XML 68 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Regulatory Matters
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Banking and Thrift [Abstract]  
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Matters
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Capital adequacy guidelines, and additionally for the Bank the prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors.
    






Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined).
(Dollars in thousands)
Actual
 
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
 
To Be Well-Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount  
 
Ratio  
At December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporation
$
249,388

 
12.91
%
 
$
154,589

 
8.00
%
 
$
193,237

 
10.00
%
Bank
232,080

 
12.15

 
152,796

 
8.00
%
 
190,995

 
10.00
%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporation
227,907

 
11.79

 
77,295

 
4.00
%
 
115,942

 
6.00
%
Bank
210,816

 
11.04

 
76,398

 
4.00
%
 
114,597

 
6.00
%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporation
227,907

 
10.55

 
86,371

 
4.00
%
 
107,964

 
5.00
%
Bank
210,816

 
9.80

 
86,005

 
4.00
%
 
107,506

 
5.00
%
At December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporation
$
256,329

 
13.90
%
 
$
147,568

 
8.00
%
 
$
184,460

 
10.00
%
Bank
238,336

 
13.06

 
145,991

 
8.00
%
 
182,489

 
10.00
%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporation
232,946

 
12.63

 
73,784

 
4.00
%
 
110,676

 
6.00
%
Bank
215,497

 
11.81

 
72,995

 
4.00
%
 
109,493

 
6.00
%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporation
232,946

 
10.85

 
85,876

 
4.00
%
 
107,346

 
5.00
%
Bank
215,497

 
10.11

 
85,277

 
4.00
%
 
106,597

 
5.00
%

    
At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, management believes that the Corporation and the Bank continued to meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. The Corporation, like other bank holding companies, currently is required to maintain Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (the sum of Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 capital) equal to at least 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively, of its total risk-weighted assets (including various off-balance-sheet items, such as standby letters of credit). The Bank, like other depository institutions, is required to maintain similar capital levels under capital adequacy guidelines. For a depository institution to be considered “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, its Tier 1 and Total Capital ratios must be at least 6.0% and 10.0% on a risk-adjusted basis, respectively. At December 31, 2014, the Bank is categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.
In July 2013, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted final rules revising the agencies’ capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules, designed to enhance such requirements and implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly referred to as Basel III. The July 2013 final rules generally implement higher minimum capital requirements, add a new common equity Tier 1 capital requirement, and establish criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital. The new minimum capital to risk-adjusted assets requirements include a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% (6.5% to be considered “well capitalized”) and a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, increased from 4.0% (and increased from 6.0% to 8.0% to be considered “well capitalized”); the total capital ratio remains at 8.0% under the new rules (10.0% to be considered “well capitalized”). Under the new rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets. The final rules permit institutions, other than certain large institutions, to elect to continue to treat certain components of accumulated other comprehensive income as permitted under the current general risk-based capital rules, and not reflect unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities in common equity Tier 1 calculations. The new minimum capital requirements became effective on January 1, 2015. The capital contribution buffer requirements phase in over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2016. Management believes that, as of December 31, 2014, the Corporation and the Bank would have met the capital adequacy requirements under Basel III if such requirements had been in effect. The Corporation and the Bank expect to be well capitalized upon the adoption of BASEL III in 2015. The Corporation will continue to analyze the impact of the new rules as it grows and as the capital conservation buffer requirements are phased in.

Dividends and Other Restrictions
The primary source of the Corporation’s dividends paid to its shareholders is from the earnings of its subsidiaries paid to the Corporation in the form of dividends.
The approval of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors is required for a state bank member in the Federal Reserve system to pay dividends if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year exceeds the Bank’s net profits (as defined) for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years. Under this formula, the Bank can declare dividends in 2015 without approval of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors of approximately $12.8 million plus an additional amount equal to the Bank’s net profits for 2015 up to the date of any such dividend declaration.
Federal Reserve Board policy applicable to the holding company also provides that, as a general matter, a bank holding company should inform the Federal Reserve and should eliminate, defer or significantly reduce the holding company’s dividends if the holding company’s net income for the preceding four quarters, net of dividends paid during the period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends, the holding company’s prospective rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition, or the holding company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Federal Reserve Board policy also provides that a bank holding company should inform the Federal Reserve reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period or that could result in a material adverse change to the organization’s capital structure.
The Federal Reserve Act requires that extension of credit by the Bank to certain affiliates, including the Corporation (parent), be secured by readily marketable securities, that extension of credit to any one affiliate be limited to 10% of the Bank’s capital and surplus (as defined), and that extensions of credit to all such affiliates be limited to 20% of the Bank’s capital and surplus.