Form 10-Q/A for period ended June 30, 2002

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Registrant)

September 12, 2003

/s/ DAVID D. HILLARD

David D. Hillard

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, L8hRRaqTP95ozvgz1ZVatWkqLBHRs+cFUaacFxdw1/HQarjl2ZCzGYa0foJRULro JgTbPG5Mdm0/yEOrIBXn0w== 0001193125-03-049198.txt : 20030915 0001193125-03-049198.hdr.sgml : 20030915 20030915061406 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-03-049198 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20020630 FILED AS OF DATE: 20030915 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: FISHER COMMUNICATIONS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001034669 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: TELEVISION BROADCASTING STATIONS [4833] IRS NUMBER: 910222175 STATE OF INCORPORATION: WA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q/A SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-22439 FILM NUMBER: 03894762 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 100 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH STREET 2: SUITE 440 CITY: SEATTLE STATE: WA ZIP: 98109-4932 BUSINESS PHONE: 2064047000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 100 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH STREET 2: SUITE 440 CITY: SEATTLE STATE: WA ZIP: 98109-4932 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: FISHER COMPANIES INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19970226 10-Q/A 1 d10qa.htm FORM 10-Q/A FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 Form 10-Q/A for period ended June 30, 2002

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002

Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-22439

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

WASHINGTON

91-0222175

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

1525 One Union Square

600 University Street

Seattle, Washington 98101-3185

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(206) 404-7000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Common Stock, $1.25 par value, outstanding as of June 30, 2002: 8,594,060

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This amendment of Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc. sets forth restated financial statements and revised related disclosures as a result of revised accounting for goodwill in connection with the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, recognition of certain obligations and settlement losses relating to a pension plan which is in the process of termination, and a change in the reporting segment information. See Note 2 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the restatements. Financial Statements (Part I, Item 1) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Part I, Item 2) have been revised to reflect the restatement. This amendment to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002 amends and restates only those items of the previously filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002 which have been affected by the restatement. In order to preserve the nature and character of the disclosures set forth in such items as originally filed, no attempt has been made in this amendment to modify or update the disclosures in the original Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q except as required to reflect the effects of the restatement and to make revisions to the Notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. As a result, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A contains forward-looking information which has not been updated for events subsequent to the date of the original filing, and the Company directs you to its SEC filings made subsequent to that original filing date for additional information.

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

The following Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are presented for the Registrant, Fisher Communications, Inc., and its subsidiaries.


1.		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations:
		Three and six months ended June 30, 2002 (restated) and 2001.

2.		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (restated):
		June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

3.		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
		Six months ended June 30, 2002 (restated) and 2001.

4.		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income:
		Three and six months ended June 30, 2002 (restated) and 2001.

5.		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 1—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

	Six months ended June 30						Three months ended June 30
	2002 Restated			2001			2002			2001
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Revenue	$	74,526		$	81,594		$	39,844		$	42,361
Costs and expenses
Cost of services sold, exclusive of depreciation and amortization reported separately below, amounting to $8,778, $8,214, $4,399 and $4,146, respectively		33,290			33,426			16,314			16,217
Selling expenses		10,571			10,255			5,789			5,419
General and administrative expenses		21,316			22,727			10,743			11,237
Depreciation and amortization		9,917			12,032			4,946			6,203

		75,094			78,440			37,792			39,076

Income (loss) from operations		(568	)		3,154			2,052			3,285
Net gain on derivative instruments		6,103						6,828
Other income, net		1,376			1,879			789			635
Equity in operations of equity investees		32			1			33			4
Interest expense		(10,423	)		(8,875	)		(5,422	)		(4,229	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(3,480	)		(3,841	)		4,280			(305	)
Provision for federal and state income taxes (benefit)		(1,300	)		(1,333	)		760			(112	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(2,180	)		(2,508	)		3,520			(193	)
Loss from discontinued operations of milling businesses, net of income tax benefit of $173					(327	)					(327	)

Income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(2,180	)		(2,835	)		3,520			(520	)
Extraordinary item—loss from extinguishment of long-term debt, net of income tax benefit of $1,206		(2,058	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income tax benefit of $34,662		(64,373	)

Net income (loss)	$	(68,611	)	$	(2,835	)	$	3,520		$	(520	)

Income (loss) per share:
From continuing operations	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.29	)	$	0.41		$	(0.02	)
From discontinued operations					(0.04	)					(0.04	)

Income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(0.25	)		(0.33	)		0.41			(0.06	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(7.50	)

Net income (loss)	$	(7.99	)	$	(0.33	)	$	0.41		$	(0.06	)

Income (loss) per share assuming dilution:
From continuing operations	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.29	)	$	0.41		$	(0.02	)
From discontinued operations					(0.04	)					(0.04	)

Income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(0.25	)		(0.33	)		0.41			(0.06	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(7.50	)

Net income (loss)	$	(7.99	)	$	(0.33	)	$	0.41		$	(0.06	)

Weighted average shares outstanding		8,592			8,561			8,593			8,563
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution		8,592			8,561			8,613			8,563
Dividends declared per share	$	0.52		$	0.26		$	0.26		$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

	June 30 2002 Restated			December 31 2001 Restated
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and short-term cash investments	$	11,874		$	3,568
Receivables, net		28,823			33,081
Prepaid income taxes		7,550			10,760
Prepaid expenses		6,072			4,251
Television and radio broadcast rights		3,135			10,318
Net working capital of discontinued operations		777			216

Total current assets		58,231			62,194

Marketable Securities, at market value		96,973			97,107

Other Assets
Cash value of life insurance and retirement deposits		12,704			12,403
Television and radio broadcast rights		7,088			1,725
Goodwill, net		90,098			189,133
Investments in equity investees		2,860			2,594
Other		22,330			12,232
Net noncurrent assets of discontinued operations		1,863			1,635

		136,943			219,722

Property, Plant and Equipment, net		252,860			244,094

	$	545,007		$	623,117

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Notes payable	$	4,796		$	25,469
Trade accounts payable		4,498			5,490
Accrued payroll and related benefits		7,733			7,616
Television and radio broadcast rights payable		1,922			8,980
Other current liabilities		3,206			5,259

Total current liabilities		22,155			52,814

Long-term Debt, net of current maturities		307,491			261,480

Other Liabilities
Accrued retirement benefits		12,404			12,497
Deferred income taxes		28,150			50,824
Television and radio broadcast rights payable, long-term portion		1,007			1,570
Other liabilities		7,538			6,777

		49,099			71,668

Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, shares authorized 12,000,000, $1.25 par value; issued 8,594,060 in 2002 and 8,591,658 in 2001		10,743			10,739
Capital in excess of par		3,486			3,486
Deferred compensation		(53	)		(66	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income—net of income taxes:
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		62,273			62,360
Net loss on interest rate swap					(2,256	)
Retained earnings		89,813			162,892

		166,262			237,155

	$	545,007		$	623,117

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

	Six months ended June 30
	2002 Restated			2001
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(68,611	)	$	(2,835	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		9,944			13,559
Noncurrent deferred income taxes		(22,626	)		5,756
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		99,035
Net (gain) loss in equity investees		(32	)		1,631
Increase in fair market value of derivative under forward transaction		(9,677	)
Extraordinary item—loss from extinguishment of debt		3,264
Amortization of television and radio broadcast rights		7,857			7,682
Payments for television and radio broadcast rights		(13,657	)		(8,383	)
Other		105			(81	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Receivables		4,269			7,009
Inventories					(321	)
Prepaid income taxes		3,210			(7,610	)
Prepaid expenses		(1,821	)		(3,337	)
Cash value of life insurance and retirement deposits		(301	)		(340	)
Other assets		636			(1,031	)
Trade accounts payable, accrued payroll and related benefits and other current liabilities		(709	)		(8,516	)
Accrued retirement benefits		(93	)		(574	)
Other liabilities		3,788			146

Net cash provided by operating activities		14,581			2,755

Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of discontinued milling business assets					49,769
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		376			212
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(21,562	)		(18,324	)
Investments in equity investees					(1,496	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(21,186	)		30,161

Cash flows from financing activities
Net (payments) borrowings under notes payable		(8,259	)		2,311
Borrowings under borrowing agreements and mortgage loans		255,131			13,000
Payments on borrowing agreements and mortgage loans		(222,461	)		(34,464	)
Payment of deferred loan costs		(5,053	)
Retirement of preferred stock of subsidiary					(6,675	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		21
Cash dividends paid		(4,468	)		(4,452	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		14,911			(30,280	)

Net increase in cash and short-term cash investments		8,306			2,636
Cash and short-term cash investments, beginning of period		3,568			275

Cash and short-term cash investments, end of period	$	11,874		$	2,911

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Six months ended June 30						Three months ended June 30
	2002 Restated			2001			2002			2001
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Net income (loss)	$	(68,611	)	$	(2,835	)	$	3,520		$	(520	)
Other comprehensive income:
Cumulative effect of accounting change					(1,396	)
Effect of income taxes					489
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities		(134	)		(9,868	)		(3,388	)		4,216
Effect of income taxes		47			3,453			1,186			(1,476	)
Net gain (loss) on interest rate swap		835			(1,177	)					111
Effect of income taxes		(292	)		412						(39	)
Loss on settlement of interest rate swap reclassified to operations		2,636
Effect of income taxes		(923	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(66,442	)	$	(10,922	)	$	1,318		$	2,292

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unaudited financial information furnished herein, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments which are necessary to state fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Fisher Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of and for the periods indicated. Fisher Communications, Inc.’s wholly-owned subsidiaries include Fisher Broadcasting Company, Fisher Media Services Company, Fisher Mills Inc., and Fisher Properties Inc. The Company presumes that users of the interim financial information herein have read or have access to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation, except in regard to material contingencies or recent subsequent events, may be determined in that context. Accordingly, footnote and other disclosures which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed on March 27, 2002 by the Company have been omitted. The financial information herein is not necessarily representative of a full year’s operations.

Restatement

Goodwill Impairment—Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). FAS 142 requires the Company to test goodwill and intangible assets for impairment upon adoption and to test goodwill at least annually, or whenever events indicate that an impairment may exist. Upon the adoption of FAS 142, the Company, with the concurrence of its independent auditors, concluded there was no impairment of goodwill. Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company and the independent auditors determined that in performing the Company’s initial impairment test, the level (reporting unit) at which the Company should assess goodwill for impairment had been incorrectly identified. The Company has determined that the impairment test should have been conducted at the operating segment level, which consists and requires separate assessment, with respect to the broadcast operations, of each of the Company’s ten television and radio station groups. As a result of the reassessment of the reporting unit, the Company reperformed the first step of the transitional impairment test, which indicated that impairment existed. Completion of the second step of the transitional impairment test resulted in a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $99,035,000 related to five television reporting units and a related tax benefit of $34,662,000 (as the aforementioned goodwill was deductible for tax purposes).

As required by the transition provisions of FAS 142, the net loss of $64,373,000 resulting from the reperformed transitional test is recorded as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This restatement has no effect on the Company’s previously reported revenues and cash flows; nor does it affect results from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2002 or the three or six months ended June 30, 2001.

Pension Plan—In addition, subsequent to the issuance of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company concluded that certain pension-related expenses should have been recorded in periods prior to 2002.

The Company had a defined-benefit plan for all non-broadcasting employees. Benefit accruals under this plan ceased in July 2001 and plan assets were distributed to participants between 2001 and the first half of 2003. The Company determined that additional pension benefits paid in 2003 to certain retired participants who worked beyond their normal retirement age (“Late Retirees”) had not been recognized over periods in which those employees provided services. Accordingly, the Company revised its financial statements to record the additional obligation to Late Retirees (the “Pension Adjustment”). Pension adjustments amounting to $299,000, net of taxes, related to periods before January 1, 2000 were recorded as a reduction of retained earnings as of that date. The impact of recording the Pension Adjustments as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 was to reduce Retained Earnings by $299,000, increase Accrued Retirement Benefits by $469,000, and reduce Deferred Income Tax Liabilities by $170,000 to reflect the pension liability and expenses that should have been recorded as of those dates. The restatement has no effect on the Company’s previously reported results from operations or cash flows for the three or six months ended June 30, 2002 or 2001 because pension adjustments to record additional expenses that should have been recognized from January 1, 2000 through June 30, 2002 were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2002. Amounts related to 2000, 2001 and the first two quarters of 2002, totaling $12,000, net of taxes, were not significant in relation to the fourth quarter of 2002 or to prior periods.

Segment Reporting—As further discussed in Note 7 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company restated its reportable segments to present the previously reported broadcasting segment as two reportable segments: television and radio. In addition, the previously reported media services segment is presented as the Fisher Plaza segment with the remaining operations in an all other category. The segmental disclosures for comparable periods have been restated to conform to this presentation.

A summary of the significant effects of the restatements on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2002 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	As originally reported			Adjustments			As restated in Form 10-Q for period ended June 30, 2002
Loss before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	(2,180	)				$	(2,180	)
Extraordinary item—loss from extinguishment of long-term debt, net of income tax benefit of $1,206		(2,058	)					(2,058	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income tax benefit of $34,662				$	(64,373	)		(64,373	)

Net loss	$	(4,238	)	$	(64,373	)	$	(68,611	)

Loss per share (basic and assuming dilution)
Loss before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	(0.25	)				$	(0.25	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)					(0.24	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle				$	(7.50	)		(7.50	)

Net loss	$	(0.49	)	$	(7.50	)	$	(7.99	)

A summary of the significant effects of the restatements on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2002 is as follows (in thousands):

	As originally reported		Adjustments			As restated in Form 10-Q for period ended June 30, 2002
Assets
Goodwill, net	$	189,133	$	(99,035	)	$	90,098
Total assets	$	644,042	$	(99,035	)	$	545,007
Liabilities
Accrued retirement benefits	$	11,935	$	469		$	12,404
Deferred income taxes	$	62,982	$	(34,832	)	$	28,150
Stockholders’ equity
Retained earnings	$	154,485	$	(64,672	)	$	89,813
Total stockholders’ equity	$	230,934	$	(64,672	)	$	166,262

A summary of the significant effects of the restatements on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2001 is as follows (in thousands):

	As originally reported		Adjustments			As restated in Form 10-Q for period ended June 30, 2002
Liabilities
Accrued retirement benefits	$	12,028	$	469		$	12,497
Deferred income taxes	$	50,994	$	(170	)	$	50,824
Stockholders’ equity
Retained earnings	$	163,191	$	(299	)	$	162,892
Total stockholders’ equity	$	237,454	$	(299	)	$	237,155

Discontinued operations

During 2001 substantially all of the assets and working capital used in the Company’s flour milling and food distributions operations were sold. Net working capital of discontinued operations includes net current assets of the discontinued milling operations remaining during the wind-up phase. Net noncurrent assets of discontinued operations includes the book value of property, plant and equipment not included in the sales described above and other noncurrent assets less noncurrent liabilities relating to the discontinued milling operations.

Derivative instruments

On March 21, 2002 the Company entered into a variable forward sales transaction (forward transaction) with a financial institution. The Company’s obligations under the forward transaction are collateralized by 3,000,000 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock owned by the Company. A portion of the forward transaction will be considered a derivative and, as such, the Company will periodically measure its fair value and recognize the derivative as an asset or a liability. The change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in the income statement. The Company may in the future designate the forward transaction as a hedge and, accordingly, the change in fair value will be recorded in the income statement or in other comprehensive income depending on its effectiveness. As of June 30, 2002 the derivative portion of the forward transaction had a fair market value of $9,677,000, which is reported in other assets in the accompanying financial statements. Changes in the fair value of the forward transaction are included in net gain on derivative instruments in the accompanying financial statements. The amount available under the forward transaction is dependent on interest rates. The Company presently has authority from its board of directors to borrow proceeds of up to $70,000,000. As of June 30, 2002, $47,707,000, including accrued interest, was outstanding under the forward transaction.

The broadcasting subsidiary entered into an interest rate swap agreement fixing the interest rate at 6.87%, plus a margin based on the broadcasting subsidiary’s ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), on a portion of its floating rate debt. The notional amount of the swap is $65,000,000, which reduces as payments are made on principal outstanding under the floating rate debt, until termination of the contract in March 2004. As of June 30, 2002 the fair market value of the swap agreement declined $938,000 since inception in March 2002. Changes in the fair market value of the swap agreement are included in net gain on derivative instruments in the accompanying financial statements.

Television and radio broadcast rights and other commitments

The Company acquires television and radio broadcast rights, and has commitments under license agreements amounting to $80,084,000 for future rights to broadcast television and radio programs through 2008, and $12,000,000 in related fees. As these programs will not be available for broadcast until a future date, they have been excluded from the financial statements. In addition, the Company has commitments under a Joint Sales Agreement totaling $14,872,000 through 2007.

Income (loss) per share

Income (loss) per share is computed as follows (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

	Six months ended June 30						Three months ended June 30
	2002 Restated			2001			2002		2001
	(Unaudited)
Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period		8,592,183			8,560,578			8,592,708		8,563,114
Dilutive effect of:
Restricted stock rights								1,796
Stock options								18,712

Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution		8,592,183			8,560,578			8,613,216		8,563,114

Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(2,180	)	$	(2,508	)	$	3,520	$	(193	)
Loss from discontinued operations of milling businesses, net of income tax benefit					(327	)				(327	)

Income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(2,180	)		(2,835	)		3,520		(520	)
Extraordinary item, net of income tax benefit		(2,058	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income tax benefit		(64,373	)

Net income (loss)	$	(68,611	)	$	(2,835	)	$	3,520	$	(520	)

Income (loss) per share:
From continuing operations	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.29	)	$	0.41	$	(0.02	)
From discontinued operations					(0.04	)				(0.04	)

Income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(0.25	)		(0.33	)		0.41		(0.06	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(7.50	)

Net income (loss)	$	(7.99	)	$	(0.33	)	$	0.41	$	(0.06	)

Income (loss) per share assuming dilution:
From continuing operations	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.29	)	$	0.41	$	(0.02	)
From discontinued operations					(0.04	)				(0.04	)

Income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(0.25	)		(0.33	)		0.41		(0.06	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(7.50	)

Net income (loss)	$	(7.99	)	$	(0.33	)	$	0.41	$	(0.06	)

The dilutive effect of 1,474 restricted stock rights and options to purchase 442,933 shares are excluded for the six month period ended June 30, 2002 because such rights and options were anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of 4,728 restricted stock rights and options to purchase 490,988 shares are excluded for the six month and three month periods ended June 30, 2001 because such rights and options were anti-dilutive.

Segment information

The Company operates its continuing operations as three principal business units: broadcasting, media services, and real estate. The Company has previously reported its television and radio operations as one reportable segment called “Broadcasting.” The Company also previously reported Fisher Plaza and the “all other” category as one reportable segment called “Media Services.” The information reported for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 has been restated to reflect the appropriate reportable segments pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (FAS 131) and to reflect reclassification of discontinued operations.

Under the provisions of FAS 131 the Company reports financial data for four reportable segments: television, radio (included in the broadcasting business unit), Fisher Plaza (included in the media services business unit), real estate, and a remaining “all other” category. The television reportable segment includes the operations of the Company’s eleven network-affiliated television stations, and a 50% interest in a company that owns a twelfth television station. The radio reportable segment includes the operations of the Company’s 28 radio stations. Corporate expenses of the broadcasting business unit are allocated to the television and radio reportable segments based on a ratio that approximates historic revenue and operating expenses of the segments. The Fisher Plaza reportable segment includes the operations of a communications center located in Seattle that serves as home of the Company’s Seattle television operations and third-parties. The real estate reportable segment includes the Company’s proprietary commercial real estate and property management operations. The operations of Fisher Pathways, Inc., a provider of satellite transmission services, Fisher Entertainment LLC, a producer of content for cable and television and Civia, Inc., which are also included in the media services business unit, as well as the expenses of Fisher Media Services Company’s corporate group, are included in an “all other” category.

Revenue for each segment is as follows (in thousands):

	Six months ended June 30						Three months ended June 30
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Television	$	46,269		$	53,918		$	25,025		$	28,051
Radio		18,640			18,958			10,036			10,010
Fisher Plaza		2,055			1,905			990			833
Real estate		6,748			6,703			3,424			3,343
All other		1,073			886			440			513
Corporate and eliminations		(259	)		(776	)		(71	)		(389	)

	$	74,526		$	81,594		$	39,844		$	42,361

Intersegment revenue is reflected in the corporate and eliminations category in the table above.

Income (loss) before interest and income taxes for each segment are as follows (in thousands):

	Six months ended June 30						Three months ended June 30
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Television	$	915		$	4,613		$	1,792		$	3,584
Radio		1,768			1,534			1,748			1,687
Fisher Plaza		626			1,256			195			474
Real estate		2,269			3,290			1,234			1,653
All other		(2,533	)		(1,552	)		(1,287	)		(1,352	)
Corporate and eliminations		3,898			(4,107	)		6,020			(2,122	)

Total segment income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		6,943			5,034			9,702			3,924
Interest expense		(10,423	)		(8,875	)		(5,422	)		(4,229	)

Consolidated income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	(3,480	)	$	(3,841	)	$	4,280		$	(305	)

Identifiable assets for each segment are as follows (in thousands):

	June 30 2002 Restated		December 31 2001 Restated
Television	$	127,126	$	237,220
Radio		73,022		67,877
Fisher Plaza		109,408		94,056
Real estate		94,537		93,328
All other		5,389		2,429
Corporate and eliminations		132,885		126,356

Continuing operations		542,367		621,266
Discontinued operations—net		2,640		1,851

	$	545,007	$	623,117

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). Upon adoption the Company ceased amortizing goodwill. Goodwill is to be tested for impairment upon adoption of FAS 142, and will be tested annually or whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that an impairment may exist. See Note 2 for a discussion of the impact of adoption of FAS 142 on the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements The Company plans to complete its annual test for impairment of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2002.

As required by FAS 142, the results for periods prior to adoption have not been restated. The following table reconciles the reported net loss and net loss per share to that which would have resulted for the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2001 if FAS 142 had been adopted effective in 2001 (in thousands, except per share amounts).

	Six months ended June 30 2001			Three months ended June 30 2001
Net loss	$	(2,835	)	$	(520	)
Goodwill amortization, net of income tax benefit		1,703			857

Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(1,132	)	$	337

Net loss per share:
Basic	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.06	)
Assuming dilution	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.06	)
Pro forma net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.13	)	$	0.04
Assuming dilution	$	(0.13	)	$	0.04

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (FAS 143). FAS 143 requires entities to record the fair value of future liabilities for asset retirement obligations as an increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. The provisions of FAS 143 shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company has certain legal obligations, principally related to leases on locations used for broadcast system assets, which fall within the scope of FAS 143. These legal obligations include a responsibility to remediate the leased sites on which these assets are located. The Company believes that the adoption of FAS 143 will not have a material impact on its financial statements.

In May 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 145 “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (FAS 145). FAS 145, which updates, clarifies, and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements, addresses the reporting of debt extinguishments and accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. The provisions of FAS 145 shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company is currently assessing the impact of FAS 145 on its financial statements.

In July 2002, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (FAS 146). FAS 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. The provisions of FAS 146 shall be effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company is currently assessing the impact of FAS 146 on its financial statements.

Subsequent events

At a meeting held on July 3, 2002, the Company’s board of directors voted to suspend payment of the quarterly dividend.

On July 19, 2002, the Company’s broadcasting subsidiary entered into a non-binding letter of intent for the sale of all member interests in the limited liability company which owns the FCC licenses and the assets associated with the operation of television stations WFXG-TV, Augusta, Georgia and WXTX-TV, Columbus, Georgia. The transaction is subject to negotiation of a purchase and sale agreement, completion of due diligence, negotiation and execution of network affiliation agreements, and FCC consent to assignment of the licenses. If the transaction is concluded, the broadcasting subsidiary may incur a loss.

On July 26, 2002, the Company’s real estate subsidiary received notification that inspection contingencies contained in a purchase and sale agreement for sale of certain of that subsidiary’s property located on Lake Union in Seattle had been satisfied. Closing of the transaction is anticipated to occur in early September. The transaction is expected to result in a gain of approximately $3,700,000 net of income tax effects.

On July 30, 2002, the Company received notice of a buyer’s intent to proceed with the purchase of land and a building located in Portland, Oregon, which is owned by the Company’s flour milling subsidiary. The transaction is anticipated to close in late August. No gain or loss is anticipated, as the property is included in discontinued operations of the milling businesses.

Net proceeds from these sales, after income taxes, are expected to be used to reduce debt and to fund construction of Fisher Plaza.

10.

Reclassifications:

Certain prior-period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on operating results.

ITEM 2—MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Except for the historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results could differ materially from results that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements and discussed elsewhere herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below, those discussed under the caption “Additional Factors That May Affect Our Business, Financial Condition And Future Results”, and those discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may subsequently arise. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, prospects and results of operations. As used herein, unless the context requires otherwise, when we say “we”, “us”,” our”, or the “Company”, we are referring to Fisher Communications, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

This discussion is intended to provide an analysis of significant trends and material changes in our financial position and operating results during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 compared with the similar period in 2001.

Effective January 1, 2002, we restructured our continuing operations into three principal business segments: broadcasting, media services, and real estate. Accordingly, the operations of Fisher Entertainment LLC, a producer of content for cable and television, and Fisher Pathways, Inc., a provider of satellite transmission services, are included in the media services segment. Previously these businesses were reported in the broadcasting segment. The operations of the portion of Fisher Plaza not occupied by KOMO TV, which previously were reported in the real estate segment, are also included in the media services segment. Fisher Plaza operations attributable to KOMO TV are included in the broadcasting segment. The media services segment also includes the consolidated operations of Civia, Inc. In 2002, we converted certain loans into a majority equity interest in Civia, Inc. During the second quarter of 2002, we purchased all remaining minority equity interests in Civia. Accordingly, Civia’s 2002 operating results are consolidated, while its 2001 results are reported under the equity method. Certain 2001 balances have been reclassified to conform to 2002 classifications.

As further discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company restated its reportable segments to present the previously reported broadcasting segment as two reportable segments: television and radio. In addition, the previously reported media services segment is presented as the Fisher Plaza segment with the remaining operations in an all other category. The segmental disclosures for corresponding periods have been restated to conform to this presentation.

At a meeting held on July 3, 2002, the Company’s board of directors voted to suspend payment of the quarterly dividend.

Net proceeds from these sales, after income taxes, are expected to be used to reduce debt and to fund construction of Fisher Plaza.

The terms of the proposed sale of the Georgia television stations have not yet been formalized and the Company and the proposed buyer of the Georgia television stations may be unable to reach agreement on final terms or may reach agreement on terms, including the purchase price, that are substantially different from the terms contained in the non-binding letter of intent. The sale of the Lake Union properties and Oregon property may not be consummated in the event the conditions to the closing of the transactions are not satisfied by the Company or the buyers.

Percentage comparisons have been omitted within the following tables where they are not considered meaningful.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The SEC has defined a company’s critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations, and which require the company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, we have identified our critical accounting policies below. We also have other accounting policies, which involve the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that are significant to understanding our results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Allowance for doubtful accounts. We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, we record a specific reserve to reduce the amounts recorded to what we believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debts based on historical experience of bad debts as a percent of accounts receivable for each business unit, adjusted for relative improvements or deteriorations in the aging and changes in current economic conditions. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional charges may be required.

Television and radio broadcast rights. Television and radio broadcast rights are recorded as assets when the license period begins and the programs are available for broadcasting, at the gross amount of the related obligations. Costs incurred in connection with the purchase of programs to be broadcast within one year are classified as current assets, while costs of those programs to be broadcast after one year are considered noncurrent. The costs are charged to operations over their estimated broadcast periods using the straight-line method. Program obligations are classified as current or noncurrent in accordance with the payment terms of the license agreement. Costs of programs which are not available for broadcast are not recorded as assets and are disclosed as commitments.

The cost of television and radio broadcasting rights is reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at the lower of unamortized cost or estimated net realizable value, and is periodically reviewed for impairment. We estimate the net realizable value of our broadcasting rights based on techniques that rely on significant assumptions. If management’s expectations of programming usefulness are revised downward, it may be necessary to write down unamortized cost to estimated net realizable value.

Accounting for derivative instruments. We utilize an interest rate swap in the management of our variable rate exposure. The interest rate swap is held at fair value with the change in fair value being recorded in the statement of income.

We entered into a variable forward sales transaction with a financial institution. Our obligations under the Forward Transaction are collateralized by 3,000,000 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock owned by us. A portion of the Forward Transaction is considered a derivative and, as such, we periodically measure its fair value and recognize the derivative as an asset or a liability. The change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in the income statement. We may in the future designate the Forward Transaction as a hedge and, accordingly, the change in fair value will be recorded in the income statement or in other comprehensive income depending on its effectiveness.

Goodwill and long-lived assets. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price of certain broadcast properties over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible net assets acquired, and is accounted for under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (FAS 142), which we adopted as of January 1, 2002. Under FAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized but are tested for impairment at least on an annual basis.

The goodwill impairment test involves a comparison of the fair value of each of our reporting units, with the carrying amounts of net assets, including goodwill, related to each reporting unit. If the carrying amount exceeds a reporting unit’s fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The impairment loss is measured based on the amount by which the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill in the reporting unit being tested. Fair values are determined based on valuations that rely primarily on the discounted cash flow method. This method uses future projections of cash flows from each of our reporting units and includes, among other estimates, projections of future advertising revenue and operating expenses, market supply and demand, projected capital spending and an assumption of our weighted average cost of capital. To the extent they have been separately identified, our indefinite-lived assets (broadcast licenses) are tested for impairment on an annual basis by applying a fair-value-based test as required by FAS 142. Our evaluations of fair values include analyses based on the future cash flows generated by the underlying assets, estimated trends and other relevant determinants of fair value for these assets. If the fair value of the asset determined is less than its carrying amount, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and its carrying value. Changes in any of these estimates, projections and assumptions could have a material effect on the fair value of these assets in future measurement periods and result in an impairment of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles which could materially affect our results of operations.

We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of long-lived tangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (FAS 144). We use our judgment when applying the impairment rules to determine when an impairment test is necessary. Factors we consider which could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to historical or forecasted operating results, a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, and significant negative cash flows or industry trends.

Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying value of an asset exceeds its estimated fair value, which is based on future discounted cash flows. In estimating these future cash flows we use future projections of cash flows directly associated with and that were expected to arise as a direct result of the use and eventual disposition of the assets. These projections rely on significant assumptions. If it is determined that a long-lived asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss would be calculated based on the excess of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset over its fair value, primarily determined based on discounted cash flows. Changes in any of our estimates could have a material effect on the estimated future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset and result in a future impairment of the involved assets with a material effect on our future results of operations.

Pension benefits. We maintain a noncontributory supplemental retirement program for key management. We also maintained a qualified defined benefit plan covering our non-broadcasting employees, which ceased accruing benefit in 2001. We began distributing plan assets to participants in 2001. The cost of these plans is reported and accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements 87, 88 and 132. These Statements require significant assumptions regarding discount rates, salary increases and asset returns. We believe that our estimates are reasonable for these key actuarial assumptions; however future actual results will likely differ from our estimates, and these differences could materially affect our future results of operation either unfavorably or favorably.

RESTATEMENT

Goodwill Impairment—Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). FAS 142 requires the Company to test goodwill and intangible assets for impairment upon adoption and to test goodwill at least annually, or whenever events indicate that an impairment may exist. Upon the adoption of FAS 142, the Company, with the concurrence of its independent auditors, concluded there was no impairment of goodwill. Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company and the independent auditors determined that in performing the Company’s initial impairment test, the level (reporting unit) at which the company should assess the goodwill for impairment had been incorrectly identified. The Company has determined that the impairment test should have been conducted at the operating segment level, which consists and requires separate assessment, with respect to the broadcast operations, of each of the Company’s ten television and radio station groups. As a result of the reassessment of the reporting unit, the Company reperformed the first step of the transitional impairment test, which indicated that impairment existed. Completion of the second step of the transitional impairment test resulted in a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $99,035,000 related to five television reporting units and a related tax benefit of $34,662,000 (as the aforementioned goodwill was deductible for tax purposes).

Segment Reporting—As further discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company restated its reportable segments to present the previously reported broadcasting segment as two reportable segments: television and radio. In addition, the previously reported media services segment is presented as the Fisher Plaza segment with the remaining operations in an all other category. The segmental disclosures for corresponding periods have been restated to conform to this presentation.

See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a summary of the significant effects of the restatement on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As restated, operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2002 showed a consolidated loss of $68,611,000 including the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle amounting to $64,373,000, net of income taxes, and an extraordinary loss item amounting to $2,058,000, net of income taxes, for write-off of deferred loan costs relating to early extinguishment of long-term debt that was repaid during the first quarter. Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was $2,835,000, including a loss of $327,000 from discontinued operations of milling businesses.

Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2002 showed consolidated net income of $3,520,000. Second quarter results include net gain on derivative instruments amounting to $6,828,000, before income tax effects. Excluding net after-tax gains on derivative instruments, second quarter results would have been a loss of $785,000. Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2001 was $520,000, including a loss of $327,000 from discontinued operations of milling businesses.

Revenue

	Six months ended June 30								Three months ended June 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Television	$	46,269,000		-14.2	%	$	53,918,000		$	25,025,000		-10.8	%	$	28,051,000
Radio		18,640,000		-1.7	%		18,958,000			10,036,000		0.3	%		10,010,000
Fisher Plaza		2,055,000		7.9	%		1,905,000			990,000		18.7	%		833,000
Real estate		6,748,000		0.7	%		6,703,000			3,424,000		2.4	%		3,343,000
All other		1,073,000		21.2	%		886,000			440,000		-14.1	%		513,000
Corporate and eliminations		(259,000	)	-66.7	%		(776,000	)		(71,000	)	-82.1	%		(389,000	)

Consolidated	$	74,526,000		-8.7	%	$	81,594,000		$	39,844,000		-5.9	%	$	42,361,000

Television revenues, net of agency commissions, declined $7,649,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared with the same period of 2001, due largely to a weak economy in the Northwest and relatively weak performance by the ABC television network. Net revenue from radio operations declined $318,000.

Based on information published by Miller, Kaplan, Arase & Co. (Miller Kaplan), during the six-month period ended June 30, 2002, revenue for the overall Seattle television market declined 12%, and revenue for the overall Portland television market declined less than 1%. Our Seattle and Portland television stations experienced revenue declines of 23% and 12%, respectively, during the six-month period. We believe that the performance of ABC and coverage of the Winter Olympic Games on a competing network were contributing factors. We also believe that KOMO TV in Seattle is impacted by the success of the Seattle Mariners baseball team, whose games are broadcast on a competing station. Our smaller market television operations experienced mixed revenue results with the Oregon and Idaho stations reporting flat or increased revenue and the Washington and Georgia station groups reporting declines.

Our radio operations also reported mixed revenue results during the first six months of 2002. Local and national revenues for our Seattle radio operations declined 15% during the six-month period due, in part, to a decline in ratings, while local and national revenues at our Portland radio stations increased 23% due, in part, to improving ratings. Miller Kaplan reported that local and national radio revenues for the Seattle and Portland radio markets declined 10% and 1%, respectively, during the same period. Six-month revenue at our small market radio stations in Eastern Washington and Montana increased 6%.

Second quarter 2002 net television revenue declined $3,026,000, compared with the same period of last year. Net revenue from radio operations increased $26,000 compared to the second quarter of 2001.

During the second quarter our Seattle and Portland television stations experienced revenue declines of 22% and 7%, respectively. Our smaller market television operations experienced revenue increases ranging from 14% to 25%, except for the Washington and Georgia station groups, which experienced declines of 1% and 8%, respectively, compared with the same period last year.

Fisher Plaza revenue increased $150,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2002, and $157,000 during the second quarter reflecting increased occupancy.

The increase in real estate revenue is primarily due to rents from the Fisher Industrial Technology Center (Fisher ITC) located in Auburn, Washington, which was 71% leased during 2002. Fisher ITC was in lease-up phase during 2001, with the first tenant taking occupancy in May.

The increase in revenue for the all other category for the six months ended June 30, 2002 is principally due to revenues from program production and development at Fisher Entertainment. Revenue from Fisher Pathways declined 42% during the six-month period and 48% during the second quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared with the same periods last year, due to a decline in demand for our satellite transmission services.

Cost of services sold

	Six months ended June 30								Three months ended June 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Television	$	23,898,000		-5.1	%	$	25,193,000		$	12,165,000		-1.7	%	$	12,377,000
Radio		6,609,000		-11.4	%		7,459,000			2,706,000		-18.9	%		3,335,000
Fisher Plaza		645,000					11,000			365,000					39,000
Real estate		1,118,000		0.3	%		1,116,000			546,000		-5.7	%		579,000
All other		553,000		30.5	%		424,000			294,000		6.9	%		275,000
Corporate and eliminations		467,000		160.2	%		(777,000	)		238,000		161.5	%		(388,000	)

Consolidated	$	33,290,000		-0.4	%	$	33,426,000		$	16,314,000		0.6	%	$	16,217,000
Percentage of revenue		44.7	%				41.0	%		40.9	%				38.3	%

The cost of services sold consists primarily of costs to acquire, produce, promote, and broadcast television and radio programming, operating costs of Fisher Plaza, costs to operate the properties held by the real estate segment, and operating costs of the businesses included in the all other category. These costs are relatively fixed in nature, and do not necessarily vary on a proportional basis with revenue.

Emphasis on expense control resulted in a reduction in operating expenses at both the television and radio segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, compared with the same periods in 2001. The largest decline in the television segment was in salaries and related expenses due to staff reduction; however, many other operating expenses in the segment declined. The radio segment experienced the largest decreases in advertising and promotion.

The increases at Fisher Plaza for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, as compared to the same periods in 2001, were primarily attributable to certain lease-up costs that had been deferred during 2001 but were expensed in 2002.

Operating expenses in the all other category increased as each of the businesses included in the segment incurred additional costs in connection with growing these businesses.

Selling expenses

	Six months ended June 30								Three months ended June 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Television	$	5,333,000		-13.5	%	$	6,162,000		$	2,797,000		-13.4	%	$	3,229,000
Radio		5,011,000		23.2	%		4,068,000			2,883,000		32.7	%		2,173,000
All other		227,000					25,000			109,000					17,000

Consolidated	$	10,571,000		3.1	%	$	10,255,000		$	5,789,000		6.9	%	$	5,419,000
Percentage of revenue		14.2	%				12.6	%		14.5	%				12.8	%

Emphasis on expense control and reduced revenue resulted in a reduction in selling expenses at the television segment for the first half and second quarter of 2002, compared with the similar periods of 2001. The largest cost reductions were in salaries and commissions.

The increases at the radio segment for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, in comparison to the same periods in 2002, are primarily attributable to costs incurred with a joint sales agreement with KING-FM which we entered into in March 2002.

Selling expenses in the all other category increased during the first half and second quarter of 2002, compared with the same periods last year, due to efforts to increase revenue growth at Fisher Pathways and at Civia, Inc.

General and administrative expenses

	Six months ended June 30								Three months ended June 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Television	$	9,510,000		-4.9	%	$	9,996,000		$	4,872,000		4.0	%	$	4,687,000
Radio		4,446,000		-4.5	%		4,658,000			2,210,000		0.1	%		2,207,000
Real estate		1,196,000		-6.9	%		1,286,000			555,000		-10.0	%		616,000
All other		2,661,000		13.2	%		2,351,000			1,243,000		-17.5	%		1,507,000
Corporate and eliminations		3,503,000		-21.1	%		4,436,000			1,863,000		-16.10	%		2,220,000

Consolidated	$	21,316,000		-6.2	%	$	22,727,000		$	10,743,000		-4.4	%	$	11,237,000
Percentage of revenue		28.6	%				27.9	%		27.0	%				26.5	%

Emphasis on expense control during the first half and second quarter of 2002 resulted in expense reductions, or minimized expense increases, in many expense categories throughout the company. The all other category experienced an increase in the six-months ended June 30, 2002 due to growth efforts at Civia, Inc. in the early part of 2002.

Depreciation and amortization

	Six months ended June 30								Three months ended June 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Television	$	6,095,000		-23.9	%	$	8,010,000		$	3,006,000		-28.0	%	$	4,174,000
Radio		566,000		-57.3	%		1,325,000			279,000		-57.7	%		660,000
Fisher Plaza		784,000		22.9	%		638,000			429,000		34.4	%		319,000
Real estate		2,190,000		18.6	%		1,846,000			1,090,000		15.6	%		943,000
All other		164,000		26.1	%		130,000			82,000		23.2	%		66,000
Corporate and eliminations		118,000		44.1	%		83,000			60,000		44.3	%		41,000

Consolidated	$	9,917,000		-17.6	%	$	12,032,000		$	4,946,000		-20.3	%	$	6,203,000
Percentage of revenue		13.3	%				14.7	%		12.4	%				14.6	%

The decline in depreciation and amortization at the television and radio segments is primarily due to a new accounting standard that provides for discontinuation of goodwill amortization beginning January 1, 2002. Goodwill amortization in the television segment amounted to $1,937,000 during the first six months of 2001 and $977,000 during the second quarter of 2001. Goodwill amortization in the radio segment amounted to $663,000 during the first six months of 2001 and $332,000 during the second quarter of 2001. Depreciation expense remained relatively constant.

Depreciation increased at Fisher Plaza because depreciation of a portion of the project did not begin until the second half of 2001 when the first phase of the project was considered substantially complete. The amounts in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 therefore include a greater portion of Fisher Plaza assets that were subject to depreciation than in the prior periods in 2001.

The increase in depreciation in the real estate segment is primarily attributable to Fisher ITC, which was 71% leased in 2002, but was vacant until May of 2001.

The increase in depreciation at all other category is related to depreciation at Civia, Inc., the results of which are consolidated beginning in 2002. Previously the operations of Civia were accounted for as an equity investment.

Income (Loss) from operations

	Six months ended June 30								Three months ended June 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Television	$	1,432,000		-68.6	%	$	4,557,000		$	2,183,000		-39.1	%	$	3,585,000
Radio		2,008,000		38.7	%		1,448,000			1,958,000		19.8	%		1,635,000
Fisher Plaza		626,000		-50.2	%		1,256,000			196,000		-58.9	%		474,000
Real estate		2,243,000		-8.6	%		2,455,000			1,234,000		2.4	%		1,205,000
All other		(2,532,000	)	23.9	%		(2,044,000	)		(1,287,000	)	-4.8	%		(1,352,000	)
Corporate and eliminations		(4,345,000	)	-3.8	%		(4,518,000	)		(2,232,000	)	-1.4	%		(2,262,000	)

Consolidated	$	(568,000	)	-118.0	%	$	3,154,000		$	2,052,000		-37.5	%	$	3,285,000

Income (loss) from operations by business segment consists of revenue less operating expenses. In computing income from operations by business segment, net gain on derivative instruments and other income net, have not been included, and interest expense and income taxes have not been deducted.

Net gain on derivative instruments

Six months ended June 30			Three months ended June 30
2002		2001	2002		2001
$	6,103,000	$-0-	$	6,828,000	$-0-

Net gain on derivative instruments includes unrealized gain resulting from an increase in fair value of a variable forward sales transaction amounting to $9,677,000 in the first half of 2002 and $7,637,000 in the second quarter of 2002, and unrealized loss from a decline in fair value of an interest rate swap agreement amounting to $938,000 in the first half and $809,000 in the second quarter of 2002 (See Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements). The net gain for the six months ended June 30, 2002 also includes a realized loss amounting to $2,636,000 from termination, in March, of an interest rate swap agreement.

Other income, net

Six months ended June 30						Three months ended June 30
2002		% Change		2001		2002		% Change		2001
$	1,376,000	-26.8	%	$	1,879,000	$	789,000	24.2	%	$	635,000

Other income, net includes dividends received on marketable securities and, to a lesser extent, interest and miscellaneous income. The decline in the six months ended June 30, 2002 is primarily due to a reduction in the quarterly dividend paid by SAFECO Corporation effective in February 2001.

Interest expense

Six months ended June 30								Three months ended June 30
2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
$	(10,423,000	)	17.4	%	$	(8,875,000	)	$	(5,422,000	)	28.2	%	$	(4,229,000	)

Interest expense includes interest on borrowed funds, loan fees, and net payments under interest rate swap agreements. The increases in 2002 interest expense, compared with 2001, are attributable to higher amounts borrowed during 2002, partially offset by lower interest rates. Interest incurred in connection with funds borrowed to finance construction of Fisher Plaza and other significant capital projects is capitalized as part of the cost of the related project. Interest capitalized during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 amounted to $1,027,000 and $1,147,000, respectively. Interest capitalized during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 amounted to $627,000 and $558,000, respectively.

Provision for federal and state income taxes (benefit)

	Six months ended June 30								Three months ended June 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change	2001
	$	(1,300,000	)	-2.5	%	$	(1,333,000	)	$	760,000			$	(112,000	)
Effective tax rate		37.4	%				34.7	%		17.8	%			36.7	%

The provision for federal and state income taxes varies directly with pre-tax income. The tax benefits reflect our ability to utilize net operating loss carrybacks. The effective tax rate varies from the statutory rate primarily due to a deduction for dividends received, offset by the impact of state income taxes.

Extraordinary item, net of income tax benefit

	Six months ended June 30						Three months ended June 30
	2002			2001			2002			2001
	$	(2,058,000	)		$-0-			$-0-			$-0-
We repaid certain loans in March 2002 and, as a result, wrote off deferred loan costs amounting to $3,264,000. Net of income tax benefit this charge amounted to $2,058,000. Other comprehensive income (loss)
	Six months ended June 30						Three months ended June 30
	2002			2001			2002			2001
	$	2,169,000		$	(8,087,000	)	$	(2,202,000	)	$	2,812,000

Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gain or loss on our marketable securities and the effective portion of the change in fair value of an interest rate swap agreement, and is net of income taxes. During the six- and three-month periods ended June 30, 2002 the value of our marketable securities decreased $87,000 and $2,202,000, respectively, net of tax. A significant portion of the marketable securities consists of 3,002,376 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock. The per share market price of SAFECO Corporation common stock was $31.15 at December 31, 2001, $32.04 at March 31, 2002, $30.89 at June 30, 2002, $32.88 at December 31, 2000, $28.19 at March 31, 2001, and $29.50 at June 30, 2001.

During the period from January 1 through March 21, 2002 we used an interest rate swap, designated as a cash flow hedge, to manage exposure to interest rate risks. During this period the fair value of the swap increased $543,000, net of tax, which is recorded in other comprehensive income. In connection with the refinancing of our long-term debt the swap agreement was terminated and the remaining negative fair market value ($1,713,000 net of tax benefit) was reclassified to operations.

Unrealized gains and losses are reported as accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2002 we had working capital of $36,076,000 and cash and short-term cash investments totaling $11,874,000. We intend to finance working capital, debt service, capital expenditures, and dividend requirements primarily through operating activities. However, we will consider using available credit facilities to fund acquisition activities and significant real estate project development activities. As of June 30, 2002, approximately $37,000,000 is available under existing credit facilities.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2002 was $14,581,000. Net cash provided by operating activities consists of our net income or loss, increased by non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, and adjusted by changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net cash used in investing activities during the period was $21,186,000, primarily for purchase of property, plant and equipment (including for the Fisher Plaza project). Net cash provided by financing activities was $14,911,000, comprised of borrowings under borrowing agreements and mortgage loans of $255,131,000 less payments of $222,461,000 on borrowing agreements and mortgage loans, as two prior credit facilities were repaid from proceeds from new credit facilities, payments on notes payable of $8,259,000, payment of deferred loan costs of $5,053,000 paid in connection with obtaining new credit facilities, and cash dividends paid to stockholders totaling $4,468,000 or $.52 per share. At a meeting held on July 3, 2002, the Company’s board of directors voted to suspend payment of the quarterly dividend.

ADDITIONAL FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND FUTURE RESULTS

The following risk factors and other information included in this Quarterly Report should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

A continuing economic downturn in the Seattle, Washington or Portland, Oregon areas could adversely affect our operations, revenue, cash flow and earnings.

Our operations are concentrated primarily in the Pacific Northwest. The Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon markets are particularly important for our financial well being. Operating results during 2001 and 2002 were adversely impacted by a soft economy, and a continuing economic downturn in these markets could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. Because our costs of services are relatively fixed, we may be unable to significantly reduce costs if our revenues continue to decline. If our revenues do not increase or if they continue to decline, we could continue to suffer net losses or such net losses could increase.

Our debt service consumes a substantial portion of the cash we generate, but our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.

We currently use a significant portion of our operating cash flow to service our debt. Our leverage makes us vulnerable to an increase in interest rates or a downturn in the operating performance of our businesses or a decline in general economic conditions. It further limits our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements or other purposes, and may limit our ability to pay dividends. Finally, it inhibits our ability to compete with competitors who are less leveraged than we are, and it constrains our ability to react to changing market conditions, changes in our industry and economic downturns.

Prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, will affect our ability to satisfy our debt obligations. If in the future we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our obligations, we may need to refinance our debt, obtain additional financing, forego or delay acquisitions and capital expenditures, or sell assets. Any of these actions could adversely affect the value of our common stock. We cannot assure you that we will generate sufficient cash flow or be able to obtain sufficient funding to satisfy our debt service requirements.

Competition in the broadcasting industry and the rise of alternative entertainment and communications media may result in losses of audience share and advertising revenue by our stations.

We cannot assure you that any of our stations will maintain or increase its current audience ratings or advertising revenue market share. Fisher Broadcasting’s television and radio stations face intense competition from local network affiliates and independent stations, as well as from cable and alternative methods of broadcasting brought about by technological advances and innovations. The stations compete for audiences on the basis of programming popularity, which has a direct effect on advertising rates. Additional significant factors affecting a station’s competitive position include assigned frequency and signal strength. The possible rise in popularity of competing entertainment and communications media could also have a materially adverse effect on Fisher Broadcasting’s audience share and advertising revenue. We cannot predict either the extent to which such competition will materialize or, if such competition materializes, the extent of its effect on our business.

The performance of the television networks could harm our operating results.

The operating results of our broadcasting operations are primarily dependent on advertising revenues. Our Seattle and Portland television stations are affiliated with the ABC Television Network. Popularity of programming on ABC lagged behind other networks during 2001 and 2002 and, contributed to a decline in audience ratings, which negatively impacted revenues for our Seattle and Portland television stations. Continued weak performance by ABC could harm our business and results of operations.

Our operating results are dependent on the success of programming aired by our television and radio stations.

We make significant commitments to acquire rights to television and radio programs under multi-year agreements. The success of such programs is dependent partly upon unpredictable and volatile factors beyond our control such as audience preferences, competing programming, and the availability of other entertainment activities. A shift in audience preferences could cause our programming not to gain popularity or decline in popularity, which could cause our advertising revenues to decline. In some instances, we may have to replace programs before their costs have been fully-amortized, resulting in write-offs that increase operating costs.

A write-down of goodwill to comply with new accounting standards would harm our operating results.

Approximately $90 million, or 17% of our total assets as of June 30, 2002, consists of unamortized goodwill. On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). FAS 142 changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. As a result of our adoption of FAS 142 we recorded a charge for impairment of goodwill amounting to $99 million before income tax benefit or $64 million after income taxes. Goodwill is to be tested at the reporting unit level annually or whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. If impairment is indicated as a result of future annual testing, we will be required to record an additional impairment charge when such impairment occurs.

Our restructuring may cause disruption of operations and distraction of management, and may not achieve the desired results.

We continue to implement a restructuring of our corporate enterprise with the objective of allowing greater functional integration of core competencies and improving operational efficiencies. This restructuring may disrupt operations and distract management, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. We cannot predict whether this restructuring will achieve the desired benefits, or whether our company will be able to fully integrate our broadcast communications, media services and other operations. We cannot assure you that the restructuring will be completed in a timely manner or that any benefits of the restructuring will justify its costs. We may incur costs in connection with the restructuring in the areas of professional fees, marketing expenses, employment expenses, and administrative expenses. In addition, we may incur additional costs which we are unable to predict at this time.

Our efforts to develop new business opportunities are subject to technological risk and may not be successful, or results may take longer than expected to realize.

We are developing new opportunities for creating, aggregating and distributing content through non-broadcast media channels, such as the Internet, cell phones, and web-enabled personal digital assistants. The success of our efforts is subject to technological innovations and risks beyond our control, so that the anticipated benefits may take longer than expected to realize. In addition, we have limited experience in non-broadcast media, which may result in errors in the conception, design or implementation of a strategy to take advantage of the opportunities available in that area. We therefore cannot give any assurance that our efforts will result in successful products or services.

The FCC’s extensive regulation of the broadcasting industry limits our ability to own and operate television and radio stations and other media outlets.

The broadcasting industry is subject to extensive regulation by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Compliance with and the effects of existing and future regulations could have a material adverse impact on us. Issuance, renewal or transfer of broadcast station operating licenses requires FCC approval, and we cannot operate our stations without FCC licenses. Failure to observe FCC rules and policies can result in the imposition of various sanctions, including monetary forfeitures, the grant of short-term (i.e., less than the full eight years) license renewals or, for particularly egregious violations, the denial of a license renewal application or revocation of a license. While the majority of such licenses are renewed by the FCC, there can be no assurance that Fisher Broadcasting’s licenses will be renewed at their expiration dates, or, if renewed, that the renewal terms will be for eight years. If the FCC decides to include conditions or qualifications in any of our licenses, we may be limited in the manner in which we may operate the affected stations.

The Communications Act and FCC rules impose specific limits on the number of stations and other media outlets an entity can own in a single market. The FCC attributes interests held by, among others, an entity’s officers, directors, certain stockholders, and in some circumstances, lenders, to that entity for purposes of applying these ownership limitations. The existing ownership rules or proposed new rules may prevent us from acquiring additional stations in a particular market. We may also be prevented from engaging in a swap transaction if the swap would cause the other company to violate these rules.

The FCC is currently considering whether to modify its national and local television ownership limitations, as well as its local radio ownership limitations. We cannot predict what action the FCC will take. If the FCC adopts proposals to allow large broadcast groups to expand further their ownership on a national basis, to permit a single entity to own more than one station in markets with fewer independently owned stations, or to allow radio operators to increase their level of ownership in local markets, our existing operations could face increased competition from entities with significantly greater resources, and greater economies of scale, than Fisher Broadcasting.

Dependence on key personnel may expose us to additional risks.

Our business is dependent on the performance of certain key employees, including our chief executive officer and other executive officers. We also employ several on-air personalities who have significant loyal audiences in their respective markets. A substantial majority of our executive officers do not have employment contracts with us. We can give no assurance that all such key personnel will remain with us. The loss of any key personnel could harm our operations and financial results.

The non-renewal or modification of affiliation agreements with major television networks could harm our operating results.

Our television stations’ affiliation with one of the four major television networks (ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX) has a significant impact on the composition of the stations’ programming, revenues, expenses and operations. We cannot give any assurance that we will be able to renew our affiliation agreements with the networks at all, or on satisfactory terms. In recent years, the networks have been attempting to change affiliation arrangements in manners that would disadvantage affiliates. The non-renewal or modification of any of the network affiliation agreements could harm our operating results.

A network might acquire a television station in one of our markets, which could harm our business and operating results.

If a network acquires a television station in a market in which we own a station affiliated with that network, the network will likely decline to renew the affiliation agreement for our station in that market, which could harm our business and results of operations.

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks may continue to affect our results of operations.

We may continue to be affected by the events of September 11, 2001, as well as by the actions taken by the United States in response to such events. At this time, we cannot determine the ultimate extent of the effect of these events and their aftermath on the operating results of our television and radio broadcasting operations. However, as a result of expanded news coverage following the attacks and subsequent military action, we experienced a loss in advertising revenues. The events of September 11 negatively affected economic activity in the United States and globally, including the markets in which we operate. If weak economic conditions continue or worsen, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, there is no assurance that there will not be further terrorist attacks against the United States or United States businesses, including real or threatened attacks. Although we have received no specific threats of such attacks, any such attacks might directly impact our physical facilities or our personnel, potentially causing substantial losses or disruptions in our operations. Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover the losses and interruptions caused by terrorist attacks. Insurance premiums may increase, or adequate coverage may not be available.

Our operations may be adversely affected by power outages, increased energy costs or earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest.

Our corporate headquarters and a significant portion of our operations are located in the Pacific Northwest. The Pacific Northwest has from time-to-time experienced earthquakes and experienced a significant earthquake on February 28, 2001 which caused damage to some of our facilities. We do not know the ultimate impact on our operations of being located near major earthquake faults, but an earthquake could harm our operating results. In addition, the Pacific Northwest may experience power shortages or outages and increased energy costs. Power shortages or outages could cause disruptions to our operations, which in turn may result in a material decrease in our revenues and earnings and have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Power shortages or increased energy costs in the Northwest could harm the region’s economy, which could reduce our advertising revenues. Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover the losses and interruptions caused by earthquakes and power outages.

Our development, ownership and operation of real property is subject to risks, including those relating to the economic climate, local real estate conditions, potential inability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance, potential collection problems, reliance on significant tenants, and regulatory risks.

Revenue and operating income from our properties and the value of our properties may be adversely affected by the general economic climate, the local economic climate and local real estate conditions, including prospective tenants’ perceptions of attractiveness of the properties and the availability of space in other competing properties. We are developing the second building at Fisher Plaza which entails significant investment by us. The softened economy in the Seattle area could adversely affect our ability to lease the space of our properties on attractive terms or at all, which could harm our operating results. Other risks relating to our real estate operations include the potential inability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance, and the potential inability to collect rent due to bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise. Several of our properties are leased to tenants that occupy substantial portions of such properties and the departure of one or more of them or the inability of any of them to pay their rents or other fees could have a significant adverse effect on our real estate revenues. Real estate income and values may also be adversely affected by such factors as applicable laws and regulations, including tax and environmental laws, interest rate levels and the availability of financing. We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rent loss insurance with respect to our properties. There are, however, certain losses that may be either uninsurable, not economically insurable or in excess of our current insurance coverage limits. If an uninsured loss occurs with respect to a property, it could harm our operating results.

A reduction on the periodic dividend on the common stock of SAFECO may adversely affect our revenue, cash flow and earnings.

We are a 2.3% stockholder of the common stock of SAFECO Corporation. If SAFECO reduces its periodic dividends, it will negatively affect our revenue, cash flow and earnings. In February 2001, SAFECO reduced its quarterly dividend from $0.37 to $0.185 per share.

Antitrust law and other regulatory considerations could prevent or delay expansion of our business or adversely affect our revenues.

The completion of any future transactions we may consider may be subject to the notification filing requirements, applicable waiting periods and possible review by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. Any television or radio station acquisitions or dispositions will be subject to the license transfer approval process of the FCC. Review by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission may cause delays in completing transactions and, in some cases, result in attempts by these agencies to prevent completion of transactions or to negotiate modifications to the proposed terms. Review by the FCC, particularly review of concentration of market revenue share, may also cause delays in completing transactions. Any delay, prohibition or modification could adversely affect the terms of a proposed transaction or could require us to abandon an acquisition or disposition opportunity. In addition, campaign finance reform laws or regulations could result in a reduction in funds being spent on advertising in certain political races, which would adversely affect our revenues and results of operations in election years.

Our investments in HDTV and digital broadcasting may not result in revenue sufficient to justify the investment.

The ultimate success of digital television broadcasting will depend on programming being produced and distributed in a digital format, the effect of current or future laws and regulations relating to digital television, including the FCC’s determination with respect to “must-carry” rules for carriage of each station’s digital channel and receiver standards for digital reception, and public acceptance and willingness to buy new digital television sets. Unless consumers embrace digital television and purchase enough units to cause home receiver prices to decline, the general public may not switch to the new technology, delaying or preventing its ultimate economic viability. Our investments in HDTV and digital broadcasting may not generate earnings and revenue sufficient to justify the investments.

We periodically engage in new business ventures which may adversely affect our operating results.

While Fisher Broadcasting has created programming in the past, we do not have significant experience in the creation of programming on the scale contemplated by Fisher Entertainment. Factors that could harm the results of Fisher Entertainment include competition from existing and new competitors, as well as related performance and price pressures, potential difficulties in relationships with cable and television networks, failure to obtain air time for the programming produced and the changing tastes and personnel of the acquirers of programming. There are many inherent risks in new business ventures such as Fisher Entertainment and Civia, Inc., including startup costs, performance of certain key personnel, the unpredictability of audience tastes, and product acceptance.

Acquisitions could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition and are in any event uncertain.

We may opportunistically acquire broadcasting and other assets we believe will improve our competitive position. However, any acquisition may fail to increase our cash flow or yield other anticipated benefits due to a number of other risks, including:

•

failure or unanticipated delays in completing acquisitions due to difficulties in obtaining regulatory approval,

•

failure of an acquisition to maintain profitability, generate cash flow, or provide expected benefits,

•

difficulty in integrating the operations, systems and management of any acquired assets or operations,

•

diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, and

•

loss of key employees of acquired assets or operations.

Some competitors for acquisition of broadcasting or other assets are likely to have greater financial and other resources than we do. We cannot predict the availability of acquisition opportunities in which we might be interested.

ITEM 3—QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

The market risk in our financial instruments represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in financial rates. We are exposed to market risk in the areas of interest rates and securities prices. These exposures are directly related to our normal funding and investing activities.

Interest Rate Exposure

Our strategy in managing exposure to interest rate changes is to maintain a balance of fixed- and variable-rate instruments. We will also consider entering into interest rate swap agreements at such times as it deems appropriate.

As of June 30, 2002, our fixed rate debt totaled $114,864,000. The fair value of our fixed-rate debt is estimated to be approximately $1,776,000 greater than the carrying amount. Market risk is estimated as the potential change in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent change in interest rates and, as of June 30, 2002, amounted to $2,934,000.

We also had $197,193,000 in variable-rate debt outstanding as of June 30, 2002. A hypothetical 10 percent change in interest rates underlying these borrowings would result in a $1,225,000 annual change in our pre-tax earnings and cash flows.

We are a party to an interest rate swap agreement fixing the interest rate at 6.87%, plus a margin based on the broadcasting subsidiary’s ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA, on a portion of our floating rate debt outstanding under an eight-year credit facility (broadcast facility). The notional amount of the swap reduces as payments are made on principal outstanding under the broadcast facility until termination of the contract on March 22, 2004. As of June 30, 2002, the notional amount of the swap was $65,000,000 and the fair value of the swap agreement was a liability of $4,274,000. A hypothetical 10 percent change in interest rates would change the fair value of our swap agreement by approximately $241,000 as of June 30, 2002. We have not designated the swap as a cash flow hedge; accordingly changes in the fair value of the swap are reported in net gain on derivative instruments in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Marketable Securities Exposure

The fair value of our investments in marketable securities as of June 30, 2002 was $96,973,000. Marketable securities consist of equity securities traded on a national securities exchange or reported on the NASDAQ securities market. A significant portion of the marketable securities consists of 3,002,376 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock. As of June 30, 2002, these shares represented 2.3% of the outstanding common stock of SAFECO Corporation. While we currently do not intend to dispose of our investments in marketable securities, we have classified the investments as available-for-sale under applicable accounting standards. Mr. William W. Krippaehne, Jr., President, CEO, and a Director of the Company, is a Director of SAFECO Corporation. A hypothetical 10 percent change in market prices underlying these securities would result in a $9,697,000 change in the fair value of the marketable securities portfolio. Although changes in securities prices would affect the fair value of the marketable securities portfolio and cause unrealized gains or losses, such gains or losses would not be realized unless the investments are sold.

As of June 30, 2002, 3,000,000 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock owned by the company were pledged as collateral under a variable forward sales transaction (forward transaction) with a financial institution. A portion of the forward transaction will be considered a derivative and, as such, we will periodically measure its fair value and recognize the derivative as an asset or a liability. The change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in the income statement. As of June 30, 2002 the derivative portion of the forward transaction had a fair market value of $9,677,000, which is included in net gain on derivative instruments in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. A hypothetical 10 percent change in the market price of SAFECO Corporation stock would change the market value of the forward transaction by approximately $6,000,000. A hypothetical 10 percent change in interest rates or in volatility would change the market value of the forward transaction by approximately $1,000,000.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits:


10.1	*	Confirmation of OTC Variable Forward Sale Transaction, dated June 3, 2002

10.2	*	Confirmation of OTC Variable Forward Sale Transaction, dated June 3, 2002

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

32.1		Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Incorporated by reference from an original report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2002.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

A report on Form 8-K was filed with the Commission on July 3, 2002 announcing that the Company’s Board of Directors had voted to suspend payment of the Company’s quarterly dividend.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

EX-31.1 3 dex311.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, William W. Krippaehne, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

Date: September 12, 2003

/s/ WILLIAM W. KRIPPAEHNE, JR.

William W. Krippaehne, Jr.

President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2 4 dex312.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

Date: September 12, 2003

/s/ DAVID D. HILLARD

David D. Hillard

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1 5 dex321.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q/A”), I William W. Krippaehne Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 12, 2003



		/s/ WILLIAM W. KRIPPAEHNE JR.
		William W. Krippaehne Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2 6 dex322.htm CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q/A”), I David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)

The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(4)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 12, 2003

/s/ DAVID D. HILLARD

David D. Hillard

Senior Vice President

Chief Financial Officer

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----