,007 Prepaid expenses and other 8,229 8,314 -------------------------- Total current assets 114,728 83,562 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and Amortization 17,026 14,675 INTANGIBLES, net 8,190 1,694 OTHER ASSETS 7,563 4,769 -------------------------- $147,507 $104,700 ========================== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Note payable $ -- $ 243 Current portion of long-term obligations 65 33 Accounts payable 3,328 4,520 Accrued payroll and related benefits 5,585 3,702 Other accrued liabilities 7,236 5,674 Deferred revenues 21,259 16,805 -------------------------- Total current liabilities 37,473 30,977 -------------------------- LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS, net of current portion 66 102 -------------------------- SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: Common stock, no par value: Authorized--120,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding--24,844,309 shares in 1999 and 22,415,222 shares in 1998 112,920 73,576 Shareholder notes receivable (686) (440) Accumulated comprehensive loss (572) (188) Deferred stock compensation (964) (1,220) Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) (730) 1,893 -------------------------- Total shareholders' equity 109,968 73,621 -------------------------- $147,507 $104,700 ========================== - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
34 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except per share amounts)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Years Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 ------------------------------------- REVENUES: License $113,620 $68,973 $31,919 Service 25,488 15,695 5,619 ------------------------------------- Total revenues 139,108 84,668 37,538 ------------------------------------- COST OF REVENUES: License 4,980 3,342 1,615 Service 18,761 10,554 3,881 ------------------------------------- Total cost of revenues 23,741 13,896 5,496 ------------------------------------- GROSS MARGIN 115,367 70,772 32,042 ------------------------------------- OPERATING EXPENSES: Research and development 24,378 15,308 9,382 Sales and marketing 51,177 35,705 16,042 General and administrative 11,587 8,462 5,432 Non-recurring charges 15,488 905 -- Purchased in process research and development 6,600 -- -- ------------------------------------- Total operating expenses 109,230 60,380 30,856 ------------------------------------- INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 6,137 10,392 1,186 OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): Interest income (expense), net 1,678 1,552 -- Other, net (496) -- 237 ------------------------------------- INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 7,319 11,944 1,423 PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 9,942 4,010 649 ------------------------------------- NET INCOME (LOSS) $ (2,623) $ 7,934 $ 774 ===================================== BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $(0.11) $0.37 $0.05 ===================================== DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $(0.11) $0.30 $0.04 ===================================== BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES 23,328 21,590 14,148 ===================================== DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES 23,328 26,747 20,299 ===================================== - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
35 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (In thousands, except share amounts)
Shareholder Preferred Stock Common Stock Notes Shares Amount Shares Amount Receivable --------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1996 2,797,878 $ 8,995 11,986,099 $ 628 $(112) Exercise of stock options -- -- 895,561 347 (108) Issuance of Common Stock -- -- 608,500 466 (234) Issuance of Common Stock in connection with initial public offering -- -- 2,375,000 38,268 -- Issuance of Common Stock in connection with the acquisition of a subsidiary -- -- 675,000 2,025 -- Issuance of Series C Preferred Stock 854,363 9,101 -- -- -- Exercise of Warrants -- -- 420,282 2,500 -- Conversion of Preferred Stock into Common Stock (3,652,241) (18,096) 3,652,241 18,096 -- Issuance of Common Stock Warrants -- -- -- 650 -- Repurchase of Common Stock -- -- (112,500) (9) -- Cumulative Translation Adjustment -- -- -- -- -- Payment on shareholder notes receivable -- -- -- -- 20 Deferred stock compensation -- -- -- 1,838 -- Amortization of deferred stock compensation -- -- -- -- -- Net income -- -- -- -- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1997 -- -- 20,500,183 64,809 (434) Exercise of stock options -- -- 1,844,466 3,501 (90) Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan -- -- 70,573 1,081 -- Cumulative Translation Adjustment -- -- -- -- -- Payment on shareholder notes receivable -- -- -- -- 84 Amortization of deferred stock compensation -- -- -- -- -- Income tax benefit of disqualifying dispositions -- -- -- 4,185 -- Net income -- -- -- -- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1998 -- -- 22,415,222 73,576 (440) Exercise of stock options -- -- 1,794,854 7,729 (686) Common stock issued under employee stock -- purchase plan -- 140,176 2,265 -- Issuance of Common Stock in connection -- with hiring CEO and Plato acquisition -- 202,500 5,963 -- Issuance of Common Stock in connection -- with Next Age acquisition -- 556,557 12,998 -- Repurchase of Common Stock -- -- (265,000) (24) -- Valuation of stock options accelerated -- -- -- 3,370 -- Cumulative Translation Adjustment -- -- -- -- -- Payment on shareholder notes receivable -- -- -- -- 440 Amortization of deferred stock compensation -- -- -- -- -- Income tax benefit of disqualifying dispositions -- -- -- 7,043 -- Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1999 -- $ -- 24,844,309 $112,920 $(686) ===========================================================================
Total Accumulated Deferred Shareholders' Comprehensive Stock Accumulated Equity Comprehensive Income/(Loss) Compensation Deficit (Deficit) Income/(Loss) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1996 -- $ (73) $(6,815) $ 2,623 Exercise of stock options -- -- -- 239 Issuance of Common Stock -- -- -- 232 Issuance of Common Stock in connection with initial public offering -- -- 38,268 Issuance of Common Stock in connection with the 2,025 acquisition of a subsidiary -- -- -- Issuance of Series C Preferred Stock -- -- -- 9,101 Exercise of Warrants -- -- -- 2,500 Conversion of Preferred Stock into Common Stock -- -- -- -- Issuance of Common Stock Warrants -- -- -- 650 Repurchase of Common Stock -- -- -- (9) Cumulative Translation Adjustment 124 -- -- 124 $ 124 Payment on shareholder notes receivable -- -- -- 20 Deferred stock compensation -- (1,838) -- -- Amortization of deferred stock compensation -- 214 -- 214 Net income -- -- 774 774 774 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1997 124 (1,697) (6,041) 56,761 $ 898 =========== Exercise of stock options -- -- -- 3,411 Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan -- -- 1,081 Cumulative Translation Adjustment (312) -- -- (312) $ (312) Payment on shareholder notes receivable -- -- -- 84 Amortization of deferred stock compensation -- 477 -- 477 Income tax benefit of disqualifying dispositions -- -- -- 4,185 Net income -- -- 7,934 7,934 7,934 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1998 (188) (1,220) 1,893 73,621 $ 7,622 =========== Exercise of stock options -- -- -- 7,043 Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan -- -- 2,265 Issuance of Common Stock in connection with hiring CEO and Plato acquisition -- -- 5,963 Issuance of Common Stock in connection with Next Age acquisition -- -- 12,998 Repurchase of Common Stock -- -- -- (24) Valuation of stock options accelerated -- -- -- 3,370 Cumulative Translation Adjustment (384) -- -- (384) $ (384) Payment on shareholder notes receivable -- -- -- 440 Amortization of deferred stock compensation -- 256 -- 256 Income tax benefit of disqualifying dispositions -- -- -- 7,043 Net loss -- -- (2,623) (2,623) (2,623) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1999 $(572) $ (964) $ (730) $109,968 $(3,007) =================================================================== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
36 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Years Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 -------------------------------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss) $ (2,623) $ 7,934 $ 774 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Amortization of deferred stock compensation 256 477 214 Depreciation and amortization 8,780 6,405 1,423 Provision for doubtful accounts 622 889 212 Valuation of stock options accelerated 3,370 -- -- Non-cash portion of non-recurring charges related to hiring CEO and acquisition of Plato 5,963 -- -- Write-off of in-process research and development 6,600 -- -- Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions accounted for as a purchase (See Note 4): Accounts receivable (17,304) (10,599) (13,366) Prepaid expenses and other (55) (4,434) (2,442) Accounts payable (1,209) 1,813 1,198 Accounts payable to related parties -- -- (268) Accrued payroll and related benefits 1,748 1,954 879 Other accrued liabilities 7,763 4,874 3,513 Deferred revenues 4,341 4,653 7,688 -------------------------------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 18,252 13,966 (175) -------------------------------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of short-term investments (35,514) (45,509) -- Sale of short-term investments 35,073 28,523 -- Purchases of property and equipment (9,056) (12,551) (7,162) Increase in other assets (3,414) (4,384) (1,055) Cost to acquire subsidiary -- -- (100) -------------------------------- Net cash used in investing activities (12,911) (33,921) (8,317) -------------------------------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from bank line of credit -- 2 4,536 Loan to related party (390) -- -- Repayment of bank line of credit -- -- (4,592) Principal payments on long-term obligations (33) (1,216) (151) Repayments of advances from related parties -- -- (25) Repayment of convertible debt to related parties -- -- (367) Repayment of promissory note (243) -- -- Payment of shareholder notes receivable, net 440 84 20 Repurchases of Common Stock (24) -- (9) Proceeds from sales of preferred stock -- -- 9,101 Proceeds from sales of common stock 9,308 4,492 41,239 -------------------------------- Net cash provided by financing activities 9,058 3,362 49,752 -------------------------------- EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH (384) (311) -- -------------------------------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,015 (16,904) 41,260 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: Beginning of Year 30,256 47,160 5,900 -------------------------------- End of Year $ 44,271 $ 30,256 $ 47,160 ======== ======== ======== SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION Cash paid for interest $ 71 $ 48 $ 42 Cash paid for taxes $ 772 $ 2,366 $ 194 ================================ ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS: Equipment capital lease $ -- $ -- $ 175 Prepaid insurance financing -- -- 588 Common Stock issued to acquire subsidiary -- -- 2,193 Fair market value of warrants issued -- -- 650 Conversion of preferred stock into common stock -- -- 18,096 Issuance of Common Stock for shareholder notes receivable 685 90 342 Income tax benefit of disqualifying dispositions 7,042 4,185 -- Common Stock issued to acquire Plato 5,963 -- -- Common Stock issued to acquire Next Age 12,998 -- -- Valuation of stock options accelerated 3,370 -- -- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
37 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1999 1. THE COMPANY Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. (formerly Enhanced Voice Processing, Inc.), was incorporated in California on October 11, 1990. Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") are involved in the design, development, marketing and support of a suite of Computer Telephony Integration ("CTI") products, including platform and applications software that enable organizations to integrate critical business information and computing resources with telephony and other telecommunications media. The Company's products are marketed primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency of the Company's subsidiaries is the local currency. Accordingly, the Company applies the current rate method to translate the subsidiaries' financial statements into U.S. dollars. Translation adjustments are included as a separate component of shareholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recorded in other income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and were not material in any of the periods presented. Use of Estimates The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Impairment of Long Lived Assets The Company reviews long lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. As of June 30, 1999, no impairment losses have been incurred. Revenue Recognition The Company generates revenues from licensing the rights to use its software products directly to end-users and indirectly through value-added resellers ("VARs"). The Company also generates revenues from sales of post-contract support, consulting and training services performed for customers who license the Company's products. The Company recognizes revenues and records estimated warranty and returns reserves from software license agreements with end users and VARs according to the provisions of Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition," as amended, which superseded SOP No. 91-1. License revenues are recognized upon shipment if there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, the fee is fixed or determinable, collection is probable and vendor specific objective evidence exists to allocate the total arrangement fee between all elements. If a software license agreement provides for 38 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) acceptance criteria that extend beyond the published specifications of the applicable product, then revenues are recognized upon the earlier of customer acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period. If a software license agreement provides for the delivery of software products and significant customization and modification services, product and service revenue is recognized on a percentage of completion basis in relation to costs incurred in the arrangement. Customers who purchase post-contract customer support services under maintenance agreements have the right to receive unspecified product updates, upgrades and enhancements. Customers that do not purchase post-contract customer support must purchase product updates, upgrades and enhancements under separate agreements that are subject to the criteria of the Company's revenue recognition policy. Revenues from post-contract customer support services are recognized ratably over the term of the support period. If post-contract customer support services are included free or at a discount in a license agreement, such amounts are allocated out of the license fee at their fair market value based on the value established by independent sale of such post-contract customer support services to customers. Consulting revenues are primarily related to implementation services performed on a time and materials basis under separate service arrangements related to the installation of the Company's software products. Revenues from consulting and training services are recognized as services are performed. Cost of license revenues includes the costs of product media, product duplication and manuals, as well as allocated labor and overhead costs related to preparation and shipment of the product. Cost of service revenues consists primarily of salaries, benefits and allocated overhead costs related to consulting personnel and the customer service department. Deferred revenues include software license fees and services that have been invoiced to the customer for which the revenue earnings process has not been completed. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company's investments consist of tax-exempt debt securities and certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or less and money market accounts. Short-term Investments The Company's investments, which consist primarily of tax-exempt debt securities, are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value. The difference between cost and fair value of all of the Company's short-term investments is insignificant. Such investments are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses, if material, are recorded as a separate component of equity until realized. Interest income is recorded using an effective interest rate, with associated premium or discount amortized to "investment income." The cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method. All available-for-sale securities are classified as current assets and mature within 12 months. Property and Equipment Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (or over the lease term if it is shorter for leasehold improvements), which range from 3 to 5 years. Property and equipment leased under capital leases is amortized over the lesser of its useful life or the lease term. Software Development Costs The Company capitalizes internally generated software development costs in compliance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed." Capitalization of computer software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility for the product. The Company capitalized approximately $4.8 million of software development in fiscal 1999, $1.9 in fiscal 39 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 1998 and $450,000 in fiscal 1997. The $4.8 million capitalized in fiscal 1999 includes the $2.2 million of purchased software recorded as a result of the Next Age acquisition (See Note 4). Net software development costs are included in other assets. Amortization of capitalized software development costs begins when the products are available for general release to customers, and is computed on a product-by-product basis as the greater of: (a) the ratio of current gross revenues for a product to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for the product; or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product (generally three years). The Company amortized $995,000 of capitalized software development costs in fiscal 1999 and $256,000 in fiscal 1998. No amortization was recorded in fiscal 1997 as these costs were incurred and capitalized near the end of the fiscal year. Research and development costs, not capitalized under SFAS 86, are expensed as incurred. Comprehensive Income SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," requires companies to report an additional measure of income on the income statement or to create a new financial statement that shows the new measure of income. Comprehensive income includes foreign currency translation gains and losses and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities that have been previously excluded from net income and reflected instead in stockholders' equity. The Company has integrated the presentation of comprehensive income (loss) with the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity. Intangibles Intangibles include goodwill, which represents the amount of purchase price in excess of the fair value of the tangible net assets in acquisitions completed by the Company and are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five to seven years. Goodwill is evaluated quarterly for impairment and written down to net realizable value if necessary. No impairment has been recorded to date. Intangible assets also include tradenames and assembled work forces that are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five to seven years. Intangible assets consist of the following at June 30 (in thousands): - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 -------- -------- Goodwill $7,953 $2,093 Workforce and trade names 934 -- ------ ------ 8,887 2,093 Less: Accumulated amortization (697) (399) ------ ------ $8,190 $1,694 ====== ====== - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) Non-Recurring Charges In connection with the hiring of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Ori Sasson, and the acquisition of Plato in December 1998 (see Note 4), the Company recorded non-recurring charges totaling $11.8 million related to compensation, consisting of common stock valued at $5.6 million and $6.2 million of tax reimbursements paid or accrued to Mr. Sasson and an additional $0.6 million of compensation paid or accrued to other Plato employees. In addition, the Company recorded $3.1 million related to an employment and severance agreement with the Company's former President and Chief Financial Officer as a result of acceleration of unvested stock options. As of June 30, 1999 the Company had paid all tax reimbursements to Ori Sasson. Additionally, during fiscal 1999, the Company recorded $300,000 related to other employment and severance agreements that called for the acceleration of unvested stock options. Purchased In-Process Research and Development ("IPR&D") In connection with the acquisition of Next Age Technologies, Inc. ("Next Age"), the Company allocated $6.6 million to purchase IPR&D for the year ended June 30, 1999 (see Note 4). This amount was expensed because the IPR&D projects identified had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. The allocation to IPR&D during the year ended June 30, 1999 was evaluated based on the SEC's current views regarding valuation methodologies. The value allocated to IPR&D was determined by estimating the costs to develop the purchased technology into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting net cash flows from each project, excluding the cash flows related to the portion of each project that was incomplete at the acquisition date, and discounting the net cash flows back to their present value. Each of the project forecasts were based upon future discounted cash flows, taking into account the stage of development of each in-process project, the cost to develop that project, the expected income stream, the life cycle of the product ultimately developed, and the associated risks. In each case, the selection of the applicable discount rate was based on consideration of the Company's weighted average costs of capital, as well as other factors including the useful life of each technology, profitability levels of each technology, the uncertainty of technology advances that were known at the time, and the stage of completion of each technology. If the projects are not successfully developed, the sales and profitability of the Company may be adversely affected in future periods. Additionally, the value of other intangible assets may be impaired. Following is a discussion of the allocation to IPR&D during the year ended June 30, 1999. At the acquisition date, Next Age was conducting development, engineering, and testing activities associated with the following future versions and products (collectively, "the Products"); a) Single-site Workforce Manager, b) Multi-site Workforce Manager, c) Multi-site/Multimedia Workforce Manager and d) Next Generation Workforce Manager. Next Age products are designed to optimize the management, staffing, scheduling and productivity of contact center employees. Upon completion, Single-site and Multi-site Workforce Manager will be made available to customers with an SQL server database. Multi-site/Multimedia Workforce Manager is expected to provide users with additional functionality and the ability to transfer information data through web-based and e-mail-based channels. Next Generation Workforce Manager is expected to allow users to channel the flow of data through Internet based platforms. At the acquisition date, Next Age was approximately 70%, 60%, 80% and 25% complete with development of the Single-site Workforce Manager, Multi-site Workforce Manager, Multi- site/Multimedia Workforce Manager and Next Generation Workforce Manager, respectively. The Company expects that the Products will be completed in fiscal 2000, after which the Company expects to begin generating economic benefits from the value of the completed IPR&D. Revenues attributable to the Products were estimated to be $10.4 million in fiscal 2000 and $23.9 million in fiscal 2001. IPR&D revenue, as a percentage of total projected Company revenue, was expected to peak in fiscal 2002 and decline thereafter as new product technologies were expected to be introduced by the Company. Operating expenses average 65% over the projection period. The costs to complete the IPR&D were expected to be $2.3 million in fiscal 2000 and $4.5 million in fiscal 2001. Risk-adjusted discount rates of 26% to 30% were utilized to discount projected cashflows. Net Income (Loss) Per Share Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common share outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of preferred stock (using the "if converted" method) and stock options and warrants (using the treasury stock method). Potential common shares are excluded from the computation of dilutive net loss per share as their effect is anti- dilutive. 41 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Common and Potential Common Shares presented in the accompanying statements of operations (as rounded) are comprised of the following (in thousands):
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Year Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 ------------------------------------------ Weighted average common shares outstanding 23,328 20,923 13,481 Shares issued in acquisition of Forte -- 667 667 ------------------------------------------ BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES 23,328 21,590 14,148 ========================================== Convertible Preferred Stock -- -- 3,090 Weighted average options and warrants for common stock -- 5,157 3,061 ------------------------------------------ DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES 23,328 26,747 20,299 ========================================== - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximately 3,226,000 common stock equivalents were excluded from diluted weighted average common shares for the year ended June 30, 1999 as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" which requires companies to record derivative financial instruments on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives would be accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The key criterion for hedge accounting is that the hedging relationship must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows. In June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities--Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133--an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133." SFAS No. 137 defers the effective date of SFAS No. 133, such that SFAS No. 133 shall be effective for all fiscal quarters of all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. This statement will not have a material impact on the financial condition or results of the operations of the Company. In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued SOP 98-4, "Deferral of the Effective Date of a Provision of SOP 97-2, `Software Revenue Recognition,'" which defers for one year the application of provisions SOP 97-2, which limits what is considered vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the various elements in a multiple element arrangement. All other provisions of SOP 97-2 remain in effect. This SOP was effective as of March 31, 1998. In December 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-9, "Modification of SOP 97-2, `Software Revenue Recognition' With Respect to Certain Transactions," which amends paragraphs 11 and 12 of SOP 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition," to require recognition of revenue using the "residual value method" under certain conditions. Effective December 15, 1998, SOP 98-9 amends SOP 98-4, "Deferral of the Effective Date of a Provision of SOP 97-2, `Software Revenue Recognition,'" to extend the deferral of the application of certain passages of SOP 97-2 provided by SOP 98-4 through fiscal years beginning on or before March 15, 1999. All other provisions of this SOP are effective for transactions entered into in fiscal years beginning after March 15, 1999. The Company has adopted SOP 97-2, as amended. The adoption of SOP 97-2 did not have a material impact on the Company's business practices or revenue recognition. In March 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." SOP 98-1 provides guidance on accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use. SOP 98-1 applies to all non-governmental entities and is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. SOP 98-1 will not have a material impact on the financial condition or results of the operations of the Company. In April 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities." For purposes of this SOP, start-up activities are defined broadly as those one-time activities related to opening a new facility, introducing a new product or service, conducting business in a new territory, conducting business with a new class of customer or beneficiary, initiating a new process in an existing facility, or commencing some new operation. Start-up activities include activities related to 42 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) organizing a new entity (commonly referred to as organization costs). This SOP provides guidance on accounting for the costs of start-up activities. SOP 98-5 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. SOP 98-5 will not have a material impact on the financial condition or results of the operations of the Company. 3. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of accounts receivable. As of June 30, 1999, approximately 17% of accounts receivable were concentrated with two customers and as of June 30, 1998, approximately 15% of accounts receivable were concentrated with two customers. The Company generally does not require collateral on accounts receivable, as the majority of the Company's customers are large, well established companies. The Company provides reserves for credit losses and such losses have been insignificant in all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. For cash equivalents, the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. For debt, the fair value is estimated based on market prices for similar debt instruments, and the carrying amount approximates fair value. Substantially all of the Company's cash and cash equivalents are held in five financial institutions. 4. ACQUISITIONS In June 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Next Age Technologies, Inc., a California corporation ("Next Age"). Next Age software products are designed to optimize the management, staffing, scheduling and productivity of contact center employees. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition, the Company issued 556,557 shares of its Common Stock in exchange for all outstanding shares of Next Age Common Stock, and issued options to purchase 25,068 shares of the Company's Common Stock in exchange for all outstanding Next Age Stock options. A total of 97,918 shares have been placed into an escrow subject to the satisfaction of all representations and warranties under the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement. The merger was accounted for as a purchase; accordingly, the Company allocated the purchase price based upon the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities assumed. The valuation was based on accepted appraisal methodologies used at the time of the allocation. The total purchase price was $14.6 million. Management estimates that $6.6 million of the purchase price represents acquired in-process technology that has not yet reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future use. Accordingly, this amount was immediately charged to expense upon consummation of the acquisition (see Note 2). Additionally, the Company allocated $2.2 million, $0.9 million, and $4.9 million of the purchase price to acquired software, workforce and trade names, and goodwill, respectively. These intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over four to seven years. The results of operations of Next Age are included in the Company's financial statements from the date of acquisition forward. Comparative pro forma financial information has not been presented, as the operations of Next Age were not material to the Company's consolidated financial statements. In December 1998, the Company hired Ori Sasson as its Chief Executive Officer and elected him as a member of the Board of Directors of Genesys. In connection with the hiring of Mr. Sasson, the Company also completed the acquisition of Plato Software Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Plato"), a company in which Mr. Sasson was a principal shareholder. The merger was completed pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization ("Merger Agreement") dated as of December 9, 1998. As Plato did not have significant operations or revenue prior to the acquisition, the Company has treated the purchase as the acquisition of an asset. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 202,500 shares of its Common Stock in exchange for all outstanding shares of Plato Common Stock, and issued options to purchase 47,500 shares of Genesys Common Stock in exchange for all outstanding Plato Stock options. A total of 50,000 shares have been placed into an escrow subject to the satisfaction of all representations and warranties under the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement. The Company 43 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) recorded the fair value of net assets purchased from Plato, which consisted of certain technology to be incorporated into the Genesys products, totaling $382,000 as of December 31, 1998. As the acquisition of Plato was consummated in connection with the election of Ori Sasson as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, in December 1998 the Company recorded as expense the portion of the shares and options issued that represented compensation to Mr. Sasson and other Plato employees. Deferred compensation totaling $800,000 related to unvested options will be amortized over the remaining vesting period of the options of approximately four years. In addition, the Company recorded as expense its reimbursement to Mr. Sasson of the tax liabilities associated with this compensation. The total amount of compensation expense and related tax reimbursements associated with this transaction was approximately $12.4 million, and was reflected as part of a non-recurring charge in the Company's financial statements in fiscal 1999. (See Note 2) In December 1997, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Forte Advanced Management Software, Inc. ("Forte") in exchange for approximately 667,099 shares of the Company's common stock. The Company also assumed Forte's outstanding options, which were converted to options to purchase 90,349 shares of the Company's common stock. The merger was accounted for as a pooling of interests and, accordingly, the consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect the acquisition on a pooling of interests basis. Net revenue and income of the separate companies, accounted for as a pooling of interests, for the years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 were (in thousands):
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Genesys Forte Advanced Telecommunications Management Laboratories, Inc. Software, Inc. Combined ------------------------------------------------- Year Ended June 30, 1998: Total Revenue $81,516 $3,152 $84,668 Net Income (Loss) 8,485 (551) 7,934 Year Ended June 30, 1997: Total Revenue $34,889 $2,649 $37,538 Net Income (Loss) 1,616 (842) 774 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Year Ended June 30, 1999 1998 ----------------------------- Computer and office equipment $ 16,576 $13,048 Furniture and fixtures 2,306 2,056 Leasehold improvements and other 11,731 6,411 ----------------------------- 30,613 21,515 Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (13,587) (6,840) ----------------------------- $ 17,026 $14,675 ============================= - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Included in property and equipment are assets acquired under capital lease obligations with an original cost of approximately $282,000 as of both June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Accumulated amortization on the leased assets was approximately $135,000 and $176,500 at June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. 44 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 6. COMMITMENTS AND LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS In June 1997, the Company entered into a long-term note payable with a vendor. The note is unsecured and bears interest at 6.74% per annum. The note was paid in full during fiscal 1999. The Company leases its facilities under noncancellable operating lease agreements, which expire on various dates through September 2003. Minimum future payments under noncancellable capital and operating leases as of June 30, 1999 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal Year Capital Operating - ----------- Leases Leases - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2000 $ 59 $ 3,873 2001 58 2,788 2002 29 2,594 2003 -- 1,044 2004 and thereafter -- 2,731 ------------------------------ Total minimum payments 146 $13,030 ============ Less: Amount representing interest at 6.74% to 19% (15) --------------- Present value of minimum payments 131 Less: Current portion (65) --------------- Long-term portion $ 66 =============== - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rent expense was approximately $4,099,000, $3,574,000 and $1,155,000 in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. 7. LITIGATION On December 17, 1996, GeoTel Communications Corporation ("GeoTel") filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts naming the Company as defendant, and alleging infringement of a patent issued to GeoTel entitled "Communications System Using a Central Controller to Control at Least One Network and Agent System", U.S. Patent No. 5,546,452 (the "GeoTel Patent"). On November 20, 1998, the Company and GeoTel entered into a settlement agreement concerning the patent dispute on terms that neither company believes are material to its financial results. Pursuant to the settlement, GeoTel will receive a pre-determined license fee for certain products paid over a fixed period of time in exchange for a nonexclusive, irrevocable license to use the technology covered by the GeoTel Patent or any related patent in all present and future Genesys products which incorporate such technology. The license fee is expensed in the period in which it is paid, which approximates the useful life of the licensed technology . From time to time, the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. As of June 30, 1999, the Company was not a party of any legal proceedings that, if decided adversely to the Company, would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. 8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS In April 1999, the Company provided Next Age with a loan to borrow up to $1.5 million, of which $390,000 was outstanding at the time of the acquisition of Next Age (see Note 4). In connection with the acquisition, the $390,000 outstanding loan was forgiven and taken into consideration as part of the Next Age acquisition purchase price. 45 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 9. COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK In June 1997, the Company completed its initial public offering of 2,375,000 shares of Common Stock at $18.00 per share. In connection with the initial public offering, all outstanding shares of Preferred Stock automatically converted into Common Stock. In addition, the Company issued 420,282 shares of Common Stock in connection with the exercise of certain warrants prior to the closing of the offering. Restricted Stock Purchase Agreements Since inception, the Company has sold an aggregate of 6,281,500 shares of Common Stock to certain employees in connection with their employment and to certain vendors. All of these shares were sold at the fair market value as of the date of purchase as determined by Board of Directors. All of these shares are subject to stock repurchase agreements whereby the Company has the right to repurchase unvested shares upon termination of employment or engagement at the original price paid for the shares. Vesting generally occurs 25% on the first anniversary date of employment or engagement and monthly thereafter over the following 36 months. As of June 30, 1999, an aggregate of 773,500 shares of Common Stock have been repurchased under these agreements, and 372,312 shares are subject to the Company's repurchase right at prices ranging from $0.0167 to $0.375 per share. Stock Plans In March 1997, the Board adopted the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1997 Plan"), which serves as a successor to the Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "1995 Plan"). All shares issued under the 1995 Plan were transferred to the 1997 Plan upon the effectiveness of the Company's initial public offering. The Company has reserved shares of Common Stock for issuance under the 1997 Plan equal to the sum of (i) the shares which remained available for issuance under the 1995 Plan, including the shares subject to outstanding options thereunder, and (ii) an additional increase of 2,400,000 shares. During 1999, the Company's shareholders approved an additional increase of 2,500,000 shares. In addition, upon the completion of each fiscal year of the Company, beginning with the 1999 fiscal year, the share reserve will automatically be increased on the first trading day of July each year by a number of shares equal to five percent (5%) of the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar month. Accordingly, on July 1, 1998, the share reserve was automatically increased by 1,120,761 shares. The 1997 Plan is divided into four separate components: (i) the Discretionary Option Grant Program, under which eligible individuals in the Company's employ or service (including officers and other employees, non-employee Board members and independent consultants) may, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be granted options to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price not less than the fair market value on the grant date, (ii) the Stock Issuance Program, under which such individuals may, in the Plan Administrator's discretion, be issued shares of Common Stock directly, either through the purchase of such shares at a price not less than the fair market value at the time of issuance or as a fully-vested bonus for services rendered the Company, (iii) the Salary Investment Option Grant Program, under which executive officers and other highly compensated employees may elect to apply a portion of their base salary to the acquisition of special below-market stock option grants, and (iv) the Automatic Option Grant Program, under which option grants will automatically be made at periodic intervals to eligible non-employee Board members to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the grant date. Under the Company's 1997 Plan, the Board of Directors may grant incentive and nonqualified stock options to employees, directors and consultants. The exercise price per share for an incentive stock option cannot be less than the fair market value on the date of grant. The exercise price per share for a nonqualified stock option cannot be less than 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant. Options granted under the Option Plan generally expire ten years after the date of grant and vesting generally occurs 25% on the first anniversary date of employment or engagement and monthly thereafter over the following 36 months. As of June 30, 1999, a total of 14,313,595 shares of Common Stock have been authorized for grant under the 1997 Plan. 46 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) On October 13, 1998, the Company simultaneously cancelled and re-issued 2,418,769 options to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock issued under its 1997 Plan during a re-pricing of employee stock options, excluding stock options issued to executive officers and directors. Stock options that were re- priced had a weighted average exercise price of $26.47 per share and were re- issued at $12.50 per share. In June 1999, the Company acquired Next Age and assumed Next Age's outstanding options granted under its stock option plan ("Next Age Plan"), which were converted to options to purchase 25,068 shares of the Company's Common Stock. In December 1998, the Company acquired Plato and assumed Plato's outstanding options granted under its stock option Plan ("Plato Plan"), which were converted to options to purchase 42,500 shares of the Company's Common Stock. On December 31, 1997, the Company acquired Forte and assumed Forte's outstanding options granted under its stock option plan ("Forte Plan"), which were converted to options to purchase 90,349 shares of the Company's Common Stock. No further options are available for future grant under the Next Age, Plato or Forte stock option plans, and the Company has reserved for issuance shares of its Common Stock for the exercise of these stock options. In addition to stock option grants made under the plans described above, during fiscal 1999, the Company's Board of Directors' Compensation Committee made discretionary stock option grants to certain of its executive officers and key employees that were outside of any plan. The number of discretionary stock option grants issued as of June 30, 1999 was 3,080,000. Vesting generally occurs 25% on the first anniversary date of employment or engagement and monthly thereafter over the following 36 months. Future discretionary grants may be made if the Compensation Committee deems it necessary to attract the services of key individuals essential to the Company's long-term growth and success. 47 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) Details of option activity under the 1997 Plan (including activity under the 1995 Plan); Forte Plan; Next Age Plan; Plato Plan; and the discretionary grants (collectively, the "Plans") are as follows:
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Options Outstanding --------------- --------------------------------- Available Number of Weighted For Grant Shares Price Per Share Average --------------------------------------------------------------------- Balances, June 30, 1996 676,334 2,636,500 $ 0.02 - $ .23 $ 0.04 Authorized 7,380,000 -- -- -- Granted (5,695,500) 5,695,500 $ 0.38 - $18.00 $ 5.66 Exercised -- (895,561) $ 0.02 - $ 7.50 $ 0.39 Canceled 212,436 (212,436) $ 0.02 - $10.00 $ 0.66 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balances, June 30, 1997 2,573,270 7,224,003 $ 0.02 - $18.00 $ 4.41 Authorized -- -- -- -- Granted outside of 1997 -- 90,349 $ 12.00 - $12.00 $12.00 Plan Granted under 1997 Plan (2,166,100) 2,166,100 $26.375 - $31.25 $28.11 Exercised -- (1,844,466) $ 0.02 - $18.00 $ 1.58 Canceled 517,041 (517,041) $ 0.02 - $30.00 $ 9.24 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balances, June 30, 1998 924,211 7,118,945 $ 0.02 - $18.00 $12.05 Authorized 3,620,761 -- -- -- Granted outside of 1997 -- 3,148,108 $ 0.40 - $21.75 $12.89 Plan Granted under 1997 Plan (7,139,829) 7,139,829 $ 0.40 - $31.13 $14.23 Exercised -- (1,794,854) $ 0.02 - $15.00 $ 4.30 Canceled 4,473,717 (4,473,717) $ 0.02 - $31.25 $19.84 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Balances, June 30, 1999 1,878,860 11,138,311 $ 0.02 - $29.75 $12.17 ======================================================================= - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares granted outside of the 1997 Plan include the Forte Plan, Next Age Plan, Plato Plan and the discretionary grants. For fiscal 1999, the price per share information for options canceled reflect exercise prices prior to the October 1998 repricing of non-executive employee stock options.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Number Weighted Weighted Number Weighted Outstanding Average Average Exercisable Average Exercise at June 30, Remaining Exercise June 30, Exercise Prices 1999 Life Price 1999 Price - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ 0.0167 - $ 10.0000 1,846,143 7.34 $ 3.1452 842,774 $ 3.0954 $ 11.4375 - $ 11.4375 2,845,750 9.73 $11.4375 75,000 $11.4375 $ 12.0000 - $ 12.0000 696,892 9.74 $12.0000 52,884 $12.0000 $ 12.5000 - $ 12.5000 2,818,959 9.25 $12.5000 247,942 $12.5000 $ 14.0000 - $ 29.7500 2,930,567 7.75 $18.2925 261,405 $15.1398 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ 0.0167 - $ 29.7500 11,138,311 8.69 $12.1744 1,480,005 $ 7.5357 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
48 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) The weighted average fair values of options granted during fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997 was $14.34, $12.00 and $12.00, respectively.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Subject to Repurchase - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number Subject to Repurchase at Weighted Average Purchase Price June 30,1999 Repurchase Price - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- $0.0167 296,062 $0.0167 $0.2250 65,000 $0.2250 $0.3750 11,250 $0.3750 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- $0.0167 - $0.3750 372,312 $0.0807 - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of June 30, 1999, 263,339 shares were vested and exercisable under the stock purchase provisions of the Plans. In connection with the issuance of stock options and common stock to employees and consultants, the Company has recorded deferred compensation in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.9 million, representing the difference between the deemed fair value of the Company's common stock and the issue price of the common stock or the exercise price of stock options at the date of grant. The Company is amortizing the deferred compensation expense over the applicable vesting period, which is typically four years. For fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, amortization expense was approximately $532,000, $477,000 and $176,000, respectively. Had compensation cost been determined under a fair value method described below, the Company's net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share would have resulted in the following pro forma amounts (in thousands except per share amounts):
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 ----------------------------------------------- Net income (loss): As reported $ (2,624) $ 7,934 $ 774 Pro forma $(27,643) $(3,271) $ (747) Basic net income (loss) per share: As reported $ (0.11) $ 0.37 $ 0.05 Pro forma $ (1.19) $ (0.15) $(0.05) Diluted net income (loss) per share: As reported $ (0.11) $ 0.30 $ 0.04 Pro forma $ (1.19) $ (0.15) $(0.05) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fair value of each option grant under the 1997 Plan is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants: risk-free rates ranging from 5-7% and corresponding to government securities with original maturities similar to the vesting periods; expected dividend yield of 0%; expected lives of 3 years beyond vest dates; and expected volatility of 77%, 56% and 115% in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan In March 1997, the Board adopted the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"). The Company has reserved 500,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the Purchase Plan. The Purchase Plan enables eligible employees to purchase common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the first or the last day of each offering period. As of June 30, 1999, 210,749 shares had been purchased under the Purchase Plan. 49 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) Issuance of Warrants Warrants Issued to Series C Shareholders Concurrent with the closing of the sale of Series C Preferred Stock to two corporate investors, the Company issued warrants for the purchase of 449,664 shares of Common Stock to one investor exercisable at a price of $35.00 per share and 44,965 shares of Common Stock to the other investor exercisable at a price of 110% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date such shares vest. The warrants expire in February 2004 and February 2000, respectively. Each of these warrants becomes exercisable upon the achievement of certain sales and development objectives specified in the warrant agreements. In accordance with SFAS 123 and related interpretations at the time, the Company recorded the aggregate estimated fair value of the warrants of $650,000 in February 1997, and will amortize the value of the warrants to cost of license revenues as the sales and development milestones are achieved. Amortization of the warrants is computed as the greater of (a) the ratio of current gross revenues generated to total revenue milestones under the agreement or (b) the straight-line method over the life of the agreement with MCI. Amortization expense recorded in fiscal 1999 and 1998 was approximately $162,500 and $203,000, respectively. Shares Reserved for Issuance As of June 30, 1999, the Company has reserved shares of Common Stock for future issuance as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Shares --------------- Employee stock purchase plan. 289,251 Exercise of stock options 13,017,171 Exercise of warrants 494,629 --------------- 13,801,051 =============== - ---------------------------------------------------------------
10. INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Year Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 -------------------------------------------------------- Current: Federal $6,704 $3,738 $ 1,106 State 1,108 544 150 Foreign 1,785 68 461 -------------------------------------------------------- Total 9,597 4,350 1,717 -------------------------------------------------------- Deferred: Federal 397 (350) (1,107) State (51) 10 39 -------------------------------------------------------- Total 346 (340) (1,068) -------------------------------------------------------- Total Provision $9,943 $4,010 $ 649 ======================================================== - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
50 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) The actual provision for income taxes differs from the statutory income tax provision as follows (in thousands):
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Year Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 ----------------------------------------- Statutory federal tax $2,562 $4,180 $ 793 State tax, net of federal benefit 302 528 124 Change in valuation allowance -- (278) (868) Foreign taxes 70 68 460 Tax exempt interest income (469) (560) -- Non-deductible compensation 6,061 -- -- In-process research & development 2,576 -- -- Research & development credits (917) -- -- Other (242) 72 140 ----------------------------------------- $9,943 $4,010 $ 649 ========================================= - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The components of the net deferred tax asset are as follows (in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year Ended June 30, 1999 1998 ---------------------------- Reserves and accruals not currently deductible $1,288 $1,343 Tax credit carryforwards 342 633 ---------------------------- Net deferred tax asset $1,630 $1,976 ============================ - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The net deferred tax asset is included in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. 11. MAJOR CUSTOMERS The following customers accounted for 10% or more of total revenues in the periods indicated:
- ------------------------------------------------------------- For the Years Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 ---------------------------- Customer A * 14.1% 11.1% - -------------------------------------------------------------
* Less than 10% of total revenues 12. SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 ("SFAS No. 131"), "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", in fiscal 1999. SFAS No. 131 established standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. It also established standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision makers, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company's chief operating decision making group is the Executive Committee, which is comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and various Vice 51 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) Presidents of the Company. The Company is organized geographically and by line of business. The Company has two major lines of business operating segments: license and service. The Company also evaluates certain subsets of business segments by service categories. While the Executive Committee evaluates results in a number of different ways, the line of business management structure is the primary basis for which it assesses financial performance and allocates resources. The Company does not track assets by operating segments. Consequently, it is not practical to show assets by operating segments.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For the Years Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1997 ------------------------------------------------------- Revenues from unaffiliated customers: License $113,620 $68,973 $31,919 Service revenue Professional service 13,603 7,360 2,817 Maintenance service 11,885 8,335 2,802 ------------------------------------------------------- Total service revenue 25,488 15,695 5,619 ------------------------------------------------------- $139,108 $84,668 $37,538 ======================================================= Cost of revenue: License $ 4,980 $ 3,342 $ 1,615 Service 18,761 10,554 3,881 ------------------------------------------------------- $ 23,741 $13,896 $ 5,496 ======================================================= - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geographic information:
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year ended June 30 (in thousands): 1999 1998 1997 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Long Lived Long Lived Long Lived Revenues Assets Revenues Assets Revenues Assets ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ United States $ 69,628 $104,925 $47,295 $ 82,959 $25,107 $69,847 United Kingdom 29,416 22,039 17,835 12,341 6,902 6,780 France 8,407 8,739 6,683 3,467 -- -- Germany 5,744 4,136 -- -- -- -- Canada 7,954 4,323 7,196 4,312 3,559 2,710 Japan 2,647 1,797 1,580 1,230 -- -- Other Foreign Countries 15,312 1,548 4,079 391 1,970 608 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total $139,108 $147,500 $84,668 $104,700 $37,538 $79,945 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues generated from international sales of the Company's products, which includes export shipments originating in the United States to unaffiliated customers and sales to unaffiliated customers from the Company's foreign offices, represented 49.9%, 44.7% and 33.4% of total revenues in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED) On Wednesday, September 28, 1999, a press release was issued announcing that Alcatel has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Genesys. The planned stock-for-stock transaction values Genesys at approximately $1.5 billion, on the basis of the current ten day average of Alcatel American Depository Shares (ADS) stock price of $28. 52 GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) The acquisition will be made by a merger under which shareholders of Genesys will be given 1.667 Alcatel ADS in exchange for one Genesys share. There is a "collar" on the deal so that the value for each given Genesys share will not exceed $55 or be less than $45. The Alcatel ADS is a U.S. Security that represents one-fifth of an Alcatel share and is listed on the NYSE. Completion of the acquisition is subject to the expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under appropriate antitrust laws and approval by Genesys shareholders. The deal is expected to be completed in January 2000. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Not applicable. 53 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The information required by this item relating to the Company's executive officers is included under the caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I. There are five members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The term of office of each Director is one year. The number of Directors of the Company shall be no less than four nor more than seven, the exact number of directors shall be fixed from time to time within such limit set by the Board of Directors or shareholders. The number of directors presently authorized is five members. Directors hold office until the end of their terms and until their succesors have been elected and qualified.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME PRINCIPAL POSITIONS IN LAST FIVE YEARS AGE DIRECTOR SINCE - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Shenkman Mr Shenkman co-founded the Company and has served as a director 37 January since January 1993. Mr. Shenkman has served as Chairman of the 1993 Board of Directors since December 1998. Mr Shenkman served as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer from its formation in October 1990 until July 1998. Ori Sasson Mr. Sasson joined the Company in December 1998 as its President 37 December and Chief Executive Officer and a director. Prior to joining the 1998 Company, Mr. Sasson was Chief Executive Officer and President of Scopus Technology, Inc., a customer relationship management software company, from March 1991 until July 1998, when Scopus was acquired by Siebel Systems, Inc. Alec Miloslavsky Mr. Miloslavsky co-founded the Company and has served as its 36 January Chief Technical Officer since the Company's formation in October 1993 1990, as a director since January 1993 and as Vice Chairman of the Board since March 1997. Prior to co-founding the Company, Mr. Miloslavsky worked as an independent software consultant. Bruce Dunlevie Mr. Dunlevie is a General Partner of Benchmark Capital LLC, a 42 July 1996 venture capital firm co-founded by Mr. Dunlevie in May 1995. Mr. Dunlevie is also a General Partner of Merrill, Pickard, Anderson & Eyre. Mr. Dunlevie also served as Vice President and General Manager of the Personnel Computer Division of Everex Systems, Inc., a personal computer manufacturer. Paul Levy In 1981, Mr. Levy co-founded and currently serves as Chairman of 43 February 1997 Rational Software Corporation ("Rational"), a software company providing products that automate componet-based development of software. Prior to April 1999, Mr. Levy served as Chief Executive Officer of Rational and prior to September 1996 he served as President of Rational. Since August 1996, he has served as a director of Peerless Systems Corporation, a provider of Software based imaging systems for the digital document product marketplace. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no family relationships among the directors and executive officers of the Company. 54 SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires certain persons, including the Company's directors and officers to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership in the Company's securities with the SEC. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports and amendments thereto furnished to the Company, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with during the year ended June 30, 1999, except for late filings by new executive officers Christopher Brennan, Donald Hunt, Ad Nederlof and Yuri Shtivelman of Form 3's to report their beneficial ownership, Donald Hunt of a Form 4 to report a purchase of the Company's Common Stock in February and Gregory Shenkman of a Form 5. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE The following table provides certain summary information regarding the compensation earned in each of the 1997, 1998 and 1999 fiscal year, for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries during each such fiscal year by (i) Mr. Sasson, who was serving as the Company's Chief Executive Officer on the last day of the 1999 fiscal year, (ii) Mr. McCloskey, who served as the Company's President and Chief Financial Officer in addition to his other responsibilities, through February 12, 1999, (iii) Mr. Shenkman, who served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer through July 24, 1998, and (iv) each of the other four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company who were serving as such on the last day of the 1999 fiscal year and whose salary and bonus for such fiscal year exceeded $100,000. In addition, included in the table is John McNulty who would have been among the four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company on the last day of the 1999 fiscal year had he continued to serve as an executive officer through such date. The individuals included in the table will be collectively referred to as the "Named Executive Officers". There were no restricted stock grants in fiscal 1999. The Company does not have a Long-Term Incentive Plan. 55
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Long-Term Annual Compensation Compensation -------------------------------- ------------ Securities Other Annual Underlying All Other Salary Bonus Compensation Options Compensation Name and Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) (2) (#) ($) (3) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ori Sasson 1999 168,269 -- 6,225,000 900,000 5,580,000 President and Chief Executive Officer (1) 1998 -- -- -- -- -- 1997 -- -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gregory Shenkman 1999 9,276 -- -- 7,500 37,500 Chairman of the Board of Directors and Former 1998 180,000 -- -- -- -- President and Chief Executive Officer (4) 1997 135,510 -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael McCloskey 1999 116,132 -- -- 150,000 71,250 Former President, Chief Financial Officer and 1998 180,000 -- -- -- -- Chief Operating Officer (5) 1997 142,645 -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Alec Miloslavsky 1999 202,500 40,000 -- -- -- Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and 1998 180,000 -- -- -- -- Chief Technical Officer 1997 133,333 -- -- 150,000 -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Richard DeGolia 1999 202,500 40,000 -- 100,000 -- Senior Vice President, Business Development 1998 180,000 -- -- -- -- and Strategic Planning, Corporate Secretary 1997 142,500 -- -- -- -- and Acting General Counsel - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Donald Hunt 1999 114,262 -- 30,000 350,000 -- Senior Vice President, Field Operations (6) 1998 -- -- -- -- -- Americas and Asia Pacific 1997 -- -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yuri Shtivelman 1999 175,705 60,000 -- 100,000 -- Senior Vice President, Product Development 1998 144,567 -- -- -- -- 1997 138,912 -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ John McNulty 1999 228,124 -- -- -- Former Vice President, Sales (7) 1998 185,000 -- -- -- -- 1997 69,375 -- -- 240,000 -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Mr. Sasson joined the Company as Chief Executive Officer in December 1998. (2) Mr. Sasson was paid $6,225,000 in tax reimbursements in connection with the acquisition of Plato (see "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions"). Mr. Hunt was paid $30,000 in commissions during fiscal 1999. (3) The value of the Common Stock issued to Mr. Sasson in connection with his hiring as Chief Executive Officer and the acquisition of Plato was 5,580,000. (See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, No. 2 Non- Recurring Charges"). Mr. Shenkman was paid $37,500 in consulting fees pursuant to the terms of his mutual executive separation agreement. Mr. McClosky was paid $71,250 in consulting fees pursuant to the terms of his employment and 56 severance agreement. See "Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Agreements". (4) Mr. Shenkman resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer in July 1998. Mr. Shenkman continues to serve as Chairman of the Board of the Directors of the Company. See "Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Agreements". (5) Mr. McCloskey resigned his position as an executive officer of the Company in February 1999. See "Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Agreements." (6) Mr. Hunt joined the Company as Senior Vice President on January 4, 1999. (7) Mr. McNulty resigned his position as an executive officer of the Company and accepted a non-executive position in January 1999. See "Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Agreements". OPTIONS/SARS GRANTED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR The following table provides information on stock option grants during fiscal year 1999 to the Named Executive Officers. No Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") were granted or outstanding during the 1999 fiscal year.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Potential Realizable Securities % of Total Value At Assumed Annual Underlying Options/SARs Exercise or Rates of Stock Price Options/SARS Granted to Base Appreciation Option ($)(4) Granted Employees in Price Epiration -------------------------- Name (#)(1) Fiscal Year (2) ($/Sh) Date (3) 5% ($)(4) 10% ($)(4) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ori Sasson 900,000 8.7878 $14.7500 2/17/09 $2,860,845 $6,160,928 Gregory Shenkman 7,500 * $20.2500 5/21/09 $ 95,513 $ 242,050 Michael McCloskey 150,000 1.4646 $12.5000 10/13/08 $1,179,177 $2,988,267 Alec Miloslavsky -- -- -- -- -- -- Richard DeGolia 100,000 * $11.4375 3/23/09 $ 719,298 $1,822,843 Yuri Shtivelman 100,000 * $11.4375 3/23/09 $ 719,298 $1,822,843 Donald Hunt 300,000 2.9293 $11.4375 3/23/09 $2,157,895 $5,468,529 50,000 * $11.4375 3/23/09 $ 359,649 $ 911,421 John McNulty -- -- -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Less than (1%) 57 (1) All options listed in the above table have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock as determined by the closing price on the date of grant. The stock option grants made in fiscal 1999 to the named executive officers vest 25% on the first anniversary date of employment or grant and monthly thereafter over the following 36 months, except for the grants to Mr. Sasson, Mr. Shenkman and the 50,000 share grant to Mr. Hunt. Mr. Sasson's option vests monthly over a four year period commencing on December 8, 1998, Mr. Sasson's first date of employment with the Company. Mr. Shenkman's option is immediately exercisable and subject to repurchase by the Company, if exercised prior to vesting, and the option fully vests, and the repurchase right lapses, one year from the date of grant. Mr. DeGolia's and Mr. Shtivelman's options for 100,000 shares are immediately exercisable and subject to repurchase by the Company, if exercised prior to vesting. These options shall vest, and the Company's repurchase rights lapse accordingly, 25% as of January 1, 2000 and monthly thereafter over the following 36 months. Mr. Hunt's 50,000 share option is immediately exercisable and fully vested as of the date of grant. See "Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements". (2) A total of 10,287,937 shares were granted in form of incentive and non- qualified stock options during fiscal 1999. (3) All stock options granted are made for a term of ten years from the date of grant. (4) The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of calculations at the assumed 5% and 10% rates mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation, if any, of the Company's stock price. The Company did not use an alternative formula for a grant date valuation, as the Company is not aware of any formula that will determine with reasonable accuracy a present value based on future unknown or volatile factors. No gain to the optionee is possible without an increase in stock price, which will benefit all stockholders commensurably. A zero percent gain in stock price will result in zero dollars for the optionee. AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES The table below provides information with respect to the Named Executive Officers concerning the unexercised options held by them as of the end of the 1999 fiscal year.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Number of Securities Underlying Value of Unexercised Acquired Value Unexercised Options/SARs At in-The-Money Options at On Exercise Realized Fiscal Year-End Fiscal Year-End Name (#) ($) (1) (#) (2) ($) (3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ori Sasson 0 $ 0 112,500 787,500 $1,153,125 $8,071,875 Gregory Shenkman 0 $ 0 7,500 0 $ 35,625 $ 0 Michael McCloskey (4) 0 $ 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 Alec Miloslavsky 0 $ 0 87,500 62,500 1,531,250 $1,093,750 Richard DeGolia 0 $ 0 100,000 0 $1,356,250 $ 0 Donald Hunt 0 $ 0 50,000 300,000 $ 678,125 $4,068,750 Yuri Shtivelman 90,000 $1,209,375 100,000 0 $1,356,250 $ 0 John McNulty 0 $ 0 0 100,000 $ 0 $1,250,000 - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
58 (1) The value realized on exercise of the stock option is the difference between the exercise price of the shares exercised and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise. (2) The stock options listed in the above table vest (i) 25% on the first anniversary of the (a) date of employment if to a new employee or (b) the grant date if to an existing employee and (ii) monthly thereafter over the following 36 months, except for the grants to Mr. Sasson, Mr. Shenkman, and the 50,000 share grant to Mr. Hunt. Mr. Sasson's option vests monthly over a four year period commencing on December 8, 1998, Mr. Sasson's first date of employment with the Company. Mr. Shenkman's option is immediately exercisable and subject to repurchase by the Company if exercised prior to vesting. The option fully vests, and the Company's repurchase rights lapse, one year from the date of grant. Both Mr. DeGolia's and Mr. Shtivelmans option for 100,000 shares each are immediately exercisable and subject to repurchase by the Company, if exercised prior to vesting. The options vest, and the Company's repurchase rights lapse accordingly, 25% as of January 1, 2000 and monthly thereafter over the following 36 months. Mr. Hunt's option for 50,000 shares is immediately exercisable and fully vested as of date of grant. See "Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements". (3) The value of unexercised in-the-money options at the end of the fiscal year is calculated by multiplying the number of exercisable in-the-money shares by the difference between the closing price ($25.00) of the Company's Common Stock on June 30, 1999 (the last trading day of the fiscal year), as reported on the Nasdaq National Market and the exercise price per share of the shares. A portion of the shares subject to these options are unvested and subject to repurchase provisions as described in footnote (2) above. (4) Pursuant to the terms of Mr. McCloskey's stock option agreement, zero shares were vested on the date of Mr. McCloskey's termination with the Company; therefore, all shares were cancelled and zero shares remained outstanding at fiscal year end. Director Compensation Except for grants of stock options, directors of the Company do not receive compensation for services rendered as a director. In addition, the Company does not pay cash compensation for committee participation or special assignments of the Board of Directors. Non-employee Board members receive option grants at periodic intervals under the Automatic Option Grant Program of the 1997 Plan and are also eligible to receive discretionary option grants under the Discretionary Option Grant Program of such plan. Under the Automatic Option Grant Program of the 1997 Plan, each individual who first becomes a non-employee Board member, whether through appointment by the Board or upon election by the shareholders, will receive two option grants at the time of his or her initial appointment or election, provided such individual has not otherwise been in the prior employ of the Company. One such option grant will be for 30,000 shares of Common Stock and the other for 20,000 shares of Common Stock. In addition, at each Annual Shareholders Meeting, each 59 individual who is to continue to serve as a non-employee Board member will receive an option grant for 7,500 shares of Common Stock, whether or not such individual has been in the prior employ of the Company. Each automatic option grant will have an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value per share of Common Stock on the grant date and will have a maximum term of 10 years, subject to earlier termination following the optionee's cessation of Board service. Each automatic option will be immediately exercisable for all of the option shares; however, any shares purchased upon exercise of the option will be subject to repurchase, at the option exercise price paid per share, should the optionees service as a non-employee Board member cease prior to vesting in those shares. The shares subject to each 30,000-share grant will vest as to 25% of the option shares on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the option grant date, provided the optionee continues to serve as a non-employee Board member. The shares subject to each 20,000-share grant will vest as to 25% of the option shares on each of the fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth anniversaries of the option grant date, provided the optionee continues to serve as a non-employee Board member. However, vesting of the shares subject to each 20,000-share grant will be subject to acceleration after the close of each fiscal year, beginning with the 1998 fiscal year, in the event that the optionee has served on a committee of the Board of Directors in such fiscal year. Vesting of 2,500 shares will accelerate with respect to each committee of the Board of Directors on which the optionee has served, up to a maximum of two committees, and will be conditioned on the optionee having attended at least 75% of the meetings held by such committee during the fiscal year. The shares to be accelerated will be those shares which would otherwise have been the first shares to vest in accordance with the four (4)-year vesting schedule described above. The shares subject to each annual 7,500-share grant will vest upon the optionee's completion of one year of Board service measured from the grant date. Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements Ori Sasson. Effective December 9, 1998, the Company entered into an ---------- employment agreement with Mr. Sasson in connection with his employment as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Pursuant to this agreement. The Company agreed to pay Mr. Sasson with the following compensation: a base salary of $300,000 per year; an annual target bonus for each fiscal year, based upon attainment of certain performance objectives, targeted at 40% of his base salary; health care coverage; a $10,000,000 dollar life insurance policy; and a disability policy. In addition, Mr. Sasson was granted an option to purchase 900,000 shares of Common Stock on February 17, 1999 at an exercise price of $14.75 per share, the fair market value per share of Common Stock on that date. The option becomes exercisable over a four-year period in 48 equal monthly installments beginning on December 9, 1998. If Mr. Sasson's employment is terminated by the Company, or if he resigns due to a change in his title or a material reduction in his duties or level of compensation, or ceases to report directly to the entire Board of Directors, or his salary is reduced by 15% or more without his written consent, or if the Company moves it's headquarters more than 40 miles outside of San Francisco, CA ("Constructive Termination"), Mr. Sasson will become entitled to payment of two years of salary and acceleration of two years of stock option vesting. Should Mr. Sasson's employment terminate due to death or disability, then he will become entitled to acceleration of two years of stock option vesting. In addition, should Mr. Sasson's employment terminate for any of the reasons described above, he will have an extended period of one year following such termination in which to exercise his outstanding stock options and he will be entitled to continued life insurance coverage and health insurance coverage for so long as is permitted by law, with the COBRA payments for the first 18 months of such health insurance coverage to be paid by the Company. Mr. Sasson agreed not to compete with the Company or solicit customers, suppliers or employees of the Company for a period of two years following his termination of employment with the Company. Change in Control Provisions. If Mr. Sasson's employment is terminated; whether by the Company, or by Constructive Termination, within 12 months after a change in control of the Company, whether by merger, asset sale, tender or exchange offer for more than 50% of the Company's outstanding voting securities (change of control), then, in addition to receiving the salary and bonus payments described above, all of Mr. Sasson's outstanding options will immediately vest. In addition, should Mr. Sasson resign voluntarily within six months following a change in control of the Company, he will become entitled to payment of two years of salary 60 and acceleration of two years of stock option vesting. In addition, should Mr. Sasson's employment terminate for any of the reasons described above, he will have an extended period of one year following such termination in which to exercise his outstanding stock options and he will be entitled to continued life insurance coverage and health insurance coverage for so long as is permitted by law, with the COBRA payments for the first 18 months of such health insurance coverage to be paid by the Company. Richard C. DeGolia. On March 5, 1996, the Company entered into an ------------------ employment agreement with Mr. DeGolia. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. DeGolia would receive a base salary of $15,000 per month and a bonus as determined by the Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. DeGolia purchased 396,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a purchase price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. Beginning March 1, 1996 these shares vest over four years, at a rate of 25% of the shares on February 18, 1997 and 1/36th of the shares at the end of each month thereafter. In September 1996, Mr. DeGolia was awarded the right to purchase 36,000 shares of Common Stock at the fair market value on the date of grant, which right was exercised in November 1996 through the issuance of a full recourse interest bearing promissory note for the amount of the purchase price. The note was paid off in full in fiscal 1998. Mr. DeGolia vested 25% of the shares on September 30, 1997 and the balance vests, subject to certain change in control provisions, in a series of 36 equal monthly installments thereafter. Change in Control Provisions. Mr. DeGolia's restricted stock purchase agreements provide that all of the unvested shares subject to certain agreements shall vest in full if there is a change of control and the acquiror fails to provide Mr. DeGolia with both cash compensation and operational responsibility that is at least equal to what he had prior to the acquisition. Mr. DeGolia's stock option grant, dated March 23, 1999, for 100,000 shares at $11.4375 per share, provides that in the event of (i) a change in control; and (ii) the acquiror fails to provide Mr. DeGolia with both cash compensation and operational responsibility that are at least equal to what he had prior to the acquisition, then all of his unvested shares will be accelerated as of the closing date of the acquisition and become fully vested immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition. In addition, all unvested shares will be fully accelerated immediately in the event of a Change of Control and upon Involuntary Termination within 18 months of such change in control. An Involuntary Termination includes any involuntary dismissal or a voluntary resignation following (a) a material reduction in operational responsibility, or (b) a reduction in compensation by more than 15%, or (c) a relocation by more than 50 miles. Donald Hunt. Effective January 4, 1999, the Company entered into an ----------- employment agreement with Mr. Hunt in connection with his employment as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Hunt will be provided with the following compensation: a base salary of $230,000 per year and an annual commission/bonus potential of up to $120,000 for each fiscal year, based upon attainment of certain performance objectives. In addition, Mr. Hunt was granted, on March 23, 1999, two options to purchase a total of 350,000 shares of Common Stock, with each having an exercise price of $11.4375, under the Company's 1997 Plan. The first option for 300,000 shares of Common Stock becomes exercisable at a rate of 25% of the shares at the end of the first year and 1/36th of the shares at the end of each month thereafter. The second option for 50,000 shares of Common Stock vests immediately. If the Company terminates Mr. Hunt's employment, other than for cause, he will become entitled to payment of six months of his base salary and COBRA continuation benefits. Should Mr. Hunt's employment terminate due to death or disability, then he will become entitled to acceleration of two years of stock option vesting. Mr. Hunt agreed not to compete with the Company or solicit customers, suppliers or employees of the Company for a period of six months following his termination of employment with the Company. Change in Control Provisions. Mr. Hunt's stock option grant, dated March 23, 1999, for 300,000 shares at $11.4375 per share, provides that in the event of (i) a change in control; and (ii) the acquiror fails to provide Mr. Hunt with both cash compensation and operational responsibility that are at least equal to what he had prior to the acquisition, then all of his unvested shares will be accelerated as of the closing date of the acquisition and become fully vested immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition. In addition, all unvested shares will be fully accelerated immediately in the event of a Change of Control and upon Involuntary Termination within 18 months of such change in control. An Involuntary Termination includes any involuntary dismissal or a voluntary 61 resignation following (a) a material reduction in operational responsibility, or (b) a reduction in compensation by more than 15%, or (c) a relocation by more than 50 miles. Yuri Shtivelman. On June 6, 1996, the Company entered into an --------------- employment agreement with Yuri Shtivelman in connection with his employment as Vice President, Corporate Strategy. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Shtivelman was provided the following compensation: a base salary of $10,833.33 per month; and an annual performance bonus of up to 20% based upon the attainment of both individual performance goals and the Company's financial performance and condition. In addition, Mr. Shtivelman was granted (i) the right to purchase 240,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a purchase price of $0.225, the fair market value on the date of Board approval, that vests over a four year period, at a rate of 25% of the shares at the end of the first year and 1/36th of the shares monthly thereafter; and (ii) an option to purchase 90,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a purchase price of $0.375, the fair market value on the date of grant that vest over a two year period, begininning the date of his hire, at a rate of 50% of the shares at the end of each year, thereafter. Change in Control Provisions. In the event of a change in control and the acquiror fails to provide Mr. Shtivelman with both cash compensation and operational responsibility that is at least equal to what he had prior to the acquisition, then all of his unvested shares, of both the restricted stock and the option referenced above, will be accelerated as of the closing date of the acquisition and become fully vested immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition. In addition, Mr. Shtivelman's stock option grant, dated March 23, 1999, for 100,000 shares at $11.4375 per share, provides that in the event of (i) a change in control, as defined above, and (ii) the acquiror fails to provide Mr. Shtivelman with both cash compensation and operational responsibility that is at least equal to what he had prior to the acquisition, then all of his unvested shares will be accelerated as of the closing date of the acquisition and become fully vested immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition. In addition, all unvested shares will be fully accelerated immediately in the event of a Change of Control and upon Involuntary Termination within 18 months of such change in control. An Involuntary Termination includes any involuntary dismissal or a voluntary resignation following (a) a material reduction in operational responsibility, or (b) a reduction in compensation by more than 15%, or (c) a relocation by more than 50 miles. Gregory Shenkman. On July 24, 1998, Mr. Shenkman resigned from his ---------------- position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and entered into to a mutual executive separation agreement with the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Shenkman agreed to continue to provide services to the Company as a consultant for a period of up to six months during which period Mr. Shenkman received monthly compensation of $15,000 per month, which is comparable to his compensation as an employee, and continued to vest his outstanding stock options and restricted shares in accordance with their original terms. Mr. Shenkman ceased to serve as a consultant to the Company in January 1999 but continues to serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. 62 Michael McCloskey. On December 11, 1998, the Company0 entered into an ----------------- employment and severance agreement with Mr. McCloskey. Pursuant to that agreement, Mr. McCloskey resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company but agreed to serve as President until the earlier to occur of (i) June 30, 1999, (ii) the date on which the Company engaged an individual or individuals who would act as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, World-Wide Sales or (iii) termination of the agreement for any other reason. As of December 11, 1998, the effective date of the agreement, 130,000 restricted shares held by Mr. McCloskey, which were otherwise unvested as of that date, accelerated and became fully vested shares of Common Stock. During the period of the employment agreement, Mr. McCloskey continued to receive the base salary and other employee benefits previously paid to him and continued to vest in his outstanding stock options and the remaining 70,000 unvested shares of restricted stock pursuant to their original terms. In the event Mr. McCloskey's employment terminated by reason of death or disability prior to June 30, 1999, the base salary discussed above would become payable and the number of option shares and restricted shares would vest. In the event of Mr. McCloskey's involuntary termination prior to June 30, 1999, including a voluntary resignation for good reason, Mr. McCloskey would continue to receive his base salary and health benefits through June 30, 1999. In the event of an early termination of the employment agreement by reason of Mr. McCloskey's voluntary resignation, Mr. McCloskey would continue to provide services to the Company under a consulting arrangement until June 30, 1999, pursuant to which he would receive monthly compensation comparable to his compensation as an employee and would continue to vest in his outstanding stock options and restricted stock in accordance with their original terms. In February 1999, Mr. McCloskey's employment agreement terminated by reason of Mr. McCloskey's voluntary resignation. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. McCloskey continued to provide consulting services to the Company until June 30th. John McNulty. On April 29, 1999, the Company entered into an ------------ employment and mutual separation agreement with John McNulty, whereby the Company shall continue to employ Mr. McNulty through December 31, 1999 at a salary of $265,000 annually, but shall do so as its Sales Strategist, Key Accounts and Channel Markets rather than as Vice President, Sales, and the Company shall not terminate Mr. McNulty's employment prior to December 31, 1999, except for cause. Under the agreement, "cause" shall mean either (i) an act of fraud or other intentional dishonesty by Mr. McNulty involving the Company or its business or (ii) a breach of the agreement by Mr. McNulty. Upon the execution of the Agreement, Mr. McNulty agreed to repay his promissory note to the Company in the amount of $101,503.04. Mr. McNulty agreed not to solicit or encourage any employee to leave the Company's employ for any reason or to interfere in any other manner with employment relationships existing between the Company and its employees. In addition, in connection with Mr. McNulty's stock option for 100,000 shares, he agreed that the 68,750 shares, which would have been unvested as of December 31, 1999, may be canceled and returned to the 1997 Plan's share reserve upon execution of the agreement rather than on the last day of Mr. McNulty's employment with the Company. The remaining 31,250 shares shall continue to vest in accordance with the original terms and conditions of the option agreement. In connection with the 240,000 shares of restricted stock held by him, Mr. McNulty agreed that the 55,000 shares, which would have been unvested as of December 31, 1999, could be repurchased by the Company at any time from the date the execution of the agreement. Genesys paid the repurchase price by canceling the Full Recourse, Secured Promissory Note, dated February 24, 1997, with respect to $20,625 of the principal outstanding under the Note. The remaining 185,000 shares of the restricted stock shall vest in accordance with the original purchase agreement. Change in Control Provisions. The purchase agreement for the restricted stock, referred to above, provides that in the event of (i) the acquisition of the Company as defined in the purchase agreement and (ii) the acquiror fails to provide Mr. McNulty with both cash compensation and operational responsibility that is at least equal to what he had prior to the acquisition, then all of his unvested shares will be accelerated as of the closing date of the acquisition and become fully vested immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition. However, in the employment and mutual separation agreement, Mr. McNulty expressly waived his right to accelerated vesting of the 55,000 restricted shares that would have vested after December 31, 1999. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on Executive Compensation The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") is currently comprised of two non-employee directors, Bruce Dunlevie and Paul D. Levy. James Jordan, also a non-employee director, served as a member of the Committee until his resignation from the Board in December 1998. The Committee administers the Company's compensation policies and programs and has primary responsibility for executive compensation matters, including the establishment of the base salaries of the Company's executive officers, the approval of individual bonuses and bonus programs for executive officers and the administration of certain employee benefit programs. In addition, the Committee has responsibility for administering the Company's 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1997 Plan") under which stock option grants and 63 direct stock issuances may be made to executive officers and other employees. The following is a summary of policies which the Committee applies in setting the compensation levels for the Company's executive officers. General Compensation Policy. The overall policy of the Committee is to offer the Company's executive officers competitive compensation opportunities based upon their personal performance, the financial performance of the Company and their contribution to that performance. One of the primary objectives is to have a substantial portion of each executive officer's compensation contingent upon the Company's financial success as well as upon such executive officer's own level of performance. Each executive officer's compensation package is comprised of two principal elements: (i) base salary, determined on the basis of the individual's position and responsibilities with the Company, the level of his or her performance, and the financial performance of the Company, and (ii) long-term stock-based incentive awards designed to strengthen the mutuality of interests between the executive officers and the Company's shareholders. Generally, as an executive officer's level of responsibility increases, a greater portion of that individual's total compensation will be dependent upon the Company's performance and stock price appreciation rather than base salary. In a limited number of cases the Committee may also make incentive performance awards payable in cash, based upon a formula which takes into account Company and individual performance. Factors. The primary factors which were taken into consideration in establishing the components of each executive officer's compensation package for the 1999 fiscal year are summarized below. However, the Committee may, in its discretion, apply entirely different factors, such as different measures of financial performance, for future fiscal years. Base Salary. In setting the base salary for each executive officer, the Committee reviewed published compensation survey data for its industry. The base salary for each officer reflects the salary levels for comparable positions in published surveys as well as the individual's personal performance and internal alignment considerations. The relative weight given to each factor varies with each individual in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. Each executive officer's base salary is adjusted each year on the basis of (i) the Compensation Committee's evaluation of the officer's personal performance for the year and (ii) the competitive marketplace for persons in comparable positions. The Company's performance and profitability may also be a factor in determining the base salaries of executive officers. Long-Term Stock-Based Incentive Compensation. From time to time, the Committee makes option grants to the Company's executive officers under the 1997 Plan. In addition to stock option grants under the 1997 Plan, the Committee made discretionary stock option grants to certain new executive officers and key employees that were outside of any plan. Future discretionary grants may be made if the Committee deems it necessary to attract the services of key individuals essential to the Company's long-term growth and success. All equity grants are designed to align the interests of each executive officer with those of the shareholders and provide each individual with a significant incentive to manage the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business. Each grant allows the officer to acquire shares of the Company's Common Stock at a fixed price per share (the market price on the grant date) over a specified period of time (up to ten (10) years), thus providing a return to the executive officer only if the market price of the shares appreciates over the option term and the officer continues in the Company's employ. The Committee takes into account the number of vested and unvested options and restricted shares held by the executive officer in order to maintain an appropriate level of equity incentive for that individual. CEO Compensation. Mr. Sasson's base salary for the 1999 fiscal year was determined by the Committee to be competitive with the compensation paid to the chief executive officers of the companies at similarly-sized companies. In addition, Mr. Sasson was awarded 900,000 options in the 1999 fiscal year. See "Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions". Compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to publicly- held companies for compensation paid to certain executive 64 officers, to the extent that compensation exceeds $1 million per officer in any year. The compensation paid to the Company's executive officers for the 1999 fiscal year did not exceed the $1 million limit per officer. In addition, the 1997 Plan is structured so that any compensation deemed paid to an executive officer in connection with the exercise of his or her outstanding options under such plan will qualify as performance-based compensation which will not be subject to the $1 million limitation However, compensation deemed paid to an executive officer in connection with the exercise of options granted outside the 1997 Plan will not qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) and will accordingly be included in the calculation of the $1 million limitation for that officer. The Committee has decided at this time not to take any other action to limit or restructure the elements of cash or equity compensation payable to the Company's executive officers. The Committee will reconsider this decision should the individual compensation of any executive officer approach the $1 million level. Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors: Bruce Dunlevie Paul D. Levy Stock Performance Graph - ----------------------- Below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder returns for the Company's Common Stock over the last three years. The Company became a public reporting company on June 17, 1997. The graph depicted below shows the Company's stock price as an index assuming $100 invested on June 17, 1997, along with the composite prices of companies listed in the Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S.) Index and the Hambrecht & Quist Index. The Company's fiscal year ends on June 30th. The total return assumes the reinvestment of dividends. The Company has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock. The Company currently anticipates that it will retain all available funds for use in its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends. The graph is an historical representation of past performance only and is not necessarily indicative of future returns to shareholders. 65 COMPARISON OF THREE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN [COMPARISON CHART HERE]
June 17, 1997 June 1997 June 1998 June 1999 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. 100 154 184 139 Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S.) 100 100 132 188 Hambrecht & Quist Technology 100 99 125 202 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation The members of the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors are named as above in the Compensation Committee Report. No member of the Committee was at any time during the 1999 fiscal year or at any other time an officer or employee of the Company. No current executive officer of the Company has ever served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Company's Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. 66 ITEM 12. SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect to beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock as of September 24, 1999 for (i) all persons who are beneficial owners of more than five percent of the Company's Common Stock, (ii) each director, (iii) each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table of the section of this Proxy Statement entitled "Executive Compensation and Related Information," and (iv) all current executive officers and directors as a group as of September 24, 1999.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Shares Beneficially Percent Owned (1) Owned (2) - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Shenkman (3) 3,009,750 11.9% 1155 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Alec Miloslavsky (4) 2,740,250 10.8% 1155 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Ori Sasson (5) 260,108 * Richard DeGolia (6) 214,720 * Donald Hunt (7) 25,529 * Paul D. Levy (8) 102,500 * Bruce Dunlevie (9) 464,972 1.8% Michael J. McCloskey (10) 0 * John McNulty (11) 24,167 * Yuri Shtivelman (12) 242,670 * All current officers and directors as a group 7,084,726 27.2% (11 Persons) (13) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------ * Less than one percent. (1) Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock. The number of shares beneficially owned includes Common Stock of which such individual has the 67 right to acquire beneficial ownership either currently or within 60 days after September 24, 1999, including, but not limited to, upon the exercise of an option. (2) Percentage of beneficial ownership is based upon 25,374,145 shares of Common Stock, all of which were outstanding on September 24, 1999. For each individual, this percentage includes Common Stock of which such individual has the right to acquire beneficial ownership either currently or within 60 days of September 24, 1999, including, but not limited to, upon the exercise of an option; however, such Common Stock shall not be deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage owned by any other individual. Such calculation is required by General Rule 13d-3(d)(1)(i) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (3) Mr. Shenkman. Includes 354,000 shares held by Dmitry Shenkman, Trustee of ------------- the Michelle Shenkman 1996 Trust u/t/a dated March 18, 1996, Michelle Shenkman is Mr. Shenkman's daughter; 354,000 shares held by Dmitry Shenkman, Trustee of the Nikita Anthony Shenkman 1996 Trust u/t/a dated March 18, 1996, Nikita is Mr. Shenkman's child; 928,000 shares held by Gregory and Yelena Shenkman, Trustees of the Shenkman Family Trust u/t/a dated March 7, 1996 and 500,000 shares held by Shenkman Partners. L.P., a California limited partnership of which Mr. Shenkman is a general partner. Also includes 7,500 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days. (4) Mr. Miloslavsky. Includes 360,000 shares held by Larry Miloslavsky and ---------------- Anatoly Elkinbard, Trustees of the Miloslavsky 1996 Irrevocable Trust u/t/a dated March 13, 1996; 350,000 shares held by Miloslavsky Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership of which Mr. Miloslavsky is a general partner and 110,000 shares held by Larry and Linda Miloslavsky, Trustee of the Joshua Trobnika Miloslavsky 1996 Trust u/t/a dated March 15,1996. Also includes 100,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after September 24, 1999. (5) Mr. Sasson. Includes 40,000 shares held by the DAS Trust UTA 9-24-98 and ----------- 40,000 shares held by the EIS Trust UTA 9-24-98, of which Mr. Sasson is the trustee. Includes 206,250 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after September 24, 1999. (6) Mr. DeGolia Includes 114,131 shares held by Richard C. DeGolia or Jennifer ----------- H. DeGolia, as Trustees of the RJ Family Trust u/t/a dated 6/16/95 of which 54,750 are unvested and subject to repurchase by the Company. Includes 100,000 unvested shares that are exercisable and, to the extent exericised, subject to repurchase by the Company, at the purchase price paid per share, in the event of Mr. DeGolia's early termination of service with the Company. (7) Mr. Hunt. Includes 25,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are --------- currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after September 24, 1999. (8) Mr. Levy. Includes 30,000 unvested shares that are subject to repurchase by --------- the Company at the purchase price paid per share, in the event Mr. Levy resigns from the Company's Board of Directors. Also includes 37,500 unvested shares issuable upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable and if exercised would be subject to the Company's right of repurchase. (9) Mr. Dunlevie. Includes 407,472 shares beneficially owned by entities ------------- affiliated with Benchmark Capital Management Co., LLC., of which Mr. Dunlevie is a managing member. Also includes 57,500 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after September 24, 1999 and if exercised would be subject to the Company's right of repurchase. (10) Mr. McCloskey. Mr. McCloskey holds zero shares of record. -------------- (11) Mr. McNulty. Includes 4,167 unvested shares which are subject to repurchase ------------ by the Company, at the purchase price paid per share, in the event of Mr. McClosky's early termination of service with the Company. 68 (12) Mr. Shtivelman. Includes 50,000 shares that remain subject to vesting and --------------- repurchase by the Company and 1,800 shares held by his daughter. Also includes 100,000 unvested shares that are exercisable and, to the extent exercised, subject to repurchase by the Company, at the purchase price paid per share, in the event of Mr. Shtivelman's early termination of service with the Company. (13) All current officers and directors as a group Includes (i) 783,750 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after September 24, 1999 and (ii) 134,750 unvested shares which are subject to repurchase by the Company, at the purchase price paid per share, in the event of the officer's early termination of service with the Company. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS In connection with the hiring its Chief Executive Officer, Ori Sasson and the acquisition of Plato in December 1998, the Company recorded non-recurring charges totaling $11.8 million related to compensation, consisting of common stock valued at $5.6 million and $6.2 million of tax reimbursements paid or accrued to Mr. Sasson and an additional $0.6 million of compensation paid or accrued to other Plato employees. In addition, the Company recorded $3 million of non-recurring charges related to an employment and severance agreement with Michael McCloskey, the Company's former President and Chief Financial Officer. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, No. 2, Non-Recurring Charges" and "Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements." 69 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K (a) List of Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 1. The following consolidated financial statements of the Company are filed in Part II, Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K: Report of Independent Public Accountants Consolidated Balance Sheets--June 30, 1998 and 1997 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 2. Financial Statement Schedules. The following financial statement schedule of the Company is filed in Part IV, Item 14(d) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. 3. Exhibits. 3.1(4) Restated Articles of Incorporations, filed with the California Secretary of State on June 27, 1997 3.2(2) Amended and Restated Bylaws 4.1 Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 4.2(1) Specimen Common Stock certificate 4.3(1) Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 29, 1996 among Genesys and the investors named therein. 4.4(1) Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated April 26, 1996 between Genesys and Benchmark Capital Partners, L.P. 70 4.5(1) Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 13, 1996 among Genesys and the investors named therein. 4.6(1) Securities Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 1997, between Genesys and MCI Telecommunications Corporation ("MCI"). 4.7(1)(5) Warrant to Purchase Share of Series C Preferred Stock, dated February 26, 1997, between Genesys and MCI. 4.8(1) Series C Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 1997, between Genesys and Intel Corporation ("Intel"). 4.9(1)(5) Warrant to Purchase Shares of Series Preferred Stock, dated February 26,1997, between Genesys and Intel. 4.10(1) Stock Exchange Agreement, dated February 26, 1997, between Genesys and Bruncor, Inc. ("Bruncor"). 4.11(1) Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 26, 1997, among Genesys and the investors named therein. 10.1(1) Credit Line with Imperial Bank, dated October 28, 1996. 10.2(1) Facilities Lease, dated July 1, 1996, between Genesys and 1155 Market Partners, with modifications, dated January 21, 1997 and January 30, 1997. 10.3(1)(5) Master Software License Agreement, dated January 31, 1996,including Addendum to Master License Agreement, dated February 1, 1996, as amended on February 26, 1997 by and between Genesys and MCI. 10.4(1)(5) Software Maintenance Agreement, dated January 31, 1996, as amended on February 26, 1997 by and between Genesys and MCI. MANAGEMENT CONTRACT, COMPENSATORY PLAN, CONTRACT OR ARRANGEMENT (Exhibits 10.5-10.21) 10.5(1) Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Genesys and its directors and officers. 10.6(1) 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended. 10.7(1) Form of Registrant's Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement. 10.8(1) 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and underlying agreements. 10.9(1) Employee Stock Purchase Plan and underlying agreements. 10.10(3) Form of Written Compensation Agreement, Notice of Grant and Option Agreement. 10.11(3) Plato Software Corporation 1998 Share Option Plan and underlying agreements. 10.12(3) Next Age Technologies, Inc. 1998 Equity Incentive Plan and underlying agreements. 10.13(2) Mutual Executive Separation and Independent Consulting Agreement by and between Genesys and Gregory Shenkman, dated October 27, 1998. 10.14(2) Employment and Severance and Independent Consulting Agreement by and between Genesys and Michael McCloskey, dated December 11, 1998. 71 10.15(2) Employment Offer Letter by and between Genesys and Ori Sasson, dated December 9, 1998. 10.16(4) Employment Offer Letter by and between Genesys and Richard DeGolia, dated March 5, 1996. 10.17(4) Employment Offer Letter by and between Genesys and Yuri Shtivelman, dated June 6, 1996. 10.18(4) Employment Offer Letter by and between Genesys and Donald Hunt, executed December 12, 1998. 10.19(4) Employment Offer Letter by and between Genesys and Christopher Brennan, dated April 8, 1999. 10.20(4) Employment Offer Letter by and between Genesys and Ad P. Nederlof, dated February 5, 1999. 21.1(4) Subsidiaries of Genesys. 23.1 Consent of Independent Public Accountants. 27(4) Financial Date Schedule (submitted for SEC use only). - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) Incorporated by reference to Genesys' Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 3, 1997 (File No. 333-24479). (2) Incorporated by reference herein to Genesys' Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1998 and filed on February 16, 1999. (3) Incorporated by reference herein to Genesys' Form S-8 filed on July 12, 1999. (4) Incorporated by reference herein to Genesys' Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 and filed on September 28, 1999. (5) Confidential treatment requested as to certain portions of these exhibits (b) Reports on Form 8-K. None. 72 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on October 27, 1999. GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. By: /s/ Ori Sasson ------------------------------------- Ori Sasson President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE /s/ Ori Sasson President, Chief Executive Officer and October 27, 1999 - ---------------------------------------- Director Ori Sasson /s/ Alec Miloslavsky Chief Technical Officer and Vice October 27, 1999 - ---------------------------------------- Chairman of the Board Alec Miloslavsky /s/ Christopher Brennan Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice October 27, 1999 - ---------------------------------------- President, Finance & Administration and Christopher Brennan Principal Financial Officer /s/ Stacey M. Wilhelmsen Corporate Controller and Principal October 27, 1999 - ---------------------------------------- Accounting Officer Stacey M. Wilhelmsen /s/ Gregory Shenkman Chairman of the Board October 27, 1999 - ---------------------------------------- Gregory Shenkman /s/ Bruce Dunlevie Director October 27, 1999 - ---------------------------------------- Bruce Dunlevie Director October 27, 1999 - ---------------------------------------- Paul Levy
73 SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Allowance for Balance at Doubtful Accounts Beginning of Additions Charged Balance at End Year ended June 30 Period to Expense Write-Offs Other of Period - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1999 $789,000 $621,944 $ (566,430) $30,366 $874,880 1998 $377,000 $889,000 $ (477,000) -- $789,000 1997 $426,000 $212,000 $ (261,000) -- $377,000 - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EX-23.1 2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated July 20, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-33773, File No. 333-47609 and File No. 333-82655) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-80881). ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP San Jose, California October 28, 1999
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----