Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2014

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash. Cash equivalents consist of liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. Restricted cash includes funds the Company is required to post as cash collateral or transfer to escrow accounts and its release is subject to contractual requirements and time restrictions. The cash may not be released to the Company without the consent of the counterparties, which is generally at their discretion. The cash could also be subject to the indemnification of losses incurred by the counterparties.

Marketable Securities

Marketable Securities – Available-for-Sale. Marketable securities are stated at fair value in accordance with the relevant accounting guidance. The Company determines the fair value of its marketable securities based on pricing from our third party service provider and market prices from industry-standard independent data providers. Such market prices may be quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 inputs) or pricing determined using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2 inputs), such as yield curve, volatility factors, credit spreads, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments or debt, broker and dealer quotes, as well as other relevant economic measures. To the extent observable inputs are not available, as is the case with the Company's mortgage securities – available for sale, the Company estimates fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). The methods and processes used to estimate the fair value of the Company's mortgage securities are discussed further below.

Mortgage securities – available-for-sale represent beneficial interests the Company retains in securitization transactions which consist of residual interests (the “residual securities”) in certain components of the cash flows of the underlying mortgage loans to the securitization trusts. As payments are received on the residual securities, the payments are applied to the cost basis of the related mortgage securities. Each period, the accretable yield for each mortgage security is evaluated and, to the extent there has been a change in the estimated cash flows, it is adjusted and applied prospectively. The accretable yield is recorded as interest income with a corresponding increase to the carrying basis of the mortgage security.

The Company estimates the fair value of its residual securities retained based on the present value of future expected cash flows to be received. Management’s best estimate of key assumptions, including credit losses, prepayment speeds, market discount rates and forward yield curves commensurate with the risks involved, are used in estimating future cash flows.

All of the Company's available-for-sale securities are reported at their estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. To the extent the cost basis of these securities exceeds the estimated fair value and the unrealized loss is considered to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recognized and the amount recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss is reclassified to earnings as a realized loss. The Company uses the specific identification method in computing realized gains or losses.

Receivables [Policy Text Block]

Service Fee Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The majority of the Company's service fee receivables relate to the Company's Cloud SaaS segment. Generally, these service fees are invoiced monthly and due within 30 days of receipt of the invoice. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at an amount estimated to cover potential uncollectible losses. Management analyzes receivables and historical bad debts, current economic trends and conditions, and the length of time receivables are past due in order to establish the allowance for doubtful accounts. The past due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the contractual payment terms of the receivable. Reserves for individual accounts are recorded when the Company becomes aware of specific customer circumstances, such as bankruptcy filings, deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position, or potential unfavorable outcomes from disputes with customers. The Company charges off uncollectible service fees receivable when receipt of contractually-obligated amounts is not deemed to be probable.

Internal Use Software [Policy Text Block]

Internal Use Software. The Company capitalizes costs of internally developed software related to its cloud-based contact center, business phone system services and certain projects for internal use incurred during the application development stage. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post implementation activities are expensed as incurred. Internal-use software is amortized on a straight line basis over its estimated useful life. The Company evaluates the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis and tests for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of these assets. During 2013, the Company recorded approximately $0.4 million of impairment charges related to internal use software. No such impairment was recorded during 2014.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition. Corvisa derives its revenue from software subscription fees for its product and from telecommunications minutes used. Corvisa also derives revenue from professional service fees charged for implementation of its contact center solution as well as CRM implementation services.

The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following four criteria are satisfied:


•	there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;


•	delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;


•	the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and


•	collectability of these fees is reasonably assured.

Subscription revenues are recognized ratably over the estimated life of the customer relationship beginning on the date our service is made available to customers. The Company recognizes usage fees at contractual rates per minute, text, etc. as these services are used. For subscription contracts with multiple elements (software subscription and professional services, such as installation), the Company assesses whether the individual elements have standalone value to the customer upon delivery. Professional services that are not considered to have standalone value to our customers, such as implementation and set-up fees, are deemed to be combined with the subscription service as a single unit of accounting and are recognized ratably over the expected lives of the customer relationships.

For contracts with multiple elements, the Company allocates consideration to the identified units of accounting based on the relative selling price hierarchy set forth in the relevant accounting guidance. The Company determines the selling price for each deliverable using vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of selling price or third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price, if it exists. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exist for a deliverable, the Company uses its best estimate of selling price ("BESP") for that deliverable. The Company estimates BESP for a deliverable by considering company-specific factors such as pricing strategies and direct product and other costs.

Professional services sold separately, such as our CRM implementation services, are generally short-term in nature and are recognized as the services are rendered for time and material contracts, and based on the percentage of services completed for fixed price contracts.

For all segments, the Company records deferred revenue when payments are received in advance of performing our service obligations and is recognized in accordance with the above criteria. When the Company is the principal in its transactions with customers, service fee revenues are recorded on a gross basis. Otherwise, service fee revenues are recorded on a net basis.

Cost of Services. Cost of services for Corvisa's communications services consist primarily of expenses incurred to host and support our CorvisaOne™ software, co-location and data charges, fees paid to third party telecommunications carriers for usage, software license fees and royalty expenses, depreciation expense associated with capitalized software related to these services, and allocated overhead, such as occupancy charges and IT infrastructure. Costs of Corvisa's professional services consist almost entirely of the compensation and related expenses of those individuals providing professional services.

Earnings per Share

Earnings Per Share (“EPS”). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. Diluted EPS is calculated assuming all options, nonvested shares and performance-based awards of the Company's common stock have been exercised, unless the exercise would be antidilutive.

Leases [Policy Text Block]

Leases. The Company categorizes leases as as either operating or capital at the inception of the lease. Certain of the Company's lease agreements provide for scheduled rent increases during the lease term, rent holidays, or other incentives. Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease from the time at which the Company takes possession of the property without regard to deferred payment terms, such as rent holidays. Additionally, incentives received are treated as a reduction of costs over the term of the lease.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes. The Company had a gross deferred tax asset of $269.6 million and $284.1 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In determining the amount of deferred tax assets to recognize in the financial statements, the Company evaluates the likelihood of realizing such benefits in future periods. The income tax guidance requires the recognition of a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Income tax guidance indicates the more likely than not threshold is a level of likelihood that is more than 50%.

Under the income tax guidance, companies are required to identify and consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Positive evidence includes, but is not limited to the following: cumulative earnings in recent years, earnings expected in future years, excess appreciated asset value over the tax basis and positive industry trends. Negative evidence includes, but is not limited to the following: cumulative losses in recent years, losses expected in future years, a history of operating losses or tax credit carryforwards expiring, and adverse industry trends.

The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence should be commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. The more negative evidence that exists, the more positive evidence is required to counter to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed for all or some of the deferred tax assets. Cumulative losses in recent years are significant negative evidence that is difficult to overcome when determining the need for a valuation allowance. Similarly, cumulative earnings in recent years represent significant positive objective evidence. If the weight of the positive evidence is sufficient to support a conclusion that it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be realized, a valuation allowance should not be recorded.

The Company examines and weighs all available evidence (both positive and negative and both historical and forecasted) in the process of determining whether it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be realized. The Company considers the relevance of historical and forecasted evidence when there has been a significant change in circumstances. Additionally, the Company evaluates the realization of its recorded deferred tax assets on an interim and annual basis. The Company does not record a full valuation allowance if the weight of the positive evidence exceeds the negative evidence and is sufficient to support a conclusion that it is more likely than not that its deferred tax asset will be realized.

If a valuation allowance is necessary, the Company considers all sources of taxable income in determining the amount of valuation allowance to be recorded. Sources of taxable income identified in the income tax guidance include the following: 1) taxable income in prior carryback year, 2) future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, 3) future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, and 4) tax planning strategies.

The Company currently evaluates estimates of uncertainty in income taxes based upon a framework established in the income tax accounting guidance. The guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement standard for the recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In accordance with the guidance, the Company evaluates whether a tax position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. The Company measures the amount to recognize in its financial statements as the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The recognition and measurement of tax benefits is often judgmental, and determinations regarding the tax benefit can change as additional developments occur relative to the issue.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updated ("ASU") 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how reporting entities must disclose going-concern uncertainties in their financial statements. This new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date of issuance of the entity’s financial statements. Further, an entity must provide certain disclosures if there is “substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.” This ASU is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. This ASU applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Compared with current U.S. GAAP, this ASU also requires significantly expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of this standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which amends the definition of a discontinued operation in ASC 205-20 and requires entities to provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued-operations criteria. The FASB issued this ASU to provide more decision-useful information and to make it more difficult for a disposal transaction to qualify as a discontinued operation. This ASU is effective prospectively for all disposals (except disposals classified as held for sale before the adoption date) or components initially classified as held for sale in periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-08 on the Company's financial statements will be based on future disposal activity.