XML 29 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12.
 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present information (in millions) about our assets and liabilities recognized at their fair values in our balance sheets categorized according to the fair value hierarchy of the inputs utilized by us to determine the fair values as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

We have elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple similar derivative contracts executed with the same counterparty, including any related cash collateral assets or obligations as shown below; however, fair value amounts by hierarchy level are presented in the following tables on a gross basis. We have no derivative contracts that are subject to master netting arrangements that are reflected gross on the balance sheet.
 
March 31, 2018
 
 
 
Total
Gross
Fair
Value
 
Effect of
Counter-
party
Netting
 
Effect of
Cash
Collateral
Netting
 
Net
Carrying
Value on
Balance
Sheet
 
Cash
Collateral
Paid or
Received
Not Offset
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity derivative
contracts
$
1,011

 
$
15

 
$

 
$
1,026

 
$
(1,013
)
 
$
(1
)
 
$
12

 
$

Physical purchase
contracts

 
2

 

 
2

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
2

 
n/a

Foreign currency
contracts
1

 

 

 
1

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
1

 
n/a

Investments of certain
benefit plans
63

 

 
8

 
71

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
71

 
n/a

Total
$
1,075

 
$
17

 
$
8

 
$
1,100

 
$
(1,013
)
 
$
(1
)
 
$
86

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Commodity derivative
contracts
$
1,030

 
$
16

 
$

 
$
1,046

 
$
(1,013
)
 
$
(33
)
 
$

 
$
(97
)
Environmental credit
obligations

 
87

 

 
87

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
87

 
n/a

Physical purchase
contracts

 
2

 

 
2

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
2

 
n/a

Total
$
1,030

 
$
105

 
$

 
$
1,135

 
$
(1,013
)
 
$
(33
)
 
$
89

 

 
December 31, 2017
 
 
 
Total
Gross
Fair
Value
 
Effect of
Counter-
party
Netting
 
Effect of
Cash
Collateral
Netting
 
Net
Carrying
Value on
Balance
Sheet
 
Cash
Collateral
Paid or
Received
Not Offset
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity derivative
contracts
$
875

 
$
19

 
$

 
$
894

 
$
(893
)
 
$

 
$
1

 
$

Investments of certain
benefit plans
65

 

 
8

 
73

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
73

 
n/a

Total
$
940

 
$
19

 
$
8

 
$
967

 
$
(893
)
 
$

 
$
74

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity derivative
contracts
$
955

 
$
14

 
$

 
$
969

 
$
(893
)
 
$
(76
)
 
$

 
$
(102
)
Environmental credit
obligations

 
104

 

 
104

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
104

 
n/a

Physical purchase
contracts

 
6

 

 
6

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
6

 
n/a

Foreign currency
contracts
7

 

 

 
7

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
7

 
n/a

Total
$
962

 
$
124

 
$

 
$
1,086

 
$
(893
)
 
$
(76
)
 
$
117

 




A description of our assets and liabilities recognized at fair value along with the valuation methods and inputs we used to develop their fair value measurements are as follows:

Commodity derivative contracts consist primarily of exchange-traded futures and swaps, and as disclosed in Note 13, some of these contracts are designated as hedging instruments. These contracts are measured at fair value using the market approach. Exchange-traded futures are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Swaps are priced using third-party broker quotes, industry pricing services, and exchange-traded curves, with appropriate consideration of counterparty credit risk, but because they have contractual terms that are not identical to exchange-traded futures instruments with a comparable market price, these financial instruments are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Physical purchase contracts represent the fair value of fixed-price corn purchase contracts. The fair values of these purchase contracts are measured using a market approach based on quoted prices from the commodity exchange or an independent pricing service and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Investments of certain benefit plans consist of investment securities held by trusts for the purpose of satisfying a portion of our obligations under certain U.S. nonqualified benefit plans. The assets categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a market approach based on quoted prices from national securities exchanges. The assets categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy represent insurance contracts, the fair value of which is provided by the insurer.

Foreign currency contracts consist of foreign currency exchange and purchase contracts entered into for our international operations to manage our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the local (functional) currencies of those operations. These contracts are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

Environmental credit obligations represent our liability for the purchase of (i) biofuel credits (primarily Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) in the U.S.) needed to satisfy our obligation to blend biofuels into the products we produce and (ii) emission credits under the California Global Warming Solutions Act (the California cap-and-trade system, also known as AB 32), Quebec’s Environmental Quality Act (the Quebec cap-and-trade system), and Ontario’s Climate Change Mitigation and Low-Carbon Economy Act (the Ontario cap-and-trade system), (collectively, the cap-and-trade systems). To the degree we are unable to blend biofuels (such as ethanol and biodiesel) at percentages required under the biofuel programs, we must purchase biofuel credits to comply with these programs. Under the cap-and-trade systems, we must purchase emission credits to comply with these systems. These programs are further described in Note 13 under “Environmental Compliance Program Price Risk.” The liability for environmental credits is based on our deficit for such credits as of the balance sheet date, if any, after considering any credits acquired or under contract, and is equal to the product of the credits deficit and the market price of these credits as of the balance sheet date. The environmental credit obligations are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured at fair value using the market approach based on quoted prices from an independent pricing service.

There were no transfers between levels for assets and liabilities held as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

There was no significant activity during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the fair value amounts categorized in Level 3 as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
There were no assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Other Financial Instruments
Financial instruments that we recognize in our balance sheets at their carrying amounts are shown in the following table along with their associated fair values (in millions):
 
 
 
March 31, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Fair Value
Hierarchy
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and temporary cash
investments
Level 1
 
$
4,658

 
$
4,658

 
$
5,850

 
$
5,850

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt (excluding capital leases)
Level 2
 
8,392

 
9,527

 
8,310

 
9,795