XML 49 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Regulatory Matters
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Regulated Operations [Abstract]  
Regulatory Matters
REGULATORY MATTERS

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements of the Company and the Bank. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Under Federal Reserve Board policies, bank holding companies may pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization's expected future needs and financial condition and if the organization is not in danger of not meeting its minimum regulatory capital requirements. Federal Reserve Board policy also provides that bank holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the bank holding company's ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized” the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table.

The actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table below:

 
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
 
To Be Well Capitalized
 Under Applicable
Action Provisions
(in thousands)
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
As of December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
$
303,951

 
12.30
%
 
$
197,733

 
8.00
%
 
$

 
%
Enterprise Bank & Trust
290,933

 
11.85

 
196,357

 
8.00

 
245,446

 
10.00

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
268,870

 
10.88

 
98,867

 
4.00

 

 

Enterprise Bank & Trust
257,565

 
10.49

 
98,178

 
4.00

 
147,268

 
6.00

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
268,870

 
8.36

 
96,519

 
3.00

 

 

Enterprise Bank & Trust
257,565

 
8.06

 
95,862

 
3.00

 
159,771

 
5.00

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
$
306,996

 
13.78
%
 
$
178,237

 
8.00
%
 
$

 
%
Enterprise Bank & Trust
267,717

 
12.06

 
177,565

 
8.00

 
221,956

 
10.00

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
276,275

 
12.40

 
89,118

 
4.00

 

 

Enterprise Bank & Trust
237,326

 
10.69

 
88,783

 
4.00

 
133,174

 
6.00

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
276,275

 
8.26

 
100,387

 
3.00

 

 

Enterprise Bank & Trust
237,326

 
7.09

 
100,387

 
3.00

 
167,311

 
5.00