EX-5 4 ex5.htm PAST-TENSE OPINION OF COUNSEL

                                                                                                                                Exhibit F-4



August 28, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Re:     Conectiv (File No. 70-9499)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As General Counsel for Conectiv, a Delaware corporation ("Conectiv"), I have acted as
counsel to Conectiv and certain of Conectiv's subsidiaries described below (collectively,
"Applicants") with respect to the matters described in the Application-Declaration on Form
U-1 (File No. 70-9499) (the "Application"), as amended by pre-effective amendment no. 1
and post-effective amendment nos. 1 through 5, of the Applicants filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under the Public Utility Holding Company
Act of 1935 (the "Act"). The Application was filed jointly by Conectiv and two operating
utility subsidiaries, Delmarva Power & Light Company ("DPL") and Atlantic City Electric
Company ("ACE").

The Application requested the Commission to authorize the payment by the Applicants of
certain dividends out of capital or unearned surplus. The Commission authorized the
payment of certain of such dividends by orders issued on September 27, 1999, January 28,
2000 and April 27, 2000 (the "Orders"). The Applicants have completed the payment of
certain of such dividends (collectively, the "Transactions") pursuant to the Application and
the Orders and now wish to close out File No. 70-9499.

I am a member of the bar of the State of Delaware, the state in which Conectiv and DPL are
incorporated. I am also a member of the bar of the Commonwealth of Virginia, a state in
which DPL is also incorporated. I am not a member of the bar of the State of New Jersey (in
which ACE is incorporated). I do not hold myself out as an expert in the laws of any state
other than Delaware and Virginia, although I have consulted and will consult with counsel
to Conectiv who are experts in such laws. For purposes of this opinion, to the extent I
deemed necessary, I have relied on advice from counsel employed or retained by Conectiv
who are a members of the bar of the State of New Jersey.

In connection with this opinion, I or attorneys in whom I have confidence have examined
originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to my satisfaction, of such records of
Conectiv and such other documents, certificates and corporate or other records as I have


Securities and Exchange Commission
August 28, 2002
Page 2

deemed necessary or appropriate as a basis for the opinions set forth herein. In my
examination, I have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of all
persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to me as originals, the conformity to
original documents of documents submitted to me as certified or photostatic copies and the
authenticity of the originals of such copies. As to various questions of fact material to such
opinions, I have relied, when relevant facts were not independently established, upon
statements contained in the Application, as amended.

Based on the foregoing, and subject to the assumptions and conditions set forth herein, I am
of the opinion that:

     1.   All state laws applicable to the Transactions have been complied with; and

     2.   Each of the Applicants involved in a particular Transaction was, at the time of the
           applicable Transaction, duly formed or incorporated under the laws of the jurisdiction
           in which it is domiciled; and

     3.   The consummation of the Transactions did not violate the legal rights of the holders
           of any securities issued by any Applicant or any associate company thereof; and

     4.   The Transactions have been carried out in accordance with the Application, as
           amended, and the Orders.

I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion together with the Certificate of Conectiv filed
pursuant to Rule 24.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Peter F. Clark

Peter F. Clark