Income Taxes	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	Accounting Standards Codification 740 (“ASC 740”) requires companies to apply their estimated annual effective tax rate on a year-to-date basis in each interim period. Under ASC 740, companies should not apply the estimated annual effective tax rate to interim financial results if the estimated annual effective tax rate is not reliably predictable. In this situation, the interim tax rate should be based on the actual year-to-date results. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016, reliable projections of the Company’s annual effective tax rate were difficult to determine, producing significant variations in the customary relationship between income tax expense and pre-tax book income. As such, the Company recorded income taxes for the period based on actual year-to-date results. In the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015, the Company applied an estimated annual effective tax rate to the interim period pre-tax (loss) / income to calculate the income tax (benefit) / provision. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the effective income tax rates were 1,140.5% and 27.4% respectively. The Company recorded a tax provision / (benefit) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 of $479 and $(2,471) respectively. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the three month period ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to certain non-deductible expenses for tax in relationship to the income reported for the third quarter. In addition, due to the cumulative loss recognized in previous years and in the current year in Australia, any tax benefit recorded is offset by the valuation allowance recorded against the subsidiary's loss. While the tax benefit is offset by the valuation allowance, the loss decreases total income utilized in calculating the effective rate during the three months ended September 30, 2016. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 due in part to a tax benefit recorded in the current period from the reconciliation of a prior year’s tax return to the amount reported for tax provision purposes. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 also due in part to a valuation reserve recorded to offset the deferred tax assets of a foreign subsidiary. The remaining differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were primarily due to state and foreign income taxes. The effective income tax rates were 99.2% and 35.3% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Company recorded a tax (benefit) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 of $(5,187) and $(7,873) respectively. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to a change in the projected financial statement earnings for the year which decreased the estimated annual effective tax rate used to compute the interim period income tax (benefit) in accordance with the accounting guidance established for computing income taxes in interim periods. The effective income tax rate also differed from the federal statutory rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 due in part to a valuation reserve recorded to offset the deferred tax assets of a foreign subsidiary. The remaining differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015were primarily due to state and foreign income taxes.

Accounting Standards Codification 740 (“ASC 740”) requires companies to apply their estimated annual effective tax rate on a year-to-date basis in each interim period. Under ASC 740, companies should not apply the estimated annual effective tax rate to interim financial results if the estimated annual effective tax rate is not reliably predictable. In this situation, the interim tax rate should be based on the actual year-to-date results. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016, reliable projections of the Company’s annual effective tax rate were difficult to determine, producing significant variations in the customary relationship between income tax expense and pre-tax book income. As such, the Company recorded income taxes for the period based on actual year-to-date results. In the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015, the Company applied an estimated annual effective tax rate to the interim period pre-tax (loss) / income to calculate the income tax (benefit) / provision.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the effective income tax rates were 1,140.5% and 27.4% respectively. The Company recorded a tax provision / (benefit) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 of $479 and $(2,471) respectively. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the three month period ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to certain non-deductible expenses for tax in relationship to the income reported for the third quarter. In addition, due to the cumulative loss recognized in previous years and in the current year in Australia, any tax benefit recorded is offset by the valuation allowance recorded against the subsidiary's loss. While the tax benefit is offset by the valuation allowance, the loss decreases total income utilized in calculating the effective rate during the three months ended September 30, 2016. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 due in part to a tax benefit recorded in the current period from the reconciliation of a prior year’s tax return to the amount reported for tax provision purposes. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 also due in part to a valuation reserve recorded to offset the deferred tax assets of a foreign subsidiary. The remaining differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were primarily due to state and foreign income taxes.

The effective income tax rates were 99.2% and 35.3% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Company recorded a tax (benefit) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 of $(5,187) and $(7,873) respectively. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to a change in the projected financial statement earnings for the year which decreased the estimated annual effective tax rate used to compute the interim period income tax (benefit) in accordance with the accounting guidance established for computing income taxes in interim periods. The effective income tax rate also differed from the federal statutory rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 due in part to a valuation reserve recorded to offset the deferred tax assets of a foreign subsidiary. The remaining differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015were primarily due to state and foreign income taxes.