XML 29 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Pension Plans, Postretirement and Other Employee Benefits
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Pension Plans, Postretirement and Other Employee Benefits
Pension Plans, Postretirement and Other Employee Benefits
Pension benefits are based on years of service and, for most salaried employees, on average compensation. Our funding policy is to contribute to the plans amounts necessary to satisfy the funding requirement of applicable federal or foreign laws and regulations. Of our $710 million benefit obligation at December 31, 2016, approximately $641 million required funding under applicable federal and foreign laws. The balance of our benefit obligation, $69 million, did not require funding under applicable federal or foreign laws and regulations. At December 31, 2016, we had approximately $561 million in assets to fund that obligation. Pension plan assets were invested in the following classes of securities:
 
Percentage of Fair Market Value
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
Equity Securities
70
%
 
61
%
 
51
%
 
61
%
Debt Securities
30
%
 
34
%
 
49
%
 
30
%
Real Estate

 
2
%
 

 
2
%
Other

 
3
%
 
%
 
7
%

The assets of some of our pension plans are invested in trusts that permit commingling of the assets of more than one employee benefit plan for investment and administrative purposes. Each of the plans participating in the trust has interests in the net assets of the underlying investment pools of the trusts. The investments for all our pension plans are recorded at estimated fair value, in compliance with the accounting guidance on fair value measurement. 
The following table presents our plan assets using the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the methods used to determine the fair value. Level 1 assets refer to those asset values based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets at the measurement date. Level 2 assets refer to assets with values determined using significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 assets include values determined with non-observable inputs.
 
Fair Value Level as of December 31, 2016
 
US
 
Foreign
Asset Category
Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets
Measurement
at NAV
 
Level 1

Level 2

Level 3
 
Assets
Measurement
at NAV
 
(Millions)
Equity securities:

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
U.S. large cap
$
22

 
$

 
$

 
$
77

 
$
2

 
$
30

 
$

 
$
26

U.S. mid cap

 

 

 

 
1

 
2

 

 

U.S. small cap

 

 

 
15

 

 

 

 

Non-U.S. large cap

 

 

 

 
7

 
67

 

 
46

Non-U.S. mid cap

 

 

 
15

 

 
15

 

 
8

Non-U.S. small cap

 

 

 

 

 
10

 

 
1

Emerging markets

 

 

 
5

 
2

 
3

 

 
1

Debt securities:

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
U.S. treasuries/government bonds

 

 

 

 
1

 

 

 

U.S. corporate bonds

 

 

 
2

 

 
1

 

 

U.S. other fixed income

 

 

 
54

 

 

 

 

Non-U.S. treasuries/government bonds

 

 

 

 
1

 
38

 

 
29

Non-U.S. corporate bonds

 

 

 

 
4

 
23

 

 
12

Non-U.S. municipal obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
1

Non-U.S. other fixed income

 

 

 

 
1

 

 

 

Real Estate:

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
Non-U.S. real estate

 

 

 

 
1

 
5

 

 

Other:

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
Insurance contracts

 

 

 

 

 
13

 
9

 

Cash held in bank accounts
2

 

 

 

 
7

 
2

 

 

Total
$
24

 
$

 
$

 
$
168

 
$
27

 
$
209

 
$
9

 
$
124

 
 
Fair Value Level as of December 31, 2015
 
US
 
Foreign
Asset Category
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Asset
Measurement
at NAV
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Asset
Measurement
at NAV
 
(Millions)
Equity securities:

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
U.S. large cap
$
33

 
$

 
$

 
$
63

 
$
5

 
$
24

 
$

 
$
23

U.S. mid cap

 

 

 
8

 
1

 
5

 

 
2

U.S. small cap

 

 

 
15

 

 

 

 

Non-U.S. large cap

 

 

 

 
13

 
65

 

 
34

Non-U.S. mid cap

 

 

 
25

 
1

 
15

 

 
15

Non-U.S. small cap

 

 

 

 

 
2

 

 
1

Emerging markets

 

 

 
8

 
2

 
4

 

 

Debt securities:

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
U.S. corporate bonds

 

 

 
35

 

 
3

 

 

U.S. other fixed income

 

 

 
113

 

 

 

 

Non-U.S. treasuries/government bonds

 

 

 

 
1

 
28

 

 
28

Non-U.S. corporate bonds

 

 

 

 
7

 
20

 

 
12

Non-U.S. mortgage backed securities

 

 

 

 

 
3

 

 

Non-U.S. municipal obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
1

Non-U.S. asset backed securities

 

 

 

 

 
2

 

 

Non-U.S. other fixed income

 

 

 

 
2

 

 

 

Real Estate:


 


 


 
 
 


 


 


 
 
Non-U.S. real estate

 

 

 

 
1

 
5

 

 
1

Other:


 


 


 
 
 


 


 


 
 
Insurance contracts

 

 

 

 

 
12

 
8

 

Cash held in bank accounts
2

 

 

 

 
11

 

 

 

Total
$
35

 
$

 
$

 
$
267

 
$
44

 
$
188

 
$
8

 
$
117


Level 1 assets were valued using market prices based on daily net asset value (NAV) or prices available daily through a public stock exchange. Level 2 assets were valued primarily using market prices, sometimes net of estimated realization expenses, and based on broker/dealer markets or in commingled funds where NAV is not available daily or publicly. For insurance contracts, the estimated surrender value of the policy was used to estimate fair market value. Level 3 assets in the Netherlands were valued using an industry standard model based on certain assumptions such as the U-return and estimated technical reserve.
 
The table below summarizes the changes in the fair value of the Level 3 assets:
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Level 3 Assets
 
Level 3 Assets
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
 
(Millions)
 
(Millions)
Balance at December 31 of the previous year
$

 
$
8

 
$

 
$
9

Actual return on plan assets:

 

 

 

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

 
1

 

 
(1
)
Ending Balance at December 31
$

 
$
9

 
$

 
$
8


The following table contains information about significant concentrations of risk, including all individual assets that make up more than 5 percent of the total assets and any direct investments in Tenneco stock:
Asset Category
Fair Value Level
 
Value
 
Percentage of
Total Assets
 
(Millions)
2016:

 

 

Tenneco Stock
1

 
$
22

 
4.0
%
2015:

 

 

Tenneco Stock
1

 
$
33

 
5.0
%

Our investment policy for both our domestic and foreign plans is to invest more heavily in equity securities than debt securities. Targeted pension plan allocations are 70 percent in equity securities and 30 percent in debt securities, with acceptable tolerance levels of plus or minus five percent within each category for our domestic plans. Our foreign plans are individually managed to different target levels depending on the investing environment in each country.
In December 2015, in anticipation of an offer to active employees and retirees in the U.S. to receive their pension benefit as a lump sum payment, we reallocated a portion of the U.S. pension plan asset portfolio to a lower percentage of equity securities and a higher percentage of debt securities, resulting in a change in the average composition of the domestic investment portfolio to 51 percent equity and 49 percent debt securities. At December 31, 2016, we reestablished the domestic pension plan asset portfolio back to the targeted mix of 70 percent equity and 30 percent debt securities.
Our approach to determining expected return on plan asset assumptions evaluates both historical returns as well as estimates of future returns, and adjusts for any expected changes in the long-term outlook for the equity and fixed income markets for both our domestic and foreign plans.
A summary of the change in benefit obligation, the change in plan assets, the development of net amount recognized, and the amounts recognized in the balance sheets for the pension plans and postretirement benefit plan follows:
 
Pension
 
Postretirement
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
US
 
(Millions)
Change in benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at December 31 of the previous year
$
416

 
$
425

 
$
448

 
$
483

 
$
141

 
$
143

Currency rate conversion

 
(38
)
 

 
(45
)
 

 

Settlement
(1
)
 

 
(8
)
 
(2
)
 

 

Service cost
1

 
8

 
1

 
9

 

 

Interest cost
15

 
14

 
17

 
15

 
6

 
6

Administrative expenses/taxes paid

 
(1
)
 

 
(2
)
 

 

Plan amendments

 
(1
)
 

 
2

 

 

Actuarial (gain)/loss
(7
)
 
50

 
(21
)
 
(17
)
 
5

 
1

Benefits paid
(152
)
 
(20
)
 
(21
)
 
(19
)
 
(9
)
 
(9
)
Participants’ contributions

 
1

 

 
1

 

 

Benefit obligation at December 31
$
272

 
$
438

 
$
416

 
$
425

 
$
143

 
$
141

Change in plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value at December 31 of the previous year
$
304

 
$
355

 
$
334

 
$
392

 
$

 
$

Currency rate conversion

 
(33
)
 

 
(38
)
 

 

Settlement
(1
)
 

 
(8
)
 
(2
)
 

 

Actual return on plan assets
21

 
50

 
(11
)
 
8

 

 

Administrative expenses/taxes paid

 
(1
)
 

 
(2
)
 

 

Employer contributions
20

 
17

 
10

 
15

 
9

 
9

Participants’ contributions

 
1

 

 
1

 

 

Benefits paid
(152
)
 
(20
)
 
(21
)
 
(19
)
 
(9
)
 
(9
)
Fair value at December 31
$
192

 
$
369

 
$
304

 
$
355

 
$

 
$

Development of net amount recognized:

 

 

 

 

 

Unfunded status at December 31
$
(80
)
 
$
(69
)
 
$
(114
)
 
$
(68
)
 
$
(143
)
 
$
(141
)
Unrecognized cost:

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial loss
146

 
145

 
232

 
144

 
48

 
49

Prior service cost/(credit)

 
4

 

 
5

 
(4
)
 
(6
)
Net amount recognized at December 31
$
66

 
$
80

 
$
118

 
$
81

 
$
(99
)
 
$
(98
)
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets as of December 31

 

 

 

 

 

Noncurrent assets
$

 
$
9

 
$

 
$
6

 
$

 
$

Current liabilities
(20
)
 
(2
)
 
(2
)
 
(3
)
 
(10
)
 
(9
)
Noncurrent liabilities
(60
)
 
(76
)
 
(112
)
 
(71
)
 
(133
)
 
(132
)
Net amount recognized
$
(80
)
 
$
(69
)
 
$
(114
)
 
$
(68
)
 
$
(143
)
 
$
(141
)

Assets of one plan may not be utilized to pay benefits of other plans. Additionally, the prepaid (accrued) pension cost has been recorded based upon certain actuarial estimates as described below. Those estimates are subject to revision in future periods given new facts or circumstances.
 
Net periodic pension costs for the years 2016, 2015 and 2014, consist of the following components:
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
 
(Millions)
Service cost — benefits earned during the year
$
1

 
$
8

 
$
1

 
$
9

 
$
1

 
$
8

Interest cost
15

 
14

 
17

 
15

 
20

 
18

Expected return on plan assets
(23
)
 
(20
)
 
(23
)
 
(21
)
 
(25
)
 
(23
)
Settlement loss
72

 

 
4

 

 
21

 

Net amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial loss
8

 
7

 
8

 
8

 
7

 
7

Prior service cost

 
1

 

 
1

 

 
2

Net pension costs
$
73

 
$
10

 
$
7

 
$
12

 
$
24

 
$
12


Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss for pension benefits consist of the following components:
 
2016
 
2015
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
 
(Millions)
Net actuarial loss
$
146

 
$
145

 
$
232

 
$
144

Prior service cost

 
4

 

 
5


$
146

 
$
149

 
$
232

 
$
149


Amounts recognized for pension and postretirement benefits in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 include the following components:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
Before-Tax
Amount
 
Tax
Benefit
 
Net-of-Tax
Amount
 
Before-Tax
Amount
 
Tax
Benefit
 
Net-of-Tax
Amount
 
(Millions)
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans:

 

 

 

 

 

Change in total actuarial gain (loss)
$
51

 
$
(21
)
 
$
30

 
$
(7
)
 
$
2

 
$
(5
)
Amortization of prior service cost included in net periodic pension and postretirement cost
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
 
(3
)
 

 
(3
)
Amortization of actuarial gain (loss) included in net periodic pension and postretirement cost
20

 
(8
)
 
12

 
23

 
(4
)
 
19

Other comprehensive income — pension benefits
$
70

 
$
(29
)
 
$
41

 
$
13

 
$
(2
)
 
$
11


 
In 2017, we expect to recognize the following amounts, which are currently reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss, as components of net periodic benefit cost:
 
2017
 
US
 
Foreign
 
(Millions)
Net actuarial loss
$
10

 
$
8

Prior service cost

 
1

 
$
10

 
$
9


The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for all pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
 
(Millions)
Projected benefit obligation
$
272

 
$
266

 
$
416

 
$
337

Accumulated benefit obligation
272

 
261

 
416

 
332

Fair value of plan assets
192

 
188

 
302

 
262


The following estimated benefit payments are payable from the pension plans to participants:
Year
US
 
Foreign
 
(Millions)
2017
$
33

 
$
15

2018
14

 
15

2019
15

 
16

2020
16

 
18

2021
15

 
17

2022-2026
77

 
95


The following assumptions were used in the accounting for the pension plans for the years of 2016, 2015, and 2014:
 
2016

2015
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations

 

 

 

Discount rate
4.2
%
 
2.8
%
 
4.3
%
 
3.5
%
Rate of compensation increase
N/A

 
2.5
%
 
N/A

 
2.7
%
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
 
US
 
Foreign
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate
4.3
%
 
3.5
%
 
4.1
%
 
3.2
%
 
4.8
%
 
4.3
%
Expected long-term return on plan assets
7.6
%
 
5.7
%
 
7.8
%
 
5.9
%
 
7.8
%
 
6.1
%
Rate of compensation increase
N/A

 
2.7
%
 
N/A

 
3.0
%
 
N/A

 
3.3
%

 
We made contributions of $37 million to our pension plans during 2016. Based on current actuarial estimates, we believe we will be required to make contributions of $32 million to those plans during 2017. Pension contributions beyond 2017 will be required, but those amounts will vary based upon many factors, including the performance of our pension fund investments during 2017 and future discount rate changes.
The Company announced and launched a voluntary program offering to buyout former employees vested in the U.S. pension plan during the third quarter of 2014. The process was completed in the fourth quarter of 2014. Based on participant responses, more than 60% of the former employees who were eligible to participate received a buyout. This resulted in a non-cash charge of $21 million. The cash payments to those former employees who elected to take the buyout were made from the pension plan's assets and did not impact the company's cash flow. This program reduced the outstanding U.S. pension liability by approximately $50 million.
In February 2016, the Company launched a voluntary program to buy out active employees and retirees who have earned benefits in the U.S. pension plans. As of December 31, 2016, this program has been substantially completed with cash payments to those who elected to take the buyout made from pension plan assets in the fourth quarter of 2016. In connection with this program the Company contributed $18 million into the pension trust and recognized a non-cash charge of $72 million. We expect to complete the program in the first quarter of 2017, at which time we will contribute another $9 million and recognize a non-cash charge of approximately $6 million.
We have life insurance plans which provided benefit to a majority of our U.S. employees. We also have postretirement plans for our U.S. employees hired before January 1, 2001. The plans cover salaried employees retiring on or after attaining age 55 who have at least 10 years of service with us. For hourly employees, the postretirement benefit plans generally cover employees who retire according to one of our hourly employee retirement plans. All of these benefits may be subject to deductibles, co-payment provisions and other limitations, and we have reserved the right to change these benefits. For those employees hired after January 1, 2001, we do not provide any postretirement benefits. Our postretirement healthcare and life insurance plans are not funded. The measurement date used to determine postretirement benefit obligations is December 31.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the years 2016, 2015, and 2014, consists of the following components:

2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Millions)
Service cost — benefits earned during the year
$

 
$

 
$

Interest on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
6

 
6

 
6

Net amortization:

 

 

Actuarial loss
5

 
6

 
4

Prior service credit
(1
)
 
(4
)
 
(7
)
Prior period correction

 

 
9

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
$
10

 
$
8

 
$
12


In the fourth quarter of 2014, we recorded an $11 million adjustment to our postretirement medical expense as a result of approximately 170 retirees who were entitled to benefits but had not been included in the prior year calculations of net periodic postretirement benefit cost.
In 2017, we expect to recognize the following amounts, which are currently reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss, as components of net periodic benefit cost:
 
2017
 
(Millions)
Net actuarial loss
$
5

Prior service credit
(1
)

$
4


The following estimated postretirement benefit payments are payable from the plan to participants:
Year
Postretirement
Benefits
 
(Millions)
2017
$
10

2018
10

2019
10

2020
10

2021
9

2022-2026
45


We do not expect to receive any future subsidies under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act.
 The weighted-average assumed health care cost trend rate used in determining the 2016 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 7.0 percent, declining to 4.5 percent by 2026. For 2015, the health care cost trend rate was 7.0 percent declining to 4.5 percent by 2026 and for 2014, the health care cost trend rate was 6.5 percent declining to 4.5 percent by 2019.
The following assumptions were used in the accounting for postretirement cost for the years of 2016, 2015 and 2014:

2016
 
2015
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations

 

Discount rate
4.2
%
 
4.3
%
Rate of compensation increase
N/A

 
N/A


2016
 
2015
 
2014
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost

 

 

Discount rate
4.3
%
 
4.1
%
 
4.8
%
Rate of compensation increase
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A


A one-percentage-point increase in the 2016 assumed health care cost trend rates would increase total service and interest cost by $1 million and would increase the postretirement benefit obligation by $15 million. A one-percentage-point decrease in the 2016 assumed health care cost trend rates would decrease the total service and interest cost by $1 million and decrease the postretirement benefit obligation by $12 million.
Based on current actuarial estimates, we believe we will be required to make postretirement contributions of approximately $10 million during 2017.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Tenneco Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Hourly Employees and the Tenneco Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Salaried Employees were merged into one plan called the Tenneco 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the “Retirement Savings Plan”). Under the plan, subject to limitations in the Internal Revenue Code, participants may elect to defer up to 75 percent of their salary through contributions to the plan, which are invested in selected mutual funds or used to buy our common stock. We match 100 percent of an employee's contributions up to three percent of the employee's salary and 50 percent of an employee's contributions that are between three percent and five percent of the employee's salary. In connection with freezing the defined benefit pension plans for nearly all U.S. based salaried and non-union hourly employees effective December 31, 2006, and the related replacement of those defined benefit plans with defined contribution plans, we are making additional contributions to the Employee Stock Ownership Plans. We recorded expense for these contributions of approximately $28 million, $27 million and $25 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Matching contributions vest immediately. Defined benefit replacement contributions fully vest on the employee’s third anniversary of employment.