LITIGATION	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
NOTE 15. LITIGATION	In August 2013, a stockholder derivative action was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (the “Court”) against the Company, and certain of its directors and officers. The complaint, as amended on September 18, 2013, seeks an unspecified amount of damages and principally alleges breaches of fiduciary duty related to the conduct of the Company’s directors and officers in a series of capital raising transactions in 2011 to 2013. Based on a review and analysis of the complaint, the Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to continue to defend it vigorously. In March 2014, this complaint was dismissed without prejudice by the Court. In February 2014, Patrick T. Mooney, M.D., our former President and Chief Executive Officer, and his wife, Elizabeth Mooney, filed a complaint against us and certain of our directors and officers in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia County. The complaint, which alleges (i) that Dr. Mooney’s termination was in breach of his employment agreement and that he is entitled to certain severance benefits, (ii) that certain legally required disclosures by the Company and its general counsel defamed Dr. Mooney, and (iii) that Dr. Mooney’s wife is entitled to damages under a theory of loss of consortium, seeks in excess of $20 million in damages. We have filed a response to the complaint seeking dismissal of four of the six counts, denying the allegations in the two counts we have not sought to dismiss, and filing counterclaims against Dr. Mooney. We believe we have strong defenses to the claims asserted and we intend to defend them vigorously.

LITIGATION

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

In August 2013, a stockholder derivative action was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (the “Court”) against the Company, and certain of its directors and officers. The complaint, as amended on September 18, 2013, seeks an unspecified amount of damages and principally alleges breaches of fiduciary duty related to the conduct of the Company’s directors and officers in a series of capital raising transactions in 2011 to 2013. Based on a review and analysis of the complaint, the Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to continue to defend it vigorously. In March 2014, this complaint was dismissed without prejudice by the Court.

In February 2014, Patrick T. Mooney, M.D., our former President and Chief Executive Officer, and his wife, Elizabeth Mooney, filed a complaint against us and certain of our directors and officers in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia County. The complaint, which alleges (i) that Dr. Mooney’s termination was in breach of his employment agreement and that he is entitled to certain severance benefits, (ii) that certain legally required disclosures by the Company and its general counsel defamed Dr. Mooney, and (iii) that Dr. Mooney’s wife is entitled to damages under a theory of loss of consortium, seeks in excess of $20 million in damages. We have filed a response to the complaint seeking dismissal of four of the six counts, denying the allegations in the two counts we have not sought to dismiss, and filing counterclaims against Dr. Mooney. We believe we have strong defenses to the claims asserted and we intend to defend them vigorously.