XML 37 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies
Capital Leases
The Company has vehicles and equipment under capital leases that were assumed through its acquisitions of Ctrack. The future minimum payments under capital leases were as follows at December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
2018
$
782

2019
491

2020
139

Total minimum capital lease payments
1,412

Less: amounts representing interest
(135
)
Present value of net minimum capital lease payments
1,277

Less: current portion
(679
)
Long-term portion
$
598


Operating Leases
The Company leases its office space and certain equipment under non-cancellable operating leases with various terms through 2020. The minimum annual rent on the Company’s office space is subject to increases based on stated rental adjustment terms, property taxes and operating costs and contains rent concessions. For financial reporting purposes, rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Accordingly, rent expense recognized in excess of rent paid is reflected as deferred rent. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, rent expense under operating leases was $2.7 million, $4.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The Company’s office space lease contains incentives in the form of reimbursement from the landlord for a portion of the costs of leasehold improvements incurred by the Company which are recorded to rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
The future minimum payments under non-cancellable operating leases were as follows at December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
2018
$
2,874

2019
2,204

2020
964

2021
365

2022
236

Thereafter
20

Total
$
6,663


Employee Retention Matters
In connection with the Company’s turnaround efforts, and to retain and encourage employees to assist the Company with its efforts, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved an all-employee retention bonus plan in 2014 (“2014 Retention Bonus Plan”) based on achieving certain financial and cash targets. The financial metrics had to be met for two consecutive quarter periods during the three quarter periods ending March 31, 2015. At December 31, 2014, the Company accrued approximately $5.5 million of the maximum total target bonus expense based on the Company’s financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 and the assessment of the probability of the achievement of the remaining metrics in March 31, 2015. The total bonus expense of approximately $10.7 million was recognized over the requisite service period, $5.2 million of which was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015. In the third quarter of 2015, the Company paid U.S. employees their bonuses with 2,158,436 net shares of the Company’s common stock. Non-U.S. employees receive cash bonus payments.
Legal
The Company is, from time to time, party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company records a loss when information indicates that a loss is both probable and estimable. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss with no best estimate in the range, the Company records the minimum estimated liability related to the claim. As additional information becomes available, the Company assesses the potential liability related to the Company’s pending litigation and revises its estimates, if necessary. The Company expenses litigation costs as incurred.
The Company is currently named as a defendant or co-defendant in some patent infringement lawsuits in the United States and is indirectly participating in other U.S. patent infringement actions pursuant to its contractual indemnification obligations to certain customers. Based on an evaluation of these matters and discussions with the Company’s intellectual property litigation counsel, the Company believes that liabilities arising from or sums paid in settlement of these existing matters would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition, other than those discussed below.
On May 27, 2015, a patent infringement action was brought against Novatel Wireless by Carucel Investments, L.P. (“Carucel”), a non-practicing entity (Carucel Investments, L.P. v. Novatel Wireless, Inc., et al., U.S.D.C. S.D. Florida, Civil Action No. 0:15-cv-61116-BB). The complaint alleged that certain MiFi mobile hotspots manufactured by Novatel Wireless infringed claims of patents owned by Carucel. On April 10, 2017, judgment was entered in favor of Novatel Wireless. Carucel has filed to appeal certain orders in the litigation. The Company does not believe there is merit to an appeal by Carucel and intends to vigorously defend the appeal. However, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any appeal or other future judgment in this case.
On September 26, 2016, the Company settled a breach of contract claim alleging that the Company had failed to pay certain royalties on hardware products sold by its subsidiary, Enfora. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company is required to pay an aggregate settlement amount of $2.8 million, $0.9 million of which remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, and is payable in eight equal quarterly installments. The contract underlying the claim has now been terminated.
On May 11, 2017, the Company initiated a lawsuit against the former stockholders of RER in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware seeking recovery of damages for civil conspiracy, fraud in the inducement, unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty. The Company has suspended payments due to the former stockholders of RER pursuant to the Earn-Out Arrangement and the Deferred Purchase Price pending the outcome of this litigation. There can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of the future judgment in this case, and an adverse judgment could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.