8-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 11, 2009

Group 1 Automotive, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	1-13461	76-0506313
(State or other jurisdiction of	(Commission File Number)	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

800 Gessner, Suite 500
Houston, Texas 77024

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(713) 647-5700

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EX-23.1

EX-99.1

EX-99.2

EX-99.3

EX-99.4

Item 8.01. Other Events.

     Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is filing this Current Report on Form 8-K (this “Report”) to reflect certain required accounting adjustments and reclassifications described below with respect to the financial information contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Original 2008 Form 10-K”) filed on February 25, 2009. Neither this Report nor the Exhibits hereto reflect any events occurring after the filing of the Original 2008 Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 1 (the “Amended 2008 Form 10-K” filed on March 13, 2009 and together with the Original 2008 Form 10-K, the “2008 Form 10-K”), or modify or update the disclosures in the 2008 Form 10-K and the Company’s filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission subsequent to the filing of the 2008 Form 10-K, including any amendments to those filings.

     As previously disclosed in the 2008 Form 10-K, in May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board finalized FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that may be Settled in Cash upon Conversion” (“APB 14-1”), which specifies the accounting for certain convertible debt instruments, including the Company’s 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2036 (“2.25% Notes”). For convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion, APB 14-1 requires an entity to separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. The adoption of APB 14-1 for the Company’s 2.25% Notes requires that the equity component of the 2.25% Notes be initially included in the paid-in-capital section of stockholders’ equity on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and that the value of the equity component be treated as an original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the 2.25% Notes. Higher interest expense results by recognizing the accretion of the discounted carrying value of the 2.25% Notes to their face amount as interest expense over the expected term of the 2.25% Notes using an effective interest rate method of amortization. APB 14-1 is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009 and early adoption was not permitted; however, once adopted, APB 14-1 requires retrospective application to the terms of instruments as they existed for all periods presented. The retrospective application of APB 14-1 affects the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.

     The Company has adjusted in Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, 99.3 and 99.4 to this Report the following financial information contained in the 2008 Form 10-K to reflect the Company’s retrospective application of APB 14-1:

• Selected Financial Data;

• Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:

• Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk; and

• Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
99.1	Selected Financial Data (adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of APB 14-1)
99.2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of APB 14-1)
99.3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of APB 14-1)
99.4	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of APB 14-1)

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
August 11, 2009	By:	/s/ John C. Rickel
Date		John C. Rickel Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
99.1	Selected Financial Data (adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of APB 14-1)
99.2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of APB 14-1)
99.3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of APB 14-1)
99.4	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of APB 14-1)

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and in each related Prospectus of our report dated February 24, 2009 (except for Notes 2, 7, 9, 15, 18, and 19, as to which the date is August 11, 2009) with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in the Current Report (Form 8-K) of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. dated August 11, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

1.	Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-75714) of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and related Prospectus
2.	Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-137088) of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and related Prospectus
3.	Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-109080) of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and related Prospectus
4.	Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-137081)
5.	Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (No. 333-113679)
6.	Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan and the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (No. 333-145034)

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP               
Houston, Texas
August 11, 2009

EX-99.1

EXHIBIT 99.1

Selected Financial Data

     The following selected historical financial data as of December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, and for the five years in the period ended December 31, 2008, have been derived from our audited financial statements, subject to certain reclassifications to make prior years conform to the current year presentation. In addition, as discussed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, our financial statements as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the years then ended, included elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 8-K, have been adjusted for the retrospective application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that may be Settled in Cash upon Conversion.” This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 8-K.

     We have accounted for all of our dealership acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting and, as a result, we do not include in our financial statements the results of operations of these dealerships prior to the date we acquired them. As a result of the effects of our acquisitions and other potential factors in the future, the historical financial information described in the selected financial data is not necessarily indicative of our results of operations and financial position in the future or the results of operations and financial position that would have resulted had such acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented in the selected financial data:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Income Statement Data:
Revenues	$	5,654,087		$	6,260,217		$	5,940,729		$	5,795,248		$	5,240,632
Cost of sales		4,738,426			5,285,750			5,001,422			4,892,521			4,440,665
Gross profit		915,661			974,467			939,307			902,727			799,967
Selling, general and administrative expenses		739,430			758,877			717,786			716,317			647,487
Depreciation and amortization expense		25,652			20,438			17,694			18,469			15,376
Asset impairments		163,023			16,784			2,241			7,607			44,711
Income (loss) from operations		(12,444	)		178,368			201,586			160,334			92,393
Other income and (expense):
Floorplan interest expense		(46,377	)		(46,822	)		(45,308	)		(36,840	)		(24,561	)
Other interest expense, net		(36,783	)		(30,068	)		(19,234	)		(14,712	)		(15,473	)
Gain (loss) on redemption of senior subordinated and convertible notes		18,126			(1,598	)		(488	)		—			(6,381	)
Other income, net		302			560			629			282			143
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(77,176	)		100,440			137,185			109,064			46,121
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(31,166	)		35,893			50,092			38,269			19,368
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(46,010	)		64,547			87,093			70,795			26,753
Income (loss) related to discontinued operations, net of tax		(2,003	)		(1,132	)		(894	)		(526	)		1,028
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax		—			—			—			(16,038	)		—
Net income (loss)	$	(48,013	)	$	63,415		$	86,199		$	54,231		$	27,781
Earnings per share:
Basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	(2.04	)	$	2.77		$	3.61		$	2.97		$	1.17
Income (loss) related to discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.05
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(0.67	)	$	—
Net income (loss)	$	(2.13	)	$	2.73		$	3.57		$	2.27		$	1.22
Diluted:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	(2.03	)	$	2.76		$	3.56		$	2.92		$	1.14
Income (loss) related to discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.02	)	$	0.04
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(0.66	)	$	—
Net income (loss)	$	(2.12	)	$	2.71		$	3.53		$	2.24		$	1.18
Dividends per share	$	0.47		$	0.56		$	0.55		$	—		$	—
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		22,513			23,270			24,146			23,866			22,808
Diluted		22,671			23,406			24,446			24,229			23,494

	December 31,
	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital	$	92,128		$	184,705		$	232,140		$	133,246		$	152,667
Inventories		845,944			878,168			807,332			736,877			853,474
Total assets		2,288,114			2,506,104			2,120,137			1,835,859			1,950,742
Floorplan notes payable — credit facility		693,692			648,469			423,007			393,459			474,134
Floorplan notes payable — manufacturer affiliates		128,580			170,911			279,572			309,528			348,295
Acquisition line		50,000			135,000			—			—			84,000
Mortgage facility		177,998			131,317			—			—			—
Long-term debt, including current portion		322,319			329,109			330,513			158,860			157,801
Stockholders’ equity		662,117			741,765			754,661			626,793			567,174
Long-term debt to capitalization(1)		45	%		45	%		30	%		20	%		30	%

(1) Includes the acquisition line, mortgage facility and other long-term debt.

EX-99.2

EXHIBIT 99.2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

     The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are not limited to historical facts, but reflect our current beliefs, expectations or intentions regarding future events. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. For examples of those risks and uncertainties, see the cautionary statements contained in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Original 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report, except as required by applicable law. Hereinafter, the term “Group 1,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and, unless the context indicates otherwise, our consolidated subsidiaries.

     As discussed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, our financial statements as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the years then ended, included elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 8-K, have been adjusted for the retrospective application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. APB 14-1,“Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that may be Settled in Cash upon Conversion.” The financial information contained in the discussion below reflects only the adjustments described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements and does not reflect events occurring after February 25, 2009, the date of the filing of our Original 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, or modify or update those disclosures that may have been affected by subsequent events.

Overview

     We are a leading operator in the $1.0 trillion automotive retail industry. As of December 31, 2008, we owned and operated 127 franchises at 97 dealership locations and 23 collision service centers in the United States and six franchises at three dealerships and two collision centers in the U.K. We market and sell an extensive range of automotive products and services including new and used vehicles and related financing, vehicle maintenance and repair services, replacement parts, and warranty, insurance and extended service contracts. Our operations are primarily located in major metropolitan areas in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas in the United States of America and in the towns of Brighton, Hailsham and Worthing in the U.K.

     As of December 31, 2008, our retail network consisted of the following three regions (with the number of dealerships they comprised): (i) the Eastern (40 dealerships in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York and South Carolina), (ii) the Central (46 dealerships in Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas), and (iii) the Western (11 dealerships in California). Each region is managed by a regional vice president reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer and a regional chief financial officer reporting directly to our Chief Financial Officer. In addition, our international operations consist of three dealerships in the U.K. also managed locally with direct reporting responsibilities to our corporate management team.

     During 2008, as throughout our 10-year history, we grew our business primarily through acquisitions. We typically seek to acquire large, profitable, well-established and well-managed dealerships that are leaders in their respective market areas. From January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008, we have acquired 61 dealership franchises with annual revenues of $2.8 billion, disposed of or terminated 49 dealership franchises with annual revenues of $0.6 billion, and been granted three new dealership franchises by our manufacturers. In 2008 alone, we acquired 3 luxury and 2 domestic franchises with expected annual revenues of $90.2 million. Each acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the corresponding results of operations of these dealerships are included in our financial statements from the date of acquisition. In the following discussion and analysis, we report certain performance measures of our newly acquired dealerships separately from those of our existing dealerships.

     Our operating results reflect the combined performance of each of our interrelated business activities, which include the sale of new vehicles, used vehicles, finance and insurance products, and parts, service and collision repair services. Historically, each of these activities has been directly or indirectly impacted by a variety of supply/demand factors, including vehicle inventories, consumer confidence, discretionary spending, availability and affordability of consumer credit, manufacturer incentives, weather patterns, fuel

prices and interest rates. For example, during periods of sustained economic downturn or significant supply/demand imbalances, new vehicle sales may be negatively impacted as consumers tend to shift their purchases to used vehicles. Some consumers may even delay their purchasing decisions altogether, electing instead to repair their existing vehicles. In such cases, however, we believe the new vehicle sales impact on our overall business is mitigated by our ability to offer other products and services, such as used vehicles and parts, service and collision repair services.

     We generally experience higher volumes of vehicle sales and service in the second and third calendar quarters of each year. This seasonality is generally attributable to consumer buying trends and the timing of manufacturer new vehicle model introductions. In addition, in some regions of the United States, vehicle purchases decline during the winter months. As a result, our revenues, cash flows and operating income are typically lower in the first and fourth quarters and higher in the second and third quarters. Other factors unrelated to seasonality, such as changes in economic condition and manufacturer incentive programs, may exaggerate seasonal or cause counter-seasonal fluctuations in our revenues and operating income.

     During 2008, the U.S. and global economies suffered from, among other things, a substantial decline in consumer confidence and a tightening of credit availability. As a result, our automotive retail industry was negatively impacted by decreasing customer demand for new and used vehicles, vehicle margin pressures and higher inventory levels. In addition, the economic downturn has adversely impacted the manufacturers that supply our new vehicle inventory and some of our parts inventory, particularly the three domestic manufacturers.

     In response to this economic crisis, we have taken several key steps to appropriately size our business and allow us to manage through this industry downturn, including: wage cuts for our senior management team and Board of Directors, as well as various other levels, alterations to pay plans, headcount reductions and the elimination or minimization of several other variable expenses to align with current and projected operational results.

     For the year ended December 31, 2008, we realized a net loss of $48.0 million, or $2.12 per diluted share, and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we realized net income of $63.4 million, or $2.71 per diluted share, and $86.2 million, or $3.53 per diluted share, respectively. The following factors impacted our financial condition and results of operations in 2008, 2007 and 2006:

     Year Ended December 31, 2008:

•

Asset Impairments: In the third quarter of 2008, we determined that the economic conditions and resulting impact on the automotive retail industry, as well as the uncertainty surrounding the going concern of the domestic automobile manufacturers, indicated the potential for an impairment of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. In response to the identification of such triggering events, we performed an interim impairment assessment of our recorded values of goodwill and intangible franchise rights. As a result of such assessment, we determined that the fair values of certain indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights were less than their respective carrying values and recorded a pretax charge of $37.1 million, primarily related to our domestic brand franchises. Further, during the third quarter of 2008, we identified potential impairment indicators relative to certain of our real estate holdings, primarily associated with domestic franchise terminations, and other equipment, after giving consideration to the likelihood that certain facilities would not be sold or used by a prospective buyer as an automobile dealership operation given market conditions. As a result, we performed an impairment assessment of these long-lived assets and determined that the respective carrying values exceeded their estimated fair market values, as determined by third-party appraisals and brokers’ opinions of value. Accordingly, we recognized an $11.0 million pretax asset impairment charge.

During the fourth quarter of 2008, we performed our annual assessment of impairments relative to our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, utilizing our valuation model, which

consists of a blend between the market and income approaches. As a result, we identified additional impairments of our recorded value of intangible franchise rights, primarily attributable to the continued weakening of the United States economy, higher market risk premiums, the negative impact of the economic recession on the automotive retail industry and the growing uncertainty surrounding the three domestic automobile manufacturers, all of which worsened between the third and fourth quarter assessments. Specifically, with regards to the valuation assumptions utilized in our income approach, we increased our weighted average cost of capital (or “WACC”) from the WACC utilized in our impairment assessment during the third quarter of 2008 and historical levels. In addition, because of the negative selling trends experienced in the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised our 2009 industry sales outlook, or seasonally adjusted annual rate (or “SAAR”), from our previous forecast. Further, with regards to the assumptions within our market approach, we utilized historical market multiples of guideline companies for both revenue and pretax net income. These multiples and the resulting fair value estimates were adversely impacted by the declines in stock values during much of 2008, including the fourth quarter. As a result, we recognized a $114.8 million pretax impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2008, predominantly related to franchises in our Western Region.

• Gain on Debt Redemption: In 2008, we redeemed $28.3 million of our 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “8.25% Notes”) and, as a result, recognized a $0.9 million pretax gain. In addition, we redeemed $63.0 million of our 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes (the “2.25% Notes”) and, as a result, recognized a $17.2 million pretax gain and a proportionate reduction in deferred tax assets relative to unamortized costs of the purchased options acquired that were deductible for tax purposes as an original issue discount. No value was attributed to the equity component of the 2.25% Notes at the time of the redemption and, therefore, no adjustment to additional paid-in-capital was recognized.

• Lease Terminations: Our results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 were negatively impacted by a $1.1 million pretax charge, related to the termination of a dealership facility lease in conjunction with the relocation of several of our dealership franchises from one to multiple facilities.

• Discontinued Operations: During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 we disposed of certain operations that qualified for discontinued operations accounting treatment. The necessary reclassifications have been made to our 2007 Consolidated Statement of Operations for twelve months ended December 31, 2007, as well as our 2007 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, to reflect these operations as discontinued. In addition, we have made reclassifications to the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007, which was derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (“2007 Form 10-K”), to properly reflect the discontinued operations.

Year Ended December 31, 2007:

• Asset Impairments: In conjunction with our annual impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, we determined the carrying value of indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights associated with six of our dealerships to be impaired. Accordingly, we recognized a $9.2 million pretax impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2007. Further, in conjunction with the sale of real estate associated with one of our dealerships, we recognized a $5.4 million pretax impairment charge. In addition, we recognized a total of $2.2 million in additional pretax impairment charges related to the impairment of fixed assets, primarily associated with sold stores and terminated franchises.

• Lease Terminations: During the first half of 2007, our results were negatively impacted by $4.3 million of pretax charges as we terminated real estate leases associated with the sale or termination of two of our domestic brand franchises. In addition, during 2007, we successfully completed the conversion of all of our stores to operate on the Dealer Services Group of Automatic Data

Processing Inc. (“ADP”) platform for dealership management services. As a result, we recognized an additional $0.7 million in lease termination costs related to these conversions.

• Loss on Bond Redemption: During the third quarter 2007, we recognized a $1.6 million pretax charge on the redemption of $36.4 million of our 8.25% Notes.

Year Ended December 31, 2006:

•	Asset Impairments: In conjunction with our annual impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, we determined the carrying value of indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights associated with two of our domestic franchises to be impaired. Accordingly, we recognized a $1.4 million pretax impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2006. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2006, we entered into an agreement to sell one of our Ford dealership franchises and, as a result, identified the carrying value of certain fixed assets associated with the dealership to be impaired. In connection therewith, we recorded a pretax impairment charge of $0.8 million.
•	Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Insurance Settlements and New Orleans Recovery: We settled all building, content and vehicle damage and business interruption insurance claims with our insurance carriers in 2006. As a result, we recognized an additional $6.4 million of business interruption proceeds related to covered payroll and fixed cost expenditures incurred during 2006, as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
•	Lease Terminations: On March 30, 2006, we announced that ADP would become the sole dealership management system provider for our existing stores. We converted a number of our stores from other systems to ADP in 2006 and settled the lease termination agreement with one of our other system providers for all stores converted as of December 31, 2006.
	In June 2006, as a result of the significant damage sustained at our Dodge store on the East Bank of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina, we terminated our franchise with DaimlerChrylser, dealership operations at this store and the associated facilities lease agreement. As a result of the lease termination, we recognized a $4.5 million pretax charge.
•	Dealership Disposals: We disposed of 13 franchises during 2006, resulting in an aggregate pretax gain on sale of $5.8 million.
•	Severance Costs: In conjunction with our management realignment from platform to regional structures, we entered into severance agreements with several employees. In aggregate, these severance costs amounted to $3.5 million in 2006.

     These items, and other variances between the periods presented, are covered in the following discussion.

Key Performance Indicators

     The following table highlights certain of the key performance indicators we use to manage our business:

Consolidated Statistical Data

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
Unit Sales
Retail Sales
New Vehicle		110,705			129,215			126,487
Used Vehicle		61,971			65,138			64,952
Total Retail Sales		172,676			194,353			191,439
Wholesale Sales		36,819			44,289			44,544
Total Vehicle Sales		209,495			238,642			235,983
Gross Margin
New Vehicle Retail Sales		6.3	%		6.7	%		7.2	%
Total Used Vehicle Sales		8.3	%		8.8	%		9.7	%
Parts and Service Sales		53.8	%		54.5	%		54.1	%
Total Gross Margin		16.2	%		15.6	%		15.8	%
SG&A(1) as a % of Gross Profit		80.8	%		77.9	%		76.4	%
Operating Margin		(0.2	)%		2.8	%		3.4	%
Pretax Margin		(1.4	)%		1.6	%		2.3	%
Finance and Insurance Revenues per Retail Unit Sold	$	1,080		$	1,045		$	975

(1) Selling, general and administrative expenses.

     The following discussion briefly highlights certain of the results and trends occurring within our business. Throughout the following discussion, references are made to same store results and variances, which are discussed in more detail in the “Results of Operations” section that follows.

     During 2008, the retail automotive industry suffered from dramatic shifts in customer vehicle preferences (primarily associated with fuel economy), declining consumer confidence, reduced credit availability and weakening economic conditions. Our new vehicle retail sales and gross margins for 2008, particularly in our truck-heavy brands and our truck dependent markets, were adversely impacted by a shift in consumer demand towards more fuel efficient vehicles during the second and third quarters of 2008, following a spike in gasoline prices. Later in the year, customer preferences trended away from fuel efficient vehicles, following the decline in gasoline prices, and negatively affected our new vehicle sales and margins. Further, the economic uncertainty substantially slowed our new vehicle retail sales in 2008 and, in turn, pressured our new vehicle margins. Our used vehicle results are directly affected by economic conditions, the level of manufacturer incentives on new vehicles, the number and quality of trade-ins and lease turn-ins and the availability of consumer credit. Declining new vehicle markets and manufacturer efforts to stimulate new vehicle sales through incentives created margin pressure in our used vehicle business and contributed to a weaker used vehicle market in 2008 as compared to 2007 and 2006. Further, similar to the new vehicle business, our used vehicle sales and margins were negatively impacted by the two shifts in customer vehicle preferences during 2008, as well as, tighter credit standards (particularly reductions in loan-to-value amounts). Our consolidated parts and service gross margin also felt the impact of more rapid growth in our relatively lower margin collision business and the negative impact of declining new and used vehicle sales, with margins declining 70 basis points in 2008. However, our consolidated finance and insurance revenues per retail unit sold increased in 2008 compared to 2007 and 2006, primarily reflecting improvements in our pricing structure. Our consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) decreased in absolute dollars by 2.6% in 2008 compared to 2007. But, as a percentage of gross profit, SG&A increased 290 basis points to 80.8% in 2008, as a result of the decline in gross profit.

     Our operating margin for 2008 was also negatively impacted by a $163.0 million charge for asset impairments, primarily attributable to identified shortfalls in the fair value of certain long lived asset and intangible franchise rights when compared to the respective capitalized value. As a result, operating margin decreased 300 basis points from 2.8% in 2007 to (0.2)% in 2008. Our pretax margin declined from 1.6% in 2007 to (1.4)% in 2008. In addition to the factors noted above, the 2008 pretax margin was negatively impacted by an increase in other interest expense, primarily attributable to interest incurred on real estate related borrowings, but partially offset by gains recognized on the redemption of our 8.25% Notes and 2.25% Notes.

     We believe that our continued growth depends on, among other things, our ability to achieve optimum performance from our diverse franchise mix, attract and retain high-caliber employees and reinvest as needed to maintain top-quality facilities, while at the same time successfully acquiring and integrating new dealerships. During 2009, we plan to continue our transition to an operating model with greater commonality of key operating processes and systems that support the extension of best practices and the leveraging of scale. In addition, we expect to spend less than $30.0 million to construct new facilities and upgrade or expand existing facilities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements, for all of its financial assets and liabilities. The statement does not require new fair value measurements, but emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy for classification of financial assets or liabilities based upon measurement inputs. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position. See Note 16 for the application of SFAS 157 and further details regarding fair value measurement our financial assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2008.

     In November 2007, the FASB deferred for one year the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities. In February 2008 the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, (SFAS 157-2), which defers the effective date of SFAS 157, as it related to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We have evaluated our financial statements and have determined the adoption of this pronouncement upon its existing nonfinancial assets, such as goodwill and intangible assets, will not materially impact us as we already utilize an income approach in measuring the fair value of our nonfinancial assets as prescribed by SFAS 157. Upon adoption we anticipate enhancing our current disclosures surrounding our nonfinancial assets and liabilities to meet the requirements of SFAS 157 similarly to those already provided for in our financial assets and liabilities in Note 16. We determined we currently do not hold any non-financial liabilities for which this pronouncement is applicable.

     In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards, which require assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to use a fair value to measure accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities, equity method investments, accounts payable, guarantees and issued debt. We adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2008, and elected not to measure any of our currently eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141 (R)”), which significantly changes the accounting for business acquisitions both during the period of the acquisition and in subsequent periods. The more significant changes in the accounting for acquisitions which could impact us are:

• certain transactions cost, which are presently treated as cost of the acquisition, will be expensed;

• restructuring costs associated with a business combination, which are presently capitalized, will be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date;

• contingencies, including contingent consideration, which are presently accounted for as an adjustment of purchase price, will be recorded at fair value with subsequent adjustments recognized in operations; and

• valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets, which are presently considered to be subsequent changes in consideration and are recorded as decreases in goodwill, will be recognized up front and in operations.

     SFAS 141 (R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 31, 2008, with an exception related to the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired contingencies related to acquisitions completed before the effective date. We have not executed or currently plan to execute any business combinations on or subsequent to December 31, 2008 for the 2009 annual period. We do not anticipate a material impact from this pronouncement on its financial position or results from operations upon adoption.

     In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”), an amendment of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), which requires disclosures of the objectives of derivative instruments and hedging activities, the method of accounting for such instruments and activities under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and disclosure of the affects of such instruments and related hedged items on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The statement encourages but does not require comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial application. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We do not believe this statement will have a material financial impact on us but only enhance our current disclosures contained within our consolidated financial statements.

     In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142-3”), which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142. SFAS 142-3 enhances the guidance over the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”). SFAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The measurement provision of this standard will apply only to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. We are currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on our processes for determining and evaluating the useful life of its intangible assets.

Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates

     Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies we use and the estimates and assumptions we make during their preparation. The following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies and critical accounting estimates.

Critical Accounting Policies

     We have identified below what we believe to be the most pervasive accounting policies that are of particular importance to the portrayal of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. See

Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of all our significant accounting policies.

     Discontinued Operations. On June 30, 2008, we sold certain operations constituting our entire dealership holdings in one particular market that qualified for discontinued operations accounting and reporting treatment. We have made certain reclassifications to our 2007 and 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to reflect these operations as discontinued.

     Inventories. We carry our new, used and demonstrator vehicle inventories, as well as our parts and accessories inventories, at the lower of cost or market in our consolidated balance sheets. Vehicle inventory cost consists of the amount paid to acquire the inventory, plus the cost of reconditioning, added equipment and transportation. Additionally, we receive interest assistance from some of our manufacturers. This assistance is accounted for as a vehicle purchase price discount and is reflected as a reduction to the inventory cost on our balance sheets and as a reduction to cost of sales in our statements of operation as the vehicles are sold. As the market value of our inventory typically declines over time, we establish reserves based on our historical loss experience and market trends. These reserves are charged to cost of sales and reduce the carrying value of our inventory on hand. Used vehicles are complex to value as there is no standardized source for determining exact values and each vehicle and each market in which we operate is unique. As a result, the value of each used vehicle taken at trade-in, or purchased at auction, is determined based on industry data, primarily accessed via our used vehicle management software and the industry expertise of the responsible used vehicle manager. Our valuation risk is mitigated, somewhat, by how quickly we turn this inventory. At December 31, 2008, our used vehicle days’ supply was 25 days.

     Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess, at the date of acquisition, of the purchase price of businesses acquired over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired.

     We perform the annual impairment assessment at the end of each calendar year, or more frequently if events or circumstances at a reporting unit occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Based on the organization and management of our business prior to 2006, each of our groups of dealerships formerly referred to as platforms qualified as reporting units for the purpose of assessing goodwill for impairment. However, with our reorganization into three domestic regions in 2007, and the corresponding changes in our management, operational and reporting structure we determined that goodwill should be evaluated at a regional level.

     Intangible Franchise Rights. Our only significant identifiable intangible assets, other than goodwill, are rights under our franchise agreements with manufacturers. Our dealerships’ franchise agreements are for various terms, ranging from one year to an indefinite period. We expect these franchise agreements to continue indefinitely and, when these agreements do not have indefinite terms, we believe that renewal of these agreements can be obtained without substantial cost. As such, we believe that our franchise agreements will contribute to cash flows for an indefinite period. Therefore, we do not amortize the carrying amount of our franchise rights. Franchise rights acquired in acquisitions prior to July 1, 2001, were not separately recorded, but were recorded and amortized as part of goodwill and remain a part of goodwill at December 31, 2008 and 2007, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Like goodwill, we test our franchise rights for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment, using a fair-value method.

     Retail Finance, Insurance and Vehicle Service Contract Revenues Recognition. We arrange financing for customers through various institutions and receive financing fees based on the difference between the loan rates charged to customers and predetermined financing rates set by the financing institution. In addition, we receive fees from the sale of insurance and vehicle service contracts to customers. Further, through agreements that we have with certain vehicle service contract administrators, we earn volume incentive rebates and interest income on reserves, as well as participate in the underwriting profits of the products.

     We may be charged back for unearned financing, insurance contract or vehicle service contract fees in the event of early termination of the contracts by customers. Revenues from these fees are recorded at the time of the sale of the vehicles and a reserve for future amounts which might be charged back is established based on our historical chargeback results and the termination provisions of the applicable contracts. While our chargeback results vary depending on the type of contract sold, a 10% change in the historical chargeback results used in determining our estimates of future amounts which might be charged back would have changed our reserve at December 31, 2008, by $1.6 million.

Critical Accounting Estimates

     The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principals requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period. We analyze our estimates based on our historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results could differ from such estimates. The following is a discussion of our critical accounting estimates.

     Goodwill. To determine the fair value of our reporting units, we use a combination of the discounted cash flow, or income, approach and the market approach. Included in the discounted cash flow are assumptions regarding revenue growth rates, future gross margins, future selling, general and administrative expenses and an estimated weighted average cost of capital. We also must estimate residual values at the end of the forecast period and future capital expenditure requirements. For the market approach, we utilize historical multiples of guideline companies. Each of these assumptions requires us to use our knowledge of (1) our industry, (2) our recent transactions and (3) reasonable performance expectations for our operations. If any one of the above assumptions change, in some cases insignificantly, or fails to materialize, the resulting decline in our estimated fair value could result in a material impairment charge to the goodwill associated with the reporting unit(s).

     Specifically, with regards to the valuation assumptions utilized in our income approach as of December 31, 2008, we determined that, because of the significant uncertainty within the market and the corresponding increase in risk premiums, our weighted average cost of capital (or “WACC”) should be increased from historical levels. In addition, based upon the negative selling trends experienced in the last several months of 2008 and the forecasts from multiple industry experts for 2009, we utilized a seasonally adjusted annual rate (or “SAAR”) of 10.5 million units for our 2009 industry sales outlook that was lower than our previous forecasts. For 2010 and beyond, we used a SAAR trend based upon historical data and previous recession recoveries. Further, with regards to the assumptions within our market approach, we utilized recent market multiples of guideline companies for both revenue and pretax net income.

     At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded the carrying value of its net assets (step one of the impairment test). As a result, we were not required to conduct the second step of the impairment test. However, if any of our assumptions change, including in some cases insignificantly, or fails to materialize, the resulting decline in the estimated fair market value of goodwill could have resulted in a step two test of goodwill for impairment. For example, if our assumptions regarding the risk-free rate used in its estimated WACC as of December 31, 2008 increased by 100 basis points or the estimated SAAR for 2009 decreased by approximately 5% to all-time record low levels and all other assumptions remained constant, we would have been required to perform a step two impairment test on goodwill for one of our reporting units. However, in both scenarios, the application of step two of the goodwill impairment test would have required the assignment of value to other assets and liabilities, which we believe would have substantially or completely eliminated the shortfall in residual values of the reporting unit, resulting in an insignificant goodwill impairment charge, if any.

     Intangible Franchise Rights. To test the carrying value of each individual franchise right for impairment under EITF D-108, we use a discounted cash flow based approach. Included in this analysis

are assumptions, at a dealership level, regarding the cash flows directly attributable to the franchise right, revenue growth rates, future gross margins and future selling, general and administrative expenses. Using an estimated weighted average cost of capital, estimated residual values at the end of the forecast period and future capital expenditure requirements, we calculate the fair value of each dealership’s franchise rights after considering estimated values for tangible assets, working capital and workforce.

     If any one of the above assumptions change or fails to materialize, the resulting decline in our intangible franchise rights’ estimated fair value could result in an additional impairment charge to the intangible franchise right associated with the applicable dealership. For example, if our assumptions regarding risk-free interest rates used in our estimated WACC used in our 2008 impairment analysis increased by 100 basis points, and all other assumptions remain constant, the resulting non-cash franchise rights impairment charge would increase by $7.5 million. Further, an approximate 0.6 million unit decrease in the forecasted SAAR levels for 2009 to all-time record low levels would have resulted in an additional non-cash franchise rights impairment charge of $7.7 million.

     Self-Insured Property and Casualty Reserves. We are self-insured for a portion of the claims related to our property and casualty insurance programs, requiring us to make estimates regarding expected losses to be incurred.

     We engage a third-party actuary to conduct a study of the exposures under the self-insured portion of our worker’s compensation and general liability insurance programs for all open policy years. We update this actuarial study on an annual basis and make the appropriate adjustments to our accrual. Actuarial estimates for the portion of claims not covered by insurance are based on our historical claims experience adjusted for loss trending and loss development factors. Changes in the frequency or severity of claims from historical levels could influence our reserve for claims and our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. A 10% change in the historical loss history used in determining our estimate of future losses would have changed our reserve for these losses at December 31, 2008, by $4.6 million.

     For workers’ compensation and general liability insurance policy years ended prior to October 31, 2005, this component of our insurance program included aggregate retention (stop loss) limits in addition to a per claim deductible limit (the “Stop Loss Plans”). Due to our historical experience in both claims frequency and severity, the likelihood of breaching the aggregate retention limits described above was deemed remote, and as such, we elected not to purchase this stop loss coverage for the policy year beginning November 1, 2005 and for each subsequent year (the “No Stop Loss Plans”). Our exposure per claim under the No Stop Loss Plans is limited to $1.0 million per occurrence, with unlimited exposure on the number of claims up to $1.0 million that we may incur.

     Our maximum potential exposure under all of the Stop Loss Plans originally totaled $42.9 million, before consideration of amounts previously paid or accruals we have recorded related to our loss projections. After consideration of the amounts paid or accrued, our remaining potential loss exposure under the Stop Loss Plans totals $13.6 million at December 31, 2008.

     Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities. We account for our investments in marketable securities and debt instruments under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Instruments (as amended),” which established standards of financial accounting and reporting for investments in equity instruments that have readily determinable fair values and for all investments in debt securities. Accordingly, we designate these investments as available-for-sale, measure them at fair value and classify them as either cash and cash equivalents or other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based upon maturity terms and certain contractual restrictions. As these investments are fairly liquid we believe our fair value techniques accurately reflect their market values and are subject to changes that are market driven and subject to demand and supply of the financial instrument markets.

     We maintain multiple trust accounts comprised of money market funds with short-term investments in marketable securities, such as U.S. government securities, commercial paper and bankers acceptances, that have maturities of less than three months. The valuation measurement inputs of these marketable securities represent unadjusted quoted prices in active markets. Also within our trust accounts, we hold investments

in debt instruments, such as government obligations and other fixed income securities. The debt securities are measured based upon quoted market prices utilizing public information, independent external valuations from pricing services or third-party advisors.

     As described in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, we utilize an interest rate hedging strategy in order to stabilize earnings exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates. We measure our interest rate derivative instruments utilizing an income approach valuation technique, converting future amounts of cash flows to a single present value in order to obtain a transfer exit price within the bid and ask spread that is most representative of the fair value of our derivative instruments. In measuring fair value, we utilize the option-pricing Black-Scholes present value technique for all of our derivative instruments. This option-pricing technique utilizes a LIBOR forward yield curve, obtained from an independent external service provider, matched to the identical maturity term of the instrument being measured. Observable inputs utilized in the income approach valuation technique incorporate identical contractual notional amounts, fixed coupon rates, periodic terms for interest payments and contract maturity. We have determined the valuation measurement inputs of these derivative instruments to maximize the use of observable inputs that market participants would use in pricing similar or identical instruments and market data obtained from independent sources, which is readily observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the derivative instrument. Further, the valuation measurement inputs minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We validate the outputs of our valuation technique by comparison to valuations from the respective counterparties.

     Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed. We estimate the values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, which involves the use of various assumptions. The most significant assumptions, and those requiring the most judgment, involve the estimated fair values of property and equipment and intangible franchise rights, with the remaining attributable to goodwill, if any. We utilize third-party experts to determine the fair values of property and equipment purchased.

     Income Taxes. We have recognized deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, that we believe will be realized, based primarily on the assumption of future taxable income. We have $164.0 million of state net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 2008 that will expire between 2009 and 2028. To the extent that we have determined that net income attributable to certain states jurisdictions will not be sufficient to realize these net operating losses, we have established a corresponding valuation allowance.

Results of Operations

     The “Same Store” amounts presented below include the results of dealerships for the identical months in each period presented in the comparison, commencing with the first full month in which the dealership was owned by us and, in the case of dispositions, ending with the last full month it was owned by us. Same Store results also include the activities of our corporate headquarters.

     For example, for a dealership acquired in June 2007, the results from this dealership will appear in our Same Store comparison beginning in 2008 for the period July 2008 through December 2008, when comparing to July 2007 through December 2007 results.

     The following table summarizes our combined Same Store results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 compared to 2006. Depending on the periods being compared, the stores included in Same Store will vary. For this reason, the 2007 Same Store results that are compared to 2008 differ from those used in the comparison to 2006.

Total Same Store Data
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008			% Change			2007			2007			% Change			2006
Revenues
New vehicle retail	$	3,216,281			(16.8	)%	$	3,865,391		$	3,528,161			(2.7	)%	$	3,624,316
Used vehicle retail		1,025,487			(7.9	)%		1,113,970			999,425			(2.1	)%	$	1,021,194
Used vehicle wholesale		217,496			(28.4	)%		303,974			265,643			(14.3	)%	$	310,115
Parts and Service		700,896			2.1	%		686,700			637,671			2.4	%	$	622,839
Finance, insurance and other		181,624			(9.8	)%		201,315			190,429			4.9	%	$	181,550
Total revenues		5,341,784			(13.4	)%		6,171,350			5,621,329			(2.4	)%		5,760,014
Cost of Sales
New vehicle retail		3,014,560			(16.4	)%		3,606,658			3,293,981			(2.1	)%		3,364,777
Used vehicle retail		915,939			(7.0	)%		985,216			880,853			(1.1	)%		890,340
Used vehicle wholesale		221,434			(27.9	)%		307,084			269,244			(13.6	)%		311,713
Parts and Service		323,903			3.7	%		312,320			291,860			2.5	%		284,803
Total cost of sales		4,475,836			(14.1	)%		5,211,278			4,735,938			(2.4	)%		4,851,633
Gross profit	$	865,948			(9.8	)%	$	960,072		$	885,391			(2.5	)%	$	908,381
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	700,191			(5.2	)%	$	738,564		$	689,071			0.2	%	$	688,027
Depreciation and amortization expenses	$	23,936			21.6	%	$	19,684		$	17,660			6.3	%	$	16,619
Floorplan interest expense	$	44,095			(3.3	)%	$	45,577		$	42,028			(2.3	)%	$	42,996
Gross Margin
New Vehicle Retail		6.3	%					6.7	%		6.6	%					7.2	%
Used Vehicle		8.5	%					8.9	%		9.1	%					9.7	%
Parts and Service		53.8	%					54.5	%		54.2	%					54.3	%
Total Gross Margin		16.2	%					15.6	%		15.8	%					15.8	%
SG&A as a % of Gross Profit		80.9	%					76.9	%		77.8	%					75.7	%
Operating Margin		0.4	%					3.0	%		2.9	%					3.5	%
Finance and Insurance Revenues per Retail Unit Sold	$	1,087			3.5	%	$	1,050		$	1,082			10.4	%	$	980

     The discussion that follows provides explanation for the variances noted above. In addition, each table presents by primary income statement line item comparative financial and non-financial data of our Same Store locations, those locations acquired or disposed of (“Transactions”) during the periods and the consolidated company for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.

New Vehicle Retail Data
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008			% Change			2007			2007			% Change			2006
Retail Unit Sales
Same Stores		107,181			(16.1	)%		127,725			117,061			(5.1	)%		123,407
Transactions		3,524						1,490			12,154						3,080
Total		110,705			(14.3	)%		129,215			129,215			2.2	%		126,487
Retail Sales Revenues
Same Stores	$	3,216,281			(16.8	)%	$	3,865,391		$	3,528,161			(2.7	)%	$	3,624,316
Transactions		176,607						49,259			386,489						88,950
Total	$	3,392,888			(13.3	)%	$	3,914,650		$	3,914,650			5.4	%	$	3,713,266
Gross Profit
Same Stores	$	201,721			(22.0	)%	$	258,733		$	234,180			(9.8	)%	$	259,539
Transactions		13,035						3,589			28,142						6,805
Total	$	214,756			(18.1	)%	$	262,322		$	262,322			(1.5	)%	$	266,344
Gross Profit per Retail
Unit Sold
Same Stores	$	1,882			(7.1	)%	$	2,026		$	2,000			(4.9	)%	$	2,103
Transactions	$	3,698					$	2,409		$	2,315					$	2,209
Total	$	1,940			(4.4	)%	$	2,030		$	2,030			(3.6	)%	$	2,106
Gross Margin
Same Stores		6.3	%					6.7	%		6.6	%					7.2	%
Transactions		7.4	%					7.3	%		7.3	%					7.7	%
Total		6.3	%					6.7	%		6.7	%					7.2	%

     Our Same Store new vehicle revenues declined 16.8% from 2007 to 2008, on a similar percentage decrease in Same Store retail unit sales. Slowing economic conditions and declining consumer confidence impacted overall new vehicle demand in the United States and, on a regional basis, we experienced weakness particularly in the California and Florida markets. Further, during most of 2008, customer preferences shifted away from less fuel-efficient vehicles and as a result, most segments of our new vehicle business were negatively impacted. Our Same Store unit sales in our truck lines decreased 21.1% from 2007 to 2008. Same Store revenues from our truck-heavy domestic franchises were down 30.1% from 2007 to 2008. Our predominantly car franchises were also impacted by the slowing economy in 2008 resulting in an aggregate decrease in unit sales of cars by 11.8% from 2007 levels. Same Store revenues from our import and luxury brands fell 12.8% and 12.6% from 2007 to 2008, on 13.1% and 8.5% less retail units, respectively.

     Same Store new vehicle revenues declined 2.7% from 2006 to 2007, on a 5.1% decrease in Same Store retail unit sales, primarily due to the results experienced within our domestic nameplates. Same Store domestic unit sales decreased 12.7% from 2006 to 2007, while Same Store revenues from our domestic lines were down 10.1% over the same period. Our Same Store revenues from import brands fell 2.9% in 2007 compared to 2006 on 3.4% less units, primarily driven by declining sales in our Western Region. However, our Same Store revenues from luxury franchises increased 5.4% from 1.8% more units, highlighting the importance of a diversified franchise portfolio.

     The following table sets forth our Same Store new vehicle retail sales volume by manufacturer:

     Same Store New Vehicle Unit Sales

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008		% Change			2007		2007		% Change			2006
Toyota		38,818		(17.8)	%		47,243		44,732		(3.5)	%		46,343
Honda		15,473		(3.8	)		16,081		13,092		1.2			12,940
Nissan		14,075		(13.2	)		16,218		13,612		(4.6	)		14,265
Ford		10,560		(29.6	)		14,999		15,326		(14.9	)		18,000
BMW		8,481		(1.8	)		8,640		5,241		12.8			4,645
General Motors		5,175		(25.4	)		6,934		7,185		(13.8	)		8,333
Chrysler		6,625		(31.0	)		9,600		9,873		(6.6	)		10,568
Mercedez-Benz		4,261		4.2			4,089		4,089		(1.0	)		4,130
Other		3,713		(5.3	)		3,921		3,911		(6.5	)		4,183
Total		107,181		(16.1	)		127,725		117,061		(5.1	)		123,407

     The following table sets forth our top 10 Same Store brands, based on retail unit sales volume, and the percentage changes from year to year, which we believe are generally consistent with the overall retail market performance of those brands in the areas where we operate:

Same Store New Vehicle Unit Sales

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008		% Change			2007		2007		% Change			2006
Toyota		31,249		(18.0)	%		38,089		35,776		(3.2)	%		36,954
Nissan		12,884		(13.8	)		14,941		12,335		(4.1	)		12,859
Honda		12,864		(0.9	)		12,983		11,055		2.9			10,740
Ford		9,120		(30.8	)		13,171		13,290		(15.9	)		15,812
BMW		6,916		(5.5	)		7,319		4,907		5.6			4,645
Lexus		5,789		(18.0	)		7,063		7,019		4.3			6,728
Dodge		4,174		(25.1	)		5,572		5,732		(6.1	)		6,102
Mercedez-Benz		3,625		(10.9	)		4,069		4,069		(1.1	)		4,116
Chevrolet		3,543		(28.9	)		4,981		4,981		(15.5	)		5,897
Acura		2,609		(15.8	)		3,098		2,037		(7.4	)		2,200
Other		14,408		(12.4	)		16,439		15,860		(8.6	)		17,353
Total		107,181		(16.1	)		127,725		117,061		(5.1	)		123,406

     Same Store sales from all of our major brands experienced year-over-year declines in 2008, with some falling more than others, highlighting the cyclical nature of our business and the need to have a well-balanced portfolio of new vehicle brands of which we sell. The level of retail sales, as well as our own ability to retain or grow market share, during future periods is difficult to predict.

     Our Same Store gross margin on new vehicle retail sales decreased 40 basis points from 2007 to 2008. The sustained slowdown in the national economy and in most of the markets in which we operate continued to depress new retail vehicle sales, increasing overall new vehicle inventory levels and competitive pressure on all of our brands and causing the shrinkage in margins. We experienced a decrease in Same Store new vehicle gross margin in most of our major brands. Further depressing new vehicle margins in 2008 was the

shift in customer preference towards more fuel-efficient vehicles during most of the year, which largely affected our truck-dependent domestic brands, as well as the truck lines of our import brands. For the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to 2007, our Same Store gross profit per retail unit (“PRU”) declined 7.1% to $1,882, representing a 13.6% decline in PRU for our domestic nameplates, a 10.0% decrease in PRU for our luxury brands and a 3.6% decline in PRU from our import nameplates.

     Our Same Store gross margin on new vehicle retail sales decreased 60 basis points from 2006 to 2007. We experienced a decrease in Same Store new vehicle gross margin in all three of our brand groups: domestic, import and luxury. For the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 2006, our Same Store PRU declined 4.9% to $2,000, attributable to a 10.2% decline in PRU from our import nameplates and a 5.4% decrease in PRU from our domestic brands.

     Most manufacturers offer interest assistance to offset floorplan interest charges incurred in connection with inventory purchases. This assistance varies by manufacturer, but generally provides for a defined amount regardless of our actual floorplan interest rate or the length of time for which the inventory is financed. The amount of interest assistance we recognize in a given period is primarily a function of the mix of units being sold, as domestic brands tend to provide more assistance, and the specific terms of the respective manufacturers’ interest assistance programs and wholesale interest rates, the average wholesale price of inventory sold, and our rate of inventory turn. For these reasons, this assistance has ranged from approximately 50% to 103% of our total floorplan interest expense over the past three years. We record these incentives as a reduction of new vehicle cost of sales as the vehicles are sold, which therefore impact the gross profit and gross margin detailed above. The total assistance recognized in cost of goods sold during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $28.3 million, $37.2 million and $36.9 million, respectively.

Used Vehicle Retail Data
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008			% Change			2007			2007			% Change			2006
Retail Unit Sales
Same Stores		59,835			(6.6	)%		64,039			58,925			(4.8	)%		61,912
Transactions		2,136						1,099			6,213						3,040
Total		61,971			(4.9	)%		65,138			65,138			0.3	%		64,952
Retail Sales Revenues
Same Stores	$	1,025,487			(7.9	)%	$	1,113,970		$	999,425			(2.1	)%	$	1,021,194
Transactions		65,072						18,443			132,988						47,113
Total	$	1,090,559			(3.7	)%	$	1,132,413		$	1,132,413			6.0	%	$	1,068,307
Gross Profit
Same Stores	$	109,548			(14.9	)%	$	128,754		$	118,573			(9.4	)%	$	130,854
Transactions		5,295						2,480			12,661						6,475
Total	$	114,843			(12.5	)%	$	131,234		$	131,234			(4.4	)%	$	137,329
Gross Profit per Retail
Unit Sold
Same Stores	$	1,831			(9.0	)%	$	2,011		$	2,012			(4.8	)%	$	2,114
Transactions	$	2,479					$	2,257		$	2,038					$	2,130
Total	$	1,853			(8.0	)%	$	2,015		$	2,015			(4.7	)%	$	2,114
Gross Margin
Same Stores		10.7	%					11.6	%		11.9	%					12.8	%
Transactions		8.1	%					13.4	%		9.5	%					13.7	%
Total		10.5	%					11.6	%		11.6	%					12.9	%

Used Vehicle Wholesale Data
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008			% Change			2007			2007			% Change			2006
Wholesale Unit Sales
Same Stores		35,607			(18.1	)%		43,460			39,529			(7.6	)%		42,768
Transactions		1,212						829			4,760						1,776
Total		36,819			(16.9	)%		44,289			44,289			(0.6	)%		44,544
Wholesale Sales Revenues
Same Stores	$	217,496			(28.4	)%	$	303,974		$	265,643			(14.3	)%	$	310,115
Transactions		15,766						6,199			44,530						12,620
Total	$	233,262			(24.8	)%	$	310,173		$	310,173			(3.9	)%	$	322,735
Gross Profit (Loss)
Same Stores	$	(3,938	)		(26.6	)%	$	(3,110	)	$	(3,601	)		(125.3	)%	$	(1,598	)
Transactions		(404	)					(485	)		6						(823	)
Total	$	(4,342	)		(20.8	)%	$	(3,595	)	$	(3,595	)		(48.5	)%	$	(2,421	)
Wholesale Profit (Loss) per
Wholesale Unit Sold
Same Stores	$	(111	)		(54.2	)%	$	(72	)	$	(91	)		(145.9	)%	$	(37	)
Transactions	$	(333	)				$	(585	)	$	1					$	(463	)
Total	$	(118	)		(45.7	)%	$	(81	)	$	(81	)		(50.0	)%	$	(54	)
Gross Margin
Same Stores		(1.8	)%					(1.0	)%		(1.4	)%					(0.5	)%
Transactions		(2.6	)%					(7.8	)%		0.0	%					(6.5	)%
Total		(1.9	)%					(1.2	)%		(1.2	)%					(0.8	)%

Total Used Vehicle Data

(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008			% Change			2007			2007			% Change			2006
Used Vehicle Unit Sales
Same Stores		95,442			(11.2	)%		107,499			98,454			(5.9	)%		104,680
Transactions		3,348						1,928			10,973						4,816
Total		98,790			(9.7	)%		109,427			109,427			(0.1	)%		109,496
Sales Revenues
Same Stores	$	1,242,983			(12.3	)%	$	1,417,944		$	1,265,068			(5.0	)%	$	1,331,309
Transactions		80,838						24,642			177,518						59,733
Total	$	1,323,821			(8.2	)%	$	1,442,586		$	1,442,586			3.7	%	$	1,391,042
Gross Profit
Same Stores	$	105,610			(15.9	)%	$	125,644		$	114,972			(11.1	)%	$	129,256
Transactions		4,891						1,995			12,667						5,652
Total	$	110,501			(13.4	)%	$	127,639		$	127,639			(5.4	)%	$	134,908
Gross Profit per Used
Vehicle Unit Sold
Same Stores	$	1,107			(5.3	)%	$	1,169		$	1,168			(5.4	)%	$	1,235
Transactions	$	1,461					$	1,035		$	1,154					$	1,174
Total	$	1,119			(4.0	)%	$	1,166		$	1,166			(5.4	)%	$	1,232
Gross Margin
Same Stores		8.5	%					8.9	%		9.1	%					9.7	%
Transactions		6.1	%					8.1	%		7.1	%					9.5	%
Total		8.3	%					8.8	%		8.8	%					9.7	%

     In addition to factors such as general economic conditions and consumer confidence, our used vehicle business is affected by the number and quality of trade-ins and lease turn-ins, the availability of consumer credit and our ability to effectively manage the level and quality of our overall used vehicle inventory. The same economic and consumer confidence issues that have slowed new vehicle business have also negatively impacted used vehicle sales, as consumers are becoming more cautious with disposable income and debt and are shifting preferences away from trucks and other less fuel-efficient vehicles, which are traditionally more profitable. As a result, our Same Store retail unit sales decreased 6.6% from 2007 to 2008, to 59,835 units and Same Store retail revenues fell 7.9%. Pressure on new vehicle margins translated into pressure on used vehicle margins, as well. In addition, the shift in customer preferences away from trucks has placed added pressure on our retail used vehicle profits. As a result, our Same Store retail used vehicle PRU declined 9.0% from $2,011 in 2007 to $1,831 in 2008, while our Same Store gross margin shrank 90 basis points over the same period.

     Since our new vehicle business is a significant source of inventory supply of our used retail operations, the decline in new vehicle sales that we experienced in 2007 was detrimental to our used vehicle operations. From 2006 to 2007, our Same Store retail unit sales decreased 4.8%, as slowing economic conditions began impacting many of our markets in 2007. Same Store retail sales revenues decreased 2.1% and gross profits decreased 9.4%. Again, the margin pressure felt on the new vehicle side of the business in 2007 negatively impacted our used vehicle profitability. For the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 2006, Same Store total used vehicle gross profit per unit declined 5.4% from $1,235 in 2006 to $1,168 in 2007, and Same Store gross margin decreased 60 basis points to 9.1% in 2007.

     Our continued focus on used vehicle sales and inventory management processes has intentionally shifted our used vehicle sales mix from the wholesale business to the traditionally more profitable retail sale. Correspondingly, our Same Store wholesale unit sales declined by 18.1% from 2007 to 2008 to 35,607 units, while Same Store wholesale revenues decreased 28.4% to $217.5 million for the same period. For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to 2006, Same Store wholesale unit sales decreased 7.6% to 39,529 units and Same Store wholesale revenues fell 14.3% to $265.6 million.

     We continue to improve our certified pre-owned (CPO) unit volume. CPO units increased on a Same Store basis to 18,786, or 31.4% of total used vehicle retail units, for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 15,194 units, or 23.7% of total used vehicle retail units, for the year ended December 31, 2007.

     Our days’ supply of used vehicle inventory decreased to 25 days at December 31, 2008 from 35 days at December 31, 2007 and 31 days at December 31, 2006. We continuously work to optimize our used vehicle inventory levels and, as such, will critically evaluate our used vehicle inventory level in the coming months to provide adequate supply and selection. Currently, we are comfortable with our overall used vehicle inventory levels, given the current and projected selling environment. However, we will continue to critically evaluate the inventory mix between cars and trucks in order to maximize operating efficiency.

Parts and Service Data
(dollars in thousands)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008			% Change			2007			2007			% Change			2006
Parts and Service Revenues
Same Stores	$	700,896			2.1	%	$	686,700		$	637,671			2.4	%	$	622,839
Transactions		49,927						13,206			62,235						26,939
Total	$	750,823			7.3	%	$	699,906		$	699,906			7.7	%	$	649,778
Gross Profit
Same Stores	$	376,993			0.7	%	$	374,380		$	345,811			2.3	%	$	338,035
Transactions		26,856						7,051			35,620						13,377
Total	$	403,849			5.9	%	$	381,431		$	381,431			8.5	%	$	351,412
Gross Margin
Same Stores		53.8	%					54.5	%		54.2	%					54.3	%
Transactions		53.8	%					53.4	%		57.2	%					49.7	%
Total		53.8	%					54.5	%		54.5	%					54.1	%

     We introduced several initiatives in 2007 and 2008 designed to improve the results of our parts and service business. These initiatives have begun to gain traction and, as a result, our Same Store parts and service revenues increased 2.1% from 2007 to 2008. We realized Same Store revenue improvements in each of our parts and service business segments. Our customer-pay (non-warranty) business increased 2.0%, while our warranty-related parts and service sales increased 1.5%. Revenues from our customer-pay (non-warranty) parts and service business improved as a result of the improvements in both our import and luxury brands of 4.3% and 4.4%, respectively, partially offset by a 4.6% decline in customer-pay parts and service revenues from our domestic brands. Our Same Store warranty-related parts and service revenues improved 5.5% and 0.4% from 2007 to 2008 within our import and luxury brands, respectively. These improvements were partially offset by a decrease of 1.6% in our domestic warranty-related revenues. Further, our Same Store collision revenues increased 4.8% compared to 2007 and our wholesale parts sales increase 1.2%.

     Same Store parts and service gross profits increased 0.7% from 2007 to 2008, reflecting the improvements that we have made to our parts and service business. Same Store parts and service gross margins fell 70 basis points to 53.8% from 2007 to 2008, primarily as a result of the increase in our collision business, which generates relatively lower margins than our customer-pay and warranty business, and the negative impact of declining new and used vehicle sales.

     During 2007, our Same Store parts and service revenues increased 2.4% as compared to 2006, primarily explained by increases in our customer pay (non-warranty) business, as well as increases in our wholesale parts business that were partially offset by declines in our warranty-related sales. Our Same Store customer pay (non-warranty) parts and service revenues increased $14.1 million, or 4.4%, in 2007 as compared to 2006, reflecting the impact of the initial implementation of several key internal initiatives during 2007. Further, the improvements in our customer pay (non-warranty) parts and service business correlate with the brand mix of our new vehicle sales that is heavily weighted towards import and luxury lines, including Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus and BMW. We experienced a $5.7 million, or 4.6%, decline in our Same Store warranty sales for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to 2006. The decline in warranty business was primarily the result of the suspension in late-2006 and 2007 of free service programs offered by some luxury brands and the financial benefit received in 2006 from some specific manufacturer quality issues that were remedied during 2006. Our Same Store wholesale parts sales improved 4.9% from 2006 to 2007, as we continue to expand our wholesale parts operations in Oklahoma.

     Same Store gross profit improved 2.3% for 2007 as compared to 2006, reflecting the impact of key initiatives designed to improve profitability of our parts and service business and, specifically, the increase in our customer pay (non-warranty) business, which was partially offset by a decline in our warranty business. Our Same Store parts and service gross margin declined 10 basis points from 2006 to 2007, primarily as a result of the increase in our lower margin wholesale parts business.

Finance and Insurance Data
(dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008		% Change			2007		2007		% Change			2006
Retail New and Used Unit Sales
Same Stores		167,017		(12.9	)%		191,764		175,986		(5.0	)%		185,319
Transactions		5,659					2,589		18,367					6,120
Total		172,676		(11.2	)%		194,353		194,353		1.5	%		191,439
Retail Finance Fees
Same Stores	$	61,011		(14.7	)%	$	71,523	$	66,315		(0.4	)%	$	66,581
Transactions		2,847					807		6,015					2,046
Total	$	63,858		(11.7	)%	$	72,330	$	72,330		5.4	%	$	68,627
Vehicle Service Contract Fees
Same Stores	$	74,537		(12.4	)%	$	85,053	$	82,086		13.8	%	$	72,146
Transactions		860					445		3,412					1,861
Total	$	75,397		(11.8	)%	$	85,498	$	85,498		15.5	%	$	74,007
Insurance and Other
Same Stores	$	46,076		3.0	%	$	44,739	$	42,028		(1.9	)%	$	42,824
Transactions		1,224					508		3,219					1,185
Total	$	47,300		4.5	%	$	45,247	$	45,247		2.8	%	$	44,009
Total
Same Stores	$	181,624		(9.8	)%	$	201,315	$	190,429		4.9	%	$	181,550
Transactions		4,931					1,760		12,646					5,093
Total	$	186,555		(8.1	)%	$	203,075	$	203,075		8.8	%	$	186,643
Finance and Insurance Revenues per Unit Sold
Same Stores	$	1,087		3.5	%	$	1,050	$	1,082		10.4	%	$	980
Transactions	$	871				$	680	$	689				$	832
Total	$	1,080		3.3	%	$	1,045	$	1,045		7.2	%	$	975

     Our Same Store total finance and insurance revenues decreased 9.8% in 2008 as compared to 2007, which was more than explained by the impact of the decline in retail units. Partially offsetting this decrease, our product penetration rates improved in 2008 from 2007 levels, and our Same Store revenues per unit sold increased 3.5% in 2008 to $1,087 per unit from 2007. Same Store retail finance fees declined 14.7 % in 2008 as compared to 2007, which was also primarily due to the 12.9% decline in Same Store retail unit sales. As a partial offset, penetration rates for our retail finance products improved in 2008 compared to 2007. Our continued efforts to reduce the cost of our vehicle service contract offerings resulted in an increase in income per vehicle service contract sold. These improvements, coupled with increased product penetration rates of our vehicle service contract offerings, partially offset the decline in retail units. As a result, our Same Store revenues from vehicle service contract fees declined 12.4% for 2008 as compared to 2007. Same Store revenues from insurance and other F&I products rose 3.0% in 2008 from 2007 primarily as a result of the improvements that we have made to the cost structure of many of these products, as well as improved product penetration rates.

     In 2007, our Same Store total finance and insurance revenues increased 4.9% as compared to 2006, as a 5.0% decline in Same Store retail unit sales was offset by a 10.4% improvement in total finance and insurance revenues per unit and higher penetration rates. Same Store retail finance fees declined 0.4% in

2007 compared to 2006, primarily as a result of the decline in Same Store retail unit sales between the two years. During 2007, we negotiated and implemented an enhanced pricing structure for our vehicle service contract products with one of our major contract vendors. As a result, we realized a substantial improvement in our 2007 income per contract as compared to 2006, which substantially explained the 13.8% increase in Same Store vehicle service contract fees. Same Store finance and other revenues declined 1.9% in 2007 compared to 2006, primarily reflecting the decline in retail unit sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Data
(dollars in thousands)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008			% Change			2007			2007			% Change			2006
Personnel
Same Stores	$	411,701			(6.8	)%	$	441,775		$	408,547			(0.1	)%	$	408,994
Transactions		23,085						8,034			41,262						17,930
Total	$	434,786			(3.3	)%	$	449,809		$	449,809			5.4	%	$	426,924
Advertising
Same Stores	$	49,921			(12.1	)%	$	56,810		$	52,517			(15.1	)%	$	61,844
Transactions		2,197						1,132			5,425						4,226
Total	$	52,118			(10.1	)%	$	57,942		$	57,942			(12.3	)%	$	66,070
Rent and Facility Costs
Same Stores	$	88,270			(0.9	)%	$	89,077		$	87,003			2.0	%	$	85,289
Transactions		3,032						3,546			5,620						6,668
Total	$	91,302			(1.4	)%	$	92,623		$	92,623			0.7	%	$	91,957
Other SG&A
Same Stores	$	150,299			(0.4	)%	$	150,902		$	141,004			6.9	%	$	131,900
Transactions		10,925						7,601			17,499						935
Total	$	161,224			1.7	%	$	158,503		$	158,503			19.3	%	$	132,835
Total SG&A
Same Stores	$	700,191			(5.2	)%	$	738,564		$	689,071			0.2	%	$	688,027
Transactions		39,239						20,313			69,806						29,759
Total	$	739,430			(2.6	)%	$	758,877		$	758,877			5.7	%	$	717,786
Total Gross Profit
Same Stores	$	865,948			(9.8	)%	$	960,072		$	885,391			(2.5	)%	$	908,381
Transactions		49,713						14,395			89,076						30,926
Total	$	915,661			(6.0	)%	$	974,467		$	974,467			3.7	%	$	939,307
SG&A as % of Gross Profit
Same Stores		80.9	%					76.9	%		77.8	%					75.7	%
Transactions		78.9	%					141.1	%		78.4	%					96.2	%
Total		80.8	%					77.9	%		77.9	%					76.4	%
Employees		7,700						8,900			8,900						8,800

     Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and incentive-based compensation, as well as rent, advertising, insurance, benefits, utilities and other fixed expenses. We believe that our personnel and advertising expenses are variable and can be adjusted in response to changing business conditions; however, it may take us several months to adjust our cost structure, or we may elect not to fully adjust a variable component, such as advertising expenses.

     We continue to adjust our spending levels in response to the declining sales environment and slowing economic conditions in many of our markets, focusing on cost efficiencies and flexing certain variable costs. In addition, we are aggressively pursuing opportunities to take advantage of our size and negotiating leverage with our vendors. As a result, we reduced the absolute dollars of Same Store SG&A in 2008 from comparable 2007 levels by 5.2%. However, our Same Store SG&A expenses increased as a percentage of gross profit from 76.9% for 2007 to 80.9% for 2008, reflecting a 9.8% decline in Same Store gross profit.

     In 2008, we continued to make difficult, but necessary, changes to the personnel side of our organization in reaction to the sustained decline in the new and used vehicle sales environment including changes in variable compensation pay plans and personnel reductions. As a result, our Same Store personnel expenses declined by 6.8% in 2008 compared to 2007. Advertising expense is managed locally and will vary period to period based upon current trends, market factors and other circumstances in each individual market. In light of recent operating trends, adjustments have been made to our advertising spending resulting in a decrease in our gross advertising expenses of 12.1% for 2008, partially offset by a 12.2% decrease in the manufacturers’ advertising assistance, which we record as a reduction of advertising expense when earned. Our Same Store rent and facility costs remained relatively flat in 2008 as compared to 2007, as increases resulting from the relocation of facilities, lease renewals and the addition of properties for operational expansion were offset by the impact of our purchase of real estate associated with several dealership locations during the period. Other SG&A consists primarily of insurance, freight, supplies, professional fees, loaner car expenses, vehicle delivery expenses, software licenses and other data processing costs, and miscellaneous other operating costs not related to personnel, advertising, or facilities. Our Same Store Other SG&A decreased 0.4% to $150.3 million in 2008 compared to 2007, as several tactical efforts were initiated in 2008 that were designed to reduce our outside services costs without sacrificing business performance, customer satisfaction and profitability.

     In response to the declining sales environment and slowing economic conditions in many of our markets, we made adjustments to various aspects of our personnel structure in 2007, including changes in our variable compensation pay plans and personnel reductions. The cost savings that resulted from these changes were substantially offset by severance payments made in the year. As a result, our Same Store personnel costs decreased 0.1% in 2007 compared to 2006. We also made adjustments to our advertising spending in 2007 and, as a result, our Same Store advertising expenses declined 15.1% from 2006 levels. Our Same Store rent and facility costs increased $1.7 million, or 2%, from 2006 to 2007. Our Same Store rent expense did not vary significantly from 2006 to 2007, as increases resulting from the relocation of facilities, lease renewals and the addition of properties for operational expansion were offset by the impact of our purchase of real estate associated with several dealership locations during the period. Same Store building insurance costs rose from 2006 to 2007, reflecting higher market rates for insurance following the hurricanes in prior years, as well as significantly higher costs for earthquake coverage for our facilities. Our Same Store Other SG&A increased 6.9% in 2007 as compared to 2006, primarily resulting from outside services utilized to implement several key business strategies, fees for attorney services provided in conjunction with several of our legal matters and non-repeating gains associated with the disposition of two dealership franchises recognized in 2006.

     Dealer Management System Conversion

On March 30, 2006, we announced that the Dealer Services Group of ADP would become the sole dealership management system (“DMS”) provider for our existing stores. We successfully completed the conversion of all of our stores to operate on the ADP platform in 2007 and recognized an additional $0.7 million in lease termination costs related to these conversions. This conversion is another key enabler in supporting efforts to standardize backroom processes and share best practices across all of our dealerships.

Depreciation and Amortization Data
(dollars in thousands)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008		% Change			2007		2007		% Change			2006
Same Stores	$	23,936		21.6	%	$	19,684	$	17,660		6.3	%	$	16,619
Transactions		1,716					754		2,778					1,075
Total	$	25,652		25.5	%	$	20,438	$	20,438		15.5	%	$	17,694

     Our Same Store depreciation and amortization expense increased 21.6% and 6.3% in 2008 and 2007, respectively, primarily due to a similar increase in our gross property and equipment holdings, as we have strategically added dealership-related real estate to our long-lived asset portfolio. In addition, we continue to make improvements to certain of our existing facilities that are designed to enhance the profitability of our dealerships and the overall customer experience.

Impairment of Assets

     We perform an annual review of the fair value of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We also perform interim reviews for impairment when evidence exists that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. During the third quarter of 2008, certain triggering events such as the recent economic conditions and the resulting impact on the automotive industry were identified. Accordingly, we performed an interim impairments assessment of the recorded indefinite-lived intangible asset values. As a result of this assessment, we determined that the fair values of certain of our indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights related to seventeen dealerships, primarily domestic franchises, were less than their respective carrying values and recorded an impairment charge. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2008, we performed our annual assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets and determined that the fair values of indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights related to seven of our dealerships did not exceed their carrying values and that impairment charges were required. The majority of the charge related to franchises within our Western Region, which continues to suffer the greatest effect of the recent economic downturn. In aggregate, we recorded $151.9 million of pretax impairment charges during 2008 relative to our intangible franchise rights. As a result of our 2007 annual assessment, we determined that the carrying values of indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights related to six of our dealerships were impaired. Accordingly, we recorded a $9.2 million of pretax impairment charge during the fourth quarter of 2007. We did not identify an impairment of our recorded goodwill in 2008 or 2007. As a result, of our 2006 assessment, we determined that the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights related to two of our domestic franchises did not exceed their carrying values and impairment charges were required. Accordingly, we recorded $1.4 million of pretax impairment charges during the fourth quarter of 2006.

     For long-lived assets, we review for impairment whenever there is evidence that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. In the third quarter of 2008, we identified triggering events relative to real estate, primarily associated with domestic franchise terminations and other equipment holdings. We reviewed the carrying value of such assets in comparison with the respective estimated fair market values as determined by third party appraisal and brokers’ opinion of value. Accordingly, we recorded an $11.1 million pretax asset impairment charge in the third quarter of 2008. In 2007, in connection with the sale of the real estate associated with one of our dealerships, we recognized a $5.4 million pretax impairment charge. Also, we determined that the fair value of certain fixed assets was less than their respective carrying values and, as a result, pretax impairment charges of $2.2 million were recognized. During the fourth quarter of 2006, we determined that the fair value of the fixed assets related to the disposal of a Ford dealership franchise was less than their carrying value and impairment charges were required. Accordingly, we recognized a pretax impairment charge of $0.8 million in 2006.

Floorplan Interest Expense
(dollars in thousands)

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008		% Change			2007		2007		% Change			2006
Same Stores	$	44,095		(3.3	)%	$	45,577	$	42,028		(2.3	)%	$	42,996
Transactions		2,282					1,245		4,794					2,312
Total	$	46,377		(1.0	)%	$	46,822	$	46,822		3.3	%	$	45,308
Memo:
Manufacturer’s assistance	$	28,311		(23.8	)%	$	37,171	$	37,171		0.7	%	$	36,922

     Our floorplan interest expense fluctuates based on changes in borrowings outstanding and interest rates, which are based on 1-month LIBOR (or Prime in some cases) plus a spread. We typically utilize excess cash on hand to pay down our floorplan borrowings, and the resulting interest earned is recognized as an offset to our gross floorplan interest expense. Mitigating the impact of interest rate fluctuations, we employ an interest rate hedging strategy, whereby we swap variable interest rate exposure for a fixed interest rate over the term of the variable interest rate debt. As of December 31, 2008, we had interest rate swaps in place for an aggregate notional amount of $550.0 million that fixed our underlying LIBOR rate at a weighted average rate of 4.7%.

     Our Same Store floorplan interest expense decreased 3.3% for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to 2007. The decrease for 2008 reflects a 118 basis point decrease in our weighted average floorplan interest rates between the respective periods, including the impact of our interest rate swaps, partially offset by a $124.0 million increase in our weighted average floorplan borrowings outstanding. Similarly, the Same Store floorplan interest expense declined 2.3% in 2007 when compared to 2006. This decrease is attributable to a decrease in our weighted average floorplan interest rates, including the impact of our interest rate swaps, which was partially offset by a $2.4 million increase in our weighted average floorplan borrowings outstanding for 2007.

Other Interest Expense, net

     Other net interest expense, which consists of interest charges on our mortgage facility, our acquisition line and our other long-term debt, partially offset by interest income, increased $6.7 million, or 22.3%, to $36.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. This increase is primarily attributable to a $159.7 million increase in our weighted average borrowings from the comparable period in 2007, as we continued the execution of our strategy to own more of the dealership related real estate. Other net interest expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 included $7.9 million of non-cash discount amortization as a result of the implementation of APB 14-1. Weighted average borrowings outstanding under our Mortgage Facility increased $103.7 million from December 31, 2007. Other real estate related borrowings increased $47.0 million from our balance at December 31, 2007. In addition, our weighted average borrowings increased for 2008 as a result of our borrowings under the Acquisition Line of our Revolving Credit Facility, primarily initiated to fund the acquisition of several dealership operations in the fourth quarter of 2007. Partially offsetting the increased interest expense from these borrowings, we redeemed $28.3 million of our 8.25% Notes and $63.0 million of our 2.25% Notes in 2008.

     From 2006 to 2007, other net interest expense increased due to an additional six months of interest on our 2.25% Notes that were issued in June 2006 and interest incurred on 2007 borrowings under our mortgage facility. Other net interest expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 included $7.3 million of non-cash discount amortization as a result of the implementation of APB 14-1. This increase was partially offset by the impact of our redemption of $36.4 million par value of our outstanding 8.25% Notes during the second half of 2007.

Gain/Loss on Redemption of Debt

     For the year ended December 31, 2008, we repurchased $28.3 million par value of our outstanding 8.25% Notes and realized a net gain of approximately $0.9 million. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we also repurchased $63.0 million par value of our outstanding 2.25% Notes

and realized a net gain of approximately $17.2 million. In 2007, we repurchased $36.4 million par value of our outstanding 8.25% Notes. As a result, we recognized a $1.6 million pretax charge, consisting of a $0.4 million redemption premium and a $1.2 million non-cash write off of unamortized bond discount and deferred costs.

Provision for Income Taxes

     For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a benefit of $31.2 million in respect of our loss from continuing operations, primarily due to the significant asset impairment charges recorded in 2008. This included a tax provision of $6.5 million relating to the $17.2 million gain recorded for the repurchase of a portion of our 2.25% Notes during the fourth quarter. The 2008 effective tax rate of 40.4% differed from the 2007 effective tax rate of 35.7% primarily due to the mix of our pretax net income (loss) among various taxable state jurisdictions, and the 2007 impact of the benefit received from the tax deductible goodwill related to dealership operations.

     For the year ended December 31, 2007, our provision for income from continuing operations for income taxes decreased $14.2 million from 2006 to $35.9 million, while the effective tax rate decreased 80 basis points to 35.7% in 2007 compared to 36.5% in 2006. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due primarily to the change attributable to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) and the impact of a change in the mix of the our pretax income from taxable state jurisdictions offset in 2007 primarily by the benefit received from tax-deductible goodwill related to dealership dispositions.

     We believe that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances provided, will be realized, based primarily on the assumption of future taxable income. We expect our effective tax rate in 2009 will be approximately 38.5% to 39.0%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Our liquidity and capital resources are primarily derived from cash on hand, cash from operations, borrowings under our credit facilities, which provide floorplan, working capital and dealership and real estate acquisition financing, and proceeds from debt and equity offerings. While we cannot guarantee it, based on current facts and circumstances, we believe we have adequate cash flow, coupled with available borrowing capacity, to fund our current operations, capital expenditures and acquisition program for 2009. If economic and business conditions deteriorate further or if our capital expenditures or acquisition plans for 2009 change, we may need to access the private or public capital markets to obtain additional funding.

Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Cash on Hand. As of December 31, 2008, our total cash on hand was $23.1 million. The balance of cash on hand excludes $44.9 million of immediately available funds used to pay down our Floorplan Line. We use the pay down of our Floorplan Line as our primary vehicle for the short-term investment of excess cash.

     Cash Flows. The following table sets forth selected historical information from our statement of cash flows from continuing operations:

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
	(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	183,746		$	10,997		$	53,067
Net cash used in investing activities		(164,712	)		(392,966	)		(268,989	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(12,887	)		375,790			217,076
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(5,826	)		(33	)		—
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	321		$	(6,212	)	$	1,154

     With respect to all new vehicle floorplan borrowings, the manufacturers of the vehicles draft our credit facilities directly with no cash flow to or from us. With respect to borrowings for used vehicle financing, we choose which vehicles to finance and the funds flow directly to us from the lender. All borrowings from, and repayments to, lenders affiliated with our vehicle manufacturers (excluding the cash flows from or to affiliated lenders participating in our syndicated lending group) are presented within cash flows from operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and all borrowings from, and repayments to, the syndicated lending group under our Revolving Credit Facility (including the cash flows from or to affiliated lenders participating in the facility) are presented within cash flows from financing activities.

•	Operating activities. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we realized $183.7 million in net cash from operating activities, primarily driven by net income, after adding back significant non-cash adjustments related to depreciation and amortization of $25.7 million and asset impairments of $163.0 million. Also contributing to the positive cash flow from operating activities was a net change in our operating assets and liabilities of $70.3 million. Cash flow from operating activities was adjusted for net gains of $18.1 million related to the repurchase of our 8.25% Notes and 2.25% Notes, which is reflected as a financing activity. In addition, cash flow from operating activities was adjusted for an increase in our deferred income tax assets of $28.4 million related primarily to the impairment of our intangible franchise assets.
	For the year ended December 31, 2007, we realized $11.0 million in net cash from operating activities, primarily driven by net income, after adding back significant non-cash adjustments related to depreciation and amortization of $20.4 million, deferred income taxes of $13.6 million and asset impairments of $16.8 million. Substantially offsetting the positive cash flow from these operating activities, the net change in our operating assets and liabilities resulted in a cash outflow of $121.8 million, which was principally the result of our decision not to renew the floorplan financing arrangement with DaimlerChrysler in February 2007 and to use $112.1 million of borrowings from our Revolving Credit Facility to close the DaimlerChrysler facility. The result of this decision was a decrease in operating cash flow and increase in financing cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2007.
	For the year ended December 31, 2006, we generated $53.1 million in net cash from operating activities, primarily driven by $86.2 million of net income. Non-cash charges, including depreciation and amortization and deferred taxes of $48.5 million, were partially offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $82.5 million, primarily due to an increase in inventories and reductions in floorplan notes payable and accounts payable.
•	Investing activities. During 2008, we used $164.7 million in investing activities, primarily as a result of $48.6 million paid for acquisitions, net of cash received, and $142.8 million for the purchase of property and equipment. The $48.6 million used for acquisitions consisted of $16.7 million to purchase the associated dealership real estate, of which $15.0 million was ultimately financed through a loan agreement with BMW, and $9.8 million to pay off the sellers’ floorplan borrowings. The $142.8 million of the property and equipment purchases consisted of $90.0 million for the purchase of land and existing buildings, of which $32.3 million was financed

	through our Mortgage Facility, and $52.8 million for the construction of new or expanded facilities, imaging projects required by the manufacturer and replacement of dealership equipment.
	During 2007, we used $393.0 million in investing activities, primarily as a result of $281.8 million paid for acquisitions, net of cash received, and $146.5 million for the purchase of property and equipment. The $281.8 million used for acquisitions consisted of $75.0 million to purchase the associated dealership real estate, of which $49.7 million was ultimately financed through our Mortgage Facility, and $72.9 million to pay off the sellers’ floorplan borrowings. The $146.5 million of the property and equipment purchases consisted of $76.2 million for the purchase of land and existing buildings, of which $66.6 million was financed through our Mortgage Facility, and $70.3 million for the construction of new or expanded facilities, imaging projects required by the manufacturer and replacement of dealership equipment.
	During 2006, we used $269.0 million in investing activities, of which $246.3 million was for acquisitions, net of cash received, and $71.3 million was for purchases of property and equipment. Included in the amount paid for acquisitions was $30.6 million for related real estate and $58.9 million of inventory financing. Approximately $58.9 million of the property and equipment purchases was for the purchase of land, existing buildings and construction of new or expanded facilities. We also received approximately $38.0 million in proceeds from sales of franchises and $13.3 million from the sales of property and equipment.
•	Financing activities. During 2008, we used $12.9 million in financing activities, primarily due to $85.0 million in net repayments under the Acquisition Line of our Revolving Credit Facility, $52.8 million of cash to repurchase $28.3 million par value of our outstanding 8.25% Notes and $63.0 million par value of our outstanding 2.25% Notes, $11.0 million in dividends paid during the year and $7.5 million in principal repayments of long term debt. Partially offsetting this amount are $50.2 million of borrowing of long-term debt related to real estate purchases, $46.7 million of net borrowings under our Mortgage Facility, and $44.0 million in net borrowings under the Floorplan Line of our Revolving Credit Facility. Included in the $44.0 million of net borrowings related to the Floorplan Line of our Revolving Credit Facility is a net cash inflow of $19.7 million due to changes in our floorplan offset account.
	During 2007, we obtained $375.8 million from financing activities, consisting of $225.5 million in net borrowings under the Floorplan Line of our Revolving Credit Facility, $135.0 million in net borrowings under the Acquisition Line of our Revolving Credit Facility utilized to fund the dealership acquisitions consummated in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $131.3 million of net borrowings under our Mortgage Facility as we continued to implement our strategy of strategically acquiring the real estate associated with our dealership operations. Included in the $225.5 million of net borrowings related to the Floorplan Line of our Revolving Credit Facility is a net cash inflow of $49.9 million due to changes in our floorplan offset account. Partially offsetting this positive cash flow, we used $63.0 million of cash to repurchase outstanding common stock and $36.9 million of cash to repurchase $36.4 million par value of our outstanding 8.25% Notes.
	During 2006, we obtained $217.1 million from financing activities, primarily from $287.5 million of net proceeds from the issuance of the 2.25% Notes, $80.6 million of proceeds from the sale of the warrants, $29.5 million in net borrowings under the Floorplan Line of our Revolving Credit Facility and $23.7 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock to benefit plans. Offsetting these receipts was $116.3 million used to purchase the calls on our common stock and $55.0 million used to repurchase outstanding common stock. Included in the $29.5 million of net borrowings related to the Floorplan Line of our Revolving Credit Facility is a net cash outflow of $66.8 million due to changes in our floorplan offset account.
	Working Capital. At December 31, 2008, we had working capital of $92.1 million. Changes in our working capital are driven primarily by changes in floorplan notes payable outstanding. Borrowings on our new vehicle floorplan notes payable, subject to agreed upon pay off terms, are equal to 100% of the factory invoice of the vehicles. Borrowings on our used vehicle floorplan notes payable, subject to agreed upon pay off terms, are limited to 70% of the aggregate book

value of our used vehicle inventory. At times, we have made payments on our floorplan notes payable using excess cash flow from operations and the proceeds of debt and equity offerings. As needed, we re-borrow the amounts later, up to the limits on the floorplan notes payable discussed below, for working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures or general corporate purposes.

Credit Facilities. Our various credit facilities are used to finance the purchase of inventory and real estate, provide acquisition funding and provide working capital for general corporate purposes. Our three facilities currently provide us with a total of $1.3 billion of borrowing capacity for inventory floorplan financing, $235.0 million for real estate purchases, and an additional $350.0 million for acquisitions, capital expenditures and/or other general corporate purposes.

•

Revolving Credit Facility. In March 2007, we amended our Revolving Credit Facility, expanding it by $400.0 million to a total of $1.35 billion, in order to increase our inventory borrowing capacity and reduce our overall cost of capital. The facility, which is now comprised of 22 major financial institutions, including three manufacturer-affiliated finance companies (Toyota, Nissan and BMW), matures in March 2012. We can expand the Revolving Credit Facility to its maximum commitment of $1.85 billion, subject to participating lender approval. This Revolving Credit Facility consists of two tranches: (1) $1.0 billion for floorplan financing, which we refer to as the Floorplan Line, and (2) $350.0 million for acquisitions, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes, including the issuance of letters of credit. We refer to this tranche as the Acquisition Line. The Floorplan Line bears interest at rates equal to 1-month LIBOR plus 87.5 basis points for new vehicle inventory and LIBOR plus 97.5 basis points for used vehicle inventory. The Acquisition Line bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin that ranges from 150.0 to 225.0 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Up to half of the Acquisition Line can be borrowed in either Euros or Pound Sterling. The capacity under the Acquisition Line can be redesignated to the Floorplan Line within the overall $1.35 billion commitment. As of December 31, 2008, we redistributed $250.0 million of borrowing capacity from the Acquisition Line to the Floorplan Line.

Our Revolving Credit Facility contains various covenants including financial ratios, such as fixed-charge coverage and leverage and current ratios, and a minimum equity requirement, among others, as well as additional maintenance requirements. Effective January 17, 2008, we amended the Revolving Credit Facility to, among other things, increase the limit on both our senior secured leverage ratio and our total leverage ratio, as well as to add a borrowing base calculation that governs the amounts of borrowings available under the Acquisition Line. As of December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with these covenants, including:

	As of December 31, 2008
	Required	Actual
Senior secured leverage ratio	< 2.75		1.49
Total leverage ratio	< 4.50		3.46
Fixed charge coverage ratio	> 1.25		1.59
Current Ratio	> 1.15		1.18

In January 2009, we amended the Revolving Credit Facility to, among other things, exclude the impact of APB 14-1 from all covenant calculations.

Based upon our current operating and financial projections, we believe that we will remain compliant with such covenants in the future. Additionally, under the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, we are limited in our ability to make cash dividend payments to our stockholders and to repurchase shares of our outstanding stock. The amount available for cash dividends and share repurchases will increase in future periods by 50% of our cumulative net income (as defined in terms of the Revolving Credit Facility), the net proceeds from stock option exercises and certain other items, and decrease by subsequent payments for cash dividends and share repurchases. Amounts borrowed under the Floorplan Line of our Revolving Credit Facility must be repaid upon the sale of the specific vehicle financed, and in no case may a borrowing for a vehicle remain outstanding greater than one year.

•	Ford Motor Credit Facility. The FMCC Facility provides financing for our entire Ford, Lincoln and Mercury new vehicle inventory. The FMCC Facility, which matures in December 2009, provides for up to $300.0 million of financing for inventory at an interest rate equal to Prime plus 150 basis points minus certain incentives. However, the Prime rate is defined to be a minimum of 4.0%. We expect the net cost of our borrowings under the FMCC Facility, after all incentives, to approximate the cost of borrowing under the Floorplan Line of our Revolving Credit Facility.
•	Real Estate Credit Facility. In March 2007, we completed an initial $75.0 million, five-year real estate credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. In April 2007, we amended this facility expanding its maximum commitment to $235.0 million and syndicating the facility with nine financial institutions. We refer to this facility as the Mortgage Facility. The Mortgage Facility will be used for acquisitions of real estate and vehicle dealerships. Borrowings under the Mortgage Facility consist of individual term loans, each in a minimum amount of $0.5 million, secured by a parcel or property. Borrowings under the facility totaled $178.0 million at December 31, 2008. The facility matures in March 2012. At our option, any loan under the Mortgage Facility will bear interest at a rate equal to (i) one month LIBOR plus 1.05% or (ii) the Base Rate plus 0.50%. Quarterly principal payments are required of each loan outstanding under the facility at an amount equal to one eightieth of the original principal amount. As of December 31, 2008, borrowings under the facility totaled $178.0 million, with $9.4 million recorded as a current maturity of long-term debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In January 2008, we purchased the real estate associated with four of our existing dealership operations, financing the majority of the transactions through Mortgage Facility borrowings of $43.3 million.
	The Mortgage Facility contains certain covenants, including financial ratios that must be complied with: fixed charge coverage ratio; senior secured leverage ratio; dispositions of financed properties; ownership of equity interests in a lessor subsidiary; and occupancy or sublease of any financed property. Effective as of January 16, 2008, we amended our Real Estate Credit Facility to increase the senior secured leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all such covenants. Based upon our current operating and financial projections, we believe that we will remain compliant with such covenants in the future.
•	DaimlerChrysler Facility. On February 28, 2007, the DaimlerChrysler Facility matured. The facility provided for up to $300.0 million of financing for our entire Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Mercedes-Benz new vehicle inventory. We elected not to renew the DaimlerChrysler Facility and used available funds from our Floorplan Line to pay off the outstanding balance on the maturity date. We continue to use the Floorplan Line to finance our Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Mercedes-Benz new vehicle inventory.

     The following table summarizes the current position of our credit facilities as of December 31, 2008:

	Total
Credit Facility	Commitment		Outstanding		Available
	(In thousands)
Floorplan Line (1)	$	1,000,000	$	693,692	$	306,308
Acquisition Line (2)		350,000		67,275		106,024
Total Revolving Credit Facility		1,350,000		760,967		412,332
FMCC Facility		300,000		88,656		211,344
Mortgage Facility		235,000		177,998		57,002
Total Credit Facilities (3)	$	1,885,000	$	1,027,621	$	680,678

(1)	The available balance at December 31, 2008, includes $44.9 million of immediately available funds.
(2)	The outstanding balance at December 31, 2008 includes $50.0 million associated with acquistions during the year and $17.3 million of letters of credit outstanding. The total amount available is restricted to a borrowing base calculation within the debt covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility.
(3)	Outstanding balance excludes $39.9 million of borrowings with manufacturer-affiliates for foreign and rental vehicle financing not associated with any of the Company’s credit facilities.

     For a more detailed discussion of our credit facilities existing as of December 31, 2008, please see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.

     2.25% Notes. On June 26, 2006, we issued $287.5 million aggregate principal amount of the 2.25% Notes at par in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. The 2.25% Notes bear interest at a rate of 2.25% per year until June 15, 2016, and at a rate of 2.00% per year thereafter. Interest on the 2.25% Notes is payable semiannually in arrears in cash on June 15^th and December 15^th of each year. The 2.25% Notes mature on June 15, 2036, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased.

     We may not redeem the 2.25% Notes before June 20, 2011. On or after that date, but prior to June 15, 2016, we may redeem all or part of the 2.25% Notes if the last reported sale price of our common stock is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price then in effect for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day prior to the date on which we mail the redemption notice. On or after June 15, 2016, we may redeem all or part of the 2.25% Notes at any time. Any redemption of the 2.25% Notes will be for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the 2.25% Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. Holders of the 2.25% Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the 2.25% Notes on each of June 15, 2016, and June 15, 2026. In addition, if we experience specified types of fundamental changes, holders of the 2.25% Notes may require us to repurchase the 2.25% Notes. Any repurchase of the 2.25% Notes pursuant to these provisions will be for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2.25% Notes to be repurchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date.

     The holders of the 2.25% Notes who convert their notes in connection with a change in control, or in the event that the our common stock ceases to be listed, as defined in the Indenture for the 2.25% Notes (the “Indenture”), may be entitled to a make-whole premium in the form of an increase in the conversion rate. Additionally, if one of these events were to occur, the holders of the 2.25% Notes may require us to purchase all or a portion of their notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2.25% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

     The 2.25% Notes are convertible into cash and, if applicable, common stock based on an initial conversion rate of 16.8267 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2.25% Notes (which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $59.43 per common share) subject to adjustment, under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter (and only

during such calendar quarter) beginning after September 30, 2006, if the closing price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is equal to or more than 130% of the applicable conversion price per share (such threshold closing price initially being $77.259); (2) during the five business day period after any ten consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per 2.25% Note for each day of the ten day trading period was less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price of our common stock and the conversion rate of the 2.25% Notes; (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions set forth in the Indenture; and (4) if we call the 2.25% Notes for redemption. Upon conversion, a holder will receive an amount in cash and common shares of our common stock, determined in the manner set forth in the Indenture. Upon any conversion of the 2.25% Notes, we will deliver to converting holders a settlement amount comprised of cash and, if applicable, shares of our common stock, based on a conversion value determined by multiplying the then applicable conversion rate by a volume weighted price of our common stock on each trading day in a specified 25 trading day observation period. In general, as described more fully in the Indenture, converting holders will receive, in respect of each $1,000 principal amount of notes being converted, the conversion value in cash up to $1,000 and the excess, if any, of the conversion value over $1,000 in shares of our common stock.

     The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2.25% Notes were used to repay borrowings under the Floorplan Line of our Credit Facility; to repurchase 933,800 shares of our common stock for approximately $50 million; and to pay the $35.7 million net cost of the purchased options and warrant transactions described below in Uses of Liquidity and Capital Resources. Debt issue costs totaled approximately $6.7 million and are being amortized over a period of ten years (the point at which the holders can first require us to redeem the 2.25% Notes).

     The 2.25% Notes rank equal in right of payment to all of our other existing and future senior indebtedness. The 2.25% Notes are not guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries and, accordingly, are structurally subordinated to all of the indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries. For a more detailed discussion of these notes please see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements.

     8.25% Notes. During August 2003, we issued the 8.25% Notes with a face amount of $150.0 million. The 8.25% Notes pay interest semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 each year, beginning February 15, 2004. Including the effects of discount and issue cost amortization, the effective interest rate is approximately 8.9%. The 8.25% Notes have the following redemption provisions:

• We were allowed to, prior to August 15, 2008, redeem all or a portion of the 8.25% Notes at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus a make-whole premium to be determined, plus accrued interest.

• We are allowed to, during the twelve-month periods beginning August 15, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and thereafter, redeem all or a portion of the 8.25% Notes at redemption prices of 104.125%, 102.750%, 101.375% and 100.000%, respectively, of the principal amount plus accrued interest.

     The 8.25% Notes are subject to various financial and other covenants, including restrictions on paying cash dividends and repurchasing shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with these covenants but were prohibited from future dividends or share repurchases, before consideration of additional amounts that may become available in the future based on a percentage of net income and future equity issuances.

     Other Real Estate Related Debt. In March 2008, we executed a series of four note agreements with a third-party financial institution for an aggregate principal of $18.6 million (the “March 2008 Real Estate Notes”), of which one matures in May 2010, and the remaining three mature in June 2010. The March 2008 Real Estate Notes pay interest monthly at various rates ranging from approximately 5.2 to 7.0%. The proceeds from the March 2008 Real Estate Notes were utilized to facilitate the acquisition of a dealership-

related building and the associated land. The cumulative outstanding balance of these notes totaled $18.1 million as of December 31, 2008.

     In June 2008, we executed a bridge loan agreement with a third-party financial institution for an aggregate principal of approximately $15.0 million (the “June 2008 Real Estate Note”) that was scheduled to mature in September 2008. The June 2008 Real Estate Note accrued interest monthly at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.5%. The proceeds from the June 2008 Real Estate Note were utilized to facilitate the acquisition of a dealership-related building and the associated land. In July 2008, we renegotiated the terms of the June 2008 Real Estate Note to extend the maturity date to July 2010 and amend the annual interest rate to LIBOR plus 1.65%. The outstanding balance of this note as of December 31, 2008 was $14.5 million.

     In October 2008, we executed a note agreement with a third-party financial institution for an aggregate principal of £10.0 million (the “Foreign Note”), which is secured by our foreign subsidiary properties. The Foreign Note is to be repaid in monthly installments beginning in March 2010 and matures in August 2018. Interest is payable on the outstanding balance at an annual rate of 1.0% plus the higher of the three-month Sterling BAA LIBOR rate or 3.0% per year.

Uses of Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Redemption of 8.25% Notes and 2.25% Notes. During 2008, we repurchased approximately $28.3 million par value of our outstanding 8.25% Notes and $63.0 million par value of our outstanding 2.25% Notes. Total cash used in completing these redemptions, excluding accrued interest of $0.8 million, was $53.6 million. During 2007, we repurchased approximately $36.4 million par value of our outstanding 8.25% Notes. Total cash used in completing the redemption, excluding accrued interest of $0.4 million, was $36.9 million.

     Capital Expenditures. Our capital expenditures include expenditures to extend the useful life of current facilities and expenditures to start or expand operations. Historically, our annual capital expenditures, exclusive of new or expanded operations, have approximately equaled our annual depreciation charge. In general, expenditures relating to the construction or expansion of dealership facilities are driven by new franchises being granted to us by a manufacturer, significant growth in sales at an existing facility, dealership acquisition activity, or manufacturer imaging programs. Due to the current and near-term projected economical conditions, we have substantially reduced our capital expenditure forecast for 2009 to be less than $30.0 million, generally funded from excess cash, primarily to maintain existing facilities or complete projects initiated in 2008.

     Acquisitions. In 2008, we completed acquisitions of 3 luxury and 2 domestic dealership franchises with expected annual revenues of approximately $90.2 million. These franchises were located in California, Maryland and Texas. Total cash consideration paid, net of cash received, of $48.6 million, included $16.7 million for related real estate and the incurrence of $9.8 million of inventory financing.

     In 2007, we completed acquisitions of 14 franchises with expected annual revenues of approximately $702.4 million. These franchises were located in California, Georgia, Kansas, New York, South Carolina and the U.K. Total cash consideration paid, net of cash received, of $281.8 million, included $75.0 million for related real estate and the incurrence of $72.9 million of inventory financing.

     During 2006, we completed acquisitions of 13 franchises with expected annual revenues of approximately $725.5 million. These franchises were located in Alabama, California, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Oklahoma. Total cash consideration paid, net of cash received, of $246.3 million, included $30.6 million for related real estate and the incurrence of $58.9 million of inventory financing.

     We purchase businesses based on expected return on investment. In general, the purchase price, excluding real estate and floorplan liabilities, is approximately 20% to 25% of the annual revenue. Cash needed to complete our acquisitions comes from excess working capital, operating cash flows of our dealerships, and borrowings under our floorplan facilities and our Acquisition Line. Due to the current economic environment, we do not anticipate completing any dealership acquisitions in 2009.

     Purchase of Convertible Note Hedge. In connection with the issuance of the 2.25% Notes in 2006, we purchased ten-year call options on our common stock (the “Purchased Options”). Under the terms of the Purchased Options, which become exercisable upon conversion of the 2.25% Notes, we have the right to purchase a total of approximately 4.8 million shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $59.43 per share. The total cost of the Purchased Options was $116.3 million. The cost of the Purchased Options results in future income-tax deductions that we expect will total approximately $43.6 million.

     In addition to the purchase of the Purchased Options, we sold warrants in separate transactions (the “Warrants”). These Warrants have a ten-year term and enable the holders to acquire shares of our common stock from us. The Warrants are exercisable for a maximum of 4.8 million shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $80.31 per share, subject to adjustment for quarterly dividends in excess of $0.14 per quarter, liquidation, bankruptcy, or a change in control of our company and other conditions. Subject to these adjustments, the maximum amount of shares of our common stock that could be required to be issued under the warrants is 9.7 million shares. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants were $80.6 million.

     The Purchased Option and Warrant transactions were designed to increase the conversion price per share of our common stock from $59.43 to $80.31 (a 50% premium to the closing price of our common stock on the date that the 2.25% Notes were priced to investors) and, therefore, mitigate the potential dilution of our common stock upon conversion of the 2.25% Notes, if any.

     No shares of our common stock have been issued or received under the Purchased Options or the Warrants. Since the price of our common stock was less than $59.43 at December 31, 2008, the intrinsic value of both the Purchased Options and the Warrants, as expressed in shares of our common stock, was zero. Changes in the price of our common stock will impact the share settlement of the 2.25% Notes, the Purchased Options and the Warrants as illustrated below (shares in thousands):

	Net Shares Issuable		Share Entitlement			Shares				Potential
Company	Under the 2.25%		Under the Purchased			Issuable Under		Net Shares		EPS
Stock Price	Notes		Options			the Warrants		Issuable		Dilution
(In thousands)
$57.00		—		—			—		—	—
$59.50		6		(6	)		—		—		6
$62.00		201		(201	)		—		—		201
$64.50		380		(380	)		—		—		380
$67.00		547		(547	)		—		—		547
$69.50		701		(701	)		—		—		701
$72.00		845		(845	)		—		—		845
$74.50		979		(979	)		—		—		979
$77.00		1,104		(1,104	)		—		—		1,104
$79.50		1,221		(1,221	)		—		—		1,221
$82.00		1,332		(1,332	)		100		100		1,432
$84.50		1,435		(1,435	)		240		240		1,675
$87.00		1,533		(1,533	)		372		372		1,905
$89.50		1,625		(1,625	)		497		497		2,122
$92.00		1,713		(1,713	)		615		615		2,328
$94.50		1,795		(1,795	)		726		726		2,521
$97.00		1,874		(1,874	)		832		832		2,706
$99.50		1,948		(1,948	)		933		933		2,881
$102.00		2,019		(2,019	)		1,029		1,029		3,048

     For dilutive earnings-per-share calculations, we will be required to include the dilutive effect, if applicable, of the net shares issuable under the 2.25% Notes and the Warrants as depicted in the table above under the heading “Potential EPS Dilution.” Although the Purchased Options have the economic benefit of decreasing the dilutive effect of the 2.25% Notes, for earnings per share purposes we cannot factor this benefit into our dilutive shares outstanding as their impact would be anti-dilutive.

     Stock Repurchases. We generally fund our stock repurchases from excess cash. In August 2008, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase a number of shares equivalent to the shares issued pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan on a quarterly basis. The Board of Directors also authorized us to repurchase up to $20.0 million of additional common shares. Pursuant to this authorization, a total of 37,300 shares were repurchased during 2008, at an average price of $20.76 per share, or approximately $0.8 million.

     In April 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30.0 million of our common shares, and in August 2007, authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $30.0 million of our common shares. Pursuant to these authorizations, a total of 1,653,777 shares were repurchased at a cost of approximately $60.0 million, exhausting the combined authorizations.

     In March 2006, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to $42.0 million of our common stock, subject to management’s judgment and the restrictions of our various debt agreements. In June 2006, this authorization was replaced with a $50.0 million authorization concurrent with the issuance of the 2.25% Notes. In conjunction with the issuance of the 2.25% Notes, we repurchased 933,800 shares of our common stock at an average price of $53.54 per share, exhausting the entire $50.0 million authorization.

     In addition, under separate authorization, in March 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of a number of shares equivalent to the shares issued pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan on a quarterly basis. Pursuant to this authorization, a total of 86,000 shares were repurchased during 2006, at a cost of approximately $4.6 million. Approximately $2.7 million of the funds for such repurchases came from employee contributions during the period. Further, a total of 75,000 shares were repurchased in March 2007, at a cost of approximately $3.0 million. All such funds came from employee contributions.

     Future repurchases are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors after considering our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, capital requirements, existing debt covenants, outlook for our business, general business conditions and other factors.

     Dividends. In 2008, our Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.14 per common share for the fourth quarter of 2007, as well as the first two quarters of 2008. In addition, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.05 per common share for the third quarter of 2008. These dividend payments on our outstanding common stock and common stock equivalents totaled $11.0 million in 2008. On February 19, 2009, our Board of Directors indefinitely suspended the cash dividend. In 2007, our Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.14 per common share for the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first three quarters of 2007. These dividend payments on our outstanding common stock and common stock equivalents totaled $13.3 million. During 2006, our Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.13 per common share for the fourth quarter of 2005 and $0.14 per common share for the first, second and third quarters of 2006. These dividend payments on our outstanding common stock and common stock equivalents totaled approximately $13.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Prior to 2006, we had never declared or paid dividends on our common stock.

     The payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors after considering the results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, capital requirements, outlook for our business, general business conditions and other factors. Provisions of our credit facilities and our senior subordinated notes require us to maintain certain financial ratios and limit the amount of disbursements we may make outside the ordinary course of business. These include limitations on the payment of cash dividends and on stock repurchases, which are limited to a percentage of cumulative net income. As of December 31, 2008, our 8.25% Notes were the most restrictive agreement with respect to such limits. This amount will increase or

decrease in future periods by adding to the current limitation the sum of 50% of our consolidated net income, if positive, and 100% of equity issuances, less actual dividends or stock repurchases completed in each quarterly period. Our Revolving Credit Facility matures in 2012 and our 8.25% Notes mature in 2013.

Contractual Obligations

     The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008:

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		< 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		Thereafter
	(In thousands)
Floorplan notes payable	$	822,272	$	822,272	$	—	$	—	$	—
Long-term debt obligations(1)	$	632,868	$	13,594	$	57,645	$	281,583	$	280,046
Estimated interest payments on floorplan notes payable(2)	$	6,097	$	6,097	$	—	$	—	$	—
Estimated interest payments on long-term debt obligations(3)	$	171,403	$	15,519	$	31,038	$	22,418	$	102,428
Operating leases	$	442,768	$	53,133	$	102,535	$	94,475	$	192,625
Purchase commitments(4)	$	23,808	$	16,533	$	7,223	$	28	$	24
Total	$	2,099,216	$	927,148	$	198,441	$	398,504	$	575,123

(1)	Includes $17.3 million of outstanding letters of credit.
(2)	Estimated interest payments were calculated using the floorplan balance and weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2008, and the assumption that these liabilities would be settled within 90 days which approximates our weighted average inventory days outstanding.
(3)	Estimated interest payments on long-term debt obligations includes fixed rate interest on our 8.25% Notes due 2013, 2.25% Notes due 2036, variable rate interest on our Real Estate Mortage Facility due 2012, and the Acquistion Line of our Revolving Credit Facility due 2012.
(4)	Includes capital expenditures, IT commitments and other.

     We, acting through our subsidiaries, are the lessee under many real estate leases that provide for our use of the respective dealership premises. Generally, our real estate and facility leases have 30-year total terms with initial terms of 15 years and three additional five-year terms, at our option. Pursuant to these leases, our subsidiaries generally agree to indemnify the lessor and other parties from certain liabilities arising as a result of the use of the leased premises, including environmental liabilities, or a breach of the lease by the lessee. Additionally, from time to time, we enter into agreements in connection with the sale of assets or businesses in which we agree to indemnify the purchaser, or other parties, from certain liabilities or costs arising in connection with the assets or business. Also, in the ordinary course of business in connection with purchases or sales of goods and services, we enter into agreements that may contain indemnification provisions. In the event that an indemnification claim is asserted, liability would be limited by the terms of the applicable agreement.

     From time to time, primarily in connection with dealership dispositions, our subsidiaries assign or sublet to the dealership purchaser the subsidiaries’ interests in any real property leases associated with such stores. In general, our subsidiaries retain responsibility for the performance of certain obligations under such leases to the extent that the assignee or sublessee does not perform, whether such performance is required prior to or following the assignment or subletting of the lease. Additionally, we and our subsidiaries generally remain subject to the terms of any guarantees made by us and our subsidiaries in connection with such leases. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the assignee or sublessee in the event of non-performance under these leases, as well as certain defenses, and we presently have no reason to believe that we or our subsidiaries will be called on to perform under any such assigned leases or subleases, we estimate that lessee rental payment obligations during the remaining terms of these leases are approximately $31.4 million at December 31, 2008. We and our subsidiaries also may be called on to perform other obligations under these leases, such as environmental remediation of the leased premises or repair of the leased premises upon termination of the lease, although we presently have no reason to believe that we or our subsidiaries will be called on to so perform and such obligations cannot be

quantified at this time. Our exposure under these leases is difficult to estimate and there can be no assurance that any performance by us or our subsidiaries required under these leases would not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and cash flows.

EX-99.3

EXHIBIT 99.3

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     The following information about our market-sensitive financial instruments constitutes a “forward-looking statement.” All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. For examples of those risks and uncertainties, see the cautionary statements contained in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Original 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report, except as required by applicable law. Hereinafter, the term “Group 1,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and, unless the context indicates otherwise, our consolidated subsidiaries.

     As discussed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, our financial statements as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the years then ended, included elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 8-K, have been adjusted for the retrospective application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that may be Settled in Cash upon Conversion.” The financial information contained in the discussion below reflects only the adjustments described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements and does not reflect events occurring after February 25, 2009, the date of the filing of our Original 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, or modify or update those disclosures that may have been affected by subsequent events.

     Interest Rates. We have interest rate risk in our variable rate debt obligations and interest rate swaps. Our policy is to manage interest rate exposure through the use of a combination of fixed and floating rate debt and interest rate swaps.

     At December 31, 2008, the principal amount outstanding of our 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2036 (the “2.25% Notes”) and 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “8.25% Notes”), which is primarily all of our fixed rate debt, totaled $299.1 million and had a fair value of $144.0 million. The aggregate carrying amount of the 2.25% Notes and the 8.25% Notes at December 31, 2008 was $228.3 million.

     At December 31, 2008, we had $822.3 million of variable-rate floorplan borrowings outstanding, $178.0 million of variable-rate mortgage facility borrowings outstanding and $50.0 million of variable-rate acquisition facility borrowings outstanding. Based on the aggregate amount, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would result in an approximate $8.2 million change to our interest expense. After consideration of the interest rate swaps described below, a 100 basis point increase would yield a net increase of $2.7 million.

     We received $27.9 million of interest assistance from certain automobile manufacturers during the year ended December 31, 2008. This assistance is reflected as a $28.3 million reduction of our new vehicle cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2008, and reduced our new vehicle inventory by $6.0 million and $6.4 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the past three years, the reduction to our new vehicle cost of sales has ranged from approximately 50% to 103% of our floorplan interest expense. Although we can provide no assurance as to the amount of future interest assistance, it is our expectation, based on historical data that an increase in prevailing interest rates would result in increased assistance from certain manufacturers.

     We use interest rate swaps to adjust our exposure to interest rate movements when appropriate based upon market conditions. These swaps are entered into with financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings, thereby minimizing the risk of credit loss. We reflect the current fair value of all derivatives on our balance sheet. The related gains or losses on these transactions are deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income in the period in which the related items being hedged are recognized in expense. However, to the extent that the change in value of a derivative contract does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the items being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in income. All of our interest rate hedges are designated as cash flow hedges. The hedge instruments are designed to convert floating rate vehicle floorplan payables under our Revolving Credit Facility to fixed rate debt. During 2008, we entered into two interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $75.0 million. The hedge instruments are designed to convert floating rate vehicle floorplan payables under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility to fixed rate debt. One swap, with $50.0 million in notional value, effectively locks in a rate of approximately 3.7% and expires in

August 2011 and the other with $25.0 million in notional value, effectively locks in a rate of approximately 3.1% and expires in March 2012. During 2007, we entered into eight interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $225.0 million, comprised of one swap with a $50.0 million notional value that effectively locks in an interest rate of approximately 5.3% and the remaining seven swaps each with a notional value of $25.0 million that effectively lock in an interest rate ranging from 4.2% to 5.3%. All of the swaps entered into 2007 expire in the latter half of 2012. In December 2005, we entered into two interest rate swaps with notional values of $100.0 million each, and in January 2006, we entered into a third interest rate swap with a notional value of $50.0 million. One swap, with $100.0 million in notional value, effectively locks in a rate of 4.9%, the second swap, also with $100.0 million in notional value, effectively locks in a rate of 4.8%, and the third swap, with $50.0 million in notional value, effectively locks in a rate of 4.7%. All three of the 2005 hedge instruments expire December 15, 2010. At December 31, 2008, net unrealized losses, net of income taxes, related to hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive loss totaled $27.9 million. At December 31, 2007, net unrealized losses, net of income taxes, related to hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive loss totaled $10.1 million. At December 31, 2006, net unrealized gains, net of income taxes, related to hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive income totaled $0.8 million. The increase in net unrealized losses from 2007 to 2008 was primarily a result of the decline in interest rates experienced during the year. At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, all of our derivative contracts were determined to be highly effective, and no ineffective portion was recognized in income.

     Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. As of December 31, 2008, we had dealership operations in the U.K. The functional currency of our U.K. subsidiaries is the Pound Sterling. We intend to remain permanently invested in these foreign operations and, as such, do not hedge against foreign currency fluctuations. If we change our intent with respect to such international investment, we would expect to implement strategies designed to manage those risks in an effort to mitigate the effect of foreign currency fluctuations on our earnings and cash flows. A 10 percent increase in average exchange rates versus the U.S. Dollar would have resulted in a $14.8 million change to our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008.

EX-99.4

EXHIBIT 99.4

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and Subsidiaries ¾ Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	2
Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
Consolidated Statements of Operations	4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

1

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Group 1 Automotive, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted for the retrospective application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”, which became effective January 1, 2009.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Group 1 Automotive, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP               
Houston, Texas
February 24, 2009, except for changes as described in Notes 2, 7, 9, 15, 18 and 19,
     as to which the date is August 11, 2009

2

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

	December 31,
	2008			2007
	(In thousands,
	except per share amounts)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,144		$	34,248
Contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables, net		102,834			189,400
Accounts and notes receivable, net		67,350			82,698
Inventories		845,944			878,168
Assets related to discontinued operations		—			30,531
Deferred income taxes		18,474			18,287
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		38,878			29,651
Total current assets		1,096,624			1,262,983
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net		514,891			427,223
GOODWILL		501,187			486,775
INTANGIBLE FRANCHISE RIGHTS		154,597			300,470
OTHER ASSETS		20,815			28,653
Total assets	$	2,288,114		$	2,506,104
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Floorplan notes payable — credit facility	$	693,692		$	648,469
Floorplan notes payable — manufacturer affiliates		128,580			170,911
Current maturities of long-term debt		13,594			12,260
Accounts payable		74,235			111,458
Liabilities related to discontinued operations		—			35,180
Accrued expenses		94,395			100,000
Total current liabilities		1,004,496			1,078,278
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities		446,878			550,149
OTHER REAL ESTATE RELATED AND LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities		50,444			6,104
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO REAL ESTATE, net of current maturities		39,401			26,913
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		2,768			41,160
LIABILITIES FROM INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES		44,655			16,188
OTHER LIABILITIES		27,135			29,016
Total liabilities before deferred revenues		1,615,777			1,747,808
DEFERRED REVENUES		10,220			16,531
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000 shares authorized; 26,052 and 25,532 issued, respectively		261			255
Additional paid-in capital		351,405			357,687
Retained earnings		437,087			496,055
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(38,109	)		(9,560	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 2,106 and 2,427 shares, respectively		(88,527	)		(102,672	)
Total stockholders’ equity		662,117			741,765
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,288,114		$	2,506,104

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
REVENUES:
New vehicle retail sales	$	3,392,888		$	3,914,650		$	3,713,266
Used vehicle retail sales		1,090,559			1,132,413			1,068,307
Used vehicle wholesale sales		233,262			310,173			322,735
Parts and service sales		750,823			699,906			649,778
Finance, insurance and other, net		186,555			203,075			186,643
Total revenues		5,654,087			6,260,217			5,940,729
COST OF SALES:
New vehicle retail sales		3,178,132			3,652,328			3,446,922
Used vehicle retail sales		975,716			1,001,179			930,978
Used vehicle wholesale sales		237,604			313,768			325,156
Parts and service sales		346,974			318,475			298,366
Total cost of sales		4,738,426			5,285,750			5,001,422
GROSS PROFIT		915,661			974,467			939,307
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		739,430			758,877			717,786
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSE		25,652			20,438			17,694
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS		163,023			16,784			2,241
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		(12,444	)		178,368			201,586
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSES):
Floorplan interest expense		(46,377	)		(46,822	)		(45,308	)
Other interest expense, net		(36,783	)		(30,068	)		(19,234	)
Gain (loss) on redemption of senior subordinated and convertible notes		18,126			(1,598	)		(488	)
Other income, net		302			560			629
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(77,176	)		100,440			137,185
PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES		(31,166	)		35,893			50,092
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS	$	(46,010	)	$	64,547		$	87,093
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Loss related to discontinued operations		(3,481	)		(1,714	)		(1,363	)
Income tax benefit related to losses on discontinued operations		1,478			582			469
Loss from discontinued operations		(2,003	)		(1,132	)		(894	)
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(48,013	)	$	63,415		$	86,199
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	(2.04	)	$	2.77		$	3.61
Loss per share from discontinued operations		(0.09	)		(0.04	)		(0.04	)
Earnings (loss) per share	$	(2.13	)	$	2.73		$	3.57
Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,513			23,270			24,146
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	(2.03	)	$	2.76		$	3.56
Loss per share from discontinued operations		(0.09	)		(0.05	)		(0.03	)
Earnings (loss) per share	$	(2.12	)	$	2.71		$	3.53
Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,671			23,406			24,446
CASH DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.47		$	0.56		$	0.55

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

																Accumulated Other
																Comprehensive Income (Loss)
																Unrealized			Unrealized			Unrealized
							Additional						Deferred			Gains (Losses)			Gains (Losses)			Gains (Losses)
	Common Stock						Paid-in			Retained			Stock-Based			on Interest			on Marketable			on Currency			Treasury
	Shares			Amount			Capital			Earnings			Compensation			Rate Swaps			Securities			Translation			Stock			Total
	(In thousands)
BALANCE, December 31, 2005		24,588		$	246		$	276,904		$	373,162		$	(5,413	)	$	(384	)	$	(322	)	$	—		$	(17,400	)	$	626,793
Impact of adoption of APB 14-1		—			—			64,012			—			—			—			—			—			—			64,012
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—			—			—			86,199			—			—			—			—			—			86,199
Interest rate swap adjustment, net of tax provision of $709		—			—			—			—			—			1,181			—			—			—			1,181
Gain on investments, net of tax provision of $70		—			—			—			—			—			—			116			—			—			116
Total comprehensive income																													87,496
Reclassification resulting from adoption of FAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006		—			—			(5,413	)		—			5,413			—			—			—			—			—
Purchases of treasury stock		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(54,964	)		(54,964	)
Issuance of common and treasury shares to employee benefit plans		346			3			(279	)		—			—			—			—			—			23,968			23,692
Issuance of restricted stock		303			3			(3	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock		(72	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Stock-based compensation		—			—			5,086			—			—			—			—			—			—			5,086
Tax benefit from options exercised and the vesting of restricted shares		—			—			8,089			—			—			—			—			—			—			8,089
Purchase of equity calls		—			—			(116,251	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(116,251	)
Sale of equity warrants		—			—			80,551			—			—			—			—			—			—			80,551
Deferred income tax benefit associated with purchase of equity calls		—			—			43,594			—			—			—			—			—			—			43,594
Cash dividends		—			—			—			(13,437	)		—			—			—			—			—			(13,437	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2006		25,165			252			356,290			445,924			—			797			(206	)		—			(48,396	)		754,661
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—			—			—			63,415			—			—			—			—			—			63,415
Interest rate swap adjustment, net of tax provision of $6,549		—			—			—			—			—			(10,915	)		—			—			—			(10,915	)
Gain on investments, net of tax provision of $78		—			—			—			—			—			—			130			—			—			130
Unrealized gain on currency translation																							634						634
Total comprehensive income																													53,264
Purchases of treasury stock		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(63,039	)		(63,039	)
Issuance of common and treasury shares to employee benefit plans		(232	)		(2	)		(8,761	)		—			—			—			—			—			8,763			—
Proceeds from sales of common stock under employee benefit plans		214			2			5,036			—			—			—			—			—						5,038
Issuance of restricted stock		414			4			(4	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock		(29	)		(1	)		1			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Stock-based compensation		—			—			4,954			—			—			—			—			—			—			4,954
Tax benefit from options exercised and the vesting of restricted shares		—			—			171			—			—			—			—			—			—			171
Cash dividends		—			—			—			(13,284	)		—			—			—			—			—			(13,284	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2007		25,532			255			357,687			496,055			—			(10,118	)		(76	)		634			(102,672	)		741,765
Comprehensive income:
Net loss		—			—			—			(48,013	)		—			—			—			—			—			(48,013	)
Interest rate swap adjustment, net of tax provision of $10,675		—			—			—			—			—			(17,791	)		—			—			—			(17,791	)
Loss on investments, net of tax provision of $125		—			—			—			—			—			—			(209	)		—			—			(209	)
Unrealized loss on currency translation		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(10,549	)		—			(10,549	)
Total comprehensive loss																													(76,562	)
Purchases of treasury stock		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(776	)		(776	)
Issuance of common and treasury shares to employee benefit plans		(358	)		(2	)		(14,913	)		—			—			—			—			—			14,625			(290	)
Proceeds from sales of common stock under employee benefit plans		223			2			3,193			—			—			—			—			—			296			3,491
Issuance of restricted stock		736			7			(7	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock		(81	)		(1	)		1			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Stock-based compensation		—			—			6,523			—			—			—			—			—			—			6,523
Tax liability from options exercised and the vesting of restricted shares		—			—			(1,079	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(1,079	)
Cash dividends		—			—			—			(10,955	)		—			—			—			—			—			(10,955	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2008		26,052		$	261		$	351,405		$	437,087		$	—		$	(27,909	)	$	(285	)	$	(9,915	)	$	(88,527	)	$	662,117

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
	(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(48,013	)	$	63,415		$	86,199
Net loss from discontinued operations	$	2,003		$	1,132		$	894
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Asset impairments		163,023			16,784			2,241
(Gain) loss on repurchase of long-term debt		(18,126	)		1,598			488
Depreciation and amortization		25,652			20,438			17,694
Deferred income taxes		(28,359	)		13,612			17,676
Stock based compensation		6,523			4,954			5,086
Amortization of debt discount and issue costs		10,229			9,575			5,127
Provision for doubtful accounts and uncollectible notes		1,192			2,442			1,609
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		1,099			(150	)		(3,657	)
Tax benefit (liability) from options exercised and the vesting of restricted shares		(1,079	)		171			8,089
Gains on sales of assets		(718	)		(1,180	)		(5,849	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions:
Contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables		87,386			(4,394	)		(3,370	)
Inventories		57,374			12,597			(29,781	)
Floorplan notes payable — manufacturer affiliates		(41,083	)		(106,312	)		(25,076	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(38,847	)		(10,155	)		(23,933	)
Accounts and notes receivable		10,106			(7,046	)		3,021
Deferred revenues		(6,311	)		(4,374	)		(4,996	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,695			(2,110	)		1,605
Net cash provided by operating activities, from continuing operations		183,746			10,997			53,067
Net cash used in operating activities, from discontinued operations		(13,373	)		(3,431	)		(4,173	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment		(142,834	)		(146,498	)		(71,281	)
Cash paid in acquisitions, net of cash received		(48,602	)		(281,834	)		(246,322	)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment		18,712			22,516			13,289
Proceeds from sales of franchises		6,522			10,192			38,024
Other		1,490			2,658			(2,699	)
Net cash used in investing activities, from continuing operations		(164,712	)		(392,966	)		(268,989	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities, from discontinued operations		23,051			(199	)		(266	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings on credit facility — Floorplan Line		5,118,757			5,493,645			3,851,025
Repayments on credit facility — Floorplan Line		(5,074,782	)		(5,268,183	)		(3,821,477	)
Repayments on credit facility — Acquisition Line		(245,000	)		(35,000	)		(15,000	)
Borrowings on credit facility — Acquisition Line		160,000			170,000			15,000
Borrowings on mortgage facility		54,625			133,684			—
Repurchase of long-term debt		(52,761	)		(36,865	)		(10,827	)
Borrowings of long-term debt related to real estate purchases		50,171			—			—
Dividends paid		(10,955	)		(13,284	)		(13,437	)
Principal payments on mortgage facility		(7,944	)		(2,367	)		—
Principal payments of long-term debt		(7,449	)		(1,861	)		(787	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to benefit plans		3,201			5,038			23,692
Borrowings on other facilities for acquisitions		1,490			—			—
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		(1,099	)		150			3,657
Repurchases of common stock, amounts based on settlement date		(776	)		(63,039	)		(54,964	)
Debt issue costs		(365	)		(3,630	)		(6,726	)
Repayments on other facilities for divestitures		—			(2,498	)		(4,880	)
Proceeds from issuance of 2.25% Convertible Notes		—			—			287,500
Purchase of equity calls		—			—			(116,251	)
Sale of equity warrants		—			—			80,551
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities, from continuing operations		(12,887	)		375,790			217,076
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities, from discontinued operations		(21,103	)		4,750			3,666
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		(5,826	)		(33	)		—
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(11,104	)		(5,092	)		381
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		34,248			39,340			38,959
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	23,144		$	34,248		$	39,340

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

1. BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION

     Group 1 Automotive, Inc., a Delaware corporation, through its subsidiaries, is a leading operator in the automotive retailing industry with operations in the states of Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas in the United States of America and in the towns of Brighton, Hailsham and Worthing in the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”). Through their dealerships, these subsidiaries sell new and used cars and light trucks; arrange related financing, and sell vehicle service and insurance contracts; provide maintenance and repair services; and sell replacement parts. Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and its subsidiaries are herein collectively referred to as the “Company” or “Group 1.”

     Prior to January 1, 2006, our retail network was organized into 13 regional dealership groups, or “platforms”. In 2006 and 2007, the Company reorganized its operations and as of December 31, 2008, the retail network consisted of the following three regions (with the number of dealerships they comprised): (i) the Eastern (40 dealerships in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York and South Carolina ), (ii) the Central (46 dealerships in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas), (iii) the Western (11 dealerships in California). Each region is managed by a regional vice president reporting directly to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. In addition, our international operations consist of three dealerships in the U.K. also managed locally with direct reporting responsibilities to the Company’s corporate management team.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     Adjustment for the Retrospective Application of APB 14-1

     In May 2008, the FASB finalized FSP APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that may be Settled in Cash upon Conversion” (“APB 14-1”), which specifies the accounting for certain convertible debt instruments, including the Company’s 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes issued June 26, 2006 and due 2036 (the “2.25% Notes”). For convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion, APB 14-1 requires an entity to separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. APB 14-1 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption was not permitted.

     On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted APB 14-1 and retrospectively adjusted the financial statements as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the years then ended to reflect its adoption of APB 14-1. Upon implementation of APB 14-1, the Company determined the fair value of a non-convertible debt instrument using the estimated effective interest rate for similar debt with no convertible features. The effective interest rate of 7.8% was estimated by comparing debt issuances from companies with similar credit ratings during the same annual period as the Company. The Company utilized a ten-year term for the assessment of the fair value of its convertible debt with any currently remaining discount amortization to be amortized over the next seven years. The adoption of APB 14-1 for the Company’s 2.25% Notes required the equity component of the 2.25% Notes to be initially included in the paid-in-capital section of stockholders’ equity on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and the value of the equity component to be treated as an original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the 2.25% Notes. Higher non-cash interest expense results from the accretion of the discounted carrying value of the 2.25% Notes to their face amount as interest expense over the expected term of the 2.25% Notes using an effective interest rate method of amortization. Repurchases of the 2.25% Notes, including those executed during the fourth quarter of 2008, reduce the additional interest charge on a prospective basis. Gains on the repurchase of the 2.25% Notes are reduced, both on a retrospective and prospective basis, as a result of the application of APB 14-1, reflecting the write-off of the associated discount described above.

     The information contained in these financial statements and the notes thereto reflect only the adjustments described below that were necessary to adopt APB 14-1 and do not reflect events occurring after February 25, 2009, the date of the filing of the Company’s Original 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, or modify or update those disclosures that may have been affected by subsequent events.

7

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     The following table sets forth the effect of the retrospective application of APB 14-1 on certain previously reported line items on the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

	Year ended December 31,
	2008						2007						2006
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
	Originally			As			Originally			As			Originally			As
	Reported			Adjusted			Reported			Adjusted			Reported			Adjusted
Other interest expense, net	$	(28,916	)	$	(36,783	)	$	(22,771	)	$	(30,068	)	$	(15,708	)	$	(19,234	)
Gain (loss) on redemption of senior subordinated and convertible notes		36,629			18,126			(1,598	)		(1,598	)		(488	)		(488	)
Income (loss) before Income Taxes		(50,806	)		(77,176	)		107,737			100,440			140,711			137,185
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes		(21,316	)		(31,166	)		38,653			35,893			51,427			50,092
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(29,490	)		(46,010	)		69,084			64,547			89,284			87,093
Net Income (Loss)	$	(31,493	)	$	(48,013	)	$	67,952		$	63,415		$	88,390		$	86,199
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	(1.31	)	$	(2.04	)	$	2.97		$	2.77		$	3.70		$	3.61
Net Income (loss) per share	$	(1.40	)	$	(2.13	)	$	2.92		$	2.73		$	3.66		$	3.57
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	(1.30	)	$	(2.03	)	$	2.95		$	2.76		$	3.65		$	3.56
Net income (loss) per share	$	(1.39	)	$	(2.12	)	$	2.90		$	2.71		$	3.62		$	3.53

     The following table sets forth the effect of the retrospective application of APB 14-1 on certain previously reported line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

	Year ended December 31,
	2008				2007
	(In thousands)
	Originally		As		Originally		As
	Reported		Adjusted		Reported		Adjusted
Other Assets(1)	$	42,786	$	20,815	$	28,730	$	28,653
Total assets		2,310,085		2,288,114		2,506,181		2,506,104
Long-Term Debt, net of current maturities		512,154		446,878		641,821		550,149
Deferred Income Tax Liability		227		2,768		6,849		41,160
Total liabilities before deferred revenues		1,678,512		1,615,777		1,805,169		1,747,808
Additional Paid-in Capital		287,393		351,405		293,675		357,687
Retained Earnings		460,335		437,087		502,783		496,055
Total stockholders’ equity	$	621,353	$	662,117	$	684,481	$	741,765

⁽¹⁾ The impact of APB 14-1 on Other Assets for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes an adjustment of $21.9 million to reduce the Company’s deferred income tax asset.

     In addition, the adoption of APB 14-1 resulted in changes to our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, and Notes 7, 9, 15, 18, and 19.

8

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and June 26, 2006 (the date of issuance of the 2.25% Notes), the carrying value of the 2.25% Notes, related discount and equity component consisted of the following:

	December 31,			December 31,			June 26,
	2008			2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Carrying amount of equity component, net of deferred income taxes	$	65,545		$	65,545		$	65,545
Allocated underwriter fees, net of deferred income taxes		(1,475	)		(1,475	)		(1,475	)
Allocated debt issuance cost, net of deferred income taxes		(58	)		(58	)		(58	)
Total net equity component	$	64,012		$	64,012		$	64,012
Deferred income tax component	$	24,461		$	34,312		$	38,408
Principal amount of 2.25% Notes		224,500			287,500		$	287,500
Unamortized discount		(66,561	)		(93,590	)		(104,873	)
Unamortized underwriter fees		(2,606	)		(3,667	)		(4,109	)
Net carrying amount of liability component	$	155,333		$	190,243		$	178,518
Net impact of APB 14-1 on retained earnings	$	(23,249	)	$	(6,730	)	$	—
Effective interest rate of liability component		7.8	%		7.8	%		7.8	%
Year-to-date contractual interest expense	$	6,311		$	6,491		$	—
Year-to-date discount amortization		8,147			7,598			—
Unamortized debt issuance cost		104			145			163

     During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased $63.0 million par value of our outstanding 2.25% Notes for net cash of $26.1 million and realized a net gain of approximately $17.2 million (after adjustments from the implementation of APB 14-1) included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In conjunction with the repurchases, $19.7 million of unamortized costs were written off including the APB 14-1 discount, underwriters’ fees and debt issuance costs. The unamortized cost of the related purchased options acquired at the time the repurchased 2.25% Notes were issued, $21.3 million, which was deductible as original issue discount for tax purposes, was taken into account in determining the Company’s tax gain. Accordingly, the Company recorded a proportionate reduction in its deferred tax assets. No value was attributed to the equity component of the 2.25% Notes at the time of the redemption and, therefore, no adjustment to additional paid-in-capital was recognized.

     Basis of Presentation

     All acquisitions of dealerships completed during the periods presented have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and their results of operations are included from the effective dates of the closings of the acquisitions. The allocations of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are assigned and recorded based on estimates of fair value. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

     Revenue Recognition

     Revenues from vehicle sales, parts sales and vehicle service are recognized upon completion of the sale and delivery to the customer. Conditions to completing a sale include having an agreement with the customer, including pricing, and the sales price must be reasonably expected to be collected.

     In accordance with EITF No. 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent,” the Company records the profit it receives for arranging vehicle fleet transactions net in other finance and insurance revenues, net. Since all sales of new vehicles must occur through franchised new vehicle dealerships, the dealerships effectively act as agents for the automobile manufacturers in completing sales of vehicles to fleet customers. As these customers typically order the vehicles, the Company has no significant general inventory risk. Additionally, fleet customers generally receive special purchase incentives from the automobile manufacturers and the Company receives only a nominal fee for facilitating the transactions. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental agencies are not included in total revenues.

     The Company arranges financing for customers through various institutions and receives financing fees based on the difference between the loan rates charged to customers and predetermined financing rates set by the financing institution. In addition, the Company receives fees from the sale of vehicle service contracts to customers. The Company may be charged back a portion of the financing, insurance contract and vehicle service contract fees in the event of early termination of the contracts by customers. Revenues from these fees are recorded at the time of the sale of the vehicles and a reserve for future chargebacks is established based on the Company’s historical operating results and the termination provisions of the applicable contracts.

     The Company consolidates the operations of its reinsurance companies. The Company reinsures the credit life and accident and health insurance policies sold by its dealerships. All of the revenues and related direct costs from the sales of these policies are deferred and recognized over the life of the policies, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises” (“SFAS 60”). During 2008, the Company terminated its offerings of credit life and accident and health insurance policies. Investment of the net assets of these companies are regulated by state insurance commissions and consist of permitted investments, in general, government-backed securities and obligations of government agencies. These investments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at market value. These investments, along with restricted cash that is not invested, are classified as other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

9

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     Cash and Cash Equivalents

     Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits and various other short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. Included in other assets is approximately $2.3 million of cash restricted for specific purposes. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, cash and cash equivalents excludes $44.9 million and $64.5 million, respectively, of immediately available funds used to pay down the Floorplan Line of the Revolving Credit Facility, which is the Company’s primary vehicle for the short-term investment of excess cash.

     Contracts-in-Transit and Vehicle Receivables

     Contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables consist primarily of amounts due from financing institutions on retail finance contracts from vehicle sales. Also included are amounts receivable from vehicle wholesale sales.

     Inventories

     New, used and demonstrator vehicles are stated at the lower of specific cost or market. Vehicle inventory cost consists of the amount paid to acquire the inventory, plus reconditioning cost, cost of equipment added and transportation cost. Additionally, the Company receives interest assistance from some of the automobile manufacturers. Such assistance is accounted for as a vehicle purchase price discount and is reflected as a reduction to the inventory cost on the balance sheet and as a reduction to cost of sales in the income statement as the vehicles are sold. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, inventory cost had been reduced by $6.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively, for interest assistance received from manufacturers. New vehicle cost of sales has been reduced by $28.3 million, $37.2 million and $36.9 million for interest assistance received related to vehicles sold for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     Parts and accessories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.

     Market adjustments are provided against the inventory balances based on the historical loss experience and management’s considerations of current market trends.

     Property and Equipment

     Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the asset.

     Expenditures for major additions or improvements, which extend the useful lives of assets, are capitalized. Minor replacements, maintenance and repairs, which do not improve or extend the lives of the assets, are charged to operations as incurred. Disposals are removed at cost less accumulated depreciation, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in current operations.

     Goodwill

     Goodwill represents the excess, at the date of acquisition, of the purchase price of businesses acquired over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company performs the annual impairment assessment of goodwill by reporting unit at the end of each calendar year using a fair-value based, two-step test. The Company also performs an impairment assessment more frequently if events or circumstances occur at a reporting unit between annual assessments that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. As of December 31, 2008, the Company defined its reporting units as each of its three regions and the U.K. See Note 10 for additional details regarding the Company’s goodwill.

     In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company compares the carrying value of the net assets of each reporting unit to its respective fair value. This represents the first step of the impairment test. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value of its net assets, the Company is then required to proceed to step two of the impairment test. The second step involves allocating the calculated fair value to all of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets of the reporting unit as if the calculated fair value was the purchase price of the business combination. This allocation could result in assigning value to intangible assets not previously recorded separately from goodwill prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”), which could result in less implied residual value assigned to goodwill (see discussion regarding franchise rights acquired prior to July 1, 2001, in “Intangible Franchise Rights” below). The Company then compares the value of the implied goodwill resulting from this second step to the carrying value of the goodwill in the reporting unit. To the extent the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment charge equal to the difference is recorded.

10

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     In completing step one of the impairment analysis, the Company uses a combination of the discounted cash flow (or income) and market approaches to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit. Included in this analysis are assumptions regarding revenue growth rates, future gross margin estimates, future selling, general and administrative expense rates and the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. The Company also estimates residual values at the end of the forecast period and future capital expenditure requirements. For the market approach, the Company utilizes recent multiples of guideline companies for both revenue and pretax income.

     Intangible Franchise Rights

     The Company’s only significant identifiable intangible assets, other than goodwill, are rights under franchise agreements with manufacturers, which are recorded at an individual dealership level. The Company expects these franchise agreements to continue for an indefinite period and, when these agreements do not have indefinite terms, the Company believes that renewal of these agreements can be obtained without substantial cost. As such, the Company believes that its franchise agreements will contribute to cash flows for an indefinite period and, therefore, the carrying amount of franchise rights are not amortized. Franchise rights acquired in acquisitions prior to July 1, 2001, were recorded and amortized as part of goodwill and remain as part of goodwill at December 31, 2008 and 2007 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Since July 1, 2001, intangible franchise rights acquired in business combinations have been recorded as distinctly separate intangible assets and, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), the Company evaluates these franchise rights for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment has occurred. See Note 10 and Note 13 for additional details regarding the Company’s intangible franchise rights.

     Long-Lived Assets

     SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever there is evidence that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. This consists of comparing the carrying amount of the asset with its expected future undiscounted cash flows without interest costs. If the asset carrying amount is less than such cash flow estimate, then it is required to be written down to its fair value. Estimates of expected future cash flows represent management’s best estimate based on currently available information and reasonable and supportable assumptions. See Note 10 for additional details regarding the Company’s long-lived assets.

     Income Taxes

     Currently, the Company operates in 15 different states in the U.S. and one other country, each of which has unique tax rates and payment calculations. As the amount of income generated in each jurisdiction varies from period to period, the Company’s estimated effective tax rate can vary based on the proportion of taxable income generated in each jurisdiction.

     The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). Under this method, deferred income taxes are recorded based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the underlying assets are realized or liabilities are settled. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

     Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (“FIN 48”). This statement clarifies the criteria that an individual tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in a company’s financial statements. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, in order to be recognized in the financial statements (See Note 9 for additional information). No cumulative adjustment was required to effect the adoption of FIN 48.

     Self-Insured Medical and Property/Casualty Plans

     The Company purchases insurance policies for worker’s compensation, liability, auto physical damage, property, pollution, employee medical benefits and other risks consisting of large deductibles and/or self insured retentions. The Company’s claim and loss history is reviewed on a periodic basis to estimate the future liability for claims arising under these programs. The insurance reserves are estimated using actuarial evaluations based upon historical loss experience, claims handling fees and adjusted for loss development factors. See Note 4 for a discussion of the effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the Company’s 2006 and 2005 results.

11

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     Fair Value of Financial Instruments

     The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables, accounts and notes receivable, investments in debt and equity securities, accounts payable, credit facilities, long-term debt and interest rate swaps. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, and credit facilities approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments or the existence of variable interest rates. The Company’s investments in debt and equity securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and thus are carried at fair market value. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “8.25% Notes”) had a carrying value, net of applicable discount, of $72.9 million and $100.3 million, respectively, and a fair value, based on quoted market prices, of $48.9 million and $102.4 million, respectively. Also, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s 2.25% Notes had a carrying value, net of applicable discount, of $155.3 million and $190.2 million, respectively, and a fair value, based on quoted market prices, of $95.1 million and $200.2 million, respectively. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair market value. See Note 16 for further details regarding the Company’s derivative financial instruments.

     Foreign Currency Translation

     The functional currency for our foreign subsidiaries is the Pound Sterling. The financial statements of all our foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. Dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.” All assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. Dollars using period-end exchange rates and all revenues and expenses are translated at average rates during the respective period. The U.S. Dollar results that arise from such translation are included in the cumulative currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other income and expense, when applicable.

     Derivative Financial Instruments

     The Company’s primary market risk exposure is increasing interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are used to adjust interest rate exposures when appropriate based on market conditions.

     The Company follows the requirements of SFAS Nos. 133, 137, 138 and 149 (collectively “SFAS 133”) pertaining to the accounting for derivatives and hedging activities. SFAS 133 requires the Company to recognize all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. The related gains or losses on these transactions are deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income in the period in which the related items being hedged are recognized in expense. However, to the extent that the change in value of a derivative contract does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the items being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in income. All of the Company’s interest rate hedges are designated as cash flow hedges.

     Factory Incentives

     In addition to the interest assistance discussed above, the Company receives various incentive payments from certain of the automobile manufacturers. These incentive payments are typically received on parts purchases from the automobile manufacturers and on new vehicle retail sales. These incentives are reflected as reductions of cost of sales in the statement of operations.

     Advertising

     The Company expenses production and other costs of advertising as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, totaled $52.1 million, $57.9 million and $66.1 million, respectively. Additionally, the Company receives advertising assistance from some of the automobile manufacturers. The assistance is accounted for as an advertising expense reimbursement and is reflected as a reduction of advertising expense in the income statement as the vehicles are sold, and in accrued expenses on the balance sheet for amounts related to vehicles still in inventory on that date. Advertising expense has been reduced by $16.7 million, $18.9 million and $16.8 million for advertising assistance received related to vehicles sold for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the accrued expenses caption of the Consolidated Balance Sheets included $3.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively, related to deferrals of advertising assistance received from the manufacturers.

12

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     Business and Credit Risk Concentrations

     The Company owns and operates franchised automotive dealerships in the United States and in the U.K. Automotive dealerships operate pursuant to franchise agreements with vehicle manufacturers. Franchise agreements generally provide the manufacturers or distributors with considerable influence over the operations of the dealership and generally provide for termination of the franchise agreement for a variety of causes. The success of any franchised automotive dealership is dependent, to a large extent, on the financial condition, management, marketing, production and distribution capabilities of the vehicle manufacturers or distributors of which the Company holds franchises. The Company purchases substantially all of its new vehicles from various manufacturers or distributors at the prevailing prices to all franchised dealers. The Company’s sales volume could be adversely impacted by the manufacturers’ or distributors’ inability to supply the dealerships with an adequate supply of vehicles. For the year ended December 31, 2008, Toyota (including Lexus, Scion and Toyota brands), Honda (including Acura and Honda brands), Nissan (including Infiniti and Nissan brands), Ford (including Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, and Volvo brands), BMW (including Mini and BMW brands), Chrysler (including Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep brands), and Mercedes-Benz (including Mercedes-Benz, Smart and Maybach brands) accounted for 35.1%, 14.0%, 12.7%, 9.5%, 8.7%, 6.0% and 5.9% of the Company’s new vehicle sales volume, respectively. No other manufacturer accounted for more than 5.0% of the Company’s total new vehicle sales volume in 2008. Through the use of an open account, the Company purchases and returns parts and accessories from/to the manufacturers and receives reimbursement for rebates, incentives and other earned credits. As of December 31, 2008, the Company was due $36.1 million from various manufacturers (see Note 12). Receivable balances from Mercedes-Benz, Ford, Toyota, General Motors, BMW, Chrysler, Honda, and Nissan represented 22.5%, 15.8%, 15.3%, 13.9%, 8.0%, 7.8%, 5.7% and 4.9%, respectively, of this total balance due from manufacturers.

     Use of Estimates

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions in determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The significant estimates made by management in the accompanying consolidated financial statements relate to inventory market adjustments, reserves for future chargebacks on finance and vehicle service contract fees, self-insured property/casualty insurance exposure, the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, the valuation of goodwill and intangible franchise rights, and reserves for potential litigation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

     Statements of Cash Flows

     With respect to all new vehicle floorplan borrowings, the manufacturers of the vehicles draft the Company’s credit facilities directly with no cash flow to or from the Company. With respect to borrowings for used vehicle financing, the Company chooses which vehicles to finance and the funds flow directly to the Company from the lender. All borrowings from, and repayments to, lenders affiliated with the vehicle manufacturers (excluding the cash flows from or to affiliated lenders participating in our syndicated lending group) are presented within cash flows from operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and all borrowings from, and repayments to, the syndicated lending group under the revolving credit facility (including the cash flows from or to affiliated lenders participating in the facility) are presented within cash flows from financing activities.

     Upon entering into a new financing arrangement with DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC in December 2005, the Company repaid approximately $157.0 million of floorplan borrowings under the revolving credit facility with funds provided by this new facility. On February 28, 2007, the DaimlerChrysler Facility matured. The Company elected not to renew the DaimlerChrysler Facility and used available funds from our floorplan line of our revolving credit facility to pay off the outstanding balance of $112.1 million on the maturity date. These repayments are reflected as a use of cash within cash flows from operating activities and a source of cash within cash flows from financing activities for 2007.

     During 2006, the Company issued $287.5 million of 2.25% Notes. In association with the issuance of these notes, the Company purchased ten-year call options on its common stock totaling $116.3 million. As a result of purchasing these options, a $43.6 million deferred tax asset was recorded as a $43.6 million increase to additional paid in capital on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. There was no cash inflow or outflow associated with the recording of this tax benefit. See Note 15 for a description of the issuance of the 2.25% Notes and the purchase of the call options.

     Cash paid for interest was $86.8 million, $85.4 million and $75.1 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash paid for income taxes was $3.1 million, $18.6 million and $37.1 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

13

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     Related-Party Transactions

     From time to time, the Company has entered into transactions with related parties. Related parties include officers, directors, five percent or greater stockholders and other management personnel of the Company.

     At times, the Company has purchased its stock from related parties. These transactions were completed at then current market prices. See Note 8 for a summary of related party lease commitments. See Note 20 for a summary of other related party transactions.

     Stock-Based Compensation

     Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R) using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all stock-based payments granted through December 31, 2005, for which the requisite service period had not been completed as of December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, (b) compensation cost for all stock-based payments granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R), and (c) the fair value of the shares sold to employees subsequent to December 31, 2005, pursuant to the employee stock purchase plan. As permitted under the transition rules for SFAS 123(R), results for prior periods were not restated. See Note 5 for further details regarding the Company’s stock based compensation plans and activities.

     Rental Costs Associated with Construction

     In October 2005, the FASB staff issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 13-1, “Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred During a Construction Period,” which, starting prospectively in the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005, requires companies to expense, versus capitalizing into the carrying costs, rental costs associated with ground or building operating leases that are incurred during a construction period. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 13-1 effective January 1, 2006. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company expensed rental cost incurred during construction of approximately $1.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The Company did not incur any rental construction cost during construction during the year ended December 31, 2008. As permitted by FAS 13-1, the Company has not restated prior year’s financial statements relative to the adoption of FAS 13-1.

     Business Segment Information

     The Company, through its operating companies, operates in the automotive retailing industry. All of the operating companies sell new and used vehicles, arrange financing, vehicle service, and insurance contracts, provide maintenance and repair services and sell replacement parts. The operating companies are similar in that they deliver the same products and services to a common customer group, their customers are generally individuals, they follow the same procedures and methods in managing their operations, and they operate in similar regulatory environments. Additionally, the Company’s management evaluates performance and allocates resources based on the operating results of the individual operating companies. For the reasons discussed above, all of the operating companies represent one reportable segment under SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”). Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the operating results of the Company’s reportable segment. By geographic area, the Company’s sales to external customers from its domestic operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, were $5,491.8 million and $6,086.9 million, respectively, and from its foreign operations were $162.3 million and $173.3 million, respectively. The Company’s domestic long-lived assets other than goodwill, intangible assets and financial instruments as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, were $531.3 million and $418.3 million, respectively, and foreign long-lived assets other than financial instruments as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, were $20.3 million and $28.4 million, respectively.

     Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements, for all of its financial assets and liabilities. The statement does not require new fair value measurements, but emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy for classification of financial assets or liabilities based upon measurement inputs. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. See Note 16 for the application of SFAS 157 and further details regarding fair value measurement of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2008.

14

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     In November 2007, the FASB deferred for one year the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities. In February 2008 the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, (SFAS 157-2), which defers the effective date of SFAS 157, as it related to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has evaluated its financial statements and has determined the adoption of this pronouncement upon its existing nonfinancial assets, such as goodwill and intangible assets, will not materially impact the Company as the Company already utilizes an income approach in measuring the fair value of its nonfinancial assets as prescribed by SFAS 157. Upon adoption the Company anticipates enhancing its current disclosures surrounding its nonfinancial assets and liabilities to meet the requirements of SFAS 157 similarly to those already provided for its financial assets and liabilities in Note 16. The Company determined it currently does not hold any nonfinancial liabilities for which this pronouncement is applicable.

     In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards, which require assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to use a fair value to measure accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities, equity method investments, accounts payable, guarantees and issued debt. The Company adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2008, and elected not to measure any of its currently eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141 (R)”), which significantly changes the accounting for business acquisitions both during the period of the acquisition and in subsequent periods. The more significant changes in the accounting for acquisitions which could impact the Company are:

• certain transactions cost, which are presently treated as cost of the acquisition, will be expensed;

• restructuring costs associated with a business combination, which are presently capitalized, will be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date;

• contingencies, including contingent consideration, which are presently accounted for as an adjustment of purchase price when resolved, will be recorded at fair value at the date of purchase with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in income; and

• valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets, which are presently considered to be subsequent changes in consideration and are recorded as decreases in goodwill, will be recognized at the date of purchase and in income.

     SFAS 141 (R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 31, 2008, with an exception related to the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired contingencies related to acquisitions completed before the effective date. The Company did not execute any business combinations on or subsequent to December 31, 2008 for the 2009 annual period. The Company does not anticipate a material impact from this pronouncement on its financial position or results from operations upon adoption.

     In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”), an amendment of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), which requires disclosures of the objectives of derivative instruments and hedging activities, the method of accounting for such instruments and activities under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and disclosure of the affects of such instruments and related hedged items on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The statement encourages but does not require comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial application. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company does not believe this statement will have a material financial impact on the Company but only enhance its current disclosures contained within its consolidated financial statements.

     In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142-3”), which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142. SFAS 142-3 enhances the guidance over the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”). SFAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The measurement provision of this standard will apply only to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its processes for determining and evaluating the useful life of its intangible assets.

15

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     Reclassifications

     On June 30, 2008, the Company disposed of certain operations that qualified for discontinued operations accounting treatment. In order to reflect these operations as discontinued, the necessary reclassifications have been made to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations, as well as the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.

3. ACQUISITIONS

     During 2008, the Company completed acquisitions of 3 luxury and 2 domestic dealership franchises located in California, Maryland and Texas. Total cash consideration paid, net of cash received, of $48.6 million, included $16.7 million for related real estate and the incurrence of $9.8 million of inventory financing. During 2007, the Company acquired 14 automobile dealership franchises located in California, Georgia, Kansas, New York, South Carolina, and internationally in southeastern England for total cash consideration, net of cash received, of $281.8 million, including $75.0 million for related real estate and $72.9 million paid to the sellers’ financing sources to pay off outstanding floorplan borrowings. During 2006, the Company acquired 13 automobile dealership franchises located in Alabama, California, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Oklahoma for total cash consideration, net of cash received, of $246.3 million, including $30.6 million paid for the associated real estate and $58.9 million paid to the sellers’ financing sources to pay off outstanding floorplan borrowings. The accompanying December 31, 2007, consolidated balance sheet includes preliminary allocations of the purchase price for all of the 2007 acquisitions based on their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition and are subject to final adjustment.

16

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

4. HURRICANES KATRINA AND RITA BUSINESS INTERRUPTION INSURANCE

     On August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast of the United States, including New Orleans, Louisiana. At that time, the Company operated six dealerships in the New Orleans area, consisting of nine franchises. Two of the dealerships were located in the heavily flooded East Bank of New Orleans and nearby Metairie areas, while the other four are located on the West Bank of New Orleans, where flood-related damage was less severe. The East Bank stores suffered significant damage and loss of business and were closed, although the Company’s Dodge store in Metairie temporarily resumed limited operations from a satellite location. In June 2006, as a result, the Company terminated the East Bank franchise with DaimlerChrysler and ceased satellite operations, while the West Bank stores reopened approximately two weeks after the storm.

     The Company maintains business interruption insurance coverage under which it filed claims, and received reimbursement, totaling $7.8 million, of which $1.4 million was recognized in 2005 and $6.4 million was recognized in 2006, after application of related deductibles, related to the effects of these two storms. The $6.4 million was reflected as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying statements of operations. In addition to the business interruption recoveries noted above, the Company also incurred and was reimbursed for approximately $0.9 million of expenses related to the clean-up and reopening of its affected dealerships. The Company recognized $0.7 million of these proceeds during 2005 and $0.2 million during 2006.

5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

     The Company provides compensation benefits to employees and non-employee directors pursuant to its 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended, and 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.

     2007 Long Term Incentive Plan

     In March 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted an amendment and restatement of the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan to, among other things (i) rename the plan as the “Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan,” (the “Incentive Plan”) (ii) increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the plan from 5.5 million to 6.5 million shares and (iii) extend the duration of the plan from March 9, 2014, to March 8, 2017. The Incentive Plan reserves shares of common stock for grants of options (including options qualified as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and options that are non-qualified) at the fair value of each stock option as of the date of grant and, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance awards, bonus stock and phantom stock awards at the market price at the date of grant to directors, officers and other employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The terms of the awards (including vesting schedules) are established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. All outstanding awards are exercisable over a period not to exceed ten years and vest over periods ranging from three to eight years. Certain of the Company’s option awards are subject to graded vesting over a service period. In those cases, the Company recognizes compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Under SFAS 123(R), forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate. As of December 31, 2008, there were 1,217,440 shares available under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan for future grants of these awards.

     Stock Option Awards

     The fair value of each stock option award is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are highly sensitive in the determination of stock-based compensation expense. The weighted average assumptions for the periods indicated are noted in the following table. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The Company utilizes historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination behavior within the valuation model; employees with unusual historical exercise behavior are similarly grouped and separately considered for valuation purposes. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. No stock option awards have been granted since November 2005.

17

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

	2005
Risk-free interest rate		5.9	%
Expected life of options		6.0	yrs
Expected volatility		42.0	%
Expected dividend yield		—
Fair value	$13.84

     The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding stock options:

						Weighted
						Average
				Weighted		Remaining		Aggregate
				Average		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Number			Exercise Price		Term		Value
								(In thousands)
Options outstanding, December 31, 2007		211,774		$	28.33
Grants		—			—
Exercised		(7,000	)		12.52
Forfeited		(35,230	)		28.08
Options outstanding, December 31, 2008		169,544		$	29.00		3.9	$	1
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2008		172,200		$	28.21		3.8	$	1
Exercisable at December 30, 2008		159,104		$	29.06		3.7	$	1

     The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, was less than $0.1 million, $0.7 million and $21.7 million, respectively.

     Restricted Stock Awards

     Beginning in 2005, the Company began granting directors and certain employees, at no cost to the recipient, restricted stock awards or, at their election, phantom stock awards, pursuant to the Incentive Plan. In November 2006, the Company began to grant certain employees, at no cost to the recipient, performance awards pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Restricted stock awards are considered outstanding at the date of grant, but are restricted from disposition for periods ranging from six months to five years. The phantom stock awards will settle in shares of common stock upon the termination of the grantees’ employment or directorship and have vesting periods also ranging from six months to five years. Performance awards are considered outstanding at the date of grant, but are restricted from disposition based on time and the achievement of certain performance criteria established by the Company. In the event the employee or director terminates his or her employment or directorship with the Company prior to the lapse of the restrictions, the shares, in most cases, will be forfeited to the Company. Compensation expense for these awards is based on the price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant and recognized over the requisite service period.

     A summary of these awards as of December 31, 2008, is as follows:

				Weighted Average
				Grant Date
	Awards			Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2007		720,069		$	37.40
Granted		735,874			11.71
Vested		(132,443	)		42.98
Forfeited		(80,540	)		36.20
Nonvested at December 31, 2008		1,242,960			21.67

18

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $2.0 million for both periods and $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, respectively.

     Employee Stock Purchase Plan

     In September 1997, the Company adopted the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (the “Purchase Plan”). The Purchase Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 2.5 million shares of common stock and provides that no options to purchase shares may be granted under the Purchase Plan after March 6, 2016. As of December 31, 2008, there were 266,480 shares remaining in reserve for future issuance under the Purchase Plan. The Purchase Plan is available to all employees of the Company and its participating subsidiaries and is a qualified plan as defined by Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. At the end of each fiscal quarter (the “Option Period”) during the term of the Purchase Plan, the employee contributions are used by the employee to acquire shares of common stock from the Company at 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or the last day of the Option Period, whichever is lower. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company issued 222,916, 148,675 and 119,915 shares, respectively, of common stock to employees participating in the Purchase Plan.

     The weighted average fair value of employee stock purchase rights issued pursuant to the Purchase Plan was $4.73, $9.47 and $9.85 during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The fair value of the stock purchase rights was calculated as the sum of (a) the difference between the stock price and the employee purchase price, (b) the value of the embedded call option and (c) the value of the embedded put option.

     All Stock-Based Payment Arrangements

     Total stock-based compensation cost was $6.5 million, $5.0 million and $5.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Total income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation arrangements was $1.7 million, $1.1 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     As of December 31, 2008, there was $20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 8.2 years.

     Cash received from option exercises and Purchase Plan purchases was $3.5 million, $5.0 million and $23.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company incurred a reduction to additional paid in capital of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as the effect of tax deductions for options exercised and restricted stock vested was less than the associated book expense previously recognized. Comparatively, the actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises, vesting of restricted shares and Purchase Plan purchases totaled $0.2 million and $8.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     SFAS 123(R) requires tax benefits relating to excess stock-based compensation deductions to be presented as a financing cash inflow. Consistent with the requirements of SFAS 123(R), the Company classified a $1.1 million reduction to additional paid in capital as a decrease in financing activities and a corresponding increase in operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008. Comparatively, the Company classified $0.2 million and $3.7 million of excess tax benefits as an increase in financing activities and a corresponding decrease in operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     The Company generally issues new shares when options are exercised or restricted stock vests or, at times, will use treasury shares if available. With respect to shares issued under the Purchase Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors has authorized specific share repurchases to fund the shares issuable under the plan. There were no modifications to the Company’s stock-based compensation plans during the year ended December 31, 2008.

6. EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLANS

     The Company has a deferred compensation plan to provide select employees and members of the Company’s Board of Directors with the opportunity to accumulate additional savings for retirement on a tax-deferred basis (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan are allowed to defer receipt of a portion of their salary and/or bonus compensation, or in the case of the Company’s directors, annual retainer and meeting fees, earned. The participants can choose from various defined investment options to determine their earnings crediting rate;

19

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

however, the Company has complete discretion over how the funds are utilized. Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan are unsecured creditors of the Company. The balances due to participants of the Deferred Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $16.7 million and $19.0 million, respectively, and are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

     The Company offers a 401(k) plan to all of its employees and, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, provided a matching contribution to those employees that participated. The matching contributions paid by the Company totaled $3.2 million, $3.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company indefinitely suspended its matching contribution.

7. EARNINGS PER SHARE

     Basic earnings per share is computed based on weighted average shares outstanding and excludes dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per share is computed including the impact of all potentially dilutive securities. The following table sets forth the calculation of earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income (loss) from:
Continuing operations, net of income taxes	$	(46,010	)	$	64,547		$	87,093
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(2,003	)		(1,132	)		(894	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(48,013	)	$	63,415		$	86,199
Weighted average basic shares outstanding		22,513			23,270			24,146
Dilutive effect of stock options, net of assumed repurchase of treasury stock		18			69			216
Dilutive effect of restricted stock, net of assumed repurchase of treasury stock		140			67			84
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		22,671			23,406			24,446
Earnings (loss) per share from:
Basic:
Continuing operations, net of income taxes	$	(2.04	)	$	2.77		$	3.61
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(0.09	)		(0.04	)		(0.04	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(2.13	)	$	2.73		$	3.57
Diluted:
Continuing operations, net of income taxes	$	(2.03	)	$	2.76		$	3.56
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(0.09	)		(0.05	)		(0.03	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(2.12	)	$	2.71		$	3.53

     Any options with an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the Company’s common stock, during the periods presented, are not considered when calculating the dilutive effect of stock options for diluted earnings per share calculations. The weighted average number of options not included in the calculation of the dilutive effect of stock options was 0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     As discussed in Note 15 below, the Company will be required to include the dilutive effect, if applicable, of the net shares issuable under the 2.25% Notes and the warrants sold in connection with the 2.25% Notes. Since the average price of the Company’s common stock for the year ended December 31, 2008, was less than $59.43, no net shares were issuable under the 2.25% Notes and the warrants.

20

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

8. OPERATING LEASES

     The Company leases various facilities and equipment under long-term operating lease agreements. The facility leases typically have a minimum term of fifteen years with options that extend the term up to an additional fifteen years.

     Future minimum lease payments for non-cancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2008, are as follows (in thousands):

	Related		Third
Year ended December 31,	Parties		Parties		Total
2009	$	3,074	$	50,059	$	53,133
2010		3,029		49,000		52,029
2011		3,029		47,477		50,506
2012		3,029		46,302		49,331
2013		3,029		42,115		45,144
Thereafter		6,978		185,647		192,625
Total	$	22,168	$	420,600	$	442,768

     Total rent expense under all operating leases was approximately $52.3 million, $57.5 million and $60.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Rent expense on related party leases, which is included in the above total rent expense amounts, totaled approximately $3.0 million, $15.8 million and $14.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     During 2008, the Company sold and leased back two facilities to unrelated third parties for an aggregate sales price of approximately $17.9 million. These transactions have been accounted for as sale-leasebacks and the future minimum rentals are included in the above table. The future minimum lease payments in aggregate for the two leases total approximately $21.0 million as of December 31, 2008. Both were determined to qualify for capital lease treatment. See Note 15 for further discussion.

     During 2007, the Company sold and leased back two facilities to unrelated third parties for an aggregate sales price of approximately $20.2 million. These transactions have been accounted for as sale-leasebacks and the future minimum rentals are included in the above table. The future minimum lease payments in aggregate for the two leases total approximately $53.7 million as of December 31, 2008. Both were determined to qualify for capital lease treatment. See Note 15 for further discussion.

21

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

9. INCOME TAXES

     Income before income taxes by geographic area was as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007		2006
	(In thousands)
Domestic	$	(76,107	)	$	98,007	$	137,185
Foreign		(1,069	)		2,433		—
Total income (loss) before income taxes	$	(77,176	)	$	100,440	$	137,185

     Federal and state income taxes are as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007		2006
	(In thousands)
Federal —
Current	$	10,338		$	19,585	$	30,724
Deferred		(39,103	)		13,290		17,285
State —
Current		547			1,537		1,689
Deferred		(2,618	)		941		394
Foreign —
Current		—			332		—
Deferred		(330	)		208		—
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	(31,166	)	$	35,893	$	50,092

     Actual income tax expense differs from income tax expense computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory corporate tax rate of 35.0% in 2008, 2007 and 2006 to income before income taxes as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
	(In thousands)
Provision at the statutory rate	$	(26,637	)	$	34,302		$	48,014
Increase (decrease) resulting from —
State income tax, net of benefit for federal deduction		(4,828	)		2,049			2,923
Foreign income taxes		(330	)		540			—
Employment credits		(273	)		(329	)		(1,194	)
Changes in valuation allowances		530			(465	)		(1,227	)
Stock-based compensation		257			317			790
Other		115			(521	)		786
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	(31,166	)	$	35,893		$	50,092

     During 2008, the Company recorded a benefit of $31.2 million in respect of its loss from continuing operations, primarily due to the asset impairment charges recorded in 2008. This included a tax provision of $6.5 million relating to the $17.2 million gain recorded for the repurchase of a portion of the 2.25% Notes during the fourth quarter. Certain expenses for stock-based compensation recorded in 2008 in accordance with SFAS 123(R) were non-deductible for income tax purposes. In addition, the impact of the changes in the mix of the Company’s pretax income from taxable state jurisdictions affected state tax expenses. The Company also provided valuation allowances with respect to certain state net operating losses based on expectations concerning their realizability. As a result of these items, and the impact of the items occurring in 2007 discussed below, the effective tax rate for the period ended December 31, 2008 increased to 40.4%, as compared 35.7% for the period ended December 31, 2007.

22

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     During 2007, certain expenses for stock-based compensation recorded in accordance with SFAS 123(R) were non-deductible for income tax purposes. In addition, the impact of the changes in the mix of the Company’s pretax income from taxable state jurisdictions affected state tax expenses. The Company also received a benefit from certain tax deductible goodwill relating to dealership dispositions. As a result of these items, and the impact of the items occurring in 2006 discussed below, the effective tax rate for the period ended December 31, 2007 decreased to 35.7%, as compared 36.5% for the period ended December 31, 2006.

     During 2006, certain expenses for stock-based compensation recorded in accordance with SFAS 123(R) were non-deductible for tax purposes. In addition, the Company adjusted its valuation allowances in respect of certain state net operating losses. As a result of these items, and the impact of the items occurring in 2006, the effective tax rate for 2006 increased to 36.5%.

     Deferred income tax provisions result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and expenses for financial reporting purposes and for tax purposes. The tax effects of these temporary differences representing deferred tax assets (liabilities) result principally from the following:

	December 31,
	2008			2007
	(In thousands)
2.25% Notes hedge	$	27,786		$	39,050
APB 14-1 Discount — 2.25% Notes		(24,461	)		(34,311	)
Loss reserves and accruals		24,781			24,420
Goodwill and intangible franchise rights		(28,787	)		(56,149	)
Depreciation expense		(1,681	)		(3,145	)
State net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards		7,522			6,383
Reinsurance operations		150			(735	)
Interest rate swaps		16,745			6,070
Other		(378	)		180
Deferred tax asset (liability)		21,677			(18,237	)
Valuation allowance on state NOL’s		(5,971	)		(4,302	)
Net deferred tax asset (liability)	$	15,706		$	(22,539	)

     As of December 31, 2008, the Company had state net operating loss carryforwards of $164.0 million that will expire between 2009 and 2028; however, as the Company expects that net income will not be sufficient to realize these net operating losses in certain state jurisdictions, a valuation allowance has been established.

     The net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following:

	December 31,
	2008			2007
	(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets —
Current	$	21,004		$	19,660
Long-term		67,574			61,566
Deferred tax liabilities —
Current		(2,530	)		(1,373	)
Long-term		(70,342	)		(102,392	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	15,706		$	(22,539	)

     The long-term deferred tax liabilities of $70.3 million included $0.2 million related to long-term foreign deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2008. The long-term deferred tax assets of $61.6 million include $0.3 million related to long-term foreign deferred tax assets that are presented in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007. The Company believes it is more likely than not, that its deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances provided, will be realized, based primarily on the assumption of future taxable income.

23

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     The Company acquired 6 franchises located at 3 dealerships in the U.K. in March 2007. The Company has not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on approximately $1.4 million of undistributed earnings and associated withholding taxes of its foreign subsidiaries as the Company has taken the position under APB 23, that its foreign earnings will be permanently reinvested outside the U.S. If a distribution of those earnings were to be made, the Company might be subject to both foreign withholding taxes and U.S. income taxes, net of any allowable foreign tax credits or deductions. However, an estimate of these taxes is not practicable.

     Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48. No cumulative adjustment was required to effect the adoption of FIN 48.

     The Company is subject to income tax in U.S. federal and numerous state jurisdictions. Based on applicable statutes of limitations, the Company is generally no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in years prior to 2004.

     A reconciliation of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits in 2008 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

	2008			2007
Balance at January 1,	$	592		$	592
Additions for current year tax positions		—			—
Additions based on tax positions in prior years		—			—
Reductions for tax positions in prior years		—			—
Settlement with tax authorities		—			—
Reductions due to lapse of statutes of limitations		(592	)		—
Balance at December 31,	$	—		$	592

     The Company has no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2008.

     Consistent with prior practices, the Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company did not incur any interest and penalties nor accrue any interest for the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized interest of approximately $52.0 thousand. The Company had approximately $82.0 thousand of interest accrued at December 31, 2007.

10. ASSET IMPAIRMENTS

     During 2008, the Company recorded the following impairment charges, all of which are reflected in asset impairments in the accompanying statement of operations:

• In the third quarter of 2008, the Company determined that the economic conditions and resulting impact on the automotive retail industry, as well as the uncertainty surrounding the going concern of the domestic automobile manufacturers, indicated the potential for an impairment of its goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. In response to the identification of such triggering events, the Company performed an interim impairment assessment of its recorded values of goodwill and intangible franchise rights. As a result of such assessment, the Company determined that the fair values of certain indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights were less than their respective carrying values and recorded a pretax charge of $37.1 million, primarily related to its domestic brand franchises.

• Further, during the third quarter of 2008, the Company identified potential impairment indicators relative to certain of its real estate holdings, primarily associated with domestic franchise terminations, and other equipment, after giving consideration to the likelihood that certain facilities would not be sold or used by a prospective buyer as an automobile dealership operation given market conditions. As a result, the Company performed an impairment assessment of these long-lived assets and determined that the respective carrying values exceeded their estimated fair market values, as determined by third-party appraisals and brokers’ opinions of value. Accordingly, the Company recognized an $11.1 million pretax asset impairment charge.

24

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

• During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company performed its annual assessment of impairments relative to its goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, utilizing our valuation model, which consists of a blend between the market and income approaches. As a result, the Company identified additional impairments of its recorded value of intangible franchise rights, primarily attributable to the continued weakening of the United States economy, higher risk premiums, the negative impact of the economic recession on the automotive retail industry and the growing uncertainty surrounding the three domestic automobile manufacturers, all of which worsened between the third and fourth quarter assessments. Specifically, with regards to the valuation assumptions utilized in the Company’s income approach, the Company increased weighted average cost of capital (or “WACC”) from the WACC utilized in its impairment assessment during the third quarter of 2008 and from historical levels. In addition, because of the negative selling trends experienced in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company revised its 2009 industry sales outlook, or seasonally adjusted annual rate (or “SAAR”), down from its previous forecasts. The Company utilized historical data and previous recession trends to estimate the SAAR for 2010 and beyond. Further, with regards to the assumptions within its market approach, the Company utilized historical market multiples of guideline companies for both revenue and pretax net income. These multiples and the resulting product were adversely impacted by the declines in stock values during much of 2008, including the fourth quarter. The Company recognized a $114.8 million pretax impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2008, predominantly related to franchises in its Western Region.

     At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units exceeded the carrying value of its net assets (step one of the impairment test). As a result, the Company was not required to conduct the second step of the impairment test described above.

     If any of the Company’s assumptions change, including in some cases insignificantly, or fails to materialize, the resulting decline in its estimated fair market value of goodwill and intangible franchise rights could result in a material impairment charge. For example, if the Company’s assumptions regarding the risk-free rate used in its estimated weighted average cost of capital as of December 31, 2008 increased by 100 basis points, and all other assumptions remained constant, the resulting non-cash franchise rights impairment charge would have increased by $7.5 million. In addition, one of the Company’s reporting units would have failed the step one impairment test for goodwill. Further, an approximate 5% decrease in the forecasted SAAR for 2009 to all-time record low levels would have resulted in an additional non-cash franchise rights impairment charge of $7.7 million. And, again, one of the Company’s reporting units would have failed the step one impairment test for goodwill. If the Company had performed a step two test with regards to this reporting unit, the application of the second step would have resulted in the assignment of fair value to other assets and liabilities. As a result, the Company believes that the implied shortfall in the residual of the reporting unit would have been substantially, or completely, eliminated, resulting in an insignificant impairment charge. However, if in future periods, the Company determines that the carrying amount of its net assets exceeds the respective fair value as a result of step one for any or all of its reporting units, the application of the second step of the impairment test could result in a material impairment charge to the goodwill associated with the reporting unit(s).

     During 2007, the Company recorded the following impairment charges, all of which are reflected in asset impairments in the accompanying statement of operations:

• As required by SFAS 142, the Company performed an annual review of the fair value of its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 2007. As a result of this assessment, the Company determined that the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights related to six dealerships did not exceed their carrying values and impairment charges were required. Accordingly, the Company recorded $9.2 million of pretax impairment charges during the fourth quarter of 2007.

• In accordance with SFAS 144, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever there is evidence that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. In connection with the Company’s sale of one of its dealership facilities, the Company recognized a $5.4 million pretax impairment charge, based upon the estimated fair market value as determined by a third-party appraisal. Further, primarily in connection with the disposal of several dealership franchises during 2007, the Company determined that the fair value of certain fixed assets was less than their carrying values and impairment charges were required. Accordingly, the Company recorded approximately $2.2 million of pretax impairment charges.

     During 2006, the Company recorded the following two impairment charges, all of which are reflected in asset impairments in the accompanying statement of operations:

25

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

• As required by SFAS 142, the Company performed an annual review of the fair value of its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 2006. As a result of this assessment, the Company determined that the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible franchise rights related to two of its domestic franchises did not exceed their carrying values and impairment charges were required. Accordingly, the Company recorded $1.4 million of pretax impairment charges during the fourth quarter of 2006.

• In accordance with SFAS 144, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever there is evidence that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. In connection with the then pending disposal of a dealership franchise, the Company determined that the fair value of certain of the fixed assets was less than their carrying values and impairment charges were required. Accordingly, the Company recorded $0.8 million of pretax impairment charges during the fourth quarter of 2006.

11. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

     On June 30, 2008, the Company sold three dealerships, with a total of seven franchises, in Albuquerque, New Mexico (the “Disposed Dealerships”), constituting the Company’s entire dealership holdings in that market. The disposal transaction resulted in a pretax loss of $0.7 million. The Disposed Dealerships are presented in the Company’s accompanying financial statements as discontinued operations. Revenues, cost of sales, operating expenses and income taxes attributable to the Disposed Dealerships have been aggregated to a single line in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for all periods presented, as follows:

	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
	2008			2007
	(In thousands)
Revenues	$	49,192		$	132,780
Loss on the sale of discontinued operations before income taxes		(3,481	)		(1,714	)
Income tax benefit		1,478			582
Net loss from discontinued operations	$	(2,003	)	$	(1,132	)

     Assets and liabilities of the Disposed Dealerships have been segregated from continuing operations and presented as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for all periods presented, as follows:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2008		2007
	(In thousands)
Current assets	$	—	$	28,515
Property, plant, and equipment, net		—		2,015
Other long term assets		—		1
Current liabilities		—		(27,317	)
Other long term liabilities		—		(7,863	)
Net liabilities of discontinued operations	$	—	$	(4,649	)

The Company allocates corporate level interest expense to discontinued operations based on the net assets of the discontinued operations.

26

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

12. DETAIL OF CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS

     Accounts and notes receivable consist of the following:

	December 31,
	2008		2007
	(In thousands)
Amounts due from manufacturers	$	36,139	$	42,749
Parts and service receivables		18,068		20,709
Finance and insurance receivables		12,293		16,076
Other		4,327		6,689
Total accounts and notes receivable		70,827		86,223
Less allowance for doubtful accounts		3,477		3,525
Accounts and notes receivable, net	$	67,350	$	82,698

     Inventories consist of the following:

	December 31,
	2008		2007
	(In thousands)
New vehicles	$	683,014	$	662,949
Used vehicles		65,216		115,935
Rental vehicles		47,803		46,898
Parts, accessories and other		49,911		52,386
Inventories	$	845,944	$	878,168

     Property and equipment consist of the following:

	Estimated
	Useful Lives		December 31,
	in Years		2008		2007
			(In thousands)
Land		—	$	181,460	$	137,344
Buildings		30 to 40		226,166		168,763
Leasehold improvements		7 to 15		70,850		58,663
Machinery and equipment		7 to 20		56,083		57,079
Furniture and fixtures		3 to 10		57,643		60,978
Company vehicles		3 to 5		10,945		11,338
Construction in progress				17,871		30,558
Total				621,018		524,723
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization				106,127		97,500
Property and equipment, net			$	514,891	$	427,223

     During 2008, the Company acquired $16.9 million of fixed assets associated with dealership acquisitions, including $11.7 million for land and $5.0 million for buildings. In addition to these acquisitions, the Company purchased $142.8 million of property and equipment, including $90.0 million for land and existing buildings.

27

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     During 2007, the Company acquired $84.1 million of fixed assets associated with dealership acquisitions, including $18.3 million for land and $56.7 million for buildings. In addition to these acquisitions, the Company purchased $146.7 million of property and equipment, including $76.3 million for land and existing buildings.

     Depreciation and amortization expense totaled approximately $25.7 million, $20.4 million, and $17.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

13. INTANGIBLE FRANCHISE RIGHTS AND GOODWILL

     The following is a roll-forward of the Company’s intangible franchise rights and goodwill accounts:

	Intangible
	Franchise Rights			Goodwill
	(in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	249,886		$	426,439
Additions through acquisitions		59,810			61,509
Disposals		—			(591	)
Impairments		(9,226	)		—
Realization of tax benefits		—			(582	)
Balance, December 31, 2007		300,470			486,775
Additions through acquisitions		6,836			15,807
Disposals		—			(765	)
Impairments		(151,849	)		—
Currency Translation		(860	)		(1,450	)
Realization of tax benefits		—			820
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	154,597		$	501,187

     The increase in goodwill is primarily related to the goodwill associated with the acquisition of two dealership franchises located in Annapolis, Maryland. The increase in goodwill was partially offset by reductions primarily related to the impact from currency translation adjustments related to our dealerships located in the UK.

     The decrease in our intangible franchise rights is primarily related to impairment charges incurred during the year 2008 reflecting the downturn in the markets and economy in which certain of our dealerships operate, increased risk premiums, as well as concern about the domestic manufacturers’ viability. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in intangible franchise rights primarily due to the acquisition discussed above. See Note 10 for further details regarding impairment charges incurred by the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

14. CREDIT FACILITIES

     Effective March 19, 2007, the Company entered into an amended and restated five-year revolving syndicated credit arrangement with 22 financial institutions, including three manufacturer-affiliated finance companies (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The Company also has a $300.0 million floorplan financing arrangement with Ford Motor Credit Company (the “FMCC Facility”), a $235.0 million Real Estate Credit Facility (the “Mortgage Facility”) for financing of real estate expansion, as well as arrangements with several other automobile manufacturers for financing of a portion of its rental vehicle inventory. Floorplan notes payable — credit facility reflects amounts payable for the purchase of specific new, used and rental vehicle inventory (with the exception of new and rental vehicle purchases financed through lenders affiliated with the respective manufacturer) whereby financing is provided by the Credit Facility. Floorplan notes payable — manufacturer affiliates reflects amounts payable for the purchase of specific new vehicles whereby financing is provided by the FMCC Facility and the financing of rental vehicle inventory with several other manufacturers. Payments on the floorplan notes payable are generally due as the vehicles are sold. As a result, these obligations are reflected on the accompanying balance sheet as current liabilities. The outstanding balances under these financing arrangements are as follows:

28

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

	December 31,
	2008		2007
	(In thousands)
Floorplan notes payable — credit facility
New vehicles	$	624,139	$	570,405
Used vehicles		56,196		69,686
Rental vehicles		13,357		8,378
Total	$	693,692	$	648,469
Floorplan notes payable — manufacturer affiliates
FMCC Facility	$	88,656	$	124,866
Other and rental vehicles		39,924		46,045
Total	$	128,580	$	170,911

Revolving Credit Facility

     In March 2007, the Company amended its revolving credit facility to provide a total borrowing capacity of $1.35 billion which matures in March 2012. The Company can expand the facility to its maximum commitment of $1.85 billion, subject to participating lender approval. This facility consists of two tranches: $1.0 billion for vehicle inventory floorplan financing, which we refer to as the Floorplan Line, and $350.0 million for working capital, including acquisitions, which we refer to as the Acquisition Line. Up to half of the Acquisition Line can be borrowed in either Euros or Pound Sterling. The capacity under the Acquisition Line can be redesignated to the Floorplan Line within the overall $1.35 billion commitment. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had redistributed $250.0 million of borrowing capacity from the Acquisition Line to the Floorplan Line. The Acquisition Line bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin that ranges from 150 to 225 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Floorplan Line bears interest at rates equal to LIBOR plus 87.5 basis points for new vehicle inventory and LIBOR plus 97.5 basis points for used vehicle inventory. In conjunction with the amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility, the Company capitalized $2.3 million of related costs that are being amortized over the term of the facility. In addition, the Company pays a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Acquisition Line. The first $37.5 million of available funds carry a 0.20% per annum commitment fee, while the balance of the available funds carry a commitment fee ranging from 0.35% to 0.50% per annum, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio and 0.20% commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility.

     As of December 31, 2008, after considering outstanding balances, the Company had $306.3 million of available floorplan capacity under the Floorplan Line. Included in the $306.3 million available balance under the Floorplan Line is $44.9 million of immediately available funds, resulting from payments made on our floorplan notes payable with excess cash. In addition, the weighted average interest rate on the Floorplan Line was 1.4% and 5.6% as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company had $50.0 million and $135.0 million outstanding in Acquisition Line borrowings at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. After considering the $50.0 million of borrowings outstanding and the $17.3 million of outstanding letters of credit, there was $106.0 million available as of December 31, 2008 under the Acquisition Line. The amount of available borrowings under the Acquisition Line may be limited from time to time based upon a borrowing base calculation within the debt covenants.

     All of the Company’s domestic dealership-owning subsidiaries are co-borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility contains a number of significant covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability to make disbursements outside of the ordinary course of business, dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, make investments and engage in mergers or consolidations. The Company is also required to comply with specified financial tests and ratios defined in the Revolving Credit Facility, such as fixed-charge coverage, current ratio, leverage, and a minimum net worth requirement, among others. Additionally, under the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility, the Company is limited in its ability to make cash dividend payments to its stockholders and to repurchase shares of its outstanding stock, based primarily on the quarterly net income of the Company. Effective January 17, 2008, the Company amended the Revolving Credit Facility to, among other things, increase the limit on both the senior secured leverage and total leverage ratios, as well as to add a borrowing base calculation that governs the amount of borrowings available under the Acquisition Line. As of December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these covenants and was limited to a total of $84.1 million for dividends or share

29

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

repurchases, before consideration of additional amounts that may become available in the future based on a percentage of net income and future equity issuances. Based upon its current operating and financial projections, the Company believes that it will remain compliant with such covenants in the future. The Company’s obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured by essentially all of the Company’s domestic personal property (other than equity interests in dealership-owning subsidiaries) including all vehicle inventory (excluding Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicle inventory) and proceeds from the disposition of dealership-owning subsidiaries.

Ford Motor Company Credit Facility

     The FMCC Facility provides for the financing of, and is collateralized by, the Company’s entire Ford, Lincoln and Mercury new vehicle inventory. This arrangement provides for $300.0 million of floorplan financing and matures on December 16, 2009. After considering the above outstanding balance, the Company had $211.3 million of available floorplan capacity under the FMCC Facility as of December 31, 2008. This facility bears interest at a rate of Prime plus 150 basis points minus certain incentives. However, the Prime rate is defined to be a minimum of 4.0%. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the interest rate on the FMCC Facility was 5.50% and 8.33%, respectively, before considering the applicable incentives. After considering all incentives received during 2008, the total cost to the Company of borrowings under the FMCC Facility approximates what the cost would be under the floorplan portion of the Credit Facility.

Real Estate Credit Facility

     On March 30, 2007, the Company entered into a five-year term real estate credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. (the “Mortgage Facility”), initially providing $75.0 million of financing for real estate expansion. In April 2007, the Company amended the Mortgage Facility expanding its maximum commitment to $235.0 million and syndicating the facility with nine financial institutions. The proceeds of the Mortgage Facility are used primarily for acquisitions of real property and vehicle dealerships. The facility matures in March 2012. At the Company’s option, any loan under the Mortgage Facility will bear interest at a rate equal to (i) one month LIBOR plus 1.05% or (ii) the Base Rate plus 0.50%. Quarterly principal payments are required of each loan outstanding under the facility at an amount equal to one eightieth of the original principal amount. As of December 31, 2008, borrowings under the facility totaled $178.0 million, with $9.4 million recorded as a current maturity of long-term debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In January 2008, we purchased the real estate associated with four of our existing dealership operations, financing the majority of the transactions through Mortgage Facility borrowings of $43.3 million. The Company capitalized $1.3 million of related debt financing costs that are being amortized over the term of the facility.

     The Mortgage Facility is guaranteed by the Company and essentially all of the existing and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries of the Company which guarantee or are required to guarantee the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility. So long as no default exists, the Company is entitled to sell any property subject to the facility on fair and reasonable terms in an arm’s length transaction, remove it from the facility, repay in full the entire outstanding balance of the loan relating to such sold property, and then increase the available borrowings under the Mortgage Facility by the amount of such loan repayment. Each loan is secured by real property (and improvements related thereto) specified by the Company and located at or near a vehicle dealership operated by a subsidiary of the Company or otherwise used or to be used by a vehicle dealership operated by a subsidiary of the Company. As of December 31, 2008, available borrowings from the Mortgage Facility totaled $57.0 million.

     The Mortgage Facility contains certain covenants, including financial ratios that must be complied with: fixed charge coverage ratio; senior secured leverage ratio; dispositions of financed properties; ownership of equity interests in a lessor subsidiary; and occupancy or sublease of any financed property. Effective January 16, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment to the Mortgage Facility to increase the senior secured leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. Based upon its current operating and financial projections, the Company believes that it will remain compliant with such covenants in the future.

Other Credit Facilities

     On February 28, 2007, the DaimlerChrysler Facility matured. The facility provided for up to $300.0 million of financing for our entire Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Mercedes-Benz new vehicle inventory. The Company elected not to renew the DaimlerChrysler Facility and used available funds from our Floorplan Line to pay off the outstanding balance on the maturity date. The Company continues to use the Floorplan Line to finance our Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Mercedes-Benz new vehicle inventory.

30

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     Excluding rental vehicles financed through the Revolving Credit Facility, financing for rental vehicles is typically obtained directly from the automobile manufacturers. These financing arrangements generally require small monthly payments and mature in varying amounts between 2009 and 2010. The weighted average interest rate charged as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, was 4.1% and 5.8%, respectively. Rental vehicles are typically moved to used vehicle inventory when they are removed from rental service and repayment of the borrowing is required at that time.

     As discussed more fully in Note 2, the Company receives interest assistance from certain automobile manufacturers. The assistance has ranged from approximately 50% to 103% of the Company’s floorplan interest expense over the past three years.

Interest Rate Risk Management Activities

          The periodic interest rates of the Revolving Credit Facility and the Mortgage Facility are indexed to 1-month LIBOR rates plus an associated company credit risk rate. In order to stabilize exposure related to fluctuations in these rates, the Company employs an interest rate hedging strategy, whereby it enters into arrangements with various financial institutional counterparties with investment grade credit ratings, swapping its variable interest rate exposure for a fixed interest rate over the same terms as the Revolving Credit Facility and the Mortgage Facility.

          The Company accounts for these derivatives under SFAS 133, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments. The Company reflects the current fair value of all derivatives on its consolidated balance sheet. The related gains or losses on these transactions are deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income in the period in which the related items being hedged are recognized in expense; however, to the extent that the change in value of a derivative contract does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the items being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in income. Monthly contractual settlements of these swap positions are recognized as Floorplan interest expense in the Company’s accompanying consolidated statement of operations. All of the Company’s interest rate hedges are designated as cash flow hedges.

     During 2008, the Company entered into two interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $75.0 million. One swap, with $50.0 million in notional value, effectively locks in a rate of approximately 3.7% and expires in August 2011 and the other with $25.0 million in notional value, effectively locks in a rate of approximately 3.1% and expires in March 2012. During 2007, we entered into eight interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $225.0 million. One swap with $50.0 million in notional value effectively locks in a rate of approximately 5.3%, and the remaining seven swaps with a notional value of $25.0 million each effectively lock in interest rates ranging from approximately 4.2% to 5.3%. All of the swaps entered in 2007 expire in the latter half of the year 2012. In January 2006, we entered into one interest rate swap with a notional value of $50.0 million which effectively fixes a rate of 4.7% and expires in December 2010.

     Included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are unrealized losses, net of income taxes, related to hedges totaling $27.9 million and $10.1 million, respectively. The income statement impact from interest rate hedges was a $9.8 million increase, $1.1 million reduction and $0.5 million reduction in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, all of the Company’s derivative contracts were determined to be highly effective, and no ineffective portion was recognized in income. Refer to Note 16 for a discussion around the fair value technique for the Company’s interest rate derivative instruments.

15. LONG-TERM DEBT

     Long-term debt consists of the following:

31

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

	December 31,
	2008		2007
	(In thousands)
2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2036 (principal of $224,500 and $287,500, respectively)	$	155,333	$	190,243
8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (principal of $74,600 and and $102,890, respectively)		72,962		100,273
Acquisition line (see Note 14)		50,000		135,000
Mortgage Facility (see Note 14)		177,998		131,317
Capital leases and various notes payable, maturing in varying amounts through April 2023 with a weighted average interest rate of 3.3% and 1.4%, respectively		94,024		38,593
	$	550,317	$	595,426
Less current maturities		13,594		12,260
	$	536,723	$	583,166

2.25% Notes

     On June 26, 2006, the Company issued $287.5 million aggregate principal amount of 2.25% Notes at par in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. The 2.25% Notes bear interest at a rate of 2.25% per year until June 15, 2016, and at a rate of 2.00% per year thereafter. Interest on the 2.25% Notes are payable semiannually in arrears in cash on June 15^th and December 15^th of each year. The 2.25% Notes mature on June 15, 2036, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased.

     The Company may not redeem the 2.25% Notes before June 20, 2011. On or after that date, but prior to June 15, 2016, the Company may redeem all or part of the 2.25% Notes if the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price then in effect for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day prior to the date on which the Company mails the redemption notice. On or after June 15, 2016, the Company may redeem all or part of the 2.25% Notes at any time. Any redemption of the 2.25% Notes will be for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the 2.25% Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. Holders of the 2.25% Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the 2.25% Notes on each of June 15, 2016, and June 15, 2026. In addition, if the Company experiences specified types of fundamental changes, holders of the 2.25% Notes may require the Company to repurchase the 2.25% Notes. Any repurchase of the 2.25% Notes pursuant to these provisions will be for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2.25% Notes to be repurchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date.

     The holders of the 2.25% Notes who convert their notes in connection with a change in control, or in the event that the Company’s common stock ceases to be listed, as defined in the Indenture for the 2.25% Notes (the “Indenture”), may be entitled to a make-whole premium in the form of an increase in the conversion rate. Additionally, if one of these events were to occur, the holders of the 2.25% Notes may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2.25% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

     The 2.25% Notes are convertible into cash and, if applicable, common stock based on an initial conversion rate of 16.8267 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2.25% Notes (which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $59.43 per common share) subject to adjustment, under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter (and only during such calendar quarter) beginning after September 30, 2006, if the closing price of the Company’s common stock for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is equal to or more than 130% of the applicable conversion price per share (such threshold closing price initially being $77.259); (2) during the five business day period after any ten consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per 2.25% Note for each day of the ten day trading period was less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock and the

32

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

conversion rate of the 2.25% Notes; (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions set forth in the Indenture; and (4) if the Company calls the 2.25% Notes for redemption. Upon conversion, a holder will receive an amount in cash and common shares of the Company’s common stock, determined in the manner set forth in the Indenture. Upon any conversion of the 2.25% Notes, the Company will deliver to converting holders a settlement amount comprised of cash and, if applicable, shares of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion value determined by multiplying the then applicable conversion rate by a volume weighted price of the Company’s common stock on each trading day in a specified 25 trading day observation period. In general, as described more fully in the Indenture, converting holders will receive, in respect of each $1,000 principal amount of notes being converted, the conversion value in cash up to $1,000 and the excess, if any, of the conversion value over $1,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock.

     The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2.25% Notes were used to repay borrowings under the Floorplan Line of the Company’s Credit Facility, which may be re-borrowed; to repurchase 933,800 shares of the Company’s common stock for approximately $50.0 million; and to pay the approximate $35.7 million net cost of the purchased options and warrant transactions described below. Underwriter’s fees, recorded as a reduction of the 2.25% Notes balance, totaled approximately $6.4 million and are being amortized over a period of ten years (the point at which the holders can first require the Company to redeem the 2.25% Notes). The amount to be amortized each period is calculated using the effective interest method. Debt issue costs, recorded in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets, totaled $0.3 million and are also being amortized over a period of ten years using the effective interest method.

     The 2.25% Notes rank equal in right of payment to all of the Company’s other existing and future senior indebtedness. The 2.25% Notes are not guaranteed by any of the Company’s subsidiaries and, accordingly, are structurally subordinated to all of the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.

     In connection with the issuance of the 2.25% Notes, the Company purchased ten-year call options on its common stock (the “Purchased Options”). Under the terms of the Purchased Options, which become exercisable upon conversion of the 2.25% Notes, the Company has the right to purchase a total of approximately 4.8 million shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $59.43 per share. The total cost of the Purchased Options was $116.3 million, which was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in 2006, in accordance with SFAS 133, as amended, EITF No. 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock,” and EITF No. 01-6, “The Meaning of ‘Indexed to a Company’s Own Stock’.” The cost of the Purchased Options will be deductible as original issue discount for income tax purposes over the expected life of the 2.25% Notes (ten years); therefore, the Company established a deferred tax asset, with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital in 2006.

     In addition to the purchase of the Purchased Options, the Company sold warrants in separate transactions (the “Warrants”). These Warrants have a ten year term and enable the holders to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock from the Company. The Warrants are exercisable for a maximum of 4.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $80.31 per share, subject to adjustment for quarterly dividends in excess of $0.14 per quarter, liquidation, bankruptcy, or a change in control of the Company and other conditions, including the failure by the Company to deliver registered securities to the purchasers upon exercise. Subject to these adjustments, the maximum amount of shares of the Company’s common stock that could be required to be issued under the warrants is 9.7 million shares. On exercise of the Warrants, the Company will settle the difference between the then market price and the strike price of the Warrants in shares of its Common Stock. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants were $80.6 million, which were recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital in 2006, in accordance with SFAS 133, EITF No. 00-19 and EITF No. 01-6.

     In accordance with EITF No. 00-19, future changes in the Company’s share price will have no effect on the carrying value of the Purchased Options or the Warrants. The Purchased Options and the Warrants are subject to early expiration upon the occurrence of certain events that may or may not be within the Company’s control. Should there be an early termination of the Purchased Options or the Warrants prior to the conversion of the 2.25% Notes from an event outside of the Company’s control, the amount of shares potentially due to or due from the Company under the Purchased Options or the Warrants will be based solely on the Company’s common stock price, and the amount of time remaining on the Purchased Options or the Warrants and will be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock. The Purchased Option and Warrant transactions were designed to increase the conversion price per share of the Company’s common stock from $59.43 to $80.31 (a 50% premium to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date that the 2.25% Notes were priced to investors) and, therefore, mitigate the potential dilution of the Company’s common stock upon conversion of the 2.25% Notes, if any.

33

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

     For dilutive earnings per share calculations, we will be required to include the dilutive effect, if applicable, of the net shares issuable under the 2.25% Notes and the Warrants. Since the average price of the Company’s common stock from the date of issuance through December 31, 2008, was less than $59.43, no net shares were issuable under the 2.25% Notes and the Warrants. Although the Purchased Options have the economic benefit of decreasing the dilutive effect of the 2.25% Notes, such shares are excluded from our dilutive shares outstanding as the impact would be anti-dilutive.

     On September 1, 2006, the Company registered the 2.25% Notes and the issuance by the Company of the maximum number of shares which may be issued upon the conversion of the 2.25% Notes (4.8 million common shares) on a Form S-3 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with The Securities Act of 1933.

     During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company began to repurchase a portion of its 2.25% Notes. In addition, the Company adopted APB 14-1 on January 1, 2009 and retrospectively adjusted the financial statements for the years 2006 through 2008, including the accounting impact from the repurchased 2.25% Notes. Refer to Note 2 for a discussion of the implementation of APB 14-1 and the repurchase of the 2.25% Notes during 2008.

8.25% Notes

     During August 2003, the Company issued 8.25% senior subordinated notes due 2013 (the “8.25% Notes”) with a face amount of $150.0 million. The 8.25% Notes pay interest semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 each year, beginning February 15, 2004. Including the effects of discount and issue cost amortization, the effective interest rate is approximately 8.9%. The 8.25% Notes have the following redemption provisions:

• The Company was allowed to, prior to August 15, 2008, redeem all or a portion of the 8.25% Notes at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus a make-whole premium plus accrued interest.

• The Company may, during the twelve-month periods beginning August 15, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and thereafter, redeem all or a portion of the 8.25% Notes at redemption prices of 104.125%, 102.750%, 101.375% and 100.000%, respectively, of the principal amount plus accrued interest.

     Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (the parent company) has no independent assets or operations and the 8.25% Notes are jointly, severally, fully, and unconditionally guaranteed, on an unsecured senior subordinated basis, by all subsidiaries of the Company, other than certain foreign subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). All of the Subsidiary Guarantors are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company (see Note 18). Additionally, the 8.25% Notes are subject to various financial and other covenants, including restrictions on paying cash dividends and repurchasing shares of its common stock, which must be maintained by the Company. As of December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

     At the time of the issuance of the 8.25% Notes, the Company incurred certain costs, which are included as deferred financing costs in Other Assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Unamortized deferred financing costs at December 31, 2008 and 2007, totaled $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The 8.25% Notes are presented net of unamortized discount of $1.6 million and $2.6 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

     During 2008, the Company repurchased approximately $28.3 million par value of the 8.25% Notes and realized a net gain on redemption of approximately $0.9 million.

Real Estate Notes

     In March 2008, the Company executed a series of four note agreements with a third-party financial institution for an aggregate principal of $18.6 million (the “March 2008 Real Estate Notes”), of which one matures in May 2010, and the remaining three mature in June 2010. The March 2008 Real Estate Notes pay interest monthly at various rates ranging from approximately 5.2% to 7.0%. The proceeds from the March 2008 Real Estate Notes were utilized to facilitate the acquisition of a dealership-related building and the associated land. The cumulative outstanding balance of these notes totaled $18.1 million as of December 31, 2008.

     In June 2008, the Company executed a bridge loan agreement with a third-party financial institution for an aggregate principal of approximately $15.0 million (the “June 2008 Real Estate Note”) that was scheduled to mature in

34

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

September 2008. The June 2008 Real Estate Note accrued interest monthly at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.5%. The proceeds from the June 2008 Real Estate Note were utilized to facilitate the acquisition of a dealership-related building and the associated land. In July 2008, the Company renegotiated the terms of the June 2008 Real Estate Note to extend the maturity date to July 2010 and amend the annual interest rate to LIBOR plus 1.65%. The outstanding balance of this note as of December 31, 2008 was $14.5 million.

     In October 2008, the Company executed a note agreement with a third-party financial institution for an aggregate principal amount of £10.0 million (the “Foreign Note”), which is secured by the Company’s foreign subsidiary properties. The Foreign Note is to be repaid in monthly installments beginning in March 2010 and matures in August 2018. Interest is payable on the outstanding balance at an annual rate of 1.0% plus the higher of the three-month Sterling BBA Libor rate or 3.0% per year.

Capital Leases

     During 2008, the Company sold and leased back the property and building related to one of its dealership facilities under a long-term lease arrangement with a third-party. In addition, the Company also sold and leased back property and buildings related to one of its dealership facilities under a long-term lease to a party that was formerly related to the Company, based upon contractual commitments entered into when the parties were related. These leases have been accounted for as capital leases, resulting in the recognition of $14.7 million of capital lease assets and obligations, which are included in Property and Equipment and Capital Lease Obligations Related to Real Estate, respectively, in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The outstanding balance of these capital leases as of December 31, 2008 was $14.2 million.

All Long-Term Debt

     Total interest expense on the 2.25% Notes and the 8.25% Notes for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $13.4 million, $16.9 million and $15.3 million, excluding amortization cost of $8.8 million, $8.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively. Included in total interest expense, as a result of the adoption of APB 14-1, is an increase of $7.9 million, $7.3 million and $3.5 million of non-cash interest for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

     Total interest expense on the Mortgage Facility and Acquisition Line for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, was approximately $10.2 million, $6.3 million and $1.0 million, excluding amortization cost of $0.6 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

     Total interest incurred on various other notes payable, which were included in long-term debt on the accompanying balance sheets, was approximately $1.1 million, of which $0.7 million and $0.4 million related to our March 2008 and June 2008 Real Estate Notes for the year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, the Company incurred $3.7 million, $1.8 million and $1.2 million of total interest expense related to capital leases and other various notes payable for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     The Company capitalized approximately $1.0 million, $2.0 million, and $0.7 million of interest on construction projects in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     The aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are as follows (in thousands):

2009	$	13,594
2010		43,969
2011		13,676
2012		204,199
2013		77,384
Thereafter		262,771
	$	615,593

16. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

     SFAS 157, which the Company prospectively adopted on January 1, 2008, defines fair value as the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 requires disclosure of the extent to which fair value is used to measure financial assets and liabilities, the inputs utilized in calculating valuation measurements, and the effect of the measurement of significant unobservable inputs on earnings, or changes in net assets, as of the measurement date. SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy based upon the transparency of inputs utilized in the measurement and valuation of financial assets or liabilities as of the measurement date:

35

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

• Level 1 — unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

• Level 2 — quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation; and

• Level 3 — unobservable inputs based upon the reporting entity’s internally developed assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

     The Company evaluated its financial assets and liabilities for those that met the criteria of the disclosure requirements and fair value framework of SFAS 157. The Company identified investments in marketable securities and debt instruments and interest rate financial derivative instruments as having met such criteria.

     Marketable Securities and Debt Instruments

     The Company accounts for its investments in marketable securities and debt instruments under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Instruments (as amended),” which established standards of financial accounting and reporting for investments in equity instruments that have readily determinable fair values and for all investments in debt securities. Accordingly, the Company designates these investments as available-for-sale, measures them at fair value and classifies them as either Cash and cash equivalents or Other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets based upon maturity terms and certain contractual restrictions.

     The Company maintains multiple trust accounts comprised of money market funds with short-term investments in marketable securities, such as U.S. government securities, commercial paper and bankers acceptances, that have maturities of less than three months. The Company determined that the valuation measurement inputs of these marketable securities represent unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and, accordingly, has classified such investments within Level 1 of the SFAS 157 hierarchy framework.

     Also within its trust accounts, the Company holds investments in debt instruments, such as government obligations and other fixed income securities. The debt securities are measured based upon quoted market prices utilizing public information, independent external valuations from pricing services or third-party advisors. Accordingly, the Company has concluded the valuation measurement inputs of these debt securities to represent, at their lowest level, quoted market prices for identical or similar assets in markets where there are few transactions for the assets and has categorized such investments within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 hierarchy framework.

     Interest Rate Derivative Instruments

     As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company utilizes an interest rate hedging strategy in order to stabilize earnings exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates. The Company measures its interest rate derivative instruments utilizing an income approach valuation technique, converting future amounts of cash flows to a single present value in order to obtain a transfer exit price within the bid and ask spread that is most representative of the fair value of its derivative instruments. In measuring fair value, the Company utilizes the option-pricing Black-Scholes present value technique for all of its derivative instruments. This option-pricing technique utilizes a LIBOR forward yield curve, obtained from an independent external service provider, matched to the identical maturity term of the instrument being measured. Observable inputs utilized in the income approach valuation technique incorporate identical contractual notional amounts, fixed coupon rates, periodic terms for interest payments and contract maturity. The Company has determined the valuation measurement inputs of these derivative instruments to maximize the use of observable inputs that market participants would use in pricing similar or identical instruments and market data obtained from independent sources, which is readily observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the derivative instrument. Further, the valuation measurement inputs minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Accordingly, the Company has classified the derivatives within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 hierarchy framework.

     The fair value of our short-term investments, debt securities and interest rate derivative instruments as of December 31, 2008 were as follows:

36

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets
Short-term investments	$	3,790	$	—		$	—	$	3,790
Debt securities		—		6,139			—		6,139
Total	$	3,790	$	6,139		$	—	$	9,929
Liabilities
Interest rate derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	(44,655	)	$	—	$	(44,655	)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

     Legal Proceedings

     From time to time, our dealerships are named in various types of litigation involving customer claims, employment matters, class action claims, purported class action claims, as well as, claims involving the manufacturer of automobiles, contractual disputes and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Due to the nature of the automotive retailing business, we may be involved in legal proceedings or suffer losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business. In the normal course of business, we are required to respond to customer, employee and other third-party complaints. In addition, the manufacturers of the vehicles we sell and service have audit rights allowing them to review the validity of amounts claimed for incentive, rebate or warranty-related items and charge us back for amounts determined to be invalid rewards under the manufacturers’ programs, subject to our right to appeal any such decision. Amounts that have been accrued or paid related to the settlement of litigation are included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.

     Through relationships with insurance companies, our dealerships sold credit insurance policies to our vehicle customers and received payments for these services. Recently, allegations have been made against insurance companies with which we do business that they did not have adequate monitoring processes in place and, as a result, failed to remit to credit insurance policyholders the appropriate amount of unearned premiums when the policy was cancelled in conjunction with early payoffs of the associated loan balance. Some of our dealerships have received notice from insurance companies advising us that they have entered into settlement agreements and indicating that the insurance companies expect the dealerships to return commissions on the dealerships’ portion of the premiums that are required to be refunded to customers. To date, the Company has paid out $1.5 million in the aggregate to settle its contractual obligations with the insurance companies. The commissions received on the sale of credit insurance products are deferred and recognized as revenue over the life of the policies, in accordance with SFAS No. 60. As such, a portion of this pay-out was offset against deferred revenue, while the remainder was recognized as a finance and insurance chargeback expense in 2008 and 2007. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses that it will pursue for a portion of these chargebacks, but anticipates paying some additional amount of claims or probable settlements in the future. However, the exact amounts cannot be determined with any certainty at this time.

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, we are not a party to any legal proceedings, including class action lawsuits to which we are a party that, individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

     Other Matters

     The Company, acting through its subsidiaries, is the lessee under many real estate leases that provide for the use by the Company’s subsidiaries of their respective dealership premises. Pursuant to these leases, the Company’s subsidiaries generally agree to indemnify the lessor and other parties from certain liabilities arising as a result of the use of the leased premises, including environmental liabilities, or a breach of the lease by the lessee. Additionally, from time to time, the Company enters into agreements in connection with the sale of assets or businesses in which it agrees to indemnify the purchaser, or other parties, from certain liabilities or costs arising in connection with the assets or business. Also, in the ordinary course of business in connection with purchases or sales of goods and services, the

37

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

Company enters into agreements that may contain indemnification provisions. In the event that an indemnification claim is asserted, liability would be limited by the terms of the applicable agreement.

     From time to time, primarily in connection with dealership dispositions, the Company’s subsidiaries assign or sublet to the dealership purchaser the subsidiaries’ interests in any real property leases associated with such stores. In general, the Company’s subsidiaries retain responsibility for the performance of certain obligations under such leases to the extent that the assignee or sublessee does not perform, whether such performance is required prior to or following the assignment or subletting of the lease. Additionally, the Company and its subsidiaries generally remain subject to the terms of any guarantees made by the Company and its subsidiaries in connection with such leases. Although the Company generally has indemnification rights against the assignee or sublessee in the event of non-performance under these leases, as well as certain defenses, and the Company presently has no reason to believe that it or its subsidiaries will be called on to perform under any such assigned leases or subleases, the Company estimates that lessee rental payment obligations during the remaining terms of these leases are approximately $31.4 million at December 31, 2008. The Company and its subsidiaries also may be called on to perform other obligations under these leases, such as environmental remediation of the leased premises or repair of the leased premises upon termination of the lease, although the Company presently has no reason to believe that it or its subsidiaries will be called on to so perform and such obligations cannot be quantified at this time. The Company’s exposure under these leases is difficult to estimate and there can be no assurance that any performance of the Company or its subsidiaries required under these leases would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and cash flows.

38

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     The following tables include condensed consolidating financial information as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for the years then ended for Group 1 Automotive, Inc.’s (as issuer of the 8.25% Notes) guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries (representing foreign entities). The condensed consolidating financial information includes certain allocations of balance sheet, income statement and cash flow items that are not necessarily indicative of the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of these entities on a stand-alone basis.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2008

						Group 1 Automotive,		Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Total Company		Elimination			Inc.		Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries
	(In thousands)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,144	$	—		$	—	$	22,598		$	546
Accounts and other receivables, net		170,184		—			—		167,975			2,209
Inventories		845,944		—			—		835,447			10,497
Deferred and other current assets		57,352		—			—		44,100			13,252
Total current assets		1,096,624		—			—		1,070,120			26,504
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net		514,891		—			—		494,616			20,275
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES		655,784		—			—		649,520			6,264
INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES		—		(868,547	)		868,547		—			—
OTHER ASSETS		20,815		—			2,844		3,951			14,020
Total assets	$	2,288,114	$	(868,547	)	$	871,391	$	2,218,207		$	67,063
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Floorplan notes payable — credit facility	$	693,692	$	—		$	—	$	693,692		$	—
Floorplan notes payable — manufacturer affiliates		128,580		—			—		123,094			5,486
Current maturities of long-term debt		13,594		—			—		13,445			149
Accounts payable		74,235		—			—		65,864			8,371
Intercompany accounts payable		—		—			171,164		(156,836	)		(14,328	)
Accrued expenses		94,395		—			—		92,704			1,691
Total current liabilities		1,004,496		—			171,164		831,963			1,369
LONG TERM DEBT, net of current maturities		536,723		—			—		522,204			14,519
LIABILITIES FROM INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES		44,655		—			—		44,655			—
DEFERRED AND OTHER LIABILITIES		29,903		—			—		28,104			1,799
Total liabilities before deferred revenues		1,615,777		—			171,164		1,426,926			17,687
DEFERRED REVENUES		10,220		—			—		1,514			8,706
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		662,117		(868,547	)		700,227		789,767			40,670
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,288,114	$	(868,547	)	$	871,391	$	2,218,207		$	67,063

39

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2007

						Group 1 Automotive,		Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Total Company		Elimination			Inc		Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries
						(In thousands)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	34,248	$	—		$	—	$	33,633		$	615
Accounts and other receivables, net		272,098		—			—		266,844			5,254
Inventories		878,168		—			—		859,396			18,772
Assets related to discontinued operations		30,531		—			—		30,531			—
Deferred and other current assets		47,938		—			—		34,984			12,954
Total current assets		1,262,983		—			—		1,225,388			37,595
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net		427,223		—			—		399,148			28,075
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES		787,245		—			—		778,793			8,452
INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES		—		(784,623	)		784,623		—			—
OTHER ASSETS		28,653		—			2,884		4,777			20,992
Total assets	$	2,506,104	$	(784,623	)	$	787,507	$	2,408,106		$	95,114
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Floorplan notes payable — credit facility	$	648,469	$	—		$	—	$	648,469		$	—
Floorplan notes payable — manufacturer affiliates		170,911		—			—		162,219			8,692
Current maturities of long-term debt		12,260		—			—		8,000			4,260
Accounts payable		111,458		—			—		98,962			12,496
Intercompany accounts payable		—		—			36,183		(36,183	)		—
Liabilities related to discontinued operations		35,180		—			—		35,180			—
Accrued expenses		100,000		—			—		98,746			1,254
Total current liabilities		1,078,278		—			36,183		1,015,393			26,702
LONG TERM DEBT, net of current maturities		583,166		—			—		582,895			271
LIABILITIES FROM INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES		16,188		—			—		16,188			—
DEFERRED AND OTHER LIABILITIES		70,176		—			—		68,277			1,899
Total liabilities before deferred revenues		1,747,808		—			36,183		1,682,753			28,872
DEFERRED REVENUES		16,531		—			—		2,098			14,433
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		741,765		(784,623	)		751,324		723,255			51,809
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,506,104	$	(784,623	)	$	787,507	$	2,408,106		$	95,114

40

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2008

						Group 1 Automotive,			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Total Company			Elimination		Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries
						(In thousands)
Revenue	$	5,654,087		$	—	$	—		$	5,490,885		$	163,202
Cost of Sales		4,738,426			—		—			4,596,663			141,763
Gross profit		915,661			—		—			894,222			21,439
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		739,430			—		3,037			718,076			18,317
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSE		25,652			—		—			24,313			1,339
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS		163,023			—		—			162,525			498
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		(12,444	)		—		(3,037	)		(10,692	)		1,285
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Floorplan interest expense		(46,377	)		—		—			(45,283	)		(1,094	)
Other interest expense, net		(36,783	)		—		—			(36,474	)		(309	)
Gain on redemption of senior subordinated and convertible notes		18,126			—		—			18,126			—
Other income (expense), net		302			—		—			305			(3	)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		—			44,976		(44,976	)		—			—
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(77,176	)		44,976		(48,013	)		(74,018	)		(121	)
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES		(31,166	)		—		—			(31,168	)		2
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(46,010	)		44,976		(48,013	)		(42,850	)		(123	)
LOSS RELATED TO DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		(2,003	)		—		—			(2,003	)		—
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(48,013	)	$	44,976	$	(48,013	)	$	(44,853	)	$	(123	)

41

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2007

	Total						Group 1 Automotive,			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Company			Elimination			Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries
							(In thousands)
Revenue	$	6,260,217		$	—		$	—		$	6,086,118		$	174,099
Cost of Sales		5,285,750			—			—			5,134,653			151,097
Gross profit		974,467			—			—			951,465			23,002
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		758,877			—			1,253			740,365			17,259
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSE		20,438			—			—			19,089			1,349
ASSET IMPAIRMENTS		16,784			—			—			16,784			—
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		178,368			—			(1,253	)		175,227			4,394
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Floorplan interest expense		(46,822	)		—			—			(46,007	)		(815	)
Other interest expense, net		(30,068	)		—			—			(29,688	)		(380	)
Loss on redemption of senior subordinated and convertible notes		(1,598	)		—			—			(1,598	)		—
Other income, net		560			—			—			531			29
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		—			(64,668	)		64,668			—			—
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		100,440			(64,668	)		63,415			98,465			3,228
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		35,893			—			—			34,810			1,083
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		64,547			(64,668	)		63,415			63,655			2,145
LOSS RELATED TO DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		(1,132	)		—			—			(1,132	)		—
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	63,415		$	(64,668	)	$	63,415		$	62,523		$	2,145

42

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2008

				Group 1 Automotive,			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Total Company			Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries
				(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, from continuing operations	$	183,746		$	(3,037	)	$	195,462		$	(8,679	)
Net cash used in operating activities, from discontinued operations		(13,373	)		—			(13,373	)		—
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment		(142,834	)		—			(141,621	)		(1,213	)
Cash paid in acquisitions, net of cash received		(48,602	)		—			(48,602	)		—
Proceeds from sales of franchises, property and equipment		25,234			—			23,897			1,337
Other		1,490			—			224			1,266
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities, from continuing operations		(164,712	)		—			(166,102	)		1,390
Net cash provided by investing activities, from discontinued operations		23,051			—			23,051			—
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings on credit facility — Floorplan Line		5,118,757			—			5,118,757			—
Repayments on credit facility — Floorplan Line		(5,074,782	)		—			(5,074,782	)		—
Repayments on credit facility — Acquisition Line		(245,000	)		—			(245,000	)		—
Borrowings on credit facility — Acquisition Line		160,000			—			160,000			—
Borrowings on mortgage facility		54,625			—			54,625			—
Repurchase of long-term debt		(52,761	)		—			(52,761	)		—
Borrowings of long-term debt related to real estate purchases		50,171			—			33,627			16,544
Dividends paid		(10,955	)		(10,955	)		—			—
Principal payments on mortgage facility		(7,944	)		—			(7,944	)		—
Principal payments of long-term debt		(7,449	)		—			(3,167	)		(4,282	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to benefit plans		3,201			3,201			—			—
Borrowings on other facilities for acquisitions		1,490			—			1,490			—
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		(1,099	)		—			(1,099	)		—
Repurchases of common stock, amounts based on settlement date		(776	)		(776	)		—			—
Debt issue costs		(365	)		—			(365	)		—
Borrowings (repayments) with subsidiaries		—			178,575			(178,575	)		—
Investment In subsidiaries		—			(176,496	)		175,687			809
Distributions to parent		—			9,488			(9,463	)		(25	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities, from continuing operations		(12,887	)		3,037			(28,970	)		13,046
Net cash used in financing activities, from discontinued operations		(21,103	)		—			(21,103	)		—
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		(5,826	)		—			—			(5,826	)
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(11,104	)		—			(11,035	)		(69	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		34,248			—			33,633			615
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	23,144		$	—		$	22,598		$	546

43

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2007

				Group 1 Automotive,			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Total Company			Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries
	(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, from continuing operations	$	10,997		$	(1,253	)	$	(465	)	$	12,715
Net cash used in operating activities, from discontinued operations	$	(3,431	)	$	—		$	(3,431	)	$	—
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment		(146,498	)		—			(146,323	)		(175	)
Cash paid in acquisitions, net of cash received		(281,834	)		—			(232,417	)		(49,417	)
Proceeds from sales of franchises, property and equipment		32,708			—			32,708			—
Other		2,658			—			2,800			(142	)
Net cash used in investing activities, from continuing operations		(392,966	)		—			(343,232	)		(49,734	)
Net cash used in investing activities, from discontinued operations		(199	)		—			(199	)		—
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings on credit facility — Floorplan Line		5,493,645			—			5,493,645			—
Repayments on credit facility — Floorplan Line		(5,268,183	)		—			(5,268,183	)		—
Borrowings on credit facility — Acquisition Line		170,000			—			170,000			—
Borrowings on mortgage facility		133,684			—			133,684			—
Repurchases of common stock, amounts based on settlement date		(63,039	)		(63,039	)		—			—
Repurchase of long-term debt		(36,865	)		—			(36,865	)		—
Repayments on credit facility — Acquisition Line		(35,000	)		—			(35,000	)		—
Dividends paid		(13,284	)		(13,284	)		—			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to benefit plans		5,038			5,038			—			—
Principal payments on mortgage facility		(2,367	)		—			(2,367	)		—
Principal payments of long-term debt		(1,861	)		—			(1,189	)		(672	)
Debt issue costs		(3,630	)		—			(3,630	)		—
Repayments on other facilities for divestitures		(2,498	)		—			(2,498	)		—
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		150			—			150			—
Borrowings (repayments) with subsidiaries		—			57,518			(57,518	)		—
Investment In subsidiaries		—			(82,616	)		41,832			40,784
Distributions to parent		—			97,636			(94,836	)		(2,800	)
Net cash provided by financing activities, from continuing operations		375,790			1,253			337,225			37,312
Net cash provided by financing activities, from discontinued operations		4,750			—			4,750			—
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		(33	)		—			—			(33	)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(5,092	)		—			(5,352	)		260
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		39,340			—			38,985			355
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	34,248		$	—		$	33,633		$	615

44

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(As Adjusted (Note 2))

19. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

	Quarter
Year Ended December 31,	First		Second		Third			Fourth			Full Year
	(In thousands, except per share data)
2008
Total revenues	$	1,503,263	$	1,583,115	$	1,433,974		$	1,133,735		$	5,654,087
Gross profit		247,579		251,411		229,619			187,052			915,661
Net income (loss)		15,178		16,003		(21,817	)		(57,377	)		(48,013	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share		0.68		0.71		(0.97	)		(2.54	)		(2.13	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		0.67		0.71		(0.96	)		(2.52	)		(2.12	)
2007
Total revenues	$	1,488,401	$	1,646,277	$	1,625,405		$	1,500,134		$	6,260,217
Gross profit		241,145		252,177		251,292			229,853			974,467
Net income		16,344		23,097		19,666			4,308			63,415
Basic earnings per share		0.68		0.97		0.85			0.19			2.73
Diluted earnings per share		0.68		0.97		0.85			0.19			2.71

     During the third quarter of 2008, the Company incurred charges of $37.1 million related to the impairment of certain intangible franchise rights, and $11.1 million related to the impairment of certain fixed assets. Also, during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company incurred charges of $114.8 million related to the impairment of certain intangible franchise rights. See Note 10.

     During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company incurred charges of $9.2 million related to the impairment of certain intangible franchise rights, and $7.6 million related to the impairment of certain fixed assets and disposal of certain dealership franchises. See Note 10 for further details regarding the Company’s impairment charges.

20. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

     During the second quarter of 2006, the Company sold a Pontiac and GMC franchised dealership to a former employee for approximately $1.9 million, realizing a gain of approximately $0.8 million. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company sold a Kia franchised dealership to a former employee for approximately $1.1 million, realizing a gain of approximately $1.0 million. These transactions were entered into on terms comparable with those in recent transactions between the Company and unrelated third parties and that the Company believes represent fair market value.

45