XML 22 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Equity and Stock-Based and Other Compensation
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Stock-Based Compensation and Equity [Abstract]  
Equity and Stock-Based and Other Compensation

Note 11.       Equity and Stock-Based and Other Compensation

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The total compensation expense (net of forfeitures) for our stock-based compensation plans was $6.2 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $8.7 million and $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, all of which are included in General and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial statements. Total stock-based compensation expense for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 included an additional $2.4 million of compensation expense as a result of revising the expected vesting of the performance share units (“PSUs”) issued in 2009 and 2010. The tax benefit recognized by us related to these plans totaled $2.8 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $3.9 million and $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

There has been no significant activity or changes to the terms and conditions of any of our stock-based compensation plans or arrangements during 2011, other than those described below.

 

2009 Share Incentive Plan

 

In January 2011, the compensation committee of our board of directors approved long-term incentive (“LTIP”) awards consisting of 178,550 restricted stock units (“RSUs”), which represent the right to receive shares of our common stock based on established restrictions, and 191,600 PSUs, which represent the right to receive shares of our common stock based on the level of achievement during a specified performance period of one or more performance goals. The RSUs are scheduled to vest over three years. Vesting of the PSUs is conditioned upon certain performance goals being met by us during the performance period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The ultimate number of shares to be issued upon vesting of PSUs will depend on the extent to which we meet the performance goals and can range from zero to three times the original “target” awards noted above. In March 2011, the compensation committee approved additional LTIP awards consisting of 160,000 RSUs with a vesting period of four years and 120,000 PSUs with a vesting period of three years. In June 2011, the compensation committee approved 60,000 RSUs with a vesting periods ranging from one to five years and 86,000 RSUs that are scheduled to vest over three years. On the grant dates, the compensation committee set goals for the 2011 PSU grants. Based in part on our results through June 30, 2011 and expectations at that date regarding our future performance, we currently anticipate that the performance goals for the PSUs granted in 2011 will be met at target levels. As a result of the 2011 awards, we currently expect to recognize compensation expense totaling approximately $29.7 million over the vesting period, of which $1.6 million and $2.6 million was recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. During the second quarter of 2011, in connection with a review of our current and expected performance versus the performance goals on the PSUs that were issued in 2009 and 2010, we revised our estimate of the ultimate number of certain of the PSUs to be vested. As a result, we recorded an additional $2.4 million of stock-based compensation expense to reflect the number of shares expected to be issued when these PSUs vest in 2012 and 2013. We review our performance against these goals on an ongoing basis and update expectations as warranted.

 

Earnings Per Share

 

Under current authoritative guidance for determining earnings per share, all unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to distributions are considered to be participating securities and therefore are included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common shares and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Our unvested RSUs contain rights to receive non-forfeitable distribution equivalents, and therefore we apply the two-class method of computing earnings per share. The calculation of earnings per share below excludes the income attributable to the unvested RSUs from the numerator. The following table summarizes basic and diluted earnings for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share amounts):

            
 Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30,
 2011 2010 2011 2010
Net income attributable to W. P. Carey members$ 79,112 $ 23,432 $ 102,455 $ 37,845
Allocation of distribution equivalents paid on unvested restricted stock units in excess of net income  (1,166)   (453)   (1,510)   (783)
Net income – basic  77,946   22,979   100,945   37,062
Income effect of dilutive securities, net of taxes  1   233   333   331
Net income – diluted$ 77,947 $ 23,212 $ 101,278 $ 37,393
            
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic  39,782,796   39,081,064   39,760,676   39,116,126
Effect of dilutive securities  460,752   429,167   431,742   451,457
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted  40,243,548   39,510,231   40,192,418   39,567,583
            

Securities included in our diluted earnings per share determination consist of stock options and restricted stock awards. Securities totaling 0.1 million shares and 0.9 million shares for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 0.1 million shares and 0.9 million shares for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were excluded from the earnings per share computations above as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.