UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2017

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to           

Commission file numbers: 001-34465 and 001-31441

SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Delaware
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) 20-1764048
23-2872718
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

4714 Gettysburg Road, P.O. Box 2034
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip code)

(717) 972-1100

(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods as such Registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants have submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrants were required to submit and post such files).   Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant, Select Medical Holdings Corporation, is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Emerging Growth Company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant, Select Medical Corporation, is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Emerging Growth Company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

As of July 31, 2017, Select Medical Holdings Corporation had outstanding 132,936,770 shares of common stock.

This Form 10-Q is a combined quarterly report being filed separately by two Registrants: Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation. Unless the context indicates otherwise, any reference in this report to “Holdings” refers to Select Medical Holdings Corporation and any reference to “Select” refers to Select Medical Corporation, the wholly owned operating subsidiary of Holdings, and any of Select’s subsidiaries. Any reference to “Concentra” refers to Concentra Inc., the indirect operating subsidiary of Concentra Group Holdings, LLC (“Concentra Group Holdings”), and its subsidiaries. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer collectively to Holdings, Select, and Concentra Group Holdings and its subsidiaries.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
ITEM 1.	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Condensed consolidated balance sheets	3
	Condensed consolidated statements of operations	4
	Condensed consolidated statements of changes in equity and income	6
	Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows	7
	Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements	8
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	30
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	50
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	50
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	51
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	51
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	53
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	53
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	54
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	54
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	54
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	54
SIGNATURES

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Select Medical Holdings Corporation				Select Medical Corporation
	December 31,		June 30,		December 31,			June 30,
	2016		2017		2016			2017
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	99,029	$	73,799	$	99,029		$	73,799
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $63,787 and $67,769 at 2016 and 2017, respectively	573,752		714,236		573,752			714,236
Prepaid income taxes	12,423		—		12,423			—
Other current assets	77,699		83,211		77,699			83,211
Total Current Assets	762,903		871,246		762,903			871,246
Property and equipment, net	892,217		911,532		892,217			911,532
Goodwill	2,751,000		2,766,296		2,751,000			2,766,296
Identifiable intangible assets, net	340,562		335,704		340,562			335,704
Other assets	173,944		169,433		173,944			169,433
Total Assets	$	4,920,626	$	5,054,211	$	4,920,626		$	5,054,211
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Bank overdrafts	$	39,362	$	34,134	$	39,362		$	34,134
Current portion of long-term debt and notes payable	13,656		26,577		13,656			26,577
Accounts payable	126,558		123,631		126,558			123,631
Accrued payroll	146,397		119,187		146,397			119,187
Accrued vacation	83,261		92,250		83,261			92,250
Accrued interest	22,325		19,277		22,325			19,277
Accrued other	140,076		146,853		140,076			146,853
Income taxes payable	—		6,976		—			6,976
Total Current Liabilities	571,635		568,885		571,635			568,885
Long-term debt, net of current portion	2,685,333		2,734,132		2,685,333			2,734,132
Non-current deferred tax liability	199,078		197,411		199,078			197,411
Other non-current liabilities	136,520		141,279		136,520			141,279
Total Liabilities	3,592,566		3,641,707		3,592,566			3,641,707
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Redeemable non-controlling interests	422,159		468,850		422,159			468,850
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock of Holdings, $0.001 par value, 700,000,000 shares authorized, 132,596,758 and 132,929,545 shares issued and outstanding at 2016 and 2017, respectively	132		133		—			—
Common stock of Select, $0.01 par value, 100 shares issued and outstanding	—		—		0			0
Capital in excess of par	443,908		454,892		925,111			936,428
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	371,685		393,294		(109,386		)	(88,109		)
Total Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation Stockholders’ Equity	815,725		848,319		815,725			848,319
Non-controlling interest	90,176		95,335		90,176			95,335
Total Equity	905,901		943,654		905,901			943,654
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	4,920,626	$	5,054,211	$	4,920,626		$	5,054,211

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Select Medical Holdings Corporation						Select Medical Corporation
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2017			2016			2017
Net operating revenues	$	1,097,631		$	1,120,675		$	1,097,631		$	1,120,675
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services	916,985			920,230			916,985			920,230
General and administrative	25,870			28,275			25,870			28,275
Bad debt expense	17,517			18,174			17,517			18,174
Depreciation and amortization	36,205			38,333			36,205			38,333
Total costs and expenses	996,577			1,005,012			996,577			1,005,012
Income from operations	101,054			115,663			101,054			115,663
Other income and expense:
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	4,546			5,666			4,546			5,666
Non-operating gain	13,035			—			13,035			—
Interest expense	(44,332		)	(37,655		)	(44,332		)	(37,655		)
Income before income taxes	74,303			83,674			74,303			83,674
Income tax expense	33,450			32,374			33,450			32,374
Net income	40,853			51,300			40,853			51,300
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	6,918			9,245			6,918			9,245
Net income attributable to Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation	$	33,935		$	42,055		$	33,935		$	42,055
Basic	$	0.26		$	0.32
Diluted	$	0.26		$	0.32
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	127,626			128,624
Diluted	127,820			128,777

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Select Medical Holdings Corporation						Select Medical Corporation
	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2017			2016			2017
Net operating revenues	$	2,185,961		$	2,232,036		$	2,185,961		$	2,232,036
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services	1,839,247			1,848,587			1,839,247			1,848,587
General and administrative	54,138			56,350			54,138			56,350
Bad debt expense	33,914			38,799			33,914			38,799
Depreciation and amortization	70,722			80,872			70,722			80,872
Total costs and expenses	1,998,021			2,024,608			1,998,021			2,024,608
Income from operations	187,940			207,428			187,940			207,428
Other income and expense:
Loss on early retirement of debt	(773		)	(19,719		)	(773		)	(19,719		)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	9,198			11,187			9,198			11,187
Non-operating gain (loss)	38,122			(49		)	38,122			(49		)
Interest expense	(83,180		)	(78,508		)	(83,180		)	(78,508		)
Income before income taxes	151,307			120,339			151,307			120,339
Income tax expense	50,510			45,576			50,510			45,576
Net income	100,797			74,763			100,797			74,763
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	12,029			16,838			12,029			16,838
Net income attributable to Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation	$	88,768		$	57,925		$	88,768		$	57,925
Basic	$	0.68		$	0.44
Diluted	$	0.68		$	0.44
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	127,563			128,544
Diluted	127,709			128,703

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Income

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

				Select Medical Holdings Corporation Stockholders
	Redeemable Non-controlling interests			Common Stock Issued		Common Stock Par Value		Capital in Excess of Par			Retained Earnings			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Non-controlling Interests			Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	422,159		132,597		$	132	$	443,908		$	371,685		$	815,725		$	90,176		$	905,901
Net income attributable to Select Medical Holdings Corporation											57,925			57,925						57,925
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	13,140													—			3,698			3,698
Issuance and vesting of restricted stock				268		1		8,700						8,701						8,701
Repurchase of common shares				(45	)	0		(332		)	(268		)	(600		)				(600		)
Exercise of stock options				109		0		963						963						963
Issuance of non-controlling interests								1,653						1,653			3,634			5,287
Purchase of non-controlling interests	(127		)								7			7						7
Distributions to non-controlling interests	(3,113		)											—			(2,303		)	(2,303		)
Redemption adjustment on non-controlling interests	36,292										(36,292		)	(36,292		)				(36,292		)
Other	499										237			237			130			367
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	468,850		132,929		$	133	$	454,892		$	393,294		$	848,319		$	95,335		$	943,654
				Select Medical Corporation Stockholders
	Redeemable Non-controlling interests			Common Stock Issued		Common Stock Par Value		Capital in Excess of Par			Retained Earnings			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Non-controlling Interests			Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	422,159		0		$	0	$	925,111		$	(109,386	)	$	815,725		$	90,176		$	905,901
Net income attributable to Select Medical Corporation											57,925			57,925						57,925
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	13,140													—			3,698			3,698
Additional investment by Holdings								963						963						963
Dividends declared and paid to Holdings											(600		)	(600		)				(600		)
Contribution related to restricted stock awards and stock option issuances by Holdings								8,701						8,701						8,701
Issuance of non-controlling interests								1,653						1,653			3,634			5,287
Purchase of non-controlling interests	(127		)								7			7						7
Distributions to non-controlling interests	(3,113		)											—			(2,303		)	(2,303		)
Redemption adjustment on non-controlling interests	36,292										(36,292		)	(36,292		)				(36,292		)
Other	499										237			237			130			367
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	468,850		0		$	0	$	936,428		$	(88,109	)	$	848,319		$	95,335		$	943,654

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Select Medical Holdings Corporation						Select Medical Corporation
	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2017			2016			2017
Operating activities
Net income	$	100,797		$	74,763		$	100,797		$	74,763
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries	12,039			10,933			12,039			10,933
Depreciation and amortization	70,722			80,872			70,722			80,872
Provision for bad debts	33,914			38,799			33,914			38,799
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	(9,198		)	(11,187		)	(9,198		)	(11,187		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	773			6,527			773			6,527
Gain on sale of assets and businesses	(43,461		)	(9,523		)	(43,461		)	(9,523		)
Loss on disposal of assets	55			—			55			—
Impairment of equity investment	5,339			—			5,339			—
Stock compensation expense	8,174			9,270			8,174			9,270
Amortization of debt discount, premium and issuance costs	7,077			5,974			7,077			5,974
Deferred income taxes	(13,286		)	(1,474		)	(13,286		)	(1,474		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of business combinations:
Accounts receivable	(44,096		)	(179,003		)	(44,096		)	(179,003		)
Other current assets	11,011			(5,557		)	11,011			(5,557		)
Other assets	4,508			4,621			4,508			4,621
Accounts payable	(15,852		)	759			(15,852		)	759
Accrued expenses	20,632			(4,833		)	20,632			(4,833		)
Income taxes	29,090			19,399			29,090			19,399
Net cash provided by operating activities	178,238			40,340			178,238			40,340
Investing activities
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	(421,519		)	(18,508		)	(421,519		)	(18,508		)
Purchases of property and equipment	(80,258		)	(105,302		)	(80,258		)	(105,302		)
Investment in businesses	(1,590		)	(9,874		)	(1,590		)	(9,874		)
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses	71,366			34,552			71,366			34,552
Net cash used in investing activities	(432,001		)	(99,132		)	(432,001		)	(99,132		)
Financing activities
Borrowings on revolving facilities	320,000			630,000			320,000			630,000
Payments on revolving facilities	(380,000		)	(550,000		)	(380,000		)	(550,000		)
Proceeds from term loans	600,127			1,139,487			600,127			1,139,487
Payments on term loans	(229,649		)	(1,173,692		)	(229,649		)	(1,173,692		)
Revolving facility debt issuance costs	—			(4,392		)	—			(4,392		)
Borrowings of other debt	22,082			9,444			22,082			9,444
Principal payments on other debt	(9,926		)	(10,437		)	(9,926		)	(10,437		)
Repayments of bank overdrafts	(2,138		)	(5,228		)	(2,138		)	(5,228		)
Repurchase of common stock	(506		)	(600		)	—			—
Dividends paid to Holdings	—			—			(506		)	(600		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	657			963			—			—
Equity investment by Holdings	—			—			657			963
Proceeds from issuance of non-controlling interests	3,103			3,553			3,103			3,553
Purchase of non-controlling interests	(1,294		)	(120		)	(1,294		)	(120		)
Distributions to non-controlling interests	(4,708		)	(5,416		)	(4,708		)	(5,416		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	317,748			33,562			317,748			33,562
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	63,985			(25,230		)	63,985			(25,230		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14,435			99,029			14,435			99,029
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	78,420		$	73,799		$	78,420		$	73,799
Supplemental Information
Cash paid for interest	$	69,315		$	76,650		$	69,315		$	76,650
Cash paid for taxes	$	35,518		$	27,626		$	35,518		$	27,626

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Select Medical Holdings Corporation (“Holdings”) include the accounts of its wholly owned subsidiary, Select Medical Corporation (“Select”). Holdings conducts substantially all of its business through Select and its subsidiaries. Holdings and Select and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “Company.” The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of June 30, 2017, and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2017, have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim reporting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Accordingly, certain information and disclosures required by GAAP, which are normally included in the notes to consolidated financial statements, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes the disclosure is adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, such information contains all adjustments, which are normal and recurring in nature, necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flow for such periods. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016 contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017.

2. Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, including disclosure of contingencies, at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 states that if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the transaction should be accounted for as an asset acquisition. In addition, the ASU clarifies the requirements for a set of activities to be considered a business and narrows the definition of an output. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill and consolidation. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. Current GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The ASU requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company plans to adopt the guidance effective January 1, 2018. Adoption of the guidance will be applied on a modified retrospective approach through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date.

8

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This ASU includes a lessee accounting model that recognizes two types of leases; finance and operating. This ASU requires that a lessee recognize on the balance sheet assets and liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. Lessees will need to recognize almost all leases on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained the dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. For short-term leases of twelve months or less, lessees are permitted to make an accounting election by class of underlying asset not to recognize right-of-use assets or lease liabilities. If the alternative is elected, lease expense would be recognized generally on the straight-line basis over the respective lease term.

The amendments in ASU 2016-02 will take effect for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. A modified retrospective approach is required for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements.

Upon adoption, the Company will recognize significant assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the operating lease obligations of the Company. Operating lease expense will still be recognized as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company will implement the new standard beginning January 1, 2019. The Company’s implementation efforts are focused on designing accounting processes, disclosure processes, and internal controls in order to account for its leases under the new standard.

In May 2014, March 2016, April 2016, and December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Principal versus Agent Considerations, ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, and ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer (collectively “the standards”), respectively, which supersede most of the current revenue recognition requirements. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. New disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers are also required. The standards require the selection of a retrospective or cumulative effect transition method.

The Company will implement the new standard beginning January 1, 2018 using the retrospective transition method.  Adoption of the new standard will result in material changes to the presentation of net operating revenues and bad debt expense in the consolidated statements of operations, but the presentation of the amount of income from operations and net income will be unchanged upon adoption of the new standards. The principal change is how the new standard requires healthcare providers to estimate the amount of variable consideration to be included in the transaction price up to an amount which is probable that a significant reversal will not occur. The most common form of variable consideration the Company experiences are amounts for services provided that are ultimately not realizable from a customer. Under the current standards, the Company’s estimate for unrealizable amounts was recorded to bad debt expense. Under the new standards, the Company’s estimate for unrealizable amounts will be recognized as a constraint to revenue and will be reflected as an allowance. Substantially all of the bad debt expense as of June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2017 will be reclassified as an allowance when the Company retrospectively applies the guidance in the standards on January 1, 2018.

The Company’s remaining implementation efforts are focused principally on refining the accounting processes, disclosure processes, and internal controls.

9

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which changed the presentation of deferred income taxes. The standard changed the presentation of deferred income taxes through the requirement that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2017. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016 has been retrospectively adjusted. Adoption of the new standard impacted the Company’s previously reported results as follows:

	December 31, 2016
	As Reported		As Adjusted
	(in thousands)
Current deferred tax asset	$	45,165	$	—
Total current assets	808,068		762,903
Other assets	152,548		173,944
Total assets	4,944,395		4,920,626
Non-current deferred tax liability	222,847		199,078
Total liabilities	3,616,335		3,592,566
Total liabilities and equity	4,944,395		4,920,626

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts in order to conform to current year presentation. As discussed above, the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016 has been changed in order to conform to the current year balance sheet presentation for the adoption of ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.

3.  Acquisitions

Physiotherapy Acquisition

On March 4, 2016, Select acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding equity securities of Physiotherapy Associates Holdings, Inc. (“Physiotherapy”) for $406.3 million, net of $12.3 million of cash acquired.

For the Physiotherapy acquisition, the Company allocated the purchase price to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company finalized the purchase price allocation.

The following table reconciles the allocation of the consideration given for identifiable net assets and goodwill acquired to the net cash paid for the acquired business (in thousands):

Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,340
Identifiable tangible assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents	87,832
Identifiable intangible assets	32,484
Goodwill	343,187
Total assets	475,843
Total liabilities	54,685
Acquired non-controlling interests	2,514
Net assets acquired	418,644
Less: Cash and cash equivalents acquired	(12,340		)
Net cash paid	$	406,304

Goodwill of $343.2 million has been recognized in the business combination, representing the excess of the consideration given over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. The value of goodwill is derived from Physiotherapy’s future earnings potential and its assembled workforce. Goodwill has been assigned to the outpatient rehabilitation reporting unit and is not deductible for tax purposes. However, prior to its acquisition by the Company, Physiotherapy completed certain acquisitions that resulted in tax deductible goodwill with an estimated value of $8.8 million, which the Company will deduct through 2030.

10

Due to the integration of Physiotherapy into our outpatient rehabilitation operations, it is not practicable to separately identify net revenue and earnings of Physiotherapy on a stand-alone basis.

The following pro forma unaudited results of operations have been prepared assuming the acquisition of Physiotherapy occurred on January 1, 2015. These results are not necessarily indicative of results of future operations nor of the results that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated on the aforementioned date. The Company’s results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 include Physiotherapy for the entire period. There were no pro forma adjustments during these periods; therefore, no pro forma information is presented for the periods.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net revenue	$	2,239,491
Net income attributable to Holdings	86,948
Income per common share:
Basic	$	0.66
Diluted	$	0.66

The net income tax impact was calculated at a statutory rate, as if Physiotherapy had been a subsidiary of the Company as of January 1, 2015. Pro forma results for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were adjusted to exclude approximately $3.2 million of Physiotherapy acquisition costs.

Other Acquisitions

The Company completed acquisitions within our specialty hospitals, outpatient rehabilitation, and Concentra segments during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company provided total consideration of $20.2 million, consisting principally of $18.5 million of cash, net of cash received, and the issuance of non-controlling interests. The assets received in these acquisitions consisted principally of accounts receivable, property and equipment, identifiable intangible assets, and goodwill, of which $0.7 million, $0.3 million, and $14.5 million of goodwill was recognized in our specialty hospitals, outpatient rehabilitation, and Concentra reporting units, respectively.

11

4. Intangible Assets and Liabilities

Goodwill

The following table shows changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting unit for the six months ended June 30, 2017:

	Specialty Hospitals			Outpatient Rehabilitation		Concentra		Total
	(in thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2016	$	1,447,406		$	643,557	$	660,037	$	2,751,000
Acquired	654			311		14,505		15,470
Measurement period adjustment	(342		)	168		—		(174		)
Balance as of June 30, 2017	$	1,447,718		$	644,036	$	674,542	$	2,766,296

See Note 3 for details of the goodwill acquired during the period.

Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities

The following table provides the gross carrying amounts, accumulated amortization, and net carrying amounts for the Company’s identifiable intangible assets and liabilities:

	December 31, 2016							June 30, 2017
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
	(in thousands)
Indefinite-lived assets:
Trademarks	$	166,698	$	—		$	166,698	$	166,698	$	—		$	166,698
Certificates of need	17,026		—			17,026		19,207		—			19,207
Accreditations	2,235		—			2,235		2,074		—			2,074
Finite-lived assets:
Customer relationships	142,198		(23,185		)	119,013		143,953		(30,681		)	113,272
Favorable leasehold interests	13,089		(2,317		)	10,772		13,295		(3,255		)	10,040
Non-compete agreements	26,655		(1,837		)	24,818		27,267		(2,854		)	24,413
Total identifiable intangible assets	$	367,901	$	(27,339	)	$	340,562	$	372,494	$	(36,790	)	$	335,704
Finite-lived liabilities:
Unfavorable leasehold interests	$	5,139	$	(1,410	)	$	3,729	$	5,343	$	(1,957	)	$	3,386

The Company’s customer relationships and non-compete agreements amortize over their estimated useful lives. Amortization expense was $4.3 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2017. Amortization expense was $8.1 million and $8.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2017, respectively.

The Company’s favorable and unfavorable leasehold interests are amortized to rent expense over the remaining term of their respective leases to reflect a market rent per period based upon the market conditions present at the acquisition date. The Company’s unfavorable leasehold interests are not separately presented on the condensed consolidated balance sheets but are included as a component of accrued other and other non-current liabilities.

The Company’s accreditations and trademarks have renewal terms and the costs to renew these intangible assets are expensed as incurred. At June 30, 2017, the accreditations and trademarks have a weighted average time until next renewal of 1.5 years and 2.4 years, respectively.

12

5. Long-Term Debt and Notes Payable

For purposes of this indebtedness footnote, references to Select exclude Concentra because the Concentra credit facilities are non-recourse to Holdings and Select.

The Company’s long-term debt and notes payable as of June 30, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

	Principal Outstanding		Unamortized Premium (Discount)			Unamortized Issuance Costs			Carrying Value		Fair Value
Select:
6.375% senior notes	$	710,000	$	892		$	(7,510	)	$	703,382	$	732,152
Credit facilities:
Revolving facility	300,000		—			—			300,000		276,000
Term loan	1,147,125		(13,480		)	(13,540		)	1,120,105		1,158,596
Other	25,700		—			—			25,700		25,700
Total Select debt	$	2,182,825	$	(12,588	)	$	(21,050	)	$	2,149,187	$	2,192,448
Concentra:
Credit facilities:
Term loan	$	619,175	$	(2,513	)	$	(11,867	)	$	604,795	$	617,434
Other	6,727		—			—			6,727		6,727
Total Concentra debt	$	625,902	$	(2,513	)	$	(11,867	)	$	611,522	$	624,161
Total debt	$	2,808,727	$	(15,101	)	$	(32,917	)	$	2,760,709	$	2,816,609

Principal maturities of the Company’s long-term debt and notes payable are approximately as follows (in thousands):

	2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		Thereafter		Total
Select:
6.375% senior notes	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	710,000	$	—	$	710,000
Credit facilities:
Revolving facility	—		—		—		—		—		300,000		300,000
Term loan	5,750		11,500		11,500		11,500		11,500		1,095,375		1,147,125
Other	10,251		3,530		11,827		68		14		10		25,700
Total Select debt	$	16,001	$	15,030	$	23,327	$	11,568	$	721,514	$	1,395,385	$	2,182,825
Concentra:
Credit facilities:
Term loan	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,016	$	6,520	$	609,639	$	619,175
Other	1,309		1,394		144		161		160		3,559		6,727
Total Concentra debt	$	1,309	$	1,394	$	144	$	3,177	$	6,680	$	613,198	$	625,902
Total debt	$	17,310	$	16,424	$	23,471	$	14,745	$	728,194	$	2,008,583	$	2,808,727

13

The Company’s long-term debt and notes payable as of December 31, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

	Principal Outstanding		Unamortized Premium (Discount)			Unamortized Issuance Costs			Carrying Value		Fair Value
Select:
6.375% senior notes	$	710,000	$	1,006		$	(8,461	)	$	702,545	$	710,000
Credit facilities:
Revolving facility	220,000		—			—			220,000		204,600
Term loans	1,147,751		(11,967		)	(13,581		)	1,122,203		1,165,860
Other	22,688		—			—			22,688		22,688
Total Select debt	$	2,100,439	$	(10,961	)	$	(22,042	)	$	2,067,436	$	2,103,148
Concentra:
Credit facilities:
Term loan	$	642,239	$	(2,773	)	$	(13,091	)	$	626,375	$	644,648
Other	5,178		—			—			5,178		5,178
Total Concentra debt	$	647,417	$	(2,773	)	$	(13,091	)	$	631,553	$	649,826
Total debt	$	2,747,856	$	(13,734	)	$	(35,133	)	$	2,698,989	$	2,752,974

Select Credit Facilities

On March 6, 2017, Select entered into a new senior secured credit agreement (the “Select credit agreement”) that provides for $1.6 billion in senior secured credit facilities comprising a $1.15 billion, seven-year term loan (the “Select term loan”) and a $450.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility (the “Select revolving facility” and together with the Select term loan, the “Select credit facilities”), including a $75.0 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit.

Select used borrowings under the Select credit facilities to: (i) repay in full the series E tranche B term loans due June 1, 2018, the series F tranche B term loans due March 31, 2021, and the revolving facility maturing March 1, 2018 under its then existing credit facilities; and (ii) pay fees and expenses in connection with the refinancing, which resulted in $6.5 million of debt extinguishment losses and $13.2 million of debt modification losses during the first quarter of 2017.

Borrowings under the Select credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to: (i) in the case of the Select term loan, Adjusted LIBO (as defined in the Select credit agreement) plus 3.50% (subject to an Adjusted LIBO floor of 1.00%), or Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Select credit agreement) plus 2.50% (subject to an Alternate Base Rate floor of 2.00%); and (ii) in the case of the Select revolving facility, Adjusted LIBO plus a percentage ranging from 3.00% to 3.25% or Alternate Base Rate plus a percentage ranging from 2.00% to 2.25%, in each case based on Select’s leverage ratio.

The Select term loan amortizes in equal quarterly installments in amounts equal to 0.25% of the aggregate original principal amount of the Select term loan commencing on June 30, 2017.  The balance of the Select term loan will be payable on March 8, 2024; however, if the Select 6.375% senior notes, which are due June 1, 2021, are outstanding on March 1, 2021, the maturity date for the Select term loan will become March 1, 2021. The Select revolving facility will be payable on March 8, 2022; however, if the Select 6.375% senior notes are outstanding on February 1, 2021, the maturity date for the Select revolving facility will become February 1, 2021.

Select will be required to prepay borrowings under the Select credit facilities with (i) 100% of the net cash proceeds received from non-ordinary course asset sales or other dispositions, or as a result of a casualty or condemnation, subject to reinvestment provisions and other customary carveouts and, to the extent required, the payment of certain indebtedness secured by liens having priority over the debt under the Select credit facilities or subject to a first lien intercreditor agreement, (ii) 100% of the net cash proceeds received from the issuance of debt obligations other than certain permitted debt obligations, and (ii) 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the Select credit agreement) if Select’s leverage ratio is greater than 4.50 to 1.00 and 25% of excess cash flow if Select’s leverage ratio is less than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00 and greater than 4.00 to 1.00, in each case, reduced by the aggregate amount of term loans, revolving loans and certain other debt optionally prepaid during the applicable fiscal year.  Select will not be required to prepay borrowings with excess cash flow if Select’s leverage ratio is less than or equal to 4.00 to 1.00.

14

The Select revolving facility requires Select to maintain a leverage ratio (as defined in the Select credit agreement), which is tested quarterly, not to exceed 6.25 to 1.00. After March 31, 2019, the leverage ratio must not exceed 6.00 to 1.00.  Failure to comply with this covenant would result in an event of default under the Select revolving facility and, absent a waiver or an amendment from the revolving lenders, preclude Select from making further borrowings under the Select revolving facility and permit the revolving lenders to accelerate all outstanding borrowings under the Select revolving facility. The termination of the Select revolving facility commitments and the acceleration of amounts outstanding thereunder would constitute an event of default with respect to the Select term loan. As of June 30, 2017, Select’s leverage ratio was 5.86 to 1.00.

The Select credit facilities also contain a number of other affirmative and restrictive covenants, including limitations on mergers, consolidations and dissolutions; sales of assets; investments and acquisitions; indebtedness; liens; affiliate transactions; and dividends and restricted payments. The Select credit facilities contain events of default for non-payment of principal and interest when due (subject, as to interest, to a grace period), cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions and an event of default that would be triggered by a change of control.

Borrowings under the Select credit facilities are guaranteed by Holdings and substantially all of Select’s current domestic subsidiaries and will be guaranteed by substantially all of Select’s future domestic subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of Select’s existing and future property and assets and by a pledge of Select’s capital stock, the capital stock of Select’s domestic subsidiaries and up to 65% of the capital stock of Select’s foreign subsidiaries held directly by Select or a domestic subsidiary.

Excess Cash Flow Payment

On March 1, 2017, Concentra made a principal prepayment of $23.1 million associated with the Concentra first lien term loans in accordance with the provision in the Concentra credit facilities that requires mandatory prepayments of term loans as a result of annual excess cash flow, as defined in the Concentra credit facilities.

Fair Value

The Company considers the inputs in the valuation process to be Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy for Select’s 6.375% senior notes and for its credit facilities. Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy is defined as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, which includes quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

The fair values of the Select credit facilities and the Concentra credit facilities were based on quoted market prices for this debt in the syndicated loan market. The fair value of Select’s 6.375% senior notes was based on quoted market prices. The carrying amount of other debt, principally short-term notes payable, approximates fair value.

15

6.  Segment Information

The Company’s reportable segments consist of: specialty hospitals, outpatient rehabilitation, and Concentra. Other activities include the Company’s corporate shared services and certain other non-consolidating joint ventures and minority investments in other healthcare related businesses. The Company evaluates performance of the segments based on Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings excluding interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, gain (loss) on early retirement of debt, stock compensation expense, Physiotherapy acquisition costs, non-operating gain (loss), and equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated subsidiaries.

The following tables summarize selected financial data for the Company’s reportable segments. The segment results of Holdings are identical to those of Select.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2017			2016			2017
	(in thousands)
Net operating revenues:
Specialty hospitals	$	585,816		$	600,960		$	1,184,770		$	1,199,747
Outpatient rehabilitation(1)	256,928			258,106			495,010			513,923
Concentra	254,868			261,586			505,745			517,735
Other	19			23			436			631
Total Company	$	1,097,631		$	1,120,675		$	2,185,961		$	2,232,036
Adjusted EBITDA:
Specialty hospitals	$	82,739		$	98,172		$	169,495		$	186,837
Outpatient rehabilitation(1)	38,132			41,926			67,011			73,277
Concentra	43,039			43,061			77,192			85,653
Other	(22,453		)	(24,479		)	(43,626		)	(48,197		)
Total Company	$	141,457		$	158,680		$	270,072		$	297,570
Total assets:(2)
Specialty hospitals	$	2,457,948		$	2,655,617		$	2,457,948		$	2,655,617
Outpatient rehabilitation	959,748			982,811			959,748			982,811
Concentra	1,328,243			1,310,483			1,328,243			1,310,483
Other	73,950			105,300			73,950			105,300
Total Company	$	4,819,889		$	5,054,211		$	4,819,889		$	5,054,211
Purchases of property and equipment, net:
Specialty hospitals	$	21,313		$	36,691		$	54,988		$	69,048
Outpatient rehabilitation(1)	3,825			6,201			8,798			12,874
Concentra	4,716			7,601			7,927			16,287
Other	3,636			4,156			8,545			7,093
Total Company	$	33,490		$	54,649		$	80,258		$	105,302

A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to income before income taxes is as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Specialty Hospitals			Outpatient Rehabilitation(1)			Concentra			Other			Total
	(in thousands)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	82,739		$	38,132		$	43,039		$	(22,453	)
Depreciation and amortization	(13,812		)	(6,202		)	(14,916		)	(1,275		)
Stock compensation expense	—			—			(192		)	(4,006		)
Income (loss) from operations	$	68,927		$	31,930		$	27,931		$	(27,734	)	$	101,054
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries													4,546
Non-operating gain													13,035
Interest expense													(44,332		)
Income before income taxes													$	74,303

16

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Specialty Hospitals			Outpatient Rehabilitation			Concentra			Other			Total
	(in thousands)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	98,172		$	41,926		$	43,061		$	(24,479	)
Depreciation and amortization	(15,454		)	(5,878		)	(15,429		)	(1,572		)
Stock compensation expense	—			—			(264		)	(4,420		)
Income (loss) from operations	$	82,718		$	36,048		$	27,368		$	(30,471	)	$	115,663
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries													5,666
Interest expense													(37,655		)
Income before income taxes													$	83,674

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Specialty Hospitals			Outpatient Rehabilitation(1)			Concentra			Other			Total
	(in thousands)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	169,495		$	67,011		$	77,192		$	(43,626	)
Depreciation and amortization	(27,705		)	(10,238		)	(30,292		)	(2,487		)
Stock compensation expense	—			—			(384		)	(7,790		)
Physiotherapy acquisition costs	—			—			—			(3,236		)
Income (loss) from operations	$	141,790		$	56,773		$	46,516		$	(57,139	)	$	187,940
Loss on early retirement of debt													(773		)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries													9,198
Non-operating gain													38,122
Interest expense													(83,180		)
Income before income taxes													$	151,307

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Specialty Hospitals			Outpatient Rehabilitation			Concentra			Other			Total
	(in thousands)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	186,837		$	73,277		$	85,653		$	(48,197	)
Depreciation and amortization	(33,954		)	(12,218		)	(31,552		)	(3,148		)
Stock compensation expense	—			—			(570		)	(8,700		)
Income (loss) from operations	$	152,883		$	61,059		$	53,531		$	(60,045	)	$	207,428
Loss on early retirement of debt													(19,719		)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries													11,187
Non-operating loss													(49		)
Interest expense													(78,508		)
Income before income taxes													$	120,339

(1)The outpatient rehabilitation segment includes the operating results of the Company’s contract therapy businesses through March 31, 2016 and Physiotherapy beginning March 4, 2016.

(2)Reflects the retrospective adoption of ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. Total assets as of June 30, 2016 were retrospectively conformed to reflect the adoption of the standard, resulting in a reduction to total assets of $18.5 million.

17

7.  Income per Common Share

Holdings applies the two-class method for calculating and presenting income per common share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of stock participation rights in undistributed earnings.

The following table sets forth the calculation of income per share in Holdings’ condensed consolidated statements of operations and the differences between basic weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share, respectively.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2017		2016		2017
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Select Medical Holdings Corporation	$	33,935	$	42,055	$	88,768	$	57,925
Less: Earnings allocated to unvested restricted stockholders	972		1,341		2,552		1,849
Net income available to common stockholders	$	32,963	$	40,714	$	86,216	$	56,076
Denominator:
Weighted average shares—basic	127,626		128,624		127,563		128,544
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options	194		153		146		159
Weighted average shares—diluted	127,820		128,777		127,709		128,703
Basic income per common share:	$	0.26	$	0.32	$	0.68	$	0.44
Diluted income per common share:	$	0.26	$	0.32	$	0.68	$	0.44

8.  Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company is a party to various legal actions, proceedings, and claims (some of which are not insured), and regulatory and other governmental audits and investigations in the ordinary course of its business. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of pending litigation, proceedings, and regulatory and other governmental audits and investigations. These matters could potentially subject the Company to sanctions, damages, recoupments, fines, and other penalties. The Department of Justice, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), or other federal and state enforcement and regulatory agencies may conduct additional investigations related to the Company’s businesses in the future that may, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.

To address claims arising out of the Company’s operations, the Company maintains professional malpractice liability insurance and general liability insurance, subject to self-insured retention of $2.0 million per medical incident for professional liability claims and $2.0 million per occurrence for general liability claims. The Company also maintains umbrella liability insurance covering claims which, due to their nature or amount, are not covered by or not fully covered by the Company’s other insurance policies. These insurance policies also do not generally cover punitive damages and are subject to various deductibles and policy limits. Significant legal actions, as well as the cost and possible lack of available insurance, could subject the Company to substantial uninsured liabilities. In the Company’s opinion, the outcome of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Healthcare providers are subject to lawsuits under the qui tam provisions of the federal False Claims Act. Qui tam lawsuits typically remain under seal (hence, usually unknown to the defendant) for some time while the government decides whether or not to intervene on behalf of a private qui tam plaintiff (known as a relator) and take the lead in the litigation. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary damages and penalties and award bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring the suits. The Company is and has been a defendant in these cases in the past, and may be named as a defendant in similar cases from time to time in the future.

18

Evansville Litigation

On October 19, 2015, the plaintiff-relators filed a Second Amended Complaint in United States of America, ex rel. Tracy Conroy, Pamela Schenk and Lisa Wilson v. Select Medical Corporation, Select Specialty Hospital—Evansville, LLC (“SSH-Evansville”), Select Employment Services, Inc., and Dr. Richard Sloan. The case is a civil action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana by private plaintiff-relators on behalf of the United States under the federal False Claims Act. The plaintiff-relators are the former CEO and two former case managers at SSH-Evansville, and the defendants currently include the Company, SSH-Evansville, a subsidiary of the Company serving as common paymaster for its employees, and a physician who practices at SSH-Evansville. The plaintiff-relators allege that SSH-Evansville discharged patients too early or held patients too long, improperly discharged patients to and readmitted them from short stay hospitals, up-coded diagnoses at admission, and admitted patients for whom long-term acute care was not medically necessary. They also allege that the defendants engaged in retaliation in violation of federal and state law. The Second Amended Complaint replaced a prior complaint that was filed under seal on September 28, 2012 and served on the Company on February 15, 2013, after a federal magistrate judge unsealed it on January 8, 2013. All deadlines in the case had been stayed after the seal was lifted in order to allow the government time to complete its investigation and to decide whether or not to intervene. On June 19, 2015, the United States Department of Justice notified the District Court of its decision not to intervene in the case.

In December 2015, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on multiple grounds, including that the action is disallowed by the False Claims Act’s public disclosure bar, which disqualifies qui tam actions that are based on fraud already publicly disclosed through enumerated sources, unless the relator is an original source, and that the plaintiff-relators did not plead their claims with sufficient particularity, as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Thereafter, the United States filed a notice asserting a veto of the defendants’ use of the public disclosure bar for claims arising from conduct from and after March 23, 2010, which was based on certain statutory changes to the public disclosure bar language included in the Affordable Care Act. On September 30, 2016, the District Court partially granted and partially denied the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. It ruled that the plaintiff-relators alleged substantially the same conduct as had been publicly disclosed and that the plaintiff relators are not original sources, so that the public disclosure bar requires dismissal of all non-retaliation claims arising from conduct before March 23, 2010. The District Court also ruled that the statutory changes to the public disclosure bar gave the United States the power to veto its applicability to claims arising from conduct on and after March 23, 2010, and therefore did not dismiss those claims based on the public disclosure bar. However, the District Court ruled that the plaintiff-relators did not plead certain of their claims relating to interrupted stay manipulation and premature discharging of patients with the requisite particularity, and dismissed those claims. The District Court declined to dismiss the plaintiff relators’ claims arising from conduct from and after March 23, 2010 relating to delayed discharging of patients and up-coding and the plaintiff relators’ retaliation claims. The plaintiff-relators then proposed a case management plan seeking nationwide discovery involving all of the Company’s LTCHs for the period from March 23, 2010 through the present, which the defendants have opposed. The Company intends to vigorously defend this action, but at this time the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this matter.

Knoxville Litigation

On July 13, 2015, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee unsealed a qui tam Complaint in Armes v. Garman, et al, No. 3:14-cv-00172-TAV-CCS, which named as defendants Select, Select Specialty Hospital—Knoxville, Inc. (“SSH-Knoxville”), Select Specialty Hospital—North Knoxville, Inc. and ten current or former employees of these facilities. The Complaint was unsealed after the United States and the State of Tennessee notified the court on July 13, 2015 that each had decided not to intervene in the case. The Complaint is a civil action that was filed under seal on April 29, 2014 by a respiratory therapist formerly employed at SSH-Knoxville. The Complaint alleges violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Tennessee Medicaid False Claims Act based on extending patient stays to increase reimbursement and to increase average length of stay; artificially prolonging the lives of patients to increase Medicare reimbursements and decrease inspections; admitting patients who do not require medically necessary care; performing unnecessary procedures and services; and delaying performance of procedures to increase billing. The Complaint was served on some of the defendants during October 2015.

In November 2015, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on multiple grounds. The defendants first argued that False Claims Act’s first-to-file bar required dismissal of plaintiff-relator’s claims. Under the first-to-file bar, if a qui tam case is pending, no person may bring a related action based on the facts underlying the first action. The defendants asserted that the plaintiff-relator’s claims were based on the same underlying facts as were asserted in the Evansville litigation, discussed above. The defendants also argued that the plaintiff-relator’s claims must be dismissed under the public disclosure bar, and because the plaintiff-relator did not plead his claims with sufficient particularity.

19

In June 2016, the District Court granted the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and dismissed with prejudice the plaintiff-relator’s lawsuit in its entirety. The District Court ruled that the first-to-file bar precludes all but one of the plaintiff-relator’s claims, and that the remaining claim must also be dismissed because the plaintiff-relator failed to plead it with sufficient particularity. In July 2016, the plaintiff-relator filed a Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Then, on October 11, 2016, the plaintiff-relator filed a Motion to Remand the case to the District Court for further proceedings, arguing that the September 30, 2016 decision in the Evansville litigation, discussed above, undermines the basis for the District Court’s dismissal. After the Court of Appeals denied the Motion to Remand, the plaintiff-relator then sought an indicative ruling from the District Court that it would vacate its prior dismissal ruling and allow plaintiff-relator to supplement his Complaint, which the defendants have opposed. The case has been fully briefed in the Court of Appeals. The Company intends to vigorously defend this action, but at this time the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this matter.

Wilmington Litigation

On January 19, 2017, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware unsealed a qui tam Complaint in United States of America and State of Delaware ex rel. Theresa Kelly v. Select Specialty Hospital—Wilmington, Inc. (“SSH-Wilmington”), Select Specialty Hospitals, Inc., Select Employment Services, Inc., Select Medical Corporation, and Crystal Cheek, No. 16-347-LPS. The Complaint was initially filed under seal on May 12, 2016 by a former chief nursing officer at SSH-Wilmington and was unsealed after the United States filed a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention on January 13, 2017. The corporate defendants were served on March 6, 2017. In the complaint, the plaintiff-relator alleges that the Select defendants and an individual defendant, who is a former health information manager at SSH-Wilmington, violated the False Claims Act and the Delaware False Claims and Reporting Act based on allegedly falsifying medical practitioner signatures on medical records and failing to properly examine the credentials of medical practitioners at SSH-Wilmington. In response to the Select defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint, on May 17, 2017 the plaintiff-relator filed an Amended Complaint asserting the same causes of action. The Select defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, which is now pending, based on numerous grounds, including that the Amended Complaint did not plead any alleged fraud with sufficient particularity, failed to plead that the alleged fraud was material to the government’s payment decision, failed to plead sufficient facts to establish that the Select defendants knowingly submitted false claims or records, and failed to allege any reverse false claim.

On March 24, 2017, the plaintiff-relator initiated a second action by filing a Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware in Theresa Kelly v. Select Medical Corporation, Select Employment Services, Inc., and SSH-Wilmington, C.A. No. N17C-03-293 CLS. The Delaware Complaint alleges that the defendants retaliated against her in violation of the Delaware Whistleblowers’ Protection Act for reporting the same alleged violations that are the subject of the federal Amended Complaint. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, or alternatively to stay, the Delaware Complaint based on the pending federal Amended Complaint and the failure to allege facts to support a violation of the Delaware Whistleblowers’ Protection Act.  The motion is currently pending.

The Company intends to vigorously defend these actions, but at this time the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this matter.

Contract Therapy Subpoena

On May 18, 2017, the Company received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey seeking various documents principally relating to the Company’s contract therapy division, which contracted to furnish rehabilitation therapy services to residents of skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) and other providers. The Company operated its contract therapy division through a subsidiary until March 31, 2016, when the Company sold the stock of the subsidiary. The subpoena seeks documents that appear to be aimed at assessing whether therapy services were furnished and billed in compliance with Medicare SNF billing requirements, including whether therapy services were coded at inappropriate levels and whether excessive or unnecessary therapy was furnished to justify coding at higher paying levels. The Company does not know whether the subpoena has been issued in connection with a qui tam lawsuit or in connection with possible civil, criminal or administrative proceedings by the government. The Company is producing documents in response to the subpoena and intends to fully cooperate with this investigation. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this matter.

20

9.  Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

Select’s 6.375% senior notes are fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed, except for customary limitations, on a senior basis by all of Select’s wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). The Subsidiary Guarantors are defined as subsidiaries where Select, or a subsidiary of Select, holds all of the outstanding ownership interests. Certain of Select’s subsidiaries did not guarantee the 6.375% senior notes (the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries” and Concentra Group Holdings and its subsidiaries, the “Non-Guarantor Concentra”).

Select conducts a significant portion of its business through its subsidiaries. Presented below is condensed consolidating financial information for Select, the Subsidiary Guarantors, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, and Non-Guarantor Concentra at December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2017 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2017.

The equity method has been used by Select with respect to investments in subsidiaries. The equity method has been used by Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to investments in Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries. Separate financial statements for Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior reported amounts in order to conform to the current year guarantor structure.

21

Select Medical Corporation

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

	Select (Parent Company Only)			Subsidiary Guarantors		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Concentra		Eliminations			Consolidated Select Medical Corporation
	(in thousands)
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	72		$	5,533	$	4,946		$	63,248	$	—		$	73,799
Accounts receivable, net	—			467,412		120,272			126,552		—			714,236
Intercompany receivables	—			1,489,631		58,333			—		(1,547,964		) (a)	—
Other current assets	17,584			28,326		12,786			24,515		—			83,211
Total Current Assets	17,656			1,990,902		196,337			214,315		(1,547,964		)	871,246
Property and equipment, net	56,568			620,364		54,964			179,636		—			911,532
Investment in affiliates	4,523,727			118,248		—			—		(4,641,975		) (b) (c)	—
Goodwill	—			2,091,754		—			674,542		—			2,766,296
Identifiable intangible assets, net	—			109,913		—			225,791		—			335,704
Other assets	42,452			98,649		36,528			16,199		(24,395		) (d)	169,433
Total Assets	$	4,640,403		$	5,029,830	$	287,829		$	1,310,483	$	(6,214,334	)	$	5,054,211
Liabilities and Equity
Current Liabilities:
Bank overdrafts	$	34,134		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	34,134
Current portion of long-term debt and notes payable	23,052			644		244			2,637		—			26,577
Accounts payable	10,362			75,105		22,387			15,777		—			123,631
Intercompany payables	1,489,631			58,333		—			—		(1,547,964		) (a)	—
Accrued payroll	7,526			80,245		3,545			27,871		—			119,187
Accrued vacation	3,927			58,895		12,214			17,214		—			92,250
Accrued interest	17,096			5		4			2,172		—			19,277
Accrued other	44,032			60,078		10,533			32,210		—			146,853
Income taxes payable	2,709			—		—			4,267		—			6,976
Total Current Liabilities	1,632,469			333,305		48,927			102,148		(1,547,964		)	568,885
Long-term debt, net of current portion	2,115,318			266		9,663			608,885		—			2,734,132
Non-current deferred tax liability	—			136,920		736			84,150		(24,395		) (d)	197,411
Other non-current liabilities	44,297			54,100		7,688			35,194		—			141,279
Total Liabilities	3,792,084			524,591		67,014			830,377		(1,572,359		)	3,641,707
Redeemable non-controlling interests	—			—		10,079			458,771		—			468,850
Stockholder’s Equity:
Common stock	0			—		—			—		—			0
Capital in excess of par	936,428			—		—			—		—			936,428
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	(88,109		)	1,314,773		(37,110		)	12,447		(1,290,110		) (c)	(88,109		)
Subsidiary investment	—			3,190,466		156,262			5,137		(3,351,865		) (b)	—
Total Select Medical Corporation Stockholder’s Equity	848,319			4,505,239		119,152			17,584		(4,641,975		)	848,319
Non-controlling interests	—			—		91,584			3,751		—			95,335
Total Equity	848,319			4,505,239		210,736			21,335		(4,641,975		)	943,654
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	4,640,403		$	5,029,830	$	287,829		$	1,310,483	$	(6,214,334	)	$	5,054,211

(a)  Elimination of intercompany balances.

(b)  Elimination of investments in consolidated subsidiaries.

(c)  Elimination of investments in consolidated subsidiaries’ earnings.

(d)  Reclass of non-current deferred tax asset to report net non-current deferred tax liability in consolidation.

22

Select Medical Corporation

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

	Select (Parent Company Only)			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Concentra			Eliminations			Consolidated Select Medical Corporation
	(in thousands)
Net operating revenues	$	23		$	687,886		$	171,180		$	261,586		$	—		$	1,120,675
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services	644			561,304			144,211			214,071			—			920,230
General and administrative	28,227			48			—			—			—			28,275
Bad debt expense	—			9,829			3,627			4,718			—			18,174
Depreciation and amortization	1,573			18,149			3,182			15,429			—			38,333
Total costs and expenses	30,444			589,330			151,020			234,218			—			1,005,012
Income (loss) from operations	(30,421		)	98,556			20,160			27,368			—			115,663
Other income and expense:
Intercompany interest and royalty fees	(2,263		)	3,596			(1,333		)	—			—			—
Intercompany management fees	63,504			(53,435		)	(10,069		)	—			—			—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	—			5,646			20			—			—			5,666
Interest expense	(19,623		)	(8,234		)	(2,360		)	(7,438		)	—			(37,655		)
Income before income taxes	11,197			46,129			6,418			19,930			—			83,674
Income tax expense (benefit)	(2,324		)	27,307			309			7,082			—			32,374
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	28,534			4,200			—			—			(32,734		) (a)	—
Net income	42,055			23,022			6,109			12,848			(32,734		)	51,300
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	—			—			2,175			7,070			—			9,245
Net income attributable to Select Medical Corporation	$	42,055		$	23,022		$	3,934		$	5,778		$	(32,734	)	$	42,055

(a) Elimination of equity in earnings of subsidiaries.

23

Select Medical Corporation

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

	Select (Parent Company Only)			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Concentra			Eliminations			Consolidated Select Medical Corporation
	(in thousands)
Net operating revenues	$	631		$	1,377,279		$	336,391		$	517,735		$	—		$	2,232,036
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services	1,176			1,142,527			282,521			422,363			—			1,848,587
General and administrative	56,263			87			—			—			—			56,350
Bad debt expense	—			21,577			6,933			10,289			—			38,799
Depreciation and amortization	3,148			39,489			6,683			31,552			—			80,872
Total costs and expenses	60,587			1,203,680			296,137			464,204			—			2,024,608
Income (loss) from operations	(59,956		)	173,599			40,254			53,531			—			207,428
Other income and expense:
Intercompany interest and royalty fees	(4,159		)	6,914			(2,755		)	—			—			—
Intercompany management fees	125,202			(106,069		)	(19,133		)	—			—			—
Loss on early retirement of debt	(19,719		)	—			—			—			—			(19,719		)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	—			11,139			48			—			—			11,187
Non-operating loss	—			(49		)	—			—			—			(49		)
Interest expense	(42,431		)	(16,307		)	(4,833		)	(14,937		)	—			(78,508		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(1,063		)	69,227			13,581			38,594			—			120,339
Income tax expense (benefit)	(2,198		)	33,243			613			13,918			—			45,576
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	56,790			9,775			—			—			(66,565		) (a)	—
Net income	57,925			45,759			12,968			24,676			(66,565		)	74,763
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	—			—			3,244			13,594			—			16,838
Net income attributable to Select Medical Corporation	$	57,925		$	45,759		$	9,724		$	11,082		$	(66,565	)	$	57,925

(a) Elimination of equity in earnings of subsidiaries.

24

Select Medical Corporation

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

	Select (Parent Company Only)			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Concentra			Eliminations			Consolidated Select Medical Corporation
	(in thousands)
Operating activities
Net income	$	57,925		$	45,759		$	12,968		$	24,676		$	(66,565	) (a)	$	74,763
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries	—			10,902			31			—			—			10,933
Depreciation and amortization	3,148			39,489			6,683			31,552			—			80,872
Provision for bad debts	—			21,577			6,933			10,289			—			38,799
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	—			(11,139		)	(48		)	—			—			(11,187		)
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	(56,790		)	(9,775		)	—			—			66,565		(a)	—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	6,527			—			—			—			—			6,527
Gain on sale of assets and businesses	(8		)	(4,828		)	(4,687		)	—			—			(9,523		)
Stock compensation expense	8,700			—			—			570			—			9,270
Amortization of debt discount, premium and issuance costs	4,342			—			—			1,632			—			5,974
Deferred income taxes	5,987			—			—			(7,461		)	—			(1,474		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of business combinations:
Accounts receivable	—			(125,418		)	(29,435		)	(24,150		)	—			(179,003		)
Other current assets	(5,631		)	5,452			(2,517		)	(2,861		)	—			(5,557		)
Other assets	3,184			(16,925		)	17,426			936			—			4,621
Accounts payable	(413		)	(1,550		)	(10		)	2,732			—			759
Accrued expenses	(5,618		)	(4,817		)	8,704			(3,102		)	—			(4,833		)
Income taxes	9,366			—			—			10,033			—			19,399
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	30,719			(51,273		)	16,048			44,846			—			40,340
Investing activities
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	—			(2,305		)	—			(16,203		)	—			(18,508		)
Purchases of property and equipment	(7,093		)	(71,813		)	(10,109		)	(16,287		)	—			(105,302		)
Investment in businesses	—			(9,874		)	—			—			—			(9,874		)
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses	8			15,007			19,537			—			—			34,552
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(7,085		)	(68,985		)	9,428			(32,490		)	—			(99,132		)
Financing activities
Borrowings on revolving facilities	630,000			—			—			—			—			630,000
Payments on revolving facilities	(550,000		)	—			—			—			—			(550,000		)
Proceeds from term loans	1,139,487			—			—			—			—			1,139,487
Payments on term loans	(1,150,627		)	—			—			(23,065		)	—			(1,173,692		)
Revolving facility debt issuance costs	(4,392		)	—			—			—			—			(4,392		)
Borrowings of other debt	6,572			—			105			2,767			—			9,444
Principal payments on other debt	(7,353		)	(204		)	(1,183		)	(1,697		)	—			(10,437		)
Repayments of bank overdrafts	(5,228		)	—			—			—			—			(5,228		)
Dividends paid to Holdings	(600		)	—			—			—			—			(600		)
Equity investment by Holdings	963			—			—			—			—			963
Intercompany	(93,455		)	119,528			(26,073		)	—			—			—
Proceeds from issuance of non-controlling interests	—			—			3,553			—			—			3,553
Purchase of non-controlling interests	—			—			(120		)	—			—			(120		)
Distributions to non-controlling interests	—			—			(1,868		)	(3,548		)	—			(5,416		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(34,633		)	119,324			(25,586		)	(25,543		)	—			33,562
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(10,999		)	(934		)	(110		)	(13,187		)	—			(25,230		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	11,071			6,467			5,056			76,435			—			99,029
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	72		$	5,533		$	4,946		$	63,248		$	—		$	73,799

(a)  Elimination of equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries.

25

Select Medical Corporation

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2016

(unaudited)

	Select (Parent Company Only)			Subsidiary Guarantors		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Concentra		Eliminations			Consolidated Select Medical Corporation
	(in thousands)
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,071		$	6,467	$	5,056		$	76,435	$	—		$	99,029
Accounts receivable, net	—			363,470		97,770			112,512		—			573,752
Intercompany receivables	—			1,573,960		28,271			—		(1,602,231		) (a)	—
Prepaid income taxes	6,658			—		—			5,765		—			12,423
Other current assets	11,953			33,958		10,269			21,519		—			77,699
Total Current Assets	29,682			1,977,855		141,366			216,231		(1,602,231		)	762,903
Property and equipment, net	48,697			603,408		50,869			189,243		—			892,217
Investment in affiliates	4,493,684			89,288		—			—		(4,582,972		) (b) (c)	—
Goodwill	—			2,090,963		—			660,037		—			2,751,000
Identifiable intangible assets, net	—			109,132		—			231,430		—			340,562
Other assets	45,636			84,803		53,954			16,235		(26,684		) (d)	173,944
Total Assets	$	4,617,699		$	4,955,449	$	246,189		$	1,313,176	$	(6,211,887	)	$	4,920,626
Liabilities and Equity
Current Liabilities:
Bank overdrafts	$	39,362		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	39,362
Current portion of long-term debt and notes payable	7,227			445		1,324			4,660		—			13,656
Accounts payable	10,775			78,608		22,397			14,778		—			126,558
Intercompany payables	1,573,960			28,271		—			—		(1,602,231		) (a)	—
Accrued payroll	16,963			92,216		4,246			32,972		—			146,397
Accrued vacation	3,440			55,486		10,668			13,667		—			83,261
Accrued interest	20,114			—		—			2,211		—			22,325
Accrued other	39,155			62,384		4,639			33,898		—			140,076
Total Current Liabilities	1,710,996			317,410		43,274			102,186		(1,602,231		)	571,635
Long-term debt, net of current portion	2,048,154			601		9,685			626,893		—			2,685,333
Non-current deferred tax liability	—			133,852		596			91,314		(26,684		) (d)	199,078
Other non-current liabilities	42,824			53,537		5,727			34,432		—			136,520
Total Liabilities	3,801,974			505,400		59,282			854,825		(1,628,915		)	3,592,566
Redeemable non-controlling interests	—			113		10,056			411,990		—			422,159
Stockholder’s Equity:
Common stock	0			—		—			—		—			0
Capital in excess of par	925,111			—		—			—		—			925,111
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	(109,386		)	1,269,014		(38,313		)	1,364		(1,232,065		) (c)	(109,386		)
Subsidiary investment	—			3,180,922		128,556			41,429		(3,350,907		) (b)	—
Total Select Medical Corporation Stockholder’s Equity	815,725			4,449,936		90,243			42,793		(4,582,972		)	815,725
Non-controlling interests	—			—		86,608			3,568		—			90,176
Total Equity	815,725			4,449,936		176,851			46,361		(4,582,972		)	905,901
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	4,617,699		$	4,955,449	$	246,189		$	1,313,176	$	(6,211,887	)	$	4,920,626

(a)  Elimination of intercompany balances.

(b)  Elimination of investments in consolidated subsidiaries.

(c)  Elimination of investments in consolidated subsidiaries’ earnings.

(d)  Reclass of non-current deferred tax asset to report net non-current deferred tax liability in consolidation.

26

Select Medical Corporation

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

(unaudited)

	Select (Parent Company Only)			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Concentra			Eliminations			Consolidated Select Medical Corporation
	(in thousands)
Net operating revenues	$	20		$	723,859		$	118,884		$	254,868		$	—		$	1,097,631
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services	606			605,730			103,767			206,882			—			916,985
General and administrative	25,844			26			—			—			—			25,870
Bad debt expense	—			10,285			2,093			5,139			—			17,517
Depreciation and amortization	1,276			17,316			2,697			14,916			—			36,205
Total costs and expenses	27,726			633,357			108,557			226,937			—			996,577
Income (loss) from operations	(27,706		)	90,502			10,327			27,931			—			101,054
Other income and expense:
Intercompany interest and royalty fees	(1,532		)	3,274			(1,742		)	—			—			—
Intercompany management fees	38,783			(32,430		)	(6,353		)	—			—			—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	—			4,519			27			—			—			4,546
Non-operating gain	10,463			2,572			—			—			—			13,035
Interest expense	(25,544		)	(6,684		)	(1,852		)	(10,252		)	—			(44,332		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(5,536		)	61,753			407			17,679			—			74,303
Income tax expense (benefit)	(473		)	26,370			672			6,881			—			33,450
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	38,998			(1,133		)	—			—			(37,865		) (a)	—
Netincome(loss)	33,935			34,250			(265		)	10,798			(37,865		)	40,853
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	—			18			824			6,076			—			6,918
Net income (loss) attributable to Select Medical Corporation	$	33,935		$	34,232		$	(1,089	)	$	4,722		$	(37,865	)	$	33,935

(a) Elimination of equity in earnings of subsidiaries.

27

Select Medical Corporation

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

(unaudited)

	Select (Parent Company Only)			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Concentra			Eliminations			Consolidated Select Medical Corporation
	(in thousands)
Net operating revenues	$	437		$	1,439,439		$	240,340		$	505,745		$	—		$	2,185,961
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services	950			1,211,439			206,774			420,084			—			1,839,247
General and administrative	54,231			(93		)	—			—			—			54,138
Bad debt expense	—			21,003			4,058			8,853			—			33,914
Depreciation and amortization	2,487			32,648			5,295			30,292			—			70,722
Total costs and expenses	57,668			1,264,997			216,127			459,229			—			1,998,021
Income (loss) from operations	(57,231		)	174,442			24,213			46,516			—			187,940
Other income and expense:
Intercompany interest and royalty fees	(2,590		)	6,044			(3,454		)	—			—			—
Intercompany management fees	94,139			(82,127		)	(12,012		)	—			—			—
Loss on early retirement of debt	(773		)	—			—			—			—			(773		)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	—			9,146			52			—			—			9,198
Non-operating gain (loss)	40,895			(2,773		)	—			—			—			38,122
Interest expense	(45,890		)	(13,318		)	(3,491		)	(20,481		)	—			(83,180		)
Income before income taxes	28,550			91,414			5,308			26,035			—			151,307
Income tax expense	8,139			31,985			607			9,779			—			50,510
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	68,357			1,873			—			—			(70,230		) (a)	—
Net income	88,768			61,302			4,701			16,256			(70,230		)	100,797
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	—			33			2,695			9,301			—			12,029
Net income attributable to Select Medical Corporation	$	88,768		$	61,269		$	2,006		$	6,955		$	(70,230	)	$	88,768

(a) Elimination of equity in earnings of subsidiaries.

28

Select Medical Corporation

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

(unaudited)

	Select (Parent Company Only)			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Concentra			Eliminations			Consolidated Select Medical Corporation
	(in thousands)
Operating activities
Net income	$	88,768		$	61,302		$	4,701		$	16,256		$	(70,230	) (a)	$	100,797
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries	—			12,000			39			—			—			12,039
Depreciation and amortization	2,487			32,648			5,295			30,292			—			70,722
Provision for bad debts	—			21,003			4,058			8,853			—			33,914
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	—			(9,146		)	(52		)	—			—			(9,198		)
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries	(68,357		)	(1,873		)	—			—			70,230		(a)	—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	773			—			—			—			—			773
Gain on sale of assets and businesses	(40,895		)	(2,566		)	—			—			—			(43,461		)
Loss on disposal of assets	—			37			12			6			—			55
Impairment of equity investment	—			5,339			—			—			—			5,339
Stock compensation expense	7,790			—			—			384			—			8,174
Amortization of debt discount, premium and issuance costs	5,371			—			2			1,704			—			7,077
Deferred income taxes	997			—			—			(14,283		)	—			(13,286		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of business combinations:
Accounts receivable	—			(22,896		)	(9,711		)	(11,489		)	—			(44,096		)
Other current assets	(2,938		)	7,342			(1,273		)	7,880			—			11,011
Other assets	(4,268		)	(341		)	(424		)	9,541			—			4,508
Accounts payable	(2,241		)	(17,695		)	(3,371		)	7,455			—			(15,852		)
Accrued expenses	(10,175		)	36,088			(2,441		)	(2,840		)	—			20,632
Income taxes	9,101			—			—			19,989			—			29,090
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(13,587		)	121,242			(3,165		)	73,748			—			178,238
Investing activities
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	(408,654		)	(605		)	(8,395		)	(3,865		)	—			(421,519		)
Purchases of property and equipment	(8,545		)	(52,591		)	(11,195		)	(7,927		)	—			(80,258		)
Investment in businesses	—			(1,590		)	—			—			—			(1,590		)
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses	63,418			7,942			6			—			—			71,366
Net cash used in investing activities	(353,781		)	(46,844		)	(19,584		)	(11,792		)	—			(432,001		)
Financing activities
Borrowings on revolving facilities	320,000			—			—			—			—			320,000
Payments on revolving facilities	(375,000		)	—			—			(5,000		)	—			(380,000		)
Proceeds from term loans	600,127			—			—			—			—			600,127
Payments on term loans	(227,399		)	—			—			(2,250		)	—			(229,649		)
Borrowings of other debt	9,765			—			9,500			2,817			—			22,082
Principal payments on other debt	(7,278		)	(385		)	(876		)	(1,387		)	—			(9,926		)
Repayments of bank overdrafts	(2,138		)	—			—			—			—			(2,138		)
Dividends paid to Holdings	(506		)	—			—			—			—			(506		)
Equity investment by Holdings	657			—			—			—			—			657
Intercompany	49,141			(68,206		)	19,065			—			—			—
Proceeds from issuance of non-controlling interests	—			—			3,103			—			—			3,103
Purchase of non-controlling interests	—			(1,294		)	—			—			—			(1,294		)
Distributions to non-controlling interests	—			(108		)	(3,294		)	(1,306		)	—			(4,708		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	367,369			(69,993		)	27,498			(7,126		)	—			317,748
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	1			4,405			4,749			54,830			—			63,985
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	4,070			3,706			625			6,034			—			14,435
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	4,071		$	8,111		$	5,374		$	60,864		$	—		$	78,420

(a)  Elimination of equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries.

29

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read this discussion together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “target,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” and similar expressions. These statements include, among others, statements regarding our expected business outlook, anticipated financial and operating results, our business strategy and means to implement our strategy, our objectives, the amount and timing of capital expenditures, the likelihood of our success in expanding our business, financing plans, budgets, working capital needs, and sources of liquidity.

Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of performance. These statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions, which in turn are based on currently available information. Important assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements include, among others, assumptions regarding our services, the expansion of our services, competitive conditions, and general economic conditions. These assumptions could prove inaccurate. Forward-looking statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

·changes in government reimbursement for our services due to the implementation of healthcare reform legislation, deficit reduction measures, and/or new payment policies (including, for example, the expiration of the moratorium limiting the full application of the 25 Percent Rule that would reduce our Medicare payments for those patients admitted to a long term acute care hospital from a referring hospital in excess of an applicable percentage admissions threshold) may result in a reduction in net operating revenues, an increase in costs, and a reduction in profitability;

·the impact of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (the “BBA of 2013”), which established payment limits for Medicare patients who do not meet specified criteria, may result in a reduction in net operating revenues and profitability of our long term acute care hospitals (“LTCHs”);

·the failure of our specialty hospitals to maintain their Medicare certifications may cause our net operating revenues and profitability to decline;

·the failure of our facilities operated as “hospitals within hospitals” to qualify as hospitals separate from their host hospitals may cause our net operating revenues and profitability to decline;

·a government investigation or assertion that we have violated applicable regulations may result in sanctions or reputational harm and increased costs;

·acquisitions or joint ventures may prove difficult or unsuccessful, use significant resources, or expose us to unforeseen liabilities;

·private third-party payors for our services may adopt payment policies that could limit our future net operating revenues and profitability;

·the failure to maintain established relationships with the physicians in the areas we serve could reduce our net operating revenues and profitability;

·shortages in qualified nurses, therapists, physicians, or other licensed providers could increase our operating costs significantly or limit our ability to staff our facilities;

·competition may limit our ability to grow and result in a decrease in our net operating revenues and profitability;

30

·the loss of key members of our management team could significantly disrupt our operations;

·the effect of claims asserted against us could subject us to substantial uninsured liabilities; and

·other factors discussed from time to time in our filings with the SEC, including factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as such risk factors may be updated from time to time in our periodic filings with the SEC.

Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the SEC, we are under no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of any new information, future events, or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results or performance.

Investors should also be aware that while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts, it is against our policy to disclose to securities analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, stockholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any securities analyst irrespective of the content of the statement or report. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not the responsibility of the Company.

Overview

We began operations in 1997 and, based on number of facilities, are one of the largest operators of specialty hospitals, outpatient rehabilitation clinics, and occupational medicine centers in the United States. As of June 30, 2017, we had operations in 46 states and the District of Columbia. As of June 30, 2017, we operated 123 specialty hospitals in 28 states and 1,608 outpatient rehabilitation clinics in 37 states and the District of Columbia. Concentra, which is operated through a joint venture subsidiary, operated 315 medical centers in 38 states as of June 30, 2017. Concentra also provides contract services at employer worksites and Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinics, or “CBOCs.”

We manage our Company through three business segments: specialty hospitals, outpatient rehabilitation, and Concentra. We had net operating revenues of $2,232.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Of this total, we earned approximately 54% of our net operating revenues from our specialty hospitals segment, approximately 23% from our outpatient rehabilitation segment, and approximately 23% from our Concentra segment. Patients are typically admitted to our specialty hospitals from general acute care hospitals. These patients have specialized needs, with serious and often complex medical conditions. Our outpatient rehabilitation segment consists of clinics that provide physical, occupational, and speech rehabilitation services. Our Concentra segment consists of medical centers and contract services provided at employer worksites and Department of Veterans Affairs CBOCs that deliver occupational medicine, physical therapy, veteran’s healthcare, and consumer health services.

Non-GAAP Measure

We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA is important to investors because Adjusted EBITDA is commonly used as an analytical indicator of performance by investors within the healthcare industry. Adjusted EBITDA is used by management to evaluate financial performance and determine resource allocation for each of our operating segments. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation, or as an alternative to or substitute for net income, income from operations, cash flows generated by operations, investing or financing activities, or other financial statement data presented in the consolidated financial statements as indicators of financial performance or liquidity. Because Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement determined in accordance with GAAP and is thus susceptible to varying calculations, Adjusted EBITDA as presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings excluding interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, gain (loss) on early retirement of debt, stock compensation expense, Physiotherapy acquisition costs, non-operating gain (loss), and equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated subsidiaries. We will refer to Adjusted EBITDA throughout the remainder of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

31

The table below reconciles net income and income from operations to Adjusted EBITDA and should be referenced when we discuss Adjusted EBITDA.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2017			2016			2017
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	40,853		$	51,300		$	100,797		$	74,763
Income tax expense	33,450			32,374			50,510			45,576
Interest expense	44,332			37,655			83,180			78,508
Non-operating loss (gain)	(13,035		)	—			(38,122		)	49
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	(4,546		)	(5,666		)	(9,198		)	(11,187		)
Loss on early retirement of debt	—			—			773			19,719
Income from operations	$	101,054		$	115,663		$	187,940		$	207,428
Stock compensation expense:
Included in general and administrative	3,399			3,775			6,839			7,524
Included in cost of services	799			909			1,335			1,746
Depreciation and amortization	36,205			38,333			70,722			80,872
Physiotherapy acquisition costs	—			—			3,236			—
Adjusted EBITDA	$	141,457		$	158,680		$	270,072		$	297,570

Summary Financial Results

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, our net operating revenues increased 2.1% to $1,120.7 million, compared to $1,097.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Income from operations increased 14.5% to $115.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $101.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Net income increased 25.6% to $51.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $40.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2016 included a pre-tax non-operating gain of $13.0 million. Our Adjusted EBITDA increased 12.2% to $158.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $141.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Our Adjusted EBITDA margin was 14.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 12.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, our net operating revenues increased 2.1% to $2,232.0 million, compared to $2,186.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Income from operations increased 10.4% to $207.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $187.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Net income was $74.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, which includes pre-tax losses on early retirement of debt of $19.7 million. Net income was $100.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, which included a pre-tax non-operating gain of $38.1 million and a pre-tax loss on early retirement of debt of $0.8 million. Our Adjusted EBITDA increased 10.2% to $297.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $270.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Our Adjusted EBITDA margin was 13.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 12.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Implementation of Patient Criteria

As discussed below under “Regulatory Changes — Medicare Reimbursement of LTCH Services — Patient Criteria,” our LTCHs transitioned to the new Medicare regulations, which establish new payment limits for Medicare patients discharged from an LTCH who do not meet specified patient criteria, beginning October 1, 2015. Since completing our transition to the new LTCH Medicare patient criteria regulations during the third quarter of 2016, we have experienced an increase in admissions of patients eligible for the full LTCH-PPS standard reimbursement rate.

The table below illustrates the trend of our case mix index and occupancy percentages during the periods in which our LTCHs became subject to the new patient criteria requirements.

	2015			2016			2017
	Occupancy Percentage		Case Mix Index(1)	Occupancy Percentage		Case Mix Index(1)	Occupancy Percentage		Case Mix Index(1)
Three months ended:
March 31	71	%	1.22	71	%	1.24	68	%	1.28
June 30	70	%	1.21	67	%	1.27	66	%	1.28
September 30	70	%	1.18	61	%	1.26
December 31	70	%	1.21	63	%	1.26

(1)Case mix index, which is calculated as the sum of all diagnostic-related group weights for the period divided by the sum of discharges for the same period, is reflective of the level of patient-acuity in our LTCHs.

Our case mix index has increased, which is reflective of the higher-acuity patients we are now admitting under patient criteria. This has resulted in increases in our net revenue per patient day due to higher reimbursement rates for these cases. Our LTCH occupancy percentage reached its lowest level during the third quarter of 2016, which is the first quarter in which all of our LTCHs operated under the new Medicare payment rules. Our LTCHs which operated under the new Medicare payment rules during both the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 experienced improved occupancy during the three months ended June 30, 2017. These LTCHs had an occupancy percentage of 70% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 69% for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

32

Significant Events

Refinancing

On March 6, 2017, Select entered into a new senior secured credit agreement that provides for $1.6 billion in senior secured credit facilities comprising a $1.15 billion, seven-year term loan and a $450.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility, including a $75.0 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit. Select used borrowings under the new Select credit facilities to: (i) repay the series E tranche B term loans due June 1, 2018, the series F tranche B term loans due March 31, 2021, and the revolving facility maturing March 1, 2018 under Select’s 2011 senior secured credit facility; and (ii) pay fees and expenses in connection with the refinancing.

Regulatory Changes

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017, contains a detailed discussion of the regulations that affect our business in Part I — Business — Government Regulations. The following is a discussion of some of the more significant healthcare regulatory changes that have affected our financial performance in the periods covered by this report or are likely to affect our financial performance and financial condition in the future. The information below should be read in conjunction with the more detailed discussion of regulations contained in our Form 10-K.

Medicare Reimbursement

The Medicare program reimburses healthcare providers for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries, which are generally persons age 65 and older, those who are chronically disabled, and those suffering from end stage renal disease. The program is governed by the Social Security Act of 1965 and is administered primarily by the Department of Health and Human Services and CMS. Net operating revenues generated directly from the Medicare program represented approximately 30% of our net operating revenues for both the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016.

Medicare Reimbursement of LTCH Services

There have been significant regulatory changes affecting LTCHs that have affected our net operating revenues and, in some cases, caused us to change our operating models and strategies. We have been subject to regulatory changes that occur through the rulemaking procedures of CMS. All Medicare payments to our LTCHs are made in accordance with the long term care hospital prospective payment system (“LTCH-PPS”). Proposed rules specifically related to LTCHs are generally published in April or May, finalized in August, and effective on October 1st of each year.

The following is a summary of significant changes to the Medicare prospective payment system for LTCHs which have affected our financial performance in the periods covered by this report or may affect our financial performance and financial condition in the future.

Fiscal Year 2016.  On August 17, 2015, CMS published the final rule updating policies and payment rates for the LTCH-PPS for fiscal year 2016 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016). The standard federal rate was set at $41,763, an increase from the standard federal rate applicable during fiscal year 2015 of $41,044. The update to the standard federal rate for fiscal year 2016 included a market basket increase of 2.4%, less a productivity adjustment of 0.5%, and less a reduction of 0.2% mandated by the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). The fixed loss amount for high cost outlier cases paid under LTCH-PPS was set at $16,423, an increase from the fixed loss amount in the 2015 fiscal year of $14,972. The fixed loss amount for high cost outlier cases paid under the site neutral payment rate described below was set at $22,538.

Fiscal Year 2017.  On August 22, 2016, CMS published the final rule updating policies and payment rates for the LTCH-PPS for fiscal year 2017 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017). The standard federal rate was set at $42,476, an increase from the standard federal rate applicable during fiscal year 2016 of $41,763. The update to the standard federal rate for fiscal year 2017 included a market basket increase of 2.8%, less a productivity adjustment of 0.3%, and less a reduction of 0.75% mandated by the ACA. The fixed-loss amount for high cost outlier cases paid under LTCH-PPS was set at $21,943, an increase from the fixed-loss amount in the 2016 fiscal year of $16,423. The fixed-loss amount for high cost outlier cases paid under the site-neutral payment rate was set at $23,573, an increase from the fixed-loss amount in the 2016 fiscal year of $22,538.

Fiscal Year 2018. On August 2, 2017, CMS released an advanced copy of the final policies and payment rates for the LTCH-PPS for fiscal year 2018 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018). The standard federal rate was set at $41,431, a decrease from the standard federal rate applicable during fiscal year 2017 of $42,476. The update to the standard federal rate for fiscal year 2018 includes a market basket increase of 2.7%, less a productivity adjustment of 0.6%, and less a reduction of 0.75% mandated by the ACA. As noted below, the update to the standard federal rate for fiscal year 2018 is impacted further by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, which limits the update for fiscal year 2018 to 1.0%. The fixed-loss amount for high cost outlier cases paid under LTCH-PPS was set at $27,382, an increase from the fixed-loss amount in the 2017 fiscal year of $21,943. The fixed-loss amount for high cost outlier cases paid under the site-neutral payment rate was set at $26,601, an increase from the fixed-loss amount in the 2017 fiscal year of $23,573.

33

Patient Criteria

The BBA of 2013, enacted December 26, 2013, establishes a dual-rate LTCH-PPS for Medicare patients discharged from an LTCH. Specifically, for Medicare patients discharged in cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2015, LTCHs will be reimbursed at the LTCH-PPS standard federal payment rate only if, immediately preceding the patient’s LTCH admission, the patient was discharged from a “subsection (d) hospital” (generally, a short-term acute care hospital paid under the inpatient prospective payment system, or “IPPS”) and either the patient’s stay included at least three days in an intensive care unit (ICU) or coronary care unit (CCU) at the subsection (d) hospital, or the patient was assigned to Medicare severity diagnosis-related group (“MS-LTC-DRG”) for LTCHs for cases receiving at least 96 hours of ventilator services in the LTCH. In addition, to be paid at the LTCH-PPS standard federal payment rate, the patient’s discharge from the LTCH may not include a principal diagnosis relating to psychiatric or rehabilitation services. For any Medicare patient who does not meet these criteria, the LTCH will be paid a lower “site neutral” payment rate, which will be the lower of: (i) IPPS comparable per diem payment rate capped at the Medicare severity diagnosis-related group (“MS-DRG”) payment rate plus any outlier payments; or (ii) 100 percent of the estimated costs for services.

The BBA of 2013 provides for a transition to the site-neutral payment rate for those patients not paid at the LTCH-PPS standard federal payment rate. During the transition period (applicable to hospital cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2015 and on or before September 30, 2017), a blended rate will be paid for Medicare patients not meeting the new criteria that is equal to 50% of the site-neutral payment rate amount and 50% of the standard federal payment rate amount. For discharges in cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2017, only the site-neutral payment rate will apply for Medicare patients not meeting the new criteria.

In addition, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2019, qualifying discharges from an LTCH will continue to be paid at the LTCH-PPS standard federal payment rate, unless the number of discharges for which payment is made under the site-neutral payment rate is greater than 50% of the total number of discharges from the LTCH for that period. If the number of discharges for which payment is made under the site-neutral payment rate is greater than 50%, then beginning in the next cost reporting period all discharges from the LTCH will be reimbursed at the site-neutral payment rate. The BBA of 2013 requires CMS to establish a process for an LTCH subject to only the site-neutral payment rate to be reinstated for payment under the dual-rate LTCH-PPS.

Payment adjustments, including the interrupted stay policy and the 25 Percent Rule (discussed below), apply to LTCH discharges regardless of whether the case is paid at the standard federal payment rate or the site-neutral payment rate. However, short stay outlier payment adjustments do not apply to cases paid at the site-neutral payment rate. CMS calculates the annual recalibration of the MS-LTC-DRG relative payment weighting factors using only data from LTCH discharges that meet the criteria for exclusion from the site-neutral payment rate. In addition, CMS applies the IPPS fixed-loss amount for high cost outliers to site-neutral cases, rather than the LTCH-PPS fixed-loss amount. CMS calculates the LTCH-PPS fixed-loss amount using only data from cases paid at the LTCH-PPS payment rate, excluding cases paid at the site-neutral rate.

Medicare Market Basket Adjustments

The ACA instituted a market basket payment adjustment to LTCHs. In fiscal years 2018 and 2019, the market basket update will be reduced by 0.75%. The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 sets the annual update for fiscal year 2018 at 1% after taking into account the market basket payment reduction of 0.75% mandated by the ACA. The ACA specifically allows these market basket reductions to result in less than a 0% payment update and payment rates that are less than the prior year.

25 Percent Rule

The “25 Percent Rule” is a downward payment adjustment that applies if the percentage of Medicare patients discharged from LTCHs who were admitted from a referring hospital (regardless of whether the LTCH or LTCH satellite is co-located with the referring hospital) exceeds the applicable percentage admissions threshold during a particular cost reporting period. For Medicare patients above the applicable percentage admissions threshold, the LTCH is reimbursed at a rate equivalent to that under general acute care hospital IPPS, which is generally lower than LTCH-PPS rates. Cases that reach outlier status in the referring hospital do not count toward the admissions threshold and are paid under LTCH-PPS.

34

Current law, as amended by the 21st Century Cures Act, precludes CMS from applying the 25 Percent Rule for freestanding LTCHs to cost reporting years beginning before July 1, 2016 and for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2016 and before October 1, 2017. In addition, current law applies higher percentage admissions thresholds under the 25 Percent Rule for most hospitals within hospitals (“HIHs”) for cost reporting years beginning before July 1, 2016 and effective for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2016 and before October 1, 2017. For freestanding LTCHs the percentage admissions threshold is suspended during the relief periods. For HIHs the percentage admissions threshold is raised from 25% to 50% during the relief periods. In the special case of rural LTCHs, LTCHs co-located with an urban single hospital, or LTCHs co-located with a Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”) dominant hospital the referral percentage was raised from 50% to 75%. Grandfathered HIHs are exempt from the 25 Percent Rule regulations.

For fiscal year 2018, CMS adopted a regulatory moratorium on the implementation of the 25 Percent Rule. As a result, the 25 Percent Rule applies to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2018. After the expiration of the regulatory moratorium, our LTCHs (whether freestanding, HIH or satellite) will be subject to a downward payment adjustment for any Medicare patients who were admitted from a co-located or a non-co-located hospital and that exceed the applicable percentage admissions threshold of all Medicare patients discharged from the LTCH during the cost reporting period. These regulatory changes will have an adverse financial impact on the net operating revenues and profitability of many of these hospitals for discharges on or after October 1, 2018.

Short Stay Outlier Policy

CMS established a different payment methodology for Medicare patients with a length of stay less than or equal to five-sixths of the geometric average length of stay for that particular MS-LTC-DRG, referred to as a short stay outlier, or “SSO.” SSO cases are paid based on the lesser of (i) 100% of the average cost of the case, (ii) 120% of the MS-LTC-DRG specific per diem amount multiplied by the patient’s length of stay, (iii) the full MS-LTC-DRG payment, or (iv) a per diem rate derived from blending 120% of the MS-LTC-DRG specific per diem amount with a per diem rate based on the general acute care hospital IPPS.

For fiscal year 2018, CMS adopted changes to the SSO policy such that all SSO cases discharged on or after October 1, 2017 are paid based on a per diem rate derived from blending 120% of the MS-LTC-DRG specific per diem amount with a per diem rate based on the general acute care hospital IPPS. Under this policy, as the length of stay of a SSO case increases, the percentage of the per diem payment amounts based on the full MS-LTCH-DRG standard federal payment rate increases and the percentage of the payment based on the IPPS comparable amount decreases.

Moratorium on New LTCHs, LTCH Satellite Facilities and LTCH beds

Current law imposes a moratorium on the establishment and classification of new LTCHs or LTCH satellite facilities, and on the increase of LTCH beds in existing LTCHs or satellite facilities through September 30, 2017. There are three exceptions to the moratorium for projects that were under development when the moratorium began on April 1, 2014. Only one exception needs to exist for the moratorium not to apply.

Medicare Reimbursement of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Services

The following is a summary of significant changes to the Medicare prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) which have affected our financial performance in the periods covered by this report or may affect our financial performance and financial condition in the future. Medicare payments to our IRFs are made in accordance with the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system (“IRF-PPS”).

Fiscal Year 2016.  On August 6, 2015, CMS published the final rule updating policies and payment rates for the IRF-PPS for fiscal year 2016 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016). The standard payment conversion factor for discharges for fiscal year 2016 was set at $15,478, an increase from the standard payment conversion factor applicable during fiscal year 2015 of $15,198. The update to the standard payment conversion factor for fiscal year 2016 included a market basket increase of 2.4%, less a productivity adjustment of 0.5%, and less a reduction of 0.2% mandated by the ACA. CMS decreased the outlier threshold amount for fiscal year 2016 to $8,658 from $8,848 established in the final rule for fiscal year 2015.

35

Fiscal Year 2017.  On August 5, 2016, CMS published the final rule updating policies and payment rates for the IRF-PPS for fiscal year 2017 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017). The standard payment conversion factor for discharges for fiscal year 2017 was set at $15,708, an increase from the standard payment conversion factor applicable during fiscal year 2016 of $15,478. The update to the standard payment conversion factor for fiscal year 2017 included a market basket increase of 2.7%, less a productivity adjustment of 0.3%, and less a reduction of 0.75% mandated by the ACA. CMS decreased the outlier threshold amount for fiscal year 2017 to $7,984 from $8,658 established in the final rule for fiscal year 2016.

Fiscal Year 2018.   On July 31, 2017, CMS released an advanced copy of the final policies and payment rates for the IRF-PPS for fiscal year 2018 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018). The standard payment conversion factor for discharges for fiscal year 2018 was set at $15,838, an increase from the standard payment conversion factor applicable during fiscal year 2017 of $15,708. The update to the standard payment conversion factor for fiscal year 2018 includes a market basket increase of 2.6%, less a productivity adjustment of 0.6%, and less a reduction of 0.75% mandated by the ACA. As noted below, the standard payment conversion factor for fiscal year 2018 is impacted further by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, which limits the update for fiscal year 2018 to 1.0%. CMS increased the outlier threshold amount for fiscal year 2018 to $8,679 from $7,984 established in the final rule for fiscal year 2017.

Medicare Market Basket Adjustments

The ACA instituted a market basket payment adjustment for IRFs. In fiscal years 2018 and 2019, the market basket update will be reduced by 0.75%. The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 sets the annual update for fiscal year 2018 at 1% after taking into account the market basket payment reduction of 0.75% mandated by the ACA. The ACA specifically allows these market basket reductions to result in less than a 0% payment update and payment rates that are less than the prior year.

Patient Classification Criteria

In order to qualify as an IRF a hospital must demonstrate that during its most recent twelve month cost reporting period it served an inpatient population of whom at least 60% required intensive rehabilitation services for one or more of 13 conditions specified by regulation. Compliance with the 60% rule is demonstrated through either medical review or the “presumptive” method, in which a patient’s diagnosis codes are compared to a “presumptive compliance” list.  For fiscal year 2018, CMS revised the 60% rule’s presumptive methodology by (i) including certain International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (“ICD-10-CM”) diagnosis codes for patients with traumatic brain injury and hip fracture conditions; and (ii) revising the presumptive methodology list for major multiple trauma by counting IRF cases that contain two or more of the ICD-10-CM codes from three major multiple trauma lists in the specified combinations.

Medicare Reimbursement of Outpatient Rehabilitation Services

The Medicare program reimburses outpatient rehabilitation providers based on the Medicare physician fee schedule. For services provided in 2017 through 2019, a 0.5% update will be applied each year to the fee schedule payment rates, subject to an adjustment beginning in 2019 under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (“MIPS”). For services provided in 2020 through 2025, a 0.0% percent update will be applied each year to the fee schedule payment rates, subject to adjustments under MIPS and the alternative payment models (“APMs”). In 2026 and subsequent years eligible professionals participating in APMs that meet certain criteria would receive annual updates of 0.75%, while all other professionals would receive annual updates of 0.25%.

Beginning in 2019, payments under the fee schedule are subject to adjustment based on performance in MIPS, which measures performance based on certain quality metrics, resource use, and meaningful use of electronic health records. Under the MIPS requirements a provider’s performance is assessed according to established performance standards and used to determine an adjustment factor that is then applied to the professional’s payment for a year. Each year from 2019 through 2024 professionals who receive a significant share of their revenues through an APM (such as accountable care organizations or bundled payment arrangements) that involves risk of financial losses and a quality measurement component will receive a 5% bonus. The bonus payment for APM participation is intended to encourage participation and testing of new APMs and to promote the alignment of incentives across payors. The specifics of the MIPS and APM adjustments beginning in 2019 and 2020, respectively, will be subject to future notice and comment rule-making.

36

Operating Statistics

The following table sets forth operating statistics for our operating segments for each of the periods presented. The operating statistics reflect data for the period of time we managed these operations:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2017			2016			2017
Specialty hospitals data:(1)
Number of hospitals owned—start of period	118			114			118			115
Number of hospitals acquired	3			1			3			1
Number of hospital start-ups	1			—			1			—
Number of hospitals closed/sold	(6		)	(1		)	(6		)	(2		)
Number of hospitals owned—end of period	116			114			116			114
Number of hospitals managed—end of period	8			9			8			9
Total number of hospitals (all)—end of period	124			123			124			123
Long term acute care hospitals	106			102			106			102
Rehabilitation hospitals	18			21			18			21
Available licensed beds(2)	5,154			5,155			5,154			5,155
Admissions(2)	13,094			13,691			26,955			27,586
Patient days(2)	317,119			316,884			655,090			634,249
Average length of stay (days)(2)	24			23			24			23
Net revenue per patient day(2)(3)	$	1,680		$	1,731		$	1,655		$	1,723
Occupancy rate(2)	68		%	68		%	70		%	68		%
Percent patient days—Medicare(2)	55		%	54		%	56		%	54		%
Outpatient rehabilitation data:
Number of clinics owned—start of period	1,441			1,445			896			1,445
Number of clinics acquired	—			—			543			1
Number of clinic start-ups	7			6			13			14
Number of clinics closed/sold	(13		)	(10		)	(17		)	(19		)
Number of clinics owned—end of period	1,435			1,441			1,435			1,441
Number of clinics managed—end of period	165			167			165			167
Total number of clinics (all)—end of period	1,600			1,608			1,600			1,608
Number of visits(2)	2,122,330			2,106,760			3,698,884			4,182,550
Net revenue per visit(2)(4)	$	102		$	103		$	102		$	102
Concentra data:
Number of centers owned—start of period	301			308			300			300
Number of centers acquired	—			5			2			11
Number of center start-ups	—			2			—			4
Number of centers closed/sold	—			—			(1		)	—
Number of centers owned—end of period	301			315			301			315
Number of visits(5)	1,890,348			1,982,255			3,736,063			3,869,070
Net revenue per visit(5)(6)	$	118		$	116		$	118		$	117

(1)Specialty hospitals consist of LTCHs and IRFs.

(2)Data excludes specialty hospitals and outpatient clinics managed by the Company.

(3)Net revenue per patient day is calculated by dividing specialty hospitals direct patient service revenues by the total number of patient days.

(4)Net revenue per visit is calculated by dividing outpatient rehabilitation clinic direct patient service revenue by the total number of visits. For purposes of this computation, outpatient rehabilitation direct patient service clinic revenue does not include managed clinics or contract therapy revenue.

(5)Data excludes onsite clinics and CBOCs.

(6)Net revenue per visit is calculated by dividing center direct patient service revenue by the total number of center visits.

37

Results of Operations

The following table outlines selected operating data as a percentage of net operating revenues for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2017		2016		2017
Net operating revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of services(1)	83.5		82.1		84.1		82.8
General and administrative	2.4		2.5		2.5		2.5
Bad debt expense	1.6		1.6		1.6		1.7
Depreciation and amortization	3.3		3.5		3.2		3.7
Income from operations	9.2		10.3		8.6		9.3
Loss on early retirement of debt	—		—		0.0		(0.9	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	0.4		0.5		0.4		0.5
Non-operating gain (loss)	1.2		—		1.7		(0.0	)
Interest expense	(4.0	)	(3.3	)	(3.8	)	(3.5	)
Income before income taxes	6.8		7.5		6.9		5.4
Income tax expense	3.1		2.9		2.3		2.0
Net income	3.7		4.6		4.6		3.4
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	0.6		0.8		0.5		0.8
Net income attributable to Holdings and Select	3.1	%	3.8	%	4.1	%	2.6	%

(1)Cost of services includes salaries, wages and benefits, operating supplies, lease and rent expense and other operating costs.

38

The following table summarizes selected financial data by business segment for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2017			% Change		2016			2017			% Change
	(in thousands)
Net operating revenues:
Specialty hospitals	$	585,816		$	600,960		2.6	%	$	1,184,770		$	1,199,747		1.3	%
Outpatient rehabilitation(1)	256,928			258,106			0.5		495,010			513,923			3.8
Concentra	254,868			261,586			2.6		505,745			517,735			2.4
Other(2)	19			23			N/M		436			631			N/M
Total Company	$	1,097,631		$	1,120,675		2.1	%	$	2,185,961		$	2,232,036		2.1	%
Income (loss) from operations:
Specialty hospitals	$	68,927		$	82,718		20.0	%	$	141,790		$	152,883		7.8	%
Outpatient rehabilitation(1)	31,930			36,048			12.9		56,773			61,059			7.5
Concentra	27,931			27,368			(2.0	)	46,516			53,531			15.1
Other(2)	(27,734		)	(30,471		)	(9.9	)	(57,139		)	(60,045		)	(5.1	)
Total Company	$	101,054		$	115,663		14.5	%	$	187,940		$	207,428		10.4	%
Adjusted EBITDA:
Specialty hospitals	$	82,739		$	98,172		18.7	%	$	169,495		$	186,837		10.2	%
Outpatient rehabilitation(1)	38,132			41,926			9.9		67,011			73,277			9.4
Concentra	43,039			43,061			0.1		77,192			85,653			11.0
Other(2)	(22,453		)	(24,479		)	(9.0	)	(43,626		)	(48,197		)	(10.5	)
Total Company	$	141,457		$	158,680		12.2	%	$	270,072		$	297,570		10.2	%
Adjusted EBITDA margins:
Specialty hospitals	14.1		%	16.3		%			14.3		%	15.6		%
Outpatient rehabilitation(1)	14.8			16.2					13.5			14.3
Concentra	16.9			16.5					15.3			16.5
Other(2)	N/M			N/M					N/M			N/M
Total Company	12.9		%	14.2		%			12.4		%	13.3		%
Total assets:(3)
Specialty hospitals	$	2,457,948		$	2,655,617				$	2,457,948		$	2,655,617
Outpatient rehabilitation	959,748			982,811					959,748			982,811
Concentra	1,328,243			1,310,483					1,328,243			1,310,483
Other(2)	73,950			105,300					73,950			105,300
Total Company	$	4,819,889		$	5,054,211				$	4,819,889		$	5,054,211
Purchases of property and equipment, net:
Specialty hospitals	$	21,313		$	36,691				$	54,988		$	69,048
Outpatient rehabilitation(1)	3,825			6,201					8,798			12,874
Concentra	4,716			7,601					7,927			16,287
Other(2)	3,636			4,156					8,545			7,093
Total Company	$	33,490		$	54,649				$	80,258		$	105,302

N/M—Not Meaningful.

(1)The outpatient rehabilitation segment includes the operating results of our contract therapy businesses through March 31, 2016 and Physiotherapy beginning March 4, 2016.

(2)Other includes our corporate services and certain other non-consolidating joint ventures and minority investments in other healthcare related businesses.

(3)Reflects the retrospective adoption of ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. Total assets as of June 30, 2016 were retrospectively conformed to reflect the adoption of the standard, resulting in a reduction to total assets of $18.5 million.

39

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

In the following, we discuss our results of operations related to net operating revenues, operating expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, depreciation and amortization, income from operations, equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, non-operating gain, interest expense, income taxes, and net income attributable to non-controlling interests, which, in each case, are the same for Holdings and Select.

Net Operating Revenues

Our net operating revenues increased 2.1% to $1,120.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1,097.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Specialty Hospitals Segment.  Net operating revenues increased 2.6% to $601.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $585.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 for our specialty hospitals segment. The increase in net operating revenues is principally due to several new inpatient rehabilitation facilities which recently commenced operations. The average net revenue per patient day for all of our specialty hospitals increased 3.0% to $1,731 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1,680 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. We had 316,884 patient days for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 317,119 days for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in patient days is principally due to closed specialty hospitals.

Outpatient Rehabilitation Segment.  Net operating revenues increased to $258.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $256.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 for our outpatient rehabilitation segment. The increase in net operating revenues was principally due to an increase in our net revenue per visit, offset in part by a decline in visits. Net revenue per visit was $103 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $102 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. We had 2,106,760 visits in our clinics for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 2,122,330 visits for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decline in visits occurred within some of our Physiotherapy markets.

Concentra Segment.  Net operating revenues increased 2.6% to $261.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $254.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 for our Concentra segment. The increase in net operating revenues was due to an increase in visits principally from newly acquired and developed medical centers. We had 1,982,255 visits in our centers for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 1,890,348 visits for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in visits principally related to our employer services. Net revenue per visit was $116 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $118 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in net revenue per visit is principally due to an increased proportion of employer service visits, which yield lower per visit rates.

40

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses include our cost of services, general and administrative expense, and bad debt expense. Our operating expenses were $966.7 million, or 86.2% of net operating revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $960.4 million, or 87.5% of net operating revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Our cost of services, a major component of which is labor expense, was $920.2 million, or 82.1% of net operating revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $917.0 million, or 83.5% of net operating revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in our operating expenses relative to our net operating revenues is principally due to the improved operating performance of our start-up specialty hospitals, specialty hospital closures, and a decline in operating expenses in our outpatient rehabilitation segment. Facility rent expense, a component of cost of services, was $57.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $57.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. General and administrative expenses were $28.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $25.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net operating revenues were 2.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 2.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Our bad debt expense was $18.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $17.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Bad debt expense as a percentage of net operating revenues was 1.6% for both the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Adjusted EBITDA

Specialty Hospitals Segment.  Adjusted EBITDA increased 18.7% to $98.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $82.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 for our specialty hospitals segment. Our Adjusted EBITDA margin for the segment was 16.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 14.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA for our specialty hospitals segment was primarily driven by the improved operating performance of our LTCHs, reductions in Adjusted EBITDA losses in our start-up specialty hospitals, and the closure of specialty hospitals which had generated Adjusted EBITDA losses during the three months ended  June 30, 2016. Adjusted EBITDA losses in our start-up specialty hospitals were $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Outpatient Rehabilitation Segment.  Adjusted EBITDA increased 9.9% to $41.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $38.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 for our outpatient rehabilitation segment. Our Adjusted EBITDA margin for the outpatient rehabilitation segment was 16.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 14.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA for our outpatient rehabilitation segment was due to improved operating performance as a result of lower cost of services during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Concentra Segment.  Adjusted EBITDA was $43.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $43.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 for our Concentra segment. Our Adjusted EBITDA margin for the Concentra segment was 16.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 16.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decline in our Adjusted EBITDA margin for our Concentra segment was the result of higher operating expenses, principally related to increased labor costs, relative to our net operating revenues.

Other.  The Adjusted EBITDA loss was $24.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to an Adjusted EBITDA loss of $22.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in our Adjusted EBITDA loss was due to an increase in general and administrative costs, which encompass our corporate shared service activities.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense was $38.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $36.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was principally due to new inpatient rehabilitation facilities operating in our specialty hospitals segment.

Income from Operations

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we had income from operations of $115.7 million, compared to $101.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in income from operations resulted principally from the improved operating performance of our specialty hospitals segment.

41

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we had equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries of $5.7 million, compared to $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in our equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries resulted principally from improved performance of the inpatient rehabilitation businesses in which we have a minority interest.

Non-Operating Gain

We recognized a non-operating gain of $13.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The non-operating gain was principally due to the sale of nine outpatient rehabilitation clinics and the sale of five specialty hospitals in an exchange transaction.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $37.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $44.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in interest expense was principally the result of decreases in our interest rates associated with the refinancing of the Select credit facilities during the first quarter of 2017 and the Concentra credit facilities during the third quarter of 2016.

Income Taxes

We recorded income tax expense of $32.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, which represented an effective tax rate of 38.7%. We recorded income tax expense of $33.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, which represented an effective tax rate of 45.0%.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, we exchanged five specialty hospitals. For tax purposes, the exchange was treated as a discrete tax event during the three months ended June 30, 2016. Our tax basis in the five specialty hospitals was less than our book basis, resulting in a tax gain exceeding our book gain. The additional tax expense resulting from this gain was the principal cause of the higher effective tax rate during this period.

Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests was $9.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $6.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase is principally due the minority interest owners’ share of income from Concentra and new inpatient rehabilitation facilities operating within our specialty hospitals segment.

42

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

In the following, we discuss our results of operations related to net operating revenues, operating expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, depreciation and amortization, income from operations, loss on early retirement of debt, equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, non-operating gain, interest expense, income taxes, and net income attributable to non-controlling interests, which, in each case, are the same for Holdings and Select.

Net Operating Revenues

Our net operating revenues increased 2.1% to $2,232.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $2,186.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Specialty Hospitals Segment.  Net operating revenues increased 1.3% to $1,199.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1,184.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 for our specialty hospitals segment. The increase in net operating revenues is principally due to several new inpatient rehabilitation facilities which recently commenced operations. The average net revenue per patient day for our specialty hospitals increased 4.1% to $1,723 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1,655 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we had 634,249 patient days, compared to 655,090 days for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in patient days is principally due to closed specialty hospitals.

Outpatient Rehabilitation Segment.  Net operating revenues increased 3.8% to $513.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $495.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 for our outpatient rehabilitation segment. The increase in net operating revenues was principally due to the acquisition of Physiotherapy on March 4, 2016, which contributed to the overall growth in our visits. The increase in net operating revenues was offset in part by the sale of our contract therapy businesses on March 31, 2016. Visits increased 13.1% to 4,182,550 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 3,698,884 visits for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Net revenue per visit was $102 for both the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Concentra Segment.  Net operating revenues increased 2.4% to $517.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $505.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 for our Concentra segment.  The increase in net operating revenues was due to an increase in visits principally from newly acquired and developed medical centers. Visits in our centers increased 3.6% to 3,869,070 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 3,736,063 visits for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in visits principally related to our employer services. Net revenue per visit was $117 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $118 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in net revenue per visit is principally due to an increased proportion of employer service visits, which yield lower per visit rates.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses include our cost of services, general and administrative expense, and bad debt expense. Our operating expenses were $1,943.7 million, or 87.0% of net operating revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1,927.3 million, or 88.2% of net operating revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Our cost of services, a major component of which is labor expense, was $1,848.6 million, or 82.8% of net operating revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1,839.2 million, or 84.1% of net operating revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in our operating expenses relative to our net operating revenues is principally due to the improved operating performance of our start-up specialty hospitals, specialty hospitals closures, and cost reductions achieved by Concentra.  Facility rent expense, a component of cost of services, was $113.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $109.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. General and administrative expenses were $56.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $54.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, which includes $3.2 million of Physiotherapy acquisition costs. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net operating revenues were 2.5% for both the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. Our bad debt expense was $38.8 million, or 1.7% of net operating revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $33.9 million, or 1.6% of net operating revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was principally the result of increases in bad debt expense in our specialty hospitals and Concentra segments.

43

Adjusted EBITDA

Specialty Hospitals Segment.  Adjusted EBITDA increased 10.2% to $186.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $169.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 for our specialty hospitals segment. Our Adjusted EBITDA margin for the segment was 15.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 14.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA for our specialty hospitals segment was primarily driven by the improved operating performance of our LTCHs, reductions in Adjusted EBITDA losses in our start-up specialty hospitals, and the closure of specialty hospitals which had generated Adjusted EBITDA losses during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Adjusted EBITDA losses in our start-up specialty hospitals were $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $10.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Outpatient Rehabilitation Segment.  Adjusted EBITDA increased 9.4% to $73.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $67.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 for our outpatient rehabilitation segment. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was principally due to growth in visits, as discussed above under “Net Operating Revenues.” Our Adjusted EBITDA margin for the outpatient rehabilitation segment was 14.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 13.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was principally due to the sale of our contract therapy businesses on March 31, 2016, which operated at lower Adjusted EBITDA margins than our outpatient rehabilitation clinics.

Concentra Segment.  Adjusted EBITDA increased 11.0% to $85.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $77.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 for our Concentra segment. Our Adjusted EBITDA margin for the Concentra segment was 16.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 15.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA for our Concentra segment was principally the result of cost reductions we have achieved.

Other.  The Adjusted EBITDA loss was $48.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to an Adjusted EBITDA loss of $43.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense was $80.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $70.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was principally due to new inpatient rehabilitation facilities operating in our specialty hospitals segment.

Income from Operations

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we had income from operations of $207.4 million, compared to $187.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in income from operations resulted principally from the improved operating performance of our specialty hospitals and Concentra segments.

Loss on Early Retirement of Debt

On March 6, 2017, we refinanced Select’s senior secured credit facilities which resulted in losses on early retirement of debt of $19.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

On March 4, 2016, we refinanced a portion of our term loans under Select’s 2011 senior secured credit facility which resulted in a loss on early retirement of debt of $0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we had equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries of $11.2 million, compared to $9.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in our equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries resulted principally from improved performance of the inpatient rehabilitation businesses in which we have a minority interest.

44

Non-Operating Gain

We recognized a non-operating gain of $38.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016.  The non-operating gain was principally due to the sale of our contract therapy businesses during the quarter ended March 31, 2016, as well as the sale of nine outpatient rehabilitation clinics and the sale of five specialty hospitals in an exchange transaction during the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $78.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $83.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in interest expense was principally the result of decreases in our interest rates associated with the refinancing of the Select credit facilities during the first quarter of 2017 and the Concentra credit facilities during the third quarter of 2016.

Income Taxes

We recorded income tax expense of $45.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, which represented an effective tax rate of 37.9% We recorded income tax expense of $50.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, which represented an effective tax rate of 33.4%.

Our effective income tax rate is derived from our full year estimated effective income tax rate and can be impacted by discrete items specific to a particular quarter and quarterly changes in our full year tax provision estimate. On March 31, 2016, we sold our contract therapy businesses. Our tax basis in our contract therapy businesses exceeded our selling price. As a result, we had no tax expense from the sale. Additionally, during the three months ended June 30, 2016, we exchanged five specialty hospitals. Our tax basis in the five specialty hospitals was less than our book basis, resulting in a tax gain exceeding our book gain. The lower effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 resulted from the net effects of the two discrete tax events discussed above.

Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests was $16.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $12.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase is principally due the minority interest owners’ share of income from Concentra.

45

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

In the following, we discuss cash flows from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities, which, in each case, are the same for Holdings and Select.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2017
	(in thousands)
Cash flows provided by operating activities	$	178,238		$	40,340
Cash flows used in investing activities	(432,001		)	(99,132		)
Cash flows provided by financing activities	317,748			33,562
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	63,985			(25,230		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14,435			99,029
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	78,420		$	73,799

Operating activities provided $40.3 million of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease in operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 is principally due to increases in our accounts receivable. Our days sales outstanding was 58 days at June 30, 2017, compared to 51 days at both December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016. Our days sales outstanding will fluctuate based upon variability in our collection cycles. The increase in our days sales outstanding and related decline in our operating cash flows is primarily related to the current underpayments we are receiving through the periodic interim payment program from Medicare in our LTCHs. These underpayments will be corrected in future months as our periodic interim payments are reconciled and reset by our fiscal intermediaries.

Investing activities used $99.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The principal use of cash was $105.3 million for purchases of property and equipment and $18.5 million for the acquisition of businesses, offset in part by $34.6 million of proceeds from the sale of assets. Investing activities used $432.0 million of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016, principally due to the acquisition of Physiotherapy.

Financing activities provided $33.6 million of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The principal source of cash was $80.0 million of net borrowings under the Select revolving facility, offset in part by $23.1 million of cash used for a principal prepayment associated with the Concentra credit facilities, $2.9 million of cash used for a term loan payment associated with the Select credit facilities, and cash used for the payment of financing costs related to the refinancing of the Select credit facilities.

Financing activities provided $317.7 million of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The principal source of cash was the issuance of $625.0 million of series F tranche B term loans, resulting in net proceeds of $600.1 million, offset by $215.7 million of cash used to repay the series D tranche B term loans and $60.0 million of net repayments under the Select revolving facility.

Capital Resources

Working capital.  We had net working capital of $302.4 million at June 30, 2017, compared to $191.3 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in net working capital is primarily due to an increase in our accounts receivable.

Select credit facilities.  On March 6, 2017, Select entered into a new senior secured credit agreement that provides for $1.6 billion in senior secured credit facilities comprising a $1.15 billion, seven-year term loan and a $450.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility, including a $75.0 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit.  Select used borrowings under the Select credit facilities to: (i) repay the series E tranche B term loans due June 1, 2018, the series F tranche B term loans due March 31, 2021, and the revolving facility maturing March 1, 2018 under its then existing credit facilities; and (ii) pay fees and expenses in connection with the refinancing.

46

Borrowings under the Select credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to: (i) in the case of the Select term loan, Adjusted LIBO (as defined in the Select credit agreement) plus 3.50% (subject to an Adjusted LIBO floor of 1.00%), or Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Select credit agreement) plus 2.50% (subject to an Alternate Base Rate floor of 2.00%); and (ii) in the case of the Select revolving facility, Adjusted LIBO plus a percentage ranging from 3.00% to 3.25% or Alternate Base Rate plus a percentage ranging from 2.00% to 2.25%, in each case based on Select’s leverage ratio.

The Select term loan amortizes in equal quarterly installments in amounts equal to 0.25% of the aggregate original principal amount of the Select term loan commencing on June 30, 2017. The balance of the Select term loan will be payable on March 8, 2024; however, if the Select 6.375% senior notes, which are due June 1, 2021, are outstanding on March 1, 2021, the maturity date for the Select term loan will become March 1, 2021. The Select revolving facility will be payable on March 8, 2022; however, if the Select 6.375% senior notes are outstanding on February 1, 2021, the maturity date for the Select revolving facility will become February 1, 2021.

Select will be required to prepay borrowings under the Select credit facilities with (i) 100% of the net cash proceeds received from non-ordinary course asset sales or other dispositions, or as a result of a casualty or condemnation, subject to reinvestment provisions and other customary carveouts and, to the extent required, the payment of certain indebtedness secured by liens having priority over the debt under the Select credit facilities or subject to a first lien intercreditor agreement, (ii) 100% of the net cash proceeds received from the issuance of debt obligations other than certain permitted debt obligations, and (ii) 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the Select credit agreement) if Select’s leverage ratio is greater than 4.50 to 1.00 and 25% of excess cash flow if Select’s leverage ratio is less than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00 and greater than 4.00 to 1.00, in each case, reduced by the aggregate amount of term loans, revolving loans and certain other debt optionally prepaid during the applicable fiscal year. Select will not be required to prepay borrowings with excess cash flow if Select’s leverage ratio is less than or equal to 4.00 to 1.00.

The Select revolving facility requires Select to maintain a leverage ratio (as defined in the Select credit agreement), which is tested quarterly, not to exceed 6.25 to 1.00. After March 31, 2019, the leverage ratio must not exceed 6.00 to 1.00.  Failure to comply with this covenant would result in an event of default under the Select revolving facility and, absent a waiver or an amendment from the revolving lenders, preclude Select from making further borrowings under the Select revolving facility and permit the revolving lenders to accelerate all outstanding borrowings under the Select revolving facility. The termination of the Select revolving facility commitments and the acceleration of amounts outstanding thereunder would constitute an event of default with respect to the Select term loan. As of June 30, 2017, Select’s leverage ratio was 5.86 to 1.00.

The Select credit facilities also contain a number of other affirmative and restrictive covenants, including limitations on mergers, consolidations and dissolutions; sales of assets; investments and acquisitions; indebtedness; liens; affiliate transactions; and dividends and restricted payments. The Select credit facilities contain events of default for non-payment of principal and interest when due (subject, as to interest, to a grace period), cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions and an event of default that would be triggered by a change of control.

Borrowings under the Select credit facilities are guaranteed by Holdings and substantially all of Select’s current domestic subsidiaries and will be guaranteed by substantially all of Select’s future domestic subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of Select’s existing and future property and assets and by a pledge of Select’s capital stock, the capital stock of Select’s domestic subsidiaries and up to 65% of the capital stock of Select’s foreign subsidiaries held directly by Select or a domestic subsidiary.

At June 30, 2017, Select had outstanding borrowings under the Select credit facilities consisting of a $1,147.1 million Select term loan (excluding unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs of $27.0 million) and borrowings of $300.0 million (excluding letters of credit) under the Select revolving facility. At June 30, 2017, Select had $111.4 million of availability under the Select revolving facility after giving effect to $38.6 million of outstanding letters of credit.

Concentra credit facilities.  Select and Holdings are not parties to the Concentra credit facilities and are not obligors with respect to Concentra’s debt under such agreements. While this debt is non-recourse to Select, it is included in Select’s consolidated financial statements.

On March 1, 2017, Concentra made a principal prepayment of $23.1 million associated with its first lien term loans in accordance with the provision in the Concentra credit facilities that requires mandatory prepayments of term loans as a result of annual excess cash flow, as defined in the Concentra credit facilities.

47

At June 30, 2017, Concentra had outstanding borrowings under the Concentra credit facilities of $619.2 million of first lien term loans (excluding unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs of $14.4 million) and no borrowings under the Concentra revolving facility. At June 30 2017, Concentra had $43.4 million of availability under its revolving facility after giving effect to $6.6 million of outstanding letters of credit.

Stock Repurchase Program.  Holdings’ board of directors has authorized a common stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $500.0 million worth of shares of its common stock. The program has been extended until December 31, 2018, and will remain in effect until then, unless further extended or earlier terminated by the board of directors. Stock repurchases under this program may be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, and at times and in such amounts as Holdings deems appropriate. Holdings funds this program with cash on hand and borrowings under the Select revolving facility. Holdings did not repurchase shares during the three months ended June 30, 2017. Since the inception of the program through June 30, 2017, Holdings has repurchased 35,924,128 shares at a cost of approximately $314.7 million, or $8.76 per share, which includes transaction costs.

Liquidity.  We believe our internally generated cash flows and borrowing capacity under the Select and Concentra credit facilities will be sufficient to finance operations over the next twelve months. We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, may be funded from operating cash flows or other sources and will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Use of Capital Resources.  We may from time to time pursue opportunities to develop new joint venture relationships with significant health systems and other healthcare providers, and from time to time we may also develop new inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and occupational medicine centers. We also intend to open new outpatient rehabilitation clinics in local areas that we currently serve where we can benefit from existing referral relationships and brand awareness to produce incremental growth. In addition to our development activities, we may grow through opportunistic acquisitions.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 states that if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the transaction should be accounted for as an asset acquisition. In addition, the ASU clarifies the requirements for a set of activities to be considered a business and narrows the definition of an output. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill and consolidation. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. Current GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The ASU requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company plans to adopt the guidance effective January 1, 2018. Adoption of the guidance will be applied on a modified retrospective approach through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This ASU includes a lessee accounting model that recognizes two types of leases; finance and operating. This ASU requires that a lessee recognize on the balance sheet assets and liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. Lessees will need to recognize almost all leases on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained the dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. For short-term leases of twelve months or less, lessees are permitted to make an accounting election by class of underlying asset not to recognize right-of-use assets or lease liabilities. If the alternative is elected, lease expense would be recognized generally on the straight-line basis over the respective lease term.

48

The amendments in ASU 2016-02 will take effect for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. A modified retrospective approach is required for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements.

Upon adoption, the Company will recognize significant assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the operating lease obligations of the Company. Operating lease expense will still be recognized as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company will implement the new standard beginning January 1, 2019. The Company’s implementation efforts are focused on designing accounting processes, disclosure processes, and internal controls in order to account for its leases under the new standard.

In May 2014, March 2016, April 2016, and December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Principal versus Agent Considerations, ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, and ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer (collectively “the standards”), respectively, which supersede most of the current revenue recognition requirements. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. New disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers are also required. The standards require the selection of a retrospective or cumulative effect transition method.

The Company will implement the new standard beginning January 1, 2018 using the retrospective transition method.  Adoption of the new standard will result in material changes to the presentation of net operating revenues and bad debt expense in the consolidated statements of operations, but the presentation of the amount of income from operations and net income will be unchanged upon adoption of the new standards. The principal change is how the new standard requires healthcare providers to estimate the amount of variable consideration to be included in the transaction price up to an amount which is probable that a significant reversal will not occur. The most common form of variable consideration the Company experiences are amounts for services provided that are ultimately not realizable from a customer. Under the current standards, the Company’s estimate for unrealizable amounts was recorded to bad debt expense. Under the new standards, the Company’s estimate for unrealizable amounts will be recognized as a constraint to revenue and will be reflected as an allowance. Substantially all of the bad debt expense as of June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2017 will be reclassified as an allowance when the Company retrospectively applies the guidance in the standards on January 1, 2018.

The Company’s remaining implementation efforts are focused principally on refining the accounting processes, disclosure processes, and internal controls.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which changed the presentation of deferred income taxes. The standard changed the presentation of deferred income taxes through the requirement that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2017. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016 has been retrospectively adjusted. Adoption of the new standard impacted the Company’s previously reported results as follows:

	December 31, 2016
	As Reported		As Adjusted
	(in thousands)
Current deferred tax asset	$	45,165	$	—
Total current assets	808,068		762,903
Other assets	152,548		173,944
Total assets	4,944,395		4,920,626
Non-current deferred tax liability	222,847		199,078
Total liabilities	3,616,335		3,592,566
Total liabilities and equity	4,944,395		4,920,626

49

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our variable rate long-term indebtedness. Our principal interest rate exposure relates to the loans outstanding under the Select credit facilities and Concentra credit facilities.

As of June 30, 2017, Select had a $1,147.1 million term loan (excluding unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs of $27.0 million) outstanding and $300.0 million in revolving borrowings outstanding under the Select credit facilities, which bear interest at variable rates.

As of June 30, 2017, Concentra had $619.2 million of first lien term loans (excluding unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs of $14.4 million) outstanding under the Concentra credit facilities, which bear interest at variable rates. Concentra did not have any outstanding revolving borrowings at June 30, 2017.

At June 30, 2017, the 3-month LIBOR rate was 1.30%. Consequently, each 0.25% increase in market interest rates will impact the interest expense on Select’s and Concentra’s variable rate debt by $5.2 million per annum.

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered in this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, including the accumulation and communication of disclosure to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure, are effective as of June 30, 2017 to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the relevant SEC rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that occurred during the second quarter ended June 30, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their goals under all potential future conditions.

50

PART IIOTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is a party to various legal actions, proceedings, and claims (some of which are not insured), and regulatory and other governmental audits and investigations in the ordinary course of its business. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of pending litigation, proceedings, and regulatory and other governmental audits and investigations. These matters could potentially subject the Company to sanctions, damages, recoupments, fines, and other penalties. The Department of Justice, CMS, or other federal and state enforcement and regulatory agencies may conduct additional investigations related to the Company’s businesses in the future that may, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.

To address claims arising out of the Company’s operations, the Company maintains professional malpractice liability insurance and general liability insurance, subject to self-insured retention of $2.0 million per medical incident for professional liability claims and $2.0 million per occurrence for general liability claims. The Company also maintains umbrella liability insurance covering claims which, due to their nature or amount, are not covered by or not fully covered by the Company’s other insurance policies. These insurance policies also do not generally cover punitive damages and are subject to various deductibles and policy limits. Significant legal actions, as well as the cost and possible lack of available insurance, could subject the Company to substantial uninsured liabilities. In the Company’s opinion, the outcome of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Healthcare providers are subject to lawsuits under the qui tam provisions of the federal False Claims Act. Qui tam lawsuits typically remain under seal (hence, usually unknown to the defendant) for some time while the government decides whether or not to intervene on behalf of a private qui tam plaintiff (known as a relator) and take the lead in the litigation. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary damages and penalties and award bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring the suits. The Company is and has been a defendant in these cases in the past, and may be named as a defendant in similar cases from time to time in the future.

Evansville Litigation

On October 19, 2015, the plaintiff-relators filed a Second Amended Complaint in United States of America, ex rel. Tracy Conroy, Pamela Schenk and Lisa Wilson v. Select Medical Corporation, Select Specialty Hospital—Evansville, LLC (“SSH-Evansville”), Select Employment Services, Inc., and Dr. Richard Sloan. The case is a civil action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana by private plaintiff-relators on behalf of the United States under the federal False Claims Act. The plaintiff-relators are the former CEO and two former case managers at SSH-Evansville, and the defendants currently include the Company, SSH-Evansville, a subsidiary of the Company serving as common paymaster for its employees, and a physician who practices at SSH-Evansville. The plaintiff-relators allege that SSH-Evansville discharged patients too early or held patients too long, improperly discharged patients to and readmitted them from short stay hospitals, up-coded diagnoses at admission, and admitted patients for whom long-term acute care was not medically necessary. They also allege that the defendants engaged in retaliation in violation of federal and state law. The Second Amended Complaint replaced a prior complaint that was filed under seal on September 28, 2012 and served on the Company on February 15, 2013, after a federal magistrate judge unsealed it on January 8, 2013. All deadlines in the case had been stayed after the seal was lifted in order to allow the government time to complete its investigation and to decide whether or not to intervene. On June 19, 2015, the United States Department of Justice notified the District Court of its decision not to intervene in the case.

In December 2015, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on multiple grounds, including that the action is disallowed by the False Claims Act’s public disclosure bar, which disqualifies qui tam actions that are based on fraud already publicly disclosed through enumerated sources, unless the relator is an original source, and that the plaintiff-relators did not plead their claims with sufficient particularity, as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Thereafter, the United States filed a notice asserting a veto of the defendants’ use of the public disclosure bar for claims arising from conduct from and after March 23, 2010, which was based on certain statutory changes to the public disclosure bar language included in the Affordable Care Act. On September 30, 2016, the District Court partially granted and partially denied the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. It ruled that the plaintiff-relators alleged substantially the same conduct as had been publicly disclosed and that the plaintiff relators are not original sources, so that the public disclosure bar requires dismissal of all non-retaliation claims arising from conduct before March 23, 2010. The District Court also ruled that the statutory changes to the public disclosure bar gave the United States the power to veto its applicability to claims arising from conduct on and after March 23, 2010, and therefore did not dismiss those claims based on the public disclosure bar. However,

51

the District Court ruled that the plaintiff-relators did not plead certain of their claims relating to interrupted stay manipulation and premature discharging of patients with the requisite particularity, and dismissed those claims. The District Court declined to dismiss the plaintiff relators’ claims arising from conduct from and after March 23, 2010 relating to delayed discharging of patients and up-coding and the plaintiff relators’ retaliation claims. The plaintiff-relators then proposed a case management plan seeking nationwide discovery involving all of the Company’s LTCHs for the period from March 23, 2010 through the present, which the defendants have opposed. The Company intends to vigorously defend this action, but at this time the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this matter.

Knoxville Litigation

On July 13, 2015, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee unsealed a qui tam Complaint in Armes v. Garman, et al, No. 3:14-cv-00172-TAV-CCS, which named as defendants Select, Select Specialty Hospital—Knoxville, Inc. (“SSH-Knoxville”), Select Specialty Hospital—North Knoxville, Inc. and ten current or former employees of these facilities. The Complaint was unsealed after the United States and the State of Tennessee notified the court on July 13, 2015 that each had decided not to intervene in the case. The Complaint is a civil action that was filed under seal on April 29, 2014 by a respiratory therapist formerly employed at SSH-Knoxville. The Complaint alleges violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Tennessee Medicaid False Claims Act based on extending patient stays to increase reimbursement and to increase average length of stay; artificially prolonging the lives of patients to increase Medicare reimbursements and decrease inspections; admitting patients who do not require medically necessary care; performing unnecessary procedures and services; and delaying performance of procedures to increase billing. The Complaint was served on some of the defendants during October 2015.

In November 2015, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on multiple grounds. The defendants first argued that False Claims Act’s first-to-file bar required dismissal of plaintiff-relator’s claims. Under the first-to-file bar, if a qui tam case is pending, no person may bring a related action based on the facts underlying the first action. The defendants asserted that the plaintiff-relator’s claims were based on the same underlying facts as were asserted in the Evansville litigation, discussed above. The defendants also argued that the plaintiff-relator’s claims must be dismissed under the public disclosure bar, and because the plaintiff-relator did not plead his claims with sufficient particularity.

In June 2016, the District Court granted the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and dismissed with prejudice the plaintiff-relator’s lawsuit in its entirety. The District Court ruled that the first-to-file bar precludes all but one of the plaintiff-relator’s claims, and that the remaining claim must also be dismissed because the plaintiff-relator failed to plead it with sufficient particularity. In July 2016, the plaintiff-relator filed a Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Then, on October 11, 2016, the plaintiff-relator filed a Motion to Remand the case to the District Court for further proceedings, arguing that the September 30, 2016 decision in the Evansville litigation, discussed above, undermines the basis for the District Court’s dismissal. After the Court of Appeals denied the Motion to Remand, the plaintiff-relator then sought an indicative ruling from the District Court that it would vacate its prior dismissal ruling and allow plaintiff-relator to supplement his Complaint, which the defendants have opposed. The case has been fully briefed in the Court of Appeals. The Company intends to vigorously defend this action, but at this time the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this matter.

Wilmington Litigation

On January 19, 2017, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware unsealed a qui tam Complaint in United States of America and State of Delaware ex rel. Theresa Kelly v. Select Specialty Hospital—Wilmington, Inc. (“SSH-Wilmington”), Select Specialty Hospitals, Inc., Select Employment Services, Inc., Select Medical Corporation, and Crystal Cheek, No. 16-347-LPS. The Complaint was initially filed under seal on May 12, 2016 by a former chief nursing officer at SSH-Wilmington and was unsealed after the United States filed a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention on January 13, 2017. The corporate defendants were served on March 6, 2017. In the complaint, the plaintiff-relator alleges that the Select defendants and an individual defendant, who is a former health information manager at SSH-Wilmington, violated the False Claims Act and the Delaware False Claims and Reporting Act based on allegedly falsifying medical practitioner signatures on medical records and failing to properly examine the credentials of medical practitioners at SSH-Wilmington. In response to the Select defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint, on May 17, 2017 the plaintiff-relator filed an Amended Complaint asserting the same causes of action. The Select defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, which is now pending, based on numerous grounds, including that the Amended Complaint did not plead any alleged fraud with sufficient particularity, failed to plead that the alleged fraud was material to the government’s payment decision, failed to plead sufficient facts to establish that the Select defendants knowingly submitted false claims or records, and failed to allege any reverse false claim.

52

On March 24, 2017, the plaintiff-relator initiated a second action by filing a Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware in Theresa Kelly v. Select Medical Corporation, Select Employment Services, Inc., and SSH-Wilmington, C.A. No. N17C-03-293 CLS. The Delaware Complaint alleges that the defendants retaliated against her in violation of the Delaware Whistleblowers’ Protection Act for reporting the same alleged violations that are the subject of the federal Amended Complaint. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, or alternatively to stay, the Delaware Complaint based on the pending federal Amended Complaint and the failure to allege facts to support a violation of the Delaware Whistleblowers’ Protection Act.  The motion is currently pending.

The Company intends to vigorously defend these actions, but at this time the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this matter.

Contract Therapy Subpoena

On May 18, 2017, the Company received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey seeking various documents principally relating to the Company’s contract therapy division, which contracted to furnish rehabilitation therapy services to residents of skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) and other providers. The Company operated its contract therapy division through a subsidiary until March 31, 2016, when the Company sold the stock of the subsidiary. The subpoena seeks documents that appear to be aimed at assessing whether therapy services were furnished and billed in compliance with Medicare SNF billing requirements, including whether therapy services were coded at inappropriate levels and whether excessive or unnecessary therapy was furnished to justify coding at higher paying levels. The Company does not know whether the subpoena has been issued in connection with a qui tam lawsuit or in connection with possible civil, criminal or administrative proceedings by the government. The Company is producing documents in response to the subpoena and intends to fully cooperate with this investigation. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this matter.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from our risk factors as previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

Holdings’ board of directors has authorized a common stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $500.0 million worth of shares of its common stock. The program has been extended until December 31, 2018 and will remain in effect until then, unless further extended or earlier terminated by the board of directors. Stock repurchases under this program may be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, and at times and in such amounts as Holdings deems appropriate. Holdings did not repurchase shares during the three months ended June 30, 2017 under the authorized common stock repurchase program.

The following table provides information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2017. The shares repurchased during the three months ended June 30, 2017 relate entirely to shares of common stock surrendered to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted shares issued to employees, pursuant to the provisions of our equity incentive plans.

	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publically Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs
April 1 - April 30, 2017	3,209	$	13.75	—	$	185,249,408
May 1 - May 31, 2017	29,165	13.70		—	185,249,408
June 1 - June 30, 2017	—	—		—	185,249,408
Total	32,374	$	13.70	—	$	185,249,408

53

ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION

In light of the results of the advisory vote on the frequency of Say-On-Pay votes at our annual meeting of stockholders on May 2, 2017, our Board of Directors determined that the Company will continue to hold an advisory Say-on-Pay vote annually. Our Board of Directors will re-evaluate this determination no later than the next stockholder vote on the frequency of Say-on-Pay votes.

ITEM 6.EXHIBITS

The exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index appearing on page 56 hereof.

54

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrants have duly caused this Report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
	By:	/s/	Martin F. Jackson
			Martin F. Jackson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer)
	By:	/s/	Scott A. Romberger
			Scott A. Romberger
		Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
		(Principal Accounting Officer)
Dated: August 3, 2017
	SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
	By:	/s/	Martin F. Jackson
			Martin F. Jackson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer)
	By:	/s/	Scott A. Romberger
			Scott A. Romberger
		Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
		(Principal Accounting Officer)
Dated: August 3, 2017

55

EXHIBIT INDEX

Number	Description
10.1	Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2017, between Old Gettysburg Associates and Select Medical Corporation (Reg. Nos. 001-34465 and 001-31441).
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101	The following financial information from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2017, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2017, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

56