XML 27 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Income Taxes
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Income Taxes [Abstract]  
Income Taxes

11. Income Taxes

The components of income tax (provision) benefit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are comprised of the following:

 

                         
    2011     2010     2009  

Current:

                       

Federal.

  $ (622   $ (893   $ 38,682  

State

    (502     (2,372     1,772  

Foreign

    (41     (95     (835

Deferred:

                       

Federal

    (284     163       (15,816

State

    (2     40       (616

Foreign

    (697     (148     9  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ (2,148   $ (3,305   $ 23,196  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

On August 24, 2009, we received a private letter ruling from the IRS granting favorable loss treatment under Sections 331 and 336 of the Code on the tax liquidation of one of our old taxable REIT subsidiaries. As a result, we completed a transaction on September 1, 2009 such that approximately 75% of the assets formerly held by this taxable REIT subsidiary are now held by a limited liability company which is wholly owned by the Operating Partnership. The remaining 25% of the assets are now held by a partnership for federal income tax purposes and is 99% owned by one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries formed in 2009. On November 6, 2009, legislation was signed that allows businesses with net operating losses for 2008 or 2009 to carry back those losses for up to five years. As a result, we received a refund from the IRS of $40,418 in the fourth quarter of 2009 due to the tax liquidation of one of our old taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Deferred income taxes represent the tax effect of the temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets (liabilities) include the following as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

                 
    2011     2010  

Investments in Joint Ventures

  $ 15     $ 47  

Fixed assets

    —         1,863  

Prepaid rent

    45       71  

Restricted stock

    43       99  

Capitalized Interest

    —         626  

Impairment of Real Estate

    5,683       10,196  

Foreign net operating loss carrying forward

    828       706  

Valuation Allowance

    (5,078     (9,301

Other

    483       569  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets, net of allowance

  $ 2,019     $ 4,876  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Straight-line rent

    (85     (510

Fixed assets

    (1,946     (3,397

Other

    (108     (106
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

  $ (2,139   $ (4,013
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net deferred tax (liability) asset

  $ (120   $ 863  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

A valuation allowance is recorded if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. We do not have projections of future taxable income in the taxable REIT subsidiaries significant enough to allow us to realize our deferred tax assets. Therefore, we have recorded a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and which causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax assets, is included in the current tax provision.

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had net deferred tax (liability) assets of $(120) and $863, after valuation allowances of $5,078 and $9,301, respectively. The decrease in the valuation allowance of $4,223 from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011 is primarily related to a decrease in net deferred tax assets and liabilities due to sales of property. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had net deferred tax assets of $863 and $776, after valuation allowances of $9,301 and $1,299, respectively. The increase in the valuation allowance of $8,002 from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 is primarily related to an increase in net deferred tax assets due to the impairment of real estate.

The components of income tax (provision) benefit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

 

                         
    2011     2010     2009  

Tax provision associated with income from operations on sold properties which is included in discontinued operations

  $ (119   $ —       $ (384

Tax provision associated with gains and losses on the sale of real estate which is included in discontinued operations

    (1,127     —         (1,462

Tax provision associated with gains and losses on the sale of real estate

    (452     (342     (143

Income tax (provision) benefit

    (450     (2,963     25,185  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax (provision) benefit

  $ (2,148   $ (3,305   $ 23,196  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The income tax (provision) benefit pertaining to income from continuing operations and gain on sale of real estate differs from the amounts computed by applying the applicable federal statutory rate as follows:

 

                         
    2011     2010     2009  

Tax (provision) benefit at federal rate related to continuing operations

  $ (2,162   $ 5,141     $ 8,574  

State tax (provision) benefit, net of federal (provision) benefit

    (521     (2,320     1,849  

Non-deductible permanent items, net

    (54     (58     (1,652

Change in valuation allowance

    1,853       (6,108     16,269  

Foreign taxes, net

    (96     (211     342  

Other

    78       251       (340
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income tax (provision) benefit

  $ (902   $ (3,305   $ 25,042  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Michigan Tax Issue

As of December 31, 2008, we had paid approximately $1,400 (representing tax and interest for the years 1997-2000) to the State of Michigan regarding business loss carryforwards the appropriateness of which was the subject of litigation initiated by us. On December 11, 2007, the Michigan Court of Claims rendered a decision against us regarding the business loss carryforwards. Also, the court ruled against us on an alternative position involving Michigan’s Capital Acquisition Deduction. We filed an appeal to the Michigan Appeals Court in January 2008; however, as a result of the lower court’s decision, an additional approximately $800 (representing tax and interest for the year 2001) had been accrued through June 30, 2009 for both tax and financial statement purposes. On August 18, 2009, the Michigan Appeals Court issued a decision in our favor on the business loss carryforward issue. The Michigan Department of Treasury appealed the decision to the Michigan Supreme Court on September 29, 2009; however, we believed there was a very low probability that the Michigan Supreme Court would accept the case. Therefore, in September 2009 we reversed our accrual of $800 (related to the 2001 tax year) and set up a receivable of $1,400 for the amount paid in 2006 (related to the 1997-2000 tax years), resulting in an aggregate reversal of prior tax expense of approximately $2,200. On April 23, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Michigan Appeals Court and reinstated the decision of the Michigan Court of Claims. Based on the most recent ruling of the Michigan Supreme Court, we reversed the receivable of $1,400 and paid approximately $800, for a total of approximately $2,200 of tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is included in continuing operations.