XML 27 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net  
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net

6. Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2016

    

2015

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

143,874

 

$

140,341

 

Additions (See Note 4)

 

 

5,334

 

 

3,533

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

149,208

 

$

143,874

 

We perform our annual impairment testing on October 1, or more frequently, if events and circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. As discussed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” we have the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value.

During our annual impairment testing on October 1, we performed a quantitative assessment where the fair value of each reporting unit was estimated using a discounted cash flow model combined with a market valuation approach. We assigned a weighting of 50% to the discounted cash flow analysis and 50% to the public company approach for the year ended December 31, 2016. Based on this assessment, we concluded that the fair value of each of the reporting units was greater than its carrying value. 

During 2015 and 2014, we performed a qualitative assessment for each reporting unit, which considered various factors, including changes in the carrying value of the reporting unit, forecasted operating results, long-term growth rates and discount rates. Additionally, we considered qualitative key events and circumstances (i.e. macroeconomic environment, industry and market specific conditions, cost factors and events specific to the reporting unit, etc.). Based on this assessment, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units was greater than its carrying value. Accordingly, no further testing was required.

Prior to our annual goodwill impairment test in 2014, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $0.7 million during the second quarter of 2014. Based on market activity declines and write-downs incurred on several jobs, we determined that the operating environment, conditions and performance at our operating unit based in California could no longer support the related goodwill balance. When the carrying value of a given reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the goodwill of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. The fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow model combined with market valuation approaches.

As of October 1, 2016, the fair value exceeded the carrying value by a significant margin for all of our reporting units with a goodwill balance.

There are significant inherent uncertainties and management judgment involved in estimating the fair value of each reporting unit. While we believe we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to estimate the fair value of our reporting units, it is possible that a material change could occur. If actual results are not consistent with our current estimates and assumptions, or the current economic outlook worsens, goodwill impairment charges may be recorded in future periods.

Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net

Identifiable intangible assets consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

    

Useful Lives

    

Gross Book

    

Accumulated

    

Gross Book

    

Accumulated

 

 

    

in Years

    

Value

    

Amortization

    

Value

    

Amortization

 

Customer relationships

 

1 - 15

 

$

57,230

 

$

(36,758)

 

$

53,334

 

$

(31,960)

 

Backlog

 

1 - 2

 

 

3,600

 

 

(3,433)

 

 

1,600

 

 

(1,412)

 

Noncompete agreements

 

2 - 7

 

 

2,890

 

 

(2,890)

 

 

2,890

 

 

(2,890)

 

Tradenames

 

2 - 25

 

 

31,640

 

 

(9,844)

 

 

27,995

 

 

(8,478)

 

Total

 

 

 

$

95,360

 

$

(52,925)

 

$

85,819

 

$

(44,740)

 

 

The amounts attributable to customer relationships, noncompete agreements and tradenames are amortized to “Selling, General and Administrative Expenses” on a pattern of economic benefit or a straight‑line method over periods from two to twenty‑five years. The amounts attributable to backlog are being amortized to “Cost of Services” on a proportionate method over the remaining backlog period. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2016,  2015 and 2014 was $8.2 million, $7.5 million and $7.7 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2016, future amortization expense of identifiable intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31—

    

 

    

 

2017

    

$

5,702

 

2018

 

 

4,861

 

2019

 

 

4,246

 

2020

 

 

3,751

 

2021

 

 

3,300

 

Thereafter

 

 

20,575

 

Total

 

$

42,435