Form 10-Q

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-22439

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

WASHINGTON		91-0222175
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1525 One Union Square

600 University Street

Seattle, Washington 98101-3185

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(206) 404-7000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Common Stock, $1.25 par value, outstanding as of September 30, 2002: 8,594,060

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

The following Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are presented for the Registrant, Fisher Communications, Inc., and its subsidiaries.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations:

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:

September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:

Nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income:

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

	Nine months ended September 30						Three months ended September 30
	2002			2001			2002			2001
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
	(Unaudited)
Revenue
Broadcasting	$	97,668		$	105,270		$	32,760		$	32,394
Media services		4,892			4,739			1,779			1,948
Real estate		9,595			9,027			3,090			3,100

		112,155			119,036			37,629			37,442

Costs and expenses
Cost of services sold		50,326			52,208			17,036			17,994
Selling expenses		16,491			15,389			5,920			5,134
General and administrative expenses		33,103			32,208			11,787			10,269
Depreciation and amortization		15,723			18,148			5,806			6,116

		115,643			117,953			40,549			39,513

Income (loss) from operations		(3,488	)		1,083			(2,920	)		(2,071	)
Net gain on derivative instruments		7,592						1,489
Other income, net		7,571			2,508			6,195			629
Equity in operations of equity investees		45			(9	)		13			(10	)
Interest expense		15,831			13,008			5,408			4,133

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and extraordinary item		(4,111	)		(9,426	)		(631	)		(5,585	)
Provision for federal and state income taxes (benefit)		(1,513	)		(3,252	)		(213	)		(1,919	)

Loss from continuing operations before extraordinary item		(2,598	)		(6,174	)		(418	)		(3,666	)
Loss from discontinued operations of milling businesses, net of income tax benefit of $269 in 2002 and $173 in 2001		(500	)		(327	)		(500	)

Loss before extraordinary item		(3,098	)		(6,501	)		(918	)		(3,666	)
Extraordinary item – loss from extinguishment of long-term debt, net of income tax benefit of $1,206		(2,058	)

Net loss	$	(5,156	)	$	(6,501	)	$	(918	)	$	(3,666	)

Loss per share:
From continuing operations	$	(0.30	)	$	(0.72	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.43	)
From discontinued operations		(0.06	)		(0.04	)		(0.06	)		—

Loss before extraordinary item		(0.36	)		(0.76	)		(0.11	)		(0.43	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)

Net loss	$	(0.60	)	$	(0.76	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.43	)

Loss per share assuming dilution:
From continuing operations	$	(0.30	)	$	(0.72	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.43	)
From discontinued operations		(0.06	)		(0.04	)		(0.06	)		—

Loss before extraordinary item		(0.36	)		(0.76	)		(0.11	)		(0.43	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)

Net loss	$	(0.60	)	$	(0.76	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.43	)

Weighted average shares outstanding		8,593			8,569			8,594			8,585
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution		8,593			8,569			8,594			8,585
Dividends declared per share	$	0.52		$	0.78		$	—		$	0.52

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

	September 30 2002			December 31 2001
	(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and short-term cash investments	$	8,016		$	3,568
Restricted cash		15,146
Receivables, net		27,811			33,081
Prepaid income taxes		13,935			10,760
Prepaid expenses		5,831			4,251
Television and radio broadcast rights		9,155			10,318
Net working capital of discontinued operations					216

Total current assets		79,894			62,194

Marketable Securities, at market value		98,315			97,107

Other Assets
Cash value of life insurance and retirement deposits		13,533			12,403
Television and radio broadcast rights		7,129			1,725
Goodwill, net		189,133			189,133
Investments in equity investees		2,873			2,594
Other		23,888			12,232
Net noncurrent assets of discontinued operations					1,635

		236,556			219,722

Property, Plant and Equipment, net		247,828			244,094

	$	662,593		$	623,117

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Notes payable	$	4,622		$	25,469
Trade accounts payable		4,434			5,490
Accrued payroll and related benefits		8,480			7,616
Television and radio broadcast rights payable		8,708			8,980
Other current liabilities		3,454			5,259

Total current liabilities		29,698			52,814

Long-term Debt, net of current maturities		310,864			261,480

Other Liabilities
Accrued retirement benefits		13,276			12,028
Deferred income taxes		69,242			50,994
Television and radio broadcast rights payable, long-term portion		1,063			1,570
Other liabilities		7,555			6,777

		91,136			71,369

Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, shares authorized 12,000,000, $1.25 par value; issued 8,594,060 in 2002 and 8,591,658 in 2001		10,743			10,739
Capital in excess of par		3,486			3,486
Deferred compensation		(47	)		(66	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income – net of income taxes:
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		63,146			62,360
Net loss on interest rate swap					(2,256	)
Retained earnings		153,567			163,191

		230,895			237,454

	$	662,593		$	623,117

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

	Nine months ended
	September 30
	2002			2001
	(in thousands)
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(5,156	)	$	(6,501	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		15,759			19,688
Noncurrent deferred income taxes		17,827			4,402
Net (gain) loss in equity investees		(44	)		3,174
Gain on sale of real estate		(5,511	)
Increase in fair market value of derivative instruments		(10,228	)
Extraordinary item – loss from extinguishment of debt		3,264
Amortization of television and radio broadcast rights		11,168			11,739
Payments for television and radio broadcast rights		(16,188	)		(12,550	)
Other		139			13
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Receivables		5,279			9,282
Prepaid income taxes		(3,175	)		(10,997	)
Prepaid expenses		(1,579	)		(3,620	)
Cash value of life insurance and retirement deposits		(1,130	)		(424	)
Other assets		949			(1,008	)
Trade accounts payable, accrued payroll and related
benefits and other current liabilities		169			(9,629	)
Accrued retirement benefits		1,248			100
Other liabilities		4,604			395

Net cash provided by operating activities		17,395			4,064

Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of discontinued milling business assets		2,800			49,910
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		13,210			213
Restricted cash		(15,146	)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(30,892	)		(31,903	)
Investments in equity investees					(2,736	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(30,028	)		15,484

Cash flows from financing activities
Net (payments) borrowings under notes payable		(8,474	)		5,107
Borrowings under borrowing agreements and mortgage loans		268,131			37,000
Payments on borrowing agreements and mortgage loans		(233,039	)		(47,632	)
Payment of deferred loan costs		(5,090	)
Retirement of preferred stock of subsidiary					(6,675	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		21			1,249
Cash dividends paid		(4,468	)		(6,686	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		17,081			(17,637	)

Net increase in cash and short-term cash investments		4,448			1,911
Cash and short-term cash investments, beginning of period		3,568			275

Cash and short-term cash investments, end of period	$	8,016		$	2,186

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Nine months ended						Three months ended
	September 30						September 30
	2002			2001			2002			2001
	(In thousands)
	(Unaudited)
Net loss	$	(5,156	)	$	(6,501	)	$	(918	)	$	(3,666	)
Other comprehensive income:
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax benefit of $489					(907	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities		1,209			(7,791	)		1,343			2,077
Effect of income taxes		(423	)		2,727			(470	)		(726	)
Net gain (loss) on interest rate swap		835			(2,563	)					(1,386	)
Effect of income taxes		(292	)		897						484
Loss on settlement of interest rate swap reclassified to operations, net of income tax benefit of $923		1,713

Comprehensive loss	$	(2,114	)	$	(14,138	)	$	(45	)	$	(3,217	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unaudited financial information furnished herein, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments which are necessary to state fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Fisher Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of and for the periods indicated. Fisher Communications, Inc.’s wholly-owned subsidiaries include Fisher Broadcasting Company, Fisher Media Services Company, Fisher Mills Inc., and Fisher Properties Inc. The Company presumes that users of the interim financial information herein have access to and have read the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation, except in regard to material contingencies or recent subsequent events, may be determined in that context. Accordingly, footnote and other disclosures which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed on March 27, 2002 by the Company have been omitted. The financial information herein is not necessarily representative of a full year’s operations.

Discontinued operations

During 2001 substantially all of the assets and working capital used in the Company’s flour milling and food distributions operations were sold. In September 2002, land and a building in Portland, Oregon used in the Company’s food distributions operations (“Portland Property”) were sold. Net proceeds from the sale were $2,800,000. During the quarter ended September 30, 2002, estimates of the net realizable value of property, plant and equipment not included in the sales described above and certain liabilities relating to the wind-up of discontinued milling operations were revised, resulting in a loss from discontinued operations amounting to $500,000, net of taxes.

Sales of real estate

In September 2002, certain property used in the Company’s real estate operations located on Lake Union in Seattle (“Lake Union Property”) was sold. Net proceeds from the sale were $12,834,000.

The Company intends to use proceeds from the sales of the Lake Union Property and the Portland Property to fund construction of Fisher Plaza. Accordingly, the Company entered into a Qualified Exchange Accommodation Agreement and proceeds from the sales have been deposited with a Qualified Intermediary (“Intermediary”), which will disburse the funds for payment of qualifying construction expenditures. As a result, under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, income taxes amounting to approximately $2,500,000 resulting from the sales have been deferred. At September 30, 2002, restricted cash represents $15,146,000 on deposit with the Intermediary that is intended for use in funding Fisher Plaza construction through February 2003.

Derivative instruments

On March 21, 2002 the Company entered into a variable forward sales transaction (“Forward Transaction”) with a financial institution. The Company’s obligations under the Forward Transaction are collateralized by 3,000,000 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock owned by the Company. A portion of the Forward Transaction will be considered a derivative and, as such, the Company will periodically measure its fair value and recognize the derivative as an asset or a liability. The change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in the income statement. The Company may in the future designate the Forward Transaction as a hedge and, accordingly, the change in fair value will be recorded in the income statement or in other comprehensive income depending on its effectiveness. As of September 30, 2002 the derivative portion of the Forward Transaction had a fair market value of $11,682,000, which is reported in other assets in the accompanying financial statements. Changes in the fair value of the Forward Transaction are included in net gain on derivative instruments in the accompanying financial statements. The amount available under the Forward Transaction is dependent on interest rates. The Company presently has authority from its board of directors to borrow proceeds of up to $70,000,000. As of September 30, 2002, $58,715,000, including accrued interest of $1,934,000, was outstanding under the Forward Transaction. Subsequent to September 30 the Company borrowed an additional $8,000,000.

The broadcasting subsidiary entered into an interest rate swap agreement fixing the interest rate on a portion of its floating rate debt at 6.87%, plus a margin based on the broadcasting subsidiary’s ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization). The notional amount of the swap is $65,000,000, which reduces as payments are made on principal outstanding

under the floating rate debt, until termination of the interest rate swap agreement in March 2004. As of September 30, 2002, the fair market value of the swap agreement declined $1,454,000 since inception in March 2002. Changes in the fair market value of the swap agreement are included in net gain on derivative instruments in the accompanying financial statements.

Television and radio broadcast rights and other commitments

The Company acquires television and radio broadcast rights, and has commitments under license agreements amounting to $77,908,000 for future rights to broadcast television and radio programs through 2008, and $12,000,000 in related fees. As these programs will not be available for broadcast until a future date, they have been excluded from the financial statements. In addition, the Company has commitments under a Joint Sales Agreement totaling $14,266,000 through 2007.

Income (loss) per share

Income (loss) per share is computed as follows:

	Nine months ended September 30						Three months ended September 30
	2002			2001			2002			2001
	(Unaudited)
Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period		8,592,818			8,568,799			8,594,060			8,585,091

Loss from continuing operations	$	(2,598	)	$	(6,174	)	$	(418	)	$	(3,666	)
Loss from discontinued operations of milling businesses, net of income tax benefit		(500	)		(327	)		(500	)

Loss before extraordinary item		(3,098	)		(6,501	)		(918	)		(3,666	)
Extraordinary item, net of income tax benefit		(2,058	)

Net loss	$	(5,156	)	$	(6,501	)	$	(918	)	$	(3,666	)

Loss per share:
From continuing operations	$	(0.30	)	$	(0.72	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.43	)
From discontinued operations		(0.06	)		(0.04	)		(0.06	)

Loss before extraordinary item		(0.36	)		(0.76	)		(0.11	)		(0.43	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)

Net loss	$	(0.60	)	$	(0.76	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.43	)

Loss per share assuming dilution:
From continuing operations	$	(0.30	)	$	(0.72	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.43	)
From discontinued operations		(0.06	)		(0.04	)		(0.06	)

Loss before extraordinary item		(0.36	)		(0.76	)		(0.11	)		(0.43	)
Extraordinary item		(0.24	)

Net loss	$	(0.60	)	$	(0.76	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.43	)

The dilutive effect of 1,474 restricted stock rights and options to purchase 442,933 shares are excluded for the nine month and three month periods ended September 30, 2002 because such rights and options were anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of 4,422 restricted stock rights and options to purchase 456,393 shares are excluded for the nine month and three month periods ended September 30, 2001 because such rights and options were anti-dilutive.

Segment information

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company restructured its continuing operations into three principal business segments: broadcasting, media services, and real estate. The operations of Fisher Entertainment LLC, a producer of content for cable and television, and Fisher Pathways, Inc., a provider of satellite transmission services, are included in the media services segment. Previously these businesses were reported in the broadcasting segment. The operations of the portion of Fisher Plaza not occupied by KOMO TV, which previously were reported in the real estate segment, are also included in the media services segment. Fisher Plaza operations attributable to KOMO TV are included in the broadcasting segment. The media services segment also includes the operations of Civia, Inc. Certain 2001 balances have been reclassified to conform to 2002 classifications.

Income from operations by business segment consists of revenue less operating expenses. In computing income from operations by business segment, other income (expense), net, has not been included, and interest expense, income taxes and unusual items have not been deducted. Identifiable assets by business segment are those assets used in the operations of each segment. Corporate assets are principally marketable securities.

Identifiable assets for each segment are as follows:

	September 30 2002		December 31 2001
Broadcasting	$	337,637	$	340,638
Media services		102,823		62,936
Real estate		86,825		93,328
Corporate, eliminations and other		135,308		124,364

Continuing operations		662,593		621,266
Discontinued operations—net				1,851

	$	662,593	$	623,117

Income (loss) from operations for each segment are as follows:

	Nine months ended September 30						Three months ended September 30
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Broadcasting	$	2,421		$	5,661		$	(773	)	$	(344	)
Media services		(1,950	)		(1,530	)		(532	)		(1,092	)
Real estate		2,797			3,212			797			1,107
Corporate, eliminations and other		(6,756	)		(6,260	)		(2,412	)		(1,742	)

	$	(3,488	)	$	1,083		$	(2,920	)	$	(2,071	)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). Upon adoption the Company ceased amortizing goodwill. Goodwill is to be tested for impairment upon adoption of FAS 142, and will be tested annually or whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. The Company has determined that indefinite-lived intangible assets resulting from past business combinations are to be accounted for as goodwill. In the second quarter of 2002 the Company completed the first step of the transitional impairment test for goodwill and found no indication of impairment. The determination of fair value is a critical and complex consideration when assessing impairment under FAS 142 that involves

significant assumptions and estimates. These assumptions and estimates were based on the Company’s best judgments. In the future, impairment must be assessed at least annually for these assets, or when indications of impairment exist. The Company’s judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators include: the Company’s assessment of the impacts of legal factors and market and economic conditions; the results of the Company’s operational performance and strategic plans; competition and market share; any potential for the sale or disposal of a significant portion of the Company’s business; and availability of sources of funding to conduct the Company’s principal operations. In the future, it is possible that such assessments could cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that certain assets are impaired. The aggregate carrying value of the Company’s goodwill is $189 million as of September 30, 2002. The Company plans to complete its annual test for impairment of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2002.

As required by FAS 142, the results for periods prior to adoption have not been restated. The following table reconciles the reported net loss and net loss per share to that which would have resulted for the nine- and three-month periods ended September 30, 2001 if FAS 142 had been adopted effective in 2001.

	Nine months ended September 30 2001			Three months ended September 30 2001
Net loss	$	(6,501	)	$	(3,666	)
Goodwill amortization, net of income tax benefit		2,549			846

Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(3,952	)	$	(2,820	)

Net loss per share:
Basic	$	(0.76	)	$	(0.43	)
Assuming dilution	$	(0.76	)	$	(0.43	)
Pro forma net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.46	)	$	(0.33	)
Assuming dilution	$	(0.46	)	$	(0.33	)

In May 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 145 “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (FAS 145). FAS 145, which updates, clarifies, and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements, addresses the reporting of debt extinguishments and accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. The provisions of FAS 145 shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company is currently assessing the impact of FAS 145 on its financial statements.

In July 2002, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (FAS 146). FAS 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. The provisions of FAS 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002; however, early adoption is permitted. During the quarter ended September 30, 2002 the Company applied the provisions of FAS 146 and recorded a charge amounting to approximately $600,000 in connection with a change in location of the Seattle Radio operations.

Subsequent events

On October 17, 2002, the broadcasting subsidiary entered into a non-binding letter of intent from a buyer interested in acquiring substantially all of the assets and assuming programming liabilities of television stations WFXG-TV, Augusta, Georgia and WXTX-TV, Columbus, Georgia. The transaction is subject to negotiation of a purchase and sale agreement, completion of due diligence, and FCC consent to assignment of the licenses. If a transaction is concluded, the broadcasting subsidiary may incur a loss of approximately $17 million. The net proceeds from a sale, after income taxes, will be used to reduce debt. A previous proposed sale reported in August did not materialize.

On October 25, 2002, the Company’s real estate subsidiary concluded the sale of the subsidiary’s Fisher Commerce Center industrial property. The transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $2,200,000 net of income tax effects. Net proceeds from the sale, after income taxes, will be used to reduce debt.

On November 8, 2002 the Company announced that it has retained Goldman, Sachs & Co. as financial advisor to assist in reviewing its strategic alternatives.

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Except for the historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results could differ materially from results that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements and discussed elsewhere herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below, those discussed under the caption “Additional Factors That May Affect Our Business, Financial Condition And Future Results”, and those discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may subsequently arise. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, prospects and results of operations. As used herein, unless the context requires otherwise, when we say “we”, “us”,” our”, or the “Company”, we are referring to Fisher Communications, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

This discussion is intended to provide an analysis of significant trends and material changes in our financial position and operating results during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002 compared with the similar period in 2001.

Effective January 1, 2002, we restructured our continuing operations into three principal business segments: broadcasting, media services, and real estate. Accordingly, the operations of Fisher Entertainment LLC, a producer of content for cable and television, and Fisher Pathways, Inc., a provider of satellite transmission services, are included in the media services segment. Previously these businesses were reported in the broadcasting segment. The operations of the portion of Fisher Plaza not occupied by KOMO TV, which previously were reported in the real estate segment, are also included in the media services segment. Fisher Plaza operations attributable to KOMO TV are included in the broadcasting segment. The media services segment also includes the consolidated operations of Civia, Inc. In 2002, we converted certain loans into a majority equity interest in Civia, Inc. During the second quarter of 2002, we purchased all remaining minority equity interests in Civia. Accordingly, Civia’s 2002 operating results are consolidated, while its 2001 results are reported under the equity method. Certain 2001 balances have been reclassified to conform to 2002 classifications.

In May 2002, the broadcasting subsidiary entered into a radio rights agreement (the “Rights Agreement”) to broadcast Seattle Mariners baseball games on KOMO-AM for the 2003 through 2008 baseball seasons. In this regard, the broadcasting subsidiary has incurred certain selling, promotional, and other costs prior to recognizing revenue under the Rights Agreement.

In September 2002, certain property used in the Company’s real estate operations located on Lake Union in Seattle (“Lake Union Property”) was sold. Net proceeds from the sale were $12,834,000. Also in September, land and a building in Portland, Oregon used in the Company’s food distributions operations (“Portland Property”) were sold. Net proceeds from the sale were $2,800,000.

On October 17, 2002, the broadcasting subsidiary entered into a non-binding letter of intent from a buyer interested in acquiring substantially all of the assets and assuming certain liabilities of television stations WFXG-TV, Augusta, Georgia and WXTX-TV, Columbus, Georgia. The transaction is subject to negotiation of a purchase and sale agreement, completion of due diligence, and FCC consent to assignment of the licenses. If a transaction is concluded, the broadcasting subsidiary may incur a loss of approximately $17 million. The net proceeds from a sale, after income taxes, will be used to reduce debt. A previous proposed sale reported in August did not materialize. The terms of the proposed sale of the Georgia television stations have not yet been finalized and the Company and the proposed buyer of the Georgia television stations may be unable to reach agreement on final terms or may reach

agreement on terms, including the purchase price, that are substantially different from the terms contained in the non-binding letter of intent.

On November 8, 2002 the Company announced that it has retained Goldman, Sachs & Co. as financial advisor to assist in reviewing its strategic alternatives.

Percentage comparisons have been omitted within the following tables where they are not considered meaningful.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). FAS 142 changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Goodwill is to be tested for impairment upon adoption of FAS 142, and will be tested annually or whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. We have determined that indefinite-lived intangible assets resulting from past business combinations are to be accounted for as goodwill. We have completed the first step of the transitional impairment test for goodwill and found no impairment. The determination of fair value is a critical and complex consideration when assessing impairment under FAS 142 that involves significant assumptions and estimates. These assumptions and estimates were based on our best judgments. In the future, impairment must be assessed at least annually for these assets, or when indications of impairment exist. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators include: our assessment of the impacts of legal factors and market and economic conditions; the results of our operational performance and strategic plans; competition and market share; any potential for the sale or disposal of a significant portion of our business; and availability of sources of funding to conduct our principal operations. In the future, it is possible that such assessments could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that certain assets are impaired. The aggregate carrying value of our goodwill is $189 million as of September 30, 2002.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 showed a consolidated loss of $5,156,000 including an extraordinary loss item amounting to $2,058,000, net of income taxes, for write-off of deferred loan costs relating to early extinguishment of long-term debt that was repaid during the first quarter. Results for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 also included the after tax effects of net gain on derivative instruments amounting to $4,787,000, gain from sale of real estate located on Lake Union in Seattle amounting to $3,475,000, and costs relating to the wind-up of discontinued milling operations amounting to $500,000. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 was $6,501,000, including a loss of $327,000 from discontinued operations of milling businesses.

Operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2002 showed a consolidated loss of $918,000. Third quarter results include the after tax effects of net gain on derivative instruments amounting to $938,000, gain from sale of real estate located on Lake Union in Seattle amounting to $3,475,000, and costs relating to the wind-up of discontinued milling operations amounting to $500,000. Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2001 was $3,666,000.

Revenue

	Nine months ended September 30						Three months ended September 30
	2002		% Change		2001		2002		% Change		2001
Broadcasting	$	97,668,000	-7.2	%	$	105,270,000	$	32,760,000	1.1	%	$	32,394,000
Media services		4,892,000	3.2	%		4,739,000		1,779,000	-8.7	%		1,948,000
Real estate		9,595,000	6.3	%		9,027,000		3,090,000	-.3	%		3,100,000

Consolidated	$	112,155,000	-5.8	%	$	119,036,000	$	37,629,000	.5	%	$	37,442,000

Broadcasting revenue declined $7,602,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with the same period of 2001, due largely to a weak economy in the Northwest and relatively weak performance by the ABC television network. Television revenues, net of agency commissions, were down 10%. Net revenue from radio operations declined less than 1%.

Based on information published by Miller, Kaplan, Arase & Co. (Miller Kaplan), during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002, revenue for the overall Seattle television market declined 6%, and revenue for the overall Portland television market increased 2%. Our Seattle and Portland television stations experienced revenue declines of 18% and 8%, respectively, during the nine-month period. We believe that the performance of ABC and coverage of the Winter Olympic Games on a competing network were contributing factors. We also believe that KOMO TV in Seattle was impacted by the popularity of the Seattle Mariners baseball team, whose games are broadcast on a competing station. Our smaller market television operations experienced mixed revenue results with the Oregon and Idaho stations reporting increased revenue and the Washington and Georgia station groups reporting declines.

Our radio operations also reported mixed revenue results during the first nine months of 2002. Local and national revenues for our Seattle radio operations declined 10% during the nine-month period due, in part, to a decline in ratings, while local and national revenues at our Portland radio stations increased 22% due, in part, to improving ratings. Miller Kaplan reported that local and national radio revenues for the Seattle and Portland radio markets declined 6% and .4%, respectively, during the same period. Nine-month revenue at our small market radio stations in Eastern Washington and Montana increased 6%.

Third quarter 2002 broadcasting revenue increased $366,000, compared with the same period of last year. Net television and radio revenues were each up 1%.

Revenue at our Seattle television station declined 7% during the third quarter. Revenue at our Portland television station increased 3% during the quarter. Our smaller market television operations experienced revenue increases ranging from 2% to 27%.

The increase in revenue for the media services segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 is principally due to revenues from program production and development at Fisher Entertainment, and revenue from Fisher Plaza. Revenue from Fisher Pathways declined 42% during the nine-month period and 40% during the third quarter ended September 30, 2002, compared with the same periods last year, due to a decline in demand for our satellite transmission services.

The increase in real estate revenue is primarily due to rents from the Fisher Industrial Technology Center (Fisher ITC) located in Auburn, Washington, which was 72% occupied during 2002. Fisher ITC was in lease-up phase during 2001, with the first tenant taking occupancy in May of that year. The revenue increase attributable to Fisher ITC was partially offset by absence of revenue from the Lake Union properties sold in September 2002, amounting to $115,000, and by vacancies at other properties.

Cost of services sold

	Nine months ended September 30								Three months ended September 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Broadcasting	$	46,087,000		-6.1	%	$	49,091,000		$	15,400,000		-6.3	%	$	16,439,000
Media services		2,514,000		27.3	%		1,975,000			1,029,000		-6.6	%		1,102,000
Real estate		1,725,000		51.0	%		1,142,000			607,000		34.0	%		453,000

Consolidated	$	50,326,000		-3.6	%	$	52,208,000		$	17,036,000		-5.3	%	$	17,994,000
Percentage of revenue		44.9	%				43.9	%		45.3	%				48.1	%

The cost of services sold consists primarily of costs to acquire, produce, and promote broadcast programming, operating costs of the businesses in the media services segment, and costs to operate the properties held by the real estate segment. These costs are relatively fixed in nature, and do not necessarily vary on a proportional basis with revenue.

Emphasis on expense control resulted in a reduction in operating expenses at the broadcasting segment for the first nine months of 2002, compared with the same period of 2001. The largest decline was in salaries and related expenses due to staff reduction; however, many other operating expenses in the segment declined.

Operating expenses in the media services segment increased during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 as additional costs were incurred in connection with growth, with the largest increase at Fisher Plaza, where certain costs were deferred during 2001. Third quarter operating expenses remained relatively flat, except for a decline in costs associated with the decline in revenue at Fisher Pathways.

The real estate segment experienced increased operating costs in several categories, including repairs and maintenance, energy and utilities, and insurance. In addition, certain operating costs relating to Fisher ITC were capitalized during the first nine months of 2001 as the facility was in lease-up phase. Expense savings relating the Lake Union properties sold in September 2002 amounted to approximately $50,000.

Selling expenses

	Nine months ended September 30								Three months ended September 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Broadcasting	$	16,222,000		5.9	%	$	15,325,000		$	5,878,000		15.4	%	$	5,094,000
Media services		269,000					64,000			42,000		5.0	%		40,000

Consolidated	$	16,491,000		7.2	%	$	15,389,000		$	5,920,000		15.3	%	$	5,134,000
Percentage of revenue		14.7	%				12.9	%		15.7	%				13.7	%

Emphasis on expense control and reduced revenue at the broadcasting segment was offset by costs incurred at Seattle Radio operations in connection with a Joint Sales Agreement that became effective March 2002 and additional sales personnel related to the Rights Agreement to broadcast Seattle Mariners baseball games on KOMO-AM.

Selling expenses at the media services segment increased during the first nine months compared with the same period last year, due to efforts to increase revenue growth at Fisher Pathways and at Civia, Inc. Third quarter 2002 selling expenses were unchanged compared with 2001, as selling efforts at Civia, Inc. were curtailed.

General and administrative expenses

	Nine months ended September 30								Three months ended September 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Broadcasting	$	22,329,000		5.8	%	$	21,099,000		$	8,372,000		29.9	%	$	6,445,000
Media services		2,391,000		-22.4	%		3,081,000			455,000		-70.0	%		1,517,000
Real estate		1,810,000		-4.4	%		1,894,000			613,000		.8	%		608,000
Corporate, eliminations & other		6,573,000		7.2	%		6,134,000			2,347,000		38.1	%		1,699,000

Consolidated	$	33,103,000		2.8	%	$	32,208,000		$	11,787,000		14.8	%	$	10,269,000
Percentage of revenue		29.5	%				27.1	%		31.3	%				27.4	%

Higher costs of medical benefits, increased bad debt expense, and a charge amounting to approximately $600,000 in connection with a change in location of the Seattle Radio operations (See Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) resulted in expense increases in the broadcasting segment during the third quarter and nine month period.

In the media services segment, expense reductions resulting from curtailment of activities at Civia, Inc. were partially offset by increased personnel and related costs at Fisher Entertainment and the corporate group.

A number of expense reductions at the corporate segment during 2002 were offset by increased insurance expense, charitable contributions, and accruals for severance and outplacement costs resulting from staff reductions.

Depreciation and amortization

	Nine months ended September 30								Three months ended September 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Broadcasting	$	10,609,000		-24.7	%	$	14,094,000		$	3,882,000		-18.4	%	$	4,759,000
Media services		1,668,000		45.0	%		1,150,000			786,000		106.2	%		381,000
Real estate		3,264,000		17.5	%		2,778,000			1,075,000		15.2	%		932,000
Corporate, eliminations & other		182,000		44.3	%		126,000			63,000		44.8	%		44,000

Consolidated	$	15,723,000		-13.4	%	$	18,148,000		$	5,806,000		-5.1	%	$	6,116,000
Percentage of revenue		14.0	%				15.2	%		15.4	%				16.3	%

The decline in depreciation and amortization at the broadcasting segment is primarily due to a new accounting standard that provides for discontinuation of goodwill amortization beginning January 1, 2002. Goodwill amortization amounted to $3,892,000 during the first nine months of 2001 and $1,292,000 during the third quarter of 2001. Depreciation expense remained relatively constant except for additional depreciation relating to a change in location of the Seattle Radio operations.

The increase in depreciation in the media services segment is attributable to operations of Fisher Plaza and Civia, Inc. Depreciation on a portion of Fisher Plaza did not begin in the first half of 2001 as the project was not substantially complete.

The increase in depreciation in the real estate segment is primarily attributable to Fisher ITC, which was 72% leased in 2002, but was vacant until May of 2001.

Income (Loss) from operations

	Nine months ended September 30								Three months ended September 30
	2002			% Change		2001			2002			% Change		2001
Broadcasting	$	2,421,000		-57.2	%	$	5,661,000		$	(773,000	)	-124.9	%	$	(343,000	)
Media services		(1,950,000	)	-27.4	%		(1,530,000	)		(532,000	)	-51.3	%		(1,092,000	)
Real estate		2,797,000		-12.9	%		3,212,000			797,000		-28.1	%		1,107,000
Corporate, eliminations & other		(6,756,000	)	-7.9	%		(6,260,000	)		(2,412,000	)	-38.3	%		(1,743,000	)

Consolidated	$	(3,488,000	)			$	1,083,000		$	(2,920,000	)	-40.9	%	$	(2,071,000	)

Income (loss) from operations by business segment consists of revenue less operating expenses. In computing income from operations by business segment, net gain on derivative instruments and other income, net, have not been included, and interest expense, income taxes and unusual items have not been deducted.

Net gain on derivative instruments

Nine months ended September 30		Three months ended September 30
2002	2001	2002	2001
$7,592,000	$-0-	$1,489,000	$-0-

Net gain on derivative instruments includes unrealized gain resulting from an increase in fair value of a variable forward sales transaction amounting to $11,682,000 in the first nine months of 2002 and $2,005,000 in the third quarter of 2002, and unrealized loss from a decline in fair value of an interest rate swap agreement amounting to $1,454,000 in the first nine months and $516,000 in the third quarter of 2002 (See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The net gain for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 also includes a realized loss amounting to $2,636,000 from termination, in March, of an interest rate swap agreement.

Other income, net

Nine months ended September 30			Three months ended September 30
2002	% Change	2001	2002	% Change	2001
$7,571,000		$2,508,000	$6,195,000		$629,000

Other income, net includes gains from sale of real estate, dividends received on marketable securities and, to a lesser extent, interest and miscellaneous income. In September 2002, certain property used in the Company’s real estate operations located on Lake Union in Seattle was sold. Gain on the sale was $5,511,000 ($3,475,000 after income tax effects).

Interest expense

Nine months ended September 30			Three months ended September 30
2002	% Change	2001	2002	% Change	2001
$15,831,000	21.7%	$13,008,000	$5,408,000	30.9%	$4,133,000

Interest expense includes interest on borrowed funds, amortization of loan fees, and net payments under interest rate swap agreements. The increases in 2002 interest expense, compared with 2001, are attributable to higher amounts borrowed during 2002, partially offset by lower interest rates. Interest incurred in connection with funds borrowed to finance construction of Fisher Plaza and other significant capital projects is capitalized as part of the cost of the related project. Interest capitalized during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 amounted to $1,701,000 and $1,569,000, respectively. Interest capitalized during the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 amounted to $674,000 and $422,000, respectively.

Provision for federal and state income taxes (benefit)

	Nine months ended September 30							Three months ended September 30
	2002			% Change	2001			2002			% Change	2001
	$	(1,513,000	)		$	(3,252,000	)	$	(213,000	)		$	(1,919,000	)
Effective tax rate		36.8	%			34.5	%		33.8	%			34.4	%

The provision for federal and state income taxes varies directly with pre-tax income. The tax benefits reflect our ability to utilize net operating loss carrybacks. The effective tax rate varies from the statutory rate primarily due to a deduction for dividends received, offset by the impact of state income taxes.

Extraordinary item, net of income tax benefit

Nine months ended September 30		Three months ended September 30
2002	2001	2002	2001
$(2,058,000)	$-0-	$-0-	$-0-

We repaid certain loans in March 2002 and, as a result, wrote off deferred loan costs amounting to $3,264,000. Net of income tax benefit this charge amounted to $2,058,000.

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Nine months ended September 30		Three months ended September 30
2002	2001	2002	2001
$3,041,000	$(7,637,000)	$872,000	$449,000

Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gain or loss on our marketable securities and the effective portion of the change in fair value of an interest rate swap agreement, and is net of income taxes. During the nine- and three-month periods ended September 30, 2002 the value of our marketable securities increased $1,208,000 and $786,000, respectively, net of tax. A significant portion of the marketable securities consists of 3,002,376 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock. The per share market price of SAFECO Corporation common stock was $32.88 at December 31, 2000, $29.50 at June 30, 2001, $30.33 at September 30, 2001, $31.15 at December 31, 2001, $30.89 at June 30, 2002, and $31.78 at September 30, 2002.

During the period from January 1 through March 21, 2002 we used an interest rate swap, designated as a cash flow hedge, to manage exposure to interest rate risks. During this period the fair value of the swap increased $543,000, net of tax, which is recorded in other comprehensive income. In connection with the refinancing of our long-term debt, the swap agreement was terminated and the remaining negative fair market value ($1,713,000 net of tax benefit) was reclassified to operations.

Unrealized gains and losses are reported as accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2002 we had working capital of $50,196,000, including cash and short-term cash investments totaling $8,016,000 and cash restricted for construction of Fisher Plaza amounting to $15,146,000. We intend to finance working capital, debt service, capital expenditures, and dividend requirements primarily through operating activities. However, we will consider using available credit facilities to fund significant real estate project development activities. As of September 30, 2002, approximately $26,000,000 is available under existing credit facilities.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $17,395,000. Net cash provided by operating activities consists of our net income or loss, increased by non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, and adjusted by changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net cash used in investing activities during the period was $30,028,000, primarily for purchase of property, plant and equipment (including for the Fisher Plaza project). Net cash provided by financing activities was $17,102,000, comprised of borrowings under borrowing agreements and mortgage loans of $268,131,000 less payments of $233,039,000 on borrowing agreements and mortgage loans, as two prior credit facilities were repaid from proceeds from new credit facilities, payments on notes payable of $8,474,000, payment of deferred loan costs of $5,090,000 paid in connection with obtaining new credit facilities, and cash dividends paid to stockholders totaling $4,468,000 or $.52 per share. At a meeting held on July 3, 2002, the Company’s board of directors voted to suspend payment of the quarterly dividend.

ADDITIONAL FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND FUTURE RESULTS

The following risk factors and other information included in this Quarterly Report should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

A continuing economic downturn in the Seattle, Washington or Portland, Oregon areas could adversely affect our operations, revenue, cash flow and earnings.

Our operations are concentrated primarily in the Pacific Northwest. The Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon markets are particularly important for our financial well being. Operating results during 2001 and 2002 were adversely impacted by a soft economy, and a continuing economic downturn in these markets could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. Because our costs of services are relatively fixed, we may be unable to significantly reduce costs if our revenues continue to decline. If our revenues do not increase or if they continue to decline, we could continue to suffer net losses or such net losses could increase.

Our debt service consumes a substantial portion of the cash we generate, but our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.

We currently use a significant portion of our operating cash flow to service our debt. Our leverage makes us vulnerable to an increase in interest rates or a downturn in the operating performance of our businesses or a decline in general economic conditions. It further limits our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements or other purposes, and may limit our ability to pay dividends. Finally, it inhibits our ability to compete with competitors who are less leveraged than we are, and it constrains our ability to react to changing market conditions, changes in our industry and economic downturns.

Prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, will affect our ability to satisfy our debt obligations. If in the future we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our obligations, we may need to refinance our debt, obtain additional financing, forego capital expenditures, or sell assets. Any of these actions could adversely affect the value of our common stock. We cannot assure you that we will generate sufficient cash flow or be able to obtain sufficient funding to satisfy our debt service requirements.

Foreign hostilities and further terrorist attacks may affect our revenues and results of operations.

We may experience a loss of advertising revenue and incur additional broadcasting expenses in the event the United States engages in foreign hostilities or in the event there is a terrorist attack against the United States. A significant news event like a war or terrorist attack will likely result in the preemption of regularly scheduled programming by network news coverage of the event. As a result, advertising may not be aired and the revenue for such advertising may be lost unless the broadcasting station is able to run the advertising at agreed-upon times in the future. There can be no assurance that advertisers will agree to run such advertising in future time periods or that space will be available for such advertising. We cannot predict the duration of such preemption of local programing if it occurs. In addition, our broadcasting stations may incur additional expenses as a result of expanded local news coverage of the local impact of a war or terrorist attack. The loss of revenue and increased expenses could negatively affect our results of operations.

Competition in the broadcasting industry and the rise of alternative entertainment and communications media may result in losses of audience share and advertising revenue by our stations.

We cannot assure you that any of our stations will maintain or increase its current audience ratings or advertising revenue market share. Fisher Broadcasting’s television and radio stations face intense competition from local network affiliates and independent stations, as well as from cable and alternative methods of broadcasting brought about by technological advances and innovations. The stations compete for audiences on the basis of programming popularity, which has a direct effect on advertising rates. Additional significant factors affecting a station’s competitive position include assigned frequency and signal strength. The possible rise in popularity of competing entertainment and communications media could also have a materially adverse effect on Fisher Broadcasting’s audience share and advertising revenue. We cannot predict either the extent to which such competition will materialize or, if such competition materializes, the extent of its effect on our business.

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is currently considering whether to modify its national and local television ownership limitations, as well as its local radio ownership limitations. We cannot predict what action the FCC will take. If the FCC adopts proposals to allow large broadcast groups to expand further their ownership on a national basis, to permit a single entity to own more than one station in markets with fewer independently owned stations, or to allow radio operators to increase their level of ownership in local markets, our existing operations could face increased competition from entities with significantly greater resources, and greater economies of scale, than Fisher Broadcasting.

The performance of the television networks could harm our operating results.

The operating results of our broadcasting operations are primarily dependent on advertising revenues. Our Seattle and Portland television stations are affiliated with the ABC Television Network. Popularity of programming on ABC lagged behind other networks during 2001 and 2002 and, contributed to a decline in audience ratings, which negatively impacted revenues for our Seattle and Portland television stations. Continued weak performance by ABC could harm our business and results of operations.

Our operating results are dependent on the success of programming aired by our television and radio stations.

We make significant commitments to acquire rights to television and radio programs under multi-year agreements. The success of such programs is dependent partly upon unpredictable and volatile factors beyond our control such as audience preferences, competing programming, and the availability of other entertainment activities. Audience preferences could cause our programming not to gain popularity or decline in popularity, which could cause our advertising revenues to decline. In some instances, we may have to replace programs before their costs have been fully-amortized, resulting in write-offs that increase operating costs.

A write-down of goodwill to comply with new accounting standards would harm our operating results.

Approximately $189 million, or 29% of our total assets as of September 30, 2002, consists of unamortized goodwill. On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). FAS 142 changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Goodwill was tested for impairment upon adoption of FAS 142, and will be tested annually or whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. We have determined that indefinite-lived intangible assets resulting from past business combinations are to be accounted for as goodwill. In the second quarter of 2002 we completed the first step of the transitional impairment test for goodwill and found no indication of impairment. The determination of fair value is a critical and complex consideration when assessing impairment under FAS 142 that involves significant assumptions and estimates. These assumptions and estimates were based on our best judgments. In the future, impairment must be assessed at least annually for these assets, or when indications of impairment exist. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators include: our assessment of the impacts of legal factors and market and economic conditions; the results of our operational performance and strategic plans; competition and market share; any potential for the sale or disposal of a significant portion of our business; and availability of sources of funding to conduct our principal operations. In the future, it is possible that such assessments could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that certain assets are impaired which, would harm our operating results.

Our restructuring may cause disruption of operations and distraction of management, and may not achieve the desired results.

We continue to implement a restructuring of our corporate enterprise with the objective of allowing greater functional integration of core competencies and improving operational efficiencies. This restructuring may disrupt operations and distract management, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. We cannot predict whether this restructuring will achieve the desired benefits, or whether our company will be able to fully integrate our broadcast communications, media services and other operations. We cannot assure you that the restructuring will be completed in a timely manner or that any benefits of the restructuring will justify its costs. We may incur costs in connection with the restructuring in the areas of professional fees, marketing expenses, employment expenses, and administrative expenses. In addition, we may incur additional costs, which we are unable to predict at this time.

Our efforts to develop new business opportunities are subject to technological risk and may not be successful, or results may take longer than expected to realize.

We are developing new opportunities for creating, aggregating and distributing content through non-broadcast media channels, such as the Internet, cell phones, and web-enabled personal digital assistants. The success of our efforts is subject to technological innovations and risks beyond our control, so that the anticipated benefits may take longer than expected to realize. In addition, we have limited experience in non-broadcast media, which may result in errors in the conception, design or implementation of a strategy to take advantage of the opportunities available in that area. We therefore cannot give any assurance that our efforts will result in successful products or services.

The FCC’s extensive regulation of the broadcasting industry limits our ability to own and operate television and radio stations and other media outlets.

The broadcasting industry is subject to extensive regulation by the FCC under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Compliance with and the effects of existing and future regulations could have a material adverse impact on us. Issuance, renewal or transfer of broadcast station operating licenses requires FCC approval, and we cannot operate our stations without FCC licenses. Failure to observe FCC rules and policies can result in the imposition of various sanctions, including monetary forfeitures, the grant of short-term (i.e., less than the full eight years) license renewals or, for particularly egregious violations, the denial of a license renewal application or revocation of a license. While the majority of such licenses are renewed by the FCC, there can be no assurance that Fisher Broadcasting’s licenses will be renewed at their expiration dates, or, if renewed, that the renewal terms will be for eight years. If the FCC decides to include conditions or qualifications in any of our licenses, we may be limited in the manner in which we may operate the affected stations.

The Communications Act and FCC rules impose specific limits on the number of stations and other media outlets an entity can own in a single market. The FCC attributes interests held by, among others, an entity’s officers, directors, certain stockholders, and in some circumstances, lenders, to that entity for purposes of applying these ownership limitations. The existing ownership rules or proposed new rules may prevent us from acquiring additional stations in a particular market. We may also be prevented from engaging in a swap transaction if the swap would cause the other company to violate these rules.

The FCC is currently considering whether to modify its national and local television ownership limitations, as well as its local radio ownership limitations. We cannot predict what action the FCC will take. If the FCC adopts proposals to allow large broadcast groups to expand further their ownership on a national basis, to permit a single entity to own more than one station in markets with fewer independently owned stations, or to allow radio operators to increase their level of ownership in local markets, our existing operations could face increased competition from entities with significantly greater resources, and greater economies of scale, than Fisher Broadcasting.

Dependence on key personnel may expose us to additional risks.

Our business is dependent on the performance of certain key employees, including our chief executive officer and other executive officers. We also employ several on-air personalities who have significant loyal audiences in their respective markets. We can give no assurance that all such key personnel will remain with us. The loss of any key personnel could harm our operations and financial results.

The non-renewal or modification of affiliation agreements with major television networks could harm our operating results.

Our television stations’ affiliation with one of the four major television networks (ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX) has a significant impact on the composition of the stations’ programming, revenues, expenses and operations. We cannot give any assurance that we will be able to renew our affiliation agreements with the networks at all, or on satisfactory terms. In recent years, the networks have been attempting to change affiliation arrangements in manners that would disadvantage affiliates. The non-renewal or modification of any of the network affiliation agreements could harm our operating results.

A network might acquire a television station in one of our markets, which could harm our business and operating results.

If a network acquires a television station in a market in which we own a station affiliated with that network, the network will likely decline to renew the affiliation agreement for our station in that market, which could harm our business and results of operations.

Our operations may be adversely affected by power outages, increased energy costs or earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest.

Our corporate headquarters and a significant portion of our operations are located in the Pacific Northwest. The Pacific Northwest has from time-to-time experienced earthquakes and experienced a significant earthquake on February 28, 2001. We do not know the ultimate impact on our operations of being located near major earthquake faults, but an earthquake could harm our operating results. In addition, the Pacific Northwest may experience power shortages or outages and increased energy costs. Power shortages or outages could cause disruptions to our operations, which in turn may result in a material decrease in our revenues and earnings and have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Power shortages or increased energy costs in the Northwest could harm the region’s economy, which could reduce our advertising revenues. Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover the losses and interruptions caused by earthquakes and power outages.

Our development, ownership and operation of real property is subject to risks, including those relating to the economic climate, local real estate conditions, potential inability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance, potential collection problems, reliance on significant tenants, and regulatory risks.

Revenue and operating income from our properties and the value of our properties may be adversely affected by the general economic climate, the local economic climate and local real estate conditions, including prospective tenants’ perceptions of attractiveness of the properties and the availability of space in other competing properties. We have developed the second building at Fisher Plaza, which entailed significant investment by us. The softened economy in the Seattle area could adversely affect our ability to lease the space of our properties on attractive terms or at all, which could harm our operating results. Other risks relating to our real estate operations include the potential inability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance, and the potential inability to collect rent due to bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise. Several of our properties are leased to tenants that occupy substantial portions of such properties and the departure of one or more of them or the inability of any of them to pay their rents or other fees could have a significant adverse effect on our real estate revenues. Real estate income and values may also be adversely affected by such factors as applicable laws and regulations, including tax and

environmental laws, interest rate levels and the availability of financing. We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rent loss insurance with respect to our properties. There are, however, certain losses that may be either uninsurable, not economically insurable or in excess of our current insurance coverage limits. If an uninsured loss occurs with respect to a property, it could harm our operating results.

A reduction on the periodic dividend on the common stock of SAFECO may adversely affect our revenue, cash flow and earnings.

We are a 2.4% stockholder of the common stock of SAFECO Corporation. If SAFECO reduces its periodic dividends, it will negatively affect our cash flow and earnings. In February 2001, SAFECO reduced its quarterly dividend from $0.37 to $0.185 per share.

Antitrust law and other regulatory considerations could prevent or delay expansion of our business or adversely affect our revenues.

The completion of any future transactions we may consider may be subject to the notification filing requirements, applicable waiting periods and possible review by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. Any television or radio station acquisitions or dispositions will be subject to the license transfer approval process of the FCC. Review by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission may cause delays in completing transactions and, in some cases, result in attempts by these agencies to prevent completion of transactions or to negotiate modifications to the proposed terms. Review by the FCC, particularly review of concentration of market revenue share, may also cause delays in completing transactions. Any delay, prohibition or modification could adversely affect the terms of a proposed transaction or could require us to abandon a transaction opportunity. In addition, campaign finance reform laws or regulations could result in a reduction in funds being spent on advertising in certain political races, which would adversely affect our revenues and results of operations in election years.

Our investments in HDTV and digital broadcasting may not result in revenue sufficient to justify the investment.

The ultimate success of digital television broadcasting will depend on programming being produced and distributed in a digital format, the effect of current or future laws and regulations relating to digital television, including the FCC’s determination with respect to “must-carry” rules for carriage of each station’s digital channel and receiver standards for digital reception, and public acceptance and willingness to buy new digital television sets. Unless consumers embrace digital television and purchase enough units to cause home receiver prices to decline, the general public may not switch to the new technology, delaying or preventing its ultimate economic viability. Our investments in HDTV and digital broadcasting may not generate earnings and revenue sufficient to justify the investments.

We periodically engage in new business ventures, which may adversely affect our operating results.

While Fisher Broadcasting has created programming in the past, we do not have significant experience in the creation of programming on the scale contemplated by Fisher Entertainment. Factors that could harm the results of Fisher Entertainment include competition from existing and new competitors, as well as related performance and price pressures, potential difficulties in relationships with cable and television networks, failure to obtain air time for the programming produced and the changing tastes and personnel of the acquirers of programming. There are many inherent risks in new business ventures such as Fisher Entertainment and Civia, Inc., including startup costs, performance of certain key personnel, the unpredictability of audience tastes, and product or service acceptance.

ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

The market risk in our financial instruments represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in financial rates. We are exposed to market risk in the areas of interest rates and securities prices. These exposures are directly related to our normal funding and investing activities.

Interest Rate Exposure

Our strategy in managing exposure to interest rate changes is to maintain a balance of fixed- and variable-rate instruments. We will also consider entering into interest rate swap agreements at such times as management deems appropriate.

As of September 30, 2002, our fixed rate debt totaled $125,325,000. The fair value of our fixed-rate debt is estimated to be approximately $1,506,000 greater than the carrying amount. Market risk is estimated as the potential change in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent change in interest rates and, as of September 30, 2002, amounted to $2,952,000.

We also had $189,957,000 in variable-rate debt outstanding as of September 30, 2002. A hypothetical 10 percent change in interest rates underlying these borrowings would result in a $1,204,000 annual change in our pre-tax earnings and cash flows.

We are a party to an interest rate swap agreement fixing the interest rate at 6.87%, plus a margin based on the broadcasting subsidiary’s ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA, on a portion of our floating rate debt outstanding under an eight-year credit facility (broadcast facility). The notional amount of the swap reduces as payments are made on principal outstanding under the broadcast facility until termination of the contract on March 22, 2004. As of September 30, 2002, the notional amount of the swap was $65,000,000 and the fair value of the swap agreement was a liability of $4,790,000. A hypothetical 10 percent change in interest rates would change the fair value of our swap agreement by approximately $176,000 as of September 30, 2002. We have not designated the swap as a cash flow hedge; accordingly changes in the fair value of the swap are reported in net gain on derivative instruments in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Marketable Securities Exposure

The fair value of our investments in marketable securities as of September 30, 2002 was $98,315,000. Marketable securities consist of equity securities traded on a national securities exchange or reported on the NASDAQ securities market. A significant portion of the marketable securities consists of 3,002,376 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock. As of September 30, 2002, these shares represented 2.4% of the outstanding common stock of SAFECO Corporation. While we currently do not intend to dispose of our investments in marketable securities, we have classified the investments as available-for-sale under applicable accounting standards. Mr. William W. Krippaehne, Jr., President, CEO, and a Director of the Company, is a Director of SAFECO Corporation. A hypothetical 10 percent change in market prices underlying these securities would result in a $9,831,000 change in the fair value of the marketable securities portfolio. Although changes in securities prices would affect the fair value of the marketable securities portfolio and cause unrealized gains or losses, such gains or losses would not be realized unless the investments are sold.

As of September 30, 2002, 3,000,000 shares of SAFECO Corporation common stock owned by the company were pledged as collateral under a variable forward sales transaction (“Forward Transaction”) with a financial institution. A portion of the Forward Transaction is considered a derivative and, as such, we periodically measure its fair value and recognize the derivative as an asset or a liability. The change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in the income statement. As of September 30, 2002 the derivative portion of the Forward Transaction had a fair market value of $11,682,000, which is included in net gain on derivative instruments in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. A hypothetical 10 percent change in the market price of SAFECO Corporation stock would change the market value of the Forward Transaction by approximately $7,000,000. A hypothetical 10 percent change in volatility would change the market value of the Forward Transaction by approximately $350,000, and a hypothetical 10 percent change in interest rates would change the market value of the Forward Transaction by approximately $750,000.

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report, and, based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various claims, legal actions and complaints in the ordinary course of their businesses. In the Company’s opinion, all such matters are adequately covered by insurance, are without merit or are of such kind, or involve such amounts, that unfavorable disposition would not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

On September 11, 2002, the board of directors passed a resolution to amend the Company’s Bylaws to reduce the number of members on the Company’s Board of Directors from fourteen to eleven.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5. Other Information

Effective October 23, 2002, Robin J. Campbell Knepper resigned from the board of directors of Fisher Communications, Inc. No replacement for Ms. Knepper has been selected at the time of this report. Ms. Knepper resigned for personal reasons.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits:


3.1		Bylaws

10.1		First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2002, by and among Fisher Broadcasting Company, certain subsidiaries of Fisher Broadcasting Company, Wachovia Bank National Association, in its capacity as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and the Bank of New York, as co-syndication agents, National City Bank, as documentation agent, and the lenders listed on the signature page thereto.

10.2		First Amendment to Loan Agreement and First Amendment to Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2002, among Fisher Media Services Company, Bank of America, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, Bank of America, N.A., as agent and Fisher Communications, Inc.

99.1		Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

99.2		Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

A report on Form 8-K dated July 3, 2002 was filed with the Commission on July 5, 2002 announcing that the Company’s Board of Directors had voted to suspend payment of the Company’s quarterly dividend.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Registrant)


Dated:	November 14, 2002	/s/ David D. Hillard
		David D. Hillard Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Section 302 Certification

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

I, William W. Krippaehne, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

November 14, 2002


/s/ William W. Krippaehne, Jr.
William W. Krippaehne, Jr. President, Chief Executive Officer

Section 302 Certification

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

I, David D. Hillard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

d) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

e) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

f) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

c) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

d) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

November 14, 2002

/s/ David D. Hillard

David D. Hillard

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

Level	Leverage Ratio	Alternate Base Rate Margin for Revolving Loans and Tranche A Term Loans	LIBOR Rate Margin for Revolving Loans, Tranche A Term Loans and Letter of Credit Fee	Alternate Base Rate Margin for Tranche B Term Loans	LIBOR Rate Margin for Tranche B Term Loans	Commitment Fee

I	³ 5.5 to 1.0	2.75%	4.00%	3.25%	4.50%	0.625%

II	³ 5.0 to 1.0 but < 5.5 to 1.0	2.75%	4.00%	3.25%	4.50%	0.625%

III	³ 4.5 to 1.0 but < 5.0 to 1.0	2.00%	3.25%	3.25%	4.50%	0.500%

IIII	³ 4.0 to 1.0 but < 4.5 to 1.0	1.75%	3.00%	3.25%	4.50%	0.500%

V	³ 3.5 to 1.0 but < 4.0 to 1.0	1.50%	2.75%	3.25%	4.50%	0.500%

VI	³ 3.0 to 1.0 but < 3.5 to 1.0	1.25%	2.50%	3.25%	4.50%	0.375%

VII	³ 2.5 to 1.0 but < 3.0 to 1.0	1.00%	2.25%	2.75%	4.00%	0.375%

VIII	< 2.5 to 1.0	0.75%	2.00%	2.75%	4.00%	0.375%

Period		Maximum Ratio
Closing Date through September 29, 2002		5.75 to 1.0
September 30, 2002 through June 29, 2003		6.00 to 1.0
June 30, 2003 through September 29, 2003		5.00 to 1.0
September 30, 2003 through June 29, 2004		4.75 to 1.0
June 30, 2004 through September 29, 2004		4.50 to 1.0
September 30, 2004 through December 30, 2004		4.00 to 1.0
December 31, 2004 and thereafter		3.00 to 1.0

Period		Minimum Ratio
Closing Date through September 29, 2002		2.25 to 1.0
September 30, 2002 through March 30, 2004		1.75 to 1.0
March 31, 2004 through June 29, 2004		2.00 to 1.0
June 30, 2004 through September 29, 2004		2.25 to 1.0
September 30, 2004 through December 30, 2004		2.75 to 1.0
December 31, 2004 and thereafter		3.00 to 1.0

BORROWER:	FISHER BROADCASTING COMPANY, a Washington corporation

	By:	/s/ David D. Hillard
	Name: David D. Hillard Title: Assistant Secretary

GUARANTORS:	FISHER RADIO REGIONAL GROUP INC., a Washington corporation

	By:	/s/ David D. Hillard
	Name: David D. Hillard Title: Assistant Secretary

	FISHER BROADCASTING-PORTLAND RADIO, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company FISHER BROADCASTING-SEATTLE RADIO, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company FISHER BROADCASTING-PORTLAND TV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company FISHER BROADCASTING-SEATTLE TV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company FISHER BROADCASTING-S.E. IDAHO TV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company FISHER BROADCASTING-IDAHO TV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company FISHER BROADCASTING-GEORGIA TV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company FISHER BROADCASTING-OREGON TV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

	FISHER BROADCASTING-WASHINGTON TV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
	By:	Fisher Broadcasting Company, its sole member

	By:	/s/ David D. Hillard
	Name: David D. Hillard Title: Assistant Secretary

ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND LENDERS:	WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Administrative Agent and as a Lender

	By:	/s/ Lawrence P. Sullivan
	Name: Lawrence P. Sullivan Title: Vice President

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

LENDERS:	BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. as a Co-Syndication Agent and as a Lender

	By:	/s/ Mark N. Crawford
	Name: Mark N. Crawford Title: Senior Vice President

	THE BANK OF NEW YORK

	By:	/s/ Stephen M. Nettler
	Name: Stephen M. Nettler Title: Vice President

	NATIONAL CITY BANK

	By:	/s/ Timothy J. Ambrose
	Name: Timothy J. Ambrose Title: Vice President

	WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

	By:	/s/ Vance Gledhill
	Name: Vance Gledhill Title: Vice President

	GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP

	By:	/s/ Susun Timmerman
		Name: Susun Timmerman Title: Sr. Risk Manager

	LANDMARK CDO LTD. LANDMARK II CDO LTD.

	By:	Aladdin Asset Management LLC as Manager

	By:	/s/ Gilles Marchand
	Name: Gilles Marchand Title: Authorized Signatory

						NEW ALLIANCE GLOBAL CDO, LIMITED

						By:		Alliance Capital Management L.P., as Sub-advisor
						By:		Alliance Capital Management Corporation as General Partner

						By:		/s/ Robert Bayer
						Name: Robert Bayer Title: Vice President

						BANK OF MONTREAL

						By:		/s/ S. Valia
						Name: S. Valia Title: MD

						BLACK DIAMOND CLO 2000-1 LTD.

						By:		/s/ David Dyer
						Name: David Dyer Title: Director

						BLACK DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL FUNDING, LTD.

						By:		/s/ David Dyer
						Name: David Dyer Title:

						TRS1 LLC

						By:		/s/ Rosemary F. Dunne
						Name: Rosemary F. Dunne Title: Attorney-in-Fact

						STANWICH LOAN FUNDING LLC

						By:		/s/ Diana L. Mushill
						Name: Diana L. Mushill Title: Asst. Vice President

						Sierra CLO I

						By:		/s/ John M. Casparian
						Name: John M. Casparian Title: Chief Operating Officer Centre Pacific, Manager

						BRYN MAWR CLO, Ltd.

						By:		Deerfield Capital Management LLC as its Collateral Manager

						By:		/s/ Dale Burrow
						Name: Dale Burrow Title: Senior Vice President

						OLYMPIC FUNDING TRUST, SERIES 1999-1

						By:		/s/ Diana L. Mushill
						Name: Diana L. Mushill Title: Authorized Agent

						ROSEMONT CLO, Ltd.

						By:		Deerfield Capital Management LLC as its Collateral Manager

						By:		/s/ Dale Burrow
						Name: Dale Burrow Title: Senior Vice President

						APEX (IDM) CDO I, Ltd.

						By:		David L. Babson & Company Inc. as Collateral Manager

						By:		/s/ Adrienne Musgnug
						Name: Adrienne Musgnug Title: Managing Director

						FLAGSHIP CLO 2001-1

						By:		/s/ Eric S. Meyer
						Name: Eric S Meyer Title: Director

						FLAGSHIP CLO II

						By:		/s/ Eric S. Meyer
						Name: Eric S. Meyer Title: Attorney-in-fact

						PILGRIM CLO 1999-1 LTD

						By:		ING Investments, LLC as its investment manager

						By:		/s/ Jeffrey A. Bakalar
						Name: Jeffrey A. Bakalar Title: Senior Vice President

						ING SENIOR INCOME FUND

						By:		ING Investments, LLC as its investment manager

						By:		/s/ Jeffrey A. Bakalar
						Name: Jeffrey A. Bakalar Title: Senior Vice President

						ING PRIME RATE TRUST

						By:		ING Investments, LLC as its investment manager

						By:		/s/ Jeffrey A. Bakalar
						Name: Jeffrey A. Bakalar Title: Senior Vice President

						OCTAGON INVESTMENT PARTNERS III, LTD.

						By:		Octagon Credit Investors, LLC as Portfolio Manager

						By:		/s/ Andrew D. Gordon
						Name: Andrew D. Gordon Title: Portfolio Manager

						OCTAGON INVESTMENT PARTNERS IV, LTD.

						By:		Octagon Credit Investors, LLC as Portfolio Manager

						By:		/s/ Andrew D. Gordon
						Name: Andrew D. Gordon Title: Portfolio Manager

						HARBOUR VIEW CLO IV, LTD.

						By:		/s/ Bill Campbell
						Name: Bill Campbell Title: Manager

						OPPENHEIMER SENIOR FLOATING RATE FUND

						By:		/s/ Bill Campbell
						Name: Bill Campbell Title: Manager

Fiscal Year		Amount
2002		$1,000,000
2003		$1,000,000
2004		$1,250,000

FISHER MEDIA SERVICES COMPANY

By:		/s/ KIRK G. ANDERSON

Name:		Kirk G. Anderson

Title:		President

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Agent

By:		/s/ DORA A. BROWN

Name:		Dora A. Brown

Title:		Vice President

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Lender

By:		/s/ MARK N. CRAWFORD

Name:		Mark N. Crawford

Title:		Senior Vice President

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a Lender

By:		/s/ THOMAS G. GUNDER

Name:		Thomas G. Gunder

Title:		V.P.

FISHER PROPERTIES INC.

By:		/s/ DAVID D. HILLARD

Name:		David D. Hillard

Title:		Assistant Secretary

FISHER PATHWAYS, INC.

By:		/s/ DAVID D. HILLARD

Name:		David D. Hillard

Title:		Assistant Secretary

FISHER ENTERTAINMENT, L.L.C.

By:		/s/ DAVID D. HILLARD

Name:		David D. Hillard

Title:		Assistant Secretary


I.	Section 7.02(e) — Investments.

	A.	Investments made during fiscal year to date:	$

	B.	Maximum permitted Investments:	$

	C.	Excess (deficient) for covenant compliance (Line IB – I.A):	$

II.	Section 7.02(g) — Investments in Civia.

	A.	Investments made subsequent to July 1, 2002:	$

	B.	Maximum permitted Investments:	$	1,700,000

	C.	Excess (deficient) for covenant compliance (Line IIB – II.A):	$

III.	Section 7.11(a) — Capital Expenditures (Fisher Plaza).

	A.	Capital expenditures related to the completion of, or tenant improvements in or maintenance of Fisher Plaza since March 21, 2002:	$

	B.	Maximum permitted capital expenditures:	$	45,000,000

	C.	Excess (deficient) for covenant compliance (Line III.B – III.A):	$

IV.	Section 7.11(b) — Capital Expenditures (Ingeniux).

	A.	Capital expenditures for the joint development and marketing of a media management system based on Ingeniux XPower software during the period commencing July 1, 2002 and ending December 31, 2002:	$

	B.	Maximum permitted capital expenditures:	$	1,100,000

	C.	Excess (deficient) for covenant compliance (Line IV.B – IV.A):	$

V.	Section 7.11(b) — Capital Expenditures (Subsidiaries).

	A.	Capital expenditures made during fiscal year to date:	$

	B.	Maximum permitted capital expenditures:	$

	C.	Excess (deficient) for covenant compliance (Line V.B – V.A):	$


I.	Section 9(a) — Capital Expenditures (Guarantor).

	A.	Capital expenditures made during fiscal year to date:		$

	B.	Maximum Permitted

		1.	The amount of $100,000:	$	100,000

		2.	The amount by which the aggregate amount of Investments made by the Guarantor during such fiscal year not otherwise permitted by subsections 3(a) through (g) of Article 3 is less than $1,000,000:	$

		3.	Maximum (Lines B.1 + B.2):	$

	C.	Excess (deficient) for covenant compliance (Line I.B – I.A):		$

II.	Section 9(b) — Capital Expenditures (Fisher Properties).

	A.	Capital expenditures made during fiscal year to date:		$

	B.	Maximum permitted capital expenditures:		$

	C.	Excess (deficient) for covenant compliance (Line II.B – II.A):		$

III.	Section 10(a) — Interest Coverage Ratio.

	A.	EBITDA for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on above date (“Subject Period”):

		1.	Consolidated net income for Subject Period:	$

		2.	Interest Charges for Subject Period:	$

		3.	Provision for income taxes for Subject Period:	$

		4.	Depreciation expenses for Subject Period:	$

		5.	Amortization expenses for intangibles for Subject Period:	$

		6.	EBITDA (Lines IIIA.1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5):	$

	B.	Fisher Broadcasting Dividends for Subject Period:		$



	C.	Net Proceeds from Dispositions for Subject Period:		$

		1.	Net Proceeds from Dispositions:	$

		2.	Non-cash charges arising from the write-off of unamortized issuance costs of Indebtedness repaid by the proceeds of such Disposition:	$

		3.	Net Proceeds (Lines IIIC.1 + 2):	$

	D.	Non-cash Adjustments (quarter ended March 31, 2002 only):		$

		1.	Losses associated with the termination of Swap Contracts:	$

		2.	Non-cash charges arising from the write-off of unamortized issuance costs of certain Indebtedness:	$

		3.	Non-cash Adjustments (Lines IIID.1 + 2):	$

	E.	Interest Charges for Subject Period:		$
		(for the period of four fiscal quarters ended on September 30, 2002, Interest Charges shall be mean Interest Charges for the period of two consecutive fiscal quarters then ended multiplied by 2 and for the period of four fiscal quarters ended on December 31, 2002, Interest Charges shall be mean Interest Charges for the period of three consecutive fiscal quarters then ended multiplied by 4 and then divided by 3)		$

	F.	Interest Coverage Ratio ((Lines IIIA.6 +B + C + D) ÷ (Line E)):			_______ to 1

	Minimum required: 2.0 to 1

[Use following for *Guarantor Full Consolidated* financial statements]

IV.	Section 10(b) — Debt to Capitalization Ratio.

	A.	Total Debt at Statement Date:		$

	B.	Total Capitalization at Statement Date:		$

	C.	Debt to Capitalization Ratio (Line IVA ÷ Line B):		$

	Maximum permitted: 70%