10QSB 1 form10-qsb_14369.htm FORM 10-QSB (MARCH 31, 2006) WWW.EXFILE.COM, INC. -- 14369 -- ZAP -- FORM 10-QSB



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



Form 10-QSB

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006

Commission File Number 0-303000


ZAP
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

CALIFORNIA
94-3210624
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
 

501 Fourth Street
Santa Rosa, CA 95401
(707) 525-8658
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
registrant's principal executive offices)




 
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.        Yes  No o
 
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)      Yes o    No x
 
Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.        Yes  No o
 
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.

 34,719,945  shares of common stock as of May 5, 2006.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format          Yes o    No x
 


 
ZAP

FORM 10-QSB
 
INDEX

 
 
 
Page No.
PART I.
Financial Information
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) :
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2006
2
 
 
 
 
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
3
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
11
 
 
 
 
 
Item 3.
Controls and Procedures
14
 
 
 
 
PART II.
Other Information
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
15
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
15
 
 
 
 
 
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
15
 
 
 
 
 
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
15
 
 
 
 
 
Item 5.
Other Information
15
 
 
 
 
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
15
 
 
 
 
SIGNATURES
 
16


 

Part I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.    Financial Statements
 
ZAP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands) 
 
 
 
March 31,
2006
 
ASSETS 
 
 
 
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 Cash and cash equivalents  
 
$
2,610
 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $317
   
343
 
Advances on Smart Car inventory
   
143
 
Inventories
   
2,060
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
294
 
Total current assets
   
5,450
 
 
     
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of $889
   
4,905
 
 
     
OTHER ASSETS
     
Smart Automobile license, net
   
2,703
 
Patents and trademarks, net   
   
62
 
Goodwill     
   
175
 
Deposits and other
   
430
 
Total assets
 
$
13,725
 
 
     
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
     
 
     
CURRENT LIABILITIES
     
Current portion of long-term debt
 
$
104
 
Accounts payable
   
177
 
Accrued liabilities  
   
2,176
 
License fee payable
   
906
 
Deferred revenue
   
1,100
 
Total current liabilities
   
4,463
 
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
     
Long-term debt, less current portion
   
1,880
 
Total liabilities
   
6,343
 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
     
PrPreferred stock, authorized 50 million shares; no par value, 7,500 shares issued and outstanding
   
7,500
 
Common stock, authorized 100 million shares; no par value; 33,394,775 shares issued and outstanding
   
80,395
 
Common stock issued as loan collateral
   
(2,929
)
Notes receivable from shareholders, net
   
(56
)
Accumulated deficit
   
(77,528
)
Total shareholders’ equity
   
7,382
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
13,725
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).


2

ZAP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(Thousands, except share amounts)

   
Three Months ended
March 31,
 
Three Months ended
March 31,
 
   
2006
 
2005
 
NET SALES
 
$
2,929
 
$
1,162
 
               
COST OF GOODS SOLD
   
2,505
   
1,128
 
               
GROSS PROFIT
   
424
   
34
 
               
OPERATING EXPENSES
             
Sales and marketing
   
251
   
193
 
General and administrative (non-cash of $1,792 and $1,180 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005)
   
3,068
   
2,860
 
Research and development
   
   
40
 
 
   
3,319
   
3,093
 
 
             
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
   
(2,895
)
 
(3,059
)
               
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
             
Gain on revaluation of warrant and put option liabilities
   
135
 
 
1,519
 
Interest expense,net
   
(6
)
 
(7
)
Other
   
(3
)   
 
     
126
 
 
1,512
 
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
   
(2,769
)
 
(1,547
)
               
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
   
4
   
4
 
NET LOSS
 
$
( 2,773
)
$
(1,551
)
               
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
             
BASIC AND DILUTED
 
$
(0.08
)
$
(0.05
)
               
WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING --
             
BASIC AND DILUTED
   
32,747
   
30,590
 


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
 
3

ZAP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
 
 
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 
$
(2,773
)
$
(1,551
)
 
         
Items not requiring the use of cash:
         
Amortization of note discount
   
   
10
 
Stock-based compensation for consulting and other services
   
1,283
   
2,792
 
Stock-based employee compensation 
   
518
   
(1,645
)
Gain on revaluation of warrant and put option liabilities
   
(135
)
 
(1,519
)
Depreciation and amortization
   
494
   
371
 
Loss on disposal of fixed asset     4    
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
   
(16
) 
 
22
 
Changes in other items affecting operations:
         
Receivables
   
(142
) 
 
(259
)
Note recievable from Smart Auto
   
   
(1,000
)
Inventories
   
(188
) 
 
376
 
Smart car inventory
   
1,235
   
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
   
(213
) 
 
(55
)
Accounts payable
   
(12
) 
 
17
 
Accrued liabilities
   
(40
) 
 
342
 
Deferred revenue
   
50
   
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
   
65
   
(2,099
)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITES
         
Purchase of equipment
   
(24
)   
(158
)
Proceeds from sale of equipment     35    
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   
11
   
(158
)
 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
         
Repurchase of common stock
   
   
(500
)
Payments on note receivable to stockholder 
   
   
14
 
Issuance of common stock and warrants, net of offering costs
    1,005    
1,955
 
Borrowings and repayments of long-term debt
   
(18
)   
13
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
987
   
1,482
 
 
         
NET INCREASE ( DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
   
1,063
   
(775
)
 
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
   
1,547
   
5,354
 
 
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
 
$
2,610
 
$
4,579
 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

 
4

ZAP
NOTES TO THE INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)    BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The financial statements included in this Form 10-QSB have been prepared by us, and have not been audited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted, although management believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The financial statements presented herein, for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 reflect, in the opinion of management, all material adjustments consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flow for the interim periods.

The risks related to our business. The Company has a history of losses, and the Company might not achieve profitability. The Company will need additional capital to achieve its business plan. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available, or if it is available, that it will be on acceptable terms. A substantial portion of the Company’s growth in the past four years has come through acquisitions and the Company may not be able to identify, complete and integrate future acquisitions.

Other risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

We face intense competition, which could cause us to lose market share. Changes in the market for electrical or fuel-efficient vehicles could cause our products to become obsolete or lose popularity. We cannot assure you that growth in the electric vehicle industry or fuel-efficient cars will continue and our business may suffer if growth in the electric vehicle industry or fuel-efficient market decreases or if we are unable to maintain the pace of industry demands. We may be unable to keep up with changes in electric vehicle or fuel-efficient technology and, as a result, may suffer a decline in our competitive position. The failure of certain key suppliers to provide us with components could have a severe and negative impact upon our business. Product liability or other claims could have a material adverse effect on our business. We may not be able to protect our Internet address. Our success is heavily dependent on protecting our intellectual property rights.

The Company relies on other entities such as G&K Automotive to convert or americanize Smart cars for sale in certain states in the United States; and to provide services under warranties and all other maintenance and repair services. If these entities are unable to supply or service Americanized Smart cars, and the Company is unable to obtain alternate sources of supply for these products and services, the Company might not be able to fill existing backorders and/or sell more Smart cars.

 
(2)    SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
5


NET LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
Basic and diluted loss per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in each period. Potential dilutive securities associated with stock options, warrants and convertible preferred stock and debt have been excluded from the diluted per share amounts, since the effect of these securities would be anti-dilutive. At March 31, 2006, these potentially dilutive securities include options for 6,820,350 shares of common stock, warrants for 52,958,415 shares of common stock, debt convertible into 930,000 shares of common stock and preferred shares that can be converted into 4.14 million shares of common stock.
 
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION-The accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are included in the condensed consolidated financial statements after elimination of significant inter-company accounts and transactions.

REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company records revenues only upon the occurrence of all of the following conditions:

-The Company has received a binding purchase order or similar commitment from the customer or distributor authorized by a representative empowered to commit the purchaser (evidence of a sale);

-The purchase price has been fixed, based on the terms of the purchase order;

-The Company has delivered the product from its distribution center to a common carrier acceptable to the purchaser. The Company's customary shipping terms are FOB shipping point; and

-The Company deems the collection of the amount invoiced probable.

The Company provides no price protection. Product sales are net of promotional discounts, rebates and return allowances.


DEFERRED REVENUE-One of the Company’s subsidiaries, Voltage Vehicles, sold licenses to auto dealerships under the ZAP name. The license agreements call for the licensee to purchase a minimum number of vehicles from ZAP each year. The Company collected $1,100,000 related to these agreements, which is classified as deferred revenue until such time as the Company begins delivering a substantial number of vehicles to these dealerships on a regular basis.

USE OF ESTIMATES -The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Significant estimates include:

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally requires no collateral from its customers. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers should deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

INVENTORY-The Company maintains reserves for estimated excess, obsolete and damaged inventory based on projected future shipments using historical selling rates, and taking into account market conditions, inventory on-hand, purchase commitments, product development plans and life expectancy, and competitive factors. If markets for the Company's products and corresponding demand were to decline, then additional reserves may be deemed necessary.

LEGAL ACCOUNTS-The Company estimates the amount of potential exposure it may have with respect to litigation claims and assessments.

RECOVERY OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS- The Company evaluates the recovery of its long-lived assets at least annually by analyzing its operating results and considering significant events or changes in the business environment.

STOCK ISSUED AS COLLATERAL- In December 2004, the Company issued 2.9 million common shares as collateral for a $1 million loan . The $3.529 million market value of these shares at the date of issuance was recorded in common stock with an offsetting contra equity account. These shares were previously issued to Mercatus Partners LLP in January 2003 as collateral for a loan that never funded. The shares were reported as lost to the Company in December 2003. In December 2004, the shares were reissued to Mercatus Partners who then assigned the shares and their interests to Phi-Nest Fund, L.P. as collateral for the $1 million loan commitment. The Company amended the Loan Agreement allowing them to purchase 500,000 shares for $1.16 per share. On March 30, 2006, the Company received $500,000 in net proceeds from the sale. The collateral was reduced to 2,441,176 shares and the loan is still pending.
 
WARRANTY - The Company provides 30 to 90 day warranties on its personal electric products and records the estimated cost of the product warranties at the date of sale. The estimated cost of warranties has not been significant to date. Should actual failure rates and material usage differ from our estimates, revisions to the warranty obligation may be required.
 
The Company also has an agreement with an outside company to provide a 36 month or 36,000 mile warranty on the Smart Car Americanized by ZAP. At March 31, 2006, the Company has recorded a warranty liablility for $77,000.
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 
The Company considers highly liquid investments with maturities from the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. All cash equivalents are in money market funds and commercial paper. The fair value of the funds approximated cost.
 
6

 
(3)   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

We have stock compensation plans for employees and directors which are described in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB as filed with the SEC on March 31, 2006. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “ Share-Based Payment ,” (“SFAS 123R”) effective January 1, 2006. SFAS 123R requires the recognition of the fair value of stock compensation in net income (loss). We recognize the stock compensation expense over the requisite service period of the individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period. All of our stock compensation is accounted for as an equity instrument. Prior to January 1, 2006, we followed Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, “ Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, ” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations in accounting for our stock compensation.

We elected the modified prospective method in adopting SFAS 123R. Under this method, the provisions of SFAS 123R apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. The unrecognized expense of awards not yet vested at the date of adoption is recognized in net income (loss) in the periods after the date of adoption using the same valuation method ( i.e. Black-Scholes) and assumptions determined under the original provisions of SFAS 123, “ Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as disclosed in our previous filings. In accordance with the modified prospective method, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to 2006 have not been restated to reflect SFAS 123R. Therefore, the results for the first quarter of 2006 are not directly comparable to the same period in the prior year.
  
Under the provisions of SFAS 123R, we recorded $493,265 of stock compensation, net of estimated forfeitures, in selling, general and administrative expenses, in our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006. We utilized the Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value of the stock compensation granted after the adoption of SFAS 123R, with the following weighted-average assumptions:
 
   
2006
 
Dividend yield
 
 
 
Expected volatility
   
140.87
%
Risk-free interest rate
   
4.63
%
Expected life (in years)
   
6.0
 
 
The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay cash dividends. Expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the average U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity Rate during the period, which approximates the rate in effect at the time of the grant. Our unvested options vest over the next three years. Our options generally have a 10-year term. The expected term is calculated using the simplified method prescribed by the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. Based on the above assumptions, the weighted-average fair values of the options granted under the stock option plans for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $0.61. As required by SFAS No. 123R, we now estimate forfeitures of employee stock options and recognize compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. Forfeiture rates are determined based on historical experience.  Estimated forfeitures are now adjusted to actual forfeiture experience as needed.
 
SFAS 123R requires us to present pro forma information for the comparative period prior to the adoption as if we had accounted for all our employee stock options under the fair value method of the original SFAS 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and loss per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation in the prior-year periods (dollars in thousands, except per-share data).

7



 
 
Three months
ended March
31,
 
 
 
2005
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss as reported
 
$
(1,551
)
 
   
 
 
Add: Stock-based employee/director compensation
   
 
 
included in reported net loss
   
(1,645
)
Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation
   
 
 
determined under fair value method for all awards
   
(417
)
Proforma net loss
 
$
(3,613
)
 
   
 
 
Loss per share:
   
 
 
Basic and diluted, as reported
 
$
(0.05
)
Basic and diluted, as adjusted
 
$
(0.12
)

The assumptions used to determine the pro forma expenses under the Black-Scholes option model for the three months ended March 31, 2005 under SFAS 123 were based on the following assumptions: expected dividend yield: 0; expected volatility: 141%; expected lives, in years: 5; and risk-free interest rate: 4.0%. In the pro forma information for periods prior to 2006, we accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.

A summary of options under the Company’s stock option plans as of December 31, 2005 and changes during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 are as follows:
 
 
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding December 31, 2005
 
 
6,416,350
 
$
1.04
 
 
8.32
 
 
 
 
Options granted under the plan
 
 
150,000
 
$
0.68
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Options exercised
 
 
(196,000)
 
$
0.30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Options forfeited and expired
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding March 31, 2006
 
 
6,370,350
 
$
1.00
 
 
8.11
 
$
5,159,984
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Options vested and exercisable
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
at March 31, 2006
 
 
3,675,418
 
$
1.00
 
 
7.84
 
$
2,977,089
 
 
Aggregate intrinsic value is the sum of the amounts by which the quoted market price of our stock exceeded the exercise price of the options at March 31, 2006, for those options for which the quoted market
 
8

 
price was in excess of the exercise price (“in-the-money-options”). The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $222,590 and $8,000 for the three month period end March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
As of March 31, 2006, total compensation cost of unvested options is $2.65 million. This cost is expected to be recognized through November 2008. We recorded no income tax benefits for stock-based compensation expense arrangements for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as we have cumulative operating losses, for which a valuation allowance has been established.
 
(4)    INVENTORIES- The Inventories at March 31, 2006 are summarized as follows (thousands):

Vehicles - conventional
 
$
452
 
Advanced Transportation vehicles       660  
Parts and supplies
   
285
 
Finished Goods
   
858
 
 
   
2,255
 
Less-inventory reserve
   
(195
)
 
 
$
2,060
 

(5)    LICENSE AND DISTRIBUTION FEE

On April 19, 2004, ZAP entered into an Exclusive Purchase, License and Supply Agreement with Smart-Automobile LLC ("SA"), a California limited liability company, to distribute and manufacture Smart cars. Smart is the brand name for a 3-cyclinder gas turbo engine car manufactured by Daimler Chrysler AG, which can achieve estimated fuel economy of 40 miles per gallon. SA is not affiliated with Daimler Chrysler, but is a direct importer.

Under the agreement ZAP will be SA’s exclusive distributor and licensee of the right to manufacture and distribute Smart cars in the United States and the non-exclusive distributor and licensee outside of the United States for a period of ten years. Subject to the terms of the agreement, ZAP will pay SA a license and distribution fee of $10,000,000: a $1 million payment in cash was made upon execution of the agreement, $1 million will be payable in cash ratably commencing with the delivery of the first 1,000 smart cars, and $8 million was paid in ZAP preferred stock.

A more detailed agreement was signed and completed on October 25, 2004. Under this agreement, SA exchanged their original Preferred Shares for new Preferred Shares with the designation of SA. These SA preferred shares convert to ZAP common shares under the following formula: For every 1,000 Smart vehicles delivered to ZAP in the years 2004, 2005 and 2006 which are fully EPA compliant to sell in the United States as new cars, the holder shall convert 500 shares of preferred stock SA to $500,000 of common stock, and allow the holder to receive 505,000 warrants with an exercise price of $2.50 per share exercisable through July 7, 2009, or when all the preferred have been converted. During 2004, ZAP allowed SA to convert 500 preferred shares to $500,000 of common stock prior to delivering any EPA compliant Smart Cars.

The Company recorded the cost of the Smart Automobile license at $10.6 million, based on: 1) the $10 million the Company paid to Smart Automobile LLC as consideration for a Purchase, License and Supply Agreement dated April 19, 2004; and 2) the fair value of five-year warrants issued under the Agreement for the purchase of 505,000 common shares at $2.50 per share and expiring in July 1, 2009. The warrants were valued at $1.16 per share using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield of 0.0%; risk free interest rate of 3.08%; contractual life of 4.5 years; and volatility of 229.43%.

During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company filed a lawsuit against Daimler Chrysler Corporation ("Daimler Chrysler") and others alleging that Daimler Chrysler has engaged in a series of anti-competitive tactics aimed at defaming ZAP and disrupting its third party relationships including this arrangement. Shortly thereafter, the Company commenced its annual impairment assessment. An independent valuation of the Smart Automobile license as of December 31, 2005 estimated the fair value to be $3.1 million with a remaining life of two years which was less than the $10.6 million recorded cost of the license. The carrying cost of the license was $8.8 million prior to the impairment calculation and accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.721 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The valuation of the license was based on the Company's discounted projected cash flows from projected sales of Smart Cars over the estimated life of the license agreement. The remaining value of the license is being amortized using the straight-line method over the next two years, which is the revised estimated life of the license. License amortization for the period ended March 31,2006 was $387,500.



9

(6)    SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY-On July 1, 2002 ZAP’s stock began trading on the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Electronic Bulletin Board (the“ OTC Bulletin Board”) under the stock symbol of ZAPZ. On June 20, 2005, ZAP received approval to list its common stock on the Archipelago Exchange (ArcaEx). This exchange was a facility of the Pacific Exchange (PCXE) and is the nation’s first totally open, all-electronic stock exchange. The Company changed its stock ticker symbol used on the Archipelago Exchange (ArcaEX) from “ZAPZ” to “ZP” on July 7, 2005. On March 7, 2006, the ArcaEx merged with the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) creating the NYSE Arca electronic trading platform. ZAP’s stock now trades on the NYSE Arca, however, the PCXE rules still apply to all stock listed on the NYSE Arca, and all prior actions taken by the Arca or the PCXE apply to our listing on the NYSE Arca.

The Company’s shareholder equity activity for the three months ended March 31, 2006 is summarized as follows:
 
   
Common
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Balance at December 31, 2005
   
32,584,866
 
$
78,451,000
 
               
Issuances of Common Stock for:
             
Exercise of options and warrants for cash
   
596,000
   
515,276
 
Cash
   
500,000
   
500,000
 
Consulting
   
171,635
   
94,900
 
Employee Compensation
   
42,274
   
24,096
 
     
1,309,909
   
1,134,272
 
Stock Option and Warrant Transactions
             
Reclassification of warrant liability
         
567,525
 
Fair value of warrants issued for consulting and other services
         
1,113,938
 
Fair value of options and warrants issued to employees
         
493,265
 
               
           
2,174,728
 
Reduction in common stock issued as loan collateral        (500,000 )      (600,000 ) 
Reclassification of deferred compensation             (765,000 ) 
               
Balance at March 31, 2006
   
33,394,775
 
$
80,395,000
 
 
The Company issued common stock as consideration under agreements for consulting and employee services during the three months ended March 31, 2006. The Company recorded the cost based on the market value of the stock at the date of grant. The cost of consulting services resulting from issuing stock and warrants and stock options is being recognized as expense over the term of their respective agreements.  Unrecognized compensation on consulting contracts at March 31, 2006 is $765,000 and will be recognized as expense through 2007.
 
In December 2004, the Company issued 2.9 million common shares as collateral for a $1 million loan. The $3.529 million market value of these shares at the date of issuance was recorded in common stock with an offsetting contra equity account. These shares were previously issued to Mercatus Partners LLP in January 2003 as collateral for a loan that never funded. The shares were reported as lost to the Company in December 2003. In December 2004, the shares were reissued to Mercatus Partners who then assigned the shares and their interests to Phi-Nest Fund, L.P. as collateral for the $1 million loan commitment. The Company amended the Loan Agreement allowing them to purchase and sell 500,000 shares for $1.16 per share. On March 30, 2006, the Company received $500,000 in net proceeds from the sale. The collateral was reduced to 2,441,176 shares and the loan is still pending.
 
The Company also issued options and warrants to consultants for professional services.  During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued warrants to consultants to purchase 1,725,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.32 per share to $1.50 per share, with a contractual life ranging from 1 to 10 years. With the exception of one warrant grant of 100,000 shares, the warrants and options were nonforfeitable and fully vested at the date of issuance and were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following range of assumptions:
 
 
Low
High
Exercise price per share
$0.32 
$1.50 
Market price
$0.32 
$1.23 
Assumptions:
 
 
Expected dividend yield
0.0% 
0.0% 
Risk free rate of return
4.63% 
4.63% 
Expected life
1.0 years 
10 years
Volatility
140.87% 
140.87% 
Fair market value
$0.06 
$1.08 

Under a purchase agreement dated February 16, 2005, the Company issued 600,000 shares of its common stock and 3 warrants for the purchase of 900,000 shares of its common stock to Lazarus Investment Partners LLP on February 17, 2005, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,260,000. Each of the 3 warrants is exercisable for 5 years, and will be exercisable for 300,000 shares of common stock at the initial exercise prices of $2.50, $3.25, and $4.00 per share. The Company also issued 30,000 shares and warrants to purchase 90,000 shares of stock to placement agents. The stock purchase agreement contains antidilution provisions under which the Company is obligated to issue additional common shares for no additional consideration if within 6 months the Company completes certain subsequent financing at less than $2.10 per share. No financings were completed during the six month period following the agreement.

10

On July 22, 2004, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC (Fusion Capital). The stock purchase agreement provided for the issuance of $24.5 million in common stock over a 40-month period. The agreement provided for the immediate issuance of 300,000 common shares as commitment and signing shares at no cost and the immediate issuance of 5-year warrants for the purchase of 2.5 million shares of common stock at prices ranging from $2.50 to $5.50 per share. The stock purchase agreement required the Company to file a registration statement by August 20, 2004 for the resale of shares issued or issuable under the stock purchase agreement and have the registration statement declared effective within 120 days. The stock purchase agreement provided for cash liquidated damages if the Company failed to meet the registration deadline. The Company did not file the required registration statement. Pursuant to EITF 00-19, the warrants issuable under the stock purchase agreement were valued using the Black Scholes option pricing model and recorded as a liability. The warrant liability was revalued at December 31, 2004 with the marked to market adjustment recorded in other expense. On February 22, 2005, the Company terminated its stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital. The Company revalued the warrant liability on February 22, 2005 and recorded the marked to market adjustment of $1.5 million in other income. The remaining warrant liability of $6.7 million was transferred to equity since the Company was no longer required to file a registration statement for the warrant shares.  Under the termination agreement, the Company repurchased 200,000 common shares from Fusion Capital for the original issuance price of $500,000. Fusion Capital retained certain commitment and signing common shares that were previously issued, and warrants to purchase up to 2.5 million shares of common stock.
 
(7)    LITIGATION - Other than the following, we are not party to any pending material legal proceedings and are not aware of any threatened or contemplated proceedings by any government authority against us.

A dormant complaint filed in 2002 against the RAP Group and Steve Schneider the CEO of ZAP, individually was reactivated by the plaintiff (Jim Arnold Trucking). The Compliant alleges breach of contract, promissory estoppel and fraud and seeks contract damages in the amount $71,000 plus monthly storage fees and punitive damages of $750,000. The Company has cross-claimed against Plaintiffs seeking compensatory damages, attorneys' fees and equitable relief for breach of oral contract, common count for goods sold and delivered, conversion, liability of surety, violation of statue, and violation of the Unfair Practices Act. On February 17, 2005, the court referred the matter to non-binding arbitration. The non binding arbitration hearing was held on July 27, 2005 where the arbritrator awarded the plaintiff damages in the amount of $68,290 plus prejudgement interest of 7%. On May 2, 2006 a trial was held with the parties agreeing to settle the matter for $40,000 and execute mutual releases of all claims arising out of the subject matter of the litigation.

On October 28, 2005, we filed a complaint against DaimlerChrysler Corporation and others in the Los Angeles Superior Court, under the title ZAP v. DaimlerChrysler AG, et al. The complaint includes claims for intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic relations; trade libel; defamation; breach of contract - agreement to negotiate in good faith; breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and unfair competition. The complaint alleges that DaimlerChrysler has engaged in a series of anti-competitive tactics aimed at defaming ZAP and disrupting its third-party business relationships. As a result of the allegations, the complaint requests damages in excess of $500 million and such other relief as the court deems just and proper. DaimlerChrysler has not yet filed a response to our complaint.
 
(8)    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Rental agreements

The Company leases office space, land and warehouse space from its CEO and major shareholder. These properties are used to operate the car outlet and to store inventory. Rental expense under these leases was approximately $39,500 and $37,100 for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Consulting services and other services

In November and December 2003, the Company entered into certain agreements with two cousins of Steven M. Schneider, the CEO. One cousin received 25,000 B-2 Restricted warrants and 25 shares of preferred stock, which was later converted into 50,000 shares of restricted common stock. The stock and warrants were issued for website design services. The other cousin received 200,000 shares of unrestricted common stock in January 2004. The shares were issued for consulting services. In April 2004, the Company issued 2 million B-2 restricted warrants and 1 million K-2 restricted warrants to Sunshine 511 Holdings for consulting services. The managing partner of Sunshine 511 Holdings is the cousin of the CEO of ZAP. In the fourth quarter of 2005 the Company expensed approximately $2.2 million, the carrying value of the prepaid services, since limited services had not been received and there were no assurances that future services would be received. Also in 2004, certain leasehold improvements in the amount of $65,000 made by the Company on rental properties were abandoned in favor of the landlord, who is the CEO of ZAP.

Inventory Purchase

In December 2005, the Company purchased inventory from a related entity where three of ZAP’s officers and or Directors are also members of its Board of Directors. The transaction resulted in a payable due to the related Company of $204,000 at December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006.
 
(9)    SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
Cash paid during the period for interest 
 
20
 
 
 
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
 
$
 
 
 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock and warrants issued for:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchase of real property and equipment
 
$
 
 
4
 
Inventory purchases
 
$
 
 
49
 
Settlement of warrant liability
 
$
568
 
 
6,711
 
Other assets
 
$
 
 
247
 
 
 
11

Item 2.       MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This quarterly report of Form 10-QSB contains forward-looking statements that are not statements of historical fact and may involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements may also relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies.
 
We have used the words "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "will," "plan," "predict," "project" and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, in this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based on expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. The following factors are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements:

•    general economic and industry conditions;
•    our history of losses, deficits and negative operating cash flows;
•    our limited operating history;
•    industry competition;
•    environmental and government regulation;
•    protection and defense of our intellectual property rights;
•    reliance on, and the ability to attract, key personnel;
•    other factors including those discussed in "Risk Factors" in our annual report on Form 10-KSB filed on March 31, 2006.
 
You should keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made by us in this quarterly report or elsewhere speaks only as of the date on which we make it. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. We have no duty to, and do not intend to, update or revise the forward-looking statements in this annual report after the date of filing, except as may be required by law. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made in this annual report or elsewhere might not occur. 
 
In this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB the terms “ZAP,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to ZAP and its subsidiaries.


Overview

ZAP stands for Zero Air Pollution(R). ZAP was founded on September 23, 1994, during an era when government and industry were debating how to solve the country's growing transportation problems. ZAP began to invent, design, manufacture, and market innovative products like its zero-emission ZAP(R)electric bicycle and ZAPPY(R) electric scooter that were cost-effective and practical for world markets. Today, ZAP is moving forward with a campaign to stay at the forefront of fuel-efficient transportation with new technologies, including energy efficient gas systems, hydrogen, electric, alcohol, hybrid and other innovative power systems. ZAP is also investing in advanced energy solutions, utilizing advanced batteries, trybrid technology and fuel cell designs.

In the process of building ZAP, the Company has pioneered a growing niche for alternative transportation. In 1995, ZAP began marketing electric transportation on the Internet through the website at www.zapworld.com. From 1996 through 1998, we continued to add to our product line; in 1999, ZAP added electric motorbikes; in 2001 ZAP added electric dive scooters; in 2003, ZAP announced its first electric automobiles, including the first-ever production electric automobile imported from its manufacturing partner in China; in 2004 ZAP introduced electric all-terrain vehicles and the fuel-efficient Smart Car; and in 2005 ZAP introduced multi-fuel vehicles, capable of running on ethanol and/or gasoline and in 2006 all electric cars.

12

Today, ZAP is a one-stop portal for a diverse lineup of quality, affordable advanced automotive technologies. ZAP has delivered more than 90,000 vehicles to customers in more than 75 different countries. Our goal is to become the largest and most complete distribution portal in the United States for advanced technology vehicles. We are focused on creating a distribution channel for our automobile and consumer products by establishing qualified automobile-dealers and developing relationships with specialty dealers throughout the United States. We currently market and sell our automobile products through qualified automotive dealers including our subsidiary, Voltage Vehicles. We currently market and sell our consumer products directly to consumers through our Internet Web site, independent representatives, retail outlets and qualified automobile dealers. We continue to develop new products independently and through development and acquisition agreements with companies and manufacturers, and by the purchase of products manufactured to our specifications. We have grown from a single product line to a full product line of electric vehicle and advanced transportation products. Most of our domestic manufacturing has been transferred to lower-cost overseas contract manufacturers.

ZAP was incorporated under the laws of the State of California, on September 23, 1994, as "ZAP Power Systems." The name of the Company was changed to "ZAPWORLD.COM" on May 16, 1999 in order to increase our visibility in the world of electronic commerce. We subsequently changed our name to ZAP on June 18, 2001 in order to reflect our growth and entry into larger, more traditional markets. Our principal executive offices are located at 501 Fourth Street Santa Rosa, California, 95401. Our telephone number is (707) 525-8658.
 
 
Subsidiaries

We have the following wholly owned subsidiaries : RAP Group, Inc., a California company ("RAP Group"), Voltage Vehicles, a Nevada company ("Voltage Vehicles"),ZAP Rental Outlet, a Nevada company ("ZAP Rentals"), ZAP Stores, Inc., a California company ("ZAP Stores"), ZAP Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada company ("ZAP Manufacturing") and ZAP World Outlet, Inc., a California company ("ZAP World"). RAP Group is engaged primarily in the sale and liquidation of conventional automobiles; Voltage Vehicles is engaged primarily in the distribution and sale of advanced technology and conventional automobiles; ZAP Stores is engaged primarily in consumer sales of ZAP products and ZAP Manufacturing is not currently an operating subsidiary. ZAP World Outlet is not currently an operating subsidiary. RAP Group and Voltage Vehicles were acquired by the Company in July 2002.


Recent Developments

Some of the significant events for the Company that occurred during the first quarter of 2006 and through the date of this report are as follows:
 
1.      
ZAP reported a record month in March for over $2 million in sales for various models of the Smart Car Americanized by ZAP. The autos were shipped to ZAP Dealers in various states.
 
2.      
ZAP conducted the first cross-country rally of the Smart Car Americanized by ZAP. The tour of six cars started in Santa Rosa California and stopped at the New York International Auto Show in New York City, and ended back in Santa Rosa, CA. The event was held to raise awareness about advanced technology vehicles.
 
3.
ZAP became listed on the Archipelgo Stock exchange which is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the
NYSE Group. At the same time ZAP changed its trading symbol to “ZP”.
 
4.
ZAP introduced its new line of Lithium Battery Systems for powering hand-held electronic devices at a recent trade show in California.

5.
ZAP has also scheduled for production a new and improved line of electric scooters such as the ZAPPY ® 3 Pro and the ZAPPY® 3 mobility. In addition, the ZAP BUZZZ All Terrain Vehicle and the ZAP MUD’E Trail Bike have also been added to the electric vehicle production line.

 

13

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Share-Based Payments. We grant options to purchase our common stock to our employees and directors under our stock option plan. The benefits provided under this plan are share-based payments subject to the provisions of revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123(R)”), Share-Based Payment. Effective January 1, 2006, we use the fair value method to apply the provisions of SFAS 123(R) with a modified prospective application which provides for certain changes to the method for valuing share-based compensation. The valuation provisions of SFAS 123(R) apply to new awards and to awards that are outstanding on the effective date and subsequently modified or cancelled. Under the modified prospective application, prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. Share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the first three months of 2006 was $493,265. At March 31, 2006, total unrecognized estimated compensation expense related to non-vested stock options granted prior to that date was $2.65 million, which is expected to be recognized through December, 2008.

Upon adoption of SFAS 123(R), we continued estimating the value of stock option awards on the date of grant using Black-Scholes option pricing model (Black-Scholes Model). The determination of the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123(R) in future periods, the compensation expense that we record under SFAS 123(R) may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period. Therefore, we believe it is important for investors to be aware of the high degree of subjectivity involved when using option pricing models to estimate share-based compensation under SFAS 123(R). Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions, are fully transferable and do not cause dilution. Because our share-based payments have characteristics significantly different from those of freely traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect our estimates of fair values, in our opinion, existing valuation models, including the Black-Scholes and lattice binomial models, may not provide reliable measures of the fair values of our share-based compensation. Consequently, there is a risk that our estimates of the fair values of our share-based compensation awards on the grant dates may bear little resemblance to the actual values realized upon the exercise, expiration, early termination or forfeiture of those share-based payments in the future. Certain share-based payments, such as employee stock options, may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments that are significantly in excess of the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. There is currently no market-based mechanism or other practical application to verify the reliability and accuracy of the estimates stemming from these valuation models, nor is there a means to compare and adjust the estimates to actual values. Although the fair value of employee share-based awards is determined in accordance with SFAS 123(R) and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.

Estimates of share-based compensation expenses are significant to our financial statements, but these expenses are based on option valuation models and will never result in the payment of cash by us. For this reason, and because we do not view share-based compensation as related to our operational performance, we exclude estimated share-based compensation expense when evaluating the business performance of our operations.

The guidance in SFAS 123(R) and SAB 107 is relatively new, and best practices are not well established. The application of these principles may be subject to further interpretation and refinement over time. There are significant differences among valuation models, and there is a possibility that we will adopt different valuation models in the future. This may result in a lack of consistency in future periods and materially affect the fair value estimate of share-based payments. It may also result in a lack of comparability with other companies that use different models, methods and assumptions.

Theoretical valuation models and market-based methods are evolving and may result in lower or higher fair value estimates for share-based compensation. The timing, readiness, adoption, general acceptance, reliability and testing of these methods is uncertain. Sophisticated mathematical models may require voluminous historical information, modeling expertise, financial analyses, correlation analyses, integrated software and databases, consulting fees, customization and testing for adequacy of internal controls. Market-based methods are emerging that, if employed by us, may dilute our earnings per share and involve significant transaction fees and ongoing administrative expenses. The uncertainties and costs of these extensive valuation efforts may outweigh the benefits to investors. 
 
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, as a percentage of net sales, certain items included in the Company’s Income Statements (see Financial Statements and Notes) for the periods indicated:


 
Three months ended March 31,
 
     
2006
   
2005
 
Statements of Operations Data:
             
Net sales
   
100
%
 
100
%
Cost of sales
   
(85.5
)
 
(97.1
)
Operating expenses
   
113.3
   
266.2
 
Loss from operations
   
(98.8
)
 
(263.3
)
Net loss
   
(94.7
)
 
(133.5
)
 
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2005

Net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 were $2.9 million compared to $1.2 million in 2005. RAP’s net sales for the period accounted were $675,000 versus $ 1 million in 2005. The net sales for ZAP were $2.2 million versus $159,000 in 2005. The sales for RAP for gas automobiles were less than last year while ZAP experienced an increase of $2.0 million primarily due to the sales of the Smart Cars Americanized by ZAP and various models of electric vehicles.

Gross profit was $424,000 for the first quarter ended March 31, 2006 compared to $34,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. The RAP Group accounted for $193,000 of the gross profit for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 versus $53,000 in 2005. ZAP’s gross profit excluding the RAP Group, increased from a loss of $19,000 in 2005 to a gain of $231,000 in 2006. The increase in gross profit was due to higher sales of the Smart Cars Americanized by ZAP.

Sales and marketing expenses in the first quarter of 2006 were $251,000 as compared to $193,000 in 2005. RAP’s expenses were $37,000 in 2006 and $27,000 in 2005 and ZAP’s expenses were $214,000 versus $166,000 in 2005. As a percentage of sales, total selling expenses decreased from 17% of sales to 9% of sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The higher expenses were primarily for the promotion of advanced technology cars.

General and administrative expenses for 2006 were $3.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as compared to $2.9 million in 2005. RAP’s portion of the expenses was $97,000 versus $181,000 in 2005. For ZAP the expenses increased from $2.6 million to $3.0 million. As a percentage of sales, general and administration expenses decreased from 246% of sales to 105% of sales. RAP’s decrease of $84,000 was primarily due to lower bad debt expenses. ZAP’s net increase of $400,000 in general and administration expenses was due to stock-based compensation expense due to the adoption of SFAS 123R.

Interest expense net of interest income was approximately $6,000 and $7,000 in the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Other income net of expense was $126,000. The other income resulted from changes in the value of a warrant liability and put option liabilities.

Net Loss was $2.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as compared to a net loss of $1.6 million for period ended March 31, 2005. The increase was primarily due to higher consulting and professional fees, as well as stock-based compensation expense due to the adoption of SFAS 123R.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
In the first three months of 2006 net cash provided by operating activities was $65,000. In the first three months of 2005, the Company used cash for operations of $2.1 million. Cash used in the first three months of 2006 was comprised of the net loss incurred for the first three months of $2.8 million plus net non-cash expenses of $2.1 million plus the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $.7 million. Cash used in operations in the first three months of 2005 was comprised of the net loss incurred for the quarter of $1.6 million plus net non-cash expenses of $31,000, and the net change in operating assets and liabilities resulting in a further use of cash of $579,000.

14

Investing activities provided cash of $11,000 in the first three months ended March 31, 2006 and used $158,000 during the first three months ended March 31, 2005.
 
Financing activities provided cash of $987,000 and $1,482,000 during the first three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

In September 2005, the Company signed a $425 million revolving financing facility with Surge Capital II, LLC that, subject to certain conditions can be used by ZAP to import Smart Cars Americanized by ZAP and other advanced transportation vehicles for ZAP dealers. The financing agreement has a term of one year, but may be extended upon agreement by both parties. The financing is based on orders ZAP receives from dealers who must be approved in advance by Surge Capital II, LLC and is secured by a first lien on substantially all of ZAP’s assets. No funds have been drawn on the financing facility as of May 12, 2006. Each financing incurs an interest charge equal to 2% of the principal amount for the first 30 days and thereafter at a Per Diem Rate of .067%.

At March 31, 2006 the Company had cash of $2.6 million compared to $4.6 million at March 31, 2005. At March 31, 2006, the Company had working capital of $1.0 million, as compared to working capital of $13.9 million at March 31, 2005. The decrease was due to the following: cash used in operations, and the expensing of prepaid non-cash professional fees. The Company, at present, does not have a credit facility for working capital in place with a bank or other financial institution.

We do not have a bank operating line of credit other than our line of credit with Surge Capital II for inventory purchase, and there can be no assurance that any required or desired financing will be available through bank borrowings, debt, or equity offerings, or otherwise, on acceptable terms. If future financing requirements are satisfied through the issuance of equity securities, investors may experience significant dilution in the net book value per share of common stock and there is no guarantee that a market will exist for the sale of the Company’s shares.

The Company’s primary capital needs are to fund its growth strategy, which includes creating an auto distribution network for the distribution of the Smart Cars and electrical vehicles, increasing its internet shopping mall presence, increasing distribution channels, establishing ZAP licensed dealerships, introducing new products, improving existing product lines and developing a strong corporate infrastructure.

Seasonality and Quarterly Results
The Company’s business is subject to seasonal influences for consumer products. Sales volumes in this industry typically slow down during the winter months, November to March in the U.S. The Company’s auto distribution network is affected by the availability of cars ready to sell to dealers.

Inflation
Our raw materials and finished products and automobiles are sourced from stable, cost-competitive industries. As such, we do not foresee any material inflationary trends for our product sources.
 
 
Item 3.               Controls and Procedures

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our management, including our CEO and our CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2006, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


15

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.                Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, we may become involved with various litigation proceedings. Except as stated below, we know of no pending or threatened legal proceeding to which we are or will be a party which, if successful, might result in a material adverse change in our business, properties or financial condition. However, as with most businesses, we are occasionally parties to lawsuits incidental to our business, none of which are anticipated to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.

A dormant complaint filed in 2002 against the RAP Group and Steve Schneider the CEO of ZAP, individually was reactivated by the plaintiff (Jim Arnold Trucking). The Compliant alleges breach of contract, promissory estoppel and fraud and seeks contract damages in the amount $71,000 plus monthly storage fees and punitive damages of $750,000. The Company has cross-claimed against Plaintiffs seeking compensatory damages, attorneys' fees and equitable relief for breach of oral contract, common count for goods sold and delivered, conversion, liability of surety, violation of statue, and violation of the Unfair Practices Act. On February 17, 2005, the court referred the matter to non-binding arbitration. The non binding arbitration hearing was held on July 27, 2005 where the arbritrator awarded the plaintiff damages in the amount of $68,290 plus prejudgement interest of 7%. On May 2, 2006 a trial was held with the parties agreeing to settle the matter for $40,000 and execute mutual releases of all claims arising out of the subject matter of the litigation.

On October 28, 2005, we filed a complaint against DaimlerChrysler Corporation and others in the Los Angeles Superior Court, under the title ZAP v. DaimlerChrysler AG, et al. The complaint includes claims for intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic relations; trade libel; defamation; breach of contract - agreement to negotiate in good faith; breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and unfair competition. The complaint alleges that DaimlerChrysler has engaged in a series of anti-competitive tactics aimed at defaming ZAP and disrupting its third-party business relationships. As a result of the allegations, the complaint requests damages in excess of $500 million and such other relief as the court deems just and proper. DaimlerChrysler has not yet filed a response to our complaint.


Item 2.        Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
Not Applicable



Item 3.                Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable



Item 4.                Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not Applicable


 
Item 5.                Other Information

Not Applicable
 
 

Item 6.                Exhibits

A.            
Exhibits
 
31.1   
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
31.2   
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
32.1   
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
32.2   
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
 
 

16

 
SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


 
 
 
 
ZAP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dated   May 12, 2006
By:  
/s/ Steven Schneider
 
Name:   Steven Schneider
 
Title:     Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 

 

Dated   May 12, 2006
    By: 
/s/ William Hartman
 
Name:    William Hartman
 
Title:      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17