UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________________ to ___________________
Commission File Number 0-22529
inTEST Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
Delaware |
22-2370659 |
804 East Gate Drive, Suite 200
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO ____
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (SS 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES X NO ____
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ___ Accelerated filer ___
Non-accelerated filer ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES ___ NO X
Number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of the close of business on April 30, 2013:
10,472,678
inTEST CORPORATION
INDEX
|
PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012 |
1 |
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings for the three months |
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the three months ended |
4 |
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended |
5 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
6 - 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
18 - 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
23 - 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
Mine Safety Disclosures |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
Other Information |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
25 |
|
|
Index to Exhibits |
26 |
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Mar. 31, Dec. 31,
2013 2012
-------- --------
ASSETS: (Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $15,384 $15,576
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $147 and $147, respectively 5,784 5,501
Inventories 3,418 3,135
Deferred tax assets 1,096 1,004
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 386 363
Total current assets 26,068 25,579
Property and equipment:
Machinery and equipment 3,975 3,948
Leasehold improvements 593 591
Gross property and equipment 4,568 4,539
Less: accumulated depreciation (3,389) (3,289)
Net property and equipment 1,179 1,250
Deferred tax assets 937 1,034
Goodwill 1,706 1,706
Intangible assets, net 2,079 2,194
Restricted certificates of deposit 450 450
Other assets 184 186
Total assets $32,603 $32,399
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 1,399 $ 1,041
Accrued wages and benefits 1,171 1,562
Accrued sales commissions 362 348
Accrued rent 544 529
Accrued professional fees 406 385
Deferred revenue and customer deposits 204 255
Other current liabilities 410 459
Total current liabilities 4,496 4,579
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9 and 11)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued or outstanding - -
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
10,483,255 and 10,453,255 shares issued 105 105
Additional paid-in capital 26,087 26,030
Retained earnings 928 636
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings 1,191 1,253
Treasury stock, at cost; 33,077 and 33,077 shares, respectively (204) (204)
Total stockholders' equity 28,107 27,820
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $32,603 $32,399
======= =======
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 1 -
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-------------------
2013 2012
-------- --------
Net revenues $ 8,973 $10,731
Cost of revenues 4,868 6,135
------- -------
Gross margin 4,105 4,596
------- -------
Operating expenses:
Selling expense 1,189 1,406
Engineering and product development expense 996 924
General and administrative expense 1,556 1,991
Restructuring and other charges - 359
------- -------
Total operating expenses 3,741 4,680
------- -------
Operating income (loss) 364 (84)
Other income 6 13
------- -------
Earnings (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) 370 (71)
Income tax expense (benefit) 78 (28)
------- -------
Net earnings (loss) $ 292 $ (43)
======= =======
Net earnings (loss) per common share-basic $0.03 $0.00
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic 10,327,428 10,205,114
Net earnings (loss) per common share-diluted $0.03 $0.00
Weighted average common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding - diluted 10,366,312 10,205,114
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 2 -
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
------------------
2013 2012
-------- -------
Net earnings (loss) $ 292 $ (43)
Foreign currency translation adjustments (62) 47
------ ------
Comprehensive earnings $ 230 $ 4
====== ======
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 3 -
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Accumulated Total
Common Stock Additional Other Stock-
---------------- Paid-In Retained Comprehensive Treasury holders'
Shares Amount Capital Earnings Earnings Stock Equity
---------- ------ ---------- -------- ------------- -------- -------
Balance, January 1, 2013 10,453,255 $ 105 $26,030 $636 $1,253 $(204) $27,820
Net earnings - - - 292 - - 292
Other comprehensive loss - - - - (62) - (62)
Amortization of deferred
compensation related
to restricted stock - - 27 - - - 27
Issuance of non-vested shares
of restricted stock 20,000 - - - - - -
Stock options exercised 10,000 - 30 - - - 30
---------- ----- ------- ---- ------ ----- -------
Balance, March 31, 2013 10,483,255 $ 105 $26,087 $928 $1,191 $(204) $28,107
========== ===== ======= ==== ====== ===== =======
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 4 -
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
------------------
2013 2012
------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings (loss) $ 292 $ (43)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 221 218
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory 110 150
Foreign exchange (gain) loss 8 (9)
Amortization of deferred compensation related to restricted stock 27 27
Loss on sale of property and equipment - 3
Proceeds from sale of demonstration equipment, net of gain - 52
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) 5 (6)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable (300) (574)
Inventories (395) (187)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (24) (19)
Other assets (2) (17)
Accounts payable 358 833
Accrued wages and benefits (385) (576)
Accrued sales commissions 14 (58)
Accrued rent 15 9
Accrued professional fees 21 (81)
Deferred revenue and customer deposits (50) (7)
Other current liabilities (49) 199
------- -------
Net cash used in operating activities (134) (86)
------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of business - (3,802)
Purchase of property and equipment (44) -
------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities (44) (3,802)
------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from stock options exercised 30 -
------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities 30 -
------- -------
Effects of exchange rates on cash (44) 32
------- -------
Net cash used in all activities (192) (3,856)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 15,576 13,957
------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $15,384 $10,101
======= =======
Cash payments for:
Domestic and foreign income taxes $ 113 $ 27
Interest $ - $ 4
Details of acquisition:
Fair value of assets acquired $ 4,026
Liabilities assumed (274)
Goodwill resulting from acquisition 50
-------
Net cash paid for acquisition $ 3,802
=======
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of non-vested shares of restricted stock $ 59 $ -
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 5 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(1) NATURE OF OPERATIONS
We are an independent designer, manufacturer and marketer of thermal, mechanical and electrical products that are primarily used by semiconductor manufacturers in conjunction with automatic test equipment ("ATE") in the testing of integrated circuits ("ICs" or "semiconductors"). In addition, in recent years, we have begun marketing our thermal products in industries outside the ATE industry, such as the automotive, consumer electronics, defense/aerospace, energy and telecommunications industries.
The consolidated entity is comprised of inTEST Corporation (parent) and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have three reportable segments which are also our reporting units: Thermal Products, Mechanical Products and Electrical Products. We manufacture our products in the U.S. Marketing and support activities are conducted worldwide from our facilities in the U.S., Germany and Singapore. On January 16, 2012, Temptronic Corporation ("Temptronic"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of inTEST Corporation, acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Thermonics, Inc. ("Thermonics"), a division of Test Enterprises, Inc. The acquisition of the Thermonics business broadens the product line of inTEST's Thermal Products segment. This acquisition is discussed further in Note 3.
The semiconductor industry in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological change, competitive pricing pressures and cyclical market patterns. This industry is subject to significant economic downturns at various times. Our financial results are affected by a wide variety of factors, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions worldwide and in the markets in which we operate, economic conditions specific to the semiconductor industry and the other industries we serve, our ability to safeguard patented technology and intellectual property in a rapidly evolving market, downward pricing pressures from customers, and our reliance on a relatively few number of customers for a significant portion of our sales. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of obsolescence of our inventory depending on the mix of future business and technological changes within the industry. As a result of these or other factors, we may experience significant period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results.
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of our accounts, including inventories, long-lived assets, goodwill, identifiable intangibles, deferred income tax valuation allowances and product warranty reserves, are particularly impacted by estimates.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and changes in cash flows for the interim periods presented. Certain footnote information has been condensed or omitted from these consolidated financial statements. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2013 (the "2012 Form 10-K").
Reclassification
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be comparable with the current period's presentation.
- 6 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Inventories
Inventories are valued on a first-in, first-out basis, not in excess of market value. Cash flows from the sale of inventories are recorded in operating cash flows. On a quarterly basis, we review our inventories and record excess and obsolete inventory charges based upon our established objective excess and obsolete inventory criteria. These criteria identify material that has not been used in a work order during the prior twelve months and the quantity of material on hand that is greater than the average annual usage of that material over the prior three years. In certain cases, additional excess and obsolete inventory charges are recorded based upon current industry conditions, anticipated product life cycles, new product introductions and expected future use of the inventory. The excess and obsolete inventory charges we record establish a new cost basis for the related inventories. We incurred excess and obsolete inventory charges of $110 and $150 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Goodwill, Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
We account for goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350 (Intangibles- Goodwill and Other). Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful economic life and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter, on a reporting unit basis, or more frequently when events and circumstances occur indicating that the recorded goodwill may be impaired. As a part of the goodwill impairment assessment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine this is the case, we are required to perform a two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, to be recognized. The two-step test is discussed below. If we determine that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amounts, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required.
If we determine it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a result of our qualitative assessment, we will perform a quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. In the Step I test, the fair value of a reporting unit is computed and compared with its book value. If the book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a Step II test is performed in which the implied fair value of goodwill is compared with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recorded in an amount equal to that excess. The two-step goodwill impairment assessment is based upon a combination of the income approach, which estimates the fair value of our reporting units based upon a discounted cash flow approach, and the market approach which estimates the fair value of our reporting units based upon comparable market multiples. This fair value is then reconciled to our market capitalization at year end with an appropriate control premium. The determination of the fair value of our reporting units requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions including the selection of appropriate peer group companies, control premiums, discount rate, terminal growth rates, forecasts of revenue and expense growth rates, changes in working capital, depreciation, amortization and capital expenditures. Changes in assumptions concerning future financial results or other underlying assumptions would have a significant impact on either the fair value of the reporting unit or the amount of the goodwill impairment charge.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Long-lived assets, which consist of finite-lived intangible assets and property and equipment, are assessed for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the estimated undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value. The cash flow estimates used to determine the impairment, if any, contain management's best estimates using appropriate assumptions and projections at that time.
- 7 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718 (Compensation - Stock Compensation) which requires that employee share-based equity awards be accounted for under the fair value method and requires the use of an option pricing model for estimating fair value of stock options granted, which is then amortized to expense over the service periods. See further disclosures related to our stock-based compensation plan in Note 10.
Subsequent Events
We have made an assessment of our operations and determined that there were no material subsequent events requiring adjustment to, or disclosure in, our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Sales of our products are made through our sales employees, third-party sales representatives and distributors. There are no differences in revenue recognition policies based on the sales channel. We do not provide our customers with rights of return or exchanges. Revenue is generally recognized upon product shipment. Our customers' purchase orders do not typically contain any customer-specific acceptance criteria, other than that the product performs within the agreed upon specifications. We test all products manufactured as part of our quality assurance process to determine that they comply with specifications prior to shipment to a customer. To the extent that any customer purchase order contains customer-specific acceptance criteria, revenue recognition is deferred until customer acceptance.
With respect to sales tax collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities, we use a net presentation in our consolidated statement of operations. As a result, there are no amounts included in either our net revenues or cost of revenues related to sales tax.
Product Warranties
We generally provide product warranties and record estimated warranty expense at the time of sale based upon historical claims experience. Warranty expense is included in selling expense in the consolidated financial statements.
Restructuring and Other Charges
We recognize a liability for restructuring charges at fair value only when the liability is incurred. The three main components of our restructuring plans have been related to workforce reductions, the consolidation of excess facilities and asset impairments. Workforce-related charges are accrued when it is determined that a liability has been incurred, which is generally after individuals have been notified of their termination dates and expected severance benefits. Plans to consolidate excess facilities result in charges for lease termination fees and future commitments to pay lease charges, net of estimated future sub-lease income. We recognize these charges when we have vacated the premises. In addition, as a result of plans to consolidate excess facilities, we may incur other associated costs such as charges to relocate inventory, equipment or personnel. We recognize charges for other associated costs when these costs are incurred, which is generally when the goods or services have been provided to us. Assets that may be impaired consist of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Asset impairment charges are based on an estimate of the amounts and timing of future cash flows related to the expected future remaining use and ultimate sale or disposal of the asset.
- 8 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Income Taxes
The asset and liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Net earnings (loss) per common share - basic is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Net earnings (loss) per common share - diluted is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during each period. Common share equivalents represent stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock and are calculated using the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation if their effect is anti-dilutive.
The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, a reconciliation of weighted average common shares outstanding - basic to weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding - diluted and the average number of potentially dilutive securities that were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect was anti-dilutive:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
2013 |
2012 |
Weighted average common shares outstanding -- basic |
10,327,428 |
10,205,114 |
Potentially dilutive securities: |
|
|
Employee stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock |
38,884 |
- |
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of potentially dilutive securities excluded from calculation |
28,750 |
421,472 |
Effect of Recently Adopted Amendments to Authoritative Accounting Guidance
- 9 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
In February 2013, the FASB issued amendments to existing guidance on the accounting for accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments require entities to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the financial statements or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income, but only if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional details about those amounts. The amendments are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012. We adopted these amendments on January 1, 2013. The adoption of these amendments did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
(3) ACQUISITION
On January 16, 2012, Temptronic acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Thermonics pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 9, 2011. Thermonics is engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, selling and distributing temperature forcing systems used in the testing of various products under temperature controlled situations. The acquisition of the Thermonics business broadened the product line of inTEST's Thermal Products segment.
The purchase price for the assets was approximately $3,802 in cash, plus the assumption of specified liabilities, including trade payables and certain customer contract obligations. In connection with this acquisition, we also signed a separate one year lease for the facility occupied by Thermonics in Sunnyvale, California. This facility is owned by certain shareholders of the seller. We ceased operations at this facility in February 2012 and relocated the Thermonics product line to our facility in Mansfield, Massachusetts where our Temptronic operations are located. During 2012, we recorded a restructuring charge of $313 related to this action. See Note 5 for further detail regarding this charge.
Total acquisition costs incurred to complete this transaction were $485. The portion of these costs that was incurred in 2011 was $148. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred and included in general and administrative expense.
The Thermonics acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination and, accordingly, the results of Thermonics have been included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition. The allocation of the total purchase price of Thermonics net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The tangible assets acquired include accounts receivable, inventory, and property and equipment. Liabilities assumed include trade payables, certain customer contract obligations and accrued payments under a non-compete/non-solicitation agreement with a former employee of Thermonics. Identifiable intangible assets acquired include customer relationships, customer backlog, the Thermonics trade name, patented technology, and a non-compete/non-solicitation agreement with a former employee of Thermonics. The excess of the purchase price over the identifiable intangible and net tangible assets in the amount of $50 was allocated to goodwill and is deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill is attributed to the synergies that are expected to result from the operations of the combined businesses. The determination of fair value reflects the assistance of third-party valuation specialists, as well as our own estimates and assumptions.
The following represents the allocation of the purchase price:
Goodwill |
$ 50 |
Identifiable intangible assets |
1,728 |
Tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed: |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
1,161 |
Inventories |
874 |
Property and equipment |
263 |
Accounts payable |
(77) |
Accrued non-compete/non-solicitation payments |
(48) |
Accrued sales commissions |
(82) |
Accrued warranty |
(67 ) |
Total purchase price |
$3,802 |
- 10 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(3) ACQUISITION (Continued)
We estimated the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired using a combination of the income, cost and market approaches. The following table provides further information about the finite-lived intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of Thermonics as of the acquisition date:
|
|
|
Weighted Average Estimated |
|
|
|
(in months) |
Customer relationships |
$1,110 |
72 |
Customer backlog |
70 |
3 |
Thermonics trade name |
140 |
48 |
Patented technology |
360 |
132 |
Non-compete/non-solicitation agreement |
48 |
18 |
Total intangible assets |
$1,728 |
78.3 |
For the period from January 16, 2012 to March 31, 2012, Thermonics contributed $669 of net revenues. We do not track net income within our Thermal Products segment by product line. As a result, the net income for Thermonics for the period from January 16, 2012 to March 31, 2012 is not available.
(4) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and intangible assets on our balance sheets are the result of our acquisitions of Sigma Systems Corp. ("Sigma") in October 2008 and Thermonics in January 2012. The acquisition of Thermonics is discussed further in Note 3.
Goodwill
All of our goodwill is allocated to our Thermal Products segment. There was no change in the amount of the carrying value of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Intangible Assets
The following tables provide further detail about our intangible assets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
|
|
March 31, 2013 |
||
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
Finite-lived intangible assets: |
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
$1,480 |
$ 509 |
$ 971 |
Patented technology |
590 |
254 |
336 |
Software |
270 |
122 |
148 |
Trade name |
140 |
42 |
98 |
Customer backlog |
70 |
70 |
- |
Non-compete/non-solicitation agreement |
48 |
32 |
16 |
Total finite-lived intangible assets |
2,598 |
1,029 |
1,569 |
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: |
|
|
|
Sigma trademark |
510 |
- |
510 |
Total intangible assets |
$3,108 |
$1,029 |
$2,079 |
- 11 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(4) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2012 |
||
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount |
|
Net Carrying Amount |
Finite-lived intangible assets: |
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
$1,480 |
$ 439 |
$1,041 |
Patented technology |
590 |
233 |
357 |
Software |
270 |
115 |
155 |
Trade name |
140 |
33 |
107 |
Customer backlog |
70 |
70 |
- |
Non-compete/non-solicitation agreement |
48 |
24 |
24 |
Total finite-lived intangible assets |
2,598 |
914 |
1,684 |
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: |
|
|
|
Sigma trademark |
510 |
- |
510 |
Total intangible assets |
$3,108 |
$ 914 |
$2,194 |
We generally amortize our finite-lived intangible assets over their estimated useful lives on a straightline basis, unless an alternate amortization method can be reliably determined. Any such alternate amortization method would be based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are expected to be consumed. None of our intangible assets have any residual value. The following table provides further information about the estimated useful lives of our finite-lived intangible assets as of March 31, 2013:
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
- - - - (in months) - - - - |
|
Finite-lived intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of Sigma: |
|
|
Customer relationships |
72 |
18 |
Software |
120 |
66 |
Patented technology |
60 |
6 |
Finite-lived intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of Thermonics: |
|
|
Customer relationships |
72 |
57.5 |
Customer backlog |
3 |
- |
Trade name |
48 |
33.5 |
Patented technology |
132 |
117.5 |
Non-compete/non-solicitation agreement |
18 |
6 |
The following table sets forth changes in the amount of the carrying value of intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2013:
Balance - January 1, 2013 |
$2,194 |
Amortization |
(115 ) |
Balance - March 31, 2013 |
$2,079 |
- 12 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(4) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)
Total amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $115 and $148, respectively. The following table sets forth the estimated annual amortization expense for our finite-lived intangible assets for each of the next five years:
2013 |
$446 |
2014 |
$355 |
2015 |
$289 |
|
$229 |
|
$212 |
(5) RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
In connection with the acquisition of Thermonics, as discussed further in Note 3, we signed a separate one year lease for the facility in Sunnyvale, California occupied by Thermonics at the time of the acquisition. This facility was owned by the seller. We ceased operations at this facility in February 2012 and relocated the Thermonics product line to our facility in Mansfield, Massachusetts where our Temptronic operations are located. During the first quarter of 2012, we incurred approximately $359 of facility closure costs related to this action. These costs included lease termination fees of approximately $220 and other costs associated with this consolidation of facilities, including the cost to relocate inventory and equipment, of approximately $139. During the fourth quarter of 2012 we received a refund of $46 of lease termination fees paid in the first quarter due to the sale of the leased facility. Accrued restructuring and other charges are included in Other Current Liabilities on our balance sheet.
Changes in our liability for restructuring and other charges for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are summarized as follows:
|
|
Thermonics |
Balance - January 1, 2012 |
$ - |
Accruals for facility closure costs |
359 |
Cash payments related to facility |
|
Balance - March 31, 2012 |
$ 200 |
(6) MAJOR CUSTOMERS
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, Hakuto Co., Ltd. accounted for 10% of our consolidated net revenues. These revenues were generated by our Thermal Products segment. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Texas Instruments Incorporated accounted for 19% of our consolidated net revenues. While all three of our operating segments sold products to this customer, these revenues were primarily generated by our Mechanical Products segment. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Teradyne, Inc. accounted for 13% of our consolidated net revenues. While both our Mechanical Products and our Electrical Products segments sold products to this customer, these revenues were primarily generated by our Electrical Products segment. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated net revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
- 13 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(7) INVENTORIES
Inventories held at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were comprised of the following:
|
|
Mar. 31, |
Dec. 31, |
Raw materials |
$2,578 |
$2,157 |
Work in process |
463 |
454 |
Inventory consigned to others |
115 |
105 |
Finished goods |
262 |
419 |
|
|
$3,418 |
$3,135 |
(8) DEBT
Letters of Credit
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of Credit |
|
|
|
Original L/C |
Expiration |
Expiration |
Mar. 31, |
Dec. 31, |
Mt. Laurel, NJ |
3/29/2010 |
3/31/2014 |
4/30/2021 |
$250 |
$250 |
Mansfield, MA |
10/27/2010 |
11/08/2013 |
8/23/2021 |
200 |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
$450 |
$450 |
(9)
GUARANTEESProduct Warranties
Balance - January 1, 2013 |
$197 |
Payments made under product warranty |
(18) |
Accruals for product warranty |
19 |
Balance - March 31, 2013 |
$198 |
(10) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
As of March 31, 2013, we had outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock awards granted under stock-based employee compensation plans that are described more fully in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2012 Form 10-K.
As of March 31, 2013, total compensation expense to be recognized in future periods was $137. The weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is 1.7 years. All of this expense is related to nonvested shares of restricted stock.
- 14 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(10) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)
Restricted Stock Awards
We record compensation expense for restricted stock awards (nonvested shares) based on the quoted market price of our stock at the grant date and amortize the expense over the vesting period. Restricted stock awards generally vest over four years. The following table shows the allocation of the compensation expense we recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to nonvested shares:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
2013 |
2012 |
Cost of revenues |
$ 1 |
$ 2 |
Selling expense |
2 |
2 |
Engineering and product development expense |
6 |
6 |
General and administrative expense |
18 |
17 |
|
$ 27 |
$ 27 |
There was no compensation expense capitalized in the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012.
The following table summarizes the activity related to nonvested shares for the three months ended March 31, 2013:
|
|
|
Weighted |
Nonvested shares outstanding, January 1, 2013 |
108,750 |
$1.63 |
Granted |
20,000 |
2.94 |
Vested |
(50,000) |
1.42 |
Forfeited |
- |
- |
Nonvested shares outstanding, March 31, 2013 |
78,750 |
2.09 |
Stock Options
|
|
|
Weighted |
Options outstanding, January 1, 2013 (219,000 exercisable) |
219,000 |
$ 3.17 |
Granted |
- |
- |
Exercised |
(10,000) |
3.04 |
Forfeited/Expired |
(189,000) |
3.04 |
Options outstanding, March 31, 2013 (20,000 exercisable) |
20,000 |
4.46 |
(11)
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANSWe have a defined contribution 401(k) plan for our employees who work in the U.S. (the "inTEST 401(k) Plan"). All permanent employees of inTEST Corporation and inTEST Silicon Valley Corporation who are at least 18 years of age are eligible to participate in the plan. We match employee contributions dollar for dollar up to 10% of the employee's annual compensation, with a maximum limit of $5. Employer contributions vest ratably over four years. Matching contributions are discretionary.
- 15 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(11) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Temptronic adopted a defined contribution 401(k) plan for its domestic employees in 1988, that was merged into the inTEST 401(k) Plan effective September 1, 2002. Prior to January 1, 2013, the inTEST 401(k) Plan retained the matching provisions of the prior Temptronic plan for all Temptronic employees, which included discretionary employer matching contributions of $0.50 on the dollar up to 6% of the employees' annual compensation, with a maximum limit of $3. The eligibility and vesting provisions of the prior Temptronic plan were conformed to those for inTEST Corporation and inTEST Silicon Valley Corporation employees.
Prior to January 1, 2013, in addition to the employer matching contributions for which Temptronic employees were eligible, Temptronic employees participating in the inTEST 401(k) plan were also eligible to receive profit sharing contributions which are more fully described in Note 16 to our 2012 Form 10-K. During the third quarter of 2012, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the inTEST 401(k) Plan. The amendment terminated the profit sharing contributions for Temptronic employees effective December 31, 2012. In addition, the amendment conformed the employer matching provisions for the Temptronic employees with those currently in place for inTEST Corporation and inTEST Silicon Valley employees effective January 1, 2013.
(12) SEGMENT INFORMATION
We have three reportable segments, which are also our reporting units: Thermal Products, Mechanical Products and Electrical Products.
The Thermal Products segment includes the operations of Temptronic, Thermonics (which we acquired in January 2012 as discussed further in Note 3), Sigma, inTEST Thermal Solutions GmbH (formerly Temptronic GmbH) (Germany), and inTEST Pte, Limited (Singapore). Sales of this segment consist primarily of temperature management systems which we design, manufacture and market under our Temptronic, Thermonics and Sigma Systems product lines. In addition, this segment provides post warranty service and support.
The Mechanical Products segment includes the operations of our Mt. Laurel, New Jersey manufacturing facility. Sales of our Mechanical Products segment consist primarily of manipulator and docking hardware products, which we design, manufacture and market. In addition, this segment provides post warranty service and support for various ATE equipment.
The Electrical Products segment includes the operations of inTEST Silicon Valley Corporation. Sales of this segment consist primarily of tester interface products which we design, manufacture and market.
We operate our business worldwide, and all three segments sell their products both domestically and internationally. All three segments sell to semiconductor manufacturers, third-party test and assembly houses and ATE manufacturers. Our Thermal Products segment also sells into a variety of industries outside of the semiconductor industry, including the automotive, consumer electronics, defense/aerospace, energy and telecommunications industries. Intercompany pricing between segments is either a multiple of cost for component parts or list price for finished goods.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers: |
2013 |
2012 |
Thermal Products |
$5,898 |
$ 6,111 |
Mechanical Products |
1,796 |
2,514 |
Electrical Products |
1,282 |
2,116 |
Intersegment sales |
(3 ) |
(10 ) |
|
$8,973 |
$10,731 |
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
Thermal Products |
$ - |
$ - |
Mechanical Products |
3 |
10 |
Electrical Products |
- |
- |
|
$ 3 |
$10 |
- 16 -
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(12) SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Earnings (loss) before income tax expense (benefit): |
2013 |
2012 |
Thermal Products |
$1,158 |
$ 317 |
Mechanical Products |
(686) |
(552) |
Electrical Products |
(8) |
365 |
Corporate |
(94 ) |
(201 ) |
|
$ 370 |
$ (71 ) |
Net earnings (loss): |
|
|
Thermal Products |
$ 914 |
$ 190 |
Mechanical Products |
(542) |
(331) |
Electrical Products |
(6) |
219 |
Corporate |
(74 ) |
(121 ) |
|
$ 292 |
$ (43 ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31, |
Dec. 31, |
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
Thermal Products |
$21,990 |
$20,849 |
Mechanical Products |
6,951 |
7,737 |
Electrical Products |
3,662 |
3,813 |
|
$32,603 |
$32,399 |
The following table provides information about our geographic areas of operation. Net revenues from unaffiliated customers are based on the location to which the goods are shipped.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|||
|
2013 |
2012 |
||
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers: |
|
|
||
U.S. |
$ 3,214 |
$ 4,196 |
||
Foreign |
5,759 |
6,535 |
||
|
$ 8,973 |
$10,731 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Mar. 31, 2013 |
Dec. 31, 2012 |
||
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
||
U.S. |
$ 871 |
$ 899 |
||
Foreign |
308 |
351 |
||
|
$1,179 |
$1,250 |
||
- 17 -
inTEST CORPORATION
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains statements relating to possible future events and results that are considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "intends," "may," "will," "should" or "anticipates" or similar terminology. See Part I, Item 1 - "Business - Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in our 2012 Form 10-K for examples of statements made in this report which may be "forward-looking statements." These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on various assumptions. Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, investors and prospective investors are cautioned that such statements are only projections, and there cannot be any assurance that these events or results will occur.
Information about the primary risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from our historic results or the results described in the forward-looking statements made in this report or presented elsewhere by Management from time to time are included in Part I, Item 1A - "Risk Factors" in our 2012 Form 10-K. Material changes to such risk factors may be reported in subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q in Part II, Item 1A. There have been no such changes from the risk factors set forth in our 2012 Form 10-K.
Overview
This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Our business and results of operations are substantially dependent upon the demand for ATE by semiconductor manufacturers and companies that specialize in the testing of ICs. Demand for ATE is driven by semiconductor manufacturers that are opening new, or expanding existing, semiconductor fabrication facilities or upgrading existing equipment, which in turn is dependent upon the current and anticipated market demand for semiconductors and products incorporating semiconductors. In the past, the semiconductor industry has been highly cyclical with recurring periods of oversupply, which often have a severe impact on the semiconductor industry's demand for ATE, including the products we manufacture. This can cause wide fluctuations in both our orders and net revenues and, depending on our ability to react quickly to these shifts in demand, can significantly impact our results of operations. These industry cycles are difficult to predict and in recent years have become more volatile and, in certain cases, shorter in duration. Because the industry cycles are generally characterized by sequential periods of growth or declines in orders and net revenues during each cycle, year over year comparisons of operating results may not always be as meaningful as comparisons of periods at similar points in either up or down cycles. In addition, during both downward and upward cycles in our industry, in any given quarter, the trend in both our orders and net revenues can be erratic. This can occur, for example, when orders are canceled or currently scheduled delivery dates are accelerated or postponed by a significant customer or when customer forecasts and general business conditions fluctuate during a quarter.
We believe that purchases of most of our products are typically made from semiconductor manufacturers' capital expenditure budgets. Certain portions of our business, however, are generally less dependent upon the capital expenditure budgets of the end users. For example, purchases of certain related ATE interface products, such as sockets and interface boards, which must be replaced periodically, are typically made from the end users' operating budgets. In addition, purchases of certain of our products, such as docking hardware, for the purpose of upgrading or improving the utilization, performance and efficiency of existing ATE, tend to be counter cyclical to sales of new ATE. Moreover, we believe a portion of our sales of thermal products results from the increasing need for temperature testing of circuit boards and specialized components that do not have the design or quantity to be tested in an electronic device handler. In addition, we market our Thermostream temperature management systems in industries outside the semiconductor test industry, such as the automotive, consumer electronics, defense/aerospace, energy and telecommunications industries. We believe that these industries usually are less cyclical than the ATE industry.
While the majority of our orders and net revenues are derived from the ATE market, our operating results do not always follow the overall trend in the ATE market in any given period. We believe that these anomalies may be driven by a variety of changes within the ATE market, including, for example, changing product requirements, longer time periods between new product offerings by OEMs and changes in customer buying patterns. In particular, demand for our mechanical and electrical products, which are sold exclusively within the ATE industry, and our operating margins in these product segments have been affected by shifts in the competitive landscape, including (i) customers placing heightened emphasis on shorter lead times
- 18 -
inTEST CORPORATION
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
(which places increased demands on our available engineering and production capacity increasing unit costs) and ordering in smaller quantities (which prevents us from acquiring component materials in larger volumes at lower cost and increasing unit costs), (ii) the practice of OEM manufacturers to specify other suppliers as primary vendors, with less frequent opportunities to compete for such designations, (iii) the role of third-party test and assembly houses in the ATE market and their requirement of products with a greater range of use at the lowest cost, (iv) customer supply line management groups demanding lower prices and spreading purchases across multiple vendors, and (v) certain competitors aggressively reducing their products' sales prices (causing us to either reduce our products' sales price to be successful in obtaining the sale or causing loss of the sale). These shifts in market practices have had, and may continue to have, varying levels of impact on our operating results and are difficult to quantify or predict from period to period. Management has taken, and will continue to take, such actions it deems appropriate to adjust our strategies, products and operations to counter such shifts in market practices as they become evident.
Net Revenues and Orders
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a breakdown of the net revenues from unaffiliated customers both by product segment and geographic area (based on the location to which the goods are shipped).
|
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
|
Mar. 31, |
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2013 |
2012 |
2012 |
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers |
(in thousands) |
||
Thermal Products |
$5,898 |
$ 6,111 |
$5,656 |
|
1,796 |
2,514 |
1,639 |
|
Electrical Products |
1,282 |
2,116 |
976 |
Intersegment sales |
(3 ) |
(10 ) |
(1 ) |
|
$8,973 |
$10,731 |
$8,270 |
Intersegment sales |
|
|
|
Thermal Products |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
Mecahnical Products |
3 |
10 |
- |
Electrical Products |
- |
- |
1 |
|
$ 3 |
$ 10 |
$ 1 |
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers (net of intersegment sales) |
|
|
|
Thermal Products |
$5,898 |
$ 6,111 |
$5,656 |
Mechanical Products |
1,793 |
2,504 |
1,638 |
Electrical Products |
1,282 |
2,116 |
976 |
|
$8,973 |
$10,731 |
$8,270 |
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
|
U.S. |
$3,214 |
$ 4,196 |
$3,863 |
Foreign |
5,759 |
6,535 |
4,407 |
|
$8,973 |
$10,731 |
$8,270 |
Our consolidated net revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 decreased $1.8 million or 16% as compared to the same period in 2012. For the quarter ended March 31, 2013, net revenues (net of intersegment sales) of our Thermal, Mechanical and Electrical Products segments decreased $213,000 or 4%, $711,000 or 28% and $834,000 or 39%, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2012. Our consolidated net revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 increased $703,000 or 9% as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2012. Net revenues (net of intersegment sales) of our Thermal, Mechanical and Electrical Products segments increased $242,000 or 4%, $155,000 or 10% and $306,000 or 31%, respectively, for the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. Net revenues from customers in various industries outside of the ATE industry and those net revenues as a percentage of our total consolidated net revenues were $1.7 million or 19%, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1.3 million or 15%, respectively, for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, and $2.4 million or 22%, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.
- 19 -
inTEST CORPORATION
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
We believe the decline in the level of net revenues of our Thermal Products segment in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 reflects in part that this segment, which has historically lagged our other two product segments in regard to experiencing the impact of both increases and decreases in the levels of demand within the ATE industry was impacted during the first quarter of 2013 by the decline in demand in the ATE industry which we began to see impacting our Mechanical Products segment during the second quarter of 2011. In addition, our Thermal Products segment sells to industries outside of the ATE industry. This diversification has, in the past, helped to balance the impact of changing levels of demand in the ATE industry. However, during the first quarter of 2013, we experienced weakened levels of demand in certain of these industries as well, which contributed to the overall level of decrease experienced by this product segment in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we began to see some improvement in demand within the Thermal Products segment resulting in an increase of approximately $763,000 or 13% in orders for the fourth quarter of 2012 as compared to the third quarter of 2012. This resulted in an increase in the net revenues of this segment in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. However, demand slowed again in the first quarter of 2013 which resulted in a decline in orders for this segment of $1.7 million or 27% for the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2012.
We believe the decline in the level of net revenues in our Mechanical Products segment in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 reflects reduced demand within the ATE industry, which we had begun to see reflected in the level of our orders for this segment during the second quarter of 2011. Although overall demand within the ATE industry remained at a reduced level throughout 2012 and into the first quarter of 2013, the impact of this decline in demand on our Mechanical Products segment was partially offset during the first quarter of 2012 by increased demand from a major customer that had recently completed an acquisition. As a result, this customer had higher than typical demand for certain of our equipment as a part of the process of integrating its post-acquisition operations. This same customer also purchases products from our Electrical Products segment. In addition, our Electrical Products segment experienced a significant increase in demand from another customer during the first half of 2012. However, the level of demand from this OEM customer weakened significantly during the second half of 2012 which resulted in a decline in the net revenues of our Electrical Products segment in the fourth quarter of 2012 as compared to the third quarter of 2012 and which continued to impact the level of net revenues of this segment in the first quarter of 2013. For our Mechanical Products segment, we have recently begun to see an increase in demand which we attribute to increased demand within the ATE industry. This increase in demand resulted in a $605,000 or 37% increase in the orders of this segment in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. Our Electrical Products segment began to experience an increase in demand late in the first quarter of 2013 which has continued into the second quarter of 2013.
Total orders for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 were $7.7 million compared to $9.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and $12.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. For the quarter ended March 31, 2013, orders for our Thermal, Mechanical and Electrical Products segments were $4.7 million, $2.2 million and $759,000, respectively, compared to $6.4 million, $1.6 million and $1.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, respectively, and $5.3 million, $3.8 million and $3.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, respectively. Orders from customers in various industries outside of the ATE industry and those orders as a percentage of our total consolidated orders were $1.2 million or 16%, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1.9 million or 20%, respectively, for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, and $1.7 million or 13%, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.We cannot be certain what the level of our orders or net revenues will be in any future period for any of our product segments.
Backlog
At March 31, 2013, our backlog of unfilled orders for all products was approximately $2.9 million compared with approximately $4.2 million at December 31, 2012 and $7.0 million at March 31, 2012. Our backlog includes customer orders which we have accepted, substantially all of which we expect to deliver in 2013. While backlog is calculated on the basis of firm purchase orders, a customer may cancel an order or accelerate or postpone currently scheduled delivery dates. Our backlog may be affected by the tendency of customers to rely on short lead times available from suppliers, including us, in periods of depressed demand. In periods of increased demand, there is a tendency towards longer lead times that has the effect of increasing backlog. As a result, our backlog at a particular date is not necessarily indicative of sales for any future period.
- 20 -
inTEST CORPORATION
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Product/Customer Mix
Our three product segments each have multiple products that we design, manufacture and sell to our customers. The gross margin on each product we offer is affected by a number of factors including the amount of intellectual property (such as patents) utilized in the product, the number of units ordered by the customer at one time, and the amount of inTEST designed and fabricated material included in our product compared with the amount of third-party designed and fabricated material included in our product. The weight of each of these factors, as well as the current market conditions, determines the ultimate sales price we can obtain for our products and the resulting gross margin.
The mix of products we sell in any period is ultimately determined by our customers' needs. Therefore, the mix of products sold in any given period can change significantly from the prior period. As a result, our consolidated gross margin can be significantly impacted in any given period by a change in the mix of products sold in that period.
We sell most of our products to semiconductor manufacturers and third-party test and assembly houses (end user sales) and to ATE manufacturers (OEM sales) who ultimately resell our equipment with theirs to semiconductor manufacturers. Our Thermal Products segment also sells into a variety of other industries including the automotive, consumer electronics, defense/aerospace, energy and telecommunications industries. The mix of customers during any given period will affect our gross margin due to differing sales discounts and commissions. For the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, our OEM sales as a percentage of net revenues were 9% and 15%, respectively.
OEM sales generally have a lower gross margin than end user sales, as OEM sales historically have had a more significant discount. Our current net operating margins on most OEM sales, however, are only slightly less than margins on end user sales because of the payment of third party sales commissions on most end user sales. We have also continued to experience demands from our OEM customers' supply line managers to reduce our sales prices to them. If we cannot further reduce our manufacturing and operating costs, these pricing pressures will continue to reduce our gross and operating margins.
Results of Operations
The results of operations for our three product segments are generally affected by the same factors. Separate discussions and analyses for each product segment would be repetitive and obscure any unique factors that affected the results of operations of our different product segments. The discussion and analysis that follows, therefore, is presented on a consolidated basis and includes discussion of factors unique to each product segment where significant to an understanding of that segment.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the principal items included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of total net revenues.
|
|
Percentage of Net Revenues |
|
|
2013 |
2012 |
Net revenues |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Cost of revenues |
54.3 |
57.2 |
Gross margin |
45.7 |
42.8 |
Selling expense |
13.3 |
13.1 |
Engineering and product development expense |
11.1 |
8.6 |
General and administrative expense |
17.3 |
18.6 |
Restructuring and other charges |
0.0 |
3.3 |
Operating income (loss) |
4.0 |
(0.8) |
Other income |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Earnings (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
4.1 |
(0.7) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
0.9 |
(0.3 ) |
Net earnings (loss) |
3.2 % |
(0.4 )% |
- 21 -
inTEST CORPORATION
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Quarter Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2012
Net Revenues. Net revenues were $9.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 compared to $10.7 million for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $1.7 million or 16%. We believe the decrease in our net revenues during the first quarter of 2013 primarily reflects the factors previously discussed in the Overview.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, our net revenues from customers in the U.S. decreased 23% and our net revenues from foreign customers decreased 12%, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2012. The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the decrease in net revenues from foreign customers was less than 1%.
Gross Margin. Gross margin was 46% for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 compared to 43% for the same period in 2012. The improvement in the gross margin was primarily the result of a reduction in our component material costs as a percentage of net revenues, which decreased from 36% in the first quarter of 2012 to 34% in the first quarter of 2013, due to changes in customer mix. To a lesser extent, the increase in gross margin also reflects a reduction in our fixed operating costs during the first quarter of 2013, both in absolute dollar terms and as a percentage of net revenues. For the quarter ended March 31, 2013, our fixed operating costs declined $364,000 as compared to the same period in 2012. As a percentage of net revenues, these costs decreased from 17% for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 to 16% for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The decline in the absolute dollar value of our fixed operating costs in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 reflects reduced headcount in our Thermal and Mechanical Products segments. In addition, during the first quarter of 2012, we were in the process of integrating the operations of Thermonics, which we acquired in January 2012. As a result, we experienced reduced production efficiency in our Thermal Products segment during the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the first quarter of 2013.
Selling Expense. Selling expense was $1.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 compared to $1.4 million for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $217,000 or 15%. The decrease primarily reflects lower levels of commission expense reflecting the lower net revenue levels in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the first quarter of 2012.
Engineering and Product Development Expense. Engineering and product development expense was $996,000 for the first quarter of 2013 compared to $924,000 for the same period in 2012, an increase of $72,000 or 8%. The increase in engineering and product development expense primarily reflects increased spending on matters related to our intellectual property.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense was $1.6 million for the first quarter of 2013 compared to $2.0 million for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $435,000 or 22%. During the first quarter of 2012, we recorded $337,000 in costs associated with the acquisition of Thermonics. There were no similar costs recorded in the first quarter of 2013.
Restructuring and Other Charges. Restructuring and other charges were $359,000 for the first quarter of 2012. There were no similar charges for the first quarter of 2013. The restructuring and other charges recorded during the first quarter of 2012 represent facility closure costs related to the closure of the Sunnyvale, California facility occupied by Thermonics at the time of our acquisition of this operation.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For the quarter ended March 31, 2013, we recorded income tax expense of $78,000 compared to an income tax benefit of $28,000 for the same period in 2012. Our effective tax rate for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 was 21% compared to an effective tax rate of 39% for the same period in 2012. On a quarterly basis, we record income tax expense or benefit based on the expected annualized effective tax rate for the various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate our businesses. The reduction in our effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 primarily reflects the recording of the effect of the reinstatement of certain domestic research and development tax credits. This change was enacted in January 2013.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash used in operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $134,000 compared to $86,000 for the same period in 2012. During the first quarter of 2013, we recorded net earnings of $292,000 compared to a net loss of $43,000 for the same period in 2012. However, the positive impact on cash of our net earnings was offset by increases of $300,000 and
- 22 -
inTEST CORPORATION
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
$395,000 in inventories and trade accounts receivable, respectively, reflecting the increased business activity in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. These increases were partially offset by a $358,000 increase in accounts payable during the first quarter of 2013, also reflecting the increased business activity as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2012. During the first quarter of 2013, accrued wages and benefits decreased $385,000 reflecting the payout of profit related bonuses accrued on the prior year's results.
We have no significant commitments for capital expenditures for the balance of 2013, however, depending upon changes in market demand, we may make such purchases as we deem necessary and appropriate.
As of March 31, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $15.4 million. We currently expect our cash and cash equivalents and projected future cash flow to be sufficient to support our short term working capital requirements. We do not currently have any credit facilities under which we can borrow to help fund our working capital or other requirements. We cannot be certain that, if needed, we would be able to obtain any credit facilities or under what terms such credit facilities would be available.
New or Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
See the Notes to the consolidated financial statements for information concerning the implementation and impact of new or recently adopted accounting standards.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories, long-lived assets, goodwill, identifiable intangibles, deferred income tax valuation allowances and product warranty reserves. We base our estimates on historical experience and on appropriate and customary assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Some of these accounting estimates and assumptions are particularly sensitive because of their significance to our consolidated financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ markedly from what had been assumed when the financial statements were prepared. As of March 31, 2013, there have been no significant changes to the accounting policies that we have deemed critical. These policies are more fully described in our 2012 Form 10-K.
Off -Balance Sheet Arrangements
There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the three months ended March 31, 2013 that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our interests.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
This disclosure is not required for a smaller reporting company.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
CEO and CFO Certifications. Included with this Quarterly Report as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are two certifications, one by each of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (the "Section 302 Certifications"). This Item 4 contains information concerning the evaluations of our disclosure controls and procedures that are referred to in the Section 302 Certifications. This information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics addressed therein.
- 23 -
inTEST CORPORATION
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (Continued)
Evaluation of Our Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The SEC requires that as of the end of the quarter covered by this Report, our CEO and CFO must evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures and report on the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.
"Disclosure controls and procedures" mean the controls and other procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), such as this Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms promulgated by the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, as opposed to absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within an entity have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a system of controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Accordingly, our management has designed the disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system were met.
CEO/CFO Conclusions about the Effectiveness of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b), inTEST management, including our CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Report, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time we may be a party to legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Information regarding the primary risks and uncertainties that could materially and adversely affect our future performance or could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements, appears in Part I, Item 1A -- "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
- 24 -
inTEST CORPORATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
A list of the Exhibits which are required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and filed with this Report is set forth in the Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page, which Index to Exhibits is incorporated herein by reference.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
inTEST Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 25 -
Index to Exhibits
3.1* Articles of Incorporation: Previously filed by the Company as an Exhibit
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-26457,
and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2* ByLaws of inTEST Corporation, as amended on October 30, 2007: Previously filed
as Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's Form 8-K on November 5, 2007 and incorporated
herein by reference.
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* Indicates document previously filed.
- 26 -
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert E. Matthiessen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 15, 2013
/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 15, 2013
/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
inTEST CORPORATION
In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 15, 2013
/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
inTEST CORPORATION
In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 15, 2013
/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
Note 5 - Restructuring and Other Charges (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
|
| Restructuring Charges | $ 359 | |
| Restructuring Reserve, Accrual Adjustment | 46 | |
|
Termination Fees [Member]
|
||
| Restructuring Charges | 220 | |
|
Facility Closure Costs [Member]
|
||
| Restructuring and Related Cost, Incurred Cost | 359 | |
|
Relocation Fees [Member]
|
||
| Restructuring Charges | $ 139 | |
|
Note 10 - Stock-Based Compensation (Detail) - Nonvested Shares (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|
| Number of Shares Outstanding | 108,750 |
| Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Outstanding (in Dollars per share) | $ 1.63 |
| Granted | 20,000 |
| Granted (in Dollars per share) | $ 2.94 |
| Vested | (50,000) |
| Vested (in Dollars per share) | $ 1.42 |
| Number of Shares Outstanding | 78,750 |
| Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Outstanding (in Dollars per share) | $ 2.09 |
|
Note 10 - Stock-Based Compensation (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|
| Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Total Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized (in Dollars) | $ 137 |
| Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Total Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized, Period for Recognition | 1 year 255 days |
| Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period | 4 years |
|
Note 3 - Acquisition (Detail) - Finite-Lived Intangible Assets Acquired with Acquisition of Thermonics (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | $ 2,598 | $ 2,598 | |
| Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life | 78 months 9 days | ||
|
Fair Value [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 1,110 | ||
|
Fair Value [Member] | Customer Backlog [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 70 | ||
|
Fair Value [Member] | Trade Names [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 140 | ||
|
Fair Value [Member] | Patented Technology [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 360 | ||
|
Fair Value [Member] | Noncompete Agreements [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 48 | ||
|
Fair Value [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 1,728 | ||
|
Customer Relationships [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 1,480 | 1,480 | |
| Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life | 72 months | ||
|
Customer Backlog [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 70 | 70 | |
| Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life | 3 months | ||
|
Trade Names [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 140 | 140 | |
| Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life | 48 months | ||
|
Patented Technology [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | 590 | 590 | |
| Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life | 132 months | ||
|
Noncompete Agreements [Member]
|
|||
| Fair Value (in Dollars) | $ 48 | $ 48 | |
| Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life | 18 months |
|
Note 8 - Debt (Tables)
|
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule Of Outstanding Letters Of Credit [Table Text Block] |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note 11 - Employee Benefit Plans (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended |
|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Temptronic Facility [Member]
|
|
| Defined Contribution Plan, Maximum Annual Contribution Per Employee, Percent | 10.00% | 6.00% |
| Defined Contribution Plan, Maximum Annual Contribution Per Employee, Amount (in Dollars) | $ 5 | $ 3 |
| Defined Contribution Plan Employer Matching Contribution Vesting Period | 4 years | |
| Maximum Contribution Per Dollar | 0.50 |
|
Note 7 - Inventories (Detail) - Inventories (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Mar. 31, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|---|---|---|
| Raw materials | $ 2,578 | $ 2,157 |
| Work in process | 463 | 454 |
| Inventory consigned to others | 115 | 105 |
| Finished goods | 262 | 419 |
| $ 3,418 | $ 3,135 |
|
Note 4 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Detail) - Changes in the Amount of the Carrying Value of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
|
| Balance - January 1, 2013 | $ 2,194 | |
| Amortization | (115) | (148) |
| Balance - March 31, 2013 | $ 2,079 | |
|
Note 10 - Stock-Based Compensation (Detail) - Allocation of Share-Based Compensation Expense (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
|
|
Cost of Sales [Member]
|
||
| Allocated Share-Based Compensation Expense | $ 1 | $ 2 |
|
Selling Expense [Member]
|
||
| Allocated Share-Based Compensation Expense | 2 | 2 |
|
Engineering and Product Development Expense [Member]
|
||
| Allocated Share-Based Compensation Expense | 6 | 6 |
|
General and Administrative Expense [Member]
|
||
| Allocated Share-Based Compensation Expense | 18 | 17 |
|
Total [Member]
|
||
| Allocated Share-Based Compensation Expense | $ 27 | $ 27 |
|
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] |
(2) SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of
Presentation and Use of Estimates
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated upon consolidation. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Certain of our accounts, including inventories,
long-lived assets, goodwill, identifiable intangibles,
deferred income tax valuation allowances and product warranty
reserves, are particularly impacted by estimates.
In
the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements include all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary
to present fairly the financial position, results of
operations, and changes in cash flows for the interim periods
presented. Certain footnote information has been condensed or
omitted from these consolidated financial statements.
Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying footnotes included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
29, 2013 (the "2012 Form 10-K").
Reclassification
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to be comparable
with the current period's presentation.
Inventories
Inventories
are valued on a first-in, first-out basis, not in excess of
market value. Cash flows from the sale of inventories are
recorded in operating cash flows. On a quarterly basis, we
review our inventories and record excess and obsolete
inventory charges based upon our established objective excess
and obsolete inventory criteria. These criteria identify
material that has not been used in a work order during the
prior twelve months and the quantity of material on hand that
is greater than the average annual usage of that material
over the prior three years. In certain cases, additional
excess and obsolete inventory charges are recorded based upon
current industry conditions, anticipated product life cycles,
new product introductions and expected future use of the
inventory. The excess and obsolete inventory charges we
record establish a new cost basis for the related
inventories. We incurred excess and obsolete inventory
charges of $110 and $150 for the three months ended March 31,
2013 and 2012, respectively.
Goodwill,
Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
We
account for goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350 (Intangibles-
Goodwill and Other). Finite-lived intangible assets are
amortized over their estimated useful economic life and are
carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Goodwill is
assessed for impairment at least annually in the fourth
quarter, on a reporting unit basis, or more frequently when
events and circumstances occur indicating that the recorded
goodwill may be impaired. As a part of the goodwill
impairment assessment, we have the option to perform a
qualitative assessment to determine whether it is
more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit
is less than its carrying amount. If we determine this is the
case, we are required to perform a two-step goodwill
impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and
measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, to be
recognized. The two-step test is discussed below. If we
determine that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value
of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amounts,
the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required.
If
we determine it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value
of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a
result of our qualitative assessment, we will perform a
quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. In the Step I
test, the fair value of a reporting unit is computed and
compared with its book value. If the book value of a
reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a Step II test is
performed in which the implied fair value of goodwill is
compared with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value,
an impairment loss is recorded in an amount equal to that
excess. The two-step goodwill impairment assessment is based
upon a combination of the income approach, which estimates
the fair value of our reporting units based upon a discounted
cash flow approach, and the market approach which estimates
the fair value of our reporting units based upon comparable
market multiples. This fair value is then reconciled to our
market capitalization at year end with an appropriate control
premium. The determination of the fair value of our reporting
units requires management to make significant estimates and
assumptions including the selection of appropriate peer group
companies, control premiums, discount rate, terminal growth
rates, forecasts of revenue and expense growth rates, changes
in working capital, depreciation, amortization and capital
expenditures. Changes in assumptions concerning future
financial results or other underlying assumptions would have
a significant impact on either the fair value of the
reporting unit or the amount of the goodwill impairment
charge.
Indefinite-lived
intangible assets are assessed for impairment at least
annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be
impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the
fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount.
If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its
fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess.
Long-lived
assets, which consist of finite-lived intangible assets and
property and equipment, are assessed for impairment whenever
events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of these assets are no longer
appropriate. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of
the estimated undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value
of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is
written down to its estimated fair value. The cash flow
estimates used to determine the impairment, if any, contain
management's best estimates using appropriate assumptions and
projections at that time.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We
account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC
Topic 718 (Compensation - Stock Compensation) which requires
that employee share-based equity awards be accounted for
under the fair value method and requires the use of an option
pricing model for estimating fair value of stock options
granted, which is then amortized to expense over the service
periods. See further disclosures related to our stock-based
compensation plan in Note 10.
Subsequent
Events
We
have made an assessment of our operations and determined that
there were no material subsequent events requiring adjustment
to, or disclosure in, our consolidated financial statements
for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is
reasonably assured. Sales of our products are made through
our sales employees, third-party sales representatives and
distributors. There are no differences in revenue recognition
policies based on the sales channel. We do not provide our
customers with rights of return or exchanges. Revenue is
generally recognized upon product shipment. Our customers'
purchase orders do not typically contain any
customer-specific acceptance criteria, other than that the
product performs within the agreed upon specifications. We
test all products manufactured as part of our quality
assurance process to determine that they comply with
specifications prior to shipment to a customer. To the extent
that any customer purchase order contains customer-specific
acceptance criteria, revenue recognition is deferred until
customer acceptance.
With
respect to sales tax collected from customers and remitted to
governmental authorities, we use a net presentation in our
consolidated statement of operations. As a result, there are
no amounts included in either our net revenues or cost of
revenues related to sales tax.
Product
Warranties
We
generally provide product warranties and record estimated
warranty expense at the time of sale based upon historical
claims experience. Warranty expense is included in selling
expense in the consolidated financial statements.
Restructuring
and Other Charges
We
recognize a liability for restructuring charges at fair value
only when the liability is incurred. The three main
components of our restructuring plans have been related to
workforce reductions, the consolidation of excess facilities
and asset impairments. Workforce-related charges are accrued
when it is determined that a liability has been incurred,
which is generally after individuals have been notified of
their termination dates and expected severance benefits.
Plans to consolidate excess facilities result in charges for
lease termination fees and future commitments to pay lease
charges, net of estimated future sub-lease income. We
recognize these charges when we have vacated the premises. In
addition, as a result of plans to consolidate excess
facilities, we may incur other associated costs such as
charges to relocate inventory, equipment or personnel. We
recognize charges for other associated costs when these costs
are incurred, which is generally when the goods or services
have been provided to us. Assets that may be impaired consist
of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Asset
impairment charges are based on an estimate of the amounts
and timing of future cash flows related to the expected
future remaining use and ultimate sale or disposal of the
asset.
Income
Taxes
The
asset and liability method is used in accounting for income
taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards and for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the periods in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in the results of operations in the period that
includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is
recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax
assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will
not be realized.
Net
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Net
earnings (loss) per common share - basic is computed by
dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during each period. Net earnings
(loss) per common share - diluted is computed by dividing net
earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common
shares and common share equivalents outstanding during each
period. Common share equivalents represent stock options and
unvested shares of restricted stock and are calculated using
the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents are
excluded from the calculation if their effect is
anti-dilutive.
The
table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
reconciliation of weighted average common shares outstanding
- basic to weighted average common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding - diluted and the average number of
potentially dilutive securities that were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share because their
effect was anti-dilutive:
Effect
of Recently Adopted Amendments to Authoritative Accounting
Guidance
In
July 2012, the FASB issued amendments to existing guidance on
the assessment of impairment for indefinite-lived intangible
assets other than goodwill. The amendments permit an entity
first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it
is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible
asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is
necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. If an
entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment,
that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value is
less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment
test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required.
The amendments are effective for annual and interim
impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after
September 15, 2012. However, an entity can choose to adopt
this guidance early even if its annual test date is before
the issuance of the final standard, provided that the entity
has not yet issued its financial statements for the most
recent annual or interim period. We adopted these amendments
on January 1, 2013. The adoption of these amendments did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2013, the FASB issued amendments to existing
guidance on the accounting for accumulated other
comprehensive income. The amendments require entities to
provide information about the amounts reclassified out of
accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In
addition, an entity is required to present, either on the
face of the financial statements or in the notes, significant
amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive
income by the respective line items of net income, but only
if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified in
its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that
are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net
income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other
disclosures that provide additional details about those
amounts. The amendments are effective for annual and interim
periods beginning after December 15, 2012. We adopted these
amendments on January 1, 2013. The adoption of these
amendments did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
'0O:F%V87-C