XML 23 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Note 21. Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Authoritative accounting guidance clarifies that fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.

Authoritative accounting guidance specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under fair values accounting guidance based on these two types of inputs are as follows:

 

Level 1 –

   Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 –

   Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated by observable data in the market.

Level 3 –

   Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs or assumptions that are unobservable in the market.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:

Securities available for sale: Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2).

The following table presents the balances of financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using  

Description

   Balance as of
December 31, 2011
     Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

U. S. Government agencies

   $ 8,795,006       $ —         $ 8,795,006       $ —     

State and municipal obligations

   $ 33,004,055       $ —         $ 33,004,055       $ —     
            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using  

Description

   Balance as of
December 31, 2010
     Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

U. S. Government agencies

   $ 8,753,857       $ —         $ 8,753,857       $ —     

State and municipal obligations

   $ 25,319,871       $ —         $ 25,319,871       $ —     

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

 

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Impaired Loans: Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business's financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans allocated to the Allowance for Loan Losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Other Real Estate Owned: Certain assets such as other real estate owned are measured at fair value less estimated costs to sell. We believe that the fair value component in its valuation follows the provisions of FASB ASC 820. The Company had other real estate owned in the amount of $2.3 million at December 31, 2011, which consisted of seven residences, fourteen lots, one former lodging property with a restaurant, two former convenience stores, a seafood house and one piece of farmland. Loans are transferred to OREO when the collateral securing them is foreclosed on. The measurement of loss associated with OREO is based on the fair value of the collateral compared to the unpaid loan balance and anticipated costs to sell the property. If there is a contract for the sale of the property, and management reasonably believes the contract will be executed, fair value is based on the sale price in that contract (Level 1). Lacking such a contract, the value of the real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Bank using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of foreclosed assets is over two years old, the fair value is considered Level 3. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred and expensed against current earnings.

The following table summarizes the Company's assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period.

 

            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using  

Description

   Balance as of
December 31, 2011
     Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable

Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Impaired Loans, net of valuation allowance

   $ 4,310,746       $ —         $ 2,057,314       $ 2,253,432   

Other real estate owned

   $ 2,279,935       $ —         $ 2,279,935       $ —     
            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using  

Description

   Balance as of
December 31, 2010
     Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 

Impaired Loans, net of valuation allowance

   $ 3,012,724       $ —         $ 3,012,724       $ —     

Other real estate owned

   $ 4,085,939       $ —         $ 4,085,939       $ —     

 

The estimated fair values of financial instruments are shown in the following table. The carrying amounts in the table are included in the balance sheets under the applicable captions.

 

Years Ended December 31,

   2011      2010  
     Carrying
Amount
     Carrying
Amount
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair Value  

Financial Assets:

           

Cash and due from banks

   $ 4,278,895       $ 4,278,895       $ 3,275,584       $ 3,275,584   

Interest-bearing deposits

     10,369,075         10,369,075         14,735,892         14,735,892   

Federal funds sold

     2,136,375         2,136,375         4,727,084         4,727,084   

Securities available-for-sale

     41,799,121         41,799,121         34,073,728         34,073,728   

Restricted securities

     1,991,200         1,991,200         2,358,500         2,358,500   

Loans, net

     233,501,821         233,935,079         244,142,325         243,940,477   

Accrued interest receivable

     1,161,191         1,161,191         1,159,924         1,159,924   

Financial Liabilities:

           

Non-interest-bearing liabilities

   $ 43,803,349       $ 43,803,349       $ 44,960,718       $ 44,960,718   

Savings and other interest-bearing deposits

     105,269,889         105,269,889         103,908,863         103,908,863   

Time deposits

     116,444,867         118,668,679         111,984,418         113,513,561   

Securities sold under repurchase agreements

     5,277,158         5,277,158         7,598,021         7,598,021   

FHLB advances

     15,000,000         16,651,084         30,000,000         31,715,392   

Accrued interest payable

     168,628         168,628         291,621         291,621   

The fair values shown do not necessarily represent the amounts which would be received on immediate settlement of the instruments. Authoritative accounting guidance excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold or purchased, accrued interest, non-interest-bearing deposits, savings, and securities sold under repurchase agreements, represent items which do not present significant market risks, are payable on demand, or are of such short duration that carrying value approximates market value.

Available-for-sale securities are carried at the quoted market prices for the individual securities held. Therefore carrying value equals market value. The carrying value of restricted securities approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions.

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers.

Time deposits are presented at estimated fair value using interest rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

The fair value of the FHLB advances is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the interest rate offered for similar advances.

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit worthiness of the counter parties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

The fair value of standby letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counter parties at the reporting date.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the fair value of loan commitments and standby letters of credit was immaterial. Therefore, they are not included in the table above.

 

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair value of the Company's financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company's overall interest rate risk.