FRFI - 2013.12.31 - 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________________________________________________
Form 10-K
___________________________________________________________________________
|
| |
ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
or
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 333-21873
_____________________________________________________________________________
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
______________________________________________________________________________
|
| | |
Delaware | | 36-3924586 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
311 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 3900, Chicago, Illinois | | 60606 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(312) 344-4300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
______________________________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | | | Accelerated filer | | ý |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "plan," "anticipate," "estimate," "project," "seek," "target," "potential," "focus," "may," "should" or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a materially adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to: changes in national, international, regional and local economic conditions generally and real estate markets specifically; changes in legislation/regulation (including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts) and actions of regulatory authorities (including the Internal Revenue Service); our ability to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust; the availability and attractiveness of financing (including both public and private capital) to us and to our potential counterparties; the availability and attractiveness of terms of additional debt repurchases; interest rates; our credit agency ratings; our ability to comply with applicable financial covenants; competition; changes in supply and demand for industrial properties (including land, the supply and demand for which is inherently more volatile than other types of industrial property) in the Company’s current and proposed market areas; difficulties in consummating acquisitions and dispositions; risks related to our investments in properties through joint ventures; environmental liabilities; slippages in development or lease-up schedules; tenant creditworthiness; higher-than-expected costs; changes in asset valuations and related impairment charges; changes in general accounting principles, policies and guidelines applicable to real estate investment trusts; international business risks and those additional factors described in Item 1A, "Risk Factors" and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we," "us" and "our" refer to First Industrial, L.P. and their respective controlled subsidiaries.
PART I
THE COMPANY
Item 1. Business
General
First Industrial, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") was organized as a limited partnership in the state of Delaware on November 23, 1993. The sole general partner is First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company") which owns common units in the Operating Partnership ("Units") representing an approximate 96.0% ownership interest at December 31, 2013. The Company also owns a preferred general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership represented by preferred units ("Preferred Units") with an aggregate liquidation priority of $75.0 million at December 31, 2013. The Company is a real estate investment trust ("REIT") as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). The Company’s operations are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership owned, in the aggregate, an approximately 4.0% interest in the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2013. Operations are also conducted through other partnerships and limited liability companies ("LLCs") of which the Operating Partnership is the sole member, and taxable REIT subsidiaries (together with the Operating Partnership, other partnerships and the LLCs, the "Consolidated Operating Partnership"), the operating data of which is consolidated with that of the Operating Partnership as presented herein.
We also hold at least a 99% limited partnership interest in First Industrial Financing Partnership, L.P. (the "Financing Partnership"), First Industrial Securities, L.P. (the "Securities Partnership"), First Industrial Mortgage Partnership, L.P. (the "Mortgage Partnership"), First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. (the "Pennsylvania Partnership"), First Industrial Harrisburg, L.P. (the "Harrisburg Partnership"), First Industrial Indianapolis, L.P. (the "Indianapolis Partnership"), TK-SV, LTD., and FI Development Services L.P. and wholly owned LLCs (together, the "Other Real Estate Partnerships"). The Other Real Estate Partnerships’ operating data is presented herein on a combined basis, separate from that of the Consolidated Operating Partnership. The general partners of the Other Real Estate Partnerships are separate corporations, each with at least a .01% general partnership interest in the Other Real Estate Partnerships for which it acts as a general partner. Each general partner of the Other Real Estate Partnerships is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
We also own noncontrolling equity interests in, and provide services to, two joint ventures (the "2003 Net Lease Joint Venture" and the "2007 Europe Joint Venture"; collectively, the "Joint Ventures"). See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Joint Ventures.
The Other Real Estate Partnerships and the Joint Ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the operating data of the Other Real Estate Partnerships and the Joint Ventures are not consolidated with that of the Consolidated Operating Partnership as presented herein.
As of December 31, 2013, we owned 585 in-service industrial properties, containing an aggregate of approximately 53.9 million square feet of gross leasable area ("GLA"). On a combined basis, as of December 31, 2013, the Other Real Estate Partnerships owned 64 in-service industrial properties, containing an aggregate of approximately 7.4 million square feet of GLA. Of the 64 industrial properties owned by the Other Real Estate Partnerships at December 31, 2013, 21 are held by the Financing Partnership, 17 are held by the Pennsylvania Partnership, nine are held by the Mortgage Partnership, six are held by the Securities Partnership, six are held by the Harrisburg Partnership, three are held by the Indianapolis Partnership, one is held by TK-SV, LTD. and one is held by FI Development Services, L.P. Our in-service portfolio includes all properties other than developed, redeveloped and acquired properties that have not yet reached stabilized occupancy (generally defined as properties that are 90% leased). Properties which are at least 75% occupied at acquisition are placed in-service. Acquired properties less than 75% occupied are placed in-service upon the earlier of reaching 90% occupancy or one year from the acquisition date. Development properties are placed in-service upon the earlier of reaching 90% occupancy or one year from the date construction is completed. Redevelopments (generally projects which require capital expenditures exceeding 25% of the gross cost basis) are placed in-service upon the earlier of reaching 90% occupancy or one year from the completion of renovation construction.
We utilize an operating approach which combines the effectiveness of decentralized, locally based property management, acquisition, sales and development functions with the cost efficiencies of centralized acquisition, sales and development support, capital markets expertise, asset management and fiscal control systems. At February 27, 2014, we had 169 employees.
We maintain a website at www.firstindustrial.com. Information on this website shall not constitute part of this Form 10-K. Copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports are available without charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC. You may also read and copy any document filed at the public reference facilities of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference
facilities. These documents also may be accessed through the SEC’s Interactive Data Electronic Application via the SEC's home page on the Internet (http://www.sec.gov). In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter, along with supplemental financial and operating information prepared by us, are all available without charge on our website or upon request to us. Amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to our executive officers or directors will also be posted to our website. We also post or otherwise make available on our website from time to time other information that may be of interest to our investors. Please direct requests as follows:
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
311 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 3900
Chicago, IL 60606
Attention: Investor Relations
Business Objectives and Growth Plans
Our fundamental business objective is to maximize the total return to our partners through per unit distributions and increases in the value of our properties and operations. Our long-term business growth plans include the following elements:
| |
• | Internal Growth. We seek to grow internally by (i) increasing revenues by renewing or re-leasing spaces subject to expiring leases at higher rental levels; (ii) increasing occupancy levels at properties where vacancies exist and maintaining occupancy elsewhere; (iii) controlling and minimizing property operating and general and administrative expenses; and (iv) renovating existing properties. |
| |
• | External Growth. We seek to grow externally through (i) the development of industrial properties; (ii) the acquisition of portfolios of industrial properties or individual properties which meet our investment parameters within our target markets; (iii) the expansion of our properties; and (iv) possible additional joint venture investments. |
| |
• | Portfolio Enhancement. We continually seek to upgrade our overall portfolio via new investments as well as through the sale of select assets that we believe do not exhibit favorable characteristics for long-term income growth. |
Our ability to pursue our long-term growth plans is affected by market conditions and our financial condition and operating capabilities.
Business Strategies
We utilize the following six strategies in connection with the operation of our business:
| |
• | Organizational Strategy. We implement our decentralized property operations strategy through the deployment of experienced regional management teams and local property managers. We provide acquisition, development and financing assistance, asset management oversight and financial reporting functions from our headquarters in Chicago, Illinois to support our regional operations. We believe the size of our portfolio enables us to realize operating efficiencies by spreading overhead among many properties and by negotiating purchasing discounts. |
| |
• | Market Strategy. Our market strategy is to concentrate on the top industrial real estate markets in the United States. These markets have one or more of the following characteristics: (i) favorable industrial real estate fundamentals, including improving industrial demand and constrained supply that can lead to long-term rent growth; (ii) warehouse distribution markets with favorable economic and business environments that should benefit from increases in distribution activity driven by growth in global trade and local consumption; and (iii) sufficient size to provide ample opportunity for growth through incremental investments as well as offer asset liquidity. |
| |
• | Leasing and Marketing Strategy. We have an operational management strategy designed to enhance tenant satisfaction and portfolio performance. We pursue an active leasing strategy, which includes broadly marketing available space, seeking to renew existing leases at higher rents per square foot and seeking leases which provide for the pass-through of property-related expenses to the tenant. We also have local and national marketing programs which focus on the business and real estate brokerage communities and national tenants. |
| |
• | Acquisition/Development Strategy. Our acquisition/development strategy is to invest in industrial properties in the top industrial real estate markets in the United States. |
| |
• | Disposition Strategy. We continuously evaluate local market conditions and property-related factors in all of our markets for purposes of identifying assets suitable for disposition. |
| |
• | Financing Strategy. To finance acquisitions, developments and debt maturities, as market conditions permit, we utilize a portion of proceeds from property sales, unsecured debt offerings, term loans, mortgage financings and line of credit borrowings under our $625.0 million unsecured credit facility (the "Unsecured Credit Facility"), and proceeds from the issuance, when and as warranted, of additional equity securities (see Recent Developments). As of February 27, 2014, we had approximately $604.0 million available for additional borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility. |
Recent Developments
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we acquired two industrial properties comprising approximately 1.1 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $72.8 million, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisitions. Additionally, we placed in-service one development totaling approximately 0.3 million square feet of GLA for a total cost of $19.1 million. We also sold 65 industrial properties comprising approximately 2.8 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels for total gross sales proceeds of $138.8 million. At December 31, 2013, we owned 585 in-service industrial properties containing approximately 53.9 million square feet of GLA.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we amended and restated our existing $450.0 million revolving credit facility (the "Old Credit Facility"), increasing the borrowing capacity to $625.0 million. We may request that the borrowing capacity under the Unsecured Credit Facility be increased to $825.0 million, subject to certain restrictions. The amendment extended the maturity date from December 12, 2014 to September 29, 2017 with an option to extend an additional one year at our election, subject to certain restrictions. At December 31, 2013, the Unsecured Credit Facility provides for interest only payments at LIBOR plus 150 basis points. The interest rate on the Unsecured Credit Facility varies based on our leverage ratio. In the event we achieve an investment grade rating from one of certain rating agencies, the rate may be decreased at our election, based on the investment grade rating. In connection with the amendment of the Old Credit Facility, we wrote off $0.1 million of unamortized deferred financing costs, which is included in loss from retirement of debt for the year ended December 31, 2013.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we repurchased and retired prior to maturity $29.8 million of our senior unsecured notes and $64.4 million in mortgage loans payable. We recognized a loss from retirement of debt on our Consolidated Statement of Operations of $6.4 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company redeemed the remaining 4,000,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/10,000th of a share of the Company's 7.25% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (the "Series J Preferred Stock"), at a redemption price of $25.00 per Depositary Share. An equivalent number of the 7.25% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units (the "Series J Preferred Units") were redeemed during the year ended December 31, 2013 as well. The Company also redeemed all of the 2,000,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/10,000th of a share of the Company's 7.25% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (the "Series K Preferred Stock"), at a redemption price of $25.00 per Depositary Share. An equivalent number of the 7.25% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units (the "Series K Preferred Units") were redeemed during the year ended December 31, 2013 as well.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 8,400,000 shares of its common stock, generating $132.1 million in net proceeds, in an underwritten public offering. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 2,315,704 shares of its common stock, generating $41.7 million in net proceeds, under the Company's "at-the-market" equity offering program (the "2012 ATM"). The proceeds from the issuances were contributed to us in exchange for an equivalent number of Units and are reflected in our financial statements as a general partner contribution.
Future Property Acquisitions, Developments and Property Sales
We have acquisition and development programs through which we seek to identify portfolio and individual industrial property acquisitions and developments.
We also sell properties based on market conditions and property related factors. As a result, we are currently engaged in negotiations relating to the possible acquisition, development or sale of certain industrial properties in our portfolio.
When evaluating potential industrial property acquisitions and developments, as well as potential industrial property sales, we will consider such factors as: (i) the geographic area and type of property; (ii) the location, construction quality, condition and design of the property; (iii) the terms of tenant leases, including the potential for rent increases; (iv) the potential for economic growth and the general business, tax and regulatory environment of the area in which the property is located; (v) the occupancy and demand by tenants for properties of a similar type in the vicinity; (vi) competition from existing properties and the potential for the construction of new properties in the area; (vii) the potential for capital appreciation of the
property; (viii) the ability to improve the property’s performance through renovation; and (ix) the potential for expansion of the physical layout of the property and/or the number of sites.
INDUSTRY
Industrial properties are typically used for the design, assembly, packaging, storage and distribution of goods and/or the provision of services. As a result, the demand for industrial space in the United States is related to the level of economic output. For the five years ended December 31, 2013, the national occupancy rate for industrial properties in the United States has ranged from 85.5%* to 88.7%*, with an occupancy rate of 88.7%* at December 31, 2013.
_______________________________________
| |
* | Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors |
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our operations involve various risks that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to pay distributions on our Units and the market value of our Units. These risks, among others contained in the Operating Partnership’s other filings with the SEC, include:
Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing and may negatively impact our liquidity, financial condition and operating results.
From time to time, the capital and credit markets in the United States and other countries experience significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which can cause the market prices of many securities and the spreads on prospective debt financings to fluctuate substantially. These circumstances can materially impact liquidity in the financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive, and in some cases result in the unavailability of financing. A significant amount of our existing indebtedness was issued through capital markets transactions. We anticipate that the capital markets could be a source of refinancing of our existing indebtedness in the future. This source of refinancing may not be available if capital market volatility and disruption occurs. Furthermore, we could potentially lose access to available liquidity under our Unsecured Credit Facility if one or more participating lenders were to default on their commitments. If our ability to issue additional debt or equity securities to finance future acquisitions, developments and redevelopments and joint venture activities or to borrow money under our Unsecured Credit Facility were to be impaired by capital market volatility and disruption, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.
In addition, capital and credit market price volatility could make the valuation of our properties more difficult. There may be significant uncertainty in the valuation, or in the stability of the value, of our properties that could result in a substantial decrease in the value of our properties. As a result, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, which may require us to recognize an impairment loss in earnings.
Real estate investments’ value fluctuates depending on conditions in the general economy and the real estate industry. These conditions may limit the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s revenues and available cash.
The factors that affect the value of our real estate and the revenues we derive from our properties include, among other things:
| |
• | general economic conditions; |
| |
• | local, regional, national and international economic conditions and other events and occurrences that affect the markets in which we own properties; |
| |
• | local conditions such as oversupply or a reduction in demand in an area; |
| |
• | the attractiveness of the properties to tenants; |
| |
• | zoning or other regulatory restrictions; |
| |
• | competition from other available real estate; |
| |
• | our ability to provide adequate maintenance and insurance; and |
| |
• | increased operating costs, including insurance premiums and real estate taxes. |
These factors may be amplified in light of a disruption of the global credit markets. Our investments in real estate assets are concentrated in the industrial sector, and the demand for industrial space in the United States is related to the level of economic output. Accordingly, reduced economic output may lead to lower occupancy rates for our properties. In addition, if any of our tenants experiences a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition, delays lease commencement, fails to make rental payments when due, becomes insolvent or declares bankruptcy, the result could be a termination of the tenant’s lease, which could adversely affect our cash flow from operations.
Many real estate costs are fixed, even if income from properties decreases.
Our financial results depend on leasing space to tenants on terms favorable to us. Our income and funds available for distribution to our unitholders will decrease if a significant number of our tenants cannot pay their rent or we are unable to lease properties on favorable terms. In addition, if a tenant does not pay its rent, we may not be able to enforce our rights as landlord without delays and we may incur substantial legal costs. Costs associated with real estate property, such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs, generally are not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the property.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership may be unable to sell properties when appropriate or at all because real estate investments are not as liquid as certain other types of assets.
Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly, which will tend to limit our ability to adjust our property portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. The inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our property portfolio could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to service debt and make distributions to our unitholders. In addition, like other companies qualifying as REITs under the Code, the Company must comply with the safe harbor rules relating to the number of properties disposed of in a year, their tax basis and the cost of improvements made to the properties, or meet other tests which enable a REIT to avoid punitive taxation on the sale of assets. Thus, our ability at any time to sell assets may be restricted.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership may be unable to sell properties on advantageous terms.
We have sold to third parties a significant number of properties in recent years and, as part of our business, we intend to continue to sell properties to third parties. Our ability to sell properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. If we are unable to sell properties on favorable terms or redeploy the proceeds of property sales in accordance with our business strategy, then our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay distributions on, and the market value of, our Units could be adversely affected.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership may be unable to complete development and re-development projects on advantageous terms.
As part of our business, we develop new and re-develop existing properties when and as conditions warrant. In addition, we have sold to third parties or sold to joint ventures development and re-development properties, and we may continue to sell such properties to third parties or to sell or contribute such properties to joint ventures as opportunities arise. The real estate development and re-development business involves significant risks that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay distributions on, and the market value of, our Units, which include:
| |
• | we may not be able to obtain financing for development projects on favorable terms and complete construction on schedule or within budget, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and delays in leasing the properties and generating cash flow; |
| |
• | we may not be able to obtain, or may experience delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other governmental permits and authorizations; and |
| |
• | the properties may perform below anticipated levels, producing cash flow below budgeted amounts and limiting our ability to sell such properties to third parties or to sell such properties to joint ventures. |
The Consolidated Operating Partnership may be unable to acquire properties on advantageous terms or acquisitions may not perform as the Consolidated Operating Partnership expects.
We acquire and intend to continue to acquire primarily industrial properties. The acquisition of properties entails various risks, including the risks that our investments may not perform as expected and that our cost estimates for bringing an acquired property up to market standards may prove inaccurate. Further, we face significant competition for attractive investment opportunities from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including publicly-traded REITs and private investors. This competition increases as investments in real estate become attractive relative to other forms of investment. As a result of competition, we may be unable to acquire additional properties as we desire or the purchase prices may be elevated. In addition, we expect to finance future acquisitions through a combination of borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility, proceeds from equity or debt offerings and debt originations by the Consolidated Operating Partnership and proceeds from property sales, which may not be available and which could adversely affect our cash flow. Any of the above risks could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay distributions on, and the market value of, our Units.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership may be unable to renew leases or find other lessees.
We are subject to the risks that, upon expiration, leases may not be renewed, the space subject to such leases may not be relet or the terms of renewal or reletting, including the cost of required renovations, may be less favorable than expiring lease terms. If we were unable to promptly renew a significant number of expiring leases or to promptly relet the space covered by such leases, or if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting were significantly lower than the current rates, our financial condition, results of operation, cash flow and ability to pay distributions on, and the market value of, our Units could be adversely affected. As of December 31, 2013, leases with respect to approximately 6.1 million, 7.3 million and 8.9 million square feet of our total GLA, representing 13%, 15% and 18% of our total GLA, expire in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
The Company might fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.
The Company intends to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. Although the Company believes that it is organized and will operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT, qualification as a REIT involves the satisfaction of numerous requirements, some of which must be met on a recurring basis. These requirements are established under highly technical and complex Code provisions of which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involve the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control.
If the Company were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it would be subject to federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at corporate rates. This could result in a discontinuation or substantial reduction in dividends to stockholders and in cash to pay interest and principal on debt securities that we issue. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, the Company would be disqualified from electing treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which it failed to qualify as a REIT.
Certain property transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on the gain attributable to the transaction.
As part of our business, we sell properties to third parties as opportunities arise. Under the Code, a 100% penalty tax could be assessed on the gain resulting from sales of properties that are deemed to be prohibited transactions. The question of what constitutes a prohibited transaction is based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each transaction. The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") could contend that certain sales of properties by us are prohibited transactions. While we have implemented controls to avoid prohibited transactions, if a dispute were to arise that was successfully argued by the IRS, the 100% penalty tax could be assessed against the profits from these transactions. In addition, any income from a prohibited transaction may adversely affect the Company’s ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT.
The REIT distribution requirements may limit the Company’s ability to retain capital and require the Company to turn to external financing sources.
The Company could, in certain instances, have taxable income without sufficient cash to enable us to meet the distribution requirements of the REIT provisions of the Code. In that situation, we could be required to borrow funds or sell properties on adverse terms in order to meet those distribution requirements. In addition, because the Company must distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of the Company’s REIT taxable income each year, the Company’s ability to accumulate capital may be limited. Thus, to provide capital resources for our ongoing business, and to satisfy our debt repayment obligations and other liquidity needs, the Company may be more dependent on outside sources of financing, such as debt financing or issuances of additional capital stock, which may or may not be available on favorable terms. Additional debt financings may substantially increase our leverage and additional equity offerings may result in substantial dilution of unitholders’ interests.
Debt financing, the degree of leverage and rising interest rates could reduce the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s cash flow.
Where possible, we intend to continue to use leverage to increase the rate of return on our investments and to allow us to make more investments than we otherwise could. Our use of leverage presents an additional element of risk in the event that the cash flow from our properties is insufficient to meet both debt payment obligations and the distribution requirements of the REIT provisions of the Code. In addition, rising interest rates would reduce our cash flow by increasing the amount of interest due on our floating rate debt and on our fixed rate debt as it matures and is refinanced.
Failure to comply with covenants in our debt agreements could adversely affect our financial condition.
The terms of our agreements governing our Unsecured Credit Facility and other indebtedness require that we comply with a number of financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage. Complying with such covenants may limit our operational flexibility. Our failure to comply with these covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt agreement even if we have satisfied our payment obligations. Consistent with our prior practice, we will, in the future, continue to interpret and certify our performance under these covenants in a good faith manner that we deem reasonable and appropriate. However, these financial covenants are complex and there can be no assurance that these provisions would not be interpreted by the noteholders or lenders in a manner that could impose and cause us to incur material costs. We anticipate that we will be able to operate in compliance with our financial covenants in 2014. Our ability to meet our financial covenants may be adversely affected if economic and credit market conditions limit our ability to reduce our debt levels consistent with, or result in net operating income below, our current expectations. Under our Unsecured Credit Facility, an event of default can also occur if the lenders, in their good faith judgment, determine that a material adverse change has occurred which could prevent timely repayment or materially impair our ability to perform our obligations under the loan agreement.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default, we would be subject to higher finance costs and fees, and the lenders under our Unsecured Credit Facility will not be required to lend any additional amounts to us. In addition, our outstanding senior unsecured notes as well as all outstanding borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, could be accelerated and declared to be immediately due and payable. Furthermore, our Unsecured Credit Facility and the indentures governing our senior unsecured notes contain certain cross-default provisions, which are triggered in the event that our other material indebtedness is in default. These cross-default provisions may require us to repay or restructure the Unsecured Credit Facility and the senior unsecured notes or other debt that is in default, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market value of, our Units. If repayment of any of our borrowings is accelerated, we cannot provide assurance that we will have sufficient assets to repay such indebtedness or that we would be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance such indebtedness. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms, or terms that are acceptable to us.
Cross-collateralization of mortgage loans could result in foreclosure on substantially all of the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s properties if the Consolidated Operating Partnership is unable to service its indebtedness.
We may obtain additional mortgage debt financing in the future, if it is available to us. These mortgages may be issued on a recourse, non-recourse or cross-collateralized basis. Cross-collateralization makes all of the subject properties available to the lender in order to satisfy our debt. Holders of this indebtedness will have a claim against these properties. To the extent indebtedness is cross-collateralized, lenders may seek to foreclose upon properties that are not the primary collateral for their loan, which may, in turn, result in acceleration of other indebtedness collateralized by properties. Foreclosure of properties would result in a loss of income and asset value to us, making it difficult for us to meet both debt payment obligations and the distribution requirements of the REIT provisions of the Code. At December 31, 2013, mortgage loans payable totaling $474.5 million were cross-collateralized, inclusive of mortgage loans payable held by the Other Real Estate Partnerships.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership may have to make lump-sum payments on its existing indebtedness.
We are required to make the following lump-sum or “balloon” payments under the terms of some of our indebtedness. Our lump-sum payments as of December 31, 2013 consist of the following:
| |
• | $10.6 million aggregate principal amount of 7.750% Notes due 2032 (the “2032 Notes”); |
| |
• | $31.9 million aggregate principal amount of 7.600% Notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes”); |
| |
• | $6.1 million aggregate principal amount of 7.150% Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”); |
| |
• | $101.9 million aggregate principal amount of 5.950% Notes due 2017 (the “2017 II Notes”); |
| |
• | $55.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.500% Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”); |
| |
• | $159.7 million aggregate principal amount of 5.750% Notes due 2016 (the “2016 Notes”); |
| |
• | $81.8 million aggregate principal amount of 6.420% Notes due 2014 (the “2014 Notes”); |
| |
• | $512.8 million in mortgage loans payable, in the aggregate, due between October 2014 and September 2022 on certain of our mortgage loans payable; and |
| |
• | a $625.0 million Unsecured Credit Facility maturing September 29, 2017, under which we may borrow to finance the acquisition of additional properties, fund developments and for other corporate purposes, including working capital. The Unsecured Credit Facility contains a one year extension option at our election, subject to certain restrictions. |
As of December 31, 2013, $173.0 million was outstanding under the Unsecured Credit Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 1.666%.
Our ability to make required payments of principal on outstanding indebtedness, whether at maturity or otherwise, may depend on our ability either to refinance the applicable indebtedness or to sell properties. We have no commitments to refinance the 2014 Notes, the 2016 Notes, the 2017 Notes, the 2017 II Notes, the 2027 Notes, the 2028 Notes, the 2032 Notes, the Unsecured Credit Facility or the mortgage loans. Our existing mortgage loan obligations are collateralized by our properties and therefore such obligations will permit the lender to foreclose on those properties in the event of a default.
There is no limitation on debt in the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s organizational documents.
As of December 31, 2013, our ratio of debt to our total market capitalization was 36.6%. We compute the percentage by calculating our total consolidated debt as a percentage of the aggregate market value of all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, assuming the exchange of all limited partnership units for the Company’s common stock, plus the aggregate stated value of all outstanding shares of preferred stock and total consolidated debt. Our organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount or percentage of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt service that could adversely affect our ability to make expected distributions to unitholders and an increased risk of default on our obligations.
Rising interest rates on the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s Unsecured Credit Facility could decrease the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s available cash.
Our Unsecured Credit Facility bears interest at a floating rate. As of December 31, 2013, our Unsecured Credit Facility had an outstanding balance of $173.0 million at a weighted average interest rate of 1.666%. At December 31, 2013, our Unsecured Credit Facility provides for interest only payments at LIBOR plus 150 basis points which rate varies based on our leverage ratio. Based on the outstanding balance on our Unsecured Credit Facility as of December 31, 2013, a 10% increase in interest rates would increase interest expense by $0.3 million on an annual basis. Increases in the interest rate payable on balances outstanding under our Unsecured Credit Facility would decrease our cash available for distribution to unitholders.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership’s mortgages may impact its ability to sell encumbered properties on advantageous terms or at all.
As part of our plan to enhance liquidity and pay down our debt, we have originated numerous mortgage financings and from time to time engage in active discussions with various lenders regarding the origination of additional mortgage financings. Certain of our mortgages contain, and it is anticipated that some future mortgages will contain, substantial prepayment premiums which we would have to pay upon the sale of a property, thereby reducing the net proceeds to us from the sale of any such property. As a result, our willingness to sell certain properties and the price at which we may desire to sell a property may be impacted by the terms of any mortgage financing encumbering a property. If we are unable to sell properties on favorable terms or redeploy the proceeds of property sales in accordance with our business strategy, then our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market value of, our Units could be adversely affected.
Adverse market and economic conditions could cause us to recognize additional impairment charges.
We regularly review our real estate assets for impairment indicators, such as a decline in a property’s occupancy rate, decline in general market conditions or a change in the expected hold period of an asset. If we determine that indicators of impairment are present, we review the properties affected by these indicators to determine whether an impairment charge is required. We use considerable judgment in making determinations about impairments, from analyzing whether there are
indicators of impairment to the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the investment. Accordingly, our subjective estimates and evaluations may not be accurate, and such estimates and evaluations are subject to change or revision.
From time to time, adverse market and economic conditions and market volatility make it difficult to value the real estate assets owned by us as well as the value of our interests in unconsolidated joint ventures. There may be significant uncertainty in the valuation, or in the stability of the cash flows, discount rates and other factors related to such assets due to the adverse market and economic conditions that could result in a substantial decrease in their value. We may be required to recognize additional asset impairment charges in the future, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Earnings and cash dividends, asset value and market interest rates affect the price of the Company’s common stock.
As a REIT, the market value of the Company’s common stock, in general, is based primarily upon the market’s perception of the Company’s growth potential and its current and potential future earnings and cash dividends. The market value of the Company’s common stock is also based upon the market value of the Company’s underlying real estate assets. For this reason, shares of the Company’s common stock may trade at prices that are higher or lower than the Company’s net asset value per share. To the extent that the Company retains operating cash flow for investment purposes, working capital reserves, or other purposes, these retained funds, while increasing the value of the Company’s underlying assets, may not correspondingly increase the market price of the Company’s common stock. The Company’s failure to meet the market’s expectations with regard to future earnings and cash dividends likely would adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock. Further, the distribution yield on the common stock (as a percentage of the price of the common stock) relative to market interest rates may also influence the price of the Company’s common stock. An increase in market interest rates might lead prospective purchasers of the Company’s common stock to expect a higher distribution yield, which would adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership may incur unanticipated costs and liabilities due to environmental problems.
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of clean-up of certain conditions relating to the presence of hazardous or toxic materials on, in or emanating from a property, and any related damages to natural resources. Environmental laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic materials. The presence of such materials, or the failure to address those conditions properly, may adversely affect the ability to rent or sell the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. Persons who dispose of or arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic materials may also be liable for the costs of clean-up of such materials, or for related natural resource damages, at or from an off-site disposal or treatment facility, whether or not the facility is owned or operated by those persons. No assurance can be given that existing environmental assessments with respect to any of our properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of any of the properties did not create any material environmental condition not known to us or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any of our properties. In addition, changes to existing environmental regulation to address, among other things, climate change, could increase the scope of our potential liabilities.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership’s insurance coverage does not include all potential losses.
We currently carry comprehensive insurance coverage including property, boiler & machinery, liability, fire, flood, terrorism, earthquake, extended coverage and rental loss as appropriate for the markets where each of our properties and their business operations are located. The insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits customarily carried for similar properties and business activities. We believe our properties are adequately insured. However, there are certain losses, including losses from earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, pollution, acts of war or riots, that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed to be economically feasible or prudent to do so. If an uninsured loss, a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, or a loss is not paid due to insurer insolvency with respect to one or more of our properties, we could experience a significant loss of capital invested and potential revenues from these properties, and could potentially remain obligated under any recourse debt associated with the property.
The Consolidated Operating Partnership is subject to risks and liabilities in connection with its investments in properties through Joint Ventures.
As of December 31, 2013, the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture owned approximately 2.5 million square feet of properties. Our net investment in this Joint Venture was $0.9 million at December 31, 2013. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in joint ventures and we may continue to develop and acquire properties through joint ventures with other persons or entities when warranted by the circumstances. Joint venture investments, in general, involve certain risks, including:
| |
• | joint venturers may share certain approval rights over major decisions; |
| |
• | joint venturers might fail to fund their share of any required capital commitments; |
| |
• | joint venturers might have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals that would affect our ability to operate the property; |
| |
• | joint venturers may have the power to act contrary to our instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including our current policy with respect to maintaining the Company’s qualification as a real estate investment trust; |
| |
• | the joint venture agreements often restrict the transfer of a member’s or joint venturer’s interest or “buy-sell” or may otherwise restrict our ability to sell the interest when we desire or on advantageous terms; |
| |
• | disputes between us and our joint venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business and subject the properties owned by the applicable joint venture to additional risk; and |
| |
• | we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our joint venturers. |
The occurrence of one or more of the events described above could adversely affect the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market value of, its Units.
In addition, joint venture investments in real estate involve all of the risks related to the ownership, acquisition, development, sale and financing of real estate discussed in the risk factors above. To the extent the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s investments in joint ventures are adversely affected by such risks, the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market value of, its Units could be adversely affected.
We are subject to risks associated with our international operations.
As of December 31, 2013, we owned one land parcel located in Canada. Our international operations will be subject to risks inherent in doing business abroad, including:
| |
• | exposure to the economic fluctuations in the locations in which we invest; |
| |
• | difficulties and costs associated with complying with a wide variety of complex laws, treaties and regulations; |
| |
• | revisions in tax treaties or other laws and regulations, including those governing the taxation of our international revenues; |
| |
• | obstacles to the repatriation of earnings and funds; |
| |
• | currency exchange rate fluctuations between the United States dollar and foreign currencies; |
| |
• | restrictions on the transfer of funds; and |
| |
• | national, regional and local political uncertainty. |
When we acquire properties located outside of the United States, we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, forging new business relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local government and permitting procedures. We work to mitigate such risks through extensive diligence and research and associations with experienced partners; however, there can be no guarantee that all such risks will be eliminated.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could negatively affect our liquidity and business operations.
The credit ratings of the Operating Partnership’s senior unsecured notes and the Company’s preferred stock are based on the Company’s operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their rating analyses. Our credit ratings can affect the availability, terms and pricing of any indebtedness and preferred stock that we may incur going forward. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain any credit rating, and in the event any credit rating is downgraded, we could incur higher borrowing costs or be unable to access certain capital markets at all.
Our business could be adversely impacted if we have deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting.
The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not prevent all errors, misstatements or misrepresentations. While management will continue to review the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, there can be no guarantee that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in accomplishing all control objectives all of the time. Deficiencies, including any material weakness, in our internal control over financial reporting which may occur in the future could result in misstatements of our results of operations, restatements of our financial statements, a decline in the price of our securities, or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Item 1B. Unresolved SEC Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
General
At December 31, 2013, we owned 585 in-service industrial properties containing an aggregate of approximately 53.9 million square feet of GLA in 25 states, with a diverse base of more than 1,650 tenants engaged in a wide variety of businesses, including manufacturing, retail, wholesale trade, distribution and professional services. The average annual rent per square foot on a portfolio basis, calculated at December 31, 2013, was $4.55. The properties are generally located in business parks that have convenient access to interstate highways and/or rail and air transportation. We maintain insurance on our properties that we believe is adequate.
We classify our properties into four industrial categories: light industrial, bulk warehouse, R&D/flex and regional warehouse. While some properties may have characteristics which fall under more than one property type, we use what we believe is the most dominant characteristic to categorize the property.
The following describes, generally, the different industrial categories:
| |
• | Light industrial properties are of less than 100,000 square feet, have a ceiling height of 16-21 feet, are comprised of 5%-50% of office space and contain less than 50% of manufacturing space; |
| |
• | Bulk warehouse buildings are of more than 100,000 square feet, have a ceiling height of at least 22 feet, are comprised of 5%-15% of office space and contain less than 25% of manufacturing space; |
| |
• | R&D/flex buildings are of less than 100,000 square feet, have a ceiling height of less than 16 feet, are comprised of 50% or more of office space and contain less than 25% of manufacturing space; and |
| |
• | Regional warehouses are of less than 100,000 square feet, have a ceiling height of at least 22 feet, are comprised of 5%-15% of office space and contain less than 25% of manufacturing space. |
The following tables summarize certain information as of December 31, 2013, with respect to the in-service properties owned by the Consolidated Operating Partnership, each of which is wholly owned.
Consolidated Operating Partnership
In-Service Property Summary Totals
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Light Industrial | | R&D/Flex | | Bulk Warehouse | | Regional Warehouse | | Total |
Metropolitan Area | GLA | | Number of Properties | | GLA | | Number of Properties | | GLA | | Number of Properties | | GLA | | Number of Properties | | GLA | | Number of Properties |
Atlanta, GA | 622,944 |
| | 11 |
| | 108,062 |
| | 2 |
| | 3,397,270 |
| | 12 |
| | 833,518 |
| | 6 |
| | 4,961,794 |
| | 31 |
|
Baltimore, MD | 615,752 |
| | 11 |
| | 170,826 |
| | 5 |
| | 586,647 |
| | 3 |
| | 96,000 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,469,225 |
| | 20 |
|
Central PA | 146,990 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,131,350 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,278,340 |
| | 7 |
|
Chicago, IL | 466,073 |
| | 8 |
| | 197,997 |
| | 3 |
| | 3,202,576 |
| | 13 |
| | 424,851 |
| | 5 |
| | 4,291,497 |
| | 29 |
|
Cincinnati, OH | 278,000 |
| | 5 |
| | 100,000 |
| | 2 |
| | 918,250 |
| | 3 |
| | 683,269 |
| | 4 |
| | 1,979,519 |
| | 14 |
|
Cleveland, OH | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,317,799 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,317,799 |
| | 7 |
|
Dallas, TX | 1,996,261 |
| | 35 |
| | 209,249 |
| | 9 |
| | 2,148,315 |
| | 16 |
| | 501,873 |
| | 7 |
| | 4,855,698 |
| | 67 |
|
Denver, CO | 1,148,368 |
| | 26 |
| | 369,949 |
| | 10 |
| | 289,354 |
| | 2 |
| | 756,685 |
| | 7 |
| | 2,564,356 |
| | 45 |
|
Detroit, MI | 2,047,255 |
| | 75 |
| | 188,263 |
| | 6 |
| | 341,792 |
| | 3 |
| | 550,089 |
| | 13 |
| | 3,127,399 |
| | 97 |
|
Houston, TX | 585,349 |
| | 9 |
| | 132,997 |
| | 6 |
| | 2,457,546 |
| | 11 |
| | 446,318 |
| | 6 |
| | 3,622,210 |
| | 32 |
|
Indianapolis, IN | 861,100 |
| | 18 |
| | 25,000 |
| | 2 |
| | 1,143,555 |
| | 5 |
| | 443,177 |
| | 5 |
| | 2,472,832 |
| | 30 |
|
Miami, FL | 88,820 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 142,804 |
| | 1 |
| | 281,626 |
| | 6 |
| | 513,250 |
| | 8 |
|
Milwaukee, WI | 343,726 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,026,409 |
| | 5 |
| | 90,089 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,460,224 |
| | 13 |
|
Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN | 969,796 |
| | 14 |
| | 80,862 |
| | 1 |
| | 2,972,995 |
| | 13 |
| | 201,173 |
| | 3 |
| | 4,224,826 |
| | 31 |
|
Nashville, TN | 163,852 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,088,627 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,252,479 |
| | 6 |
|
Northern New Jersey | 749,849 |
| | 13 |
| | 171,601 |
| | 3 |
| | 329,593 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,251,043 |
| | 18 |
|
Philadelphia, PA | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 131,934 |
| | 2 |
| | 131,934 |
| | 2 |
|
Phoenix, AZ | 38,560 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 710,403 |
| | 5 |
| | 354,327 |
| | 5 |
| | 1,103,290 |
| | 11 |
|
Salt Lake City, UT | 190,620 |
| | 6 |
| | 146,937 |
| | 6 |
| | 279,179 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 616,736 |
| | 13 |
|
Seattle, WA | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 258,126 |
| | 2 |
| | 127,399 |
| | 2 |
| | 385,525 |
| | 4 |
|
Southern California (a) | 743,038 |
| | 20 |
| | 88,064 |
| | 1 |
| | 2,016,153 |
| | 8 |
| | 556,721 |
| | 9 |
| | 3,403,976 |
| | 38 |
|
Southern New Jersey | 115,626 |
| | 2 |
| | 45,054 |
| | 1 |
| | 172,100 |
| | 1 |
| | 191,329 |
| | 2 |
| | 524,109 |
| | 6 |
|
St. Louis, MO | 631,732 |
| | 9 |
| | 191,923 |
| | 2 |
| | 1,368,095 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,191,750 |
| | 15 |
|
Tampa, FL | 234,679 |
| | 7 |
| | 543,742 |
| | 24 |
| | 209,500 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 987,921 |
| | 32 |
|
Other (b) | 102,997 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,796,108 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,899,105 |
| | 9 |
|
Total | 13,141,387 |
| | 284 |
| | 2,770,526 |
| | 83 |
| | 31,304,546 |
| | 134 |
| | 6,670,378 |
| | 84 |
| | 53,886,837 |
| | 585 |
|
Occupancy by Industrial Building Type | | | 88 | % | | | | 85 | % | | | | 96 | % | | | | 94 | % | | | | 93 | % |
____________________
| |
(a) | Southern California includes the markets of Los Angeles, Inland Empire and San Diego. |
| |
(b) | Properties are located in Grand Rapids, MI, Orlando, FL, Kansas City, MO, San Antonio, TX, Birmingham, AL, Jefferson County, KY, Greenville, KY, Horn Lake, MS, and Fort Smith, AR. |
Consolidated Operating Partnership
In-Service Property Summary Totals
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Metropolitan Area | | GLA | | Number of Properties | | Average Occupancy at 12/31/13 | | GLA as a % of Total Portfolio | | Encumbrances at 12/31/13 (In 000s)(c) |
Atlanta, GA | | 4,961,794 |
| | 31 |
| | 89 | % | | 9.2 | % | | $ | 29,025 |
|
Baltimore, MD | | 1,469,225 |
| | 20 |
| | 89 | % | | 2.7 | % | | 9,737 |
|
Central PA | | 3,278,340 |
| | 7 |
| | 99 | % | | 6.1 | % | | 29,689 |
|
Chicago, IL | | 4,291,497 |
| | 29 |
| | 96 | % | | 8.0 | % | | 29,768 |
|
Cincinnati, OH | | 1,979,519 |
| | 14 |
| | 90 | % | | 3.7 | % | | 12,033 |
|
Cleveland, OH | | 1,317,799 |
| | 7 |
| | 100 | % | | 2.4 | % | | 25,921 |
|
Dallas, TX | | 4,855,698 |
| | 67 |
| | 94 | % | | 9.0 | % | | 57,673 |
|
Denver, CO | | 2,564,356 |
| | 45 |
| | 94 | % | | 4.8 | % | | 26,688 |
|
Detroit, MI | | 3,127,399 |
| | 97 |
| | 95 | % | | 5.8 | % | | — |
|
Houston, TX | | 3,622,210 |
| | 32 |
| | 99 | % | | 6.7 | % | | 56,205 |
|
Indianapolis, IN | | 2,472,832 |
| | 30 |
| | 91 | % | | 4.6 | % | | 15,295 |
|
Miami, FL | | 513,250 |
| | 8 |
| | 79 | % | | 1.0 | % | | — |
|
Milwaukee, WI | | 1,460,224 |
| | 13 |
| | 96 | % | | 2.7 | % | | 15,119 |
|
Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN | | 4,224,826 |
| | 31 |
| | 91 | % | | 7.8 | % | | 65,993 |
|
Nashville, TN | | 1,252,479 |
| | 6 |
| | 97 | % | | 2.3 | % | | 26,647 |
|
Northern New Jersey | | 1,251,043 |
| | 18 |
| | 92 | % | | 2.3 | % | | 24,135 |
|
Philadelphia, PA | | 131,934 |
| | 2 |
| | 100 | % | | 0.3 | % | | 3,548 |
|
Phoenix, AZ | | 1,103,290 |
| | 11 |
| | 94 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 17,932 |
|
Salt Lake City, UT | | 616,736 |
| | 13 |
| | 91 | % | | 1.2 | % | | 10,735 |
|
Seattle, WA | | 385,525 |
| | 4 |
| | 100 | % | | 0.7 | % | | 5,070 |
|
Southern California (a) | | 3,403,976 |
| | 38 |
| | 93 | % | | 6.3 | % | | 71,164 |
|
Southern New Jersey | | 524,109 |
| | 6 |
| | 41 | % | | 1.0 | % | | 3,115 |
|
St. Louis, MO | | 2,191,750 |
| | 15 |
| | 88 | % | | 4.1 | % | | 17,781 |
|
Tampa, FL | | 987,921 |
| | 32 |
| | 91 | % | | 1.8 | % | | 9,353 |
|
Other (b) | | 1,899,105 |
| | 9 |
| | 100 | % | | 3.5 | % | | 17,589 |
|
Total or Average | | 53,886,837 |
| | 585 |
| | 93 | % | | 100 | % | | 580,215 |
|
____________________
| |
(a) | Southern California includes the markets of Los Angeles, Inland Empire and San Diego. |
| |
(b) | Properties are located in Grand Rapids, MI, Orlando, FL, Kansas City, MO, San Antonio, TX, Birmingham, AL, Jefferson County, KY, Greenville, KY, Horn Lake, MS, and Fort Smith, AR. |
| |
(c) | Certain properties are pledged as collateral under our mortgage financings at December 31, 2013. For purposes of this table, the total principal balance of a mortgage loan payable that is collateralized by a pool of properties is allocated among the properties in the pool based on each property’s carrying balance. |
Property Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we acquired two industrial properties and several land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $72.8 million. One of the two industrial properties was vacant upon acquisition and the other industrial property was acquired at a capitalization rate of 6.7%. The capitalization rate for this industrial property acquisition was calculated using the estimated stabilized net operating income (excluding straight line rent and amortization of below market rent) and dividing it by the sum of the purchase price plus estimated costs incurred to stabilize the property. The acquired industrial properties have the following characteristics:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Metropolitan Area | | Number of Properties | | GLA | | Property Type | | Occupancy at 12/31/13 |
Chicago, IL | | 1 |
| | 509,216 |
| | Bulk Warehouse | | 0 | % |
Chicago, IL | | 1 |
| | 626,784 |
| | Bulk Warehouse | | 100 | % |
| | 2 |
| | 1,136,000 |
| | | | |
Development Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we placed in-service one bulk warehouse development located in Southern California totaling approximately 0.3 million square feet of GLA at a total cost of $19.1 million. Included in total costs is $1.8 million incurred on leasing costs, which includes tenant improvements and leasing commissions. At December 31, 2013, the occupancy is 100%. The capitalization rate for this development, calculated using the estimated stabilized net operating income (excluding straight line rent) divided by the total investment in the developed property, is 7.3%.
As of December 31, 2013, we substantially completed one industrial property totaling approximately 0.5 million square feet of GLA and have three industrial properties that are under construction totaling approximately 0.8 million square feet of GLA. The estimated total costs for the development property that is substantially complete is approximately $54.0 million, of which $53.2 million has been incurred as of December 31, 2013. The estimated total costs for the three development properties under construction are $49.2 million, of which $25.3 million has been incurred as of December 31, 2013. There can be no assurance that the actual completion cost will not exceed the estimated completion cost stated above. The completed developments and developments under construction have the following characteristics: |
| | | | | | | |
Completed Developments - Not In-Service | | GLA | | Property Type | | Quarter of Building Completion |
Southern California | | 489,000 |
| | Bulk Warehouse | | Q4 2013 |
| | 489,000 |
| | | | |
Developments Under Construction | | GLA | | Property Type | | Anticipated Quarter of Building Completion |
Chicago, IL | | 250,000 |
| | Bulk Warehouse Expansion | | Q3 2014 |
Southern California | | 555,670 |
| | Bulk Warehouse | | Q2 2014 |
Southern California | | 43,485 |
| | Regional Warehouse | | Q2 2014 |
| | 849,155 |
| | | | |
Property Sales
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we sold 65 industrial properties comprising approximately 2.8 million square feet of GLA, at a weighted average capitalization rate of 5.5%, and several land parcels for total gross sales proceeds of approximately $138.8 million. The capitalization rate for the 65 industrial property sales is calculated by taking revenues of the property (excluding straight-line rent, lease inducement amortization and above and below market lease amortization) less operating expenses of the property for a period of the last twelve full months prior to sale and dividing the sum by the sales price of the property. The sold industrial properties have the following characteristics:
|
| | | | | | | | |
Metropolitan Area | | Number of Properties | | GLA | | Property Type |
Atlanta, GA | | 1 |
| | 90,000 |
| | Regional Warehouse |
Baltimore, MD | | 1 |
| | 171,000 |
| | Regional Warehouse |
Chicago, IL | | 5 |
| | 404,461 |
| | Light Industrial/R&D/Flex/Regional Warehouse |
Dallas, TX | | 14 |
| | 468,358 |
| | Light Industrial/R&D/Flex |
Denver, CO | | 2 |
| | 157,065 |
| | R&D/Flex |
Detroit, MI | | 7 |
| | 214,372 |
| | Light Industrial/Regional Warehouse/R&D/Flex |
Indianapolis, IN | | 1 |
| | 23,950 |
| | Regional Warehouse |
Milwaukee, WI | | 1 |
| | 43,440 |
| | Light Industrial |
Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN | | 2 |
| | 122,562 |
| | Regional Warehouse |
Northern New Jersey | | 1 |
| | 24,051 |
| | R&D/Flex |
Salt Lake City, UT | | 27 |
| | 384,305 |
| | Light Industrial |
Southern New Jersey | | 1 |
| | 109,000 |
| | Bulk Warehouse |
Toronto, ON | | 1 |
| | 280,773 |
| | Bulk Warehouse |
Other (a) | | 1 |
| | 355,964 |
| | Bulk Warehouse |
Total | | 65 |
| | 2,849,301 |
| | |
(a) Property was located in Omaha, NE.
Tenant and Lease Information
We have a diverse base of more than 1,650 tenants engaged in a wide variety of businesses including retail, wholesale trade, distribution, manufacturing and professional services. At December 31, 2013, our leases, on a combined basis, have a weighted average lease length of 6.0 years and provide for periodic rent increases that are either fixed or based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. Industrial tenants typically have net or semi-net leases and pay as additional rent their percentage of the property’s operating costs, including the costs of common area maintenance, property taxes and insurance. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 93% of the GLA of our in-service properties was leased, and no single tenant or group of related tenants accounted for more than 3.2% of the Consolidated Operating Partnerships’ and Other Real Estate Partnerships’ combined rent revenues, nor did any single tenant or group of related tenants occupy more than 2.2% of the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s and Other Real Estate Partnership’s combined total GLA of our in-service properties.
Leasing Activity
The following table provides a summary of our leasing activity for the year ended December 31, 2013. The table does not include month to month leases or leases with terms less than twelve months. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Leases Signed | | Square Feet Signed (in 000’s) | | Average GAAP Rent Per Square Foot (1) | | GAAP Basis Rent Growth (2) | | Weighted Average Lease Term (3) | | Turnover Costs Per Square Foot (4) | | Weighted Average Retention (5) |
New Leases | 223 |
| | 3,366 |
| | $ | 4.88 |
| | (7.2 | )% | | 5.4 |
| | $ | 6.16 |
| | N/A |
|
Renewal Leases | 372 |
| | 8,178 |
| | $ | 4.08 |
| | 9.6 | % | | 3.8 |
| | $ | 1.17 |
| | 77.1 | % |
Development | 9 |
| | 416 |
| | $ | 4.71 |
| | N/A |
| | 5.8 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Total / Weighted Average | 604 |
| | 11,960 |
| | $ | 4.33 |
| | 3.6 | % | | 4.3 |
| | $ | 2.56 |
| | 77.1 | % |
| |
(1) | Average GAAP rent is the average rent calculated in accordance with GAAP, over the term of the lease. |
| |
(2) | GAAP basis rent growth is a ratio of the change in net effective rent (on a GAAP basis, including straight-line rent adjustments as required by GAAP) compared to the net effective rent (on a GAAP basis) of the comparable lease. New leases where there were no prior comparable leases are also excluded. |
| |
(3) | The lease term is expressed in years. Assumes no exercise of lease renewal options, if any. |
| |
(4) | Turnover costs are comprised of the costs incurred or capitalized for improvements of vacant and renewal spaces, as well as the commissions paid and costs capitalized for leasing transactions. Turnover costs per square foot represent the total turnover costs expected to be incurred on the leases signed during the period and do not reflect actual expenditures for the period. |
| |
(5) | Represents the weighted average square feet of tenants renewing their respective leases. |
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we signed 148 new leases with free rent periods during the lease term on 2.7 million square feet of GLA. Total free rent concessions are $5.2 million associated with these new leases. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we signed 74 renewal leases with free rent periods during the lease term on 1.3 million square feet of GLA. Total concessions are $1.3 million associated with these renewal leases. Lastly, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we signed eight development leases with free rent periods during the lease term on 0.4 million square feet of GLA. Total free rent concessions are $0.5 million associated with these development leases.
Lease Expirations
Fundamentals for the United States industrial real estate market continued to improve in 2013, as growth in the general economy drove additional demand for space. Development of new industrial space has increased in response to this growth in demand, but demand has outpaced supply. The fourth quarter of 2013 marked the 14th consecutive quarter of increasing occupancy for the overall market. These conditions have resulted in improved market rental rate environments in virtually all of our markets. Based on our recent experience, market conditions, and the forecast from a leading national research company for 2014, we expect our average net effective rental rates for renewal leases on a cash basis to be slightly higher than the expiring rates. Rental rates for new leases on a cash basis on average are expected to be less than the comparative prior leases for 2014, primarily due to the differing market conditions when the comparative leases were structured. The following table shows scheduled lease expirations for all leases for our in-service properties as of December 31, 2013.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year of Expiration(1) | | Number of Leases Expiring | | GLA Expiring(2) | | Percentage of GLA Expiring(2) | | Annual Base Rent Under Expiring Leases (3) | | Percentage of Total Annual Base Rent Expiring (3) |
| | | | | | | | (In thousands) | | |
2014 | | 375 |
| | 6,096,314 |
| | 13 | % | | $ | 28,541 |
| | 13 | % |
2015 | | 362 |
| | 7,335,535 |
| | 15 | % | | 34,558 |
| | 16 | % |
2016 | | 350 |
| | 8,900,415 |
| | 18 | % | | 37,352 |
| | 17 | % |
2017 | | 202 |
| | 5,610,655 |
| | 12 | % | | 26,891 |
| | 12 | % |
2018 | | 167 |
| | 6,571,167 |
| | 13 | % | | 29,897 |
| | 13 | % |
2019 | | 104 |
| | 4,582,325 |
| | 9 | % | | 23,135 |
| | 10 | % |
2020 | | 38 |
| | 2,607,555 |
| | 5 | % | | 11,317 |
| | 5 | % |
2021 | | 31 |
| | 2,985,420 |
| | 6 | % | | 12,947 |
| | 6 | % |
2022 | | 15 |
| | 808,816 |
| | 2 | % | | 3,169 |
| | 1 | % |
2023 | | 16 |
| | 2,016,237 |
| | 4 | % | | 7,646 |
| | 3 | % |
Thereafter | | 15 |
| | 1,553,288 |
| | 3 | % | | 7,915 |
| | 4 | % |
Total | | 1,675 |
| | 49,067,727 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 223,368 |
| | 100 | % |
____________________
| |
(1) | Includes leases that expire on or after January 1, 2014 and assumes tenants do not exercise existing renewal, termination or purchase options. |
| |
(2) | Does not include existing vacancies of 3,800,288 aggregate square feet and December 31, 2013 move outs of 1,018,822 aggregate square feet. |
| |
(3) | Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the terms of the lease, as of December 31, 2013, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted, then the first positive rent value is used. |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. All such proceedings, taken together, are not expected to have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Partners’ Capital, Related Partner Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There is no established public trading market for the general partner and limited partner Units. As of February 27, 2014, there were 154 holders of record of general partner and limited partner Units.
The following table sets forth the distributions per Unit paid or declared by us during the periods noted:
|
| | | | |
Quarter Ended | | Distribution Declared |
December 31, 2013 | | $ | 0.085 |
|
September 30, 2013 | | $ | 0.085 |
|
June 30, 2013 | | $ | 0.085 |
|
March 31, 2013 | | $ | 0.085 |
|
We did not pay or declare distributions during the year ended December 31, 2012. Our ability to make distributions is dependent on multiple factors, including cash flow and capital expenditure requirements, as well as ensuring that the Company meets the minimum distribution requirements set forth in the Code. Holders of general partner and limited partner Units are entitled to receive distributions when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of the Company, our general partner, after the priority distributions required under our partnership agreement have been made with respect to Preferred Units out of any funds legally available for that purpose.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Operating Partnership did not issue any limited partner units.
Subject to lock-up periods and certain adjustments, holders of limited partner Units of the Operating Partnership can redeem their Units by providing written notification to the General Partner of the Operating Partnership. Unless the General Partner provides notice of a redemption restriction to the holder, redemption must be made within seven business days after receipt of the holder’s notice. The redemption can be effectuated, as determined by the General Partner, either by exchanging the Units for shares of common stock of the Company on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment, or by paying cash equal to the fair market value of such shares. Prior requests for redemption have generally been fulfilled with shares of common stock of the Company, and we intend to continue this practice. If each Unit of the Operating Partnership were redeemed as of December 31, 2013, we could satisfy our redemption obligations by making an aggregate cash payment of approximately $80.2 million or by issuing 4,597,313 shares of the Company’s common stock.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following sets forth selected financial and operating data for the Consolidated Operating Partnership. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. All consolidated financial data has been restated, as appropriate, to reflect the impact of activity classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended 12/31/13 | | Year Ended 12/31/12 | | Year Ended 12/31/11 | | Year Ended 12/31/10 | | Year Ended 12/31/09 |
| (In thousands, except per unit data) |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Total Revenues | $ | 288,936 |
| | $ | 275,443 |
| | $ | 263,826 |
| | $ | 266,087 |
| | $ | 327,629 |
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | 6,979 |
| | (22,333 | ) | | (31,336 | ) | | (161,588 | ) | | (19,297 | ) |
Loss from Continuing Operations Available to Unitholders | (6,601 | ) | | (39,307 | ) | | (49,983 | ) | | (180,748 | ) | | (38,643 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) Available to Unitholders and Participating Securities | $ | 27,033 |
| | $ | (23,169 | ) | | $ | (28,527 | ) | | $ | (241,184 | ) | | $ | (15,189 | ) |
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Units: | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from Continuing Operations Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | (0.41 | ) | | $ | (0.58 | ) | | $ | (2.65 | ) | | $ | (0.71 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) Available to Unitholders | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | (3.53 | ) | | $ | (0.28 | ) |
Distributions Per Unit | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.00 |
| | $ | 0.00 |
| | $ | 0.00 |
| | $ | 0.00 |
|
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Units | 111,646 |
| | 96,509 |
| | 85,913 |
| | 68,327 |
| | 54,261 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (End of Period): | | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate, Before Accumulated Depreciation | $ | 2,748,179 |
| | $ | 2,764,007 |
| | $ | 2,660,974 |
| | $ | 2,331,596 |
| | $ | 2,965,091 |
|
Total Assets | 2,498,779 |
| | 2,503,882 |
| | 2,571,113 |
| | 2,711,786 |
| | 3,200,410 |
|
Indebtedness (Inclusive of Indebtedness Held for Sale) | 1,119,131 |
| | 1,228,479 |
| | 1,373,515 |
| | 1,688,005 |
| | 1,966,167 |
|
Partners’ Capital | 1,180,722 |
| | 1,155,151 |
| | 1,081,992 |
| | 901,303 |
| | 1,083,291 |
|
Cash Flow Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Flow From Operating Activities | $ | 114,052 |
| | $ | 117,851 |
| | $ | 70,175 |
| | $ | 48,342 |
| | $ | 139,616 |
|
Cash Flow From Investing Activities | (59,704 | ) | | (20,430 | ) | | 65,067 |
| | 45,531 |
| | 37,554 |
|
Cash Flow From Financing Activities | (52,136 | ) | | (100,693 | ) | | (150,041 | ) | | (252,673 | ) | | 1,257 |
|
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with "Selected Financial Data" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
In addition, the following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "plan," "anticipate," "estimate," "project," "seek," "target," "potential," "focus," "may," "should" or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a materially adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to: changes in national, international, regional and local economic conditions generally and real estate markets specifically; changes in legislation/regulation (including changes to laws governing the taxation of REITs) and actions of regulatory authorities (including the IRS); our ability to qualify and maintain our status as a REIT; the availability and attractiveness of financing (including both public and private capital) to us and to our potential counterparties; the availability and attractiveness of terms of additional debt repurchases; interest rates; our credit agency ratings; our ability to comply with applicable financial covenants; competition; changes in supply and demand for industrial properties (including land, the supply and demand for which is inherently more volatile than other types of industrial property) in the Company’s current and proposed market areas; difficulties in consummating acquisitions and dispositions; risks related to our investments in properties through joint ventures; environmental liabilities; slippages in development or lease-up schedules; tenant creditworthiness; higher-than-expected costs; changes in asset valuations and related impairment charges; changes in general accounting principles, policies and guidelines applicable to REITs; international business risks and those additional factors described in Item 1A, "Risk Factors" and in our other filings with the SEC. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements.
The Operating Partnership was organized as a limited partnership in the state of Delaware on November 23, 1993. The sole general partner is First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., which owns Units in the Operating Partnership representing an approximate 96.0% ownership interest at December 31, 2013. The Company also owns Preferred Units in the Operating Partnership with an aggregate liquidation priority of $75.0 million at December 31, 2013. The Company is a REIT as defined in the Code. The Company’s operations are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership owns, in the aggregate, approximately a 4.0% interest in the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2013. Operations are also conducted through other partnerships and limited liability companies (LLCs) of which the Operating Partnership is the sole member, and taxable REIT subsidiaries (together with the Operating Partnership, other partnerships and the LLCs, the Consolidated Operating Partnership), the operating data of which is consolidated with that of the Operating Partnership as presented herein.
We also hold at least a 99% limited partnership interest in the Financing Partnership, the Securities Partnership, the Mortgage Partnership, the Pennsylvania Partnership, the Harrisburg Partnership, the Indianapolis Partnership, TK-SV, LTD., and FI Development Services, L.P. and wholly owned LLCs (together, the Other Real Estate Partnerships). See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Other Real Estate Partnerships. The Other Real Estate Partnerships’ operating data is presented herein on a combined basis, separate from that of the Consolidated Operating Partnership. The general partners of the Other Real Estate Partnerships are separate corporations, each with at least a .01% general partnership interest in the Other Real Estate Partnerships for which it acts as a general partner. Each general partner of the Other Real Estate Partnerships is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
We also own noncontrolling equity interests in, and provide various services to, two joint ventures (the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture and the 2007 Europe Joint Venture). See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Joint Ventures.
Our financial statements report the LLCs and the taxable REIT subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and the Other Real Estate Partnerships and the Joint Ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Profits, losses and distributions of the Operating Partnership, the LLCs and the Other Real Estate Partnerships are allocated to the general partner and the limited partners, or members, as applicable, in accordance with the provisions contained in the partnership agreements or operating agreements, as applicable, of the Operating Partnership, the LLCs and the Other Real Estate Partnerships.
As of December 31, 2013, we owned 585 in-service industrial properties, containing an aggregate of approximately 53.9 million square feet of GLA. On a combined basis, as of December 31, 2013, the Other Real Estate Partnerships owned 64 in-service industrial properties, containing an aggregate of approximately 7.4 million square feet of GLA. Of the 64 industrial
properties owned by the Other Real Estate Partnerships at December 31, 2013, 21 are held by the Financing Partnership, 17 are held by the Pennsylvania Partnership, nine are held by the Mortgage Partnership, six are held by the Securities Partnership, six are held by the Harrisburg Partnership, three are held by the Indianapolis Partnership, one is held by TK-SV, LTD and one is held by FI Development Services, L.P.
We believe our financial condition and results of operations are, primarily, a function of our performance in four key areas: leasing of industrial properties, acquisition and development of additional industrial properties, disposition of industrial properties and access to external capital.
We generate revenue primarily from rental income and tenant recoveries from long-term (generally three to six years) operating leases of our industrial properties. Such revenue is offset by certain property specific operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management, utilities and insurance expenses, along with certain other costs and expenses, such as depreciation and amortization costs and general and administrative and interest expenses. Our revenue growth is dependent, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income, through increasing either or both occupancy rates and rental rates at our properties, (ii) maximize tenant recoveries and (iii) minimize operating and certain other expenses. Revenues generated from rental income and tenant recoveries are a significant source of funds, in addition to income generated from gains/losses on the sale of our properties (as discussed below), for our liquidity. The leasing of property, in general, and occupancy rates, rental rates, operating expenses and certain non-operating expenses, in particular, are impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. The leasing of property also entails various risks, including the risk of tenant default. If we were unable to maintain or increase occupancy rates and rental rates at our properties or to maintain tenant recoveries and operating and certain other expenses consistent with historical levels and proportions, our revenue would decline. Further, if a significant number of our tenants were unable to pay rent (including tenant recoveries) or if we were unable to rent our properties on favorable terms, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and the Company’s ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, the Company’s common stock would be adversely affected.
Our revenue growth is also dependent, in part, on our ability to acquire existing, and acquire and develop new, additional industrial properties on favorable terms. The Consolidated Operating Partnership seeks to identify opportunities to acquire existing industrial properties on favorable terms, and, when conditions permit, also seeks to identify opportunities to acquire and develop new industrial properties on favorable terms. Existing properties, as they are acquired, and acquired and developed properties, as they are leased, generate revenue from rental income, tenant recoveries and fees, income from which, as discussed above, is a source of funds for our distributions. The acquisition and development of properties is impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. The acquisition and development of properties also entails various risks, including the risk that our investments may not perform as expected. For example, acquired existing and acquired and developed new properties may not sustain and/or achieve anticipated occupancy and rental rate levels. With respect to acquired and developed new properties, we may not be able to complete construction on schedule or within budget, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and delays in leasing the properties. Also, we face significant competition for attractive acquisition and development opportunities from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including publicly-traded REITs and private investors. Further, as discussed below, we may not be able to finance the acquisition and development opportunities we identify. If we were unable to acquire and develop sufficient additional properties on favorable terms, or if such investments did not perform as expected, our revenue growth would be limited and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and the Company’s ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, the Company’s common stock would be adversely affected.
We also generate income from the sale of our properties (including existing buildings, buildings which we have developed or re-developed on a merchant basis and land). The gain/loss on, and fees from, the sale of such properties are included in our income and can be a significant source of funds, in addition to revenues generated from rental income and tenant recoveries. Proceeds from sales are being used to repay outstanding debt and, market conditions permitting, may be used to fund the acquisition of existing, and the acquisition and development of new, industrial properties. The sale of properties is impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. The sale of properties also entails various risks, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. Further, our ability to sell properties is limited by safe harbor rules applying to REITs under the Code which relate to the number of properties that may be disposed of in a year, their tax bases and the cost of improvements made to the properties, along with other tests which enable a REIT to avoid punitive taxation on the sale of assets. If we are unable to sell properties on favorable terms, our income growth would be limited and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and the Company’s ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, the Company’s common stock could be adversely affected.
We utilize a portion of the net sales proceeds from property sales, borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility, and proceeds from the issuance, when and as warranted, of additional debt and equity securities to refinance debt and finance future
acquisitions and developments. Access to external capital on favorable terms plays a key role in our financial condition and results of operations, as it impacts our cost of capital and our ability and cost to refinance existing indebtedness as it matures and to fund acquisitions and developments or through the issuance, when and as warranted, of additional equity securities. Our ability to access external capital on favorable terms is dependent on various factors, including general market conditions, interest rates, credit ratings on our capital stock and debt, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions and the market price of the Company’s capital stock. If we were unable to access external capital on favorable terms, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and the Company’s ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, the Company’s common stock could be adversely affected.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe the following critical accounting policies relate to the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
| |
• | Accounts Receivable: We are subject to tenant defaults and bankruptcies that could affect the collection of rent due under our outstanding accounts receivable, include straight-line rent. In order to mitigate these risks, we perform credit reviews and analyses on our major existing tenants and all prospective tenants meeting certain financial thresholds before leases are executed. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts which is an estimate that is based on our assessment of various factors including the accounts receivable aging, customer credit-worthiness and historical bad debts. |
| |
• | Notes Receivable: Notes receivable are included in prepaid expenses and other assets, net and are loans that are generally collateralized by real estate. Notes receivable are considered past due when a contractual payment is not remitted in accordance with the terms of the note agreement. We evaluate the collectability of each note receivable on an individual basis based on various factors which may include payment history, expected fair value of the collateral on the loan and internal and external credit information. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. When a loan is considered impaired, the amount of the loss accrual is calculated by comparing the carrying amount of the note receivable to the present value of expected future cash flows. Since the majority of our notes receivable are collateralized by a first mortgage, the loans have risk characteristics similar to the risks in owning commercial real estate. Interest income on performing loans is accrued as earned. A loan is placed on non-accrual status when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. Recognition of interest income on non-performing loans on an accrual basis is resumed when it is probable that we will be able to collect amounts due according to the contractual terms. |
| |
• | Investment in Real Estate: We are engaged in the acquisition of individual properties as well as multi-property portfolios. We are required to allocate purchase price between land, building, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, in-place leases, tenant relationships and above and below market leases. Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) our estimate of fair market lease rents for each corresponding in-place lease. Acquired above market leases are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases and acquired below market leases are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases. In-place lease and tenant relationship values for acquired properties are recorded based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value allocated to in-place lease intangible assets is amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining lease term of the respective lease. The value allocated to tenant relationships is amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the expected term of the relationship, which includes an estimate of the probability of lease renewal and its estimated term. We also must allocate purchase price on multi-property portfolios to individual properties. The allocation of purchase price is based on our assessment of various characteristics of the markets where the property is located and the expected cash flows of the property. |
We review our held-for-use properties on a continuous basis for possible impairment and provide a provision if impairments are determined. We utilize the guidelines established under the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the "FASB") guidance for accounting for the impairment of long lived assets to determine if impairment conditions exist. We review the expected undiscounted cash flows of the property to determine if there are any indications of impairment. If the expected undiscounted cash flows of a particular property are less than the net
book basis of the property, we will recognize an impairment charge equal to the amount of carrying value of the property that exceeds the fair value of the property. Fair value is generally determined by discounting the future expected cash flows of the property. The preparation of the undiscounted cash flows and the calculation of fair value involve subjective assumptions such as estimated occupancy, rental rates, ultimate residual value and hold period. The discount rate used to present value the cash flows for determining fair value is also subjective.
| |
• | Real Estate Held for Sale: Properties are classified as held for sale when all criteria within the FASB’s guidance relating to the disposal of long lived assets are met for such properties. When properties are classified as held for sale, we cease depreciating the properties and estimate the values of such properties and record them at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. If circumstances arise that were previously considered unlikely, and, as a result, we decide not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, we will reclassify such property as held and used. We estimate the value of such property and measure it at the lower of its carrying amount (adjusted for any depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used) or fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. Fair value of operational industrial properties is generally determined either by discounting the future expected cash flows of the property, third party contract prices or quotes from local brokers. The preparation of the discounted cash flows and the calculation of fair value involve subjective assumptions such as estimated occupancy, rental rates, ultimate residual value, hold period and discount rate. Fair value of land is primarily determined by members of management who are responsible for the individual markets where the land parcels are located, quotes from local brokers or by third party contract prices. The determination of the fair value of real estate assets is also highly subjective, especially in markets where there is a lack of recent comparable transactions. |
| |
• | Accounting for Joint Ventures: We analyze our investments in Joint Ventures to determine whether the joint ventures should be accounted for under the equity method of accounting or consolidated into our financial statements based on standards set forth under the FASB’s guidance relating to the consolidation of variable interest entities. Based on the guidance set forth in these pronouncements, we do not consolidate any of our joint venture investments because either the joint venture has been determined to be a variable interest entity but we are not the primary beneficiary or the joint venture has been determined not to be a variable interest entity and we lack control of the joint venture. Our assessment of whether we are the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity involves the consideration of various factors including the form of our ownership interest, our representation on the entity’s governing body, the size of our investment and future cash flows of the entity. |
| |
• | Capitalization of Costs: We capitalize (direct and certain indirect) costs incurred in developing and expanding real estate assets as part of the investment basis. Costs incurred in making repairs and maintaining real estate assets are expensed as incurred. During the land development and construction periods, we capitalize interest costs, real estate taxes and certain general and administrative costs of the personnel performing development up to the time the property is substantially complete. The interest rate used to capitalize interest is based upon our average borrowing rate on existing debt. We also capitalize internal and external costs incurred to successfully originate a lease that result directly from, and are essential to, the acquisition of that lease. Leasing costs that meet the requirements for capitalization are presented as a component of prepaid expenses and other assets, net. The determination and calculation of certain costs requires estimates by us. |
| |
• | Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities: In the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, significant management judgment is required to estimate our current and deferred income tax liabilities. Our estimates are based on our interpretation of tax laws. These estimates may have an impact on the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments may be required by a change in assessment of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities, changes due to audit adjustments by federal and state tax authorities, the Company’s inability to qualify as a REIT, and changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included within the income tax provision. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, we estimate future taxable income, considering the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies and the realizability of tax loss carryforwards. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or a portion of our deferred tax assets in the future, we would reduce such amounts through a charge to income in the period in which that determination is made. Conversely, if we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net carrying amounts, we would decrease the recorded valuation allowance through an increase to income in the period in which that determination is made. |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2012
Our net income (loss) available to unitholders and participating securities was $27.0 million and $(23.2) million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Basic and diluted net income (loss) available to unitholders was $0.24 per Unit and $(0.24) per Unit for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The tables below summarize our revenues, property expenses and depreciation and other amortization by various categories for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Same store properties are properties owned prior to January 1, 2012 and held as an operating property through December 31, 2013 and developments and redevelopments that were placed in service prior to January 1, 2012 or were substantially completed for the 12 months prior to January 1, 2012. Properties which are at least 75% occupied at acquisition are placed in service. Acquisitions that are less than 75% occupied at the date of acquisition, developments and redevelopments are placed in service as they reach the earlier of a) stabilized occupancy (generally defined as 90% occupied), or b) one year subsequent to acquisition or development/redevelopment construction completion. Properties are moved from the same store classification to the redevelopment classification when capital expenditures for a project are estimated to exceed 25% of the undepreciated gross book value of the property. Acquired properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to December 31, 2011 and held as an operating property through December 31, 2013. Sold properties are properties that were sold subsequent to December 31, 2011. (Re)Developments and land are land parcels and developments and redevelopments that were not: a) substantially complete 12 months prior to January 1, 2012 or b) stabilized prior to January 1, 2012. Other revenues are derived from the operations of our maintenance company, fees earned from our Joint Ventures and other miscellaneous revenues. Other expenses are derived from the operations of our maintenance company and other miscellaneous regional expenses.
Our future financial condition and results of operations, including rental revenues, may be impacted by the future acquisition and sale of properties. Our future revenues and expenses may vary materially from historical rates.
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the average occupancy rates of our same store properties were 90.5% and 88.4%, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| ($ in 000’s) |
REVENUES | | | | | | | |
Same Store Properties | $ | 278,184 |
| | $ | 270,184 |
| | $ | 8,000 |
| | 3.0 | % |
Acquired Properties | 2,729 |
| | 1,954 |
| | 775 |
| | 39.7 | % |
Sold Properties | 10,169 |
| | 20,524 |
| | (10,355 | ) | | (50.5 | )% |
(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above | 6,604 |
| | 698 |
| | 5,906 |
| | 846.1 | % |
Other | 1,459 |
| | 2,635 |
| | (1,176 | ) | | (44.6 | )% |
| $ | 299,145 |
| | $ | 295,995 |
| | $ | 3,150 |
| | 1.1 | % |
Discontinued Operations | (10,209 | ) | | (20,552 | ) | | 10,343 |
| | (50.3 | )% |
Total Revenues | $ | 288,936 |
| | $ | 275,443 |
| | $ | 13,493 |
| | 4.9 | % |
Revenues from same store properties increased $8.0 million primarily due to increases in occupancy and tenant recoveries, partially offset by a decrease in lease cancellation fees. Revenues from acquired properties increased $0.8 million due to the two leased industrial properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2011 totaling approximately 1.0 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from sold properties decreased $10.4 million due to the 91 industrial properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2011 totaling approximately 6.9 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from (re)developments and land increased $5.9 million due to an increase in occupancy. Other revenues decreased $1.2 million primarily due to certain one-time revenue transactions during the year ended December 31, 2012, as well as a decrease in leasing fees earned from our Joint Ventures and a decrease in revenues from the operations of our maintenance company for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| ($ in 000’s) |
PROPERTY EXPENSES | | | | | | | |
Same Store Properties | $ | 83,512 |
| | $ | 78,208 |
| | $ | 5,304 |
| | 6.8 | % |
Acquired Properties | 1,047 |
| | 420 |
| | 627 |
| | 149.3 | % |
Sold Properties | 3,924 |
| | 8,324 |
| | (4,400 | ) | | (52.9 | )% |
(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above | 1,938 |
| | 658 |
| | 1,280 |
| | 194.5 | % |
Other | 8,816 |
| | 9,485 |
| | (669 | ) | | (7.1 | )% |
| $ | 99,237 |
| | $ | 97,095 |
| | $ | 2,142 |
| | 2.2 | % |
Discontinued Operations | (4,133 | ) | | (8,490 | ) | | 4,357 |
| | (51.3 | )% |
Total Property Expenses | $ | 95,104 |
| | $ | 88,605 |
| | $ | 6,499 |
| | 7.3 | % |
Property expenses include real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management, utilities, insurance and other property related expenses. Property expenses from same store properties increased $5.3 million primarily due to an increase in real estate tax expense due to refunds received in 2012 relating to previous years and an increase in repairs and maintenance expense due to the higher snow removal costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 due to the mild 2012 winter. Property expenses from acquired properties increased $0.6 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2011. Property expenses from sold properties decreased $4.4 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2011. Property expenses from (re)developments and land increased $1.3 million primarily due to an increase in real estate tax expense. Other expenses remained relatively unchanged.
General and administrative expense decreased $1.9 million, or 7.4%, during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 due primarily to the acceleration of expense recorded during 2012 related to restricted stock held by the Company’s CEO in connection with the terms of his employment agreement that was entered into in December 2012.
The impairment charge included in continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $1.0 million is primarily due to marketing a certain property for sale and our assessment of the likelihood of a potential sale transaction. The impairment reversal included in continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $0.02 million is primarily comprised of an impairment reversal relating to a certain industrial property that no longer qualified for held for sale classification.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| ($ in 000’s) |
DEPRECIATION AND OTHER AMORTIZATION | | | | | | | |
Same Store Properties | $ | 94,703 |
| | $ | 98,455 |
| | $ | (3,752 | ) | | (3.8 | )% |
Acquired Properties | 1,755 |
| | 808 |
| | 947 |
| | 117.2 | % |
Sold Properties | 3,493 |
| | 7,560 |
| | (4,067 | ) | | (53.8 | )% |
(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above | 1,749 |
| | 344 |
| | 1,405 |
| | 408.4 | % |
Corporate Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment | 618 |
| | 1,077 |
| | (459 | ) | | (42.6 | )% |
| $ | 102,318 |
| | $ | 108,244 |
| | $ | (5,926 | ) | | (5.5 | )% |
Discontinued Operations | (3,494 | ) | | (7,561 | ) | | 4,067 |
| | (53.8 | )% |
Total Depreciation and Other Amortization | $ | 98,824 |
| | $ | 100,683 |
| | $ | (1,859 | ) | | (1.8 | )% |
Depreciation and other amortization for same store properties decreased $3.8 million due to certain intangible assets related to acquisitions of real estate becoming fully depreciated as well as certain adjustments, which should have been recorded in previous periods, recorded during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 causing a decrease in depreciation and amortization expense . Depreciation and other amortization from acquired properties increased $0.9 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2011. Depreciation and other amortization from sold properties decreased $4.1 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2011. Depreciation and other amortization for (re)developments and land increased $1.4 million primarily due to an increase in substantial completion of developments. Corporate furniture, fixtures and equipment depreciation expense decreased $0.5 million due to assets becoming fully depreciated.
Interest income decreased $0.5 million, or 17.1%, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average note receivable balance outstanding and a decrease in the weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.
Interest expense decreased $8.9 million, or 11.5%, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average debt balance outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2013 ($1,238.0 million) as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 ($1,321.6 million), an increase in capitalized interest of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 due to an increase in development activities and a decrease in the weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2013 (5.79%) as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 (6.02%).
Amortization of deferred financing costs decreased $0.2 million, or 6.6%, due to lower deferred financing costs due to the amendment to our credit facility in July 2013 and the write off of financing costs related to the early retirement of certain mortgage loans and the repurchase and retirement of certain senior unsecured notes.
In October 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement (the "Series F Agreement") to mitigate our exposure to floating interest rates related to the coupon reset of our Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units. The Series F Agreement had a notional value of $50.0 million and fixed the 30 year Treasury constant maturity treasury rate at 5.2175%. We recorded $0.1 million in mark-to-market net gain, inclusive of $0.8 million in swap payments, for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to $0.3 million in mark-to-market net loss, inclusive of $1.2 million in swap payments, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Series F Agreement matured on October 1, 2013.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized a net loss from retirement of debt of $6.4 million due to the partial repurchase of certain series of our senior unsecured notes, the early payoff of certain mortgage loans and the write-off of certain unamortized loan fees associated with the amendment of our revolving line of credit. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized a net loss from retirement of debt of $9.7 million due to the partial repurchase of certain series of our senior unsecured notes and early payoff of certain mortgage loans.
Equity in income of other real estate partnerships increased $3.8 million, or 49.6%, during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to a decrease in depreciation expense caused by a decrease in catch-up depreciation taken for properties that were classified as held for sale in 2011 but no longer classified as held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2012 and by certain intangible assets related to acquisitions of real estate becoming fully depreciated. The increase is also due to a decrease in interest expense due to a decrease in the weighted average debt balance outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012 as well as an increase in gain on sale of real estate for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012.
Equity in income of joint ventures decreased $1.4 million, or 91.3%, during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to a decrease in our pro rata share of gain on sale of real estate and earn-outs on property sales from the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized $0.8 million of gain on change in control of interests related to the acquisition of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The $0.8 million of gain represents the difference between our carrying value and fair value of our equity interest on the acquisition date.
The income tax provision (as allocated to continuing operations and gain on sale of real estate, as applicable) decreased $5.5 million or 100.1% during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to a one-time IRS audit adjustment related to the 2009 liquidation of a former taxable REIT subsidiary that was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2012.
The following table summarizes certain information regarding the industrial properties included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
|
| | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| ($ in 000’s) |
Total Revenues | $ | 10,209 |
| | $ | 20,552 |
|
Property Expenses | (4,133 | ) | | (8,490 | ) |
Impairment of Real Estate | (1,605 | ) | | (1,121 | ) |
Depreciation and Amortization | (3,494 | ) | | (7,561 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 32,657 |
| | 12,758 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations | $ | 33,634 |
| | $ | 16,138 |
|
Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 reflects the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to 65 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2013. The impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $1.6 million relates to impairment charges recorded due to the carrying values of certain properties exceeding the estimated fair values based upon third party purchase contracts for properties held for sale during 2013.
Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 reflects the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to 26 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2012 and the results of operations of 65 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2013. The impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $1.1 million relates to impairment charges recorded due to carrying values of certain properties exceeding the estimated fair values based upon third party purchase contracts for properties held for sale during 2012.
The $1.0 million and $3.8 million gain on sale of real estate for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, resulted from the sale of several land parcels that did not meet the criteria for inclusion in discontinued operations.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2012 to Year Ended December 31, 2011
Our net loss available to unitholders was $23.2 million and $28.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Basic and diluted net loss available to unitholders was $0.24 per Unit and $0.33 per Unit for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The tables below summarize our revenues, property expenses and depreciation and other amortization by various categories for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Same store properties are properties owned prior to January 1, 2011 and held as an operating property through December 31, 2012 and developments and redevelopments that were placed in service prior to January 1, 2011 or were substantially completed for the 12 months prior to January 1, 2011. Properties which are at least 75% occupied at acquisition are placed in service. Acquisitions that are less than 75% occupied at the date of acquisition, developments and redevelopments are placed in service as they reach the earlier of a) stabilized occupancy (generally defined as 90% occupied), or b) one year subsequent to acquisition or development/redevelopment construction completion. Properties are moved from the same store classification to the redevelopment classification when capital expenditures for a project are estimated to exceed 25% of the undepreciated gross book value of the property. Acquired properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to December 31, 2010 and held as an operating property through December 31, 2012. Sold properties are properties that were sold subsequent to December 31, 2010. (Re)Developments and land are land parcels and developments and redevelopments that were not: a) substantially complete 12 months prior to January 1, 2011 or b) stabilized prior to January 1, 2011. Other revenues are derived from the operations of our maintenance company, fees earned from our Joint Ventures and other miscellaneous revenues. Other expenses are derived from the operations of our maintenance company and other miscellaneous regional expenses.
During the period between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012, two industrial properties previously classified within same store, comprising approximately 0.1 million square feet, are included in the redevelopment classification as of December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2013, redevelopment activities for both properties are complete and are classified as in-service. These properties were moved back to the same store classification in 2013.
Our future financial condition and results of operations, including rental revenues, may be impacted by the future acquisition and sale of properties. Our future revenues and expenses may vary materially from historical rates.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the average occupancy rates of our same store properties were 87.4% and 85.7%, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| ($ in 000’s) |
REVENUES | | | | | | | |
Same Store Properties | $ | 280,120 |
| | $ | 273,552 |
| | $ | 6,568 |
| | 2.4 | % |
Acquired Properties | 4,378 |
| | 1,396 |
| | 2,982 |
| | 213.6 | % |
Sold Properties | 6,811 |
| | 16,777 |
| | (9,966 | ) | | (59.4 | )% |
(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above | 1,503 |
| | 659 |
| | 844 |
| | 128.1 | % |
Other | 3,183 |
| | 2,219 |
| | 964 |
| | 43.4 | % |
| $ | 295,995 |
| | $ | 294,603 |
| | $ | 1,392 |
| | 0.5 | % |
Discontinued Operations | (20,552 | ) | | (30,777 | ) | | 10,225 |
| | (33.2 | )% |
Total Revenues | $ | 275,443 |
| | $ | 263,826 |
| | $ | 11,617 |
| | 4.4 | % |
Revenues from same store properties increased $6.6 million primarily due to an increase in average occupancy and an increase in lease cancellation fees. Revenues from acquired properties increased $3.0 million due to the two industrial properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2010 totaling approximately 1.1 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from sold properties decreased $10.0 million due to the 60 industrial properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2010 totaling approximately 6.9 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from (re)developments and land increased $0.8 million primarily due to an increase in occupancy. Other revenues increased $1.0 million primarily due to several one-time fees and the reversal of an allowance for deferred rent receivable related to certain tenants, partially offset by a decrease in fees earned from our Joint Ventures.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| ($ in 000’s) |
PROPERTY EXPENSES | | | | | | | |
Same Store Properties | $ | 82,953 |
| | $ | 86,741 |
| | $ | (3,788 | ) | | (4.4 | )% |
Acquired Properties | 888 |
| | 261 |
| | 627 |
| | 240.2 | % |
Sold Properties | 2,566 |
| | 6,499 |
| | (3,933 | ) | | (60.5 | )% |
(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above | 1,202 |
| | 691 |
| | 511 |
| | 74.0 | % |
Other | 9,486 |
| | 8,018 |
| | 1,468 |
| | 18.3 | % |
| $ | 97,095 |
| | $ | 102,210 |
| | $ | (5,115 | ) | | (5.0 | )% |
Discontinued Operations | (8,490 | ) | | (12,438 | ) | | 3,948 |
| | (31.7 | )% |
Total Property Expenses | $ | 88,605 |
| | $ | 89,772 |
| | $ | (1,167 | ) | | (1.3 | )% |
Property expenses include real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management, utilities, insurance and other property related expenses. Property expenses from same store properties decreased $3.8 million due primarily to a decrease in real estate tax expense resulting from an increase in refunds received relating to previous tax years and a decrease in repairs and maintenance expense resulting from lower snow removal costs incurred due to the mild 2012 winter. Property expenses from acquired properties increased $0.6 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2010. Property expenses from sold properties decreased $3.9 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2010. Property expenses from (re)developments and land increased by $0.5 million due to an increase in real estate tax expense related to developments being placed in service. Other expenses increased by $1.5 million due to an increase in incentive compensation expense.
General and administrative expense increased $4.5 million, or 21.7%, during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 due primarily to the acceleration of expense recorded during 2012 related to restricted stock held by the Company’s CEO in connection with the terms of his employment agreement that was entered into in December 2012. The increase was also due to an increase in incentive compensation expense and an increase in franchise tax expense due to the reversal of a state franchise tax reserve relating to the 1996-2001 tax years during the year ended December 31, 2011.
We committed to a plan to reduce organizational and overhead costs in October 2008 and have subsequently modified that plan with the goal of further reducing these costs. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we incurred $1.6 million in restructuring charges to provide for costs associated with the termination of a certain office lease ($1.2 million) and other costs ($0.4 million) associated with implementing our restructuring plan.
The impairment reversal included in continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 of $0.02 million and $8.3 million, respectively, is primarily comprised of a impairment reversal relating to certain industrial properties that no longer qualified for held for sale classification and land parcels that were either sold or no longer qualified for held for sale classification.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| ($ in 000’s) |
DEPRECIATION AND OTHER AMORTIZATION | | | | | | | |
Same Store Properties | $ | 102,515 |
| | $ | 104,058 |
| | $ | (1,543 | ) | | (1.5 | )% |
Acquired Properties | 2,625 |
| | 1,219 |
| | 1,406 |
| | 115.3 | % |
Sold Properties | 1,199 |
| | 3,295 |
| | (2,096 | ) | | (63.6 | )% |
(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above | 828 |
| | 661 |
| | 167 |
| | 25.3 | % |
Corporate Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment | 1,077 |
| | 1,426 |
| | (349 | ) | | (24.5 | )% |
| $ | 108,244 |
| | $ | 110,659 |
| | $ | (2,415 | ) | | (2.2 | )% |
Discontinued Operations | (7,561 | ) | | (8,174 | ) | | 613 |
| | (7.5 | )% |
Total Depreciation and Other Amortization | $ | 100,683 |
| | $ | 102,485 |
| | $ | (1,802 | ) | | (1.8 | )% |
Depreciation and other amortization for same store properties decreased $1.5 million primarily due to the accelerated depreciation and amortization taken during the year ended December 31, 2011 attributable to certain tenants who terminated their lease early. Depreciation and other amortization from acquired properties increased $1.4 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2010. Depreciation and other amortization from sold properties decreased $2.1 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2010. Depreciation and other amortization for (re)developments and land and other increased $0.2 million due to an increase in substantial completion of developments. Corporate furniture, fixtures and equipment depreciation expense decreased $0.3 million due to assets becoming fully depreciated.
Interest income decreased $1.1 million, or 26.3%, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average interest rate for notes receivable for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011.
Interest expense, inclusive of interest expense included in discontinued operations, decreased $17.4 million, or 18.3%, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average debt balance outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2012 ($1,321.6 million) as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 ($1,509.6 million), an increase in capitalized interest of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 due to an increase in development activities and a decrease in the weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2012 (6.02%) as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 (6.33%).
Amortization of deferred financing costs decreased $0.5 million, or 14.1%, due primarily to lower deferred financing costs due to the write-off of financing costs related to the repurchase and retirement of certain of our senior unsecured notes, the replacement of our previous credit facility with the Old Credit Facility in December 2011 and the early retirement of certain mortgage loans, partially offset by the costs associated with the origination of mortgage financings during 2012 and 2011.
We recorded $0.3 million in mark-to-market net loss, inclusive of $1.2 million in swap payments for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to $1.7 million in mark-to-market loss, inclusive of $0.6 million in swap payments, for the year ended December 31, 2011.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized a net loss from retirement of debt of $9.7 million due to the partial repurchase of a certain series of our senior unsecured notes and early payoff of certain mortgage loans. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized a net loss from retirement of debt of $5.3 million due primarily to the early payoff of certain mortgage loans, the partial repurchase of certain series of our senior unsecured notes, the write-off of a portion of unamortized fees associated with the previous unsecured credit facility and a loss on a transfer of a property to a lender in satisfaction of a mortgage loan.
Foreign currency exchange loss of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 relates to the substantial liquidation of operations in Canada.
Equity in income of other real estate partnerships decreased $4.1 million, or 34.8%, primarily due to an increase in depreciation and amortization related to depreciation taken for properties that were classified as held for sale in 2011 but no longer classified held for sale in 2012 and a decrease in gain on sale of real estate for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011.
Equity in income of joint ventures increased $0.6 million, or 59.1%, during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to an increase in our pro rata share of gain on sale of real estate from the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, gain on change in control of interests relates to the acquisition of the 85% equity interest in one property in each of those periods from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recognized $0.8 million gain and $0.7 million gain, respectively, which is the difference between our carrying value and fair value of our equity interest in each of the properties on the respective acquisition date.
Income tax provision (as allocated to continuing operations, discontinued operations and gain on sale of real estate, as applicable) increased $3.4 million, or 157.1%, during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 due primarily to a one-time IRS audit adjustment on the 2009 liquidation of a former taxable REIT subsidiary, partially offset by a decrease in taxes related to the gain on sale of real estate in the new taxable REIT subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011.
The following table summarizes certain information regarding the industrial properties included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
|
| | | | | | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
| ($ in 000’s) |
Total Revenues | $ | 20,552 |
| | $ | 30,777 |
|
Property Expenses | (8,490 | ) | | (12,438 | ) |
Impairment of Real Estate | (1,121 | ) | | (6,214 | ) |
Depreciation and Amortization | (7,561 | ) | | (8,174 | ) |
Interest Expense | — |
| | (63 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 12,758 |
| | 18,814 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes | — |
| | (1,246 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations | $ | 16,138 |
| | $ | 21,456 |
|
Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 reflects the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to 26 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2012 and the results of operations of 65 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2013. The impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $1.1 million relates to impairment charges recorded due to carrying values of certain properties exceeding the estimated fair values based upon third party purchase contracts for properties held for sale during 2012.
Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 reflects the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to 34 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2011, the results of operations of 65 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2013 and the results of operations of 26 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2012. The impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2011 of $6.2 million relates to impairment charges recorded due to carrying values of certain properties exceeding the estimated fair values based upon third party purchase contracts for properties held for sale during 2011.
The $3.8 million and $1.4 million gain on sale of real estate for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, resulted from the sale of one land parcel in each respective year that did not meet the criteria for inclusion in discontinued operations.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At December 31, 2013, our cash and cash equivalents were approximately $6.5 million. We also had $452.0 million available for additional borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility.
We have considered our short-term (through December 31, 2014) liquidity needs and the adequacy of our estimated cash flow from operations and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. Our 2014 Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $81.8 million, are due June 2, 2014. Also, we have $43.3 million in mortgage loans payable outstanding at December 31, 2013 that mature prior to December 31, 2014 or we anticipate prepaying during 2014. Additionally, as discussed in Subsequent Events, during the first quarter of 2014 the Company is redeeming all outstanding Series F Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and Series G Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, for an aggregate payment of $75.0 million plus all accumulated and unpaid distributions. An equivalent number of Series F Preferred Units and Series G Preferred Units will also be redeemed on the respective redemption dates. We expect to satisfy these payment obligations prior to December 31, 2014 with borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility and the $200.0 million unsecured term loan that we entered into during January 2014 (see Subsequent Events). With the exception of these payment obligations, we believe that our principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund normal recurring expenses, property acquisitions, developments, renovations, expansions and other nonrecurring capital improvements, debt service requirements, preferred distributions, the minimum distributions required to maintain the Company’s REIT qualification under the Code and distributions approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. We anticipate that these needs will be met with cash flows provided by operating activities as well as the disposition of select assets. These needs may also be met by the issuance of additional Units or long-term unsecured indebtedness, subject to market conditions and contractual restrictions or borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility.
We expect to meet long-term (after December 31, 2014) liquidity requirements such as property acquisitions, developments, scheduled debt maturities, major renovations, expansions and other nonrecurring capital improvements through the disposition of select assets, long-term unsecured and secured indebtedness and the issuance of additional Units and preferred Units, subject to market conditions.
We also financed the development and acquisition of additional properties through borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility and may finance the development or acquisition of additional properties through such borrowings, to the extent capacity is available, in the future. At December 31, 2013, borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 1.666%. As of February 27, 2014, we had approximately $604.0 million available for additional borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility. Our Unsecured Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants including limitations on incurrence of debt and debt service coverage. Our access to borrowings may be limited if we fail to meet any of these covenants. We believe that we were in compliance with our financial covenants as of December 31, 2013, and we anticipate that we will be able to operate in compliance with our financial covenants in 2014.
Our senior unsecured notes have been assigned credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch Ratings of BBB-/Ba2/BB+, respectively. In the event of a downgrade, we believe we would continue to have access to sufficient capital; however, our cost of borrowing would increase and our ability to access certain financial markets may be limited.
Year Ended December 31, 2013
Net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $114.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, was comprised primarily of the non-cash adjustments of approximately $88.1 million and net income of approximately $41.4 million, offset by the net change in operating assets and liabilities of approximately $10.6 million and payments of premiums, discounts and prepayment penalties associated with retirement of debt of approximately $4.8 million. The adjustments for the non-cash items of approximately $88.1 million are primarily comprised of depreciation and amortization of approximately $115.7 million, the loss from retirement of debt of approximately $6.4 million, the impairment of real estate of approximately $2.7 million and the provision for bad debt of approximately $0.7 million, offset by the gain on sale of real estate of approximately $33.7 million and the effect of the straight-lining of rental income of approximately $3.7 million.
Net cash used in investing activities of approximately $59.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, was comprised primarily of investments in and advances to the Other Real Estate Partnerships, the acquisition of two industrial properties and several land parcels, the development of real estate, capital expenditures related to the improvement of existing real estate, payments related to leasing activities and an increase in escrows, offset by the net proceeds from the sale of real estate, distributions from the Other Real Estate Partnerships in excess of equity in income and the repayments on our notes receivable.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we acquired two industrial properties comprising approximately 1.1 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels. The purchase price of these acquisitions totaled approximately $73.6 million, including costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the industrial properties and land parcels.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we sold 65 industrial properties comprising approximately 2.8 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels. Proceeds from the sales of the 65 industrial properties and several land parcels, net of closing costs, were approximately $120.7 million. We are in various stages of discussions with third parties for the sale of additional properties and plan to continue to selectively market other properties for sale in 2014.
Net cash used in financing activities of approximately $52.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, was comprised primarily of the redemption of our Series J Preferred Units and Series K Preferred Units, repayments on our senior unsecured notes and mortgage loans payable, general and limited partnership Unit and preferred general partnership Unit distributions, payments of debt and equity issuance costs, the repurchase and retirement of restricted Units and payments on the interest rate swap agreement, offset by net proceeds from the issuance of Units and net proceeds from our Unsecured Credit Facility.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we paid off and retired prior to maturity mortgage loans in the amount of $64.4 million and we repurchased $29.8 million of our unsecured notes at an aggregate purchase price of $33.5 million. We may from time to time repay additional amounts of our outstanding debt. Any repayments would depend upon prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors we consider important. Future repayments may materially impact our liquidity, taxable income and results of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company redeemed the remaining 4,000,000 Depositary Shares of the Company's Series J Preferred Stock for $25.00 per Depositary Share, or $100.0 million in the aggregate, and paid a prorated second quarter dividend of $0.055382 per Depositary Share, totaling approximately $0.2 million. An equivalent number of Series J Preferred Units were redeemed during the year ended December 31, 2013 as well. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company redeemed all of the 2,000,000 outstanding Depositary Shares of the Company's Series K Preferred Stock for $25.00 per Depositary Share, or $50.0 million in the aggregate, and paid a pro-rated third quarter dividend of $0.090625 per Depositary Share, totaling approximately $0.2 million. An equivalent number of Series K Preferred Units were redeemed during the year ended December 31, 2013 as well.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 8,400,000 shares of the Company's common stock through a public offering, resulting in proceeds, net of the underwriter's discount, of approximately $132.3 million. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 2,315,704 shares of the Company's common stock through 2012 ATM, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $41.7 million. These proceeds were contributed to us in exchange for an equivalent number of Units.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table lists our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Payments Due by Period (In thousands) |
| Total | | Less Than 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | Over 5 Years |
Operating and Ground Leases(1)(2) | $ | 33,076 |
| | $ | 1,824 |
| | $ | 3,333 |
| | $ | 2,802 |
| | $ | 25,117 |
|
Real Estate Development Costs (1)(3) | $ | 23,900 |
| | 23,900 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Long Term Debt | $ | 1,199,996 |
| | 111,518 |
| | 300,988 |
| | 466,734 |
| | 320,756 |
|
Interest Expense on Long Term Debt(1)(4) | $ | 266,847 |
| | 57,633 |
| | 90,679 |
| | 52,751 |
| | 65,784 |
|
Total | $ | 1,523,819 |
| | $ | 194,875 |
| | $ | 395,000 |
| | $ | 522,287 |
| | $ | 411,657 |
|
____________________
| |
(2) | Operating lease minimum rental payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $6.8 million due in the future under non-cancelable subleases. |
| |
(3) | Represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of development projects. |
| |
(4) | Does not include interest expense on our Unsecured Credit Facility. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2013, we had a letter of credit and several performance bonds outstanding, amounting to $6.1 million in the aggregate. The letter of credit and performance bonds are not reflected as liabilities on our balance sheet. We have no other off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303 of Regulation S-K, other than those disclosed on the Contractual Obligations and Commitments table above, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operation or liquidity and capital resources.
Environmental
We paid approximately $0.5 million and $0.3 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to environmental expenditures. We estimate 2014 expenditures of approximately $0.8 million. We estimate that the aggregate expenditures which need to be expended in 2014 and beyond with regard to currently identified environmental issues will not exceed approximately $2.3 million.
Inflation
For the last several years, inflation has not had a significant impact on us because of the relatively low inflation rates in our markets of operation. Most of our leases require the tenants to pay their share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation. In addition, many of the outstanding leases have lease terms of six years which may enable us to replace existing leases with new leases at higher base rentals if rents of existing leases are below the then-existing market rate.
Market Risk
The following discussion about our risk-management activities includes "forward-looking statements" that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward- looking statements. Our business subjects us to market risk from interest rates, and to a much lesser extent, foreign currency fluctuations.
Interest Rate Risk
This analysis presents the hypothetical gain or loss in earnings, cash flows or fair value of the financial instruments and derivative instruments which are held by us at December 31, 2013 that are sensitive to changes in the interest rates. While this analysis may have some use as a benchmark, it should not be viewed as a forecast.
In the normal course of business, we also face risks that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit risk and legal risk and are not represented in the following analysis.
At December 31, 2013, $1,026.1 million (85.6% of total debt at December 31, 2013) of our debt was fixed rate debt and $173.0 million (14.4% of total debt at December 31, 2013) of our debt was variable rate debt. At December 31, 2012, $1,130.5 million (92.0% of total debt at December 31, 2012) of our debt was fixed rate debt and $98.0 million (8.0% of total debt at December 31, 2012) of our debt was variable rate debt. Currently, we do not enter into financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of the debt, but not our earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt, changes in the base interest rate used to calculate the all-in interest rate generally do not impact the fair value of the debt, but would affect our future earnings and cash flows. The interest rate risk and changes in fair market value of fixed rate debt generally do not have a significant impact on us until we are required to refinance such debt. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the maturity dates of our various fixed rate debt.
Based upon the amount of variable rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, a 10% increase or decrease in the interest rate on our variable rate debt would decrease or increase, respectively, future net income and cash flows by approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million per year, respectively. The foregoing calculation assumes an instantaneous increase or decrease in the rates applicable to the amount of borrowings outstanding under our Unsecured Credit Facility at December 31, 2013. Changes in LIBOR could result in a greater than 10% increase to such rates. In addition, the calculation does not account for other possible actions, such as prepayment, that we might take in response to any rate increase. A 10% increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of the fixed rate debt at December 31, 2013 and 2012 by approximately $18.1 million to $1,050.2 million and by approximately $22.8 million to $1,194.1 million, respectively. A 10% decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value of the fixed rate debt at December 31, 2013 and 2012 by approximately $18.7 million to $1,087.0 million and by approximately $23.6 million to $1,240.5 million, respectively.
The use of derivative financial instruments allows us to manage risks of increases in interest rates with respect to the effect these fluctuations would have on our earnings and cash flows. There were no derivatives outstanding as of December 31, 2013 (see Subsequent Events).
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Owning industrial property outside of the United States exposes the Operating Partnership to the possibility of volatile movements in foreign exchange rates. Changes in foreign currencies can affect the operating results of international operations reported in U.S. dollars and the value of the foreign assets reported in U.S. dollars. The economic impact of foreign exchange rate movements is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental actions and other factors. At December 31, 2013, we owned one land parcel for which the U.S. dollar was not the functional currency. The land parcel is located in Ontario, Canada and uses the Canadian dollar as its functional currency.
IRS Tax Refund
On August 24, 2009, we received a private letter ruling from the IRS granting favorable loss treatment under Sections 331 and 336 of the Code on the tax liquidation of one of our former taxable REIT subsidiaries. On November 6, 2009, legislation was signed that allowed businesses with net operating losses for 2008 or 2009 to carry back those losses for up to five years. As a result, we received a refund from the IRS of $40.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 (the "Refund") in connection with this tax liquidation. The IRS examination team, which is required by statute to review all refund claims in excess of $2.0 million on behalf of the Joint Committee on Taxation, indicated to us that it disagreed with certain of the property valuations we obtained from an independent valuation expert in support of our fair value of the liquidated taxable REIT subsidiary and our claim for the Refund. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we reached an agreement with the regional office of the IRS on a proposed adjustment to the Refund. The total agreed-upon adjustment to taxable income was $13.7 million, which equates to $4.8 million of taxes owed. We were also required to pay accrued interest of approximately $0.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Operating Partnership recorded the charge for the agreed-upon adjustment and the related estimated accrued interest which was reflected as a component of income tax expense. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the settlement amount was approved by the Joint Committee on Taxation and we paid the agreed upon taxes and related accrued interest.
As a result of the Joint Committee on Taxation's approval, during 2013 we entered into closing agreements with the IRS that determined the timing of the settlement on the tax characterization of the limited partners of the Operating Partnership and the stockholders of the Company. Pursuant to these closing agreements, $8.2 million of the preferred stock distributions for the year ended December 31, 2012 are taxable as capital gain.
Subsequent Events
From January 1, 2014 to February 27, 2014, we acquired one industrial property for a purchase price of approximately $13.4 million, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition and we sold one industrial property for approximately $1.3 million. Additionally, during January 2014 the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture sold two industrial properties.
On January 29, 2014, we entered into a $200.0 million unsecured loan with a seven-year term. The loan features interest-only payments and initially bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus 175 basis points. The rate is subject to adjustment based on our leverage ratio or credit ratings. We also entered into interest rate swap agreements, with an aggregate notional value of $200.0 million, to convert the term loan's LIBOR rate to a fixed rate of approximately 4.04% per annum based on the loan's current spread.
On February 3, 2014, the Company announced that it will redeem all 50,000 Depositary Shares of its Series F Preferred Stock. The redemption price will be $1,000.00 per Depositary Share, or $50.0 million, plus all accumulated and unpaid distributions to and including the date of redemption, March 6, 2014. The Company also announced that it will redeem all 25,000 Depositary Shares of its Series G Preferred Stock. The redemption price will be $1,000.00 per Depositary Share, or $25.0 million plus all accumulated and unpaid distributions to and including the date of redemption, March 31, 2014. An equivalent number of Series F Preferred Units and Series G Preferred Units will also be redeemed on the respective redemption dates.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Response to this item is included in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” above.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules included in Item 15.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria described in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein within Item 15. See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence and Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The Operating Partnership has no directors or executive officers; instead it is managed by its sole general partner, the Company. The information with respect to the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership required by Item 10, Item 11, Item 12, Item 13 and Item 14 is hereby incorporated or furnished, solely to the extent required by such item, from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which is expected to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. Information from the Company’s definitive proxy statement shall not be deemed to be “filed” or “soliciting material,” or subject to liability for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to the maximum extent permitted under the Exchange Act.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits (1 & 2) See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.
(3) Exhibits:
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| |
3.1 | | Twelfth Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of First Industrial, L.P. dated February 27, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.1 | | Indenture, dated as of May 13, 1997, between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, as amended by Form 10-Q/A No. 1 of the Company filed May 30, 1997, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.2 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of May 13, 1997, between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association as Trustee relating to $100 million of 7.15% Notes due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, as amended by Form 10-Q/A No. 1 of the Company filed May 30, 1997, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.3 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated October 28, 1997 between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association providing for the issuance of Medium-Term Notes due Nine Months or more from Date of Issue (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K of the Operating Partnership, dated November 3, 1997, as filed November 3, 1997, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.4 | | 7.50% Medium-Term Note due 2017 in principal amount of $100 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.5 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of July 14, 1998, between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, relating to First Industrial, L.P.’s 7.60% Notes due July 15, 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Operating Partnership dated July 15, 1998, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.6 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 7 dated as of April 15, 2002, between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association, relating to First Industrial, L.P.’s 6.875% Notes due 2012 and 7.75% Notes due 2032 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.7 | | Form of 6.875% Notes due in 2012 in the principal amount of $200 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. and 7.75% Notes due in 2032 in the principal amount of $50 million issued by First Industrial L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.8 | | Form of 7.75% Notes due 2032 in the principal amount of $50 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.9 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 8, dated as of May 17, relating to 6.42% Senior Notes due June 1, 2014, by and between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Operating Partnership, dated May 27, 2004, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.10 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 10, dated as of January 10, 2006, relating to 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016, by and between the Operating Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed January 11, 2006, File No. 1-13102) |
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| |
4.11 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 11, dated as of May 7, 2007, relating to 5.95% Senior Notes due 2017, by and between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed May 5, 2007, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
10.1 | | Sales Agreement by and among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated September 16, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Form 8-K of the Operating Partnership, dated September 16, 2004, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
10.2 | | Amended and Restated Unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 19, 2013 among First Industrial, L.P., First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the other lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed July 22, 2013, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
10.3 | | Distribution Agreement among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC dated March 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed March 2, 2012, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
10.4 | | Unsecured Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 29, 2014 among First Industrial, L.P., First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the other lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed January 29, 2014, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
21.1 | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
23* | | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
| |
31.1* | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., registrant’s sole general partner, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
| |
31.2* | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., registrant’s sole general partner, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
| |
32** | | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
101.1* | | The following financial statements from First Industrial, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (audited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (audited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (audited), (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (audited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (audited) and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (audited). |
_______________________
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| |
3.1 | | Twelfth Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of First Industrial, L.P. dated February 27, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.1 | | Indenture, dated as of May 13, 1997, between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, as amended by Form 10-Q/A No. 1 of the Company filed May 30, 1997, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.2 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of May 13, 1997, between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association as Trustee relating to $100 million of 7.15% Notes due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, as amended by Form 10-Q/A No. 1 of the Company filed May 30, 1997, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.3 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated October 28, 1997 between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association providing for the issuance of Medium-Term Notes due Nine Months or more from Date of Issue (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K of the Operating Partnership, dated November 3, 1997, as filed November 3, 1997, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.4 | | 7.50% Medium-Term Note due 2017 in principal amount of $100 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.5 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of July 14, 1998, between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, relating to First Industrial, L.P.’s 7.60% Notes due July 15, 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Operating Partnership dated July 15, 1998, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.6 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 7 dated as of April 15, 2002, between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association, relating to First Industrial, L.P.’s 6.875% Notes due 2012 and 7.75% Notes due 2032 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.7 | | Form of 6.875% Notes due in 2012 in the principal amount of $200 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. and 7.75% Notes due in 2032 in the principal amount of $50 million issued by First Industrial L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.80 | | Form of 7.75% Notes due 2032 in the principal amount of $50 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.9 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 8, dated as of May 17, relating to 6.42% Senior Notes due June 1, 2014, by and between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Operating Partnership, dated May 27, 2004, File No. 333-21873) |
| |
4.10 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 10, dated as of January 10, 2006, relating to 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016, by and between the Operating Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed January 11, 2006, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
4.11 | | Supplemental Indenture No. 11, dated as of May 7, 2007, relating to 5.95% Senior Notes due 2017, by and between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed May 5, 2007, File No. 1-13102) |
| |
10.1 | | Sales Agreement by and among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated September 16, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Form 8-K of the Operating Partnership, dated September 16, 2004, File No. 333-21873) |
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | |
10.2 | | Amended and Restated Unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 19, 2013 among First Industrial, L.P., First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the other lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed July 22, 2013, File No. 1-13102) |
| | |
10.3 | | Distribution Agreement among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC dated March 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed March 2, 2012, File No. 1-13102) |
| | |
10.4 | | Unsecured Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 29, 2014 among First Industrial, L.P., First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the other lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed January 29, 2014, File No. 1-13102) |
| | |
21.1 | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, File No. 1-13102) |
| | |
23* | | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
| | |
31.1* | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., registrant’s sole general partner, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
| | |
31.2* | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., registrant’s sole general partner, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
| | |
32** | | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
101.1* | | The following financial statements from First Industrial, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (audited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (audited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (audited), (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (audited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (audited) and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (audited). |
_______________________
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FIRST INDUSTRIAL PENNSYLVANIA, L.P.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
| |
| Page |
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | |
| |
| |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Partners of
First Industrial, L.P.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of changes in partners' capital and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Industrial, L.P. and its subsidiaries (the “Consolidated Operating Partnership”) at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Consolidated Operating Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Consolidated Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedules, and on the Consolidated Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2014
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
| (In thousands except Unit data) |
ASSETS | | | |
Assets: | | | |
Investment in Real Estate: | | | |
Land | $ | 610,802 |
| | $ | 598,404 |
|
Buildings and Improvements | 2,113,689 |
| | 2,146,375 |
|
Construction in Progress | 23,688 |
| | 19,228 |
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation | (652,971 | ) | | (639,481 | ) |
Net Investment in Real Estate | 2,095,208 |
| | 2,124,526 |
|
Real Estate and Other Assets Held for Sale, Net of Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of $0 and $3,050 | — |
| | 6,765 |
|
Investments in and Advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships | 196,323 |
| | 178,104 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 6,518 |
| | 4,357 |
|
Tenant Accounts Receivable, Net | 4,746 |
| | 3,867 |
|
Investments in Joint Ventures | 907 |
| | 1,012 |
|
Deferred Rent Receivable, Net | 49,173 |
| | 47,930 |
|
Deferred Financing Costs, Net | 10,570 |
| | 10,948 |
|
Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net | 26,581 |
| | 29,374 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net | 108,753 |
| | 96,999 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 2,498,779 |
| | $ | 2,503,882 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | | | |
Liabilities: | | | |
Indebtedness: | | | |
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net | $ | 580,215 |
| | $ | 656,329 |
|
Senior Unsecured Notes, Net | 445,916 |
| | 474,150 |
|
Unsecured Credit Facility | 173,000 |
| | 98,000 |
|
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities | 70,139 |
| | 78,876 |
|
Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net | 11,879 |
| | 13,597 |
|
Rents Received in Advance and Security Deposits | 26,619 |
| | 27,327 |
|
Distributions Payable | 10,289 |
| | 452 |
|
Total Liabilities | 1,318,057 |
| | 1,348,731 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies | — |
| | — |
|
Partners’ Capital: | | | |
General Partner Preferred Units | 73,587 |
| | 217,971 |
|
General Partner Units (109,980,850 and 98,767,913 units outstanding) | 1,027,664 |
| | 859,727 |
|
Limited Partners Units (4,597,313 and 4,702,341 units outstanding) | 82,833 |
| | 84,282 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | (3,362 | ) | | (6,829 | ) |
Total Partners’ Capital | 1,180,722 |
| | 1,155,151 |
|
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital | $ | 2,498,779 |
| | $ | 2,503,882 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
| (In thousands except per unit data) |
Revenues: | | | | | |
Rental Income | $ | 222,102 |
| | $ | 214,595 |
| | $ | 203,602 |
|
Tenant Recoveries and Other Income | 66,834 |
| | 60,848 |
| | 60,224 |
|
Total Revenues | 288,936 |
| | 275,443 |
| | 263,826 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | |
Property Expenses | 95,104 |
| | 88,605 |
| | 89,772 |
|
General and Administrative | 23,106 |
| | 24,959 |
| | 20,508 |
|
Restructuring Costs | — |
| | — |
| | 1,553 |
|
Impairment of Real Estate | 1,047 |
| | (20 | ) | | (8,293 | ) |
Depreciation and Other Amortization | 98,824 |
| | 100,683 |
| | 102,485 |
|
Total Expenses | 218,081 |
| | 214,227 |
| | 206,025 |
|
Other Income (Expense): | | | | | |
Interest Income | 2,438 |
| | 2,940 |
| | 3,990 |
|
Interest Expense | (68,857 | ) | | (77,794 | ) | | (95,103 | ) |
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs | (3,038 | ) | | (3,252 | ) | | (3,785 | ) |
Mark-to-Market Gain (Loss) on Interest Rate Protection Agreements | 52 |
| | (328 | ) | | (1,718 | ) |
Loss from Retirement of Debt | (6,423 | ) | | (9,684 | ) | | (5,299 | ) |
Foreign Currency Exchange Loss | — |
| | — |
| | (332 | ) |
Total Other Income (Expense) | (75,828 | ) | | (88,118 | ) | | (102,247 | ) |
Loss from Continuing Operations Before Equity in Income of Other Real Estate Partnerships, Equity in Income of Joint Ventures, Gain on Change in Control of Interests and Income Tax Benefit (Provision) | (4,973 | ) | | (26,902 | ) | | (44,446 | ) |
Equity in Income of Other Real Estate Partnerships | 11,603 |
| | 7,756 |
| | 11,891 |
|
Equity in Income of Joint Ventures | 136 |
| | 1,559 |
| | 980 |
|
Gain on Change in Control of Interests | — |
| | 776 |
| | 689 |
|
Income Tax Benefit (Provision) | 213 |
| | (5,522 | ) | | (450 | ) |
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | 6,979 |
| | (22,333 | ) | | (31,336 | ) |
Discontinued Operations: | | | | | |
Income Attributable to Discontinued Operations | 977 |
| | 3,380 |
| | 3,888 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 32,657 |
| | 12,758 |
| | 18,814 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes Allocable to Discontinued Operations | — |
| | — |
| | (1,246 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations | 33,634 |
| | 16,138 |
| | 21,456 |
|
Income (Loss) Before Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 40,613 |
| | (6,195 | ) | | (9,880 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 1,030 |
| | 3,777 |
| | 1,370 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes Allocable to Gain on Sale of Real Estate | (210 | ) | | — |
| | (452 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) | 41,433 |
| | (2,418 | ) | | (8,962 | ) |
Less: Preferred Unit Distributions | (8,733 | ) | | (18,947 | ) | | (19,565 | ) |
Less: Redemption of Preferred Units | (5,667 | ) | | (1,804 | ) | | — |
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Unitholders and Participating Securities | $ | 27,033 |
| | $ | (23,169 | ) | | $ | (28,527 | ) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Unit: | | | | | |
Loss from Continuing Operations Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | (0.41 | ) | | $ | (0.58 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations Attributable to Unitholders | $ | 0.30 |
| | $ | 0.17 |
| | $ | 0.25 |
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Unitholders | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.33 | ) |
Distributions Per Unit | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Weighted Average Units Outstanding | 111,646 |
| | 96,509 |
| | 85,913 |
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Unitholders Attributable to: | | | | | |
General Partner | $ | 25,912 |
| | $ | (21,968 | ) | | $ | (26,782 | ) |
Limited Partners | 1,121 |
| | (1,201 | ) | | (1,745 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) Available to Unitholders and Participating Securities | $ | 27,033 |
| | $ | (23,169 | ) | | $ | (28,527 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
| (In thousands) |
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 41,433 |
| | $ | (2,418 | ) | | $ | (8,962 | ) |
Amortization of Interest Rate Protection Agreements | 2,411 |
| | 2,271 |
| | 2,166 |
|
Write-off of Unamortized Settlement Amounts of Interest Rate Protection Agreements | 1,116 |
| | 3,247 |
| | 3,250 |
|
Reclassification of Foreign Exchange Loss on Substantial Liquidation of Foreign Entities, Net of Income Tax Benefit | — |
| | — |
| | 179 |
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment, Net of Income Tax Benefit | (60 | ) | | 32 |
| | (1,470 | ) |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | $ | 44,900 |
| | $ | 3,132 |
| | $ | (4,837 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| General Partner Preferred Units | | General Partner Units | | Limited Partner Units | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total |
| (In thousands) |
Balance as of December 31, 2010 | $ | 266,211 |
| | $ | 558,496 |
| | $ | 93,100 |
| | $ | (16,504 | ) | | $ | 901,303 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Units, Net of Issuance Costs | — |
| | 202,332 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 202,332 |
|
Stock Based Compensation Activity | — |
| | 2,759 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,759 |
|
Conversion of Limited Partner Units to General Partner Units | — |
| | 1,109 |
| | (1,109 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Preferred Unit Distributions | (19,565 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (19,565 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) | 19,565 |
| | (26,782 | ) | | (1,745 | ) | | — |
| | (8,962 | ) |
Other Comprehensive Income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,125 |
| | 4,125 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | $ | 266,211 |
| | $ | 737,914 |
| | $ | 90,246 |
| | $ | (12,379 | ) | | 1,081,992 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Units, Net of Issuance Costs | — |
| | 134,436 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 134,436 |
|
Redemption of Preferred Units | (48,240 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (48,240 | ) |
Stock Based Compensation Activity | — |
| | 4,582 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,582 |
|
Conversion of Limited Partner Units to General Partner Units | — |
| | 4,763 |
| | (4,763 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Preferred Unit Distributions | (20,751 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (20,751 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) | 20,751 |
| | (21,968 | ) | | (1,201 | ) | | — |
| | (2,418 | ) |
Other Comprehensive Income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,550 |
| | 5,550 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2012 | $ | 217,971 |
| | $ | 859,727 |
| | $ | 84,282 |
| | $ | (6,829 | ) | | 1,155,151 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Units, Net of Issuance Costs | — |
| | 173,785 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 173,785 |
|
Redemption of Preferred Units | (144,384 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (144,384 | ) |
Stock Based Compensation Activity | — |
| | 4,532 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,532 |
|
Conversion of Limited Partner Units to General Partner Units | — |
| | 996 |
| | (996 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Common Unit Distributions | — |
| | (37,288 | ) | | (1,574 | ) | | — |
| | (38,862 | ) |
Preferred Unit Distributions | (14,400 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14,400 | ) |
Net Income | 14,400 |
| | 25,912 |
| | 1,121 |
| | — |
| | 41,433 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,467 |
| | 3,467 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 73,587 |
| | $ | 1,027,664 |
| | $ | 82,833 |
| | $ | (3,362 | ) | | 1,180,722 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
| (In thousands) |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 41,433 |
| | $ | (2,418 | ) | | $ | (8,962 | ) |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation | 83,835 |
| | 88,123 |
| | 85,849 |
|
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs | 3,038 |
| | 3,252 |
| | 3,785 |
|
Other Amortization | 28,787 |
| | 32,763 |
| | 33,218 |
|
Impairment of Real Estate | 2,652 |
| | 1,101 |
| | (2,079 | ) |
Provision for Bad Debt | 729 |
| | 463 |
| | 1,146 |
|
Equity in Income of Joint Ventures | (136 | ) | | (1,559 | ) | | (980 | ) |
Distributions from Joint Ventures | 177 |
| | 1,580 |
| | 1,033 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | (33,687 | ) | | (16,535 | ) | | (20,184 | ) |
Gain on Change in Control of Interests | — |
| | (776 | ) | | (689 | ) |
Loss from Retirement of Debt | 6,423 |
| | 9,684 |
| | 5,299 |
|
Mark-to-Market (Gain) Loss on Interest Rate Protection Agreements | (52 | ) | | 328 |
| | 1,718 |
|
Equity in Income of Other Real Estate Partnerships | (11,603 | ) | | (7,756 | ) | | (11,891 | ) |
Distributions from Investment in Other Real Estate Partnerships | 11,603 |
| | 7,756 |
| | 11,891 |
|
(Increase) Decrease in Tenant Accounts Receivable, Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net | (3,277 | ) | | 5,576 |
| | (3,154 | ) |
Increase in Deferred Rent Receivable | (3,694 | ) | | (3,374 | ) | | (7,275 | ) |
(Decrease) Increase in Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses, Other Liabilities, Rents Received in Advance and Security Deposits | (7,355 | ) | | 4,993 |
| | (12,201 | ) |
Decrease in Restricted Cash | — |
| | — |
| | 105 |
|
Payments of Premiums, Discounts and Prepayment Penalties Associated with Retirement of Debt | (4,821 | ) | | (7,065 | ) | | (6,454 | ) |
Cash Book Overdraft | — |
| | 1,715 |
| | — |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 114,052 |
| | 117,851 |
| | 70,175 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Acquisitions of Real Estate | (73,642 | ) | | (48,621 | ) | | (5,277 | ) |
Additions to Investment in Real Estate and Non-Acquisition Tenant Improvements and Lease Costs | (88,789 | ) | | (74,511 | ) | | (77,619 | ) |
Net Proceeds from Sales of Investments in Real Estate | 120,674 |
| | 80,362 |
| | 71,083 |
|
Investments in and Advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships | (50,946 | ) | | (30,006 | ) | | (125,089 | ) |
Distributions from Other Real Estate Partnerships in Excess of Equity in Income | 32,727 |
| | 38,354 |
| | 191,178 |
|
Contributions to and Investments in Joint Ventures | (38 | ) | | (190 | ) | | (155 | ) |
Distributions from Joint Ventures | 104 |
| | 90 |
| | 650 |
|
Repayments of Notes Receivable | 615 |
| | 14,365 |
| | 10,393 |
|
Increase in Escrows | (409 | ) | | (273 | ) | | (97 | ) |
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities | (59,704 | ) | | (20,430 | ) | | 65,067 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Debt and Equity Issuance Costs | (3,575 | ) | | (1,512 | ) | | (6,502 | ) |
Unit Contributions | 174,081 |
| | 134,905 |
| | 202,845 |
|
Repurchase and Retirement of Restricted Units | (2,968 | ) | | (2,690 | ) | | (1,001 | ) |
Common Unit Distributions | (29,025 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Preferred Unit Distributions Paid | (8,733 | ) | | (23,258 | ) | | (15,254 | ) |
Redemption of Preferred Units | (150,000 | ) | | (50,000 | ) | | — |
|
Payments on Interest Rate Swap Agreement | (1,079 | ) | | (1,144 | ) | | (489 | ) |
Proceeds from Origination of Mortgage Loans Payable | — |
| | 97,561 |
| | 199,884 |
|
Repayments on Mortgage and Other Loans Payable | (76,068 | ) | | (37,402 | ) | | (67,164 | ) |
Repayments of Senior Unsecured Notes | (29,769 | ) | | (166,153 | ) | | (234,307 | ) |
Proceeds from Unsecured Credit Facility | 373,000 |
| | 339,000 |
| | 390,500 |
|
Repayments on Unsecured Credit Facility | (298,000 | ) | | (390,000 | ) | | (618,553 | ) |
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities | (52,136 | ) | | (100,693 | ) | | (150,041 | ) |
Net Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents | (51 | ) | | 5 |
| | (61 | ) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | 2,212 |
| | (3,272 | ) | | (14,799 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year | 4,357 |
| | 7,624 |
| | 22,484 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year | $ | 6,518 |
| | $ | 4,357 |
| | $ | 7,624 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per Unit data)
1. Organization and Formation of Partnership
First Industrial, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") was organized as a limited partnership in the state of Delaware on November 23, 1993. The sole general partner is First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company") which owns common units in the Operating Partnership ("Units") representing an approximate 96.0% and 95.5% ownership interest at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company also owns a preferred general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership represented by preferred Units ("Preferred Units") with an aggregate liquidation priority of $75,000 at December 31, 2013. The Company is a real estate investment trust ("REIT") as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). The Company’s operations are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership owned, in the aggregate, approximately a 4.0% and 4.5% interest in the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Operations are also conducted through other partnerships and limited liability companies ("LLCs") of which the Operating Partnership is the sole member, and taxable REIT subsidiaries (together with the Operating Partnership, other partnerships and the LLCs, the "Consolidated Operating Partnership"), the operating data of which is consolidated with that of the Operating Partnership as presented herein. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we," "us" and "our" refer to First Industrial, L.P. and its controlled subsidiaries.
We also hold at least a 99% limited partnership interest in First Industrial Financing Partnership, L.P. (the "Financing Partnership"), First Industrial Securities, L.P. (the "Securities Partnership"), First Industrial Mortgage Partnership, L.P, (the "Mortgage Partnership"), First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. (the "Pennsylvania Partnership"), First Industrial Harrisburg, L.P. (the "Harrisburg Partnership"), First Industrial Indianapolis, L.P. (the "Indianapolis Partnership"), TK-SV, LTD. and FI Development Services, L.P. (together, the "Other Real Estate Partnerships").
We also own noncontrolling equity interests in, and provide various services to, two joint ventures (the "2003 Net Lease Joint Venture" and the "2007 Europe Joint Venture"; collectively, the "Joint Ventures"). See Note 6 for more information on the Joint Ventures.
The general partners of the Other Real Estate Partnerships are separate corporations, each with at least a .01% general partnership interest in the Other Real Estate Partnership for which it acts as a general partner. Each general partner of the Other Real Estate Partnerships is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
As of December 31, 2013, we owned 587 industrial properties located in 24 states, containing an aggregate of approximately 54.9 million square feet of gross leasable area ("GLA"). On a combined basis, as of December 31, 2013, the Other Real Estate Partnerships owned 65 industrial properties containing an aggregate of approximately 8.1 million square feet of GLA.
Profits, losses and distributions of us, the LLCs and Other Real Estate Partnerships are allocated to the general partner and the limited partners or the members, as applicable, in accordance with the provisions contained within the partnership agreements, operating agreements or other ownership agreements, as applicable.
The Other Real Estate Partnerships and the Joint Ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the operating data of the Other Real Estate Partnerships and the Joint Ventures are not consolidated with that of the Consolidated Operating Partnership as presented herein.
Any references to the number of buildings and square footage in the financial statement footnotes are unaudited.
2. Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 include the accounts and operating results of the Operating Partnership, the LLCs, other partnerships and the taxable REIT subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Such financial statements present our limited partnership interests in each of the Other Real Estate Partnerships and our noncontrolling equity interests in our Joint Ventures under the equity method of accounting. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
In order to conform with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required in preparation of our financial statements to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications and Other Presentation Matters
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2012 Consolidated Balance Sheet to conform to the 2013 presentation. The results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 includes adjustments to depreciation and amortization expense of $(1,561) and $1,286, respectively, which should have been recorded during previous periods. Management evaluated the impact of the adjustments and does not believe they are material to the results of the current year or any previous period.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short term maturity of these investments.
Investment in Real Estate and Depreciation
Investment in real estate is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We review our properties on a quarterly basis for impairment and provide a provision if impairments exist. To determine if an impairment may exist, we review our properties and identify those that have had either an event of change or event of circumstances warranting further assessment of recoverability (such as a decrease in occupancy or decline in general market conditions). If further assessment of recoverability is needed, we estimate the future net cash flows expected to result from the use of the property and its eventual disposition on an individual property basis. If the sum of the expected future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the property on an individual property basis, we will recognize an impairment loss based upon the estimated fair value of such property. For properties we consider held for sale, we cease depreciating the properties and value the properties at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. If circumstances arise that were previously considered unlikely, and, as a result, we decide not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, we will reclassify such property as held and used. Such property is measured at the lower of its carrying amount (adjusted for any depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used) or fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. We classify properties as held for sale when all criteria within the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the "FASB") guidance on the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets are met.
Interest costs, real estate taxes, compensation costs of development personnel and other directly related costs incurred during construction periods are capitalized and depreciated commencing with the date the property is substantially completed. Upon substantial completion, we reclassify construction in progress to building, tenant improvements and leasing commissions. Such costs begin to be capitalized to the development projects from the point we are undergoing necessary activities to get the development ready for its intended use and ceases when the development projects are substantially completed and held available for occupancy.
Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:
|
| |
| Years |
Buildings and Improvements | 7 to 50 |
Land Improvements | 3 to 20 |
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment | 4 to 10 |
Tenant Improvements | Shorter of Lease Term or Useful Life |
Construction expenditures for tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing commissions (inclusive of compensation costs of personnel attributable to leasing) are capitalized and amortized over the terms of each specific lease. Capitalized compensation costs of personnel attributable to leasing relate to time directly attributable to originating leases with independent third parties that result directly from and are essential to originating those leases and would not have been incurred had these leasing transactions not occurred. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Expenditures for improvements are capitalized.
Upon acquisition of a property, we allocate the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which generally consists of land, buildings, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and intangible assets including in-place leases, above market and below market leases and tenant relationships. We allocate the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Acquired above and below market leases are valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below market fixed rate renewal options for below market leases. The above market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the below market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases.
The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships, which are included as components of deferred leasing intangibles, net are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships) as adjustments to depreciation and other amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease early, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvements, leasing commissions, above and below market leases, the in-place lease value and tenant relationships is immediately written off.
Deferred leasing intangibles, net of accumulated amortization, included in our total assets and total liabilities consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
In-Place Leases | $ | 14,045 |
| | $ | 15,216 |
|
Above Market Leases | 3,004 |
| | 3,829 |
|
Tenant Relationships | 9,532 |
| | 10,329 |
|
Total Included in Total Assets, Net of $26,663 and $32,614 of Accumulated Amortization | $ | 26,581 |
| | $ | 29,374 |
|
Below Market Leases | $ | 11,879 |
| | $ | 13,597 |
|
Total Included in Total Liabilities, Net of $7,604 and $8,527 of Accumulated Amortization | $ | 11,879 |
| | $ | 13,597 |
|
Amortization expense related to in-place leases and tenant relationships, exclusive of amortization expense related to in-place leases and tenant relationships included in discontinued operations, was $5,615, $6,303 and $9,202 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Rental revenues increased by $465, $666 and $1,340 related to net amortization of above/(below) market leases, exclusive of net amortization related to above/(below) market leases included in discontinued operations, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We will recognize net amortization related to deferred leasing intangibles over the next five years, for properties owned as of December 31, 2013 as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Estimated Amortization of In-Place Leases and Tenant Relationships | | Estimated Net Increase to Rental Revenues Related to Above and Below Market Leases |
2014 | $ | 4,652 |
| | $ | 388 |
|
2015 | $ | 4,086 |
| | $ | 375 |
|
2016 | $ | 3,066 |
| | $ | 888 |
|
2017 | $ | 2,797 |
| | $ | 828 |
|
2018 | $ | 1,932 |
| | $ | 756 |
|
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation
At December 31, 2013, we owned a land parcel located in Toronto, Canada for which the functional currency was determined to be the Canadian dollar. The assets and liabilities related to this land parcel are translated to U.S. dollars from the
Canadian dollar based on the current exchange rate prevailing at each balance sheet date. The income statement accounts related to this land parcel are translated using the average exchange rate for the period. The resulting translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term financing. These fees and costs are being amortized over the terms of the respective loans. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $16,520 and $14,551 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date.
Investment in and Advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships
Investment in and Advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships represents our limited partnership interests in and advances to, through the Operating Partnership, the Other Real Estate Partnerships. We account for our Investment in and Advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of earnings or losses of the Other Real Estate Partnerships is reflected in income as earned and contributions or distributions increase or decrease, respectively, our Investment in and Advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships as paid or received, respectively.
On a continuous basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our Investment in and Advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships may be impaired. An investment is impaired if our estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. Our estimates of fair value for each investment are based on a number of subjective assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, market rental rates and operating costs, the discount rate used to value the cash flows of the properties and the discount rate used to value the debt. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, our fair values estimated by management in the impairment analyses may not be realized.
Investments in Joint Ventures
Investments in joint ventures represent our limited partnership interests in our Joint Ventures. We account for our investments in joint ventures under the equity method of accounting, as we do not have a majority voting interest, operational control or financial control. Control is determined using accounting standards related to the consolidation of joint ventures and variable interest entities. In order to assess whether consolidation of a variable interest entity is required, an enterprise is required to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity ("VIE") based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Additionally, they require an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and provide a framework for the events that trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE.
Under the equity method of accounting, our share of earnings or losses of our Joint Ventures is reflected in income as earned and contributions or distributions increase or decrease our investments in joint ventures as paid or received, respectively. Differences between our carrying value of our investments in joint ventures and our underlying equity of such Joint Ventures are amortized over the respective lives of the underlying assets.
On a continuous basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our investments in joint ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired if our estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. Our estimates of fair value for each investment are based on a number of subjective assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, market rental rates and operating costs, the discount rate used to value the cash flows of the properties, the capitalization rate used to estimate the terminal value of the underlying properties and the discount rate used to value the Joint Ventures’ debt. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, our fair values estimated in the impairment analyses may not be realized.
Limited Partners Units
Limited partner Units are reported within Partners’ Capital in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 because they are not redeemable for cash or other assets (a) at a fixed or determinable date, (b) at the option of the Unitholder
or (c) upon the occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of the Operating Partnership. Redemption can be effectuated, as determined by the General Partner, either by exchanging the Units for shares of common stock of the Company on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment, or by paying cash equal to the fair market value of such shares.
The Operating Partnership is the only significant asset of the Company and economic, fiduciary and contractual means align the interests of the Company and the Operating Partnership. The Board of Directors and officers of the Company direct the Company to act when acting in its capacity as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Because of this, the Operating Partnership is deemed to have effective control of the form of redemption consideration. As of December 31, 2013, all criteria were met for the Operating Partnership to control the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of the Company’s common shares required to be delivered upon redemption of all remaining Units.
Stock Based Compensation
We measure compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognize compensation expense over the service period for awards expected to vest.
Net income, net of preferred unit distributions and redemption of preferred units, is allocated to Unitholders and participating securities based upon their proportionate share of weighted average Units plus weighted average participating securities. Participating securities are unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. Restricted stock awards granted to employees and directors are considered participating securities as they receive non-forfeitable dividend or dividend equivalents at the same rate as Units. See Note 11 for further disclosure about participating securities.
Revenue Recognition
Rental income is recognized on a straight-line method under which contractual rent increases are recognized evenly over the lease term. Tenant recovery income includes payments from tenants for real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and is recognized as revenue in the same period the related expenses are incurred by us.
Revenue is generally recognized on payments received from tenants for early lease terminations upon the effective termination of a tenant’s lease and when we have no further obligations under the lease.
Interest income on notes receivable is recognized based on the accrual method unless a significant uncertainty of collection exists. If a significant uncertainty exists, interest income is recognized as collected.
We provide an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of tenant accounts receivable including deferred rent receivable, which is estimated to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,352 and $1,852 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Deferred rent receivable in the consolidated balance sheets is shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,694 and $1,733 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For accounts receivable we deem uncollectible, we use the direct write-off method.
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
Gain on sale of real estate is recognized using the full accrual method, when appropriate. Gains relating to transactions which do not meet the full accrual method of accounting are deferred and recognized when the full accrual method of accounting criteria are met or by using the installment or deposit methods of profit recognition, as appropriate in the circumstances. As the assets are sold, their costs and related accumulated depreciation are written off with resulting gains or losses reflected in net income or loss. Estimated future costs to be incurred by us after completion of each sale are included in the determination of the gain on sales.
Notes Receivable
Notes receivable are primarily comprised of mortgage notes receivable that we have made in connection with sales of real estate assets. The notes receivable are recorded at fair value at the time of issuance. Discounts on notes receivable are accreted over the life of the related note receivable. Interest income is accrued as earned. Notes receivable are considered past due when a contractual payment is not remitted in accordance with the terms of the note agreement. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the collectability of each mortgage note receivable on an individual basis based on various factors which may include payment history, expected fair value of the collateral and internal and external credit information. A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due under the existing contractual terms. When a loan is considered impaired, the amount of the loss accrual is calculated by comparing the carrying amount of the note receivable to the present value of expected future cash flows. Since the majority of our notes receivable are collateralized by a first mortgage, the loans have risk characteristics similar to the risks in owning commercial real estate.
Income Taxes
In accordance with partnership taxation, each of the partners is responsible for reporting their share of taxable income or loss.
A benefit/provision has been made for federal, state and local income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. We may also be subject to certain federal excise and franchise taxes if we engage in certain types of transactions. In accordance with FASB’s guidance, the total benefit/provision has been separately allocated to income (loss) from continuing operations, income (loss) from discontinued operations and gain (loss) on sale of real estate. The provision for excise and franchise taxes has been reflected in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and has not been separately stated due to its insignificance.
During 2005, we recorded a $745 franchise tax reserve related to a potential state franchise tax assessment for the 1996-2001 tax years. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we received a refund from the state, representing amounts paid during 2006 related to the 1996-2001 tax years. Based on the refund received and discussions with the taxing authorities, as of December 31, 2011, management believes that it is unlikely that any franchise tax amounts will be assessed by the state for such tax years. As such, during the year ended December 31, 2011, we reversed $745 of franchise taxes. Franchise taxes are recorded within general and administrative expense.
Earnings Per Unit ("EPU")
Basic net income (loss) available to Unitholders per Unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to Unitholders by the weighted average number of Units outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) available to Unitholders per Unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to Unitholders by the sum of the weighted average number of Units outstanding and any dilutive non-participating securities for the period. See Note 11 for further disclosure about EPU.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Historically, we have used interest rate protection agreements ("Agreements") to fix the interest rate on anticipated offerings of senior unsecured notes or convert floating rate debt and preferred units to fixed rate. Receipts or payments that result from the settlement of Agreements used to fix the interest rate on anticipated offerings of senior unsecured notes are amortized over the life of the derivative or the life of the debt and included in interest expense. Receipts or payments resulting from Agreements used to convert floating rate debt to fixed rate debt are recognized as a component of interest expense. Agreements which qualify for hedge accounting are marked-to-market and any gain or loss that is effective is recognized in other comprehensive income (partners’ capital). Agreements which do not qualify for hedge accounting are marked-to-market and any gain or loss is recognized in net income (loss) available to Unitholders immediately. Amounts accumulated in other comprehensive income during the hedge period are reclassified to earnings in the same period during which the forecasted transaction or hedged item affects net income (loss). The credit risks associated with Agreements are controlled through the evaluation and monitoring of the creditworthiness of the counterparty. In the event that the counterparty fails to meet the terms of Agreements, our exposure is limited to the current value of the interest rate differential, not the notional amount, and our carrying value of Agreements on the balance sheet. See Note 16 for more information on the Agreements.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments other than our derivatives include tenant accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable, other accrued expenses, mortgage loans payable, unsecured credit facility and senior unsecured notes. The fair values of the tenant accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued expenses approximate their carrying or contract values. See Note 7 for the fair values of the mortgage loans payable, unsecured credit facility and senior unsecured notes and see Note 4 for the fair value of our notes receivable.
Discontinued Operations
The FASB’s guidance on financial reporting for the disposal of long lived assets requires that the results of operations and gains or losses on the sale of property or property held for sale be presented in discontinued operations if both of the following criteria are met: (a) the operations and cash flows of the property have been (or will be) eliminated from our ongoing operations as a result of the disposal transaction and (b) we will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the property after the disposal transaction. The guidance also requires prior period results of operations for these properties to be reclassified and presented in discontinued operations in prior consolidated statements of operations.
Segment Reporting
Management views the Consolidated Operating Partnership as a single segment based on its method of internal reporting.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, "Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2013-02"). ASU 2013-02 requires that public companies present, either in a single note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. ASU 2013-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and is to be applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
4. Investment in Real Estate
Acquisitions
In 2011, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.7 million square feet of GLA through the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture (see Note 6). The gross agreed-upon fair value for the industrial property was $30,625, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the industrial property. The acquisition was funded through the assumption of a mortgage loan, whose carrying value approximated fair market value, in the amount of $24,417 and a cash payment of $5,277 (85% of the net fair value of the acquisition). We accounted for this transaction as a step acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting. Due to the change in control that occurred, we recorded a gain during the year ended December 31, 2011 of $689 related to the difference between our carrying value and fair value of our equity interest on the acquisition date.
In 2012, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA through the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture (see Note 6) and several land parcels. The gross agreed-upon fair value for the industrial property was $21,819, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the industrial property. The acquisition was funded through the assumption of a mortgage loan, which was subsequently paid off on the date of acquisition and whose carrying value approximated fair market value, in the amount of $12,026 and a cash payment of $8,324 (85% of the net fair value of the acquisition). We accounted for this transaction as a step acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting. Due to the change in control that occurred, we recorded a gain during the year ended December 31, 2012 of $776 related to the difference between our carrying value and fair value of our equity interest on the acquisition date. The purchase price of the land parcels was approximately $40,003, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the land parcels.
In 2013, we acquired two industrial properties, one of which we acquired through the acquisition of 100% of the equity interest in the limited liability company that owned the industrial property, comprising approximately 1.1 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels. One of the two industrial properties was vacant upon acquisition. The purchase price of these acquisitions totaled approximately $72,812, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the industrial properties and land parcels.
We value third party acquisitions and acquisitions of unconsolidated joint venture partner interests in industrial properties on a similar basis, generally by applying an income capitalization approach. The fair value measurements are based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 measurements, as discussed below. The fair value estimates for each industrial property acquired from our joint venture partner during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were based on a weighted average capitalization rate approximating 7.3% and 8.4%, respectively. The fair value measurements also include consideration of the fair market value of debt.
Intangible Assets (Liabilities) Subject To Amortization in the Period of Acquisition
The fair value at the date of acquisition of in-place leases, tenant relationships and below market leases recorded due to the real estate properties acquired for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, which are recorded as deferred leasing intangibles, are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
In-Place Leases | $ | 2,807 |
| | $ | 1,750 |
|
Tenant Relationships | $ | 1,914 |
| | $ | 1,012 |
|
Below Market Leases | $ | (188 | ) | | $ | (102 | ) |
The weighted average life in months of in-place leases, tenant relationships and below market leases recorded at the time of acquisition as a result of the real estate properties acquired for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
|
| | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
In-Place Leases | 52 | | 118 |
Tenant Relationships | 112 | | 178 |
Below Market Leases | 52 | | 118 |
Sales and Discontinued Operations
In 2011, we sold 34 industrial properties comprising approximately 2.9 million square feet of GLA and one land parcel. Gross proceeds from the sales of the industrial properties and one land parcel were approximately $81,693. Included in the 34 industrial properties sold is one industrial property totaling approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA that we transferred title to a lender in satisfaction of a non-recourse mortgage loan. The gain on sale of real estate was approximately $20,184, of which $18,814 is shown in discontinued operations. The 34 sold industrial properties meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the 34 sold industrial properties are included in discontinued operations. The results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the one land parcel, which does not meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations, is included in continuing operations.
In 2012, we sold 26 industrial properties comprising approximately 4.1 million square feet of GLA and one land parcel. Gross proceeds from the sales of the industrial properties and one land parcel were approximately $83,098. The gain on sale of real estate was approximately $16,535, of which $12,758 is shown in discontinued operations. The 26 sold industrial properties meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the 26 industrial properties sold are included in discontinued operations. The results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the one land parcel, which does not meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations, is included in continuing operations.
In 2013, we sold 65 industrial properties comprising approximately 2.8 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels. Gross proceeds from the sales of the industrial properties and land parcels were approximately $138,769. The gain on sale of real estate was approximately $33,687, of which $32,657 is shown in discounted operations. The 65 sold industrial properties meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the 65 industrial properties sold are included in discontinued operations. The results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the several land parcels, which do not meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations, are included in continuing operations.
The following table discloses certain information regarding the industrial properties included in our discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Total Revenues | $ | 10,209 |
| | $ | 20,552 |
| | $ | 30,777 |
|
Property Expenses | (4,133 | ) | | (8,490 | ) | | (12,438 | ) |
Impairment of Real Estate | (1,605 | ) | | (1,121 | ) | | (6,214 | ) |
Depreciation and Amortization | (3,494 | ) | | (7,561 | ) | | (8,174 | ) |
Interest Expense | — |
| | — |
| | (63 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 32,657 |
| | 12,758 |
| | 18,814 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes | — |
| | — |
| | (1,246 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations | $ | 33,634 |
| | $ | 16,138 |
| | $ | 21,456 |
|
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had notes receivable and accrued interest outstanding, issued in connection with sales of industrial properties, of approximately $52,605 and $40,771, net of a discount of $191 and $255, respectively, which are included as a component of prepaid expenses and other assets, net. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of the notes receivable, including accrued interest, was $53,482 and $44,352, respectively. The fair value of our notes receivable was determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans with similar remaining maturities would be made to other borrowers. The current market rates we utilized were internally estimated; therefore, we have concluded that our determination of fair value of our notes receivable was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs, as discussed below.
Impairment Charges
During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recorded the following net non-cash impairment charges (reversals):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Sold Operating Properties | $ | 1,605 |
| | $ | 1,121 |
| | $ | 6,214 |
|
Impairment—Discontinued Operations | $ | 1,605 |
| | $ | 1,121 |
| | $ | 6,214 |
|
Sold Land Parcels | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (5,918 | ) |
Operating Properties Not Held for Sale | 1,047 |
| | (20 | ) | | (1,768 | ) |
Land Parcels | — |
| | — |
| | (607 | ) |
Impairment—Continuing Operations | $ | 1,047 |
| | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | (8,293 | ) |
Total Net Impairment | $ | 2,652 |
| | $ | 1,101 |
| | $ | (2,079 | ) |
The net impairment charges for assets that qualify to be classified as held for sale are calculated as the difference between the carrying value of the properties and land parcels and the estimated fair value, less costs to sell. The impairment charges for assets not held for sale are calculated as the difference between the carrying value of the properties and land parcels and the estimated fair value. The net impairment charges recorded during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are due to marketing certain properties and land parcels for sale and our assessment of the likelihood and timing of a potential sale transaction. Catch-up depreciation and amortization has been recorded during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, if applicable, for certain assets that are no longer classified as held for sale.
The accounting guidance for the fair value measurement provisions for the impairment of long lived assets establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The real estate assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were either sold or are recorded at carrying value at December 31, 2013.
The fair market values were determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analyses using expected cash flows, internal valuations of real estate and third party offers. For operational real estate assets, the most significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analyses included the discount rate, projected occupancy levels, market rental rates, capital expenditures and the terminal capitalization rate. For the valuation of land parcels, we reviewed recent comparable sales transactions, to the extent available, or if not available, we considered older comparable transactions, adjusted upward or downward to reflect management’s assumptions about current market conditions. In all cases, members of our management team that were responsible for the individual markets where the land parcels were located determined the internal valuations. Valuations based on third party offers include bona fide contract prices and letter of intent amounts that we believe are indicative of fair value.
5. Investments in and Advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships
The investments in and advances to Other Real Estate Partnerships reflects the Operating Partnership’s limited partnership equity interests in the entities referred to in Note 1 to these consolidated financial statements.
Summarized condensed financial information as derived from the financial statements of the Other Real Estate Partnerships is presented below:
Condensed Combined Balance Sheets:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
ASSETS | | | |
Assets: | | | |
Net Investment in Real Estate | $ | 276,294 |
| | $ | 264,284 |
|
Note Receivable | 119,364 |
| | 142,982 |
|
Other Assets, Net | 33,234 |
| | 34,476 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 428,892 |
| | $ | 441,742 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | | | |
Liabilities: | | | |
Mortgage Loans Payable | $ | 97,675 |
| | $ | 107,287 |
|
Other Liabilities, Net | 13,795 |
| | 11,570 |
|
Partners’ Capital | 317,422 |
| | 322,885 |
|
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital | $ | 428,892 |
| | $ | 441,742 |
|
Operating Partnership’s Share of Equity | $ | 316,188 |
| | $ | 321,663 |
|
Basis Differentials (1) | (119,865 | ) | | (143,559 | ) |
Carrying Value of the Operating Partnership’s Investments in Other Real Estate Partnerships | $ | 196,323 |
| | $ | 178,104 |
|
_____________________
| |
(1) | This amount represents the aggregate difference between the Operating Partnership’s historical cost basis and the basis reflected at the Other Real Estate Partnerships’ level. Basis differentials relate to the elimination of a note receivable and related accrued interest between a Other Real Estate Partnership and wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. |
Condensed Combined Statements of Operations:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Total Revenues | $ | 39,290 |
| | $ | 38,882 |
| | $ | 39,001 |
|
Property Expenses | (12,286 | ) | | (11,302 | ) | | (11,509 | ) |
Impairment of Real Estate | — |
| | 172 |
| | 582 |
|
Depreciation and Other Amortization | (12,207 | ) | | (13,992 | ) | | (12,759 | ) |
Interest Income | 4,999 |
| | 7,776 |
| | 11,697 |
|
Interest Expense | (4,701 | ) | | (5,712 | ) | | (5,024 | ) |
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs | (187 | ) | | (208 | ) | | (178 | ) |
Loss from Retirement of Debt | (214 | ) | | — |
| | (160 | ) |
Income from Continuing Operations | 14,694 |
| | 15,616 |
| | 21,650 |
|
Discontinued Operations: | | | | | |
Income Attributable to Discontinued Operations | 276 |
| | 118 |
| | 462 |
|
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Real Estate | 1,687 |
| | (93 | ) | | 1,605 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations | 1,963 |
| | 25 |
| | 2,067 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 70 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net Income | $ | 16,727 |
| | $ | 15,641 |
| | $ | 23,717 |
|
6. Investments in Joint Ventures
On May 16, 2003, we entered into the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture with an institutional investor to invest in industrial properties. We own a 15% equity interest in and provide property management services to the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. At December 31, 2013, the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture owned four industrial properties comprising approximately 2.5 million square feet of GLA. During January 2014, the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture sold two properties comprising approximately 1.6 million square feet of GLA.
The 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture is considered a variable interest entity in accordance with the FASB guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. We continue to conclude that we are not the primary beneficiary of this venture. As of December 31, 2013, our investment in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture is $907. Our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our investment. We acquired the 85% equity interest in one property on February 13, 2012 and the 85% equity interest in another property on May 26, 2011, in each case from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture (see Note 4).
During December 2007, we entered into the 2007 Europe Joint Venture with an institutional investor to invest in, own, develop, redevelop and operate industrial properties. We continue to hold our 10% equity interest in the 2007 Europe Joint Venture. As of December 31, 2013, the 2007 Europe Joint Venture did not own any properties.
During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recognized fees of $231, $516 and $970, respectively, from our Joint Ventures.
The combined summarized financial information of the investments in Joint Ventures is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Condensed Combined Balance Sheets: | | | |
Gross Investment in Real Estate | $ | 28,389 |
| | $ | 115,488 |
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation | (4,253 | ) | | (38,535 | ) |
Net Investment in Real Estate | 24,136 |
| | 76,953 |
|
Real Estate and Other Assets Held for Sale, Net of Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of $40,387 and $0 | 48,408 |
| | — |
|
Other Assets | 7,690 |
| | 17,327 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 80,234 |
| | $ | 94,280 |
|
| | | |
Indebtedness | $ | 24,656 |
| | $ | 81,764 |
|
Other Liabilities | 1,615 |
| | 4,817 |
|
Indebtedness, Accrued Interest Expense and Leasing Intangibles Held for Sale, Net of Accumulated Amortization of $3,208 and $0 | 48,651 |
| | — |
|
Equity | 5,312 |
| | 7,699 |
|
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 80,234 |
| | $ | 94,280 |
|
Company’s Share of Equity | $ | 896 |
| | $ | 1,252 |
|
Basis Differentials(1) | (200 | ) | | (448 | ) |
Carrying Value of the Company’s Investments in Joint Ventures | $ | 696 |
| | $ | 804 |
|
_______________
| |
(1) | This amount represents the aggregate difference between our historical cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level. Basis differentials are primarily comprised of impairments we recorded to reduce certain of our investments in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture to fair value and certain deferred fees which are not reflected at the joint venture level. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Condensed Combined Statements of Operations: | | | | | |
Total Revenues | $ | 3,433 |
| | $ | 3,371 |
| | $ | 3,411 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | |
Property Expenses and Other | 1,070 |
| | 1,096 |
| | 1,226 |
|
Depreciation and Other Amortization | 931 |
| | 764 |
| | 836 |
|
Interest Expense | 1,532 |
| | 1,633 |
| | 1,643 |
|
Total Expenses | 3,533 |
| | 3,493 |
| | 3,705 |
|
Discontinued Operations: | | | | | |
Loss Attributable to Discontinued Operations | (1,300 | ) | | (1,607 | ) | | (1,587 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 513 |
| | 4,974 |
| | 3,137 |
|
(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations | (787 | ) | | 3,367 |
| | 1,550 |
|
Net (Loss) Income | $ | (887 | ) | | $ | 3,245 |
| | $ | 1,256 |
|
Equity in Income of Joint Ventures | $ | 136 |
| | $ | 1,559 |
| | $ | 980 |
|
7. Indebtedness
The following table discloses certain information regarding our indebtedness:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding Balance at | | Interest Rate at December 31, 2013 | | Effective Interest Rate at Issuance | | Maturity Date | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | |
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net | $ | 580,215 |
| | $ | 656,329 |
| | 4.03% – 8.26% | 4.03% – 8.26% | October 2014 – September 2022 | |
Unamortized Premiums | (115 | ) | | (161 | ) | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Loans Payable, Gross | $ | 580,100 |
| | $ | 656,168 |
| | | | | | | |
Senior Unsecured Notes, Net | | | | | | | | | | |
2016 Notes | $ | 159,566 |
| | $ | 159,510 |
| | 5.750% | | 5.91% | | 01/15/16 | |
2017 Notes | 54,960 |
| | 55,385 |
| | 7.500% | | 7.52% | | 12/01/17 | |
2027 Notes | 6,066 |
| | 6,066 |
| | 7.150% | | 7.11% | | 05/15/27 | |
2028 Notes | 31,883 |
| | 55,261 |
| | 7.600% | | 8.13% | | 07/15/28 | |
2032 Notes | 10,514 |
| | 11,500 |
| | 7.750% | | 7.87% | | 04/15/32 | |
2014 Notes | 81,149 |
| | 79,683 |
| | 6.420% | | 6.54% | | 06/01/14 | |
2017 II Notes | 101,778 |
| | 106,745 |
| | 5.950% | | 6.37% | | 05/15/17 | |
Subtotal | $ | 445,916 |
| | $ | 474,150 |
| | | | | | | |
Unamortized Discounts | 980 |
| | 2,570 |
| | | | | | | |
Senior Unsecured Notes, Gross | $ | 446,896 |
| | $ | 476,720 |
| | | | | | | |
Unsecured Credit Facility* | $ | 173,000 |
| | $ | 98,000 |
| | 1.666% | | 1.666% | | 09/29/17 | |
* The maturity date may be extended an additional year at our election, subject to certain restrictions.
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net
During the year ended December 31, 2012, we originated the following mortgage loans:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Financing | | Loan Principal | | Interest Rate | | Origination Date | | Maturity Date | | Amortization Period | | Number of Industrial Properties Collateralizing Mortgage | | GLA (In millions) | | Properties Carrying Value at December 31, 2012 |
I-V | | $ | 97,561 |
| | 4.03 | % | | August 2012 | | September 2022 | | 30-year | | 30 |
| | 3.7 |
| | $ | 100,443 |
|
For Mortgage Financings I through V, principal prepayments were prohibited for 12 months after loan origination, after which prepayment premiums are calculated at the greater of yield maintenance or 1% of the outstanding balance.
During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we paid off and retired prior to maturity mortgage loans payable in the amount of $64,395 and $14,112, respectively. In connection with these pay offs prior to maturity, we recognized $1,364 and $361 as loss from retirement of debt for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
As of December 31, 2013, mortgage loans payable are collateralized, and in some instances cross-collateralized, by industrial properties with a net carrying value of $729,348. We believe the Operating Partnership and the Company were in compliance with all covenants relating to mortgage loans payable as of December 31, 2013.
Senior Unsecured Notes, Net
During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we repurchased and retired the following senior unsecured notes prior to maturity:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal Amount Repurchased | | Purchase Price |
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
2014 Notes | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,439 |
|
2017 Notes | 430 |
| | 4,223 |
| | 482 |
| | 4,632 |
|
2017 II Notes | 5,000 |
| | — |
| | 5,300 |
| | — |
|
2028 Notes | 23,394 |
| | 69,680 |
| | 26,547 |
| | 72,541 |
|
2032 Notes | 1,000 |
| | 23,400 |
| | 1,163 |
| | 24,001 |
|
Total | $ | 29,824 |
| | $ | 106,303 |
| | $ | 33,492 |
| | $ | 110,613 |
|
In connection with these repurchases prior to maturity, we recognized $5,003 and $9,323 as loss from retirement of debt for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, which is the difference between the repurchase price and the principal amount retired, net of the pro rata write-off of the unamortized debt issue discount, the unamortized deferred financing costs, the unamortized settlement amount of the interest rate protection agreements and the professional services fees related to the repurchases of $28, $191, $1,116 and $0 and $598, $728, $3,247 and $440, respectively.
On April 16, 2012, we paid off and retired our 2012 Notes, at maturity, in the amount of $61,829.
The indentures governing our senior unsecured notes contain certain financial covenants, including limitations on incurrence of debt and debt service coverage. We believe the Operating Partnership and the Company were in compliance with all covenants relating to senior unsecured notes as of December 31, 2013. However, these financial covenants are complex and there can be no assurance that these provisions would not be interpreted by our noteholders in a manner that could impose and cause us to incur material costs.
Unsecured Credit Facility
On July 19, 2013, we amended and restated our existing $450,000 revolving credit agreement (the "Old Credit Facility"), increasing the borrowing capacity thereunder to $625,000 (as amended and restated, the "Unsecured Credit Facility"). We may request that the borrowing capacity under the Unsecured Credit Facility be increased to $825,000, subject to certain restrictions. The amendment extended the maturity date from December 12, 2014 to September 29, 2017 with an option to extend an additional one year at our election, subject to certain restrictions. At December 31, 2013, the Unsecured Credit Facility provides for interest only payments at LIBOR plus 150 basis points. The interest rate on the Unsecured Credit Facility varies based on our leverage ratio. In the event we achieve an investment grade rating from one of certain rating agencies, the rate may be decreased at our election, based on the investment grade rating. In connection with the amendment of the Old Credit Facility, we wrote off $56 of unamortized deferred financing costs, which is included in loss from retirement of debt for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The Unsecured Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants, including limitations on incurrence of debt and debt service coverage. Under the Unsecured Credit Facility, an event of default can also occur if the lenders, in their good faith judgment, determine that a material adverse change has occurred which could prevent timely repayment or materially impair our ability to perform our obligations under the loan agreement. We believe that we were in compliance with all covenants relating to the Unsecured Credit Facility as of December 31, 2013. However, these financial covenants are complex and there can be no assurance that these provisions would not be interpreted by our lenders in a manner that could impose and cause us to incur material costs.
Indebtedness
The following is a schedule of the stated maturities and scheduled principal payments of our indebtedness, exclusive of premiums and discounts, for the next five years ending December 31, and thereafter:
|
| | | |
| Amount |
2014 | $ | 111,518 |
|
2015 | 34,726 |
|
2016 | 266,262 |
|
2017 | 339,783 |
|
2018 | 126,951 |
|
Thereafter | 320,756 |
|
Total | $ | 1,199,996 |
|
Fair Value
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of our indebtedness was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
| Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net | $ | 580,215 |
| | $ | 585,449 |
| | $ | 656,329 |
| | $ | 699,903 |
|
Senior Unsecured Debt, Net | 445,916 |
| | 482,781 |
| | 474,150 |
| | 516,943 |
|
Unsecured Credit Facility | 173,000 |
| | 173,000 |
| | 98,000 |
| | 98,192 |
|
Total | $ | 1,199,131 |
| | $ | 1,241,230 |
| | $ | 1,228,479 |
| | $ | 1,315,038 |
|
The fair values of our mortgage loans payable were determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made based upon similar leverage levels and similar remaining maturities. The current market rates we utilized were internally estimated. The fair value of the senior unsecured debt was determined by using rates, as advised by our bankers in certain cases, that are based upon recent trades within the same series of the senior unsecured debt, recent trades for senior unsecured debt with comparable maturities, recent trades for fixed rate unsecured debt from companies with profiles similar to ours, as well as overall economic conditions. The fair value of the Unsecured Credit Facility was determined by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining term, assuming no repayment until maturity. We have concluded that our determination of fair value for our mortgage loans payable, senior unsecured debt and Unsecured Credit Facility was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs.
8. Partners’ Capital
We have issued general partnership units and limited partnership units and preferred general partnership units. The general partnership units resulted from capital contributions from the Company. The limited partnership units are issued in conjunction with the acquisition of certain properties (see discussion below). Subject to certain lock-up periods, holders of limited partner Units of the Operating Partnership can redeem their Units by providing written notification to the General Partner of the Operating Partnership. Unless the General Partner provides notice of a redemption restriction to the holder, redemption must be made within seven business days after receipt of the holder’s notice. The redemption can be effectuated, as determined by the General Partner, either by exchanging the Units for shares of common stock of the Company on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment, or by paying cash equal to the fair market value of such shares. Prior requests for redemption have generally been fulfilled with shares of common stock of the Company, and we intend to continue this practice. If each Unit of the Operating Partnership were redeemed as of December 31, 2013, we could satisfy our redemption obligations by making an aggregate cash payment of approximately $80,223 or by issuing 4,597,313 shares of the Company’s common stock. The preferred general partnership units result from preferred capital contributions from the Company. The preferred general partnership units had an aggregate liquidation priority of $75,000 and $225,000 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We are required to make all required distributions on the preferred general partnership units prior to any distribution of cash or assets to the holders of the Units. The consent of the holder of the limited partnership units is required to alter such holder’s rights as to allocations and distributions, to alter or modify such holder’s rights with respect to redemption, to cause the early termination of the Consolidated Operating Partnership, or to amend the provisions of the partnership agreement which requires such consent.
Preferred Contributions:
On May 27, 2004, the Company issued 50,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of the Company’s 6.236%, Series F Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (the "Series F Preferred Stock"), at an initial offering price of $1,000.00 per Depositary Share. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock were contributed to us in exchange for 6.236% Series F Cumulative Preferred Units (the "Series F Preferred Units") and are reflected in our financial statements as a general partner preferred unit contribution. Dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of initial issuance and are payable quarterly in arrears. The coupon rate of the Series F Preferred Stock resets every quarter at 2.375% plus the greater of (i) the 30 year Treasury constant maturity treasury ("CMT") Rate, (ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate or (iii) 3-month LIBOR. For the fourth quarter of 2013, the coupon rate was 6.065%. With respect to the payment of dividends and amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series F Preferred Stock ranks senior to payments on the Company’s Common Stock and pari passu with the Company’s Series G Preferred Stock (hereinafter defined). The Series F Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash at the Company's option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of $1,000.00 per Depositary Share, or $50,000 in the aggregate, plus dividends accrued and unpaid to the redemption date. The Series F Preferred Units have no stated maturity and are not convertible into any other securities of the Company. In October 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to mitigate our exposure to floating interest rates related to the forecasted reset rate of the coupon rate of the Series F Preferred Stock, which matured on October 1, 2013 (see Note 16). On February 3, 2014, the Company called for the redemption of the Series F Preferred Stock (see Note 19).
On May 27, 2004, the Company issued 25,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of the Company’s 7.236%, Series G Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (the "Series G Preferred Stock"), at an initial offering price of $1,000.00 per Depositary Share. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock were contributed to us in exchange for 7.236% Series G Cumulative Preferred Units (the "Series G Preferred Units") and are reflected in our financial statements as a general partner preferred unit contribution. Dividends on the Series G Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of initial issuance and are payable semi-annually in arrears for the period from the date of original issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock through March 31, 2014 (the "Series G Initial Fixed Rate Period"), commencing on September 30, 2004, at a rate of 7.236% per annum of the liquidation preference (the "Series G Initial Distribution Rate") (equivalent to $72.36 per Depositary Share). On or after March 31, 2014, the Series G Initial Distribution Rate is subject to reset, at the Company’s option, subject to certain conditions and parameters, at fixed or floating rates and periods. Fixed rates and periods will be determined through a remarketing procedure. Floating rates during floating rate periods will equal 2.500% (the initial credit spread), plus the greater of (i) the 3-month LIBOR, (ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate, and (iii) the 30 year Treasury CMT Rate, reseting quarterly. Dividends on the Series G Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears for floating rate periods. With respect to the payment of dividends and amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series G Preferred Stock ranks senior to payments on the Company’s Common Stock and pari passu with the Company’s Series F Preferred Stock. On or after March 31, 2014, the Series G Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash at the Company's option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of $1,000.00 per Depositary Share, or $25,000 in the aggregate, plus dividends accrued and unpaid to the redemption date. The Series G Preferred Units have no stated maturity and are not convertible into any other securities of the Company. On February 3, 2014, the Company called for the redemption of the Series G Preferred Stock (see Note 19).
On January 13, 2006, the Company issued 6,000,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/10,000th of a share of the Company’s 7.25%, Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (the "Series J Preferred Stock"), at an initial offering price of $25.00 per Depositary Share. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Series J Preferred Stock were contributed to us in exchange for 7.25% Series J Cumulative Preferred Units (the "Series J Preferred Units") and are reflected in our financial statements as a general partner preferred unit contribution. The Series J Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash at the Company's option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equivalent to $25.00 per Depositary Share, or $150,000 in the aggregate, plus dividends accrued and unpaid to the redemption date. On December 21, 2012, the Company redeemed 2,000,000 Depositary Shares of the Series J Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per Depositary Share, and paid a pro-rated fourth quarter dividend of $0.407812 per Depositary Share, totaling $816. An equivalent number of Series J Preferred Units were redeemed on December 21, 2012 as well. One-third of the initial offering costs associated with the issuance of the Series J Preferred Units, as well as costs associated with the partial redemption, totaled $1,804 and are reflected as a deduction from net loss in determining earnings per unit for the year ended December 31, 2012. The remaining 4,000,000 Depositary Shares of the Series J Preferred Stock were redeemed on April 11, 2013, at a redemption price of $25.00 per Depositary Share, and the Company paid a pro-rated second quarter dividend of $0.055382 per Depositary Share, totaling $221. An equivalent number of Series J Preferred Units were redeemed on April 11, 2013 as well. The remaining initial offering costs associated with the issuance of the Series J Preferred Units, as well as costs associated with the redemption, totaled $3,546 and are reflected as a deduction from net income in determining earnings per unit for the year ended December 31, 2013.
On August 21, 2006, the Company issued 2,000,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/10,000th of a share of the Company’s 7.25%, Series K Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (the "Series K Preferred
Stock"), at an initial offering price of $25.00 per Depositary Share. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Series K Preferred Stock were contributed to us in exchange for 7.25% Series K Cumulative Preferred Units (the "Series K Preferred Units") and are reflected in our financial statements as a general partner preferred unit contribution. The Series K Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash at the Company's option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equivalent to $25.00 per Depositary Share, or $50,000 in the aggregate, plus dividends accrued and unpaid to the redemption date. On July 18, 2013, the Company fully redeemed the Series K Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per Depositary Share, and paid a pro-rated third quarter dividend of $0.090625 per Depositary Share, totaling $181. An equivalent number of Series K Preferred Units were redeemed on July 18, 2013 as well. The initial offering costs associated with the issuance of the Series K Preferred Units, as well as costs associated with the redemption, totaled $2,121 and are reflected as a deduction from net income in determining earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The Company has 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized. All series of preferred stock have no stated maturity (although the Company may redeem all such preferred stock on or following their optional redemption dates at its option, in whole or in part).
The following table summarizes the preferred units outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended 2013 | | Year Ended 2012 |
| Units Outstanding | | Liquidation Preference | | Units Outstanding | | Liquidation Preference |
Series F Preferred Units | 500 |
| | $ | 50,000 |
| | 500 |
| | $ | 50,000 |
|
Series G Preferred Units | 250 |
| | $ | 25,000 |
| | 250 |
| | $ | 25,000 |
|
Series J Preferred Units | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 400 |
| | $ | 100,000 |
|
Series K Preferred Units | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 200 |
| | $ | 50,000 |
|
Unit Contributions
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, 105,028, 535,026, and 125,784 limited partnership units, respectively, were converted into an equivalent number of general partnership units, resulting in a reclassification of $996, $4,763 and $1,109, respectively, between Limited Partners Units and General Partner Units.
During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company issued 8,400,000, 9,400,000 and 17,300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in an underwritten public offering. Net proceeds to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, were $132,050, $116,715 and $201,150, respectively. The proceeds were contributed to us in exchange for Units and are reflected in our financial statements as a general partner contribution.
On February 28, 2011, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into distribution agreements with sales agents to sell up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, for up to $100,000 aggregate gross sale proceeds, from time to time in "at-the-market" offerings (the "2011 ATM"). During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 115,856 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2011 ATM resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $1,391. These net proceeds were contributed to us in exchange for an equivalent number of Units and are reflected in our financial statements as a general partner contribution. On February 29, 2012, we terminated the 2011 ATM in preparation for the commencement of the 2012 ATM (defined hereafter).
On March 1, 2012, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into distribution agreements with sales agents to sell up to 12,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, for up to $125,000 aggregate gross sale proceeds, from time to time in "at-the-market" offerings (the "2012 ATM"). During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company issued 2,315,704 and 1,532,598 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock under the 2012 ATM resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $41,735 and $18,063. These net proceeds were contributed to us in exchange for an equivalent number of Units and are reflected in our financial statements as a general partner contribution.
Under the terms of the ATMs, sales are to be made primarily in transactions that are deemed to be "at-the-market" offerings, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange or sales made through a market maker other than on an exchange or by privately negotiated transactions.
The following table is a roll-forward of the General Partnership and Limited Partnership Units outstanding, including unvested general partner restricted units (see Note 15), for the three years ended December 31, 2013:
|
| | |
| General Partnership and Limited Partnership Units Outstanding |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | 74,204,447 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Units | 17,646,586 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Restricted Units | 292,339 |
|
Repurchase and Retirement of Restricted Units | (98,603 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | 92,044,769 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Units | 11,085,905 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Restricted Units | 565,137 |
|
Repurchase and Retirement of Restricted Units | (225,557 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | 103,470,254 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Units | 10,853,693 |
|
Issuance of General Partner Restricted Units | 284,461 |
|
Repurchase and Retirement of Restricted Units | (30,245 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | 114,578,163 |
|
Distributions
The coupon rate of our Series F Preferred Units resets every quarter at 2.375% plus the greater of (i) the 30 year Treasury CMT Rate, (ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate or (iii) 3-month LIBOR. For the fourth quarter of 2013, the coupon rate was 6.065%. See Note 16 for additional derivative information related to the Series F Preferred Units coupon rate reset.
The following table summarizes distributions accrued during the past three years:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Total Distribution * | | Total Distribution * | | Total Distribution |
General Partner/Limited Partner Units | $ | 38,862 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Series F Preferred Units | $ | 2,896 |
| | $ | 2,728 |
| | $ | 3,256 |
|
Series G Preferred Units | $ | 1,809 |
| | $ | 1,809 |
| | $ | 1,809 |
|
Series J Preferred Units | $ | 2,034 |
| | $ | 10,785 |
| | $ | 10,875 |
|
Series K Preferred Units | $ | 1,994 |
| | $ | 3,625 |
| | $ | 3,625 |
|
________________________
| |
* | The second quarter 2013 and fourth quarter 2012 distribution related to the redeemed Series J Preferred Units was pro-rated as discussed in the "Preferred Contributions" section. The third quarter 2013 distribution related to the redeemed Series K Preferred Units was pro-rated as discussed in the "Preferred Contributions" section. |
9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following tables summarize the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component and the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest Rate Protection Agreements | | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment | | Total |
Balance as of December 31, 2012 | $ | (7,008 | ) | | $ | 179 |
| | $ | (6,829 | ) |
Other Comprehensive Loss Before Reclassifications | — |
| | (60 | ) | | (60 | ) |
Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | 3,527 |
| | — |
| | 3,527 |
|
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 3,527 |
| | (60 | ) | | 3,467 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | (3,481 | ) | | $ | 119 |
| | $ | (3,362 | ) |
|
| | | | | | |
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components | | Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations |
Interest Rate Protection Agreements | | | | |
Amortization of Interest Rate Protection Agreements | | $ | 2,411 |
| | Interest Expense |
Write-off of Unamortized Settlement Amounts of Interest Rate Protection Agreements | | 1,116 |
| | Loss from Retirement of Debt |
| | $ | 3,527 |
| | Total |
10. Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Interest Paid, Net of Interest Expense Capitalized in Connection with Development Activity | $ | 65,978 |
| | $ | 77,795 |
| | $ | 95,527 |
|
Interest Expense Capitalized in Connection with Development Activity | $ | 2,813 |
| | $ | 1,768 |
| | $ | 437 |
|
Income Taxes Paid (Refunded) | $ | 5,433 |
| | $ | (295 | ) | | $ | 1,876 |
|
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: | | | | | |
Distribution Payable on General and Limited Partner Units | $ | 9,837 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Distribution Payable on Preferred Units | $ | 452 |
| | $ | 452 |
| | $ | 4,763 |
|
Exchange of Limited Partnership Units for General Partnership Units: | | | | | |
Limited Partnership Units | $ | (996 | ) | | $ | (4,763 | ) | | $ | (1,109 | ) |
General Partnership Units | 996 |
| | 4,763 |
| | 1,109 |
|
Total | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Property Transfer to Lender in Satisfaction of Non-Recourse Mortgage Loan: | | | | | |
Net Investment in Real Estate | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (3,200 | ) |
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net | — |
| | — |
| | (1,987 | ) |
Mortgage Loan Payable, Net | — |
| | — |
| | 5,040 |
|
Loss from Retirement of Debt | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (147 | ) |
Assumption of Indebtedness and Other Liabilities in Real Estate Acquisitions | $ | 483 |
| | $ | 12,026 |
| | $ | 24,417 |
|
Notes Receivable Issued in Conjunction with Certain Property Sales | $ | 12,520 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 7,029 |
|
Accounts Payable Related to Construction in Progress and Additions to Investment in Real Estate | $ | 10,402 |
| | $ | 9,584 |
| | $ | 6,177 |
|
Write-off of Fully Depreciated Assets | $ | (52,800 | ) | | $ | (39,208 | ) | | $ | (51,434 | ) |
11. Earnings Per Unit (EPU)
The computation of basic and diluted EPU is presented below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Numerator: | | | | | |
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | $ | 6,979 |
| | $ | (22,333 | ) | | $ | (31,336 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate, Net of Income Tax Provision | 820 |
| | 3,777 |
| | 918 |
|
Preferred Unit Distributions | (8,733 | ) | | (18,947 | ) | | (19,565 | ) |
Redemption of Preferred Units | (5,667 | ) | | (1,804 | ) | | — |
|
Loss from Continuing Operations Available to Unitholders | $ | (6,601 | ) | | $ | (39,307 | ) | | $ | (49,983 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations | $ | 33,634 |
| | $ | 16,138 |
| | $ | 21,456 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations Allocable to Participating Securities | $ | (162 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations Attributable to Unitholders | $ | 33,472 |
| | $ | 16,138 |
| | $ | 21,456 |
|
Net Income (Loss) Available | $ | 27,033 |
| | $ | (23,169 | ) | | $ | (28,527 | ) |
Net Income Allocable to Participating Securities | (162 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Unitholders | 26,871 |
| | (23,169 | ) | | (28,527 | ) |
Denominator: | | | | | |
Weighted Average Units—Basic and Diluted | 111,646 |
| | 96,509 |
| | 85,913 |
|
Basic and Diluted EPU: | | | | | |
Loss from Continuing Operations Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | (0.41 | ) | | $ | (0.58 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations Attributable to Unitholders | $ | 0.30 |
| | $ | 0.17 |
| | $ | 0.25 |
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Unitholders | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.33 | ) |
Participating securities include Units that correspond to the Company's 488,861, 288,627 and 673,381 of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which participate in non-forfeitable distributions of the Operating Partnership. Under the two class method, participating security holders are allocated income, in proportion to total weighted average units outstanding, based upon the greater of net income (after reduction for preferred unit distributions and redemption of preferred units) or common distributions declared. Since participating security holders are not obligated to share in losses and no common distributions were declared during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, there was no allocation of income to participating security holders for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
The number of weighted average units—diluted is the same as the number of weighted average units—basic for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, as the effect of LTIP Unit Awards (as defined in Note 15) which do not participate in non-forfeitable dividends of the Company was excluded as its inclusion would have been antidilutive to the loss from continuing operations available to Unitholders. The following awards could be dilutive in future periods:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Number of Awards Outstanding At December 31, 2013 | | Number of Awards Outstanding At December 31, 2012 | | Number of Awards Outstanding At December 31, 2011 |
Non-Participating Securities: | | | | | |
Restricted Unit Awards | 73,400 |
| | 483,500 |
| | 731,900 |
|
Options | — |
| | — |
| | 25,201 |
|
LTIP Unit Awards | 718,960 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
12. Income Taxes
The components of income tax benefit (provision) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are comprised of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Current: | | | | | |
Federal | $ | 231 |
| | $ | (5,210 | ) | | $ | (622 | ) |
State | (264 | ) | | (253 | ) | | (502 | ) |
Foreign | — |
| | (10 | ) | | (41 | ) |
Deferred: | | | | | |
Federal | — |
| | — |
| | (284 | ) |
State | 36 |
| | (49 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Foreign | — |
| | — |
| | (697 | ) |
| $ | 3 |
| | $ | (5,522 | ) | | $ | (2,148 | ) |
Deferred income taxes represent the tax effect of the temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets (liabilities) include the following as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
| | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Impairment of Real Estate | $ | 5,185 |
| | $ | 5,519 |
|
Foreign Net Operating Loss Carryforward | 1,312 |
| | 854 |
|
Valuation Allowance | (5,357 | ) | | (5,244 | ) |
Other | 696 |
| | 617 |
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets, Net of Allowance | $ | 1,836 |
| | $ | 1,746 |
|
Straight-line Rent | (76 | ) | | (91 | ) |
Fixed Assets | (1,771 | ) | | (1,666 | ) |
Other | (122 | ) | | (158 | ) |
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities | $ | (1,969 | ) | | $ | (1,915 | ) |
Total Net Deferred Tax Liabilities | $ | (133 | ) | | $ | (169 | ) |
A valuation allowance is recorded if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. We do not have projections of future taxable income or other sources of taxable income in the taxable REIT subsidiaries significant enough to allow us to believe it is more likely than not that we will realize our deferred tax assets. Therefore, we have recorded a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and which causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax assets, is included in the current tax provision.
The income tax benefit (provision) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations and gain on sale of real estate differs from the amounts computed by applying the applicable federal statutory rate as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Tax Benefit (Provision) at Federal Rate Related to Continuing Operations | $ | 286 |
| | $ | 557 |
| | $ | (2,162 | ) |
State Tax Provision, Net of Federal Benefit (Provision) | (236 | ) | | (244 | ) | | (521 | ) |
Non-deductible Permanent Items, Net | 21 |
| | 32 |
| | (54 | ) |
IRS Audit Adjustment and Accrued Interest | 58 |
| | (5,523 | ) | | — |
|
Change in Valuation Allowance | (388 | ) | | (166 | ) | | 1,853 |
|
Foreign Taxes, Net | — |
| | (10 | ) | | (96 | ) |
Other | 262 |
| | (168 | ) | | 78 |
|
Net Income Tax Benefit (Provision) | $ | 3 |
| | $ | (5,522 | ) | | $ | (902 | ) |
We evaluate tax positions taken in the financial statements on a quarterly basis under the interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As a result of this evaluation, we may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is "more-likely-than-not" that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities. As of December 31, 2013, we do not have any unrecognized tax benefits.
We file income tax returns in the U.S., and various states and foreign jurisdictions. In general, the statutes of limitations for income tax returns remain open for the years 2010 through 2013.
IRS Tax Refund
On August 24, 2009, we received a private letter ruling from the IRS granting favorable loss treatment under Sections 331 and 336 of the Code on the tax liquidation of one of our former taxable REIT subsidiaries. On November 6, 2009, legislation was signed that allowed businesses with net operating losses for 2008 or 2009 to carry back those losses for up to five years. As a result, we received a refund from the IRS of $40,418 in the fourth quarter of 2009 (the "Refund") in connection with this tax liquidation. The IRS examination team, which is required by statute to review all refund claims in excess of $2,000 on behalf of the Joint Committee on Taxation, indicated to us that it disagreed with certain of the property valuations we obtained from an independent valuation expert in support of our fair value of the liquidated taxable REIT subsidiary and our claim for the Refund. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we reached an agreement with the regional office of the IRS on a proposed adjustment to the Refund. The total agreed-upon adjustment to taxable income was $13,700, which equates to $4,806 of taxes owed. We were also required to pay accrued interest of approximately $500. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Operating Partnership recorded a charge for the agreed-upon adjustment and the related estimated accrued interest which was reflected as a component of income tax expense. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the settlement amount was approved by the Joint Committee on Taxation and we paid the agreed upon taxes and related accrued interest.
As a result of the Joint Committee on Taxation's approval during 2013, we entered into closing agreements with the IRS that determined the timing of the settlement on the tax characterization of the limited partners of the Operating Partnership and the stockholders of the Company. Pursuant to these closing agreements, $8,238 of the preferred stock distributions for the year ended December 31, 2012 are taxable as capital gain.
13. Restructuring Costs
We committed to a plan to reduce organizational and overhead costs in October 2008 and had subsequently modified that plan during 2011 with the goal of further reducing those costs. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized $1,553 in restructuring costs, of which $1,200 related to the termination of certain office leases and $353 related to other expenses. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, $1,130 and $1,464, respectively, relating to unpaid restructuring expense was included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities.
14. Future Rental Revenues
Our properties are leased to tenants under net and semi-net operating leases. Minimum lease payments receivable, excluding tenant reimbursements of expenses, under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
|
| | | |
2014 | $ | 212,995 |
|
2015 | 186,527 |
|
2016 | 150,716 |
|
2017 | 121,437 |
|
2018 | 92,209 |
|
Thereafter | 254,896 |
|
Total | $ | 1,018,780 |
|
15. Stock Based Compensation
The Company maintains five stock incentive plans, (the "Stock Incentive Plans") which are administered by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. There are 11,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plans. Only officers, certain employees, the Company’s Independent Directors and our affiliates generally are eligible to participate in the Stock Incentive Plans.
The Stock Incentive Plans authorize (i) the grant of stock options that qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code, (ii) the grant of stock options that do not so qualify, (iii) restricted stock/unit awards (including awards subject to performance conditions), and (iv) dividend equivalent rights. The exercise price of the stock options is determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee. Special provisions apply to awards granted under the Stock Incentive Plans in the event of a change in control in the Consolidated Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2013, awards covering 373,243 shares of common stock were available to be granted under the Stock Incentive Plans.
In September 1994, the Company’s Board of Directors approved and the Company adopted a 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan. Under the Company’s 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan, all eligible employees may participate by making voluntary contributions. The Company may make, but are not required to make, matching contributions, which are funded by the Operating Partnership. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, matching contributions of $300, $284 and $197, respectively, were recorded.
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we awarded 284,461, 565,137 and 292,339 shares, respectively, of restricted stock awards to certain employees, which had a fair value of $4,719, $7,065 and $3,248 on the date of approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and/or the Board of Directors. We issued Units to the Company in the same amounts. These restricted stock awards generally vest over a period of three years. Compensation expense will be charged to earnings over the vesting period for the shares expected to vest except if the recipient is not required to provide future service in exchange for vesting of the share. If vesting of a recipient's restricted stock awards is not contingent upon future service, the expense is recognized immediately at the date of grant. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recognized $1,008 and $3,649 of compensation expense related to restricted stock awards granted to our Chief Executive Officer for which future service was not required.
The Board of Directors adopted the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Program ("LTIP") and effective July 1, 2013, certain officers and employees were granted 718,960 performance units ("LTIP Unit Awards"). The LTIP Unit Awards had a fair value of $5,411 on the grant date as determined by a lattice-binomial option-pricing model based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The LTIP Unit Awards vest based upon the relative total shareholder return ("TSR") of our common stock compared to the TSRs of the MSCI US REIT Index and the NAREIT Industrial Index. The TSR for half of the granted units is calculated based upon the performance from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014 and the other half is calculated based upon the performance from July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015. Compensation expense will be charged to earnings on a straight-line basis over the respective performance periods. At the end of the respective performance periods, each participant will be issued shares of our common stock equal to the maximum shares issuable to the participant for the performance period multiplied by a percentage, ranging from 0% to 100%, based on our TSR as compared to the TSR of the MSCI US REIT Index and the NAREIT Industrial Index. The participants will also be entitled to dividend equivalents for shares issued pursuant to vested LTIP Unit Awards, of which dividend equivalents represent any common dividends that would have been paid with respect to such issued shares after the grant of the LTIP Unit Awards and prior to the date of settlement.
As mentioned above, the fair value of the LTIP Unit Awards at issuance was determined by a lattice-binomial option-pricing model based on a Monte Carlo simulation using the following assumptions:
|
| | |
Expected dividend yield | 2.22 | % |
Expected volatility - range used | 24.28% - 34.66% |
|
Expected volatility - weighted average | 30.61 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | 0.03% - 0.71% |
|
Expected term | 1 - 2.5 years |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recognized $6,202, $8,559 and $3,759 in amortization related to restricted stock and unit awards and LTIP Unit Awards, of which $34, $21 and $0, respectively, was capitalized in connection with development activities. At December 31, 2013, we had $7,319 in unrecognized compensation related to unvested restricted stock and LTIP Unit Awards. The weighted average period that the unrecognized compensation is expected to be recognized is 0.83 years.
Restricted stock and unit award and LTIP Unit Award transactions for the year ended December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 (Restricted Stock and Unit) | 772,127 |
| | $ | 7.02 |
|
Issued (Restricted Stock and Unit and LTIP Unit Award) | 1,003,421 |
| | $ | 10.10 |
|
Forfeited (Restricted Stock and Unit) | (201,719 | ) | | $ | 4.58 |
|
Vested (Restricted Stock and Unit) | (292,608 | ) | | $ | 7.41 |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 (Restricted Stock and Unit and LTIP Unit Award) | 1,281,221 |
| | $ | 9.72 |
|
16. Derivatives
Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense or preferred stock dividends and to manage our cash flow volatility and exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
Our Series F Preferred Units are subject to a coupon rate reset. The coupon rate resets every quarter at 2.375% plus the greater of i) the 30 year Treasury CMT Rate, ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate or iii) 3-month LIBOR. For the fourth quarter of 2013, the new coupon rate was 6.065%. In October 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $50,000 to mitigate our exposure to floating interest rates related to the forecasted reset rate of the coupon rate of our Series F Preferred Units (the "Series F Agreement"). This Series F Agreement fixes the 30 year Treasury CMT rate at 5.2175%. Accounting guidance for derivatives does not permit hedge accounting treatment related to equity instruments and therefore the mark-to-market gains or losses related to this agreement are recorded in the statement of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, gains of $52 and losses of $328, respectively, are recognized as mark-to-market gain (loss) on interest rate protection agreements. Quarterly payments are treated as a component of the mark-to-market gains or losses and totaled $774 and $1,169 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Series F Agreement matured on October 1, 2013.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in other comprehensive income ("OCI") and is subsequently reclassified to earnings through interest expense over the life of the derivative or over the life of the debt. In the next 12 months, we expect to amortize approximately $1,358 into net income by increasing interest expense for interest rate protection agreements we settled in previous periods.
The following is a summary of the terms of our Series F Agreement and its fair value, which is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hedge Product | | Notional Amount | | Strike | | Trade Date | | Maturity Date | | Fair Value As of December 31, 2013 | | Fair Value As of December 31, 2012 |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series F Agreement* | | $ | 50,000 |
| | 5.2175 | % | | October 1, 2008 | | October 1, 2013 | | N/A | | $ | (826 | ) |
_________________________
| |
* | Fair value excludes quarterly settlement payment due on Series F Agreement. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding payable was $305. |
The following is a summary of the impact of the derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on the statements of operations and the statements of OCI for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Year Ended |
Interest Rate Products | | Location on Statement | | December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Amortization Reclassified from OCI into Income (Loss) | | Interest Expense | | $ | (2,411 | ) | | $ | (2,271 | ) |
The guidance for fair value measurement of financial instruments includes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The following table sets forth our financial liability related to the Series F Agreement that is accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: |
Description | | Fair Value | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Series F Agreement at December 31, 2012 | | $ | (826 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | (826 | ) |
The following table presents the quantitative information about the Level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements: |
Description | | Fair Value | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Inputs | | Range |
Series F Agreement at December 31, 2012 | | $ | (826 | ) | | Discounted Cash Flow | | Long Dated Treasuries (A) | | 2.82% - 2.91% |
| | | | | | Own Credit Risk (B) | | 0.98% - 1.59% |
________________
(A) Represents the forward 30 year Treasury CMT Rate.
(B) Represents credit default swap spread curve used in the valuation analysis at December 31, 2012.
The valuation of the Series F Agreement was determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the instrument. This analysis reflected the contractual terms of the agreement including the period to maturity. In adjusting the fair value of the Series F Agreement for the effect of nonperformance risk, we had considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancement. To comply with the provisions of fair value measurement, we calculated a credit valuation adjustment to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and our counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. We considered the Series F Agreement to be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to a significant number of unobservable inputs. The Series
F Agreement swapped a fixed rate of 5.2175% for floating rate payments based on 30 year Treasury CMT rate. No market observable prices exist for long dated Treasuries. Therefore, we have classified the Series F Agreement in its entirety as Level 3.
The following table presents a reconciliation of our liability classified as Level 3 at December 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
| | | |
| Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Derivatives |
Ending Liability Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | (1,667 | ) |
Mark-to-Market of the Series F Agreement | 841 |
|
Ending Liability Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | (826 | ) |
Mark-to-Market of the Series F Agreement | 826 |
|
Ending Liability Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | — |
|
17. Related Party Transactions
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had payable balances of $1,799 and $3,761, respectively, to wholly owned entities of the Company.
18. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, we are involved in legal actions arising from the ownership of our industrial properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions are not expected to have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, operations or liquidity.
Three properties have leases granting the tenants options to purchase the property. Such options are exercisable at various times at appraised fair market value or at a fixed purchase price in excess of our depreciated cost of the asset. We have no notice of any exercise of any tenant purchase option.
At December 31, 2013, we had an outstanding letter of credit and performance bonds in the aggregate amount of $6,102.
In conjunction with the development of industrial properties, we have entered into agreements with general contractors for the construction of industrial buildings. At December 31, 2013, we have three industrial buildings totaling approximately 0.8 million square feet of GLA that are under construction. The estimated total construction costs as of December 31, 2013, are approximately $49,200 (unaudited). Of this amount, approximately $23,900 (unaudited) remains to be funded. There can be no assurance that the actual completion cost will not exceed the estimated completion cost stated above.
Ground and Operating Lease Agreements
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recognized $1,440, $1,565 and $1,955, respectively, in operating and ground lease expense.
Future minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancelable ground and operating leases under which we are the lessee as of December 31, 2013 are as follows:
|
| | | |
2014 | $ | 1,824 |
|
2015 | 1,660 |
|
2016 | 1,673 |
|
2017 | 1,702 |
|
2018 | 1,100 |
|
Thereafter | 25,117 |
|
Total* | $ | 33,076 |
|
___________________
| |
* | Minimum rental payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $6,832 due in the future under non-cancelable subleases. |
19. Subsequent Events
From January 1, 2014 to February 27, 2014, we acquired one industrial property for a purchase price of approximately $13,400, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition and we sold one industrial property for approximately $1,335. Additionally, in January 2014 the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture sold two industrial properties (see Note 6).
On January 29, 2014, we entered into a $200,000 unsecured loan with a seven-year term. The loan features interest-only payments and initially bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus 175 basis points. The rate is subject to adjustment based on our leverage ratio or credit ratings. We also entered into interest rate swap agreements, with an aggregate notional value of $200,000, to convert the term loan's LIBOR rate to a fixed rate of approximately 4.04% per annum, based on the loan's current spread.
On February 3, 2014, the Company announced that it will redeem all 50,000 Depositary Shares of its Series F Preferred Stock. The redemption price will be $1,000.00 per Depositary Share, or $50,000, plus all accumulated and unpaid distributions to and including the date of redemption, March 6, 2014. The Company also announced that it will redeem all 25,000 Depositary Shares of its Series G Preferred Stock. The redemption price will be $1,000.00 per Depositary Share, or $25,000 plus all accumulated and unpaid distributions to and including the date of redemption, March 31, 2014. An equivalent number of Series F Preferred Units and Series G Preferred Units will also be redeemed on the respective redemption dates.
20. Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
The following tables summarize our quarterly financial information. The first, second and third fiscal quarters of 2013 and all fiscal quarters in 2012 have been revised in accordance with guidance on accounting for discontinued operations.
Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders and Participating Securities and basic and diluted EPU from Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders have not been affected.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
| First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
Total Revenues | $ | 71,146 |
| | $ | 72,376 |
| | $ | 71,454 |
| | $ | 73,960 |
|
Equity in Income of Other Real Estate Partnerships | 2,172 |
| | 2,399 |
| | 4,546 |
| | 2,486 |
|
Equity in Income of Joint Ventures | 20 |
| | 27 |
| | 72 |
| | 17 |
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | 979 |
| | (1,193 | ) | | 4,337 |
| | 2,856 |
|
(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations | (2,369 | ) | | 12,586 |
| | 4,180 |
| | 19,237 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate, Net of Income Tax | 262 |
| | — |
| | 221 |
| | 337 |
|
Net (Loss) Income | (1,128 | ) | | 11,393 |
| | 8,738 |
| | 22,430 |
|
Preferred Unit Distributions | (3,837 | ) | | (2,277 | ) | | (1,392 | ) | | (1,227 | ) |
Redemption of Preferred Units | — |
| | (3,546 | ) | | (2,121 | ) | | — |
|
Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders and Participating Securities | (4,965 | ) | | 5,570 |
| | 5,225 |
| | 21,203 |
|
Income from Continuing Operations Allocable to Participating Securities | (36 | ) | | — |
| | (8 | ) | | (8 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations Allocable to Participating Securities | — |
| | (42 | ) | | (34 | ) | | (83 | ) |
Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders | $ | (5,001 | ) | | $ | 5,528 |
| | $ | 5,183 |
| | $ | 21,112 |
|
Basic Earnings Per Unit: | | | | | | | |
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
|
(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations Attributable to Unitholders | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | 0.11 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.17 |
|
Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | 0.19 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Unit: | | | | | | | |
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
|
(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations Attributable to Unitholders | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | 0.11 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.17 |
|
Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | 0.18 |
|
Weighted Average Units —Basic | 105,477 |
| | 112,808 |
| | 114,089 |
| | 114,089 |
|
LTIP Unit Awards | — |
| | — |
| | 407 |
| | 485 |
|
Weighted Average Units —Diluted | 105,477 |
| | 112,808 |
| | 114,496 |
| | 114,574 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
| First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
Total Revenues | $ | 67,696 |
| | $ | 68,909 |
| | $ | 67,313 |
| | $ | 71,525 |
|
Equity in Income of Other Real Estate Partnerships | 1,098 |
| | 2,468 |
| | 1,946 |
| | 2,244 |
|
Equity in Income of Joint Ventures | 91 |
| | 37 |
| | 28 |
| | 1,403 |
|
Loss from Continuing Operations | (5,123 | ) | | (13,374 | ) | | (370 | ) | | (3,466 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations | 6,227 |
| | 3,030 |
| | 5,786 |
| | 1,095 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | — |
| | — |
| | 3,777 |
| | — |
|
Net Income (Loss) | 1,104 |
| | (10,344 | ) | | 9,193 |
| | (2,371 | ) |
Preferred Unit Distributions | (4,762 | ) | | (4,798 | ) | | (4,725 | ) | | (4,662 | ) |
Redemption of Preferred Units | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,804 | ) |
Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders and Participating Securities | (3,658 | ) | | (15,142 | ) | | 4,468 |
| | (8,837 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations Allocable to Participating Securities | — |
| | — |
| | (34 | ) | | — |
|
Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders | $ | (3,658 | ) | | $ | (15,142 | ) | | $ | 4,434 |
| | $ | (8,837 | ) |
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Unit: | | | | | | | |
Loss from Continuing Operations Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.11 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.10 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations Attributable to Unitholders | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
|
Net (Loss) Income Available to Unitholders | $ | (0.04 | ) | | $ | (0.16 | ) | | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | (0.09 | ) |
Weighted Average Units —Basic and Diluted | 91,811 |
| | 93,106 |
| | 98,432 |
| | 102,599 |
|
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Partners of
First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. and its subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.
Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.'s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.'s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2014
FIRST INDUSTRIAL PENNSYLVANIA, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
| (In thousands) |
ASSETS |
Assets: | | | |
Investment in Real Estate: | | | |
Land | $ | 47,629 |
| | $ | 47,665 |
|
Buildings and Improvements | 93,459 |
| | 71,983 |
|
Construction in Progress | 1,815 |
| | 6,840 |
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation | (21,788 | ) | | (22,096 | ) |
Net Investment in Real Estate | 121,115 |
| | 104,392 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 349 |
| | 371 |
|
Tenant Accounts Receivable, Net | 438 |
| | 167 |
|
Related Party Notes Receivable | 119,364 |
| | 142,982 |
|
Deferred Rent Receivable, Net | 3,000 |
| | 2,780 |
|
Deferred Financing Costs, Net | 199 |
| | 242 |
|
Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net | 2,396 |
| | 2,764 |
|
Prepaid Expenses, Accrued Interest Income and Other Assets, Net | 1,579 |
| | 1,480 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 248,440 |
|
| $ | 255,178 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL |
Liabilities: | | | |
Mortgage Loans Payable | $ | 34,188 |
| | $ | 34,845 |
|
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities | 5,335 |
| | 3,264 |
|
Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net | — |
| | 58 |
|
Rents Received in Advance and Security Deposits | 1,106 |
| | 1,195 |
|
Total Liabilities | 40,629 |
| | 39,362 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies | — |
| | — |
|
Partners’ Capital | 207,811 |
| | 215,816 |
|
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital | $ | 248,440 |
| | $ | 255,178 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL PENNSYLVANIA, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
| (In thousands) |
Revenues: | | | | | |
Rental Income | $ | 9,987 |
| | $ | 10,138 |
| | $ | 10,204 |
|
Tenant Recoveries and Other Income | 3,050 |
| | 2,922 |
| | 3,063 |
|
Total Revenues | 13,037 |
| | 13,060 |
| | 13,267 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | |
Property Expenses | 3,970 |
| | 3,451 |
| | 3,280 |
|
Impairment of Real Estate | — |
| | — |
| | (595 | ) |
Depreciation and Other Amortization | 3,917 |
| | 4,811 |
| | 4,104 |
|
Total Expenses | 7,887 |
| | 8,262 |
| | 6,789 |
|
Other Income (Expense): | | | | | |
Related Party Interest Income and Facility Fee Income | 5,065 |
| | 7,825 |
| | 11,679 |
|
Interest Expense | (904 | ) | | (1,506 | ) | | (1,431 | ) |
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs | (43 | ) | | (43 | ) | | (34 | ) |
Foreign Currency Remeasurement Loss | — |
| | — |
| | (658 | ) |
Total Other Income (Expense) | 4,118 |
| | 6,276 |
| | 9,556 |
|
Income from Continuing Operations | 9,268 |
| | 11,074 |
| | 16,034 |
|
Discontinued Operations: | | | | | |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | — |
| | — |
| | 500 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations | — |
| | — |
| | 500 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 62 |
| | — |
| | 44 |
|
Net Income | $ | 9,330 |
| | $ | 11,074 |
| | $ | 16,578 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL PENNSYLVANIA, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
|
| | | |
| Total |
| (In thousands) |
Balance at December 31, 2010 (Unaudited) | $ | 332,095 |
|
Contributions | 16,020 |
|
Distributions | (164,897 | ) |
Net Income | 16,578 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 199,796 |
|
Contributions | 33,938 |
|
Distributions | (28,992 | ) |
Net Income | 11,074 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | 215,816 |
|
Contributions | 31,685 |
|
Distributions | (49,020 | ) |
Net Income | 9,330 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 207,811 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL PENNSYLVANIA, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
| (In thousands) |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Net Income | $ | 9,330 |
| | $ | 11,074 |
| | $ | 16,578 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation | 3,232 |
| | 3,927 |
| | 2,771 |
|
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs | 43 |
| | 43 |
| | 34 |
|
Other Amortization | 682 |
| | 879 |
| | 1,377 |
|
Impairment of Real Estate | — |
| | — |
| | (595 | ) |
Foreign Currency Remeasurement Loss | — |
| | — |
| | 658 |
|
Provision for (Reversal of) Bad Debt | 7 |
| | 22 |
| | (11 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | (62 | ) | | — |
| | (544 | ) |
(Increase) Decrease in Tenant Accounts Receivable, Prepaid Expenses, Accrued Interest Income and Other Assets, Net | (235 | ) | | 1,444 |
| | 1,503 |
|
Increase in Deferred Rent Receivable | (220 | ) | | (196 | ) | | (348 | ) |
Increase in Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses, Other Liabilities, Rents Received in Advance and Security Deposits | 69 |
| | 67 |
| | 69 |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 12,846 |
| | 17,260 |
| | 21,492 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Acquisition of Real Estate | — |
| | (6,887 | ) | | — |
|
Additions to Investment in Real Estate and Non-Acquisition Tenant Improvements and Lease Costs | (18,592 | ) | | (3,861 | ) | | (3,351 | ) |
Net Proceeds from Sales of Investment in Real Estate | 98 |
| | — |
| | 1,054 |
|
Repayments of Related Party Notes Receivable | 24,425 |
| | 9,699 |
| | 112,186 |
|
Funding of Related Party Notes Receivable | (807 | ) | | (20,773 | ) | | (5,299 | ) |
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities | 5,124 |
| | (21,822 | ) | | 104,590 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Contributions | 31,685 |
| | 33,938 |
| | 16,020 |
|
Distributions | (49,020 | ) | | (28,992 | ) | | (164,897 | ) |
Debt Issuance Costs | — |
| | — |
| | (188 | ) |
Proceeds from Origination of Mortgage Loans Payable | — |
| | — |
| | 22,898 |
|
Repayments on Mortgage Loans Payable | (657 | ) | | (626 | ) | | (413 | ) |
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities | (17,992 | ) | | 4,320 |
| | (126,580 | ) |
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (22 | ) | | (242 | ) | | (498 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year | 371 |
| | 613 |
| | 1,111 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year | $ | 349 |
| | $ | 371 |
| | $ | 613 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
FIRST INDUSTRIAL PENNSYLVANIA, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands)
| |
1. | Organization and Formation of Partnership |
First Industrial, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") was organized as a limited partnership in the state of Delaware on November 23, 1993. The sole general partner is First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company") with an approximate 96.0% and 95.5% partnership interest at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company is a real estate investment trust ("REIT") as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. The Company’s operations are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership own, in the aggregate, approximately a 4.0% and 4.5% interest in the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The Operating Partnership owns a 99.72% limited partnership interest in First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. The general partner of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. is a separate corporation, with a 0.28% general partnership interest in First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. The general partner of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
As of December 31, 2013, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. owned 18 industrial properties, containing an aggregate of approximately 2.8 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels aggregating to 297 acres. Two separate land parcels, aggregating to 237 acres, are leased to a tenant under non-cancelable ground leases.
Profits, losses and distributions of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. are allocated to the general partner and the limited partner in accordance with the provisions contained within the restated and amended partnership agreement.
Any references to the number of buildings, square footage or acreage in the financial statement footnotes are unaudited.
| |
2. | Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 include the accounts and operating results of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
In order to conform with generally accepted accounting principles, management, in preparation of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.’s financial statements, is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these investments.
Investment in Real Estate and Depreciation
Investment in Real Estate is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. reviews its properties on a continuous basis for impairment and provides a provision if impairments exist. To determine if an impairment may exist, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. reviews its properties and identifies those that have had either an event of change or event of circumstances warranting further assessment of recoverability (such as a decrease in occupancy or decline in general market conditions). If further assessment of recoverability is needed, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. estimates the future net cash flows expected to result from the use of the property and its eventual disposition on an individual property basis. If the sum of the expected future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the property on an individual property basis, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. will recognize an impairment loss based upon the estimated fair value of such property. For properties management considers held for sale, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. ceases depreciating the properties and values the properties at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. If circumstances arise that were previously considered unlikely, and as a result, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. will reclassify such property as held and used. Such property is measured at the lower of its carrying amount (adjusted for any depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used) or fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. classifies properties
as held for sale when all criteria within the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the "FASB") guidance on the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets are met.
Interest costs, real estate taxes, compensation costs of development personnel and other directly related expenses incurred during construction periods are capitalized and depreciated commencing with the date the property is substantially completed. Upon substantial completion, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. reclassifies construction in progress to building, tenant improvement and leasing commissions. Such costs begin to be capitalized to the development projects from the point First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. is undergoing necessary activities to get the development ready for its intended use and ceases when the development projects are substantially completed and held available for occupancy.
Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:
|
| |
| Years |
Buildings and Improvements | 7 to 40 |
Land Improvements | 13 to 20 |
Tenant Improvements | Shorter of Lease Term or Useful Life |
Construction expenditures for tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing commissions (inclusive of compensation costs of personnel attributable to leasing) are capitalized and amortized over the terms of each specific lease. Capitalized compensation costs of personnel attributable to leasing relate to time directly attributable to originating leases with independent third parties that result directly from and are essential to originating those leases and would not have been incurred had these leasing transactions not occurred. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Expenditures for improvements are capitalized.
Upon acquisition of a property, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. allocates the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which generally consists of land, buildings, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and intangible assets including in-place leases, above market and below market leases and tenant relationships. First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. allocates the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Acquired above and below market leases are valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below market fixed rate renewal options for below market leases. The above market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the below market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases.
The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships, which are included as components of Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships) as adjustments to depreciation and other amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease early, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvements, leasing commissions, above and below market leases, the in-place lease value and tenant relationships is immediately written off.
Deferred Leasing Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization included in First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.’s total assets and total liabilities consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
In-Place Leases | $ | 994 |
| | $ | 1,188 |
|
Above Market Leases | 975 |
| | 1,042 |
|
Tenant Relationships | 427 |
| | 534 |
|
Total Included in Total Assets, Net of $1,682 and $2,098 of Accumulated Amortization | $ | 2,396 |
| | $ | 2,764 |
|
Below Market Leases | $ | — |
| | $ | 58 |
|
Total Included in Total Liabilities, Net of $0 and $346 of Accumulated Amortization | $ | — |
| | $ | 58 |
|
Amortization expense related to in-place leases and tenant relationships of deferred leasing intangibles was $301, $458 and $974 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Rental revenues (decreased) increased by $(9), $15 and $(34) related to amortization of above/(below) market leases for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. will recognize net amortization expense related to the deferred leasing intangibles over the next five years, for properties owned as of December 31, 2013 as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Estimated Amortization of In-Place Leases and Tenant Relationships | | Estimated Net Decrease to Rental Revenues Related to Above Market Leases |
2014 | $ | 183 |
| | $ | 66 |
|
2015 | $ | 171 |
| | $ | 66 |
|
2016 | $ | 138 |
| | $ | 66 |
|
2017 | $ | 124 |
| | $ | 66 |
|
2018 | $ | 89 |
| | $ | 66 |
|
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term financing. These fees and costs are being amortized over the terms of the respective loans. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $134 and $91 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date.
Revenue Recognition
Rental income is recognized on a straight-line method under which contractual rent increases are recognized evenly over the lease term. Tenant recovery income includes payments from tenants for real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and is recognized as revenues in the same period the related expenses are incurred by First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.
Revenue is generally recognized on payments received from tenants for early lease terminations upon the effective termination of a tenant’s lease and when First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. has no further obligations under the lease.
Interest income on the related party notes receivable is recognized based on the accrual method unless a significant uncertainty of collection exists. If a significant uncertainty exists, interest income is recognized as collected.
First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. provides an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of tenant accounts receivable which is estimated to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $21 and $24 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For accounts receivable First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. deems uncollectible, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. uses the direct write-off method.
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
Gain on sale of real estate is recognized using the full accrual method, when appropriate. Gains relating to transactions which do not meet the full accrual method of accounting are deferred and recognized when the full accrual method of accounting criteria are met or by using the installment or deposit methods of profit recognition, as appropriate in the circumstances. As the assets are sold, their costs and related accumulated depreciation are written off with resulting gains or losses reflected in net income or loss. Estimated future costs to be incurred by First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. after completion of each sale are accrued and included in the determination of the gain on sales.
Related Party Notes Receivable
Related Party Notes Receivable are comprised of a revolving secured note receivable and a revolving unsecured note receivable. The notes receivable are recorded at fair value at the time of issuance. Interest income is accrued as earned. Notes receivable are considered past due when a contractual payment is not remitted in accordance with the terms of the note agreement. On a quarterly basis, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. evaluates the collectability of each note receivable based on various factors which may include payment history, expected fair value of the collateral, to the extent applicable, on the loan and internal credit information. A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. will be unable to collect all amounts due under the existing contractual terms. When a
loan is considered impaired, the amount of the loss accrual is calculated by comparing the carrying amount of the note receivable to the present value of expected future cash flows. Since First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.’s notes receivable are collateralized by a first mortgage, the loans have risk characteristics similar to the risks in owning commercial real estate.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.’s financial instruments include tenant accounts receivable, related party notes receivable, accounts payable, other accrued expenses and mortgage loans payable. The fair values of tenant accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued expenses approximate their carrying or contract values. See Note 5 for the fair values of the mortgage loans payable and see Note 3 for the fair value of the related party notes receivable.
Discontinued Operations
The FASB’s guidance on financial reporting for the disposal of long lived assets requires that the results of operations and gains or losses on the sale of property or property held for sale be presented in discontinued operations if both of the following criteria are met: (a) the operations and cash flows of the property have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. as a result of the disposal transaction and (b) First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the property after the disposal transaction. The guidance also requires prior period results of operations for these properties to be reclassified and presented in discontinued operations in prior consolidated statements of operations.
| |
3. | Related Party Notes Receivable |
On July 1, 2009, the Operating Partnership contributed and assigned to First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. title and interest in a revolving secured note receivable (the "Related Party Secured Note Receivable") in exchange for an increased ownership interest in First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. Concurrent with the contribution on July 1, 2009, the terms of the Related Party Secured Note Receivable were restated and amended. The Related Party Secured Note Receivable has a lending capacity of $550,000, subject to certain restrictions, earns interest at a variable rate equal to the Bank Prime Rate plus 2% and matured on September 1, 2012. On September 1, 2012, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. amended and restated the Related Party Secured Note Receivable. The amendment extended the maturity date of the Related Party Secured Note Receivable to September 1, 2015 and amended the variable interest rate to be equal to the one month term LIBOR rate, as of two business days prior to each calendar month end, plus 2.60%. The Related Party Secured Note Receivable also earns a quarterly facility fee equal to 0.25% per annum of $550,000. The borrowers on the Related Party Secured Note Receivable are two subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership (the "Related Party Borrowers"). The Related Party Borrowers are 100% directly or indirectly owned by the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2013, the Related Party Secured Note Receivable was collateralized by industrial properties with a net carrying value of $139,834.
On July 1, 2009, the Operating Partnership also contributed and assigned to First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. title and interest in a revolving unsecured note receivable (the "Related Party Unsecured Note Receivable") in exchange for an increased ownership interest in First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. Concurrent with the contribution on July 1, 2009, the terms of the Related Party Unsecured Note Receivable were restated and amended. The Related Party Unsecured Note Receivable allowed for a lending capacity of $100,000 and allowed for loans in Canadian dollars. All loans denominated in US dollars earned interest at a variable rate equal to the Bank Prime Rate plus 3.0% and all loans denominated in Canadian dollars earned interest at a variable rate equal to the CDOR rate plus 3.0%. The Related Party Unsecured Note Receivable matured on July 1, 2012. The Related Party Borrowers are the same borrowers on the Related Party Unsecured Note Receivable.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of the Related Party Secured Note Receivable was $119,364 and $145,201, respectively. The fair value of the Related Party Secured Note Receivable was determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made based upon similar leverage levels and similar remaining maturities. The current market rates utilized were internally estimated. First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. has concluded that its determination of fair value for the Related Party Secured Note Receivable was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs.
| |
4. | Investment in Real Estate |
Sales and Discontinued Operations
In 2011, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. sold one industrial property comprising approximately 0.01 million square feet of GLA. Gross proceeds from the sale of the one industrial property was approximately $1,150. The one industrial property
meets the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore, the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate of $500 for the one sold industrial property is included in discontinued operations.
In 2013 and 2012, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. did not sell any industrial properties.
The following table discloses certain information regarding the industrial properties included in discontinued operations by First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2011.
|
| | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | $ | 500 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations | $ | 500 |
|
Impairment Charges
During the year ended December 31, 2011, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. recorded the following net non-cash reversal of impairment charges:
|
| | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Land Parcels—Not Held for Sale | $ | (595 | ) |
Impairment—Continuing Operations | $ | (595 | ) |
The impairment charges for assets not held for sale are calculated as the difference between the carrying value of the properties and land parcels and the estimated fair value. The impairment reversal of $595 recorded during the year ended December 31, 2011 was due to the reversal of estimated closing costs related to a land parcel that no longer met the criteria to be classified as held for sale at December 31, 2011.
The accounting guidance for the fair value measurement provisions for the impairment of long lived assets establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The fair market value of the land parcel was determined using internal valuations of real estate. Management reviewed and considered older comparable transactions and adjusted upward or downward to reflect management’s assumptions about current market conditions.
The impairment reversal recorded during the year ended December 31, 2011, represents fair value measurements recorded on a non-recurring basis. The valuation techniques utilized by management to determine the fair value measurements would be considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The asset was recorded at carrying value at December 31, 2011.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding Balance at | | Interest Rate at December 31, 2013 | | Effective Interest Rate at Issuance | | Maturity Date |
December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Mortgage Loans Payable | $ | 34,188 |
| | $ | 34,845 |
| | 4.45% – 7.50% | | 4.45% – 7.50% | | May 2016 – October 2020 |
As of December 31, 2013, mortgage loans payable are collateralized by, and in some instances cross-collateralized by, industrial properties with a net carrying value of $32,397. First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. believes it was in compliance with all covenants relating to mortgage loans payable as of December 31, 2013.
The following is a schedule of the stated maturities and scheduled principal payments of mortgage loans payable for the next five years ending December 31, and thereafter:
|
| | | |
| Amount |
2014 | $ | 690 |
|
2015 | 725 |
|
2016 | 2,203 |
|
2017 | 754 |
|
2018 | 20,447 |
|
Thereafter | 9,369 |
|
Total | $ | 34,188 |
|
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of mortgage loans payable was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
| Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
Mortgage Loans Payable | $ | 34,188 |
| | $ | 34,389 |
| | $ | 34,845 |
| | $ | 36,655 |
|
The fair values of the mortgage loans payable were determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made based upon similar leverage levels and similar remaining maturities. The current market rates utilized were internally estimated. First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. has concluded that its determination of fair value for the mortgage loans payable was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs.
| |
6. | Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Interest Paid, Net of Interest Expense Capitalized in Connection with Development Activity | $ | 907 |
| | $ | 1,509 |
| | $ | 1,350 |
|
Interest Expense Capitalized in Connection with Development Activity | $ | 798 |
| | $ | 228 |
| | $ | — |
|
Accounts Payable Related to Construction in Progress and Additions to Investment in Real Estate | $ | 4,633 |
| | $ | 2,698 |
| | $ | 61 |
|
Write-off of Fully Depreciated Assets | $ | (4,698 | ) | | $ | (2,048 | ) | | $ | (3,369 | ) |
| |
7. | Future Rental Revenues |
First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.’s properties are leased to tenants under net and semi-net operating leases. Minimum lease payments, excluding tenant reimbursements of expenses, under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
|
| | | |
2014 | $ | 8,936 |
|
2015 | 6,445 |
|
2016 | 4,924 |
|
2017 | 3,596 |
|
2018 | 3,022 |
|
Thereafter | 26,273 |
|
Total | $ | 53,196 |
|
Credit Risk
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, ADESA accounted for 22.2%, 21.9% and 21.7% of rental revenues, respectively.
| |
8. | Related Party Transactions |
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. had receivable balances of $119,635 and $143,287, respectively, from wholly owned entities of the Company and the Operating Partnership. The receivable balances include the related party notes receivable and accrued interest income.
| |
9. | Commitments and Contingencies |
In the normal course of business, First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P. is involved in legal actions arising from the ownership of its properties. In management’s opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions are not expected to have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, operations or liquidity of First Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.
At December 31, 2013, we had outstanding performance bonds in the aggregate amount of $1,953.
Subsequent events were evaluated through February 27, 2014 and it was determined that there were no events that required disclosure within these financial statements.
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Partners of
The Combined Partnerships:
We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of the Combined Partnerships and their subsidiaries, which comprise the combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2013, and the related combined statements of operations, changes in partners’ capital and cash flows for the year then ended.
Management's Responsibility for the Combined Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the combined financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of combined financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the combined financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the combined financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the Combined Partnerships' preparation and fair presentation of the combined financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Combined Partnerships' internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the combined financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Combined Partnerships and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2014
THE COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) |
| |
ASSETS |
Assets: | | | |
Investment in Real Estate: | | | |
Land | $ | 22,544 |
| | $ | 22,725 |
|
Buildings and Improvements | 85,845 |
| | 88,382 |
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation | (35,870 | ) | | (34,684 | ) |
Net Investment in Real Estate | 72,519 |
| | 76,423 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 158 |
| | 166 |
|
Tenant Accounts Receivable, Net | 277 |
| | 338 |
|
Deferred Rent Receivable, Net | 1,995 |
| | 1,989 |
|
Deferred Financing Costs, Net | 333 |
| | 410 |
|
Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net | 753 |
| | 926 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net | 2,250 |
| | 2,234 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 78,285 |
|
| $ | 82,486 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL |
Liabilities: | | | |
Mortgage Loans Payable | $ | 32,835 |
| | $ | 33,412 |
|
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities | 1,737 |
| | 1,809 |
|
Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net | 1,748 |
| | 1,867 |
|
Rents Received in Advance and Security Deposits | 1,160 |
| | 1,137 |
|
Total Liabilities | 37,480 |
| | 38,225 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies | — |
| | — |
|
Partners’ Capital | 40,805 |
| | 44,261 |
|
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital | $ | 78,285 |
| | $ | 82,486 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements.
THE COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| (In thousands) |
Revenues: | | | | | |
Rental Income | $ | 10,486 |
| | $ | 9,998 |
| | $ | 10,421 |
|
Tenant Recoveries and Other Income | 2,885 |
| | 3,077 |
| | 2,928 |
|
Total Revenues | 13,371 |
| | 13,075 |
| | 13,349 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | |
Property Expenses | 3,946 |
| | 4,038 |
| | 4,338 |
|
Depreciation and Other Amortization | 4,037 |
| | 4,685 |
| | 4,631 |
|
Total Expenses | 7,983 |
| | 8,723 |
| | 8,969 |
|
Other Income (Expense): | | | | | |
Interest Expense | (1,585 | ) | | (1,531 | ) | | (1,060 | ) |
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs | (77 | ) | | (75 | ) | | (57 | ) |
Loss from Retirement of Debt | — |
| | — |
| | (160 | ) |
Total Other Income (Expense) | (1,662 | ) | | (1,606 | ) | | (1,277 | ) |
Income from Continuing Operations | 3,726 |
| | 2,746 |
| | 3,103 |
|
Discontinued Operations: | | | | | |
Income Attributable to Discontinued Operations | 187 |
| | 206 |
| | 246 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 1,632 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations | 1,819 |
| | 206 |
| | 246 |
|
Net Income | $ | 5,545 |
| | $ | 2,952 |
| | $ | 3,349 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements.
THE COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
|
| | | |
| Total |
| (In thousands) |
Balance at December 31, 2010 (Unaudited) | $ | 75,595 |
|
Contributions (Unaudited) | 10,657 |
|
Distributions (Unaudited) | (40,541 | ) |
Net Income (Unaudited) | 3,349 |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2011 (Unaudited) | $ | 49,060 |
|
Contributions (Unaudited) | 9,062 |
|
Distributions (Unaudited) | (16,813 | ) |
Net Income (Unaudited) | 2,952 |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | $ | 44,261 |
|
Contributions | 3,152 |
|
Distributions | (12,153 | ) |
Net Income | 5,545 |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 40,805 |
|
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements.
THE COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| (In thousands) |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Net Income | $ | 5,545 |
| | $ | 2,952 |
| | $ | 3,349 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation | 3,473 |
| | 3,967 |
| | 3,794 |
|
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs | 77 |
| | 75 |
| | 57 |
|
Other Amortization | 550 |
| | 817 |
| | 889 |
|
(Reversal of) Provision for Bad Debt | (10 | ) | | 43 |
| | (23 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | (1,632 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Loss from Retirement of Debt | — |
| | — |
| | 160 |
|
(Increase) Decrease in Tenant Accounts Receivable, Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net | (131 | ) | | (267 | ) | | 71 |
|
Increase in Deferred Rent Receivable | (212 | ) | | (74 | ) | | (88 | ) |
(Decrease) Increase in Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses, Other Liabilities, Rents Received in Advance and Security Deposits | (158 | ) | | 390 |
| | 247 |
|
Prepayment Penalties Associated with Retirement of Debt | — |
| | — |
| | (74 | ) |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 7,502 |
| | 7,903 |
| | 8,382 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Additions to Investment in Real Estate and Lease Costs | (1,558 | ) | | (3,249 | ) | | (1,918 | ) |
Net Proceeds from Sales of Investment in Real Estate | 3,626 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities | 2,068 |
| | (3,249 | ) | | (1,918 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Contributions | 3,152 |
| | 9,062 |
| | 10,657 |
|
Distributions | (12,153 | ) | | (16,813 | ) | | (40,541 | ) |
Debt Issuance Costs | — |
| | (34 | ) | | (405 | ) |
Proceeds from Origination of Mortgage Loans Payable | — |
| | 3,038 |
| | 27,481 |
|
Repayments on Mortgage Loans Payable | (577 | ) | | (513 | ) | | (3,932 | ) |
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities | (9,578 | ) | | (5,260 | ) | | (6,740 | ) |
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (8 | ) | | (606 | ) | | (276 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year | 166 |
| | 772 |
| | 1,048 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year | $ | 158 |
| | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 772 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements.
THE COMBINED PARTNERSHIPS
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands)
| |
1. | Organization and Formation of Partnerships |
First Industrial, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") was organized as a limited partnership in the state of Delaware on November 23, 1993. The sole general partner is First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company") with an approximate 96.0% and 95.5% partnership interest at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company is a real estate investment trust ("REIT") as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. The Company’s operations are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The limited partners of the Operating Partnership own, in the aggregate, approximately a 4.0% and 4.5% interest in the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The Operating Partnership owns a 99.9% and 99.0% limited partnership interest in First Industrial Financing Partnership L.P. and First Industrial Indianapolis L.P., respectively. The general partner is a separate corporation and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, with a 0.01% and 1.0% general partnership interest in First Industrial Financing Partnership L.P. and First Industrial Indianapolis L.P., respectively. First Industrial Financing Partnership L.P. and its subsidiaries and First Industrial Indianapolis L.P. are collectively referred to as the "Combined Partnerships."
As of December 31, 2013, the Combined Partnerships own 24 industrial properties, containing an aggregate of approximately 3.1 million square feet of GLA.
Profits, losses and distributions of the Combined Partnerships are allocated to the general partner and the limited partner in accordance with the provisions contained within the restated and amended partnership agreements.
Any references to the number of buildings, square footage or acreage in the financial statement footnotes are unaudited.
| |
2. | Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The combined financial statements at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 include the accounts and operating results of the Combined Partnerships and their wholly owned subsidiaries. The Combined Partnerships have been presented on a combined basis because they are under common control.
In order to conform with generally accepted accounting principles, management, in preparation of the Combined Partnerships’ financial statements, is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these investments.
Investment in Real Estate and Depreciation
Investment in Real Estate is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Combined Partnerships review their properties on a continuous basis for impairment and provide a provision if impairments exist. To determine if an impairment may exist, the Combined Partnerships review their properties and identify those that have had either an event of change or event of circumstances warranting further assessment of recoverability (such as a decrease in occupancy or decline in general market conditions). If further assessment of recoverability is needed, the Combined Partnerships estimate the future net cash flows expected to result from the use of the property and its eventual disposition on an individual property basis. If the sum of the expected future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the property on an individual property basis, the Combined Partnerships will recognize an impairment loss based upon the estimated fair value of such property. For properties management considers held for sale, the Combined Partnerships cease depreciating the properties and value the properties at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. If circumstances arise that were previously considered unlikely, and as a result, the Combined Partnerships decide not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the Combined Partnerships will reclassify such property as held and used. Such property is measured at the lower of its carrying amount (adjusted for any depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used) or fair value at the date of the subsequent
decision not to sell. The Combined Partnerships classify properties as held for sale when all criteria within the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the "FASB") guidance on the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets are met.
Interest costs, real estate taxes, compensation costs of development personnel and other directly related expenses incurred during construction periods are capitalized and depreciated commencing with the date the property is substantially completed. Upon substantial completion, the Combined Partnerships reclassify construction in progress to building, tenant improvement and leasing commissions. Such costs begin to be capitalized to the development projects from the point the Combined Partnerships are undergoing necessary activities to get the development ready for its intended use and cease when the development projects are substantially completed and held available for occupancy.
Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:
|
| |
| Years |
Buildings and Improvements | 7 to 40 |
Land Improvements | 8 to 15 |
Tenant Improvements | Shorter of Lease Term or Useful Life |
Construction expenditures for tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing commissions (inclusive of compensation costs of personnel attributable to leasing) are capitalized and amortized over the terms of each specific lease. Capitalized compensation costs of personnel attributable to leasing relate to time directly attributable to originating leases with independent third parties that result directly from and are essential to originating those leases and would not have been incurred had these leasing transactions not occurred. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Expenditures for improvements are capitalized.
Upon acquisition of a property, the Combined Partnerships allocate the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which generally consists of land, buildings, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and intangible assets including in-place leases, above market and below market leases and tenant relationships. The Combined Partnerships allocate the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Acquired above and below market leases are valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below market fixed rate renewal options for below market leases. The above market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the below market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases.
The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships, which are included as components of Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships) as adjustments to depreciation and other amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease early, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvements, leasing commissions, above and below market leases, the in-place lease value and tenant relationships is immediately written off.
Deferred Leasing Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization included in the Combined Partnerships’ total assets and total liabilities consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) |
In-Place Leases | $ | 638 |
| | $ | 796 |
|
Above Market Leases | 14 |
| | 17 |
|
Tenant Relationships | 101 |
| | 113 |
|
Total Included in Total Assets, Net of $1,243 and $1,251 of Accumulated Amortization | $ | 753 |
| | $ | 926 |
|
Below Market Leases | $ | 1,748 |
| | $ | 1,867 |
|
Total Included in Total Liabilities, Net of $635 and $516 of Accumulated Amortization | $ | 1,748 |
| | $ | 1,867 |
|
Amortization expense related to in-place leases and tenant relationships of deferred leasing intangibles was $170, $197 (unaudited) and $240 (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Rental revenues increased by $116, $116 (unaudited) and $117 (unaudited) related to amortization of above/(below) market leases for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Combined Partnerships will recognize net amortization expense related to the deferred leasing intangibles over the next five years, for properties owned as of December 31, 2013 as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Estimated Amortization of In-Place Leases and Tenant Relationships | | Estimated Net Increase to Rental Revenues Related to Above and Below Market Leases |
2014 | $ | 104 |
| | $ | 116 |
|
2015 | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 116 |
|
2016 | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 116 |
|
2017 | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 116 |
|
2018 | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 116 |
|
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term financing. These fees and costs are being amortized over the terms of the respective loans. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $229 and $152 (unaudited) at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date.
Revenue Recognition
Rental income is recognized on a straight-line method under which contractual rent increases are recognized evenly over the lease term. Tenant recovery income includes payments from tenants for real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and is recognized as revenues in the same period the related expenses are incurred by the Combined Partnerships.
Revenue is generally recognized on payments received from tenants for early lease terminations upon the effective termination of a tenant’s lease and when the Combined Partnerships have no further obligations under the lease.
The Combined Partnerships provide an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of tenant accounts receivable which is estimated to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable in the combined balance sheets are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2 and $12 (unaudited) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For accounts receivable deemed uncollectible, the Combined Partnerships use the direct write-off method.
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
Gain on sale of real estate is recognized using the full accrual method, when appropriate. Gains relating to transactions which do not meet the full accrual method of accounting are deferred and recognized when the full accrual method of accounting criteria are met or by using the installment or deposit methods of profit recognition, as appropriate in the circumstances. As the assets are sold, their costs and related accumulated depreciation are written off with resulting gains or losses reflected in net income or loss. Estimated future costs to be incurred by the Combined Partnerships after completion of each sale are accrued and included in the determination of the gain on sales.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The financial instruments of the Combined Partnerships include tenant accounts receivable, accounts payable, other accrued expenses and mortgage loans payable. The fair values of tenant accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued expenses approximate their carrying or contract values. See Note 4 for the fair values of the mortgage loans payable.
Discontinued Operations
The FASB’s guidance on financial reporting for the disposal of long lived assets requires that the results of operations and gains or losses on the sale of property or property held for sale be presented in discontinued operations if both of the following criteria are met: (a) the operations and cash flows of the property have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Combined Partnerships as a result of the disposal transaction and (b) the Combined Partnerships will not have any
significant continuing involvement in the operations of the property after the disposal transaction. The guidance also requires prior period results of operations for these properties to be reclassified and presented in discontinued operations in prior combined statements of operations.
| |
3. | Investment in Real Estate |
Sales and Discontinued Operations
In 2011 and 2012 the Combined Partnerships did not sell any industrial properties.
In 2013, the Combined Partnerships sold one industrial property comprising approximately 0.2 million square feet of GLA. Gross proceeds from the sale of the one industrial property was approximately $3,789. The one industrial property meets the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore, the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the one sold industrial property is included in discontinued operations. The following table discloses the discontinued operation for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Total Revenues | $ | 444 |
| | $ | 545 |
| | $ | 554 |
|
Property Expenses | (187 | ) | | (194 | ) | | (256 | ) |
Depreciation and Amortization | (70 | ) | | (145 | ) | | (52 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate | 1,632 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations | $ | 1,819 |
| | $ | 206 |
| | $ | 246 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding Balance at | | Interest Rate at December 31, 2013 | | Effective Interest Rate at Issuance | | Maturity Date |
December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) |
Mortgage Loans Payable | $ | 32,835 |
| | $ | 33,412 |
| | 4.03% – 7.87% | | 4.03% – 7.87% | | January 2015 – September 2022 |
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Combined Partnerships originated the following mortgage loan (unaudited):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Financing | | Loan Principal | | Interest Rate | | Origination Date | | Maturity Date | | Amortization Period | | Number of Industrial Properties Collateralizing Mortgage | | GLA (In millions) | | Property Carrying Value at December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) |
I | | $ | 3,038 |
| | 4.03 | % | | August 29, 2012 | | September 2022 | | 30-year | | 1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | $ | 3,228 |
|
For Mortgage Financing I, principal prepayments were prohibited for 12 months after loan origination, after which prepayment premiums are calculated at the greater of yield maintenance or 1% of the outstanding balance.
As of December 31, 2013, mortgage loans payable are collateralized by, and in some instances cross-collateralized by, industrial properties with a net carrying value of $25,870. The Combined Partnerships believe it was in compliance with all covenants relating to mortgage loans payable as of December 31, 2013.
The following is a schedule of the stated maturities and scheduled principal payments of mortgage loans payable for the next five years ending December 31, and thereafter:
|
| | | |
| Amount |
2014 | $ | 606 |
|
2015 | 1,771 |
|
2016 | 635 |
|
2017 | 665 |
|
2018 | 20,386 |
|
Thereafter | 8,772 |
|
Total | $ | 32,835 |
|
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of mortgage loans payable was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) |
| Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
Mortgage Loans Payable | $ | 32,835 |
| | $ | 32,285 |
| | $ | 33,412 |
| | $ | 34,519 |
|
The fair values of the mortgage loans payable were determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made based upon similar leverage levels and similar remaining maturities. The current market rates utilized were internally estimated. The Combined Partnerships have concluded that its determination of fair value for the mortgage loans payable was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs.
| |
5. | Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
Interest Paid | $ | 1,587 |
| | $ | 1,522 |
| | $ | 981 |
|
Accounts Payable Related Additions to Investment in Real Estate | $ | 172 |
| | $ | 63 |
| | $ | 278 |
|
Write-off of Fully Depreciated Assets | $ | (2,140 | ) | | $ | (2,801 | ) | | $ | (1,875 | ) |
| |
6. | Future Rental Revenues |
The Combined Partnerships’ properties are leased to tenants under net and semi-net operating leases. Minimum lease payments, excluding tenant reimbursements of expenses, under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
|
| | | |
2014 | $ | 9,796 |
|
2015 | 7,762 |
|
2016 | 6,018 |
|
2017 | 4,485 |
|
2018 | 3,461 |
|
Thereafter | 10,429 |
|
Total | $ | 41,951 |
|
Credit Risk
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Teledyne Energy Systems, Inc. accounted for 11.2%, 11.5% (unaudited) and 10.5% (unaudited) of rental revenues, respectively.
| |
7. | Related Party Transactions |
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Combined Partnerships had payable balances of $388 and $194 (unaudited), respectively, from wholly owned entities of the Company and the Operating Partnership.
| |
8. | Commitments and Contingencies |
In the normal course of business, the Combined Partnerships are involved in legal actions arising from the ownership of its properties. In management’s opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions are not expected to have a materially adverse effect on the combined financial position, operations or liquidity of the Combined Partnerships.
Subsequent events were evaluated through February 27, 2014 and it was determined that there were no events that required disclosure within these financial statements.
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Address | | Location (City/State) | | (a) Encumbrances | | (b) Initial Cost | | (c) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition or Completion and Valuation Provision | | Gross Amount Carried At Close of Period 12/31/13 | | Accumulated Depreciation 12/31/2013 | | Year Acquired/ Constructed | | Depreciable Lives (Years) |
Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Building and Improvements | | Total |
| | | | (In thousands) | | | | |
Atlanta | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1650 Highway 155 | | McDonough, GA | | — |
| | 788 |
| | 4,544 |
| | (817 | ) | | 365 |
| | 4,150 |
| | 4,515 |
| | 2,368 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1665 Dogwood | | Conyers, GA | | — |
| | 635 |
| | 3,662 |
| | 946 |
| | 635 |
| | 4,608 |
| | 5,243 |
| | 2,064 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1715 Dogwood | | Conyers, GA | | — |
| | 288 |
| | 1,675 |
| | 801 |
| | 228 |
| | 2,536 |
| | 2,764 |
| | 1,006 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
11235 Harland Drive | | Covington, GA | | — |
| | 125 |
| | 739 |
| | 164 |
| | 125 |
| | 903 |
| | 1,028 |
| | 422 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
4051 Southmeadow Parkway | | Atlanta, GA | | — |
| | 726 |
| | 4,130 |
| | 889 |
| | 726 |
| | 5,019 |
| | 5,745 |
| | 2,238 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
4071 Southmeadow Parkway | | Atlanta, GA | | — |
| | 750 |
| | 4,460 |
| | 1,688 |
| | 828 |
| | 6,070 |
| | 6,898 |
| | 2,733 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
4081 Southmeadow Parkway | | Atlanta, GA | | — |
| | 1,012 |
| | 5,918 |
| | 1,457 |
| | 1,157 |
| | 7,230 |
| | 8,387 |
| | 3,214 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
5570 Tulane Dr | (d) | Atlanta, GA | | 2,281 |
| | 527 |
| | 2,984 |
| | 1,046 |
| | 546 |
| | 4,011 |
| | 4,557 |
| | 1,546 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
955 Cobb Place | | Kennesaw, GA | | 3,008 |
| | 780 |
| | 4,420 |
| | 809 |
| | 804 |
| | 5,205 |
| | 6,009 |
| | 1,929 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
1256 Oakbrook Drive | | Norcross, GA | | 1,290 |
| | 336 |
| | 1,907 |
| | 334 |
| | 339 |
| | 2,238 |
| | 2,577 |
| | 673 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
1265 Oakbrook Drive | | Norcross, GA | | 1,167 |
| | 307 |
| | 1,742 |
| | 281 |
| | 309 |
| | 2,021 |
| | 2,330 |
| | 631 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
1280 Oakbrook Drive | | Norcross, GA | | 1,161 |
| | 281 |
| | 1,592 |
| | 286 |
| | 283 |
| | 1,876 |
| | 2,159 |
| | 563 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
1300 Oakbrook Drive | | Norcross, GA | | 1,640 |
| | 420 |
| | 2,381 |
| | 248 |
| | 423 |
| | 2,626 |
| | 3,049 |
| | 797 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
1325 Oakbrook Drive | | Norcross, GA | | 1,362 |
| | 332 |
| | 1,879 |
| | 322 |
| | 334 |
| | 2,199 |
| | 2,533 |
| | 681 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
1351 Oakbrook Drive | | Norcross, GA | | — |
| | 370 |
| | 2,099 |
| | (940 | ) | | 146 |
| | 1,383 |
| | 1,529 |
| | 687 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
1346 Oakbrook Drive | | Norcross, GA | | — |
| | 740 |
| | 4,192 |
| | (699 | ) | | 352 |
| | 3,881 |
| | 4,233 |
| | 1,719 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
3060 South Park Blvd | | Ellenwood, GA | | — |
| | 1,600 |
| | 12,464 |
| | 2,386 |
| | 1,604 |
| | 14,846 |
| | 16,450 |
| | 4,514 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
Greenwood Industrial Park | | McDonough, GA | | 4,523 |
| | 1,550 |
| | — |
| | 7,485 |
| | 1,550 |
| | 7,485 |
| | 9,035 |
| | 1,761 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
46 Kent Drive | | Cartersville GA | | 1,757 |
| | 794 |
| | 2,252 |
| | 6 |
| | 798 |
| | 2,254 |
| | 3,052 |
| | 725 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
605 Stonehill Drive | | Atlanta, GA | | 1,534 |
| | 485 |
| | 1,979 |
| | (23 | ) | | 490 |
| | 1,951 |
| | 2,441 |
| | 1,521 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
6514 Warren Drive | | Norcross, GA | | — |
| | 510 |
| | 1,250 |
| | 114 |
| | 513 |
| | 1,361 |
| | 1,874 |
| | 390 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
6544 Warren Drive | | Norcross, GA | | — |
| | 711 |
| | 2,310 |
| | 298 |
| | 715 |
| | 2,604 |
| | 3,319 |
| | 799 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
5356 E. Ponce De Leon | | Stone Mountain, GA | | 2,571 |
| | 604 |
| | 3,888 |
| | 288 |
| | 610 |
| | 4,170 |
| | 4,780 |
| | 1,724 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
5390 E. Ponce De Leon | | Stone Mountain, GA | | — |
| | 397 |
| | 1,791 |
| | 42 |
| | 402 |
| | 1,828 |
| | 2,230 |
| | 622 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
195 & 197 Collins Boulevard | | Athens, GA | | — |
| | 1,410 |
| | 5,344 |
| | (1,742 | ) | | 989 |
| | 4,023 |
| | 5,012 |
| | 3,142 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
1755 Enterprise Drive | | Buford, GA | | 1,317 |
| | 712 |
| | 2,118 |
| | (200 | ) | | 716 |
| | 1,914 |
| | 2,630 |
| | 533 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
4555 Atwater Court | | Buford, GA | | 2,266 |
| | 881 |
| | 3,550 |
| | 96 |
| | 885 |
| | 3,642 |
| | 4,527 |
| | 1,002 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
80 Liberty Industrial Parkway | | McDonough, GA | | — |
| | 756 |
| | 3,695 |
| | (1,428 | ) | | 467 |
| | 2,556 |
| | 3,023 |
| | 800 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
596 Bonnie Valentine | | Pendergrass, GA | | — |
| | 2,580 |
| | 21,730 |
| | 2,870 |
| | 2,594 |
| | 24,586 |
| | 27,180 |
| | 5,013 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
11415 Old Roswell Road | | Alpharetta, GA | | 3,148 |
| | 2,403 |
| | 1,912 |
| | 628 |
| | 2,428 |
| | 2,515 |
| | 4,943 |
| | 784 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Baltimore | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9700 Martin Luther King Hwy | | Lanham, MD | | — |
| | 700 |
| | 1,920 |
| | 734 |
| | 700 |
| | 2,654 |
| | 3,354 |
| | 961 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
9730 Martin Luther King Hwy | | Lanham, MD | | — |
| | 500 |
| | 955 |
| | 500 |
| | 500 |
| | 1,455 |
| | 1,955 |
| | 498 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4621 Boston Way | | Lanham, MD | | — |
| | 1,100 |
| | 3,070 |
| | 466 |
| | 1,100 |
| | 3,536 |
| | 4,636 |
| | 1,235 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
4720 Boston Way | | Lanham, MD | | — |
| | 1,200 |
| | 2,174 |
| | 630 |
| | 1,200 |
| | 2,804 |
| | 4,004 |
| | 903 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
22520 Randolph Drive | | Dulles, VA | | 7,301 |
| | 3,200 |
| | 8,187 |
| | (850 | ) | | 3,208 |
| | 7,329 |
| | 10,537 |
| | 1,508 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
22630 Dulles Summit Court | | Dulles, VA | | — |
| | 2,200 |
| | 9,346 |
| | (820 | ) | | 2,206 |
| | 8,520 |
| | 10,726 |
| | 1,793 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
4201 Forbes Boulevard | | Lanham, MD | | — |
| | 356 |
| | 1,823 |
| | 156 |
| | 375 |
| | 1,960 |
| | 2,335 |
| | 518 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
4370-4383 Lottsford Vista Road | | Lanham, MD | | — |
| | 279 |
| | 1,358 |
| | 107 |
| | 296 |
| | 1,448 |
| | 1,744 |
| | 399 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
4400 Lottsford Vista Road | | Lanham, MD | | — |
| | 351 |
| | 1,955 |
| | 206 |
| | 372 |
| | 2,140 |
| | 2,512 |
| | 481 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
4420 Lottsford Vista Road | | Lanham, MD | | — |
| | 539 |
| | 2,196 |
| | (14 | ) | | 568 |
| | 2,153 |
| | 2,721 |
| | 522 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
11204 McCormick Road | | Hunt Valley, MD | | — |
| | 1,017 |
| | 3,132 |
| | (59 | ) | | 1,038 |
| | 3,052 |
| | 4,090 |
| | 1,043 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
11110 Pepper Road | | Hunt Valley, MD | | — |
| | 918 |
| | 2,529 |
| | 337 |
| | 938 |
| | 2,846 |
| | 3,784 |
| | 1,070 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
11100-11120 Gilroy Road | | Hunt Valley, MD | | — |
| | 901 |
| | 1,455 |
| | (55 | ) | | 919 |
| | 1,382 |
| | 2,301 |
| | 490 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
10709 Gilroy Road | | Hunt Valley, MD | | 2,436 |
| | 913 |
| | 2,705 |
| | (143 | ) | | 913 |
| | 2,562 |
| | 3,475 |
| | 1,030 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
7120-7132 Ambassador Road | | Baltimore, MD | | — |
| | 829 |
| | 1,329 |
| | 1,155 |
| | 847 |
| | 2,466 |
| | 3,313 |
| | 648 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
7142 Ambassador Road | | Hunt Valley, MD | | — |
| | 924 |
| | 2,876 |
| | 4,274 |
| | 942 |
| | 7,132 |
| | 8,074 |
| | 1,363 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
7144-7162 Ambassador Road | | Baltimore, MD | | — |
| | 979 |
| | 1,672 |
| | 181 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 1,832 |
| | 2,832 |
| | 613 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
7200 Rutherford Road | | Baltimore, MD | | — |
| | 1,032 |
| | 2,150 |
| | 330 |
| | 1,054 |
| | 2,458 |
| | 3,512 |
| | 840 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
2700 Lord Baltimore Road | | Baltimore, MD | | — |
| | 875 |
| | 1,826 |
| | 740 |
| | 897 |
| | 2,544 |
| | 3,441 |
| | 939 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
1225 Bengies Road | | Baltimore, MD | | — |
| | 2,640 |
| | 270 |
| | 14,439 |
| | 2,823 |
| | 14,526 |
| | 17,349 |
| | 2,902 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Central Pennsylvania | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
16522 Hunters Green Parkway | | Hagerstown, MD | | 11,893 |
| | 1,390 |
| | 13,104 |
| | 3,948 |
| | 1,863 |
| | 16,579 |
| | 18,442 |
| | 4,302 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
6951 Allentown Blvd | | Harrisburg, PA | | — |
| | 585 |
| | 3,176 |
| | 306 |
| | 601 |
| | 3,466 |
| | 4,067 |
| | 1,045 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
320 Reliance Road | | Washington, PA | | — |
| | 201 |
| | 1,819 |
| | (283 | ) | | 178 |
| | 1,559 |
| | 1,737 |
| | 660 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
1490 Dennison Circle | | Carlisle, PA | | — |
| | 1,500 |
| | — |
| | 14,234 |
| | 2,341 |
| | 13,393 |
| | 15,734 |
| | 2,527 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
298 First Avenue | | Gouldsboro, PA | | — |
| | 7,022 |
| | — |
| | 58,462 |
| | 7,019 |
| | 58,465 |
| | 65,484 |
| | 8,269 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
225 Cross Farm Lane | | York, PA | | 17,796 |
| | 4,718 |
| | — |
| | 23,567 |
| | 4,715 |
| | 23,570 |
| | 28,285 |
| | 3,689 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
105 Steamboat Blvd | | Manchester, PA | | — |
| | 4,085 |
| | 14,464 |
| | 1 |
| | 4,070 |
| | 14,480 |
| | 18,550 |
| | 1,116 |
| | 2012 | | (j) |
Chicago | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6750 South Sayre Avenue | | Bedford Park, IL | | — |
| | 224 |
| | 1,309 |
| | 584 |
| | 224 |
| | 1,893 |
| | 2,117 |
| | 862 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
585 Slawin Court | | Mount Prospect, IL | | — |
| | 611 |
| | 3,505 |
| | 1,697 |
| | 525 |
| | 5,288 |
| | 5,813 |
| | 3,093 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2300 Windsor Court | | Addison, IL | | 3,652 |
| | 688 |
| | 3,943 |
| | 1,173 |
| | 696 |
| | 5,108 |
| | 5,804 |
| | 2,492 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
305-311 Era Drive | | Northbrook, IL | | — |
| | 200 |
| | 1,154 |
| | 1,012 |
| | 205 |
| | 2,161 |
| | 2,366 |
| | 733 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
11241 Melrose Street | | Franklin Park, IL | | — |
| | 332 |
| | 1,931 |
| | 44 |
| | 208 |
| | 2,099 |
| | 2,307 |
| | 1,240 |
| | 1995 | | (j) |
11939 South Central Avenue | | Alsip, IL | | — |
| | 1,208 |
| | 6,843 |
| | 2,685 |
| | 1,305 |
| | 9,431 |
| | 10,736 |
| | 3,672 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
1010-50 Sesame Street | | Bensenville, IL | | — |
| | 979 |
| | 5,546 |
| | 3,998 |
| | 1,048 |
| | 9,475 |
| | 10,523 |
| | 3,211 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
2120-24 Roberts | | Broadview, IL | | — |
| | 220 |
| | 1,248 |
| | 277 |
| | 231 |
| | 1,514 |
| | 1,745 |
| | 583 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
800 Business Drive | | Mount Prospect, IL | | — |
| | 631 |
| | 3,493 |
| | 328 |
| | 666 |
| | 3,786 |
| | 4,452 |
| | 1,230 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
580 Slawin Court | | Mount Prospect, IL | | 818 |
| | 233 |
| | 1,292 |
| | (37 | ) | | 162 |
| | 1,326 |
| | 1,488 |
| | 505 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
1005 101st Street | | Lemont, IL | | 6,141 |
| | 1,200 |
| | 6,643 |
| | 918 |
| | 1,220 |
| | 7,541 |
| | 8,761 |
| | 2,406 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
175 Wall Street | | Glendale Heights, IL | | 1,478 |
| | 427 |
| | 2,363 |
| | 163 |
| | 433 |
| | 2,520 |
| | 2,953 |
| | 799 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
800-820 Thorndale Avenue | | Bensenville, IL | | — |
| | 751 |
| | 4,159 |
| | 1,464 |
| | 761 |
| | 5,613 |
| | 6,374 |
| | 1,971 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
251 Airport Road | | North Aurora, IL | | 5,171 |
| | 983 |
| | — |
| | 6,696 |
| | 983 |
| | 6,696 |
| | 7,679 |
| | 1,999 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1661 Feehanville Drive | | Mount Prospect, IL | | — |
| | 985 |
| | 5,455 |
| | 2,725 |
| | 1,044 |
| | 8,121 |
| | 9,165 |
| | 2,599 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
400 Crossroads Pkwy | | Bolingbrook, IL | | — |
| | 1,178 |
| | 9,453 |
| | 1,130 |
| | 1,181 |
| | 10,580 |
| | 11,761 |
| | 3,078 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
7609 W. Industrial Drive | | Forest Park, IL | | — |
| | 1,207 |
| | 2,343 |
| | 103 |
| | 1,213 |
| | 2,440 |
| | 3,653 |
| | 963 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
7801 W. Industrial Drive | | Forest Park, IL | | — |
| | 1,215 |
| | 3,020 |
| | 468 |
| | 1,220 |
| | 3,483 |
| | 4,703 |
| | 1,230 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
725 Kimberly Drive | | Carol Stream, IL | | — |
| | 793 |
| | 1,395 |
| | 154 |
| | 801 |
| | 1,541 |
| | 2,342 |
| | 505 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
17001 S. Vincennes | | Thornton, IL | | — |
| | 497 |
| | 504 |
| | 37 |
| | 513 |
| | 525 |
| | 1,038 |
| | 332 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
1111 Davis Road | | Elgin, IL | | 2,777 |
| | 998 |
| | 1,859 |
| | 1,028 |
| | 1,046 |
| | 2,839 |
| | 3,885 |
| | 1,690 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2900 W. 166th Street | | Markham, IL | | — |
| | 1,132 |
| | 4,293 |
| | 723 |
| | 1,134 |
| | 5,014 |
| | 6,148 |
| | 2,093 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
555 W. Algonquin Rd | | Arlington Heights, IL | | — |
| | 574 |
| | 741 |
| | 1,936 |
| | 579 |
| | 2,672 |
| | 3,251 |
| | 608 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
7000 W. 60th Street | | Chicago, IL | | — |
| | 609 |
| | 932 |
| | 100 |
| | 667 |
| | 974 |
| | 1,641 |
| | 511 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
9501 Nevada | | Franklin Park, IL | | — |
| | 2,721 |
| | 5,630 |
| | (199 | ) | | 2,737 |
| | 5,415 |
| | 8,152 |
| | 1,182 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
1501 Oakton Street | | Elk Grove Village, IL | | 7,283 |
| | 3,369 |
| | 6,121 |
| | (117 | ) | | 3,482 |
| | 5,891 |
| | 9,373 |
| | 1,291 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
16500 W. 103rd Street | | Woodridge, IL | | 2,448 |
| | 744 |
| | 2,458 |
| | 366 |
| | 762 |
| | 2,806 |
| | 3,568 |
| | 738 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
8505 50th Street | | Kenosha, WI | | — |
| | 3,212 |
| | — |
| | 24,960 |
| | 3,212 |
| | 24,960 |
| | 28,172 |
| | 3,905 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
4100 Rock Creek Blvd | | Joliet, IL | | — |
| | 4,476 |
| | 16,061 |
| | 77 |
| | 4,476 |
| | 16,138 |
| | 20,614 |
| | 380 |
| | 2013 | | (j) |
10100 58th Place | | Kenosha, WI | | — |
| | 4,201 |
| | 17,604 |
| | 1,363 |
| | 4,201 |
| | 18,967 |
| | 23,168 |
| | 247 |
| | 2013 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Address | | Location (City/State) | | (a) Encumbrances | | (b) Initial Cost | | (c) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition or Completion and Valuation Provision | | Gross Amount Carried At Close of Period 12/31/13 | | Accumulated Depreciation 12/31/2013 | | Year Acquired/ Constructed | | Depreciable Lives (Years) |
Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Building and Improvements | | Total |
| | | | (In thousands) | | | | |
Cincinnati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9900-9970 Princeton | | Cincinnati, OH | | 3,743 |
| | 545 |
| | 3,088 |
| | 1,706 |
| | 566 |
| | 4,773 |
| | 5,339 |
| | 1,993 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
2940 Highland | | Cincinnati, OH | | — |
| | 1,717 |
| | 9,730 |
| | 94 |
| | 952 |
| | 10,589 |
| | 11,541 |
| | 5,167 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
4700-4750 Creek Road | | Blue Ash, OH | | — |
| | 1,080 |
| | 6,118 |
| | 1,351 |
| | 1,109 |
| | 7,440 |
| | 8,549 |
| | 3,066 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
4436 Muhlhauser Road | | Hamilton, OH | | 3,715 |
| | 630 |
| | — |
| | 5,276 |
| | 630 |
| | 5,276 |
| | 5,906 |
| | 1,490 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
4438 Muhlhauser Road | | Hamilton, OH | | 4,575 |
| | 779 |
| | — |
| | 6,517 |
| | 779 |
| | 6,517 |
| | 7,296 |
| | 1,886 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
420 Wards Corner Road | | Loveland, OH | | — |
| | 600 |
| | 1,083 |
| | 574 |
| | 606 |
| | 1,651 |
| | 2,257 |
| | 515 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
422 Wards Corner Road | | Loveland, OH | | — |
| | 600 |
| | 1,811 |
| | (137 | ) | | 592 |
| | 1,682 |
| | 2,274 |
| | 511 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
4663 Dues Drive | | Westchester, OH | | — |
| | 858 |
| | 2,273 |
| | 543 |
| | 875 |
| | 2,799 |
| | 3,674 |
| | 2,195 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
9525 Glades Drive | | Westchester, OH | | — |
| | 347 |
| | 1,323 |
| | 115 |
| | 355 |
| | 1,430 |
| | 1,785 |
| | 485 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
9774-9792 Windisch Road | | Westchester, OH | | — |
| | 392 |
| | 1,744 |
| | 29 |
| | 394 |
| | 1,771 |
| | 2,165 |
| | 469 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
9808-9830 Windisch Road | | Westchester, OH | | — |
| | 395 |
| | 2,541 |
| | 47 |
| | 397 |
| | 2,586 |
| | 2,983 |
| | 521 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
9842-9862 Windisch Road | | Westchester, OH | | — |
| | 506 |
| | 3,148 |
| | 143 |
| | 508 |
| | 3,289 |
| | 3,797 |
| | 710 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
9872-9898 Windisch Road | | Westchester, OH | | — |
| | 546 |
| | 3,039 |
| | 137 |
| | 548 |
| | 3,174 |
| | 3,722 |
| | 722 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
9902-9922 Windisch Road | | Westchester, OH | | — |
| | 623 |
| | 4,003 |
| | 694 |
| | 627 |
| | 4,693 |
| | 5,320 |
| | 1,244 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
Cleveland | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30311 Emerald Valley Parkway | | Glenwillow, OH | | 9,320 |
| | 681 |
| | 11,838 |
| | 988 |
| | 691 |
| | 12,816 |
| | 13,507 |
| | 3,523 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
30333 Emerald Valley Parkway | | Glenwillow, OH | | 4,693 |
| | 466 |
| | 5,447 |
| | 186 |
| | 475 |
| | 5,624 |
| | 6,099 |
| | 1,812 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
7800 Cochran Road | | Glenwillow, OH | | — |
| | 972 |
| | 7,033 |
| | 337 |
| | 991 |
| | 7,351 |
| | 8,342 |
| | 2,131 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
7900 Cochran Road | | Glenwillow, OH | | 4,808 |
| | 775 |
| | 6,244 |
| | 10 |
| | 792 |
| | 6,237 |
| | 7,029 |
| | 1,652 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
7905 Cochran Road | | Glenwillow, OH | | — |
| | 920 |
| | 6,174 |
| | 341 |
| | 921 |
| | 6,514 |
| | 7,435 |
| | 1,913 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
30600 Carter Street | | Solon, OH | | — |
| | 989 |
| | 3,042 |
| | 652 |
| | 1,022 |
| | 3,661 |
| | 4,683 |
| | 2,139 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
8181 Darrow Road | | Twinsburg, OH | | 7,100 |
| | 2,478 |
| | 6,791 |
| | 2,016 |
| | 2,496 |
| | 8,789 |
| | 11,285 |
| | 2,805 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Dallas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2406-2416 Walnut Ridge | | Dallas, TX | | — |
| | 178 |
| | 1,006 |
| | 633 |
| | 172 |
| | 1,645 |
| | 1,817 |
| | 545 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
2401-2419 Walnut Ridge | | Dallas, TX | | — |
| | 148 |
| | 839 |
| | 403 |
| | 142 |
| | 1,248 |
| | 1,390 |
| | 398 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
900-906 Great Southwest Pkwy | | Arlington, TX | | — |
| | 237 |
| | 1,342 |
| | 638 |
| | 270 |
| | 1,947 |
| | 2,217 |
| | 756 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
3000 West Commerce | | Dallas, TX | | — |
| | 456 |
| | 2,584 |
| | 1,032 |
| | 469 |
| | 3,603 |
| | 4,072 |
| | 1,363 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
3030 Hansboro | | Dallas, TX | | — |
| | 266 |
| | 1,510 |
| | (664 | ) | | 87 |
| | 1,025 |
| | 1,112 |
| | 628 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
405-407 113th | | Arlington, TX | | — |
| | 181 |
| | 1,026 |
| | 588 |
| | 185 |
| | 1,610 |
| | 1,795 |
| | 624 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
816 111th Street | | Arlington, TX | | 882 |
| | 251 |
| | 1,421 |
| | 195 |
| | 258 |
| | 1,609 |
| | 1,867 |
| | 633 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
7427 Dogwood Park | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 96 |
| | 532 |
| | 302 |
| | 102 |
| | 828 |
| | 930 |
| | 274 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
7348-54 Tower Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 88 |
| | 489 |
| | 213 |
| | 94 |
| | 696 |
| | 790 |
| | 246 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
7339-41 Tower Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 98 |
| | 541 |
| | 174 |
| | 104 |
| | 709 |
| | 813 |
| | 245 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
7437-45 Tower Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 102 |
| | 563 |
| | 287 |
| | 108 |
| | 844 |
| | 952 |
| | 268 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7331-59 Airport Freeway | | Richland Hills, TX | | 1,669 |
| | 354 |
| | 1,958 |
| | 340 |
| | 372 |
| | 2,280 |
| | 2,652 |
| | 829 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
7338-60 Dogwood Park | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 106 |
| | 587 |
| | 244 |
| | 112 |
| | 825 |
| | 937 |
| | 265 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
7450-70 Dogwood Park | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 106 |
| | 584 |
| | 99 |
| | 112 |
| | 677 |
| | 789 |
| | 250 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
7423-49 Airport Freeway | | Richland Hills, TX | | 1,487 |
| | 293 |
| | 1,621 |
| | 449 |
| | 308 |
| | 2,055 |
| | 2,363 |
| | 712 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
7400 Whitehall Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 109 |
| | 603 |
| | 95 |
| | 115 |
| | 692 |
| | 807 |
| | 249 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1602-1654 Terre Colony | | Dallas, TX | | 1,831 |
| | 458 |
| | 2,596 |
| | 822 |
| | 468 |
| | 3,408 |
| | 3,876 |
| | 1,043 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2351-2355 Merritt Drive | | Garland, TX | | — |
| | 101 |
| | 574 |
| | 157 |
| | 92 |
| | 740 |
| | 832 |
| | 257 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2220 Merritt Drive | | Garland, TX | | — |
| | 352 |
| | 1,993 |
| | 507 |
| | 316 |
| | 2,536 |
| | 2,852 |
| | 896 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2010 Merritt Drive | | Garland, TX | | — |
| | 350 |
| | 1,981 |
| | 55 |
| | 318 |
| | 2,068 |
| | 2,386 |
| | 608 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2363 Merritt Drive | | Garland, TX | | — |
| | 73 |
| | 412 |
| | 10 |
| | 47 |
| | 448 |
| | 495 |
| | 200 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2447 Merritt Drive | | Garland, TX | | — |
| | 70 |
| | 395 |
| | (115 | ) | | 23 |
| | 327 |
| | 350 |
| | 190 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2465-2475 Merritt Drive | | Garland, TX | | — |
| | 91 |
| | 514 |
| | 39 |
| | 71 |
| | 573 |
| | 644 |
| | 206 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2485-2505 Merritt Drive | | Garland, TX | | — |
| | 431 |
| | 2,440 |
| | 762 |
| | 426 |
| | 3,207 |
| | 3,633 |
| | 1,055 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2110 Hutton Drive | | Carrolton, TX | | — |
| | 374 |
| | 2,117 |
| | 100 |
| | 255 |
| | 2,336 |
| | 2,591 |
| | 717 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
2025 McKenzie Drive | | Carrolton, TX | | 1,439 |
| | 437 |
| | 2,478 |
| | 130 |
| | 442 |
| | 2,603 |
| | 3,045 |
| | 831 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
2019 McKenzie Drive | | Carrolton, TX | | 1,734 |
| | 502 |
| | 2,843 |
| | 324 |
| | 507 |
| | 3,162 |
| | 3,669 |
| | 1,031 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
2029-2035 McKenzie Drive | | Carrolton, TX | | 1,512 |
| | 306 |
| | 1,870 |
| | 236 |
| | 306 |
| | 2,106 |
| | 2,412 |
| | 675 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
2015 McKenzie Drive | | Carrolton, TX | | 2,527 |
| | 510 |
| | 2,891 |
| | 352 |
| | 516 |
| | 3,237 |
| | 3,753 |
| | 1,015 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
2009 McKenzie Drive | | Carrolton, TX | | 2,448 |
| | 476 |
| | 2,699 |
| | 460 |
| | 481 |
| | 3,154 |
| | 3,635 |
| | 1,011 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
900-1100 Avenue S | | Grand Prairie, TX | | 2,577 |
| | 623 |
| | 3,528 |
| | 1,304 |
| | 629 |
| | 4,826 |
| | 5,455 |
| | 1,538 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
Plano Crossing | (f) | Plano, TX | | 9,504 |
| | 1,961 |
| | 11,112 |
| | 1,039 |
| | 1,981 |
| | 12,131 |
| | 14,112 |
| | 3,464 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
7413A-C Dogwood Park | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 110 |
| | 623 |
| | 255 |
| | 111 |
| | 877 |
| | 988 |
| | 265 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
7450 Tower Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 36 |
| | 204 |
| | 103 |
| | 36 |
| | 307 |
| | 343 |
| | 101 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
7436 Tower Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 57 |
| | 324 |
| | 196 |
| | 58 |
| | 519 |
| | 577 |
| | 150 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
7426 Tower Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 76 |
| | 429 |
| | 249 |
| | 76 |
| | 678 |
| | 754 |
| | 230 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
7427-7429 Tower Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 75 |
| | 427 |
| | 146 |
| | 76 |
| | 572 |
| | 648 |
| | 189 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
2840-2842 Handley Ederville Rd | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 112 |
| | 635 |
| | 55 |
| | 113 |
| | 689 |
| | 802 |
| | 192 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
7451-7477 Airport Freeway | | Richland Hills, TX | | 1,387 |
| | 256 |
| | 1,453 |
| | 495 |
| | 259 |
| | 1,945 |
| | 2,204 |
| | 541 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
7450 Whitehall Street | | Richland Hills, TX | | — |
| | 104 |
| | 591 |
| | 339 |
| | 105 |
| | 929 |
| | 1,034 |
| | 223 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
3000 Wesley Way | | Richland Hills, TX | | 907 |
| | 208 |
| | 1,181 |
| | 18 |
| | 211 |
| | 1,196 |
| | 1,407 |
| | 337 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
7451 Dogwood Park | | Richland Hills, TX | | 671 |
| | 133 |
| | 753 |
| | 184 |
| | 134 |
| | 936 |
| | 1,070 |
| | 224 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
825-827 Avenue H | (d) | Arlington, TX | | 2,568 |
| | 600 |
| | 3,006 |
| | 58 |
| | 604 |
| | 3,060 |
| | 3,664 |
| | 1,094 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
1013-31 Avenue M | | Grand Prairie, TX | | — |
| | 300 |
| | 1,504 |
| | 243 |
| | 302 |
| | 1,745 |
| | 2,047 |
| | 527 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
1172-84 113th Street | (d) | Grand Prairie, TX | | 1,992 |
| | 700 |
| | 3,509 |
| | 5 |
| | 704 |
| | 3,510 |
| | 4,214 |
| | 1,091 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
1200-16 Avenue H | (d) | Arlington, TX | | 1,733 |
| | 600 |
| | 2,846 |
| | 222 |
| | 604 |
| | 3,064 |
| | 3,668 |
| | 847 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
1322-66 W. North Carrier Parkway | (e) | Grand Prairie, TX | | 4,633 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 5,012 |
| | 598 |
| | 1,006 |
| | 5,604 |
| | 6,610 |
| | 1,571 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
2401-2407 Centennial Dr | | Arlington, TX | | 2,107 |
| | 600 |
| | 2,534 |
| | (93 | ) | | 604 |
| | 2,437 |
| | 3,041 |
| | 909 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
3111 West Commerce Street | | Dallas, TX | | 3,731 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 3,364 |
| | 517 |
| | 1,011 |
| | 3,870 |
| | 4,881 |
| | 1,201 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
13800 Senlac Drive | | Farmers Ranch, TX | | 3,399 |
| | 823 |
| | 4,042 |
| | (16 | ) | | 825 |
| | 4,024 |
| | 4,849 |
| | 1,204 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
801-831 S Great Southwest Pkwy | (g) | Grand Prairie, TX | | — |
| | 2,581 |
| | 16,556 |
| | 15 |
| | 2,586 |
| | 16,566 |
| | 19,152 |
| | 6,938 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
801 Heinz Way | | Grand Prairie, TX | | 2,697 |
| | 599 |
| | 3,327 |
| | 360 |
| | 601 |
| | 3,685 |
| | 4,286 |
| | 1,227 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
901-937 Heinz Way | | Grand Prairie, TX | | 2,065 |
| | 493 |
| | 2,758 |
| | 31 |
| | 481 |
| | 2,801 |
| | 3,282 |
| | 970 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
3301 Century Circle | | Irving, TX | | 2,173 |
| | 760 |
| | 3,856 |
| | (16 | ) | | 771 |
| | 3,829 |
| | 4,600 |
| | 746 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
3901 W Miller Road | | Garland, TX | | — |
| | 1,912 |
| | — |
| | 16,444 |
| | 1,947 |
| | 16,409 |
| | 18,356 |
| | 3,234 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Denver | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4785 Elati | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 173 |
| | 981 |
| | 203 |
| | 175 |
| | 1,182 |
| | 1,357 |
| | 448 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
4770 Fox Street | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 132 |
| | 750 |
| | 216 |
| | 134 |
| | 964 |
| | 1,098 |
| | 378 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
3851-3871 Revere | | Denver, CO | | 1,309 |
| | 361 |
| | 2,047 |
| | 363 |
| | 368 |
| | 2,403 |
| | 2,771 |
| | 909 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
4570 Ivy Street | | Denver, CO | | 1,120 |
| | 219 |
| | 1,239 |
| | 279 |
| | 220 |
| | 1,517 |
| | 1,737 |
| | 587 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5855 Stapleton Drive North | | Denver, CO | | 1,398 |
| | 288 |
| | 1,630 |
| | 249 |
| | 290 |
| | 1,877 |
| | 2,167 |
| | 742 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5885 Stapleton Drive North | | Denver, CO | | 1,741 |
| | 376 |
| | 2,129 |
| | 195 |
| | 380 |
| | 2,320 |
| | 2,700 |
| | 919 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5977 North Broadway | | Denver, CO | | 1,438 |
| | 268 |
| | 1,518 |
| | 500 |
| | 271 |
| | 2,015 |
| | 2,286 |
| | 719 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Address | | Location (City/State) | | (a) Encumbrances | | (b) Initial Cost | | (c) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition or Completion and Valuation Provision | | Gross Amount Carried At Close of Period 12/31/13 | | Accumulated Depreciation 12/31/2013 | | Year Acquired/ Constructed | | Depreciable Lives (Years) |
Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Building and Improvements | | Total |
| | | | (In thousands) | | | | |
5952-5978 North Broadway | | Denver, CO | | 2,301 |
| | 414 |
| | 2,346 |
| | 898 |
| | 422 |
| | 3,236 |
| | 3,658 |
| | 1,307 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
4721 Ironton Street | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 232 |
| | 1,313 |
| | 305 |
| | 236 |
| | 1,614 |
| | 1,850 |
| | 624 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
7003 E 47th Ave Drive | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 441 |
| | 2,689 |
| | 16 |
| | 441 |
| | 2,705 |
| | 3,146 |
| | 1,099 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
9500 West 49th Street - A | | Wheatridge, CO | | — |
| | 283 |
| | 1,625 |
| | 112 |
| | 287 |
| | 1,733 |
| | 2,020 |
| | 762 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
9500 West 49th Street - B | | Wheatridge, CO | | — |
| | 225 |
| | 1,272 |
| | 132 |
| | 227 |
| | 1,402 |
| | 1,629 |
| | 556 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
9500 West 49th Street - C | | Wheatridge, CO | | — |
| | 600 |
| | 3,409 |
| | 123 |
| | 601 |
| | 3,531 |
| | 4,132 |
| | 1,460 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
9500 West 49th Street - D | | Wheatridge, CO | | — |
| | 246 |
| | 1,537 |
| | 390 |
| | 247 |
| | 1,926 |
| | 2,173 |
| | 812 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
451-591 East 124th Avenue | | Littleton, CO | | — |
| | 383 |
| | 2,145 |
| | 466 |
| | 383 |
| | 2,611 |
| | 2,994 |
| | 989 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
15000 West 6th Avenue | | Golden, CO | | — |
| | 913 |
| | 5,174 |
| | 1,097 |
| | 918 |
| | 6,266 |
| | 7,184 |
| | 2,593 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
14998 West 6th Avenue Bldg E | | Golden, CO | | — |
| | 565 |
| | 3,199 |
| | 341 |
| | 570 |
| | 3,535 |
| | 4,105 |
| | 1,370 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
14998 West 6th Avenue Bldg F | | Englewood, CO | | — |
| | 269 |
| | 1,525 |
| | 96 |
| | 273 |
| | 1,617 |
| | 1,890 |
| | 650 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
6547 South Racine Circle | | Englewood, CO | | 2,930 |
| | 739 |
| | 4,241 |
| | 346 |
| | 739 |
| | 4,587 |
| | 5,326 |
| | 1,925 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
11701 East 53rd Avenue | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 416 |
| | 2,355 |
| | 399 |
| | 422 |
| | 2,748 |
| | 3,170 |
| | 1,041 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5401 Oswego | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 273 |
| | 1,547 |
| | 254 |
| | 278 |
| | 1,796 |
| | 2,074 |
| | 722 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
14818 West 6th Avenue Bldg A | | Golden, CO | | — |
| | 468 |
| | 2,799 |
| | 131 |
| | 468 |
| | 2,930 |
| | 3,398 |
| | 1,176 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
14828 West 6th Avenue Bldg B | | Golden, CO | | — |
| | 503 |
| | 2,942 |
| | 386 |
| | 503 |
| | 3,328 |
| | 3,831 |
| | 1,334 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
445 Bryant Street | | Denver, CO | | 6,904 |
| | 1,829 |
| | 10,219 |
| | 2,564 |
| | 1,829 |
| | 12,783 |
| | 14,612 |
| | 4,935 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
3811 Joliet | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 735 |
| | 4,166 |
| | 543 |
| | 752 |
| | 4,692 |
| | 5,444 |
| | 1,802 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
12055 E 49th Ave/4955 Peoria | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 298 |
| | 1,688 |
| | 481 |
| | 305 |
| | 2,162 |
| | 2,467 |
| | 802 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
4940-4950 Paris | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 152 |
| | 861 |
| | 285 |
| | 156 |
| | 1,142 |
| | 1,298 |
| | 427 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
4970 Paris | | Denver, CO | | — |
| | 95 |
| | 537 |
| | 101 |
| | 97 |
| | 636 |
| | 733 |
| | 239 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
7367 South Revere Parkway | | Englewood, CO | | 3,273 |
| | 926 |
| | 5,124 |
| | 877 |
| | 934 |
| | 5,993 |
| | 6,927 |
| | 2,444 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
8200 East Park Meadows Drive | (d) | Lone Tree, CO | | — |
| | 1,297 |
| | 7,348 |
| | 1,281 |
| | 1,304 |
| | 8,622 |
| | 9,926 |
| | 2,817 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
3250 Quentin Street | (d) | Aurora, CO | | — |
| | 1,220 |
| | 6,911 |
| | 937 |
| | 1,230 |
| | 7,838 |
| | 9,068 |
| | 2,612 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
Highpoint Bus Ctr B | | Littleton, CO | | — |
| | 739 |
| | — |
| | 3,500 |
| | 781 |
| | 3,458 |
| | 4,239 |
| | 1,020 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
1130 W. 124th Ave. | | Westminster, CO | | — |
| | 441 |
| | — |
| | 3,382 |
| | 441 |
| | 3,382 |
| | 3,823 |
| | 1,154 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
1070 W. 124th Ave. | | Westminster, CO | | — |
| | 374 |
| | — |
| | 2,902 |
| | 374 |
| | 2,902 |
| | 3,276 |
| | 924 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
1020 W. 124th Ave. | | Westminster, CO | | — |
| | 374 |
| | — |
| | 2,825 |
| | 374 |
| | 2,825 |
| | 3,199 |
| | 859 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
8810 W. 116th Circle | | Broomfield, CO | | — |
| | 312 |
| | — |
| | 1,462 |
| | 370 |
| | 1,404 |
| | 1,774 |
| | 407 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
960 W. 124th Ave | | Westminster, CO | | — |
| | 441 |
| | — |
| | 3,432 |
| | 442 |
| | 3,431 |
| | 3,873 |
| | 1,070 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
8820 W. 116th Circle | | Broomfield, CO | | — |
| | 338 |
| | 1,918 |
| | 317 |
| | 372 |
| | 2,201 |
| | 2,573 |
| | 597 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
8835 W. 116th Circle | | Broomfield, CO | | — |
| | 1,151 |
| | 6,523 |
| | 1,628 |
| | 1,304 |
| | 7,998 |
| | 9,302 |
| | 2,205 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
18150 E. 32nd Place | | Aurora, CO | | 1,913 |
| | 563 |
| | 3,188 |
| | 298 |
| | 572 |
| | 3,477 |
| | 4,049 |
| | 1,052 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
7005 E. 46th Avenue Drive | | Denver, CO | | 1,448 |
| | 512 |
| | 2,025 |
| | 94 |
| | 517 |
| | 2,114 |
| | 2,631 |
| | 674 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
4001 Salazar Way | | Frederick, CO | | — |
| | 1,271 |
| | 6,508 |
| | (88 | ) | | 1,276 |
| | 6,415 |
| | 7,691 |
| | 1,818 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5909-5915 N. Broadway | | Denver, CO | | 913 |
| | 495 |
| | 1,268 |
| | 80 |
| | 500 |
| | 1,343 |
| | 1,843 |
| | 514 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
Detroit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
449 Executive Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 125 |
| | 425 |
| | 1,060 |
| | 218 |
| | 1,392 |
| | 1,610 |
| | 1,244 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
501 Executive Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 71 |
| | 236 |
| | 610 |
| | 129 |
| | 788 |
| | 917 |
| | 634 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
451 Robbins Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 96 |
| | 448 |
| | 877 |
| | 192 |
| | 1,229 |
| | 1,421 |
| | 1,093 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1416 Meijer Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 94 |
| | 394 |
| | 399 |
| | 121 |
| | 766 |
| | 887 |
| | 695 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1624 Meijer Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 236 |
| | 1,406 |
| | 967 |
| | 373 |
| | 2,236 |
| | 2,609 |
| | 1,967 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1972 Meijer Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 315 |
| | 1,301 |
| | 787 |
| | 372 |
| | 2,031 |
| | 2,403 |
| | 1,478 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1621 Northwood Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 85 |
| | 351 |
| | 1,014 |
| | 215 |
| | 1,235 |
| | 1,450 |
| | 1,171 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1707 Northwood Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 95 |
| | 262 |
| | 1,720 |
| | 239 |
| | 1,838 |
| | 2,077 |
| | 1,302 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1788 Northwood Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 50 |
| | 196 |
| | 483 |
| | 103 |
| | 626 |
| | 729 |
| | 564 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1826 Northwood Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 55 |
| | 208 |
| | 472 |
| | 103 |
| | 632 |
| | 735 |
| | 554 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1864 Northwood Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 57 |
| | 190 |
| | 489 |
| | 107 |
| | 629 |
| | 736 |
| | 572 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2451 Elliott Avenue | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 78 |
| | 319 |
| | 742 |
| | 164 |
| | 975 |
| | 1,139 |
| | 781 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2730 Research Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 903 |
| | 4,215 |
| | 829 |
| | 903 |
| | 5,044 |
| | 5,947 |
| | 3,918 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2791 Research Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 557 |
| | 2,731 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 560 |
| | 3,728 |
| | 4,288 |
| | 2,360 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2871 Research Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 324 |
| | 1,487 |
| | 437 |
| | 327 |
| | 1,921 |
| | 2,248 |
| | 1,350 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
3011 Research Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 457 |
| | 2,104 |
| | 475 |
| | 457 |
| | 2,579 |
| | 3,036 |
| | 1,994 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2870 Technology Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 275 |
| | 1,262 |
| | 342 |
| | 279 |
| | 1,600 |
| | 1,879 |
| | 1,220 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2900 Technology Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 214 |
| | 977 |
| | 564 |
| | 219 |
| | 1,536 |
| | 1,755 |
| | 970 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2930 Technology Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 131 |
| | 594 |
| | 435 |
| | 138 |
| | 1,022 |
| | 1,160 |
| | 663 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
2950 Technology Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 178 |
| | 819 |
| | 305 |
| | 185 |
| | 1,117 |
| | 1,302 |
| | 754 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23014 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 39 |
| | 203 |
| | 197 |
| | 56 |
| | 383 |
| | 439 |
| | 318 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23028 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 98 |
| | 507 |
| | 285 |
| | 125 |
| | 765 |
| | 890 |
| | 676 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23035 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 71 |
| | 355 |
| | 237 |
| | 93 |
| | 570 |
| | 663 |
| | 497 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23042 Commerce Drive | | Farmintgon Hills, MI | | — |
| | 67 |
| | 277 |
| | 273 |
| | 89 |
| | 528 |
| | 617 |
| | 477 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23065 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 71 |
| | 408 |
| | 338 |
| | 93 |
| | 724 |
| | 817 |
| | 553 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23079 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 68 |
| | 301 |
| | 290 |
| | 79 |
| | 580 |
| | 659 |
| | 491 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23093 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 211 |
| | 1,024 |
| | 1,219 |
| | 295 |
| | 2,159 |
| | 2,454 |
| | 1,635 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23135 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 146 |
| | 701 |
| | 392 |
| | 158 |
| | 1,081 |
| | 1,239 |
| | 849 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23163 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 111 |
| | 513 |
| | 382 |
| | 138 |
| | 868 |
| | 1,006 |
| | 682 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23177 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 175 |
| | 1,007 |
| | 608 |
| | 254 |
| | 1,536 |
| | 1,790 |
| | 1,239 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23206 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 125 |
| | 531 |
| | 367 |
| | 137 |
| | 886 |
| | 1,023 |
| | 693 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
23370 Commerce Drive | | Farmington Hills, MI | | — |
| | 59 |
| | 233 |
| | 175 |
| | 66 |
| | 401 |
| | 467 |
| | 374 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
32450 N Avis Drive | | Madison Heights, MI | | — |
| | 281 |
| | 1,590 |
| | 529 |
| | 286 |
| | 2,114 |
| | 2,400 |
| | 963 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
12707 Eckles Road | | Plymouth Township, MI | | — |
| | 255 |
| | 1,445 |
| | 220 |
| | 267 |
| | 1,653 |
| | 1,920 |
| | 687 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
9300-9328 Harrison Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 147 |
| | 834 |
| | 407 |
| | 159 |
| | 1,229 |
| | 1,388 |
| | 493 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
9330-9358 Harrison Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 81 |
| | 456 |
| | 242 |
| | 89 |
| | 690 |
| | 779 |
| | 270 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
28420-28448 Highland Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 143 |
| | 809 |
| | 641 |
| | 154 |
| | 1,439 |
| | 1,593 |
| | 464 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
28450-28478 Highland Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 81 |
| | 461 |
| | 457 |
| | 90 |
| | 909 |
| | 999 |
| | 314 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
28421-28449 Highland Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 109 |
| | 617 |
| | 480 |
| | 119 |
| | 1,087 |
| | 1,206 |
| | 414 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
28451-28479 Highland Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 107 |
| | 608 |
| | 413 |
| | 117 |
| | 1,011 |
| | 1,128 |
| | 364 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
28825-28909 Highland Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 70 |
| | 395 |
| | 393 |
| | 78 |
| | 780 |
| | 858 |
| | 277 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
28933-29017 Highland Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 112 |
| | 634 |
| | 592 |
| | 122 |
| | 1,216 |
| | 1,338 |
| | 371 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
28824-28908 Highland Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 134 |
| | 760 |
| | 577 |
| | 145 |
| | 1,326 |
| | 1,471 |
| | 472 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
28932-29016 Highland Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 123 |
| | 694 |
| | 582 |
| | 133 |
| | 1,266 |
| | 1,399 |
| | 436 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
9710-9734 Harrison Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 125 |
| | 706 |
| | 432 |
| | 135 |
| | 1,128 |
| | 1,263 |
| | 425 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
9740-9772 Harrison Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 132 |
| | 749 |
| | 398 |
| | 143 |
| | 1,136 |
| | 1,279 |
| | 441 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
9840-9868 Harrison Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 144 |
| | 815 |
| | 296 |
| | 155 |
| | 1,100 |
| | 1,255 |
| | 429 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
9800-9824 Harrison Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 117 |
| | 664 |
| | 362 |
| | 127 |
| | 1,016 |
| | 1,143 |
| | 362 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
29265-29285 Airport Dr | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 140 |
| | 794 |
| | 258 |
| | 151 |
| | 1,041 |
| | 1,192 |
| | 431 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
29185-29225 Airport Dr | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 140 |
| | 792 |
| | 514 |
| | 151 |
| | 1,295 |
| | 1,446 |
| | 519 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
29149-29165 Airport Dr | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 216 |
| | 1,225 |
| | 295 |
| | 231 |
| | 1,505 |
| | 1,736 |
| | 629 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
29101-29115 Airport Dr | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 130 |
| | 738 |
| | 290 |
| | 141 |
| | 1,017 |
| | 1,158 |
| | 440 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
29031-29045 Airport Dr | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 124 |
| | 704 |
| | 157 |
| | 134 |
| | 851 |
| | 985 |
| | 345 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
29050-29062 Airport Dr | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 127 |
| | 718 |
| | 221 |
| | 137 |
| | 929 |
| | 1,066 |
| | 386 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
29120-29134 Airport Dr | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 161 |
| | 912 |
| | 522 |
| | 173 |
| | 1,422 |
| | 1,595 |
| | 503 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Address | | Location (City/State) | | (a) Encumbrances | | (b) Initial Cost | | (c) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition or Completion and Valuation Provision | | Gross Amount Carried At Close of Period 12/31/13 | | Accumulated Depreciation 12/31/2013 | | Year Acquired/ Constructed | | Depreciable Lives (Years) |
Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Building and Improvements | | Total |
| | | | (In thousands) | | | | |
29200-29214 Airport Dr | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 170 |
| | 963 |
| | 376 |
| | 182 |
| | 1,327 |
| | 1,509 |
| | 555 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
9301-9339 Middlebelt Rd | | Romulus, MI | | — |
| | 124 |
| | 703 |
| | 481 |
| | 130 |
| | 1,178 |
| | 1,308 |
| | 504 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
32975 Capitol Avenue | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 135 |
| | 748 |
| | (183 | ) | | 77 |
| | 623 |
| | 700 |
| | 291 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
32920 Capitol Avenue | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 76 |
| | 422 |
| | (91 | ) | | 27 |
| | 380 |
| | 407 |
| | 197 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
11923 Brookfield Avenue | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 120 |
| | 665 |
| | (324 | ) | | 32 |
| | 429 |
| | 461 |
| | 281 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
13405 Stark Road | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 46 |
| | 254 |
| | (3 | ) | | 30 |
| | 267 |
| | 297 |
| | 127 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
450 Robbins Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 166 |
| | 920 |
| | 231 |
| | 178 |
| | 1,139 |
| | 1,317 |
| | 433 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
12886 Westmore Avenue | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 190 |
| | 1,050 |
| | (351 | ) | | 86 |
| | 803 |
| | 889 |
| | 424 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
33025 Industrial Road | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 80 |
| | 442 |
| | (324 | ) | | 6 |
| | 192 |
| | 198 |
| | 168 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
47711 Clipper Street | | Plymouth Township, MI | | — |
| | 539 |
| | 2,983 |
| | 299 |
| | 575 |
| | 3,246 |
| | 3,821 |
| | 1,255 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
32975 Industrial Road | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 160 |
| | 887 |
| | (192 | ) | | 92 |
| | 763 |
| | 855 |
| | 365 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
32985 Industrial Road | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 137 |
| | 761 |
| | (329 | ) | | 46 |
| | 523 |
| | 569 |
| | 303 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
32995 Industrial Road | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 160 |
| | 887 |
| | (409 | ) | | 53 |
| | 585 |
| | 638 |
| | 349 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
12874 Westmore Avenue | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 137 |
| | 761 |
| | (302 | ) | | 58 |
| | 538 |
| | 596 |
| | 289 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1775 Bellingham | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 344 |
| | 1,902 |
| | 329 |
| | 367 |
| | 2,208 |
| | 2,575 |
| | 835 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1785 East Maple | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 92 |
| | 507 |
| | 200 |
| | 98 |
| | 701 |
| | 799 |
| | 237 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1807 East Maple | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 321 |
| | 1,775 |
| | (437 | ) | | 191 |
| | 1,468 |
| | 1,659 |
| | 692 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
980 Chicago | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 206 |
| | 1,141 |
| | 272 |
| | 220 |
| | 1,399 |
| | 1,619 |
| | 498 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1840 Enterprise Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 573 |
| | 3,170 |
| | (2,261 | ) | | 49 |
| | 1,433 |
| | 1,482 |
| | 1,176 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1885 Enterprise Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 209 |
| | 1,158 |
| | 200 |
| | 223 |
| | 1,344 |
| | 1,567 |
| | 498 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1935-55 Enterprise Drive | | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 1,285 |
| | 7,144 |
| | 1,352 |
| | 1,371 |
| | 8,410 |
| | 9,781 |
| | 3,318 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
5500 Enterprise Court | | Warren, MI | | — |
| | 675 |
| | 3,737 |
| | 671 |
| | 721 |
| | 4,362 |
| | 5,083 |
| | 1,636 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
750 Chicago Road | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 323 |
| | 1,790 |
| | 373 |
| | 345 |
| | 2,141 |
| | 2,486 |
| | 824 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
800 Chicago Road | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 283 |
| | 1,567 |
| | 370 |
| | 302 |
| | 1,918 |
| | 2,220 |
| | 713 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
850 Chicago Road | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 183 |
| | 1,016 |
| | 218 |
| | 196 |
| | 1,221 |
| | 1,417 |
| | 462 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1100 East Mandoline Road | | Madison Heights, MI | | — |
| | 888 |
| | 4,915 |
| | (1,234 | ) | | 332 |
| | 4,237 |
| | 4,569 |
| | 2,211 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1080, 1120, 1180 John Papalas Drive | (e) | Lincoln Park, MI | | — |
| | 366 |
| | 3,241 |
| | 356 |
| | 297 |
| | 3,666 |
| | 3,963 |
| | 1,756 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
4872 S. Lapeer Road | | Lake Orion Twsp, MI | | — |
| | 1,342 |
| | 5,441 |
| | 1,208 |
| | 1,412 |
| | 6,579 |
| | 7,991 |
| | 2,350 |
| | 1999 | | (j) |
1400 Allen Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 209 |
| | 1,154 |
| | 213 |
| | 212 |
| | 1,364 |
| | 1,576 |
| | 419 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
1408 Allen Drive | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 151 |
| | 834 |
| | 110 |
| | 153 |
| | 942 |
| | 1,095 |
| | 289 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
32505 Industrial Drive | | Madison Heights, MI | | — |
| | 345 |
| | 1,910 |
| | 340 |
| | 351 |
| | 2,244 |
| | 2,595 |
| | 847 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
1799-1855 Northfield Drive | (d) | Rochester Hills, MI | | — |
| | 481 |
| | 2,665 |
| | 367 |
| | 490 |
| | 3,023 |
| | 3,513 |
| | 976 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
28435 Automation Blvd | | Wixom, MI | | — |
| | 621 |
| | — |
| | 3,662 |
| | 628 |
| | 3,655 |
| | 4,283 |
| | 827 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
32200 N Avis Drive | | Madison Heights, MI | | — |
| | 503 |
| | 3,367 |
| | (1,376 | ) | | 195 |
| | 2,299 |
| | 2,494 |
| | 857 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
100 Kay Industrial Drive | | Rion Township, MI | | — |
| | 677 |
| | 2,018 |
| | 78 |
| | 685 |
| | 2,088 |
| | 2,773 |
| | 741 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11800 Sears Drive | | Livonia, MI | | — |
| | 693 |
| | 1,507 |
| | 1,195 |
| | 476 |
| | 2,919 |
| | 3,395 |
| | 1,304 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
1099 Chicago Road | | Troy, MI | | — |
| | 1,277 |
| | 1,332 |
| | (1,291 | ) | | 303 |
| | 1,015 |
| | 1,318 |
| | 239 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
42555 Merrill Road | | Sterling Heights, MI | | — |
| | 1,080 |
| | 2,300 |
| | 3,487 |
| | 1,090 |
| | 5,777 |
| | 6,867 |
| | 1,759 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
200 Northpointe Drive | | Orion Township, MI | | — |
| | 723 |
| | 2,063 |
| | 36 |
| | 734 |
| | 2,088 |
| | 2,822 |
| | 775 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
Houston | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2102-2314 Edwards Street | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 348 |
| | 1,973 |
| | 1,708 |
| | 382 |
| | 3,647 |
| | 4,029 |
| | 1,241 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
3351 Rauch St | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 272 |
| | 1,541 |
| | 497 |
| | 278 |
| | 2,032 |
| | 2,310 |
| | 709 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
3801-3851 Yale St | | Houston, TX | | 2,000 |
| | 413 |
| | 2,343 |
| | 435 |
| | 425 |
| | 2,766 |
| | 3,191 |
| | 1,117 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
3337-3347 Rauch Street | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 227 |
| | 1,287 |
| | 454 |
| | 233 |
| | 1,735 |
| | 1,968 |
| | 617 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
8505 N Loop East | | Houston, TX | | 1,679 |
| | 439 |
| | 2,489 |
| | 626 |
| | 449 |
| | 3,105 |
| | 3,554 |
| | 1,183 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
4749-4799 Eastpark Dr | | Houston, TX | | 2,481 |
| | 594 |
| | 3,368 |
| | 1,290 |
| | 611 |
| | 4,641 |
| | 5,252 |
| | 1,741 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
4851 Homestead Road | | Houston, TX | | 3,264 |
| | 491 |
| | 2,782 |
| | 1,573 |
| | 504 |
| | 4,342 |
| | 4,846 |
| | 1,560 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
3365-3385 Rauch Street | | Houston, TX | | 1,613 |
| | 284 |
| | 1,611 |
| | 677 |
| | 290 |
| | 2,282 |
| | 2,572 |
| | 936 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5050 Campbell Road | | Houston, TX | | 1,928 |
| | 461 |
| | 2,610 |
| | 1,009 |
| | 470 |
| | 3,610 |
| | 4,080 |
| | 1,200 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
4300 Pine Timbers | | Houston, TX | | 2,804 |
| | 489 |
| | 2,769 |
| | 741 |
| | 499 |
| | 3,500 |
| | 3,999 |
| | 1,369 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
2500-2530 Fairway Park Drive | | Houston, TX | | 3,371 |
| | 766 |
| | 4,342 |
| | 2,027 |
| | 792 |
| | 6,343 |
| | 7,135 |
| | 2,290 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
6550 Longpointe | | Houston, TX | | 1,617 |
| | 362 |
| | 2,050 |
| | 1,010 |
| | 370 |
| | 3,052 |
| | 3,422 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
1815 Turning Basin Dr | | Houston, TX | | 1,859 |
| | 487 |
| | 2,761 |
| | 687 |
| | 531 |
| | 3,404 |
| | 3,935 |
| | 1,337 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
1819 Turning Basin Dr | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 231 |
| | 1,308 |
| | 543 |
| | 251 |
| | 1,831 |
| | 2,082 |
| | 697 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
1805 Turning Basin Dr | | Houston, TX | | 2,203 |
| | 564 |
| | 3,197 |
| | 902 |
| | 616 |
| | 4,047 |
| | 4,663 |
| | 1,599 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
9835A Genard Road | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 1,505 |
| | 8,333 |
| | 3,162 |
| | 1,581 |
| | 11,419 |
| | 13,000 |
| | 3,629 |
| | 1999 | | (j) |
9835B Genard Road | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 245 |
| | 1,357 |
| | 827 |
| | 256 |
| | 2,173 |
| | 2,429 |
| | 788 |
| | 1999 | | (j) |
11505 State Highway 225 | | LaPorte City, TX | | 4,639 |
| | 940 |
| | 4,675 |
| | 606 |
| | 940 |
| | 5,281 |
| | 6,221 |
| | 1,658 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
1500 E. Main Street | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 201 |
| | 1,328 |
| | (26 | ) | | 204 |
| | 1,299 |
| | 1,503 |
| | 765 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
700 Industrial Blvd | | Sugar Land, TX | | 3,162 |
| | 608 |
| | 3,679 |
| | 259 |
| | 617 |
| | 3,929 |
| | 4,546 |
| | 1,019 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
7230-7238 Wynnwood | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 254 |
| | 764 |
| | 152 |
| | 259 |
| | 911 |
| | 1,170 |
| | 315 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
7240-7248 Wynnwood | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 271 |
| | 726 |
| | 27 |
| | 276 |
| | 748 |
| | 1,024 |
| | 289 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
7250-7260 Wynnwood | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 200 |
| | 481 |
| | 115 |
| | 203 |
| | 593 |
| | 796 |
| | 191 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
6400 Long Point | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 188 |
| | 898 |
| | (87 | ) | | 188 |
| | 811 |
| | 999 |
| | 248 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
12705 S. Kirkwood, Ste 100-150 | | Stafford, TX | | — |
| | 154 |
| | 626 |
| | 80 |
| | 155 |
| | 705 |
| | 860 |
| | 215 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
12705 S. Kirkwood, Ste 200-220 | | Stafford, TX | | — |
| | 404 |
| | 1,698 |
| | 282 |
| | 393 |
| | 1,991 |
| | 2,384 |
| | 643 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
8850 Jameel | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 171 |
| | 826 |
| | 41 |
| | 171 |
| | 867 |
| | 1,038 |
| | 289 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
8800 Jameel | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 163 |
| | 798 |
| | (105 | ) | | 124 |
| | 732 |
| | 856 |
| | 249 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
8700 Jameel | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 170 |
| | 1,020 |
| | (265 | ) | | 120 |
| | 805 |
| | 925 |
| | 201 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
8600 Jameel | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 163 |
| | 818 |
| | 58 |
| | 163 |
| | 876 |
| | 1,039 |
| | 280 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
7967 Blankenship | | Houston, TX | | — |
| | 307 |
| | 1,166 |
| | 335 |
| | 307 |
| | 1,501 |
| | 1,808 |
| | 278 |
| | 2010 | | (j) |
8800 City Park Loop East | | Houston, TX | | 23,585 |
| | 3,717 |
| | 19,237 |
| | — |
| | 3,717 |
| | 19,237 |
| | 22,954 |
| | 2,570 |
| | 2011 | | (j) |
Indianapolis | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1445 Brookville Way | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 459 |
| | 2,603 |
| | 1,007 |
| | 476 |
| | 3,593 |
| | 4,069 |
| | 1,476 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1440 Brookville Way | | Indianapolis, IN | | 3,521 |
| | 665 |
| | 3,770 |
| | 588 |
| | 685 |
| | 4,338 |
| | 5,023 |
| | 1,914 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1240 Brookville Way | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 247 |
| | 1,402 |
| | 369 |
| | 258 |
| | 1,760 |
| | 2,018 |
| | 792 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1345 Brookville Way | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 586 |
| | 3,321 |
| | 794 |
| | 601 |
| | 4,100 |
| | 4,701 |
| | 1,756 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1350 Brookville Way | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 205 |
| | 1,161 |
| | 310 |
| | 212 |
| | 1,464 |
| | 1,676 |
| | 681 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1341 Sadlier Circle South | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 131 |
| | 743 |
| | 198 |
| | 136 |
| | 936 |
| | 1,072 |
| | 386 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1322-1438 Sadlier Circle East | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 145 |
| | 822 |
| | 301 |
| | 152 |
| | 1,116 |
| | 1,268 |
| | 479 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1327-1441 Sadlier Circle West | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 218 |
| | 1,234 |
| | 558 |
| | 225 |
| | 1,785 |
| | 2,010 |
| | 674 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1304 Sadlier Circle West | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 71 |
| | 405 |
| | 189 |
| | 75 |
| | 590 |
| | 665 |
| | 261 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1402-1430 Sadlier Circle West | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 165 |
| | 934 |
| | 371 |
| | 171 |
| | 1,299 |
| | 1,470 |
| | 535 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1504 Sadlier Circle South | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 219 |
| | 1,238 |
| | (112 | ) | | 115 |
| | 1,230 |
| | 1,345 |
| | 701 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1365-1367 Sadlier Way Circle East | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 121 |
| | 688 |
| | 136 |
| | 91 |
| | 854 |
| | 945 |
| | 351 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1352-1354 Sadlier Circle West | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 178 |
| | 1,008 |
| | 187 |
| | 166 |
| | 1,207 |
| | 1,373 |
| | 508 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1335 Sadlier Circle East | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 81 |
| | 460 |
| | 197 |
| | 85 |
| | 653 |
| | 738 |
| | 260 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1425 Sadlier Circle West | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 21 |
| | 117 |
| | 37 |
| | 23 |
| | 152 |
| | 175 |
| | 67 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
6951 East 30th St | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 256 |
| | 1,449 |
| | 213 |
| | 265 |
| | 1,653 |
| | 1,918 |
| | 707 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
6701 East 30th St | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 78 |
| | 443 |
| | 98 |
| | 82 |
| | 537 |
| | 619 |
| | 229 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
6737 East 30th St | | Indianapolis, IN | | 1,738 |
| | 385 |
| | 2,181 |
| | 195 |
| | 398 |
| | 2,363 |
| | 2,761 |
| | 1,046 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Address | | Location (City/State) | | (a) Encumbrances | | (b) Initial Cost | | (c) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition or Completion and Valuation Provision | | Gross Amount Carried At Close of Period 12/31/13 | | Accumulated Depreciation 12/31/2013 | | Year Acquired/ Constructed | | Depreciable Lives (Years) |
Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Building and Improvements | | Total |
| | | | (In thousands) | | | | |
6555 East 30th St | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 484 |
| | 4,760 |
| | 1,971 |
| | 484 |
| | 6,731 |
| | 7,215 |
| | 2,630 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
8402-8440 E 33rd St | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 222 |
| | 1,260 |
| | 603 |
| | 230 |
| | 1,855 |
| | 2,085 |
| | 812 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
8520-8630 E 33rd St | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 326 |
| | 1,848 |
| | 270 |
| | 281 |
| | 2,163 |
| | 2,444 |
| | 926 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
8710-8768 E 33rd St | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 175 |
| | 993 |
| | 397 |
| | 180 |
| | 1,385 |
| | 1,565 |
| | 538 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
3316-3346 N. Pagosa Court | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 325 |
| | 1,842 |
| | 458 |
| | 332 |
| | 2,293 |
| | 2,625 |
| | 921 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
7901 West 21st St. | | Indianapolis, IN | | 5,128 |
| | 1,048 |
| | 6,027 |
| | 240 |
| | 1,048 |
| | 6,267 |
| | 7,315 |
| | 2,531 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
1225 Brookville Way | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 60 |
| | — |
| | 416 |
| | 68 |
| | 408 |
| | 476 |
| | 166 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
6751 E 30th St | | Indianapolis, IN | | 2,391 |
| | 728 |
| | 2,837 |
| | 235 |
| | 741 |
| | 3,059 |
| | 3,800 |
| | 1,213 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5705-97 Park Plaza Ct. | | Indianapolis, IN | | 2,517 |
| | 600 |
| | 2,194 |
| | 797 |
| | 609 |
| | 2,982 |
| | 3,591 |
| | 935 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
9319-9341 Castlegate Drive | | Indianapolis, IN | | — |
| | 530 |
| | 1,235 |
| | 690 |
| | 544 |
| | 1,911 |
| | 2,455 |
| | 578 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
1133 Northwest L Street | | Richmond, IN | | — |
| | 201 |
| | 1,358 |
| | (195 | ) | | 208 |
| | 1,156 |
| | 1,364 |
| | 561 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
14425 Bergen Blvd | | Noblesville, IN | | — |
| | 647 |
| | — |
| | 3,455 |
| | 743 |
| | 3,359 |
| | 4,102 |
| | 512 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
Miami | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4700 NW 15th Avenue | | Ft. Lauderdale, FL | | — |
| | 908 |
| | 1,883 |
| | 256 |
| | 912 |
| | 2,135 |
| | 3,047 |
| | 662 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
4710 NW 15th Avenue | | Ft. Lauderdale, FL | | — |
| | 830 |
| | 2,722 |
| | 260 |
| | 834 |
| | 2,978 |
| | 3,812 |
| | 733 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
4720 NW 15th Avenue | | Ft. Lauderdale, FL | | — |
| | 937 |
| | 2,455 |
| | 456 |
| | 942 |
| | 2,906 |
| | 3,848 |
| | 755 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
4740 NW 15th Avenue | | Ft. Lauderdale, FL | | — |
| | 1,107 |
| | 3,111 |
| | 320 |
| | 1,112 |
| | 3,426 |
| | 4,538 |
| | 820 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
4750 NW 15th Avenue | | Ft. Lauderdale, FL | | — |
| | 947 |
| | 3,079 |
| | 785 |
| | 951 |
| | 3,860 |
| | 4,811 |
| | 1,075 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
4800 NW 15th Avenue | | Ft. Lauderdale, FL | | — |
| | 1,092 |
| | 3,308 |
| | 238 |
| | 1,097 |
| | 3,541 |
| | 4,638 |
| | 898 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
6891 NW 74th Street | | Medley, FL | | — |
| | 857 |
| | 3,428 |
| | 3,986 |
| | 864 |
| | 7,407 |
| | 8,271 |
| | 1,346 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
12601 &12605 NW 115th Avenue | | Medley, FL | | — |
| | 2,521 |
| | — |
| | 651 |
| | 828 |
| | 2,344 |
| | 3,172 |
| | 247 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Milwaukee | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5355 South Westridge Drive | | New Berlin, WI | | 5,334 |
| | 1,630 |
| | 7,058 |
| | (108 | ) | | 1,646 |
| | 6,934 |
| | 8,580 |
| | 1,481 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
320-334 W. Vogel Avenue | | Milwaukee, WI | | 2,731 |
| | 506 |
| | 3,199 |
| | (189 | ) | | 508 |
| | 3,008 |
| | 3,516 |
| | 1,312 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
4950 South 6th Avenue | | Milwaukee, WI | | 1,491 |
| | 299 |
| | 1,565 |
| | 263 |
| | 301 |
| | 1,826 |
| | 2,127 |
| | 880 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
W140 N9059 Lilly Road | | Menomonee Falls, WI | | — |
| | 343 |
| | 1,153 |
| | 99 |
| | 366 |
| | 1,229 |
| | 1,595 |
| | 361 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
200 W. Vogel Avenue-Bldg B | | Milwaukee, WI | | 1,689 |
| | 301 |
| | 2,150 |
| | (42 | ) | | 302 |
| | 2,107 |
| | 2,409 |
| | 916 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
4921 S. 2nd Street | | Milwaukee, WI | | — |
| | 101 |
| | 713 |
| | (214 | ) | | 58 |
| | 542 |
| | 600 |
| | 272 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
1500 Peebles Drive | | Richland Center, WI | | — |
| | 1,577 |
| | 1,018 |
| | (278 | ) | | 1,528 |
| | 789 |
| | 2,317 |
| | 640 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
16600 West Glendale Ave | | New Berlin, WI | | 2,360 |
| | 704 |
| | 1,923 |
| | 877 |
| | 715 |
| | 2,789 |
| | 3,504 |
| | 1,286 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2905 S. 160th Street | | New Berlin, WI | | — |
| | 261 |
| | 672 |
| | 346 |
| | 265 |
| | 1,014 |
| | 1,279 |
| | 395 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
2855 S. 160th Street | | New Berlin, WI | | — |
| | 221 |
| | 628 |
| | 120 |
| | 225 |
| | 744 |
| | 969 |
| | 244 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
2485 Commerce Drive | | New Berlin, WI | | 1,514 |
| | 483 |
| | 1,516 |
| | 249 |
| | 491 |
| | 1,757 |
| | 2,248 |
| | 748 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
14518 Whittaker Way | | Menomonee Falls, WI | | — |
| | 437 |
| | 1,082 |
| | 396 |
| | 445 |
| | 1,470 |
| | 1,915 |
| | 456 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
N58W15380 Shawn Circle | | Menomonee Falls, WI | | — |
| | 1,188 |
| | — |
| | 16,949 |
| | 1,204 |
| | 16,933 |
| | 18,137 |
| | 2,473 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minneapolis/St. Paul | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6201 West 111th Street | | Bloomington, MN | | 3,627 |
| | 1,358 |
| | 8,622 |
| | 13,463 |
| | 1,519 |
| | 21,924 |
| | 23,443 |
| | 10,288 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
7251-7267 Washington Avenue | | Edina, MN | | — |
| | 129 |
| | 382 |
| | 733 |
| | 182 |
| | 1,062 |
| | 1,244 |
| | 787 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
7301-7325 Washington Avenue | | Edina, MN | | — |
| | 174 |
| | 391 |
| | (1 | ) | | 193 |
| | 371 |
| | 564 |
| | 104 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
7101 Winnetka Avenue South | | Brooklyn Park, MN | | 5,765 |
| | 2,195 |
| | 6,084 |
| | 3,923 |
| | 2,228 |
| | 9,974 |
| | 12,202 |
| | 6,834 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
9901 West 74th Street | | Eden Prairie, MN | | 3,306 |
| | 621 |
| | 3,289 |
| | 3,089 |
| | 639 |
| | 6,360 |
| | 6,999 |
| | 5,278 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1030 Lone Oak Road | | Eagan, MN | | 2,560 |
| | 456 |
| | 2,703 |
| | 642 |
| | 456 |
| | 3,345 |
| | 3,801 |
| | 1,489 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
1060 Lone Oak Road | | Eagan, MN | | 3,290 |
| | 624 |
| | 3,700 |
| | 560 |
| | 624 |
| | 4,260 |
| | 4,884 |
| | 1,985 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
5400 Nathan Lane | | Plymouth, MN | | 2,850 |
| | 749 |
| | 4,461 |
| | 822 |
| | 757 |
| | 5,275 |
| | 6,032 |
| | 2,481 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
10120 W 76th Street | | Eden Prairie, MN | | — |
| | 315 |
| | 1,804 |
| | 1,876 |
| | 315 |
| | 3,680 |
| | 3,995 |
| | 1,748 |
| | 1995 | | (j) |
12155 Nicollet Ave. | | Burnsville, MN | | — |
| | 286 |
| | — |
| | 1,827 |
| | 288 |
| | 1,825 |
| | 2,113 |
| | 796 |
| | 1995 | | (j) |
4100 Peavey Road | | Chaska, MN | | — |
| | 277 |
| | 2,261 |
| | 806 |
| | 277 |
| | 3,067 |
| | 3,344 |
| | 1,268 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
5205 Highway 169 | | Plymouth, MN | | — |
| | 446 |
| | 2,525 |
| | 767 |
| | 578 |
| | 3,160 |
| | 3,738 |
| | 1,409 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
7100-7198 Shady Oak Road | | Eden Prairie, MN | | 4,828 |
| | 715 |
| | 4,054 |
| | 2,400 |
| | 736 |
| | 6,433 |
| | 7,169 |
| | 2,524 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
7500-7546 Washington Avenue | | Eden Prairie, MN | | — |
| | 229 |
| | 1,300 |
| | 847 |
| | 235 |
| | 2,141 |
| | 2,376 |
| | 842 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
7550-7586 Washington Avenue | | Eden Prairie, MN | | — |
| | 153 |
| | 867 |
| | 281 |
| | 157 |
| | 1,144 |
| | 1,301 |
| | 484 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
5240-5300 Valley Industrial Blvd | | Shakopee, MN | | 2,270 |
| | 362 |
| | 2,049 |
| | 827 |
| | 371 |
| | 2,867 |
| | 3,238 |
| | 1,115 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
500-530 Kasota Avenue SE | | Minneapolis, MN | | — |
| | 415 |
| | 2,354 |
| | 1,042 |
| | 434 |
| | 3,377 |
| | 3,811 |
| | 1,334 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
2530-2570 Kasota Avenue | | St. Paul, MN | | — |
| | 407 |
| | 2,308 |
| | 836 |
| | 441 |
| | 3,110 |
| | 3,551 |
| | 1,186 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
5775 12th Avenue | | Shakopee, MN | | 4,108 |
| | 590 |
| | — |
| | 5,270 |
| | 590 |
| | 5,270 |
| | 5,860 |
| | 1,871 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1157 Valley Park Drive | | Shakopee, MN | | — |
| | 760 |
| | — |
| | 6,592 |
| | 888 |
| | 6,464 |
| | 7,352 |
| | 2,352 |
| | 1999 | | (j) |
9600 West 76th Street | | Eden Prairie, MN | | 2,317 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 2,450 |
| | 378 |
| | 1,034 |
| | 2,794 |
| | 3,828 |
| | 848 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
9700 West 76th Street | | Eden Prairie, MN | | 3,243 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 2,709 |
| | 871 |
| | 1,038 |
| | 3,542 |
| | 4,580 |
| | 1,072 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
7600 69th Avenue | | Greenfield, MN | | — |
| | 1,500 |
| | 8,328 |
| | 1,387 |
| | 1,510 |
| | 9,705 |
| | 11,215 |
| | 3,234 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
5017 Boone Avenue North | | New Hope, MN | | — |
| | 1,000 |
| | 1,599 |
| | (100 | ) | | 1,009 |
| | 1,490 |
| | 2,499 |
| | 721 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
2300 West Highway 13 | | Burnsville, MN | | — |
| | 2,517 |
| | 6,069 |
| | (1,692 | ) | | 1,296 |
| | 5,598 |
| | 6,894 |
| | 3,092 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
1087 Park Place | | Shakopee, MN | | 4,196 |
| | 1,195 |
| | 4,891 |
| | (666 | ) | | 1,198 |
| | 4,222 |
| | 5,420 |
| | 961 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
5391 12th Avenue SE | | Shakopee, MN | | 4,510 |
| | 1,392 |
| | 8,149 |
| | (501 | ) | | 1,395 |
| | 7,645 |
| | 9,040 |
| | 1,700 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
4701 Valley Industrial Blvd S | | Shakopee, MN | | 5,660 |
| | 1,296 |
| | 7,157 |
| | (379 | ) | | 1,299 |
| | 6,775 |
| | 8,074 |
| | 2,166 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
7035 Winnetka Avenue North | | Brooklyn Park, MN | | 4,260 |
| | 1,275 |
| | — |
| | 6,469 |
| | 1,343 |
| | 6,401 |
| | 7,744 |
| | 1,081 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
139 Eva Street | | St. Paul, MN | | — |
| | 2,132 |
| | 3,105 |
| | 90 |
| | 2,175 |
| | 3,152 |
| | 5,327 |
| | 806 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
21900 Dodd Boulevard | | Lakeville, MN | | 9,203 |
| | 2,289 |
| | 7,952 |
| | — |
| | 2,289 |
| | 7,952 |
| | 10,241 |
| | 1,349 |
| | 2010 | | (j) |
Nashville | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3099 Barry Drive | | Portland, TN | | — |
| | 418 |
| | 2,368 |
| | (680 | ) | | 248 |
| | 1,858 |
| | 2,106 |
| | 988 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1931 Air Lane Drive | | Nashville, TN | | 2,398 |
| | 489 |
| | 2,785 |
| | 286 |
| | 493 |
| | 3,067 |
| | 3,560 |
| | 1,230 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
4640 Cummings Park | | Nashville, TN | | 2,113 |
| | 360 |
| | 2,040 |
| | 613 |
| | 365 |
| | 2,648 |
| | 3,013 |
| | 884 |
| | 1999 | | (j) |
1740 River Hills Drive | | Nashville, TN | | 2,898 |
| | 848 |
| | 4,383 |
| | 558 |
| | 888 |
| | 4,901 |
| | 5,789 |
| | 1,681 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
211 Ellery Court | | Nashville, TN | | 2,832 |
| | 606 |
| | 3,192 |
| | 258 |
| | 616 |
| | 3,440 |
| | 4,056 |
| | 902 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
130 Maddox Road | | Gallatin, TN | | 16,406 |
| | 1,778 |
| | — |
| | 24,298 |
| | 1,778 |
| | 24,298 |
| | 26,076 |
| | 3,465 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Northern New Jersey | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14 World's Fair Drive | | Franklin, NJ | | — |
| | 483 |
| | 2,735 |
| | 704 |
| | 503 |
| | 3,419 |
| | 3,922 |
| | 1,371 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12 World's Fair Drive | | Franklin, NJ | | — |
| | 572 |
| | 3,240 |
| | 1,014 |
| | 593 |
| | 4,233 |
| | 4,826 |
| | 1,713 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
22 World's Fair Drive | | Franklin, NJ | | — |
| | 364 |
| | 2,064 |
| | 379 |
| | 375 |
| | 2,432 |
| | 2,807 |
| | 954 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
26 World's Fair Drive | | Franklin, NJ | | — |
| | 361 |
| | 2,048 |
| | 508 |
| | 377 |
| | 2,540 |
| | 2,917 |
| | 979 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
24 World's Fair Drive | | Franklin, NJ | | — |
| | 347 |
| | 1,968 |
| | 471 |
| | 362 |
| | 2,424 |
| | 2,786 |
| | 948 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
20 World's Fair Drive Lot 13 | | Sumerset, NJ | | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | 2,555 |
| | 691 |
| | 1,873 |
| | 2,564 |
| | 603 |
| | 1999 | | (j) |
45 Route 46 | | Pine Brook, NJ | | — |
| | 969 |
| | 5,491 |
| | 906 |
| | 978 |
| | 6,388 |
| | 7,366 |
| | 2,048 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
43 Route 46 | | Pine Brook, NJ | | — |
| | 474 |
| | 2,686 |
| | 553 |
| | 479 |
| | 3,234 |
| | 3,713 |
| | 1,108 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
39 Route 46 | | Pine Brook, NJ | | — |
| | 260 |
| | 1,471 |
| | 196 |
| | 262 |
| | 1,665 |
| | 1,927 |
| | 536 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
26 Chapin Road | | Pine Brook, NJ | | 4,654 |
| | 956 |
| | 5,415 |
| | 796 |
| | 965 |
| | 6,202 |
| | 7,167 |
| | 2,100 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
30 Chapin Road | | Pine Brook, NJ | | 4,494 |
| | 960 |
| | 5,440 |
| | 521 |
| | 969 |
| | 5,952 |
| | 6,921 |
| | 1,961 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
20 Hook Mountain Road | | Pine Brook, NJ | | — |
| | 1,507 |
| | 8,542 |
| | 2,815 |
| | 1,534 |
| | 11,330 |
| | 12,864 |
| | 4,276 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
30 Hook Mountain Road | | Pine Brook, NJ | | — |
| | 389 |
| | 2,206 |
| | 540 |
| | 396 |
| | 2,739 |
| | 3,135 |
| | 883 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
16 Chapin Rod | | Pine Brook, NJ | | 3,538 |
| | 885 |
| | 5,015 |
| | 569 |
| | 901 |
| | 5,568 |
| | 6,469 |
| | 1,819 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
20 Chapin Road | | Pine Brook, NJ | | 4,437 |
| | 1,134 |
| | 6,426 |
| | 550 |
| | 1,154 |
| | 6,956 |
| | 8,110 |
| | 2,218 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
2500 Main Street | | Sayreville, NJ | | 3,534 |
| | 944 |
| | — |
| | 4,535 |
| | 944 |
| | 4,535 |
| | 5,479 |
| | 1,244 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Address | | Location (City/State) | | (a) Encumbrances | | (b) Initial Cost | | (c) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition or Completion and Valuation Provision | | Gross Amount Carried At Close of Period 12/31/13 | | Accumulated Depreciation 12/31/2013 | | Year Acquired/ Constructed | | Depreciable Lives (Years) |
Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Building and Improvements | | Total |
| | | | (In thousands) | | | | |
2400 Main Street | | Sayreville, NJ | | — |
| | 996 |
| | — |
| | 5,527 |
| | 996 |
| | 5,527 |
| | 6,523 |
| | 1,323 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
309-313 Pierce Street | | Somerset, NJ | | 3,478 |
| | 1,300 |
| | 4,628 |
| | 1,020 |
| | 1,309 |
| | 5,639 |
| | 6,948 |
| | 1,743 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
Philadelphia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3240 S. 78th Street | | Philadelphia, PA | | — |
| | 515 |
| | 1,245 |
| | (513 | ) | | 423 |
| | 824 |
| | 1,247 |
| | 222 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
2455 Boulevard of Generals | | Norristown, PA | | 3,548 |
| | 1,200 |
| | 4,800 |
| | 1,088 |
| | 1,226 |
| | 5,862 |
| | 7,088 |
| | 1,849 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Phoenix | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1045 South Edward Drive | | Tempe, AZ | | — |
| | 390 |
| | 2,160 |
| | 155 |
| | 396 |
| | 2,309 |
| | 2,705 |
| | 805 |
| | 1999 | | (j) |
50 South 56th Street | | Chandler, AZ | | — |
| | 1,206 |
| | 3,218 |
| | 1,362 |
| | 1,252 |
| | 4,534 |
| | 5,786 |
| | 1,003 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
4701 W. Jefferson | | Phoenix, AZ | | 2,526 |
| | 926 |
| | 2,195 |
| | 443 |
| | 929 |
| | 2,635 |
| | 3,564 |
| | 1,272 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
7102 W. Roosevelt | | Phoenix, AZ | | — |
| | 1,613 |
| | 6,451 |
| | 389 |
| | 1,620 |
| | 6,833 |
| | 8,453 |
| | 1,971 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
4137 West Adams Street | | Phoenix, AZ | | — |
| | 990 |
| | 2,661 |
| | 467 |
| | 1,038 |
| | 3,080 |
| | 4,118 |
| | 883 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
245 W. Lodge | | Tempe, AZ | | — |
| | 898 |
| | 3,066 |
| | (1,890 | ) | | 362 |
| | 1,712 |
| | 2,074 |
| | 650 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
1590 E Riverview Dr. | | Phoenix, AZ | | 4,809 |
| | 1,293 |
| | 5,950 |
| | 401 |
| | 1,292 |
| | 6,352 |
| | 7,644 |
| | 1,171 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
14131 N. Rio Vista Blvd | | Peoria, AZ | | — |
| | 2,563 |
| | 9,388 |
| | 1,160 |
| | 2,563 |
| | 10,548 |
| | 13,111 |
| | 2,294 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
8716 W. Ludlow Drive | | Peoria, AZ | | — |
| | 2,709 |
| | 10,970 |
| | 935 |
| | 2,709 |
| | 11,905 |
| | 14,614 |
| | 2,347 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
3815 W. Washington St. | | Phoenix, AZ | | 3,725 |
| | 1,675 |
| | 4,514 |
| | 149 |
| | 1,719 |
| | 4,619 |
| | 6,338 |
| | 814 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
9180 W. Buckeye Road | | Tolleson, AZ | | 6,872 |
| | 1,904 |
| | 6,805 |
| | 2,251 |
| | 1,923 |
| | 9,037 |
| | 10,960 |
| | 1,357 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Salt Lake City | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1270 West 2320 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 138 |
| | 784 |
| | 144 |
| | 143 |
| | 923 |
| | 1,066 |
| | 334 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1275 West 2240 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 395 |
| | 2,241 |
| | 275 |
| | 408 |
| | 2,503 |
| | 2,911 |
| | 962 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1288 West 2240 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 119 |
| | 672 |
| | 128 |
| | 123 |
| | 796 |
| | 919 |
| | 293 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
2235 South 1300 West | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 198 |
| | 1,120 |
| | 346 |
| | 204 |
| | 1,460 |
| | 1,664 |
| | 541 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1293 West 2200 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 158 |
| | 896 |
| | 248 |
| | 163 |
| | 1,139 |
| | 1,302 |
| | 412 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1279 West 2200 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 198 |
| | 1,120 |
| | 360 |
| | 204 |
| | 1,474 |
| | 1,678 |
| | 636 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1272 West 2240 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 336 |
| | 1,905 |
| | 415 |
| | 347 |
| | 2,309 |
| | 2,656 |
| | 891 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1149 West 2240 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 217 |
| | 1,232 |
| | 248 |
| | 225 |
| | 1,472 |
| | 1,697 |
| | 550 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1142 West 2320 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 217 |
| | 1,232 |
| | 168 |
| | 225 |
| | 1,392 |
| | 1,617 |
| | 518 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
1152 West 2240 South | | West Valley, UT | | — |
| | 1,652 |
| | — |
| | 2,577 |
| | 669 |
| | 3,560 |
| | 4,229 |
| | 1,352 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
1815-1957 South 4650 West | | Salt Lake City, UT | | 7,372 |
| | 1,707 |
| | 10,873 |
| | 451 |
| | 1,713 |
| | 11,318 |
| | 13,031 |
| | 2,650 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2100 Alexander Street | | West Valley, UT | | 1,287 |
| | 376 |
| | 1,670 |
| | 293 |
| | 376 |
| | 1,963 |
| | 2,339 |
| | 421 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
2064 Alexander Street | | West Valley, UT | | 2,076 |
| | 864 |
| | 2,771 |
| | 138 |
| | 869 |
| | 2,904 |
| | 3,773 |
| | 819 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
Seattle | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1901 Raymond Ave SW | | Renton, WA | | 1,362 |
| | 4,458 |
| | 2,659 |
| | 722 |
| | 4,594 |
| | 3,245 |
| | 7,839 |
| | 827 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
19014 64th Avenue South | | Kent, WA | | 3,164 |
| | 1,990 |
| | 3,979 |
| | 352 |
| | 2,042 |
| | 4,279 |
| | 6,321 |
| | 914 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
18640 68th Avenue South | | Kent, WA | | 544 |
| | 1,218 |
| | 1,950 |
| | 374 |
| | 1,258 |
| | 2,284 |
| | 3,542 |
| | 630 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3480 Marginal Way | | Seattle, WA | | — |
| | 9,139 |
| | 5,881 |
| | 1,228 |
| | 9,340 |
| | 6,908 |
| | 16,248 |
| | 918 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Southern California | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1944 Vista Bella Way | | Rancho Domingue, CA | | 3,824 |
| | 1,746 |
| | 3,148 |
| | 562 |
| | 1,822 |
| | 3,634 |
| | 5,456 |
| | 1,248 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
2000 Vista Bella Way | | Rancho Domingue, CA | | 1,390 |
| | 817 |
| | 1,673 |
| | 287 |
| | 853 |
| | 1,924 |
| | 2,777 |
| | 653 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
2835 East Ana Street | | Rancho Domingue, CA | | 3,049 |
| | 1,682 |
| | 2,750 |
| | 96 |
| | 1,772 |
| | 2,756 |
| | 4,528 |
| | 804 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
16275 Technology Drive | | San Diego, CA | | — |
| | 2,848 |
| | 8,641 |
| | 244 |
| | 2,859 |
| | 8,874 |
| | 11,733 |
| | 2,002 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
665 N. Baldwin Park Blvd. | | City of Industry, CA | | 4,470 |
| | 2,124 |
| | 5,219 |
| | 1,587 |
| | 2,143 |
| | 6,787 |
| | 8,930 |
| | 2,145 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
27801 Avenue Scott | | Santa Clarita, CA | | 7,499 |
| | 2,890 |
| | 7,020 |
| | 788 |
| | 2,902 |
| | 7,796 |
| | 10,698 |
| | 2,084 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2610 & 2660 Columbia St | | Torrance, CA | | 4,796 |
| | 3,008 |
| | 5,826 |
| | 748 |
| | 3,031 |
| | 6,551 |
| | 9,582 |
| | 1,517 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
433 Alaska Avenue | | Torrance, CA | | — |
| | 681 |
| | 168 |
| | 19 |
| | 684 |
| | 184 |
| | 868 |
| | 95 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
4020 S. Compton Ave | | Los Angeles, CA | | — |
| | 3,800 |
| | 7,330 |
| | 71 |
| | 3,825 |
| | 7,376 |
| | 11,201 |
| | 1,629 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
6305 El Camino Real | | Carlsbad, CA | | — |
| | 1,590 |
| | 6,360 |
| | 7,730 |
| | 1,590 |
| | 14,090 |
| | 15,680 |
| | 2,965 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2325 Camino Vida Roble | | Carlsbad, CA | | 2,049 |
| | 1,441 |
| | 1,239 |
| | 706 |
| | 1,446 |
| | 1,940 |
| | 3,386 |
| | 483 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2335 Camino Vida Roble | | Carlsbad, CA | | 1,115 |
| | 817 |
| | 762 |
| | 263 |
| | 821 |
| | 1,021 |
| | 1,842 |
| | 355 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2345 Camino Vida Roble | | Carlsbad, CA | | 720 |
| | 562 |
| | 456 |
| | 88 |
| | 565 |
| | 541 |
| | 1,106 |
| | 238 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2355 Camino Vida Roble | | Carlsbad, CA | | 596 |
| | 481 |
| | 365 |
| | 139 |
| | 483 |
| | 502 |
| | 985 |
| | 182 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2365 Camino Vida Roble | | Carlsbad, CA | | 1,204 |
| | 1,098 |
| | 630 |
| | 261 |
| | 1,102 |
| | 887 |
| | 1,989 |
| | 280 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
2375 Camino Vida Roble | | Carlsbad, CA | | 1,412 |
| | 1,210 |
| | 874 |
| | 185 |
| | 1,214 |
| | 1,055 |
| | 2,269 |
| | 385 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
6451 El Camino Real | | Carlsbad, CA | | — |
| | 2,885 |
| | 1,931 |
| | 728 |
| | 2,895 |
| | 2,649 |
| | 5,544 |
| | 852 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
8572 Spectrum Lane | | San Diego, CA | | 2,237 |
| | 806 |
| | 3,225 |
| | 439 |
| | 807 |
| | 3,663 |
| | 4,470 |
| | 753 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
13100 Gregg Street | | Poway, CA | | — |
| | 1,040 |
| | 4,160 |
| | 341 |
| | 1,073 |
| | 4,468 |
| | 5,541 |
| | 1,153 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
21730-21748 Marilla St. | | Chatsworth, CA | | 2,988 |
| | 2,585 |
| | 3,210 |
| | 99 |
| | 2,608 |
| | 3,286 |
| | 5,894 |
| | 833 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
8015 Paramount | | Pico Rivera, CA | | — |
| | 3,616 |
| | 3,902 |
| | 61 |
| | 3,657 |
| | 3,922 |
| | 7,579 |
| | 1,215 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
3365 E. Slauson | | Vernon, CA | | — |
| | 2,367 |
| | 3,243 |
| | 40 |
| | 2,396 |
| | 3,254 |
| | 5,650 |
| | 1,062 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
3015 East Ana | | Rancho Domingue, CA | | — |
| | 19,678 |
| | 9,321 |
| | 6,271 |
| | 20,144 |
| | 15,126 |
| | 35,270 |
| | 2,954 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
19067 Reyes Ave | | Rancho Domingue, CA | | — |
| | 9,281 |
| | 3,920 |
| | 40 |
| | 9,381 |
| | 3,860 |
| | 13,241 |
| | 1,389 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
24870 Nandina Avenue | | Moreno Valley, CA | | — |
| | 13,543 |
| | — |
| | 20,904 |
| | 6,482 |
| | 27,965 |
| | 34,447 |
| | 848 |
| | 2012 | | (j) |
1250 Rancho Conejo Blvd. | | Thousand Oaks, CA | | — |
| | 1,435 |
| | 779 |
| | 42 |
| | 1,441 |
| | 815 |
| | 2,256 |
| | 280 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
1260 Rancho Conejo Blvd. | | Thousand Oaks, CA | | — |
| | 1,353 |
| | 722 |
| | (844 | ) | | 675 |
| | 556 |
| | 1,231 |
| | 219 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
1270 Rancho Conejo Blvd. | | Thousand Oaks, CA | | — |
| | 1,224 |
| | 716 |
| | 21 |
| | 1,229 |
| | 732 |
| | 1,961 |
| | 258 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
1280 Rancho Conejo Blvd. | | Thousand Oaks, CA | | 2,971 |
| | 2,043 |
| | 3,408 |
| | (233 | ) | | 2,051 |
| | 3,167 |
| | 5,218 |
| | 586 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
1290 Rancho Conejo Blvd | | Thousand Oaks, CA | | 2,559 |
| | 1,754 |
| | 2,949 |
| | (204 | ) | | 1,761 |
| | 2,738 |
| | 4,499 |
| | 512 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
100 West Sinclair Street | | Riverside, CA | | — |
| | 4,894 |
| | 3,481 |
| | (4,546 | ) | | 1,819 |
| | 2,010 |
| | 3,829 |
| | 1,165 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
14050 Day Street | | Moreno Valley, CA | | 3,376 |
| | 2,538 |
| | 2,538 |
| | 290 |
| | 2,565 |
| | 2,801 |
| | 5,366 |
| | 668 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
12925 Marlay Avenue | | Fontana, CA | | 9,265 |
| | 6,072 |
| | 7,891 |
| | 762 |
| | 6,090 |
| | 8,635 |
| | 14,725 |
| | 2,669 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
18201-18291 Santa Fe | | Rancho Domingue, CA | | 10,015 |
| | 6,720 |
| | — |
| | 9,197 |
| | 6,897 |
| | 9,020 |
| | 15,917 |
| | 1,409 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
1011 Rancho Conejo | | Thousand Oaks, CA | | 5,629 |
| | 7,717 |
| | 2,518 |
| | (187 | ) | | 7,752 |
| | 2,296 |
| | 10,048 |
| | 852 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
2300 Corporate Center Drive | | Thousand Oaks, CA | | — |
| | 6,506 |
| | 4,885 |
| | (5,433 | ) | | 3,236 |
| | 2,722 |
| | 5,958 |
| | 803 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
19021 S. Reyes Ave. | | Rancho Domingue, CA | | — |
| | 8,183 |
| | 7,501 |
| | 761 |
| | 8,545 |
| | 7,900 |
| | 16,445 |
| | 1,390 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
6185 Kimball Ave | | Chino, CA | | — |
| | 6,385 |
| | — |
| | 12,335 |
| | 6,382 |
| | 12,338 |
| | 18,720 |
| | 297 |
| | 2013 | | (j) |
5555 Bandini Blvd | | Bell, CA | | — |
| | 32,536 |
| | — |
| | 20,668 |
| | 32,540 |
| | 20,664 |
| | 53,204 |
| | 128 |
| | 2013 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern New Jersey | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2060 Springdale Road | | Cherry Hill, NJ | | — |
| | 258 |
| | 1,436 |
| | 795 |
| | 258 |
| | 2,231 |
| | 2,489 |
| | 916 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
111 Whittendale Drive | | Morrestown, NJ | | 1,933 |
| | 522 |
| | 2,916 |
| | 425 |
| | 522 |
| | 3,341 |
| | 3,863 |
| | 1,095 |
| | 2000 | | (j) |
7851 Airport Highway | | Pennsauken, NJ | | — |
| | 160 |
| | 508 |
| | 381 |
| | 162 |
| | 887 |
| | 1,049 |
| | 313 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
103 Central Avenue | | Mt. Laurel, NJ | | — |
| | 610 |
| | 1,847 |
| | 1,239 |
| | 619 |
| | 3,077 |
| | 3,696 |
| | 935 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
7890 Airport Hwy/7015 Central | | Pennsauken, NJ | | 1,182 |
| | 300 |
| | 989 |
| | 543 |
| | 425 |
| | 1,407 |
| | 1,832 |
| | 814 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
600 Creek Road | | Delanco, NJ | | — |
| | 2,125 |
| | 6,504 |
| | (4,089 | ) | | 1,557 |
| | 2,983 |
| | 4,540 |
| | 596 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
St. Louis | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
10431 Midwest Industrial Blvd | | Olivette, MO | | 1,284 |
| | 237 |
| | 1,360 |
| | 444 |
| | 237 |
| | 1,804 |
| | 2,041 |
| | 789 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
10751 Midwest Industrial Boulevard | | Olivette, MO | | — |
| | 193 |
| | 1,119 |
| | 294 |
| | 194 |
| | 1,412 |
| | 1,606 |
| | 542 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
6951 N Hanley | (d) | Hazelwood, MO | | — |
| | 405 |
| | 2,295 |
| | 2,465 |
| | 419 |
| | 4,746 |
| | 5,165 |
| | 1,656 |
| | 1996 | | (j) |
1067-1083 Warson-Bldg A | | St. Louis, MO | | 1,685 |
| | 246 |
| | 1,359 |
| | 798 |
| | 251 |
| | 2,152 |
| | 2,403 |
| | 510 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
1093-1107 Warson-Bldg B | | St. Louis, MO | | 2,877 |
| | 380 |
| | 2,103 |
| | 1,622 |
| | 388 |
| | 3,717 |
| | 4,105 |
| | 929 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
1113-1129 Warson-Bldg C | | St. Louis, MO | | 2,404 |
| | 303 |
| | 1,680 |
| | 1,446 |
| | 310 |
| | 3,119 |
| | 3,429 |
| | 993 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
1131-1151 Warson-Bldg D | | St. Louis, MO | | 2,188 |
| | 353 |
| | 1,952 |
| | 817 |
| | 360 |
| | 2,762 |
| | 3,122 |
| | 919 |
| | 2002 | | (j) |
6821-6857 Hazelwood Avenue | | Berkeley, MO | | — |
| | 985 |
| | 6,205 |
| | 556 |
| | 985 |
| | 6,761 |
| | 7,746 |
| | 1,946 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
13701 Rider Trail North | | Earth City, MO | | — |
| | 800 |
| | 2,099 |
| | 710 |
| | 804 |
| | 2,805 |
| | 3,609 |
| | 883 |
| | 2003 | | (j) |
1908-2000 Innerbelt | (d) | Overland, MO | | 7,343 |
| | 1,590 |
| | 9,026 |
| | 1,018 |
| | 1,591 |
| | 10,043 |
| | 11,634 |
| | 3,515 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
9060 Latty Avenue | | Berkeley, MO | | — |
| | 687 |
| | 1,947 |
| | (241 | ) | | 694 |
| | 1,699 |
| | 2,393 |
| | 1,354 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
21-25 Gateway Commerce Center | | Edwardsville, IL | | — |
| | 1,874 |
| | 31,958 |
| | (470 | ) | | 1,902 |
| | 31,460 |
| | 33,362 |
| | 6,418 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Address | | Location (City/State) | | (a) Encumbrances | | (b) Initial Cost | | (c) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition or Completion and Valuation Provision | | Gross Amount Carried At Close of Period 12/31/13 | | Accumulated Depreciation 12/31/2013 | | Year Acquired/ Constructed | | Depreciable Lives (Years) |
Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Building and Improvements | | Total |
| | | | (In thousands) | | | | |
6647 Romiss Court | | St. Louis, MO | | — |
| | 230 |
| | 681 |
| | (8 | ) | | 241 |
| | 662 |
| | 903 |
| | 210 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Tampa | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5313 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 204 |
| | 1,159 |
| | 541 |
| | 257 |
| | 1,647 |
| | 1,904 |
| | 546 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5525 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 192 |
| | 1,086 |
| | 263 |
| | 200 |
| | 1,341 |
| | 1,541 |
| | 499 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5709 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 192 |
| | 1,086 |
| | 170 |
| | 200 |
| | 1,248 |
| | 1,448 |
| | 501 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5711 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 243 |
| | 1,376 |
| | 159 |
| | 255 |
| | 1,523 |
| | 1,778 |
| | 599 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5453 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 71 |
| | 402 |
| | 147 |
| | 82 |
| | 538 |
| | 620 |
| | 217 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5455 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 307 |
| | 1,742 |
| | 724 |
| | 326 |
| | 2,447 |
| | 2,773 |
| | 931 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5553 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 307 |
| | 1,742 |
| | 353 |
| | 326 |
| | 2,076 |
| | 2,402 |
| | 822 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5501 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 215 |
| | 871 |
| | 300 |
| | 242 |
| | 1,144 |
| | 1,386 |
| | 455 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5503 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 98 |
| | 402 |
| | 313 |
| | 110 |
| | 703 |
| | 813 |
| | 321 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5555 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 213 |
| | 1,206 |
| | 277 |
| | 221 |
| | 1,475 |
| | 1,696 |
| | 627 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5557 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 59 |
| | 335 |
| | 52 |
| | 62 |
| | 384 |
| | 446 |
| | 150 |
| | 1997 | | (j) |
5461 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 261 |
| | — |
| | 1,305 |
| | 265 |
| | 1,301 |
| | 1,566 |
| | 495 |
| | 1998 | | (j) |
5481 W Waters Avenue | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 558 |
| | — |
| | 2,498 |
| | 561 |
| | 2,495 |
| | 3,056 |
| | 977 |
| | 1999 | | (j) |
4515-4519 George Road | | Tampa, FL | | 2,532 |
| | 633 |
| | 3,587 |
| | 838 |
| | 640 |
| | 4,418 |
| | 5,058 |
| | 1,404 |
| | 2001 | | (j) |
6089 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | 932 |
| | 180 |
| | 987 |
| | 114 |
| | 186 |
| | 1,095 |
| | 1,281 |
| | 380 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
6091 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | 649 |
| | 140 |
| | 730 |
| | 48 |
| | 144 |
| | 774 |
| | 918 |
| | 269 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
6103 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | 978 |
| | 220 |
| | 1,160 |
| | 2 |
| | 226 |
| | 1,156 |
| | 1,382 |
| | 339 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
6201 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | 932 |
| | 200 |
| | 1,107 |
| | 10 |
| | 205 |
| | 1,112 |
| | 1,317 |
| | 396 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
6203 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | 1,331 |
| | 300 |
| | 1,460 |
| | 122 |
| | 311 |
| | 1,571 |
| | 1,882 |
| | 705 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
6205 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | 1,260 |
| | 270 |
| | 1,363 |
| | 149 |
| | 278 |
| | 1,504 |
| | 1,782 |
| | 387 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
6101 Johns Road | | Tampa, FL | | 739 |
| | 210 |
| | 833 |
| | 1 |
| | 216 |
| | 828 |
| | 1,044 |
| | 276 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
4908 Tampa West Blvd | | Tampa, FL | | — |
| | 2,622 |
| | 8,643 |
| | (820 | ) | | 2,635 |
| | 7,810 |
| | 10,445 |
| | 2,421 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
11701 Belcher Road South | | Largo, FL | | — |
| | 1,657 |
| | 2,768 |
| | (1,656 | ) | | 852 |
| | 1,917 |
| | 2,769 |
| | 637 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
4900-4914 Creekside Drive | (h) | Clearwater, FL | | — |
| | 3,702 |
| | 7,338 |
| | (3,252 | ) | | 2,245 |
| | 5,543 |
| | 7,788 |
| | 1,867 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
12345 Starkey Road | | Largo, FL | | — |
| | 898 |
| | 2,078 |
| | (643 | ) | | 599 |
| | 1,734 |
| | 2,333 |
| | 606 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5050 Kendrick Court | | Grand Rapids, MI | | — |
| | 1,721 |
| | 11,433 |
| | (2,272 | ) | | 988 |
| | 9,894 |
| | 10,882 |
| | 7,052 |
| | 1994 | | (j) |
6266 Hurt Road | | Horn Lake, MS | | — |
| | 427 |
| | — |
| | 3,782 |
| | 387 |
| | 3,822 |
| | 4,209 |
| | 806 |
| | 2004 | | (j) |
6301 Hazeltine National Drive | | Orlando, FL | | 3,809 |
| | 909 |
| | 4,613 |
| | 203 |
| | 920 |
| | 4,805 |
| | 5,725 |
| | 1,693 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
12626 Silicon Drive | | San Antonio, TX | | 2,580 |
| | 768 |
| | 3,448 |
| | (216 | ) | | 779 |
| | 3,221 |
| | 4,000 |
| | 1,024 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
3100 Pinson Valley Parkway | | Birmingham, AL | | — |
| | 303 |
| | 742 |
| | (285 | ) | | 225 |
| | 535 |
| | 760 |
| | 186 |
| | 2005 | | (j) |
3730 Wheeler Avenue | | Fort Smith, AR | | — |
| | 720 |
| | 2,800 |
| | (589 | ) | | 583 |
| | 2,348 |
| | 2,931 |
| | 736 |
| | 2006 | | (j) |
3200 Pond Station | | Jefferson County, KY | | — |
| | 2,074 |
| | — |
| | 9,896 |
| | 2,120 |
| | 9,850 |
| | 11,970 |
| | 1,734 |
| | 2007 | | (j) |
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7501 NW 106th Terrace | | Kansas City, MO | | 11,200 |
| | 4,152 |
| | — |
| | 13,649 |
| | 4,228 |
| | 13,573 |
| | 17,801 |
| | 1,767 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
600 Greene Drive | | Greenville, KY | | — |
| | 294 |
| | 8,570 |
| | (727 | ) | | 296 |
| | 7,841 |
| | 8,137 |
| | 3,509 |
| | 2008 | | (j) |
Developments / Land Parcels | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Developments / Land Parcels | (i) | | | — |
| | 110,525 |
| | — |
| | 3,584 |
| (k) | 101,859 |
| | 12,250 |
| | 114,109 |
| | 1,515 |
| | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 580,215 |
| | $ | 638,359 |
| | $ | 1,477,133 |
| | $ | 608,999 |
| | $ | 610,802 |
| | $ | 2,113,689 |
| | $ | 2,724,491 |
| | $ | 652,971 |
| | | | |
_______________________
NOTES:
| |
(a) | See description of encumbrances in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
(b) | Initial cost for each respective property is tangible purchase price allocated in accordance with FASB’s guidance on business combinations. |
| |
(c) | Improvements are net of the write-off of fully depreciated assets and impairment of real estate. |
| |
(d) | Comprised of two properties. |
| |
(e) | Comprised of three properties. |
| |
(f) | Comprised of four properties. |
| |
(g) | Comprised of five properties. |
| |
(h) | Comprised of eight properties. |
| |
(i) | These properties represent developable land and land parcels for which we receive ground lease income. |
| |
(j) | Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated lives: |
|
| |
| |
Buildings and Improvements | 7 to 50 years |
Land Improvements | 3 to 20 years |
Tenant Improvements | Shorter of Lease Term or Useful Life |
| |
(k) | Includes foreign currency translation adjustments. |
At December 31, 2013, the aggregate cost of land and buildings and equipment for federal income tax purpose was approximately $2.7 billion (excluding construction in progress).
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2013
The changes in investment in real estate, including investment in real estate held for sale, for the three years ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | | (In thousands) | | |
Balance, Beginning of Year | $ | 2,773,501 |
| | $ | 2,766,989 |
| | $ | 2,791,667 |
|
Acquisition of Real Estate Assets | 69,481 |
| | 58,886 |
| | 22,953 |
|
Construction Costs and Improvements | 74,254 |
| | 64,600 |
| | 66,130 |
|
Disposition of Real Estate Assets | (136,705 | ) | | (90,794 | ) | | (86,732 | ) |
Impairment of Real Estate | (2,652 | ) | | (1,101 | ) | | 2,079 |
|
Write-off of Fully Depreciated Assets | (29,700 | ) | | (25,079 | ) | | (29,108 | ) |
Balance, End of Year | $ | 2,748,179 |
| | $ | 2,773,501 |
| | $ | 2,766,989 |
|
The changes in accumulated depreciation, including accumulated depreciation for real estate held for sale, for the three years ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | | (In thousands) | | |
Balance, Beginning of Year | $ | 642,439 |
| | $ | 609,986 |
| | $ | 581,851 |
|
Depreciation for Year | 83,835 |
| | 88,123 |
| | 85,849 |
|
Disposition of Assets | (43,603 | ) | | (30,591 | ) | | (28,606 | ) |
Write-off of Fully Depreciated Assets | (29,700 | ) | | (25,079 | ) | | (29,108 | ) |
Balance, End of Year | $ | 652,971 |
| | $ | 642,439 |
| | $ | 609,986 |
|
SCHEDULE IV:
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
As of December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Interest rate | | Final Maturity Date | | Periodic Payment Terms | | Prior Liens | | Face Amount of Mortgages | | Carrying Amount of Mortgages * | | Principal Amount of Loans Subject to Delinquent Principal or Interest |
Borrower A | | 4.75 | % | | 3/31/2014 | | Interest monthly and principal at maturity | | N/A | | $ | 9,800 |
| | $ | 9,800 |
| | N/A |
Borrower B | | 4.75 | % | | 12/26/2014 | | Interest monthly and principal at maturity | | N/A | | 2,720 |
| | 2,720 |
| | N/A |
Borrower C | | 6.75 | % | | 6/30/2015 | | Interest and principal monthly | | N/A | | 10,325 |
| | 9,821 |
| | N/A |
Borrower D | | 7.50 | % | | 12/22/2016 | | Interest and principal monthly | | N/A | | 8,030 |
| | 7,165 |
| | N/A |
Borrower E | | 6.35 | % | | 6/30/2017 | | Interest and principal monthly | | N/A | | 24,207 |
| | 23,099 |
| | N/A |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 55,082 |
| | $ | 52,605 |
| | |
_______________
|
| |
* | Carrying amount includes all applicable accrued interest and accretion of discount to date, net of amounts reserved for loan losses. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Balance at Beginning of Period | | $ | 40,771 |
| | $ | 47,420 |
| | $ | 50,687 |
|
Additions During Period: | | | | | | |
New Mortgage Loans | | 12,520 |
| | — |
| | 7,029 |
|
Accretion of Discount | | 64 |
| | 64 |
| | 64 |
|
Deductions During Period: | | | | | | |
Provision for Loan Loss Reserve | | (150 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Collections of Principal | | (598 | ) | | (6,707 | ) | | (10,304 | ) |
Interest | | (2 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (56 | ) |
Balance at Close of Period | | $ | 52,605 |
| | $ | 40,771 |
| | $ | 47,420 |
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P. |
| |
By: | | FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC. |
| | as general partner |
| |
By: | | /s/ BRUCE W. DUNCAN |
| | Bruce W. Duncan |
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: February 27, 2014
|
| | |
By: | | /s/ SCOTT A. MUSIL |
| | Scott A. Musil |
| | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Date: February 27, 2014
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
/s/ W. EDWIN TYLER W. Edwin Tyler | | Chairman of the Board of Directors | | February 27, 2014 |
| | |
/s/ BRUCE W. DUNCAN Bruce W. Duncan | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | February 27, 2014 |
| | |
/s/ MATTHEW DOMINSKI Matthew Dominski | | Director | | February 27, 2014 |
| | |
/s/ H. PATRICK HACKETT, JR. H. Patrick Hackett, Jr. | | Director | | February 27, 2014 |
| | |
/s/ JOHN E. RAU John E. Rau | | Director | | February 27, 2014 |
| | |
/s/ L. PETER SHARPE L. Peter Sharpe | | Director | | February 27, 2014 |