-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, MOyX4mRPcbr5fSvCijVupvOenOrD0K0wcWyORsRdI3gbdAbFD28JMRKdulvnYZ++ xC3CdKMcx2xi8ZgUv/wJWQ== 0001014100-04-000170.txt : 20040630 0001014100-04-000170.hdr.sgml : 20040630 20040630153256 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001014100-04-000170 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20031231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20040630 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SHORE BANCSHARES INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001035092 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS [6021] IRS NUMBER: 521974638 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MD FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K/A SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-22345 FILM NUMBER: 04891339 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 18 EAST DOVER STREET CITY: EASTON STATE: MD ZIP: 21601-3013 BUSINESS PHONE: 4108221400 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 18 EAST DOVER STREET CITY: EASTON STATE: MD ZIP: 21601-3013 10-K/A 1 edg2616.txt AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM 10-K UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ------------------------------- FORM 10-K/A AMENDMENT NO. 1 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003 0-22345 ------- Commission File No. SHORE BANCSHARES, INC. ---------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Maryland 52-1974638 - ------------------------------- ------------- (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 18 East Dover Street, Easton, Maryland 21601 - -------------------------------------- ----- (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (410) 822-1400 ------------- Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None. Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.01 per share Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days Yes X No -- --- Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ____ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes X No -- --- The aggregate market value of the Corporation's voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003 was $153,083,156. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock as of May 31, 2004 was 5,496,634. Documents Incorporated by Reference Certain information required by Part III of this annual report is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Stockholders' Meeting. Explanatory Note ---------------- This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends the Form 10-K to include the Company's Risk Factors in Item 1 of Part I, which were inadvertently omitted. Except for the addition of these Risk Factors, all other portions of Item 1 of Part I remain unchanged. Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 12b-15, new certifications are supplied as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2. INDEX ----- Part I Item 1. Business.............................................................2 Part IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.....13 SIGNATURES...................................................................16 EXHIBIT LIST.................................................................17 PART I Item 1. Business. General The Company was incorporated under the laws of Maryland on March 15, 1996 and is a bank holding company and a financial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHC Act"). The Company engages in the business of acting as the parent company to two bank subsidiaries, The Centreville National Bank of Maryland ("Centreville National Bank") and The Talbot Bank of Easton, Maryland ("Talbot Bank") (together with Centreville National Bank, the "Banks"), two insurance producers, The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and Elliott Wilson Insurance, LLC, one insurance premium finance company, Mubell Finance, LLC (together with The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and Elliot Wilson Insurance, LLC, the "Insurance Subsidiaries"), and an investment adviser firm, Wye Financial Services, LLC ("Wye Financial"). The Company also has a non-active subsidiary, Shore Pension Services, LLC. On November 12, 2003, the Company announced that it had executed a definitive merger agreement to merge with Midstate Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware bank holding company ("Midstate Bancorp"). If this merger is consummated, the Company will acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital securities of The Felton Bank, a Delaware commercial bank ("Felton Bank"), which will operate in as an independent bank subsidiary. For more information about this transaction, see Item 7 of Part II of this report under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation--Recent Developments". Talbot Bank owns all of the issued and outstanding securities of Dover Street Realty, Inc., a Maryland corporation that engages in the business of holding and managing real property acquired by Talbot Bank as a result of loan foreclosures. Centreville National Bank owns 29.25% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Delmarva Data. Delmarva Data is a Maryland corporation located in Easton, Maryland, which provides data processing services to banks located in Maryland, Delaware, Virginia and the District of Columbia. Delmarva Data provides these services to Centreville National Bank and Talbot Bank. Banking Products and Services Centreville National Bank is a national banking association that commenced operations in 1876. Talbot Bank is a Maryland commercial bank and commenced operations in 1885. The Banks operate twelve full service branches and sixteen ATM's, providing a full range of commercial and consumer banking products and services to individuals, businesses, and other organizations in Kent, Queen Anne's, Caroline, Talbot and Dorchester counties in Maryland. The Banks' deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"). The Banks are independent community banks and serve businesses and individuals in their respective market areas. Services offered are essentially the same as those offered by larger regional institutions that compete with the Banks. Services provided to businesses include commercial checking, savings, certificate of deposit and overnight investment sweep accounts. The Banks offer all forms of commercial lending, including secured and unsecured loans, working capital loans, lines of credit, term loans, accounts receivable financing, real estate acquisition development, construction loans and letters of credit. Merchant credit card clearing services are available as well as direct deposit of payroll, internet banking and telephone banking services. Services to individuals include checking accounts, various savings programs, mortgage loans, home improvement loans, installment and other personal loans, credit cards, personal lines of credit, automobile and other consumer financing, safe deposit boxes, debit cards, 24 hour telephone banking, PC and internet banking, and 24-hour automatic teller machine services. The Banks also offer nondeposit products, such as mutual funds and annuities, and discount brokerage services to their customers. Additionally, the Banks have Saturday hours and extended hours on certain evenings during the week for added customer convenience. -2- Lending Activities The Company's lending operations are conducted through the Banks. The Company originates secured and unsecured loans for business purposes. It is typical for commercial loans to be secured by real estate, accounts receivable, inventory equipment or other assets of the business. Commercial loans generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one to four family residential mortgage loans. Repayment is often dependent on the successful operation of the business and may be affected by adverse conditions in the local economy or real estate market. The financial condition and cash flow of commercial borrowers is therefore carefully analyzed during the loan approval process, and continues to be monitored by obtaining business financial statements, personal financial statements and income tax returns. The frequency of this ongoing analysis depends upon the size and complexity of the credit and collateral that secures the loan. It is also the Company's general policy to obtain personal guarantees from the principals of the commercial loan borrowers. The Company provides residential real estate construction loans to builders and individuals for single family dwellings. Residential construction loans are usually granted based upon "as completed" appraisals and are secured by the property under construction. Additional collateral may be taken if loan to value ratios exceed 80%. Site inspections are performed to determine pre-specified stages of completion before loan proceeds are disbursed. These loans typically have maturities of six to twelve months and may be fixed or variable rate. Permanent financing for individuals offered by the Company includes fixed and variable rate loans with three-year or five-year balloons, and one, three or five year Adjustable Rate Mortgages. The risk of loss associated with real estate construction lending is controlled through conservative underwriting procedures such as loan to value ratios of 80% or less, obtaining additional collateral when prudent, and closely monitoring construction projects to control disbursement of funds on loans. The Company originates fixed and variable rate residential mortgage loans. As with any consumer loan, repayment is dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability, which can be adversely impacted by job loss, divorce, illness, or personal bankruptcy. Underwriting standards recommend loan to value ratios not to exceed 80% based on appraisals performed by approved appraisers of the Company. Title insurance protecting the Company's lien priority, as well as fire and casualty insurance, is required. The Company also originates and sells long term fixed rate residential mortgage loans on the secondary market. These loans are not typically funded by the Company, however the Company receives a commission upon settlement. Commercial real estate loans are primarily those secured by office condominiums, retail buildings, warehouses and general purpose business space. Low loan to value ratio standards, as well as the thorough financial analysis performed and the Company's knowledge of the local economy in which it lends, can reduce the risk associated with these loans. A variety of consumer loans are offered to customers, including home equity loans, credit cards and other secured and unsecured lines of credit and term loans. Careful analysis of an applicant's creditworthiness is performed before granting credit, and on-going monitoring of loans outstanding is performed in an effort to minimize risk of loss by identifying problem loans early. Insurance Activities The Insurance Subsidiaries were formed as a result of the Company's acquisition of the assets of The Avon-Dixon Agency, Inc., Elliott Wilson Insurance, Inc., Avon-Dixon Financial Services, Inc., Joseph M. George & Son, Inc. and 59th Street Finance Company on May 1, 2002. On November 1, 2002, The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC completed its acquisition of certain assets of W. M. Freestate & Son, Inc., a full-service insurance producer firm owned by Mark M. Freestate, who serves on the Board of Directors of Centreville National Bank. Through these entities, the Company offers a full range of insurance products and services to customers, including insurance premium financing. -3- Investment Adviser Activities Through Wye Financial, which was formed in 2002, the Company offers a variety of financial planning products and services to customers within its market areas. Seasonality Management does not believe that the business activities of the Company are seasonal in nature. Deposits may vary depending on local and national economic conditions, but management believes that any variation will not have a material impact on the Company's planning or policy-making strategies. Employees At March 1, 2004, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 250 persons, of which 217 were employed on a full-time basis. COMPETITION The banking business, in all of its phases, is highly competitive. Within their market areas, the Company and its subsidiaries compete with commercial banks (including local banks and branches or affiliates of other larger banks), savings and loan associations and credit unions for loans and deposits, with money market and mutual funds and other investment alternatives for deposits, with consumer finance companies for loans, with insurance companies, agents and brokers for insurance products, and with other financial institutions for various types of products and services. There is also competition for commercial and retail banking business from banks and financial institutions located outside our market areas. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates, personalized services, the quality and range of financial services, convenience of office locations and office hours. The primary factors in competing for loans are interest rates, loan origination fees, the quality and range of lending services and personalized services. To compete with other financial services providers, the Company relies principally upon local promotional activities, including advertisements in local newspapers, trade journals and other publications and on the radio, personal relationships established by officers, directors and employees with customers, and specialized services tailored to meet its customers' needs. In those instances in which the Company is unable to accommodate a customers' needs, the Company will arrange for those services to be provided by other financial services providers with which it has a relationship. The Company additional relies on referrals from satisfied customers. Current banking laws facilitate interstate branching and merger activity among banks. Since September, 1995, certain bank holding companies are authorized to acquire banks throughout the United States. In addition, on and after June 1, 1997, certain banks are permitted to merge with banks organized under the laws of different states. As a result, interstate banking is now an accepted element of competition in the banking industry and the Company may be brought into competition with institutions with which it does not presently compete. -4- The following table sets forth deposit data for Kent, Queen Anne's, Caroline, Talbot and Dorchester Counties as of June 30, 2003, the most recent date for which comparative information is available. % of Kent County Deposits Total - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Peoples Bank of Kent County, Maryland $142,813 35.61% The Chestertown Bank of Maryland 123,972 30.91 Chesapeake Bank and Trust Co. 55,045 13.72 Farmers Bank of Maryland 33,927 8.46 The Centreville National Bank 24,325 6.07 SunTrust Bank 20,981 5.23 -------- ------- Total $401,063 100.00% ======== ======= Source: FDIC DataBook % of Queen Anne's County Deposits Total - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) The Queenstown Bank of Maryland $229,423 40.93% The Centreville National Bank of Maryland 167,514 29.89 Bank of America, National Association 50,009 8.92 The Chestertown Bank of Maryland 41,326 7.37 M&T 34,772 6.20 BankAnnapolis 21,397 3.82 Farmers Bank 16,065 2.87 -------- ------- Total $560,506 100.00% ======== ======= Source: FDIC DataBook % of Caroline County Deposits Total - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Provident State Bank of Preston, Maryland $103,323 32.11% Peoples Bank of Maryland 88,954 27.64 Allfirst Bank 33,676 10.47 The Centreville National Bank of Maryland 29,822 9.27 Farmers Bank of Maryland 28,919 8.99 Bank of America, National Association 15,727 4.89 Atlantic Bank 13,786 4.28 Easton Bank & Trust 7,571 2.35 -------- ------ Total $321,778 100.00% ======== ======= Source: FDIC DataBook -5- % of Talbot County Deposits Total - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) The Talbot Bank of Easton, Maryland $321,870 41.56% St. Michaels Bank 157,173 20.29 Bank of America, National Association 79,684 10.29 Easton Bank & Trust 74,250 9.59 SunTrust Bank 43,834 5.66 Allfirst Bank 33,522 4.33 Farmers Bank 26,414 3.41 First Mariner Bank 19,554 2.52 The Queenstown Bank of Maryland 14,470 1.87 Chevy Chase Bank 3,746 0.48 -------- ------- Total $774,517 100.00% ======== ======= Source: FDIC DataBook % of Dorchester County Deposits Total - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) The National Bank of Cambridge $161,282 33.90% Bank of the Eastern Shore 131,370 27.62 Hebron Savings Bank 44,254 9.30 Provident State Bank of Preston, Maryland 29,993 6.31 Bank of America, National Association 28,038 5.89 Atlantic Bank 26,687 5.61 M&T 26,234 5.51 SunTrust Bank 14,608 3.07 The Talbot Bank of Easton, Maryland 13,271 2.79 -------- ------ Total $475,737 100.00% ======== ======= Source: FDIC DataBook CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS The Federal Deposit Insurance Company Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA") established a system of prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions. Under this system, federal banking regulators are required to rate supervised institutions on the basis of five capital categories: "well -capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized," and "critically undercapitalized;" and to take certain mandatory actions, and are authorized to take other discretionary actions, with respect to institutions in the three undercapitalized categories. The severity of the actions will depend upon the category in which the institution is placed. A depository institution is "well capitalized" if it has a total risk based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1 risk based capital ratio of 6% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater and is not subject to any order, regulatory agreement, or written directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. An "adequately capitalized" institution is defined as one that has a total risk based capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier 1 risk based capital ratio of 4% or greater and a leverage ratio of 4% or greater (or 3% or greater in the case of a bank with a composite CAMEL rating of 1). FDICIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution, including the payment of cash dividends, or paying a management fee to its holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. Undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans. For a capital restoration plan to be acceptable, the depository institution's parent holding -6- company must guarantee (subject to certain limitations) that the institution will comply with such capital restoration plan. Significantly undercapitalized depository institutions may be subject to a number of other requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized and requirements to reduce total assets and stop accepting deposits from correspondent banks. Critically undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator, generally within 90 days of the date such institution is determined to be critically undercapitalized. As of December 31, 2003, each of the Banks was deemed to be "well capitalized". For more information regarding the capital condition of the Company, see Note 17 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Report. SUPERVISION AND REGULATION The following is a summary of the material regulations and policies applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries and is not intended to be a comprehensive discussion. Changes in applicable laws and regulations may have a material effect on the business of the Company. General The Company is a bank holding company and a financial holding company registered with the Board of Governors of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "FRB") under the BHC Act and, as such, is subject to the supervision, examination and reporting requirements of the BHC Act and the regulations of the FRB. Talbot Bank is a Maryland commercial bank subject to the banking laws of Maryland and to regulation by the Commissioner of Financial Regulation of Maryland, who is required by statute to make at least one examination in each calendar year (or at 18-month intervals if the Commissioner determines that an examination is unnecessary in a particular calendar year). Centreville National Bank is a national banking association subject to federal banking laws and regulations enforced and/or promulgated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC"), which is required by statute to make at least one examination in each calendar year (or at 18-month intervals if the association has assets of $250 million or less and meets certain other conditions). The deposits of the Banks are insured by the FDIC, and certain laws and regulations administered by the FDIC also govern their operations. The Banks are also subject to numerous state and federal statutes and regulations that affect the business of banking. Nonbank affiliates of the Company are subject to examination by the FRB, and, as affiliates of the Banks, are subject to examination by the FDIC, the Commissioner of Financial Regulation of Maryland, and, in certain cases, the OCC. In addition, The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC, Elliott Wilson Insurance, LLC, and Mubell Finance, LLC are each subject to licensing and regulation by state insurance authorities. Retail sales of insurance products by these insurance affiliates are also subject to the requirements of the Interagency Statement on Retail Sales of Nondeposit Investment Products promulgated in 1994, as amended, by the FDIC, the FRB, the OCC, and the Office of Thrift Supervision. Wye Financial Services, LLC is subject to the registration and examination requirements of federal and state laws governing investment advisers. Regulation of Financial Holding Companies In November 1999, the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the "GLBA") was signed into law. Effective in pertinent part on March 11, 2000, GLBA revises the BHC Act and repeals the affiliation provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which, taken together, limited the securities, insurance and other non-banking activities of any company that controls an FDIC insured financial institution. Under GLBA, a bank holding company can elect, subject to certain qualifications, to become a "financial holding company." GLBA provides that a financial holding company may engage in a full range of financial activities, including insurance and securities sales and underwriting activities, and real estate development, with new expedited notice procedures. Maryland law generally permits Maryland State chartered banks, including the Bank, to engage in the same activities, directly or through an affiliate, as national banking -7- associations. GLBA permits certain qualified national banking associations to form financial subsidiaries, which have broad authority to engage in all financial activities except insurance underwriting, insurance investments, real estate investment or development, or merchant banking. Thus, GLBA has the effect of broadening the permitted activities of the Bank. The Company and its affiliates are subject to the provisions of Section 23A and Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. Section 23A limits the amount of loans or extensions of credit to, and investments in, the Company and its nonbank affiliates by the Bank. Section 23B requires that transactions between the Bank and the Company and its nonbank affiliates be on terms and under circumstances that are substantially the same as with non-affiliates. Under FRB policy, the Company is expected to act as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks, and the FRB may charge the Company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to a subsidiary bank when required. In addition, under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"), depository institutions insured by the FDIC can be held liable for any losses incurred by, or reasonably anticipated to be incurred by, the FDIC in connection with (i) the default of a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution or (ii) any assistance provided by the FDIC to a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution in danger of default. Accordingly, in the event that any insured subsidiary of the Company causes a loss to the FDIC, other insured subsidiaries of the Company could be required to compensate the FDIC by reimbursing it for the estimated amount of such loss. Such cross guaranty liabilities generally are superior in priority to obligations of a financial institution to its stockholders and obligations to other affiliates. Federal Banking Regulation Federal banking regulators, such as the FRB, the FDIC, and the OCC, may prohibit the institutions over which they have supervisory authority from engaging in activities or investments that the agencies believes are unsafe or unsound banking practices. Federal banking regulators have extensive enforcement authority over the institutions they regulate to prohibit or correct activities that violate law, regulation or a regulatory agreement or which are deemed to be unsafe or unsound practices. Enforcement actions may include the appointment of a conservator or receiver, the issuance of a cease and desist order, the termination of deposit insurance, the imposition of civil money penalties on the institution, its directors, officers, employees and institution-affiliated parties, the issuance of directives to increase capital, the issuance of formal and informal agreements, the removal of or restrictions on directors, officers, employees and institution-affiliated parties, and the enforcement of any such mechanisms through restraining orders or other court actions. The Banks are subject to certain restrictions on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders or any related interest of such persons, which generally require that such credit extensions be made on substantially the same terms as are available to third parties dealing with the Banks and not involve more than the normal risk of repayment. Other laws tie the maximum amount that may be loaned to any one customer and its related interests to capital levels. As part of FDICIA, each federal banking regulator adopted non-capital safety and soundness standards for institutions under its authority. These standards include internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, and compensation, fees and benefits. An institution that fails to meet those standards may be required by the agency to develop a plan acceptable to meet the standards. Failure to submit or implement such a plan may subject the institution to regulatory sanctions. The Company, on behalf of the Banks, believes that the Banks meet substantially all standards that have been adopted. FDICIA also imposes new capital standards on insured depository institutions. The Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") requires that, in connection with the examination of financial institutions within their jurisdictions, the federal banking regulators evaluate the record of the financial institution in meeting the credit needs of their communities including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of those banks. These factors are also considered by all regulatory agencies in evaluating mergers, acquisitions and applications to open a branch or facility. As of the date of its most recent examination report, each of the Banks has a CRA rating of "Satisfactory." -8- Deposit Insurance As FDIC member institutions, the Banks' deposits are insured to a maximum of $100,000 per depositor through the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF"), administered by the FDIC, and each institution is required to pay semi-annual deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC. The BIF assessment rates have a range of 0 to 27 cents for every $100 in assessable deposits. In addition, as a result of the April 1997 merger of Kent Savings and Loan Association, F.A. into Centreville National Bank, approximately $33.2 million of the Centreville National Bank's deposits are insured through the Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF"), also administered by the FDIC, which are determined quarterly. The federal Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 included provisions that, among other things, recapitalized the SAIF through a special assessment on savings association deposits and bank deposits that had been acquired from savings associations. USA PATRIOT Act Congress adopted the USA PATRIOT Act (the "Patriot Act") on October 26, 2001 in response to the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. Under the Patriot Act, certain financial institutions, including banks, are required to maintain and prepare additional records and reports that are designed to assist the government's efforts to combat terrorism. The Patriot Act includes sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and required additional regulations, including, among other things, standards for verifying client identification when opening an account and rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering. Federal Securities Laws The Company's common stock is registered with the SEC under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The Company is subject to information reporting, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements of the Exchange Act. The federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the new regulations adopted in furtherance thereof made several changes to the Exchange Act and the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. to which the Company is subject. These changes impose additional requirements and restrictions on the Company, including, among other things, restrictions on loans to and other transactions with insiders, additional disclosure requirements in the reports and other documents that the Company files with the SEC, new director independence requirements, certain Board of Director committee requirements, and other corporate governance requirements. Governmental Monetary and Credit Policies and Economic Controls The earnings and growth of the banking industry and ultimately of the Bank are affected by the monetary and credit policies of governmental authorities, including the FRB. An important function of the FRB is to regulate the national supply of bank credit in order to control recessionary and inflationary pressures. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the FRB to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the federal funds rate, changes in the discount rate of member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and may also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for deposits. The monetary policies of the FRB authorities have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to have such an effect in the future. In view of changing conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, as well as the effect of actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the FRB, no prediction can be made as to possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or their effect on the business and earnings of the Company and its subsidiaries. AVAILABLE INFORMATION The Company maintains an Internet site at www.shbi.net on which it makes available, free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to the foregoing as -9- soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. In addition, stockholders may access these reports and documents on the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. RISK FACTORS The following factors may impact the Company's business and should be considered carefully in evaluating an investment in shares of the Company's common stock: The Company's Future Depends on the Successful Growth of its Subsidiaries The Company's primary business activity for the foreseeable future will be to act as the holding company of Talbot Bank, Centreville National Bank, and its other subsidiaries. Therefore, the Company's future profitability will depend on the success and growth of these subsidiaries. In the future, part of the Company's growth may come from buying other banks and buying or establishing other companies. Such entities may not be profitable after they are purchased or established, and they may lose money, particularly at first. A new bank or company may bring with it unexpected liabilities, bad loans, or bad employee relations, or the new bank or company may lose customers. A Majority of the Company's Business is Concentrated in Maryland; A Significant Amount of the Company's Business is Concentrated in Real Estate Lending A majority of the Company's customers, including most of the loan customers of the Banks, are Maryland residents. Therefore, a decline in local economic conditions may have a greater effect on the Company's earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital of larger financial institutions whose loan portfolios are geographically diverse. Further, the Banks make many real estate secured loans, which are in greater demand when interest rates are low and economic conditions are good. Even when economic conditions are good and interest rates are low, these conditions may not continue. Additionally, the market values of the real estate securing these loans may deteriorate, and the Company may lose money if a borrower fails to repay a real estate loan. The Banks May Experience Loan Losses in Excess of Their Allowances The risk of credit losses on loans varies with, among other things, general economic conditions, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan and, in the case of a collateralized loan, the value and marketability of the collateral for the loan. Management bases the allowance for loan losses upon, among other things, historical experience, an evaluation of economic conditions and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality. Based upon such factors, management makes various assumptions and judgments about the ultimate collectability of the loan portfolio and provides an allowance for loan losses based upon a percentage of the outstanding balances and for specific loans when their ultimate collectability is considered questionable. If management's assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect and the allowance for loan losses is inadequate to absorb future losses, or if the bank regulatory authorities require the Company or the Banks to increase their respective allowance for loan losses as a part of their examination process, our earnings and capital could be significantly and adversely affected. Although management uses the best information available to make determinations with respect to the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used or adverse developments arise with respect to our non-performing or performing loans. Material additions to the allowance for loan losses of one of the Banks would result in a decrease in that bank's net income and capital, and could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Interest Rates and Other Economic Conditions Will Impact Results of Operation Results of operations for financial institutions, including the Company and its subsidiaries, may be materially and adversely affected by changes in prevailing economic conditions, including declines in real estate values, rapid changes in interest rates and the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government. The Company's profitability is in part a function of the spread between the interest rates earned on assets and the interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities (i.e., net interest income), including advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Interest rate risk arises from mismatches (i.e., the interest sensitivity gap) between the -10- dollar amount of repricing or maturing assets and liabilities and is measured in terms of the ratio of the interest rate sensitivity gap to total assets. More assets repricing or maturing than liabilities over a given time period is considered asset-sensitive and is reflected as a positive gap, and more liabilities repricing or maturing than assets over a given time period is considered liability-sensitive and is reflected as negative gap. An asset-sensitive position (i.e., a positive gap) could enhance earnings in a rising interest rate environment and could negatively impact earnings in a falling interest rate environment, while a liability-sensitive position (i.e., a negative gap) could enhance earnings in a falling interest rate environment and negatively impact earnings in a rising interest rate environment. Fluctuations in interest rates are not predictable or controllable. The Company has attempted to structure its asset and liability management strategies to mitigate the impact on net interest income of changes in market interest rates, but there can be no assurance that these attempts will be successful in the event of such changes. The Company's Ability to Pay Dividends is Limited Holders of shares of the Company's common stock are entitled to dividends if, when, and as declared by the Company's Board of Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. The Company's current ability to pay dividends to stockholders is largely dependent upon the receipt of dividends from the Banks. Both federal and state laws impose restrictions on the ability of the Banks to pay dividends. Federal law prohibits the payment of a dividend by an insured depository institution if the depository institution is considered "undercapitalized" or if the payment of the dividend would make the institution "undercapitalized". For a Maryland state-chartered bank, dividends may be paid out of undivided profits or, with the prior approval of the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation, from surplus in excess of 100% of required capital stock. If however, the surplus of a Maryland bank is less than 100% of its required capital stock, cash dividends may not be paid in excess of 90% of net earnings. In addition to these specific restrictions, bank regulatory agencies also have the ability to prohibit proposed dividends by a financial institution that would otherwise be permitted under applicable regulations if the regulatory body determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. National banking associations are generally limited, subject to certain exceptions, to paying dividends out of undivided profits. Because of these limitations, there can be no guarantee that the Company will declare dividends in any fiscal quarter. The Market Value of the Company's Investments Could Decline As of December 31, 2003, the Company had classified 90% of its investment securities as available-for-sale pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 ("SFAS 115") relating to accounting for investments. SFAS 115 requires that unrealized gains and losses in the estimated value of the available-for-sale portfolio be "marked to market" and reflected as a separate item in stockholders' equity (net of tax) as accumulated other comprehensive income. The remaining investment securities are classified as held-to-maturity in accordance with SFAS 115, and are stated at amortized cost. In the past, gains on sales of investment securities have not been a significant source of income for the Company. There can be no assurance that future market performance of the Company's investment portfolio will enable the Company to realize income from sales of securities. Stockholders' equity will continue to reflect the unrealized gains and losses (net of tax) of these investments. There can be no assurance that the market value of the Company's investment portfolio will not decline, causing a corresponding decline in stockholders' equity. Management believes that several factors will affect the market values of the Company's investment portfolio. These include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates or expectations of changes, the degree of volatility in the securities markets, inflation rates or expectations of inflation and the slope of the interest rate yield curve (the yield curve refers to the differences between shorter-term and longer-term interest rates; a positively sloped yield curve means shorter-term rates are lower than longer-term rates). Also, the passage of time will affect the market values of our investment securities, in that the closer they are to maturing, the closer the market price should be to par value. These and other factors may impact specific categories of the portfolio differently, and management cannot predict the effect these factors may have on any specific category. -11- The Banking Industry is Heavily Regulated; Significant Regulatory Changes Could Adversely Affect the Company's Operations The Company's operations and those of its subsidiaries are and will be affected by current and future legislation and by the policies established from time to time by various federal and state regulatory authorities. The Company is subject to supervision by the FRB; Talbot Bank is subject to supervision and periodic examination by the Maryland Commissioner and the FDIC; and Centreville National Bank is subject to supervision and periodic examination by the OCC and the FDIC. Banking regulations, designed primarily for the safety of depositors, may limit a financial institution's growth and the return to its investors by restricting such activities as the payment of dividends, mergers with or acquisitions by other institutions, investments, loans and interest rates, interest rates paid on deposits, expansion of branch offices, and the offering of securities or trust services. The Company's bank subsidiaries are also subject to capitalization guidelines established by federal law and could be subject to enforcement actions to the extent that those banks are found by regulatory examiners to be undercapitalized. It is not possible to predict what changes, if any, will be made to existing federal and state legislation and regulations or the effect that such changes may have on the Company's future business and earnings prospects, as well as those of its bank subsidiaries. Management also cannot predict the nature or the extent of the effect on the Company's business and earnings of future fiscal or monetary policies, economic controls, or new federal or state legislation. Further, the cost of compliance with regulatory requirements may adversely affect the Company's ability to operate profitably. The Company Operates in a Competitive Market The Company and its subsidiaries operate in a competitive environment, competing for loans, deposits, and customers with commercial banks, savings associations and other financial entities. Competition for deposits comes primarily from other commercial banks, savings associations, credit unions, money market and mutual funds and other investment alternatives. Competition for loans comes primarily from other commercial banks, savings associations, mortgage banking firms, credit unions and other financial intermediaries. Competition for other products, such as insurance and securities products, comes from other banks, securities and brokerage companies, insurance companies, insurance agents and brokers, and other nonbank financial service providers in the Company's market areas. Many of these competitors are much larger in terms of total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets, and/or offer a broader range of financial services than those offered by the Company and its subsidiaries. In addition, banks with a larger capitalization and financial intermediaries not subject to bank regulatory restrictions have larger lending limits and are thereby able to serve the needs of larger customers. Finally, the Company's growth and profitability will depend upon its ability to attract and retain skilled managerial, marketing and technical personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the financial services industry is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. The Company May be Subject to Claims The Company may from time to time be subject to claims from its customers for losses due to alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, errors and omissions of employees, officers and agents, incomplete documentation, their failure, or the failure of their subsidiaries, to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or many other reasons. Also, the employees of the Company and/or its subsidiaries may knowingly or unknowingly violate laws and regulations. Management may not be aware of any violations until after their occurrence. This lack of knowledge may not insulate the Company or its subsidiaries from liability. Claims and legal actions may result in legal expenses and liabilities that may reduce the Company's profitability and hurt its financial condition. The Shares of the Company's Stock are Not Heavily Traded The shares of the Company's common stock are listed on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market and are not heavily traded. Stock that is not heavily traded can be more volatile than stock trading in an active public market. Factors such as the Company's financial results, the introduction of new products and services by the Company or its competitors, and various factors affecting the banking industry generally may have a significant impact on the market price of the Company's common stock. Management cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for the Company's common stock will develop or be sustained in the future. In recent years, the stock market has experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and market prices for the stock of many companies have -12- experienced wide price fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to their operating performance. Therefore, the Company's stockholders may not be able to sell their shares at the volumes, prices, or times that they desire. The Shares of the Company's Common Stock are Not Insured Investments in the shares of the Company's common stock are not deposits and are not insured against loss by the government. The Company May be Adversely Affected by Recent Legislation GLBA was signed into law on November 12, 1999. Among other things, this law repeals restrictions on banks affiliating with securities firms. It also permits bank holding companies that become financial holding companies to engage in additional financial activities, including insurance and securities underwriting and agency activities, merchant banking, and insurance company portfolio investment activities that are currently not permitted for bank holding companies. GLBA may have the result of increasing the competition that the Company faces from larger banks and other companies. It is not possible to predict the full effect that GLBA will have on the Company. In addition, recent changes in other federal banking laws facilitate interstate branching and merger activity among banks. Such changes may result in an even greater degree of competition in the banking industry, and the Company may be brought into competition with institutions with which it does not presently compete. From time to time other changes are proposed to laws affecting the banking industry, and these changes could have a material effect on the Company's business and prospects. The Company's future profitability may be adversely affected by increased competition resulting from this legislation. The Company May Not be Able to Keep Pace with Developments in Technology The Company and its subsidiaries use various technologies in their respective businesses, including telecommunication, data processing, computers, automation, internet-based banking, and debit cards. Technology changes rapidly. The Company's ability to compete successfully with other banks and non-bank entities may depend on whether it can exploit technological changes. The Company may not be able to exploit technological changes, and any investment it does make may not make it more profitable. The Company's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and Maryland Law May Discourage a Corporate Takeover The Company's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws contain certain provisions designed to enhance the ability of the Board of Directors to deal with attempts to acquire control of the Company. These provisions provide for the classification of the Board into three classes; directors of each class generally serve for staggered three-year periods. No director may be removed except for cause and then only by a vote of at least two-thirds of the total eligible stockholder votes. In addition, Maryland law contains anti-takeover provisions that apply to the Company. Although these provisions do not preclude a takeover, they may have the effect of discouraging a future takeover attempt which would not be approved by the board of directors, but pursuant to which stockholders might receive a substantial premium for their shares over then-current market prices. As a result, stockholders who might desire to participate in such a transaction might not have the opportunity to do so. Such provisions will also render the removal of the board of directors and of management more difficult and, therefore, may serve to perpetuate current management. As a result of the foregoing, such provisions could potentially adversely affect the market price of the Company's common stock. PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K. (a)(1),(2) Financial Statements* Independent Auditors' Report -13- Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2002 Consolidated Statements of Income -- Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity -- Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (3) Exhibits Required to be Filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K 3.1 Shore Bancshares, Inc. Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 8-K filed by Shore Bancshares, Inc. on December 14, 2000). 3.2 Shore Bancshares, Inc. Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 on Form 8-K filed by Shore Bancshares, Inc. on December 14, 2000). 10.1 Form of Employment Agreement with W. Moorhead Vermilye (incorporated by reference to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 on Form 8-K filed by Shore Bancshares, Inc. on July 31, 2000). 10.2 Form of Employment Agreement with Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated by reference to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 on Form 8-K filed by Shore Bancshares, Inc. on July 31, 2000). 10.3 Form of Employment Agreement between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and Kevin P. LaTulip, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-K filed by Shore Bancshares, Inc. on March 31, 2003). 10.4 Form of Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreement between The Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003). 10.5 Form of Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement between The Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003). 21 Subsidiaries of Shore Bancshares, Inc.* 23 Consent of Stegman & Company.* 31.1 Certifications of the CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed herewith). 31.2 Certifications of the PAO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed herewith). 32.1 Certifications of the CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 (furnished herewith). 32.2 Certifications of the PAO pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 (furnished herewith). -14- 99.1 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Company's definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed on March 31, 2003). 99.2 1998 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from the Shore Bancshares, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on September 25, 1998 (Registration No. 333-64319)). 99.3 Talbot Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 4, 2001 (Registration No. 333-60214)). - ----------------------------------------------- * Previously filed with the Form 10-K to which this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A relates. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. On November 12, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to report in Item 5 that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement with Midstate Bancorp. -15- SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Shore Bancshares, Inc. Date: June 30, 2004 By: /s/ W. Moorhead Vermilye ------------------------------------- W. Moorhead Vermilye President and CEO -16- EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit No. Description - ----------- ----------- Exhibit 3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2000). Exhibit 3.2 Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2000). Exhibit 10.1 Form of Employment Agreement with W. Moorhead Vermilye (incorporated by reference to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 of the Company's Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2000). Exhibit 10.2 Form of Employment Agreement with Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated by reference to Appendix XIII of Exhibit 2.1 of the Company's Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2000). Exhibit 10.3 Form of Employment Agreement between The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC and Kevin P. LaTulip (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002). Exhibit 10.4 Form of Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreement between The Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003). Exhibit 10.5 Form of Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement between The Centreville National Bank of Maryland and Daniel T. Cannon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003). Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of the Company.* Exhibit 23 Consent of Stegman & Company.* Exhibit 31.1 Certifications of the CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed herewith). Exhibit 31.2 Certifications of the PAO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (filed herewith). Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 (furnished herewith). Exhibit 32.2 Certification of the PAO pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 (furnished herewith). Exhibit 99.1 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Company's definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed on March 31, 2003). Exhibit 99.2 1998 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on September 25, 1998 (Registration No. 333-64319)). Exhibit 99.3 Talbot Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 4, 2001 (Registration No. 333-60214)). - ------------------------------------- * Previously filed with the Form 10-K to which this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A relates. -17- EX-31 2 edg2616exh31_1.txt W. MOORHEAD VERMILYE CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, W. Moorhead Vermilye, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Shore Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: June 30, 2004 By: /s/ W. Moorhead Vermilye ------------------------------------ W. Moorhead Vermilye President/Chief Executive Officer EX-31 3 edg2616exh31_2.txt SUSAN E. LEAVERTON CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Susan E. Leaverton, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Shore Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: June 30, 2004 By: /s/ Susan E. Leaverton ---------------------------------- Susan E. Leaverton, CPA Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer EX-32 4 edg2616exh32_1.txt CERTIF OF PERIODIC REPT - W MOORHEAD VERMILYE EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Shore Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc. Date: June 30, 2004 /s/ W. Moorhead Vermilye ----------------------------------- W. Moorhead Vermilye President/Chief Executive Officer EX-32 5 edg2616exh32_2.txt CERTIF OF PERIODIC REPT - SUSAN E LEAVERTON EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Shore Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc. Date: June 30, 2004 /s/ Susan E. Leaverton -------------------------------------- Susan E. Leaverton Treasurer/Principal Accounting Officer -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----