10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

Commission File Number 000-22211

SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New Jersey	21-0398330
(State of incorporation)	(IRS employer identification no.)

1 South Jersey Plaza, Folsom, NJ 08037

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(609) 561-9000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes [X]No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes [ ]No [X]

As of November 8 there were 2,339,139 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding. All common shares are owned by South Jersey Industries, Inc., the parent company of South Jersey Gas Company.

SJG-1

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements — See Pages 3 through 24

SJG-2

SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
		Three Months Ended
		September 30,
		2005			2004
Operating Revenues	$	89,702		$	73,480
Operating Expenses:
Cost of Sales		67,076			50,183
Operations		10,474			12,069
Maintenance		1,456			1,465
Depreciation		5,512			5,282
Energy and Other Taxes		1,580			1,653
Total Operating Expenses		86,098			70,652
Operating Income		3,604			2,828
Other Income and (Expense), Net		11			72
Interest Charges		(4,720	)		(4,499	)
Loss Before Income Taxes		(1,105	)		(1,599	)
Income Tax Benefit		334			519
Net Loss	$	(771	)	$	(1,080	)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.

SJG-3

SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
		Nine Months Ended
		September 30,
		2005			2004
Operating Revenues	$	390,322		$	351,710
Operating Expenses:
Cost of Sales		266,532			234,344
Operations		37,702			39,026
Maintenance		4,460			4,249
Depreciation		16,307			17,748
Energy and Other Taxes		8,425			8,364
Total Operating Expenses		333,426			303,731
Operating Income		56,896			47,979
Other Income and (Expense), Net		(27	)		631
Interest Charges		(13,353	)		(13,167	)
Income Before Income Taxes		43,516			35,443
Income Taxes		(18,368	)		(14,994	)
Net Income	$	25,148		$	20,449
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.

SJG-4

 

SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
		Three Months Ended
		September 30,
		2005			2004
Net Loss	$	(771	)	$	(1,080	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax:*
Change in Fair Value of Investments		100			(54	)
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives		100			-
Amortization of Realized Loss on Treasury Lock
Related to Long-Term Debt Refinance		2			-
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Net of Tax*		202			(54	)
Comprehensive Loss	$	(569	)	$	(1,134	)
		Nine Months Ended
		September 30,
		2005			2004
Net Income	$	25,148		$	20,449
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax:*
Change in Fair Value of Investments		178			(354	)
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives		(618	)		4
Amortization of Realized Loss on Treasury Lock
Related to Long-Term Debt Refinance		2			-
Other Comprehensive Loss - Net of Tax*		(438	)		(350	)
Comprehensive Income	$	24,710		$	20,099
* Determined using a combined statutory tax rate of 40.85%.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.

SJG-5

SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
		Nine Months Ended
		September 30,
		2005			2004
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	25,148		$	20,449
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization		18,577			19,377
Provision for Losses on Accounts Receivable		167			(144	)
Revenues and Fuel Costs Deferred - Net		(8,003	)		8,048
Deferred and Non-Current Income Taxes and Credits - Net		19,555			10,086
Environmental Remediation Costs - Net		(2,117	)		(1,745	)
Gas Plant Cost of Removal		(679	)		(679	)
Changes in:
Accounts Receivable		41,127			49,445
Inventories		(32,894	)		(25,194	)
Prepayments and Other Current Assets		(1,357	)		(652	)
Prepaid and Accrued Taxes - Net		(13,472	)		(20,705	)
Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities		18,940			(5,626	)
Other Assets		5,572			4,390
Other Liabilities		(2,317	)		(1,177	)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		68,247			55,873
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital Expenditures		(51,860	)		(45,385	)
Purchase of Available-for-Sale Securities		-			(105	)
Proceeds from Sale of Segment		-			2,668
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(51,860	)		(42,822	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net Borrowings (Repayments) of Lines of Credit		8,500			(44,300	)
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt		10,000			40,000
Principal Repayments of Long-Term Debt		(22,773	)		(21,773	)
Redemption of Preferred Stock		(1,690	)		-
Dividends on Common Stock		(11,251	)		-
Premium for Early Retirement of Debt		(184	)		-
Payments for Issuance of Long-Term Debt		(289	)		(359	)
Additional Investment by Shareholder		-			15,000
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities		(17,687	)		(11,432	)
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(1,300	)		1,619
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		3,310			3,210
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	2,010		$	4,829
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.

SJG-6

SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
		September 30,			December 31,
		2005			2004
Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Utility Plant, at original cost	$	1,004,515		$	957,287
Accumulated Depreciation		(233,986	)		(224,506	)
Property, Plant and Equipment - Net		770,529			732,781
Investments:
Available-for-Sale Securities		5,517			5,296
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents		2,010			3,310
Accounts Receivable		24,915			39,916
Unbilled Revenues		8,163			34,861
Provision for Uncollectibles		(2,466	)		(2,871	)
Natural Gas in Storage, average cost		99,049			65,691
Materials and Supplies, average cost		4,089			4,553
Prepaid Taxes		19,463			6,104
Derivatives - Energy Related Assets		15,572			1,273
Other Prepayments and Current Assets		3,435			2,078
Total Current Assets		174,230			154,915
Regulatory Assets:
Gross Receipts and Franchise Taxes		591			924
Environmental Remediation Costs:
Expended - Net		7,398			5,281
Liability for Future Expenditures		56,290			51,046
Income Taxes - Flowthrough Depreciation		5,908			6,641
Deferred Postretirement Benefit Costs		2,740			3,024
Societal Benefit Costs		2,107			4,562
Other Regulatory Assets		1,164			1,157
Total Regulatory Assets		76,198			72,635
Other Noncurrent Assets:
Unamortized Debt Discount and Expense		7,969			7,957
Prepaid Pension		22,924			24,812
Accounts Receivable - Merchandise		6,004			7,101
Derivatives - Energy Related Assets		780			-
Other		2,031			2,089
Total Other Noncurrent Assets		39,708			41,959
Total Assets	$	1,066,182		$	1,007,586
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.

SJG-7

SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
		September 30,			December 31,
		2005			2004
Capitalization and Liabilities
Common Equity:
Common Stock, Par Value $2.50 per share:
Authorized - 4,000,000 shares
Outstanding - 2,339,139 shares	$	5,848		$	5,848
Other Paid-In Capital and Premium on Common Stock		170,317			170,317
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss		(550	)		(112	)
Retained Earnings		138,967			130,695
Total Common Equity		314,582			306,748
Preferred Stock:
Redeemable Cumulative Preferred 8% Series - Par Value $100
per share; Authorized 41,966 shares; 0 and 16,904 shares outstanding
at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		-			1,690
Long-Term Debt		272,235			282,008
Total Capitalization		586,817			590,446
Current Liabilities:
Notes Payable		61,500			53,000
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt		2,273			5,273
Accounts Payable		82,761			59,026
Derivatives - Energy Related Liabilities		680			1,800
Derivatives - Other		-			344
Deferred Income Taxes - Net		18,295			2,627
Customer Deposits		8,994			8,846
Environmental Remediation Costs		16,553			13,531
Taxes Accrued		1,115			1,228
Dividends Declared		5,626			-
Interest Accrued and Other Current Liabilities		9,262			12,386
Total Current Liabilities		207,059			158,061
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities:
Deferred Income Taxes - Net		142,350			138,208
Environmental Remediation Costs		39,737			37,515
Regulatory Liabilities		73,433			63,836
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits		9,946			11,039
Investment Tax Credits		2,878			3,129
Derivatives - Energy Related Liabilities		86			-
Other		3,876			5,352
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities		272,306			259,079
Total Capitalization and Liabilities	$	1,066,182		$	1,007,586
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.

SJG-8

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

The Entity - South Jersey Industries, Inc. (SJI) owns all of the outstanding common stock of South Jersey Gas Company (SJG). In our opinion, the condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments needed to fairly present SJG’s financial position and operating results at the dates and for the periods presented. Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations and, accordingly, this interim financial information should not be the basis for estimating the full year’s operating results. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with SJG’s 2004 Forms 10-K and 10-K/A.

Equity Investments - We classify equity investments purchased as long-term investments as Available-for-Sale Securities on our condensed balance sheets and carry them at their fair value with any unrealized gains or losses included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.

Estimates and Assumptions - We prepare our condensed financial statements to conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed financial statements and related disclosures. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include amounts related to regulatory accounting, energy derivatives, environmental remediation costs, pension and other postretirement benefit costs, and revenue recognition.

Regulation - SJG is subject to the rules and regulations of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU). We maintain our accounts according to the BPU’s prescribed Uniform System of Accounts. SJG follows the accounting for regulated enterprises prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” In general, Statement No. 71 allows deferral of certain costs and creation of certain obligations when it is probable that these items will be recovered from or refunded to customers in future periods.

Operating Revenues - We bill customers monthly for gas deliveries. For retail customers not billed at the end of each month, we record an estimate to recognize unbilled revenues from the date of the last meter reading to the end of the month. We deferred and recognized revenues related to our appliance service contracts seasonally over the full 12-month term of the contract prior to transferring that business to South Jersey Energy Service Plus (SJESP). SJESP is an affiliate by common ownership.

The BPU allows us to recover all prudently incurred gas costs through the Basic Gas Supply Service (BGSS) clause. We collect these costs on a forecasted basis upon BPU order. SJG defers over/under-recoveries of gas costs and includes them in the following year's BGSS or other similar recovery mechanism. We pay interest on overcollected BGSS balances at the rate of return on rate base utilized by the BPU to set rates in its last base rate proceeding.

SJG-9

Our tariff also includes a Temperature Adjustment Clause (TAC), a Remediation Adjustment Clause (RAC), a New Jersey Clean Energy Program (NJCEP) and a Universal Service Fund (USF) program. Our TAC reduces the impact of temperature fluctuations on the Company and our customers. The RAC recovers environmental remediation costs of former gas manufacturing plants and the NJCEP recovers costs associated with our energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. The USF is a statewide customer assistance program that utilizes utilities as a collection agent. TAC adjustments affect revenue, income and cash flows since colder-than-normal weather can generate credits to customers, while warmer-than-normal weather can result in additional billings. RAC adjustments do not directly affect earnings because we defer and recover these costs through rates over 7-year amortization periods. NJCEP and USF adjustments are also deferred and do not affect earnings, as related costs and customer credits are recovered through rates on an ongoing basis.

Accounts Receivable and Provision for Uncollectible Accounts - Accounts receivable are carried at the amount owed by customers. A provision for uncollectible accounts has been established based on our collection experience and an assessment of the collectibility of specific accounts.

Property, Plant & Equipment - For regulatory purposes, utility plant is stated at original cost, which may be different than SJG’s cost if the assets were acquired from another regulated entity. The cost of adding, replacing and renewing property is charged to the appropriate plant account.

Depreciation - We depreciate utility plant on a straight-line basis over the estimated remaining lives of the various property classes. These estimates are periodically reviewed and adjusted as required after BPU approval. As a result of our recent rate case settlement, our composite depreciation rate was reduced from 2.9% to 2.4%, effective July 8, 2004. Except for extraordinary retirements, accumulated depreciation is charged with the cost of depreciable utility property retired, less salvage.

Capitalized Interest - SJG capitalizes interest on construction at the rate of return on rate base utilized by the BPU to set rates in the last base rate proceeding. Capitalized interest is included in Utility Plant on the condensed balance sheets and is reflected on the condensed statements of income as a reduction of Interest Charges. For the periods ended September 30, SJG capitalized interest as follows (in thousands):

	September 30, 2005		September 30, 2004
Quarter ended	$	258	$	200
Nine months ended		800		531

SJG-10

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - We review the carrying amount of an asset for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such amount may not be recoverable. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004, we did not identify any significant impairments.

Derivative Instruments - SJG accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended. We record all derivatives, whether designated as hedging relationships or not, on the condensed balance sheets at fair value unless the derivative contracts qualify for the normal purchase and sale exemption. If the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, we recognize the changes in the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk in earnings. We currently have no fair value hedges. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, we record the effective portion of the hedge in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and recognize it in the condensed income statement when the hedged item affects earnings. We recognize ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges immediately in earnings.

As part of its gas purchasing strategy, SJG occasionally uses financial contracts to hedge against forward price risk. The costs or benefits of these short-term contracts are recoverable through our BGSS, subject to BPU approval. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, SJG had $(15.6) million and $0.5 million of (benefits) costs, respectively, included in its BGSS related to open financial contracts (See caption Regulatory Assets & Regulatory Liabilities).

The vast majority of our contracts relate to physical transactions that qualify for the normal purchase and sale exception. Therefore, we are not required to mark these contracts to market.

From time to time we enter into interest rate derivative agreements to hedge exposure to increasing rates with respect to our variable rate debt. We account for these interest rate derivatives as cash flow hedges. In November 2004, we entered into a derivative transaction known as a “Treasury Lock” to hedge against the impact of possible interest rate increases on a $10.0 million, 30-year debt issuance originally planned for July 2005 (See Note 4 - Long-Term Debt). SJG terminated that Treasury Lock on its July 15, 2005 expiration date at a cost of $1.2 million. Subsequently, we entered into a second Treasury Lock in August 2005, related to the same debt, that we terminated on its expiration date of September 13, 2005 at a cost of $0.2 million. Because the replacement debt was issued on September 13, 2005, within two months of the original Treasury Lock expiration date, the cost of both Treasury Locks has been included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and is being amortized over the thirty year life of the new debt issue. As of September 30, 2005, the after-tax unamortized cost of these treasury locks included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss was $0.8 million. At December 31, 2004, the market value of the original Treasury Lock contract included in the condensed balance sheets under Derivatives - Other was $344,000, the after-tax amount included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss was $203,400. We calculated the Treasury Locks to be highly effective as defined under Statement No. 133.

SJG-11

We determine the fair value of interest rate derivative agreements using quotations from independent parties.

Asset Retirement Costs -We have certain easements and right-of-way agreements that qualify as legal obligations under FASB Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” However, as it is our intent to maintain these agreements in perpetuity, we have not recorded any liabilities associated with these agreements. SJG recovers certain asset retirement costs through rates charged to customers. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had accrued amounts in excess of actual removal costs incurred totaling $47.9 and $47.3 million, respectively, which are recorded as Regulatory Liabilities on the condensed balance sheets in accordance with Statement No. 143.

New Accounting Pronouncements -In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This statement is not effective until reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2006. Since officers of SJG participate in the Stock Option, Stock Appreciation Rights and Restricted Stock Award Plan of SJI, changes in accounting for share-based awards at SJI would also impact SJG. Management is currently evaluating the effect of this Statement, but does not anticipate the adoption of this Statement to have a material effect on our financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” This interpretation clarifies the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in FASB Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” and is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Management is currently evaluating the effect of this standard, but does not anticipate the adoption of this interpretation to have a material effect on our financial statements.

Regulatory Assets & Regulatory Liabilities - All significant regulatory assets are separately identified on the condensed balance sheets under the caption Regulatory Assets. Each item that is separately identified is being recovered through utility rate charges. SJG is currently permitted to recover interest on its Environmental Remediation and Societal Benefit costs while the other assets are being recovered without a return on investments over the following periods:

SJG-12

	Years Remaining As of September 30, 2005
Regulatory Asset
Gross Receipts and Franchise Taxes	1
Environmental Remediation Costs:
Expended - Net	Various
Liability for Future Expenditures	Not Applicable
Income Taxes - Flowthrough Depreciation	6
Deferred Postretirement Benefit Costs	7
Societal Benefit Costs	Various

Some of the assets reflected under the caption Other Regulatory Assets are currently being recovered from ratepayers as approved by the BPU. Management believes that the remaining deferred costs are probable of recovery from ratepayers through future utility rates, based on experience with previous BPU orders.

Regulatory Liabilities at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consisted of the following items (in thousands):

	September 30,       2005		December 31,      2004
Deferred Gas Revenues - Net	$	20,447	$	12,334
Excess Plant Removal Costs		47,886		47,345
Overcollected State Taxes		3,987		3,871
Other		1,113		286
Total Regulatory Liabilities	$	73,433	$	63,836

Deferred Gas Revenues - Net represent SJG’s net overcollected gas costs and are monitored through SJG’s BGSS mechanism. Derivative contracts used to hedge our natural gas purchases are recoverable through the BGSS, subject to BPU approval. The offset to the change in fair value of these contracts is recorded as a Regulatory Asset or Regulatory Liability, accordingly. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, amounts related to these contracts represent $15.6 million and $(0.5) million, respectively, of the Deferred Gas Revenues - Net disclosed in the table above.

Excess Plant Removal Costs represent amounts accrued in excess of actual utility plant removal costs incurred to date. All other regulatory liability amounts are subject to being returned to ratepayers in future rate proceedings.

SJG-13

Cash and Cash Equivalents - For purposes of reporting cash flows, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.

Reclassifications - SJG reclassified some previously reported amounts to conform with current year classifications. Such reclassifications include the move of $1.2 million and $5.4 million of certain operating expenses previously included in Revenue to Cost of Sales and Operations Expense, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.

During the period ended September 30, 2005, the Company determined that acquisitions of property and equipment on account, which were previously reported as offsetting components of changes in operating liabilities and capital expenditures should not have been reported in the statements of cash flows. The condensed statement of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 has been revised to reflect a decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities with a corresponding decrease in cash flows used in investing activities of approximately $2.7 million.

    The amounts noted above are considered immaterial to the overall presentation of SJG’s condensed financial statements.

Note 2.Regulatory Actions:

Base Rates - In January 1997, the BPU granted SJG rate relief, which was predicated in part upon a 9.62% rate of return on rate base that included an 11.25% return on common equity. This rate relief provided for cost-of-service recovery, including deferred costs, through base rates. Additionally, our threshold for sharing pre-tax margins generated by interruptible and off-system sales and transportation increased. As a result of this case, SJG kept 100% of pre-tax margins up to the threshold level of $7.8 million. The next $750,000 was credited to customers through the Basic Gas Supply Service (BGSS) clause. Thereafter, SJG kept 20% of the pre-tax margins as it had historically.

On July 7, 2004, the BPU granted SJG a base rate increase of $20.0 million, which was predicated in part upon a 7.97% rate of return on rate base that included a 10.0% return on common equity. The increase was effective July 8, 2004 and designed to provide an incremental $8.5 million on an annualized basis to net income. SJG was also permitted recovery of regulatory assets contained in its petition and a reduction in its composite depreciation rate from 2.9% to 2.4%.

Included in the base rate increase was a change to the sharing of pre-tax margins on interruptible and off-system sales and transportation. SJG now recovers through its base rates $7.8 million that it had previously recovered through the sharing of pre-tax margins. As a result, the sharing of pre-tax margins now begins from dollar one, with SJG retaining 20%. Moreover, SJG now shares pre-tax margins from on-system capacity release sales, in addition to the interruptible and off-system sales and interruptible transportation. Effective July 1, 2006, the 20% retained by SJG will decrease to 15% of such margins.

SJG-14

As part of the overall settlement effective July 8, 2004, SJG reduced rates in several rate clauses that were no longer needed by SJG to recover costs. SJG was either no longer incurring or had already recovered the specific costs that these clauses were designed to recover. Since revenues raised under these clauses were for cost recovery only and had no profit margin built in, their elimination has no impact on SJG’s net income. However, SJG’s customers’ bills declined by an estimated $38.9 million annually due to the elimination of these clauses, more than offsetting the base rate increase awarded.

Pending Audits - The BPU issued an order under which it is performing a competitive services audit and a management audit that includes a focused review of SJG’s gas supply and purchasing practices. The audits, which commenced in October 2004, are mandated by statute to be conducted at predetermined intervals. Management does not currently anticipate the outcome of these audits, for which the fieldwork has been completed, to have a material effect on SJG’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Appliance Service Business - On July 23, 2004, the BPU approved SJG’s petition and related agreements to transfer its appliance service business from the regulated utility. In anticipation of this transfer, SJI had formed South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC (SJESP) to perform appliance repair services after BPU approval of the transfer. SJESP purchased certain assets and assumed certain liabilities required to perform such repair services from SJG for the net book value of $1.2 million on September 1, 2004. The agreements also called for SJESP to pay an additional $1.5 million to SJG. This $1.5 million was credited by SJG to customers through the Remediation Adjustment Clause (RAC) and had no earnings impact on SJG. The transfer has no effect on the provision of safety-related or emergency-related services to the public since the transferred services include only non-safety related, competitive appliance services.

Other Regulatory Matters - Effective January 10, 2000, the BPU approved full unbundling of SJG’s system. This allows all natural gas consumers to select their natural gas commodity supplier. As of September 30, 2005, 12,372 of SJG’s residential customers were purchasing their gas commodity from someone other than SJG. Customers choosing to purchase natural gas from providers other than the utility are charged for the cost of gas by the marketer, not the utility. The resulting decrease in SJG’s revenues is offset by a corresponding decrease in gas costs. While customer choice can reduce utility revenues, it does not negatively affect SJG’s net income or financial condition. Unbundling did not change the fact that SJG still recovers cost of service, including deferred costs, through base rates.

SJG-15

In March 2003, the BPU approved a statewide Universal Service Fund (USF) program through which funds for the USF and Lifeline Credit and Tenants Assistance (Lifeline) Programs would be collected from customers of all New Jersey electric and gas utilities. In June 2004, the BPU approved the statewide budget of $113.0 million for all the state’s electric and gas utilities and the increased rates were implemented effective July 1, 2004, resulting in a $3.9 million increase to SJG’s annual USF recoveries. In April 2005, SJG made its annual USF filing, along with the state’s other electric and gas utilities, proposing no rate change to the statewide program. This rate proposal was approved by the BPU in June 2005.

In February 2004, SJG filed notice with the BPU to reduce its gas cost revenues collected under the BGSS by approximately $5.0 million, via a rate reduction, in addition to providing for a $20.8 million bill credit to customers. Both the rate reduction and bill credit were approved and implemented in March 2004.

In June 2004, SJG made its annual BGSS filing with the BPU requesting a $4.9 million increase in gas cost recoveries. In October 2004, the requested increase was approved on a provisional basis.

In February 2005, SJG filed notice with the BPU to provide for an $11.4 million bill credit to customers. The bill credit was implemented in March 2005. In June 2005, SJG made its annual BGSS filing with the BPU requesting a $17.1 million, or 6.3%, increase in gas cost recoveries in response to increasing wholesale gas costs. In August 2005, the BPU approved SJG’s requested increase, effective September 1, 2005.

In September 2004, SJG filed for a $2.6 million reduction to its annual Societal Benefits Clause (SBC) recovery level. The SBC recovers costs related to BPU-mandated programs, including environmental remediation costs that are recovered through SJG’s RAC; energy efficiency and renewable energy program costs that are recovered through SJG’s New Jersey Clean Energy Programs; consumer education program costs; and low income program costs that are recovered through the Universal Service Fund.

In December 2004, the BPU approved the statewide funding of the New Jersey Clean Energy Programs of $745.0 million for the years 2005 through 2008. Of this amount, SJG will be responsible for approximately $25.4 million over the four-year period. Amounts not yet expended have been included in SJG’s Contractual Obligations table included in Note 8.

Filings and petitions described above are still pending unless otherwise indicated.

Note 3.Related Party Transactions:

SJG conducts business with its parent, SJI, and several of SJI’s other wholly owned subsidiaries. A description of each of these affiliates is as follows:

· South Jersey Energy Company (SJE) - a third party energy marketer supplying natural gas to customers within our territory.

· South Jersey Resources Group (SJRG) - a wholesale gas and risk management business that supplies natural gas to retail marketers, utility businesses and electricity generators in the mid-Atlantic and southern regions.

SJG-16

· Marina Energy LLC (Marina) - an owner and operator of production facilities for the commercial and industrial markets.

· South Jersey Energy Service Plus (SJESP) - an appliance service and installation company.

SJG sells natural gas for resale to both SJE and SJRG. These sales comply with Section 284.02 of the Regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Additionally, we meet some of our gas purchasing requirements by purchasing natural gas for resale from SJRG. For SJE and SJESP, we also provide billing services. For SJE’s residential customers for which we perform billing services, we purchase the related accounts receivable at book value plus a factor for potential uncollectible accounts and assume all risk associated with the collection of such amounts. Finally, we provide natural gas transportation services to Marina under BPU-approved utility tariffs.

In addition to the above, SJG provides various administrative and professional services for SJI, SJE, SJRG, SJESP and Marina. These services include administrative support, information system and data management support, and office space rental. Likewise, SJI provides substantial administrative services on our behalf including such items as public and governmental relations, cash management and consulting services.

A summary of these related party transactions were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
Sales and Services Provided to:		2005		2004		2005		2004
SJI	$	298	$	201	$	1,038	$	621
SJE		184		2,203		581		7,167
SJRG		628		13		4,250		4,197
Marina		53		55		205		162
SJESP		198		92		582		92
Sales and Services Received from:
SJRG	$	80	$	8,507	$	2,807	$	18,647
SJI		1,020		1,014		4,449		3,997

SJG-17

Amounts due to related parties included in Accounts Payable and amounts due from related parties included in Accounts Receivable on the condensed financial statements are as follows:
		As of September 30,		As of December 31,
Amounts due to:		2005		2004
SJI	$	348	$	741
SJE		2,993		622
SJESP		1,169		1,808
Amounts due from:
SJI	$	88	$	49
SJE		53		79
SJRG		1,599		6
Marina		12		24
SJESP		58		83

For certain types of transactions, SJG and SJI serve as central processing agents for the related parties discussed above. Amounts due to and due from these related parties for pass-through items are not considered material to the financial statements as a whole and are not included in the amounts disclosed above.

Lastly SJG purchases meter reading services from Millennium Account Services, LLC (Millennium), a partnership between SJI and Conectiv Solutions, LLC. Millennium reads our utility customers’ meters on a monthly basis for a fee. Fees incurred by SJG, related to such services and amounts due included in Accounts Payable on the condensed financial statements were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Meter Reading Service Fees	$	659	$	653	$	1,955	$	1,941
		As of September 30,		As of December 31,
		2005		2004
Amounts due to Millennium	$	221	$	440

SJG-18

Note 4.Long-Term Debt:

On July 15, 2005 we redeemed a $10 million 7.9% medium term note at par with the intention of replacing the note within sixty days. On July 22, 2005, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to establish a $150 million Medium Term Note (MTN) program. The registration statement became effective on September 8, 2005 and on September 13, 2005 we subsequently issued a $10 million 5.45% medium term note with a maturity of thirty years to replace the one that had been redeemed in July 2005.

In anticipation of this debt replacement, we had previously entered into a derivative transaction known as a “Treasury Lock” in November, 2004, to hedge against an increase in long-term interest rates. When the 7.9% medium term note was redeemed, we terminated the Treasury Lock on its expiration date by paying $1.2 million to the counterparty. We subsequently entered into a second Treasury Lock in August, 2005, related to the same debt, which was terminated on its expiration date of September 13, 2005 by paying $0.2 million to the counterparty. (See Note 1 - Derivative Instruments.)

Note 5.Unused Lines of Credit and Compensating Balances:

Bank credit available to SJG totaled $176.0 million at September 30, 2005, of which $61.5 million was used. Those bank facilities consist of a $100.0 million, 3-year revolving credit facility that expires in August 2006 and $76.0 million of uncommitted bank lines. The revolving credit was established in August 2003 with a syndicate of banks to enhance the liquidity position of SJG. The revolving credit facility contains certain financial covenants measured on a quarterly basis. SJG was in compliance with these covenants as of September 30, 2005.

Note 6.Retained Earnings:

SJG is restricted as to the amount of cash dividends or other distributions that may be paid on its common stock by an order issued by the BPU in July 2004 that granted SJG an increase in base rates. Per the order, SJG is required to maintain total common equity of no less than $289.0 million. SJG’s total common equity balance was $314.6 million at September 30, 2005.

Restrictions exist under various loan agreements regarding the amount of cash dividends or other distributions that we may pay on our common stock. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, these restrictions did not affect the amount that may be distributed from SJG’s retained earnings.

We received an equity infusion of $15.0 million from SJI during 2004. Contributions of capital are credited to Other Paid-In Capital and Premium on Common Stock. Future equity contributions will occur on an as needed basis.

SJG-19

Note 7.Pensions & Other Postretirement Benefit Plans:

We participate in the defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans of SJI. The pension plans provide annuity payments to the majority of full-time, regular employees upon retirement. Newly hired employees do not qualify for participation in the defined benefit pension plans. New hires are eligible to receive an enhanced version of the Company’s defined contribution plan (401-K). The other postretirement benefit plans provide health care and life insurance benefits to some retirees.

Net periodic benefit cost for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components (in thousands):

	Pension Benefits
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
		2005			2004			2005			2004
Service Cost	$	689		$	672		$	2,066		$	2,016
Interest Cost		1,332			1,274			3,996			3,822
Expected Return on Plan Assets		(1,869	)		(1,580	)		(5,608	)		(4,740	)
Amortization of Loss and Other		475			388			1,427			1,164
Net Periodic Benefit Cost		627			754			1,881			2,262
Capitalized Benefit Costs		(219	)		(226	)		(658	)		(678	)
Net Periodic Benefit Expense	$	408		$	528		$	1,223		$	1,584
	Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
		2005			2004			2005			2004
Service Cost	$	183		$	341		$	549		$	1,023
Interest Cost		491			603			1,473			1,809
Expected Return on Plan Assets		(371	)		(351	)		(1,112	)		(1,053	)
Amortization of Transition Obligation		-			189			-			567
Amortization of Loss and Other		52			37			156			111
Net Periodic Benefit Cost		355			819			1,066			2,457
Capitalized Benefit Costs		(124	)		(246	)		(373	)		(737	)
Net Periodic Benefit Expense	$	231		$	573		$	693		$	1,720

Capitalized benefit costs reflected in the table above relate to SJG’s construction program.

SJG-20

The decrease in pensions costs is primarily related to the expected returns on the $10.8 million pension contribution made in December 2004.

As of November 2004, we implemented caps on the amount of the premium we pay for all employees eligible for postretirement health care. Employees are responsible for those costs which exceed the premium caps. As a result of these caps, we were able to reduce our postretirement benefit costs other than pension.

In addition, both pension and other postretirement benefit costs were reduced as a result of an early retirement plan offered in 2004.

Future Benefit Payments - The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid during the following years (in thousands):

			Other
	Pension Benefits		Postretirement Benefits
2005	$	3,823	$	1,461
2006		3,987		1,651
2007		4,189		1,854
2008		4,420		2,036
2009		4,694		2,207
2010-2014		29,188		12,606

Contributions - We currently expect our 2005 pension contribution to range from $0.2 to $2.3 million depending on changes in investment performance and the discount rate for the year. SJG also has a regulatory obligation to contribute $3.6 million annually to its other postretirement benefit plans, less costs incurred directly by the company.

Note 8.Commitments and Contingencies:

Contractual Cash Obligations - The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations and their applicable payment due dates as of September 30, 2005 (in thousands):

				Up to		2 - 3		4 - 5		More than
Contractual Obligations		Total		1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years
Long-Term Debt	$	274,508	$	2,273	$	2,270	$	10,000	$	259,965
Interest on Long-Term Debt		228,917		15,605		32,476		32,287		148,549
Operating Leases		531		86		365		64		16
Construction Obligations		11,498		11,436		62		-		-
Commodity Supply Purchase Obligations		251,628		1,450		19,626		112,014		118,538

SJG-21

New Jersey Clean Energy
Program (Note 2)		21,394		4,994		14,400		2,000		-
Other Purchase Obligations		4,831		1,779		1,927		1,125		-
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	793,307	$	37,623	$	71,126	$	157,490	$	527,068

Expected environmental remediation costs are not included in the table above due to the subjective nature of such costs and timing of anticipated payments. SJG’s regulatory obligation to contribute $3.6 million annually to its postretirement benefit plans other than pensions, less costs incurred directly by the company, is not included as the duration is indefinite. As a result, the total obligation cannot be calculated. As discussed in Note 7, we currently expect our 2005 pension contribution to range from $0.2 to $2.3 million depending on changes in investment performance and the discount rate for the year. Furthermore, future pension contributions beyond 2005 cannot be determined at this time.

Gas Supply Contracts - SJG, in the normal course of conducting business, has entered into long-term contracts for natural gas supplies, firm transportation and gas storage service. The earliest that any of these contracts expires is March 2006. The transportation and storage service agreements between us and our interstate pipeline suppliers were made under Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved tariffs. Our cumulative obligation for demand charges and reservation fees paid to suppliers for these services is approximately $4.4 million per month, recovered on a current basis through the BGSS.

Pending Litigation - We are subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of business and other legal proceedings. We accrue liabilities related to these claims when we can determine the amount or range of amounts of likely settlement costs for those claims. Management does not currently anticipate the disposition of any known claims to have a material adverse effect on SJG’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Environmental Remediation Costs - We incurred and recorded costs for environmental cleanup of 12 sites where the Company or its predecessors operated manufactured gas plants (MGP). We stopped manufacturing gas in the 1950s.

We successfully entered into settlements with all of our historic comprehensive general liability carriers regarding the environmental remediation expenditures at our sites. Also, we have purchased a Cleanup Cost Cap Insurance Policy limiting the amount of remediation expenditures that we will be required to make at 11 of our sites. This Policy will be in force until 2024 at 10 sites and until 2029 at one site. The future cost estimates discussed hereafter are not reduced by projected insurance recoveries from the Cleanup Cost Cap Insurance Policy. The policy is limited to an aggregate payment amount of $50.0 million, of which we have recovered $7.5 million as of September 30, 2005.

SJG-22

Since the early 1980s, we accrued environmental remediation costs of $151.8 million, of which $95.5 million has been spent as of September 30, 2005. With the assistance of a consulting firm, we estimate that undiscounted future costs to clean up our sites will range from $56.3 million to $205.9 million. Four of our sites comprise a significant portion of these estimates, ranging from $33.1 million at the low end and $124.7 million at the high end. We recorded the lower end of the range, $56.3 million, as a liability because a single reliable estimation point is not feasible due to the amount of uncertainty involved in the nature of projected remediation efforts and the long period over which remediation efforts will continue. Recorded amounts include estimated costs based on projected investigation and remediation work plans using existing technologies. Actual costs could differ from the estimates due to the long-term nature of the projects, changing technology, government regulations and site-specific requirements. Significant risks surrounding these estimates include unforeseen market price increases for remedial services, property owner acceptance of remedy selection, regulatory approval of selected remedy and remedial investigative findings.

The following table details the amounts expended and accrued for environmental remediation:

	Three Months Ended			Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2005			September 30, 2005
Beginning Balance	$	52,700		$	51,046
Accruals		5,160			8,994
Expenditures		(1,570	)		(3,750	)
Ending Balance	$	56,290		$	56,290

The balances are segregated between current and non-current on the September 30, 2005 condensed balance sheets under the captions Current Liabilities and Deferred Credits and Other Non-Current Liabilities.

The remediation efforts at our four most significant sites include the following:

Site 1 - The remedial selection process is underway for this site. Once complete, a remedial action work plan will be submitted to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) for approval. Remaining steps to remediate include remedy selection, regulatory approval and remedy implementation for impacted soil, groundwater, and river sediments as well as acceptance of the selected remedy by affected property owners.

Site 2 - Various remedial investigation and action activities, such as completed and approved interim remedial measures and conceptual remedy selection, are ongoing at this site. Remaining steps to remediate include remedy selection, regulatory approval, and implementation for the remaining impacted soil, groundwater, and stream sediments.

SJG-23

Site 3 - Remedial investigative activities are ongoing at this site. Remaining steps to remediate include completing the remedial investigation of impacted soil and groundwater in preparation for selecting the appropriate action and implementation gaining regulatory and property owner approval of the selected remedy.

Site 4 - The NJDEP has approved the selected remedy to address impacted soil and groundwater at this site. Remaining steps to remediate include bidding, implementation, and ongoing operation and maintenance of the selected remedy.

We have two regulatory assets associated with environmental costs. The first asset, Environmental Remediation Cost: Expended - Net, represents what was actually spent to clean up former gas manufacturing plant sites. These costs meet the requirements of FASB Statement No. 71. The BPU allows us to recover expenditures through the RAC.

The other asset, Environmental Remediation Cost: Liability for Future Expenditures, relates to estimated future expenditures determined under the guidance of FASB Statement No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies." We recorded this amount, which relates to former manufactured gas plant sites, as a regulatory asset under Statement No. 71 with the corresponding amount reflected on the condensed balance sheets under the captions Current Liabilities and Deferred Credits and Other Non-Current Liabilities. The BPU's intent, evidenced by current practice, is to allow us to recover the deferred costs after they are spent over 7-year periods.

As of September 30, 2005, we reflected the unamortized remediation costs of $7.4 million on the condensed balance sheet under the caption Regulatory Assets. Since implementing the RAC in 1992, we have recovered $45.2 million through rates.

Note 9.Subsequent Events:

On October 21, 2005, SJG entered into two forward-starting interest rate swaps which effectively fixed the interest rate at 3.43% for 30 years on $25 million of tax-exempt debt which is expected to be issued in early 2006. The debt will be used to provide long-term financing for capital improvements made to SJG’s gas transmission and distribution system serving Atlantic and Cape May Counties in southern New Jersey.

SJG-24

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial

Condition and Results of Operations (Unaudited)

Overview

South Jersey Gas Company (SJG) is a regulated natural gas utility. SJG distributed natural gas in the seven southernmost counties of New Jersey to 317,273 customers at September 30, 2005, compared with 308,205 customers at September 30, 2004. SJG also:

· sells natural gas and pipeline transportation capacity (off-system sales) on a wholesale basis to various customers on the interstate pipeline system;

· transports natural gas purchased directly from producers or suppliers for its own sales and for some of its customers; and

· serviced appliances via the sale of appliance service programs, as well as on a time and materials basis through September 1, 2004, at which time the business line was transferred out of SJG and into an affiliate by common ownership, South Jersey Energy Service Plus, LLC.

Forward-Looking Statement and Risk Factors

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may qualify as “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Report should be considered forward-looking statements made in good faith by the Company and are intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Report, or any other of the Company’s documents or oral presentations, words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “goal”, “intend”, “objective”, “plan”, “project”, “seek”, “strategy” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following: general economic conditions on an international, national, state and local level; weather conditions in our marketing areas; changes in commodity costs; changes in the availability of natural gas; regulatory, legislative and court decisions; competition; the availability and cost of capital; costs and effects of legal proceedings and environmental liabilities; the failure of customers or suppliers to fulfill their contractual obligations; and changes in business strategies.

A discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties may be found in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. These cautionary statements should not be construed by you to be exhaustive and they are made only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or, in any document incorporated by reference, the date of such document. While the Company believes these forward-looking statements to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that they will approximate actual experience or that the expectations derived from them will be realized. Further, the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

SJG-25

Critical Accounting Policies

 Estimates and Assumptions - As described in the notes to our condensed financial statements, management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. SJG’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 describes five critical accounting policies within Management’s Discussion and Analysis that require a significant amount of judgment and estimation. These relate to regulatory accounting, energy derivatives, environmental remediation costs, pension and other postretirement employee benefit costs, and revenue recognition.

New Accounting Pronouncements - See detailed discussions concerning New Accounting Pronouncements and their impact on SJG in Note 1 to the condensed financial statements.

Temperature Adjustment Clause - A BPU-approved Temperature Adjustment Clause (TAC) decreased SJG’s net income by $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and increased SJG’s net income by $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The clause is designed to mitigate the effect of variations in heating season temperatures from historical norms. While we record the revenue and income impacts of TAC adjustments as incurred, cash inflows or outflows directly attributable to TAC adjustments generally do not begin until the next clause year. Each TAC year begins October 1 and ends May 31 of the subsequent year.

Recent Regulatory Actions -See detailed discussions concerning Recent Regulatory Actions in Note 2 to the condensed financial statements.

Environmental Remediation -We incurred and recorded costs for environmental clean up of 12 sites where SJG or its predecessors operated manufactured gas plants (MGP). SJG stopped manufacturing gas in the 1950s. We successfully entered into settlements with all of SJG’s historic comprehensive general liability carriers regarding environmental remediation expenditures at former MGP sites. As part of these settlements, SJG purchased an insurance policy that caps its remediation expenditures at 11 of these sites. The insurance policy is in force until 2024 at 10 sites and until 2029 at one site. The policy is limited to an aggregate payment amount of $50.0 million, of which we have recovered $7.5 million as of September 30, 2005.

We believe that all costs incurred net of insurance recoveries relating to the MGP sites will be recovered through rates under SJG’s Remediation Adjustment Clause (RAC). The RAC currently permits us to recover incurred costs in equal installments over 7-year periods with carrying costs. As of September 30, 2005, we have $7.4 million of remediation costs not yet recovered through rates.

Other matters are discussed in Note 8 to the condensed financial statements included as part of this report.

SJG-26

Customer Choice - All residential natural gas customers in New Jersey can choose their gas supplier under the terms of the Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act of 1999. Customers purchasing natural gas from providers other than SJG are charged for gas costs by the marketer, not SJG. While customer choice can affect utility revenues and gas costs, it does not affect SJG’s net income or financial condition. For a period of several years, marketers had successfully attracted gas commodity customers by offering natural gas at prices competitive with those available under regulated utility tariffs. More recently, marketers have found it increasingly difficult to compete with the utility under changing market conditions, see caption Operating Revenues. As these difficult market conditions continue, SJG’s affiliate, South Jersey Energy Company, responded by returning approximately 69,000 residential gas customers to the utility during the third quarter. As of September 30, 2005, only 12,372 residential transportation customers remained, all of which were using marketers other than South Jersey Energy Company.

Results of Operations

Operating Revenues - Revenues increased $16.2 million and $38.6 million for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005, respectively, compared with the same periods last year primarily due to four factors. First, SJG added nearly 9,100 customers during the 12-month period ended September 30, 2005, which represents a 2.9% increase in total customers. Second, 88% of the residential customers and 65% of the commercial customers purchasing their gas from a source other than SJG migrated back to utility sales service. The total number of transportation customers decreased from 108,453 at September 30, 2004, to 14,263 at September 30, 2005 as third party marketers are finding it difficult to compete with the utility’s BGSS rates under current market conditions. The majority of this migration occurred during the third quarter of 2005 as the number of transportation customers totaled 84,768 at June 30, 2005. The migration of customers from transportation service back to sales service has a direct impact on utility revenues as charges for gas costs are included in sales revenues and not in transportation revenues. However, since gas costs are passed on directly to customers without any profit margin added by SJG, the change in customer utilization of gas marketers did not impact SJG’s profitability.

Third, SJG experienced an increase in revenues from Off-System Sales (OSS) as a direct result of the higher per unit cost of natural gas. This was coupled with an increase in capacity release activity in 2005. Capacity release allows SJG to sell any unused capacity, but the revenues from such activities are much lower than those from OSS since no commodity is included in the sale.

Finally, sales to an electric generation customer increased substantially as it experienced a high demand for electric during an unusually hot summer season in 2005.

SJG-27

Partially offsetting the positive factors noted above, were lower customer utilization rates experienced during 2005 compared with the same periods in 2004, the transfer of the appliance service business from the utility, and the impact of the July 2004 rate case settlement on year-to-date revenues (refer to the table that follows). SJG’s revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were reduced by the impact of the July 2004 settlement of several matters before the BPU. This settlement increased SJG’s base rates but, at the same time, reduced rates in several clauses that were no longer needed to recover costs. SJG was either no longer incurring or had already recovered the specific costs that these clauses were designed to recover. Since revenues raised under these clauses were for cost recovery only and had no profit margin built in, their elimination has no impact on SJG’s net income.

The base rate increase discussed above and in greater detail in Note 2 to the condensed financial statements, had the impact of increasing utility margins (revenues less gas costs and associated energy taxes) by approximately $6.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared with the same periods last year.

Total gas throughput increased 43.1% to 37.8 billion cubic feet (Bcf) for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. For the nine months ended, gas throughput increased 23.5% to 119.7 Bcf. The higher throughput was primarily due to a significant increase in capacity release activity during 2005. While revenues from such activities are not as high as when we sell the commodity, contributions to margins are still comparable.

The following is a comparison of operating revenue and throughput for the three and nine months ended September 30:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
		2005		2004		2005		2004
Operating Revenues (thousands):
Firm
Residential	$	22,307	$	23,052	$	148,724	$	122,160
Commercial		10,325		7,331		55,440		36,311
Industrial		1,279		787		3,383		3,819
Cogeneration & Electric Generation		10,901		5,503		16,040		7,926
Firm Transportation		8,258		10,921		45,335		57,331
Total Firm Operating Revenues		53,070		47,594		268,922		227,547
Interruptible		340		421		1,179		1,178
Interruptible Transportation		361		369		1,476		933
Off-System		32,909		20,934		108,148		107,310
Capacity Release & Storage		2,608		2,184		9,214		6,848
Appliance Service		-		1,451		-		6,360
Other		414		527		1,383		1,534
Total Operating Revenues	$	89,702	$	73,480	$	390,322	$	351,710

SJG-28

Throughput (MMcf):
Firm
Residential	1,176	1,051	11,767	10,340
Commercial	699	429	4,959	3,447
Industrial	12	15	138	131
Cogeneration & Electric Generation	1,114	701	1,601	944
Firm Transportation	5,304	5,794	21,457	24,568
Total Firm Throughput	8,305	7,990	39,922	39,430

Interruptible	16	40	95	128
Interruptible Transportation	523	581	2,119	1,746
Off-System	3,463	3,349	13,593	15,971
Capacity Release & Storage	25,512	14,462	64,016	39,657
Total Throughput	37,819	26,422	119,745	96,932

Cost of Sales - SJG’s cost of sales increased $16.9 million and $32.2 million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 compared with the same periods in 2004 due to the increase in SJG’s total customer base, the impact of the migration of customers from transportation service back to sales service, and increased Off-System Sales volume and Electric Generation Sales volume as discussed in detail under Operating Revenues. While changes in gas costs associated with OSS directly impact cost of sales, changes in the unit cost of gas sold to utility ratepayers do not always directly affect cost of sales. We defer fluctuations in gas costs to ratepayers not reflected in current rates to future periods under a BPU-approved Basic Gas Supply Service (BGSS) price structure. Finally, cost of sales experienced a partially offsetting decrease from the transfer of the appliance service business out of the utility effective September 1, 2004. Cost of sales related to the appliance service business are included in the results of SJG through September 1, 2004. Such costs totaled $0.3 million and $1.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

Gas supply sources include contract and open-market purchases. SJG secures and maintains its own gas supplies to serve its sales customers. We do not anticipate any difficulty renewing or replacing expiring contracts under substantially similar terms and conditions.

Operating Expenses - A summary of principal changes in other operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30 is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,			Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2005 vs. 2004			2005 vs. 2004
Operations	$	(1,595	)	$	(1,324	)
Maintenance		(9	)		211
Depreciation		230			(1,441	)
Energy and Other Taxes		(73	)		61

SJG-29

Operations expense decreased $1.6 million during the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 primarily as a result of the transfer of the appliance service business on September 1, 2004. Operating expenses in the third quarter of 2004 included $0.9 million directly related to the appliance service business. SJG also experienced higher healthcare costs in the third quarter of 2004 resulting in a $0.2 million increase to expense last year. Finally, a cyclical decrease in accrued vacation reduced expenses by an additional $0.4 million during the quarter.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, appliance service related operating expenses totaled $3.5 million. A corresponding decrease in operating expense from the absence of such costs in 2005 is not evident in the table above due to several offsetting increases in 2005. This includes a $0.3 million increase in uncollectible expense relating to an increase in the company’s reserve for uncollectibles to address higher balances in accounts receivable. Higher payroll and collection agency costs were also experienced in the customer service function. Expenses related to our mandatory involvement in the New Jersey Clean Energy Program increased by $0.3 million to comply with the new State spending requirement (See Contractual Obligations table in Note 8). As the BPU allows for full recovery of these costs through the Societal Benefits Clause, the increase in expense is offset by an increase in revenues and has no impact on SJG’s net income. Transmission and distribution expenses also increased approximately $0.4 million as a result of a shift in work from capital related projects to expense-related projects. Finally, administrative and general expense increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as a result of increased regulatory expenses resulting from amortizations approved in the July 2004 rate case settlement; a $0.7 million increase in accrued compensation tied to corporate performance; and a 2004 reduction of SJG’s reserve for outstanding claims in the amount of $0.3 million following a period of favorable claims settlements. It should be noted that the amortizations of approximately $0.4 million resulting from the rate case settlement were included in rate recovery from its customers and had no impact on net income.

Depreciation decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared with 2004 mainly due to lower depreciation rates approved by the BPU as part of SJG’s recent rate case settlement. SJG’s composite depreciation rate was reduced from 2.9% to 2.4% effective July 2004. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared with 2004 is due to SJG’s additional investment in utility plant, while depreciation rates were comparable during both those periods.

Other Income and Expense - Other income and expense was higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared with 2005 due to a pre-tax gain of $686,000 on SJG’s post-retirement healthcare plan trust. The movement of plan assets to a new investment manager triggered the recognition of gains on investments in 2004.

Interest Charges - Interest charges increased $221,000 in the third quarter and $186,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared with the respective periods last year. For both the quarter and the year-to-date, the increase was primarily due to higher average long-term debt levels and higher interest rates on short-term borrowings, offset by lower interest rates on long-term debt. Otherwise, SJG experienced lower levels of interest payable to rate payers on overcollected gas costs. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, these costs approximated $137,200 and $343,000, respectively, compared to $ -0- in 2005.

SJG-30

Income Taxes - SJG’s total income taxes applicable to operations differ from the tax that would have resulted by applying the statutory federal and state income tax rates to pre-tax income as a result of various deferred tax items. The account of Income Taxes - Flowthrough Depreciation, as shown on the condensed balance sheets, is amortized at a rate of $245,000 per quarter and is the primary cause of these differences. Due to the seasonal nature of our operations, these tax variances may appear larger relative to the pre-tax income during the second and third quarters when operating results are historically lower.

Net Income -Reasons for the increase in net income in 2005 are discussed in detail above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources - Liquidity needs at SJG are driven by factors that include natural gas commodity prices; the impact of weather on customer bills; lags in fully collecting gas costs from customers under the Basic Gas Supply Service charge; the timing of construction and remediation expenditures and related permanent financings; mandated tax payment dates; and both discretionary and required repayments of long-term debt.

We first seek to meet liquidity needs with net cash provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $68.2 million and $55.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities varies from year to year primarily due to the impact of weather on customer demand and related gas purchases, inventory utilization and gas cost recoveries.

In addition to annual fluctuations, SJG’s operations are also subject to seasonal fluctuations. Significant changes in the balances of current assets and current liabilities can occur from the end of one reporting period to another as evidenced by the changes on the condensed balance sheets. Cash inflows generally increase during the first and second quarters as a result of collections on winter season accounts receivable and the increased use of gas in storage to serve customers. Some of this cash is used to pay down short-term notes payable to banks and cover dividend requirements. During the second and third quarters of 2005, SJG refilled its gas storages. Much of this injection activity was purchased on credit and at significantly higher prices than in the prior year. As a result, it appears as an increase in Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities on the statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. SJG also ends each calendar year in a prepaid tax position due to mandatory prepayment requirements on all state taxes. Such prepayments are credited against amounts otherwise due during the first quarter; thus, further improving first quarter liquidity. During the second quarter, SJG is required to make its mandatory tax prepayments, thus resulting in a significant use of capital.

Sales during the first quarter historically exceed any other quarter during the year. As a result, accounts receivable is generally at its highest as of March 31^st as compared to any other quarter end. Receivable levels typically are considerably lower at the end of the second and third quarters as warmer weather reduces the heating needs of our customers. Unlike billed sales, customer receivables associated with unbilled revenue will track temperatures during the last month of the reporting period. As such, unbilled revenues will generally be highest at the end of the fourth quarter as weather is colder in the month of December compared with March, June and September.

SJG-31

We use short-term borrowings under lines of credit from commercial banks to supplement cash from operations, to support working capital needs and to finance capital expenditures as incurred. From time to time, we refinance short-term debt incurred to finance capital expenditures with long-term debt. Bank credit available to SJG totaled $176.0 million at September 30, 2005, of which $61.5 million was used. Those bank facilities consist of a $100.0 million, 3-year revolving credit facility that expires in August 2006 and $76.0 million of uncommitted bank lines. The revolving credit was established in August 2003 with a syndicate of banks to enhance the liquidity position of SJG. The revolving credit facility contains certain financial covenants measured on a quarterly basis. SJG was in compliance with these covenants as of September 30, 2005. Based upon the existing credit facilities and a regular dialogue with our banks, we believe that there will continue to be sufficient credit available to meet our future liquidity needs.

SJG supplements its operating cash flow and credit lines with both debt and capital contributions from its parent, SJI. Over the years, SJG has used long-term debt, primarily in the form of First Mortgage Bonds and Medium Term Notes (MTN), secured by the same pool of utility assets, to finance its long-term borrowing needs. These needs are primarily capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment. Under a $150.0 million MTN program established in December 2002, SJG issued $110.0 million of long-term debt in 2003 and the remaining $40.0 million of long-term debt in August 2004. We used the proceeds of all of the issues to refinance short-term debt outstanding to commercial banks and for the redemption of certain high interest bearing securities. In July 2005, we redeemed $10.0 million of our 7.9% MTN’s, at par. SJG established a new $150.0 million MTN program that became effective September 8, 2005. On September 13, 2005, we issued a $10.0 million MTN under the new program with a coupon of 5.45% and a maturity of 30 years.

SJG is restricted as to the amount of cash dividends or other distributions that may be paid on its common stock by an order issued by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities in July 2004, that granted SJG an increase in base rates. Per the order, SJG is required to maintain Total Common Equity of no less than $289.0 million. SJG’s Total Common Equity balance was $314.6 million at September 30, 2005.

SJG’s capital structure, excluding an immaterial amount of preferred stock outstanding at the end of 2004, was as follows:

	September 30,	December 31,
	2005	2004
Common Equity	48%	48%
Long-Term Debt	42%	44%
Short-Term Debt	10%	8%
Total	100%	100%

SJG’s long-term, senior secured debt is rated “A” and “Baa1” by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investor Services, respectively. These ratings have not changed in the past five years.

SJG-32

Capital Expenditures, Commitments and Contingencies

Capital Expenditures - SJG has a continuing need for cash resources and capital, primarily to invest in new and replacement facilities and equipment and for environmental remediation costs. Net cash outflows for construction and remediation projects for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 amounted to $53.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively. We estimate net cash outflows for the remainder of 2005 to be $17.2 million. For 2006 and 2007, we estimate the net cash outflows to be approximately $48.8 million and $47.5 million, respectively. Included in these estimates are two large special projects totaling $12.1 million for the installation of a 24-inch pipeline, of which $6.3 million and $5.8 million are expected to be paid in 2005 and 2006, respectively.

Commitments and Contingencies - SJG has certain commitments for both pipeline capacity and gas supply for which it pays fees regardless of usage. Those commitments as of September 30, 2005 average $47.4 million annually and total $251.6 million over the contracts’ lives. Approximately 53% of the financial commitment under these contracts expires during the next five years. We expect to renew each of these contracts under renewal provisions as provided in each contract. SJG recovers all prudently incurred fees through rates via the Basic Gas Supply Service clause.

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations and their applicable payment due dates (in thousands):

			Up to		2 - 3		4 - 5		More than
Contractual Obligations		Total		1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years
Long-Term Debt	$	274,508	$	2,273	$	2,270	$	10,000	$	259,965
Interest on Long-Term Debt		228,917		15,605		32,476		32,287		148,549
Operating Leases		531		86		365		64		16
Construction Obligations		11,498		11,436		62		-		-
Commodity Supply Purchase Obligations		251,628		1,450		19,626		112,014		118,538
New Jersey Clean Energy
Program (Note2)		21,394		4,994		14,400		2,000		-
Other Purchase Obligations		4,831		1,779		1,927		1,125		-
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	793,307	$	37,623	$	71,126	$	157,490	$	527,068

Expected environmental remediation costs are not included in the table above due to the subjective nature of such costs and timing of anticipated payments. SJG’s regulatory obligation to contribute $3.6 million annually to its postretirement benefit plans other than pensions, less costs incurred directly by the company, is not included as the duration is indefinite. As a result, the total obligation cannot be calculated. As discussed in Note 7, we currently expect our 2005 pension contribution to range from $0.2 to $2.3 million depending on changes in investment performance and the discount rate for the year. Furthermore, future pension contributions beyond 2005 cannot be determined at this time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements - SJG has no off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

SJG-33

Pending Litigation - SJG is subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of business and other legal proceedings. We accrue liabilities related to claims when we can determine the amount or range of amounts of likely settlement costs for those claims. Management does not currently anticipate the disposition of any known claims to have a material adverse effect on SJG’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

SJG-34

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About

Market Risks of the Company (Unaudited)

Market Risks

Commodity Market Risks - SJG primarily transacts commodities on a physical basis. As part of its gas purchasing strategy, SJG occasionally uses financial derivative contracts to hedge against forward price risk. These contracts are recoverable through SJG’s BGSS, subject to BPU approval. The fair value of these contracts determined under the mark-to-market method based on prices actively quoted on the NYMEX, which are all due within one year as of September 30, 2005 is as follows (in thousands):

 

Assets		Maturity		Maturity		Beyond
Source of Fair Value			< 1 Year		1 - 3 Years		3 Years		Total
Prices Actively Quoted	NYMEX	$	15,275	$	780	$	-	$	16,055
Other External Sources	Basis		297		-		-		297
Total		$	15,572	$	780	$	-	$	16,352
Liabilities			Maturity		Maturity		Beyond
Source of Fair Value			< 1 Year		1 - 3 Years		3 Years		Total
Prices Actively Quoted	NYMEX	$	169	$	86	$	-	$	255
Other External Sources	Basis		511		-		-		511
Total		$	680	$	86	$	-	$	766

NYMEX (New York Mercantile Exchange) is the primary national commodities exchange on which natural gas is traded. Basis represents the price of a NYMEX natural gas futures contract adjusted for the difference in price for delivering the gas at another location. Contracted volumes of our NYMEX and Basis contracts are 2.9 bcf with a weighted average settlement price of $7.22 per Mmbtu.

A reconciliation of SJG's estimated net fair value of energy-related derivatives, including energy trading and hedging contracts, follow (in thousands):

Net Derivatives — Energy Related Liability, January 1, 2005	$	(527	)
Contracts Settled During Quarter Ended September 30, 2005		(2,534	)
Other Changes in Fair Value from Continuing
and New Contracts, Net		18,647
Net Derivatives — Energy Related Asset, September 30, 2005	$	15,586

SJG-35

Interest Rate Risk - Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to short-term, variable rate borrowings. Our short-term, variable rate debt outstanding at September 30, 2005, was $61.5 million and averaged $34.3 million during the first nine months of 2005. A hypothetical 100 basis point (1%) increase in interest rates on our average variable rate debt outstanding would result in a $202,000 increase in our annual interest expense, net of tax. We chose the 100 basis point increase for illustrative purposes, as it provides a simple basis for calculating the impact of interest rate changes under a variety of interest rate scenarios. The change in basis points (b.p.) of our average monthly interest rates from the beginning to end of each of the last five fiscal years was as follows: 2004 - 115 b.p. increase; 2003 - 31 b.p. decrease; 2002 - 74 b.p. decrease; 2001 - 383 b.p. decrease; and 2000 - 83 b.p. increase. For September 2005, our average interest rate on variable rate debt was 4.26%. SJG primarily issues long-term debt at fixed rates and, consequently, interest expense on existing debt is not significantly impacted by changes in market interest rates. In November 2004, SJG entered into a derivative transaction known as a “Treasury Lock” to hedge against the impact of possible interest rate increases on a $10.0 million, thirty-year debt issuance planned for July 2005. We terminated that Treasury Lock on its July 15, 2005 expiration date at a cost of $1.2 million. In August, we entered into a new Treasury Lock in anticipation of the same debt issuance and terminated it on September 13, 2005 at a cost of $183,000. We issued a $10.0 million MTN with a thirty-year maturity on that same day. Because we issued the replacement debt within two months of the termination of both Treasury Locks, we deferred the costs of the Treasury Locks and will amortize them over the life of that debt.

On October 21, 2005, SJG entered into two forward-starting interest rate swaps which effectively fixed the interest rate at 3.43% for thirty years on $25 million of tax-exempt debt which is expected to be issued in early 2006. The debt will be used to provide long-term financing for capital improvements made to SJG’s gas transmission and distribution system serving Atlantic and Cape May Counties in southern New Jersey.

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges - The company’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of the periods indicated is as follows:

Twelve Months
Ended
September 30,	Year Ended December 31,
2005		2004	2003	2002	2001	2000
4.2x		3.9x	3.3x	2.9x	2.6x	2.6x

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges represents, on a pre-tax basis, the number of times earnings covers fixed charges. Earnings consist of net income, to which has been added fixed charges and taxes based on income of the company before discontinued operations. Fixed charges consist of interest charges and preferred securities dividend requirements and an interest factor in rentals.

SJG-36

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

SJG management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that all material information required to be filed in this quarterly report has been made known to them in a timely fashion.

No change in SJG’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during SJG’s second fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

SJG-37

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item l. Legal Proceedings

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Part I, Item 1, Note 8, beginning on page 21.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits
Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

SJG-38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY

(Registrant)

Dated: November 9, 2005	By:         /s/ Edward J. Graham
	Edward J. Graham
	President & Chief Executive Officer
Dated: November 9, 2005	By:         /s/ David A. Kindlick
	David A. Kindlick
	Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

SJG-39

EX-31.1

  Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Edward J. Graham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, of South Jersey Gas Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15 d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 9, 2005             /s/ Edward J. Graham

Edward J. Graham

         & #160;President & Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, David A. Kindlick, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, of South Jersey Gas Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15 d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 9, 2005          /s/ David A. Kindlick

 David A. Kindlick

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Edward J. Graham

-----------------------------------------------------

Name: Edward J. Graham

Title: Chief Executive Officer

November 9, 2005

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David A. Kindlick

-------------------------------------------------------

Name: David A. Kindlick

Title: Chief Financial Officer

November 9, 2005